One day in October 2010, a man by the name of Angel Mendez was at his home, asleep on a futon next to his pregnant girlfriend. Hed built the home himself, and it almost redefined the word modest. It was little more than a one-room shack in the back yard of another persons residence, with a blanket for a door. He awoke from his nap to see a person pulling back the blanket. He picked up his BB gun, and heard someone shout gun! before 15 rounds came flying at him. He was grievously injured, ultimately losing a leg. His unarmed girlfriend was also wounded.
It turns out the person who shot at Mendez was a police officer. Los Angeles County sheriffs deputies Christopher Conley and Jennifer Peterson were looking for a parolee who was believed to be armed and dangerous. They did not have a warrant to search Mendezs home, and they did not announce their presence or identity before accosting him. They entered, saw his BB gun, and started firing.
Lest you think this is a unique incident, in March I wrote about the terrible case of Andrew Scott. Like Mendez, Scott was an innocent man at home with his girlfriend when the police came. Like Mendez, he was mistaken by police for the armed and dangerous man they sought. They pounded on his door, but they didnt have a warrant, and they didnt announce themselves. Like any reasonable person, he was alarmed at the late-night disturbance and had no reason to expect the police were its source. So he grabbed his gun. When he opened his door, the police shot him dead in two seconds.
Neither Mendez nor Scott did anything wrong. They were both absolutely within their constitutional rights to pick up a weapon in response to the unidentified persons attempting to enter their homes. Yet Mendez, and Scotts heirs, have so far lost in court, unable to collect any meaningful compensation from the police officers who shot them precisely because they exercised those rights.
Scotts estate lost at the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the doctrine of qualified immunity protected the officers from having to pay any compensation to the innocent victims of their mistaken and wrongful use of force. Mendez lost yesterday in the Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously against a quirky Ninth Circuit use-of-force rule that allowed excessive-force claims where an officer intentionally or recklessly provokes a violent confrontation, if the provocation is an independent Fourth Amendment violation. In other words, if the officers violated Mendezs Fourth Amendment rights by unlawfully entering his home, they could be held liable for shooting Mendez even if the shooting itself might otherwise have been justified under existing law.
The Supreme Court found that the Ninth Circuits rule violated court precedent requiring lower courts to instead apply a totality of the circumstances approach to such cases, under which the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight. The Supreme Court then remanded the case back to the lower courts, where the deck is already stacked against Mendez. The court of appeals, after all, already ruled that the officers had qualified immunity from Mendezs claim, and the trial court determined that Mendezs decision to pick up the BB gun was a superseding cause that limited the damages he could collect.
Its time for a different approach. Its time for Fourth Amendment jurisprudence to explicitly recognize and accommodate the Second Amendment. If the Second Amendment means anything at all, it means that I have a right to defend myself in my own home, where as Justice Scalia noted in District of Columbia v. Heller the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute. Moreover, the Second Amendment exists in large part to protect the private citizen from state tyranny. It is odd indeed, then, that current law largely grants officers of the state the right to kill me in my own home even if I do nothing wrong. Indeed, the very act of exercising my Second Amendment rights picking up a gun makes it less likely that I will prevail in court.
Theres an old saying that a person would rather be judged by twelve than carried by six. In times of peril, the thinking goes, its better to risk a jury than to risk your life. But under modern jurisprudence, when the police barge in youre likely to be carried by six and then judged wanting by one: Youll die in the face of overwhelming firepower, and your estates case will be tossed right out of court by a judge.
This presents the homeowner especially if he lives in a high-crime area where the need for a gun is most dire with an impossible situation. In the event of a home intrusion, he has to identify the intruder before he picks up his gun or risk being shot dead instantaneously. If the cops make a good-faith mistake, the burden is on the homeowner. If the cops act improperly, as they did in both Scott and Mendez, the burden is still on the homeowner. Heads, they win; tails you lose.
What is to be done about this? Civil-rights jurisprudence must recognize the central legal truths of Heller and empower the original meaning of the Constitution. Police use of force against an armed homeowner should be evaluated on Second Amendment grounds, not merely as an unreasonable search or seizure. Agents of the state should be held liable for violations of Second Amendment rights when they kill or injure someone solely because he or she exercised those rights. Shooting an innocent man in his own home because he grabs a gun when an unidentified person pounds on his door or barges through it isnt just an unreasonable search or seizure. Its a direct violation of his clearly established right to keep and bear arms.
Its not too much to ask police officers to obtain warrants and to knock and announce their presence in all but the most exigent circumstances. In both Scott and Mendez, there was no good reason for police not to identify themselves. Yet in both cases, a residents reasonable response to police failures undermined his efforts to hold them accountable for those failures in court. That is unacceptable. When a person enters my house unannounced, I should have the right to hold a gun in my hand. To argue otherwise is to eviscerate the Second Amendment.
READ MORE: A Federal Appeals Court Goes to War against the Second Amendment What Justice Gorsuch Might Mean for the Second Amendment Why Would Anyone Want a Firearm?
David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and an attorney.
See more here:
- Assemblyman Tim Donnelly Introduces Sweeping Handgun Carry License Reform Bill AB 1563 - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Ex-Supreme Court justice pushes gun grab, 2nd Amendment rewrite - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Party of guns: 2016ers speak to NRA - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Michigan 2014 Second Amendment March - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Georgia Governor Signs Law Allowing Firearms In Public Places - Andrew Napolitano - Stuart Varney - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Tony DeTora's Second Amendment Commitment - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Second Amendment Man Drug PSA - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Do you exercise your Second Amendment Rights while riding? - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Kira Davis - My 2nd Amendment Story - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Gabby Franco for NRA News: "Freedoms Are Not Untouchable" - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- SafeandVaultStore GS592820 Second Amendment Gun Safe - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Oathbreaking Tyrant: Justice John Paul Stevens Wants To Change The Second Amendment - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Dear LiberalViewer: Second Amendment Response - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Justice John Paul Stevens Wants To Change The Second Amendment - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- God & The Second Amendment - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Amend The Second Amendment? - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Justice John Paul Stevens on the Second Amendment - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- CCRW Televised Forum - Mental Health, Second Amendment - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Obama lying supporting second amendment - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Second Amendment Rally Saturday - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Second Amendment and other t-shirts support the cause - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- 2nd Amendment - Laws - April 27th, 2014 [April 27th, 2014]
- Second Amendment - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw - April 27th, 2014 [April 27th, 2014]
- Rep. Larry Pittman talks about Second Amendment - Video - April 27th, 2014 [April 27th, 2014]
- billkeyz talking about gun control the Second Amendment NRA - Video - April 27th, 2014 [April 27th, 2014]
- US Senate Candidates Iowa - Second Amendment - Video - April 27th, 2014 [April 27th, 2014]
- NRA leadership uses Bloomberg gun control push to rally members - April 28th, 2014 [April 28th, 2014]
- Open Carry Or Concealed Carry In California & Does The NRA Oppose - Video - April 28th, 2014 [April 28th, 2014]
- Greg Brannon Nuke Second Amendment right - Video - April 28th, 2014 [April 28th, 2014]
- SafeandVaultStore GS724027 Second Amendment Gun Safe - Video - April 28th, 2014 [April 28th, 2014]
- Supreme Court Gun Carry Rights; Drake v. Jerejian, Pending petition - Video - April 29th, 2014 [April 29th, 2014]
- Letter: NRA opposes reasonable responses - April 30th, 2014 [April 30th, 2014]
- Common sense calls for repeal of second amendment - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- GUNS: Amendment words to fight over - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Gun lobby group receives open government award - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- NFL Player Brags About Shooting a Skunk to NRA - Video - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Disgruntled Motel Owner Uses Second Amendment To Fight Government Officials #ZHG - Video - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Psychiatrists to push NWO gun control - Video - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Second Amendment Action Day 2014 - Video - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Second Amendment Action Day 2014 at the Pennsylvania Capitol - Video - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Second Amendment Action Day - Video - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Second Amendment Action Day Rally - Video - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Pyro Planet Second Amendment & Star Spangled Blast - Video - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Gun rights: Times have changed since the creation of the Second Amendment - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Billy Johnson for NRA News: "Infringed Rights" - Video - May 3rd, 2014 [May 3rd, 2014]
- Second Amendment group marches in El Paso - May 4th, 2014 [May 4th, 2014]
- The Second Amendment (Part 1 of 2) - Video - May 4th, 2014 [May 4th, 2014]
- New Jersey Gun-Carrying Limit Left Intact by High Court - May 5th, 2014 [May 5th, 2014]
- Supreme Court Wasnt Serious about the Second Amendment - May 5th, 2014 [May 5th, 2014]
- Staying away from guns and Gitmo - May 6th, 2014 [May 6th, 2014]
- US Supreme Court refuses to consider gun-rights case - May 6th, 2014 [May 6th, 2014]
- Success For Gun Owners & 2nd Amendment Defenders In 2014 - May 6th, 2014 [May 6th, 2014]
- Yen on Second Amendment - Video - May 6th, 2014 [May 6th, 2014]
- Second Amendment Shootout - Video - May 6th, 2014 [May 6th, 2014]
- Gun Depot USA Second amendment target shooting. - Video - May 6th, 2014 [May 6th, 2014]
- Second Amendment in real time boils down to politics - May 8th, 2014 [May 8th, 2014]
- Second Amendment - Laws - May 8th, 2014 [May 8th, 2014]
- Alan Gottlieb Supporting Compromise of your Second Amendment Rights - Video - May 9th, 2014 [May 9th, 2014]
- Lawmakers divided on bill that restricts EBT use - May 10th, 2014 [May 10th, 2014]
- Defenseless Nigerian Men, No Second Amendment #BringBackOurGirls Boku Haram - Video - May 10th, 2014 [May 10th, 2014]
- The Second Amendment (Part 2 of 2) - Video - May 10th, 2014 [May 10th, 2014]
- Flawed argument I - May 11th, 2014 [May 11th, 2014]
- Minera Panama S.A. and Petaquilla Minerals Limited Sign $60 Million Agreement - May 11th, 2014 [May 11th, 2014]
- Interview Interrupted by State Highway Administrator - Video - May 12th, 2014 [May 12th, 2014]
- Lawmakers debate proposed EBT restrictions - Video - May 12th, 2014 [May 12th, 2014]
- N.J. Gov. Chris Christie under the gun over ammo bill, as White House beckons - May 13th, 2014 [May 13th, 2014]
- Guns and Supreme Court: Is Second Amendment a Privilege, Not a Right? - May 13th, 2014 [May 13th, 2014]
- Guns to be focus of rally - May 15th, 2014 [May 15th, 2014]
- DHS Says "Hands Off" VIP Terrorist - Video - May 15th, 2014 [May 15th, 2014]
- INFOWARS Nightly News: with David Knight Monday May 12 2014: Plus Special Reports - Video - May 15th, 2014 [May 15th, 2014]
- Gun rights advocates hope for convention impact - May 16th, 2014 [May 16th, 2014]
- Det Bowers on the Second Amendment - Video - May 16th, 2014 [May 16th, 2014]
- Trevor Stewart - V18 - AUDIO - THE RACIAL NETWORK & THE SECOND AMENDMENT - Video - May 16th, 2014 [May 16th, 2014]
- Trevor Stewart - V17 - THE RACIAL-NETWORK & THE SECOND AMENDMENT - Video - May 16th, 2014 [May 16th, 2014]
- The Second Amendment: A Biography - Video - May 16th, 2014 [May 16th, 2014]
- Knowing Your Rights.... Yes we have them! - Video - May 18th, 2014 [May 18th, 2014]
- The Second Amendment (Game) - Video - May 18th, 2014 [May 18th, 2014]
- We Have Rights! An Animation On The Second Amendment - Video - May 18th, 2014 [May 18th, 2014]
- Letter: 2nd amendment purposes - May 20th, 2014 [May 20th, 2014]
- Senator Ted Cruz's father Rafael Cruz on the Second Amendment - Video - May 20th, 2014 [May 20th, 2014]