(Washington, D.C.) -- When the original NAFTA agreement was implemented in 1994, biotechnology processes intended for practical agricultural use was in its early stages. But genetic modification has come a long way in the past quarter-century and advances continue daily.

Laboratory-based genetic sequencing and manipulation is clearly addressed in the new U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement rules. So now, scientific processes and regulations that evolved independently for more than 25 years need to be standardized for the US, Mexico, and Canada.

Ian Affleck is Vice-President of Biotechnology for Crop Life Canada, with an agribusiness membership that includes seed companies and plant breeders. Crop Life Canada is working to align regulations spelled out under the new USMCA. And Affleck says those rules will require systemic changes because the American and the Canadian GMO development rules evolved very differently.

With the USMCA coming into force, theres a biotechnology chapter thats supposed to help the two countries align their approaches. Most countries around the world, the US included, chose a Process-based approach. So, their first step would be to say, Did you use genetic engineering, and create a GMO? If so, we want to take a look. Canada took a different approach, to say It doesnt matter how you made it, its really about what you made. Is the Product you made so new that we to take a look, as a government, to ensure its safety. We just start from a different foot to get to those approvals.

To say that genetic modification changed farming practices is an understatement. Glyphosate-tolerance, BT-insecticide integration, and trait-stacking made for huge and obvious changes to crops and yield. But Affleck says that recent advances in Gene Editing technology are far more subtle - and small differences can make big problems for seed-breeders accessing new markets.

The advent of gene editing is a really new technology for plant breeders. It adds a new wrinkle into the equation. With GMOs usually the changes were always big. With gene editing its not so certain. It may be able to make a larger or drastic change, or it might be a smaller change. So, this is why we need this policy guidance of what is new, to make sure that as plant breeders are embarking on products, they know what it is they have to do, to meet their regulatory expectations.

Crop Life Canada is lobbying in favor of the U.S. processed-based approach - for very practical reasons. Ian Affleck doesnt want Canadian farmers to miss out on American products.

The USDA-APHIS rules, if you were to boil them down its have you done something thats something that plant couldnt have done on its own, and if you did, youre going to need an assessment. If you didnt, you dont need an assessment. Thats a very rational way forward. If were not clear on our policies going forward, it could make launching US varieties in Canada a little more tricky.

Originally posted here:

Dealing with New Biotechnology Realities in USMCA | AG - KMAland