Trumps secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, has said Ayn Rands novel Atlas Shrugged is his favorite book. Mike Pompeo, head of the CIA, cited Rand as a major inspiration. Before he withdrew his nomination, Trumps pick to head the Labor Department, Andrew Puzder, revealed that he devotes much free time to reading Rand.
Such is the case with many other Trump advisers and allies: The Republican leader of the House of Representatives, Paul Ryan, famously made his staff members read Ayn Rand. Trump himself has said that hes a fan of Rand and identifies with Howard Roark, the protagonist of Rands novel, The Fountainhead, an architect who dynamites a housing project he designed because the builders did not precisely follow his blueprints.
As a philosopher, I have often wondered at the remarkable endurance and popularity of Ayn Rands influence on American politics. Even by earlier standards, however, Rands dominance over the current administration looks especially strong.
Whats in common with Ayn Rand?
Recently, historian and Rand expert Jennifer Burns wrote how Rands sway over the Republican Party is diminishing. Burns says the promises of government largesse and economic nationalism under Trump would repel Rand.
That was before the president unveiled his proposed federal budget that greatly slashes nonmilitary government spending and before Paul Ryans Obamacare reform, which promised to strip health coverage from 24 million low-income Americans and grant the rich a generous tax cut instead. Now, Trump looks to be zeroing in on a significant tax cut for the rich and corporations.
These all sound like measures Rand would enthusiastically support, in so far as they assist the capitalists and so-called job creators, instead of the poor.
Though the Trump administration looks quite steeped in Rands thought, there is one curious discrepancy. Ayn Rand exudes a robust elitism, unlike any I have observed elsewhere in the tomes of political philosophy. But this runs counter to the narrative of the Trump phenomenon: Central to the Trumps ascendancy is a rejection of elites reigning from urban centers and the coasts, overrepresented at universities and in Hollywood, apparently.
Liberals despair over the fact that they are branded elitists, while, as former television host Jon Stewart put it, Republicans backed a man who takes every chance to tout his superiority, and lords over creation from a gilded penthouse apartment, in a skyscraper that bears his own name.
Clearly, liberals lost this rhetorical battle.
What is Ayn Rands philosophy?
How shall we make sense of the gross elitism at the heart of the Trump administration, embodied in its devotion to Ayn Rand elitism that its supporters overlook or ignore, and happily ascribe to the left instead?
Ayn Rands philosophy is quite straightforward. Rand sees the world divided into makers and takers. But, in her view, the real makers are a select few a real elite, on whom we would do well to rely, and for whom we should clear the way, by reducing or removing taxes and government regulations, among other things.
Rands thought is intellectually digestible, unnuanced, easily translated into policy approaches and statements.
Small government is in order because it lets the great people soar to great heights, and they will drag the rest with them. Rand says we must ensure that the exceptional men, the innovators, the intellectual giants, are not held down by the majority. In fact, it is the members of this exceptional minority who lift the whole of a free society to the level of their own achievements, while rising further and ever further.
Mitt Romney captured Rands philosophy well during the 2012 campaign when he spoke of the 47 percent of Americans who do not work, vote Democrat and are happy to be supported by hardworking, conservative Americans.
No sympathy for the poor
In laying out her dualistic vision of society, divided into good and evil, Rands language is often starker and harsher. In her 1957 novel, Atlas Shrugged, she says,
The man at the top of the intellectual pyramid contributes the most to all those below him, but gets nothing except his material payment, receiving no intellectual bonus from others to add to the value of his time. The man at the bottom who, left to himself, would starve in his hopeless ineptitude, contributes nothing to those above him, but receives the bonus of all their brains.
Rands is the opposite of a charitable view of humankind, and can, in fact, be quite cruel. Consider her attack on Pope Paul VI, who, in his 1967 encyclical Progressio Populorum, argued that the West has a duty to help developing nations, and called for its sympathy for the global poor.
Rand was appalled; instead of feeling sympathy for the poor, she says
When [Western Man] discovered entire populations rotting alive in such conditions [in the developing world], is he not to acknowledge, with a burning stab of pride or pride and gratitude the achievements of his nation and his culture, of the men who created them and left him a nobler heritage to carry forward?
Telling it like it is
Why doesnt Rands elitism turn off Republican voters? or turn them against their leaders who, apparently, ought to disdain lower and middle class folk? If anyone like Trump identifies with Rands protagonists, they must think themselves truly excellent, while the muddling masses, they are beyond hope.
Why hasnt news of this disdain then trickled down to the voters yet?
The neoconservatives, who held sway under President George W. Bush, were also quite elitist, but figured out how to speak to the Republican base, in their language. Bush himself, despite his Andover-Yale upbringing, was lauded as someone you could have a beer with.
Trump has succeeded even better in this respect he famously tells it like it is, his supporters like to say. Of course, as judged by fact-checkers, Trumps relationship to the truth is embattled and tenuous; what his supporters seem to appreciate, rather, is his willingness to voice their suspicions and prejudices without worrying about recriminations of critics. Trump says things people are reluctant or shy to voice loudly if at all.
Building ones fortune
This gets us closer to whats going on. Rand is decidedly cynical about the said masses: There is little point in preaching to them; they wont change or improve, at least of their own accord; nor will they offer assistance to the capitalists. The masses just need to stay out of the way.
The principal virtue of a free market, Rand explains, is that the exceptional men, the innovators, the intellectual giants, are not held down by the majority. In fact, it is the members of this exceptional minority who lift the whole of a free society to the level of their own achievements
But they dont lift the masses willingly or easily, she says: While the majority have barely assimilated the value of the automobile, the creative minority introduces the airplane. The majority learn by demonstration, the minority are free to demonstrate.
Like Rand, her followers who populate the Trump administration are largely indifferent to the progress of the masses. They will let people be. Rand believes, quite simply, most people are hapless on their own, and we simply cannot expect much of them. There are only a few on whom we should pin our hopes; the rest are simply irrelevant. Which is why she complains about our tendency to give welfare to the needy. She says,
The welfare and rights of the producers were not regarded as worthy of consideration or recognition. This is the most damning indictment of the present state of our culture.
So, why do Republicans get away with eluding the title of elitist despite their allegiance to Rand while Democrats are stuck with this title?
I think part of the reason is that Democrats, among other things, are moralistic. They are more optimistic about human nature they are more optimistic about the capacity of humans to progress morally and live in harmony.
Thus, liberals judge: They call out our racism, our sexism, our xenophobia. They make people feel bad for harboring such prejudices, wittingly or not, and they warn us away from potentially offensive language, and phrases.
Many conservative opponents scorn liberals for their ill-founded nave optimism. For in Rands world there is no hope for the vast majority of mankind. She heaps scorn on the poor billions, whom civilized men are prodded to help.
The best they can hope for is that they might be lucky enough to enjoy the riches produced by the real innovators, which might eventually trickle down to them in their misery.
To the extent that Trump and his colleagues embrace Rands thought, they must share or approach some of her cynicism.
Firmin DeBrabander, Professor of Philosophy, Maryland Institute College of Art
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
Trumps secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, has said Ayn Rands novel Atlas Shrugged is his favorite book. Mike Pompeo, head of the CIA, cited Rand as a major inspiration. Before he withdrew his nomination, Trumps pick to head the Labor Department, Andrew Puzder, revealed that he devotes much free time to reading Rand.
Such is the case with many other Trump advisers and allies: The Republican leader of the House of Representatives, Paul Ryan, famously made his staff members read Ayn Rand. Trump himself has said that hes a fan of Rand and identifies with Howard Roark, the protagonist of Rands novel, The Fountainhead, an architect who dynamites a housing project he designed because the builders did not precisely follow his blueprints.
As a philosopher, I have often wondered at the remarkable endurance and popularity of Ayn Rands influence on American politics. Even by earlier standards, however, Rands dominance over the current administration looks especially strong.
Whats in common with Ayn Rand?
Recently, historian and Rand expert Jennifer Burns wrote how Rands sway over the Republican Party is diminishing. Burns says the promises of government largesse and economic nationalism under Trump would repel Rand.
That was before the president unveiled his proposed federal budget that greatly slashes nonmilitary government spending and before Paul Ryans Obamacare reform, which promised to strip health coverage from 24 million low-income Americans and grant the rich a generous tax cut instead. Now, Trump looks to be zeroing in on a significant tax cut for the rich and corporations.
These all sound like measures Rand would enthusiastically support, in so far as they assist the capitalists and so-called job creators, instead of the poor.
Though the Trump administration looks quite steeped in Rands thought, there is one curious discrepancy. Ayn Rand exudes a robust elitism, unlike any I have observed elsewhere in the tomes of political philosophy. But this runs counter to the narrative of the Trump phenomenon: Central to the Trumps ascendancy is a rejection of elites reigning from urban centers and the coasts, overrepresented at universities and in Hollywood, apparently.
Liberals despair over the fact that they are branded elitists, while, as former television host Jon Stewart put it, Republicans backed a man who takes every chance to tout his superiority, and lords over creation from a gilded penthouse apartment, in a skyscraper that bears his own name.
Clearly, liberals lost this rhetorical battle.
What is Ayn Rands philosophy?
How shall we make sense of the gross elitism at the heart of the Trump administration, embodied in its devotion to Ayn Rand elitism that its supporters overlook or ignore, and happily ascribe to the left instead?
Ayn Rands philosophy is quite straightforward. Rand sees the world divided into makers and takers. But, in her view, the real makers are a select few a real elite, on whom we would do well to rely, and for whom we should clear the way, by reducing or removing taxes and government regulations, among other things.
Rands thought is intellectually digestible, unnuanced, easily translated into policy approaches and statements.
Small government is in order because it lets the great people soar to great heights, and they will drag the rest with them. Rand says we must ensure that the exceptional men, the innovators, the intellectual giants, are not held down by the majority. In fact, it is the members of this exceptional minority who lift the whole of a free society to the level of their own achievements, while rising further and ever further.
Mitt Romney captured Rands philosophy well during the 2012 campaign when he spoke of the 47 percent of Americans who do not work, vote Democrat and are happy to be supported by hardworking, conservative Americans.
No sympathy for the poor
In laying out her dualistic vision of society, divided into good and evil, Rands language is often starker and harsher. In her 1957 novel, Atlas Shrugged, she says,
The man at the top of the intellectual pyramid contributes the most to all those below him, but gets nothing except his material payment, receiving no intellectual bonus from others to add to the value of his time. The man at the bottom who, left to himself, would starve in his hopeless ineptitude, contributes nothing to those above him, but receives the bonus of all their brains.
Rands is the opposite of a charitable view of humankind, and can, in fact, be quite cruel. Consider her attack on Pope Paul VI, who, in his 1967 encyclical Progressio Populorum, argued that the West has a duty to help developing nations, and called for its sympathy for the global poor.
Rand was appalled; instead of feeling sympathy for the poor, she says
When [Western Man] discovered entire populations rotting alive in such conditions [in the developing world], is he not to acknowledge, with a burning stab of pride or pride and gratitude the achievements of his nation and his culture, of the men who created them and left him a nobler heritage to carry forward?
Telling it like it is
Why doesnt Rands elitism turn off Republican voters? or turn them against their leaders who, apparently, ought to disdain lower and middle class folk? If anyone like Trump identifies with Rands protagonists, they must think themselves truly excellent, while the muddling masses, they are beyond hope.
Why hasnt news of this disdain then trickled down to the voters yet?
The neoconservatives, who held sway under President George W. Bush, were also quite elitist, but figured out how to speak to the Republican base, in their language. Bush himself, despite his Andover-Yale upbringing, was lauded as someone you could have a beer with.
Trump has succeeded even better in this respect he famously tells it like it is, his supporters like to say. Of course, as judged by fact-checkers, Trumps relationship to the truth is embattled and tenuous; what his supporters seem to appreciate, rather, is his willingness to voice their suspicions and prejudices without worrying about recriminations of critics. Trump says things people are reluctant or shy to voice loudly if at all.
Building ones fortune
This gets us closer to whats going on. Rand is decidedly cynical about the said masses: There is little point in preaching to them; they wont change or improve, at least of their own accord; nor will they offer assistance to the capitalists. The masses just need to stay out of the way.
The principal virtue of a free market, Rand explains, is that the exceptional men, the innovators, the intellectual giants, are not held down by the majority. In fact, it is the members of this exceptional minority who lift the whole of a free society to the level of their own achievements
But they dont lift the masses willingly or easily, she says: While the majority have barely assimilated the value of the automobile, the creative minority introduces the airplane. The majority learn by demonstration, the minority are free to demonstrate.
Like Rand, her followers who populate the Trump administration are largely indifferent to the progress of the masses. They will let people be. Rand believes, quite simply, most people are hapless on their own, and we simply cannot expect much of them. There are only a few on whom we should pin our hopes; the rest are simply irrelevant. Which is why she complains about our tendency to give welfare to the needy. She says,
The welfare and rights of the producers were not regarded as worthy of consideration or recognition. This is the most damning indictment of the present state of our culture.
So, why do Republicans get away with eluding the title of elitist despite their allegiance to Rand while Democrats are stuck with this title?
I think part of the reason is that Democrats, among other things, are moralistic. They are more optimistic about human nature they are more optimistic about the capacity of humans to progress morally and live in harmony.
Thus, liberals judge: They call out our racism, our sexism, our xenophobia. They make people feel bad for harboring such prejudices, wittingly or not, and they warn us away from potentially offensive language, and phrases.
Many conservative opponents scorn liberals for their ill-founded nave optimism. For in Rands world there is no hope for the vast majority of mankind. She heaps scorn on the poor billions, whom civilized men are prodded to help.
The best they can hope for is that they might be lucky enough to enjoy the riches produced by the real innovators, which might eventually trickle down to them in their misery.
To the extent that Trump and his colleagues embrace Rands thought, they must share or approach some of her cynicism.
Firmin DeBrabander, Professor of Philosophy, Maryland Institute College of Art
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
Firmin DeBrabander | The Conversation
http://bsmedia.business-standard.com/_media/bs/wap/images/bs_logo_amp.png 177 22
Continue reading here:
How Ayn Rand's 'elitism' lives on in the Donald Trump ...
- Voices for Reason Blog | The Ayn Rand Institute - December 9th, 2016 [December 9th, 2016]
- Media, morality and the neighbors cow: When did Ayn Rand become the ... - December 14th, 2016 [December 14th, 2016]
- How Ayn Rands theories destroyed Never Trump conservatism - December 14th, 2016 [December 14th, 2016]
- Ayn Rand's Progressive Readers are Misguided | National Review - December 14th, 2016 [December 14th, 2016]
- The Daily 202: Ayn Rand-acolyte Donald Trump stacks his cabinet with ... - December 14th, 2016 [December 14th, 2016]
- The scary ghost of Ayn Rand looms over the Trump cabinet - December 18th, 2016 [December 18th, 2016]
- Fountainhead of bad ideas: Ayn Rands fanboys take the reins ... - December 18th, 2016 [December 18th, 2016]
- Ayn Rand Institute eStore : Ayn Rand - January 11th, 2017 [January 11th, 2017]
- Ayn Rand Made US a Selfish, Greedy Nation - January 20th, 2017 [January 20th, 2017]
- Ayn Rand and the Invincible Cult of Selfishness on the ... - January 24th, 2017 [January 24th, 2017]
- The Ayn Rand scene Sajid Javid reads every year - Spectator.co.uk - February 9th, 2017 [February 9th, 2017]
- The Ayn Rand in Donald Trump: The Virtue of America First | The ... - American Spectator - February 13th, 2017 [February 13th, 2017]
- Would Ayn Rand Have Cast President Trump As A Villain? | Zero ... - February 15th, 2017 [February 15th, 2017]
- Jerome Tuccille, Author of It Usually Begins With Ayn Rand and More, RIP - Reason (blog) - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- Ayn Rand Contra Nietzsche - The Objective Standard - February 22nd, 2017 [February 22nd, 2017]
- Judging Milo Yiannopoulos, ft. Ayn Rand (Episode #24 of MY PODCAST) - ChicagoNow (blog) - February 23rd, 2017 [February 23rd, 2017]
- How Much Ayn Rand Is There in Trump's 'America First' Foreign ... - American Spectator - March 1st, 2017 [March 1st, 2017]
- Who Is Ayn Rand? - The Objective Standard - The Objective Standard - March 8th, 2017 [March 8th, 2017]
- Cheer Up, Justin Amash! There's No Need to Cry Over One Missed Vote. - Slate Magazine (blog) - March 11th, 2017 [March 11th, 2017]
- No sympathy: How Ayn Rand's elitism lives on in the Trump ... - Salon - Salon - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- Mick Mulvaney's snake oil: A blend of bad science, bad math and really bad politics - Salon - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Make the magic money tree work for everyone, not just the rich - The Guardian - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Neo-Tech Views On Ayn Rand and Objectivism | Good Herald - Good Herald - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Elate's Revival of Ayn Rand's NIGHT OF JANUARY 16TH Opens 6/3 - Broadway World - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Is Germany Blowing It? - The Awl - June 7th, 2017 [June 7th, 2017]
- Letter: Deregulation is not always best - Aiken Standard - June 11th, 2017 [June 11th, 2017]
- How the Dark Web's Dread Pirate Roberts Went Down - New York Times - June 12th, 2017 [June 12th, 2017]
- Trump's Credibility Problem - National Review - June 12th, 2017 [June 12th, 2017]
- Trump & Ryan's (Tryan's) Co-Conspiracy in Moral Bankruptcy - The Good Men Project (blog) - June 12th, 2017 [June 12th, 2017]
- Shall we all hang separately? - Nevada Appeal - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- PBS Is Airing Right-Wing-Sponsored School Privatization Propaganda - The National Memo (blog) - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- South Fayette educator and coach has the music in him - Observer-Reporter - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Tech Talk: Israel's Fortune 500 companies - The Jerusalem Post - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- The Fountainhead: American Eclectic - Patheos (blog) - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- NY Times, After 'Corrections,' Still Has Palin-Giffords 'Targeting' Myth in Scalise Shooting Editorial - NewsBusters (press release) (blog) - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- Both parties responsible for economic failings - Alpena News - June 18th, 2017 [June 18th, 2017]
- Wayne LaPierre, Tomi Lahren, and a Rally Cry From Young Conservative Women - D Magazine - June 20th, 2017 [June 20th, 2017]
- Goodbye Reason, Hello Violence - Townhall - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Selfie by Will Storr review are the young really so self-obsessed? - The Guardian - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- If You Saw Uber's CEO Testify Before the DC Council, His Downfall May Come as No Surprise - HuffPost - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Working toward graduation: 50 SPS students participate in credit recovery program - Stillwater News Press - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Ayn Rand | American author | Britannica.com - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Travis Kalanick may have resigned as Uber's CEO but he isn't going away - Washington Post - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- 'Fargo' Season 3 finale recap: A mostly satisfying, but ambiguous ending - Baltimore Sun - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- London Theater Review: Topical Drama 'Terror' - Variety - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- Paul Ryan conflicted by Jesus Christ and Ayn Rand -- Norman Jensen - Madison.com - June 24th, 2017 [June 24th, 2017]
- BOB BARR: Goodbye reason, Hello violence - MDJOnline.com - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]
- Lowell Thomas, the Original 'Voice of America' - The Weekly Standard - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]
- This Classic Colonial Revival in Westchester Has Impressive Literary Ties - Mansion Global - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]
- The Continuing Scourge of Tenant Harassment: If You Don't Like It, Move. - The Nonprofit Quarterly (registration) - June 27th, 2017 [June 27th, 2017]
- The least of these - Ashland Daily Press - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Why can't self-satisfied liberals admit that conservatives care about people, too? - The Week Magazine - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Letter: Things aren't going so well under President Trump - Detroit Lakes Online - July 2nd, 2017 [July 2nd, 2017]
- J. Talbot Manvel: Declaration of Independence joined morality and law - CapitalGazette.com - July 2nd, 2017 [July 2nd, 2017]
- I watched the sun set on my Sunset Boulevard romance - Los Angeles Times - July 2nd, 2017 [July 2nd, 2017]
- Republican states raising taxes, not lowering them | The Seattle Times - The Seattle Times - July 3rd, 2017 [July 3rd, 2017]
- Takers and Fakers - New York Times (blog) - July 14th, 2017 [July 14th, 2017]
- BOB BARR: Violent tribalism on display in Charlottesville - MDJOnline.com - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- Is There Really an 'Insidious Libertarian-To-Alt-Right Pipeline'? - Reason (blog) - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- 30 important life lessons Dirty Dancing taught us - EW.com - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- Ayn Rand - Salon.com - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- Anthem Essay Contest Ayn Rand Education - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- What's Wrong With America? - Falls Church News Press - August 25th, 2017 [August 25th, 2017]
- Why Stephen K. Bannon was such a failure - The Washington Post - Washington Post - August 25th, 2017 [August 25th, 2017]
- Movie Review: In Pattinson, 'Twilight' sidles up to Ratso Rizzo - The Providence Journal - August 25th, 2017 [August 25th, 2017]
- Why Mark Cuban and Kevin O'Leary read Ayn Rand - January 29th, 2018 [January 29th, 2018]
- How Hillary Clinton Is Like Ayn Rand | The Weekly Standard - March 16th, 2018 [March 16th, 2018]
- Ayn Rand's Ideas - An Overview | AynRand.org - June 23rd, 2018 [June 23rd, 2018]
- The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand, Paperback | Barnes & Noble - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- In Defense of Ayn Rand, Monster Under the Progressive Bed - July 21st, 2018 [July 21st, 2018]
- Ayn Rand Institute eStore - September 6th, 2018 [September 6th, 2018]
- Ayn Rand, Objectivism - The Atlas Society - November 23rd, 2018 [November 23rd, 2018]
- Here's how Ayn Rand helped turn the US into a selfish and ... - November 27th, 2018 [November 27th, 2018]
- Is There a Proof of Ayn Rand's Ethics? - November 27th, 2018 [November 27th, 2018]
- Ayn Rand raged against government benefits but grabbed ... - November 29th, 2018 [November 29th, 2018]
- President Obama Jabs At Ayn Rand, Knocks Himself Out - December 9th, 2018 [December 9th, 2018]
- Column: This is what happens when you take Ayn Rand seriously ... - February 16th, 2019 [February 16th, 2019]
- Ayn Rand - The New York Times - March 25th, 2019 [March 25th, 2019]
- Atlas Shrugged: (Centennial Edition) by Ayn Rand, Paperback ... - March 25th, 2019 [March 25th, 2019]
- Ayn Rand - Philosopher, Writer - Biography - March 25th, 2019 [March 25th, 2019]