Jordan B Peterson – YouTube

I have been in London many times this year, working with Penguin Random House UK, the greatest publishing house. In front of the BBC studios there is a statue of George Orwell, and its presence gave rise to this video.

Additional relevant links:

My new book: 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: https://jordanbpeterson.com……

12 Rules for Life Tour: Dates, Cities and Venues: https://jordanbpeterson.com…

My first book: Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: https://jordanbpeterson.com……

Dr Jordan B Peterson Website: http://jordanbpeterson.com/

Self Authoring Suite: http://selfauthoring.com/Understand Myself personality test: http://understandmyself.com/

Blog: https://jordanbpeterson.com…Podcast: https://jordanbpeterson.com……Reading List: https://jordanbpeterson.com……Twitter: https://twitter.com/jordanb…

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jor… Show less

See the original post:

Jordan B Peterson – YouTube

Adrian Peterson Stats, News, Videos, Highlights, Pictures …

‘;if (data[“playerRater7DAY”] != null) {fhtml += ‘

‘ + data[“playerRater7DAY”] + ‘

‘ + data[“positionRank”] + ‘

‘ + data[“percentOwned”] + ‘

‘ + perChange.replace(‘-‘,”) + ‘

‘ + perChange.replace(‘+’,”) + ‘

Go to ‘ + name + ‘

ESPN Fantasy Football

‘;}if (fhtml != ”) {if (updatetext == true) {$(‘#fantasy-content’).html(fhtml);$(‘#fantasy-container’).show();} else {if (statushtml != ”) {$(‘#fantasy-status’).html(statushtml);}$(‘#fantasy-stats’).html(fhtml);}}$(‘#fantasy-teams’).change(function(){getFantasyData($(this).val(), $(‘#fantasy-teams option:selected’).text(), false);return false;});}}if (loggedIn){$.getJSON(“http://games.espn.com/ffl/api/v1/userEntries?callback=?”,function(data) {if (data != null) {userentries = data[“userEntries”];if (userentries != null && userentries.length > 0) {for (i=0; i

Follow this link:

Adrian Peterson Stats, News, Videos, Highlights, Pictures …

Peterson Institute for International Economics

After centuries of technological progress and advances in international cooperation, the world is more connected than ever. But how much has the rise of trade and the modern global economy helped or hurt American businesses, workers, and consumers? Here is a basic guide to the economic side of this broad and much debated topic, drawn from current research.

Read more:

Peterson Institute for International Economics

Home – Lighthouse Public Affairs, LLC

Rich Peterson, Founder email Rich

Rich Peterson is a respected Bay Area regulatory strategist and problem-solver, with a unique breadth of experience that spans business, government, nonprofit, philanthropic and political endeavors.

Over the last two decades, Rich has cultivated an expansive roster of meaningful relationships with local, state and federal elected leaders, appointed commissioners, senior staff, as well as business, community and nonprofit leaders. He has served in important public oversight and fiduciary roles for the City and County of San Francisco, and on behalf of numerous private nonprofits and philanthropies. His counsel is routinely sought by industry leading companiesincluding such clients as AT&T, CH2M/Jacobs, Genentech, Grocery Outlet, Hearst, LaSalle, Oceanwide Holdings, Prologis, Republic Services, Uniqlo, and Veritas Investmentswho trust his expert guidance to navigate successfully through the Bay Areas political and regulatory landscape.

Richs efforts in 2010 and 2011 on behalf of his firms client, bond insurer MBIA, Inc., were instrumental in brokering a successful financial compromise with the City and the Asian Art Museum. His guidance helped to identify and ultimately achieve a win-win scenario that few initially thought possible, restructuring Museum finances to save it from bankruptcy, while avoiding the needless costs and PR headaches of a possible legal dispute.

In 2012, Rich facilitated key government approvals that ensured the successful, on-schedule opening of global retailer Uniqlos first West Coast storewhich would be the largest store opening in San Franciscos history. He similarly worked in 2012 to guide the new owners of Market Street Place through a variety of regulatory and political challenges facing their project. Today, the 250,000-square-foot retail complex is poised to figure as a key cornerstone in the revitalization of the Citys Mid-Market area.

In 2013, Rich helped secure key approvals at San Franciscos Planning Commission on behalf of value grocer, Grocery Outlet, as it opened its first San Francisco store in the Citys Richmond district. In addition, Rich helped facilitate approvals at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and the Board of Supervisors on behalf of engineering leader CH2M/Jacobs related to engineering and design aspects of the Citys newest wastewater treatment facility. He provided ongoing regional political strategy to biotech leader, Genentechan original firm clientmost recently in connection with its private transportation system.

In 2014, Rich assisted Veritas InvestmentsSan Franciscos largest residential property ownerthrough a multitude of permit processes as well as community-engagement opportunities that reflect the fast-growing companys values. He also worked on behalf of several neighborhood organizations to facilitate a series of successful votes (all unanimous) before the Recreation & Park Commission, SFPUC, and the Board of Supervisors to convert a long abandoned reservoir into a spectacular new five acre park on Russian Hill, overlooking the Bay. He continued to assist Grocery Outlet through its San Francisco expansion, with the opening of its newest location in Visitacion Valley. Rich also advised CPMC (Sutter Health) on political strategy and community development efforts as it considers the redevelopment of its 5-acre California Campus.

In 2015, Rich helped LaSalle Hotel Propertiesone of the nations largest hotel companiesto maintain critical private automobile access to its Hotel Villa Florence on Powell Street. The move successfully carved out an exception for guests of the popular Union Square hotel within SFMTAs planned closure of the street to private vehicles. Rich also began his engagement with Beijing-based developer Oceanwide Holdings, LTD in its highly complex entitlement process for its proposed 2.25 million square foot, twin-tower, mixed-use project. The Oceanwide Center development is the largest single project within San Franciscos ambitious new Transbay Development District. Rich further continued to assist longtime firm client, the Hearst Corporation, on a variety of important regulatory and community matters. He served at the Mayors request as Chairman of the City Hall Centennial celebration, personally raising the funds necessary to support a series of events and improvement projects for the Citys most important building. The free public celebration of San Francisco City Halls 100-year milestone was attended by an estimated 30,000 residents and visitors.

In 2016, Rich continued to manage the firms entitlement work on behalf of the massive $1.5 billion Oceanwide Center project, securing successful and on-time approvals at the Recreation and Park Commission, Planning Commission, and Board of Supervisors. The focus has now turned to facilitating its timely and on-budget construction. Additionally, Rich is leading the public affairs efforts for San Francisco-based Prologis, the worlds leading developer and operator of industrial and logistics space, on its proposed 1M+ million square foot, four-building, multi-story manufacturing and distribution facility, the San Francisco Gateway. He also facilitated the opening of two more Grocery Outlets, most recently in the Citys politically complicated Mission District.

In 2017, Rich helped longtime client CH2M/Jacobs in a fiercely competitive bid process, winning the contract to serve as the prime design and engineering contractor for the Port of San Francisco to rebuild three miles of the City’s seawall. Ultimately, San Franciscos seawall rebuild will cost upwards of $5 to $10 billion over the next 20 years, making it perhaps the most expensive single municipal project in Bay Area history. Rich further assisted Hines, a leading international developer, together with Hines partner Urban Pacific Development, in their ongoing efforts to secure the necessary entitlements for their 61-story condo, office and hotel project at 542-550 Howard Street, which will also include an accompanying 500-unit housing project located just three blocks east. Together, these projects are the largest remaining elements in the massive, transformative Transbay District. Rich also continued his ongoing work as lead local adviser to Prologis on political strategy and community engagement in relation to is its proposed state-of-the-art San Francisco Gateway distribution and logistics center that the San Francisco Chronicle praised as a potential blue collar salvation for jobs that have long been disappearing from the City.

From December 2007 to May 2010, Rich served as an appointed Trustee to the San Francisco Employees Retirement System, also known as SFERS. Acting as the elected Board President in his final year, Richs leadership of SFERS oversaw the approximately $20 billion public pension fund for some 55,000 current and retired employees of the City and County of San Francisco.

From January 2004 through October 2007, Rich served as an appointed commissioner to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, or SFRA. He was elected to three consecutive terms as president by his fellow commissioners. From 1948 through 2011, the SFRA was the primary driver of economic renewal in the City, with its main function being the direct promotion of economic vitality through the removal of urban blight in certain, dedicated, redevelopment Plan areas. Key projects completed or significantly advanced during his term include: Mission Bay, Yerba Buena Center, the St. Regis Hotel, and the Hunters Point Shipyard.

Personally, Rich is also recognized as among the most active and productive political organizers in the Bay Area, having assisted a multitude of local, state and federal candidates, and local and state ballot measures over the last 15 years. Rich served as a Finance Committee Chair for both of former San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsoms mayoral campaigns, and he also served as president of Mayor Newsoms Inaugural Committee following his reelection in 2007. More recently, he has been acknowledged as one of the late Mayor Ed Lees largest fundraisers.

Rich has been an active volunteer over the last 20 years on behalf of an array of non-profit causes. Of particular note are his efforts on behalf of Town School for Boys, where he serves as a trustee; SPUR, San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association, which he serves as a director; The Guardsmen, which he formerly served as a director; At the Crossroads, where he sits on the capital campaign Advisory Board and assists with fundraising; and UCSFs Pediatric Epilepsy Center.

For the two decades Rich has also been an active investor in Silicon Valley multi-family real estate, and holds a current California real estate Broker license. He is married to Tanya Peterson, the President and Executive Director of the San Francisco Zoological Society (SF Zoo). They reside in The Presidio with their twin children.

A native San Franciscan, Rich has spent his entire life actively involved in the business, civic, philanthropic and social affairs of the Bay Area. Rich received his Bachelor of Sciences in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley in 1990.

Read more from the original source:

Home – Lighthouse Public Affairs, LLC

Undergraduate Degree Programs | NanoEngineering

The Department of NanoEngineering offers undergraduate programs leading to theB.S. degreesinNanoengineeringandChemical Engineering. The Chemical Engineering and NanoEngineering undergraduate programs areaccredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET. The undergraduate degree programs focus on integrating the various sciences and engineering disciplines necessary for successful careers in the evolving nanotechnology industry.These two degree programshave very different requirements and are described in separate sections.

B.S. NanoEngineering

TheNanoEngineering Undergraduate Program became effective Fall 2010.Thismajor focuses on nanoscale science, engineering, and technology that have the potential to make valuable advances in different areas that include, to name a few, new materials, biology and medicine, energy conversion, sensors, and environmental remediation. The program includes affiliated faculty from the Department of NanoEngineering, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and the Department of Bioengineering. The NanoEngineering undergraduate program is tailored to provide breadth and flexibility by taking advantage of the strength of basic sciences and other engineering disciplines at UC San Diego. The intention is to graduate nanoengineers who are multidisciplinary and can work in a broad spectrum of industries.

B.S. Chemical Engineering

The Chemical Engineering undergraduate program is housed within the NanoEngineering Department. The program is made up of faculty from the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, the Department of Bioengineering and the Department of NanoEngineering. The curricula at both the undergraduate and graduate levels are designed to support and foster chemical engineering as a profession that interfaces engineering and all aspects of basic sciences (physics, chemistry, and biology). As of Fall 2008, the Department of NanoEngineering has taken over the administration of the B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering.

Academic Advising

Upon admission to the major, students should consult the catalog or NanoEngineering website for their program of study, and their undergraduate/graduate advisor if they have questions. Because some course and/or curricular changes may be made every year, it is imperative that students consult with the departments student affairs advisors on an annual basis.

Students can meet with the academic advisors during walk-in hours, schedule an appointment, or send messages through the Virtual Advising Center (VAC).

Program Alterations/Exceptions to Requirements

Variations from or exceptions to any program or course requirements are possible only if the Undergraduate Affairs Committee approves a petition before the courses in question are taken.

Independent Study

Students may take NANO 199 or CENG 199, Independent Study for Undergraduates, under the guidance of a NANO or CENG faculty member. This course is taken as an elective on a P/NP basis. Under very restrictive conditions, however, it may be used to satisfy upper-division Technical Elective or Nanoengineering Elective course requirements for the major. Students interested in this alternative must have completed at least 90 units and earned a UCSD cumulative GPA of 3.0 or better. Eligible students must identify a faculty member with whom they wish to work and propose a two-quarter research or study topic. Please visit the Student Affairs office for more information.

See the original post:

Undergraduate Degree Programs | NanoEngineering

UC San Diego NanoEngineering Department

The NanoEngineering program has received accreditation by the Accreditation Commission of ABET, the global accreditor of college and university programs in applied and natural science, computing, engineering and engineering technology. UC San Diego’s NanoEngineering program is the first of its kind in the nation to receive this accreditation. Our NanoEngineering students can feel confident that their education meets global standards and that they will be prepared to enter the workforce worldwide.

ABET accreditation assures that programs meet standards to produce graduates ready to enter critical technical fields that are leading the way in innovation and emerging technologies, and anticipating the welfare and safety needs of the public. Please visit the ABET website for more information on why accreditation matters.

Congratulations to the NanoEngineering department and students!

Original post:

UC San Diego NanoEngineering Department

Nanoengineering – Wikipedia

Nanoengineering is the practice of engineering on the nanoscale. It derives its name from the nanometre, a unit of measurement equalling one billionth of a meter.

Nanoengineering is largely a synonym for nanotechnology, but emphasizes the engineering rather than the pure science aspects of the field.

The first nanoengineering program was started at the University of Toronto within the Engineering Science program as one of the options of study in the final years. In 2003, the Lund Institute of Technology started a program in Nanoengineering. In 2004, the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering at SUNY Polytechnic Institute was established on the campus of the University at Albany. In 2005, the University of Waterloo established a unique program which offers a full degree in Nanotechnology Engineering. [1] Louisiana Tech University started the first program in the U.S. in 2005. In 2006 the University of Duisburg-Essen started a Bachelor and a Master program NanoEngineering. [2] Unlike early NanoEngineering programs, the first Nanoengineering Department in the world, offering both undergraduate and graduate degrees, was established by the University of California, San Diego in 2007.In 2009, the University of Toronto began offering all Options of study in Engineering Science as degrees, bringing the second nanoengineering degree to Canada. Rice University established in 2016 a Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering (MSNE).DTU Nanotech – the Department of Micro- and Nanotechnology – is a department at the Technical University of Denmark established in 1990.

In 2013, Wayne State University began offering a Nanoengineering Undergraduate Certificate Program, which is funded by a Nanoengineering Undergraduate Education (NUE) grant from the National Science Foundation. The primary goal is to offer specialized undergraduate training in nanotechnology. Other goals are: 1) to teach emerging technologies at the undergraduate level, 2) to train a new adaptive workforce, and 3) to retrain working engineers and professionals.[3]

Here is the original post:

Nanoengineering – Wikipedia

NETS – What are Nanoengineering and Nanotechnology?

is one billionth of a meter, or three to five atoms in width. It would take approximately 40,000 nanometers lined up in a row to equal the width of a human hair. NanoEngineering concerns itself with manipulating processes that occur on the scale of 1-100 nanometers.

The general term, nanotechnology, is sometimes used to refer to common products that have improved properties due to being fortified with nanoscale materials. One example is nano-improved tooth-colored enamel, as used by dentists for fillings. The general use of the term nanotechnology then differs from the more specific sciences that fall under its heading.

NanoEngineering is an interdisciplinary science that builds biochemical structures smaller than bacterium, which function like microscopic factories. This is possible by utilizing basic biochemical processes at the atomic or molecular level. In simple terms, molecules interact through natural processes, and NanoEngineering takes advantage of those processes by direct manipulation.


Read more:

NETS – What are Nanoengineering and Nanotechnology?


Turning the NaI concept into reality necessitates an extraordinary and long-term effort. This requires the integration of nanoelectronics, nanophotonics, nanophononics, nanospintronics, topological effects, as well as the physics and chemistry of materials. This also requires operations in an extremely broad range of science and technology, including Microwaves, Millimeter waves, TeraHertz, Infrared and Optics, and will exploit various excitations, such as surface waves, spin waves, phonons, electrons, photons, plasmons, and their hybrids, for sensing, information processing and storage. Integrating

This high level of integration, which goes beyond individual functionalities, components and devices and requires cooperation across a range of disciplines, makes the Nano Engineering Flagship unique in its approach. It will be crucial in tackling the 6 strategic challenges identified as:




Nano-Engineering introduces a novel key-enabling non-invasive broadband technology, the Nano-engineered Interface (NaI), realising omni -connectivity and putting humans and their interactions at the center of the future digital society.Omni-connectivity encompasses real-time communication, sensing, monitoring, and data processing among humans, objects, and their environment. The vision of Omni-connectivity englobes people in a new sphere of extremely simplified, intuitive and natural communication.The Nano-engineered Interface (NaI) a non-invasive wireless ultraflat functional system will make this possible. NaI will be applicable to any surface on any physical item and thereby exponentially diversify and increase connections among humans, wearables, vehicles, and everyday objects. NaI will communicate with other NaI-networks from local up to satellites by using the whole frequency spectrum from microwave frequency to optics

See the article here:


Jordan Peterson – Wikipedia

From July 1993 to June 1998,[1] Peterson lived in Arlington, Massachusetts, while teaching and conducting research at Harvard University as an assistant and an associate professor in the psychology department. During his time at Harvard, he studied aggression arising from drug and alcohol abuse and supervised a number of unconventional thesis proposals.[20] Two former Ph.D. students, Shelley Carson, a psychologist and teacher from Harvard, and author Gregg Hurwitz recalled that Peterson’s lectures were already highly admired by the students.[5] In July 1998, he returned to Canada and took up a post as a full professor at the University of Toronto.[1][22]

Peterson’s areas of study and research are in the fields of psychopharmacology, abnormal, neuro, clinical, personality, social, industrial and organizational,[1] religious, ideological,[3] political, and creativity psychology.[4] Peterson has authored or co-authored more than a hundred academic papers,[24] has been cited almost 8,000 times as of mid-2017,[25] with a h-index of 39 at Scopus and 51 at Google Scholar.[26][27]

For most of his career, Peterson had an active clinical practice, seeing 20 people a week. He had been active on social media, but in September 2016 he released a series of videos in which he criticized Bill C-16 that changed his career and life.[18][28] In 2017, he decided to put the clinical practice on hold,[10] as well as, in 2018, temporarily stopping teaching because of new projects.[15][29]

Something we cannot see protects us from something we do not understand. The thing we cannot see is culture, in its intrapsychic or internal manifestation. The thing we do not understand is the chaos that gave rise to culture.If the structure of culture is disrupted, unwittingly, chaos returns. We will do anything anything to defend ourselves against that return.

Jordan Peterson, 1998 (Descensus ad Inferos)[6]

In 1999 Routledge published Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief. The book, which took Peterson 13 years to complete, describes a comprehensive theory about how people construct meaning, beliefs and make narratives using ideas from various fields including mythology, religion, literature, philosophy and psychology in accordance to the modern scientific understanding of how the brain functions.[20][6][30]

According to Peterson, his main goal was to examine why both individuals and groups participate in social conflict, explore the reasoning and motivation individuals take to support their belief systems (i.e. ideological identification[20]) that eventually results in killing and pathological atrocities like the Gulag, the Auschwitz concentration camp and the Rwandan genocide.[20][6][30] He considers that an “analysis of the world’s religious ideas might allow us to describe our essential morality and eventually develop a universal system of morality”.[30] Jungian archetypes play an important role in the book.[5]

In 2004, a 13-part TV series based on Peterson’s book Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief aired on TVOntario.[14][22][31]

In January 2018, Penguin Random House published Peterson’s second book, 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos. The work contains abstract ethical principles about life, in a more accessible style than Maps of Meaning.[10][5][11]To promote the book, Peterson went on a world tour.[32][33][34] As part of the tour, Peterson was interviewed by Cathy Newman on Channel 4 News which generated considerable attention, as well as popularity for the book.[35][36][37][38] The book topped bestselling lists in Canada, US and the United Kingdom.[39][40]

In 2013, Peterson began recording his lectures (“Personality and Its Transformations”, “Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief”[41]) and uploading them to YouTube. His YouTube channel has gathered more than 1.3 million subscribers and his videos have received more than 65 million views as of August 2018.[28][42] In January 2017, he hired a production team to film his psychology lectures at the University of Toronto. He used funds received on the crowdfunding website Patreon after he became embroiled in the Bill C-16 controversy in September 2016. His funding through Patreon has increased from $1,000 per month in August 2016 to $14,000 by January 2017, more than $50,000 by July 2017, and over $80,000 by May 2018.[18][28][43][44]

Peterson has appeared on many podcasts, conversational series, as well other online shows.[42][45] In December 2016, Peterson started his own podcast, The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast, which has 53 episodes as of June 28, 2018, including academic guests such as Camille Paglia, Martin Daly, and James W. Pennebaker,[46] while on his channel he has also interviewed Stephen Hicks, Richard J. Haier, and Jonathan Haidt among others.[46] Peterson supported engineer James Damore in his action against Google.[11]

In May 2017, Peterson began The psychological significance of the Biblical stories,[47] a series of live theatre lectures, also published as podcasts, in which he analyzes archetypal narratives in Genesis as patterns of behavior ostensibly vital for personal, social and cultural stability.[11][48]

In 2005, Peterson and his colleagues set up a for-profit company to provide and produce a writing therapy program with a series of online writing exercises.[49] Titled the Self Authoring Suite,[14] it includes the Past Authoring Program (a guided autobiography); two Present Authoring Programs which allow the participant to analyze their personality faults and virtues in terms of the Big Five personality model; and the Future Authoring Program which guides participants through the process of planning their desired futures. The latter program was used with McGill University undergraduates on academic probation to improve their grades, as well as since 2011 at Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.[50][51] The programs were developed partially from research by James W. Pennebaker at the University of Texas at Austin and Gary Latham at the Rotman School of Management of the University of Toronto.[5] Peterson’s co-authored 2015 study showed significant reduction in ethnic and gender-group differences in performance, especially among ethnic minority male students.[51][52] According to Peterson, more than 10,000 students have used the program as of January 2017, with drop-out rates decreasing by 25% and GPAs rising by 20%.[14]

Peterson’s critiques of political correctness range over issues such as postmodernism, postmodern feminism, white privilege, cultural appropriation, and environmentalism.[45][53][54]

Writing in the National Post, Chris Selley said Peterson’s opponents had “underestimated the fury being inspired by modern preoccupations like white privilege and cultural appropriation, and by the marginalization, shouting down or outright cancellation of other viewpoints in polite society’s institutions”,[55] while in The Spectator, Tim Lott stated Peterson became “an outspoken critic of mainstream academia”.[21] Peterson’s social media presence has magnified the impact of these views; Simona Chiose of The Globe and Mail noted: “few University of Toronto professors in the humanities and social sciences have enjoyed the global name recognition Prof. Peterson has won”.[28]

According to his study conducted with one of his students, Christine Brophy of the relationship between political belief and personality, political correctness exists in two types: “PC-egalitarianism” and “PC-authoritarianism”, which is a manifestation of “offense sensitivity”.[56] He places classical liberals in the first type, and places so-called social justice warriors, who he says “weaponize compassion”, in the second.[14][3] The study also found an overlap between PC-authoritarians and right-wing authoritarians.[56]

Peterson considers that the universities should be held as among the most responsible for the wave of political correctness which appeared in North America and Europe.[28] According to Peterson, he watched the rise of political correctness on campuses since the early 1990s,[57] and considers that the humanities have become corrupt, less reliant on science, and instead of “intelligent conversation, we are having an ideological conversation”. From his own experience as a university professor, he states that the students who are coming to his classes are uneducated and unaware about the mass exterminations and crimes by Stalinism and Maoism, which were not given the same attention as fascism and Nazism. He also says that “instead of being ennobled or inculcated into the proper culture, the last vestiges of structure are stripped from [the students] by post-modernism and neo-Marxism, which defines everything in terms of relativism and power”.[21][58][59]

Peterson, 2017[58]

Peterson states that postmodern philosophers and sociologists since the 1960s[53] have built upon and extended certain core tenets of Marxism and communism while simultaneously appearing to disavow both ideologies. He says that it is difficult to understand contemporary Western society without considering the influence of a strain of postmodernism thought that migrated from France to the United States through the English department at Yale University. He states that certain academics in the humanities “started to play a sleight of hand, and instead of pitting the proletariat, the working class, against the bourgeois, they started to pit the oppressed against the oppressor. That opened up the avenue to identifying any number of groups as oppressed and oppressor and to continue the same narrative under a different name… The people who hold this doctrine this radical, postmodern, communitarian doctrine that makes racial identity or sexual identity or gender identity or some kind of group identity paramount they’ve got control over most low-to-mid level bureaucratic structures, and many governments as well”.[58][24] Peterson’s perspective on the influence of postmodernism on North American humanities departments has been compared to Cultural Marxist conspiracy theories.[37][60][61][62]

Peterson recommends that the state halt funding to faculties and courses he describes as neo-Marxist, and advises students to avoid disciplines like women’s studies, ethnic studies and racial studies, as well other fields of study he believes are corrupted by the ideology such as sociology, anthropology and English literature.[63][64] He says that these fields, under the pretense of academic inquiry, propagate unscientific methods, fraudulent peer-review processes for academic journals, publications that garner zero citations,[65] cult-like behaviour,[63] safe-spaces,[66] and radical left-wing political activism for students.[53] Peterson has proposed launching a website which uses artificial intelligence to identify and showcase the amount of ideologization in specific courses. He announced in November 2017 that he had temporarily postponed the project as “it might add excessively to current polarization”.[67][68]

Peterson has criticized the use of the term “white privilege”, stating that “being called out on their white privilege, identified with a particular racial group and then made to suffer the consequences of the existence of that racial group and its hypothetical crimes, and that sort of thing has to come to a stop…. [It’s] racist in its extreme”.[53] In regard to identity politics, while “left plays them on behalf of the oppressed, let’s say, and the right tends to play them on behalf of nationalism and ethnic pride” he considers them “equally dangerous” and that instead should be emphasized individualism and individual responsibility.[69] He has also been prominent in the debate about cultural appropriation, stating it promotes self-censorship in society and journalism.[70]

On September 27, 2016, Peterson released the first installment of a three-part lecture video series, entitled “Professor against political correctness: Part I: Fear and the Law”.[18][71] In the video, he stated he would not use the preferred gender pronouns of students and faculty, saying it fell under compelled speech, and announced his objection to the Canadian government’s Bill C-16, which proposed to add “gender identity or expression” as a prohibited ground of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act, and to similarly expand the definitions of promoting genocide and publicly inciting hatred in the Criminal Code.[71][72]

He stated that his objection to the bill was based on potential free speech implications if the Criminal Code is amended, as he claimed he could then be prosecuted under provincial human rights laws if he refuses to call a transsexual student or faculty member by the individual’s preferred pronoun.[73] Furthermore, he argued that the new amendments, paired with section 46.3 of the Ontario Human Rights Code, would make it possible for employers and organizations to be subject to punishment under the code if any employee or associate says anything that can be construed “directly or indirectly” as offensive, “whether intentionally or unintentionally”.[74] Other academics and lawyers challenged Peterson’s interpretation of C-16.[73] Law professor Brenda Cossman said that his interpretation of the bill was an intentional mischaracterisation, while the Canadian Bar Association wrote a letter urging the adoption of the bill in which they criticised Peterson’s take on its effects.[75]

The series of videos drew criticism from transgender activists, faculty and labour unions, and critics accused Peterson of “helping to foster a climate for hate to thrive” and of “fundamentally mischaracterising” the law.[76][18] Protests erupted on campus, some including violence, and the controversy attracted international media attention.[77][78][79] When asked in September 2016 if he would comply with the request of a student to use a preferred pronoun, Peterson said “it would depend on how they asked me[…] If I could detect that there was a chip on their shoulder, or that they were [asking me] with political motives, then I would probably say no[…] If I could have a conversation like the one we’re having now, I could probably meet them on an equal level”.[79] Two months later, the National Post published an op-ed by Peterson in which he elaborated on his opposition to the bill and explained why he publicly made a stand against it:

I will never use words I hate, like the trendy and artificially constructed words “zhe” and “zher.” These words are at the vanguard of a post-modern, radical leftist ideology that I detest, and which is, in my professional opinion, frighteningly similar to the Marxist doctrines that killed at least 100 million people in the 20th century.

I have been studying authoritarianism on the right and the left for 35 years. I wrote a book, Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief, on the topic, which explores how ideologies hijack language and belief. As a result of my studies, I have come to believe that Marxism is a murderous ideology. I believe its practitioners in modern universities should be ashamed of themselves for continuing to promote such vicious, untenable and anti-human ideas, and for indoctrinating their students with these beliefs. I am therefore not going to mouth Marxist words. That would make me a puppet of the radical left, and that is not going to happen. Period.[80]

In response to the controversy, academic administrators at the University of Toronto sent Peterson two letters of warning, one noting that free speech had to be made in accordance with human rights legislation and the other adding that his refusal to use the preferred personal pronouns of students and faculty upon request could constitute discrimination. Peterson speculated that these warning letters were leading up to formal disciplinary action against him, but in December the university assured him that he would retain his professorship, and in January 2017 he returned to teach his psychology class at the University of Toronto.[81][18]

In February 2017, Maxime Bernier, candidate for leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, stated that he shifted his position on Bill C-16, from support to opposition, after meeting with Peterson and discussing it.[82] Peterson’s analysis of the bill was also frequently cited by senators who were opposed to its passage.[83] In April 2017, Peterson was denied a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) grant for the first time in his career, which he interpreted as retaliation for his statements regarding Bill C-16.[25] A media relations adviser for SSHRC said “[c]ommittees assess only the information contained in the application”.[84] In response, The Rebel Media launched an Indiegogo campaign on Peterson’s behalf.[85] The campaign raised C$195,000 by its end on May 6, equivalent to over two years of research funding.[86] In May 2017, Peterson spoke against Bill C-16 at a Canadian Senate committee on legal and constitutional affairs hearing. He was one of 24 witnesses who were invited to speak about the bill.[83]

In November 2017, a teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University first year communications course was censured by her professors for showing a segment of The Agenda, which featured Peterson debating Bill C-16 with another professor, during a classroom discussion about pronouns.[87][88][89] The reasons given for the censure included the clip creating a “toxic climate”, being compared to a “speech by Hitler”,[19] and being itself in violation of Bill C-16.[90] The censure was later withdrawn and both the professors and the university formally apologized.[91][92][93] The events were criticized by Peterson, as well as several newspaper editorial boards[94][95][96] and national newspaper columnists[97][98][99][100] as an example of the suppression of free speech on university campuses. In June 2018, Peterson filed a $1.5-million lawsuit against Wilfrid Laurier University, arguing that three staff members of the university had maliciously defamed him by making negative comments about him behind closed doors.[101] Wilfried Laurier asked that the lawsuit be dismissed, saying that it was ironic for a purported advocate of free speech to attempt to curtail free speech.[102]

Peterson has argued that there is an ongoing “crisis of masculinity” and “backlash against masculinity” where the “masculine spirit is under assault”.[13][103][104][105] He has argued that feminism and policies such as no-fault divorce have had adverse effects on gender relations and destabilized society.[103] He has argued that the existing societal hierarchy that the “left” has characterised as an “oppressive patriarchy” might “be predicated on competence.”[13] Peterson has said that men without partners are likely to become violent, and has proposed “enforced monogamy”, wherein monogamy is a social norm, as a solution to the problem.[13][103] He has attributed the rise of Donald Trump and far-right European politicians to what he says is a push to “feminize” men, saying “If men are pushed too hard to feminize they will become more and more interested in harsh, fascist political ideology.”[106] He attracted considerable attention over a 2018 Channel 4 interview where he clashed with interviewer Cathy Newman on the topic of the gender pay gap.[107][108] Peterson disputed that the gender pay gap was solely due to sexual discrimination.[108][109][110] Writing for The New York Times, Nellie Bowles said that most of Peterson’s ideas “stem from a gnawing anxiety around gender”.[13]

Peterson doubts the scientific consensus on climate change.[111] On climate change, Peterson has said he is “very sceptical of the models that are used to predict climate change.”[112] He has also said, “You can’t trust the data because too much ideology is involved.”[113]

Peterson married Tammy Roberts in 1989.[18] They have one daughter and one son.[14][18]

Politically, Peterson has described himself as a classic British liberal,[114][21] and has stated that he is commonly mistaken to be right wing.[42] He is a philosophical pragmatist.[48] In a 2017 interview, Peterson identified as a Christian.[115] However, in 2018 he has emphasized that his conceptualization of Christianity is probably not what it is generally understood, stating that the ethical responsibility of a Christian is to imitate Christ, for him meaning “something like you need to take responsibility for the evil in the world as if you were responsible for it… to understand that you determine the direction of the world, whether it’s toward heaven or hell”.[116] When asked if he believes in God, Peterson responded: “I think the proper response to that is No, but I’m afraid He might exist”.[10] Writing for The Spectator, Tim Lott said Peterson draws inspiration from Jung’s philosophy of religion, and holds views similar to the Christian existentialism of Sren Kierkegaard and Paul Tillich. Lott also said Peterson has respect for Taoism, as it views nature as a struggle between order and chaos, and posits that life would be meaningless without this duality.[21]

Starting around 2000, Peterson began collecting Soviet-era paintings,[19] displayed in his house as a reminder of, he argues, the relationship between totalitarian propaganda and art, and as examples of how idealistic visions can become totalitarian oppression and horror.[5][29] In 2016, Peterson became an honorary member of the extended family of Charles Joseph, a Kwakwaka’wakw artist, and was given the name Alestalagie (“Great Seeker”).[19][117] Since late 2016, Peterson has been on a strict diet consisting only of meat and some vegetables, to control severe depression and an auto-immune disorder, including psoriasis and uveitis.[15][118]

Read more:

Jordan Peterson – Wikipedia

Peterson Middle School

October, 2018 Students of the Month

Monthly, Peterson recognizes students for their outstandingeffort, improvement and/or overall demonstration of good citizenship in theclassroom and in the Peterson community. Students earning thisrecognition are celebrated by being invited to a small celebration during SSR.

Learn More

Continue reading here:

Peterson Middle School

These Environmentally Friendly Bricks Are Made out of Human Urine

Bathroom Bricks

The next time you pee, think about this: Your urine could one day create the sustainable building materials of the future.

Dyllon Randall is a research engineer at the University of Cape Town. He’s also the supervisor on a new project in which students harvested urine from urinals so they could transform the waste into building bricks. Not only could these bio-bricks eliminate one form of human waste, they could also help fight climate change.

Liquid Gold

In a paper published in the Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, the team describes the process of creating one of its bio-bricks.

First, they collect human urine in special urinals that convert much of the liquid into a solid fertilizer. Then, they add the remaining urine to loose sand they colonized with a bacteria that produces an enzyme called urease. This urease reacts with the urine over a period of four to six days, cementing the sand into the brick-like shape of its container.

This whole process takes place at room temperature, while creating traditional bricks involves the use of carbon emission-producing kilns. And as yet another bonus, the team says it can convert the little bit of human urine left over from the brick-building process into yet another fertilizer.

Flushed Away

Ultimately, this team has taken something most of us don’t think twice about flushing down the toilet every day and transformed it into two things we need: fertilizer and building materials.

Still, the amount of urine needed to produce just one brick would require about 100 trips to the restroom, so unless the team is able to get its hands on a lot more urine, these bio-bricks might never find their way onto a construction site.

READ MORE: World-First: Bio-Bricks From Urine [University of Cape Town]

More on upcycling waste: Researchers Devise Method for Recycling Astronaut Urine to Make 3D Printing Plastics in Space

Continue reading here:

These Environmentally Friendly Bricks Are Made out of Human Urine

Former General: The US Will Likely Fight a War With China

“Strong Likelihood”

On Wednesday, a retired general predicted that America will wage a war with China in the future.

That’s according to the Associated Press, which quoted Lt. General Ben Hodges’ remarks at a Warsaw conference for Central European military leaders.

“I think in 15 years — it’s not inevitable — but it is a very strong likelihood that we will be at war with China,” Hodges said.

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

The risk is that this sort of rhetoric could become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

A military leader publicly predicting war with another major world power seems like the sort of move that could make such a war much more likely to happen.

Town Ain’t big Enough

Hodges’ comments seem to come from China’s increasing political and economic influence around the world. America will need to reckon with the fact that China is quickly gaining on other world leaders and may soon pass them technologically and economically.

Hopefully, that reckoning comes with a little bit more grace than setting the stage for a future of warfare.

READ MORE: Retired US general says war with China likely in 15 years [AP]

More on China: An AI Research Supergroup Just Added its First Chinese Firm

View original post here:

Former General: The US Will Likely Fight a War With China

Facebook Sees a Future in Augmented Reality Glasses


The year is 2025. You’re trying to pay attention to your nephew blowing out the candles on his birthday cake, but bright-red Facebook notifications keep flickering in your peripheral vision.

The social media giant really wants its breakout hardware device to be a pair of augmented reality glasses. That’s according to the company’s head of AR, Ficus Kirkpatrick, who blabbed to TechCrunch during an AR event last week in LA.

“We want to see [AR] glasses come into reality,” Kirkpatrick said, “and I think we want to play our part in helping to bring them there.”

Eye Spy

This isn’t the first sign that Facebook wants to dominate the AR space. It bought the breakout VR company Oculus in 2014. Last year, it filed a patent for what look an awful lot like smart spectacles.

If heads-up glasses are the company’s next push, it’ll need to overcome decades of missteps in the space, from Nintendo’s disastrous Virtual Boy to Google’s failed-and-revived Project Glass. And Kirkpatrick cautioned to TechCrunch that the tech likely won’t be here for at least five years.

If the company dreams up a compelling product, though, we’re all going to need to ask ourselves whether we want Facebook notifications clogging up our views as much as they already do our screens.

READ MOREFacebook Confirms It’s Building Augmented Reality Glasses [TechCrunch]

More on augmented reality: These Are The Lightest Augmented Reality Smart Glasses on The Market

Here is the original post:

Facebook Sees a Future in Augmented Reality Glasses

Poll: Cool Teens Think Self-Driving Cars Are Totally Lame

Can It Kickflip?

Sources tell us that teens are into a lot of totally-rad stuff like skateboards, dank memes, and dabbing.

Notably missing from that list? Self-driving cars. It takes a lot for people who still needs their parents to drive them to their dates to pass on autonomous vehicles, but that’s exactly what 56 percent of 764 teens polled by State Farm insurance said, according to CBS News.

Hall Monitors

To be fair, the poll was taken among the narcs of the teen world: members of Students Against Destructive Decisions, a group that fights underage substance abuse. According to CBS’s article, chief concerns included the lack of steering wheels and brake pedals fully autonomous vehicles.

Without those standard features, some of the teens felt hesitant to give full control over their safety to the self-driving car.

Buckle Up

No matter how safe self-driving cars may become, this poll illuminates an often-overlooked challenge for autonomous vehicles: actual human interest. In addition to the many technological and political hurdles on the path towards a world of AVs, we can’t forget to address the needs of the people who will be riding in them.

That means that solving problems like motion sickness in people who are used to driving, and convincing passengers that their lives are in good hands, will need to be just as high an industry priority as actually getting the cars to work right.

READ MORE: Self-driving cars are a nonstarter for many teens [CBS News]

More on teens in AVs: Federal Officials put the Brakes on a Driverless School Bus

See the original post:

Poll: Cool Teens Think Self-Driving Cars Are Totally Lame

Terminator 2’s Terrifying Villain Inspired a New Liquid Metal Robot

Hasta La Vista

Soochow University robotics professor Li Xiangpeng didn’t mince words in a new interview about his latest robot.

“We were inspired,” he told the South China Morning Post, “by T-1000 from Terminator 2: Judgment Day.

T-1000? The killer assassin android on a special mission to murder the teenaged John Connor? That T-1000?

Thankfully, it wasn’t T-1000’s killer instincts that prompted Xiangpeng. Instead it was the liquid-metal robot’s shape-shifting ability that fascinated his research team. And while the robot they built is far less advanced than the one depicted in James Cameron’s sci-fi classic, it could pave the way for bots to come.

Hey Janelle

Xiangpeng and other researchers from China and Australia detail their creation in a paper published earlier this month in the journal Advanced Materials.

Ultimately, their robot comprises just three parts: a plastic wheel, drops of a gallium-based liquid metal alloy, and a small lithium battery. Voltage from the battery alters the liquid metal’s center of gravity, which causes the palm-sized robot to roll in one direction or the other.

I’ll Be Back

The bot may be a far cry from T-1000, but the researchers believe their creation could serve as inspiration for other devices, the same way James Cameron’s 1991 smash-hit followup to “The Terminator” inspired them to build this tiny bot.

“In the future, we expect to further develop soft robots incorporating liquid metal that could be used in special missions such as searching for and rescuing earthquake victims, since they can change shape to slide under doors or make it through spaces humans can’t get into,” researcher Tang Shiyang told SCMP.

Saving people following natural disasters — now that’s the kind of mission we can get behind.

READ MORE: Chinese Scientists Develop Shape-Shifting Robot Inspired by T-1000 From Terminator [South China Morning Post]

More on Terminator-esque robots: Russia’s New Space Robot Can Drive, Use Tools… and Shoot

Read more from the original source:

Terminator 2’s Terrifying Villain Inspired a New Liquid Metal Robot

Scientists: The Government Should Invest in Carbon Capture Now

Scrub Tech

It’s starting to look as though our best bet to stave off a climate change apocalypse is carbon capture: technology that can clean a huge amount of greenhouse gases from the planet’s atmosphere.

The problem: that technology doesn’t exist yet. In a 368-page report published Thursday by the National Academies of Science, leading scientists argued that the government should invest heavily in research that could leave to planet-saving carbon capture.


The urgent call for carbon capture research comes on the tail of a damning UN report in which researchers concluded that civilization has much less time than we thought to prevent irreparable environmental devastation.

This is a different sort of investment than expanding our use of solar and wind power — two things we know how to do fairly well at this point. Carbon capture tech still needs more fundamental research.

But Maybe

Different approaches to carbon capture tech have shown promise at the proof of concept level, as The New York Times reported. The real challenge will be scaling those different technologies to the point where they can accomplish what the National Academies of Sciences is hoping.

Unfortunately, this may mean putting all of our chips on entrepreneurs and hoping that some tech company cracks the climate code. Because until someone figures carbon capture out, it would seem things are going to keep getting worse.

READ MORE: Scientists Push for a Crash Program to Scrub Carbon From the Air [The New York Times]

More on carbon capture: Experts Worry a Landmark Report on Climate Change Will Call for Unrealistic Tech

View original post here:

Scientists: The Government Should Invest in Carbon Capture Now

A Stem Cell Transplant Let a Wheelchair-Bound Man Dance Again

Stand Up Guy

For 10 years, Roy Palmer had no feeling in his lower extremities. Two days after receiving a stem cell transplant, he cried tears of joy because he could feel a cramp in his leg.

The technical term for the procedure the British man underwent is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). And while risky, it’s offering new hope to people like Palmer, who found himself wheelchair-bound after multiple sclerosis (MS) caused his immune system to attack his nerves’ protective coverings.

Biological Reboot

Ever hear the IT troubleshooting go-to of turning a system off and on again to fix it? The HSCT process is similar, but instead of a computer, doctors attempt to reboot a patient’s immune system.

To do this, they first remove stem cells from the patient’s body. Then the patient undergoes chemotherapy, which kills the rest of their immune system. After that, the doctors use the extracted stem cells to reboot the patient’s immune system.

It took just two days for the treatment to restore some of the feeling in Palmer’s legs. Eventually, he was able to walk on his own and even dance. He told the BBC in a recent interview that he now feels like he has a second chance at life.

“We went on holiday, not so long ago, to Turkey. I walked on the beach,” said Palmer. “Little things like that, people do not realize what it means to me.”

Risk / Reward

Still, HSCT isn’t some miracle cure for MS. Though it worked for Palmer, that’s not always the case, and HSCT can also cause infections and infertility. The National MS Society still considers HSCT to be an experimental treatment, and the Food and Drug Administration has yet to approve the therapy in the U.S.

However, MS affects more than 2.3 million people, and if a stem cell transplant can help even some of those folks the way it helped Palmer, it’s a therapy worth exploring.

READ MORE: Walking Again After Ten Years With MS [BBC]

More on HCST: New Breakthrough Treatment Could “Reverse Disability” for MS Patients

Read the original here:

A Stem Cell Transplant Let a Wheelchair-Bound Man Dance Again