12345...10...


THE RESOURCE BASED abundance ECONOMY

Know the foods beforehand that you should avoid if one wants to pass the test.

Most are unaware that certain everyday foods will deter you from a pass on the drug test if you are aware you will increase your chances of success in passing it. Researching these foods will put you ahead and avoiding the consumption of these foods around the day of or a few days prior the test will further heighten your chance of being successful. Here are some foods to avoid:

Hemp Oil/Seeds/Milk: This can be brought back positive for THC. It is hard for the test to distinguish between marijuana abusers and a typical meal with hemp seeds.

All Cold/ Flu Remedies: Avoid all remedies to help heal a cold. These remedies narrow the blood vessels to relieve congestion. A synthetic amphetamine is used in the remedy, and thus you can test positive for amphetamines in the drug test.

Azo: This is used to combat urinary tract infections as well as permit relief to the victim. Azo helps to rid the infection bacteria in the track by stripping it of all the bacteria; the side effect is that it turns the different urine colors than the natural and the administrators just assume you are trying to fool or hide from the system.

Sudafed: This is a remedy used for the relief of allergies. Beware of this, as this will bring your results to an apex positive. A synthetic amphetamine is used, and you will strike positive for amphetamines.

Tonic Water: This also goes by the name of quinine water. This can be mistaken for opiates. It was a means to deliver quinines from South America to its destination. Do not even be tempted to drink a little or that is a guarantee of failure.

Vitamin B Supplements: Avoid any natural herbs with Vitamin B2 contained in it or Vitamin B complex supplements. Commercial B2 supplements are synthetic and are also known as Riboflavin. It is a fermentation of a particular plant, or it may contain hempseed oil. It will falsify a positive for marijuana usage. Do not take until you know you are in the safe zone for passing the test.

Ibuprofen: It is a common use is for a painkiller, but it comes as the results back as positive on the drug test in the testing window of 48 hours. It tests positive for marijuana, benzodiazepines, and barbiturates. So the next time you are in pain (near your drug test date) reach for the aspirin or the Tylenol.

Poppy Seeds: These tasty seeds are delicious on a muffin or bagel but, at best, refrain from them (around or on the testing date) as they contain amounts of opiates. The opiates are in the form of codeine and opium. Instead of poppy seeds substitute with sesame or sunflower seeds.

Know the difference between store versus laboratory testing

Buying from the store is a simple step, and you can walk into any store, and they most likely have a drug test kit in stock. The results are quick and easy. Do your research though, as some can have the results within one to five minutes, while others have to be mailed to a laboratory to get the results. You can find bulk rates or the best price with online shopping and research. There are 2 types of urine tests that you can take from home:

You do not need to send it in for testing: the urination makes contact to the strip reacting with it and producing the results. If it changes colors or produces a symbol, the results are positive, if otherwise then the results are negative.

Laboratory Grade Screening Test: If you must go to a laboratory or you must send it via mail, then the laboratory will have to send you back the results. It is more accurate as it can be tested for alteration or tampering with the results. The laboratory tests for important compounds. The PH balance and the absence of minerals indicate that it could have been tampered with. The presence of certain substances could indicate additives.

Here is a great resource for our readers in order to learn how to pass a urine drug test in 2 days:

8. Get to know the different types of drugs that are being tested.

There are five basic major drugs that are tested. These were the five upmost common abused substances. The following are the topmost:

Marijuana: This is anything composed of THC. Examples are vaping weed, wax, BHO, shatter any THC edibles (pills, gummy, cooked), etc.

Cocaine: Any snorting, smoking, or shooting of cocaine-related substances such as coca leaves, tinctures, alcohol (of any kind) or chewing leaves, crack, local anesthetics and prescription drugs, etc.

Opiates: Prescription drugs, painkillers, anti-anxiety medication, etc. It also consists of illegal drugs. If codeine is attached to the suffix of the word it usually means it is an opiate.

Amphetamines: It helps relieve anxiety, depression, weight loss, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, to name a few

Methamphetamines: A powerful stimulate when synthesizing amphetamines. This is where Meth falls into the category.

Simply do not do them.

The most simple, effective and safest way is to simply not do them at all. This is the most healthy for you. Spend time in a hobby and indulge in a healthy lifestyle: eating right, hygiene, exercising, etc. This is the one-hundred percent best for you as most (if not all drugs) leave you with no real fix and being detrimental to your health. They make you crave more, and you are then controlled by a substance where you are never content. There are other things you can do as well: make a difference, volunteer, indulge in ones passions or dreams. One who actively participates in ones own life lives a more productive and a more happy-filled life than one who reaches for the drug to fix ones problem.

How to get off of Drug Abuse

Take baby steps.

Everything with a lasting change must be built on a foundation of baby steps, if one tries to get off of it cold then one is susceptible to cling back into it and fall under the same destructive habits or maybe even delve deeper into it. Wane off of it a little at a time, until you can become totally independent of it. It is said that Patience is a virtue. This indeed must require patience; one must not get discouraged. If one keeps at it, one will start to see the progress he has begun. One can do this if one has the determination to succeed.

Find an accountability partner.

One must combat feelings of loneliness or all the weight being put on ones shoulders; the majority of people tend to harbor these feelings. This is dangerous as this can give you a mentality of Oh well, why try? One must try! The outcome far outweighs the pain. A friend who has been in the same or similar predicament makes it easier to sort through this life addiction together. One can be accountable to ones self but having another makes it all the more difficult to slip back into ones destructive phase in life. This gives one the ability to relate to another and adds another layer of protection from the detrimental lifestyle. It can only get easier from here. One cannot do this alone.

Seek professional help and guidance

More than likely, most have this implemented for them. If one does not, they must actively seek it. They will know how to help detox you. Detoxification is vital to flush the body of the drugs that left trace amounts of it in ones body. This can help with ones cravings for it as well because it is removing any of the substances that may still be left in ones body. They know the best ways to heal your body and make it stronger through a daily practice of things researched and proven. They will usually send one to rehab where the victim gets another chance at indulging in ones life fully once again.

Practice the healthy ways to relax you and indulge your senses.

Learn more about yourself in a healthy manner: What relaxes you? What motivates you? What are your likes/dislikes? Stress is the number one cause for one to enter the word of drugs. There are more healthy and productive ways one can implement to achieve permanent, lasting results, than just diving for drugs because you think it is going to give a quick fix.

Meditation is known for its relaxing benefits and can prevent or help relax ones being physical, mentally, and emotionally. A diffuser can help in indulging ones senses with aromatherapy: the art of finding ones smell that helps better ones self. Indulge in exercises like Yoga, etc.

Focus on your breathing. Be present at the moment. It would be a wise choice to invest in a journal and write down ones thoughts. This can help to look back at progress or aid in the relief of struggle. Some need organized discipline and there are a plethora of videos, how-tos, and courses to help one implement lifestyle changes vital to their health and well-being. Sobriety is an art form of being able to participant in ones life to the apex point one can reach.

Any type of aerobic exercise is good for health and to help perspire the drug out of ones system. Swimming, running, riding a bicycle are just a few examples.

See the original post here:

THE RESOURCE BASED abundance ECONOMY

Resource Based Economy | A New Vision For Humanity

A Global Resource Based Economy requires that we efficiently manage our planet’s resources as a single system. By using technology and resources more intelligently, we can provide a high standard of living for ultimately everyone, free of charge.

In such a system, there is no reason to hurt each other or the environment, and no advantages to be gained from doing so. This would surpass the need for stealing, embezzlement, corruption, and envy. These behaviors are not inborn, but a result of being raised in todays society of scarcity.

See the original post here:

Resource Based Economy | A New Vision For Humanity

Center For Resource Management | Resource Based Economy

Engineers, Architects, and Technicians are needed at this time to help provide competent Design Development Level drawing package (Phase 1). Moving forward, the Design Development Drawing and specification package (Phase 2) will be used to create full Tender/Construction documents (Phase 3) for what could be multiple Construction packages.

The below list of persons are urged to come forward with their own unique skill sets. The most urgent skill sets are listed in order of requirements with respect to the critical path Designated by Phase indicator:

Phase 1 System Planning (Design Development):

Phase 2 Structure planning (Schematic Design):

Phase 3 Tendering, Contracts & Construction:

Statisticians, scientists and any other technical specialists who feel their unique skills could be of use are also encouraged to volunteer.

We would like to reiterate that these unpaid voluntary positions are at this time to help advance this first project.

Note that knowing English and having consistent access to a personal computer with Internet connection are prerequisites to joining the team. Also, if you are a software engineer, please look at our volunteering opportunities on thevenusproject.com.

To get involved, please submit the form below.

More here:

Center For Resource Management | Resource Based Economy

Resource Based Economy | The Venus Project

Global problems faced by mankind today are impacting individuals and nations rapidly. Climate change, famine, war, epidemics of deadly diseases and environmental pollution contribute to the long list of global challenges we, as humans, need to promptly addressbefore an eventualcatastrophe swiftly becomes inevitable.

Regardless of political philosophy, religious beliefs, or social customs, all socio-economic systemsultimately depend upon natural resources, such as clean air and water, arable land, and the necessary technology and personnel to maintain a high standard of living.

Modern society has access to highly advanced technologies and can make available food, clothing, housing, medical care, a relevant educational system, and develop a limitless supply of renewable, non-contaminating energy such as geothermal, solar, wind and tidal.

It is now possible to have everyone on Earth enjoy a very high standard of living with all of the amenities that a prosperous civilization can provide. This can be accomplished through the intelligent and humane application of science and technology.

Individuals and interest groups are governed by lawsthatdemandmaximum profit where possible. These laws are inherent in the monetary system prevalent in most countries today capitalism. The basic principles of capitalism demand exponential growth at all cost causing financial cataclysms such as the 1929s Great Depression in the United States and the recentfinancial crisisof2007-08.

We are separated by borders and beliefs which make it impossible for us to arrive at relevantsolutionswhile being divided ideologically. Most of our problems today are technical but we are still looking forsolutions through political means.We need toacceptthat eliminatingthese global threatsrequiresthe employment ofmethodologies rather than personal opinions.

We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.~ Albert Einstein

The Venus Project proposes a holistic approach with a global socio-economic system that utilizes the most current technological and scientific advances to provide the highest possible living standard for all people on Earth. The proposed system is called Resource Based Economy. The term and meaning was coined by Jacque Fresco, the founder of The Venus Project.

In a Resource Based Economy all goods and services are available to all people without the need for means of exchange such as money, credits, barter or any other means. For this to be achieved all resources must be declared as the common heritage of all Earths inhabitants. Equipped with the latest scientific and technological marvels mankind could reach extremely high productivity levels and create abundance of resources.

Resource Based Economy concerns itself with three main factors, namely Environmental, Technological and Human. We invite you to investigate further into these factors and discovermore about The Venus Project and Resource Based Economy.

Similarly to all other living creatures, ourbehavior is determined largelyby the factors inourenvironment. The combination of influences throughout the countless events in our lives build our character and we assume []

Read More

Many people believe that there is too much technology in the world today, and that technology is the major cause of our environmental pollution. This is not the case. It []

Read More

Our present culture is driven by technically incompetent politicians, scarcity-oriented economics and a system of obsolete values. In order for us to make the transition to this new, more humane []

Read More

Read more here:

Resource Based Economy | The Venus Project

Resource Based Economy | A New Vision For Humanity

A Global Resource Based Economy requires that we efficiently manage our planet’s resources as a single system. By using technology and resources more intelligently, we can provide a high standard of living for ultimately everyone, free of charge.

In such a system, there is no reason to hurt each other or the environment, and no advantages to be gained from doing so. This would surpass the need for stealing, embezzlement, corruption, and envy. These behaviors are not inborn, but a result of being raised in todays society of scarcity.

View original post here:

Resource Based Economy | A New Vision For Humanity

Center For Resource Management | Resource Based Economy

Engineers, Architects, and Technicians are needed at this time to help provide competent Design Development Level drawing package (Phase 1). Moving forward, the Design Development Drawing and specification package (Phase 2) will be used to create full Tender/Construction documents (Phase 3) for what could be multiple Construction packages.

The below list of persons are urged to come forward with their own unique skill sets. The most urgent skill sets are listed in order of requirements with respect to the critical path Designated by Phase indicator:

Phase 1 System Planning (Design Development):

Phase 2 Structure planning (Schematic Design):

Phase 3 Tendering, Contracts & Construction:

Statisticians, scientists and any other technical specialists who feel their unique skills could be of use are also encouraged to volunteer.

We would like to reiterate that these unpaid voluntary positions are at this time to help advance this first project.

Note that knowing English and having consistent access to a personal computer with Internet connection are prerequisites to joining the team. Also, if you are a software engineer, please look at our volunteering opportunities on thevenusproject.com.

To get involved, please submit the form below.

Here is the original post:

Center For Resource Management | Resource Based Economy

THE RESOURCE BASED abundance ECONOMY

Know the foods beforehand that you should avoid if one wants to pass the test.

Most are unaware that certain everyday foods will deter you from a pass on the drug test if you are aware you will increase your chances of success in passing it. Researching these foods will put you ahead and avoiding the consumption of these foods around the day of or a few days prior the test will further heighten your chance of being successful. Here are some foods to avoid:

Hemp Oil/Seeds/Milk: This can be brought back positive for THC. It is hard for the test to distinguish between marijuana abusers and a typical meal with hemp seeds.

All Cold/ Flu Remedies: Avoid all remedies to help heal a cold. These remedies narrow the blood vessels to relieve congestion. A synthetic amphetamine is used in the remedy, and thus you can test positive for amphetamines in the drug test.

Azo: This is used to combat urinary tract infections as well as permit relief to the victim. Azo helps to rid the infection bacteria in the track by stripping it of all the bacteria; the side effect is that it turns the different urine colors than the natural and the administrators just assume you are trying to fool or hide from the system.

Sudafed: This is a remedy used for the relief of allergies. Beware of this, as this will bring your results to an apex positive. A synthetic amphetamine is used, and you will strike positive for amphetamines.

Tonic Water: This also goes by the name of quinine water. This can be mistaken for opiates. It was a means to deliver quinines from South America to its destination. Do not even be tempted to drink a little or that is a guarantee of failure.

Vitamin B Supplements: Avoid any natural herbs with Vitamin B2 contained in it or Vitamin B complex supplements. Commercial B2 supplements are synthetic and are also known as Riboflavin. It is a fermentation of a particular plant, or it may contain hempseed oil. It will falsify a positive for marijuana usage. Do not take until you know you are in the safe zone for passing the test.

Ibuprofen: It is a common use is for a painkiller, but it comes as the results back as positive on the drug test in the testing window of 48 hours. It tests positive for marijuana, benzodiazepines, and barbiturates. So the next time you are in pain (near your drug test date) reach for the aspirin or the Tylenol.

Poppy Seeds: These tasty seeds are delicious on a muffin or bagel but, at best, refrain from them (around or on the testing date) as they contain amounts of opiates. The opiates are in the form of codeine and opium. Instead of poppy seeds substitute with sesame or sunflower seeds.

Know the difference between store versus laboratory testing

Buying from the store is a simple step, and you can walk into any store, and they most likely have a drug test kit in stock. The results are quick and easy. Do your research though, as some can have the results within one to five minutes, while others have to be mailed to a laboratory to get the results. You can find bulk rates or the best price with online shopping and research. There are 2 types of urine tests that you can take from home:

You do not need to send it in for testing: the urination makes contact to the strip reacting with it and producing the results. If it changes colors or produces a symbol, the results are positive, if otherwise then the results are negative.

Laboratory Grade Screening Test: If you must go to a laboratory or you must send it via mail, then the laboratory will have to send you back the results. It is more accurate as it can be tested for alteration or tampering with the results. The laboratory tests for important compounds. The PH balance and the absence of minerals indicate that it could have been tampered with. The presence of certain substances could indicate additives.

Here is a great resource for our readers in order to learn how to pass a urine drug test in 2 days:

8. Get to know the different types of drugs that are being tested.

There are five basic major drugs that are tested. These were the five upmost common abused substances. The following are the topmost:

Marijuana: This is anything composed of THC. Examples are vaping weed, wax, BHO, shatter any THC edibles (pills, gummy, cooked), etc.

Cocaine: Any snorting, smoking, or shooting of cocaine-related substances such as coca leaves, tinctures, alcohol (of any kind) or chewing leaves, crack, local anesthetics and prescription drugs, etc.

Opiates: Prescription drugs, painkillers, anti-anxiety medication, etc. It also consists of illegal drugs. If codeine is attached to the suffix of the word it usually means it is an opiate.

Amphetamines: It helps relieve anxiety, depression, weight loss, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, to name a few

Methamphetamines: A powerful stimulate when synthesizing amphetamines. This is where Meth falls into the category.

Simply do not do them.

The most simple, effective and safest way is to simply not do them at all. This is the most healthy for you. Spend time in a hobby and indulge in a healthy lifestyle: eating right, hygiene, exercising, etc. This is the one-hundred percent best for you as most (if not all drugs) leave you with no real fix and being detrimental to your health. They make you crave more, and you are then controlled by a substance where you are never content. There are other things you can do as well: make a difference, volunteer, indulge in ones passions or dreams. One who actively participates in ones own life lives a more productive and a more happy-filled life than one who reaches for the drug to fix ones problem.

How to get off of Drug Abuse

Take baby steps.

Everything with a lasting change must be built on a foundation of baby steps, if one tries to get off of it cold then one is susceptible to cling back into it and fall under the same destructive habits or maybe even delve deeper into it. Wane off of it a little at a time, until you can become totally independent of it. It is said that Patience is a virtue. This indeed must require patience; one must not get discouraged. If one keeps at it, one will start to see the progress he has begun. One can do this if one has the determination to succeed.

Find an accountability partner.

One must combat feelings of loneliness or all the weight being put on ones shoulders; the majority of people tend to harbor these feelings. This is dangerous as this can give you a mentality of Oh well, why try? One must try! The outcome far outweighs the pain. A friend who has been in the same or similar predicament makes it easier to sort through this life addiction together. One can be accountable to ones self but having another makes it all the more difficult to slip back into ones destructive phase in life. This gives one the ability to relate to another and adds another layer of protection from the detrimental lifestyle. It can only get easier from here. One cannot do this alone.

Seek professional help and guidance

More than likely, most have this implemented for them. If one does not, they must actively seek it. They will know how to help detox you. Detoxification is vital to flush the body of the drugs that left trace amounts of it in ones body. This can help with ones cravings for it as well because it is removing any of the substances that may still be left in ones body. They know the best ways to heal your body and make it stronger through a daily practice of things researched and proven. They will usually send one to rehab where the victim gets another chance at indulging in ones life fully once again.

Practice the healthy ways to relax you and indulge your senses.

Learn more about yourself in a healthy manner: What relaxes you? What motivates you? What are your likes/dislikes? Stress is the number one cause for one to enter the word of drugs. There are more healthy and productive ways one can implement to achieve permanent, lasting results, than just diving for drugs because you think it is going to give a quick fix.

Meditation is known for its relaxing benefits and can prevent or help relax ones being physical, mentally, and emotionally. A diffuser can help in indulging ones senses with aromatherapy: the art of finding ones smell that helps better ones self. Indulge in exercises like Yoga, etc.

Focus on your breathing. Be present at the moment. It would be a wise choice to invest in a journal and write down ones thoughts. This can help to look back at progress or aid in the relief of struggle. Some need organized discipline and there are a plethora of videos, how-tos, and courses to help one implement lifestyle changes vital to their health and well-being. Sobriety is an art form of being able to participant in ones life to the apex point one can reach.

Any type of aerobic exercise is good for health and to help perspire the drug out of ones system. Swimming, running, riding a bicycle are just a few examples.

See original here:

THE RESOURCE BASED abundance ECONOMY

Resource Based Economy – Home | Facebook

Children as young as four are working in Congolese mines to find cobalt which is used to make your smartphone work – a Sky News investigation has found”slavery still exists…. 8p a day or a beating, sounds like slavery. i would give up my smart phone. i would go back to a typewriter. nothing is worth treating people like this.things can be made traceable if companies want to. corruption will always exist, yes. however, we don’t have to make it easy for them. there are ways, we just have to collectively be willing to fight for them”- Christina Lowe

Read the original:

Resource Based Economy – Home | Facebook

Crossroads Resource Center Finding Food in Farm Country

Alabama

Central Alabama Region (3 counties, 2012). Partner: Central Alabama Planning and Development Commission (CARPDC). Data Summary

North Alabama (11 counties, 2011). Partner: Food Bank of North Alabama. Data Summary

Santa Rosa County Region (Florida and Alabama)(5 counties, 2006). Partner: Team Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa County Economic Development). Data Summary

Building Food Security in Alaska (entire state, 2014). By Ken Meter and Megan Phillips Goldenberg. Statewide study commissioned by the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. Report

Fairbanks Region (3 counties, 2013). Partner: Partner: University of AlaskaFairbanks. Data Summary

Coconino County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Maricopa County (2018). Building Community Connections Through Community Foods. Meter, K.; Goldenberg, M.P.; & Ross P. Prepared for Maricopa County Food Systems Council by Crossroads Resource Center.

Navajo County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Southern Arizona (5 counties, 2011). Partners: Community Food Bank of Tucson and Pima County Food System Alliance. Data Summary

Yavapai County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Arkansas Farm & Food Economy (2015). Partner: Heifer Project International. (Still to be released)

ArkLaTex Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, 2016). Partners: Slow Food North Louisiana and We Grow Together! Local Food & Farm Economy and Strategic Recommendations

Eastern Arkansas (8 counties, 2012). Partners: East Arkansas Enterprise Community & Heifer Project International. Data Summary

State of Arkansas (March, 2011). Partner: Heifer Project International. Data Summary

State of California, Sacramento metro area and Ventura County(2005). Partners: Roots of Change Vivid Picture Project, Ecotrust. Data Summary

Central Coast (2004) Results summarized in Finding Food in Farm Country. Partner: Community Alliance with Family Farms. Data Summary

Mendocino County (1 county, 2010). Partner: North Coast Opportunities, Inc. & Mendocino County Community Health Services Susan Sher. Data Summary

Mount Shasta / Mount Lassen Region (6 counties, 2012). Partner: California Center for Cooperative Development. Data Summary

Sacramento Metro (2004). Partner: Vivid Picture Project. Data Summary

Ventura County (1 county, 2004). Partner: Vivid Picture Project. Data Summary

Coeur dAlene Reservation Local Farm and Food Economy (1 tribal community and 2 counties, 2017).Partner: Benewah Medical and Wellness Center. Data Summary

Adams County, Colorado (2016). Partners: Logan Simpson Design Firm, Two Forks Collective, City of Brighton & County of Adams. Market Study for Adams County Special Ag District. District Plan

Boulder County (1 county, 2009). Partners: Boulder County, Colorado State University Extension. Data Summary

Denver Metropolitan Region (7 counties, 2008). Partner: Civic Results & Metro Denver Health and Wellness Commission. Data Summary

Montezuma County (1 county, 2013). Partner: LiveWell Montezuma. Data Summary

San Luis Valley (2018). Three Potential Value-Added Opportunities for the San Luis Valley. Meter, K., Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the Adams State University Value-Added Committee Alamosa, Colorado.

San Luis Valley Region (6 counties, 2013). Partner: San Luis Valley partners. Data Summary

Santa Rosa County Region (Florida and Alabama) (5 counties, 2006). Partner: Team Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa County economic development). Data Summary

SarasotaCounty (1 county, 2006). Partner: Sarasota County Government. Data Summary

Atlanta Metro Region (28 counties, 2008). Partner: Emory University & Georgia Organics. Data Summary

State of Hawaii 2017). Partners: Hawaii State Department of Health, The Kohala Center, The Food Basket, Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Blue Zones Project. Comprehensive food system assessment focused on low-income food access. Hawaii Food for All

Hawaii(2003). Finding Food in Farm Country. Data Summary

Maui (2003). Partner: Maui Land & Pine. PowerPoints (2)

State of Hawaii (2003). Partner: Maui Land & Pine. PowerPoints (2)

Coeur dAlene Reservation Local Farm and Food Economy (1 tribal community and 2 counties, 2017). Partner: Benewah Medical and Wellness Center. Data Summary

Greater Treasure Valley region (Idaho & Oregon) (9 counties, 2010). Partner: Treasure Valley Food Coalition & Treasure Valley Food Network. Data Summary

Nez Perce Tribe Food Sovereignty Assessment (1 tribal community and 4 Idaho counties, 2018). Partner: Nez Perce Tribe Economic Development. Nimiipuu (Nez Perce Tribe) Food Sovereignty Assessment

Central Illinois (32 counties, 2011). Partner: Edible Economy Project. Data Summary

Sangamon Region (9 counties, 2010). Partner: Illinois Stewardship Alliance. Data Summary

Southern Illinois (23 counties, 2012). Partners: FoodWorks, Connect Southern Illinois. Data Summary

Columbus Region 2015 (2 counties, 2015). Partner: Columbus Regional Health. Data Summary

Columbus Region (2 counties, 2013). Partner: Columbus Regional Health. Data Summary

Elkhart Region (8 counties, 2014). Partner: Elkhart County Foodshed Initiative. With funding from Goshen Hospital Health Care Foundation. Data Summary

Hancock County, Indiana (2015). Partners: Hoosier Harvest Market and the Indiana State Department of Health. Opportunities for Farm-to-School in Hancock County, Indiana

Northeast Indiana (2016). Partners: Manheim Solutions, Inc., and Northeast Indiana Regional Partnership. Northeast Indiana Local Food Network Phase 1 Report

Southwest Indiana (7 counties, 2013). Partner: Welborn Baptist Foundation (Evansville). Snapshots of the Southwest Indiana farm & food economy. Interviews with food system leaders

Southwest Indiana (7 counties, 2013). Partner: Welborn Baptist Foundation (Evansville). Farm and Food economy report. Data Summary

State of Indiana (2012). Partner: Indiana State Department of Health. Hoosier Farmer? Emergent Food Systems in Indiana (2012)

Black Hawk region(8 counties, 2005). Partners: University of Northern Iowa (UNI) Local Foods Project Annual Meeting & Buy Fresh Buy Local campaign, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Des Moines Region (6 counties, 2012). Partners: Food & You; Polk County Health Department. Data Summary

Fairfield (2007). Partner: Pathfinders RC&D. Data Summary

Golden Hills RC&D region (Southwest Iowa) (8 counties, 2006). Partners: Golden Hills Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Iowa Valley RC&D region (East Central Iowa) (6 counties, 2007). Partners: Iowa Valley Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, Northwest Area Foundation. Data Summary

Marshall County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Prairie Rivers RC&D, Marshalltown Community College and COMIDA. Data Summary

Northeast region(2004) Partners: GROWN Locally, Northeast Iowa Farm and Food Coalition, Iowa State University Extension, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, Oneota Coop. No Data Summary published contact CRC or NIFFC for more information.

Pathfinders RC&D region (Southeast Iowa) (6 counties, 2007). Partners: Pathfinders Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Prairie Rivers RC&D region (Central Iowa) (6 counties, 2006). Partners: Prairie Rivers Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Story County (1 county, 2010). Partner: Story County. Data Summary

Woodbury County(1 county, 2005). Partner: Woodbury County Organic Growers Conference, Woodbury County Rural Economic Development, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Wright County(2004) Partner: Heres 2 Our Health, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, ALCES Foundation. No Data Summary published contact CRC or H2OH for more information.

Wright County and Northeast Iowa (2004). Results summarized in Finding Food in Farm Country. Data Summary

Kaw River Valley (2008). Partner: Kansas Rural Center, Kansas State University, The Merc Co-op. Data Summary

Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas (1 county, 2017). Partners: Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas; Healthy Communities Wyandotte. Kansas City Kansas Healthy Food System Assessment

ArkLaTex Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, 2016). Partners: Slow Food North Louisiana and We Grow Together! Local Food & Farm Economy and Strategic Recommendations

Central Louisiana (9 parishes, 2013). Partner: Central Louisiana Economic Development Association. PowerPoint Presentation

Building Support for Community-Based Foods in the Lakes Region of Maine (2 counties, 2016). Partners: Town of Bridgton and County of Cumberland. Report

City of Auburn (1 County) (2018). Auburns Agricultural and Resource Protection Zoning (AGRP): Consultant Recommendations. Meter, K. & Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the City of Auburn, Maine, by Crossroads Resource Center. Auburns Local Economy: Agriculture, Forestry, and Housing . Meter, K. & Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the City of Auburn, Maine, by Crossroads Resource Center.

Lewiston + Auburn Region (Maine, 2015). Partners: Karp Resources and Grow L+A. Lewiston-Auburn Regional Food Hub Feasibility Study

Province of Manitoba (2009). Partner: Food Matters Manitoba (formerly Manitoba Food Charter). Data Summary

East Chesapeake Bay region (Maryland & Virginia)(7 counties, October, 2007). Partner: Food and Water Watch, East Chesapeake farmers. Data Summary

East Michigan Region (14 counties, 2012). Partner: East Michigan Council of Governments. Data Summary

Elkhart Region (8 counties, 2014). Partner: Partner: Elkhart County Foodshed Initiative. With funding from Goshen Hospital Health Care Foundation. Data Summary

Genesee County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Ruth Mott Foundation. Data Summary

Upper Peninsula (15 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Central Upper Peninsula (6 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Eastern Upper Peninsula (3 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Western Upper Peninsula (6 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

State of Minnesota (2009). Partner: Blue Cross Blue Shield Center for Prevention. Full Report

Northwest region(13 counties, 2005). Partners: Northwest Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

Scott County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Scott County. Data Summary

Southeast Minnesota regionI (Original Finding Food in Farm Country study, 2001). Partners: Experiment in Rural Cooperation, Community Design Center, & University of Minnesota. Full Report

Southeast Minnesota region II (15 counties, 2007new study with expanded region). Partners: Experiment in Rural Cooperation, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

West Central region(12 counties, 2005). Partners: West Central Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

Western Minnesota (10 counties 2008). Partner: Land Stewardship Project. Data Summary

Finding Food in Farm Country: Findings inSoutheast Minnesota(2001), Northwest Minnesota (2005), and West Central Minnesota (2005). Data Summary

An Overview of Mississippis Farm & Food Economy (Statewide 2014). Partner: Mississippi Food Policy Council, with funding from Winrock International. Full Report

Mississippi Delta (18 counties, 2011). Partner: Delta Fresh Food Initiative. Data Summary

Eastern Montana (2011). Partners: Community GATE & Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Expanded Golden Triangle (11 counties, 2017). Partners: Montana Cooperative Development Center, Montana Farmers Union, Farmers Union International. Expanded Golden Triangle (Montana) Potential Community Foods Collaborative

Golden Triangle region (2011). Partner: Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Southeast of Golden Triangle region (2011). Partner: Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Southwest Montana (7 counties, 2012). Partner: Headwaters RC&D. Data Summary

Western Montana (5 counties, 2011). Partners: Lake County Community Development Corporation, High Stakes Foundation, Alternative Energy Resources Organization, Nourish the Flathead, Community Food and Agriculture Coalition, New West. Data Summary

State of Nebraska (2010). Partner: No More Empty Pots. Data Summary

Great Falls region (New Hampshire & Vermont) (4 counties, 2010). Partner: Great Falls Food Hub. Data Summary

State of New Mexico (2007). Partner: New Mexico Acequia Association.

Arid Lowlands & Lower Rio Grande (11 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Central Plains (7 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Colorado Plateau & Intermountain Valley Bioregion (2 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Read the rest here:

Crossroads Resource Center Finding Food in Farm Country

Crossroads Resource Center Finding Food in Farm Country

Alabama

Central Alabama Region (3 counties, 2012). Partner: Central Alabama Planning and Development Commission (CARPDC). Data Summary

North Alabama (11 counties, 2011). Partner: Food Bank of North Alabama. Data Summary

Santa Rosa County Region (Florida and Alabama)(5 counties, 2006). Partner: Team Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa County Economic Development). Data Summary

Building Food Security in Alaska (entire state, 2014). By Ken Meter and Megan Phillips Goldenberg. Statewide study commissioned by the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. Report

Fairbanks Region (3 counties, 2013). Partner: Partner: University of AlaskaFairbanks. Data Summary

Coconino County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Maricopa County (2018). Building Community Connections Through Community Foods. Meter, K.; Goldenberg, M.P.; & Ross P. Prepared for Maricopa County Food Systems Council by Crossroads Resource Center.

Navajo County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Southern Arizona (5 counties, 2011). Partners: Community Food Bank of Tucson and Pima County Food System Alliance. Data Summary

Yavapai County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Arkansas Farm & Food Economy (2015). Partner: Heifer Project International. (Still to be released)

ArkLaTex Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, 2016). Partners: Slow Food North Louisiana and We Grow Together! Local Food & Farm Economy and Strategic Recommendations

Eastern Arkansas (8 counties, 2012). Partners: East Arkansas Enterprise Community & Heifer Project International. Data Summary

State of Arkansas (March, 2011). Partner: Heifer Project International. Data Summary

State of California, Sacramento metro area and Ventura County(2005). Partners: Roots of Change Vivid Picture Project, Ecotrust. Data Summary

Central Coast (2004) Results summarized in Finding Food in Farm Country. Partner: Community Alliance with Family Farms. Data Summary

Mendocino County (1 county, 2010). Partner: North Coast Opportunities, Inc. & Mendocino County Community Health Services Susan Sher. Data Summary

Mount Shasta / Mount Lassen Region (6 counties, 2012). Partner: California Center for Cooperative Development. Data Summary

Sacramento Metro (2004). Partner: Vivid Picture Project. Data Summary

Ventura County (1 county, 2004). Partner: Vivid Picture Project. Data Summary

Coeur dAlene Reservation Local Farm and Food Economy (1 tribal community and 2 counties, 2017).Partner: Benewah Medical and Wellness Center. Data Summary

Adams County, Colorado (2016). Partners: Logan Simpson Design Firm, Two Forks Collective, City of Brighton & County of Adams. Market Study for Adams County Special Ag District. District Plan

Boulder County (1 county, 2009). Partners: Boulder County, Colorado State University Extension. Data Summary

Denver Metropolitan Region (7 counties, 2008). Partner: Civic Results & Metro Denver Health and Wellness Commission. Data Summary

Montezuma County (1 county, 2013). Partner: LiveWell Montezuma. Data Summary

San Luis Valley (2018). Three Potential Value-Added Opportunities for the San Luis Valley. Meter, K., Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the Adams State University Value-Added Committee Alamosa, Colorado.

San Luis Valley Region (6 counties, 2013). Partner: San Luis Valley partners. Data Summary

Santa Rosa County Region (Florida and Alabama) (5 counties, 2006). Partner: Team Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa County economic development). Data Summary

SarasotaCounty (1 county, 2006). Partner: Sarasota County Government. Data Summary

Atlanta Metro Region (28 counties, 2008). Partner: Emory University & Georgia Organics. Data Summary

State of Hawaii 2017). Partners: Hawaii State Department of Health, The Kohala Center, The Food Basket, Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Blue Zones Project. Comprehensive food system assessment focused on low-income food access. Hawaii Food for All

Hawaii(2003). Finding Food in Farm Country. Data Summary

Maui (2003). Partner: Maui Land & Pine. PowerPoints (2)

State of Hawaii (2003). Partner: Maui Land & Pine. PowerPoints (2)

Coeur dAlene Reservation Local Farm and Food Economy (1 tribal community and 2 counties, 2017). Partner: Benewah Medical and Wellness Center. Data Summary

Greater Treasure Valley region (Idaho & Oregon) (9 counties, 2010). Partner: Treasure Valley Food Coalition & Treasure Valley Food Network. Data Summary

Nez Perce Tribe Food Sovereignty Assessment (1 tribal community and 4 Idaho counties, 2018). Partner: Nez Perce Tribe Economic Development. Nimiipuu (Nez Perce Tribe) Food Sovereignty Assessment

Central Illinois (32 counties, 2011). Partner: Edible Economy Project. Data Summary

Sangamon Region (9 counties, 2010). Partner: Illinois Stewardship Alliance. Data Summary

Southern Illinois (23 counties, 2012). Partners: FoodWorks, Connect Southern Illinois. Data Summary

Columbus Region 2015 (2 counties, 2015). Partner: Columbus Regional Health. Data Summary

Columbus Region (2 counties, 2013). Partner: Columbus Regional Health. Data Summary

Elkhart Region (8 counties, 2014). Partner: Elkhart County Foodshed Initiative. With funding from Goshen Hospital Health Care Foundation. Data Summary

Hancock County, Indiana (2015). Partners: Hoosier Harvest Market and the Indiana State Department of Health. Opportunities for Farm-to-School in Hancock County, Indiana

Northeast Indiana (2016). Partners: Manheim Solutions, Inc., and Northeast Indiana Regional Partnership. Northeast Indiana Local Food Network Phase 1 Report

Southwest Indiana (7 counties, 2013). Partner: Welborn Baptist Foundation (Evansville). Snapshots of the Southwest Indiana farm & food economy. Interviews with food system leaders

Southwest Indiana (7 counties, 2013). Partner: Welborn Baptist Foundation (Evansville). Farm and Food economy report. Data Summary

State of Indiana (2012). Partner: Indiana State Department of Health. Hoosier Farmer? Emergent Food Systems in Indiana (2012)

Black Hawk region(8 counties, 2005). Partners: University of Northern Iowa (UNI) Local Foods Project Annual Meeting & Buy Fresh Buy Local campaign, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Des Moines Region (6 counties, 2012). Partners: Food & You; Polk County Health Department. Data Summary

Fairfield (2007). Partner: Pathfinders RC&D. Data Summary

Golden Hills RC&D region (Southwest Iowa) (8 counties, 2006). Partners: Golden Hills Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Iowa Valley RC&D region (East Central Iowa) (6 counties, 2007). Partners: Iowa Valley Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, Northwest Area Foundation. Data Summary

Marshall County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Prairie Rivers RC&D, Marshalltown Community College and COMIDA. Data Summary

Northeast region(2004) Partners: GROWN Locally, Northeast Iowa Farm and Food Coalition, Iowa State University Extension, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, Oneota Coop. No Data Summary published contact CRC or NIFFC for more information.

Pathfinders RC&D region (Southeast Iowa) (6 counties, 2007). Partners: Pathfinders Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Prairie Rivers RC&D region (Central Iowa) (6 counties, 2006). Partners: Prairie Rivers Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Story County (1 county, 2010). Partner: Story County. Data Summary

Woodbury County(1 county, 2005). Partner: Woodbury County Organic Growers Conference, Woodbury County Rural Economic Development, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Wright County(2004) Partner: Heres 2 Our Health, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, ALCES Foundation. No Data Summary published contact CRC or H2OH for more information.

Wright County and Northeast Iowa (2004). Results summarized in Finding Food in Farm Country. Data Summary

Kaw River Valley (2008). Partner: Kansas Rural Center, Kansas State University, The Merc Co-op. Data Summary

Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas (1 county, 2017). Partners: Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas; Healthy Communities Wyandotte. Kansas City Kansas Healthy Food System Assessment

ArkLaTex Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, 2016). Partners: Slow Food North Louisiana and We Grow Together! Local Food & Farm Economy and Strategic Recommendations

Central Louisiana (9 parishes, 2013). Partner: Central Louisiana Economic Development Association. PowerPoint Presentation

Building Support for Community-Based Foods in the Lakes Region of Maine (2 counties, 2016). Partners: Town of Bridgton and County of Cumberland. Report

City of Auburn (1 County) (2018). Auburns Agricultural and Resource Protection Zoning (AGRP): Consultant Recommendations. Meter, K. & Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the City of Auburn, Maine, by Crossroads Resource Center. Auburns Local Economy: Agriculture, Forestry, and Housing . Meter, K. & Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the City of Auburn, Maine, by Crossroads Resource Center.

Lewiston + Auburn Region (Maine, 2015). Partners: Karp Resources and Grow L+A. Lewiston-Auburn Regional Food Hub Feasibility Study

Province of Manitoba (2009). Partner: Food Matters Manitoba (formerly Manitoba Food Charter). Data Summary

East Chesapeake Bay region (Maryland & Virginia)(7 counties, October, 2007). Partner: Food and Water Watch, East Chesapeake farmers. Data Summary

East Michigan Region (14 counties, 2012). Partner: East Michigan Council of Governments. Data Summary

Elkhart Region (8 counties, 2014). Partner: Partner: Elkhart County Foodshed Initiative. With funding from Goshen Hospital Health Care Foundation. Data Summary

Genesee County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Ruth Mott Foundation. Data Summary

Upper Peninsula (15 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Central Upper Peninsula (6 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Eastern Upper Peninsula (3 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Western Upper Peninsula (6 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

State of Minnesota (2009). Partner: Blue Cross Blue Shield Center for Prevention. Full Report

Northwest region(13 counties, 2005). Partners: Northwest Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

Scott County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Scott County. Data Summary

Southeast Minnesota regionI (Original Finding Food in Farm Country study, 2001). Partners: Experiment in Rural Cooperation, Community Design Center, & University of Minnesota. Full Report

Southeast Minnesota region II (15 counties, 2007new study with expanded region). Partners: Experiment in Rural Cooperation, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

West Central region(12 counties, 2005). Partners: West Central Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

Western Minnesota (10 counties 2008). Partner: Land Stewardship Project. Data Summary

Finding Food in Farm Country: Findings inSoutheast Minnesota(2001), Northwest Minnesota (2005), and West Central Minnesota (2005). Data Summary

An Overview of Mississippis Farm & Food Economy (Statewide 2014). Partner: Mississippi Food Policy Council, with funding from Winrock International. Full Report

Mississippi Delta (18 counties, 2011). Partner: Delta Fresh Food Initiative. Data Summary

Eastern Montana (2011). Partners: Community GATE & Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Expanded Golden Triangle (11 counties, 2017). Partners: Montana Cooperative Development Center, Montana Farmers Union, Farmers Union International. Expanded Golden Triangle (Montana) Potential Community Foods Collaborative

Golden Triangle region (2011). Partner: Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Southeast of Golden Triangle region (2011). Partner: Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Southwest Montana (7 counties, 2012). Partner: Headwaters RC&D. Data Summary

Western Montana (5 counties, 2011). Partners: Lake County Community Development Corporation, High Stakes Foundation, Alternative Energy Resources Organization, Nourish the Flathead, Community Food and Agriculture Coalition, New West. Data Summary

State of Nebraska (2010). Partner: No More Empty Pots. Data Summary

Great Falls region (New Hampshire & Vermont) (4 counties, 2010). Partner: Great Falls Food Hub. Data Summary

State of New Mexico (2007). Partner: New Mexico Acequia Association.

Arid Lowlands & Lower Rio Grande (11 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Central Plains (7 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Colorado Plateau & Intermountain Valley Bioregion (2 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

View original post here:

Crossroads Resource Center Finding Food in Farm Country

Crossroads Resource Center Finding Food in Farm Country

Alabama

Central Alabama Region (3 counties, 2012). Partner: Central Alabama Planning and Development Commission (CARPDC). Data Summary

North Alabama (11 counties, 2011). Partner: Food Bank of North Alabama. Data Summary

Santa Rosa County Region (Florida and Alabama)(5 counties, 2006). Partner: Team Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa County Economic Development). Data Summary

Building Food Security in Alaska (entire state, 2014). By Ken Meter and Megan Phillips Goldenberg. Statewide study commissioned by the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. Report

Fairbanks Region (3 counties, 2013). Partner: Partner: University of AlaskaFairbanks. Data Summary

Coconino County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Maricopa County (2018). Building Community Connections Through Community Foods. Meter, K.; Goldenberg, M.P.; & Ross P. Prepared for Maricopa County Food Systems Council by Crossroads Resource Center.

Navajo County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Southern Arizona (5 counties, 2011). Partners: Community Food Bank of Tucson and Pima County Food System Alliance. Data Summary

Yavapai County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Arkansas Farm & Food Economy (2015). Partner: Heifer Project International. (Still to be released)

ArkLaTex Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, 2016). Partners: Slow Food North Louisiana and We Grow Together! Local Food & Farm Economy and Strategic Recommendations

Eastern Arkansas (8 counties, 2012). Partners: East Arkansas Enterprise Community & Heifer Project International. Data Summary

State of Arkansas (March, 2011). Partner: Heifer Project International. Data Summary

State of California, Sacramento metro area and Ventura County(2005). Partners: Roots of Change Vivid Picture Project, Ecotrust. Data Summary

Central Coast (2004) Results summarized in Finding Food in Farm Country. Partner: Community Alliance with Family Farms. Data Summary

Mendocino County (1 county, 2010). Partner: North Coast Opportunities, Inc. & Mendocino County Community Health Services Susan Sher. Data Summary

Mount Shasta / Mount Lassen Region (6 counties, 2012). Partner: California Center for Cooperative Development. Data Summary

Sacramento Metro (2004). Partner: Vivid Picture Project. Data Summary

Ventura County (1 county, 2004). Partner: Vivid Picture Project. Data Summary

Coeur dAlene Reservation Local Farm and Food Economy (1 tribal community and 2 counties, 2017).Partner: Benewah Medical and Wellness Center. Data Summary

Adams County, Colorado (2016). Partners: Logan Simpson Design Firm, Two Forks Collective, City of Brighton & County of Adams. Market Study for Adams County Special Ag District. District Plan

Boulder County (1 county, 2009). Partners: Boulder County, Colorado State University Extension. Data Summary

Denver Metropolitan Region (7 counties, 2008). Partner: Civic Results & Metro Denver Health and Wellness Commission. Data Summary

Montezuma County (1 county, 2013). Partner: LiveWell Montezuma. Data Summary

San Luis Valley (2018). Three Potential Value-Added Opportunities for the San Luis Valley. Meter, K., Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the Adams State University Value-Added Committee Alamosa, Colorado.

San Luis Valley Region (6 counties, 2013). Partner: San Luis Valley partners. Data Summary

Santa Rosa County Region (Florida and Alabama) (5 counties, 2006). Partner: Team Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa County economic development). Data Summary

SarasotaCounty (1 county, 2006). Partner: Sarasota County Government. Data Summary

Atlanta Metro Region (28 counties, 2008). Partner: Emory University & Georgia Organics. Data Summary

State of Hawaii 2017). Partners: Hawaii State Department of Health, The Kohala Center, The Food Basket, Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Blue Zones Project. Comprehensive food system assessment focused on low-income food access. Hawaii Food for All

Hawaii(2003). Finding Food in Farm Country. Data Summary

Maui (2003). Partner: Maui Land & Pine. PowerPoints (2)

State of Hawaii (2003). Partner: Maui Land & Pine. PowerPoints (2)

Coeur dAlene Reservation Local Farm and Food Economy (1 tribal community and 2 counties, 2017). Partner: Benewah Medical and Wellness Center. Data Summary

Greater Treasure Valley region (Idaho & Oregon) (9 counties, 2010). Partner: Treasure Valley Food Coalition & Treasure Valley Food Network. Data Summary

Nez Perce Tribe Food Sovereignty Assessment (1 tribal community and 4 Idaho counties, 2018). Partner: Nez Perce Tribe Economic Development. Nimiipuu (Nez Perce Tribe) Food Sovereignty Assessment

Central Illinois (32 counties, 2011). Partner: Edible Economy Project. Data Summary

Sangamon Region (9 counties, 2010). Partner: Illinois Stewardship Alliance. Data Summary

Southern Illinois (23 counties, 2012). Partners: FoodWorks, Connect Southern Illinois. Data Summary

Columbus Region 2015 (2 counties, 2015). Partner: Columbus Regional Health. Data Summary

Columbus Region (2 counties, 2013). Partner: Columbus Regional Health. Data Summary

Elkhart Region (8 counties, 2014). Partner: Elkhart County Foodshed Initiative. With funding from Goshen Hospital Health Care Foundation. Data Summary

Hancock County, Indiana (2015). Partners: Hoosier Harvest Market and the Indiana State Department of Health. Opportunities for Farm-to-School in Hancock County, Indiana

Northeast Indiana (2016). Partners: Manheim Solutions, Inc., and Northeast Indiana Regional Partnership. Northeast Indiana Local Food Network Phase 1 Report

Southwest Indiana (7 counties, 2013). Partner: Welborn Baptist Foundation (Evansville). Snapshots of the Southwest Indiana farm & food economy. Interviews with food system leaders

Southwest Indiana (7 counties, 2013). Partner: Welborn Baptist Foundation (Evansville). Farm and Food economy report. Data Summary

State of Indiana (2012). Partner: Indiana State Department of Health. Hoosier Farmer? Emergent Food Systems in Indiana (2012)

Black Hawk region(8 counties, 2005). Partners: University of Northern Iowa (UNI) Local Foods Project Annual Meeting & Buy Fresh Buy Local campaign, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Des Moines Region (6 counties, 2012). Partners: Food & You; Polk County Health Department. Data Summary

Fairfield (2007). Partner: Pathfinders RC&D. Data Summary

Golden Hills RC&D region (Southwest Iowa) (8 counties, 2006). Partners: Golden Hills Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Iowa Valley RC&D region (East Central Iowa) (6 counties, 2007). Partners: Iowa Valley Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, Northwest Area Foundation. Data Summary

Marshall County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Prairie Rivers RC&D, Marshalltown Community College and COMIDA. Data Summary

Northeast region(2004) Partners: GROWN Locally, Northeast Iowa Farm and Food Coalition, Iowa State University Extension, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, Oneota Coop. No Data Summary published contact CRC or NIFFC for more information.

Pathfinders RC&D region (Southeast Iowa) (6 counties, 2007). Partners: Pathfinders Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Prairie Rivers RC&D region (Central Iowa) (6 counties, 2006). Partners: Prairie Rivers Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Story County (1 county, 2010). Partner: Story County. Data Summary

Woodbury County(1 county, 2005). Partner: Woodbury County Organic Growers Conference, Woodbury County Rural Economic Development, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Wright County(2004) Partner: Heres 2 Our Health, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, ALCES Foundation. No Data Summary published contact CRC or H2OH for more information.

Wright County and Northeast Iowa (2004). Results summarized in Finding Food in Farm Country. Data Summary

Kaw River Valley (2008). Partner: Kansas Rural Center, Kansas State University, The Merc Co-op. Data Summary

Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas (1 county, 2017). Partners: Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas; Healthy Communities Wyandotte. Kansas City Kansas Healthy Food System Assessment

ArkLaTex Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, 2016). Partners: Slow Food North Louisiana and We Grow Together! Local Food & Farm Economy and Strategic Recommendations

Central Louisiana (9 parishes, 2013). Partner: Central Louisiana Economic Development Association. PowerPoint Presentation

Building Support for Community-Based Foods in the Lakes Region of Maine (2 counties, 2016). Partners: Town of Bridgton and County of Cumberland. Report

City of Auburn (1 County) (2018). Auburns Agricultural and Resource Protection Zoning (AGRP): Consultant Recommendations. Meter, K. & Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the City of Auburn, Maine, by Crossroads Resource Center. Auburns Local Economy: Agriculture, Forestry, and Housing . Meter, K. & Goldenberg, M.P. Prepared for the City of Auburn, Maine, by Crossroads Resource Center.

Lewiston + Auburn Region (Maine, 2015). Partners: Karp Resources and Grow L+A. Lewiston-Auburn Regional Food Hub Feasibility Study

Province of Manitoba (2009). Partner: Food Matters Manitoba (formerly Manitoba Food Charter). Data Summary

East Chesapeake Bay region (Maryland & Virginia)(7 counties, October, 2007). Partner: Food and Water Watch, East Chesapeake farmers. Data Summary

East Michigan Region (14 counties, 2012). Partner: East Michigan Council of Governments. Data Summary

Elkhart Region (8 counties, 2014). Partner: Partner: Elkhart County Foodshed Initiative. With funding from Goshen Hospital Health Care Foundation. Data Summary

Genesee County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Ruth Mott Foundation. Data Summary

Upper Peninsula (15 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Central Upper Peninsula (6 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Eastern Upper Peninsula (3 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Western Upper Peninsula (6 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

State of Minnesota (2009). Partner: Blue Cross Blue Shield Center for Prevention. Full Report

Northwest region(13 counties, 2005). Partners: Northwest Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

Scott County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Scott County. Data Summary

Southeast Minnesota regionI (Original Finding Food in Farm Country study, 2001). Partners: Experiment in Rural Cooperation, Community Design Center, & University of Minnesota. Full Report

Southeast Minnesota region II (15 counties, 2007new study with expanded region). Partners: Experiment in Rural Cooperation, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

West Central region(12 counties, 2005). Partners: West Central Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

Western Minnesota (10 counties 2008). Partner: Land Stewardship Project. Data Summary

Finding Food in Farm Country: Findings inSoutheast Minnesota(2001), Northwest Minnesota (2005), and West Central Minnesota (2005). Data Summary

An Overview of Mississippis Farm & Food Economy (Statewide 2014). Partner: Mississippi Food Policy Council, with funding from Winrock International. Full Report

Mississippi Delta (18 counties, 2011). Partner: Delta Fresh Food Initiative. Data Summary

Eastern Montana (2011). Partners: Community GATE & Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Expanded Golden Triangle (11 counties, 2017). Partners: Montana Cooperative Development Center, Montana Farmers Union, Farmers Union International. Expanded Golden Triangle (Montana) Potential Community Foods Collaborative

Golden Triangle region (2011). Partner: Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Southeast of Golden Triangle region (2011). Partner: Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Southwest Montana (7 counties, 2012). Partner: Headwaters RC&D. Data Summary

Western Montana (5 counties, 2011). Partners: Lake County Community Development Corporation, High Stakes Foundation, Alternative Energy Resources Organization, Nourish the Flathead, Community Food and Agriculture Coalition, New West. Data Summary

State of Nebraska (2010). Partner: No More Empty Pots. Data Summary

Great Falls region (New Hampshire & Vermont) (4 counties, 2010). Partner: Great Falls Food Hub. Data Summary

State of New Mexico (2007). Partner: New Mexico Acequia Association.

Arid Lowlands & Lower Rio Grande (11 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Central Plains (7 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Colorado Plateau & Intermountain Valley Bioregion (2 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

More:

Crossroads Resource Center Finding Food in Farm Country

Amazon.com: Competency-Based Human Resource Management …

Thorough, honest, solid, and especially useful if YOU are the one called upon to explain all this to everybody else! * Training * This comprehensive, applied handbook will be of significant interest to HR professionals, professors, and students alike. * Choice * HR helps organization get the best out of its workforce. This book presents a new method for managing that talent. * HR Magazine * Explains how fitting employee talents to the work is more effective method. This comprehensive guidebook shows how to do it. * Soundview Executive Book Summary * A well-researched book with practical application appropriate for a teaching text as well as a professional resource. A well-balanced presentation of theory and practice that acknowledges challenges as well as opportunities. Very readable-a must for the busy HR professional. — Edith M. Donohue, Ph.D., SPHR, consultant; coauthor of Life After Layoff A book inexorably linked to post-millennium business success! Best-in-class companies must look beyond profit and head count to drive the world economy and social change. Dubois and Rothwell’s brilliant and pragmatic concept of competency-based HR systems is one of the foundations of this contemporary approach! — Regina M. Sacha, Vice President, Human Resources, FedEx Custom Critical I challenge any HR or training professional to use these methodologies in his or her organization. It will mean a whole new way of partnering with the other functional areas. — Kimberly R. Woollard, Vice President, Human Resources, MacDill Federal Credit Union A must read for any manager responsible for change in his or her organization. I have implemented these concepts with my managers and have seen direct results with their strategic thinking and problem resolution skills. — Jacquelyn Nunez, Vice President, Group Operations, The Union Labor Life Insurance Co.

More here:

Amazon.com: Competency-Based Human Resource Management …

Amazon.com: Competency-Based Human Resource Management …

Thorough, honest, solid, and especially useful if YOU are the one called upon to explain all this to everybody else! * Training * This comprehensive, applied handbook will be of significant interest to HR professionals, professors, and students alike. * Choice * HR helps organization get the best out of its workforce. This book presents a new method for managing that talent. * HR Magazine * Explains how fitting employee talents to the work is more effective method. This comprehensive guidebook shows how to do it. * Soundview Executive Book Summary * A well-researched book with practical application appropriate for a teaching text as well as a professional resource. A well-balanced presentation of theory and practice that acknowledges challenges as well as opportunities. Very readable-a must for the busy HR professional. — Edith M. Donohue, Ph.D., SPHR, consultant; coauthor of Life After Layoff A book inexorably linked to post-millennium business success! Best-in-class companies must look beyond profit and head count to drive the world economy and social change. Dubois and Rothwell’s brilliant and pragmatic concept of competency-based HR systems is one of the foundations of this contemporary approach! — Regina M. Sacha, Vice President, Human Resources, FedEx Custom Critical I challenge any HR or training professional to use these methodologies in his or her organization. It will mean a whole new way of partnering with the other functional areas. — Kimberly R. Woollard, Vice President, Human Resources, MacDill Federal Credit Union A must read for any manager responsible for change in his or her organization. I have implemented these concepts with my managers and have seen direct results with their strategic thinking and problem resolution skills. — Jacquelyn Nunez, Vice President, Group Operations, The Union Labor Life Insurance Co.

Read the original:

Amazon.com: Competency-Based Human Resource Management …

Crossroads Resource Center Finding Food in Farm Country

Alabama

Central Alabama Region (3 counties, 2012). Partner: Central Alabama Planning and Development Commission (CARPDC). Data Summary

North Alabama (11 counties, 2011). Partner: Food Bank of North Alabama. Data Summary

Santa Rosa County Region (Florida and Alabama)(5 counties, 2006). Partner: Team Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa County Economic Development). Data Summary

Building Food Security in Alaska (entire state, 2014). By Ken Meter and Megan Phillips Goldenberg. Statewide study commissioned by the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. Report

Fairbanks Region (3 counties, 2013). Partner: Partner: University of AlaskaFairbanks. Data Summary

Coconino County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Navajo County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Southern Arizona (5 counties, 2011). Partners: Community Food Bank of Tucson and Pima County Food System Alliance. Data Summary

Yavapai County (July, 2006). Partner: Northern Arizona University Center for Sustainable Environments. Data Summary

Arkansas Farm & Food Economy (2015). Partner: Heifer Project International. (Still to be released)

ArkLaTex Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, 2016). Partners: Slow Food North Louisiana and We Grow Together! Local Food & Farm Economy and Strategic Recommendations

Eastern Arkansas (8 counties, 2012). Partners: East Arkansas Enterprise Community & Heifer Project International. Data Summary

State of Arkansas (March, 2011). Partner: Heifer Project International. Data Summary

State of California, Sacramento metro area and Ventura County(2005). Partners: Roots of Change Vivid Picture Project, Ecotrust. Data Summary

Central Coast (2004) Results summarized in Finding Food in Farm Country. Partner: Community Alliance with Family Farms. Data Summary

Mendocino County (1 county, 2010). Partner: North Coast Opportunities, Inc. & Mendocino County Community Health Services Susan Sher. Data Summary

Mount Shasta / Mount Lassen Region (6 counties, 2012). Partner: California Center for Cooperative Development. Data Summary

Sacramento Metro (2004). Partner: Vivid Picture Project. Data Summary

Ventura County (1 county, 2004). Partner: Vivid Picture Project. Data Summary

Coeur dAlene Reservation Local Farm and Food Economy (1 tribal community and 2 counties, 2017).Partner: Benewah Medical and Wellness Center. Data Summary

Adams County, Colorado (2016). Partners: Logan Simpson Design Firm, Two Forks Collective, City of Brighton & County of Adams. Market Study for Adams County Special Ag District. District Plan

Boulder County (1 county, 2009). Partners: Boulder County, Colorado State University Extension. Data Summary

Denver Metropolitan Region (7 counties, 2008). Partner: Civic Results & Metro Denver Health and Wellness Commission. Data Summary

Montezuma County (1 county, 2013). Partner: LiveWell Montezuma. Data Summary

San Luis Valley Region (6 counties, 2013). Partner: San Luis Valley partners. Data Summary

Santa Rosa County Region (Florida and Alabama) (5 counties, 2006). Partner: Team Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa County economic development). Data Summary

SarasotaCounty (1 county, 2006). Partner: Sarasota County Government. Data Summary

Atlanta Metro Region (28 counties, 2008). Partner: Emory University & Georgia Organics. Data Summary

State of Hawaii 2017). Partners: Hawaii State Department of Health, The Kohala Center, The Food Basket, Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Blue Zones Project. Comprehensive food system assessment focused on low-income food access. Hawaii Food for All

Hawaii(2003). Finding Food in Farm Country. Data Summary

Maui (2003). Partner: Maui Land & Pine. PowerPoints (2)

State of Hawaii (2003). Partner: Maui Land & Pine. PowerPoints (2)

Coeur dAlene Reservation Local Farm and Food Economy (1 tribal community and 2 counties, 2017). Partner: Benewah Medical and Wellness Center. Data Summary

Greater Treasure Valley region (Idaho & Oregon) (9 counties, 2010). Partner: Treasure Valley Food Coalition & Treasure Valley Food Network. Data Summary

Nez Perce Tribe Food Sovereignty Assessment (1 tribal community and 4 Idaho counties, 2018). Partner: Nez Perce Tribe Economic Development. Nimiipuu (Nez Perce Tribe) Food Sovereignty Assessment

Central Illinois (32 counties, 2011). Partner: Edible Economy Project. Data Summary

Sangamon Region (9 counties, 2010). Partner: Illinois Stewardship Alliance. Data Summary

Southern Illinois (23 counties, 2012). Partners: FoodWorks, Connect Southern Illinois. Data Summary

Columbus Region 2015 (2 counties, 2015). Partner: Columbus Regional Health. Data Summary

Columbus Region (2 counties, 2013). Partner: Columbus Regional Health. Data Summary

Elkhart Region (8 counties, 2014). Partner: Elkhart County Foodshed Initiative. With funding from Goshen Hospital Health Care Foundation. Data Summary

Hancock County, Indiana (2015). Partners: Hoosier Harvest Market and the Indiana State Department of Health. Opportunities for Farm-to-School in Hancock County, Indiana

Northeast Indiana (2016). Partners: Manheim Solutions, Inc., and Northeast Indiana Regional Partnership. Northeast Indiana Local Food Network Phase 1 Report

Southwest Indiana (7 counties, 2013). Partner: Welborn Baptist Foundation (Evansville). Snapshots of the Southwest Indiana farm & food economy. Interviews with food system leaders

Southwest Indiana (7 counties, 2013). Partner: Welborn Baptist Foundation (Evansville). Farm and Food economy report. Data Summary

State of Indiana (2012). Partner: Indiana State Department of Health. Hoosier Farmer? Emergent Food Systems in Indiana (2012)

Black Hawk region(8 counties, 2005). Partners: University of Northern Iowa (UNI) Local Foods Project Annual Meeting & Buy Fresh Buy Local campaign, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Des Moines Region (6 counties, 2012). Partners: Food & You; Polk County Health Department. Data Summary

Fairfield (2007). Partner: Pathfinders RC&D. Data Summary

Golden Hills RC&D region (Southwest Iowa) (8 counties, 2006). Partners: Golden Hills Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Iowa Valley RC&D region (East Central Iowa) (6 counties, 2007). Partners: Iowa Valley Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, Northwest Area Foundation. Data Summary

Marshall County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Prairie Rivers RC&D, Marshalltown Community College and COMIDA. Data Summary

Northeast region(2004) Partners: GROWN Locally, Northeast Iowa Farm and Food Coalition, Iowa State University Extension, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, Oneota Coop. No Data Summary published contact CRC or NIFFC for more information.

Pathfinders RC&D region (Southeast Iowa) (6 counties, 2007). Partners: Pathfinders Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Prairie Rivers RC&D region (Central Iowa) (6 counties, 2006). Partners: Prairie Rivers Resource Conservation and Development District, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Story County (1 county, 2010). Partner: Story County. Data Summary

Woodbury County(1 county, 2005). Partner: Woodbury County Organic Growers Conference, Woodbury County Rural Economic Development, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University. Data Summary

Wright County(2004) Partner: Heres 2 Our Health, Aldo Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, ALCES Foundation. No Data Summary published contact CRC or H2OH for more information.

Wright County and Northeast Iowa (2004). Results summarized in Finding Food in Farm Country. Data Summary

Kaw River Valley (2008). Partner: Kansas Rural Center, Kansas State University, The Merc Co-op. Data Summary

Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas (1 county, 2017). Partners: Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas; Healthy Communities Wyandotte. Kansas City Kansas Healthy Food System Assessment

ArkLaTex Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, 2016). Partners: Slow Food North Louisiana and We Grow Together! Local Food & Farm Economy and Strategic Recommendations

Central Louisiana (9 parishes, 2013). Partner: Central Louisiana Economic Development Association. PowerPoint Presentation

Building Support for Community-Based Foods in the Lakes Region of Maine (2 counties, 2016). Partners: Town of Bridgton and County of Cumberland. Report

Lewiston + Auburn Region (Maine, 2015). Partners: Karp Resources and Grow L+A. Lewiston-Auburn Regional Food Hub Feasibility Study

Province of Manitoba (2009). Partner: Food Matters Manitoba (formerly Manitoba Food Charter). Data Summary

East Chesapeake Bay region (Maryland & Virginia)(7 counties, October, 2007). Partner: Food and Water Watch, East Chesapeake farmers. Data Summary

East Michigan Region (14 counties, 2012). Partner: East Michigan Council of Governments. Data Summary

Elkhart Region (8 counties, 2014). Partner: Partner: Elkhart County Foodshed Initiative. With funding from Goshen Hospital Health Care Foundation. Data Summary

Genesee County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Ruth Mott Foundation. Data Summary

Upper Peninsula (15 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Central Upper Peninsula (6 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Eastern Upper Peninsula (3 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

Western Upper Peninsula (6 counties, 2013). Partner: U.P. Food Exchange. Data Summary

State of Minnesota (2009). Partner: Blue Cross Blue Shield Center for Prevention. Full Report

Northwest region(13 counties, 2005). Partners: Northwest Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

Scott County (1 county, 2009). Partner: Scott County. Data Summary

Southeast Minnesota regionI (Original Finding Food in Farm Country study, 2001). Partners: Experiment in Rural Cooperation, Community Design Center, & University of Minnesota. Full Report

Southeast Minnesota region II (15 counties, 2007new study with expanded region). Partners: Experiment in Rural Cooperation, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

West Central region(12 counties, 2005). Partners: West Central Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota. Data Summary

Western Minnesota (10 counties 2008). Partner: Land Stewardship Project. Data Summary

Finding Food in Farm Country: Findings inSoutheast Minnesota(2001), Northwest Minnesota (2005), and West Central Minnesota (2005). Data Summary

An Overview of Mississippis Farm & Food Economy (Statewide 2014). Partner: Mississippi Food Policy Council, with funding from Winrock International. Full Report

Mississippi Delta (18 counties, 2011). Partner: Delta Fresh Food Initiative. Data Summary

Eastern Montana (2011). Partners: Community GATE & Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Expanded Golden Triangle (11 counties, 2017). Partners: Montana Cooperative Development Center, Montana Farmers Union, Farmers Union International. Expanded Golden Triangle (Montana) Potential Community Foods Collaborative

Golden Triangle region (2011). Partner: Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Southeast of Golden Triangle region (2011). Partner: Montana Farmers Union. Data Summary

Southwest Montana (7 counties, 2012). Partner: Headwaters RC&D. Data Summary

Western Montana (5 counties, 2011). Partners: Lake County Community Development Corporation, High Stakes Foundation, Alternative Energy Resources Organization, Nourish the Flathead, Community Food and Agriculture Coalition, New West. Data Summary

State of Nebraska (2010). Partner: No More Empty Pots. Data Summary

Great Falls region (New Hampshire & Vermont) (4 counties, 2010). Partner: Great Falls Food Hub. Data Summary

State of New Mexico (2007). Partner: New Mexico Acequia Association.

Arid Lowlands & Lower Rio Grande (11 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Central Plains (7 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Colorado Plateau & Intermountain Valley Bioregion (2 counties, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

High Plains & Ogallala region (5 regions, 2009). Partner: New Mexico Bioneers. Data Summary

Northern New Mexico I(5 counties, 2007).Partner: New Mexico Acequia Association. Data Summary

Northern New Mexico II (5 counties, 2009) Partner: New Mexico Acequia Association. Data Summary

Go here to see the original:

Crossroads Resource Center Finding Food in Farm Country

Resource Based Economy – Home | Facebook

Children as young as four are working in Congolese mines to find cobalt which is used to make your smartphone work – a Sky News investigation has found”slavery still exists…. 8p a day or a beating, sounds like slavery. i would give up my smart phone. i would go back to a typewriter. nothing is worth treating people like this.things can be made traceable if companies want to. corruption will always exist, yes. however, we don’t have to make it easy for them. there are ways, we just have to collectively be willing to fight for them”- Christina Lowe

Original post:

Resource Based Economy – Home | Facebook

Resource Based Economy | A New Vision For Humanity

A Global Resource Based Economy requires that we efficiently manage our planet’s resources as a single system. By using technology and resources more intelligently, we can provide a high standard of living for ultimately everyone, free of charge.

In such a system, there is no reason to hurt each other or the environment, and no advantages to be gained from doing so. This would surpass the need for stealing, embezzlement, corruption, and envy. These behaviors are not inborn, but a result of being raised in todays society of scarcity.

Read this article:

Resource Based Economy | A New Vision For Humanity

Amazon.com: Competency-Based Human Resource Management …

Thorough, honest, solid, and especially useful if YOU are the one called upon to explain all this to everybody else! * Training * This comprehensive, applied handbook will be of significant interest to HR professionals, professors, and students alike. * Choice * HR helps organization get the best out of its workforce. This book presents a new method for managing that talent. * HR Magazine * Explains how fitting employee talents to the work is more effective method. This comprehensive guidebook shows how to do it. * Soundview Executive Book Summary * A well-researched book with practical application appropriate for a teaching text as well as a professional resource. A well-balanced presentation of theory and practice that acknowledges challenges as well as opportunities. Very readable-a must for the busy HR professional. — Edith M. Donohue, Ph.D., SPHR, consultant; coauthor of Life After Layoff A book inexorably linked to post-millennium business success! Best-in-class companies must look beyond profit and head count to drive the world economy and social change. Dubois and Rothwell’s brilliant and pragmatic concept of competency-based HR systems is one of the foundations of this contemporary approach! — Regina M. Sacha, Vice President, Human Resources, FedEx Custom Critical I challenge any HR or training professional to use these methodologies in his or her organization. It will mean a whole new way of partnering with the other functional areas. — Kimberly R. Woollard, Vice President, Human Resources, MacDill Federal Credit Union A must read for any manager responsible for change in his or her organization. I have implemented these concepts with my managers and have seen direct results with their strategic thinking and problem resolution skills. — Jacquelyn Nunez, Vice President, Group Operations, The Union Labor Life Insurance Co.

Continued here:

Amazon.com: Competency-Based Human Resource Management …

Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% …

“As economic, environmental, and security imperatives converge, advanced resource productivity is quickly rising to the top of the global agenda. But let’s make no little plans: new technologies, artfully combined via integrative design, can now quintuple the work wrung from energy, water, and other resources. Building on our 1997 collaboration in Factor Four, and cross-pollinating with new findings from around the world, this exciting synthesis combines a powerful efficiency toolkit with farsighted policy insights – vital to ensure that efficiency’s gains are not offset but reinforced to create a richer, fairer, safer, and cooler world.” Amory B. Lovins, Chairman and Chief Scientist, Rocky Mountain Institute, USA, Co-Author of ‘Factor Four’

“This book shows once again, even to the most conservative critics, that not only are significant improvements possible, they are profitable, and when coupled with the understanding that reducing environmental devastation is critical, provide a vital message of hope for the future.” Hunter Lovins, President, Natural Capitalism Solutions, Co-Author of ‘Factor Four’

“The fivefold increase of resource productivity described in this book is impressive, but perfectly feasible, and it would give the world a bit more time to learn how to adapt.” Dennis Meadows, Co-author Limits to Growth and 2009 Japan Prize Laureate

“The exciting thing about Factor Five is the combination of boldness and realism, precisely what is needed to get civilization back onto an economic path that is environmentally sustainable.” Lester R. Brown, President, Earth Policy Institute

“The potential to reduce emissions by 80% on an economically viable basis is good news for world leaders and their negotiators on climate change.” Dr R K Pachauri, Chairman, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

“Factor Five is the clearest non-partisan handbook on ecological renaissance available to date and should be read by every policymaker and practitioner.” Professor Calestous Juma, Harvard Kennedy School

“The arrival of Factor Five couldn’t be more timely – or more significant.” Jonathon Porritt, Founding Director, Forum for the Future, UK

“The mounting concern about climate change has distracted attention from the fact that CO2 emissions are just part of the existential problem facing humanity. We need urgently to reduce our use of ALL the resources, not just fossil fuels. This new book is the best point of departure I know for doing that. The fivefold increase of resource productivity it describes is impressive, but perfectly feasible, and it would give the world a bit more time to learn how to adapt to ecological collapse. The book has two especially important innovations. The authors deal seriously with the rebound effect, and they base their scenarios on a long term trajectory of rising energy prices.” Dennis Meadows, Co-author Limits to Growth and 2009 Japan Prize Laureate

“Is it possible to imagine a world where we can actually phase out fossil fuels before the climate phases us out? It’s now feasible by reading Factor Five.” Peter Newman, Professor of Sustainability, Curtin University and author of Resilient Cities

“[There can be] no sustainable development without a sustainable development of companies. Factor Five provides compelling arguments and examples that sustainable business is achievable and profitable on a large scale and that companies play a key role in creating sustainable development. Factor Five confirms the crucial role of increasing eco-efficiency to foster sustainable development.” Stefan Schaltegger, Professor of Sustainability Management, Leuphana University, Germany

“The world needs radical eco-innovation to shape an opportunity out of the current crisis. This book provides excellent key examples in a systems perspective. Written by radical thinkers with a unique experience on how change can be managed, this book is a must-reading for both leaders and academics.” Prof. Dr. Raimund Bleischwitz, Wuppertal Institute, Co-Director ‘Material Flows and Resource Management’ Professor at the College of Europe, Bruges/Belgium

“Some may have ignored the message of Factor Four 15 years ago. We can no longer afford to ignore it, and should now embrace the strengthened message of Factor Five.” Professor Bedrich Moldan, Senator, Czech Republic, Former Chairman, European Environment Agency, and former Czechoslovak Environment Minister

“We are living in the most exciting era of human history. We are in the process of expanding our perspectives from a focus on short-term economic and materialistic growth to a whole-system approach with true, long-term happiness for all at its core. We are adding the need for ‘sufficiency’ to ‘efficiency’ and ‘productivity’ in our discussions on how to reduce human impacts on the Earth. Economy and ecology are not an ‘either-or’ trade-off. We now know that both are critical in every aspect of society. We must advance science and technology based on values and vision. The ‘leapfrog’ effect should be promoted in developing nations-not only in terms of technology but also in terms of lifestyles and societal values. Our urgent imperative is to figure out how to maximize happiness while minimizing environmental impacts. Factor Five provides the West and East alike with a compass to set our visions and to measure our progress.” Junko Edahiro, Environmental Affairs Journalist, co-Chief Executive, Japan for Sustainability

“Factor Five is the clearest non-partisan handbook on ecological renaissance available to date. It should be read by every policymaker and practitioner irrespective of their political position on global change.” Professor Calestous Juma, Harvard Kennedy School

“We all know what will happen if we go on producing and consuming the same way as in the twentieth century. But we don’t really know how to produce and consume in the planet-friendly way. This is why we need this book. So urgently.” Brice Lalonde, French Climate Ambassador, former environment minister of France

“Strong economic signals and innovative technologies make a powerful combination, and are the best hope – indeed, the only hope – of the changes needed to protect the environment. Building on the robust foundation of Factor Four, Ernst von Weizsacker and his colleagues write an inspiring manifesto for change to reduce resource use while minimising the impact on living conditions. If their recipe is sometimes over-optimistic, that is a good fault. The environment needs some optimistic friends these days.” Frances Cairncross, Exeter College, Oxford (Author of Costing the Earth)

“Climate change represents the biggest challenge our generation has experienced. Factor Five shows us through sustainable business practices we can achieve positive environmental and economic outcomes. They are not mutually exclusive concepts – sustainability is just good business.” Dan Atkins, Managing Director, Shaper Group

“Even if the climate were not changing, the need for the transition from fossil fuels to renewable, regenerative systems would be just as urgent. This is a recipe book for a far more economically rational world, as well as a more sustainable one.” Professor Janis Birkeland, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), and author of Positive Development

“Every lawyer and lobbyist who is asked to defend ‘Business As Usual’ should read Factor Five. This manual for re-engineering the future holds out both hope and profit in equal parts – if only we can get the political framework right, and align the lobbies with the interests of humanity.” Tom Spencer, Former Member of the European Parliament, Founder and Executive Director of the European Centre for Public Affairs, and Vice Chairman, Institute for Environmental Security

“Today, the world is faced by many challenges which all derive from the unsustainable practices with which we use our resources. Despite the most severe global economic crisis, resource prices have not returned to the low price levels of the 1990’s, demonstrating that we have to reduce our ‘resource obesity’ as an economy and come to sustainable levels of resource consumption. A factor five improvement in resource efficiency is not only necessary, it is imperative for economies and companies to survive in a new resource and atmosphere-constrained world. This book not only clearly makes this point, but also shows that it is possible with what we know today. This key message makes this book essential reading.” Professor Ernst Worrell, Utrecht University, Lead Author, IPCC Working Group III, Fourth Assessment Report (2004 – 2007)

“Factor Five is about how to achieve the resource productivity gains that are necessary for the world to avoid a future with declining human wellbeing. It provides a clear way forward. In the past, the pursuit of efficiency gains has sometimes led to loss of resilience, resulting in unexpected and unwanted outcomes (like salinized irrigation systems). I applaud the Factor Five initiative, and urge it to embrace the equally important goal of maintaining resilience in the face of the looming global shocks confronting the world.” Dr Brian Walker, CSIRO Research Fellow, Resilience Alliance Program Director and Chair of Board

Follow this link:

Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% …

Center For Resource Management | Resource Based Economy

Engineers, Architects, and Technicians are needed at this time to help provide competent Design Development Level drawing package (Phase 1). Moving forward, the Design Development Drawing and specification package (Phase 2) will be used to create full Tender/Construction documents (Phase 3) for what could be multiple Construction packages.

The below list of persons are urged to come forward with their own unique skill sets. The most urgent skill sets are listed in order of requirements with respect to the critical path Designated by Phase indicator:

Phase 1 System Planning (Design Development):

Phase 2 Structure planning (Schematic Design):

Phase 3 Tendering, Contracts & Construction:

Statisticians, scientists and any other technical specialists who feel their unique skills could be of use are also encouraged to volunteer.

We would like to reiterate that these unpaid voluntary positions are at this time to help advance this first project.

Note that knowing English and having consistent access to a personal computer with Internet connection are prerequisites to joining the team. Also, if you are a software engineer, please look at our volunteering opportunities on thevenusproject.com.

To get involved, please submit the form below.

Excerpt from:

Center For Resource Management | Resource Based Economy

Resource Based Economy | A New Vision For Humanity

A Global Resource Based Economy requires that we efficiently manage our planet’s resources as a single system. By using technology and resources more intelligently, we can provide a high standard of living for ultimately everyone, free of charge.

In such a system, there is no reason to hurt each other or the environment, and no advantages to be gained from doing so. This would surpass the need for stealing, embezzlement, corruption, and envy. These behaviors are not inborn, but a result of being raised in todays society of scarcity.

Go here to read the rest:

Resource Based Economy | A New Vision For Humanity


12345...10...