Its not exactly the rivalry between Uber and Lyft, but U.S. astronauts will eventually have two different options for taxiing to and from the International Space Stationand neither of them will be designed or built by NASA. The nearly $7 billion in contracts awarded this week have been split unevenly between Boeing (BA) and SpaceX, Elon Musks space-exploration startup.For taxpayers, that leads to an obvious question: Isnt it cheaper to have a single builder?
Thats an issue government has been grappling over for decades, most notably at the Pentagon. Military equipment contracts are increasingly awarded to one design from a single supplier as a way to keep a lid on costs. That imperative has become particularly critical over the past five years as Washington struggles to curb deficits and Tea Party lawmakers campaign to slash federal spending across the board, even for projects and constituencies the Republican Party has traditionally supported.
Were going to find out how well sole sourcing works, says Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with Teal Group. Once upon a time, it was about having an industrial base. Now its all about costs. The accountants are in charge.
One major example of the single-source approach came to a head in the long debate over the engine on the Pentagons most-expensive weapons system, Lockheed Martins (LMT) F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter. An earlier fighter jet, the F-16,has two engine providers. But in the F-35 program, General Electric (GE) andRolls-Royce (RR/:LN) spent the better part of a decade developing an alternative engine for the F-35,even as military officials repeatedly asked Congress to shut down the secondary effort and spend the money on other projects. Finally, in 2011, legislators agreed and Pratt & Whitney (UTX) was left as the sole engine supplier for the F-35.
That arrangement led to a rare public scuffle earlier this year when the Pentagons F-35 program chief blasted Pratt & Whitney for not suitably managing costs on the engine. When you are in a sole-source environment it is difficult to find the right leverage and motivation and drive the cost out of a program, Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan told reporters in April. A report inAviation Week described the general as frustrated by the lack of leverage he has in dealing with a monopoly engine provider. (Pratt & Whitney spokesman Matthew Bates says the company has spent more than $65 million to reduce the F-35 engines cost by half.)
A similar situation occurred with the futuristic helmet F-35 pilots will wear. Displeased by the performance of the product from a Rockwell Collins (COL)-Elbit Systems (ESLT) joint venture, the Pentagon askedBAE Systems (BA/:LN) in 2011 to develop an alternative. Last October, after the original supplier improved its helmets performance and agreed to a price cut, the government ended work on the BAE helmet after spending a reported $60 million. BAE Systems wont confirm that figure.
By bringing both Boeing and SpaceX into the dual development of new vehicles that can reach the space station, NASA is making an an initial foray into supporting a private space-travel industry that entrepreneurs hope will become a thriving space tourism sector. (California-based SpaceX will receive $2.6 billion for the work that Boeing told NASA would cost $4.2 billion; officials at SpaceX did not respond to a question about the cost disparity.)
The dual contracts are, in some ways, a throwback to an earlier era when the U.S. used large space and defense contracts as a way to seed entire industries. The rationale was that Uncle Sam is best positioned to catalyze investments in areas of strategic national interests and then private enterprise follows. Thats what NASA hopes will happen with the Boeing and SpaceX projects: a space station shuttle that flies in parallel with the companies other ventures to develop the field of space tourism, opening up the door to more and more people seeing what we have seen from space, as astronaut Michael Fincke, who has spent 381 days in orbit, put it this week. Musk, for his part, envisions SpaceX as helping one day to build a city on Mars.
The record for both single- and dual-contracting approaches is mixed, and its not easy to conclude that having only one supplier is any better or worse, in terms of performance and expense to taxpayers, Aboulafia and others say. Beyond the cost of a single space program or weapons system, government budget officials must consider the industrial base that accompanies a particular project when deciding to fund multiple suppliers. That issue of a competency also includes whether a company has done both commercial and government work, Aboulafia says, such as Boeing, GE, and Pratt & Whitney.
Weve seen examples where competition is good and competitions bad for federal procurement, says Michael Lewis, a vice president of strategy and planning at BAE Systems, calling a multiple-supplier scenario a great risk mitigator for critical items the government is buying. He sees the current environment as one in which cost trumps other considerations, even when the total price difference for a product is minimal. Budgets have gone up and down all through history, Lewis says. Its really a mindset about what are we buying. Are we just out to get the cheapest or does the performance of the item factor into it?
View original post here:
NASA Just Bought Two Space Taxis. Will Competition Save Money?
- 2D Laser Profiling Scanner for Detecting Targets - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- NASA Energy Concept Could Harness the Power of Ocean Waves - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Data Acquisition Modules - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Dr. Scott Barthelmy, Research Scientist, Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Laser Tracker Ensures Accurate Alignment of Ares I Components - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Dual Cryogenic Capacitive Density Sensor - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Advanced Technologies Will Help Hubble Yield More Remarkable Discoveries - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Dr. Gerard Holzmann, Senior Research Scientist at the Laboratory for Reliable Software, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- NASA Research Will Help Aircraft Avoid Ocean Storms and Turbulence - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- NASA Awards 2008 Software of the Year - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Here Come The Tricorders - Update - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- China's View on Space - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Milsat Coordination and Tracking Issues - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Trash Talking and End Runs at NASA HQ - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Ares 1-Y is Toast - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Beyond Augustine - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Analyzing LCROSS' Plume - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Live Event: NASA-Sponsored Power Beaming Challenge - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- JSC Wants To Build a Replicator - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- USA: Looking For Ways To Hang On - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Lunar Lander Challenge Prizes Awarded - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Senate Votes To Restore NASA Budget Cuts - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- New FAA Regs for Commercial Reentry - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- TEDxNASA: An Invitation-Only NASA Meeting - Unless You Are Lucky - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Close Call For Courtney Stadd - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Space: A Waste? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Making NASA Cool - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Engaging JSC’s Next Gen: A Leadership Analysis - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Dumpster Diving for Rockets - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- TEDx NASA - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Reflections On a Business Trip in Huntsville - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Staying the Course - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- The Economics of Space - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Ideas at Work - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Blah Blah Blah - Why We Should Care About Social Media - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Will White House Speak Soon About NASA? - December 12th, 2009 [December 12th, 2009]
- Software Aids Design of Ares V Composite Shroud Structure - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- ASDX Series of silicon pressure sensors - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Industry Update: Analysis & Simulation Software - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Battery Will Provide Backup Power for Space Shuttles - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- NASA Employee Claims To Have Witnessed Hijacking Planning - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Big Party in The Mojave Tonight - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Looking at Boulders on the Moon - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- SpaceBook Featured by White House - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- New Ways to Use Constellation Stuff - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- LaRC internal Poll Update - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Coalition for Space Exploration Does a (Much Needed) Reboot - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Lunar Orbiter: Comparing Old and New Images - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Boulder Trails On The Moon - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Vote for John Grunsfeld - National Geographic Adventurer of the YeAR - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Charlie Bolden at WIA/AIAA - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Live Webcast From The Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Big Aerospace Warns of Job Cut Impact - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- The Boulders of Copernicus - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- shame on us - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- 2009 Space Elevator Games - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Random Hacks of Kindness - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- TEDx NASA Tickets Available to the Public - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- It’s better in person - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Leading Amidst the Disruptive Innovation Storm - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Space: What’s NOT to Hope for? - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Government in the Digital Age - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- SpaceUp – A Space Unconference - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Starfleet Academy? - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Crowdsourcing NASA - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Bringing Home The Bacon - December 14th, 2009 [December 14th, 2009]
- Anti-Space Mom with Pro-Space Kids - December 14th, 2009 [December 14th, 2009]
- How Quickly We Forget - December 14th, 2009 [December 14th, 2009]
- WISE Launch A Success - December 14th, 2009 [December 14th, 2009]
- Dynetics Buys Orion Propulsion - December 15th, 2009 [December 15th, 2009]
- New NASA Governance Structure Under Development - December 16th, 2009 [December 16th, 2009]
- Bolden Meets With Obama on Wednesday - December 16th, 2009 [December 16th, 2009]
- MSFC Procurement Doesn't Understand what "Open Source" Means - December 16th, 2009 [December 16th, 2009]
- Bolden Meets With Obama - December 17th, 2009 [December 17th, 2009]
- Parker Griffith AT MSFC Today - December 18th, 2009 [December 18th, 2009]
- Why Your NASA Computer May Not Work Properly - December 18th, 2009 [December 18th, 2009]
- Lakes and Fog on Titan - December 18th, 2009 [December 18th, 2009]
- Waterworld Found - December 18th, 2009 [December 18th, 2009]
- Pandora Could Exist - December 18th, 2009 [December 18th, 2009]
- Laurie Leshin Is The New ESMD Deputy AA - December 18th, 2009 [December 18th, 2009]