A new theory has been put forward which claims Blockstream CEO Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous inventor of Bitcoin. The theory, laid out in a video entitled Bitcoin - Unmasking Satoshi Nakamoto, was posted on May 11 by YouTuber Barely Sociable.

The video draws comparisons between Adam Back and Satoshi based on the trail of breadcrumbs left by Satoshi before he disappeared from the internet altogether. The video points out similarities in Back and Satoshis writing style, coding ability, and constructs a timeline which seeks to connect the two men based on the timing of their appearance (and disappearance) on/from the internet.

When asked for comment, Back told Decrypt, "Just that people speculate, but I'm not Satoshi. To cut short Google searches and digging."

Adam Back had also taken to Twitter to refute the claims. Back admitted that the timeline may look suspicious, but attributed it to mere coincidence.

Some claim to be Satoshi, days google research blogging stories, and in court, to widespread non-belief. Seems I need the opposite: I am not Satoshi despite recent video / reddit claiming so. Some factors & timing may look suspicious in hindsight; coincidence & facts are untidy, Back tweeted.

Here, the CEO of Blockstreama private company which sells off-chain Bitcoin solutions like the Liquid networkis referencing self-professed Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig Wright. Wright has sued multiple members of the crypto community, including Back, who claimed he is not Satoshi. The latest states of all five lawsuits can be seen here.

Back continued on Twitter, It goes deeper - some of what they google researched is true: I moved to Malta, an EU tax haven - in 2009. Pure coincidence, though ofc I did know about Bitcoin in 2008 via emails from Satoshi. I was born in London. I do use double-space and native spelling British. Can code C++, said Back, he said.

The video pointed out that all of Satoshis original emails with members of the cypherpunk community are still publicly available. All except oneBacks. The explanation offered by Back is that he purposely deleted all of his correspondence with Satoshi in order to protect the Bitcoin creators identity.

The video also references Backs deep involvement in the cypherpunk space, particularly his early focus on Ecash and b-moneyboth precursors to Bitcoin (created by David Chaum and Wei Dai respectively) which formed the cryptographic building blocks for Satoshi Nakamotos final invention.

Back again admitted the apparent similarities between his and Satoshis interests, but said it still doesnt amount to proof.

Back stated that he was interested in ecash, implementing Chaums ecash library and proposed cryptographic techniques similar to ecash.

Still not Satoshi [though], he added.

The video ends by pointing out that Blockstream is now involved in building centralized off-chain solutions for sending Bitcoinas a for-profit company. Products like Blockstreams Liquid take Bitcoin transactions off the main chain, and instead funnel them through the privately owned products named above.

But if Back was Satoshi, he wouldnt need the money.

Updated with comment from Adam Back.

Follow this link:

New theory claims Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto - Decrypt