All that information in reality would expose how biased his investigation was, Rodriguez said.

But the defense was thwarted by Judge Mary Staley Clark, who sustained repeated state objections that served to protect Persinger. Harris was ultimately found guilty of maliciously killing his son and is serving a life sentence plus 32 years in prison.

His hearing for a new trial concluded Tuesday.

It wasnt just the experts like Persinger who found safe haven in Staley Clarks rulings, the defense alleges. There were also the Cobb County police investigators who, according to Harris defense, provided false testimony to secure search warrants.

Everything was biased in their minds and continued to get worse, as I saw it, defense co-counsel Bryan Lumpkin testified. We werent allowed to put up the evidence that bore that out.

With Staley Clark presiding, Harris appellate lawyer, Mitch Durham, argued Tuesday that Staley Clarks decisions in the 2016 murder trial made it impossible for his client to receive a fair shake. While Staley Clark is not expected to rule against herself, testimony from this weeks hearing will inform the appeal likely to follow in the Georgia Supreme Court.

Persinger, for example, made several nefarious insinuations about the time Harris spent on a psychologists website right before Coopers death. It was clear, Rodriguez testified Tuesday, that Persinger either did not know Harris had contracted with the psychologist to develop his site or prosecutors were trying to pull a fast one on me.

I wanted to confront him with all the easily available, easily discoverable information that wouldve made it clear to him (that Harris) wasnt involved in some kind of conniving plan to prepare for a criminal trial, Rodriguez said. All that information in reality would expose how biased his investigation was.

But he didnt get the chance.

You cant impeach someone with evidence they didnt know, Cobb Assistant District Attorney Linda Dunikoski said Tuesday, explaining the states position in the 2016 trial. Staley Clark sided with the state back then. It remains to be seen whether shes changed her mind.

Dunikoski fought back against defense claims that the judge prevented them from thoroughly challenging state witnesses.

Quoting lead defense counsel Maddox Kilgore, In his opinion, they did a great job of destroying law enforcement, Dunikoski said.

There was additional unfounded testimony about Harris from state witnesses, according to the defense. He never created a Whisper post saying I hate being married with kids, nor did he search for information about how long it takes for a child to die in a hot car, Rodriguez said.

Whether those factors amount to substantial harm requiring a new trial will be up to Judge Staley Clark, whose ruling will come sometime in the new year.

Harris, who appeared via Zoom at the virtual hearing, remains incarcerated at Macon State Prison in south central Georgia.

Original post:

Judge to decide whether her rulings deprived Ross Harris of fair trial - Atlanta Journal Constitution