Access to Primary Heath Care: Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders (2013) – Video

Access to Primary Heath Care: Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders (2013)
The inauguration of Ronald Reagan as president in 1981, ushered in an eight-year period of conservative leadership in the us government. Under his leadersh….. public intervention using…

By: tareac harkaloza

View original post here:

Access to Primary Heath Care: Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders (2013) – Video

In Early White House Maneuvering, Paul Avoids Predictability

Rand Paul wasn’t a conventional Republican when he won a U.S. Senate seat in Kentucky, and he’s not mapping out a predictable strategy as he ponders a 2016 bid for the White House.

Paul confirmed Friday that he will announce his intentions in April or May, and then he spent the day displaying an ideological and political balancing act.

“We have to be a bigger party,” he told Alabama Republicans at a fundraising gala Friday evening. “I want to take that message across America. I’ve shown I’ll go anywhere.”

He takes with him the small-government libertarianism of his father, former congressman and failed presidential candidate Ron Paul. But the senator also mixes in frequent references to his “Christian faith” as he courts cultural conservatives who were wary of his father.

There’s the usual blistering of President Barack Obama and his executive orders, but Paul reminds his partisan audiences that the expansion of presidential authority has spanned decades, through administrations of both major parties.

Paul calls for the conservative “boldness” of Ronald Reagan and offers GOP orthodoxy on tax and spending cuts, making him a tea party darling.

He talks tough on national defense, but also staged an actual Senate filibuster talking for hours on the chamber floor, rather than just using procedural paper delays to protest the American government’s use of drones.

Meanwhile, he chides Republicans to reach into the cities for non-white votes that have eluded the GOP by particularly wide margins in Obama’s two national victories. And Paul champions criminal-justice reform and plugs his work with New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, a black Democrat, on the issue.

It adds up to a politician who is difficult to put into a box.

“Maybe a different kind of Republican might be the kind of Republican that can win,” Paul told reporters Friday in Kentucky.

Read the original post:

In Early White House Maneuvering, Paul Avoids Predictability

High surf expected at San Diego beaches

LA MESA (CNS) – A fundraiser was scheduled to be held Sunday for a 33-year-old Heartland Fire & Rescue firefighter who was born with a heart condition and is now awaiting a heart transplant at a Los Angeles hospital.

Deputy Fire Marshal Adam Beardsley was diagnosed with blood clots in his lungs in September. Following months of treatment, his doctors discovered that his heart had significantly weakened and he was in need of a heart transplant, according to a Gofundme page started by his sister, Katie.

Beardsley was admitted to Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center last month and is waiting for a donor heart to become available. His wife of five years, Megan, continues to work in San Diego and visits him in Los Angeles, as do his sister and parents.

A fundraiser scheduled for 1 p.m. at Bolt Brewery, 8179 Center St. in La Mesa was created to offset some of the unexpected expenses the family was taking on, such as often commuting to Los Angeles and renting an apartment close to the hospital, according to the fundraising page.

His recovery is also expected to be costly because he will have to spend two weeks in the hospital post surgery, and another three months of recovery in Los Angeles.

Monetary donations can also be made at

In addition to raising money, Beardsley’s family was also working to raise awareness of the importance of organ donation. Those who wish to become organ donors may do so at

Follow this link:

High surf expected at San Diego beaches

Rand Paul's libertarian foreign policy has GOP rivals comparing him to Obama

When Republicans still gleeful over their November election wins accused President Obama of waging an unauthorized war against the Islamic State, Sen. Rand Paul marched to a different beat and introduced legislation to give congressional consent to the latest front in the war on terrorism.

When Mr. Obama surprised the world over the holidays by warming relations with the Castro regime, most Republicans howled about communist appeasement. But Mr. Paul declared that he supported normalizing relations with Cuba.

When the Democratic president gave a defiant State of the Union address last week filled with veto threats and unilateral policy actions, Republican congressional leaders accused Mr. Obama of conducting an imperial presidency. But Mr. Paul said he wanted to find ways to work with Mr. Obama.

PHOTOS: Top earning dead celebrities

And when Mr. Paul found himself on a California stage a few days ago with several Republican presidential rivals advocating for additional sanctions on Iran, the Kentucky Republican argued against slamming Tehran to the ground and for giving the president more time to persuade Iran to put the brakes on its nuclear enrichment program in return for relief from sanctions that have crippled its economy.

I think diplomacy is better than war, and we should give diplomacy a chance, the senator declared.

To Mr. Paul, son of former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas and a favorite of the Republican Partys libertarian and anti-war factions, his positions seemed perfectly consistent with his view that political conflict and military intervention too often have been first solutions when they should be last resorts.

SEE ALSO: Rand Paul reintroduces fathers Audit the Fed legislation

His rivals for the presidential nomination see things differently and say Mr. Paul sounds like an Obama apologist.

I am a little cautious, I would say, perhaps skeptical about negotiating with someone who has openly said he wants to force all of us to either be like him or die, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida said of Irans supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, snapping back at Mr. Pauls position Sunday at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.

Visit link:

Rand Paul's libertarian foreign policy has GOP rivals comparing him to Obama

New medical marijuana bill revives hope for sick Floridians

Disappointed by the failure of last years medical marijuana amendment?

Well, it looks like were getting another and more secure chance, thanks to legislation filed Monday that would legalize medical marijuana for patients with certain conditions.

Last November we saw voters approval of medical marijuana in Florida; 57 percent voted in favor of the amendment. But thanks to another amendment to the state constitution approved in 2006, amendments must garner 60 percent of the vote in order to pass. As would only happen in Florida, that amendment passed with a yes from 57 percent of voters. Ironically, that particular majority rubber stamped an amendment ensuring any subsequent majorities of that size would be invalid.

Which is why, with a clear electoral majority, we are still without medical marijuana in Florida.

While we cant rectify our re-election of a man who was able to slither his way out of the largest fraud settlement in history only by invoking the Fifth Amendment 75 times we may have another shot at legal medical marijuana.

Our great green hope, in this case, comes in the form of St. Petersburg Sen. Jeff Brandes.

Interestingly, Brandes belongs to the Republican Party the party that so enthusiastically venerates Ronald Reagan, whose crusade against weed still earns him the ire of activists and stoners everywhere.

Maybe its because the times are changing; maybe its because of the broad support medical marijuana has in Florida. Maybe people saw the 23 states that allow medical marijuana havent yet descended into hellfire and ruin. Or perhaps it has something to do with cannabis proven ability to help the sick.

In fact, there already is a law on the books in Florida which recognizes this fact. Last year, a specific strain of marijuana, Charlottes Web, was legalized to treat seizures. The strain is famous in medical marijuana circles. Web has a potent amount of CBD, one of the two compounds in marijuana, but lacks THC. CBD produces calming, antipsychotic effects while THC is associated with the high. Charlottes Web actually used to be called Hippies Disappointment, before it was successfully used to treat a severely epileptic girl named Charlotte.

Unfortunately, this law hasnt cut the mustard. Its been so tied down by bureaucracy and challenges that the people who need Charlottes Web still arent able to get it. Brandes bill would cut through the obstacles, and provide marijuana to patients with other diseases.

Continue reading here:

New medical marijuana bill revives hope for sick Floridians

We Were Promised Space Lasers: The State of the Union's Biggest Fibs

This Tuesday, Jan. 20, President Barack Obama will honor an American tradition as old as George Washington: the State of the Union. The constitutionally ordained address to each new session of Congress has been a presidential ritual since 1790. Its a chance to check in on the present and make some pledges for our future.

Its that future bit that got us thinking: If all that talk had come true, even the crazy, far-out pledgesespecially the crazy, far-out pledgeswhat would our world look like today? Not political promises and posturing for lower taxes or immigration reform, but lifestyle manna such as supersonic jets and paralysis-curing implants.

So we read through 35 years of State of the Union addresses, from Obama back to Ronald Reagan, and found an interesting mix of science and science fiction with varying likelihoods of the prognostications ever becoming reality. Obama may have missed his goal of having 1 million electric cars on the road by 2015 (by 725,000 cars), but its bound to happen one day. Meanwhile, Reagans nuclear shield (popularly known as the Star Wars program) is a remnant of a time tormented by the Cold War. As for Clintons child-safe smart guns well, whos to tell?

Together, these visions offer a uniquely American version of Utopia. One wed be perfectly happy driving our Wi-Fi-enabled, 3D-printed, hydrogen-fueled car aroundbut maybe only for a day or two.

The Pledge: In 2013, Obama referred to a once-shuttered warehouse in the Rust Belt that became a state-of-the-art lab where new workers are mastering 3D printing and proposed replicating its success around the country.

The Reality? As Obama said, it has already happened in Youngstown, Ohio, thanks to his Manufacturing Innovation Institutes. But the likelihood of reviving former industrial towns with 3D printing hubs seems counterintuitive to the very idea of 3D printing, not to mention the fact that 3D printing is still pricier than the old-fashioned assembly line for most manufacturers.

The Pledge:In 2013, Obama also heralded the work of scientists who are developing drugs to regenerate damaged organs and urged Congress to keep making those investments.

The Reality? Things are looking good. Scientists have made great advances in regenerating organs using stem cells (doctors grew trachea way back in 2008). And ever since Obama removed some barriers for using stem cells in research, scientists have been steaming ahead.

The Pledge: In 2000, President Bill Clinton asked gun companies to invest in smart guns to keep weapons out of the hands of children, as well as other steps to keep guns out of the wrong hands.

The Reality? Despite the 15 years that have passed since Clintons call to action, its still a dreamone pretty much destined to fail, thanks both to the National Rifle Association and to lack of consumer interest. (We do have fingerprint-enabled gun casesand GPS locators that track when a gun is drawn and shot. Baby steps.)

Go here to see the original:

We Were Promised Space Lasers: The State of the Union's Biggest Fibs

Medical intern, resident hour reduction shows little change in care – new data


Getting a medical residency at the UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center is a challenge, but has been a dream come true for doctor-in-training Dr. Mark Duncan.

“It’s obviously a lot of work, but I think the medical school prepared me well,” he said.

Residents and interns are an important part of the medical team at U.S. hospitals. For decades, it wouldn’t be unusual to work 30 hours in a row or more.

“The initial concerns were mainly over whether or not these long shifts were causing poorer outcomes or medical errors in the hospital,” said Dr. Mitesh Patel of the University of Pennsylvania.

The medical profession has been trying to do a number of things to try to improve patient care and patient safety. The most significant was to try to regulate intern and resident hours. So in 2011, the rules changed. Instead of working 30 consecutive hours, residents can now work a maximum of 28, and interns can work 16.

“In the first year after the reforms there was no positive or negative association with the duty hour reforms and changes in patient death or readmissions to the hospital,” said Patel.

Patel and fellow University of Pennsylvania Dr. Kevin Yolpp evaluated whether this cut in hours affected death or readmission rates for almost 3 million hospitalized Medicare patients.

The hope was that it would improve quality of care, but the new data shows it hasn’t made much of a difference.

“While they may be important in terms of having better rested interns and residents may not directly lead to significant improvements in patients outcomes,” said Volpp.

Read the original here:

Medical intern, resident hour reduction shows little change in care – new data

Rand Paul and Berkeley: libertarian and leftwing hotbed find common cause

The rightwing firebrand's outspoken criticism of NSA surveillance has struck a chord with a young liberal audience Ronald Reagan famously described the University of California at Berkeley as "a haven for communist sympathisers". Another rightwing politician who styles himself as Reagan's intellectual successor will stand at a lectern this week at the Bay Area campus to decry the excesses of …

Go here to read the rest:

Rand Paul and Berkeley: libertarian and leftwing hotbed find common cause

Jindal gives speech on defending religious liberty


Gov. Bobby Jindal delivered a speech Thursday evening at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Library where he expressed his belief in the importance of defending religious liberty.

Jindal outlined the attacks on religious liberty, including from Obama’s administration, and he offered solutions to fight against these efforts. Below are his remarks in their entirety.

Speech provided by the office of Gov. Bobby Jindal:

Thank youit’s an honor to speak hereI’ve been looking forward to this night.

I have spoken out aggressively in recent months about the disastrous effects of Obamacare, about our dire need to reform American education, and about the urgency for our country to re-endorse the concept of growing our economy that President Reagan so uniquely championed. These are issues of great importance, essential for the future of America.

But tonight, I’m going to talk to you about an entirely different topic, and that topic may surprise you. Tonight I want to give a speech I’ve never given before, about an issue lurking just beneath the surface that issue is The Silent War on Religious Liberty.

I can think of no better place to give this speech than the Ronald Reagan Foundation and Library. President Reagan himself said that, “Freedom is not the sole prerogative of a chosen few, but the universal right of all God’s children.”

When he said this, he was not expressing a strictly personal belief in the nature of man as a created being as a child of God. He was reaffirming the most basic contention of the American Founding, set forth in the Declaration of Independence, that we are a nation constituted in accordance with the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” and that we are a people “endowed by [our] Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”

Let me make this explicit: the source and justification for the very existence of the United States of America is and always has been contingent upon the understanding of man as a created being, with a Creator conferring his intrinsic rights “among [them] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Original post:

Jindal gives speech on defending religious liberty

DARPA Tried to Build Skynet in the 1980s


From 1983 to 1993 DARPA spent over $1 billion on a program called the Strategic Computing Initiative. The agency’s goal was to push the boundaries of computers, artificial intelligence, and robotics to build something that, in hindsight, looks strikingly similar to the dystopian future of the Terminator movies. They wanted to build Skynet.

Much like Ronald Reagan’s Star Wars program, the idea behind Strategic Computing proved too futuristic for its time. But with the stunning advancements we’re witnessing today in military AI and autonomous robots, it’s worth revisiting this nearly forgotten program, and asking ourselves if we’re ready for a world of hyperconnected killing machines. And perhaps a more futile question: Even if we wanted to stop it, is it too late?


If the new generation technology evolves as we now expect, there will be unique new opportunities for military applications of computing. For example, instead of fielding simple guided missiles or remotely piloted vehicles, we might launch completely autonomous land, sea, and air vehicles capable of complex, far-ranging reconnaissance and attack missions. The possibilities are quite startling, and suggest that new generation computing could fundamentally change the nature of future conflicts.

That’s from a little-known document presented to Congress in October of 1983 outlining the mission of the new Strategic Computing Initiative (SCI). And like nearly everything DARPA has done before and since, it’s unapologetically ambitious.

The vision for SCI was wrapped up in a completely new system spearheaded by Robert Kahn, then director of Information Processing Techniques Office (IPTO) at DARPA. As it’s explained in the 2002 book Strategic Computing, Kahn wasn’t the first to imagine such a system, but “he was the first to articulate a vision of what SC might be. He launched the project and shaped its early years. SC went on to have a life of its own, run by other people, but it never lost the imprint of Kahn.”

The system was supposed to create a world where autonomous vehicles not only provide intelligence on any enemy worldwide, but could strike with deadly precision from land, sea, and air. It was to be a global network that connected every aspect of the U.S. military’s technological capabilitiescapabilities that depended on new, impossibly fast computers.

But the network wasn’t supposed to process information in a cold, matter-of-fact way. No, this new system was supposed to see, hear, act, and react. Most importantly, it was supposed to understand, all without human prompting.


Continue reading here:

DARPA Tried to Build Skynet in the 1980s

Poll: Republicans go libertarian

A new poll confirms a libertarian renaissance in 2013.

FreedomWorks commissioned a national survey of registered voters last month, shared first with POLITICO, that finds 78 percent of Republicans and GOP-leaning independents self-identify as fiscally conservative and socially moderate.

Its not that Republicans are suddenly self-identifying as libertarians and devouring Ayn Rand novels, but more that they seem to be embracing underlying libertarian priorities and views about the role of government.

(PHOTOS: Libertarianism goes mainstream)

The GOP dominated politics for a generation with a coalition of libertarians, social conservatives and defense hawks that Ronald Reagan successfully cobbled together in 1980. The tea party-affiliated FreedomWorks argues in a 23-page report that the so-called three-legged stool has become lopsided.

The poll asked Republican voters what they are most interested in: 40 percent said individual freedom through lower taxes and reducing the size and scope of government, 27 percent picked traditional values and 18 percent chose a strong national defense.

Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway, who ran the poll, said shes seeing a spike in voters who feel the government is too expensive, invasive and expansive.

The perfect storm is being created between the NSA, the IRS, the implementation of Obamacare and now Syria, she said. People are looking at the government more suspiciously. Theyre looking with deeper scrutiny and reasonable suspicion.

(Also on POLITICO: Libertarianism goes mainstream)

FreedomWorks, which is among the groups leading the controversial push to defund the federal health care law even if it risks a government shutdown, argues that GOP voters have limited appetite for grand bargains that would raise taxes. Two-thirds of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents said they want their member of Congress to keep their promises and stick to principles as opposed to compromise in a bipartisan way to get things done.

The rest is here:

Poll: Republicans go libertarian

Liberal group outlines $385B in Medicare cuts

WASHINGTON (AP) Hoping to head off wider health care cuts in upcoming budget talks, a think tank close to the White House is unveiling a plan for how to save $385 billion, mostly from Medicare.

Medicaid and the new health care law are largely spared from cuts in the blueprint being released Wednesday by the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress. Instead, it targets Medicare service providers, from the pharmaceutical industry to hospitals and nursing homes. And higher-income Medicare recipients would face increased monthly premiums for outpatient and prescription coverage.

After taxes, health care costs are probably the thorniest issue facing policymakers looking for a way to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff, an economically toxic combination of tax increases and spending cuts looming Jan. 1 if compromise fails.

Rising health care costs are the most stubborn element of the nation’s long-term budget woes. At the same time, a recent report for the government estimated that the U.S. health care system squanders $750 billion a year, about 30 cents of every medical dollar.

The center’s proposal is notable because it comes from an organization that serves as a kind of idea factory for President Barack Obama’s administration, akin to the conservative Heritage Foundation during Ronald Reagan’s presidency. The plan calls on Obama to draw the line against broader cuts and premium increases in budget talks with Republicans.

“This isn’t a floor. This is a ceiling,” said Neera Tanden, president of the center and formerly a senior White House official who worked on Obama’s health overhaul. “The idea was to provide ideas in the debate that would not punish the middle class and low-income seniors.”

Congressional Republicans call the approach wishful thinking. They argue that all health care programs, including Medicaid for the poor and Obama’s law covering the uninsured, must be on the table. They say any plan that walls off big portions of government health care spending is simply not credible.

Tanden suggests Republicans recheck the election results. Voters, she said, knew that Republican Mitt Romney wanted to repeal the health care law, privatize Medicare and give Medicaid over to the states and they chose Obama. “This election was not a coin toss,” she said. “We did not come out equal.”

The center’s plan rejects raising the Medicare eligibility age to 67, a concession that Obama quietly offered up in failed budget negotiations last year. Instead it focuses on squeezing Medicare service providers, a strategy the plan’s authors say will make the entire health care system more efficient without risking quality.

Drugmakers would take the biggest hit, accounting for $160 billion, or about 40 percent of the proposed 10-year savings. Nearly all of that would come from requiring pharmaceutical companies to pay rebates on drugs provided to low-income Medicare beneficiaries.

Read the original post:

Liberal group outlines $385B in Medicare cuts

Opening Plenary: Governance, Security, Economy, and the Ecosystem of the Changing Arctic – Video

31-05-2012 08:24 American Geophysical Union presents: Science Policy Conference Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center Washington, DC Tuesday, 1 May 2012 8:15 – 8:30 am: Welcome Ballroom B Opening Remarks: Michael McPhaden, President, American Geophysical Union Opening Remarks and Moderator: Vera Alexander, President, Arctic Research Consortium of the US Panelists: Fran Ulmer, Chair, US Arctic Research Commission Alan Thornhill, Chief Environmental Officer, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, US Department of Interior Rapidly changing Arctic conditions require constant evaluation of economic, social, and security considerations for the most northern portion of the United States. Our speakers will address the risks and rewards related to the evolving energy landscape of the region and the many inherent social considerations related to energy development in the Arctic landscape, including lessons learned from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Go here to read the rest:

Opening Plenary: Governance, Security, Economy, and the Ecosystem of the Changing Arctic – Video