We tend to think of freedom as an emancipatory idealand with good reason. Throughout history, the desire to be free inspired countless marginalized groups to challenge the rule of political and economic elites. Liberty was the watchword of the Atlantic revolutionaries who, at the end of the 18th century, toppled autocratic kings, arrogant elites and (in Haiti) slaveholders, thus putting an end to the Old Regime. In the 19th and 20th centuries, Black civil rights activists and feminists fought for the expansion of democracy in the name of freedom, while populists and progressives struggled to put an end to the economic domination of workers.
While these groups had different objectives and ambitions, sometimes putting them at odds with one another, they all agreed that their main goalfreedomrequired enhancing the peoples voice in government. When the late Rep. John Lewis called on Americans to let freedom ring, he was drawing on this tradition.
But there is another side to the story of freedom as well. Over the past 250 years, the cry for liberty has also been used by conservatives to defend elite interests. In their view, true freedom is not about collective control over government; it consists in the private enjoyment of ones life and goods. From this perspective, preserving freedom has little to do with making government accountable to the people. Democratically elected majorities, conservatives point out, pose just as much, or even more of a threat to personal security and individual rightespecially the right to propertyas rapacious kings or greedy elites. This means that freedom can best be preserved by institutions that curb the power of those majorities, or simply by shrinking the sphere of government as much as possible.
This particular way of thinking about freedom was pioneered in the late 18th century by the defenders of the Old Regime. From the 1770s onward, as revolutionaries on both sides of the Atlantic rebelled in the name of liberty, a flood of pamphlets, treatises and newspaper articles appeared with titles such as Some Observations On Liberty, Civil Liberty Asserted or On the Liberty of the Citizen. Their authors vehemently denied that the Atlantic Revolutions would bring greater freedom. As, for instance, the Scottish philosopher Adam Fergusona staunch opponent of the American Revolutionexplained, liberty consisted in the security of our rights. And from that perspective, the American colonists already were free, even though they lacked control over the way in which they were governed. As British subjects, they enjoyed more security than was ever before enjoyed by any people. This meant that the colonists liberty was best preserved by maintaining the status quo; their attempts to govern themselves could only end in anarchy and mob rule.
Get your history fix in one place: sign up for the weekly TIME History newsletter
In the course of the 19th century this view became widespread among European elites, who continued to vehemently oppose the advent of democracy. Benjamin Constant, one of Europes most celebrated political thinkers, rejected the example of the French revolutionaries, arguing that they had confused liberty with participation in collective power. Instead, freedom-lovers should look to the British constitution, where hierarchies were firmly entrenched. Here, Constant claimed, freedom, understood as peaceful enjoyment and private independence, was perfectly secureeven though less than five percent of British adults could vote. The Hungarian politician Jzseph Etvs, among many others, agreed. Writing in the wake of the brutally suppressed revolutions that rose against several European monarchies in 1848, he complained that the insurgents, battling for manhood suffrage, had confused liberty with the principle of the peoples supremacy. But such confusion could only lead to democratic despotism. True libertydefined by Etvs as respect for well-earned rightscould best be achieved by limiting state power as much as possible, not by democratization.
In the U.S., conservatives were likewise eager to claim that they, and they alone, were the true defenders of freedom. In the 1790s, some of the more extreme Federalists tried to counter the democratic gains of the preceding decade in the name of liberty. In the view of the staunch Federalist Noah Webster, for instance, it was a mistake to think that to obtain liberty, and establish a free government, nothing was necessary but to get rid of kings, nobles, and priests. To preserve true freedomwhich Webster defined as the peaceful enjoyment of ones life and propertypopular power instead needed to be curbed, preferably by reserving the Senate for the wealthy. Yet such views were slower to gain traction in the United States than in Europe. To Websters dismay, overall, his contemporaries believed that freedom could best be preserved by extending democracy rather than by restricting popular control over government.
But by the end of the 19th century, conservative attempts to reclaim the concept of freedom did catch on. The abolition of slavery, rapid industrialization and mass migration from Europe expanded the agricultural and industrial working classes exponentially, as well as giving them greater political agency. This fueled increasing anxiety about popular government among American elites, who now began to claim that mass democracy posed a major threat to liberty, notably the right to property. Francis Parkman, scion of a powerful Boston family, was just one of a growing number of statesmen who raised doubts about the wisdom of universal suffrage, as the masses of the nation want equality more than they want liberty.
William Graham Sumner, an influential Yale professor, likewise spoke for many when he warned of the advent of a new, democratic kind of despotisma danger that could best be avoided by restricting the sphere of government as much as possible. Laissez faire, or, in blunt English, mind your own business, Sumner concluded, was the doctrine of liberty.
Being alert to this history can help us to understand why, today, people can use the same wordfreedomto mean two very different things. When conservative politicians like Rand Paul and advocacy groups FreedomWorks or the Federalist Society talk about their love of liberty, they usually mean something very different from civil rights activists like John Lewisand from the revolutionaries, abolitionists and feminists in whose footsteps Lewis walked. Instead, they are channeling 19th century conservatives like Francis Parkman and William Graham Sumner, who believed that freedom is about protecting property rightsif need be, by obstructing democracy. Hundreds of years later, those two competing views of freedom remain largely unreconcilable.
Annelien de Dijn is the author of Freedom: An Unruly History, available now from Harvard University Press.
For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.
Contact us at editors@time.com.
Here is the original post:
- if democracy and freedom got in the way of making money in the USA would they be eradicated? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 1984 by George Orwell? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Propaganda in 1984 by George Orwell? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- If America supports freedom and democracy, why have we done the following? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Another fine example of Bush supporting freedom and democracy? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Do you think that people have the right to the freedom of thought without influence anymore? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Forrest Gump - Need a thesis relating to freedom and democracy? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 1984 by George Orwell’s statement? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- How do you spread freedom and democracy without being in contradiction with the terms? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- What’s the difference between democracy and freedom? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 3. The American Solution - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 4. Relating to Images - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 5. Representing Images - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 6. Exploring Images - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 7. Understanding Images - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 8. Acting Upon Images - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 9. The Paradigm Shift to Generativity - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 1. Totalitarianism and Variability - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 2. Freedom and Changeability - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 3. The Freedom Culture - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- New Web Special: China and 60 Years of Communist Party Rule - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Cuban Regime Intensifies Opposition Crackdown with Sham Trial - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Postponing Dalai Lama Meeting Sends Wrong Message - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Freedom House Sends High-Level Delegation to Egypt - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Detained Syrian Opposition Figure Must Be Immediately Released - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Activist's Upheld Conviction a Troubling Sign for Justice in Kazakhstan - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Tunisia's Electoral Process Severely Damaged by Pre-Election Rights Violations - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Lifting of EU Arms Embargo on Uzbekistan Sends Wrong Message on Human Rights - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Pakistan Assembly Urged to Reject Restrictive Amendments to Press Law - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Freedom House Launches Web Feature on Fall of Berlin Wall - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Resolutions on Defamation of Religions Do Not Belong at United Nations, Organizations Say - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Bloggers' Jailing Threatens New Media's Emergence in Azerbaijan - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Support Chinese Human Rights Activists, Freedom House Tells Obama on Eve of Visit - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- UN Should Pass Resolution Condemning Iran Human Rights Abuses - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Congress Urged to Lift Ban on U.S. Travel to Cuba - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Filipino Massacre Reflects Climate of Impunity - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Switzerland Vote Disappointing Blow to Religious Freedom - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Freedom House Launches Campaign to Defend Freedom of Expression - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Poll Shows Zimbabweans Want Elections and Democratic Constitution - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Clinton Speech Signals Greater Emphasis on Human Rights in U.S. Policy - December 16th, 2009 [December 16th, 2009]
- The Prosperity Problem - January 5th, 2010 [January 5th, 2010]
- Freedom in the World 2010: Global Erosion of Freedom - January 12th, 2010 [January 12th, 2010]
- Freedom House Congratulates Memorial on Human Rights Award - January 13th, 2010 [January 13th, 2010]
- Recent Blogger Arrests a Troubling Trend in the Middle East/North Africa Region - January 13th, 2010 [January 13th, 2010]
- Freedom House Calls Upon the Government of Uzbekistan to Release its Jailed Activists - January 13th, 2010 [January 13th, 2010]
- Citing Iran Crackdown, Freedom House Launches Net Freedom Initiative - January 13th, 2010 [January 13th, 2010]
- Google Response to Chinese Cyber-Attacks Appropriate - January 14th, 2010 [January 14th, 2010]
- Ombudsman Statements Reflect Culture of Intimidation in Chechnya - January 15th, 2010 [January 15th, 2010]
- Bloggers Stifled Again in Egypt - January 15th, 2010 [January 15th, 2010]
- Google Applauded for Stance on China Internet Censorship - January 16th, 2010 [January 16th, 2010]
- Latest Convictions Reflect Crackdown on Freedom of Expression and Association in Vietnam - January 21st, 2010 [January 21st, 2010]
- Integrity of Elections in Sri Lanka Endangered, Says Freedom House - January 22nd, 2010 [January 22nd, 2010]
- Freedom House Welcomes Clinton Speech on Internet Freedom - January 23rd, 2010 [January 23rd, 2010]
- Group wants same military benefits for gay spouses - Washington Times - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- Va. health bill could foil Obama proposal - Boston Globe - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- THE VA FIRST INTERNAL EVIDENCE OF CHANGE FOR GULF WAR VETERANS OF 1990-91 DOES ... - Veterans Today Network - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- Freedom Driver System Receives Medical Device CE Mark - Today's Medical Developments - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- NxStage Announces New FREEDOM Data Showing the Positive Impact of its Daily ... - CNNMoney.com (press release) - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- Phil Lewis: Coach fumbles lesson on freedom of the press - Naples Daily News - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- Report: Prescription drug prices vary drastically in NY - Poughkeepsie Journal - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- Bill Bell: Surgeon models success on international scale - Whittier Daily News - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- Justin Trottier: Time to call time on homeopathy - National Post (blog) - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- Voice of the Day Initiative would aid rights of patients - News-Leader.com - March 8th, 2010 [March 8th, 2010]
- Free Speech under Attack in Morocco - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Freedom House, Russian Rights Groups Announce New Partnership - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Egyptian Government Must Live Up To Its Human Rights Commitments in Geneva - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Global Human Rights Advocates Meet With President Obama on U.S. Human Rights Agenda - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Death of Political Prisoner in Cuba Exposes Systemic Prison Maltreatment and Torture - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- New Study Finds Gains for Women's Rights in the Middle East - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Egyptian Government Continues to Use Emergency Law to Crack Down on Freedom of Speech - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Human Rights Advocates Issue Plan of Action as Human Rights Council Meets in Geneva - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Sri Lankan Government Heightens Intimidation Campaign Against Voices of Dissent - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Nigerian and Indonesian Activists Challenge Repressive Measures in "Defamation of Religions" Debate - March 11th, 2010 [March 11th, 2010]
- Healing Healthcare: Restore Medical Freedom - Gather.com - March 15th, 2010 [March 15th, 2010]
- Putting the "I" back in medicine - McGill Daily - March 15th, 2010 [March 15th, 2010]
- Freedom House Calls on Kyrgyz Government to Loosen Controls on Media - March 16th, 2010 [March 16th, 2010]
- Talking Points - FOXNews - March 17th, 2010 [March 17th, 2010]
- The Battle Over Health Care At America's Medical Schools - FOXNews - March 17th, 2010 [March 17th, 2010]
- News Article Ceremony Honors Fallen Medical Servicemembers - Department of Defense - March 17th, 2010 [March 17th, 2010]
- Vietnam Temporarily Frees Prominent Catholic Priest - Christian Post - March 17th, 2010 [March 17th, 2010]