12


Vaping advocacy group launches an art installation in Brussels to tell policymakers that flavours matter – Yahoo Finance

Flavours Matter mural in Brussels

Members of World Vapers Alliance hold the missing puzzle piece on the mural that says Flavours help smokers quit (Les Saveurs Aident les Fumeurs Arrter)

MEP Pietro Fiocchi attending Flavours Matter demonstration in Brussels

Members of World Vapers Alliance together with MEP Pietro Fiocchi in front of the mural that says Flavours Matter

Brussels, Belgium, May 11, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A global alliance of vapers gathered in Brussels today to call on European policymakers to stand against possible bans on vape flavours. The World Vapers Alliance (WVA) displayed an art installation in front of the European Parliament with a simple message Flavours help smokers quit.

This marks the third event of WVAs Europe-wide campaign #FlavoursMatter. The campaign was launched with one aim: to show policymakers in Europe and across the world that vape flavours are instrumental for smoking cessation. The group hosted demonstrations in Stockholm, Sweden and the Hague, Netherlands in March 2022. Shortly after the demonstration, a postponement of the dutch vape flavour ban by six months was announced in the Netherlands.

Flavours play a crucial role in helping consumers quit smoking millions of Europeans have already stopped by switching to vaping. The variety of flavours is one of the most important reasons many people switch to e-cigarettes and never go back to smoking. We have already seen that vaping works! It helped millions of people change their lives and now, we need policies to catch up. Therefore, we are delighted that some MEPs are with us and help to defend vaping flavours, says Michael Landl, director of World Vapers' Alliance.

The installation was attended by Member of the European Parliament Pietro Fiocchi.

We all agree that not smoking is the best choice, but we also know very well that tax increases and limitations are not working solutions! I do strongly believe that alternative systems to traditional smoking are the biggest instrument to greatly reduce the percentage of lung diseases and cancer! Any ideological approach against such systems is negative and against any scientific data!, said Fiocchi.

Consumers from across Europe can join the campaign to make their voices heard and also contact their political representatives via WVAs action centers and share their vaping stories to convince policymakers to avoid flavour bans: https://worldvapersalliance.com/flavours-matter/

Story continues

We need to raise our voice and tell policymakers about all the positive effects flavours play in helping smokers quit. The data shows that adults who vape flavoured e-cigarettes are 230% more likely to quit smoking than those who use unflavoured e-cigarettes, and we have to make sure that this is taken into account when the next regulations are drafted. That is why we are here in Brussels with one simple message: flavours matter! added Landl.

Attachments

Read the original here:

Vaping advocacy group launches an art installation in Brussels to tell policymakers that flavours matter - Yahoo Finance

Hawaii Bill to Ban Flavored Vapes Awaits Governor’s Signature – Filter

On May 3, the Hawaii House of Representatives passed legislation that would ban the sale of flavored vaping products. Previously passed by the Senate, the bill now moves to the desk of Governor David Ige, a Democrat. If he signs it, Hawaii will become the fifth state to prohibit flavored e-cigarettes, joining Rhode Island, New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts.

Described as surviving a rollercoaster legislative session by Honolulu Civil Beat, House Bill 1570 passed the House with the needed two-thirds majority36 state representatives voted in favor, 15 in oppositionand launched a debate that could pit the state against federal policy.

The lingering issue at hand concerns whether or not to retain the bills current PMTA exemptiona carveout, inserted by the Senate, to allow any flavored vaping products that might in future be authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), through its premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) process. Amid widespread scapegoating of flavors for a supposed youth vaping crisis, the FDA has authorized no flavored products so far.

The industry and consumer advocates, of course, oppose the bill on the grounds that it will strip from the market the flavored products that adults prefer to help them switch from cigarettesdeterring the adoption of safer products and prompting current vapers to potentially return to smoking. According to the CDC, Hawaiis Hispanic and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander populations have historically had the states highest smoking rates, and young adults smoke more than older adults. Around 1,400 people in Hawaii die of smoking-related causes each year.

The most zealous political supporters of a total ban, he said, are going so far as to poison-pill this bill so that they can come back in January without an exemption.

The supporters of the flavor ban appear split over the PMTA exemption. While some accept it as a logical compromise, public health nonprofits and some governmental bodies, including Hawaiis Department of Health, have argued that the exemption would favor tobacco companies with the resources to get FDA authorization for their vaping products. They therefore think the current bill doesnt go far enough, and want instead to prepare legislation that permanently bans all flavors, regardless of what the FDA decides. With the PMTA carveout, if any flavored vaping products achieve FDA authorizationa feat that seems increasingly improbablethose could legally be sold in Hawaii.

What blows my mind is youre seeing the state [potentially] superseding the FDA on public health decisions, Scott Rasak, the chief operating officer of JOCOR Distro, which distributes vaping products throughout Hawaii, told Filter. The most zealous political supporters of a total ban, he said, are going so far as to poison-pill this bill so that they can come back in January without an exemption in there. Its baffling to me.

Its currently uncertain, as Rasak explained, which way Governor Ige will go.

We havent made any progress on this issue in six-plus years of trying, Representative Scot Matayoshi, a Democrat who introduced the original vaping bill in January 2021, told Filter. This is the only bill thats made it this far.

I lost a fierce ally in the SenateSenator Roz Bakerwho is not running for re-election, so I dont think wed make much progress next year if this were to die completely, he continued. This is probably our last shot in the foreseeable future of doing this.

Rep. Yamane is not alone in finding the bill legally questionable.

Hawaiis flavor-ban bill has been contentious from the start. It has received outsized attention in recent months after state Representative Ryan Yamane, a Democrat who has gotten funds from tobacco and vaping companies, suggested adding amendments like establishing a standardized and scientific testing process to determine whether flavors are actually present in products. Yamane argued that the amendments would have prevented potential lawsuits. But he didnt get his wish, and thats how Hawaii ended up with the current version of the bill: The Senate assured Rep. Matayoshi that Yamanes amendments would be removed, and the body kept its promise, returning the bill essentially to its original form for a final House vote.

But Yamane is not alone in finding the bill legally questionable. The state attorney generals office has warned that it might be flawed in another way. Because the bill is titled Relating to the Youth Vaping Epidemic but also bans all flavored tobacco products, like menthol cigarettes, it may leave itself open to a constitutional challenge, as the Constitution of the State of Hawaii mandates that [e]ach law shall embrace but one subject, which shall be expressed in its title. All tobacco products, in other words, goes beyond the scope of the title.

Public health activist groups, as well as the anti-harm-reduction bureaucrats at the Hawaii Department of Health, are up in arms about the exemption for PMTA products, Greg Conley, the president of the American Vaping Association (AVA), told Filter. Their reasons for opposing this billnot enough products are bannedare diametrically opposed to ours, but we now appear to be on the same side. Governor Ige should veto this bill.

Photograph by Edmund Garman via Flickr/Creative Commons 2.0

AVA has provided donations to The Influence Foundation, which operates Filter. Filters Editorial Independence Policy applies.

Continued here:

Hawaii Bill to Ban Flavored Vapes Awaits Governor's Signature - Filter

How To Vape Responsibly At Concerts And Festivals – Metal Injection

Its nearly concert and festival season! With the sun shining and COVID-19 no longer cancelling plans, many people are now preparing to brave the crowds and make up for lost time.

If youre planning to vape at an upcoming concert or festival, it helps to know the rules that surround certain venues and locations. For venues that do allow e-cigarettes, adhering to vaping etiquette is essential. In this guide, well be sharing all of the tips, tricks and extra info you need to know about vaping at concerts and festivals to help you have the best possible experience.

While e-cigarettes are evidenced to be 95% less harmful than cigarettes, not all public spaces allow vaping, so make sure to double-check that the event youre going to does beforehand.

However, most if not all events will have a designated smoking and vaping area which is usually separate from the venue. Some venues may request that you make your way towards this area or they may ask you to step outside the venue entirely.

As a rule of thumb, avoid vaping in queues and enclosed spaces where your vapour can blow directly into other peoples faces. More on this below!

As vaping has become more socially accepted within recent years, travelling abroad with e-cigarettes and to events has become a lot easier. By practicing vaping social etiquette, youre helping to continue this support that the vaping community needs! Heres our top tips on how to enjoy vaping at music events while respecting those around you.

When youre vaping around others, its important to remain spatially aware and be mindful that not everyone will appreciate vapour being blown into their face. You may also want to pay attention to the weather if its a particularly windy day, the people in front of you or behind you could be met with a face full of unwanted vapour.

Before exhaling, take a moment to quickly check around you, and try blowing in the opposite direction of people if you can. That way, you can reduce the chances of annoying your fellow concert-goers. If all else fails, exhale upwards!

One of the major benefits of switching from smoking to vaping is the endless e-liquid flavour choice. From candy and dessert flavours to fruit, drinks, and more, the vaping industry has gone above and beyond when it comes to creativity.

Equally, vape kits have become part of this vast customisability. Theres now thousands of models to choose from, all designed for different needs and experience levels.

While not mandatory, we highly recommend bringing discreet e-liquids and vape devices such as pod kits and disposables. Since these types of devices are much more lightweight, youll be doing both yourself and others a favour!

Unless you were previously a heavy smoker, most vapers do not need to use their device constantly. If youre someone who vapers very frequently, you could try setting yourself various intervals in which you can vape for a period of time before putting it away. For example, you could vape heavily over the space of a couple of minutes and repeat this process every hour.

Stealth vaping is all about staying low-key. Theres nothing wrong with being a loud and proud vaper, but when youre in a crowd, this wont always go down well. Before attending your event, try practising some stealth vaping techniques.

One discreet vaping method is to lower your vapes battery power. Most if not all vape kits now allow you to easily adjust your devices battery power, which in turn will scale down your vapour. This wont necessarily affect the intensity of your flavours, but rather the amount of clouds that you produce.

Another well-known stealth vaping trick is to inhale and hold before exhaling. The longer you hold, the less visible the vapour will be when you exhale. Many vapers also choose to exhale through their nose while around large crowds of people.

Depending on where you are, you can always try to exhale into your clothing or into a tissue. This may feel slightly odd to begin with, but its a trick that most vapers master quickly.

Enter your e-mail below to get a daily update with all of our headlines.

Continued here:

How To Vape Responsibly At Concerts And Festivals - Metal Injection

Connecting The Community To Fight An Epidemic – liherald.com

by Marcella Bianco

(NAPSI)According to recent research by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 2 million middle- and high-school students use e-cigarettes. With the study conducted fully during the COVID-19 pandemic, this places U.S. youth in a pandemic and an epidemic.

Nicotine hurts the developing brain and this addiction can lead to others. Whats more, vaping increases a persons chance of experiencing complications from upper respiratory illnesses, and some researchers believe a relationship exists between vaping and serious respiratory impacts, such as those from COVID-19. While a network of solutions is required to overcome this epidemic, there are actions people can each take today.

Families play a critical role in influencing a childs decision-making. Parents and guardians can help keep their kids healthy by having thoughtful, factual conversations about the dangers of vaping. For assistance getting started, parents and guardians can turn to no-cost digital tools from Be Vape Freea nationwide initiative, built around the evidence-based CATCH My Breath program, that provides standards-aligned e-cigarette prevention resources for educators teaching grades 5-12 and families. Be Vape Free was created in partnership with the CVS Health Foundation, CATCH Global Foundation, and Discovery Education.

The parent toolkit is designed to give parents, guardians, educators, and community members the opportunity to learn more about the vaping epidemic, gauge a childs risk of trying e-cigarettes and find the best strategy to talk to kids about the dangers of e-cigarettes. Chock-full of facts and research, these resources have just about everything families need to empower students to live a healthy life. With the toolkit, families can answer key questions related to vaping including:

What is vaping?

Why do teens vape?

What do vapes look like?

What are in vapes?

What are the effects of vaping?

What are signs of vaping?

With this informational foundation, parents and guardians can connect with their kids to initiate conversations about the dangers of e-cigarettes based on facts. Togetherone conversation, one day, and one student at a timewe can end the vaping epidemic by arming young people with the tools they need to make healthy, smart decisions, and impart lessons that last a lifetime.

Ms Bianco is the National Program Director for the CATCH My Breath youth e-cigarette prevention program. She has 18 years of experience working in tobacco prevention and control with government and non-profit organizations.

Continue reading here:

Connecting The Community To Fight An Epidemic - liherald.com

Calgary convenience store faces dozens of charges related to sale of vaping products – Global News

A northeast business has been charged with selling vaping products to minors.

The owner and manager of Gemini Convenience Store in the Pineridge community face 42 counts of violating the Tobacco, Smoking and Vaping Reduction Act. Charges include selling vaping products to minors and failing to request ID from customers under 25.

Business license inspectors and the Calgary Police Service were involved in the investigation after members of the public complained to 311.

I would like to thank those that reached out to us via 311 and would encourage others to do the same, if they learn of a business selling smoking and vaping products to minors, Michael Briegel, the citys chief business license inspector, said in a statement. It is important that we protect the health of young people age requirements are in place for these products for a reason.

Trending Stories

Story continues below advertisement

If convicted, Maple Gifts and Confectionary Enterprise Ltd., Nupar Vasistha and Sudhakar Tandon could face fines of up to $10,000 for the first offence and $100,000 for subsequent ones.

The city also said it will conduct a business license review of Gemini Convenience, given the seriousness of the charges.

2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Excerpt from:

Calgary convenience store faces dozens of charges related to sale of vaping products - Global News

Over vaping devices, New Trier High School refers students to local police, who have issued dozens of tickets in last 3 years – The Record – The…

New Trier High School is among numerous Illinois schools that refer students to local law enforcement following certain on-campus transgressions, as revealed on April 28 in a thorough investigation by ProPublica and the Chicago Tribune.

The report explains how students in districts across the state face fines and court appearances for relatively minor in-school offenses, even though a state law prohibits schools from fining students as a form of discipline.

According to the reports findings, over the most recent three school years (2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21), Winnetka and Northfield police combined to issue 62 citations (Winnetka: 56; Northfield: 6) to New Trier students for violations occurring on school grounds.

School officials told The Record that a vast majority of the citations were part of an initiative to curb student use of vaping devices to consume nicotine and marijuana. Other districts in Illinois, according to the articles research, refer students to local law enforcement for violations such as truancy, littering and vulgar language, among other things.

A day after the investigation was published, Illinois State Board of Education Superintendent Dr. Carmen Ayala sent a letter to all Illinois school leaders, urging them to immediately stop enabling the fining of students.

Alaya wrote in the letter that fines can have a tangible impact on the safety, security, and wellbeing of an entire family and that multiple laws in Illinois intend to prohibit the ticketing of students as a form of discipline.

However, some schools have found loopholes between the Illinois School Code and the Municipal Code and abdicated their responsibility for student discipline to local law enforcement, she says.

New Trier Superintendent Dr. Paul Sally said the district will review its policies in response to Ayalas letter, but he does not believe referring offending students to police runs afoul of the state laws in all cases.

Sally added that he understands scrutiny for law-enforcement involvement in certain in-school offenses, such as truancy, but believes the districts policy to combat vaping devices aligns with the health and safety priorities of the community.

The shared interest for our community is keeping our adolescents healthy, Sally wrote in an email to The Record. The Village has a vested interest in partnering with us to put policies, procedures, and ordinances in place that promote and support the health and safety of our students. To that end, we follow local ordinances when it comes to engaging the police on violations such as nicotine and THC possession, and in the aim to help students learn and grow, the primary consequences the police use are community service and peer jury.

In 2018, Sally said, New Trier student usage of vaping devices more than doubled from 19 percent in both 2014 and 2016 to 42 percent leading to a new district strategy involving local law enforcement.

A district memo to the School Board in August 2018 mentions fines and court appearances as possible consequences for vape usage or possession.

To address this issue along with an increase in marijuana usage due to vaping, we made curricular and policy changes with the goal of educating students about the risks, helping them make informed choices, and when appropriate, providing a consequence, Sally wrote.

In the memo, Asst. Superintendent for Student Services Tim Hayes wrote that addressing the vaping concerns requires a community-wide approach and reported that beginning that school year the district would notify its school-resource officers who are employees of the local police departments when a student is found in possession of a vaping device or e-cigarette.

Our hope is that these citations will provide an additional incentive for students to cease using these devices, Hayes wrote.

Winnetka Police Chief Marc Hornstein said the school resource officers have discretion on whether to issue a citation, which may include a fine if the offending student is under the age of 18. A fine does not accompany a marijuana citation, he said, but $75 is the departments standard fine for underage tobacco use. Hornstein added, however, that in most cases fines are waived in favor of community service or peer jury deliberation. A court hearing fee of $40, though, may still apply.

Sally said that the strategy has reduced student vaping on school grounds.

Hornstein told The Record that the Winnetka Police Department does not typically work with Winnetka Public Schools District 36 to issue tickets to students. Neither does the Wilmette Police Department, according to Chief Kyle Murphy, who said most Wilmette schools handle disciplinary issues in-house and the goal of both the district and police department is to avoid citing students unless it is necessary to open the door for a specific course of action.

Officials from Glencoe D35 and Avoca D37 agreed and said they do not refer minor in-school violations to local police.

The Record is a nonprofit, nonpartisan community newsroom that relies on reader support to fuel its independent local journalism.

Subscribe to The Record to fund responsible news coverage for your community.

Already a subscriber? You can make a tax-deductible donation at any time.

Follow this link:

Over vaping devices, New Trier High School refers students to local police, who have issued dozens of tickets in last 3 years - The Record - The...

Editorial: It’s already too easy to addict kids to vaping. SC bill would make it worse. – Charleston Post Courier

Over the weekend, a coalition of public health groups ran full-page ads in The Post and Courier and other S.C. newspapers warning against an effort in the state Senate to strip cities and counties of their right to do a job the Legislature refuses to do: regulating tobacco company efforts to addict teens.

The American Cancer Society, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and American Lung and Heart associations worry that the Senate will use the confusion of the final few days of the legislative session to pass H.3681, which would prohibit local governments from regulating cigarette, vape or other tobacco flavors or ingredients, and block these governments from requiring local licenses to sell tobacco products.

On its face, the bill appears long dead. Although the House passed it in 2021 and the Senate pulled it out of committee without so much as a public hearing, its been stuck on the Senate contested calendar for more than a year. Thats normally a sure sign of a bill thats going nowhere absent a compromise that all sides buy into. Normally, but not always.

Public health officials are concerned that the bill will suddenly be resurrected and passed this week. That might sound paranoid, but its actually quite common for lawmakers to wait until the end of the session to try to sneak through legislation they know the public would oppose. Activists say theyre hearing too much buzz about H.3681 to ignore. (And yes, we realize that it's popular for special-interest groups to claim to be under attack when theyre really not in order to raise money, but the anti-tobacco advocates arent trying to raise money; theyve been at the Statehouse furiously working the Senate to prevent the legislation from being brought back to life.)

So while we hope any effort to sneak the legislation onto Gov. Henry McMasters desk will fizzle and that if it doesnt, hell veto it its worth taking the time to explain what H.3681 is all about.

Its supporters say they want to ensure that tobacco laws are uniform across the state, but in fact they have fought efforts to have a uniform statewide law that would help enforce the law that prohibits tobacco use by minors. H.3754 would treat tobacco sales more like alcohol sales, requiring businesses to get a license to sell the products and empowering the state to revoke those licenses if they dont guard against selling tobacco to minors. Thats important because, according to the American Heart Association, three-quarters of kids who try to buy tobacco products succeed.

Tobacco companies have kept the tobacco licensing bill locked in subcommittee for two years because uniform tobacco laws isnt their goal. Their goal is to ensure that nothing is done in South Carolina to reduce sales of tobacco products even products that are deliberately manipulated to entice children to use them.

South Carolina has one of the nation's highest rates of teen nicotine use, and vaping has powered an uptick in youth tobacco use nationally. The CDC says nearly all high school students who use tobacco products use flavored products, so that's why some local governments want to prohibit the sales of such products.

The vaping pre-emption bill also is the latest in a long string of bills to strip elected city and county council members of the right to govern their communities. Such bills start out with a leg up at the Statehouse regardless of the underlying topic because too many legislators believe they know more about what should happen in local communities than the people who are elected to govern those communities.

Either the assault on local governments or the assault on public health would be reason enough to let this legislation die when the Legislature adjourns Thursday. The combination of the two makes it nearly criminal that anyone would seriously consider pushing it into law.

See more here:

Editorial: It's already too easy to addict kids to vaping. SC bill would make it worse. - Charleston Post Courier

Britain May Officially License Vapes as Smoking Cessation Medical Products – Vaping Post

The British Medical Association supports these developments and has suggested that e-cigarettes are licensed as medicine.

In my review I have considered a range of critical interventions that will make the most difference. For example, Ive looked at the promotion of vaping as a less harmful alternative; a greater role for the NHS in ending smoking and the need to tackle illicit tobacco sales, said Khan in response to his appointment.

Tobacco is the single largest cause of preventable illness and death, with a quarter of deaths from all cancers estimated to be from smoking in 2019. Despite national progress such as the ban on indoor smoking implemented in 2007, smoking remains very high in certain parts of the country particularly in poorer areas.

I have been tasked by the Health and Social Care Secretary to help the government achieve its ambition to be smokefree by 2030. The evidence is clear that taking action on smoking will be critical to dramatically improving the health and wealth of the nation.

The UK has long been a leader in endorsing the use of safer alternative nicotine products for smoking cessation, and as a result the nation has the lowest smoking rates ever recorded since cigarettes arrived on the scene decades ago.

Back in 2017 the UK governments document released last Summer, Towards a Smokefree Generation, A Tobacco Control Plan for England, encouraged different localities to develop their own tobacco control strategies, with a focus on e-cigarettes and other harm reduction or smoking cessation aides

The British Medical Association supports these developments and has suggested that e-cigarettes are licensed as medicine, allowing doctors to recommend them to smokers trying to quit.

Read Further: Express

UK: Free Vapes Given to Homeless Smokers as Part of Quit-Smoking Trial

View original post here:

Britain May Officially License Vapes as Smoking Cessation Medical Products - Vaping Post

Counties, boards of education joining to sue over underage vaping – Huntington Herald Dispatch

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Go here to read the rest:

Counties, boards of education joining to sue over underage vaping - Huntington Herald Dispatch

Vaping Regulation Threatens a Lifesaving Smoking Alternative – Reason

Electronic cigarettes, which deliver nicotine without tobacco or combustion, are the most important harm-reducing alternative to smoking ever developed, one that couldpreventmillions of premature deaths in the U.S. alone. Yet bureaucrats and politicians seem determined tonegatethat historic opportunity through regulations and taxes that threaten to cripple the industry.

In October, seven years after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officially declared its intention to regulate "electronic nicotine delivery systems" (ENDS), the agency finally approved one such product. But the FDA, which has rejected applications for millions of other vaping products, still seems inclined to ban the e-liquid flavors that former smokers overwhelmingly prefer. Why? Because teenagers also like them.

The FDA authorized the marketing of R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company's Vuse Solo device, along with two tobacco-flavored cartridges. It said the company had presented enough evidence to conclude that the products "could benefit addicted adult smokers" by "reducing their exposure to harmful chemicals." But at the same time, the FDA rejected 10 applications for Vuse Solo cartridges in other flavors.

According to survey data, three-quarters of adult vapers prefer flavors other than tobacco. But because those flavors also appeal to teenagers, the FDAsays, they will be approved only if manufacturers present "robust," "reliable," and "product-specific" evidence that their benefits in helping smokers quit outweigh the risk that they will encourage underage vaping.

R.J. Reynolds, whose Vuse products account fornearly a third ofthe ENDS market, is a large company that had the resources to conduct the sort of expensive research demanded by the FDA.The fact that it was nevertheless unable to overcome the agency's bias against flavored ENDS did not bode well for other manufacturers or for consumers who value variety.

Under federal law, the FDA is supposed to decide whether approving a vaping product is "appropriate for the protection of public health," taking into account "the risks and benefits to the population as a whole." While that collectivist calculus is both morally dubious and highly subjective, it at least suggests that the FDA is expected to weigh the benefits of flavored e-liquids, measured in smoking-related death and disease these products could help prevent, against the costs of the underage vaping they might encourage. Instead, the FDA seems bent on rejecting any ENDS in flavors that are popular among teenagers, even when the main consumers are adults.

Survey dataindicate that the vast majority of teenagers who vape regularly are current or former smokers. That means the FDA'sfearthat ENDS are causing an "epidemic" of adolescent nicotine addiction is overblownespecially since vaping by teenagers dropped substantially in 2019 and 2020, a development the agency prefers to ignore. There is even less reason to think vaping is a significant "gateway" to smoking among teenagers who otherwise never would have tried nicotine. If anything,recent trendssuggest the availability of ENDS has accelerated the downward trend in adolescent smoking.

The folly of the obsession with preventing underage vaping was apparent in San Francisco, where a 2018 ban on flavored ENDS seems to haveboostedsmoking by teenagers and young adults. That cautionary example has not deterred other jurisdictions fromconsideringthe same counterproductive policy.

In case heavy-handed federal and local regulations are not enough to stop smokers from quitting, House Democrats have proposedexcise taxesthat would double or triple the retail price of e-liquids. "This tax will not only kill my business," a Georgia vape shop owner toldReason's Christian Britschgi. "It will kill Americans."

In an AugustAmerican Journal of Public Healtharticle, 15 prominent tobacco researcherswarnedthat "policies intended to reduce adolescent vaping," including flavor bans, "may also reduce adult smokers' use of e-cigarettes in quit attempts." Theyemphasizedthat "the potential lifesaving benefits of e-cigarettes for adult smokers deserve attention equal to the risks to youths."

That article summarized "a growing body of evidence" that "vaping can foster smoking cessation." Yet Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (DIll.), who wrote a bill he called the END ENDS Act, insists "there's simply no evidence that vapes help [smokers] quit." He also claims to believe "adults can do what they want," which is likewise demonstrably false given the severe restrictions he favors.

Although the FDAacknowledgesthe harm-reducing potential of ENDS, in practice it is giving that benefit short shrift. Other policy makers, meanwhile, are proceeding as if the lives of smokers count for nothing.

Read more:

Vaping Regulation Threatens a Lifesaving Smoking Alternative - Reason

US: First County in Oregon Bans The Sales of Flavoured Vaping Products US: First County in Oregon Bans The Sales of Flavoured Vaping Products – Vaping…

Violators are subject to a Class A civil infraction which could equate to a fine of up to $2,000 for individuals or $4,000 for corporations.

Under the new ordinance, violations are subject to a Class A civil infraction issued by a county code enforcement officer. This could equate to a fine of up to $2,000 for individuals or $4,000 for corporations. Even though the vote was not unanimous, we clearly heard each commissioner express agreement that the use of tobacco substances is harmful and marketing strategies that aggressively target anyone in our communityespecially young people and marginalized groupsare unacceptable, said Harrington.

Im confident that this step forward, along with the roll out of statewide tobacco retail licensing requirements, will serve to protect the health of all Washington County residents, added the chair.

Earlier this year, the Oregon Senate approved House Bill 2261, a measure banning online sales of vaping products. An earlier article on Vaping Post by Michael McGrady, had explained that naturally this move is significant for vapers and vape businesses alike. Meanwhile in 2020, a flavour ban proposed by Oregon Governor Kate Brown was killed, and a program to license all nicotine retailers was put forward instead.

Oregon Measure Proposing E-Cig Tax is Up For Voting

Link:

US: First County in Oregon Bans The Sales of Flavoured Vaping Products US: First County in Oregon Bans The Sales of Flavoured Vaping Products - Vaping...

What youve been vaping for: MGC Pharma now has the first-ever Cannabinoid vape available as an unapprov … – Stockhead

The TGA nod is the first ever in Australia. A breakthrough which gives MGC Pharma partner EXTRAX credibility, access and a huge head start into a unique market.

Note the date, the Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) has just approved Australias first ever CBD-based vape product.

The TGA gave European cannabis extracts company, EXTRAX, a partner of MGC Pharma (ASX:MXC), approval for its pre-filled vapes to be sold here in Australia, under Category 2: CBD dominant medicinal cannabis product as an unapproved therapeutic good, on valid prescription from a medical practitioner.

The EXTRAX vapes contain hemp extract with 80% cannabinoids, with MGC Pharma being the Australian importer and manufacturer.

EXTRAX is the brainchild of founder Alla Kuznetsova, a wellness and CBD specialist whos been involved in developing different herbal products based on cannabis extracts for over five years.

The blurb says all EXTRAX products are big on five core elements Balance, Calm, Dream, Elate, and Focus a process the company says provides balance and connection to mind, body and soul through natural herbal extracts.

Something Australians can now determine for themselves.

Todays TGA approval isnt just a landmark achievement for MGC Pharma and EXTRAX but also provides certified credibility for EXTRAX cannabis-based vape products as they look to enter other markets.

MGC Pharma says the approval is testament to the partnerships rigorous pharmaceutical standards which sees both companies gain first mover access into the significant Australian CBD vape market.

This is a great step for MGC Pharma and for EXTRAX, and has been achieved through the hard work and dedication of Nicole Godresse, our Global Sales Officer, says MGC Pharma CEO Roby Zomer.

As the importer and manufacturer of EXTRAX pre-filled vapes in Australia, this becomes the latest addition to MGC Pharmas extensive pharmaceutical and consumer product range.

Our range is growing in size and quality, and this heralds a new future of cannabis consumption both in-country and further afield, Zomer said.

MGC Pharma continues to ramp up its market presence across the world.

The company is currently building up its manufacturing and global distribution capacity in Europe, after completing its new production facility in Malta.

The opening of the new facility will create a European manufacturing hub for MXCs lead drug CimetrA, as well as for other liquid form dose medicines.

CimetraA is in late clinical development, and has been proven to contain anti-inflammatory properties that could fight COVID-19.

In the US, MGC Pharma works with distributor AMC Holdings to sell its products into the largest market in the world.

Under the partnership deal, AMC will seek to obtain the necessary US regulatory approval, and to commercialise CimetrA as quickly as possible in the country.

MGC Pharma has also been given the green light to import CimetrA into India, a crucial step to being granted Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for COVID-19 treatment.

Leading Indian pharmaceutical manufacturer Medopharm has been appointed to import and market CimetrA in India.

This article was developed in collaboration with MGC Pharma, a Stockhead advertiser at the time of publishing.

This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions.

Get the latest Stockhead news delivered free to your inbox.

It's free. Unsubscribe whenever you want.

You might be interested in

See more here:

What youve been vaping for: MGC Pharma now has the first-ever Cannabinoid vape available as an unapprov ... - Stockhead

The obscure UN conflab that seeks to cut off the world from vaping and harm reduction – The Parliament Magazine

While most popular attention this month has been on the vital discussions at the United Nations COP26 Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, there is an equally important UN conference happening in Geneva that also contemplates the fate of millions of lives.

There are also questions on the importance of science, the role of activists and industry, and how humanity can forget a better path based on common agreements to be implemented in each country.

This year, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, an obscure World Health Organization treaty dedicated to eradicating tobacco use, is having its ninth iteration, known as COP9 in Switzerland.

At this conference, 168 member delegations as well as a narrowly selected group of tobacco control advocates participate in discussions and debates to forge global standards on taxation, restrictions, and rules on tobacco products.

While no one would object to these goals, the conference threatens to put one of the largest public health victories in recent memory at stake: tobacco harm reduction by innovative technologies.

Though the well-documented scientific evidence on the life-saving potential of smokers switching to less harmful vaping devices is clear and undeniable, it is one scientific fact that is ignored or denied throughout the event.

As I have uncovered in my two trips to the COP FCTC event, one of the most dogmatic conclusions of the event organizers is that they consider nicotine vaping devices, what they label Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (or ENDS), as ordinary tobacco products that should be as harshly taxed, regulated, and eventually eradicated from the market altogether.

It is this nuance that alternative harm reducing technologies like vaping or heat-not-burn devices pose the same threat as traditional cigarettes that so animates activists, former smokers, and some health officials who criticise the FCTC and its proceedings. Not to mention the yearly mission of several delegations to completely bar journalists and media from any of the debates.

Considering that many countries represented have embraced policies that elevate harm reduction and acceptance of vaping at home, including the United Kingdom, Canada, France, and New Zealand, it is perhaps most frustrating that this nuance is stopped at the door and reiterated by the power brokers at COP.

What makes COP9 FCTC different from its climate change cousin is the elevated role of public health lobbies and advocacy groups throughout the proceeding.

Groups such as the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention, and the Framework Convention Alliance on Tobacco Control are the recognised NGOs that are able to intervene in parts of the discussions and help set the agenda.

Billionaire Michael Bloomberg has pledged millions directly to these organizations and similar entities, with hopes that any tobacco-related products including vaping devices are regulated, restricted, and banned. It is no surprise, then, that any efforts to recognise the life-saving potential of vaping devices are blocked immediately.

These lobby groups have routinely been caught bribing and funding various political bodies in developing nations with the goal of restricting and banning vaping devices.

Whats more, they often bully and shame delegations if they do not adopt a strict prohibitionist attitude on tobacco alternatives like vaping, awarding countries like the Philippines, Honduras, or Guatemala with Dirty Ashtray awards for insisting on amendments with unhelpful and often confusing wording or for requesting further discussion on various amendments.

The Filipino delegation, in their video statement to open the conference, said that it was important to recognise vaping devices and products that deliver a similar satisfaction but with far less harm.

The recognition of this fact and the potential to save millions of smokers lives by the delegations at the FCTCs COP9 is realistically the most pressing issue that should be addressed. It is one that millions of vapers, who have added years to their life by switching away from tobacco, should have represented in an international body.

Whether delegations will understand this key point, and whether they will embrace science over prohibitionist ideology, however, remains to be seen.

This articlereflects the views of the author andnotthe views of The Parliament Magazine or of the Dods Group

Read the original:

The obscure UN conflab that seeks to cut off the world from vaping and harm reduction - The Parliament Magazine

ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-1286) In Certain Oil-Vaping Cartridges – Intellectual Property – United States – Mondaq News Alerts

10 November 2021

Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On November 4, 2021, the ITC issued aNotice ofInvestigationinCertain Oil-Vaping Cartridges,Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same(Inv. No. 337-TA-1286).

By way of background, this investigation is based on an October4, 2021complaintfiled by Shenzhen SmooreTechology Limited of China ("Smoore") alleging aviolation of section 337 by 38 respondents in the U.S., Canada, andHong Kong in the unlawful importation and/or sale in the U.S. ofcertain oil-vaping cartridges, components thereof, and productscontaining the same by reason of infringement of (1) certain claimsof Patent No. 10,357,623 ("the '623 patent"); U.S.Patent No. 10,791,763 ("the '763 patent"); U.S.Patent No. 10,791,762 ("the '762 patent"); and U.S.Registered Trademark No. 5,633,060 ("the '060mark").

According to the complaint, the '623 patent relatesgenerally to a vaporizer/atomizer device, which includes a liquidstorage cavity, where that cavity expressly excludes the presenceof a wick or other liquid-storage medium; the '763 patentrelates generally to a vaporizer/atomizer device, which includes aliquid storage cavity open at a mouthpiece end to the outsidebefore a mouthpiece is installed; and the '762 patent relatesgenerally to an electronic cigarette that includes avaporizer/atomizer assembly and a liquid storage cavity. The'060 mark is a standard character CCELL mark under which Smooremarkets, advertises, and sells vaporizer products, such aselectronic cigarettes, oral vaporizers for smokers, and vaporizescartridges. The accused products are atomizers, cartridges,mouthpieces, vaporizers, and vaping products used to inhalecannabidiol ("CBD") and/or marinal("THC"). Smoore is requesting that the Commissionissue limited exclusion orders and permanent cease-and-desistorders directed to respondents. According to the Notice ofInvestigation, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations willparticipate as a party in the investigation. Lastly, ChiefALJ Charles E. Bullock issued anoticeindicating that ALJ Clark S. Cheneywill preside in the investigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a generalguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soughtabout your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States

Obhan & Associates

Trademarks Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of India, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries

Milbank LLP

The article also examines the 30 Federal Circuit cases, including their exemplary patent claims, that found eligibility upon Alice challenges.

View post:

ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-1286) In Certain Oil-Vaping Cartridges - Intellectual Property - United States - Mondaq News Alerts

The Relationship Between Vaping and Mental Health – Vaping Post

Smokers on psychotropic drugs tend to need higher doses of nicotine.

Research has also indicated that nicotine also alters the coping mechanism in the brain increasing sensitivity to stress. This creates a vicious cycle meaning that this sensitivity is increased as nicotine is consumed in higher doses, which in turns leads to more nicotine consumption.

In fact, data keep indicating that mental health patients are more likely to smoke than individuals who do not suffer from psychological or psychiatric conditions. Moreover, these individuals are more likely to find it harder to quit. To this effect, they benefit greatly from having extra support in relation to smoking cessation and access to safer alternatives, that would at least lessen the chances of them also suffering from smoke-related conditions.

On the other hand, a recent report by former stop-smoking service manager in the UK, Louise Ross, the third in a series of five, said that nicotine is not what kills smokers and highlighted the importance of improving the understanding that e-cigarettes are substantially safer than smoking, and can be used to help smokers quit.

She added that nurses are in an especially good position to promote smoking cessation. Given that studies have indicated that smokers respond well to intensive smoking cessation treatments that are tailor made for their needs, explained Ross, nurses who understand individual patients needs are ideally placed to give ongoing smoking cessation support.

Moreover, she underlined, smokers on psychotropic drugs tend to need higher doses of nicotine. The tar (and not the nicotine) in tobacco smoke also increases the need for higher doses of some psychotropic medications, so stopping smoking enables some people to be prescribed a lower dose and experience fewer side-effects (NCSCT, 2018).

The Link Between Smoking, Vaping and Psychological Well-Being in the US

View original post here:

The Relationship Between Vaping and Mental Health - Vaping Post

Three differences between vaping cartridges and raw concentrates – The GrowthOp

Breadcrumb Trail Links

Although vaping THC cartridges is easier for many cannabis users, vaping concentrates has increased in popularity.

Author of the article:

It seems that vaping cannabis has become just as popular as rolling a blunt or taking a bong hit in recent years. Part of the reason for this may be that there are so many different forms of vaporizing weed. Additionally, vaping cannabis offers a level of convenience thats hard to top.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

For people who are just beginning to familiarize themselves with the world of vaping cannabis products, some of the terminology can get confusing. Thats especially the case when determining whether or not its best to go with a vape pen or a wax pen.

While a vape pen can be used with any cartridge having 510 threading, wax pens require users to have their own concentrates to use. Here are some other key differences between vaping cartridges and raw concentrates.

One of the biggest differences between vaping raw concentrates and vaping THC cartridges is the fact that cartridges are essentially plug and play. After affixing it to the battery, users are ready to find the temperature that works for them and begin taking hits from their device.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Concentrates are a different story. To properly vape concentrates, users must apply their concentrates directly into the pen itself, which can leave excess residue behind if not done properly. Another downfall is that sometimes the pen may not burn the concentrates all the way, which leaves behind sticker residue that is difficult to clean.

Although vaping THC cartridges is easier for many cannabis users, vaping concentrates has increased in popularity for good reason. While the primary ingredient in vape cartridges is THC distillate, in the U.S, there are numerous cutting ingredients such as coconut oil and other potentially harmful ingredients like heavy metals.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

On the other hand, vaping concentrates offers users the opportunity to consume pure concentrates, free of any additives. The fact that the individual consumers add the concentrate themselves provides more peace of mind that the product being consumed is safer than potentially harmful cartridges.

Since consumers choosing to vape concentrates rather than cartridges are able to use more sophisticated devices, they are often left to do more maintenance than counterparts who use disposable vape pens with 510 threading.

When regularly using a wax pen to vape concentrates, consumers should be aware they will likely need to replace parts of their device, such as the atomizer and the coil. That can be a tricky process depending on the type of wax pen.

Consumers who prefer to vape THC cartridges dont have to worry about much maintenance with their devices since they can simply discard their pen and get a new one once it starts to show signs of decline.

While most people think theres no big difference between vaping concentrates and THC cartridges, there are a few key characteristics that help to tell them apart. This can make life easier when trying to determine whether its best for the user to buy a wax pen that can vaporize concentrates or a vape pen just for cartridges.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

The FreshToast.com , a U.S. lifestyle site that contributes lifestyle content and, with their partnership with 600,000 physicians via Skipta, medical marijuana information to The GrowthOp.

Subscribe to Weekend Dispensary , a new weekly newsletter from The GrowthOp.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Sign-up for Weekend Dispensary to get the latest cannabis news and exclusive articles delivered straight to your inbox.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Weekend Dispensary will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

See the original post here:

Three differences between vaping cartridges and raw concentrates - The GrowthOp

Taxing Vapes Is Better Than Leaving It Unregulated – The Rakyat Post

Subscribe to ourTelegramchannel for the latest stories and updates.

So long story short, in October, Finance Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz noted the governmentsplanin Budget 2022 to hike up the excise duty imposed on liquid or gel products for vaping and it also includes those that contain nicotine.

This would effectively increase the tax rate from RM0.40 for each millilitre of liquid or gel products to RM1.20 per millilitre, starting 1 January 2022.

Just like how a sin tax on sugary drinks can reduce societys risk of contracting non-communicable diseases like obesity, diabetes and heart disease, it is not uncommon to see taxation on vaping products.

But in this case, some countries prefer no taxation at all to harness the full potential of vaping products and incentivise smokers to switch to the less harmful product.

The Malaysian Public Health Physicians Association (PPPKAM) President Datuk Dr Zainal Ariffin Omar,describedthe decision to expand sin tax to include vaping products as a commendable plan, while Dr Koh Kar Chai, president of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA)explainedthat the tax couldnt have come sooner.

Taxation is a pragmatic approach to regulate the products, reduce their overall consumption and improve overall public health, besides having the bonus of generating revenue for the country.

The Federation of Private Medical Practitioners Associations Malaysia (FPMPAM) President Dr Steven Chow Kim Wengstressedthat strict regulations must first come into play before the country begins installing this new tax framework.

The association agrees thattobacco harm reduction (THR)strategies that encourage cigarette smokers to switch to vaping products as a less harmful alternative to their habits must be supervised and studied to implement better regulations in the future.

FPMPAM say that the adoption of THR strategies would reduce health risks contributed by cigarette smoking and save Malaysia billions of ringgit in treating smoking-related diseases.

This opinion is also agreed by Dr Arifin Fii, a local specialist in addiction therapy, whosaidthat THR presents itself as a practical solution to counter the prevalence of smoking.

The use of vaping products has been globally accepted as the prefered choice for people to put out their cigarettes and allow them to safely transition to a less harmful means of quitting the habit for good.

So it stands to reason that the government should endeavour to regulate and introducepoliciesto better promote THR here in Malaysia to make vaping products regulated with controls to ensure products meet safety and quality standards for consumers.

Read More: Just How Regulated Is Malaysias Vape Industry? Lets Look Past The Smoke Screen

Share your thoughts with us via TRPsFacebook,Twitter, andInstagram.

Typing out trending topics and walking the fine line between deep and dumb.

Continued here:

Taxing Vapes Is Better Than Leaving It Unregulated - The Rakyat Post

Cost of cannabis: Vaping THC dramatically increases risk of psychosis – Midland Daily News

A recent study by a Grand Rapids physician found that the use of e-cigarettes to vape tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) places people at a significantly increased risk for the development of psychotic disorders.

Research has previously shown that individuals who consume THC are three times as likely as those who do not to develop a psychotic disorder, said Dr. Chad Percifield, author of the study. Vaping solutions increase this risk more than sixfold due to the potency of the vaping solution, which on average contains 52% THC versus the 13% THC contained in the marijuana flower.

The increased risk of psychosis is especially noteworthy when considering trends in e-cigarette use among adolescents.

The use of modified electronic cigarettes and unregulated black-market devices to vape THC, the mind-altering (i.e. psychoactive) compound in marijuana, has been increasing in recent years.

This is because vaping THC is inconspicuous, odorless and more convenient when compared to traditional means of smoking THC.

Its a growing problem, Percifield said. In 2019, 46% of high school seniors reported vaping of some kind, up from 34% in 2016. More significantly, 21% of those surveyed in 2019 stated they vape marijuana, more than doubling the figure from a similar 2017 survey. Of all those who vape, over 60% said they do it to experiment.

Percifields research findings note that the known impact of THC consumption on development of psychosis, the high potency of THC vaping solutions compounded with the increased use of e-cigarettes among adolescents place that population at an increasing risk of psychiatric illness.

His report presents the case of a 20-year-old woman with a history of major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe and heavy THC use by vaping who had two inpatient treatments separated by 2 weeks. Her first admission was for suicidal ideation and was preceded by ICU treatment for vaping-related lung injury. Her second admission followed a suicide attempt by several methods including stabbing, electrocution and ingestion. The patient was noted to be exhibiting psychotic features during her second admission. The patient was stabilized on quetiapine 600 mg nightly, fluoxetine 60 mg daily and gabapentin 100 mg daily prn anxiety and discharged home.

There is little research regarding mental health consequences of vaping THC, but considering the high potency of vaping solutions, an increased risk of THC-induced psychosis and schizophrenia spectrum disorders should be considered, according to Percifield.

His findings back up research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The human brain continues to develop from before birth into the mid-20s and is vulnerable to the effects of addictive substances. Frequent marijuana use during adolescence increases the risk for and early onset of psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia, according to the CDC.

The risk for psychotic disorders increases with frequency of use and potency of the marijuana product, according to a recent Surgeon Generals Advisory: Marijuana Use and the Developing Brain.

The amount of drug used, the age at first use and genetic vulnerability have all been shown to influence this relationship. The strongest evidence to date concerns links between marijuana use and psychiatric disorders in those with a preexisting genetic or other vulnerability, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Research shows that many adolescents vape to experiment just to try it out. Others report they vape because it tastes good. Its critically important; however, that we increase awareness that vaping can have long-lasting effects on both physical and mental health, Percifield added. "Adolescents who vape, especially if vaping marijuana, are placing themselves at an exponentially increased risk of developing a psychotic disorder, and that can have a lifelong impact."

So, what is psychosis?

Most people think of psychosis as a break with reality. In a way it is.

Psychosis is a condition that affects the way your brain processes information and it causes you to lose touch with reality. It can make it difficult for people to recognize what is real and what isnt, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness.

Psychosis is a symptom, not an illness, and it is more common than you may think. As many as 3 in 100 people will have an episode at some point in their lives. Psychosis includes a range of symptoms but typically involves one of these two major experiences, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness.

Hallucinations are seeing, hearing or feeling things that arent there, such as the following:

Hearing voices (auditory hallucinations). Strange sensations or unexplainable feelings. Seeing glimpses of objects or people that are not there or distortions.

Delusions are strong beliefs that are not consistent with the persons culture, are unlikely to be true and may seem irrational to others, such as the following:

Believing external forces are controlling thoughts, feelings and behaviors. Believing that trivial remarks, events or objects have personal meaning or significance. Thinking you have special powers, are on a special mission or even that you are God.

Psychosis is not always permanent.

Psychosis can be treated and early treatment increases the chance of a successful recovery; studies have shown that it is common for a person to have symptoms for more than a year before receiving treatment. Reducing this duration of untreated psychosis is crucial because early treatment often equals a better recovery. Traditional treatment involves psychotherapy and medication, according to the National Institute of Mental Health.

Psychosis can be related to several mental conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder and substance use disorders, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness.

Continue reading here:

Cost of cannabis: Vaping THC dramatically increases risk of psychosis - Midland Daily News

State AGs Want Flavored Vapes and Other Products Banned – WGRT Local News

Youth nicotine use has not gone away, even with decades of campaigning to educate kids about the dangers of addiction. In fact, there is an ongoing surge in the use of e-cigarettes, or vaping.

A coalition of Attorneys General, including Michigans, are asking the Food and Drug Administration to regulate the industry and stop allowing flavors that appeal to kids and to stop selling things like nicotine pouches, gum, and lozenges. They also want to tighten up marketing restrictions and age verification measures.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel said, The youth nicotine epidemic is an urgent public health matter and it is on us to ensure that the health and safety of our youth is not jeopardized. I urge the FDA to take immediate action and use its regulatory powers to impose restrictions on these products that are harming our young people.

The marketing that the AGs are trying to stop seems to be very successful. Vaping has gone up from 1.5 percent of high schoolers in 2011 to 27.5 percent in 2019. Eighty percent of young people who use e-cigarettes choose candy, mint, or fruit flavors.

The FDA could rule on September 9th of this year as to the future of flavored vapes and other high-nicotine products.

Reporting for WGRT Jennie McClelland

See original here:

State AGs Want Flavored Vapes and Other Products Banned - WGRT Local News

Time to talk to your teen about vaping? | by Washington State Department of Health | Public Health Connection | Aug, 2021 – Venture Views

There are many dangers associated with vaping. Vapes contain harmful chemicals like nicotine that can harm brain development. And young people who use e-cigarettes may be more likely to smoke cigarettes in the future.

The good news is that the 2020 National Youth Tobacco Survey showed that youth e-cigarette use decreased during the pandemic. However, 3.6 million youth still vape. And as young people return to classrooms, the pressure to vape with friends also returns.

Parents, teachers, and adults can help young people make informed decisions. By keeping yourself informed, you can know what to say when the topic comes up. The earlier and more often you speak with young people about e-cigarettes, the more likely they are to listen.

Live Vape Free is a new program from Optum and the Department of Health. It offers practical advice that can help you talk with your teen about vaping. Its a self-guided program with videos, downloadable materials, and 1-on-1 support. Its structured approach is based on 35 years of physical, psychological, and behavioral health science.

Live Vape Free provides:

Sign up and start your self-guided learning at doh.wa.gov/livevapefree.

Read this article:

Time to talk to your teen about vaping? | by Washington State Department of Health | Public Health Connection | Aug, 2021 - Venture Views



12