What is the Electoral College? Which states have the most electoral votes? How it works – syracuse.com

What is the Electoral College? As America votes in the 2020 election, voters may be wondering how it works, why we have it, and where the magic number 270 comes from.

For starters, the college is not like a university or other institute of higher learning. Its a group of people 538 to be exact who chooses the president and the vice president of the United States of America. The White House race is not decided by the popular vote, unlike local and state elections.

As a result, the winning presidential candidate only needs to secure 270 electoral votes and can still end up with fewer total votes across the U.S. This political phenomenon has happened five times: In 2016, when Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton with nearly 3 million fewer total votes; in 2000, when Al Gore lost to George W. Bush; in 1888, when Benjamin Harrison beat the more popular Grover Cleveland; in 1876, when Rutherford B. Hayes defeated Samuel Tilden; and in 1824 when John Quincy Adams lost the popular vote to Andrew Jackson but had the electoral college support.

Why 538? The number of electors in each state (and the District of Columbia) is equal to the number of congressional seats that state has in the House and Senate. Each state (and Washington, D.C.) has at least three electoral votes; the number of votes per state is determined by the number of representatives, which is determined by the population count from the most recent Census.

Congress has a total of 435 House members and 100 senators (two per U.S. state). The Electoral College has 538 members because the District of Columbia was awarded three electors with passage of the 23rd Amendment.

The magic number 270 is simply the minimum number of electoral votes required to secure a majority and win the presidential election.

Which states have the most electoral votes?

California has the most electoral votes with 55, followed by 38 in Texas, 29 in New York and Florida, 20 in Illinois and Pennsylvania, and 18 in Ohio.

Alaska, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming each have the fewest electoral votes: Three.

Battleground states are typically U.S. states with a large number of electoral votes with a balanced number of Republican and Democratic voters. Most states vote the same way every year, which is why analysts often say a candidate can win the election if they simply win a small handful of states.

In the 2020 race between President Trump and Democratic candidate Joe Biden, Politico reports eight battleground states are being eyed as crucial to winning: Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

When a presidential candidate receives the most votes in a state, they get all of that states electoral votes except for Maine and Nebraska, which split electoral votes based on popular voting. So when millions of U.S. voters cast their ballot for a presidential candidate, theyre actually not voting for Trump or Biden theyre voting for their chosen electors.

According to the National Archives, political parties in each state choose electors before Election Day, typically at conventions. Electors are typically party members rewarded for service and are all but assumed to vote for their partys nominee some states require it, and electors rarely go rogue. (There were seven faithless electors in 2016, the most since 1972, who went against voters' wishes and cast votes for people like Colin Powell, Bernie Sanders, Ron Paul and John Kasich.)

If all of this sounds confusing, youre not alone. It gets even more complicated when you realize 538 is an even number and a presidential election can technically end in a tie. This happened in 1800 and 1824, forcing the House of Representatives to choose the president.

When do electors vote?

The winner in the 2020 presidential election is not expected to be announced on Election Day, due to the large number of absentee and mail-in ballots amid the coronavirus pandemic. It may take weeks to determine a winner, but technically the race wont be decided until the electors cast their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December or Dec. 14 this year.

In New York, 29 electors will formally vote in Albany with procedures and traditions that date back more than 200 years. Its unclear how Covid-19 will change the proceedings, but the electors typically meet inside the state Capitols Senate chamber to fill out paper ballots and deposit them in a wooden box, leaving it to a clerk to count votes manually.

Why do we have an Electoral College anyway?

The U.S. Constitution set up the Electoral College because the founding fathers were said to be afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what Alexis de Tocqueville called the tyranny of the majority making the wrong choice for president.

Alexander Hamilton said the Electoral College can ensure a Commander in Chief is chosen by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.

Today, the Electoral College is considered more of a formality, but it could one day be abandoned for a more direct democratic process. For example, U.S. senators were originally appointed by state legislatures until the 17th Amendment made them directly elected by the public.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the Electoral College could be abolished by an amendment to the Constitution, requiring a two-thirds vote of both chambers, or by states bypassing the college and joining the National Popular Vote Compact. States in the NPV would give all of its electoral votes to whichever candidate wins the national popular vote, rather than the states popular vote.

Originally posted here:

What is the Electoral College? Which states have the most electoral votes? How it works - syracuse.com

Write-ins and third party votes a waste – The Merciad

Ever since the first presidential election, there has been essentially two parties running against each other.

Whether its been the Federalists against the Democratic-Republicans or the Democrats against the Republicans, one party will emerge victorious over the other.

However, there has almost always been a smaller third party weaving its way in and out of elections. From the Whig Party of the early 1800s to todays Libertarian and Green Parties, these lesser-known parties have come up with candidates for mayor, governor, senator, representative or even President.

This year Jo Jorgenson is the Libertarian Partys presidential candidate. In 2016, that honor was bestowed upon Gary Johnson, former governor of New Mexico, while Jill Stein, a physician from Massachusetts, was the presidential candidate of the Green Party, a position she resumed from the 2012 election.

Another thing that US elections have seen in recent years have been write-in votes. In 2016, Queen Elizabeth II was a popular write-in vote since many Americans did not have faith in Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.

Maryland governor Larry Hogan received some backlash recently for putting in Ronald Reagan as his write-in vote, which brings me to my main point: write-in and third party votes arent just a waste, theyre detrimental to elections.

Even if one electoral vote were to go to a third party or write-in candidate, it could completely change who wins the election. Another overseen problem are faithless electors, who are individuals that give their electoral votes to people that are not running for the presidency.

In 2016, there were 7 such individuals. 2 of these votes came from Texas, with 1 vote going to Ron Paul and another to John Kasich. Washington had the most faithless electors, with 4;3 of the votes going to Colin Powell while the other went to Faith Spotted Eagle.

The last faithless elector came from Hawaii, and their vote went to Bernie Sanders. Although these might just look like 7 electoral votes, they could have easily helped strengthen the race between Clinton and Trump.

I dont have anything against those who support a third party, but I believe that when it comes to presidential elections, its best to stick to the two main parties, especially with such a crucial election like this one.

If even one electoral vote goes to someone other than the two main candidates, it could easily devastate the election and change an outcome. No matter how different our ideological views may be, for now lets just put our differences aside, vote for the major candidate of our choice, and see how the election plays out.

Visit link:

Write-ins and third party votes a waste - The Merciad

Why Mark ZuckerbergAnd George SorosAre Actually Conservative Heroes – Forbes

Nobody likes Mark Zuckerberg. The Facebook CEO has lower favorable ratings across the board than President Donald Trump, according to some polling. But since Zuckerberg runs a Silicon Valley social network, he is especially loathed by Republicans, like the senators who last week accused him and his counterparts at Twitter and Google of censoring conservatives.

Such criticism is unfounded. In fact, in a real way, Zuckerberg should be lauded a patron saint of the American conservative movement. And right-wingers should also be praising George Soros, another one of their undeserved bogeymen. Both are paying big money to limit governments involvement in our lives, a pillar of the intellectual foundation of modern-day conservatism.

This is the face of someone paying to enact a conservative ideal in American government.

In whats become a stylized ritual, Republican senators lined up to bellow at Zuckerberg at a hearing last Wednesday, their punishment for Facebooks treatment of the New York Posts recent report on the contents of Hunter Bidens laptop.

Yet in the aggregate, Facebook does conservatives an enormous service. Right-leaning posts perform particularly well on Facebook, multiple studies show. Most days, the list of the best-performing posts on Facebook is a list of whatever Dan Bongino or Ben Shapiro are thinking that day.

On top of platforming their ideas, Zuckerberg is also bankrolling a classic conservative ideal. Not too long ago, classic conservatives like the Buckley family and libertarian conservatives like former Republican U.S. Rep. Ron Paul presented a united front on the drug war.

Since the drug war allowed law enforcement to enter Americans homes and disrupt their lives for making personal choices about their bodies and their habits, the drug war was considered one of the most obvious examples of a big and intrusive government availableand thus, anathema to a classic conservative.

In an example of horseshoe theory in action, the dogma around legal drugs has switched, and Republican lawmakers have become some of the drug wars staunchest defenders, with the liberals they deride as socialists some of the loudest and most reliable voices calling for an end to prisons stuffed with drug users. And both Zuckerberg and Soros have ponied up cash to actually change these policies.

On Oct. 1, the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative, the policy-slash-philanthropy outfit founded by pediatrician Priscilla Chan and her more famous husband, contributed $500,000 to the campaign to pass Measure 110, a ballot initiative in Oregon that would decriminalize possession of small amounts of drugsall drugs, including hard drugs.

Soros is also doing this. A monster among conservatives for his support for the American Civil Liberties Union and other perceived progressive causes, Soros has for years been one of the biggest bankrollers of drug-policy reform. His Open Society Foundation funds the Drug Policy Alliance, the New York-based policy shop that advocates for drug-policy reform. And DPAs political shop, Drug Policy Action, is the biggest bankroller of Measure 110. Contributions to that effort total about $2.3 million, according to the most recent campaign finance filings.

Bankrolling small government, amplifying conservative voices. Add in Facebooks natural resistance to government regulationthe company was fined $5 billion by the Federal Trade Commission in 2019, and would not benefit much from stricter government regulation of either its service or the internetand you have an outfit that adheres to politics that are closer to classic conservatism than anything else.

There are some flaws in the orthodoxy. Measure 110, for example, doesnt eliminate government involvement in drug policy. Instead, it would redirect money from law enforcement to drug treatment and counseling. Then again, conservatives have been happy to jump on the revenue train generated by legalized marijuana, with former Speaker of the House John Boehner joining the board of legal marijuana company Acreage Holdings.

You could argue that modern-day conservatism doesnt bear much resemblance to the classic small-government model. You would probably be right. Still, its hard to see how Mark Zuckerberg hasnt done anything but a service to conservatives online. And at least in Oregon, both he and Soros are putting cash on the barrel to bring about a classic conservative ideal.

Here is the original post:

Why Mark ZuckerbergAnd George SorosAre Actually Conservative Heroes - Forbes

The Libertarian Moment That Never Comes – The New Republic

Johnsons relatively strong showing in 2016 bespoke significant right-leaning dissatisfaction with Trump. The defeated ranks of the Never Trump crowd might easily have defected to the Libertarian Party in 2017, carrying a significant portfolio of media and donor assets out of the Republican tent along with them. Indeed, most of that cohort fit a socially liberal, fiscally conservative profile that would have required little ideological accommodation on either side. Instead, this faction gravitated toward novel enterprises like the Lincoln Project and formed a de facto armistice with Democrats in an effort to deny Trump reelection.

Rather than consolidating a newly aggrieved legion of supporters, movement libertarianism has spent the last few years in a state of reflective evolution. Prominent commentators like economist Tyler Cowen have observed the birth of a state capacity libertarianism, embodied in new groups like the Niskanen Center, that is more agnostic about the scope of government than traditional organizations like the Cato Institute. Meanwhile, activists and commentators have cast about for new identifying labels, some discarding libertarian for the more nebulous concept of classical liberalism.

Above all else, the chief obstacle to a growing Libertarian Partyone that actually wins office from time to time, or at least regularly claims a vote share in the high single digitsis simply the architecture of the American electoral system, which tends to sideline minor parties. Independent and third-party bids have, at times, broken through, as with Theodore Roosevelt in 1912, George Wallace in 1968, and Ross Perot in 1992. But those men were nationally known figures, each offering a true ideological alternative to what the Democrats and Republicans were serving up.

There might have been such a man for the moment this year: Justin Amash. The Michigan Republican, who won national headlines for breaking with his party and voting to impeach Donald Trump, explored the possibility of running for the Libertarian Party nomination about six weeks into the coronavirus lockdown, a notion that seemed to cause much more anxiety among establishment Democrats than the Trump camp. Amash, however, withdrew his short-lived campaign for the Libertarian Party nomination later in the spring. It seems quite likely in retrospect that he might have been blazing a brighter electoral path than Jorgensen is at the moment, but well never know. Its difficult, and perhaps impossible, to bring capable, ambitious leaders to moribund parties.


The Libertarian Moment That Never Comes - The New Republic

Conservative vs. Liberal Views of Social Change: Who’s Right? – The Doctor Weighs In

As inother periods in our history, ours is a battleground between two basic views of statecraft: 1) the liberal view of social change for the good of the people and 2) the conservative belief that any social engineering is doomed to failure at best and is tyrannical at worst.

Our present-day heated, even venomous arguments, are nothing new. Abraham Lincoln, not a rabid Socialist, had to contend with the reactionary Democratic Party of his time. It was called the know nothing party. It was true to its name.

Teddy Roosevelt (TR) fought the big money interests of his time. He also planted the seeds of the progressive movement. His fifth cousin Franklin Delano (FDR) gave us the New Deal, a social experiment of profound dimensions. And Lyndon Johnson completed the work of Lincoln, TR, and FDR with his much underappreciated War on Poverty.

This seemingly inexorable process of progressivism was punctuated with conservative backlash. The most profound was initiated by Ronald Reagan whose worldview could be summed up by his own pithy phrase from his 1981 Inaugural address:

Government is the problem, not the solution.

This conservative trend continued during George Bushs two terms and assumed its most extreme form in the Libertarian ideology of Ron Paul. A stance that is perpetuated by his son, Senator Rand Paul.

This was followed by two terms of the progressive, Barack Obama. In addition to digging us out of the economic mess left by the preceding president, he also was able to get the Affordable Care Act signed into law. Although it fell short of the universal coverage that many progressives hoped for, it did significantly increase coverage, particularly in the left-leaning states that expanded Medicaid.

And, then came Republican Donald Trump who has spent his first term trying to undo everything that Obama had put into place. True to his promise, he slashed taxes primarily benefiting corporations and the rich. He also implemented severely restrictive immigration policies.

Other articles by this author:The Unfortunate Consequences of Disbelieving in Free WillWhat is the Science Behind the Spread of Fake News?

However, His biggest coup when it comes to conservative social policy may come on November 10, 2020. This is when the newly lopsided Supreme Court votes on whether The ACA is constitutional or not.

So, whos right?

An important book by Timothy Wilson, Redirect: The Surprising New Science of Psychological Change, reviews the track record of social change through policy.

Wilson is a social psychologist at the University of Virginia who has made groundbreaking discoveries in the study of intuition and introspection. Who better to judge whether intuition and ideology are sufficient? Although written in 2011, it is still quite relevant today. In fact, it is an eye-opener.

Equally important to read is a review of Wilsons book in Science Magazine that was written by Geoffrey L. Cohen of Stanford Universitys Departments of Education and Psychology. It appeared shortly after the book was published.

Here is what he said,

When the father of the field, German refugee Kurt Lewin, conducted his seminal studies, the problems of World War II preoccupied him:

At the heart of Lewins approach rested a novel idea: social problems are amenable to experimentation. The best way to understand something is to try to change it, he was fond of saying. Beyond descriptive and correlational studies, Lewin championed experimental manipulation: Introduce an exogenous shock to the system and see how it responds.

Cohen goes on to say,

Lewin also advocated a diagnosis stage in what he dubbed action research. First, assess the relationships among variables in a system. In doing so, one could identify the pressure points where a small nudge might have large consequences.

For example, to encourage families to eat cheap-cut meats like sweetbreads during the war (because the finer cuts had limited supply),Lewin showed the importance of the gatekeeper, the person who controls the behavioral channelin this case, the housewife.

He also demonstrated the impotence of persuasion and the power of the small group. Bring housewives together into a new groupsupportive of change, freeing them from the grip of their old familial norms, and they would try the novel foods far more frequently than if they were lectured to.

Time and again, Lewin showed that what often seem problems of bad attitudes, lack of information or economic incentives were instead problems of group influence, identity, and social perception.

But most revolutionary was Lewins method. There was a combination of optimism and folly in the idea that researchers could, through the experimental method, change reality, and improve social conditions for the better.

In Redirect: The Surprising New Science of Psychological Change, Timothy Wilson reviews much of this history and revisits the field of social psychology 70 years after Lewins pioneering work.

To summarize his findings from this extensive review, it becomes clear that policies based on ideology and intuition are almost always doomed to failure. On the other hand, policies based on controlled studiesemploying the best techniques science provideshave an infinitely better chance to succeed.

Such studies start with a limited population sample. Once proven effective, they are scaled up to larger and larger populations. Fortunately, our thousands of municipalities, tens of thousands of school districts, and 50 culturally-diverse states offer an enormous laboratory for such social experiments.

Interventions that defuse blacks and whites fear of interracial rejection increase their likelihood of becoming friends. And reminiscent of Lewin, there are studies that cleverly manipulate social norms to reduce teen alcohol use and encourage energy conservation.

Now lets consider the ideologically-based policies, such as, for instance,the ownership society ofGeorgeBush. The ideawas basically quintessential conservative:

Give people property and theyll become conservative. This is because they now have something to lose. Hopefully, they start voting Republicana not-so-fringe benefit of the policys advocates.

The catastrophic failure of this policy is still reverberating through our economy today and will, I believe, continue to do so for many years to come.

Cohen, the Stanford scientist, concludes:

Wilson wants society to adopt more of an experimental approach to solving social problemsputting interventions to the test with randomized controlled trials. This is a good idea, at least when the ambition is to disseminate the interventions widely. However, one problem that Redirect does not explicitly address concerns limitations in the experimental method itself.

There is nothing better than an experimentfor testing causality, whether an intervention A affects a social problem B. However, a positive experimental result risks deluding us into believing that A is both necessary and sufficientto solve B.

But as Lewin taught us, the effect of A will depend on the context into which it is introducedthe preexisting system of variables. Encourage students to see their academic fates as within their own control and they will thrive., provided on inhabiting a classroom that provides them with opportunities for growth, such as committed teachers and quality instruction.

Many of the interventions Wilson reviews act like catalysts. They will not teach a student who cannot spell to spell, butthey will encourage the student to seize opportunities to learn how. Because the effects of interventions are context-dependent,there will be no silver bullets.

Wilson compellingly argues that effective interventions validated by social-science research are rarely implemented. This is a problem. Why are such interventions ignored in favor of ideology and intuition? What can we do to prevent this? What interventions should we be implementing today?

Richard Thaler is an economist at the University of Chicago and Cass Sunstein is a professor of law at Harvard Law School. These professors, both with an unimpeachable conservative (in the academic sense of the word) track record, did something unique in our ideology-soaked political environment: They looked at the science.

Specifically, they examined the field of behavioral economics as developed by Daniel Kahneman and his colleagues. And in doing so, they arrived at a surprising conclusion:

When based on science, both a conservative and a liberal approach to social policy can be married.

In their book, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Thaler and Sunstein state:

The libertarian aspect of our strategies lies in the straightforward insistence that, in general, people should be free to do what they like and to opt-out of undesirable arrangements if they want to do so. On the other hand, it is legitimate for choice architects to try to influence peoples behavior in order to make their lives longer, healthier, and better.'

They dubbed this theoryLibertarian Paternalism, somewhat of a dissonant contradiction to my ears. Their argument is that you dont have to compel people to do whats good for them, rather you can nudge them toward it. For example:

You get the picture.

How such an approach would fare with anti-maskers and anti-vaxxers who detest wearing their facial covering or getting their children vaccinated against deadly diseases, is left unanswered.

I suspect that part of the answer will not be wholly acceptable to libertarian paternalists a la Thaler and Sunstein; lets call it soft coercion.

Take, as an example, smoking cessation. The science is unequivocal: smoking cigarettes is deadly!

But libertarian ideology says that as a free society we should be free to smoke and if it kills us, well, that was our choice. This argument totally ignores the societal harm done by smoking, such as:

So how did we, as a society that lives in reality rather than in an ideological ivory tower, deal with it? We followed the science and banished smokers from all spaces where people congregate. Further, we limited them smoking to circumscribed spaces (smoking rooms, outside of their office building) that were not always very inviting.

We raised the prices of cigarettes to make them less affordable. We forced cigarette manufacturers to label their products with prominently warning labels. We even made them pay the cost of anti-smoking public service announcements.

This approach did not outright ban smoking, acknowledging our societys libertarian streak, rather it nudged smokers into quitting this harmful habit.

So when it comes to dealing with the ideological anti-vaxxers school districts may face funding penalties for not mandating childrens immunization. To deal with the anti-maskers, companies could become legally liable if they do not mandate wearing a mask at work.

Does this tactic sound too coercive? I suggest it is a middle ground between mandates and laissez-faire, between liberal and conservative approaches. And, it was demonstrated to be successful in dealing with the man-made cigarette pandemic that afflicted the world.

I believe that, just as with the smoking problem, at the end of the day we will be forced to acknowledge science and abandon intuition and ideology.

It gives me hope that examined dispassionately through the lens of scientific evidence such seemingly irreconcilable ideologies as Libertarianism and Liberalism can rise above the ideological cacophony and give us enlightened policymaking.

Is it too much to ask?

In the current environment, probably.

Published 12/28/11. Updated and republished 6/16/17. Updated and republished again 11/2/20 because of the remarkable relevance of the arguments to todays political environment. We hope it adds to the much-needed conversation about U.S. policy approaches.

Go here to read the rest:

Conservative vs. Liberal Views of Social Change: Who's Right? - The Doctor Weighs In

Maybe Jo Jorgensen Finishing With 1% Would Actually Be Pretty Good? – Reason

As dawn broke on the final day of voting in election 2020, Libertarian Party (L.P.) presidential nominee Jo Jorgensen was polling nationally at around 1.8 percent, and above the margin between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden in five states: Ohio, Texas, Georgia, Iowa, and (in scant polling) Alaska.

That's a far cry from 2016 Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson's last pre-election polling average of 4.8 percent, or even the former New Mexico governor's disappointing-to-many final tally of 3.28 percent.

"Beating Gary's last numbers would be success," Jorgensen told Reason's Eric Boehm one month ago, while also complaining about not being included in nearly as many polls this cycle. "I'm hoping to beat his second run. But, you know, put it this way: I will consider it not a success if I don't at least his beat his numbers from his first run."

Johnson's 2012 exertions won him 0.99 percent of the national vote, or just a hair under the L.P.'s then-record haul of 1.06 percent in 1980, in a ticket headed by Ed Clark and financed by deep-pocketed vice presidential nominee David Koch (yes, that one). So what Jorgensen is saying that anything below 1 percent would be a disappointment.

Certainly, many Libertarians would consider even a 1.1 percent showingjust one-third of 2016!to be a bummer, while many two-party voters (including not a small number of self-described small-l libertarians) would use it as an opportunity for ridicule, or at least critique of how the party always seems to squander its opportunities. Democrats and Republicans aren't even talking about reducing government and expanding freedom anymore, in a country where those issues have resonated historically, and all you got was this lousy one percent?

But as the clock ticks toward the first poll-closings at 7 p.m. eastern, I would suggest at least entertaining another interpretation. Maybe 1.1 percent in this third-party-unfriendly environment would be an accomplishment, cementing the L.P.'s transformation over the past decade from a mostly non-podium performer that couldn't win over even half of a percent of the electorate from 19842008, to the third party in the United States. (Yes, yes, insert "tallest dwarf" joke here.)

Consider: As of late October (per the indispensable Richard Winger), in the 32 states that register voters by party, there were 47.1 million Democrats, 35 million Republicans, and 33.7 independents. Libertarians, while a distant third at 652,000, towered above Greens (240,000), the Constitution Party (130,000), the New Yorkbased Working Families (50,000), and the desiccated husk of Ross Perot's Reform Party (9,000).

Jorgensen, with a fraction of the name recognition of 2008 Libertarian nominee Bob Barr (then an ex-GOP congressman who made his name in the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton), is polling ahead of all third-party and independent presidential candidates in every state except New York (where, after just two polls, she trailed independent Brock Pierce and Green Party nominee Howie Hawkins). This on the heels of Gary Johnson beating all third-party comers in all 50 states.

Barr, on the other hand, finished with just 0.4 percent of the vote, behind the 0.56 percent of four-time independent candidate Ralph Nader, who Barr beat in just six states.

When Jorgensen, the party's vice presidential nominee in 1996 (Harry Browne won just 0.5 percent of the vote that year, behind both Nader and Perot), finishes in third place tonight, that will mark the third consecutive presidential bronze medal for the L.P.something no political party has pulled off since the Socialists between 19161932.

Put another way, of all voters who selected neither a Democrat nor a Republican for president, 57 percent of them chose a Libertarian in both 2012 and 2016, the party's highest-ever such share, topping Ron Paul's 48 percent in 1988. Polling suggests that Jorgensen is likely to repeat that performance, even with such luminaries as Kanye West on some ballots. The dominant alternative to the political status quo is called "Libertarian."

And contrary to a common critique, it's not just about presidential elections. The party has more than 200 elected officials, mostly in state and local positions, though since April their ranks have included for the first time a sitting (if lame-duck) member of Congress, Rep. Justin Amash (LMich.). Elected Libertarians do useful stuff, like pass occupational licensing reform, remove ancient prohibitions from the books, and reform public-sector pensions.

That sound you hear is aggressive eye rolling from Democratic and Republican voters, who are busy battling the most important election in the history of mankind, and have no patience left for political LARPers. And fair enoughmarginal blocs will always be treated marginally, at least until we're needed to help push through the types of libertarian reforms that major-party politicians talk about but rarely accomplish: ending the drug war, bringing the troops home, reducing the size of government, protecting free speech, even helping improve infrastructure.

But the more that libertarians retain their own discrete political identity, rather than latching on like barnacles to the rusty tankers of the two major parties, the more likely that their affections will be solicited, rather than taken for granted. President Donald Trump is out there stressing anti-war themes to 2016 Johnson voters, and that's not a bad outcome at all (if inferior to actually ending our Forever Wars).

The past week has featured many semi-prominent libertarian media personalities ripping each other's faces off (rhetorically) in advance of the election. It will ever be thushave you met libertarians? There is a powerful lure to be part of something that could be, if you squint at it just right, characterized as winning. It would be pretty to think that this Republican or that Democrat is gonna really do the libertarian things just as soon as he/she wins the next election.

In the face of those temptations, and the motivating negative polarization of seeing awful politicians and ideologies in or near power, it's a wonder there's much of any third-party juice left four years after a bitterly divided election. If in this context, a relative no-name candidate produces the party's second-best-ever result, while beating all other third partiers in all 50 states, I'd call that an accomplishment.

Who knows if and when our 19th century political groupings will transmogrify into something new, or even perhaps stumble off into the sunset. When that day nears, people will be looking anew toward the next available alternative. Right now, for better and for worse, wartsso many warts!and all, that alternative is called "Libertarian." And will be on Wednesday, too.

Read more here:

Maybe Jo Jorgensen Finishing With 1% Would Actually Be Pretty Good? - Reason

Ronald ‘Ron’ Annuschat – Kingfisher Times

Ronald Ron Stephen Annuschat, 58, of Okarche, passed away Friday, Oct. 30, 2020, at Mercy Hospital in Oklahoma City.

Ron was the eighth child of Arthur Frank and Ruth Janet (Brueggen) Annuschat and was born on Oct. 5, 1962, in Okarche.

He grew up on the family farm east of Okarche where he resided until his death.

Ron was a 1980 graduate of Okarche High School and excelled at woodworking and was part of the 1979 state championship basketball team with his brother Nick.

He went on to attend El Reno Junior College.

Ron worked beside his brothers and many nephews and late father on the family farm. He especially enjoyed raising Suffolk sheep for which he and his brother Nick won many awards.

Lambing season was a very busy but exciting time as it brought new life to the farm.

His true passion was the countless hours spent working and planting on his John Deere tractor and beaming brightly when an abundant crop was produced.

We should have all known Ron was going to be a great fanner at a young age. He would play in the dirt in the backyard with his siblings and each would have their own farm.

Rons farm was always the nicest with special curves and roads, but he would always stop and help his younger siblings to help perfect theirs, but never as great as his.

In his down time you could find Ron at his old alma mater Okarche High School watching basketball. His brothers and he spent countless hours watching the New York Yankees baseball games or his beloved OU Sooners.

It wasnt uncommon for his late brother Stanley to call the house many times from the dairybarn to check the score while Ron was cooking.

You could often find Ron in the barn holding and talking to his baby goats and lambs. His brother Nick often laughed and called him Dr. Dolittle.

He took great pride in all the litters of Great Pyrenees pups that were born on the farm.

With the help of his brothers one night when a storm was coming in, he just knew they had to move the pups to a safer spot. He stated afterward that she was not a very smart mother, but used some more choice words to express his disappointment in her.

It was not uncommon for the schools to bring the young children out to the farm for a tour and Ron was always the tour guide.

The children would send colored pictures thanking Ron and the brothers for letting them visit.

He proudly displayed all the artwork all over the house and knew who each child was as well as their parents. Ron loved people, especially his many high school friends, but didnt mind making a truckload of new friends along the way.

He was a member of the Okarche Knights of Columbus, Holy Trinity Catholic Church and the United Suffolk Sheep Association.

Ron is survived by his brothers Nick Annuschat of the home and Larry Annuschat of Okarche; and sisters Vicki Marks (Terry) of Omega, Sandy Raupe (Richard) of Okarche, Denise Meyer (Mike) of Salina, Kan., and Jackie Walta (Chris) of Kingfisher.

He is also survived by his loving nephews, nieces, great-nephews and great-nieces who were such a big part of his life.

He was preceded in death by his parents Arthur and Ruth Annuschat and his brothers Paul, Stanley and David.

Ron will surely be missed by his family and friends, but will be remembered for his loud laughter, love for his family, friends and for all of Gods wonders.

A private graveside service for immediate family was Saturday, Nov. 7, at Holy Trinity Catholic Cemetery in Okarche. It was officiated by Father Cory Stanley and Pastor James Inman.

Services are under the direction of Sanders Funeral Service, Kingfisher.

Memorials may be made to Holy Trinity Catholic Church, Center of Family Love and First Baptist Church all of Okarche.

Read more:

Ronald 'Ron' Annuschat - Kingfisher Times

Who are US electoral college voters and what could happen if state results are disputed? – ABC News

Battleground states are still being counted and the US election remains too close to call.

US President Donald Trump has already flagged involving the Supreme Court in the decision, while Democratic opponent Joe Biden says he is on track for victory.

The pair are fighting for the last electoral college votes up for grabs with each eyeing the necessary 270 to win the election.

The 538 electors of the electoral college are the Americans who will elect the president. So what do we know about them?

In 48 of the 50 states, as well as Washington DC, whoever wins that state's popular vote choses the state's electors typically party insiders who will vote for their candidate.

So this year, the Republicans will choose the electors to represent Texas, while the Democrats will select the electors for California.

But in Nebraska and Maine, both candidates can be awarded electoral college votes owing to special laws there.

Each states' electors will cast their votes on December 14. The votes will then be counted by Congress on January 6.

This is a process overseen by Vice-President Mike Pence in his role as Senate president.

The President-elect will then begin their term on January 20.

With several key states going down to the wire, the Trump campaign is signalling it will dispute results that don't go their way.

Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, North Carolina and Georgia are all in doubt.

The so-called "blue wall" of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania are the ones being watched very closely.

Mr Trump has already said he believed he won the election and said he would involve the Supreme Court to contest a negative result.

There could be a situation where both Mr Trump and Mr Biden claim victory in several of these states.

In this case, both parties could try to send their electors to the electoral college.

In this scenario, it is theoretically possible for a state's governor and legislature each representing a different political party to submit two different election results.

This has happened once in US history.

There were duelling electors in three states following the 1876 election.

Follow the twists and turns as Donald Trump and Joe Biden face off in the race for the White House.

That dispute was resolved after Republican Rutherford B. Hayes became president in exchange for withdrawing US troops left over from the Civil War from Southern states.

The risk of this happening again is heightened in the battleground states of Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which have Democratic governors and Republican-controlled legislatures.

In the lead up to the election, experts said the President could press Republican-controlled legislatures to appoint electors favourable to him, claiming the initial vote count reflected the true outcome.

Governors in those same states could end up backing a separate slate of electors pledged to Mr Biden if the final count showed the Democratic candidate had won.

If this happens, both sets of electors would meet and vote on December 14 and the competing results would be sent to Congress.

But, states have until December 8, known as the "safe harbor" deadline under federal law, to resolve any disputes over their vote totals and certify the winner of the election.

If a state fails to finalise its vote count by then, Congress is no longer required to accept its results under the electoral college system.

Both houses of Congress the House of Representatives and the Senate could both choose to accept the same group of electors.

That would settle the matter.

The chambers could also split, which is more likely if the Republicans retain control of the Senate and Democrats hold onto their House majority.

If politicians cannot agree on a set of electors, the country will find itself in uncharted territory.

Interpreting the Electoral Count Act would be needed to decide who wins.

Described by some academics as "unintelligible," it seems to favour the slate of electors certified by the state's governor, according to Ned Foley, a professor at Ohio State University Moritz College of Law.

However, Mr Foley told Reuters that some scholars and an analysis by the Congressional Research Service have rejected that conclusion.

Academics have sketched out several scenarios.

Keep up with the latest US politics news and get more insights by signing up to ABC News on Messenger.

Under one, Mr Pence as president of the Senate could throw out both sets of a state's electors.

Another contemplates that the House of Representatives would end up choosing between Mr Biden and Mr Trump.

There is even a scenario in which the Speaker of the House, currently Democrat Nancy Pelosi, could become acting president.

It could require the Supreme Court to interpret the act, but that is not a guarantee.

Jessica Levinson, director of Loyola Law School's Public Service Institute, told Reuters if this scenario plays out the court could decided to not be the institution which decides the election.

"I could see a court saying this would really be better left up to Congress," she said.

Another scenario which could cause chaos is if their are "faithless" or rogue electors.

These are electors who go against the candidate who won their state.

It is uncommon, but it has happened recently.

Out of 23,507 elector votes cast in 58 presidential elections, just 90 have gone rogue, according to political activist group FairVote.

Send us your questions, thoughts, and stories about the 2020 US election. Your question will help guide our coverage.

In 2016, 10 electors from six states went rogue, eight defecting from former Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and two from Republican Donald Trump.

These faithless electors cast their vote for Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders, activist Faith Spotted Eagle and three Republicans John Kasich, Colin Powell and Ron Paul.

Only once, in 1796, has an elector cast their vote for the opponent of their pledged candidate.

Most states have laws against electors being "faithless", however, these are typically fines or voiding an elector's vote.

There are 16 states with a combined 191 electoral college votes who do not have laws binding electors.

This includes the battleground state of Pennsylvania.

The greatest risk arises where one rogue vote could determine the presidency.

If no candidate has the requisite 270 electoral votes, the winner would be decided by the newly elected House of Representatives when the US Congress meets to count the electoral votes on January 6.

Securing the Senate majority will be vital for the winner of the presidency.

Currently, Republicans appear poised to retain control at a 53-47 seat Senate majority.


Read the original:

Who are US electoral college voters and what could happen if state results are disputed? - ABC News

Ron Onesti: The 1893 World’s Fair is getting me through this – Chicago Daily Herald

As I am sitting here writing this, the presidential election is neck-and-neck. So much turmoil, unrest and uncertainty. By the time you read this, things will have hopefully settled down. The challenges we have faced in this last year from the COVID-19 pandemic, myriad social issues and the volatile political battlefield we are thrust upon made for arguably the most difficult time in recent history.

You never hear me talk politics. I of course have my opinions and take a personal stance for what I believe in when necessary. But I do not betray the trust of our loyal supporters who depend upon me to help them keep their music memories alive. No one reads this column, attends our shows, feasts at our festivals or breaks bread at our restaurants to hear me soapbox my political and/or social beliefs. They just want to know when Paul Anka is coming back or what my favorite Led Zeppelin song is. Maybe a question or two about my meatballs, but that's it!

And I completely respect that! I see it as my place to help our people get through that scary stuff by virtue of our shows. Our music is to provide some sort of balance versus all those news reports that illustrate numerous causes of concern about our civilization as we know it.

So when will the shows return? Your guess is as good as mine. I am hoping to get a Christmas gift in the form of an all-access pass to opening our music venues. Just stay tuned!

So how can we stay positive right now without our live music in light of the violence and destruction that has surrounded us for months? I have been trying to stay engaged with our beloved customers and friends on social media with live Walk 'N Talks during my morning walk in the forest preserves and backstage stories in this column. For the past 24 Thursday nights I have hosted an online live interview show with legendary drummers Vinny Appice of Black Sabbath and Carmine Appice from Vanilla Fudge. We have welcomed some of the industry's most iconic musicians as guests for an hour of colorful candor about the business of rock 'n' roll. Add to it many livestream concerts and regular Facebook posts and I have been out there!

I, like many of you, am a history buff. I recently watched a television program about the 1893 Columbian Exposition, the World's Fair held in Chicago. They built more than 50 buildings, all similar to what we now know as the Museum of Science and Industry, one of only two buildings to survive the fair. The Columbian Exposition stretched over 600 acres and welcomed more than 150,000 guests a day for six months! The largest building could hold 300,000 guests! To put it into perspective, Soldier Field seats 61,000.

But to me, the largesse of the fair is not the most amazing thing about it. It is the fact it was held just about 20 years after the Chicago Fire of 1871!

Think about it. Thousands of buildings in the downtown area leveled by fire. Electricity on a mass scale had yet to be perfected, as it was to be unveiled at the fair itself. So the city needed to not only rebuild in a way fitting for an event of that magnitude, but also had to convince the World's Fair Committee to award the event to the newly built city over New York, Washington, D.C., and other prominent cities. All that ONLY 20 years after practically complete desolation of the area! Incredible! Go Chicago!

And that helped me tremendously. If we as a city can come back from that, just like then, we can come back stronger than ever now. If we survived a Civil War, states seceding and Lincoln's assassination, we can survive what is going on today.

We have been miserable for eight months but World War II lasted more than four years! Movie posters and other paper products of that era are so scarce because so much was being recycled for the war effort. Even the copper penny of 1943 was made of steel so that real copper could be used for bullets!

Look at all the civil unrest going on now, in particular, what has happened in downtown Chicago. Then Google some videos of the 1968 Democratic National Convention. The similarities of the social issues then and the unrest today, some 50 years later, is eerie, to say the least.

Add to it the tragedies of 911. We thought the world as we knew it would never be the same. And it wasn't.

Yet still, humanity managed to rise out of the ashes, and move forward. Many would say that after each of those devastating moments in our history, we came out of it stronger.

That is the lesson I learned from slamming on the brakes and remembering history. We WILL emerge victorious from all of this! I will not lose faith in this great country. If it is politics that divides us, it is the music that will unite us!

And that is where I come in!

So I wish you the strength to take a deep breath and come out of this stronger. Just think of how good the live music will sound, no matter how off-key that '80s "hair band" may sound. And think of those meatballs, that hot box of popcorn, our prime rib. It won't have ever have tasted so good!

I also wish you and your family the safety and good health possible for you to make it through all of this. When the sun finally comes out, we will join together, arm-in-arm, singing and dancing together, just like we once did. This will all be a nightmare in our past, overtaken by the sunshine of our future. Keep the faith, and when in doubt, play vinyl records!

Ron Onesti is president and CEO of the Onesti Entertainment Corp. and The Historic Arcada Theatre in St. Charles. Celebrity questions and comments? Email ron@oshows.com.

Originally posted here:

Ron Onesti: The 1893 World's Fair is getting me through this - Chicago Daily Herald

QAnon Congress: Here’s What Happened in Races of Q Supporters – The Daily Dot

Twenty-seven candidates who have publicly expressed at least some support for the QAnon conspiracy theory25 Republicans, one member of the Independent Party of Delaware, and one independentsecured a spot on the ballot in yesterdays general election.

They almost entirely failed, a poor showing for the burgeoning movement. But they can tout at least one success.

Shiva Ayyadurai, Massachusetts: After losing the Republican Senate primary, the self-described inventor of email and QAnon supporter ran as a write-in candidate but received less than 1% in the general election.

Derrick Grayson, Georgia: Grayson is one of many candidates in Georgias Senate special election primary. He shared Q slogans in tweets touting a discussion with Ron Paul about the Federal Reserve and won roughly 1.1% of the vote, failing to advance to the runoff.

Jo Rae Perkins, Oregon: Perkins won slightly less than 50% in the GOP Oregon Senate primary, and has been a prolific promoter and supporter of Q. Shes claimed that Q is a military intelligence operation, compared belief in Q to belief in Jesus Christ, and over the summer, was one of a number of high-profile Republicans to take the oath to become a QAnon digital soldier. Running in a heavily Democratic state, she lost the general election 59%-38% to Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.).

Lauren Witzke, Delaware: After winning her insurgent candidacy in the Republican Senate primary, Witzke lost to stalwart Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) 59%-38%. Witzke had publicly endorsed Q a number of times, though she later retracted that support, claiming that Q was a psyop designed to make people trusting of a non-existent plan and that it was more hype than substance.

Josh Barnett, Arizona 7th Congressional District: Barnett, who shared numerous QAnon hashtags before denouncing the movement as nonsense, won the Republican nomination after running unopposed but lost to incumbent Rep. Josh Gallego (D-Ariz.).

Joyce Bentley, Nevada 1st Congressional District: Bentley won her primary election in June and had shared the hugely popular QAnon video The Plan to Save the World in October 2018. She lost to incumbent Democrat Dina Titus.

Lauren Boebert, Colorado 3rd Congressional District: One of the most prolific Q-supporters running for Congress, Boebert has appeared on multiple hugely popular QAnon YouTube channels, only to claim since then that she doesnt follow Q. On Wednesday, Boebert beat Democrat Diane Mitsch Bush to clinch the seat for Colorados 3rd Congressional District. She previously released a statement to supporters calling herself Congresswoman-elect, claiming, The QAnon attacks were ridiculous. I have consistently said I am not a follower of and I do not believe in conspiracy theories.

Rayla Campbell, write-in candidate for Massachusetts 7th Congressional District: Campbell, who has been seen in social media posts in a Q t-shirt, lost to incumbent Rep. Ayanna Presley (D-Mass.).

Mike Cargile, California 35th Congressional District: One of two candidates who ran in the blanket primary for his district, Cargile has tweeted numerous Q slogans and called Q a perfect sentiment. He lost to Democrat Norma Torres.

Erin Cruz, California 36th Congressional District: Cruz finished in the top two of her districts primary and has expressed support for Q on numerous occasions, calling it valid information thats in line with whats coming out of the government. She lost to Democrat Raul Ruiz.

Johsie Cruz Ezammudeen, Georgia 4th Congressional District: Ezmamudeen ran unopposed in the Republican primary and has shared Q videos and sentiments. She lost to Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.).

Ron Curtis, Hawaii 1st Congressional District: Curtis won the primary in his district after tweeting and sharing a number of Q-related posts, including material from Vincent Fusca, a man many Q believers incorrectly think is actually John F. Kennedy Jr. The race hadnt been called at press time.

Marjorie Taylor Green, Georgia 14th Congressional District: Greene might be the best known Q-aligned congressional candidate, drawing national media attention for her inflammatory videos and stalwart support of Q. After her Democratic opponent unexpectedly dropped out, Greene won her election to become the first QAnon-embracing member of the U.S. Congress.

Alison Hayden, California 15th Congressional District: Hayden finished in the top-two of her California blanket primary and has shared a number of QAnon tweets and videos. Hayden lost to popular incumbent Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.).

Bob Lancia, Rhode Island 2nd Congressional District: Lancia is a former Rhode Island state legislator who easily won his primary election and has retweeted Q material, though he denied being an actual follower of the movement, claiming that his staff retweeted the posts because they supported President Trump. He lost to 11-term Rep. Jim Langevin (D-Fla.)

Tracy Lovvorn, Massachusetts 2nd Congressional District: Lovvorn won her primary after running unopposed and has shared Q slogans on multiple social media platforms. She lost her election in this heavily Democratic district near Boston to 13-term Rep. James McGovern (D-Mass.).

KW Miller, Florida 18th Congressional District: Miller got a measure of national attention for his candidacy with his bizarre theories about Beyonc not actually being Black, as well as his vocal support of QAnon. Despite his media profile, Miller received around just 2% of the vote in his bid to unseat Republican Brian Mast.

Buzz Patterson, California 7th Congressional District: Patterson, who finished second in the blanket primary in his district, was asked on Twitter if he supported QAnon and replied, Yep! He later told Axios that he doesnt remember sending the tweet and doesnt actually support Q. At press time, Patterson trailed Democrat Ami Bera by about 2-to-1.

Nikka Piterman, California 13th Congressional District: Having finished second in his top-two primary in this heavily Democratic part of the San Francisco area, Piterman lost his general election by about 82 points. In 2019, he retweeted posts with the QAnon hashtag several times.

Billy Prempeh, New Jersey 9th Congressional District: Despite tweeting a photo of his presence at a QAnon rally and posing with a Q flag, Prempeh called his allegiance to Q fake news. Prempeh lost his general election bid.

Catherine Purcell, Delaware At-Large Congressional District: Purcell is running as a third-party candidate and has endorsed QAnon and the idea that global elites are harvesting children for the chemical compound adrenochrome. She received 1.5% of the vote.

Christine Quinn, Florida 14th Congressional District: Quinn, who has shared Q material on Twitter on several occasions, won her competitive primary election but lost her general by 60-40.

Theresa Raborn, Illinois 2nd Congressional District: After running unopposed in the Republican primary, Raborn lost general election. She has publicly supported Q several times, including sharing the video of Michael Flynn taking the QAnon oath, which she said she shared only because it was patriotic.

Lavern Spicer, Florida 24th Congressional District: Spicer ran unopposed in her primary, and has shared links to the popular QAnon promoting video series Fall of the Cabal several times. She lost her general election bid to Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-Fla.).

Angela Stanton-King, Georgia 5th Congressional District: Another QAnon candidate who received national attention, Stanton-King ran unopposed in her primary and has shared a number of QAnon tweets and videosonly to claim that she did so only to question the movement. She lost her general election bid to Democrat Nikema Williams.

Johnny Teague, Texas 9th Congressional District: Teague has shared QAnon content on several occasions and lost his bid to unseat longtime Rep. Al Green (D-Texas).

Antoine Tucker, New Yorks 14th Congressional District: Tucker lost his write-in bid against Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and had expressed support for Q and its ideas on many occasions.

Rob Weber, Ohio 9th Congressional District: Another high-profile QAnon candidate, Weber won a contested primary and has publicly endorsed Q a number of times. His general election bid ended with a loss to Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio).

Philanise White, Illinois 1st Congressional District: White ran unopposed for the Republican nomination in this heavily Democratic Chicago district and lost to longtime Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.). She had tweeted support for QAnon several times.

Daniel Wood, Arizonas 3rd Congressional District: Wood ran unopposed for the Republican nomination in this heavily Democratic part of the state. Wood has tweeted Q posts and slogans many times and lost his bid in the general election by a 2-to-1 margin to Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.0.

Read more:

QAnon Congress: Here's What Happened in Races of Q Supporters - The Daily Dot

Governor Ron Desantis and FHPCA Recognize November as Florida Hospice and Palliative Care Month – Holmes County Times Advertiser

Staff Report| Washington County News

TALLAHASSEE - Governor Ron Desantis has declared November as Hospice and Palliative Care Month in Florida. In 2019, 139,865 patients received hospice care throughout Florida and a continual increase is expected in the years ahead. Florida Hospice & Palliative Care Association is pleased to join hospice providers and supporters across the state in recognizing November as Hospice and Palliative Care Month in Florida. High quality care, education, and accessibility are hallmarks of hospice care in Florida as every eligible resident has a hospice services available to them. Hospice and Palliative Care Month in Florida highlights the quality and variety of services offered in every county across the state.

"The beliefs that, 'Every day is a gift' and 'The days you have should be lived to the fullest' are foundational to the valuable services available through your local hospice," said Paul A. Ledford, President & CEO of Florida Hospice & Palliative Care Associat ion. "When curative therapies are no longer helpful, it is appropriate for the plan of care to change focus to be about comfort and quality of life. This November, we want to raise awareness that hospices around Florida are here to help. It is very rewarding to see patients and families find the comfort and care they need, at the right place, and the right time."

Read Governor Desantis' proclamation athttps://www.floridaho spices.or g/wp content/uploads/2020/11/Hospice-and-Palliative-Care-Month.pdf

Visitwww.Lett1ospiceHelp.orgto find basic facts and resources on what to expect from hospice providers as a patient and caregiver. The 'Find a Provider' feature allows users to locate end-of life care programs in Florida.

See the rest here:

Governor Ron Desantis and FHPCA Recognize November as Florida Hospice and Palliative Care Month - Holmes County Times Advertiser

Borat Vs. Ali G Vs. Bruno: Who’s The Best Sacha Baron Cohen Character? – CinemaBlend

Bruno (2009)

The Austrian, gay fashion journalist also got his own movie back in 2009, and quite frankly, I think its the most underappreciated. Much like Borat, Bruno was also a sort of mockumentary with interview segments, but I personally think the narrative was the strongest of the 3 movies. Brunos dream is to become the biggest Austrian superstar since Hitler and the movie may be even more offensive than Borat, but in the best sort of way. Highlights include Bruno driving what looks like a baby right into traffic and making out with his boyfriend in the middle of a cage fight in front of a booing audience. Its cringe-worthy gold!

I personally find Bruno much funnier than Borat, but I know Im in the minority. Plus, if were going by box office receipts, then Borat was far and away a bigger success, making $262.6 million domestically compared to Brunos $138.8 million, and Ali G Indahouses paltry in comparison $25.9 million. No question, Borat wins this round.

See the original post here:

Borat Vs. Ali G Vs. Bruno: Who's The Best Sacha Baron Cohen Character? - CinemaBlend

How Does the Electoral College Work and Why Does It Matter? – The New York Times

The process of choosing electors can be an insiders game, said Kimberly Wehle, a professor at the University of Baltimore and the author of What You Need to Know About Voting and Why. They are often state legislators, party leaders or donors, she said.

The important number is 270. A total of 538 electoral votes are in play across all 50 states and Washington, D.C. The total number of electoral votes assigned to each state varies depending on population, but each state has at least three, and the District of Columbia has had three electors since 1961.

Most are, and it helps to think of voting on a state-by-state basis, Professor Amar said.

Its just like in tennis, he said. Its how many sets you win and not how many games or points you win. You have to win the set, and in our system, you have to win the state.

Two exceptions are Maine and Nebraska, which rely on congressional districts to divvy up electoral votes. The winner of the states popular vote gets two electoral votes, and one vote is awarded to the winner of the popular vote in each congressional district.

There are arguments that the states with smaller populations are overrepresented in the Electoral College, because every state gets at least 3 electors regardless of population. In a stark example, sparsely populated Wyoming has three votes and a population of about 580,000, giving its individual voters far more clout in the election than their millions of counterparts in densely populated states like Florida, California and New York. And the American citizens who live in territories like Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands are not represented by any electors.

When you talk about the Electoral College shaping the election, it shapes the election all the time because it puts the focus on certain states and not others, said Alexander Keyssar, a professor of history and social policy at Harvard University.

For years there have been debates about abolishing the Electoral College entirely, with the 2016 election bringing the debate back to the surface. It was even a talking point among 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.

View post:

How Does the Electoral College Work and Why Does It Matter? - The New York Times

Here are all your local golf results – Bangor Daily News

GolfHOLE-IN-ONERobert MacLeod

BAR HARBOR, Maine Robert MacLeod of Bar Harbor recorded a hole-in-one on the 201-yard ninth hole at Kebo Valley Golf Club on Friday. He used a 3-wood for the ace and it was witnessed by Susanne MacLeod and Jon Linder.

BAR HARBOR, Maine Clyde Lewis of Ellsworth shot a hole-in-one on the 156-yard 15th hole at Kebo Valley Golf Club on Friday. He used a hybrid club for the ace and it was witnessed by Mark Leonardi, Brent Barker and Mark Wanner.

ROCKLAND, Maine Phil Bertocci of Rockland shot his first career hole-in-one playing Wednesday at Rockland Golf Club. Bertocci used an 8-iron to ace the 136-yard fifth hole. The shot was witnessed by Charlie Johanson.

Greely 322, Scarborough 336, Falmouth 337, Gorham 338, Mt. Ararat 352, Edward Little 356, Messalonskee 362, Hampden Acad. 374

Andrew Klein 77 Greely, (tie) Peter Malia 79 Scarborough, Bennett Berg 79, (tie) DJ Kenney 80 Greely, Jack Stowell 80 Falmouth, (tie) Colin Merritt 81 Edward Little, Nick McGonagle 81 Deering, Parker Bate 81 Mt. Ararat, Connor Albert 82 Greely, Nick Montgomery 83 Greely, Quinn Dillon 83 Gorham, Kyle Douin 83 Cony, (tie) Buteau, Asa, Scarborough 84, Castles, Lucas, Gorham 84, Veilleux, Jack Scarborough 84, Hilchey, Parker Camden Hills 84, (tie) Lumbert, Bryce Gorham 85, Tracy, Dominic Falmouth 85, Tobias, Quincy Cony 85, Stowell, Henry Falmouth 85, (tie) Farr, Sam Gorham 86, Grant, Mitch Messalonskee 86, Stromick, Austin Brunswick 86, Enck, Aidan Gorham 86, Bay, Cooper Portland 86,

(tie) Flaherty, Lucas South Portland 87, Seekins, Sam Messalonskee 87, Vickery, John Hampden 87, Thibault, Parker Lewiston 87, Mathieu, Drew Windham 87, Hwang, Jonny Falmouth 87, (tie) Smiley, Owen Bangor 88, Schoenberg, Eli Mt. Ararat 88, (tie) Allen, Liam Cheverus 89, Griffiths, Alden Scarborough 89, Turcotte, Connor Edward Little 89, Dufour, Bryce Lewiston 89, Brook, Andrew Bangor 90, (tie) Betz, Sam Mt. Ararat 91, Parker, Jake Brewer 91, Delmonaco, Ethan Brewer 91, (tie) Mitchell, Ham Falmouth 92, Henke, Ty Mt. Ararat 92, Cloutier, Anthony Cheverus 92, (tie) Adams, Wyatt South Portland 93, Gray, Harrison Edward Little 93, Webber, John Scarborough 93, Marquis, Spencer Brunswick 93, Cassidy, Will Edward Little 93, (tie) Smith, James Messalonskee 94, Thayer, Jagger Hampden 94,

(tie) Lilly, Jude Messalonskee 95, Lyons, Andrew Hampden 95, (tie) Stolt, Bobby Cony 96, Perron, Jack Bangor 96, Robbins, Clay Edward Little 96, (tie) Clark, Sam Cheverus 97, Doolittle, Connor Westbrook 97, Spooner, Luke Mt. Ararat 97, (tie) Abbott, Josh Brewer 98, Vine, Elias Hampden 98, Llerena, TJ Hampden 99, Lapointe, Landon Brewer 101, Giancotti, Nick Cheverus 108, Ardito, Joe Messalonskee 111

1. Remy Levin 88 Bonny Eagle, 2. Ruth Weeks 89 Greely, 3. Taylor Gardner 101 Hampden, 4. Nicole Walker 103 Gorham

Green Mountain Results 1. Robert Hall, Phil Norton, Lornie Smith 105, 2. Lee Brewer, Eben Salvatore, Jud Starr 91, 3. Randy Stanley, Ty Smith, Mike Modeen; Individual: A. Robert Hall, B. Eben Salvatore, C. Lornie Smith

Friday Senior League Modified Stableford: 1. Robbie Robinson, Norm Simmons, Mike Boothby +10; 2. Ron Harriman, Ralph Holyoke, Doug Higgins +6; 3. Rick Robertson, Jim Blakeman, Shawn Sutherland, Ed St. Heart +4; 4. John Richard, Jim Hancock, Don Goodness, John Roach +3; 5. Steve Smith, Duane Hanson, Peter Beatham +1; 6. Tim Gallant, Chris Dunifer, Dana Wardwell, Dan Watters, Even; Pins: No. 7 Jim Hancock 6-7; No 9. Chris Dunifer 15-0; No. 16 Jim Hancock 4-7; No. 18 Shawn Sutherland 17-4

BCS Tournament 1. Bill Hutchins, Deron Smith, Regan Smith, Liam Hutchins 56; Most Accurate: Bob Lyford; Pin: No. 16 Terry McDonald 9-0; Rawcliffe Open 1. Al Porter, BJ Porter, Jody Lyford, Bob Lyford 58, 2. Byron Dunbar, Jamie Leavitt, Marty Kelly, Randy McLaughlin 59, 3. Nate Ellis Jr., Nate Ellis Sr., Derek Newland, Cameron Newland 61 (mc), 4. Kevin Grant, Mike Stoup, John Kotredes, Richard Cox 61, 5. Carl Gaudet, Darryl Luce, Mike Walker, Katie Walker 62; Pins, No. 3, Gold/Red: Bruce Ireland 13-1; White: Doug Chambers; No. 16, Gold/Red: Jen Williams; White: Bob Lyford: Most Accurate, Red/Gold: BJ Porter; White: Darryl Ross

Senior Scramble Results Dick Gassett, Russ Black, John Higgins, Jim Awalt -7; (tie) Tom Winston, Mel McLay, Doug Stark, Dennis Kiah -5; Rocky Alley, Bill Nickels, Jerry Noble, Lou Martin -5; David Gubler, Royce Morrison, Mark Molnar, John Shoppe -5; Bob Leighton, Bob McKenney, Ralph Alley, Jim Oreskovich -4; Alan Gray, Mark Johnson, Chuck Hode, Dick Keene -4; Randy Irish, Bill Ferris, Bob Wilks, Mike Dore -3; John Somes, Jim Bonzey, Ron Allen, Bob Carter -2; Bob Tweedie, Kerry Woodbury, Bob Gray, Bob Fraser -2; Pins: No. 2 Dick Gassett 7-0, No. 6 Jim Awalt 6-6

Golf Wars Scramble League Gross: 1. Fearsome 33, 2. The Hackers 33; Net: The Happy Hookers 28.5, 2. Two Oldies +2 30.1; Pins: 6. Jim McFarland 33-0, 9. Mark Wanner 22-1

Kebo Boys Game, 3 BB Stableford 1. Hank Tibbetts, Tim Vanderploeg, Phil Norton, Rick Wolff 121; 2. Wyman Tapley, Ty Smith, Carl Lusby, Ed Darling 115, Randy Stanley, Mark Leonardi, Jud Starr, Steve Dodge 115

Overall Gross: Ray Brochu 75, Bruce Bubier 77, Colin Roy 79; Net: Phil McCabe 61, Vic Gaudreau 66 (mc), Dave Ames 67; Flight 1, Gross: Eric Lacroix 80 (mc), Preston Ward 80 (mc), Dave St. Andre 80; Net: Steve Assante 70 (mc), Scott Karczewski 70, Mark Kamen 71; Flight 2, Gross: Greg Page 80, Bill Fairchild 84, Bill Hunter 86; Net: Mert Dearnley 70, Ron Aho 72 (mc), Tony Trask 72 (mc); Flight 3, Gross: Mike McGuire 82 (mc), Mike Knox 82, Rick Cronin 83; Net: Dick McCann 70, Paul Connolly 71 (mc), Charlie Miller 71; Flight 4, Gross: Cy Thompson 81, Bob Ouellette 85, Bob Spencer 87; Net: Ben Walker 71, Jim Murphy 72, Phil Poulin 73; Super Senior, Gross: Dana McCurdy 90; Net: Leo Lever 73; Best Ball, Gross: Rick Cronin, Mike Knox, Preston Ward, Eric Lacroix 70 (mc); Ray Brochu, Tom Kus, Ed McKay, Paul Drouin 70; Best Ball, Net: Reggie Gammon, Ken Luce, Dick McCann, Cy Thompson 59; Steve Assante, Jim Ouellette, Dan Peaslee, Mike Cote 60 (mc); Pins: No. 2 Charlie Pray 2-8, Cy Thompson 9-11, No. 7 Ray Brochu 12-3, Leo Bellemare 14-9, No. 15 Leo Bellemare 11, Bob Ouellette 9-6, No. 17 Alan Turner 3-4, Jim Murphy 3-7, Skins, Gross: No. 4 John Deetjen (3), No. 6 Dave St. Andre (3), No. 7 Ray Brochu (2), No. 11 Charlie Pray (3), No. 13 Eric Johnson (3), No. 17 Jim Murphy (2); Net: none

Tuesdays results Gross: Hosel Rockets 31, 2. Potential 35; Net: 1. Dukes of Hazards 26.7, 2. Party of Fore 28.6; Pins: No. 6 Gary Seavey 52-0, No. 9 Glenn MegQuier 19-7

6th Annual Golf for Alzheimers Sponsored by Birch Bay Village 1. Chris Shelton, Rob McKenney, David Mitchell, Joe Domagala 61; 2. Nicholas Schoeder, Jake Willis, Darryl White, Scott Lawliss 63; Pins: No. 4 David Mitchell 8-11, No. 15 Nicholas Schoeder 7-9; Longest Drive: Bryant Ciomei

Better ball tourney Flight 1, Gross: Kristin Kannegieser, Leslie Guenther 70; Kathi OGrady, Mary Brandes 74; Ruth Colucci, Catherine Boyle 77; Debby Gardner, Laura Lipman 79; Net: Katy Heskett, Abigail Wermers 66; Kris Hughes, Meredith Koerner 66; Maria Cianchette, Carolyn Cianchette 66; Kimberly Lazenby, Barbara Ropke 67; Kathy Lyons, Colleen Arnold 67

Flight 2, Gross: Allison Landes, Debbie Porter 79; Linda Cameron, Marlene Viger 87; Melissa Dalfonso, Patricia Bouton 88; Caren Lederer, Lisa Fontaine 88; Kathy Heaton, Lorri Higgins 88; Maureen Lano, Barbara Deschenes 88 Net: Deborah Barry, Joy Eon 65; Ann Anthony, Meg Lyon 65; Jane Flower, Marcia Blake 68; Karen-Lee Moody, Susan McLain 69; Flight 3, Gross: Barbara Pearson, Maureen Collins 93; Terry Sullivan, Joanne Allaire 96; Marianne McNally, Penny Guerin 97; Linda Laughlin, Bea McGarvey 97; Susan Wootton, Heidi Lyman 97; Net: Ann Houser, Jean Farrell 69; Susan Graffam, Diane Snow 72; Barb Hintze, Betty Holmes 72; Bonnie Cote, Jean Smith 72

Skins, Gross: Leslie Guenther No. 8, Patricia Bouton No. 4, Debby Gardner No. 12, Linda Varrell No. 13, Bernice Vadnais No. 10, Lisa Wintle No. 14, Susie Gravel No. 17, Marla Leblanc No. 2; Net: Meg Lyon No. 7, No. 9, Joy Eon No. 1, Caren Lederer No. 16

Better ball tourney Gross, Flight 1: Janet Nelson, Cheryl Cole 77, Diane Bova, Irene Schultz 79, Liz Coffin, Karen Bamford 80; Flight 2: Polly Hoffman, Anne Barnes 85; Diana Wescott, Nan Bragg 89; Judy Edgecomb, Kathy Sproul 89; Net, Flight 1: Anne Raynor, Jenifer Stewart 63, Sharon Houle, Maggie Black 66, Sue Coffin & Sherrie Thomas 66; Flight 2: Lila Geis, Cindy Shaw 63, Barbara Redmond, Laurie Clark 64, Donna Hanson, Karen Stuart 65; Gross Skins: No. 2 Karen Bamford 3, No. 4 Diane Bova 4, No. 5 Cindy Choate 3, No. 12 Janet Nelson 3, No. 15 Diane Bova 3, No. 16 Rachel Newman 4; Net Skins: No. 7 Linda Morin-Pasco 2, No. 8 Linda Morin-Pasco 1, No. 9 Diana Wescott 2

Regular Tees Flight 1, Gross: Mike Doran 69, Nate McCue 70, Brian Angis 70; Net: Shawn Casey 64, Matt Bowe 65, Tony Leslie 65; Senior, 55-62, Gross: Phil Barter 73, Mike OBrien 73, Len Cole 75; Net: Mark Genest 66, Butch Kennedy 67, Ray Ross 68; 63+, Gross: John Downing 73, Gary Manoogian 74, Bob Barber 76; Net: Ed Hickey 63, Steve Hodge 65, Ken Sawtelle 65

Senior Tees 57-68, Gross: Mark Curtis 72, Craig Lapierre 72, Bob Rudy 75, Zibby Puleio 75; Net: Bill Holmes 68, Doug Prevost 68, Jim Stevens 69. 69+, Gross: Joe Collins 73, Rick Plummer 74, Ron Brown 75. Net: Lloyd Doughty 65, Norm Charleston 72, John Collins 72

Team, One Gross/One Net: Ryan Masse, Jim Stevens, Nate McCue, Matt Bowe 121, Mike OBrien, Brian Angis, Carl Poirier, Martin Doherty 124, Tony Leslie, Butch Kennedy, Tim Mariano, Mark Hammond 125, Chris King, Shawn Casey, John Conley, Phil Ingraham 126, Seth Woodcock, Joe Alvarez, Jarod Richard, Neil Angis 127, James Anderson, Mer Doucette, Mark Manzi, Jason Willis 127.

Black Tees Skins, Gross: all tied; Net: No. 5 Ed Hickey 2, No. 7 Joe Larivierre 2, No. 11 Dave Ertz 2, No. 13 Mark Genest 1, No. 16 Harry Loring 2. Senior Tees Skins, Gross: No. 1 Martin Doherty 3, No. 3 Dave Collinsworth 2, No. 5 Bob Hintze 3, No. 16 Rick Plummer 2, No. 18 Joe Collins 3; Net: No. 7 Mike Dumais 2, No. 10 Jim Stevens 2; Pins Black Tees: No. 3 Jeff Cole 2-5, No. 6 Tony Leslie 8-4, No. 13 Patrick Perreault 7-9, No. 16 Joe Alvarez 20-0; Senior Tees No. 3 Don Johnson 9-5, No. 6 Paul Pelletier 1-5, No. 13 Glenn Furth 6-6, No. 16 Robert Hintze 28-8

Tuesday Morning Senior League (par 35) Gross: 1. Bill Fernandez 37, 2. Rick Gilman 37, 3. Mike Lafontaine 39, 4. Fran Riva 42, 5. Ed Lucas 42; Net: 1. Jim Bosse 29, 2. Alan Gray 29, 3. Shawn Small 30, 4. George Thibodeau 31, 5. Bob Lebretton 31, 6. George Strout 32, 7. Bob Ruhlin 32; Pins: No. 4, Rick Gilman 2-6, No. 8, Jim Bosse 5-4; Long drive, Red tees: Kathy Lafontaine; Gold tees: Phil Keith; White tees: Andy Taylor

Mens Senior League 1. Bruce Wiersma, Don Payne, Cliff Wilbur 30; 2. Ralph Allen, Ron Goldstone, Dick Burger 33; 3. Jim Oreskovich, Butch Robichaud, Merle Trimm 34; 4. Joe Guaraldo, Robbie Robinson, Bob Pentland, Roger Theriault 35

Senior Scramble 1. Kate Doherty-Perez, Steve Cates, Brian ODonnell, Ken Smith -4; 2. Jane Hooper, John Caruso, Fred Morgan, Gordon Faulkingham, Melrose Beal -3; 3. Lynn King, Pierre Dumont, Bob Tracy, Bill Swayne -2 (won putt-off); 4. Sue Derickson, Paul Look, Gary Derickson, Scott Whitney -2; 5. Charles Lightner, Ralph Backman, Sonny Beal, Gary Willey -2; Pin: No. 2 Scott Whitney 11-5, No. 5 Bob Tracy 2-11

Thursday Morning Stableford League 1. John Arsenault, Aaron Newcomb +7, 2. John May, Marty Drew E, 3. Thea Davis, John Arsenault -2, 4. Ed Hallett, Heokbum Kwon -4; pins: No. 3 Ed Hallett 9-10, No. 8 Thea Davis 27-4, No. 9 Aaron Newcomb 19-10, No. 12 Terry McDonald 4-11, No. 16 Aaron Newcomb 5-8; Skins: No. 3 Eddie Hallett, No. 5 Heokbum Kwon,

No. 13 John Arsenault, No. 14 John May, No. 16 Aaron Newcomb

Ladies Association A Flight, Gross: Sally Stockman 87, Kathy Harper 97; Net: Jan Staples 75, Molly Mugler 76; Putts: Sally Stockman 30; B Flight, Gross: (tie) Diane Bryant 111, Joanna Schleif 111; Net: Joni Hall 80, (tie) Martha Bouchard 84, Joyce Cooley 84; Putts: Diane Bryant 30; Pins: No. 5 Kathy Harper, No. 10 Sue Wootton

Senior Scramble Rocky Alley, Eric White, Bob Wilks, Warren Young -6; David Gubler, Mike Dore, Bob Fraser -5; Randy Irish, Jim Bonzey, Chuck Hodge, John Higgins -3; Dennis Kiah, Kerry Woodbury, Russ Black, Jerry Noble -2; Bob Leighton, Dick Gassett, Joe Guaraldo, Doug Stark -2; Pins: No. 2 Randy Irish 12-4, No. 6 Dick Gassett 4-2


Here are all your local golf results - Bangor Daily News

YouTube Has Censored The Ron Paul Liberty Report: You Won’t Believe Why! – OpEd – Eurasia Review

As many of you have already heard, YouTube (owned by Google, withdeep roots in the deep state), inexplicably removed our Ron Paul Liberty Report from 23 September, titled Covid Whistleblowers Expose Narrative As Total Fraud,' and officially delivered a warning to the Ron Paul Liberty Report You Tube channel. They claimed in the notice that the program, which you can watch for yourselfhere, violated their community guidelines regarding spam, deceptive practices, and scams.

We are in danger of having our entire channel removed if we continuein these prohibited activities, they warned. Please watch the program for yourself and attempt to identify where any of these three violations took place.

Dr. Paul sent an appeal asking for specific clarification as to what in the program violated their community standards. This seems important, because if they could point to something that was said or something in the title or thumbnail photo that violated their guidelines, it wouldnt be that difficult to avoid such phrases or words or even photos in the future. Yes, it might be annoying and unfair, but knowing specifically what was the violation or violations would logically benefit both parties, as YouTube was clear in their warning that they did not want to lose us.

Imagine if a police officer pulled you over and began writing a ticket and when you requested the reason for the ticket they refused to tell you. Or perhaps they arrested you with no clearly articulated reason. Neither did the judge nor jury utter a peep when they ruled on the case and passed sentence.

This is how YouTube responded to a request for the habeas corpus of our crime:

As Ron Paul Institute Senior Fellow (and attorney) Adam Dick wrote me after I showed him the result of the appeal, What understanding? Violation determined and appeal denied; that is all the info to understand. The process seems designed to prevent understanding anything other than that power is being exercised.

Yes. Power is being exercised and we do not have to tell you why.

Digging a bit deeper into the actual reason they decided to pull the episode of the Liberty Report (which as most of you know is hours in the making and represents years in preparation), turns up this bizarre email YouTube sent to the Ron Paul Liberty Reports gmail address:

So finally we are getting more of an explanation of where we might have gone wrong. YouTube simply does not allow any criticism of the World Health Organization a United Nations bureaucratic body that hasabsolutely no idea what to doabout the Covid health problem. One week you must wear masks, the next week you dont need them, etc. But dont dare criticize them or you will have your metaphorical larynx ripped from your body.

As we have pointed out on the Liberty Report several times probably contributing to our being targeted the World Health Organization is not even led by a doctor, but by aviolent Ethiopian communistpolitician.

If you dare criticize a violent Ethiopian communist, you will be banned from YouTube. It seems that simple.

So, as another violent communist oncewrote, what is to be done?

We are still looking at our options. For now we have opened abackup account on BitChuteso that if a future YouTube broadcast is pulled we can offer it up to you without so much delay.

Ultimately we believe the noose will tighten on any dissident voices such as Dr. Pauls. It seems bizarre in what so many love to claim is the freest country on earth, one that must spend billions freeing others overseas, that anyone challenging the prevailing mainstream media/US government narrative on Covid or foreign policy or anything else must be silenced. Once there was the gulag for dissidents, these days its big tech companies that do hundreds of billions of dollars in business with US intelligence and the US government who do the bidding of their paymasters. But hey, theyre private companies so dont you dare complain as you are herded into your ideological boxcar!

We are looking at other options to deliver the Ron Paul Liberty Report to our viewers who on YouTube are a hair away from passing the quarter million subscriber mark but many of these options are not cheap. As you all know, we operate on a shoestring and we stretch every penny from the generous contributions of our supporters.

But we are going to need your help if we are going to keep the peace and prosperity message of the Ron Paul Liberty Report alive. We are directly challenging multi-billion dollar media empires and their narratives they are not at all happy about it.

This is your program, and if you want it to continue one of the last voices challenging the dominant and crushing narrative coming from the mainstream media on the Left AND Right we will need your support.

Please consider atax-deductible contributionto the Ron Paul Institute, which is the producer of the Ron Paul Liberty Report. Every donation is gratefully appreciated, but were going to need some big bucks to fight this freight train we see bearing down on us. Once they have obliterated us, they will be coming for you. Please help. By the way, we LOVE Bitcoin and you can make a Bitcoin donation at the above link.

Dr. Paul famously says, no army can stop an idea whose time has come. Even in these seemingly dark days, the time has come for our peace and prosperity message. Please do what you can to help us. We need you and we appreciate you.

This article was published by RonPaul Institute.

Read this article:

YouTube Has Censored The Ron Paul Liberty Report: You Won't Believe Why! - OpEd - Eurasia Review

Egomania, Dementia, and Stroke – Splice Today

Three political people in various states of disarray or death frame our political options.

Faced witha choice between rudeness, lies, and tariffs on the right and arson, child endangerment, and national bankruptcy on the left, youd think America would find some other option, such as Libertarian Party presidential candidate Jo Jorgensen. Realistically, though, the handful of Americans who care enough about politics to trudge to the polls (or mailbox) on Election Day will be focused on angry partisan micro-issues rather than big-picture philosophical differences.

The closest most voters will get to looking at a big picture will be mulling the basic psychological traits of the candidatesparticularly Trumps egomania and Bidens dementiaand how much horror or affinity those traits inspire (not that people gauging politics by personality traits is anything unusualtake this recent piece by someone still steamed that former vice presidential candidate Joe Liebermans son gave him a harsh grade in school). Add to the mix the late Ruth Bader Ginsburgs purported deathbed wish that Trump not appoint her replacementand give all this an ominous backdrop of COVIDand its an election about declining health all around. The two main presidential candidates may not be death-bed decrepit, but theyre still sort of decrepit.

First: Trump, love him or hate him, is going to keep working his angry grandpa shtick to Election Day and beyond. There will be no grand philosophical agenda even in a second term, just more swatting at things that annoy him.For its failure to prevent a recent crime and rioting upsurge, New York City, like Portland and Seattle, has been designated by Trumps Department of Justice an anarchist jurisdiction. This is more a way of saying those places are behaving badly than of saying they have coherent rebellious philosophies.

Would that they did! Instead, New York City will participate in electoral democracy in just over a month like the rest of the nation. Far from promoting anarchism, the city will go on behaving like a totalitarian socialist enclave, disrupted by even-more-socialist rioters.

All the while, leftists in and outside New York will pretend to be freedom lovers guarding humanity against a tyrannical Trump. The strange warnings from the left about the possibility of a Red Miragethat is, the appearance of a Trump victory on election night, which should not be taken too seriously, were toldare surely a better indicator that the left is contemplating non-democratic or at least vote-tweaking resolutions to Americas political struggles than that the right is. Be watchful.

The half of the political spectrum that appears willing to, say, route money from left-leaning corporations friendly with Bill Gates and Jack Dorsey to Black Lives Matter-affiliated bail-funding groups and then to less-formal projects like renting a U-Haul full of riot weapons is probably not the half of the political spectrum that wants the election and its aftermath to go smoothly, even when they give themselves anodyne names such as the Transition Project.

In a world now full of people who want gun manufacturers and the like to get sued for what their customers do, maybe the bail-funders should be held accountable for the subsequent actions of those they assist, too. This increased blurring of the public/private lines is why populism (of some sort) is making more and more sense: the commanding heights of government, capitalism, and philanthropy alike are held by anti-civilization subversives.

With that in mind, I cant rule out Trumps combative egomania continuing to yield some good results, working like an anarchist wrecking ball swung directly at those commanding heights, even if the wrecking ball doesnt do nuance (or have the grace to admit it already holds the highest office in the land). Trump having his anarchist strategic uses doesnt excuse his numerous un-libertarian actions, or the often obnoxious psychological traits of those who feel the strongest and most immediate affinity for him.

Regardless, I dont think many people are falling for the lefts 11th-hour attempt to spin Trumps hopes for reelectionand his reasonable fear of mail-in and proxy vote fraudas a dictatorial urge to cling to power, overturn elections, and fight for control of the military. Despite the fevered imaginings of the Transition Project, most people see in Trump a man probably happy to retire into a gig as talk show host or golf tournament host if it comes to that.

Second: Bidens now selling himself to us, when hes awake, as in essence the devil we know. How big or surprising could the risks be after all these decades, goes the argument? Well, Biden may not be surprising, but anyone claiming to have libertarian leanings should recall that Biden has been awful for decades, not merely predictable.

As people watch forthcoming Supreme Court confirmation hearings, they should recall Biden is himself a veteran of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Libertarians who saw the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings three decades ago remember Biden asking Thomas how America could be expected to tolerate a Justice who had spoken fondly of libertarian arguments in favor of property rights. Bidens the enemy and long has been; dont kid yourself to burnish your respectable-establishment cred.

That establishment still expects Americans to be impressed when, say, an array of Republicans associated with the FBI, CIA, and the anti-Trump group called the Lincoln Project endorse Bidenor when 30 former Romney staffers (which is a hell of a lot of fair-weather Republicans on team Romney, I must say) do so, but inspiring this sort of army-of-dwarves onslaught is surely the biggest point in Trump's favor.

Third: Ron Paul, you know in your heart, is the politician who makes the most sense, with his lifetime of warnings that government has grown too big and too powerful and needs to be put back in its constitutional straitjacket. Thus, many goodhearted people, whether libertarian or not, were alarmed by Pauls micro-stroke last week, even though hes not running for anything anymore. Hes still the politician making the most sense, even when hes impaired. Hes also the least alarming, since hes the only one who doesnt want to control you.

Paul had a bit of a rough week even before the stroke, with YouTube censoring his video expressing skepticism about the dominant COVID narrative and the SEC temporarily shutting down a bitcoin operation run by Pauls former political director. But then, while people look upon Pauls stroke with alarm, what was that bizarre Pelosi moment last week when she abruptly stopped in mid-interview with George Stephanopoulos to say good morning and announce the day of the week for no reason? At least Paul has the excuse of a strokeand hes not running the House of Representatives.

Its fitting Pelosi now thinks Trump doesnt deserve a chance to debate Biden. She probably wants to protect her fellow dementia sufferer Biden from abuse by Trump, in much the same way Fox News wants to protect George Soros from anything that might come off as an anti-Semitic attack, so much so theyre willing to cut off Newt Gingrich in the middle of criticizing Soros financial influence. All around us, the foolish rush to protect the faltering.

But the immediate choice before Americans, who, unlike me, plan to vote, should really be which candidate most resembles Ron Paul. The Libertarian seems the obvious choice. I will say this for Trump, though: He, far more than Biden, is the heir to the mantle of mildly anti-war politics.

Notice how the establishment, even the parts claiming to be anti-war, trot out purported insults to the troops when they really want to make some public figure look like a heretic. ButTrump reportedly saying World War I soldiers were dupes and we were unwise to join the Allies may be the most delightfully anti-war thing any president has ever saidand perfectly in keeping with the sentiments of a whole school of tragic English poets I couldve sworn we were also supposed to respect only yesterday or so.

Former Trump associate Michael Cohen and others saying Trump would happily start a war to boost his popularity is more a laughable confession of their own likes and dislikes than a convincing analysis of Trump. Say what you will about the grouchy old egomaniac, he doesnt seem to think war is cool. You cant convince me hes itching for conquest one day and then expect me to be horrified the next by him scoffing at militarism or saying DC fights needless wars to keep arms dealers healthy. Thats hardcore peacenik talk from the Prezand thank goodness.

Thirtysomething Ivy Leaguer CNN national security reporter Ryan Browne was aghast at that Trump comment, tweeting, In an unprecedented public attack by a sitting US president on the leadership of the US military, President Trump has accused US military leaders of seeking to start wars to boost the profits of defense contractors. Gasp! Maybe Brownes so young that Eisenhowers warning about the military-industrial complex has faded into the forgotten recesses of history for him, jumbled up with World War I trench battles and the sack of Rome.

Id prefer to outlast Rome, and Im not convinced the Bidens and CNNs of our world know best how to achieve that. Im not so sure the current establishment will even outlast Ron Paul.

Todd Seavey is the author ofLibertarianism for Beginnersand is on Twitter at@ToddSeavey.

See original here:

Egomania, Dementia, and Stroke - Splice Today

Ron Paul: The Fed’s Brilliant Plan? More Inflation And Higher Prices – OpEd – Eurasia Review

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently announced that the Fed is abandoning inflation targeting where the Fed aims to maintain a price inflation rate of up to two percent. Instead, the Fed will allow inflation to remain above two percent to balance out periods of lower inflation. Powells announcement is not a radical shift in policy. It is an acknowledgment that the Fed is unlikely to reverse course and stop increasing the money supply anytime soon.

Following the 2008 market meltdown, the Fed embarked on an unprecedented money-creation binge. The result was historically low interest rates and an explosion of debt. Today total household debt and business debt are each over 16 trillion dollars. Of course, the biggest debtor is the federal government.

The explosion of debt puts pressure on the Fed to keep increasing the money supply in order to maintain low interest rates. An increase in rates to anything close to what they would be in a free market could make it impossible for consumers, businesses, and (especially) the federal government to manage their debt. This would create a major economic crisis.

The Fed has also dramatically expanded its balance sheet since 2008 via multiple rounds of quantitative easing. According to Bloomberg, the Fed is now the worlds largest investor and holds about one-third of all bonds backed by US home mortgages.

Congress has expanded the Feds portfolio by giving the central bank authority to make trillions of dollars of payments to business as well as to state and local governments in order to help the economy recover from the unnecessary and destructive lockdowns.

Contrary to what most mainstream economists claim, a general increase in prices is an effect not a cause of inflation. Inflation occurs whenever the central bank creates money. Increasing the money supply lowers interest rates, which are the price of money, distorting the market and creating a bubble (or bubbles) that provides the illusion of prosperity. The illusion lasts until the inevitable crash. Since the distortions come from money creation, the system cannot be fixed by just requiring the Fed to adopt a rules-based monetary policy.

Once the lockdowns end, the Feds actions may lead to a short-term boom. However, the long-term effect will be even more debt, continued erosion of the average Americans standard of living, and the collapse of the fiat money system and the welfare-warfare state. The crisis will likely be brought on by a rejection of the dollars reserve currency status. This will be supported both by concerns about the stability of the US economy and resentment over Americas hyper-interventionist foreign policy.

The question is not if the current system will end. The question is how it will end.

If the end comes via a meltdown, the result will likely be chaos, violence, and increased support for authoritarian movements as desperate people trade their few remaining liberties in hopes of gaining security.

However, if pro-liberty Americans are able to force Congress to begin cutting spending starting with the money wasted on militarism and to move toward restoring a sound and sane monetary policy that includes ending the Federal Reserve, we can minimize an economic crisis and begin restoring limited constitutional government, a free-market economy, and respect for liberty.

This article was published by RonPaul Institute.

Here is the original post:

Ron Paul: The Fed's Brilliant Plan? More Inflation And Higher Prices - OpEd - Eurasia Review

Sparks Mayor Ron Smith dies after battle with pancreatic cancer – Sparks Tribune

By Kayla Anderson

Sparks Tribune

City of Sparks Mayor Ron Smith passed away on Friday, August 21, following his two-year battle with pancreatic cancer at the age of 71.

As a Sparks resident for more than 35 years, Smith had a visible passion for his community, eventually running for (and winning) a Sparks City Council seat in the 2006 election representing constituents in Ward 3. Smith served three more consecutive four-year terms as city councilman as well as became Mayor Pro Tempore during the years 2012-2018.

During his tenure with the City of Sparks, Smith was involved in dozens of projects and sat on a number of local and regional boards, but is most known for: his role with the Regional Transportation Commission in strongly advocating for improving transportation and infrastructure needs to accommodate the Citys growth; serving as chairman of the Truckee River Flood Mitigation Authority; and he was instrumental in directing the Nevada Veterans Memorial Plaza Project at the Sparks Marina.

As a veteran himself, Ron was extremely passionate about this project, says Sparks City Councilman Kristopher Dahir, adding that it was extremely important to Smith to ensure that the 900-plus Nevada veterans who died fighting for the country were properly honored and that future generations knew of the sacrifices which allowed us our freedoms.

His friendship meant a lot to me. In the beginning of my career with City Council he was my mentor. He was in it for so long, he gave back so much to the community. He was a man of integrity and honest about what he believed. He always said, the best thing about me is youll always know what I think and the worst thing about me is youll always know what I think, Dahir fondly recalls.

I really loved working with him on projects like the Sparks Marina Veterans Memorial and traveling with him to Washington D.C. (as part of the Nevada League of Cities to represent Sparks on a federal and legislative level). Those trips were really fun, Dahir adds.

He admits that they didnt always agree with Smith on everything, but he appreciated his honesty and firm beliefs. Dahir was fortunate to have been able to have dinner with Smith and his wife Karen at Red Hawk Golf and Resort just a few weeks ago, laughing and listening to music as they talked about the city that Smith loved.

He worked hard on the Veterans Memorial, and citywide making sure our river is clean and ready for our citizens to enjoy. He was also very involved with the RTC and worked hard on a few dreams that I hope I can help come to fruition, Dahir says.

His biggest hope was that we have a safe city. Ron was a big supporter of the police, fire department, and security of our community. In the last two years he had chemotherapy every week and would have to recover, and then hed get right back out there to work on projects that improved the city. He fought until the end with his family around him- they were the most important thing to him. He said his family was his biggest treasure, including his nine grandchildren, he says.

Along with being involved with progressing the future of Sparks, Smith is also remembered as having a sense of humor.

He definitely enjoyed his Chik-fil-A coffees, Dahir smiles.

Sparks City Councilmember Donald Abbott says that he met Smith a bit later in his career when he was a city councilman even though for many of his friends Smith was their first boss at Scolaris.

Its been nice seeing all the lives he impacted, from being the manager of Scolaris to his work with the Sparks City Council. One of my fondest memories of him is- and he did this all the time- is that when someone would ask him to do something crazy, hed nod his head up and down and say Absolutely no. That always got a good laugh out of me. I also heard a story that when he was the manager of Scolaris he pranked his receptionist by having her call a tow truck to get out of the parking lot that was her own car, laughs Abbott.

He was silly, but he also knew when to be serious. He just had fun. He was a normal human being who was the same person in the office as he was off-hours, Abbott adds.

Abbott also credits Smith to being his mentor as well in the beginning of his own political career.

He was the first person I ever went door knocking with, it was nice to campaign with him and have someone believe in me who wasnt my mother, he chuckles. Ron loved his community, loved his family, loved the Giants, and he was always helping others. He definitely will be missed, Abbott says.

Personally, when I think about my interactions with Ron Smith over the last four years, the first two words that come to mind are that hes passionate and transparent. He always had a respectful demeanor towards me and answered my calls (even during that year when I continuously grilled him about the state of D Andrea). He never failed to tell me exactly how he felt and went out of his way to greet me at city council meetings and give me the information I needed. He lifted those around him up and gave them the strength to reach their potential, and for that he will never forgotten.

Details of Ron Smiths memorial service have yet to be announced. In lieu of flowers, the family asks that donations be made to the Nevada Veterans Memorial Plaza Project through:www.nvmp.info; P.O. Box 50967 Sparks, Nevada 89435.

Comments from nevada publicofficials on Ron Smiths passing:

Ron was a good friend and mentor, and a man who deeply loved his City and community. His mark will be left on this community for decades to come, says current Sparks Mayor Pro Tempore Ed Lawson.

I was deeply honored to be appointed by Mayor Smith to fill his Ward 3 council seat when he was elected Mayor in 2018, says Sparks City Councilman Paul Anderson. I will truly miss my friend and mentor who did such great things regionally and for our Sparks community, he adds.

Ron provided knowledge and experience which helped me grow as a councilmember for this great city that he so loved. He was a great inspiration to me. Thank you, Mayor, may you rest in peace, says Councilwoman Charlene Bybee.

We are deeply saddened to announce the passing of our Mayor, says Sparks City Manager Neil Krutz. His battle with cancer was incredibly courageous. All of us at the City will greatly miss him, and our most sincere condolences go out to his family.

On behalf of the Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County, I am deeply saddened by the passing of Sparks Mayor Ron Smith. Mayor Smith was a long-standing member on the RTC Board of Commissioners, serving in various roles, including Board Chair, since 2009. As a Veteran and longtime Sparks resident, he truly believed in making our community a better and safer place for future generations. A champion for transportation and infrastructure, Mayor Smith was a proponent to build major regional projects, including the Pyramid/McCarran Intersection Improvements, the SouthEast Connector, and the 4thStreet/Prater Way BRT, among others. Mayor Smith also led the community effort to build a Veterans memorial, which is now under construction at the Sparks Marina, in tribute to all Nevada Veterans who made the ultimate sacrifice in service to our country. We will remember him for his kindness and how deeply he cared for all of us. To honor his memory and his contributions, it is up to the rest of us to carry on his legacy of caring and visionary leadership, stewardship, and public service. Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County Executive Director Bill Thomas.

Mayor Smith was a tireless advocate of families and children and a strong supporter of our schools. He loved his community deeply and was a true champion for the people of Sparks. Even during his final illness, he continued to work hard for the people he represented. We will miss his leadership and commitment.- Washoe County School District

Post Views: 505

Read more:

Sparks Mayor Ron Smith dies after battle with pancreatic cancer - Sparks Tribune

Soucheray: On the stoop of Sacred Heart Church, they do what they can do – TwinCities.com-Pioneer Press

Rumor had it that the boss found a new gig, playing any of her variety of wind instruments every other Saturday on the stoop of Sacred Heart Church in St. Paul, which basically has three addresses, Ron Ryan Jr. Boulevard, Sinnen Street and, most conventionally, 840 E. Sixth St., as in the heart of the East Side.

In the summer of 2020, when it feels like the soul has left the body of the nation and charred is the new urban motif, it seemed important to check on the boss, to not lose sight of the goodness still around us in small but important ways, and the good people who devote their lives to the service of others.

The boss waved as I walked across the parking lot. She was dressed for the chill of a brilliant morning that was sending out an unmistakable warning about autumn. Not far away was Sister Jean Ersfeld, working the keyboard on her 465 Sound ToneBank Casio electric piano. Lets call it serenading. The nature of Sacred Heart has changed with the times and is now most significantly home to a large Hispanic community. It was a food pickup last Saturday morning, and a line of cars drove past the open end of a big rental truck and people were taking dairy and produce and dry goods. Food. Not quite water turned to wine, but close enough if the kids are hungry.

Who qualifies? I asked the boss.

No questions asked, the boss said.

I looked up at the words engraved in granite on the front of the church.

Does Iglesia Del Sagrado Corazon mean Sacred Heart?

I hope so, the boss said.

Her name is Lynore Girmscheid. She and Sister Jean are members of the School Sisters of Notre Dame, my favorite order of nuns, not counting the Daughters of Charity, because they featured that heavily starched cornette that suggested they were wearing a fixed wing for takeoff. The SSND rose in the rankings after a couple of SSND stalwarts wrote to me wondering if the Crabby Coffee Shop was real. Sister Jean is the musical director at Sacred Heart. When Jerry Lowe, a deacon at Sacred Heart and a connected fellow with the Society of St. Vincent de Paul, organized the food made available with the help of Target and Costco and others, Sister Jean thought she and Lynore might spice it up with a little salsa and a hymn or two if they were lively enough.

Times are tough around here, Lowe, who is 84, told me. We do what we can do. Every other week, we do the same service at Incarnation Church in Minneapolis.

The musicians, of course, dont charge a cent. They take the edge off what might be a burdensome errand for those in need and introduce a note of festivity. The pickup runs from 8 to 10 a.m., and people can check their bulletins for the schedule.

I can call Lynore boss with accuracy. For years, she was the liturgical director at Lumen Christi in Highland Park and for reasons that still baffle me, I ended up on her decorating crew as hard labor. I hauled wreathes up from the storage tunnels under the church, moved ladders around and fed spools of lights to a guy actually on the ladder. She was a good boss and often sprung us laborers early so we wouldnt miss the kickoff.

The boss has always been the inclusive type and wanted me to meet Prisciliano Maya, who is the Spanish Mass minister. Thats what she does. She works the room and gets to know people. If I hadnt brushed off college-level Spanish so many years ago, I could have had a chat with Prisciliano.

That vast asphalt parking lot now humming with graciousness? On Aug. 26, 1994, St. Paul police officer Ron Ryan Jr. responded to a man sleeping in a car in the same Sacred Heart parking lot. As Ryan approached the car, Guy Harvey Baker shot Ryan dead and then stole the officers gun. A few hours later, the same guy killed officer Timothy Jones and his police canine, Laser. A dark, dark day. It was everybody on deck at the Pioneer Press. I hadnt been back since.

You know about the parking lot, boss?

I know, she said. I know.

And then she returned to her music. Its what she has to give.

Joe Soucheray can be reached at jsoucheray@pioneerpress.com. Soucherays Garage Logic podcast can be heard at garagelogic.com.

Originally posted here:

Soucheray: On the stoop of Sacred Heart Church, they do what they can do - TwinCities.com-Pioneer Press

Paul Lee has one of the quickest Funny Cars on the tour; is a win coming soon? – NHRA.com

Even after last evenings first night qualifying session, the best run in Funny Car in the three races since the resumption of racing following the pandemic shutdown does not belong to points leader Tommy Johnson Jr. or race winners Matt Hagan or Ron Capps. It belongs instead to Paul Lee and crew chiefs Jim Oberhofer and Donnie Bender, even if in an unofficial capacity.

In round one of eliminations at the E3 Spark Plugs NHRA Nationals at Indy in early July, Lees Global Electronic Technology Toyota covered the 1,000-foot course in 3.888 seconds. The only problem was that he clipped the finish line timers, disqualifying the run, but it was still enough to get the attention of the Funny car pits. Only Capps, who ran 3.895 to lead Friday qualifying, and Johnson, who ran 3.896 to beat Capps at the first Indy race, have been close.

The car has been running great, but its really been mishandling, he said, in a bit of an understatement, as he also took out a timing block at the last race. We took the car back over to Don Schumacher Racing because its a clone of their cars. Rahn Tobler went over the whole steering setup and found where it had been binding and preventing me from turning the wheel when the car was under downforce.

Lee, like almost everyone, has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Because he has heart disease and also contracted pneumonia two decades ago, hes been very cautious with his health as those factors could put him at extra risk if he were to catch the coronavirus. In addition to the mandatory temperature checks that all people entering the racetrack must undergo, Lee also checks his crew again in the pit area. He also provided free COVID-19 tests for the employees of his businesses.

On the positive side, Lees FTI transmission and McLeod Clutches businesses during the pandemic has skyrocketed.

People arent going to the movies or going on vacations or even going out to dinner in some states; theyre staying at home working on their hobbies, and for a lot of them that means cars. Weve sold twice as many transmission kits as we did last year, and we still have four months to go.

Additionally, with the 11-race shortened schedule, Lee will get to race the entire season for the first time; he entered the year expecting only to run 15 of the planned 24 races. He sits 10th in points and would love to remain in the top 10. Throughout his entire career, hes only finished in the top 10 once, in 2004, when he was racing in Alcohol Funny Car and scored all three of his career national event victories.

Can a first nitro win be far behind?

Read more from the original source:

Paul Lee has one of the quickest Funny Cars on the tour; is a win coming soon? - NHRA.com