There are many factors at play when it comes to your weight, and genetics is certainly one of them. Every person's body responds differently to food and exercise, and there's some truth to the notion that obesity can run in families.
Genetics and weight are definitely linked, but you're not doomed by your DNA.
Image Credit: Rostislav_Sedlacek/iStock/GettyImages
But what runs in your family may not necessarily be your fate. How your genetics affect your weight is only one piece of the puzzle.
If it seems like some people can eat pizza for breakfast while others gain weight just from looking at sugar, that's because, well, everyone is different thanks in part to genes.
"We inherit all kinds of traits, such as hair and eye color, height and also body type," Keith-Thomas Ayoob, EdD, RD, clinical professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, tells LIVESTRONG.com. "If two people both have what might be called a "stocky frame," their kids are probably not going to have frames that are long and lanky."
Like other traits, there's no singular gene connected to weight or obesity. In fact, according to Harvard Health Publishing, more than 400 genes are involved in contributing to obesity.
And while we're not sure exactly how they work, there's definitely a connection between genes and weight. Indeed, a November 2017 study in the International Journal of Obesity found that people with a higher genetic risk of obesity tended to gain more weight from age 20 on than those without this risk.
What we do know: Our genes form the basis for our body's signal and response system, which guides food intake, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). One hypothesis is that our bodies are primed to protect us against weight loss because energy, stored in fat, is crucial to survival. So the same genes that helped our ancestors survive food scarcity are still working to protect us, even though most of us have all the food we need and then some.
While most research has focused on how genetic risk affects obesity, more recent research has taken an in-depth look at the links between genetics, obesity and body mass index (BMI) over time.
In one study published January 2020 in JAMA Cardiology, researchers assessed the data on more than 2,500 adults from 1985 to 2010. Using a score based on each participant's DNA, they calculated the genetic risk of obesity for each person and compared it to measurements taken over the course of the 25-year study period. They also monitored each person's BMI over time.
"You may need to adjust your goals to take into account what your body can do [but] lifestyle and your eating style are major players in the obesity war perhaps the main players because they're the only ones over which you can have some control."
Their analysis showed that BMI in young adulthood explained about 52 percent of a person's BMI 25 years later, while genetics explained only about 14 percent. In the end, they concluded that fitness and BMI over time were better indicators of obesity risk than genetics.
Ayoob agrees that having a family history of obesity does not mean you have no control over your BMI.
"It means you may need to adjust your goals to take into account what your body can do and what you should expect," he says. "Lifestyle and your eating style are major players in the obesity war perhaps the main players because they're the only ones over which you can have some control."
Aim for at least 150 minutes of physical activity each week, and remember: Walking counts!
Image Credit: Igor Alecsander/E+/GettyImages
The bottom line? Genes play a role, yes, but lifestyle aka the diet and activity choices you make every day is the best determining factor when it comes to the number on the scale, your BMI and your overall health.
And if your lifestyle isn't the healthiest, it's worth it to make some improvements: The excess fat associated with obesity puts people at risk for other serious conditions, such as cardiovascular disease and stroke.
Here are some suggestions from the experts to get started:
1. Add Weight Lifting to Your Routine
People with a genetic propensity toward obesity can lower their percentage of body fat by raising their metabolism, Robert Herbst, a personal trainer specializing in weight loss, tells LIVESTRONG.com.
To do this effectively, he highly recommends regular weight lifting.
"You should perform compound movements such as squats, lunges, bench press and deadlifts. These cause your metabolism to be elevated for 48 to 72 hours afterward as your body repairs muscle fibers that were broken down during the exercise and builds additional muscle in anticipation of greater loads in the future," he says.
Since muscle is more metabolically active than fat, building more of it helps your body burn more calories, even at rest.
Obesity is diagnosed when your body fat levels are much higher than the healthy range. At the very basic level, too much body fat occurs when more calories come in than go out. So it makes perfect sense to take stock of how and what you eat when confronting obesity.
"Genetics aside, look at the eating habits you grew up with. Are they compatible with having a healthy weight?" Ayoob asks.
A healthy, balanced diet where no food group is restricted is the best approach, he says.
Herbst recommends focusing on whole foods (think: fruits, vegetables and whole grains) and limiting empty-calorie junk foods like soda, chips and sweets.
As part of a healthy eating plan, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute emphasizes staying within your daily calorie goal for weight loss and controlling portion sizes.
Wondering how to calculate your calories for weight loss? Download the MyPlate app to do the job and help you track your intake, so you can stay focused and achieve your goals!
An important part of the equation when making healthy lifestyle changes is making sure those changes are maintainable. Ayoob recommends setting realistic goals and starting off slow.
"Weight loss that is slow and steady, not fast and furious, will win this race," he says. "Give yourself a year. The year will pass anyway, so it's a matter of it passing with progress or just keeping the status quo," he said.
In that time, aim to be purposefully active most days, even if that means just brisk walking, for at least 30 minutes.
He advises his own patients to engage in 30 to 60 minutes of physical activity five or more days a week, with walking being the most common activity.
This is in line with the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services' Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, which recommend adults do at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity each week along with muscle-strengthening activities at least two days.
Read more:
Genetics and Weight: Is There an Obesity Gene? - LIVESTRONG.COM
- IOM not webcast today. Why Not? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- National Academies skeptical at Best. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Some Confusion Exists - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Why DTC Genomics IS Medicine. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- First Mari, Now Linda. Who's next? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Is it true? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Re-Reviewing the National Academies - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- The problem with nonclinicians....... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Crazy Night of Emails to Government - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Adrienne Carlson's Personalized Medicine. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Tell Me, How do you feel now? Sherpa's RX - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- This Just In. 23andMe to go to GPs. I love my readers!! - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Sorry so long away - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 2D6 Rears its ugly head..... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Ok, Fine, Back to Plavix - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Kaiser a protoype for Collins' Aim - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- A few months late to the party.... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Stated Another Way....... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Excuse Me? Harvard and Navigenics? WTF? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Follow up to Yesterday's WTF? Harvard, Navi? and Pfizer??? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Did you get your kit? Thanks Dr. Rob from MedCo - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Gluco...Wha? Parkinson's Disease and Glucocerebrosidase mutations. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Away and now back, What did I miss???? 23andme layoffs? Selling Genomes for cheap up next! - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Change IS Needed. I agree with William, sometimes. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Good Enough Science? Apparently so at 23andme - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Long QT Syndrome, location matters - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Congratulations Generation Health. Nice pick up! - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- An argument 23andSerge can't win...23andme but not medicine - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Stop. Breathe. Repeat. An analysis of the direction of DTC Genomics Field. - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Hey DTC genomics, Stay Private, Stay Alive, Go Public and Die - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- You can't have it both way. Either scared your genome is sold off or not. - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- 15 Days Away Gives Time for Perspective. - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- What about the SACGHS registry? Another missed opportunity? - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- AJHG is in and my Favorite Muin is in it! But He Is NOT the Father! - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Navigenics for 23andMe prices? - December 18th, 2009 [December 18th, 2009]
- Lp(a) Maybe there's something there that wasn't there before? - December 24th, 2009 [December 24th, 2009]
- Another Year, Another Bankruptcy - December 31st, 2009 [December 31st, 2009]
- 5 Technologies going bye bye in this decade? - January 6th, 2010 [January 6th, 2010]
- Hackers, HITECH and HIPAA in DTC Genomics, Oh My! - January 7th, 2010 [January 7th, 2010]
- Personal Genomics Flop.....big Belly Flop! - January 8th, 2010 [January 8th, 2010]
- Gotta Love It. Even the daycare....... - January 11th, 2010 [January 11th, 2010]
- Congratulations Navigenics. You ARE a clinical lab! Uh-Oh... - January 12th, 2010 [January 12th, 2010]
- CETP, Jewish Centenarians and Alzheimers - January 14th, 2010 [January 14th, 2010]
- Enter the "Not" DTC Genomics Rep - January 17th, 2010 [January 17th, 2010]
- Why Dr. Vanier's Navigenics appointment is good for PM - January 22nd, 2010 [January 22nd, 2010]
- Holy Crap! MedCo Follows in CVS footsteps - February 3rd, 2010 [February 3rd, 2010]
- FDA, Warfarin, still not as sexy to me. - February 5th, 2010 [February 5th, 2010]
- Hype, Hype, Hype from a single study. - February 11th, 2010 [February 11th, 2010]
- I love my readers, even Renata M! - February 17th, 2010 [February 17th, 2010]
- How can insurers use DTC genomics to profile? - February 17th, 2010 [February 17th, 2010]
- 9p21.....ahem. Paynter et.al. Smackdown. Again. - February 18th, 2010 [February 18th, 2010]
- Hey! It's Pete Hulick! Are you Going to GET? - February 19th, 2010 [February 19th, 2010]
- I was wrong......AHEM - February 28th, 2010 [February 28th, 2010]
- G2C2, finally a tool for genomic education! - March 2nd, 2010 [March 2nd, 2010]
- Just 4 million? What 23andMe is worth. - March 5th, 2010 [March 5th, 2010]
- What a difference a year makes - March 9th, 2010 [March 9th, 2010]
- ........DTC Genomic Medicine? - March 12th, 2010 [March 12th, 2010]
- The FDA, 2c19 and the ACC - March 13th, 2010 [March 13th, 2010]
- The problem with Comparative Whole Genomics...... - March 13th, 2010 [March 13th, 2010]
- BRCA testing by 23andME is the same as Myriad Genetics. - March 15th, 2010 [March 15th, 2010]
- The Argument Against DTC Genomics Marketing and such - March 16th, 2010 [March 16th, 2010]
- A moment of Clarity. Some DTCG is not bad. - March 18th, 2010 [March 18th, 2010]
- SNPs for breast cancer risk? It Depends. - March 18th, 2010 [March 18th, 2010]
- How can MDVIP use Navigenics Test for Medicine? - March 18th, 2010 [March 18th, 2010]
- Why did P&G invest in Navigenics? - March 23rd, 2010 [March 23rd, 2010]
- PGx in DTCG? Doesn't stand up to Useful testing. - March 25th, 2010 [March 25th, 2010]
- End of Gene Patents? - March 29th, 2010 [March 29th, 2010]
- Sherpa Accepting Chief Medical Officership - April 3rd, 2010 [April 3rd, 2010]
- The Rumors of My Death........ - April 20th, 2010 [April 20th, 2010]
- Happy DNA Day! - April 25th, 2010 [April 25th, 2010]
- 99 USD, DNA day and patient letters - April 25th, 2010 [April 25th, 2010]
- 2C19, Navigenics and Clinical Reality. - May 1st, 2010 [May 1st, 2010]
- Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative rising - May 7th, 2010 [May 7th, 2010]
- Personal Genomes in Clinical Care. Quake paper is a waste! - May 11th, 2010 [May 11th, 2010]
- Personal Genomes in Clinical Care. Quake paper Falls Short! - May 13th, 2010 [May 13th, 2010]
- Last post edited by Drew - May 13th, 2010 [May 13th, 2010]
- GateKeeper? FCUK U! - May 13th, 2010 [May 13th, 2010]
- GateKeeper? F! U! - May 15th, 2010 [May 15th, 2010]
- Potential of genomic medicine, LOST - May 19th, 2010 [May 19th, 2010]
- How Bad Can a House Investigation be for DTC Genomics? - May 20th, 2010 [May 20th, 2010]