Is the Spiritual Realm more Real than the Natural? Brad Jersak | Brad Jersak – Patheos


How would you respond to the statement, The spiritual realm is more real than the natural realm?

Ive thought about this type of statement a lot, having heard the statement in a variety of forms through the years. Similarly, the Catholic priest, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, once said, We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience.

Both these statements affirm something important but invariably over-steer into a sort of neo-Gnostic dualism, which Ill explain below.

First, nearly every conceivable theological mistake seems to begin with an important truth understood wrongly. So lets begin with the truth. What is true about these statements? Both the one you cite and also Chardins?

The worldview of Christ, his prophetic predecessors and his apostolic successors was not materialistic. They acknowledged the reality of a spiritual realm above, behind or within the material world. They believed in God, though he was invisible; in spiritual beings, whether angelic or demonic; and in the spirits of departed people, whether in the heavens or beneath the earth. While Christianity has developed beyond literalist readings of that worldview, the ancients were right to see that there is more to reality than meets the eye. So even post-modern Christians are not strict materialists.

This is especially true of people. We are more than biological factories. We are more than the sum of our primate parts. We believe that to be human includes more than a body. Whatever we call the immaterial aspects of our humanity the soul and/or spirit, the mind and/or heart, conscience and/or consciousness to be human involves natural AND spiritual dimensions that both faith and science have trouble grasping.

The statements also indicate that despite appearances, our assumption that the material world is denser than the spiritual world is somehow not quite right. Im not speaking literally.

Rather, Im thinking especially about biblical texts such as the book of Hebrews where we hear that the temporal earthly temple was merely a shadow of the eternal heavenly temple. The author almost sounds like Plato, and indeed, may have been a Christian convert from the Platonic Judaism of Philo of Alexandria.

Later, in chapter 11, Hebrews speaks about the substance of faith in Gods promises that had not yet materialized. I dont purport to understand the substance of immaterial faith, but clearly, the promises of God were a reality to those who hoped in them even apart from their fulfillment.

And while its important to avoid the hard anti-material dualism of the Gnostics, we also want to acknowledge the dualities in biblical statements such as:

There are so many Scriptures like these that affirm the reality of a spiritual or heavenly realm that is more than temporal and more than material and, therefore, also in some way ultimate relative to the natural plane. So to be charitable, you can see how our charismatic friends and even Chardin try to hold that truth in play in the context of our incredibly materialistic society. This is especially important for Christians to remember when being consumed by consumerism and an obsession with the stuff of the worldly kingdom.

And yet it feels to me that these statements overcompensate and may swerve wildly into the other ditch.

Earlier, I referred to the ancient (or not so ancient) heresy of Gnosticism. While there were an array of complex pseudo-Christian Gnostic streams that became especially influential in the second century, many of them seem to have divorced the spiritual realm from the material realm, or at least wanted to. Ill have to generalize here. They would have seen the heavenly kingdom as entirely separate from and out of sync with the material world.

This is quite different than the New Testament vision where Christ says, The kingdom of heaven has come near or The kingdom of God is in your midst or at hand or within you. Indeed, the kingdom parables of Christ are all about the kingdom of God permeating this world and our real earthly lives like seeds being sown or a wheat field sprouting or yeast leavening a loaf or a tree spreading its branches. In Christ, the kingdom is here, evident in real things we see and hear and touch and do. Its a way of being in this world and its the grace of God happening in a thousand little ways throughout our days here. Said another way, the kingdom of God is about heaven and earth united, beyond separation.

The Gnostics also believed the material realm was intrinsically evil, nothing that a Holy God would directly touch. Before I critique that notion, lets say that its not entirely without justification, even biblically but that theyve drastically misunderstood important words and ideas.

For example, as we look around, we see a certain corruption at work in the world and in people. To them, 1 John 2:15-17 seem to make perfect sense:

As you can see, the plain and literal reading of the text seems obvious: the world and the flesh are evil. No?

No. We need to understand that by world, John is not referring to the world that God created (and it was good) or the world of people that God so loved that he gave his only Son (John 3). The world were to avoid is the world systemhostile to Christ. It is comprised of corrupt societies that traffic in greed, injustice, oppression and moral darkness. According to Paul, we are to be in the world but not of the world. That is, we live in our communities without participating in the practices and systems that destroy communities.

So too with the flesh. Surely the flesh that cannot enter the kingdom of God does not refer to the material flesh of our humanity since God the Word became flesh (John 1:14). In fact, Christ not only became human he became flesh in the sense of entering fully the human condition to restore and redeem it. He dignified the flesh by uniting himself to human nature fully.

So the flesh that Paul derides is not the flesh of our humanity, but rather, our egoism and its demands. To be spiritual is, contra Chardin, NOT over against being human, but against the cravings and darkened desires of the fallen human mind. Indeed, to become spiritual is to have the Spirit give LIFE to our mortal bodies, not to degrade them as evil. We should have kept reading Romans 8:

10But if Christ is in you, then even though your body is subject to death because of sin, the Spirit gives life because of righteousness. 11And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies because of his Spirit who lives in you (Romans 8:10-11).

Finally, you can see how the dualism that divorces spirit and matter and degrades Gods good world and our fleshly bodies as innately evil would lead the Gnostics to a theology of escape. But its not just those heretics of old who dabble in anti-material escapism. A few examples come to mind Ill mention three:

1. Left Behind rapture theology: As a young dispensationalist, we didnt have much hope for this world. We were intent on escape via the rapture, hopefully next week, definitely in our lifetime. And we foresaw nothing for the material world but the degradation of the society and humanity into a global empire led by the Antichrist, culminating in Armageddon and followed later by the consumption of the universe in fire.

The one and only solution: dont get left behind!Or left below!if you prefer the Simsons version:

2. Charismatic supernaturalism:I have no doubt that the apostolic church was charismatic and supernatural in the truest sense. I am convinced that the Holy Spirit is alive and well, active in our lives and continuing to move, speak and heal. Im an eye-witness and occasional participant.

But there is a brand of supernaturalISMthat feels very escapist to me. Rather than embracing our fleshly existence as the venue where the kingdom comes on earth as in heaven or the Word becomes flesh and dwells among us, it becomes obsessed with all things flitty, ethereal and abstracted from real life. It sings, Let your glory fall on this room and then instead of seeing that glory in the face of their brothers and sisters, or in the poor and the broken, squints its eyes hoping to glimpse angel feathers, glowing orbs and whisps of shekinah smoke.

Worse, it continually tries to evade the messy human condition, inventing a theology of denial that cant accept lament.

3. Our heavenly home: Heaven is my home. Im just passin through.

In his book, Surprised by Hope, N.T. Wright reminds us that the biblical vision does not end in a heavenly realm divorced from this world as disembodied spirits. Rather, he says, the gospel foresees the restoration of this world and the resurrection of our bodies. Granted, we will apparently be immortal and spiritual, but nonetheless somehow embodied humans enjoying a tangible reality engaged with the five senses.

I would point out to Wrights disciples that he does not deny the reality of heaven or paradise as such. That is, Hebrews 11-12 is not wrong to speak of the cloud of witnesses of departed saints 12 or the spirits of righteous men worshiping now at Mount Zion. For Paul, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord and John the Revelator sees myriads of souls worshiping at the Lambs throne. As Jesus said, we worship the God of the living such that he believed Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are somehow alive and Moses and Elijah could appear with him on Tabor.

So, while we still await the final resurrection and our telosas immortal and embodied humanity in the reconstructed universe (this universe, according to Revelation 21), we know death involves a beatific vision in the presence of God. But also, lets not imagine that the goal is to escape from our bodies into a permanent cloudy by-and-by.

So, is the spiritual realm more real than the natural? What does more real even mean if 1. both are real and if 2. God encompasses and indwells both and 3. unites them in himself? While the kingdom of heaven (i.e. God) creates, sustains and reigns over the earthly realm, its not helpful to think of the material realm as unreal or separate or evil. Its been dignified by its very creation, by the incarnation and by Gods intention of its ultimate restoration.

And, are we spiritual beings having a human experience?Our human experience isnota mere episode in the life of a supra-human spirit. Humans ARE both spiritual and embodied by nature and by grace. There is nothing unspiritual about being human and in fact, the most spiritual thing about us IS our humanity. To be spiritual by grace is to become more truly human.

Read this article:

Is the Spiritual Realm more Real than the Natural? Brad Jersak | Brad Jersak - Patheos

Related Post

Comments are closed.