Amicus Therapeutics Presents Positive Preclinical Fabry Disease Gene Therapy Data at the 17th Annual WORLDSymposium 2021 – GlobeNewswire

Amicus Optimized Transgene Show Greater Substrate Reduction than Wild Type Construct Across All Tissues and Doses

Further Validates Combining Amicus-Engineered Transgenes with Penns AAV Gene Therapy Technologies to Develop Next Generation Gene Therapies

PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 08, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Amicus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: FOLD) today announced initial preclinical data from its investigational adeno-associated viral (AAV) gene therapy program for Fabry disease in mice. The results are featured in a virtual poster presentation at the 17th Annual WORLDSymposium 2021, being held February 8-12, 2021. The poster is also available in the Events and Presentations section of the Amicus Therapeutics corporate website.

Fabry disease is an inherited lysosomal disorder caused by deficiency of the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A (GLA). Reduced or absent levels of GLA lead to accumulation of disease substrate leading to cellular disfunction and organ damage, which results in the clinical manifestations of Fabry disease. Amicus, in collaboration with the Gene Therapy Program of the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn), is developing a novel gene therapy for Fabry disease that combines the Amicus protein-engineering expertise and deep knowledge and experience in Fabry disease with Penns adeno associated virus (AAV) gene transfer technologies.

This initial preclinical study assessed a range of single doses of AAV in Gla knockout (KO) mice with either natural unmodified hGLA (wildtype hGLA) or Amicus/Penn engineered hGLA transgenes (engineered hGLA). The Amicus/Penn engineered hGLAs are designed for improved stability which is believed to provide a larger window for the enzyme to stay active while in circulation prior to being taken up into the target tissues and for additional stabilization after cell uptake. The lead Amicus/Penn engineered hGLA declared as an IND candidate is designated as AT-GTX-701.

Preclinical Poster Highlights for Amicus/Penn AAV Gene Therapy for Fabry Disease:

Hung Do, Ph.D., Chief Science Officer of Amicus Therapeutics, stated, These very important preclinical results validate our capabilities to develop engineered proteins via a gene therapy that can result in superior substrate reduction compared with a wildtype transgene. This is the second program in our collaboration with Penn that has demonstrated the potential advantages of optimizing the target protein in these disorders, and may be applicable to other lysosomal disorders as we continue to combine our understanding of the molecular basis of these diseases and expertise in protein engineering, together with Penns vector engineering expertise, to develop novel gene therapies.

Amicus is currently developing AAV gene therapies in collaboration with Penn for Pompe disease, Fabry disease, CDD, CLN1, MPS IIIB, a next generation program in MPS IIIA, as well as Angelman Syndrome. The agreement between Amicus and Penn is a Research, Collaboration and License Agreement, providing funding to Penn to advance the preclinical research programs in the Wilson Lab and to license certain technologies invented under the funded Research Collaboration.

About Fabry DiseaseFabry disease is an inherited lysosomal disorder caused by deficiency of an enzyme called alpha-galactosidase A (alpha-Gal A), which is the result of mutations in the GLA gene. The primary biological function of alpha-Gal A is to degrade specific lipids in lysosomes, including globotriaosylceramide (referred to here as GL-3 and also known as Gb3). Lipids that can be degraded by the action of alpha-Gal A are called "substrates" of the enzyme. Reduced or absent levels of alpha-Gal A activity lead to the accumulation of GL-3 in the affected tissues, including the central nervous system, heart, kidneys, and skin. Progressive accumulation of GL-3 is believed to lead to the morbidity and mortality of Fabry disease, including pain, kidney failure, heart disease, and stroke. The symptoms can be severe, differ from patient to patient, and begin at an early age. All Fabry disease is progressive and may lead to irreversible organ damage regardless of the time of symptom onset.

About Amicus Therapeutics Amicus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: FOLD) is a global, patient-dedicated biotechnology company focused on discovering, developing and delivering novel high-quality medicines for people living with rare metabolic diseases. With extraordinary patient focus, Amicus Therapeutics is committed to advancing and expanding a robust pipeline of cutting-edge, first- or best-in-class medicines for rare metabolic diseases. For more information please visit the companys website at http://www.amicusrx.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements relating to initial preclinical data from its investigational adeno-associated viral (AAV) gene therapy program for Fabry disease in mice and the potential implications of these data for the future advancement and development of a gene therapy for Fabry disease and other lysosomal disorders and development of potential platform technologies. Words such as, but not limited to, look forward to, believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, intend, "confidence," "encouraged," potential, plan, targets, likely, may, will, would, should and could, and similar expressions or words identify forward-looking statements. The forward looking statements included in this press release are based on management's current expectations and belief's which are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and factors, including that the preliminary data reported before completion of the study will not be predictive of future results, that results of additional preliminary data or data from the completed study or any future study will not yield results that are consistent with the preliminary data presented, that later study results will not support further development, or even if such later results are favorable, that the Company will not be able to successfully complete the development of, obtain regulatory approval for, or successfully commercialize. In addition, all forward looking statements are subject to the other risks and uncertainties detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from those set forth in this press release. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only of the date hereof. All forward looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement and we undertake no obligation to revise this press release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.

CONTACTS:

Investors:Andrew FaughnanSr. Director, Investor Relationsafaughnan@amicusrx.com(609) 662-3809

Media:Diana MooreHead of Global Corporate Communicationsdmoore@amicusrx.com(609) 662-5079

FOLDG

Read the original here:

Amicus Therapeutics Presents Positive Preclinical Fabry Disease Gene Therapy Data at the 17th Annual WORLDSymposium 2021 - GlobeNewswire

Paragon Biosciences Expands Cell And Gene Therapy Platform – Contract Pharma

Paragon Biosciences, a life science innovator that creates, invests in and builds life science companies in biopharmaceuticals, cell and gene therapy and synthetic biology utilizing artificial intelligence, has launched CiRC Biosciences, a cell therapy company developing treatments for serious diseases with high, unmet needs with an initial focus on the eye."The addition of CiRC Biosciences to our portfolio builds upon our cell and gene therapy platform, an area that has tremendous potential to address serious genetic diseases," said Jeff Aronin, founder, chairman and chief executive officer, Paragon Biosciences. "CiRC Biosciences gives us the science to target retinal diseases that could lead to vision restoration with numerous other applications in the years ahead."CiRC Biosciences is currently advancing pre-clinical development of chemically induced retinal cells for vision restoration in Geographic Atrophy Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Dry AMD), which is the most common cause of irreversible vision loss over the age of 65, and advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), a genetic disorder that causes tunnel vision and eventual blindness. There are no U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved treatments to restore vision loss in Dry AMD or RP.The company's novel mechanism of action is designed for direct chemical conversion of fibroblasts into other cell types using a cocktail of small molecules in an 11-day chemical conversion process. Pre-clinical studies have shown efficacy in blind mice that demonstrated vision restoration. CiRC Biosciences has provisional patent applications to protect its platform."Our technology transforms ordinary skin cells into specialized retinal cells using a cocktail of small molecules," said Sai Chavala, M.D., co-founder and chief scientific officer, CiRC Biosciences. "This process is potentially safer, quicker, more cost effective and easier to manufacturer than using traditional stem cells. Working with Paragon Biosciences to build and advance CiRC Biosciences provides us the opportunity to efficiently progress this technology through research and development stages.CiRC Biosciences first reported its discovery in the highly respected scientific journal Nature (April 15, 2020). A recently published New England Journal of Medicine article (Nov. 5, 2020) discussed CiRC's technology of using chemically induced cells to restore retinal function. The article concluded, "The new and emerging strategies for the rescue, regeneration, and replacement of photoreceptors suggest a bright future in the fight to preserve and restore vision in blinding eye diseases."The abstract in Nature is available here.Access to the NEJM article is available here.

Continue reading here:

Paragon Biosciences Expands Cell And Gene Therapy Platform - Contract Pharma

FDA Clears IND Application for Passage Bio’s Gene Therapy Candidate PBKR03 for Treatment of Patients with Early Infantile Krabbe Disease, A Rare…

DetailsCategory: DNA RNA and CellsPublished on Monday, 08 February 2021 16:09Hits: 438

- Phase 1/2 trial expected to commence in first half of 2021

- Company has three INDs cleared for rare monogenic CNS disorders

PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA I February 08, 2021 I Passage Bio, Inc. (Nasdaq: PASG), a genetic medicines company focused on developing transformative therapies for rare monogenic central nervous system (CNS) disorders, today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared an investigational new drug (IND) application for PBKR03, an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-delivery gene therapy being studied for the treatment of early infantile Krabbe disease (Globoid Cell Leukodystrophy). Currently, there are no approved disease-modifying therapies available for Krabbe disease, a rare lysosomal storage disease that most often presents early in a childs life, resulting in rapid progressive damage to both the brain and peripheral nervous system and mortality by two years of age. Underscoring the urgent medical need in the patient population, the FDA has previously granted Passage Bio both Orphan Drug and Rare Pediatric Disease designations for PBKR03 for treatment in Krabbe disease.

As part of our commitment to deliver a transformative, one-time gene therapy to the children and their families who suffer from the devastating effects of Krabbe disease, we are excited to advance toward clinically evaluating the potential life-changing benefits of PBKR03, said Bruce Goldsmith, Ph.D., chief executive officer of Passage Bio. The FDA clearance of our IND for PBKR03 is an important milestone for Passage Bio, paving the way for the start of our third clinical program in rare monogenic CNS disorders in the first half of 2021. Having solidified our clinical trial preparedness and manufacturing readiness during the past year, we are well-positioned to move with urgency to advance PBKR03 into the clinic.

PBKR03 utilizes a next-generation proprietary AAV capsid to deliver, through intra-cisterna magna (ICM) administration, a functional GALC gene to Krabbe patients with mutations in the gene that codes for galactosylceramidase (GAL-C). Low GAL-C activity results in accumulation of psychosine which is toxic to the myelin-producing oligodendrocytes of the CNS and Schwann cells in the periphery, resulting in damage to both the central and peripheral nervous systems. PBKR03 has the potential to treat both the central nervous system and peripheral nerve manifestations observed in Krabbe disease patients.

Compelling preclinical data support advancement into clinical trials

PBKR03 is supported by extensive preclinical studies, conducted by our collaborator, the University of Pennsylvanias Gene Therapy Program, showing meaningful transduction of both the central and peripheral nervous system in animal models, with restoration of myelination in the brain and peripheral nerves. In a naturally occurring Krabbe animal model, a single ICM injection of an AAVhu68 capsid containing the normal canine GALC gene showed normalization of GALC activity, reduction of cerebral spinal fluid psychosine levels, normalization of peripheral nerve conduction velocity, improvement in brain myelination, reduction in brain inflammation and increased survival.

Phase 1/2 study anticipated for 1H21

Passage Bio expects to initiate a Phase1/2 clinical trial for PBKR03 in the first half of 2021. The trial is designed as a dose escalation study of a single ICM dose of PBKR03 in pediatric subjects with early infantile Krabbe disease. The primary endpoint of the Phase 1/2 study is safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints include CSF and serum GALC levels, disease biomarkers, and clinical outcome measures. Initial data from the trial is anticipated to potentially readout in late 2021 or early 2022, depending on the timing of when the first patient is treated in the study.

PENN Financial Disclosure

The University of Pennsylvania (Penn) and its Gene Therapy Program receives sponsored research funding from Passage Bio, and Penn has licensed intellectual property to Passage Bio that may result in future financial returns to Penn.

About Krabbe Disease

Krabbe disease is a rare and often life-threatening lysosomal storage disease caused by mutations in the GALC gene, which encodes galactosylceramidase, an enzyme that breaks down galactosylceramide and psychosine. Without adequate levels of galactosylceramidase, psychosine accumulates, causing widespread death of myelin-producing cells and progressive damage to nerves in both the brain and peripheral tissues. The early infantile form of the disease is the most severe and common, typically manifesting before six months of age and accounting for 60 percent to 70 percent of diagnoses. In these patients, the disease course is highly predictable and rapidly progresses to include loss of acquired milestones, staring episodes, apnea, peripheral neuropathy, severe weakness, unresponsiveness to stimuli, seizures, blindness, deafness and eventual death by two years of age. Late infantile patients, defined by onset between seven to twelve months of age, present similar symptoms and have a median survival of approximately five years from onset of symptoms. The estimated worldwide incidence of Krabbe disease is 2.6 in 100,000 births, which is higher than reported due to lack of adequate screening at birth.

About Passage Bio

At Passage Bio (Nasdaq: PASG), we are on a mission to provide life-transforming gene therapies for patients with rare, monogenic CNS diseases that replace their suffering with boundless possibility, all while building lasting relationships with the communities we serve. Based in Philadelphia, PA, our company has established a strategic collaboration and licensing agreement with the renowned University of Pennsylvanias Gene Therapy Program to conduct our discovery and IND-enabling preclinical work. This provides our team with enhanced access to a broad portfolio of gene therapy candidates and future gene therapy innovations that we then pair with our deep clinical, regulatory, manufacturing and commercial expertise to rapidly advance our robust pipeline of optimized gene therapies into clinical testing. As we work with speed and tenacity, we are always mindful of patients who may be able to benefit from our therapies. More information is available at http://www.passagebio.com.

SOURCE: Passage Bio

Go here to read the rest:

FDA Clears IND Application for Passage Bio's Gene Therapy Candidate PBKR03 for Treatment of Patients with Early Infantile Krabbe Disease, A Rare...

Gene Therapy Market by Therapeutic Approach, Type of Gene Therapy, Type of Vectors Used, Therapeutic Areas, Route of Administration, and Key…

New York, Feb. 05, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Reportlinker.com announces the release of the report "Gene Therapy Market by Therapeutic Approach, Type of Gene Therapy, Type of Vectors Used, Therapeutic Areas, Route of Administration, and Key Geographical Regions: Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2020-2030" - https://www.reportlinker.com/p06020737/?utm_source=GNW Considering the current pace of research and product development activity in this field, experts believe that the number of clinical research initiatives involving gene therapies are likely to grow by 17% annually. In this context, the USFDA released a notification, mentioning that it now expects to receive twice as many gene therapy applications each year, starting 2020. Despite the ongoing pandemic, it is worth highlighting that gene therapy companies raised approximately USD 5.5 billion in capital investments, in 2020 alone. This is indicative of the promising therapeutic potential of this emerging class of pharmacological interventions, which has led investors to bet heavily on the success of different gene therapy candidates in the long term.

Several technology platforms are currently available for discovery and development of various types of gene therapies. In fact, advances in bioanalytical methods (such as genome sequencing), and genome editing and manipulation technologies (such as molecular switches), have enabled the development of novel therapy development tools / platforms. In fact, technology licensing is a lucrative source of income for stakeholders in this industry, particularly for those with proprietary gene editing platforms. Given the growing demand for interventions that focus on the amelioration of the underlying (genetic) causes of diseases, it is expected that the gene therapy pipeline will continue to steadily expand. Moreover, promising results from ongoing clinical research initiatives are likely to bring in more investments to support therapy product development initiatives in this domain. Therefore, we are led to believe that the global gene therapy market is poised to witness significant growth in the foreseen future.

SCOPE OF THE REPORT The Gene Therapy Market (4th Edition) by Therapeutic Approach (Gene Augmentation, Oncolytic Viral Therapy, Immunotherapy and Others), Type of Gene Therapy (Ex vivo and In vivo), Type of Vectors used (Adeno Associated Virus, Adenovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus, Lentivirus, Plasmid DNA, Retrovirus and Others), Target Therapeutic Areas (Autoimmune Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases, Dermatological Disorders, Genetic Disorders, Hematological Disorders, Metabolic Disorders, Muscle-related Diseases, Oncological Disorders, Ophthalmic Diseases and Others), Route of Administration (Intraarticular, Intracerebellar, Intradermal, Intramuscular, Intratumoral, Intravenous, Intravesical, Intravitreal, Subretinal and Others), and Key Geographical Regions (US, EU5 and rest of the world): Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2020-2030 report features an extensive study of the current market landscape of gene therapies, primarily focusing on gene augmentation-based therapies, oncolytic viral therapies, immunotherapies and gene editing therapies. The study also features an elaborate discussion on the future potential of this evolving market.

Amongst other elements, the report features: - A detailed review of the overall market landscape of gene therapies and gene editing therapies, including information on phase of development (marketed, clinical, preclinical and discovery) of pipeline candidates, key therapeutic areas (autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular diseases, dermatological disorders, genetic disorders, hematological disorders, immunological disorders, infectious diseases, inflammatory disorders, liver diseases, metabolic disorders, muscle-related diseases, nervous system disorders, oncological disorders, ophthalmic diseases and others), target disease indication(s), type of vector used, type of gene, therapeutic approach (gene augmentation, oncolytic viral therapy and others), type of gene therapy (ex vivo and in vivo), route of administration and special drug designation(s) awarded (if any). - A detailed review of the players engaged in the development of gene therapies, along with information on their year of establishment, company size, location of headquarters, regional landscape and key players engaged in this domain. - An elaborate discussion on the various types of viral and non-viral vectors, along with information on design, manufacturing requirements, advantages and limitations of currently available gene delivery vectors. - A discussion on the regulatory landscape related to gene therapies across various geographies, namely North America (the US and Canada), Europe and Asia-Pacific (Australia, China, Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea), providing details related to the various challenges associated with obtaining reimbursements for gene therapies. - Detailed profiles of marketed and late stage (phase II/III and above) gene therapies, including development timeline of the therapy, information on the current development status, mechanism of action, affiliated technology, strength of patent portfolio, dosage and manufacturing details, as well as details related to the developer company. - An elaborate discussion on the various commercialization strategies that can be adopted by drug developers across different stages of therapy development, including prior to drug launch, at / during drug launch and post-marketing. - A review of the various emerging technologies and therapy development platforms that are being used to design and manufacture gene therapies, featuring detailed profiles of technologies that were / are being used for the development of four or more products / product candidates. - An in-depth analysis of various patents that have been filed / granted related to gene therapies and gene editing therapies, since 2016. The analysis assesses several relevant parameters associated with the patents, including type of patent (granted patents, patent applications and others), publication year, regional applicability, CPC symbols, emerging focus areas, leading industry players (in terms of the number of patents filed / granted), and patent valuation. - A detailed analysis of the various mergers and acquisitions that have taken place within this domain, during the period 2015-2020, based on several relevant parameters, such as year of agreement, type of deal, geographical location of the companies involved, key value drivers, highest phase of development of the acquired company product and target therapeutic area. - An analysis of the investments made at various stages of development in companies that are focused in this area, between 2015-2020, including seed financing, venture capital financing, IPOs, secondary offerings, debt financing, grants and other equity offerings. - A detailed geographical clinical trial analysis of completed, ongoing and planned studies of numerous gene therapies, based on various relevant parameters, such as trial registration year, trial status, trial phase, target therapeutic area, geography, type of sponsor, prominent treatment sites and enrolled patient population. - An analysis of the various factors that are likely to influence the pricing of gene therapies, featuring different models / approaches that may be adopted by manufacturers to decide the prices of these therapies. - An analysis of the big biopharma players engaged in this domain, featuring a heat map based on parameters, such as number of gene therapies under development, funding information, partnership activity and strength of patent portfolio. - An informed estimate of the annual demand for gene therapies, taking into account the marketed gene-based therapies and clinical studies evaluating gene therapies; the analysis also takes into consideration various relevant parameters, such as target patient population, dosing frequency and dose strength. - A case study on the prevalent and emerging trends related to vector manufacturing, along with information on companies offering contract services for manufacturing vectors. The study also includes a detailed discussion on the manufacturing processes associated with various types of vectors. - A discussion on the various operating models adopted by gene therapy developers for supply chain management, highlighting the stakeholders involved, factors affecting the supply of therapeutic products and challenges encountered by developers across the different stages of the gene therapy supply chain.

One of the key objectives of the report was to estimate the existing market size and the future opportunity associated with gene therapies, for the next decade. Based on multiple parameters, such as target patient population, likely adoption rates and expected pricing, we have provided informed estimates on the evolution of the market for the period 2020-2030. The report also features the likely distribution of the current and forecasted opportunity across [A] therapeutic approach (gene augmentation, oncolytic viral therapy, immunotherapy and others), [B] type of gene therapy (ex vivo and in vivo), [C] type of vectors used (adeno associated virus, adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, lentivirus, plasmid DNA, retrovirus and others), [D] target therapeutic areas (autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular diseases, dermatological disorders, genetic disorders, hematological disorders, metabolic disorders, muscle-related diseases, oncological disorders, ophthalmic diseases and others), [E] route of administration (intraarticular, intracerebellar, intradermal, intramuscular, intratumoral, intravenous, intravesical, intravitreal, subretinal and others), and [F] key geographical regions (US, EU5 and rest of the world). In order to account for future uncertainties and to add robustness to our model, we have provided three market forecast scenarios, namely conservative, base and optimistic scenarios, representing different tracks of the industrys growth.

The opinions and insights presented in this study were influenced by discussions conducted with multiple stakeholders in this domain. The report features detailed transcripts of interviews held with the following individuals: - Adam Rogers (CEO, Hemera Biosciences) - Al Hawkins (CEO, Milo Biotechnology) - Buel Dan Rodgers (Founder & CEO, AAVogen) - Christopher Reinhard (CEO and Chairman, Gene Therapeutics (previously known as Cardium Therapeutics)) - Michael Triplett (CEO, Myonexus Therapeutics) - Robert Jan Lamers (CEO, Arthrogen) - Ryo Kubota (CEO, Chairman & President, Acucela) - Tom Wilton (CBO, LogicBio Therapeutics) - Jeffrey Hung (CCO, Vigene Biosciences) - Cedric Szpirer (Executive & Scientific Director, Delphi Genetics) - Marco Schmeer (Project Manager) & Tatjana Buchholz (Marketing Manager, PlasmidFactory) - Molly Cameron (Corporate Communications Manager, Orchard Therapeutics)

All actual figures have been sourced and analyzed from publicly available information forums and primary research discussions. Financial figures mentioned in this report are in USD, unless otherwise specified.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY The data presented in this report has been gathered via secondary and primary research. For all our projects, we conduct interviews with experts in the area (academia, industry, medical practice and other associations) to solicit their opinions on emerging trends in the market. This is primarily useful for us to draw out our own opinion on how the market will evolve across different regions and technology segments. Where possible, the available data has been checked for accuracy from multiple sources of information.

The secondary sources of information include - Annual reports - Investor presentations - SEC filings - Industry databases - News releases from company websites - Government policy documents - Industry analysts views

While the focus has been on forecasting the market over the coming decade, the report also provides our independent view on various emerging trends in the industry. This opinion is solely based on our knowledge, research and understanding of the relevant market, gathered from various secondary and primary sources of information.

KEY QUESTIONS ANSWERED - Who are the leading industry players engaged in the development of gene therapies? - How many gene therapy candidates are present in the current development pipeline? Which key disease indications are targeted by such products? - Which types of vectors are most commonly used for effective delivery of gene therapies? - What are the key regulatory requirements for gene therapy approval, across various geographies? - Which commercialization strategies are most commonly adopted by gene therapy developers, across different stages of development? - What are the different pricing models and reimbursement strategies currently being adopted for gene therapies? - What are the various technology platforms that are either available in the market or are being designed for the development of gene therapies? - Who are the key CMOs / CDMOs engaged in supplying viral / plasmid vectors for gene therapy development? - What are the key value drivers of the merger and acquisition activity in the gene therapy industry? - Who are the key stakeholders that have actively made investments in the gene therapy domain? - Which are the most active trial sites (in terms of number of clinical studies being conducted) related to this domain? - How is the current and future market opportunity likely to be distributed across key market segments?

CHAPTER OUTLINES Chapter 2 provides an executive summary of the key insights captured in our research. It offers a high-level view on the current state of the market for gene therapies and its likely evolution in the short-mid term and long term.

Chapter 3 provides a general overview of gene therapies, including a discussion on their historical background. It further highlights the different types of gene therapies (namely somatic and germline therapies, and in vivo and ex vivo therapies), potential application areas of such products and route of administration of these therapeutic interventions. In addition, it provides information on the concept of gene editing, highlighting key historical milestones, applications and various techniques used for gene editing. The also chapter includes a discussion on the advantages and disadvantages associated with gene therapies. Further, it features a brief discussion on the ethical and social concerns related to gene therapies, while highlighting future constraints and challenges related to the manufacturing and commercial viability of such product candidates.

Chapter 4 provides a general introduction to the various types of viral and non-viral gene delivery vectors. It includes a detailed discussion on the design, manufacturing requirements, advantages and limitations of currently available vectors.

Chapter 5 features a detailed discussion on the regulatory landscape related to gene therapies across various geographies, such as the US, Canada, Europe, Australia, China, Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea. Further, it highlights an emerging concept of reimbursement which was recently adopted by multiple gene therapy developers, along with a discussion on several issues associated with reimbursement of gene therapies.

Chapter 6 includes information on over 800 gene therapies and gene editing therapies that are currently approved or are in different stages of development. It features a detailed analysis of pipeline molecules, based on several relevant parameters, such as key therapeutic areas (autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular diseases, dermatological disorders, genetic disorders, hematological disorders, immunological disorders, infectious diseases, inflammatory disorders, liver diseases, metabolic disorders, muscle-related diseases, nervous system disorders, oncological disorders, ophthalmic diseases and others), target disease indication(s), phase of development (marketed, clinical, preclinical and discovery), type of vector used, type of gene, type of gene therapy (ex vivo and in vivo), therapeutic approach (gene augmentation, oncolytic viral therapy and others), route of administration and special drug designation (if any). Further, we have presented a grid analysis of gene therapies based on phase of development, therapeutic area and therapeutic approach.

Chapter 7 provides a detailed review of the players engaged in the development of gene therapies, along with information on their year of establishment, company size, location of headquarters, regional landscape and key players engaged in this domain. Further, we have presented a logo landscape of product developers in North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region on the basis of company size.

Chapter 8 provides detailed profiles of marketed gene therapies. Each profile includes information about the innovator company, its product pipeline (focused on gene therapy only), development timeline of the therapy, its mechanism of action, target indication, current status of development, details related to manufacturing, dosage and sales, the companys patent portfolio and collaborations focused on its gene therapy product / technology.

Chapter 9 features an elaborate discussion on the various strategies that can be adopted by therapy developers across key commercialization stages, including prior to drug launch, during drug launch and post-launch. In addition, it presents an in-depth analysis of the key commercialization strategies that have been adopted by developers of gene therapies approved during the period 2015-2020.

Chapter 10 provides detailed profiles of drugs that are in advanced stages of clinical development (phase II/III and above). Each drug profile provides information on the current developmental status of the drug, its route of administration, developers, primary target indication, special drug designation received, target gene, dosage, mechanism of action, technology, patent portfolio, clinical trials and collaborations (if any).

Chapter 11 provides a list of technology platforms that are either available in the market or in the process of being designed for the development of gene therapies. In addition, it features brief profiles of some of the key technologies. Each profile features details on the various pipeline molecules that have been / are being developed using the technology, its advantages and the partnerships that have been established related to the technology platform. Further, the chapter includes detailed discussions on various novel and innovative technologies, along with brief information about key technology providers.

Chapter 12 highlights the potential target indications (segregated by therapeutic areas) that are currently the prime focus of companies developing gene therapies. These include genetic disorders, metabolic disorders, nervous system disorders, oncological disorders and ophthalmic diseases.

Chapter 13 provides an overview of the various patents that have been filed / granted in relation to gene therapy and gene editing technologies. It also features a detailed analysis, highlighting the prevalent trends related to type of patent, publication year, regional applicability, CPC symbols, emerging areas and leading industry players (in terms of number of patents filed). In addition, it features a competitive benchmarking analysis of the patent portfolios of leading industry players and patent valuation. For the purpose of this analysis, we have taken into consideration patents that have been filed / granted since 2016.

Chapter 14 features a detailed analysis of the various mergers and acquisitions that have taken place within this domain, during the period 2015-2020, based on several relevant parameters, such as year of agreement, type of deal, geographical location of the companies involved, key value drivers, highest phase of development of the acquired company product and target therapeutic area.

Chapter 15 presents details on various funding instances, investments and grants reported within the gene therapy domain. The chapter includes information on various types of investments (such as venture capital financing, debt financing, grants, capital raised from IPO and subsequent offerings) received by the companies between 2015 and 2020, highlighting the growing interest of the venture capital community and other strategic investors in this market.

Chapter 16 presents a detailed, geographical clinical trial analysis of completed, ongoing and planned studies focused on gene therapies, based on various relevant parameters, such as trial registration year, trial status, trial phase, target therapeutic area, geography, type of sponsor, prominent treatment sites and enrolled patient population.

Chapter 17 highlights our views on the various factors that may be taken into consideration while deciding the price of a gene therapy. It features discussions on different pricing models / approaches, based on the size of the target population, which a pharmaceutical company may choose to adopt in order to decide the price of its proprietary products.

Chapter 18 highlights top big biopharma players engaged in the field of gene therapy, featuring a heat map analysis based on several parameters, including therapeutic area, type of vector used, therapeutic approach and type of gene therapy.

Chapter 19 features an informed estimate of the annual demand for gene therapies, taking into account the marketed gene-based therapies and clinical studies evaluating gene therapies; the analysis also takes into consideration various relevant parameters, such as target patient population, dosing frequency and dose strength.

Chapter 20 presents an elaborate market forecast analysis, highlighting the future potential of the market till the year 2030. It also includes future sales projections of gene therapies that are either marketed or in advanced stages of clinical development (phase II/III and above). Sales potential and growth opportunity were estimated based on the target patient population, likely adoption rates, existing / future competition from other drug classes and the likely price of products. The chapter also presents a detailed market segmentation on the basis of [A] therapeutic approach (gene augmentation, oncolytic viral therapy, immunotherapy and others), [B] type of gene therapy (ex vivo and in vivo), [C] type of vector used (adeno associated virus, adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, lentivirus, plasmid DNA, retrovirus and others), [D] target therapeutic area (autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular diseases, dermatological disorders, genetic disorders, hematological disorders, metabolic disorders, muscle-related diseases, oncological disorders, ophthalmic diseases and others), [E] route of administration (intraarticular, intracerebellar, intradermal, intramuscular, intratumoral, intravenous, intravesical, intravitreal, subretinal and others), and [F] key geographical regions (US, EU5 and rest of the world).

Chapter 21 provides insights on viral vector manufacturing, highlighting the steps and processes related to manufacturing and bioprocessing of vectors. In addition, it features the challenges that exist in this domain. Further, the chapter provides details on various players that offer contract manufacturing services for viral and plasmid vectors.

Chapter 22 provides a glimpse of the gene therapy supply chain. It discusses the steps for implementing a robust model and provides information related to the global regulations for supply chain. Moreover, the chapter discusses the challenges associated with supply chain of gene therapies. In addition, it features the technological solutions that can be adopted for the management of gene therapy supply chain.

Chapter 23 summarizes the overall report, wherein we have mentioned all the key facts and figures described in the previous chapters. The chapter also highlights important evolutionary trends that were identified during the course of the study and are expected to influence the future of the gene therapy market.

Chapter 24 is a collection of interview transcripts of the discussions that were held with key stakeholders in this market. The chapter provides details of interviews held with Adam Rogers (CEO, Hemera Biosciences), Al Hawkins (CEO, Milo Biotechnology), Buel Dan Rodgers (Founder & CEO, AAVogen), Christopher Reinhard (CEO & Chairman, Gene Therapeutics (previously known as Cardium Therapeutics)), Michael Triplett (CEO, Myonexus Therapeutics), Robert Jan Lamers (CEO, Arthrogen), Ryo Kubota (CEO, Chairman & President, Acucela), Tom Wilton (CBO, LogicBio Therapeutics), Jeffrey Hung (CCO, Vigene Biosciences), Cedric Szpirer (Executive & Scientific Director, Delphi Genetics), Marco Schmeer (Project Manager) & Tatjana Buchholz (Marketing Manager, PlasmidFactory) and Molly Cameron (Corporate Communications Manager, Orchard Therapeutics). In addition, a brief profile of each company has been provided.

Chapter 25 is an appendix, which provides tabulated data and numbers for all the figures included in the report.

Chapter 26 is an appendix, which contains a list of companies and organizations mentioned in this report.Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p06020737/?utm_source=GNW

About ReportlinkerReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

__________________________

Read more:

Gene Therapy Market by Therapeutic Approach, Type of Gene Therapy, Type of Vectors Used, Therapeutic Areas, Route of Administration, and Key...

FDA approves third gene therapy for large B-cell lymphoma – European Pharmaceutical Review

Breyanzi (lisocabtagene maraleucel) was approved on the 54 percent complete remission rate achieved in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma trials.

Breyanzi (lisocabtagene maraleucel), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-based gene therapy to treat adult patients with certain types of large B-cell lymphoma who have not responded to, or relapsed, after at least two other types of systemic treatment has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

According to the agency, Breyanzi is the third gene therapy approved in the US for certain types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Breyanzi is not indicated for the treatment of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Todays approval represents another milestone in the rapidly progressing field of gene therapy by providing an additional treatment option for adults with certain types of cancer affecting the blood, bone marrow, and lymph nodes, commented Dr Peter Marks, director of the FDAs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Gene and cell therapies have evolved from promising concepts to practical cancer treatment regimens.

DLBCL is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adults. Approximately 77,000 new cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma are diagnosed in the US each year, with DLBCL accounting for around a third of newly diagnosed cases.

Breyanzi is customised for each patient; their T cells, a type of white blood cell, are collected and genetically modified to include a new gene that facilitates targeting and killing of the lymphoma cells. Once the cells are modified, they are infused back into the patient.

The safety and efficacy of the treatment were established in a multi-centre clinical trial of more than 250 adults with refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphoma. The complete remission rate after treatment with Breyanzi was 54 percent.

The treatment can cause severe side effects, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which is a systemic response to the activation and proliferation of CAR T cells, causing high fever and flu-like symptoms and neurologic toxicities. Both CRS and neurological events can be life-threatening, so the therapy is being approved with a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) which includes elements to assure safe use (ETASU).

The requirements include, among other things, that healthcare facilities that dispense Breyanzi be specially certified, with staff involved in the prescribing, dispensing or administering of the treatment being trained to recognise and manage the risks of CRS and neurologic toxicities.

Other side effects include hypersensitivity reactions, serious infections, low blood cell counts and a weakened immune system. According to the FDA, side effects generally appear within the first one to two weeks following treatment, but some side effects may occur later.

To further evaluate the long-term safety, the FDA is also requiring the manufacturer to conduct a post-marketing observational study involving patients treated with Breyanzi.

The approval was granted to Juno Therapeutics Inc., a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

Read more from the original source:

FDA approves third gene therapy for large B-cell lymphoma - European Pharmaceutical Review

Darwin’s theory of evolution got us thinking about our understanding of God, says Bharat Jhunjhunwala – Free Press Journal

The English naturalist Charles Darwin was born on this day in 1809. He studied the evolution of turtles in the Galapagos Islands of South America. He came up with the theory that the present man had evolved from apes. At that time, the western world believed that god had made man in his likeness, just as a sculptor sculpts a statue with hammer and chisel. Thus, the Bible says, God created humankind in his own image male and female he created them (Genesis 1:27).

Instead, Darwin suggested that there was no intervention by an external entity in the process. Humankind evolved by the process of natural selection. There is a variation in all living species. Some monkeys are supple, others are strong. Those among them that adjusted to the existing environment proliferated, while those that failed to adapt, died. His theory challenged the Biblical concept of God creating mankind.

Darwinism vs the Bible

The opposition to Darwins theory of evolution can be gauged from a discussion held in 1860 between Bishop Samuel Wilberforce and the naturalist Thomas Henry Huxley, a Darwinist, at the University of Oxford. Wilberforce asked Huxley whether he claimed descent from an ape on his grandmothers or grandfathers side? Huxley responded that he would rather be descended from an ape than a man who used his talents to bring ridicule into a serious scientific discussion. The question posed by the Bishop shows that Darwins theory was pitted against the narrative of the Bible.

The issue is equally important for the Hindu religions, although it was apparently not debated at that timeor now. The Vayu Purana says that Brahma created four sets of 1,000 pairs of men and women (8:37-40), just as the Bible says God created humankind. Next, the Bible says, And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul (Genesis 2:7). In parallel, the Vayu Purana tells of Brahmas five efforts at creation: of demons, gods, man, ancestors, and birds and animals from darkness (9:6).

Hindu parallels

Next, the Bible tells of the creation of Eve from Adams rib. (Genesis 2:21-22). In parallel, the Purana says that Swayambhu and his wife Shatarupa were created by splitting of the body of Brahma (10:7-8). Next, the Bible say that after being expelled from the Garden of Eden, Adam started to till the ground (Genesis 3:23). In parallel, the Vayu Purana says that the trees began to die at one time. People meditated on the matter. Then trees began to grow again in their homes (8:83-90). Therefore, Darwins refuting the Biblical creation of man by God equally refutes the Hindu creation of man by Brahma.

However, this writer would like to believe that Darwin did not actually refute the Bible or the Vayu Purana. The issue hinges on how we understand God or Brahma. Scientists tell us that at one time, the entire universe was contained in a black hole. Then there was a big bang and elements like hydrogen, oxygen, earth, plants, animals and man were created sequentially.

The question arises, where was God or Brahma when the entire universe was contained in the black hole? If we consider that God was in the black hole at that time, then it would follow that God and the universe were the same entity and that God-Universe itself exploded or divided and the world as we know it, came into existence.

'Monist' & 'Monotheist'

In this formula, God is the name of the consciousness of the Universe as contained in the black hole. God is universal consciousness. This possibility matches with the statement in the Upanishads that Brahman thought, I am one, let me be many. This description of God is known as Monist philosophy.

If, on the other hand, God was outside the black hole and he caused the explosion in the black hole, then the question arises: where was God when there was nothing in the universe except the black hole? This description of God is known as Monotheist philosophy.

Be that as it may, if we accept the Monist approach, then the ideas of Darwin, the Bible and the Hindu ideas of the creation of man become consistent with each other. In that case, we may understand that the inner consciousness of the ape caused the ape to evolve and it became man.

Male & female consciousness

In continuation of the above, when the Bible says that God created Eve from Adams rib (Genesis 2:21-22), or the Vayu Purana says that Brahma divided his body of darkness into Swayambhu Manu and his wife Shatarupa; we may understand this as the evolution of the human consciousness into male and female consciousnesses.

Mankind had already been created, according to the Bible and the Vayu Purana. Biblical scholars, such as Nahum M Sarna, author of the JPS Biblical Commentary and David Wenham, author of the Word Biblical Commentary, say that the creation of Eve from Adams rib actually describes the beginning of the institution of marriage. The same idea is encapsulated in the Vayu Purana saying that Shatarupa accepted Swayambhu Manu as her husband.

Darwin represents a fundamental break in the understanding of God. He has caused us to think whether God was an external entity that created man, so to say, with a hammer and a chisel; or whether God was an all-pervasive internal entity that evolved. The road opened by Darwin still needs to be walked on. One key difference in the Abrahamic- and Hindu religions is that the Abrahamic religions think of God as an external entity, while Hindu religions think of Brahman as an internal and all-pervasive entity. The time is at hand to resolve this debate, thanks to Darwin.

The writer is former Professor of Economics, IIM Bengaluru.

View original post here:

Darwin's theory of evolution got us thinking about our understanding of God, says Bharat Jhunjhunwala - Free Press Journal

Jonathan Wells: Scientific Revolutions and Counter-Revolutions – Discovery Institute

Image: Liberty Leading the People, by Eugne Delacroix, via Wikimedia Commons.

On a classicID the Futureepisode, Casey Luskin interviewsbiologist Jonathan Wellsabout evolution, intelligent design, scientific revolutions, and historian of science Thomas Kuhn. Kuhn argued from the history of science that reigning scientific paradigms do not give way gently and rationally before new and conflicting evidence; instead, the proponents of the old paradigm tend to dig in their heels and resist till the bitter end. Wells sees this dynamic at work with the reigning paradigm in origins biology, the modern theory of evolution, now challenged by the theory of intelligent design. Download the podcast or listen to it here.

Wells describes examples of how the current conversation among scientists about evolution and intelligent design matches many of the key characteristics of earlier paradigm shifts outlined in Kuhns seminal workThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions. As part of the conversation Luskin and Wells also highlight Wellss incisive and sometimes irreverentThe Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design.

Here is the original post:

Jonathan Wells: Scientific Revolutions and Counter-Revolutions - Discovery Institute

DigiPlus Conclave: Optimism and imagination are key approaches for dealing with technology – ETBrandEquity.com

In conversation with Prasad Sangameshwaran, editor of ETBrandEquity.com, Tom Goodwin, founder of All We Have Is Now and the author of Digital Darwinism, touched upon various aspects of the interim period we are in today - between the pre and post digital world.

The dialogue began with the question if we have crossed even the first stage of digital darwinism yet. The author revealed that the theory behind the term was that there would be a post-digital age where we rethink the world around us in the new context with technology, admitting that we are not as close to it as we might think. While the pandemic has accelerated the change in consumer behaviour to become more technology-focused, we are only perhaps 10 per cent in.

(This is an executive summary of the session, and the longer version will be uploaded in the coming days)Read all insightful sessions here

Read this article:

DigiPlus Conclave: Optimism and imagination are key approaches for dealing with technology - ETBrandEquity.com

Past and prologue: Engaging with our history | Columnists | eastoregonian.com – East Oregonian

The year 2020 proved to be a contentious year on many fronts political, social, medical but nothing surprised me more than the nationwide controversies over statues and monuments associated with dark moments in our past. We here in Pendleton recently sorted out a disagreement over streets named for figures in the Confederacy, so I thought it might be worth exploring some of the issues and questions these events bring to the surface.

You often hear people opposed to the removal of controversial monuments declare, You cant rewrite history. Actually, historians rewrite history all the time. In many cases, journalists are the first on the scene of a big event, and they write what they and others observed as it happened. In Stalins Soviet Union, for example, foreign correspondents witnessed a sad parade of cringing, broken defendants in the infamous 1930s show trials.

Based on the courtroom proceedings, correspondents could only concur with the verdict that the defendants were wreckers and enemies of the state that deserved execution. When it emerged later that these people were arrested and tortured solely for their alleged opposition to Stalins brutal regime, historians corrected the record.

Sometimes, an existing narrative is broadened to reflect the emergence of individuals once obscured. American women had few books written about them prior to their debut as the home-front workers who made the nation go in World War II.

The American woman soon will have her own dedicated Smithsonian museum, the ultimate historical accolade. Gay Americans became a popular topic of inquiry after the riots at New York Citys Stonewall Inn on June 28, 1969. Who are these men, people asked, and what are they protesting? These inclusions enlivened and enriched the study of U.S. history, which has too often proved to be a boring names and dates recitation of political milestones.

Reevaluation of established narratives also figures prominently in the rewriting of history.

I vividly recall my fourth grade visit to the Whitman Mission, where we heard how violent Indians brutally murdered well-meaning whites who were only trying to treat a measles epidemic. Thanks to individuals like Pendletons Bobbie Conner and other scholars of Indian history, visitors are now invited to consider the massacre as part of a clash of civilizations between colonizing whites and Indians pushing back.

How would you react, the exhibits ask, if strangers came bringing deadly diseases and planning to take your land and livelihood? Similarly, novelists like Margaret Mitchell painted a distorted picture of the Civil War-era south, where plantation owners were chivalrous and slaves either honorary family members or scheming, murderous criminals.

Gone with the Wind became the standard-bearing novel and film representing this view. But as a fuller picture of African Americans emerged during both world wars and the fledgling Civil Rights movement, historians began to examine the institution of slavery with fresh eyes. They uncovered a catalog of horrors that dramatized the moral darkness of slavery slave ships from Africa, harsh working conditions, brutal beatings and family separations. In cinematic terms, these discoveries suggest that 12 Years a Slave represents the African American experience under slavery with greater accuracy than Gone with the Wind.

These revisions have naturally inspired a reckoning with individuals who supported slavery, segregation and/or ethnic cleansing. Commemorations in public spaces proclaim that the honoree is someone to be admired. The question then becomes, do people who enslaved and/or abused fellow humans deserve to be honored? Confederates like General Robert E. Lee certainly fought for a cause, but that cause was a defense of slavery.

The Princeton School of Public and International Affairs decided long ago to name their institution for President Woodrow Wilson. In recent years, a close examination of his presidency reveals that he had actively worked to block the employment of African Americans in the federal government. Is a segregationist like Wilson someone we want future public servants to emulate?

That icon of conservation and progressivism, Theodore Roosevelt, believed strongly in Social Darwinism, which holds that whites are stronger than and intellectually superior to nonwhites, and therefore justified in the ethnic cleansing of Indian lands. Should he continue to be revered as an exemplary citizen? Thomas Jefferson allegedly fathered a child with a slave on his estate, and Abraham Lincoln assisted slave-owning clients as an Illinois lawyer. What is to be done with their public tributes?

I have often thought that Europe has too much history ancient rivalries, disputed territories, numerous wars while the United States has too little. As this is fundamentally a forward-looking country, it is gratifying to see people engaging with their history, even as disagreements sharpen.

Next month, I will offer some further thoughts on these commemoration conundrums and other issues pertinent to how we remember controversial events and individuals.

Brigit Farley is a Washington State University professor, student of history, adventurer and Irish heritage girl living in Pendleton.

Read more here:

Past and prologue: Engaging with our history | Columnists | eastoregonian.com - East Oregonian

Darwin and Race: Three Strikes, He’s Out – Discovery Institute

Photo: African pygmy Ota Benga was displayed at the Bronx Zoo in 1906, in support of Darwinian theory, via Wikimedia Commons.

February is Black History Month, and this week, Friday, February 12, is Darwin Day the birthday of Charles Darwin. It is, therefore, quite appropriate to probe and ask, What exactly did Charles Darwin evolutions leading light believe about race? Was he a racist? Most of Darwins apologists say emphatically, No! Adrian Desmond and James Moore, for example, suggest that opposition to slavery was indeed Darwins sacred cause, and that his conviction that all humankind was linked together through common descent led to that fervent belief. Adam Gopnik inAngels and Ages(2009) states emphatically, Racism, in any form that would have been familiar in his time or would be familiar in ours, had no place either in Darwins life or in Darwins logic. But is this true? A careful examination of the facts suggests that when it comes to Darwin and race its, Three strikes, youre out!

First, although Darwin may indeed have opposed slavery, he did not believe in racial equality. In theDescent of Man(1871) he cited the work of his generations leading ethnologists J. Barnard Davis and Paul Broca in linking cranial capacity with racial and ethnic hierarchies. Darwin was quite clear on the matter; science demonstrated that craniometrics allowed for the ranking of intellect accordingly:

The belief that there exists in man some close relationship between the size of the brain and the development of the intellectual faculties is supported by the comparison of skulls of savage and civilized races, of ancient and modern people, and by the analogy of the whole vertebrate series. Dr. J. Barnard Davis hasproved[emphasis added], by many careful measurements, that the mean internal capacity of the skull in Europeans is 92.3 cubic inches; in Americans 87.5; in Asians 87.1; and in Australians only 81.9 cubic inches.

Should there be any surprise, then, that Darwin would tell the Reverend Charles Kingsley in aletterdated February 6, 1862, It is very true what you say about the higher races of men, when high enough, replacing & clearing off the lower races. In 500 years how the Anglo-saxon race will have spread & exterminated whole nations; & in consequence how much the Human race, viewed as a unit, will have risen in rank. Or that he wouldwriteto William Graham on July 3, 1881, Remember what risks the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is. The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilised races throughout the world. For Darwin, humans could be placed into definite racial categories with an Anglo-centric eye. Did Darwin really believe in the equality of all humankind: no. Strike one.

Did common descent translate for Darwin into racial equality the so-called brotherhood of man? Quite the contrary. For him, common descent also meant struggle for existence and so survival of the fittest could easily translate into racial superiority, national expansion, extermination of inferior peoples, and a view of human progress that was unmistakably racialized. Even his apologists, Desmond and Moore, are forced to admit inDarwins Sacred Cause(2009), Darwin ended up calibrating human rank no differently than the rest of his generation. After shunning talk of high and low in his youthful evolution notebooks, he had ceased to be unique or interesting on the subject. For Darwin common descent meant the evolutionary ascent of superior ethnic and racial groups over inferior ones. Strike two.

Finally, there is Darwins contribution to eugenics, a horrific abuse in the name of science that sought to improve humanity by selective breeding of societys best and the forced sterilization of societys worst people. One of Darwins most persistent defenders, historian Peter Bowler, insists inDarwin Deleted(2013), that eugenics was spawned by middle class fears of a rising tide of the unfit in later 19th- and early 20th-century society. Furthermore, he argues, It was eugenics that encouraged scientists to focus on heredity and recognize the potential of artificial selection, and they could have done this without the inspiration of Darwinism. It is true that eugenics certainly had a class-based element to it, but it is also true that eugenics was also seen as a form of racial hygiene leading toward a better society. Bowlers claim that eugenics could have been pursued without Darwin is doubtful. After all, it was Darwins own fascination with the domestic breeding of pigeons and livestock that formed the first chapter of hisOrigin of Species(1859) and this domestic breeding analogy he took to be the essence of natural selections creative power. Jean Gayon has argued convincingly inDarwins Struggle for Survival(1998)that his domestic breeding analogy was not merely a pedagogical tool or heuristic device but essential to the theory itself. But despite what Bowler argues, the link between Darwin and eugenics was made by leading eugenicists themselves, as when Paul Popenoe and Roswell Hill Johnson write inApplied Eugenics(1918):

The science of eugenics is the natural result of the spread and acceptance of organic evolution, following the publication of Darwins workThe Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, in 1859. It took a generation for his ideas to win the day; but then they revolutionized the intellectual life of the civilized world. Man came to realize that the course of nature is regular; that the observed sequence of events can be described in formulas which are called natural laws; he learned that he could achieve great results in plant and animal breeding by working in harmony with these laws. Then the question logically arose, Is not man himself subject to those same laws? Can he not use his knowledge of them to improve his own species, as he has been more or less consciously improving the plants and animals that were of most value to him, for many centuries?

So it would appear that efforts to distance Darwin from the odious designs of eugenics are contradicted by the statements of eugenicists themselves. Whatever Bowler may think of the matter, it is clear that Darwins theory was uppermost in these social manipulators minds when they contemplated the wonders to which eugenic principles could be applied. Strike three.

By any measure, when racial equality is being discussed, Darwin is clearlyoutof the running.

Editors note: Darwinism and its legacy for racial thinking are examined in John Wests multiple award-winning documentary Human Zoos:

Read the original post:

Darwin and Race: Three Strikes, He's Out - Discovery Institute

Bitcoin Cash, Ripple Price Prediction: What Next for BCH and XRP? – InvestingCube

The Bitcoin Cash and Ripple prices are flying high today as part of the massive cryptocurrency rally. The BCH and XRP prices have risen by more than 10% in the past 24 hours, bringing their total market cap to more than $14.3 billion and $21 billion, respectively.

News: The Ripple and Bitcoin Cash prices are not the only ones rallying. Indeed, the price of Bitcoin, Polkadot, and other digital currencies has rallied in the past 12 hours. That has brought the total market cap of digital currencies tracked by CoinMarketCap to more than $1.3 trillion. Bitcoin itself is now valued at more than $880 billion.

The BTC has jumped after Tesla announced that it was acquiring Bitcoin worth more than $1.5 billion. As such, investors believe that acceptance has come to the crypto market, which will also push other currencies higher.

The XRP price has been relatively resilient recently. In December, it dropped to a multi-year low of $0.1740 after the SEC launched a major investigation. Many exchanges suspended it.

It then rebounded in January as part of the Wall Street Bets euphoria and reached a high of $0.7556. As this euphoria waned, the Ripple price tumbled to $0.34, a 54% decline. Since then, it has been attempting to rebound and is now trading at $0.47.

Unfortunately, the current rebound of XRP will likely not last based on technical patterns. The daily chart shows that it has formed a bearish flag pattern that is shown in blue. Therefore, in the near term, the price will likely resume falling, as shown below.

On the four-hour chart, we see that the BCH price has been on an uptrend. It has formed an ascending channel that is shown in blue. And today, it managed to move above this channel. Also, the price is being supported by the 25-day and 15-day smoothed moving averages. Therefore, I suspect that the BCH will continue rebounding as bulls target the resistance at $550.

Dont miss a beat! Follow us onTelegramandTwitter.

More content

Originally posted here:

Bitcoin Cash, Ripple Price Prediction: What Next for BCH and XRP? - InvestingCube

The Impact of Bitcoin on Online Poker – TechRound

Over the past couple of years, blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies have crept up from the shadowy basements of computer geeks and nerds and is slowly finding its way into mainstream acceptance. Nowadays, its hard to engage in online financial transactions without the likes of Bitcoin, Ripple, Ehtereum, and Lite coin coming up. And Online Poker is no exception. Many poker and sports gambling sites are now, in fact, accepting cryptocurrency payments as deposits. According to Beastsofpoker.com, over $2 million worth of Bitcoin is wagered each our at online poker sites and casinos.

But despite this, most people still have no clue about what goes on behind the working of cryptocurrencies. Questions are often asked on what they are exactly. What makes Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies special? And most importantly, what kind of impact does Bitcoin have on online poker?

To break it down, cryptocurrencies are digital currencies secured by cryptography that you can use to buy services and goods online. However, unlike other online transactions, these currencies use a more secure online ledger, thus limiting fraud and identity theft as much as possible. In fact, each transaction is recorded and globally recognized, which makes it almost impossible to hack or forge.

People also argue that because the decentralized computer networks built on blockchain are behind the transfers, governments cant seize or freeze your deposits. On top of that, unlike the traditional banks, most of these cryptocurrency exchanges dont charge transaction fees.

With all these benefits, you might be wondering why there isnt a surge of more cryptocurrencies out there. Well, on the contrary, there are presently as many as 1,000 virtual currencies operating all over the world. However, being the industry leader, Bitcoin is the most popular. In the last two years alone, its value has grown by over 1,000%. It is also the most readily accepted in online poker among various websites. In fact, the majority of millionaires are already investing in crypto.

The acceptance of Bitcoin to the online poker community can be traced back to the Black Friday in Poker, an event that occurred in 2011 when the United States Department of Justice indicted the three major figureheads in online poker in the country. Big sites were closed up, and soon after, major payment processors like Netteler started leaving the online gambling realm. Likewise, banks started rejecting deposits, making it impossible for players to place deposits and receive payments.

It was then that a group of poker professionals came up with the idea to look for an alternative a fluid financial tool that would allow direct connection between poker sites and players. Bitcoin was the most viable option. And so, the SealsWithClubs (SWC) poker site was formed an Us-friendly Online Poker room that cut out the middlemen like banks and accepted Bitcoin only.

Up until then, Bitcoin was still largely a foreign concept and was notoriously difficult to acquire. People would either mine it or perform cash for Bitcoin swaps. Despite its relatively small size, SWC still made its mark in the online poker playfield, even emerging top ten best US-friendly poker sites at the time.

Its existence alone showcased the possibilities of Bitcoin peer to peer transactions and set the avenue for other online gambling sites. Eventually, other online poker sites, including sportsbooks and online casinos, jumped into the mix, taking advantage ofBitcoins smooth mode of payments.

As weve seen, Bitcoin is not the only cryptocurrency in the game out there. Others like Ethereum, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash are equally as legitimate and accepted in online gambling sites. However, Bitcoin still has a significant lead over the others in terms of popularity.

So why do online poker sites and casinos love Bitcoin so much? Well, other than the decentralization and security factor, there are a few other reasons.

Perhaps the main reason why online gambling sites gravitate towards Bitcoin is that there are almost no restrictions made on transactions. You see, following the events of Black Friday, the government banned any gambling businesses from operating in states where online gambling was illegal. As a result, banks complied with this law, rejecting several transactions relating to offshore gambling. However, while the government might influence banks and other financial institutions, they cannot exert the same on Bitcoin. Overall, with Bitcoin, customers get to make their deposits and withdrawals without interference.

The other good thing about Bitcoin is that it doesnt come with any charges on deposits and withdrawals like banks. This saves money for both the players and the poker site, which was originally responsible for the withdrawal charges. With Bitcoin, gamblers instead only pay a significantly smaller fee to the miners when making withdrawals or deposits.

Theres no denying now that cryptocurrencies are trending these days. They have sparked people worldwide, and now everybody wants to try this new currency in town. In a bid to attract these curious crowds, any newly developed online poker site or casino tries to capitalize on the trend, launching with a cryptocurrency provision.

From the look of things, Bitcoin is clearly not going anywhere. For as long as the unregulated markets are present, there will be a place for decentralized currency in the online poker gambling realm. However, it is still less popular in the states where online gambling is legalized. Theres simply no need for it since most people in these countries can gamble already freely through other financial instruments.

It is also noteworthy that it is important to take care when gambling with unlicensed sites in states that have legalized gambling. Although Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may create an avenue for it, such states have regulations to protect their legal poker market and are quite vigilant in taking action against illegal gambling activities.

Original post:

The Impact of Bitcoin on Online Poker - TechRound

Ray Dalio on why Bitcoin is zooming and why it faces hurdles as an alternative asset – Moneycontrol

Bitcoin is the talk of the global financial markets as the digital currency is seeing a huge trading frenzy. With Tesla acquiring $1.5 billion of the cryptocurrency, Bitcoins price has zoomed into the stratosphere. One Bitcoin is now worth about $45,500, higher by 57% in 2021; even more than 25 ounces of gold. Just before the pandemic struck in March last year, the digital currency was trading even below $5,000.

Now an important debate raging globally is what is in store for Bitcoin, and where lie the risks?For instance, is the demand for a digital currency as an alternative asset class here to stay? Are digital currencies substitutes for traditional asset classes like gold, and can one easily and quickly shift between assets? Or is this just a speculative bubble gripping global investors?

No doubt, the digital currency has come a long way, and it is being seen more than just an alternative investment fad. Ray Dalio, the billionaire hedge fund manager of Bridgewater Associates, puts it succinctly in a recent client note: It seems to me that Bitcoin has succeeded in crossing the line from being a highly speculative idea that could well not be around in short order to probably being around and having some value in the future.

Folks at Bridgewater Associates note that Bitcoin offers stable and limited issuance that cannot be devalued by central bank printing.

While about 90 percent of the Bitcoin supply is already mined, new issuance will slow even every few years. In fact, the currency will never be fully mined. Thats one feature that seems to be encouraging digital cryptocurrency collectors and speculators. While there is a limited supply of Bitcoins, digital currencies are mushrooming at a rapid pace. There are more than 4,000 cryptocurrencies, which means that there is unlimited supply of these currencies.

Bitcoins advantage is that it has a more widespread acceptance over other digital currencies. Bitcoin commands a lions share of more than 75 percent of the total cryptocurrency market-cap. Even with other cryptocurrencies such Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin which have features similarly to Bitcoin such as limited supply, the latter has been more in demand. In fact, many Bitcoin enthusiasts are seeing Bitcoin as a form of digital gold.

On the other hand, government bonds hardly offer high returns in this zero-to-low interest rate environment even as currencies across the globe are depreciating. Although, Bitcoins dont offer any yield as such much like gold, that has not been a disadvantage in this low rate environment.

Nevertheless, Bitcoins price movements have been sharp and volatile compared to assets like gold, real-estate or other safe-haven currencies, diminishing its appeal as an alternative asset class.

Other Disadvantages

There are some other evident drawbacks. Dalio notes that it is unclear whether Bitcoin can provide diversification when portfolios need it most, or act as an adequate hedge against inflation. Bitcoin is also a relative newcomer among assets, and so it does not have a history to determine whether the asset class can indeed protect and enhance returns on a portfolio.

Bitcoin has generally appreciated alongside rising inflation expectations, but its longer-term historical relationships with inflation and gold have been relatively weak, said the Bridgewater note.The vast majority of people and governments are not still using it as a reserve asset like gold in their balance sheets, which also include large global institutional fund allocators.

Bitcoins large trading frenzy and high turnover is due to the rise in high-frequency traders, and the rise of derivatives on them. High-profile buyers such as Tesla are further fuelling investor interest. Its also driving Bitcoins higher turnover with trading volumes increasing more than gold. But this is due to asset-churning and speculation over long-term risk-raking, points Bridgewater.

This could also be a classic bubble-like behaviour. Leverages on Bitcoins have increased phenomenally which has pushed prices higher, further heightening risks.

The digital asset also faces major regulatory risk. While institutional investors may increase allocation if it is regulated, governments could also stymie its growth if the alternative proves to be more successful, or emerge as a big threat to fiat currency. Authorities have already been hollering that Bitcoin is also a conduit for money laundering.

Go here to read the rest:

Ray Dalio on why Bitcoin is zooming and why it faces hurdles as an alternative asset - Moneycontrol

The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust: What It Is and How It Works – CoinDesk – Coindesk

The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) is the worlds largest bitcoin fund and the first investment vehicle of its kind to report financials regularly to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

GBTC shares are part of a range of traditional financial products that track cryptocurrency prices offered by Grayscale Investments; the worlds biggest digital asset management firm and part of the Digital Currency Group (DCG) led by founder and CEO, Barry Silbert. DCG is also the parent company of Coindesk.

Originally launched in 2013 as the Bitcoin Investment Trust (BIT), the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust offers accredited investors the opportunity to gain exposure to the leading cryptocurrency by purchasing shares of an open-ended private trust that holds in excess of 649,130 BTC to date equating to almost 3.1% of bitcoins current circulating supply.

The fund tracks the price of bitcoin using the XBX index published by TradeBlock a company recently acquired by CoinDesk. During periods of high bitcoin market volatility, GBTC shares trade at a discount or premium depending on investor demand. For example, when bitcoin experiences a sharp increase in price, theres generally a higher demand for GBTC shares from institutional investors which in turn drives their price up.

On May 31, 2017, the shares traded at 137% premium as bitcoin began its ascent to $19,783 before sharply correcting. Since 2019, GBTC premiums have oscillated in a much narrower range between 6% and 38%.

The minimum buy-in is $50,000 and Grayscale charges a 2.0% annual account fee which is accrued daily, according to the official website. Each GBTC share, as of Feb. 5, 2021, entitles the holder to 0.00094825 BTC (approximately $40).

What are the benefits of purchasing GBTC shares over bitcoin?

Simply put, the main selling point is: bitcoin without the hassle and stress.

The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust allows investors to speculate on bitcoin without having to buy it directly. This eliminates the need to organize the safe storage and custody of the digital asset, and saves a number of associated costs. It also allows institutional investors to complete large buy orders with minimal slippage compared to centralized crypto exchanges which often lack sufficient liquidity. Slippage is when a trade is executed at a different price than expected, for example when placing a large buy order drives up an assets price.

Because GBTC shares are a form of traditional security, there is also much clearer tax guidance and the opportunity to hold shares in a number of tax-advantaged accounts, such as Roth IRAs or 401(k)s.

Who can invest in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust?

Only accredited investors can invest in Grayscale financial products.

An accredited investor, according to the United States Securities Act 1933 Rule 1 Regulation D definition, is someone who can show an annual income of at least $200,000 or a combined spousal income of $300,000 for the past 2 years with the expectation of receiving the same or more during the current year. In August 2020, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission expanded the definition to include people with defined measures of professional knowledge, experience or certifications in addition to the existing tests for income or net worth. This means that individuals who are able to demonstrate a level of sophistication can also qualify as accredited investors without needing to earn a six figure salary.

When the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust first went live almost 8 years ago, it was initially a private fund for a select number of investors. In 2015, however, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust received approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to sell GBTC shares publicly. These are available on OTCQX, an over-the-counter market for financial securities.

Who are the main investors in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust?

According to the latest company reports, the top 5 largest holders of GBTC shares are:

What other products does Grayscale Investment offer?

Grayscale provides investors with a range of similar trusts that track a variety of different cryptocurrencies, including;

Grayscale also allows accredited investors to gain exposure to a basket of cryptocurrencies through the Grayscale Digital Large Cap Fund. This allows investors to diversify across multiple crypto-assets and reduce risk. The fund contains bitcoin (BTC), bitcoin cash (BCH), litecoin (LTC), and ether (ETH). For a time, the basket of assets also contained XRP. However, following the SEC lawsuit against Ripple over the asset, it was decidedly removed. Shortly after, the single-asset Grayscale XRP Trust was liquidated.

Each share of the Digital Large Cap Fund entitles the holder to: 0.00047385 BTC, 0.00047433 BCH, 0.00166948 LTC and 0.00286382 ETH (respectively). On Dec. 21, 2020, Grayscale reduced the annual fee attached to this product from 3.0% to 2.5%.

See original here:

The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust: What It Is and How It Works - CoinDesk - Coindesk

Bitcoin Cash USD On Bullish Momentum: 9.14% Up In The Last 24 Hours – Via News Agency

Bitcoin Cash USD is currently on bullish momentum. At 12:04 EST on Saturday, 6 February, Bitcoin Cash USD is at $474.20 and up by 9.14% in the last 24 hours.

Over the last six hours, Bitcoin Cash USDs higher value was $480.17 and the lower value was $474.20.

Over the last twelve hours, Bitcoin Cash USDs higher value was $488.40 and the lower value was $468.87.

In relation to Bitcoin Cash USDs daily highs and lows, its 9.761% up from its trailing 24-hour low of $432.03 and 2.907% down from its trailing 24-hour high of $488.40.

About Bitcoin Cash USDs yearly highs and lows, its 240.612% up from its 52-week low and 24.706% down from its 52-week high.

Bitcoin Cash USDs last day, last week, and last months average volatility was 6.09%, 4.04%, and 5.64%, respectively.

Bitcoin Cash USDs last day, last week, and last months high and low average amplitude percentage was 6.80%, 7.42%, and 12.19%, respectively.

Accelerate files preliminary prospectus for accelerate Bitcoin ETF. According to Business Insider on Wednesday, 3 February, "CALGARY, AB, Feb. 2, 2021 /CNW/ -Accelerate Financial Technologies Inc., ("Accelerate") is pleased to announce that it has filed and obtained a receipt for a preliminary prospectus with the Canadian securities regulators for Accelerate Bitcoin ETF ("ABTC")."

Goldman Sachss rahmani strikes warning over Bitcoin value. According to Bloomberg Quint on Wednesday, 3 February, "The wild swings in the price of Bitcoin prove its not a real unit of value, though blockchain technology "is here to stay," according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.s Sharmin Mossavar-Rahmani.", "Rahmanis skepticism about Bitcoins intrinsic value echoes that of European Central Bank governing council member Gabriel Makhlouf, who said last month Bitcoin investors should be prepared to "lose all their money." Still, the cryptocurrency has plenty of high-profile proponents."

Bitcoin proselytizer saylor says over 1,000 firms join webinar. According to Bloomberg Quint on Wednesday, 3 February, "The chief executive officer of MicroStrategy Inc. and Bitcoin proselytizer made the projection at his companys World Now global conference that featured breakout sessions on the future of Bitcoin and how corporations can best position themselves to capitalize on the digital token. ", "Michael Saylor says he sees an "avalanche" of companies moving their cash into Bitcoin over the next 12 months."

Klarna CEO cautions executives promoting Bitcoin investments. According to Bloomberg Quint on Thursday, 4 February, "Michael Saylor, CEO of MicroStrategy Inc. and a Bitcoin proselytizer, said this week at his companys World Now global conference that he sees an "avalanche" of companies moving their cash into Bitcoin over the next 12 months."

Bitcoin declines after bouncing off top of recent price range. According to Bloomberg Quint on Thursday, 4 February, "A strengthening dollar since the start of the year has kept Bitcoin stuck in a consolidation phase, but that could be ending soon, according to Ed Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda Corp."

Only 15% of Bitcoin traders are women, broker study shows. According to Bloomberg Quint on Friday, 5 February, "said the percentage of women holding Bitcoin on its platform increased from just 10% a year ago.", "As Bitcoin prices boomed over the past year, with millions of people around the world signing up for day-trading accounts during the pandemic, it remains largely a hobby of young men. "

According to Business Insider on Friday, 5 February, "The price of Bitcoin skyrocketed in 2020, prompting a wave of new investors to sign up to various trading platforms. "

Visit link:

Bitcoin Cash USD On Bullish Momentum: 9.14% Up In The Last 24 Hours - Via News Agency

Central Bank of Kenya to Reportedly Use Bitcoin as Reserve Currency – Coingape

The Central Bank of Kenya in a historical decision has decided to switch to use Bitcoin as a Reserve currency in order to resolve growing financial problems in the country as per a report from Daily News Arena.

Patrick Njoroge, Central Bank Governor said that the decision was taken after considering numerous factors including a shortage of foreign currency reserves, increase velocity of money, and shield Kenya from exploitative loans that threaten the sovereignty of Kenya. He explained,

Our decision to shift to Bitcoin is both tactical and logical. Our currency has always been the punching bag for the International Monetary Fund which always claims that the Kenya shilling is overvalued. This has led to too much pressure on the Kenyan Shilling and this has a negative effect on the economy. We are losing too much simply because someone at IMF woke up on the wrong side of the bed. Bitcoin will put an end to this.

The Central Bank Governor reportedly said that they intend to use Bitcoin to reduce their growing foreign exchange losses and help them reduce their national debt. The decision should not come as a surprise to many as Kenya has emerged as the leader in mobile money and have also used bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as the bridge currency.

The decision by the Kenyan central bank is in quite a contrast to the Nigerian Central Banks recent decision to impose a banking ban on crypto traders and exchanges in the country. The decision by the Kenyan central bank also comes on a day when the US Treasury Secretary claimed that Bitcoin would never find its way into the central banks.

The institutions have already started using Bitcoin as a Treasury Reserve asset by converting a portion of their treasury cash into Bitcoin. Now the governments especially the developing nations financially crippled by trade sanctions and a declining national economy.

The article was reportedly published by a Satire Website

To keep track of DeFi updates in real time, check out our DeFi news feed Here.

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on Linkedin

Share on Telegram

See original here:

Central Bank of Kenya to Reportedly Use Bitcoin as Reserve Currency - Coingape

Allbirds and Icebreaker back regenerative wool platform | Apparel Industry News | just-style – just-style.com

Commitments from 167 farms represents more than 2m acres of regenerative farming

The ZQRX index, which is based on NZM's ethical wool platform, ZQ, aims to help tackle the environmental impact of the global fashion industry, which is responsible for 10% of annual greenhouse gas emissions worldwide.

The frameworkaddressesclimate change and greenhouse gas emissions and makes the case for regenerative farming practices which representa considerable opportunity to sequester (store) carbon, and slow climate change. Theindex also includes the foundational tenants of ZQ such as animal welfare and social responsibility, as well as an increased focus on environmental issues that directly reduce carbon emission and improve biodiversity, like waste, water quality and soil health.

The ZQRXindex is currently being applied to 167 farms in New Zealand, representing over 2m acres of land and resulting in carbon being retained and stored in soil, and in vegetation, with many additional animal welfare and social responsibility benefits also being seen.

The three brands, which combined represent about 2mkgs of wool,have committed to sourcing their New Zealand Merino through the ZQRXplatform.

"Through our industry-leading carbon footprint work with our leading brand partners, andwith support from the Ministry forPrimary Industries, we know on-farm emissions represent approximately 60% of the emissions associated with woollen products and are our biggest opportunity to lower our impacts," says John Brakenridge, New Zealand Merino CEO. "Through the adoption of regenerative practices that both store more carbon and emit less, we could reduce our on-farm emissions down to zero.

"The ZQRXindex addresses the health of the eco-system and farming communities, rewarding the value of growers who are committed to regenerative agricultural practises. ZQRXis the start of a global movement toward brands, businesses and growers working together to address critical global issues such as climate change and biodiversity loss. We dream of a day when all wool is farmed with regenerative practices."

IcebreakerandSmartwoolhelped found the original ZQ platform 13 years ago, whileAllbirds, which also sources ZQ ethical wool, will be the first fashion brand to label every item produced with its carbon footprint.

"As we've seen through 2020, swift sea-change can only be achieved through collective action; together, competitors have enough influence to right the ship when it comes to the universal threat of climate change. With ZQRX, we are backing a movement towards a truly regenerative future, one that prioritises the planet and supports our unwavering pursuit to make better things in a better way," says Allbirds' co-founder Tim Brown.

Greg Smith, Icebreaker brand president, adds:"We've always believed nature has the answers and our decisions need to have respect for the greater ecosystem. We are constantly impressed by the way farmers care for their land, care for their animals and care for their people. They are all interlinked. Our growers have already made strides, over generations, to farm regeneratively. ZQRXboth honours these steps and provides us a platform to measure, track improvements and push beyond.

"While there is no one solution to the climate challenges we face, the ZQRXplatform empowers farmers to work with nature to improve continuously. It is one step we, collectively, as the world's leading Merino wool brands, can take to change the world and leave the planet better off than we found it."

View post:

Allbirds and Icebreaker back regenerative wool platform | Apparel Industry News | just-style - just-style.com

Let caterpillars nibble your leaves to create a healthier garden, advise the RHS – HouseBeautiful.com

Letting caterpillars feast on leaves can help to create a healthier ecosystem in your garden, says the Royal Horticulture Society (RHS).

Despite being considered as minor pests who nibble prized plants and veg, the gardening charity explained in their latest Gardening With The RHS podcast that 'tolerating a few nibbled leaves' can help attract wildlife in your garden and 'reduce the need for human intervention'.

Andrew Salisbury, the RHS' chief entomologist, said: 'Moths and butterflies do have caterpillars that feed on garden plants so you need to tolerate a few nibbled plants to have a healthy ecosystem in your garden.'

While many of us have spent years searching for ways to deter the eating machines from our favourite flowers, they may actually be good for our garden after all.

In the podcast, Andrew explained that he had been watching the caterpillars enjoy his nasturtiums before the bees came to take them away. 'In the course of three hours I watched wasps come in, search, find a caterpillar, fly off, and feed their babies in their nest,' he said.

Katharine VogellGetty Images

'I watched every caterpillar get taken, so if you encourage the grubs you encourage the predators that eat them. It's important to put up with some nibbled cabbages to have a healthy ecosystem in your garden.'

Also in the podcast, Andrew said we should avoid having a garden that's too tidy, and to accept a bit of damage to get a healthy, balanced eco-system. Time to let caterpillars enjoy your garden...

Like this article? Sign up to our newsletter to get more articles like this delivered straight to your inbox.

SIGN UP

In need of some positivity or not able to make it to the shops? Subscribe to House Beautiful magazine today and get each issue delivered directly to your door.

Best breathable gloves Gardening Gloves

Burgon & Ball Tweed Gardening Gloves, Medium, Grey

17.50

This classic grey pair of gloves has an adjustable strap to keep your hands secure whilst gardening. They also haveultra-soft felt palms and a breathable mesh fabric to help you keep cool when it's warm.

Everyday gloves Gardening Gloves

Everyday gardening gloves

Withnon-slip dots for a sure grip andafour-way stretch fit, these everyday gardening gloves keep hands protected from cuts as well as the sun (they have been made withcertified 50+ UPF for maximum sun protection).

Best breathable gloves Gardening Gloves

Leather Gardening Gloves for Women

12.80

Coming in at just over12, these green gloves havea3D breathable mesh back to keep your hands cool and comfortable. Ideal for the summer months.

READ MORE:20 best gardening gifts under 35

Multi-purpose gloves Gardening Gloves

Gauntlet Gloves

20.00

These soft grey suede gloves are great for tasks around the house and garden. Sold in one size, they aim to protect your hands no matter what job you take on.

Microfibre gloves Gardening Gloves

Microfibre Gardening Glove - Medium

With amicrofibre and polyester mixfabric, these green gardening gloves will allowyou to weed, prune and plant with ease. As well as being easy to clean, they also have an adjustable velcro strap, too.

Best stylish gardening gloves Gardening Gloves

Striped Tulip Potting Gloves

34.95

These 100 per centcotton canvasgardening gloves featuring Orla Kiely's famous print are fully lined with elasticated wrists. It's great if you're on the hunt for a stylish option.

Best water-resistant gloves Gardening Gloves

Showa water repellent gardening gloves 306

Gardening on a rainy day? Well, add these affordable water repellent gloves to the top of your wish list. Fully coated with latex, they offer apowerful grip in both wet and dry conditions.

Large gardening gloves Gardening Gloves

Gardening Gloves, Green, Large

11.99

Used and recommended by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, these large gardening gloveshaveleather palms and durable elastane backs that give a little stretch. Perfect for those hands-on tasks in the garden.

Affordable gardening gloves Gardening Gloves

Briers Rigger Gloves Twin Pack

Keep your hands safe from scrapes and cuts in the garden with these large gloves. Made from leather, cotton and polyester, they aregreat for heavy-duty tasks.

Best for comfort Gardening Gloves

Everyday gardening gloves

In a soft beige hue, these everyday gardening gloves have been made from a soft, stretch fabric to provide complete comfort. As well as this,thepalms and fingers are covered with silicone dots to give you a sure-handed grip.

Denim gloves Gardening Gloves

Denim Gardening Glove with Gauntlet Cuff

Stylish and practical, these denim gardening gloves protectagainst sharp thorns, needles, briars and insect bites.

Thorn proof Gardening Gloves

Leather Gardening Gloves Thorn Proof Garden work gloves

Designed to protect hands against thorns, these leather gardening gloves featureanadjustable rip-tape strap for comfort and amore generous fit. We love the added pop of blue.

Best for pulling out tough weeds - Gardening Gloves

RHS Burgon and Ball flora & fauna gloves

Part of the RHS Flora & Fauna collection, these vibrant bird-printed gloves are great for pulling out tough weeds. They have been made with a soft hardwearing fabric to help you as you get your garden in shape.

Professional gardening gloves - Gardening Gloves

Professional Garden Gloves

Designed to last, these professional garden gloves offercomfort, durability and protection. They also have anextra palm and finger protection, to keep you safe when pruning plants.

Best gloves for harsh jobs - Gardening Gloves

Irwin Heavy Duty Jobsite Gloves L

21.70

Looking for a professional pair of gardening gloves to help with heavy-duty jobs? Then this pair is just for you. Designed for harsh application and rough materials, you can be sure that these gloves will protect your hands outdoors.

Like this article?Sign up to our newsletterto get more articles like this delivered straight to your inbox.

SIGN UP

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

View post:

Let caterpillars nibble your leaves to create a healthier garden, advise the RHS - HouseBeautiful.com

5G experimentation and security grows in govt, military sectors – Help Net Security

Spirent Communications released its 5G outlook report, based on analysis and takeaways from over 600 global 5G engagements in 2020.

The report provides insights from across the 5G eco-system on the current status of 5G, illustrating the accelerated timetables from service providers in upgrading to 5G standalone (SA) with the new 5G Core, and revealing how 5G is driving new initiatives and sector engagements.

2020 was certainly a year to remember, not just because of the unprecedented challenges presented by COVID-19, but also because of the rapid development for the telecom industry, said Spirent Head of 5G Strategy, Steve Douglas.

Telecom is keeping its sights firmly focused on 5Gs future, not in spite of the challenges of the pandemic, but because of them, and our latest report gives an unparalleled view of the current status of 5G and the trends were seeing for the year ahead, based on the investments, research, testing and innovation by the leading 5G players.

5G activity surged in 2020 with accelerated timetables from service providers to deliver 5G SA core deployments, following non-standalones (NSAs) inability to really wow customers and deliver a solid new revenue proposition.

Service provider engagement increased nearly 50% as service assurance integration ramped up, and leading operators accelerated 5G standalone network strategies and new 5G core deployments.

Through service contracts, elements that would previously have been delivered inhouse are now being delivered by trusted partners, as operators need to be able to move quickly to keep up with the complexity of 5G and the accelerated timetables.

The year saw notable growth in engagements with government, military and academia around 5G experimentation and security initiatives, as governments explore new use cases.

Other notable initiatives include cloud hyperscalers exploring operator edge partnerships, Open RAN being explored in support of supply chain diversity initiatives, and multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) accelerating their plans for 5G.

Whether it was a core network buildout, lab certification, or new service delivered, 5G plus automated assurance were the dynamic duo that customers turned to as they sought to continue pushing forward with their 5G plans, with 80% of Spirents assurance business focused on 5G work.

While the pandemic has undoubtedly accelerated 5G timetables, it seems likely this accelerated trend is here to stay.

In many ways, the pandemic has accelerated trends that we hadnt anticipated gaining steam for at least another couple of years, said Douglas, whether fixed wireless access driven by working from home, or automation required to safely conduct field testing with limited personnel. While there were delays, by and large 5G powered ahead and remained in control of its destiny.

Visit link:

5G experimentation and security grows in govt, military sectors - Help Net Security

New Technology to Kill SARS Associated Human Coronavirus in the Air and on Surfaces – PRNewswire

CHICAGO, Feb. 11, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Eco Smart Health today announced that their Sonic Smart Antimicrobial System can effectively reduce virus transmission within schools, gyms, spas, salons, hotels, and dental/medical offices.

The company's patented all-natural EPA exempt (FIRFA) and FDA (GRAS) recognized formulation Pure Sonic is suspended into the air and on all surfaces by way of the company's patent pending Sonic SmartAero Cleaner device. With the union of both innovative products, 99.9% of pathogens such as SARS Associated Human Coronavirus, Norovirus; Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Herpes Simplex, HIV-1, Streptococcus, E Coli, Salmonella, Staphylococcus, Tuberculosis, Salmonella, Legionella- Influenza Virus Type A, Viral Diarrhea Virus are killed within commercial spaces as large as 3,000 square feet.

The Pure Sonic formulation has been tested by a world-renowned level 3 laboratory and has proven to kill the above pathogens quickly and effectively. Since September 2020, field testing of the Sonic SmartAero Cleaner device used to suspend the Pure Sonic formulation into the air has validated all company claims.

Vice President and co-founder Mark Hearsh says, "Being a supplier to the hospitality industry for the past 15 years, the impetus to develop the Sonic Smart Antimicrobial System originated from my interest to come up with a solution for hotel housekeeping and maintenance departments to make both the air and surfaces in guest rooms safe to get people back into Hotels."

Benefits of the Sonic Smart System are:

Eric Rawet, the Director of Technology explains that "Once turned on, the Sonic Smart Aero Cleaner launches the Pure Sonic into the space's atmosphere activating the formulation to attach itself to airborne viruses and dissolving it's protein envelope causing it to expire" Rawet also states, "Through molecular diffusion all surfaces within the entire room are protected using the same process. Our website explains all the science behind our system"

Systems range in price between $199.00 to $299.00 depending on size of space to be treated and the cost per treatment is $1.50 to $2.00 depending on size of area. The products will go on sale on the company's site ecosmarthealth.com in mid-February 2021.

Hearsh and Rawet in 2019 were awarded a patent for a device called the "Med-Wand" that reduces cross contamination within the operating room and emergency rooms and a floor mopping system under the trade name "Spill Master" which is used in businesses and public facilities today to prevent slip and falls.

The Company's Mission Statement is: Made in America solutions to provide safer and healthier environments. Our team is made of leading engineers, product specialist, marketers and other professionals who have years of experience in their respective specialty and are united with the company's mission - To Help Solve Modern Day Problems.

For additional information please email [emailprotected]or visit ecosmarthealth.com

Media Contact: Eric Rawet Eco Smart Health Corp. 1-888-344-1150 [emailprotected]

SOURCE Eco Smart Health

See original here:

New Technology to Kill SARS Associated Human Coronavirus in the Air and on Surfaces - PRNewswire