Why Dominion’s Approach to Offshore Wind May Prove Costly to Consumers – WVTF

This fall, Dominion surprised industry experts when it announced plans to build a massive wind farm off Virginias coast.

The company has no experience with offshore wind, and critics say customers could be stuck with big bills if the company is not required to compete for the right to build.

Dominion says its determined to cut carbon emissions 55% in the next decade. That means burning less gas and coal while boosting production of clean power.

Energy blogger Ivy Main says thats why the company has now decided to tap this states considerable potential for wind power.

They are planning to build out the entire Virginia wind energy area 27 miles off of Virginia Beach.

Dominions first estimate of cost is $7.8 billion, but thats based on using resources from Europe according to spokesman Jeremy Slayton.

That would include things like manufacturing of the turbines, because right now the turbines themselves are manufactured in Europe and then have to be transported by boat over to the United States.

The company says costs will come down as the United States gears up to supply a new industry off American shores. And state government is likely to provide support.

The economic development and the job prospects are terrific for Virginia, says Main.

But theres something else that could keep costs down competitive bidding. At the University of Virginia, Professor Bill Shobe studies the economics of energy. He says about a hundred countries have already shown how powerful that approach can be.

They set a renewables target, and then they announced they were going to hold an auction, and what interested firms would do is bid a price for an amount of renewable power that they would agree to provide, and the results of those auctions have been astonishing, he explains.

Using this model for production of solar power helped lower costs by 62% over a four-year period, and Main says costs to produce offshore wind power dropped 32% in a single year. Shobe says its the only way consumers will know theyre getting the best price, and it might not keep Dominion from building the wind farm.

If Dominion wants to bid to build the turbines themselves, by all means. If they are really the low cost provider, then theyll win the bids.

If Dominion moves forward, Main hopes it will partner with another, more experienced firm. Its already working with the worlds largest wind energy supplier a Danish company called Orsted on a demonstration project involving two turbines, but the big wind farm would involve 220 of them.

"I had been given a heads up early that they had not consulted with Orsted before they made the announcement that they were going forward with the big farm," she recalls. "Then another developer told me that he had checked with them as to whether they might want another partner, and theyd said no that they were going to do it themselves, and then Dominion held its quarterly earnings call and confirmed there that it planned to develop, own and operate the wind farm by itself.

Since she published her concerns, Dominion has said its undecided on the issue of whether to fly solo.

We are evaluating how best to proceed with our commercial offshore wind project," says Dominion spokesman Slayton. "No specific decisions have been made regarding partners or suppliers or those sorts of things.

The company says the wind farm will come online in three stages in 2024, 25 and 26. Noting many other states plan wind farms in that same time frame, Main says federal regulators could be overwhelmed unable to grant permits quickly enough to keep Dominion on schedule.

Go here to read the rest:

Why Dominion's Approach to Offshore Wind May Prove Costly to Consumers - WVTF

Natural gas of Israel’s largest offshore field to start flowing within two weeks – Haaretz

Natural gas will begin flowing from Leviathan, Israels largest offshore natural gas field, within two weeks, with exports to Egypt and Jordan following shortly thereafter, Energy Minister Yuval Steinitz said Monday.

Binyamin Zomer, vice president for regional affairs at Texas-based Noble Energy, the lead partner in Leviathan, confirmed the news. Before the end of the year we will start supplying the domestic market, and in the weeks right after that we will export to Egypt and Jordan, he told the annual Israel Energy and Business Convention in Ramat Gan.

The Leviathan partners have signed multibillion-dollar export deals to Egypt and Jordan. Steinitz told the conference that despite opposition from environmentalists, there was no reason Israel shouldnt also be exporting gas to Europe.

Zomer said that because of Leviathans lifespan, all export options were under consideration, including delivery by undersea pipeline to Europe. As to concerns about air pollution from Leviathans rig, he said that it met the strictest standards and that gas would mean a net gain for the environment.

Im sure the public understands that the biggest impact of the Leviathan rig will be when you can close the coal stations in Hadera, he said, referring to generating plants of the Israel Electric Corporation.

Zomer said that with the development of the smaller Karish and Tanin gas fields by the Green energy company Energean, competition was ramping up in the industry. No one knows at what range prices will settle, he said. Its a function of supply and demand and were already seeing new prices.

The IEC is buying gas from the Tamar field at $6.30 per million British thermal units, but it has signed an agreement to buy from Leviathan at $4.80. Karish and Tanin have been signing deals at between $3.50 and $4.00

We've got more newsletters we think you'll find interesting.

Please try again later.

The email address you have provided is already registered.

See the article here:

Natural gas of Israel's largest offshore field to start flowing within two weeks - Haaretz

HMRC lacks staff to investigate over 5.7 million offshore tip-offs – International Investment

The HMRC does not have the staff to investigate all the offshore tip-offs it gets, after being swamped with a staggering 5.7 million pieces of information about overseas bank accounts held by three million British citizens.

The information is coming from 100 countries under common reporting standards (CRS) agreed by the international Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The standards are designed to stop tax evasion, or avoidance, by making governments aware of overseas money held by their citizens.

However, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) does not have enough people to follow up on the information, according to the tax consultancy BDO, so is instead sending out a series of "nudge" letters to the people named asking them to send details of their financial affairs in an attempt to uncover incidents of tax evasion, The Times first reported.

HMRC has come under pressure to more actively investigate taxpayers with hidden offshore assets since the 2016 Panama Papers scandal. There is currently an open parliamentary inquiry into whether HMRC is sufficiently able to tackle tax evasion and avoidance.

The UK tax office made 540 requests to overseas authorities for information on UK taxpayers last year, an increase of 24% on the previous year, as it intensifies its crackdown on hidden offshore assets, says Pinsent Masons, the international law firm.

Pinsent Masons says that HMRC is increasing its investigations overseas into taxpayers it believes are hiding assets. Investigations can lead to penalties of up to 200% of the tax HMRC believes is owed.

UK investors in offshore funds are coming under increasing scrutiny by the tax authorities. HMRC believes there is a significant group of UK investors misreporting their income and gains from investments in offshore funds, and, as a consequence, their overall UK tax liability.

HMRC have begun to send out compliance letters to tenants of residential property that they believe is owned by an overseas company or trust (called a non-resident corporate landlord). The purpose of the letter is to enable HMRC to gather information to make sure that the landlord is paying the correct amount of tax.

HMRC's approach to hidden offshore assets is laid out in its No Safe Havens' strategy, which was launched in March this year. In this strategy document, HMRC says it will use criminal investigations to send a strong deterrent message to taxpayers.

Subscribe to International Investment's free, twice-daily, newsletter

Read this article:

HMRC lacks staff to investigate over 5.7 million offshore tip-offs - International Investment

North Seas Nations to Reinforce Cooperation on Offshore Wind – Saurenergy

Energy Ministers from North Seas countries have agreed to their 2020 Work Programme on offshore wind deployment as a means of reaching climate neutrality by 2050. The 10 North Seas Energy Cooperation countries Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the UK have agreed at their Ministerial meeting in Esbjerg in June 2019 to broaden the scope of their cooperation. Their 2020 Work Programme now elaborates what they intend to do together on maritime spatial planning, electricity grids and developing hybrid and joint offshore wind farms.

The 10 countries have committed to assessing the current framework for offshore wind farms that have a grid connection to more than one country and identifying possible obstacles. Such hybrid projects will be key in pooling assets and infrastructure together and reduce the costs of deploying offshore wind.

The countries have also recognised that space in the North Seas is finite and will collaborate on maritime spatial planning to be able to utilise the energy potential of the North Seas. The countries will better coordinate the planning and development offshore (and onshore) electricity grid expansion in order to facilitate the expansion of offshore wind. And will develop concrete plans for potential joint cross-border offshore wind farms that generate benefits for all participating parties.

Offshore wind will be vital for Europe to deliver on its decarbonisation goals. The European Commission has stated that 230-450 of offshore wind will be necessary to deliver climate neutrality by 2050. Anew report by WindEuropeshowed that 450 GW of offshore wind in Europe (380 GW of which in the North Seas) is both achievable and affordable provided countries collaborate with one another in their investments in electricity grids and take the right approach to maritime spatial planning.

WindEurope CEO Giles Dickson said that up to 380 GW of offshore wind is doable in the North Seas by 2050 if countries collaborate effectively on maritime spatial planning, grid investments and hybrid offshore projects.

The North Seas countries realise that and are taking concrete steps to make these big volumes happen. Its great to see this reinforced commitment from Governments on offshore wind and to see them widening and deepening the scope of their work together. This is Europe at its best. And a great example for other regions, in particular, the Baltic to follow, he said.

Read more from the original source:

North Seas Nations to Reinforce Cooperation on Offshore Wind - Saurenergy

With Nation Transfixed by Impeachment, Trump Admin Quietly Serves Offshore Drilling Companies a ‘Sweetheart Giveaway’ – EcoWatch

2. Shuba (Russia)

While most countries celebrate Christmas on December 25th, Russia is one of the few countries that celebrates this holiday on January 7th in accordance with the Orthodox Julian calendar.

Colloquially known as "herring under a fur coat," shuba is a popular dish served during the holiday season in Russia. Its main ingredients include pickled herring, hard-boiled eggs, mayonnaise, and grated vegetables like carrots, beets, potatoes, and onions.

The dish gets its name from its top layer, which is usually made of mayonnaise or a beet dressing that resembles a warm winter coat.

While this may seem like an unconventional dish, it's an excellent source of protein, potassium, antioxidants, and vitamins A and B.

3. Yebeg Wot (Ethiopia)

Similarly to Ethiopia's national dish, doro wat (chicken stew), yebeg wot is a popular lamb stew served during the holiday season.

Weeks prior to the holidays, farmers feed lambs a high calorie diet. This leads to fatty, tender meat, which is added to a stew made of onions, tomatoes, garlic, kibbeh (Ethiopian butter), berbere spice mix, and various spices.

Many serve yebeg wot with injera, a popular flatbread.

This dish is a rich source of protein, carbs, and antioxidants.

4. Spiced Hot Chocolate (Peru)

If you think you know how to make the best hot chocolate, you may want to give Peru's spiced hot chocolate a try.

This creamy hot chocolate with a kick is made with chocolate, condensed or evaporated milk, and a combination of spices, such as cinnamon, chili powder, cloves, and nutmeg.

In fact, this beverage is so popular that it has its own event known as la Chocolatadas, during which people gather and serve spiced hot chocolate with a popular cake known as panetn.

5. Mince Pie (England)

Also known as mincemeat or Christmas pie, mince pie is a widely popular and historical holiday dessert.

Despite its name, most modern mincemeat pies are meatless. Traditionally, mince pies were made of shredded beef or mutton, suet, dried fruit, and spices.

However, most varieties today simply consist of pastry dough, dried apples and raisins, distilled spirits, vegetable shortening, and a spice mixture containing nutmeg, cloves, and cinnamon.

Interestingly, the pies used to be oblongly shaped to represent a manger, although most mince pies served today are circular.

6. Bibingka (Philippines)

During the holiday season, bibingka is a common breakfast item in the Philippines.

Bibingka consists of rice flour or sticky rice, coconut milk, sugar, and water wrapped and cooked in banana leaves. Eggs, cheese, and coconut flakes are sometimes added as a garnish.

This dish is usually served for breakfast or after Simbng Gabi a nine-day series of Filipino Catholic masses leading up to Christmas.

In fact, it's common to have food stations set up outside of church for churchgoers to buy bibingka and other popular sweets, such as steamed rice cakes known as puto bumbong. Many enjoy these treats with a hot cup of tea or coffee.

7. Butter Tarts (Canada)

While a typical Canadian diet is similar to that of a typical U.S. diet, it has a few classic treats of its own.

Butter tarts are a Canadian dessert that's served during many holidays, but mostly during Thanksgiving and Christmas.

They're small pastries with a sweet filling made of butter, sugar, maple or corn syrup, eggs, and sometimes walnuts and raisins. Enjoy these tarts with a cup of coffee for the ultimate treat.

8. Latkes (Israel)

During Hanukkah, latkes are a delicious staple on most dinner plates. In Hebrew, the dish is known as levivot.

Fried in hot oil, latkes are symbolic of the oil that, according to a text that serves as the central source of Jewish religious law, lit the menorah for 8 days despite only having enough oil for 1 day.

Made of the simplest of ingredients, you can make latkes with shredded potato and onion, eggs, and breadcrumbs or matzo. Deep fry it in hot oil, and you have yourself some delicious latkes.

Other popular Hanukkah treats include sufganiyot (jelly donuts), challah (braided bread), and beef brisket.

9. Hangikjt (Iceland)

Served during Christmas, hangikjt is one of the most popular Icelandic holiday foods.

It translates to "hung meat" and involves smoked lamb or mutton. Its name originates from the traditional practice of hanging smoked meats in a smoking shed for weeks to develop a smoky, salty flavor.

Hangikjt is commonly served with green beans, potatoes that are coated in a white bchamel sauce, and side of pickled red cabbage.

10. Bahn Chung (Vietnam)

Bahn chung is a beloved rice cake enjoyed during Tt (Vietnamese New Year).

This dish is made using sticky rice, pork, mung beans, green onions, fish sauce, and spices like salt and pepper.

In addition to its great flavor, it's placed in front of family altars to pay tribute to ancestors and prayers for the upcoming year.

11. Pasteles (Puerto Rico)

Pasteles are a classic Christmas dish in Puerto Rico.

Making pasteles requires time and patience. The inner portion of the pasteles consists of a mixture of ground pork and an adobo blended spice sauce. The outer portion is made using a special masa dough made of grated green bananas, yauta, and spices.

After allowing the dough to sit for a few hours, the masa is placed on banana leaves, the pork filling is added, and it's wrapped.

Traditional Puertorican pasteles are boiled in hot water and served with rice, meat, fish, pigeon peas, and hot sauce for a delicious holiday feast.

12. Eggnog (United States)

Eggnog isn't a holiday treat around the world. In fact, it's mostly enjoyed in the United States and Canada.

This drink is made from milk, cream, whipped egg whites, egg yolks, and sugar, resulting in a creamy, smooth texture.

Most people enjoy eggnog as an alcoholic beverage by adding rum, bourbon, or brandy.

13. Kutia (Ukraine)

Kutia is a traditional Christmas Eve dish that is popular among members of the Ukranian Orthodox Church. As part of the Julian calendar, Christmas Eve falls on January 6th.

It's usually the first dish served as part of Sviata Vecheria a 12-dish vegetarian feast to commemorate the 12 apostles.

Made from cooked wheat berries, poppy seeds, dried fruit, and honey, this dish is packed with nutrition, which is an important focus of this Ukranian feast. In fact, this dish is so important to the meal that all guests are expected to have at least one spoonful.

However, it's customary to wait until the first star in the sky appears before digging in.

14. Janssons Frestelse (Sweden)

Also known as Jansson's Temptation, this casserole dish is made from potatoes, onions, heavy cream, breadcrumbs, and sprats a small, oily fish similar to sardines.

It's usually accompanied by a smorgasbord of food known as the "julbord," which translates to "Yule table" or "Christmas table." It's enjoyed with foods like baked ham, meatballs, fish, boiled potatoes, cheeses, and various cooked vegetables.

The origin of its name is controversial, though many believe it originated from a popular opera singer known as Pelle Janzon.

15. Christmas Cake (Global)

Christmas cake is a popular dessert around the world.

It's a type of fruit cake made of flour, eggs, sugar, spices, candied cherries, dried fruit, and brandy. Traditional Christmas cake is made at least 2 months ahead to allow adequate time to slowly "feed" the cake with brandy every 2 weeks. Finally, it's topped with a marzipan icing.

While it's mostly known as a British dessert, many countries serve Christmas cake during the holiday season. In fact, South Koreans are well-known for their beautiful, artistic Christmas cake decorations.

The Bottom Line

Many cultures celebrate the holiday season for different reasons. Whether it's Christmas, Hanukkah, or New Year, food plays a central role in celebrations around the world.

From savory main dishes to sweet desserts, each culture brings a unique twist to this jolly season.

With the holidays just around the corner, remember to enjoy all the delicious food and memories they will bring.

Read the original post:

With Nation Transfixed by Impeachment, Trump Admin Quietly Serves Offshore Drilling Companies a 'Sweetheart Giveaway' - EcoWatch

A usurpation of Fourth Amendment rights – BayStateBanner

Whenever they change police policies, you know were the ones who will be targeted.

Prior to 1968 it would have been a constitutional violation for a policeman to stop-and-frisk anyone unless he had a warrant for that individuals arrest. However, the U.S. Supreme Court altered that restriction with its decision in the case of Terry vs. Ohio. It became permissible for a police officer to stop-and-frisk if it was his judgment that the person was carrying a gun or was about to commit a crime. The question then became whether the police force was judicious in the implementation of its stop-and-frisk policy. Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York is now forced to account for the policy when he was in office.

The primary objective of stops by police in New York was to discover and remove guns thus reducing the number of shootings. Bloomberg served as mayor from 2002-2013. In 2002 there were 97,296 stops and 1,892 victims of gunfire. In 2011 the number of stops had climbed to 685,724 but there were still 1,821 gunfire victims. Clearly the stops were ineffective.

The disastrous aspect of the policy is that blacks and Latinos were the primary victims of the stops. They were nine times more likely to be stopped than were whites. And with all this police harassment, very few guns were taken off the street. During the Bloomberg era only 14 guns were found in every 10,000 stops.

Now that Bloomberg plans to run for president, blacks seem to be concerned that the apology for his support of stop-and-frisk is sincere, and well it should be. But little attention has been given to the loss of our Fourth Amendment rights. This constitutional amendment prohibited any unwarranted violations by the police. It states in part that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated

In the process of defying this right, the police have alienated their relationship with blacks and Latinos. Without the support of the community, the police are less effective at their primary objectives, the protection of citizens and the deterrence of crime. Nonetheless there has been no serious outcry against the loss of Fourth Amendment rights.

Compare this with the protest from the National Rifle Association over any restriction on the unfettered right to buy guns, even firearms intended for military use. The NRA has imposed upon the American public an interpretation of the Second Amendment that would have required the Founding Fathers to anticipate in the late 1700s the availability of AR-15 style rifles as a common weapon of choice. The slow reloading flint locks were common back then.

The loss of Fourth Amendment rights did not end with stop-and-frisk. The technology industry in its many forms has now felt free to alienate whatever rights of privacy remain, regardless of the citizens race. Industry leaders insist that the loss of privacy is a modest price to pay in order for the high tech media to be affordable. Perhaps, but it is still a crime to record a telephone call without permission.

Bloombergs apology is an admission that stop-and-frisk has failed. Black leaders who oppose the practice should present their protest from the perspective of an excessive violation of the Fourth Amendment rights to privacy. This is an important grievance to pursue now because many people of all ethnicities are concerned with the massive loss of Fourth Amendment rights created by digital technology.

Go here to read the rest:

A usurpation of Fourth Amendment rights - BayStateBanner

Why is Adam Schiff sniffing around the phone records of reporters and congressmen? – Washington Examiner

Adam Schiff owes the public some answers.

The House Intelligence Committee chairman should explain why and under what authority he obtained and then publicized phone records that included calls involving the president's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, ranking Intelligence Committee Republican Devin Nunes, journalist John Solomon, and others. It is far from clear when, or even whether, House subpoena powers extend so far without a court-ordered search warrant.

The California Democrat has used the records to hint at attempts by the Trump team and by Nunes, Schiffs bitter rival, to coordinate a pressure campaign against Ukraine for Trumps personal benefit. Solomon, meanwhile, was the conduit for much of the reporting, some of it from dubious sources, that Trumps defenders have cited as the reason Trump wanted certain Ukrainian actions investigated.

The exact scope of congressional subpoena power is a legal gray area, frequently fought over in the courts without clear resolution. In Schiffs favor, Congress arguably deserves more latitude amid impeachment proceedings. And as Giuliani and his associate Lev Parnas are both reportedly under investigation by divisions of the Justice Department, it is possible, if one stretches the imagination, that Schiff was somehow just piggybacking on those investigations to secure their phone logs.

But Schiff is on dangerous ground by publicizing phone calls by fellow members of Congress and journalists. Perhaps Schiff merely stumbled across Nunes's and Solomon's calls because they involved Giuliani or Parnas. But it sets a dangerous precedent that journalists, protected with good reason by the First Amendment, or members of Congress, protected with good reason by the Constitution's speech or debate clause, should be thus exposed by a committee chairman just to score what appears to be a few extra political points.

Nunes's phone calls probably do not merit speech or debate protection. But they might, and it is not a frivolous question. If a member of Congress takes an action connected to oversight for example, speaking on the phone with someone tasked by the president to do something in Ukraine the courts have ruled that the pertinence of this action to the speech or debate clause does not hinge on the formality of the investigation but on "whether information is acquired in connection with or in aid of an activity that qualifies as legislative in nature. Maybe it's a crazy idea, but there probably ought to be a presumption against leaking a political rival's phone activity in this manner. In fact, Schiff's behavior in this regard resembles that for which he now hopes to impeach the president.

There are other concerns here, as well. In the context of executive law enforcement, Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures generally require permission from judges or magistrates. In other words, the checks and balances of the system require two of the three branches, not just one, to agree that the search is necessary and lawful. If Congress, meaning Schiff, acted without judicial imprimatur, then the legitimacy of his phone-records search is certainly questionable.

Meanwhile, if he did subpoena Solomons calls again, this is not entirely clear that would also raise serious issues related to press freedoms, in addition to the Fourth Amendment concerns. Schiff needs to clear up why Solomons calls were included in his dragnet. Their release appears to be an act of petty vengeance against someone whose reporting followed the wrong narrative.

Schiff owes the public absolute transparency here about his methods, and he must provide legal justifications that clear a fairly high bar. Yes, his exercise of power may conceivably have been legitimate, but count us unconvinced. Absent a full and convincing explanation, the phone-records search was presumptively invalid.

The rest is here:

Why is Adam Schiff sniffing around the phone records of reporters and congressmen? - Washington Examiner

Can the Police Be Trusted to Apply This Arrest Tactic? – The National Interest Online

But his apology, made at a predominantly black church in Brooklyn, puzzled many observers. That included scholars of criminal justice like ourselves.

Bloomberg has long been a vocal supporter of a policy the city police department officially called Stop, Question, and Frisk, including during his time as New Yorks mayor. In an effort to control crime, police aggressively and indiscriminately stopped and questioned people on the streets or in public housing projects. Police also often patted down suspects to check for weapons.

His apology was confusing because that phrase, often shortened to stop and frisk, is used to describe two different things.

As we wrote in our book, Stop and Frisk: The Use and Abuse of a Controversial Policing Tactic, one is a legitimate, constitutionally sanctioned tactic, grounded in a police officers reasonable suspicion that a particular person is engaged in criminal activity.

The other is an illegitimate, broad crime-control strategy that, more often than not, ignores the laws requirement that a particular person be reasonably suspected of breaking the law.

For centuries, the English common law tradition, which undergirds U.S. law, has recognized a police officers right to stop a member of the public to inquire about potentially criminal behavior. They can do this without needing to meet the legal standard for arresting the person and charging them with a crime provided the officer had reasonable grounds to be suspicious in the first place.

In 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court codified that practice in its decision in Terry v. Ohio. In that case, a police officer saw two black men walking up and down a Cleveland street and repeatedly peering into a particular stores windows. A white man joined them, after which the police officer approached the group, identified himself and patted down the mens clothes effectively, stopping and frisking them. The pat-down revealed that two of them were carrying illegally concealed firearms and burglars tools.

The men challenged the constitutionality of the initial stop and the subsequent pat-down.

When the case got to the Supreme Court, the justices established that stop-and-frisk was a practice fundamentally different than a search or seizure as specified by the Fourth Amendment. They concluded that the police officer had what they called a reasonable suspicion that the suspects were preparing to burglarize the store.

The court also ruled that police could pat down suspects to ensure they arent armed with weapons that could be used against the officers.

Taken together, the ruling gives police broad authority to decide when, whether and why to stop, question and frisk people.

In several rulings since 1968, the Supreme Court has expanded officers power to stop members of the public. That expanded power includes stopping someone in the open concourse area of an airport and requesting to see persons ticket and identification, briefly searching a car for hidden weapons, stopping people for minor infractions while really investigating more serious crimes and even frisking people under the pretext of looking for weapons in hopes of finding drugs.

Left unchecked, all that discretion could lead to discriminatory, racially unjust and unconstitutional behavior in which blacks and Hispanics are targeted more often than their proportion of the population would suggest they should be.

At its core, the stop-and-frisk approach is supposed to rely on more than a hunch. But the low burden of proof, the large discretion granted to police and the relatively invisible nature of these sorts of encounters combine to create real potential for abuse. Indeed, several U.S. police departments turned stop-and-frisk tactics into a wider, more aggressive strategy to cut down on crime.

Since 2002, New York City police officers, for instance, have stopped, questioned and often frisked hundreds of thousands of people each year. Police conducted more than 685,000 stops in 2011 alone. Over 82% of the people stopped were black or Hispanic, in a city where 52% of the population is black or Hispanic. Just 12% of all stops of people of any race resulted in an arrest or a summons.

Based on that data, a federal judge ruled in 2013 that the New York Police Department had unconstitutionally racially profiled its stop-and-frisk targets.

That year, New York police stopped 191,851 people; since 2014, under Bloombergs successor Mayor Bill DeBlasio, the number has dropped steadily. In 2018, just 11,008 people were stopped, and 31% of the stops resulted in an arrest or a summons.

As mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg warned that a judges 2013 ruling restricting stop-and-frisk policing could bring rising crime rates. Since the ruling, crime has stayed historically low. AP Photo/Seth Wenig

New Yorks aggressive stopping-and-frisking practices happened at the same time as changes within the citys police department, including a strategy in which police commanders identified what they called high-crime areas and flooded those locations with officers on foot patrols.

During that same time frame, the citys crime rate dropped especially its murder rate.

But crime rates stayed historically low even after officers dramatically reduced the frequency of stop-and-frisk encounters, signaling that other circumstances not stop-and-frisk drove the crime rate lower.

Despite those problems in New York, we believe that it is possible for stop-and-frisk to succeed in contemporary policing so long as it is not used broadly and indiscriminately.

Officers can be fair to suspects if they stop and question a person only when objective circumstances give rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and if they frisk that person only when clear facts suggest the person may be armed.

For instance, it could be appropriate for an officer to stop and frisk someone on the street for wearing a trench coat in hot weather. Another example that could warrant a stop-and-frisk would be if an officer sees someone repeatedly entering and leaving a bank or store without doing any business inside.

Those situations dont depend on the race or ethnicity of the potential suspect. Racial or ethnic characteristics should be part of an officers decision to stop someone only if the person in other ways matches a description of a criminal suspect police are seeking.

Given the pervasiveness of racism and implicit bias, we believe that police departments that use stop-and-frisk tactics should be actively on guard against officers misuse of police power.

That includes careful recruitment and selection of new officers, excellent training and clearly written policies. Moreover, officers must be supervised in ways that increase accountability and transparency, potentially involving external oversight.

Body-worn cameras offer an opportunity for police departments to monitor and control officer decision-making during stop-and-frisk activities. Supervisors, training officers and even community members could systematically review body-worn camera footage as part of efforts to hold officers accountable for staying within the bounds of department policies and constitutional limitations.

If used properly, we believe, stop-and-frisk can be successfully and legitimately used while treating people with dignity and respect and giving suspects fair opportunities to tell their sides of the story. By making decisions fairly and acting with trustworthy motives, officers can ensure public safety while honoring citizens constitutional rights.

[ Expertise in your inbox. Sign up for The Conversations newsletter and get a digest of academic takes on todays news, every day. ]

Henry F. Fradella, Professor and Associate Director, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University and Michael D. White, Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Image: Reuters

View post:

Can the Police Be Trusted to Apply This Arrest Tactic? - The National Interest Online

Facial Recognition Technology: Is There Anything to Be Afraid Of? – DevPro Journal

Over the past year, the debate over facial recognition technology has heated up. On one hand, facial recognition technology, like other forms of biometric identification, can greatly benefit systems in which the users identity must be flawlessly verified. Ravi Raj from Passage AI explains, Increasingly weve seen leaks of sensitive private information including credit card numbers, passwords and social security numbers, through data hacks, often resulting in identity theft. Facial recognition technology can increase the security of sensitive accounts by requiring a biometric scan to access an account in place of a password.

Raj says when its used ethically and accurately, facial recognition technology can also provide consumers with greater convenience. Raj says, for example, Facial recognition could be used to identify a passenger when they use public transit and automatically debit their accounts.

And there are numerous other uses or potential applications for facial recognition technology.

Identifying people in photos posted on social media is a familiar use case. This technology can also provide an efficient and secure solution to unlock mobile devices, target dynamic advertising based on a consumers age and gender, automatically track school attendance, and streamline airline check-in processes.

While some industries are exploring the promising potential, there is also ample concern over how facial recognition technology could create risks so much so that some legislators have passed laws to ban or limit its use, including San Francisco, Oakland, and the Boston suburb of Somerville.

Raj says concerns over facial recognition technology center on three general areas:

Raj says if businesses, enterprises or organizations use facial recognition for applications beyond what they publicly disclosed, it could lead to privacy and ethical issues.

He points out, however, Consumers do not have to give up privacy as long as their data is used solely for the reason described and nothing else.

Beyond privacy, Raj says, security of the data is very critical to ensure that hackers and other bad actors dont make malicious use of the data.

A report on the 2019 BioStar2 security breach brought some of these issues front and center. One of the biggest concerns is that unsecured biometric data cant be changed once its stolen its easier to update a password than change a face. Also, if account and personal information are stolen with biometric data, cybercriminals can take over accounts even exchange the account owners facial and fingerprint records for their own.

Raj comments, There could also be bias in the data that is used for training the deep learning models for facial recognition. Since the data sets used in a particular country would underrepresent minorities, it could lead to bias and algorithm errors when dealing with recognition of minorities.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) also raises questions about the use of facial recognition technology for surveillance, which could be carried out without peoples knowledge or consent. The ACLU warns that driver license photographs or other images could be used with surveillance systems to build systems that can track people.

The American Bar Association points out that using facial recognition technology for some use cases could violate the Fourth Amendment, which protects US citizens from unlawful search in places where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy. In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that collecting historical cell site location information (CSLI) from cellular providers, which could be used to track a person, required a warrant. In its decision, the Supreme Court stated that as technology advances, courts would have to work to protect peoples privacy.

Facial recognition technology could also interfere with First Amendment rights to freedom of association if people know theyre being watched, they may begin to self-censor their activity.

If you are considering providing your users with identity, user authentication, or access control solutions using facial recognition technology, Raj advises you to vet solutions carefully.

It is extremely important that facial recognition technology be 100 percent accurate, he says. Even a small amount of inaccuracy can lead to inconvenience for consumers, and worse, violation of civil rights and the likelihood of innocent individuals being punished, especially in law enforcement applications.

He advises, Software developers should be very clear on how this technology is used in the solutions they provide and make sure their users are also aware.

Continued here:

Facial Recognition Technology: Is There Anything to Be Afraid Of? - DevPro Journal

MIT Says New Technique Lets You Hack Your Own Brain Waves

MIT researchers have found that they could teach test subjects how to manipulate their own alpha brain waves, thereby improving attention at a given task.

MIT researchers say they’ve taught test subjects how to manipulate their own alpha brain waves, thereby improving attention at a given task. The key: give the participants live feedback of their brain activity.

The study, published Wednesday in the journal Neuron, suggests the possibility of teaching people, particularly those with learning disabilities, how to improve their focus through neurofeedback.

“There’s a lot of interest in using neurofeedback to try to help people with various brain disorders and behavioral problems,” says Robert Desimone, director of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research. “It’s a completely noninvasive way of controlling and testing the role of different types of brain activity.”

The team of scientists found that by suppressing alpha waves in one half of their parietal cortex — the lobe responsible for touch, spatial sense, navigation, as well as attention — subjects were better able to pay attention to objects on a screen.

The connection between attention and alpha waves has been established by previous studies. What wasn’t clear until now, as the authors claim in an official statement, is whether the connection was a byproduct of a different process, or if alpha waves directly control attention.

In a clever experiment, participants were given live neurofeedback that described their alpha waves. They had to look at a grating pattern in the center of a monitor and were told to use mental effort to increase the pattern’s contrast, thereby making it more visible.

The contrast became more visible as the asymmetry of alpha waves in both the left and right hemisphere of the parietal cortex grew based on live data picked up by a brain activity monitor. In other words, the alpha waves were suppressed in one side while increasing in the other.

One group learned how to suppress the alpha waves in the left, another in the right side of the brain. Both groups showed opposite results: more response, or attention, to flashes of light in the right and left side of the screen, respectively.

Astonishingly, after ten minutes of the exercise, the subjects learned how to increase the contrast, thereby increasing control over their attention.

“After the experiment, the subjects said they knew that they were controlling the contrast, but they didn’t know how they did it,” lead author Yasaman Bagherzadeh said in the statement. “We think the basis is conditional learning — whenever you do a behavior and you receive a reward, you’re reinforcing that behavior.”

“Alpha manipulation really was controlling people’s attention, even though they didn’t have any clear understanding of how they were doing it,” Desimone added.

Some substantial questions remain, like how the subjects were controlling their alpha brain waves in the first place. The team also doesn’t know how long the effects of this brain wave manipulation last, despite some signs that the effects “did seem to persist afterwards,” according to Desimone.

The scientists also don’t know if the technique will actually be able to be applied to real-life scenarios, such as teaching people with behavioral problems how to improve attention. It’s also unclear if the technique applies to other kinds of brain waves, such as beta waves that have been linked to Parkinson’s disease in the past.

But, at the same time, the experiment seems to demonstrate that we have a surprising degree of subconscious control over the mechanics of our own brains.

The post MIT Says New Technique Lets You Hack Your Own Brain Waves appeared first on Futurism.

Read this article:
MIT Says New Technique Lets You Hack Your Own Brain Waves

Nation’s Entire Gov Shuts Down to Focus on Measles Outbreak

A measles outbreak in Samoa has left 60 people dead, the vast majority of them children under the age of four, prompting a nationwide vaccination campaign.

The island nation of Samoa is in the midst of a devastating measles outbreak — and the government has now ceased all operations not focused on containing it.

As of Wednesday, the measles outbreak has killed 60 people, Ars Technica reported, with 52 of those being children under the age of four. An additional 4,052 people have fallen ill, which is a huge number for a nation with a population of around 200,000.

On Tuesday, Samoa’s government announced that it would shut down all public and government services on Thursday and Friday from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. so that officials could help public servants go door-to-door administering measles vaccines.

“The public is hereby advised to tie a red cloth or red flag in front of their houses and near the road to indicate that family members have not been vaccinated,” the government wrote in the announcement. “The red mark makes it easier for the teams to identify households for vaccinations.”

As for why Samoa is experiencing this outbreak, the nation’s measles vaccination rate for infants was just 31 percent in 2018, according to World Health Organization data, representing a huge drop from its 90 percent rate in 2013.

The WHO notes that the public’s reluctance to vaccinate could be related to the deaths of two infants in 2018, who died on the same day after receiving a measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine containing the muscle relaxant Attracurium.

The nurses who mixed the drug in with the vaccines were caught and are now in prison, but anti-vaxx organizations picked up on the story, using it to stoke fears of vaccinations.

Now, Samoa’s government is trying desperately to contain a measles outbreak that’s claiming more lives by the day — all while anti-vaxxers compare their efforts to Nazi Germany and try to convince Samoans they just need a bit more Vitamin A in their diet.

“Let us work together to encourage and convince those that do not believe that vaccinations are the only answer to the epidemic,” Prime Minister Tuilaepa Sailele Malielegaoi urged citizens in a state address on Tuesday. “Let us not be distracted by the promise of alternative cures… No traditional healers or kangen water preparations can cure measles.”

The post Nation’s Entire Gov Shuts Down to Focus on Measles Outbreak appeared first on Futurism.

See the original post here:
Nation’s Entire Gov Shuts Down to Focus on Measles Outbreak

The Company Behind Pokémon Go Is Making AR Glasses

Niantic, the company behind Pokémon Go, announced that it partnered up with Qualcomm to develop new augmented reality (AR) glasses.

Immersive Gaming

Niantic, the company that created augmented reality games including the undying Pokémon Go and the much more forgettable Harry Potter: Wizards Unite, is now developing a new pair of AR glasses.

The company announced on Thursday that it’s partnering up with the tech company Qualcomm to create the glasses, according to CNET. As Apple and Facebook also work toward their own smart glasses in bids to succeed where Google Glass spectacularly failed, Niantic is entering the fray and creating a new design that will use Qualcomm’s new mixed reality chip, all in an attempt to finally make AR wearables happen.

Licensing Play

Niantic and Qualcomm haven’t explained how the glasses might be used — and, arguably more importantly, it remains unclear whether they’ll be compatible with Pokémon Go.

Rather, CNET reports that the companies seem to be developing glasses that other companies could license and sell rather than actually manufacturing them.

“We build a reference design to enable other hardware manufacturers to commercialize.” Qualcomm head of mixed reality Hugo Swart told CNET.

READ MORE: New smart glasses coming from Qualcomm and Pokemon Go creator Niantic [CNET]

More on Pokémon: Putting Pokémon On The Blockchain Takes Microtransactions To Their Inevitable, Insufferable End

The post The Company Behind Pokémon Go Is Making AR Glasses appeared first on Futurism.

See the rest here:
The Company Behind Pokémon Go Is Making AR Glasses

This Futuristic Space Hoodie is a “Self-Contained Microhabitat”

British clothing design firm Vollebak devised a futuristic hoodie that could help astronauts sleep while drifting through space inside a cramped spacecraft.

Cocoon Hoodie

High-end British clothing design firm Vollebak has devised a futuristic hoodie that it says could help astronauts catch some much-needed z’s while drifting through the cosmos inside a cramped spacecraft. It promises to create a “self-contained microhabitat” by cocooning the wearer’s head inside a “space helmet” hood.

Images courtesy of Vollebank

Getting sleep is difficult in orbit: astronauts aboard the International Space Station, for instance, experience 16 sunrises every day. Many astronauts have been reported using sleeping aids including medication and eye masks to get some rest.

Deep Sleep in Space

The Deep Sleep Cocoon is meant to help space travelers cope not only with a lack of sleep but with high-pressure situations as well. Five segments inspired by insect coverings, according to the website, completely enclose the wearer’s head, shutting out light.

“From an engineering perspective it makes the jacket a cross between a woodlouse and a space helmet,” reads a description.

“We wanted zipping the Deep Sleep Cocoon up on a plane flight to be like hanging up a Do Not Disturb sign,” Vollebak co-founder Steve Tidball explained in a statement. “Bright lights disappear. Everything gets quieter. And people leave you alone.”

When the wearer needs to be alert, the “space helmet” hoodie can be folded down, turning the jacket into a standard garment you’d find back on Earth.

Last year, the company behind the hoodie released what it claims to be the world’s first graphene jacket, making it extremely flexible and strong. The company also sells a t-shirt made out of sustainably sourced plant algae and a color-shifting jacket inspired by the adaptive camouflage of squids.

Unfortunately, the Deep Sleep Cocoon doesn’t come cheap. The jacket can be yours for a cool $895 at the company’s website starting now.

READ MORE: The Deep Sleep Cocoon. Designed to help you sleep anywhere. And built for the first missions to Mars. [Vollebak]

More on futuristic clothing: This Startup Is Selling “Little Black Dresses” Designed By AI

The post This Futuristic Space Hoodie is a “Self-Contained Microhabitat” appeared first on Futurism.

Read the original:
This Futuristic Space Hoodie is a “Self-Contained Microhabitat”

This Single-Celled Creature Is Weirdly Smart

Scientists observed surprisingly complex behavior from a single-celled organism that strongly resembles active decisionmaking.

They’re Learning

Scientists say they’ve observed what they’re calling signs of complex decisionmaking in a single-celled organism, breathing new life into a theory that was laughed off over a century ago.

The aquatic creature, Stentor roeseli, responds differently over time to the same stimulus, which ScienceAlert reports is evidence that the critter can make decisions — or at least do whatever the single-celled equivalent of changing one’s mind might be. It’s not quite accurate to say a creature without any sort of nervous system is actively thinking, but the discovery challenges many of scientists’ assumptions about animal intelligence.

Poke Test

Similar single-celled organisms will gradually respond less and less to repeated stimuli. Stentor roeseli, however, will first bend away from the source of the stimulus — but later change tactics and flap its cilia in defense, contract, or float away, according to research published Thursday in Current Biology.

A zoologist named Herbert Spencer Jennings first made the same discovery in 1906, ScienceAlert reports, but no one has been able to recreate it since.

Possible Answers

The likelihood that the organism would select one strategy over another was nearly a 50-50 split, suggesting that some biological mechanism is choosing one over the other almost as though it were flipping a coin.

Saying that Stentor roeseli can make decisions is more of an illustration than a precise explanation, but until scientists continue to probe the complex behavior, it may be the best way to describe what’s going on in the little critter.

READ MORE: This Single-Celled Animal Makes Complex ‘Decisions’ Even Without a Nervous System [ScienceAlert]

More on intelligence: Fringe Idea: Should we Gene-Hack Animals to Make Them Smarter?

The post This Single-Celled Creature Is Weirdly Smart appeared first on Futurism.

Read the original here:
This Single-Celled Creature Is Weirdly Smart

Cafe Staffed by Robots Opens in Japan

SoftBank Robotics has opened the Pepper PARLOR, a cafe where robots work alongside human staff to serve and entertain customers.

RoboRestaurant

On Thursday, SoftBank Robotics opened the Pepper PARLOR, a cafe where three different types of robots work alongside human staff to serve and entertain customers.

“[The] aim is to create a space where people can easily experience the coexistence of people and robots and enjoy the evolution of robots and the future of living with robots,” the company told ZDNet. “We want to make robots not only for convenience and efficiency, but also to expand the possibilities of people and bring happiness.”

Three’s Company

SoftBank developed all three of the robots working in the Pepper PARLOR, including the cafe’s eponym, Pepper. That semi-humanoid robot does most of the interacting with customers, greeting them and taking their orders.

SoftBank’s NAO robots, meanwhile, provide the entertainment, performing choreographed dances to entertain patrons. When the cafe closes, the company’s autonomous vacuum robot Whiz cleans its floors.

Cafe Laboratory

SoftBank didn’t open the Pepper PARLOR just so it could show the public what a future full of robots might be like, though. It also hopes to use the cafe to gather data about how to make its robots more useful for clients.

“We will be able to build know-how by managing the store on our own instead of relying on a partner business,” SoftBank’s Chief Creative Officer Kazutaka Hasumi told The Asian Review. “That way we will be able to propose functions that companies want in robots.”

READ MORE: SoftBank enters the cafe business with new robot-filled Pepper Parlor [Digital Trends]

More on Pepper: A Robot Is Scheduled to Testify in Front of the UK Parliament

The post Cafe Staffed by Robots Opens in Japan appeared first on Futurism.

Excerpt from:
Cafe Staffed by Robots Opens in Japan

Scientists Find Dead Star Roasting Its Giant Exoplanet

For the first time ever, scientists have discovered a giant exoplanet orbiting a white dwarf — the extremely dense remains of an exploded dead star.

Exquisite Corpse

For the first time ever, New Scientist reports, scientists have discovered signs of an exoplanet orbiting a white dwarf — the corpse of an exploded star. It’s estimated to be about the size of Jupiter, and it’s orbiting the dead star at an incredibly close distance.

The discovery could help us gain insight into the evolution of distant star systems, as well as our own. Planets this close to a white dwarf usually have no chance of survival, as they get sucked in by the white dwarf’s immense gravitational pull.

The team’s finding came after they detected a gas ring around a white dwarf called G29-38, some 1,200 light years away. Within this disk, a massive planet, mostly composed of water and hydrogen sulfide, orbits the white dwarf every ten days.

“This discovery is major progress, because over the past two decades, we had growing evidence that planetary systems survive into the white-dwarf stage,” lead author Boris Gaensicke, from the University of Warwick in England, said in a statement.  “Such a system has never been seen before, and it was immediately clear to me that this was a unique star,” Gaensicke added.

Eviscerated Star

The exoplanet won’t be around for long, though.

“This star has a planet that we can’t see directly, but because the star is so hot it is evaporating the planet, and we detect the atmosphere it is losing,” Gaensicke said.

“The orbit of the planet is most probably the result of gravitational interactions, indicating the presence of additional planets in the system,” the team wrote in the abstract of their paper, published this week in the journal Nature. Their theory goes that other planets might have pushed the planet towards its eviscerated star.

“This confirms what we have been thinking for the past 25 years — white dwarfs have proper planetary systems around them,” lead researcher Gaensicke told New Scientist.

READ MORE: We’ve discovered a planet orbiting an exploded star for the first time [New Scientist]

More on white dwarfs: Two Dead Stars Are Orbiting Each Other’s Corpses Incredibly Fast

The post Scientists Find Dead Star Roasting Its Giant Exoplanet appeared first on Futurism.

Read more:
Scientists Find Dead Star Roasting Its Giant Exoplanet

First-Ever “Pig-Monkey Chimeras” Born in Chinese Lab

According to a New Scientist exclusive, the first ever pig that had a small proportion of Its cells derived from a monkey was born in a lab in China.

According to a New Scientist exclusive, the first ever piglets with cells from monkeys have been born in a Chinese lab.

“This is the first report of full-term pig-monkey chimeras,” State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology researcher Tang Hai, a co-author on a new paper about the birth, told the magazine.

The researchers’ final aim is to grow human organs inside animals — but that future is still many years out. These particular piglets unfortunately died within a week of birth, with the exact cause of death still unknown.

To create the pig-monkey chimeras, Hai and his team grew a monkey cell culture, derived embryonic stem cells from it, and injected them into pig embryos four days after fertilization.

The results leave something to be desired. Only two out of ten piglets turned out to be chimeras. The team had to implant more than 4,000 embryos to get to these results.

“Given the extremely low chimeric efficiency and the deaths of all the animals, I actually see this as fairly discouraging,” stem cell biologist Paul Knoepfler from the University of California, Davis, told New Scientist.

The monkey cells in the two chimeras were spread across a number of vital organs, but only represented a very low proportion of cells — between one-in-1,000 and one-in-10,000, according to New Scientist.

The post First-Ever “Pig-Monkey Chimeras” Born in Chinese Lab appeared first on Futurism.

Visit link:
First-Ever “Pig-Monkey Chimeras” Born in Chinese Lab

Uber Gets Thousands of Sexual Assault Complaints per Year

Over the last two years, almost 6,000 Uber passengers reported sexual assault. While the company has taken steps to stop it, it also downplays the problem.

Disturbing Trend

Between 2017 and 2018, nearly 6,000 American Uber passengers filed complaints saying that their drivers or another passenger sexually assaulted them. And that’s just the official reports.

“Each of those incidents represents an individual who has undergone a horrific trauma,” Uber chief legal officer Tony West told NBC News. “But I’m not surprised by those numbers. And I’m not surprised because sexual violence is just much more pervasive in society than I think most people realize.”

Acknowledging Problems

Uber shared the sexual assault numbers in a new year-end safety report that the company published on Thursday along with a press release that described how it paired with organizations like the National Sexual Violence Resource Center to address the issue.

Uber has drawn unwanted attention in recent years for reports about its drivers sexually assaulting passengers.

Tiny Fraction

The press release points out that the reports only represent a tiny fraction of all Uber trips, and also, uncomfortably, attempts to downplay the problem by presenting statistics on how many people die in car crashes, get murdered, and were sexually assaulted at large.

“We do four million rides a day. That’s 45 trips per second,” West told NBC. “And when you’re operating at that kind of scale, thankfully, 99.9 percent of those rides end with absolutely no safety incident whatsoever.”

READ MORE: Uber reveals extent of sexual assault problem: thousands of abuse reports a year [NBC News]

More on Uber: A Driver Tricked Uber’s Algorithm Sexually Assaulted a Passenger

The post Uber Gets Thousands of Sexual Assault Complaints per Year appeared first on Futurism.

Original post:
Uber Gets Thousands of Sexual Assault Complaints per Year

Elon Musk Keeps Buying Mansions in a Particular Neighborhood

Elon Musk spent $100 million to buy seven homes in Los Angeles' pricey Bel-Air neighborhood in recent years, along with an estate near Tesla's HQ upstate.

Musk City

Over the past seven years, Elon Musk has bought up a cluster of expensive homes in Los Angeles’ ritzy Bel-Air neighborhood.

Musk paid about approximately $100 million for the homes, six of which are all in close proximity within Bel-Air, according to The Wall Street Journal. The seventh is a full estate with a $27 million mansion in Northern California, near Tesla headquarters. While it’s not unusual to see a billionaire buy up a neighborhood, Musk’s real estate grabs are particularly striking given how he claimed to be low on cash in court on Thursday.

House Broke

Musk’s comments on his wealth came during official testimony during the trial over his now infamous “pedo guy” tweet aimed at cave diver Vernon Unsworth.

While sorting out his net worth, Musk acknowledged that he has about $20 billion to his name, Business Insider reports, but said most of it is tied up in various investments and businesses. That and seven mansions, apparently.

Buy Low

Real estate costs in Bel-Air have climbed since Musk bought the pod of homes, the WSJ reports.

It’s not clear what sort of use they get on a regular basis, but a real estate agent told the WSJ that Musk probably offers them up to employees or other associates as needed — while a neighbor speculated that Musk might try connecting them with an underground tunnel.

READ MORE: Elon Musk Buys Out the Neighbors [The Wall Street Journal]

More on Elon Musk: Police Reports: Meth, Heroin, Cocaine Found at Tesla Factory

The post Elon Musk Keeps Buying Mansions in a Particular Neighborhood appeared first on Futurism.

Visit link:
Elon Musk Keeps Buying Mansions in a Particular Neighborhood

This Startup Made a Nose Spray for Microdosing Psilocybin

Oregon startup Silo Wellness created a nasal spray that delivers precise amounts of the magic mushroom compound psilocybin with each pump for microdosing.

Take a large enough dose of psilocybin, the compound found in “magic mushrooms,” and you could find yourself largely incapacitated for hours while you ride out the trip.

But some people microdose psilocybin, meaning they take just a tiny bit of it. Advocates claim the practice does everything from increasing creativity and concentration to helping cope with depression and anxiety — all without hallucinations or the feeling of melting into the floor.

Now, Oregon startup Silo Wellness has created a nasal spray that takes the guesswork out of microdosing by delivering a precise amount of psilocybin with each pump — and the company believes it’s just a matter of time before it can begin selling the spray in the United States.

“We solved the age-old problem with plant- and fungus-based medicine: How do you know how much is a dose?” Michael Hartman, co-inventor of the spray, told New Atlas. “How do you avoid taking too much, like the cannabis edibles dilemma? We also managed to solve one of the common complaints of some mushroom users: taste and upset stomach.”

While psilocybin and other psychedelics are gaining traction in the world of medicine, magic mushrooms are still illegal in the U.S., and only two cities have decriminalized them: Denver, Colorado, and Oakland, California.

That’s forced Silo to develop its spray in Jamaica, where psilocybin-containing shrooms are legal.

However, nearly a hundred other cities in the U.S. are currently considering psychedelics decriminalization, and Silo Wellness is banking on psilocybin eventually being legalized for recreational use in the nation.

“Oregon is on track to pass its psilocybin initiative petition in the fall of 2020,” CEO Mike Arnold told New Atlas, adding that the company expects “states to fall like dominoes thereafter, much like cannabis but with a much more compressed timeline.”

“Legalization is inevitable,” he concluded.

The post This Startup Made a Nose Spray for Microdosing Psilocybin appeared first on Futurism.

More here:
This Startup Made a Nose Spray for Microdosing Psilocybin