Predictions for the 2020s, From a Futurist, a Trend Forecaster and an Astrologer – Vogue

Astrologically, the new decade really doesnt start until the end of this year, on December 21. Every 20 years, Saturn and Jupiter meet. I have learned theyre happy to see each other. They set the tone for the coming 20 years, for culture, for fashion, for government, for literature, for the pace of our days, and our focus.

Jupiter and Saturn are important because theyre in the middle of the solar system. For the past 200 years, theyve always met in earth signs. It was Taurus, and Virgo, and Capricorn. This year, we have a name for it astrologers always call everything terrible namesits called the Grand Mutation. It sounds like the Ebola virus, but its not. Thats when theres a change in element. Saturn and Jupiter are going into air [signs]. Theyre aligning in Aquarius. It has a pretty huge effect on civilization.

The past 200 years, we saw the assembly line, the booming of manufacturing, and the industrial age. These are all earthy things, things you can buy, see, and touch. Now, when we move into the next 20 years where Aquarius is going to dominate, it will be the real flowering of the Age of Aquarius, like the 1960sflower power children. Its a lighter influence, a nonmaterialistic sign.

What Im really excited about is Aquarius likes to work in groups. To tackle big problems, like the environment, people will work across nations. It will no longer be, Well, the United States against France, against Germany, against China. No. These countries will work together in teams to tackle big problems that affect us all. Are the robots coming? Yes. But also, some very wonderful things with medicine.

Saturn, right now, is in Capricorn. Whenever you get a lot of Capricorn planets, you always get a conservative wind blowing through the world. You see it with Brexit, you see it here. In the late 80s and early 90s, there were a lot of planets in Capricorn. We had George Bush as president, and Ronald Reagan. We did in 2016, and Mr. Trump got in. With the next election, its sort of half and half, so its way too early to call. Its not destiny. People say, Whos going to win? I have no idea. We have to vote.

In 1982, Saturn and Jupiter met in an air sign. For the next 20 years, they were in air. Babies born in those years, from 1982 to 2000, those babies are going to lead the brigade into the future.


Predictions for the 2020s, From a Futurist, a Trend Forecaster and an Astrologer - Vogue

How to Think Like a Futurist – MIT Technology Review

Futurist and business consultant Amy Webb says that by asking the right questions, just about anyone can do what she does: separate real trends from hype and glean the paths that technologies will take. In her recently released book, The Signals Are Talking: Why Todays Fringe Is Tomorrows Mainstream, Webb shares some of her methods for analyzing the impact of innovations. She spoke to MIT Technology Reviews executive editor, Brian Bergstein, in an interview that Insider Premium subscribers can listen to here. Highlights condensed for clarity follow.

Why did you write this book? People pay you and your consulting firm for insights into the future. Arent you giving away some secrets?

My goal is to democratize the skills of a futurist, so that more and more people have the ability to see around corners. I just think its so important. Because Im concerned about the direction that were headed in.

Im not concerned in the conventional way; Im not one of those people who believes that artificially intelligent robots are going to take all our jobs and destroy humanity. The concern that I have is that technology is becoming more and more fantastical and politicized. And in the process, we fetishize the future rather than [having] the more boring conversations that are just as important.

What do you mean when you say we fetishize the future?

Ive gone back and looked at spikes in innovation. Theres a cycle that follows each one of those innovation spikes. If you track all the way back to the invention of the light bulb, you have this sudden introduction in newspapers and people get very excited. The story goes in a weird direction from there. That was the birth of modern science fiction. Theres this sudden interest in what is fantastical versus what is realistic. Weve seen that happen with the introduction of [artificial] light, with cars, with the Internet. Now as we stand on the precipice of AI, the same things happening again. I see the word futurist in many more Twitter bios than I ever have before. Were all really excited about it, but I dont see very many people working in a diligent, methodical way on thinking through the implications.

Lets talk about how you sort through the implications of technologies. In your book you say you look at trends in seemingly unrelated fields that could converge.

I was just at IBMs T.J. Watson Center, where all the research scientists are based, talking to them about artificial intelligence. They live, breathe, eat, sleep AI. One of the challenges with working in such a rarified field is that at some point, in order to do your job well, you have to block out all of the distraction and noise from other spaces. You sort of acclimate yourself to not paying attention to how the work that youre doing may impact other fields. Youre just trying to get the next part of your experiment or the next part of your research pushed forward. Therefore, you dont want to waste any time thinking about how this line of code or this outcome may impact health or geopolitics or whatever it might be.

[But] it is that kind of thinking thats so imperative because in the absence of [it], you wind up with what we saw in March when Microsoft took a research project that it had from China, which was a chatbot, introduced that same chatbot here in the United States on Twitter, and within 24 hours it went on a racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic rampage. That was Tay.AI.

Its not like no one couldve seen that coming.

Yes. They shouldve seen that coming.

To find trends that might converge, you say you look for signals on the fringe, beyond the usual things that get covered in the technology press. Fair enough, but how can all of us look on the fringes?

Its not like theres a singular source where you would go to find the unusual suspects at the fringe. Instead, its a series of guiding questions. Pick a topic and then say, Okay. Who do I know of thats been working directly and indirectly in this space? Maybe try to figure out, Well, whos funding this work? Whos encouraging experimentation? I always find it fascinating to go on Iarpas website. They publicly post their RFPs. Thatll give you a window into the kinds of things that theyre thinking about. Who might be directly impacted if this technology succeeds one way or the other? Who could be incentivized to work against any change? Because they stand to gain something, they stand to lose something, who might see this technology as just the starting-off point for something else? Start asking those questions.

One of the chapters in the book goes through bio-hackers. There are these bio-hacking communities all over the place, and theyre doing all kinds of experimentation, whether thats injecting RFID tags under their skin or any other number of things. A lot of people would look at those folks and laugh at them or think theyre ridiculous, but again were looking through the lens of our own present reality without thinking about, Where are we headed?

Whats one of your favorite predictions right now?

I think some of my favorite things that are on the horizon are interesting, promising, and also scary. One of them is smart dust. Youve actually covered this in Tech Review. Smart dust are these tiny computers that are no bigger than a grain of salt or a speck of dust. Theoretically you could, in your hand at any given time, hold 5,000 sensors. Lets say that youre holding this handful of dust and you blew it into the wind. We are going to soon be in an era when its going to be really difficult to tell if you as a person have been hacked in some way, which is breathtaking and terrifying and fantastically interesting.

While reading your book, I was thinking of Future Shock by Alvin and Heidi Toffler, published in 1970. The book argued that the modern world stresses and disorients people by creating more change than we can handle in a short period of time. Is that right?

Unfortunately, I think thats still very true in the year 2016. My goal with the book and my goal in general is to break that cycle of continual surprise and shock.

If theres a way to make the future a little less exciting and a little bit more boring, thats good for everybody because that means that were not continually shocked by new ideas, that were not continually discounting people on the fringe.

Read the original here:

How to Think Like a Futurist - MIT Technology Review

Healthcare Innovator and Futurist to Benefitfocus One Place 2020 – AiThority

Rubin Pillay, MD, PhD to Discuss Healthcare 3.0 at Benefits Technology and Business Conference

Benefitfocus, Inc., a leading cloud-based benefits management platform and services provider, announced that Rubin Pillay, MD, PhD, Professor of Healthcare Innovation and medical futurist, will speak during the annualOne Place Conference.Benefitfocus benefits technology and business conference will be held onMarch 17-19inCharleston, SC.

Read More: The Future of Works Most Crucial Component: Artificial Intelligence

Were excited to welcome Dr. Pillay to our largest, most innovative event of the year. His background as a medical futurist and his 30-year career in healthcare as a clinician, academic and innovator make him well-suited to speak to the rapidly evolving healthcare space and the future of benefits during a pivotal time for change, saidRay August, Benefitfocus President and CEO. Our mission is to simplify employee benefits for everyone by bringing the entire benefits ecosystem together consumers, brokers, employers and carriers. Dr. Pillays experience brings a unique perspective to discussing dynamics and exploring innovative solutions to the toughest industry challenges.

Read More: What is Chinas Password Law and What it Means for the Blockchain Industry?

Dr. Pillay joins retired Air Force Col.Nicole Malachowski, the first woman on the Thunderbirds Air Demonstration Squadron and a White House Fellow and Adviser, andPhil Hansen, an internationally recognized multimedia artist, speaker and author. Dr. Pillay will present onWednesday, March 18, at9:00 a.m., on Healthcare 3.0: How Technology is Driving the Transition to Prosumers, Platforms and Outsurance.

Read More: Visa Acquires Plaid for $5.3 Billion; Pledges to Build a Secured Digital Fintech Ecosystem Globally

Read more:

Healthcare Innovator and Futurist to Benefitfocus One Place 2020 - AiThority

These Researchers Want You to Live In a Fungus Megastructure – Futurism

Imagine that you roll out of bed onto a living fungus floor. The walls and ceiling heck, the whole apartment building, down to the plumbing and electrical systems are made of fungus too. Wood and concrete are remnants of the distant past; this entire city, from the schools to the stores to the hospitals, is made ofliving fungus constantly growing, dying off and regenerating itself.

Thats the visionlaid out in a provocative new paper, which a team of European academics say is the first-ever exploration of living fungus potential as a raw material for futuristic, eco-friendly monolithic structures that would, in their telling, revolutionize the entire built environment and economy.

We propose to develop a structural substrate by using live fungal mycelium, reads the paper. Fungal buildings will self-grow, build, and repair themselves.

The idea is a response to the prospect of catastrophic climate change. Growing our building materials from biological materials, the theory goes, would makeconstruction less dependent on fossil fuels and environmentally-destructive mining operations.

Fungal materials can have a wide variety of mechanical properties ranging from foam-like to wood-like to polymer-like to elastomer-like, Han Wsten, a microbiologist at The Netherlands Utrecht University who co-authored the not-yet-peer-reviewed paper, told Futurism. The fact that we can make wood-like materials implies that we can use it for the building industry.

Along with other forms of living materials, fungal architecture is not a new idea other research groups have explored the idea of growing building materials out of mycelium. NASA,for instance, is currently testingwhether fungus could grow in Martian soil, potentially giving the space agency a low-cost way to grow space habitats onsite.

But those projects all involve killing the fungus after it grows, a process that makes it sturdier as a building material that the team says has already been used for load-bearing structures or boundary walls.

So far, they say, no one else has explored the possibility of building monolithic structures out of living fungus.

The selling point of our materials is that it is biodegradable, thereby helping to create a circular economy, Wsten said. At the same time, it should not degrade when actually used as a building material. We can work around this apparent paradox by coating the material. In fact, we also coat wood with paint of oils to protect it against degradation.

It may be that we will find a fungus that creates wood-like materials without the need of pressing, he said.

Even with a coating, Wsten went on to explain, the goal is to keep the fungal architecture alive so that an architect could rejuvenate it with water and trigger further growth if repairs or alternations were necessary. Those same coatings, the team says, could be used to capitalize on the fungus internal structure of networks to replace things like a buildings plumbing, electrical wiring, or other logistical needs.

Important to note: those ideas, like much of the teams research, remain fairly speculative.

Andrew Adamatzky, a computer scientist at the University of the West of England who also co-authored the paper, told Futurism that the team is working to build fungal versions of neuromorphic circuits and other electronics. He conceded that conventional wires are cheaper and easier to work with, but added that the living circuits will be self-growing, self-assembling and self-repairing, which no traditional circuitry can do.

This is really challenging, but a real opportunity to explore how buildings could grow, self-repair, adapt and disrupt conventional ways of building production by working with highly local resources and growing in-situ to minimize logistics and energy use in material production, said Phil Ayres, a co-author of the paper from the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, aiming towards a circular economy for construction.

More on living materials: Scientists Create Living Concrete That Can Heal Itself

See more here:

These Researchers Want You to Live In a Fungus Megastructure - Futurism

Meet the futurist with 2020 vision – Sydney Morning Herald

Will wages finally pick up in 2020? Will politicians across the Liberal-Labor divide come to a bipartisan agreement that climate change is a real and future danger? Will the influence of our ageing Baby Boomers begin to wane in the wake of Generation Zs withering catchphrase of 2019, OK, Boomer? Can the #MeToo movement maintain its momentum? Which will be the top box office film franchise release this year: James Bonds No Time to Die in April or Fast & Furious 9 in May? Has the avocado smash had its day?

Futurology is a fascinating, if inexact, science.Credit:Tanya Cooper/illustrationroom.com.au

Answering these questions is invigorating stuff. But its all in a days work for futurist Ross Dawson, chairman of the Future Exploration Network, who compares the trajectory of major social movements to a tiny crystal spreading out across an entire frozen block. Take climate change. The anger and frustration among those who accept the science of climate change is growing, while the position of the deniers is becoming more deeply entrenched, he says. This will lead to even greater polarisation. I find it impossible to imagine a scenario in which climate activism will reduce.

Wage growth is likely to remain tepid in 2020, with an expansion in low-wage jobs resulting in a widening wealth divide. If anything, Baby Boomers economic and political clout will increase because asset wealth will continue to outstrip income wealth, with Australia boasting one of the worlds most unaffordable housing markets, Dawson says.

The #MeToo movement sparked a wider debate, not just about sexual harassment but the sexual abuse of power. While there is the inevitable pushback against social movements like #MeToo, its larger implications the balance of power between the genders still has a long way to play out, says Dawson. The recent election of a young, female prime minister in Finland showed whats possible.

While Dawson baulks when I ask him about the likely box-office hits of 2020 and shifting tastes in brunches (Thats not what I do), he predicts the era of peak entertainment content will only intensify in 2020. I read that more than $US100 billion is currently being spent in TV and film production across the Western world. With all our current existential worries, were looking for escapism.

To read more from Good Weekend magazine, visit our page at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and Brisbane Times.

Here is the original post:

Meet the futurist with 2020 vision - Sydney Morning Herald

Scientists: Ocean Warming at the Rate of Five A-Bombs per Second – Futurism

After analyzing data from the 1950s through 2019, an international team of scientists determined that the averagetemperature of the worlds oceans in 2019 was 0.075 degrees Celsius (.135 degrees Fahrenheit) higher than the 19812010 average.

That might not seem like a significant amount of warming, but given the massive volume of the oceans, an increase even that small would require a staggering influx of heat 228 sextillion Joules worth, according to the scientists study, which was published in the journalAdvances in Atmospheric Sciences on Monday.

Thats a hard number to contextualize, so one of the scientists behind the study did the math to put it into an explosive frame of reference by comparing it to the amount of energy released by the atomic bomb the United States military dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, in 1945.

The Hiroshima atom-bomb exploded with an energy of about 63,000,000,000,000 Joules, author Lijing Cheng from the Chinese Academy of Sciences said in a press release. The amount of heat we have put in the worlds oceans in the past 25 years equals to 3.6 billion Hiroshima atom-bomb explosions.

That averages out to four Hiroshima bombs worth of energy entering the oceans every second for the past 25 years. But even more troubling, the rate isnt holding steady at that alarming figure its increasing.

In 2019, ocean warming was equivalent to about five Hiroshima bombs of heat, every second, day and night, 365 days a year, study author John Abraham, from the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota, told Vice.

And in case atomic bombs are still too abstract of a comparative unit, the 2019 rate is equivalent to every person on Earth constantly pointing 100 hair dryers at the oceans, Abraham told Vice.

The less technical term is: Its a shit-ton of energy, he said and its already having a hugeimpacting the environment.

Ice is melting faster, causing sea levels to rise. Dolphins and other marine life are dying because they cant adapt quickly enough. Even the increase in the amount of water evaporating into the atmosphere due to the heat is negatively impacting on our planet.

It makes hurricanes and typhoons more powerful, and it makes rainfall more intense, Abraham told Vice. It puts our weather on steroids.

And remember, the rate is increasing meaning that every moment we delay taking action to slow or reverse the warming, the situation is only going to get worse.

READ MORE: 5 Hiroshima Bombs of Heat, Every Second: The Worlds Oceans Absorbed Record-Level Heat Last Year [Vice]

More on ocean warming: Scientists: Warming Oceans Will Lead to Catastrophic Future

View original post here:

Scientists: Ocean Warming at the Rate of Five A-Bombs per Second - Futurism

Scientists Create "Living Concrete" That Can Heal Itself – Futurism

Its Alive!

Scientists at the University of Colorado, Boulder have created whatThe New York Timescalls a living concrete, teeming with photosynthetic bacteria, that can grow itself and regenerate itself much like a living organism.

The concrete is a mixture of gelatin, sand, and cyanobacteria that cools similarly to Jell-O, the Times reports. The resulting structure was able to regenerate itself three times after researchers cut it apart, suggesting apotential breakthrough in the nascent field of self-assembling materials.

The living concrete, which the Colorado scientists made in partnership with DARPA, starts out as a sickly green color that fades as the bacteria dies off, according to research published Wednesday in the journal Matter.

It really does look like a Frankenstein material, UC Boulder engineer and project leader Will Srubar told the NYT.

Even as the color fades, the bacteria survive for several weeks and can be rejuvenated resulting in further growth under the right conditions.

DARPA is particularly interested in a self-growing material that it can use to assemble structures in remote desert areas, or potentially even in space, according to the NYT.

If the living concrete can scale up to that level, it could reduce the amount and weight of materials that space agencies will need to launch.

Theres no way were going to carry building materials to space, Srubar told the NYT. Well bring biology with us.

READ MORE: Bricks Alive! Scientists Create Living Concrete [New York Times]

More on materials: Scientists Create Material With Living Metabolism

Follow this link:

Scientists Create "Living Concrete" That Can Heal Itself - Futurism

2020 Real Estate Newsmakers: The Achievers and the Futurists – RisMedia.com

Accomplishments in business. Charitable contributions. Daring leadership. Out-of-the-box thinking. Over the course of the past year, RISMedias 2020 Real Estate Newsmakers contributed to the housing industry in numerous ways, bettering their communities, consumers and larger sphere, across eight categories: Achievers, Crusaders, Futurists, Influencers, Inspirations, Luminaries, Trailblazers and Trendsetters. Here, we showcase their stories.

Matthew BeallCEOHawaii Life

In 2019, Beall and Hawaii Life acquired two firms: Country Brokers and East Oahu Realty. We have enjoyed incredible growth, Beall says. I love my Hawaii Life.

David MarineChief Marketing OfficerColdwell Banker Real Estate

In 2019, Marine led Project North Star, Coldwell Banker Real Estates first rebrand in 40 years. When I go to work or give a talk, I constantly think about how Im not just representing myself, but so many others, Marine says. Its never just about you.Vini MoolchandaniREALTORCompass

In 2019, Moolchandani helped a $900,000 listing sell in 21 daysafter it had been listed by two others and on the market for more than 400 days. I am beyond grateful to be part of this amazing industry and to be able to serve so many families, Moolchandani says.Ward MorrisonPresidentMotto Mortgage

In 2019, Motto Mortgage and Morrison celebrated the companys 150th franchise sale, as well as its third anniversary. One-hundred fifty franchises sold in only three years is an extraordinary feat for a startup franchisor, Morrison says. This growth demonstrates the demand and potential of our business model.Fiona PetrieExecutive Vice President & Managing Director of U.S. OperationsRE/MAX INTEGRA

From 2018 to 2019, RE/MAX INTEGRA grew substantially, with Petrie facilitating 20 new office openings, 36 expansions and 13 mergers and acquisitions. I strive to empower others to discover their own talents in the industry, Petrie says.Lindsay SmithChief Strategy OfficerTitle AllianceIn 2019, Title Alliance appointed Smith as chief strategy officer. My motto is every personemployee, partner and clientshould feel like a VIP at all times, says Smith.

Allen AlishahiCo-Founder & PresidentShelterZoom

In 2019, Alishahi and ShelterZoom debuted Mithra Contract, a fully digital, tokenized smart contract platform. I am helping to bring next-generation technology to our industry, which presents an enjoyable challenge, Alishahi says.AJ CanariaCreative Director & Executive Brand AmbassadorInside Real Estate

At the beginning of the year, Canaria was appointed creative director and executive brand ambassador for Inside Real Estate. I am one of real estates storytellers and connectors, Canaria says.Vy LuuGeneral ManagerReal Estate Webmasters

In 2019, Luu was appointed general manager for Real Estate Webmasters, contributing to its core initiatives, including bringing data standards worldwide. This will open up data and facilitate competition, ultimately benefitting both sides of real estate transactions, Luu says.Mike MiedlerPresident & CEOCentury 21 Real Estate LLC

In 2019, Century 21 Real Estate LLC appointed Miedler to president and CEO, formerly from chief growth officer. Success in real estate comes down to two factors: taking care of and valuing the customer, Miedler says.

Kasey StewartDirector of Member DevelopmentNational Association of REALTORS

In 2019, Stewart continued to develop educational programs at the National Association of REALTORS, including the Commitment to Excellence (C2EX) program. Im incredibly proud to work with NAR volunteer leaders and staff on C2EX, says Stewart. It truly takes a village to launch and grow a program of this magnitude.Gayln ZieglerDirector of Operations, Keller OffersKeller Williams

In 2019, Keller Williams launched Keller Offers, an iBuying program, and appointed Ziegler as its director of Operations. We feel very passionately that the consumer needs an advocate in their corner with all the changes going on in the industry right now, says Ziegler.For more from the 2020 Real Estate Newsmakers, go toRISMedia.com/2020-Newsmakersor RISMediasReal Estate magazine. For consideration for the 2021 Real Estate Newsmakers, please email nominations tomaria@rismedia.com.

Read the rest here:

2020 Real Estate Newsmakers: The Achievers and the Futurists - RisMedia.com

The Roots Young Futurists 2020: Nominate the Leaders Who Are Ready to Change the World – The Root

Young FuturistsYoung Futurists is our annual list of the 25 best and brightest young African-Americans who excel in the fields of social justice and activism, arts and culture, enterprise and corporate innovation, science and technology, and green innovation.

The 2020 election is shaping up to be one of the most consequential elections in American history, and frankly, many of us are stressed just thinking about choosing a new leader (and getting rid of the old one).

But what if you had a chance to choose the leaders of tomorrow? Were looking for the young, outspoken social justice activists who are doing the real work on the ground to change their communities for the better; the savvy young entrepreneur who is already providing real jobs and real opportunities; the young environmentalists who are literally fighting to save the planet and their future; the techy kids who would rather code and create new apps than play basketball (not that theres anything wrong with that, were looking for that young superstar athlete in the making, too); the creative geniuses who can tell their stories through art, music and film.

If you know any African Americans between the ages of 10 and 24 who fit those descriptions, now is the time to nominate them for The Roots 2020 Young Futurists.

We will select 25 young leaders who are already making their mark in the fields of social justice and activism; arts and culture; enterprise and corporate innovation; science and technology; and green innovation (environment).

Last year, our list included some incredible kids, like 12-year-old Mari Copeny, who has been advocating for clean drinking water for her hometown of Flint, Mich., earning the title of Little Miss Flint in 2015when she was 8. Or Black-ish star Marsai Martin, who is already crushing the Hollywood game after making history as the youngest executive producer of a major Hollywood film at age 14. Or Elijah Precciely, who entered college as a sophomore after receiving a full-ride scholarship to Southern University in May 2018, when he was 11.

Heres your chance to tell us about the feature leaders who are destined for great things. The nomination period will run through Feb. 7. Please tell us about potential Young Futurists by filling out this nomination form.


The Roots Young Futurists 2020: Nominate the Leaders Who Are Ready to Change the World - The Root

MIT Suspends Another Professor for Epstein Ties – Futurism


MIT has placed tenured mechanical engineering professor Seth Lloyd on administrative because of a failure to disclose ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased and disgraced financier accused of sex trafficking and other crimes.

Over the years, Epstein donated $225,000 to Lloyds research and also gave him a personal gift of $60,000, according to an extensive report about Epsteins connections to MIT that the university released Friday. Lloyd hid the source of the donations by processing them through various administrators ultimately tainting his research by linking it to Epsteins disgraceful legacy.

The news about Lloyd and his subsequent suspension is just the latest in a string of grim revelations regarding MITs ties to Epstein. While Lloyd admitted to having visited Epstein in prison, Epsteins influence on the university extended far beyond one engineering professor.

Joi Ito, the since-resigned director of the MIT Media Lab also accepted and obscured the source of hundreds of thousands of dollars from Epstein and millions more that were funneled through Epsteins company. Computer scientist Richard Stallman also resigned in the wake of controversy surrounding off-color comments he made about the scandal.

As news about Epsteins contributions to MIT continued to break, university president Rafael Reif vowed to donate an amount equivalent to Epsteins donations to a charity supporting victims of sexual abuse.

So far, Reif has committed to donating $850,000. But as InsideHigher Ed reports, he hasnt yet determined what organization its going to support.

READ MORE: More Epstein Fallout at MIT [Inside Higher Ed]

More on Epstein and MIT: Bizarre MIT Meeting About Jeffrey Epstein Ends in Tears, Yelling

Read the original post:

MIT Suspends Another Professor for Epstein Ties - Futurism

Trump Demands That Apple Give Government Access to iPhones – Futurism

Open Sesame

On Tuesday evening, Trump complained that Apple refuses to help law enforcement investigate violent and drug-related crimes.

The previous day, Attorney General William Barrhad criticized Apple for refusing to unlock the Pensacola Naval Air Station shooters iPhones or provide a backdoor that would allow the government to do so directly, according toCBSNews.

While Trumps tweet blasts Apple over that refusal, the company says its been actively collaborating with law enforcement, according to a statement published in Input Mag.

Its already possible to crack some iPhones encryption, especially since the shooters used older models with outdated security, 9to5Mac reports. And while Apple says it fulfilled the FBIs requests, it wont let the FBI access the shooters communications directly. Apples logic: implementing backdoor access would make investigators jobs easier, but it would also create a major threat to the safety and privacy of all iPhone users.

Apple toldInput that The queries resulted in many gigabytes of information that we turned over to investigators. In every instance, we responded with all of the information that we had.

We have always maintained there is no such thing as a backdoor just for the good guys, reads Apples statement. Backdoors can also be exploited by those who threaten our national security and the data security of our customers.

READ MORE: Apple responds to AG Barr over unlocking Pensacola shooters phone: No. [Input News]

More on privacy: Big Tech Splits Over Privacy Issues, at Least on the Surface.

Continue reading here:

Trump Demands That Apple Give Government Access to iPhones - Futurism

How futurists from the past predicted life in 2020 – 9News

Futurists, academics and technologists have always wondered what life will be like in the years ahead.

Making bold predictions can be a risky move, leaving one looking more fool than oracle especially when the crystal ball gazing is done from several decades away.

We've put together seven predictions for life in 2020, from as far back as the 1960s and as recent as 2017.

In 1984 it turned out Apple founder Steve Jobs was already envisioning how a Siri-like AI companion would be assisting us in our day-to-day lives, in 2020. "The next stage is going to be computers as 'agents,'" he said in a 1984 interview with Newsweek's Access Magazine. "In other words, it will be as if there's a little person inside that box who starts to anticipate what you want. Rather than help you, it will start to guide you through large amounts of information. It will almost be like you have a little friend inside that box." Jobs was bang on the money, as underlined by the advancing digital butler-type tech rolled out by Google, Apple and Amazon.

In 2017 John McAfee, the controversial computer antivirus mogul, predicted that by the end of 2020 the price of a single Bitcoin would reach $1 million. The current Bitcoin price is hovering just over AUD $10,000, so the world's most popular cyptocurrency has a lot of work to do over the next 365 days. McAfee has promised to eat a body part if his bold prediction does not happen.

The average human living 100 years

Thirty years ago, futurist Ray Kurzweil predicted the average life expectancy for humans would be 100. While Kurzweil may have missed the mark with that call, turns out he foresaw the rise of wearable tech and how that kind of data could potentially help us live healthier lives. "Computerised health monitors built into watches, jewellery, and clothing which diagnose both acute and chronic health conditions are widely used. In addition to diagnosis, these monitors provide a range of remedial recommendations and interventions," he wrote in The Age of Spiritual Machines.

In 1968, with the world under the foreboding shadow of a perilous Cold War, a Stamford professor predicted nuclear power would rise to become the dominant force in US energy by the year 2020. Professor Charles Scarlott also believed any advances in renewable energy would be negligible and not figure large in the US energy mix. Turns out his estimations were wildly off-target. According to US government figures, nuclear electric power makes up about 9 per cent of total US energy production. Fossil fuels still dominate, with 79 per cent, and renewables coming in on 12 per cent.

In 2009 Microsoft released a promotional video, laying out its vision for life in 2020 (watch above). Microsoft doesn't proposes anything too radical. A lot of the featured technology hinted at was already in early stage development when the film was made. There is a lot of glass screen computing, touch screen tech and augmented reality too. A man slides apart his mobile phone into a series of cards, which isn't something we can do yet, but Samsung did give us with a foldable phone last year.

In a 1968 paper, a political science professor at world-renowned MIT predicted humans would become a cohesive band of happy and loving people, thanks to better communication, translation of language and a deeper understanding of what makes us tick emotionally and psychologically. "By the year 2018 nationalism should be a waning force in the world," Ithiel de Sola Pool wrote. While we are more connected than ever before, and supposedly know more about ourselves and the human condition than at any other time in history, global nationalism has never been more fierce since the end of WWII.

Read the original here:

How futurists from the past predicted life in 2020 - 9News

The Australian Wildfires Are So Bad You Can See Them From Space – Futurism

Big Picture

Australia is in the midst of an environmental catastrophe, with raging wildfires making parts of the nation look like a blood-red apocalyptic hellscape.

As dramatic as the scene on the ground might be, though, the view from above may be even more disturbing as images of the wildfires taken from space show the full extent of the devastation.

On Friday, Business Insider published a series of images and videos of the wildfires taken from space.

One particularly striking visual is courtesy of the Japan Meteorological Agencys Himawari-8 satellite, which photographs the Earth every 10 minutes. The agency produced an animation of the scene in Australia from space by stringing together a days worth of the images, providing agrim off-world view of both the brushfires and their smoke plumes.

Another powerful image shared by Business Insider shows what the situation looks like during the day from the perspective of the European Space Agencys Sentinel-2 satellite. It was taken on December 31 over the bushfire in Bateman Bay, Australia, and its impossible to even see the ground in some parts of the photo through all of the heavy smoke.

As of Friday, the wildfires have killed at least 19 people and destroyed more than 1,400 homes. Theyre now so big, theyre even generating their own self-perpetuating weather phenomena and according to experts, Australias situation will likely get worse before it gets better.

We dont usually see fires like this until January or February, but these have been going on since spring, Australia-based climate scientist Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick told NBC News.Its already the worst fire season on record, and were really just in our first month of summer.

READ MORE: Stunning images from space reveal the shocking extent of Australias bushfire crisis [Business Insider]

More on wildfires: Devastating Fires in Amazon Rainforest Can Be Seen From Space

Continue reading here:

The Australian Wildfires Are So Bad You Can See Them From Space - Futurism

NASA Proposed Sending Japanese Astronauts to the Moon – Futurism

Japan on the Moon

NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine secretly proposed using US rockets to send Japanese astronauts to the Moon, Japanese newspaper The Mainichi reports, citing multiple sources familiar with the talks.

According to the paper, Bridenstine made the proposal during an unofficial September 2019 visit in which he met with space industry leaders, including the head of the Japanese governments Space Policy Committee. Bridenstine reportedly encouraged attendees to consider a future in which Japanese astronauts joined Americans on the lunar surface.

NASA has some very ambitious plans to return US astronauts to the Moon as part of the agencys Artemis program by 2024, using a research space station in the Moons orbit called the Lunar Gateway as a stepping stone.

In May, Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe met with president Donald Trump, in part to discuss a cooperation in space exploration. Less than four months later, NASA and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency officially announced they will work together under the Artemis program, with Japan assisting the US in building the Gateway.

According to The Mainichi, the move could also represent a way to keep Chinas space ambitions in check.

The globes most powerful nations are racing to make the Moon a strategic outpost and China is well on its way to make its first crewed mission to the Moon a reality.

READ MORE: US and Japan in talks to boost space ties, send Japanese astronauts to moon in 2020s [The Mainichi]

More on Japans space efforts: Japanese Rockets Launch Pad Inexplicably Bursts Into Flames

See the original post here:

NASA Proposed Sending Japanese Astronauts to the Moon - Futurism

Elon Musk Hints That a Cybertruck Is Headed to Mars – Futurism

Enigmatic Elon

When SpaceXs Starship heads to Mars in 2022, its payload could include a Tesla Cybertruck. Maybe.

SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has been hinting that his companies might once again team up to send a car into space and depending on how you interpret one of his latest tweets, its starting to look even more likely that a Cybertruck could be headed to the Red Planet.

In November 2019, Musk declared via Twitter that a pressurized version of Teslas Cybertruck would be the official truck of Mars. The following month, he noted in another tweet that Starship would have the payload capacity for a Cybertruck.

Then, on December 29, a Twitter user straight up asked Musk if a Cybertruck will be on board the 2022 Starship mission. His response? A single emoji:

None of this is exactly a definitive confirmation, but right now, it seems one of the following is certain: either SpaceX is seriously considering sending a Cybertruck into space, or Musk really enjoys trolling people with the idea.

READ MORE: Pressurized Tesla Cybertruck To Be Official Pickup Truck Of Mars [Inside EVs]

More on the Cybertruck: Elon Musk Might Send a Tesla Cybertruck to Space

Read more from the original source:

Elon Musk Hints That a Cybertruck Is Headed to Mars - Futurism

Jetpacks, surveillance, and a 26-hour workweek. Here’s what past generations expected for 2020 – WUSA9.com

WASHINGTON D.C., DC Jetpacks, surveillance, and a life expectancy of 100 years old. Those were just some of the predictions for 2020, made by past generations.

So which were on the right path, and which were way off the mark? WUSA9 looked into it.

Anti-Gravity Belts:

This prediction was made in 1968 by a mathematician and scientist named DG Brennan. In that year, he predicted that anti-gravity belts would "revolutionize the tactics of land warfare."

In particular, Brennan believed Jetpacks and anti-gravity vehicles would become a normal tool in warfare. Clearly this hasn't been developed on a widespread basis.

Although a quick search of Youtube will show various videos of Jetpacks being tested. So perhaps, this technology isn't far from being used in war.


Here's one we all wish were true. Futurist Ray Kurzweil predicted in 1999 that life expectancy would rise to 100 years old by 2019.

Unfortunately, this has not come true. Globally the rate hovers just below 75-year-old, and in the United States, that number sits just below 80-years-old.

Widespread Tracking:

Kurzweil made another ominous prediction, writing that privacy would become a huge political and social issue in 2020. He predicted that every move we make would be tracked and "stored in a database somewhere."

This prediction has indeed come true in a lot of ways. Smartphones can track our exact location at any given moment. Every Google search and Facebook post is collected and analyzed, creating a digital footprint.

And this new technology has become even more apparent when looking at countries like China, where widespread surveillance programs have been initiated.

China - A Global Power:

Another prediction came from futurists Peter Schwartz and Peter Leyden, who wrote their prediction in a 1997 article, titled 'The Long Boom.'

"By 2020," they wrote. "The Chinese economy [will have] grown to be the largest in the world."

They proved correct that China would see massive economic growth. However, they were wrong that China would surpass the United States. Currently, China has the second-largest nominal GDP at $9 trillion. By comparison, the United States has a nominal GDP of over $21 trillion.

Boris' Rise To Power (Scary Accurate):

What's startling about this prediction is that Boris Johnson was just a journalist at the time, who had never held public office.

World Population:

In 1994, The International Food Policy Research Institute made a prediction for 2020 as well, estimating the world population would reach 2020. That would mean a massive jump of 2.5 billion people in a quarter-century.

This prediction proved to be very close, as the most recent estimate by the United Nations puts the world population at 7.7 billion people.

That same U.N. report estimates that the population will continue rising, jumping by another 2 billion people by 2050.


Most experts would probably argue that this one has not panned out. In 1968, a political science professor at MIT named Ithiel de Sola Pool, made the following optimistic prediction:

"By the Year of 2018," he wrote. "Nationalism should be a waning force in the world.

Many would argue that the global attitude has in fact gone in the other direction. Whether it's the 'Brexit' fight in England, the 'America First' mentality in the United States, or the rise of populist strongmen in countries like China, the Philippines, and India, this Nationalist sentiment is on full display.


Here's one we all wish was true. In 1968, physicist Herman Kahn and futurist Anthony J. Weiner said that Americans would have 26-hour work-weeks by 2020.

In reality, Americans work on average 35 hours per week, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Maybe there's a good chance for 2021?

RELATED: These are 7 of the most popular New Year's resolutions

RELATED: A look at the DMV's most-read crime stories of 2019

Download the brand new WUSA9 app here.

Sign up for the Get Up DC newsletter: Your forecast. Your commute. Your news.

Read the original here:

Jetpacks, surveillance, and a 26-hour workweek. Here's what past generations expected for 2020 - WUSA9.com

China Quietly Confirms Birth of Third Gene-Edited Baby – Futurism

On Monday, Chinese state-run news agencyXinhuareported that He Jiankui, the researcher responsible for creating the worlds first gene-edited babies, had been sentenced to three years in prison on the charge of illegally practicing medicine.

Given that China condemned Hes research almost immediately after he announced the births of the twin babies, its not particularly surprising to hear that the researcher is being punished for his controversial experiment.

But included in Xinhuas latest report was a bit of news we thought we might never hear: a third gene-edited baby has officially been born.

Back in November 2018, when He first announced the existence of the gene-edited twins, he also let slip that another woman was pregnant with an additional edited embryo.

In January, Stanford bioethicist William Hurlbut told news agency Agence France-Presse that hed talked extensively to He about that third gene-edited baby. He said believed the woman was likely 12 to 14 weeks pregnant at the time, which would make her due to give birth around June or July 2019.

July came and went without any news about the third gene-edited baby, though but now, China has quietly confirmed its birth, with Xinhua reporting that He was sentenced for his experiments in which three genetically edited babies were born.

The report doesnt include any additional information on the baby. We dont know its sex, its health status, whether the birth involved any complications or if the baby is even still alive.

But we do know this baby was born, meaning that at some point this year, there were not two, but three genetically engineered humans walking or, more likely, crawling the Earth.

See more here:

China Quietly Confirms Birth of Third Gene-Edited Baby - Futurism

Mysterious Swarms of Giant Drones Have Officials Baffled – Futurism

Giant Drones

On December 24, The Denver Post reported that fleets of up to 17 drones, each with an estimated wingspan of six feet, had been spotted flying over Colorados Phillips and Yuma counties at night for more than a week.

Since then, the sightings have expanded to six counties in Colorado and Nebraska, with as many as 30 drones spotted in the sky at once and,ominously, no one seems to know who they belong to.

Phillips County Sheriff Thomas Elliott told the Postthat the giant drones appeared each night around 7 p.m. and disappeared by 10 p.m. They maintained an altitude between 61 and 91 meters (200 and 300 feet), flying in square patterns of about 40 kilometers (25 miles).

Theyve been doing a grid search, a grid pattern, Elliott said. They fly one square and then they fly another square.

So far, the list of organizations that deny knowing anything about the giant drones includes the Federal Aviation Administration, the Air Force, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the United States Army Forces Command.

Elliot told the Post that the Sheriffs office is hoping someone will spot one of the drones on the ground but Colorado-based drone pilot Vic Moss warns that residents shouldnt try to shoot one down as their batteries can cause fires.

If you shoot a drone down over your house and it lands on your house, he told the Post, you might not have a house in 45 minutes.

READ MORE: Mysterious swarms of giant drones have started to appear in the Colorado and Nebraska night sky, and nobody knows where theyre coming from [Business Insider]

More on drones: Man Uses His Heat-Seeking Drone to Find Missing Child

Here is the original post:

Mysterious Swarms of Giant Drones Have Officials Baffled - Futurism

Hypersonic planes and robots: Futurist predicts what we can expect by end of decade – Daily Star

We will wake up to a new decade tomorrow. And while the 2010s brought us innovations in areas such as technology, transport and music, what could the 2020s offer?

The Daily Star spoke to leading futurist Dr Ian Pearson - who correctly predicted the invention of the text message - about what we can expect by the end of this decade.

I think we will see more spectacular improvements in things such as robotics and artificial intelligence.

I think drones will become smarter. For example, I think theyll be able to fly themselves and hold a position.

I expect to see lots of insect-sized drones that can be used for monitoring and surveillance.

Also, at the moment people use selfie sticks, but instead people could have a drone a couple of metres in front of them and a couple more at the side taking a bunch of shots from different angles.

I think we will also see augmented reality devices making an appearance on the market, where people will wear a headset or something the same size as your glasses, that will do the job of your phone but project virtual images for example, of items or celebrities straight on to your retina, removing the need for a mobile.

By 2030 augmented reality contact lenses may even be available.

Lab-grown meat is coming, although I dont think it will come in vast quantities during the 2020s.

Its a technology that is developing quite slowly.

Even though veganism became a big trend in the 2010s, I dont think stem cell meat will replace regular meat fully at the end of this new decade, but it could be something that happens by 2050.

Some people have become vegan for health reasons, but weve already seen some studies that showed red meat being unhealthy have been debunked, so theres a possibility they could switch back and veganism could be a passing fad.

Its been a bit of an overhyped technology, but 3D printing may have a role in food as you could have 3D printed kitchen items or cake decorations, for example.

Weve seen a lot of development in this area, especially in terms of fibres. Already, companies are using clever manufacturing techniques to turn objects such as coconut and sweetcorn husks into fabrics.

These are also more sustainable items, as people become increasingly concerned about the environment.

We may see people wearing clothes that are resistant to stains or stop you sweating much.

What is most exciting for me is the tech that is built into it.

By 2030 you could have people wearing clothes that change colour, have patterns on that move like a video or Christmas jumpers that have a mini light show built in.

You may see hypersonic jets, which are currently in development with the aim of being used by the military, brought in that could get people from London to Sydney in just four-and-a-half hours, and London to New York in two hours.

If people carry on being very concerned about the environment, they may take fewer foreign holidays by plane.

However, virtual reality wouldnt replace holidays like in the film Total Recall, people wont go into a VR landscape for two weeks.

"But what itll be used for will be a way of exploring the rooms of a resort or hotel youre considering booking, or taking a quick look at the area, so itll be a tool for decision-making.

People can also use VR virtual reality to try out activities such as skiing or snowboarding.

We are likely to see more people using voice-activated technology to do things such as switching off all the lights or switching on the security.

There could also be smart heating, that will heat the person rather than heat the room using either smart fabrics or specially-directed infrared beams.

Hi-res or virtual displays could also replace paintings, and ovens and microwaves could be programmed to talk to food packaging to get cooking instructions.

By 2050, Id imagine that androids would do most of the cooking and cleaning in peoples homes.

However, there is a chance that people could hack into smart objects like your fridge or microwave to steal information about you that could be a major concern by 2030.

Weve all been reading about the self-driving cars for the last few years, and they are making a lot of progress. I imagine there will be some on the roads by 2030.

They are currently very expensive, at least 30,000, but people will build driverless pods for 300-400.

Some city centres will be designed to have driverless pod systems. People could get in and be dropped off exactly where they want.

It also increases social inclusivity. If people can be driven where they need to be, they may leave home more often and get involved in their community. Ten years is a long time in tech, so it is feasible.

See http://www.futurizon.com

Read more here:

Hypersonic planes and robots: Futurist predicts what we can expect by end of decade - Daily Star

We live so fast I can’t even finish this sent… – The Register

Something for the Weekend, Sir? Call me an idiot* but I have no idea what you are talking about, why you're saying it or indeed what's going on any more.

Oh, and welcome to the Year 51-85-139.

Do you know what I'm talking about? No? Then you know exactly what I'm talking about.

Worried that my weekly outbursts of cynicism here might simply betray a weakening grip on the fast pace of tech disruption, last summer I began reading futurist Tom Cheesewright's High Frequency Change. The book tries to explain why idiots (ie, anyone who isn't a futurist) perceive modern tech business as being founded on the cult of fleeting unsustainability, and how to go about convincing oneself that it isn't.

Unfortunately, I never got past chapter three as I had other pressing things to do. By the time these were half-done, I'd moved on to other things. Sorry, Tom, but that's how it is these days. Always looking to the future, me.

What I did learn from the book is that things are not really intended to make specific sense as they whizz by across a rapidly morphing cultural landscape so there's no point worrying my idiotic but pretty little head about questions such as "why?"

For example, did you guess what the aforementioned "Year 51-85-139" business was about? Well, colour experts Pantone have declared its Classic Blue ref. 19-4052 TPG (that's 51 Red, 85 Green, 139 Blue) to be the theme colour for 2020.

Here it is. Now you know what 2020 is going to look like.

My (clearly foolish) reaction to this news is to wonder why a year should be assigned a colour from a Pantone reference library. Is it like the 12-year cycle of Chinese animals? Or is it a plot by rogue freemasons to design a coat of arms replete with colour symbolism to revive the Knights Templar with the support of Vatican 2 agents, Agnes Nutter and Bigfoot? Are we being led annually towards an ultimate Pantone reference that lies beyond the spectrum of human visibility and whose first implementation in a CSS tag will trigger the awakening of the Old Ones?

Nope. The idea is to buy a Pantone 19-4052 TPG espresso mug and keychain, then turn our goldfish-like attention to the next thing. Trying to make sense of it is an idiot's game. Don't stand still, move along please.

Youtube Video

I found that if you spend long enough wondering "why?", your brain tricks itself into deducing a ludicrously unlikely purpose behind this stuff and then convinces you that it makes sense. For example, take this advertising poster I found just inches from my face when I nipped to the gents during a journalists' Christmas bash in the typically drunken and debauched surroundings of a central London church.

You've heard of town-twinning, right? Well, the latrine into which I was artlessly jimmy-riddling at that very moment had been twinned with the one pictured in the photograph, in Uganda. For those of you working in spy agencies seeking something to stave off the workplace boredom other than secrete "always-on" code into other people's Alexa skills, have a peek at the Ugandan convenience at your convenience via live satellite: the map references are given on the poster.

Nice logo at the, er, bottom. Shitting infographics, it's all the rage, didn't you know?

Give yourself five minutes and I'm sure you can come up with a valid and worthy reason for toilet-twinning to exist. However, I think you might be missing the point, which is that there isn't one. It's a thing, that's all. Move along please, zip it up, let the next customer have a go. By the time you've Googled toilet-twinning, the fad will be over and replaced by fridge-twinning or eraser-at-the-end-of-a-pencil-twinning.

It's not that earnest charitable endeavours are mere objects of smug amusement so much that everything has become slave to the prevailing culture of short-termism. We exist in an era where are unproven, unworkable ideas change ownership for billions of dollars and failed businesspeople are hailed as heroes that we should try to emulate.

At this point, your brain's reasoning function stumbles into cynicism. My smartphone, my car, my trousers: I'll get around to changing them all soon enough, so why bother giving it any serious thought?

And so here we are, welcome to my world. This is how I handle high-frequency change, Tom: I ignore it or take the piss out of it.

Talking of public signs, here's one I saw in a local park on New Year's Day. It warns visitors that a steep hill lies ahead. It is particularly heart-warming that the infographic-inspired icons target three very specific types of park user: someone in a wheelchair; oldsters sharing a stick; and my Dad.

Hang on isn't that Pantone Classic Blue?

Youtube Video

* content experience user interactivity prompt

More here:

We live so fast I can't even finish this sent... - The Register