Rachel Lehmann-Haupt writes about Counsyl
I’d like this to sit on the Internet for the next fifty years —just in case Rachel feels like it is ever personally expedient for her to pretend this article was never published should fashions and politics in reproductive medicine ever shift like they tend to do…
Title: Want a Perfect Baby? Counsyl Says: Just Spit
Translation: Eugenics is bad, but Counsyl isn’t Credible
Breakdown: Spitting is considered crude in all cultures, but especially European cultures. The idea of a “Perfect Baby” is taboo because it is an allusion to eugenics. However, all parents want “perfect babies.” Thus, Rachel allusion is that Counsyl promises something both impossible and taboo —but as immature upstarts who need gentle correction and merit little actual attention.
1: Counsyl is a me-too scam
Every expecting parent wants to have a perfect kid. Counsyl, a new Redwood City, Calif.- based genetics company, hopes to profit off this fantasy by selling a cheap(er) genetic test that claims to screen out 100 dangerous genetic anomalies.
Breakdown: [everybody wants something perfect but that's impossible.] Counsyl: “new” “hopes” “profit” “fantasy” “cheap(er)” (even less credible than other already low-value tests) “claims” [something vague, dubious, but scary].
Photo: Little Child Spitting Water
Caption:
“Water play in my bathroom. -Homage to rebekka’s “talk” series
Translation: First word Rachel associated with “Counsyl” is “spit.” What a buccal DNA sample has anything to do with “water play in my bathroom” is: nothing. Rachel doesn’t care because she doesn’t take Counsyl seriously. She didn’t even bother to post a picture of the logo, company, or product. Flickr “spit,” copy-paste… next!
2: Counsyl is Heterodox
Even with the creepy Gattaca undertones, Counsyl’s technology could potentially save lives and health care dollars as a kind of preventative medicine. But the accuracy of the new technology is still in question, and it’s unclear if the masses really want to know these answers to such questions — even if insurance is willing to pay. Accuracy and large-scale adoption is the formula Counsyl needs to make its business model work.
Breakdown:
Even with the creepy Gattaca undertones,
First: “creepy” is intelligentsia for “heterodox.” Also: a movie reference. Pop culture. Not serious.
Counsyl’s technology could potentially save lives and health care dollars as a kind of preventative medicine.
[dubious... unrecognized technology] “could” “potentially” [dubious... impossible promise] [dubious... includes profit motive] “kind of” [dubious] [dubious].
Also: there is no such thing as “saving health care dollars.” YOU DON’T PAY FOR HEALTH CARE! There is only “insurers not paying claims with money they’ve already collected from your employer.” Any “savings” is money already paid by you to pay the margin calls for your big broke investment bank medical insurer (Aside: Medicare of Connecticut flat refused to pay providers for all claims this month. Your “cost saving initiatives” in action.)
But the accuracy of the new technology is still in question
This is a baldfaced lie so astounding that it breaks my concentration just to read it. The Counsyl “technology” is extremely accurate —especially by medical standards —and you can rerun tests if necessary. It’s the immediate clinical application of this extremely accurate data which is not well understood —which is not especially problematic considering the low cost and immutability of your genotype. I don’t expect Rachel to understand the distinction —in fact, she would probably be insulted if you challenged her casual dismissal of the entire core substance of the product —because “she’s more about the people-side” and “I don’t ‘do’ math.” I’m not an idiot, but the shear sophistication behind Counsyl humbles me, and I’m a complete asshole. Calling Counsyl “inaccurate” is like calling Idaho “the Moon.”
and it’s unclear if the masses really want to know these answers to such questions — even if insurance is willing to pay.
1) the masses don’t care about rs230492384, but they do care such questions including “how I not have retard baby?” 2) the opinion of the masses is irrelevant because first, even if 99% of people didn’t want this test, that shouldn’t restrict the remaining 1%, and second, the masses don’t have any coherent or useful medical opinion, and third, the masses don’t pay for health care — insurers do— but Rachel doesn’t consider that relevant because she already has decided that genetic testing is heterodox in the same way that I have already decided that homeopathy is heterodox —your insurer’s reimbursement policy be damned.
Accuracy and large-scale adoption is the formula Counsyl needs to make its business model work.
No. All Counsyl needs to do is
- Not be 23andMe
- Not engage in expensive lawsuits
- Have more money than they spend —which largely amounts to: 1) sales higher than debt service 2) not hiring anybody who ever expects to participate normal salaryman society, or really, to ever work at any other company ever again, and probably will (should) kill themselves if the company catastrophically fails (not official medical recommendation) 3) unix, which is apparently cheap in dollars but impossibly expensive in humans
Large-scale adoption is the EXACTLY WRONG formula, because a dozen 30-somethings cannot compete dollar for dollar with big providers which have almost unlimited credit and a monopoly on distribution. All a Labcorp would have to do would be add checkbox to their superbill —as so goaded by an army of blueshirt blabbermouths screaming about “widespread adoption” in the press, and… whoops! Counsyl just missed one payment on its “world domination sales numbers” to service all that pushed debt to buy “widespread adoption.” Knock knock! Hello! It’s me! Your friendly pharma VC bagman! I would like to sit on your board now. Would you like an Xbox to play while you sit out this forced acquisition?
The market point for a generic genetic test is about the cost of a vaccine. You may as well try to compete in the medical gauze market —at least cotton has a longer shelf life. Go for the impossible-to-replicate speciality test in public, while building a local vertical for complete medical testing in private. What’s the big difference between a genetic test and all other medical labs? Another machine? It’s not the technology that makes a medical test: it’s the distribution! Your own single-internist medical center can be bought for about $200,000 if you already know a doctor who’d work there. Why would you want to know about that terrible business? Because you know which test the doctor orders in real practice? The one on the superbill. You know who puts which labs on which superbills? I do. (actually, Steve uses Google Docs to make his own forms) The risk is: which is more expensive, the liability of launching a medical practice (probably illegal, as in “American in China” illegal), or the liability of missing the market for your product (certain death)?
to be continued…
- June 11th At Westport, CT: Federal Red Flags, HIPAA Security Rules and Fraud Prevention - November 7th, 2009 [November 7th, 2009]
- Do not learn Dvorak! - November 7th, 2009 [November 7th, 2009]
- You Can’t Solve Problems By Making It Illegal To Have The Problem - November 7th, 2009 [November 7th, 2009]
- A Force Fix for Healthcare - November 7th, 2009 [November 7th, 2009]
- Yahble, HIT, Bubblecon, BIZDEV!, Solid State - November 7th, 2009 [November 7th, 2009]
- 15 things that suck about the Palm Pre - November 7th, 2009 [November 7th, 2009]
- What an Indie Genomics Lab Looks Like - November 7th, 2009 [November 7th, 2009]
- Practice Fusion: Class D Felony? - February 26th, 2010 [February 26th, 2010]
- Practice Fusion Responds - March 7th, 2010 [March 7th, 2010]
- Practice Fusion: Do the math: $44,000 is a LIE - March 10th, 2010 [March 10th, 2010]
- How Much Until Doctors Approve of 23andMe? - March 10th, 2010 [March 10th, 2010]
- Biochemicals as Media, Not Methods - March 10th, 2010 [March 10th, 2010]
- More Practice Fusion Reality Distortion - March 10th, 2010 [March 10th, 2010]
- Same Test Results: 23andMe is Myriad is BRCA is Medicine - March 12th, 2010 [March 12th, 2010]
- BRCA is 23andMe is Myriad is Medicine - March 13th, 2010 [March 13th, 2010]
- Getting Serious About Genomics as Common Medical Practice - March 15th, 2010 [March 15th, 2010]
- The New John Mackey of Genetics: Linda Avey? - March 15th, 2010 [March 15th, 2010]
- Keep the Medical, Well, Medical - March 16th, 2010 [March 16th, 2010]
- If 23andMe shuts down, it won’t be for some mundane reason like the bills weren’t paid - March 16th, 2010 [March 16th, 2010]
- If I Run A Medical Practice, How Do I Use A 23andMe? - March 17th, 2010 [March 17th, 2010]
- 23andMe Contract in Bad Faith - March 19th, 2010 [March 19th, 2010]
- Doctors CANNOT Use 23andMe Due To 23andMe’s Bad Faith Contract - March 20th, 2010 [March 20th, 2010]
- Pathway Compared to 23andMe and Navigenics - March 22nd, 2010 [March 22nd, 2010]
- There’s a Word for “Views Differ” When One View Is The State - March 24th, 2010 [March 24th, 2010]
- Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. USPTO, et al. – Opinion - March 29th, 2010 [March 29th, 2010]
- Birth of a Super Villain - April 3rd, 2010 [April 3rd, 2010]
- “Medical Products” like 23andMe must not become the new “Financial Products” - April 4th, 2010 [April 4th, 2010]
- How I Would Apply Genomic Technology In Clinical Use Today - April 5th, 2010 [April 5th, 2010]
- Gmail Enterprise: World’s Best EMR - April 6th, 2010 [April 6th, 2010]
- Brief Primer on Health Law Compliance - April 9th, 2010 [April 9th, 2010]
- Spoiler: You ARE the “Valids” - April 9th, 2010 [April 9th, 2010]
- Is Medicare Bankrupt? What the Hell Is Going On? - April 17th, 2010 [April 17th, 2010]
- The Big Shuffle: Medicare Cuts Rates by 21.3% (but not “technically”) - April 17th, 2010 [April 17th, 2010]
- “Tech Hiring Binge” == “Fear for Your Job, Nerds” - April 18th, 2010 [April 18th, 2010]
- How Bad is Bad? $.20 on the Private Medical Insurance Dollar - April 20th, 2010 [April 20th, 2010]
- Update: How Bad is Bad? It Used to Be $.45 on the Medical Insurance Dollar - April 20th, 2010 [April 20th, 2010]
- World’s Best “EMR” for $1000: Google Spreadsheets + iPad - April 21st, 2010 [April 21st, 2010]
- Don’t Insult Me with your “AOL Keyword” Strategy, Google Health - April 21st, 2010 [April 21st, 2010]
- How to Play LAWGAMES - April 23rd, 2010 [April 23rd, 2010]
- Top 4 Predatory Schemes Encroaching on American Medicine: Part 1 - April 25th, 2010 [April 25th, 2010]
- What’s the Big Deal About iPads? - April 27th, 2010 [April 27th, 2010]
- Got Google Android for Google I/O - April 27th, 2010 [April 27th, 2010]
- Google Enterprise meets HIPAA and HITECH Compliant Laws - April 29th, 2010 [April 29th, 2010]
- Pixels of Accuracy CHALENGE: Diagnostic Medical Imaging - April 29th, 2010 [April 29th, 2010]
- 23andMe Launder AlioGenetics Doesn’t Even Bother to Remove 23andMe Logo - April 30th, 2010 [April 30th, 2010]
- Anthem of CT Denies $600 Until “Subscriber Responds to our Coordination of Benefits Questionnaire” - May 1st, 2010 [May 1st, 2010]
- Apple And Google Team Up To Launch Revolutionary Mobile Health System - May 1st, 2010 [May 1st, 2010]
- Funny Pictures from This Year Building the Medical Practice - May 6th, 2010 [May 6th, 2010]
- Remote Medical Video Monitoring on iPad and iPhone - May 7th, 2010 [May 7th, 2010]
- Google Calendar Overhead Waiting Room Display - May 7th, 2010 [May 7th, 2010]
- Various Whiteboards on Solid State Medical Operations - May 7th, 2010 [May 7th, 2010]
- The Raw Facts about Counsyl - May 7th, 2010 [May 7th, 2010]
- Brawndo: Still Mutilating Thirst, Still Not Yet Sold at the Stop-n-Shop Pharmacy - May 9th, 2010 [May 9th, 2010]
- Video: Google Enterprise to Outsource Medical Administration - May 9th, 2010 [May 9th, 2010]
- Gattaca: “The Matrix” of Genomics - May 11th, 2010 [May 11th, 2010]
- 23andMe Now Diagnoses Fatal Tay-Sachs Disease - May 12th, 2010 [May 12th, 2010]
- Why Was Pathway Targeted for FDA Enforcement and Not 23andMe? - May 15th, 2010 [May 15th, 2010]
- John Dolan on Aging and the Horrifying Conclusion of GWAS - May 16th, 2010 [May 16th, 2010]
- Sam R. Riley Wants To Tell You About Practice Fusion - May 17th, 2010 [May 17th, 2010]
- Response to “Genomic Medicine: Lost” - May 19th, 2010 [May 19th, 2010]
- Death And Taxes: CMS to IRS - May 19th, 2010 [May 19th, 2010]
- Please Stop Antagonizing the AMA - May 26th, 2010 [May 26th, 2010]
- Dan Vorhaus, Attorney At Law, Legally Advises Medical Doctors Can Use 23andMe To Provide Medical Advice - May 28th, 2010 [May 28th, 2010]
- Singularity Summit 2010 in San Francisco to Explore Intelligence Augmentation - June 7th, 2010 [June 7th, 2010]
- OpenPCR: DNA amplification for anyone - June 10th, 2010 [June 10th, 2010]
- FDA sends letters to 5 genetic testing companies - June 11th, 2010 [June 11th, 2010]
- Amazon And The NIH Team Up To Put Human Genome In The Cloud - March 31st, 2012 [March 31st, 2012]
- ReproSource Comments on New Study Linking Infertility to Genetics - April 25th, 2012 [April 25th, 2012]
- Genetics 101 Part 1: What are genes? - Video - April 30th, 2012 [April 30th, 2012]
- Red Ice Radio - David Icke - Hour 1 - The Manipulation of Humanity - Video - April 30th, 2012 [April 30th, 2012]
- Genetics Part 5: Human Genetic Disorders - Video - April 30th, 2012 [April 30th, 2012]
- C2CAM - The Nephilim, Genetic Manipulation - April 30th, 2012 [April 30th, 2012]
- Human Nature talk with Robert Sapolsky, Gabor Mate, James Gilligan, Richard Wilkinson - Video - April 30th, 2012 [April 30th, 2012]
- Human Genetic Diseases - Video - April 30th, 2012 [April 30th, 2012]
- Alien Scientist on Genetics, Implants - April 30th, 2012 [April 30th, 2012]
- Research and Markets: Genetics, 6th Edition International Student Version Continues To Educate Today's Students for ... - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Myriad Genetics to Present at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2012 Health Care Conference - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Genetics may explain some people's dislike of meat - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- 'Blond Genes' May Vary Around the World - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Naturally blond hair in Solomon Islanders rooted in native gene - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]