These days, libertarianism tends to be quite discredited. It is now associated with the goofy candidature of Gary Johnson, having a rather narrow range of issueslegalize weed! less taxes!, cucking ones way to politics through sweeping all the embarrassing problems under the carpet, then surrendering to liberal virtue-signaling and endorsing anti-white diversity.
Now, everyone on the Alt-Right, manosphere und so wieser is laughing at those whose adhesion to a bunch of abstract premises leads to endorse globalist capital, and now that Trump officially heads the State, wed be better off if some private companies were nationalized than let to shadowy overlords.
To Americans, libertarianism has been a constant background presence. Its main icons, be them Ayn Rand, Murray Rothbard or Friedrich Hayek, were always read and discussed here and there, and never fell into oblivion although they barely had media attention. The academic and political standing of libertarianism may be marginal, it has always been granted small platforms and resurrected from time to time in the public landscape, one of the most conspicuous examples of it being the Tea Party demonstrations.
To a frog like yours trulyKek being now praised by thousands of well-meaning memers, I can embrace the frog moniker gladlylibertarianism does not have the same standing at all. In French universities, libertarian thinkers are barely discussed, even in classes that are supposed to tackle economics: for one hour spent talking about Hayek, Keynes easily enjoys ten, and the same goes on when comparing the attention given to, respectively, Adam Smith and Karl Marx.
On a wider perspective, a lot of the contemporary French identity is built on Jacobinism, i.e. on crushing underfoot organic regional sociability in the name of a bureaucratized and Masonic republic. The artificial construction of France is exactly the kind of endeavour libertarianism loathes. No matter why the public choices school, for example, is barely studied here: pompous leftist teachers and mediocre fonctionnaires are too busy gushing about themselves, sometimes hiding the emptiness of their life behind a ridiculous epic narrative that turns social achievements into heroic feats, to give a fair hearing to pertinent criticism.
When I found out about libertarianism, I was already sick of the dominant fifty shades of leftism political culture. The gloomy mediocrity of small bureaucrats, including most school teachers, combined with their petty political righteousness, always repelled me. Thus, the discovery oflaissez-faire advocates felt like stumbling on an entirely new scene of thoughtand my initial feeling was vindicated when I found about the naturalism often associated with it, something refreshing and intuitively more satisfying than the mainstream culture-obsessed, biology-denying view.
Libertarianism looked like it could solve everything. More entrepreneurship, more rights to those who actually create wealth and live through the good values of personal responsibility and work ethic, less parasitesbe they bureaucrats or immigrants, no more repressive speech laws. Coincidentally, a new translation of Ayn Rands Atlas Shrugged was published at this time: I devoured it, loving the sense of life, the heroism, the epic, the generally great and achieving ethos contained in it. Arent John Galt and Hank Rearden more appealing than any corrupt politician or beta bureaucrat that pretends to be altruistic while backstabbing his own colleagues and parasitizing the country?
Now, although I still support small-scale entrepreneurship wholeheartedly, I would never defend naked libertarianism, and here is why.
Part of the Rothschild family, where nepotism and consanguinity keep the money in
Unity makes strength, and trust is much easier to cultivate in a small group where everyone truly belongs than in an anonymous great society. Some ethnic groups, especially whites, tend to be instinctively individualistic, with a lot of people favouring personal liberty over belonging, while others, especially Jews, tend to favor extended family business and nepotism.
On a short-term basis, mobile individuals can do better than those who are bound to many social obligations. On the long run, however, extended families manage to create an environment of trust and concentrate capital. And whereas individuals may start cheating each other or scattering their wealth away, thanks to having no proper economic network, families and tribes will be able to invest heavily in some of their members and keep their wealth inside. This has been true for Jewish families, wherever their members work as moneylenders or diamond dealers, for Asians investing in new restaurants or any other business project of their own, and for North Africans taking over pubs and small shops in France.
The latter example is especially telling. White bartenders, butchers, grocers and the like have been chased off French suburbs by daily North African and black violence. No one helped them, everyone being afraid of getting harassed as well and busy with their own business. (Yep, just like what happened and still happens in Rotheram.) As a result, these isolated, unprotected shop-owners sold their outlet for a cheap price and fled. North Africans always covered each others violence and replied in groups against any hurdle, whereas whites lowered their heads and hoped not to be next on the list.
Atlas Shrugged was wrong. Loners get wrecked by groups. Packs of hyenas corner and eat the lone dog.
Libertarianism is not good for individuals on the long runit turns them into asocial weaklings, soon to be legally enslaved by global companies or beaten by groups, be they made of nepotistic family members or thugs.
How the middle classes end up after jobs have been sent overseas and wages lowered
People often believe, thanks to Leftist media and cuckservative posturing, that libertarians are big bosses. This is mostly, if not entirely, false. Most libertarians are middle class guys who want more opportunities, less taxation, and believe that libertarianism will help them to turn into successful entrepreneurs. They may be right in very specific circumstances: during the 2000s, small companies overturned the market of electronics, thus benefiting both to their independent founders and to society as a whole; but ultimately, they got bought by giants like Apple and Google, who are much better off when backed by a corrupt State than on a truly free market.
Libertarianism is a fake alternative, just as impossible to realize as communism: far from putting everyone at its place, it lets ample room to mafias, monopolies, unemployment caused by mechanization and global competition. If one wants the middle classes to survive, one must protect the employment and relative independence of its membersbankers and billionaires be damned.
Spontaneous order helped by a weak government. I hope they at least smoke weed.
A good feature of libertarianism is that it usually goes along with a positive stance on biology and human nature, in contrast with the everything is cultural and ought to be deconstructed left. However, this stance often leads to an exaggerated optimism about human nature. In a society of laissez-faire, the libertarians say, people flourish and the order appears spontaneously.
Well, this is plainly false. As all of the great religions say, after what Christians call the Fall, man is a sinner. If you let children flourish without moral standards and role models, they become spoiled, entitled, manipulative, emotionally fragile and deprived of self-control. If you let women flourish without suspicion, you let free rein to their propensities to hypergamy, hysteria, self-entitlement and everything we can witness in them today. If you let men do as they please, you let them become greedy, envious, and turning into bullies. As a Muslim proverb says, people must be flogged to enter into paradiseand as Aristotle put forth, virtues are trained dispositions, no matter the magnitude of innate talents and propensities.
Michelle The Man Obama and Lying Crooked at a Democrat meeting
When the laissez-faire rules, some will succeed on the market more than others, due to differences in investment, work, and natural abilities. Some will succeed enough to be able to buy someone elses business: this is the natural consequence of differences in wealth and of greed. When corrupt politicians enter the game, things become worse, as they will usually help some large business owners to shield their position against competitorsat the expense of most people, who then lose their independence and live off a wage.
At the end, what we get is a handful of very wealthy individuals who have managed to concentrate most capital and power levers into their hands and a big crowd of low-wage employees ready to cut each others throat for a small promotion, and females waiting in line to get notched by the one per cent while finding the other ninety-nine per cent boring.
Censorship by massive social pressure, monopoly over the institutions and crybullying is perfectly legal. What could go wrong?
On the surface, libertarianism looks good here, because it protects the individuals rights against left-hailing Statism and cuts off the welfare programs that have attracted dozens of millions of immigrants. Beneath, however, things are quite dire. Libertarianism enshrines the leftists right to free speech they abuse from, allows the pressure tactics used by radicals, and lets freethinking individuals getting singled out by SJWs as long as these do not resort to overt stealing or overt physical violence. As for the immigrants, libertarianism tends to oppose the very notion of non-private boundaries, thus letting the local cultures and identities defenseless against both greedy capitalists and subproletarian masses.
Supporting an ideology that allows the leftists to destroy society more or less legally equates to cucking, plain and simple. Desiring an ephemeral cohabitation with rabid ideological warriors is stupid. We should aim at a lasting victory, not at pretending to constrain them through useless means.
Am I the only one to find that Gary Johnson looks like a snail (Spongebob notwithstanding)?
In 2013, one of the rare French libertarians academic teachers, Jean-Louis Caccomo, was forced into a mental ward at the request of his university president. He then spent more than a year getting drugged. Mr. Caccomo had no real psychological problem: his confinement was part of a vicious strategy of pathologization and career-destruction that was already used by the Soviets. French libertarians could have wide denounced the abuse. Nonetheless, most of them freaked out, and almost no one dared to actually defend him publicly.
Why should rational egoists team up and risk their careers to defend one of themselves after all? They would rather posture at confidential social events, rail at organic solidarity and protectionism, or trolling the shit out of individuals of their own social milieu because Ive got the right to mock X, its my right to free speech! The few libertarian people I knew firsthand, the few events I have witnessed in that small milieu, were enough to give me serious doubts about libertarianism: how can a good political ideology breed such an unhealthy mindset?
Political ideologies are tools. They are not ends in themselves. All forms of government arent fit for any people or any era. Political actors must know at least the most important ones to get some inspiration, but ultimately, said actors win on the ground, not in philosophical debates.
Individualism, mindless consumerism, careerism, hedonism are part of the problem. Individual rights granted regardless of ones abilities, situation, and identity are a disaster. Time has come to overcome modernity, not stall in one of its false alternatives. The merchant caste must be regulated, though neither micromanaged or hampered by a parasitic bureaucracy nor denied its members right for small-scale independence. Individual rights must be conditional, boundaries must be restored, minority identities based on anti-white male resentment must be crushed so they cannot devour sociability from the inside again, and the pater familias must assert himself anew.
Long live the State and protectionism as long as they defend the backbone of society and healthy relationships between the sexes, and no quarter for those who think they have a right to wage grievance-mongering against us, no matter if they want to use the State or private companies. At the end, the socialism-libertarianism dichotomy is quite secondary.
Read Next: Sugar Baby Culture In The US Is Creating A Marketplace for Prostitution
Continue reading here:
- History of nanotechnology - Wikipedia - September 19th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - September 19th, 2018
- Nano - September 8th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - September 3rd, 2018
- Nano - August 29th, 2018
- Molecular nanotechnology - Wikipedia - August 29th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - August 20th, 2018
- Grey goo - Wikipedia - August 2nd, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - July 30th, 2018
- Nanotechnology : Dallas County Community College District - July 30th, 2018
- What is Nanotechnology? | Nano - July 27th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - July 27th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Simple English Wikipedia, the free ... - July 27th, 2018
- Alphabet Will Bring Its Balloon-Powered Internet to Kenya - July 24th, 2018
- 3 Reasons Why We Might Return to The Moon - July 24th, 2018
- This New Startup Is Making Chatbots Dumber So You Can Actually Talk to Them - July 24th, 2018
- Most Of NASA’s Moon Rocks Remain Untouched By Scientists - July 24th, 2018
- AI-Generated Video Games Are Limitless, And Endlessly Entertaining - July 24th, 2018
- This Wearable Controller Lets You Pilot a Drone With Your Body - July 24th, 2018
- Google and The UN Team Up To Study The Effects of Climate Change - July 24th, 2018
- This Week in Science: July 14 – July 20, 2018 - July 24th, 2018
- China Is Investing In Its Own Hyperloop To Clear Its Crowded Highways - July 24th, 2018
- This Week in Tech: July 14 – July 20, 2018 - July 24th, 2018
- The BlackFly Flying Car is Making the Future of Flight Personal - July 24th, 2018
- U.S. Department of Defense Established A Center To Better Integrate AI - July 24th, 2018
- Federal Agencies Propose Major Changes to Endangered Species Act - July 24th, 2018
- Malta Plans to Create the World’s First Decentralized Stock Exchange - July 24th, 2018
- WhatsApp Updates Controls in India in an Effort to Thwart Mob Violence - July 24th, 2018
- Leaders Who Pledged Not To Build Autonomous Killing Machines Are Ignoring The Real Problem - July 24th, 2018
- MIT Researchers Create an Aerosol Spray Loaded With Nanobots - July 24th, 2018
- Tesla Is Reportedly Asking Suppliers to Refund Payments so It Can Appear Profitable - July 24th, 2018
- History of nanotechnology - Wikipedia - July 2nd, 2018
- Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology - July 2nd, 2018
- Grey goo - Wikipedia - July 2nd, 2018
- Libertarianism - Wikipedia - June 30th, 2018
- Can Libertarianism Be a Governing Philosophy? - June 30th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - June 26th, 2018
- What is Nanotechnology? | Nano - June 26th, 2018
- Nanotechnology | Britannica.com - June 26th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - June 23rd, 2018
- History of nanotechnology - Wikipedia - June 23rd, 2018
- Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology - June 23rd, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - June 21st, 2018
- Geography Quizzes For Australia - Fun Map Games - June 14th, 2018
- JAS Oceania - JAS Home - June 14th, 2018
- Nineteen Eighty-Four - Wikipedia - June 14th, 2018
- War on drugs - Wikipedia - June 11th, 2018
- Homepage - The War On Drugs - June 11th, 2018
- Philippines War on Drugs | Human Rights Watch - June 11th, 2018
- The War on Drugs (band) - Wikipedia - June 11th, 2018
- A Brief History of the Drug War | Drug Policy Alliance - June 11th, 2018
- War on Drugs | United States history | Britannica.com - June 11th, 2018
- Molecular nanotechnology - Wikipedia - May 30th, 2018
- Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology - May 30th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Wikipedia - May 13th, 2018
- Molecular nanotechnology - Wikipedia - May 13th, 2018
- What is Nanotechnology? Webopedia Definition - May 12th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - Chemistry (B.S.) | www.bloomu.edu - May 12th, 2018
- Nanotechnology meetings 2018 | Nanotechnology conferences ... - May 12th, 2018
- nanotechnology | Ancient Origins - May 12th, 2018
- NanoTech Institute - The University of Texas at Dallas - May 12th, 2018
- Nanotechnology, Science and Applications - Dove Press - May 12th, 2018
- Nanomaterials & Molecular Nanotechnology - High Impact ... - May 12th, 2018
- Nanotechnology | National Institute of Food and Agriculture - May 12th, 2018
- Nanotechnology - dummies - May 12th, 2018
- Nanotechnology | ETC Group - May 12th, 2018
- What is Nanotechnology? Biology for Kids | Mocomi - May 12th, 2018
- Nanotech - Home - May 12th, 2018
- Hedonism - Wikipedia - May 11th, 2018
- Hedonism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - May 11th, 2018
- hedonism | Philosophy & Definition | Britannica.com - May 11th, 2018
- Clothing Optional Resorts, Negril, Jamaica | Hedonism II - May 11th, 2018
- Home Hedonism Wines - May 11th, 2018
- Nanotechnology meetings 2018 | Nanotechnology conferences ... - May 5th, 2018
- Home Bathtub Refinishing Orlando - Nanotechnology - May 5th, 2018
- Future Nanotechnology - April 24th, 2018
- Nano - April 16th, 2018
- Nanotechnology meetings 2018 | Nanotechnology conferences ... - April 16th, 2018
- Nano - April 15th, 2018
- Nanotechnology meetings 2018 | Nanotechnology conferences ... - April 15th, 2018