President Trump consistently misstates his impact on NATO's budget and how that budget works. (Meg Kelly/The Washington Post)

Americans know that a strong alliance of free, sovereign and independent nations is the best defense for our freedoms and for our interests. That is why my administration has demanded that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligation. As a result of this insistence, billions of dollars more have begun to pour into NATO. In fact, people are shocked. But billions and billions of dollars more coming in from countries that, in my opinion, would not have been paying so quickly. President Trump, speech in Warsaw, July 6, 2017

Whenever we delve into Trumps rhetoric on the funding of NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, we find that he fundamentally mischaracterizes the way NATO works. This was true of candidate Trump, who received Three Pinocchios for a series of misleading claims about NATO funding, and of President Trump, who received anupdated rating of Four Pinocchios for his failure to correct his talking points.

Trump now says new money is pouring into NATObecause of his administration. We logged versions ofthis claim at least 15 times in our Fact Checker database tracking every false or misleading claim by Trump in his first full year as president.

This is yet another case where Trump is quick to take credit for decisions others made prior to his election, or unrelated to his presidency. Lets dig into the facts.

Trump started making this claim when head-libbed itin his maiden speech to Congress at the end of February a month into his presidency. I can tell you the money is pouring in. Very nice, he said, mentioning he was pressing NATO allies in very frank and strong discussions. As we noted at the time, this is nonsensical.

NATO was established in the aftermath of World War II. It began with 12 members in a defense alliance among Western European countries, the United States and Canada to counter the Soviet Union and its satellite countries in Eastern Europe (known as the Warsaw Pact). After the Soviet Union collapsed and the Warsaw Pact unraveled, NATO expanded to include many Eastern European nations and even former parts of the Soviet Union. There are now 28 member countries in NATO.

There are two types of funding for NATO: direct and indirect. Direct contributions are shared among the 29 member states to pay for the costs of the actual alliance (for example, maintenance and headquarters activity). But when Trump talks about financial obligation and money pouring into NATO, he is talking about indirect spending. (The White House did not respond to our request for explanation.)

Indirect spending is the money NATO countries spend on their own defense budgets. These contributions are voluntary and not legally binding. Each country decides what to contribute based on their own defense capability.

Each NATO member has had this 2 percent spending guideline since 2006, but not everyone had been actively working toward that. Then during a 2014 summit in Wales, NATO members pledged to stop cutting their defense expenditure and move toward that 2 percent guideline within 10 years. This decision, taken just months after the annexation of Crimea, was a response to Russian aggression in Ukraine.

That means long before Trump started complaining about other countries NATO contributions during the campaign and into his presidency, members had committed to having defense spending account for 2 percent of each nations gross domestic product by 2024.

Since the 2014 meeting, defense expenditures from member countries increased steadily. The cumulative spending increase from 2015 to 2017 above 2014 level is an additional $45.8 billion, according toNATOs announcement from June 29, 2017.

Defense spending from non-U.S. members is estimated to increase $13 billion in 2017. But there is no evidence the Trump administration had anything to do with these countries independent decisions to bolster their own defense spending. These budget decisions were made during the 2016 calendar year, before Trump became president.

In 2017, six countries met the 2 percent goal. United States leads the pack at 3.6 percent. The other countries are Greece, Estonia, Britain, Romania and Poland. (Greece met the guideline even though it slashed defense spending, because its economy collapsed. This is whysome experts say the guideline is rather arbitrary.)

Other nations especially ones that border Russia or Ukraine have bolstered their defense spending in response to perceived threats from Russia.Romania and Poland are former members of the Warsaw Pact.

Who deserves the most credit? Vladimir Putin. It was the invasion of Crimea, the launching of insurgency backed by Russia in Eastern Ukraine, that was the wake-up call for the majority of the allies, said Alexander Vershbow, former deputy secretary general of NATO. It took a while to see the results; 2015 was not a year of substantial increases but 2016 was. So again, Vladimir Putin and his aggressive behavior deserves more credit than the president of the United States.

Every U.S. president in recent memory similarly called on other countries to increase their defense spending, experts say, but Trumps rhetoric may have lit a fire for countries setting their budgets for 2018 and beyond. For example, at the May 25 NATO meeting, member countries agreed to develop a plan by the end of 2017 showing how they would meet the 2 percent guideline.

Still, Trump goes way too far taking credit, and no new commitments have been made since he became president.

Even if you wanted to take a look at the impact that Trump had on defense spending, you have to wait a few years, said Jim Townsend, former deputy assistant secretary of Defense for European and NATO policy. If you see a huge surge in 2018, you can ask: Was that a Trump surge or something else causing that? But you have to get there first. The money that is in the budget this year was set in motion last year.

Trump certainly is not the first president to insist other members of NATO increase their defense spending. Yet he says that because of his insistence, countries are spending billions and billions more. Defense spending by NATO countries increased since they agreed in 2014 to work toward the 2 percent guideline, in response to threats from Russia. Increases in spending since then were the countries voluntary, independent decisions precedinghis presidency.

This over-the-top rhetoric goes way too far, once again pushing him into Four-Pinocchio territory.

(About our rating scale)

Send us facts to check by filling out this form

Keep tabs on Trumps promises with our Trump Promise Tracker

Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter

Do you rate this claim as true or false? More Pinocchios for false, fewer based on your opinion of the statement's truthfulness. (The check mark means you think the statement is true, not that you agree with the rating.)

We need to verify that you are an actual person.

This is a non-scientific user poll. Results are not statistically valid and cannot be assumed to reflect the views of Washington Post users as a group or the general population.

Share the Facts

2017-07-12 11:26:27 UTC

1

1

5

Four Pinocchios

"That is why my administration has demanded that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligation. As a result of this insistence, billions of dollars more have begun to pour into NATO. "

Donald Trump

President of the United States

speech in Warsaw

Thursday, July 6, 2017

2017-07-06

View original post here:

President Trump's claim 'billions and billions' are 'pouring into NATO ... - Washington Post