The poet Richard Brautigan said that one day we would all be watched over by "machines of loving grace". It was a nice sentiment at the time. But I surmise Brautigan might have done a quick 180 if he was alive today. He would see how intelligent machines in general and AI in particular were being semi-weaponized or otherwise appropriated for purposes of a new kind of social engineering. He would also likely note how this process is usually positioned as something "good for humanity" in vague ways that never seem to be fully explained.
As both a technologist and a journalist, I find it very difficult to think of transhumanism and what I'll call the New Eugenics as anything less than deeply and literally dehumanizing.
The hits, as they say, just keep on coming. Recently I ran across an article advising recent college graduates looking for jobs that they had better be prepared to have their facial expressions scanned and evaluated by artificial intelligence programs during and after interviews.
An article in the publication "Higher Ed" warned that: "Getting a job increasingly requires going through an interview on an AI platformIf the proprietary technology [used to ] to evaluate the recordings concludes that a candidate does well in matching the demeanor, enthusiasm, facial expressions or word choice of current employees of the company, it recommends the candidate for the next round. If the candidate is judged by the software to be out of step, that candidate is not likely to move on."
If this were happening in China, of course, it would be much less surprising. You don't have to be a Harvard-trained psychiatrist to see that this kind of technology is violating some very basic human boundaries: how we think and feel and our innermost and private thoughts. And you don't have to be a political scientist to see that totalitarian societies are in the business of breaking down these boundaries for purposes of social and political control.
Facial recognition has already been implemented by some law enforcement agencies. Other technology being used for social control starts out in the corporate world and then migrates. Given the melding of corporate and government power that's taken place in the U.S. over the last few decades, what's impermissible in government now can get fully implemented in the corporate world and then in the course of time bleeds over to government use via outsourcing and other mechanisms. It's a nifty little shell game. This was the case with the overt collection of certain types of data on citizens which was expressly forbidden by federal law. The way around it was to have corporations to do the dirty work and then turn around and sell the data to various government entities. Will we see the same thing happen with artificial intelligence and its ability to pry into our lives in unprecedented ways?
There is a kind of quasi-worship of technology as a force majeure in humanity's evolution that puts AI at the center of human existence. This line of thinking is now linked to the principles of transhumanism, a set of values and goals being pushed by Silicon Valley elites. This warped vision of techno-utopianism assures us that sophisticated computers are inherently superior to humans. Implicit in this view is the notion that intelligence (and one kind of intelligence at that) is the most important quality in the vast array of attributes that are the essential qualities of our collective humanity and longstanding cultural legacies.
The corporate PR frontage for these "breakthroughs" is always the same: they will only be used for the highest purposes like getting rid of plastics in the oceans. But still the question remains: who will control or regulate the use of these man-made creatures?
The most hardcore transhumanists believe that our role is simply to step aside and assist in the creation of new life forms made possible by hooking up human brains to computers and the Internet, what they consider to be an evolutionary quantum leap. Unfortunately, people in powerful corporate positions like Ray Kurzweil, Google's Director of Engineering, and Elon Musk, founder of Neuralink, actually believe in these convoluted superhero mythologies. This line of thinking is also beginning to creep into the mainstream thanks to the corporate-driven hype put forth by powerful Silicon Valley companies who are pushing these ideas for profit and to maintain technology's ineluctable "more, better, faster" momentum.
The transhumanist agenda is a runaway freight train, barely mentioned in the mainstream media, but threatening to run over us all. In related "mad science" offshoot, scientists have succeeded in creating the first biological computer-based hybrids called Xenobotswhich the New York Times describes as "programmable organisms" that "live for only about a week". The corporate PR frontage for these "breakthroughs" is always the same: they will only be used for the highest purposes like getting rid of plastics in the oceans. But still the question remains: who will control or regulate the use of these man-made creatures?In the brave new world of building machines that can think and evolve on their own because they combine AI programming with biological programming, we have to ask where all this is headed. If machines are being used to evaluate us for job interviews, then why won't they be eventually used as police officers or judges? (In fact, Singapore is now using robotic dogs to police parks for Covid-related social distancing.)
As both a technologist and a journalist, I find it very difficult to think of transhumanism and what I'll call the New Eugenics as anything less than deeply and literally dehumanizing. In the aftermath of WWII, eugenics used to be widely reviled when Nazi scientists experimented with and so highly valued it. Now it's lauded as cutting edge.There are two ugly flies in this ointment. The first is the question of who directs and controls the AI machines being built. You can make a safe bet that it won't be you, your friends, or your neighbors but rather technocratic elites. The second is the fact that programmers, and their masters, the corporate Lords of Tech, are the least likely candidates to come up with the necessary wisdom to imbue AI with the deeper human qualities necessary to make it anything more than a force used for social and political control in conjunction with mass surveillance and other tools.
Another consideration is: how does politics fit into this picture? In the middle ages, one of the great power shifts that took place was from medieval rulers to the church. In the age of the enlightenment, another shift took place: from the church to the modern state. Now we are experiencing yet another great transition: a shift of power from state and federal political systems to corporations and, by extension, to the global elites that are increasingly exerting great influence on both, the 1 percenters that Bernie Sanders frequently refers to.
When considering the use of any new technology, the question should be asked: who does it ultimately serve? And to what extent are ordinary citizens allowed to express their approval or disapproval of the complex technological regimes being created that we all end up involuntarily depending upon?
These trends have political implications because they have happened in tandem with the neoliberal sleight of hand that began with President Reagan. Gradually anti-democratic policy changes over a period of decades allowed elites to begin the process of transferring public funds to private coffers. This was done under the neoliberal smokescreen of widely touted but socially hollow benefits such as privatization, outsourcing, and deregulation bolstered by nostrums such as "Government must get out of the way to let innovation thrive."
Behind the scenes, the use of advanced technology has played a strong role in enabling this transition but it did so out of the public's watchful eye. Now, it seems abundantly clear that technologies such as 5G, machine learning, and AI will continue to be leveraged by technocratic elites for the purposes of social engineering and economic gain. As Yuval Harari, one of transhumanism's most vocal proponents has stated: "Whoever controls these algorithms will be the real government."
If AI is allowed to begin making decisions that affect our everyday lives in the realms of work, play and business, it's important to be aware of who this technology serves: technologically sophisticated elites. We have been hearing promises for some time about how better advanced computer technology was going to revolutionize our lives by changing just about every aspect of them for the better. But the reality on the ground seems to be quite different than what was advertised. Yes, there are many areas where it can be argued that the use of computer and Internet technology has improved the quality of life. But there are just as many others where it has failed miserably. Healthcare is just one example. Here misguided legislation combined with an obsession with insurance company-mandated data gathering has created massive info-bureaucracies where doctors and nurses spend far too much time feeding patient data into a huge information databases where it often seems to languish. Nurses and other medical professionals have long complained that too much of their time is spent on data gathering and not enough time focusing on healthcare itself and real patient needs.
When considering the use of any new technology, the question should be asked: who does it ultimately serve? And to what extent are ordinary citizens allowed to express their approval or disapproval of the complex technological regimes being created that we all end up involuntarily depending upon? In a second "Gilded Age" where the power of billionaires and elites over our lives is now being widely questioned, what do we do about their ability to radically and undemocratically alter the landscape of our daily lives using the almighty algorithm?
Go here to read the rest:
A Closer Look at the AI Hype Machine: Who Really Benefits? - Common Dreams
- Hidden In Plain Sight 4 Movies That Expose The Globalist ... - December 8th, 2016 [December 8th, 2016]
- WHAT IS TRANSHUMANISM? - Nick Bostrom - December 10th, 2016 [December 10th, 2016]
- Transhumanism | Foreign Policy - December 10th, 2016 [December 10th, 2016]
- Transhumanism in fiction - Wikipedia - December 23rd, 2016 [December 23rd, 2016]
- Transhumanism | Bioethics.com - January 3rd, 2017 [January 3rd, 2017]
- Trexit?: Transnationalism and Transhumanism and why They ... - January 13th, 2017 [January 13th, 2017]
- Sociologist: 'Capitalism 2.0' about to slay liberalism's sacred cow - WND.com - February 8th, 2017 [February 8th, 2017]
- Zoltan Istvan on transhumanism, politics and why the human body has to go - New Atlas - February 22nd, 2017 [February 22nd, 2017]
- Buddhism and Transhumanism - Lankaweb - February 23rd, 2017 [February 23rd, 2017]
- 'To Be A Machine' Digs Into The Meaning Of Humanity - WPSU - March 1st, 2017 [March 1st, 2017]
- Touring transhumanism 'To Be a Machine' - Maine Edge - March 2nd, 2017 [March 2nd, 2017]
- Transhumanism Conference at Samford University - March 3rd, 2017 [March 3rd, 2017]
- The Reality Principle - Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies - March 11th, 2017 [March 11th, 2017]
- Transhumanism: The World's Most Dangerous Idea? - March 11th, 2017 [March 11th, 2017]
- Transhumanism Is Just Fancy Sex-Shaming And Self-Loathing - The Federalist - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- 4 life-changing emerging technologies to get excited about - Born2Invest - June 7th, 2017 [June 7th, 2017]
- The body electric - Arkansas Times - June 8th, 2017 [June 8th, 2017]
- Peter Thiel is Funding the Comeback of the Woolly Mammoth - Inverse - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Futuristic Thriller State of Mind Gets 15 Minutes of New Gameplay Footage - DualShockers - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Little Atoms at Wilderness - Little Atoms - June 29th, 2017 [June 29th, 2017]
- Review: Poem 88's Correspondences series brings us back to balance - ArtsATL - July 7th, 2017 [July 7th, 2017]
- Putting Infants Down Like Dogs - First Things - July 22nd, 2017 [July 22nd, 2017]
- Fringe movements key to changing the world - Winnipeg Free Press - July 22nd, 2017 [July 22nd, 2017]
- Luton hate crime probe over St Thomas's church graffiti - BBC News - July 26th, 2017 [July 26th, 2017]
- The MetroSpiritual: Creating super-humans through Transhumanism is becoming a reality - New York Daily News - July 29th, 2017 [July 29th, 2017]
- How the death of EDM brought pop music one step closer to eternal life - Washington Post - August 4th, 2017 [August 4th, 2017]
- Pop music moves a step closer to eternal life - The Columbian - August 5th, 2017 [August 5th, 2017]
- TRICOAST ENTERTAINMENT RELEASES FIRST ... - Digital Journal - Digital Journal - August 9th, 2017 [August 9th, 2017]
- Transhumanism Is Not Libertarian, It's an Abomination - The American Conservative - August 22nd, 2017 [August 22nd, 2017]
- Bloodborne, Transhumanism and Cosmic Cyberpunk - Kotaku UK (blog) - August 25th, 2017 [August 25th, 2017]
- Hidden In Plain Sight - 4 Movies That Expose The Globalist ... - March 23rd, 2018 [March 23rd, 2018]
- Transhumanism Foreign Policy - May 8th, 2018 [May 8th, 2018]
- Transhumanism - Catholicism.org - May 12th, 2018 [May 12th, 2018]
- Transhumanism | social and philosophical movement ... - May 21st, 2018 [May 21st, 2018]
- Transhumanism Is Despair Its an Ersatz Version of ... - May 21st, 2018 [May 21st, 2018]
- Transhumanism: Genetic Engineering of Man - the New ... - July 6th, 2018 [July 6th, 2018]
- Transhumanism Has Opened the Gates of Hell-Steve Quayle and ... - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- Transhumanism by Dorian Mays on Prezi - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- What is Mormon Transhumanism? And is it Mormon? | Interpreter ... - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- Transhumanism: The Anti-Human Singularity Agenda - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- TRANSHUMANISM Feral House - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- Transhumanism - H+Pedia - hpluspedia.org - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- Transhumanism - Mercurial Essays - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- Transhumanism: The History of a Dangerous Idea: David ... - November 8th, 2018 [November 8th, 2018]
- Transhumanism - reddit - December 28th, 2018 [December 28th, 2018]
- Transhumanism | Future | FANDOM powered by Wikia - February 8th, 2019 [February 8th, 2019]
- transhumanism | Definition, Origins, Characteristics, & Facts ... - February 8th, 2019 [February 8th, 2019]
- Elevating the Human Condition - Humanity+ What does it mean ... - June 3rd, 2019 [June 3rd, 2019]
- What is Transhumanism? - GenSix Productions - June 3rd, 2019 [June 3rd, 2019]
- Transhumanism - RationalWiki - June 3rd, 2019 [June 3rd, 2019]
- Transhumanism Is TemptingUntil You Remember Inspector Gadget ... - June 3rd, 2019 [June 3rd, 2019]
- Transhumanism | Conspiracy School - June 3rd, 2019 [June 3rd, 2019]
- Transhumanism - Britannica.com - June 3rd, 2019 [June 3rd, 2019]
- Seattle faith groups reckon with AI and what it means to be truly human - Seattle Times - November 12th, 2019 [November 12th, 2019]
- The 2010s were the decade of trans - The Spectator USA - December 21st, 2019 [December 21st, 2019]
- Being alive: Institut Franais presents 'The Night of Ideas' - Daily Sabah - January 30th, 2020 [January 30th, 2020]
- Sleeve Into Altered Carbon: The Role Playing Game - Nerdist - March 17th, 2020 [March 17th, 2020]
- Zoltan Istvan: The Transhumanist Candidate - Roads and Kingdoms - March 17th, 2020 [March 17th, 2020]
- Transhumanism: Pros and Cons - iGyaan - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- What is transhumanism, or, what does it mean to be human ... - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- What is transhumanism? | CARM.org - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- Meet Ai-Da, the worlds first AI artist, who is almost human - Dazed - April 3rd, 2020 [April 3rd, 2020]
- Cosmodeism: Prologue to a Theology of Transhumanism - Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies - April 3rd, 2020 [April 3rd, 2020]
- Whats the best way to prepare for the apocalypse? Dont ask these guys - Telegraph.co.uk - April 23rd, 2020 [April 23rd, 2020]
- The benefits and risks of AI and post-human life - Independent Australia - April 26th, 2020 [April 26th, 2020]
- Hi John. Will artificial intelligence replace humanity by 2084? - Eternity News - July 23rd, 2020 [July 23rd, 2020]
- Silicon Valley, the start-up incarnation 4/5. Palmer Luckey, the geek who needed to make sure the army supremacy of the West - Pledge Times - August 5th, 2020 [August 5th, 2020]
- Transhumanism: The cyborgs and biohackers redefining ... - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- The Honorable Dr. Dale Layman, Founder of Robowatch, LLC, is Recognized as the 2020 Humanitarian of the Year by Top 100 Registry, Inc. - IT News... - September 4th, 2020 [September 4th, 2020]
- To be a Machine review: Experimental format well-suited to plays core theme - The Irish Times - October 8th, 2020 [October 8th, 2020]
- Dublin Theatre Festival reviews: The Great Hunger, and To Be A Machine - Irish Examiner - October 8th, 2020 [October 8th, 2020]
- Fact check: UK deaths linked to COVID-19 did not stop in June - Reuters - December 5th, 2020 [December 5th, 2020]
- transhumanism | Definition, Origins, Characteristics ... - December 5th, 2020 [December 5th, 2020]
- What is Transhumanism? - December 5th, 2020 [December 5th, 2020]
- Is Biohacking The Future Of Skincare? - British Vogue - December 28th, 2020 [December 28th, 2020]
- Cyberpunk And GTA 2-Inspired "Glitchpunk" Enters Early Access This Year - TheGamer - February 4th, 2021 [February 4th, 2021]
- 'Glitchpunk' will see players take to the neon streets from a top-down view - NME - February 4th, 2021 [February 4th, 2021]
- Into The Darkness Is A Promising VR Adventure With Boneworks-Like Physics - UploadVR - February 4th, 2021 [February 4th, 2021]
- The Chronicles of Covid, or why we must kill the Great Reset Witch - The Conservative Woman - February 10th, 2021 [February 10th, 2021]
- The Matrix Resurrections: The Studio Is Making Us Do This! - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence - December 27th, 2021 [December 27th, 2021]