The most common genetic cause of alterations in pediatric patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) were fusion genes, which were associated with more aggressive disease, according to a study published in Thyroid.
In this study, several novel rearrangements were identified, and the fusion genes seemed to be a molecular marker number one in this patient population.
Overall, the study included 93 pediatric patients who had undergone thyroid surgery between 2003 and 2019 at the Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Second Faculty Medicine, Charles University, and Motol University Hospital in Prague. The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 14.5 3.4 years, and the female to male ratio was 2.6 to 1. Eighty-two patients had a total thyroidectomy and 11 had a subtotal thyroidectomy, where 10 were completed to total thyroidectomy.
The mean tumor size was 22.1 13.7 mm, and the investigators noted that 17 patients had microcarcinoma. Twenty-six patients (29.9%) had PTC of classical variant, 20 (23.0%) had classical and follicular variant, 29 (33.3%) had follicular variant, 3 (3.4%) had solid variant, 3 (3.4%) had a mixture of classical/follicular/solid variant, 2 (2.3%) had diffuse sclerosing variant, 2 (2.3%) had columnar variant, 1 (1.1%) had tall cell variant, and 1 (1.1%) had case clear cell variant.
After a median follow-up was 72 months (range, 2-198), 11 (19.3%) patients had persistent or recurrent disease at least 1 year after surgery or patients who were in remission and later had a malignant object thyroid tissue formed. Sixteen (19.3%) patients only had biochemical evidence of persistent disease, while 56 (67.5%) remained in remission with no evidence of disease. One patient died due to advanced disease. Additionally, 10 patients were not classified because of short-term follow-up, 84 received radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment, and 8 did not receive RAI because of low-risk disease.
More than half (55.9%) of the patients had fusion genes, which included RET, NTRK1, NTRK3, ALK, BRAF, and MET. Additionally, 10 different types of RET fusions were observed in 26 patients, 4 types of NTRK3fusions in 14 patients, 1 ALK fusion in 6 patients, 2 types of NTRK1 fusions in 3 patients, 2 types of BRAFfusions in 2 patients, and 1 type of MET fusions in 1 patient. Overall, 20 types of fusion genes were identified in the study, 11 of which were interchromosomal and 9 were intrachromosomal rearrangements.
Investigators detected 2 co-existing RET fusions in 1 PTC nodule, which included ACBD5/RET fusion with juxtaposition of exon 11 of the ACBD5 gene and exon 12 of RET gene in the first and BBIP1/RET fusion with a juxtaposition of exon 1 of the BBIP1 gene and exon 8 of the RET gene. CCDC6/RET rearrangement was the most common fusion gene, which was observed in 13 patients (14%), while 1 of these patients had a novel isoform including a part of exon 9 of RET gene. Other rearrangements that were observed more commonly included ETV6/NTRK3 in 10 patients (10.8%), NCOA4/RET, and STRN/ALK both in 6 patients (6.5%) and RBPMS/NTRK3 found in 2 patients (2.2%). The remaining fusions were not recurrent.
BRAF fusions with partner genes, CUL1, and OPTN were reciprocal, and the IRF2BP2/NTRK1 fusion gene has 2 isoforms, 1 being a fusion of exon 1 and the second of exon 2 of the IRF2BP2 gene with exon 10 of the NTRK1 gene. Every isoform was found in a different patient, and no patients with fusion genes had a prior history of radiation exposure before their PTC diagnosis.
The investigators also compared the samples positive for the fusion gene to those that did not harbor this mutation. Positive samples were associated significantly with the mixture of classical and follicular types of PTC (P =.025), and the fusion-positive samples were also significantly associated with extrathyroidal extension (P <.001), higher T classification (P =.009), lymph node metastases (P <.001), distant metastases (P =.021), chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (P =.001), and frequent occurrence of psammoma bodies (P =.004). Patients who were positive for the fusion gene has also received more frequent multiple doses of RAI therapy (P=.008). Borderline statistically significant associations were observed for features such as tumor size larger in fusion gene-positive tumors (P =.057), number of microcarcinomas higher in fusion gene-negative tumors (P=.052), and a higher number of patients who were not given RAI treatment (P =.058).
Samples that were positive for the fusion genes were different from each other as well, according to the fused oncogene involved. A statistical analysis was only able to be performed between RET and NTRK3 fusion gene-positive samples because of the low number of samples in the other fusion groups. RET fusions were significantly associated with lower mean age of patients at diagnosis (P =.035), lymph node metastases (P =.033), distant metastases (P =.020), and frequent occurrence of psammoma bodies (P =.006). The NTRK3fusions were significantly associated with follicular variant PTC (P =.013).
In RET fusion gene-positive group, 11 patients (42.3%) were of prepubertal age (up to age 12) compared with only 1 patient (7.1%) in the NTRK3 fusion-positive group (P =.021).
All patients with distant metastases (n = 10) had the genetic cause of PTC detected, which was HRAS Q61R point mutation in 1 patient, NCOA4/RET in 4, CCDC6/RET in 2, RASAL2/RET in 1, EML4/MET in 1, and co-occurrence of ACBD5/RET with BBIP1/RET in 1.
Point mutations in BRAF, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, and TERT genes were assessed in all patients, in which 18 (19%) had the BRAF V600E mutation, and the HRAS Q61R and NRAS Q61K was found in 1 patient each. No mutations were found in the KRAS gene or in the promoter region of TERT. Patients with HRAS-positive PTC (n = 1) underwent radiation treatment for Hodgkins lymphoma. The co-occurrence of fusion gene and somatic point alternation was not identified in the study.
These findings demonstrated a point mutation or fusion gene was observed in 72 pediatric patients (77.4%) with PTC, and the oncogenic alteration was unidentified in 21 patients (22.6%). Most tumors were follicular variants of PTC and T1/T2 classification predominated the tumor samples in this study. No patients had experienced recurrence or persistence of structural disease, but 1 patient had biochemical persistence of their disease while almost all of the other patients remained in remission.
Overall, this study demonstrated that fusion genes occurred in 56% of pediatric patients with PTC, and point mutations in the BRAF and RAS genes were observed in 77% of patients. Patients who harbored a fusion gene had more aggressive forms of the disease, which included more frequent extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and consequently had received more doses of RAI than those without the fusion gene mutations.
Reference
Pekova B, Sykorova V, Dvorakova S, et al.RET, NTRK, ALK, BRAF,andMETfusions in a large cohort of pediatric papillary thyroid carcinomas.Thyroid.Published Online July 1, 2020. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0802
See the original post:
- IOM not webcast today. Why Not? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- National Academies skeptical at Best. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Some Confusion Exists - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Why DTC Genomics IS Medicine. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- First Mari, Now Linda. Who's next? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Is it true? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Re-Reviewing the National Academies - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- The problem with nonclinicians....... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Crazy Night of Emails to Government - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Adrienne Carlson's Personalized Medicine. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Tell Me, How do you feel now? Sherpa's RX - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- This Just In. 23andMe to go to GPs. I love my readers!! - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Sorry so long away - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 2D6 Rears its ugly head..... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Ok, Fine, Back to Plavix - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Kaiser a protoype for Collins' Aim - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- A few months late to the party.... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Stated Another Way....... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Excuse Me? Harvard and Navigenics? WTF? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Follow up to Yesterday's WTF? Harvard, Navi? and Pfizer??? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Did you get your kit? Thanks Dr. Rob from MedCo - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Gluco...Wha? Parkinson's Disease and Glucocerebrosidase mutations. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Away and now back, What did I miss???? 23andme layoffs? Selling Genomes for cheap up next! - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Change IS Needed. I agree with William, sometimes. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Good Enough Science? Apparently so at 23andme - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Long QT Syndrome, location matters - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Congratulations Generation Health. Nice pick up! - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- An argument 23andSerge can't win...23andme but not medicine - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Stop. Breathe. Repeat. An analysis of the direction of DTC Genomics Field. - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Hey DTC genomics, Stay Private, Stay Alive, Go Public and Die - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- You can't have it both way. Either scared your genome is sold off or not. - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- 15 Days Away Gives Time for Perspective. - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- What about the SACGHS registry? Another missed opportunity? - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- AJHG is in and my Favorite Muin is in it! But He Is NOT the Father! - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Navigenics for 23andMe prices? - December 18th, 2009 [December 18th, 2009]
- Lp(a) Maybe there's something there that wasn't there before? - December 24th, 2009 [December 24th, 2009]
- Another Year, Another Bankruptcy - December 31st, 2009 [December 31st, 2009]
- 5 Technologies going bye bye in this decade? - January 6th, 2010 [January 6th, 2010]
- Hackers, HITECH and HIPAA in DTC Genomics, Oh My! - January 7th, 2010 [January 7th, 2010]
- Personal Genomics Flop.....big Belly Flop! - January 8th, 2010 [January 8th, 2010]
- Gotta Love It. Even the daycare....... - January 11th, 2010 [January 11th, 2010]
- Congratulations Navigenics. You ARE a clinical lab! Uh-Oh... - January 12th, 2010 [January 12th, 2010]
- CETP, Jewish Centenarians and Alzheimers - January 14th, 2010 [January 14th, 2010]
- Enter the "Not" DTC Genomics Rep - January 17th, 2010 [January 17th, 2010]
- Why Dr. Vanier's Navigenics appointment is good for PM - January 22nd, 2010 [January 22nd, 2010]
- Holy Crap! MedCo Follows in CVS footsteps - February 3rd, 2010 [February 3rd, 2010]
- FDA, Warfarin, still not as sexy to me. - February 5th, 2010 [February 5th, 2010]
- Hype, Hype, Hype from a single study. - February 11th, 2010 [February 11th, 2010]
- I love my readers, even Renata M! - February 17th, 2010 [February 17th, 2010]
- How can insurers use DTC genomics to profile? - February 17th, 2010 [February 17th, 2010]
- 9p21.....ahem. Paynter et.al. Smackdown. Again. - February 18th, 2010 [February 18th, 2010]
- Hey! It's Pete Hulick! Are you Going to GET? - February 19th, 2010 [February 19th, 2010]
- I was wrong......AHEM - February 28th, 2010 [February 28th, 2010]
- G2C2, finally a tool for genomic education! - March 2nd, 2010 [March 2nd, 2010]
- Just 4 million? What 23andMe is worth. - March 5th, 2010 [March 5th, 2010]
- What a difference a year makes - March 9th, 2010 [March 9th, 2010]
- ........DTC Genomic Medicine? - March 12th, 2010 [March 12th, 2010]
- The FDA, 2c19 and the ACC - March 13th, 2010 [March 13th, 2010]
- The problem with Comparative Whole Genomics...... - March 13th, 2010 [March 13th, 2010]
- BRCA testing by 23andME is the same as Myriad Genetics. - March 15th, 2010 [March 15th, 2010]
- The Argument Against DTC Genomics Marketing and such - March 16th, 2010 [March 16th, 2010]
- A moment of Clarity. Some DTCG is not bad. - March 18th, 2010 [March 18th, 2010]
- SNPs for breast cancer risk? It Depends. - March 18th, 2010 [March 18th, 2010]
- How can MDVIP use Navigenics Test for Medicine? - March 18th, 2010 [March 18th, 2010]
- Why did P&G invest in Navigenics? - March 23rd, 2010 [March 23rd, 2010]
- PGx in DTCG? Doesn't stand up to Useful testing. - March 25th, 2010 [March 25th, 2010]
- End of Gene Patents? - March 29th, 2010 [March 29th, 2010]
- Sherpa Accepting Chief Medical Officership - April 3rd, 2010 [April 3rd, 2010]
- The Rumors of My Death........ - April 20th, 2010 [April 20th, 2010]
- Happy DNA Day! - April 25th, 2010 [April 25th, 2010]
- 99 USD, DNA day and patient letters - April 25th, 2010 [April 25th, 2010]
- 2C19, Navigenics and Clinical Reality. - May 1st, 2010 [May 1st, 2010]
- Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative rising - May 7th, 2010 [May 7th, 2010]
- Personal Genomes in Clinical Care. Quake paper is a waste! - May 11th, 2010 [May 11th, 2010]
- Personal Genomes in Clinical Care. Quake paper Falls Short! - May 13th, 2010 [May 13th, 2010]
- Last post edited by Drew - May 13th, 2010 [May 13th, 2010]
- GateKeeper? FCUK U! - May 13th, 2010 [May 13th, 2010]
- GateKeeper? F! U! - May 15th, 2010 [May 15th, 2010]
- Potential of genomic medicine, LOST - May 19th, 2010 [May 19th, 2010]
- How Bad Can a House Investigation be for DTC Genomics? - May 20th, 2010 [May 20th, 2010]