In the spring of 2017, a college student named Mary spit into a tube and sent it to the DNA testing company Ancestry,which analyzed it and sent back a breakdown of her family history.
But Mary wanted to know more. The human genome contains, in theory, an extraordinary wealth of pre-programmed information about who we are and who we might become: whether she was at risk for the same types of cancer that killed her parents, for instance, or if she had medical conditions she could unknowingly pass on to her children.
For that information, Mary were withholding her last name to protect her privacy turned to a dubious new sector of the genomics industry, in which startups claim to provide vastly greater insights than prominent companies like Ancestry and 23andMe do. She uploaded a copy of her raw genetic code, which Ancestry provided as a 17.6 megabyte text file, to a site called Genomelink, which advertises tests for everything from medical conditions and mental illnesses to ludicrously specific personality traits including loneliness, social communication problems, and vulnerability to helicopter parenting.
But when her results arrived, Mary immediately noticed that many were wildly inaccurate. Genomelink said she was less easily depressed, but Mary was diagnosed with clinical depression at a young age. The startup predicted that she had a peanut allergy, but Mary told Futurism that peanut butter is one of the true loves of my life. Other errors in Marys report included traits like blood iron levels, body fat measurements, hearing problems, height, and skin complexion.
I felt that much of it was off-base and unhelpful, she told Futurism, as it didnt fit me at all.
Genomelink is just one of a growing number of shady DNA testing startups now operating in the regulatory Wild West of commercial genomics.
Theres GenePlaza, for instance, which sold a DNA test that claimed to predict users sexual preferences and still sells tests that purport to measure intelligence and risk of depression. A company called Soccer Genomics claims to examine a childs DNA to create a sports training regimen to turn them into the perfect soccer player. An outfit called GenoPalate told a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reporter that their DNA demanded a diet of elk meat and passion fruit. A venture called Vinome claims it can recommend the perfect wine for each person based on their genetic code.
The problem, according to experts, is that these companies are promising information about DNA with a granularity that even scientists cant deliver. Deanna Church, a geneticist at the biotech company Inscripta, told Futurism the tests are all equally useless.
There is not a scientific basis for this sort of testing, she said. I certainly would not recommend anyone spend any money on this sort of thing.
But thousands of people are doing just that and receiving supposed facts about themselves that have little or no scientific grounding. This can cause problems Genomelink customers could feasibly see their predictions for traits like gluten sensitivity, longevity, or alcohol drinking behavior, assume the results are valid, and make ill-informed lifestyle or medical changes based on the results.
And other Genomelink customers agree with Mary: the results just dont hold up.
It sometimes feels like horoscope readings! one woman told Futurism. Many seem like self-perception results. How can I know if they are correct when what I feel about it may only be my perception rather than a fact?
Another concern is privacy. Genomelink tells customers they can request to have their data scrubbed from the companys servers, but all it takes is one corporate acquisition or potentially a generous enough bid for the stores of personal data for that to change. Underlying the phenomenon is an unavoidable economic reality: Its getting incredibly cheap to have your DNA sequenced. Just ten years ago, it cost nearly $100,000 to produce a full human genome, according to the National Human Genome Research Institute. Today, an Ancestry kit costs just $59.
These increasingly-affordable tests are tantalizing your DNA is essentially a personal blueprint that dictates everything from your susceptibility to specific diseases to your eye color. While our environments and lifestyles play major roles in who and what we become, the influence of DNA is vast.
The ability to interpret DNAs full influence, however, still eludes us. Geneticists have only started to crack DNAs code, and experts told Futurism that theyre nowhere near able to predict something as complex as personality traits and that any startup claiming to do so should raise immediate red flags.
I think its fair to say that by and large, most of these tests are not useful at the moment, Shoumita Dasgupta, a biomedical geneticist at the Boston University School of Medicine, told Futurism. Maybe its just me being cynical, but I think its simply greed that is driving people to develop these tools for which there is limited scientific justification at best.
Tomohiro Takano, the CEO of Genomelink parent company Awakens, readily admits that the results arent always accurate.
I know that many of the DNA traits may not be true, Takano said in an interview with Futurism.
Takano did point toward some steps Genomelink has taken to communicate its own limitations. Every time a Genomelink customer gets a new trait report, he said, it comes with information that indicates how reliable the prediction is, along with a breakdown of the rigor of the studies its based on.
Takano also defended the company by saying that it doesnt explicitly recommend lifestyle changes based on results.
What we want to do here is communicate that limitation too, he said. Many of our users, myself included, want to know where is the science today.
Overall, Takano said, he sees Genomelink as an entertainment product as much as an educational one an idea that was harshly rebuked by experts.
I think it is concerning when the line between medical testing and entertainment is blurred, Gillian Hooker, President-Elect of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, told Futurism. Imagery and language that indicates a test may be medically useful could be very misleading when theres limited or no evidence to support its use.
And I think there is a particular vulnerability when you involve conditions that are poorly understood scientifically, physically and emotionally challenging and for which people may be seeking answers that science has yet to uncover, Hooker added, listing traits like depression, allergies, vitamin reports, and food sensitivities all of which Genomelink claims to identify.
Make no mistake: DNA tests can already provide doctors with valuable information about patients health, and Hooker often helps patients navigate them in her clinical practice. Genetic assessments can help oncologists determine whether their patients have a high risk of cancer, for instance, and how best to treat any existing tumors.
It might be simplest to picture DNA as an extremely intricate instruction manual. DNA exists as a long string of molecules called nucleotides, which include one of four molecular components. The order of those four components, read from one end to the other, guides the biological machinery found in every cell as it assembles and operates the human body.
Hooker said DNA screens will likely provide useful tools for cardiologists, neurologists, pediatricians, and also for prenatal caregivers. But the science to support tests for mental illness and intelligence already apoorly-defined metric isnt there yet.
For complex traits, we just dont understand enough to be able to look at someones DNA and make predictions about sports ability, intelligence, etc, Church, the geneticist, said. It is not that these things dont have a genetic component, it is just that we dont understand enough about the genetics, or how environment impacts these genetic variants.
Because this realm of science is so new, Hooker recommends that patients consult with trained genetic counselors who can offer specialized guidance to make sure tests will yield useful info and help people understand and come to terms with their results afterward.
Mary took her results with a grain of salt and realized that Genomelink wasnt giving her valid interpretations of her DNA. But others could easily be misled Mary said that she feels Genomelink never communicated to her the scientific limitations of its reports.
Personally, I find it irresponsible to market products of this type, Dasgupta, the geneticist from Boston, told Futurism, because providing genetic trait reports that are validated by robust science alongside flimsier predictions lends authority to the latter.
She added: We cant expect the average consumer to be able to tell the difference.
Futurism Associate Social Media Editor Natalie Coleman provided significant research assistance for this story.
- Battery-Free Game Boy Powered by Force of Mashing Buttons - September 9th, 2020
- China Just Launched a Mysterious “Reusable Test Spacecraft” - September 9th, 2020
- Fauci Warns That Earth Has Entered a “Pandemic Era” - September 9th, 2020
- Plants Do Something Weird When They Grow Near Human Corpses, Scientists Say - September 9th, 2020
- Finally, There’s Evidence That the Russian COVID Vaccine Might Work - September 9th, 2020
- Engineers Test Jetliner Where You Ride in the Wings - September 9th, 2020
- Chinese Rocket Booster Crashes Near School, Explodes - September 9th, 2020
- Gene-Hacked “Bodybuilder” Mice Stayed Ripped on Space Station - September 9th, 2020
- Scientists Search 10 Million Stars, See No Signs of Alien Civilization - September 9th, 2020
- Americans’ Teeth Are Cracking in Huge Numbers - September 9th, 2020
- General Motors Is Teaming Up With Tesla Competitor Nikola - September 9th, 2020
- Major Newspaper Publishes Op-Ed Written by GPT-3 - September 9th, 2020
- NASA Is Making Moon Rover Parts Out of Metallic Glass - September 9th, 2020
- China’s Mysterious Reusable Spacecraft Just Spent Two Days in Orbit - September 9th, 2020
- US Military Deploys Robot Dogs to Guard Air Force Base - September 9th, 2020
- This Device Allows You to Control a Computer With Your Tongue - September 9th, 2020
- Watch Ford’s Insanely Powerful Electric Mustang Pop a Wheelie on the Drag Strip - September 8th, 2020
- NASA’s Moon-Bound Orion Spacecraft is Officially Fit for Flight - September 8th, 2020
- Amazon Promises Its Alexa For Landlords System Doesn’t Spy on Tenants - September 8th, 2020
- Psychophysicists: Your Brain Might Not Be as Conscious as You Think - September 8th, 2020
- A Three-Star System Ripped Apart Its Own Protoplanetary Disc - September 8th, 2020
- Close-Up Images of Sunspots Look Like Horrible Gaping Mouths - September 8th, 2020
- Neuroscientist: There Was a Huge Problem With Neuralink’s Demo - September 8th, 2020
- Battery-Free Game Boy Powered by Force of Mashing Buttons - September 8th, 2020
- China Just Launched a Mysterious “Reusable Test Spacecraft” - September 8th, 2020
- Russian Scientist Still Plotting to Create More CRISPR Babies - September 8th, 2020
- Plants Do Something Weird When They Grow Near Human Corpses, Scientists Say - September 8th, 2020
- Fauci Warns That Earth Has Entered a “Pandemic Era” - September 8th, 2020
- Engineers Test Jetliner Where You Ride in the Wings - September 8th, 2020
- Finally, There’s Evidence That the Russian COVID Vaccine Might Work - September 8th, 2020
- Fauci: We Could Cut Trials Short and Give Out COVID Vaccine "Right Now" - Futurism - September 4th, 2020
- SETI Team Increases Number of Stars That Might Host Life by 200x - Futurism - September 4th, 2020
- Chadwick Bosemans Wakanda: Afro-Futurism Is in the Present - Common Dreams - September 4th, 2020
- Japanese Company Tests a Flying Car With a Human On Board - Futurism - September 4th, 2020
- Scientists Are Running Out of Primates to Test Vaccines On - Futurism - September 4th, 2020
- Pandemic Recovery: Economic Developments and Future of Work - Modern Diplomacy - September 4th, 2020
- What Goes Right and Wrong When We Predict a High-Tech Future - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence - September 4th, 2020
- Lucid Motors Claims to Have Beaten Tesla Model S on Drag Strip - Futurism - September 4th, 2020
- Astronomers Claim to Have Spotted the Most Massive Black Hole Merger Ever - Futurism - September 2nd, 2020
- Research: LSD Microdoses as Effective as Opioids at Treating Pain - Futurism - September 2nd, 2020
- Here Are The Most Popular Office Buildings in the US - COMMERCIALCaf - September 2nd, 2020
- Pollution Dissolved This Shark’s Teeth and Skin, Researchers Say - August 31st, 2020
- Japanese Company Tests a Flying Car — With a Human On Board - August 31st, 2020
- Research: LSD Microdoses as Effective as Opioids at Treating Pain - August 31st, 2020
- This Dumbass Comet Just Flew Directly Into the Sun - August 31st, 2020
- A Hacker Reportedly Gained Access to Tesla’s Entire Fleet - August 31st, 2020
- Researchers Forced Living Cells to Navigate Tiny Mazes - August 31st, 2020
- Elon Musk: Tesla Security Was “Overzealous” In Kicking Out Drone Photographer - August 31st, 2020
- SpaceX Is Planning to Fly Its Starship Prototype This Weekend - August 31st, 2020
- A NASA Satellite From the 1960s Is About to Die - August 31st, 2020
- Scientists Saw Space Debris During the Day for the First Time - August 31st, 2020
- Neuralink’s Demo Didn’t Impress Experts - August 31st, 2020
- Elon Musk: We’ve Already Implanted Neuralink in Live Pigs - August 31st, 2020
- Veterans Are Taking a Psychedelic Plant to Fight PTSD - August 31st, 2020
- Elon Musk Compares Neuralink to “a ‘Black Mirror’ Episode” - August 31st, 2020
- Police Brutality Videos Are Giving Teens PTSD Symptoms - August 31st, 2020
- Amazon Gets Permission to Start Making Drone Deliveries - August 31st, 2020
- Scientists Are Running Out of Primates to Test Vaccines On - August 31st, 2020
- A White House Advisor Is Pushing a Reckless Herd Immunity COVID Strategy - August 31st, 2020
- NASA Shows Off GIF of a Dust Devil on Mars - August 31st, 2020
- Vovlo partners with professional futurists to help forecast vision - Industrial Vehicle Technology International - August 10th, 2020
- The Impact of COVID on Digital Health - Medscape - August 10th, 2020
- Comprehensive Report on Internet of Things IoT Managed Services Market Set to Witness Huge Growth by 2025 | Aricent, Cisco Systems, Cognizant... - August 10th, 2020
- Saved by the Bell Peacock Trailer Shows Familiar Faces in Reboot - Collider.com - August 10th, 2020
- This Is What Leadership Will Be In 2030 - Forbes - August 10th, 2020
- Scientists Made Mice Glow in the Dark to Study Mitochondria - Futurism - August 10th, 2020
- #PulpNonFiction: On postalgia, purpose and progress - Bizcommunity.com - August 10th, 2020
- Smart Cities for Dummies LIVE - Dr. Jonathan Reichental on Ian Khan's Future Readiness Livestream - GlobeNewswire - August 10th, 2020
- Access to Justice by another name | Medina Eve Abdelkader - The Lawyer's Daily - August 10th, 2020
- COVID-19 puts the brakes on bike sales, repairs - Chicago Daily Herald - August 10th, 2020
- What a Jain merchants rare and candid autobiography tells us about life in the Mughal era - Scroll.in - August 10th, 2020
- Life After COVID-19: What Will it Look Like? - WTTW News - August 10th, 2020
- The future of facial recognition: the impact on smart cities - SmartCitiesWorld - August 10th, 2020
- Webinar: Building services that are accessible, innovative, and fast - The Mandarin - August 10th, 2020
- You Decide: Is it really 2030? - The Coastland Times - The Coastland Times - August 10th, 2020
- Composer Ted Hearne Examines White Complicity in the Displacement of Black Americans - The Daily Beast - August 10th, 2020
- NASA Imaged the Bubble Around the Solar System and... Yikes - Futurism - August 10th, 2020
- Astronomers May Have Found a Star That’s Just 33 Years Old - August 10th, 2020
- Your Bones Are Made Out of Exploded Stars, Scientists Say - August 10th, 2020
- Scientists Are Using The Moon as a Giant Mirror to Search For Aliens - August 10th, 2020