The term artificial intelligence is thrown around too loosely    these days. For example, I was looking at an old student    project on GitHub,a tic-tac-toe program. The programmer,    who back then was a student, described his program as an    artificial intelligence.  
    Its not artificial intelligence. The game engine is simply an    algorithm that scans the available spaces and determines if    placing an X or an O on that square wins the game. Theres no    consciousness, no judgement based on the programs past    experience.  
    Even with chess, claims of artificial intelligence are    frequently exaggerated. Chess programs, along with many other    programs, have gotten so fast that it is quite easy for a chess    program to simply consider all possible game branches to a    given depth (e.g., three moves ahead) and choose the most    advantageous path.  
    Maybe for the endgame a chess program switches to evaluating    positions according to a specialized endgames database. Even    so, this doesnt have to be artificial intelligence. There    might be some simple threshold, such as that when there are    fewer than nine pieces on the board, switch to endgame mode.  
    Despite how good computers have gotten at chess, they have not    put professional chess players out of work. The only way Im    attending a tournament of computers playing chess is if my own    chess program is competing, and Im moving very slowly on that    one.  
    Though on the other hand, there are so few professional players    in the world that putting them all out of work would not be as    impactful as, for example, putting all marketing copy writers    out of work, or putting all graphic designers out of work.  
    Despite the obvious shortcomings of the artificial    intelligence that is available today,corporate    executivesare still eager to use it to replace human    writers, artists and anyone else they can think of.  
    A couple of weeks ago, I asked SDXL to generate for me a few    images of William Shakespeare in a coffee shop writing a play    on a laptop computer. All of the results were bad in varying    degrees. The best image, in my opinion, the only one I thought    worth posting here, still has some obvious flaws that you will    notice even if you know very little about Shakespeare.  
    Now suppose that in an episode of a Star Trek show one of the    main characters goes to a holodeck and asks the computer to    render Shakespeare. The holodeck Shakespeare willalmost    certainly have two hands with five fingers each, and on each    hand each finger will have the expected number of joints (one    fewer for the thumb than the other four).  
    Of course thats because from a real-world viewpoint, the    producers of the show will hire a human actor to portray    Shakespeare. In the story, its because the holodeck computer    understands how humans are put together and how they move.  
    Looking at Star Trek as a promise for the future, its clear    that A.I. has a very long way to go.  
    In much of Star Trek (the original series), computers    store and retrieve lots of information, and automate many    repetitive processes, but they dont really show creativity.  
    However, the original series episode The Ultimate Computer is    rather prescient of the fears many have about A.I. today. The    titular computer is the new M-5, which has just been installed    aboard the Enterprise. Roger Thompson for CounterPunch.org:  
      In the early scenes [of the episode], Captain Kirk      [(William Shatner)] expresses concerns that he might be      replaced by the machine, a fear that is now common in many      quarters.    
    There is ademonstration of the M-5s capabilities early    on in the episode that does nothing to assuage Kirks fears.    The powerful computer is tasked with naming crew members for a    landing party to go down to the planet the Enterprise is    currently orbiting. The M-5 makes the same choices as Captain    Kirk, with one glaring and galling exception: the M-5 doesnt    think Kirk needs to go down to the planet.  
    But even ChatGPT would be able to put together a landing party    roster. War games will be the true test of the M-5.  
      When the M-5 begins its rampage during the war games,      Kirk convinces the machines creator, Dr. Daystrom [(William      Marshall)], to talk to it and try to make it stop, but      Daystrom suffers a nervous breakdown before he can get the      M-5 to discontinue the attack. Kirk then proves the M-5 is      guilty of murder, and the computer shuts itself off and      leaves      theEnterpriseunable      to defend herself from attack from the surviving ships in      Commodore Wesleys attack force. Fortunately, Wesley [(Barry      Russo)] decides not to destroy      theEnterprise, and      Kirk comments that he knew that Wesley would act with      compassion. Dr. McCoy [(DeForest Kelley)], always true to      character, then remarks: Compassion. Thats the one thing no      machine ever had. Maybe its the one thing that keeps men      ahead of them.    
    Not sure I agree with the good doctor on this one. If the M-5    can feel guilt, cant it also feel compassion? But if it    couldnt feel guilt, wouldnt it just have gone ahead and    destroyed all the ships in the war games?  
    How exactly the M-5 works is left very vague. But with Lt.    Commander Data (Brent Spiner) on Star Trek: The Next    Generation, the super-strong and super-smart android who    is second in line to command the Enterprise-D should something    unfortunate happen to Captain Picard, we get a much clearer    idea of what the androids intelligence is based on. Datas    brain essentially has an LLM.  
    I quote now from the page about violinists at Memory Alpha. I like    Memory Alpha, despite the annoying tendency to use past tense    for absolutely everything.  
      In2366,Datacombined      the differing styles of violinistsJascha      HeifetzandTrenka      Bron-Kenexpertly.Jean-Luc      Picardconvinced him that having done      so evidenced that he had not merely imitated their      techniques, but created something new from them. (TNG:      "The      Ensigns of Command")    
      Later that year, Data askedPerrinwhose      style of the over three hundredconcertviolinists      that he had been programmed with that she fancied. Among      themanywere      Heifetz,Yehudi      Menuhin,Grak-tay,      andTataglia.      She chose Tataglia. (TNG:      "Sarek")    
    I know who Jascha Heifetz and Yehudi Menuhin are, I have    recordings by them in my iTunes collection. Id be hard-pressed    to identify in-universe what stylistic details Data will take    from them, though of course from a production point of view I    strongly doubt the recording violinists were given the    direction to mix the styles of Heifetz and Menuhin with    fictional violinists of their own imagining.  
    Data surely has books like The Art of String Quartet    Playing by Mary D. Herter Norton in his memory banks and    can quote them at will. But he also has the experience of    handling an actual violin and playing it in an ensemble with    human players whose intonation and rhythm might not be quite as    precise as his.  
    Unlike todays LLMs, Data understands that he can get things    wrong sometimes. In the episode Cause and Effect, he realizes    he got it wrong multiple times when its too late, but he will    still be able to send a message to when its too early for    anyone to understand whats going on.  
    Before anyone complains, I shouldsay something about    spoilers. So far Ive only mentioned episodes that first aired    more than thirty years ago. If youve read this far, you either    have watched these episodes many times and know them by heart,    or you havent watched them but know so much about more recent    episodes, movies and series that its not a spoiler to tell you    that the Enterprise gets destroyed and undestroyed several    times.  
    At the crucial moment when everything is about to go wrong,    Captain Picard (Patrick Stewart) listens to his senior officers    for ideas on how to avert annihilation, and decides to do what    Lt. Commander Data suggests.  
    It is during the explosion that Data realizes that the right    thing to do is what Commander Riker (Jonathan Frakes) suggests.    The Enterprise blows up and the time loop is reset. As the time    loop starts a new iteration, Datas strange message from the    future becomes more insistent: the number 3, corresponding to    the three pips on Commander Rikers uniform.  
    For all Data's knowledge and ability, Starfleet still considers    Commander Riker to be more qualified than Data to command a    starship.  
    In the second part of the Redemption two-parter, Picard is    trying to set up a detection grid to catch Romulans supplying    weapons to one side in a Klingon civil war. Given the short    notice, Picard can only assemble a small complement of random    undermanned ships. Picard sends some of his senior officers to    captain some of the ships.  
    First time I watched the episode, I was skeptical of the    detection grid idea, but mostly because the diagram we see on    the screen suggests a two-dimensional grid. If the Romulans can    come all the way from Romulus, surely they can go around a    detection grid that doesnt surround the whole planet. But    lets put that aside, lets just say that either I    misunderstood the diagram or the graphics department messed up    the diagram.  
    Picard assigns Data to command the USS Sutherland. Lieutenant    Hobson (Timothy Carhart) decides hes going to be the shadow    captain of the Sutherland. No, actually, shadow captain is    the wrong term, it implies that Hobson will treat the nominal    captain with a bare minimum of respect and deference.  
    But from the moment Data comes aboard, Hobson openly    disrespects the android, who has earned the same rank in    Starfleet from years of experience, and Datas experience    includes almost five years aboard the flagship of the fleet.  
    We may doubt that Data bases his violin playing on Heifetz or    Menuhin, but its clear that he bases his leadership style on    Picards example, calmly listening to his subordinates and    treating them as professionals rather than recruits at boot    camp.  
    But that style wont quite work with Hobson, who is always    ready to substitute his own judgement for that of an artificial    intelligence he does not respect.  
    Once again at a crucial moment, Data realizes that what needs    to be done is not the obvious thing everyone assumes. The    Romulans notice a hole in the detection grid and go to it. Data    decides that he needs to make the hole bigger and fire a shot    in the dark to illuminate the cloaked Romulan ship.  
    With Captain Picard saying the gap needs to be closed, Hobson    obviously doesnt want to do the crazy idea that the android    has just come up with. So Data feigns anger, like hes going to    punch Hobson in the face if Hobson doesnt do what Data orders.  
    And so, the Romulan ship is detected, and the Romulans decide    to abandon their favored side in the Klingon civil war. I dont    think ChatGPT would come up with that idea.  
    The open thread question: Assuming the continuation of human    civilization to the 24th Century, how do you think artificial    intelligence will progress?  
    Feel free to mention pertinent examples from newer shows like    Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Picard.    But please, no bashing of those shows just to bash them.  
See original here:
Star Trek open thread: A long way away from true artificial intelligence - Daily Kos