Three Senate Republicans on Monday proposed repealing the nation's controversial health care law in favor of a replacement that eliminates most of the government coverage mandates it imposed and offers tax breaks to help the lower-income obtain coverage.

The supporters of the proposal, Sens. Orrin Hatch of Utah, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Richard Burr of North Carolina, said in a written statement that their goal was to "reduce health care costs and increase access to affordable, high quality care."

The plan is a rarity among congressional Republicans, who vowed more than three years to "repeal and replace" President Barack Obama's health care law, also known as 'Obamacare,' but since then have focused almost exclusively on trying to repeal it without advancing a comprehensive alternative.

As described by aides, the size of the tax credits envisioned in the alternative would be determined by age and income, and be available to the unemployed as well as those seeking individual coverage or working for smaller companies. Those with incomes up to three times the federal poverty level generally $70,650 for a family of four would be eligible.

The proposal repeals all of the tax increases that have taken effect with the new health care law, including one on medical devices and another on high-cost insurance plans. Yet it would impose a new one by limiting the tax exemption that individuals are allowed to take for the cost of their health insurance premiums.

Under current law, 100 percent of premiums are exempt from federal income tax, and the proposal would reduce that to 65 percent.

In addition to raising money to help finance the tax breaks for those with lower incomes, the change would help control the cost of coverage, aides said.

Under the proposal, employers that provide health care would be permitted to deduct their full cost, as is now the case.

In another major change, the proposal would roll back the expansion of Medicaid that is a central part of the new health care law. In its place, Republicans proposed giving individual states a fixed amount to pay for care of their poor residents, based on the number of individuals who live at or below the poverty level.

Republicans said they did not have overall cost estimates for the legislation, or of the impact it would have on the uninsured population. In a written statement, they said that generally speaking, it would neither raise nor lower deficits over a decade, yet achieve "significant savings for consumers and taxpayers."

See the article here:

3 Republicans Back Health Care Alternative