Ceremony to remember Matthew Graves set one year since his death – KOBI-TV NBC5 / KOTI-TV NBC2

EAGLE POINT, Ore. Thursday will mark one year since 33-year-old Matthew Thayer Graves death. The district attorney says Graves didnt comply with officers commands and a physical struggle ensued.

But family and friends say he had a mental illness and police used excessive force. Five of 7 grand jurors said the officer who fired the fatal shots acted lawfully in his use of deadly force enough to clear him.

But the family is pursuing civil action to ensure something like this never happens again. The attorney for the family of Graves says they cannot comment since theyre currently in litigation with Eagle Point.

According to the settlement offer NBC5 News obtained this summer, Graves parents have been offered just over a million dollars. The family turned it down and filed thecivil suit arguing Graves was deprived of his Fourth Amendment civil rights leading up to the shooting.

Friends of the family who knew Graves shared their thoughts one year since his passing.

When I found out what had happened I was pretty angry, said Tina Sandoval, a friend of the family who knew Graves for years.

One year ago this Thursday will mark a tragic moment for friends and family of the 33-year-old from Eagle Point. He was shot and killed by Eagle Point Police on September 19, 2018 in the bathroom of a Carls Jr.

Sandoval knew Graves since he was in middle school with her daughters the whole family took the news of his passing very hard.

His smile just lit up a room, she said. Sandovaldescribed Graves as an easy-going, fun-loving guy. He was very funny and had a heart, huge and was always doing something for somebody else.

He was like a son to her and she still has difficulty thinking about how he died.

Constantly just battle with it in my mind, she said. I wish there was something that we could do to bring him back, to have avoided it but I mean hes gone.

Friends and family say Graves had schizophrenia. Sandoval says it developed slowly but got worse.

After a few years, he got to where he just was around his family, she said. He really didnt want to talk to anybody or see anybody.

Eagle Point Police say Graves was not complying with an officer and ended up in a physical struggle. A second officer showed up and during the fight saw what he thought was a gun. It was, in fact, a taser. Graves was shot twice in the back.

Several members of the grand jury felt the officers taser looked too similar to a gun. Eagle Point Police have since made changes to its tasers. The department confirmed this week it has placed fluorescent markings on all its tasers to ensure theyre able to differentiate between their tasers and their guns.

Sandoval also believes if there had been more training on how to handle someone with mental illness this could all have been avoided.

Especially training on how to de-escalate, she said. That was one of the things that instead of de-escalating the officer escalated.

One year later though, Graves friends and family hope action is taken.

It wouldnt have even gotten that far had the officer had better training to recognize the mental illness, she said.

So nothing like this ever happens again.

Eagle Point Police was unavailable to talk on Wednesday about its training to deal with mental health.

A ceremony to remember Graves will be held tomorrow at 7:45 p.m near the Banner Bank in Eagle Point. Organizers hope to share memories of him and raise awareness of the injustice they believe surrounds his death.

NBC5 News Reporter Miles Furuichi graduated from Chapman University with degrees in English and Journalism. He received post graduate experience in Los Angeles in photojournalism and commercial photography. He also spent time in Dublin, Ireland working in print journalism and advertising.

Miles is a Rogue Valley native, raised in Ashland. He enjoys hiking, mountain biking and photography.

Excerpt from:

Ceremony to remember Matthew Graves set one year since his death - KOBI-TV NBC5 / KOTI-TV NBC2

Portland protesters to Greyhound: Stop letting immigration agents on buses – Street Roots News

Activists plan a rally to put pressure on the carrier and to inform passengers of their rights

Demonstrators will rally in Portland this weekendand deliver a letter to Greyhound Lines Inc., demanding the bus company stop allowing federal immigration enforcement agents to board its vehicles in order to check passengers immigration statuses.

But whether Greyhound has any choice in the matter is unclear, with Greyhound and federal agencies saying the law dictates the company must allow these checks and activists and the American Civil Liberties Union saying Greyhound has the right to keep federal agents off its buses unless they have a warrant.

Protesters also plan to distribute know your rights leaflets to passengers, informing them they have the right to not answer questions about their immigration status without legal counsel and the right to refuse a search of their belongings.

The rally will take place at 2 p.m. Saturday, Sept. 21, at Greyhounds new loading zone at Northwest Station Way, between Lovejoy and Marshal Streets in Portlands Old Town neighborhood. It is part of a nationwide, coordinated series of protests taking place this month and last aimed at challenging the Trump administrations deportation and immigrant detention practices.

Fight for Im/migrants and Refugees Everywhere, or FIRE, and International Workers Solidarity Network, or IWSN, initially put out the call for action and led a protest that drew about 200 demonstrators to Manhattans Port Authority Bus Terminal on Aug. 23. Protests are also occurring in Houston, Austin, Atlanta, Buffalo, Philadelphia and Boston.

The number of rail and bus passengers being stopped, questioned and detained in the northern United States for immigration enforcement purposes has increased since 2017, according to an NBC News report in June. The increase follows the reversal of an Obama-era policy that restricted the approval of such searches.

Locally, the Portland chapter of Workers World Party, with the endorsement of several other area groups including Occupy ICE, Portland Central American Solidarity Committee and International League of Peoples Struggle PDX, is organizing the demonstration and inviting members of the public to join.

Donald Trumps immigration policy is racist terror, blatant cruelty and creates social divisions that can only be characterized as white supremacy. We are fighting for unity among workers and immigrants everywhere, said local Workers World Party organizer Lyn Neeley.

On the national level, the Amalgamated Transit Union, which represents Greyhound bus drivers, has publicly announced its support of the ACLUs effort to pressure Greyhound into ceasing its cooperation with immigration status checks on the buses its drivers operate.

In a statement, however, Greyhound told Street Roots that because its a regulated carrier, it is required to comply with the requests of federal agents.

It said Border Patrol searches of its buses have negatively impacted its customers and operation, and therefore its calling on Congress to change the law requiring its compliance.

We also encourage all our customers to know their rights and share their opinions on this important issue with their members of Congress, the company stated.

Greyhound provides bilingual know-your-rights information at its terminals and online so passengers know their options if confronted by immigration officials during their travels.

But the ACLU disagrees with Greyhounds interpretation of the law, arguing the company does have the right to refuse entry to Border Patrol agents under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure.

In response, Greyhounds parent company, FirstGroup, sent a letter to the ACLU stating Fourth Amendment protection is extended to individuals in private vehicles, not commercial, regulated operators.

While the national branch of ACLU did not reply to our requests for comment, ACLU of Oregons immigration rights attorney, Leland Baxter-Neal, said he does not believe it has changed its position since receiving the letter.

Greyhound buses has the right to protect its clients and their Fourth Amendment right and to require Customs and Border Protection to produce a warrant before they enter the bus, Baxter-Neal said.

He said Border Patrol, which is an arm of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, shouldnt be searching buses for undocumented immigrants because its problematic.

The concern is that folks who may be citizens and in the eyes of a CBP officer dont quote-unquote look American enough might be subject to scrutiny, to harassment, just like we saw with (Mohanad) Elshieky from Portland.

Elshieky, a stand-up comedian, made national headlines in January after Border Patrol agents pulled him off a bus in Spokane, Wash., that was bound for Portland. The agents challenged the documentation he produced when questioned, even though he is in the country legally.

The other concern, Baxter-Neal said, is that (agents) may be walking down the bus picking people based on their looks and asking those individuals whether they have papers, which is just straight-up racial profiling. So the practice is deeply concerning, and the fact that Greyhound lets it happen rather than protect its loyal customers is also deeply troubling, and thats why the ACLU has reached out and asked them to change their practice.

In accordance with requirements attached to federal Title VI funding Greyhound receives, its adopted a policy protecting its passengers from discrimination based on race, color or national origin.

Baxter-Neal argues its cooperation with Border Patrol violates its own policy. Not only that, he said, it also seems like pretty bad business to be exposing your loyal customers to racialized harassment at the hand of an out of control agency like CBP.

When Street Roots inquired with Border Patrol, an agency spokesperson pointed to the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, stating it gives agents the authority to board, without a warrant, any railcar, aircraft, conveyance or vehicle within 100 miles of the border in order to question individuals and make arrests.

These actions, according to the act, are supposed to be for the purpose of preventing illegal entry into the United States thats why theyre supposed to take place near a border. However, it seems unlikely that an individual boarding a bus in Spokane or Seattle, Wash., just crossed into the country illegally from Canada.

While these cities are, just barely, within 100 miles of the U.S. border, the state of Oregon is not. For this reason, Border Patrol does not perform bus checks in Oregon, said the agencys regional spokesperson Jason Givens.

Givens did not answer a question about how many people his agency has detained nationally as a result of Greyhound bus searches.

Greyhound corporation should join the ACLU in a suit against ICE and the Border Patrol to stop these unlawful interrogations, arrests and incarcerations of innocent people, said Portland protest organizer Johnnie Lewis. Regardless of what they say, Greyhound has the right to say no.

While much of the rhetoric surrounding the anti-immigration enforcement demonstrations has focused on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, with many promotional materials and signs bearing the slogan Keep ICE off Greyhound buses, ICE is not the agency responsible for conducting bus checks.

ICEs regional spokesperson, Tanya Roman, told Street Roots in an email that her agency does not board Greyhound buses in order to check the immigration status of patrons on board. Any suggestion to the contrary is irresponsible, speculative and inaccurate.

Her statement aligns with what the ACLU of Oregon understands about the bus checks.

I have not heard about this being an issue with ICE, as it is with Customs and Border Protection, Baxter-Neal said. We know this is a tactic specifically that CBP uses to target and racially profile individuals on buses.

For more information about the demonstration on Sept. 21, visit Facebook.com/wwppdx.

Email Senior Staff Reporter Emily Green atemily@streetroots.org. Follow her onTwitter@greenwrites.

Go here to see the original:

Portland protesters to Greyhound: Stop letting immigration agents on buses - Street Roots News

Mercer Co. sheriff sued in federal court – Lima Ohio

LIMA Alleging multiple civil rights violations, a former Mercer County farmer has filed a lawsuit in federal court against Mercer County Sheriff Jeff Grey.

Jeff Rasawehr, who now lives in an affluent neighborhood northeast of Detroit, has had a long history with the Mercer County Sheriffs Office, and the federal lawsuit is the latest in the public tiff between the two entities. According to his online website, countycoverup.com, Rasawehr alleges that Greys office has unfairly targeted him since 2011 due to a family property disagreement.

In 2011, I was in the beginnings of a very difficult divorce, Rasawehr said in a video published in early 2019. At the same time, there was a family battle over land and trust. My relatives and my ex-wife needed to have me tarnished with a criminal record.

In the same video, Rasawehr said the office had collected 3,800 documents with the intention to arrest him.

According to a 2016 letter sent to one of Rasawehrs six lawyers, Joseph Yamin, by Mercer County Prosecuting Attorney Matthew Fox, the Mercer County Sheriffs Office began receiving communications from Rasawehr beginning in 2012.

I am aware that the Mercer County Sheriffs Office has tried to respond to Mr. Rasawehr in a professional manner, Foxs letter states. Recently, the Mercer County Sheriffs Office has simply ignored his emails and phone calls, although keeping detailed records, including voice recordings, video recordings and copies of electronic correspondence of every contact Mr. Rasawehr has had with the Mercer County Sheriffs Office. Mr. Rasawehrs stated goal is to provoke the Mercer County Sheriffs Office into an over-reaction situation so he can sue the Mercer County Sheriffs Office.

At the time, Fox requested that Rasawehr cease and desist all contact with my office, my staff and employees.

Later in 2016, Rasawehr was arrested for multiple counts of obstructing official business, stalking and telecommunications harassment.

Three years later after an extensive pre-trial period, Rasawehr had been found guilty of the two of the 26 charges filed against him menacing by stalking and telecommunications harassment and he was sentenced to five years of community control sanctions.

In the federal lawsuit signed off by Rasawehrs six lawyers this past Tuesday, Rasawehr alleges that the 2016 arrest violated his first and fourth amendment rights, and that Greys comments in an article published by The Lima News covering Rasawehrs arrest had a significant chilling effect on the further exercise of free speech of the plaintiff (Rasawehr) that continues unabated to this day.

Of the seven counts filed in the lawsuit, the last two concern Greys oversight of the deputy who arrested Rasawehr.

Due to Rasawehrs alleged suffering caused by Grey and Rasawehrs arrest, the lawsuit estimates that damages are not anticipated to be less than $1 million.

Fox declined comment due to the pending litigation.

The full lawsuit can be read online at limaohio.com.

Rasawehr

Reach Josh Ellerbrock at 567-242-0398.

Excerpt from:

Mercer Co. sheriff sued in federal court - Lima Ohio

Warren BOE gets construction update | News, Sports, Jobs – Marietta Times

VINCENT With the concrete block structure of its new elementary school rising less than a mile away, the board of education for Warren Local Schools received an update Monday night on the districts construction project.

Were fully under way with the elementary building, and the high school is about ready to start footers and interior concrete, said superintendent Kyle Newton. Theyre moving scaffolding around the elementary school as they finish it up to the roofline.

The project has proven to be more expensive than originally expected, and the board last month got approval from the Ohio Facilities Construction Commission for the fourth amendment to its agreement. Newton provided the board with a summary of the process and history, which notes that the estimates were originally drawn up in 2015, the bond levy was defeated in November 2016 and then passed in May 2017. Groundbreaking for the elementary school was held in April of this year.

During that period, Newton said, there is no provision in the OFCC process for updating cost estimates.

The district included a $5 million contingency fund in the bond levy, but Newton said the board has been adamant that the state assume its share of any cost increases attributed to market conditions on the co-funded parts of the project.

With the state paying 72 percent of the costs, theres a lot at stake, he said. If you add a million dollars to the co-funded part, thats $720,000 we need to get from the state.

So far, Newton said, the board has been successful in doing that and the state has been co-operative.

The OFCC has been phenomenal, he said.

Newton said Warrens experience points to deficiencies in the states process for what are called lapsed districts those that get state approval but get rejected by local voters several times before being successful. It isnt part of the established process to periodically update the costs for districts that have to appeal to voters over a period of several elections. As a result, at least for Warren, nearly four years had elapsed between the initial estimates and time work actually began.

The original estimate for the entire project was $63 million. Newton said that figure is obsolete but the total cost estimate has not been updated recently.

Board president Bob Crum said Warrens response apparently is unusual.

Most boards just accept that theyre over the budget and go back to the public for more money, but we havent done that, he said. Were not backing down on that, and weve been blessed.

Board vice president Sidney Brackenridge said the OFCC had been reasonable in considering the amendments and picking up its share.

I have to credit the state, theyve really stepped up, he said.

In other matters, the board:

Authorized creation of a new account to receive $369,424 from the newly created state fund intended to provide mental health and social services for students and their families. Treasurer Melcie Wells said creating a separate fund was a condition of the grant.

Heard a presentation from Paul Mock, southeastern regional manager for the Ohio School Boards Association, awarding Warren board president Bob Crum with a certificate recognizing 15 years of service.

Township trustees across Washington County are raising their eyebrows and discussing calendar adjustments as the ...

Fiscal and directional oversight of the Washington County Health Department is set up by state law to allow those ...

Friends of Lower Muskingum River will host a river clean-up for Make a Difference Day with Marietta College on ...

View original post here:

Warren BOE gets construction update | News, Sports, Jobs - Marietta Times

Five Steps You Must Take Today To Defend Your Gun Rights – OutdoorHub

Hopefully the mere fact that youre reading this article means that youre concerned and willing to take action against the all-out assault we are seeing against the Second Amendment.

To make matters worse, the liberal Left and mainstream media just do not get it, nor do they care. Make no mistake, the liberal side of the field (look no further than the current democratic candidates for president) wants to force a mandatory buy back of your assault rifles, outlaw high capacity magazines and implement Red Flag laws. (a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment)

And it wont stop there.

Teaching in the firearms training world on a consistent basis, I make it a point in every single class to ask students if they are aware of anti-gun legislation in their own state much less on the national level. I am frustrated to report that while most know there is some kind of pending law changes, they are woefully unaware of the actual bills and what the implications are, even in their own backyard.

To put things in perspective, the highly debated number of gun laws currently in the US (federal, state and local) range from a low of about 300 to upwards of 20,000 according to a study by the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy (I suspect the number is somewhere in the middle). Even if the true number is the lower, there are more than adequate laws on the books to address issues such as the mentally ill or convicted felons from owning or possessing firearms. Just as there are extensive laws prohibiting drunk driving, impaired drivers still continue to drive and kill innocent people, in many instances after having already been convicted of a prior drunk driving offense and their drivers license being suspended.

It is past time to get serious and act, RIGHT NOW!

Below are just a few of the ways and steps to take to fight off the insidious and uneducated attacks against gun ownership.

Spend some time getting to know what legislation has been introduced at the local, state, and national levels. An example is the current push around the nation for red flag laws and high capacity magazine bans. The Red Flag law essentially eliminates you from being secure in your own home against unlawful seizure of your firearms because someone (could be anyone, your neighbor, friend or even a spouse) says you are a threat to yourself or others. The end result is that your right to due process, being secure against unreasonable search and seizure by a warrant-less search (Fourth Amendment issue) will be compromised. There are obvious great possibilities of abuse through any such legislation. This is only one example of current anti-gun legislation being pushed in many states and at the federal level. Do you know what the US Constitution and your own states constitution actually says when it comes to your right to keep and bear arms?

Education is only the first step, now you must act. Contact your state representatives, governor, and congressman to voice your opposition to any legislation that compromises the Second Amendment. Phone calls, emails, and letters to the editor are all ways to make your voice heard. Be courteous and professional but firm in your resolve that anti-gun agendas and legislation will equal voting the politician out of office when the time comes. Currently all Democratic candidates for president in the 2020 elections are running on a platform of mandatory buybacks (confiscation) of assault weapons. Not one of these candidates deserves a vote from any American what believes in and supports the constitution. Nor does any retail outlet deserve my business or support while calling for the disarmament of law-abiding citizens.

Being a part of a bigger united movement is critical. Whether it is the NRA, Gun Owners of America, National Shooting Sports Foundation, your local state gun club/association, or all of the above you must support these efforts. By being involved you will be supporting grass roots efforts to keep and maintain your rights as enumerated in the Second Amendment. All of these organizations have strong gun safety programs promoting safe and responsible firearms use.

I provide firearms training on a regular basis. While I feel it is my responsibility to provide factual information concerning gun issues and legislation to all my students, I maintain a high level of professionalism when doing so. Admittedly it is hard to leave the emotion out of it but I believe this is the best approach. Likewise understand that carrying a firearm openly in todays high emotion climate may not be the best approach. I suggest you carry concealed, discreetly and professionally, all the time.

Keeping yourself well trained, educated and dedicated to a defensive way of life makes you more confident and professional when it comes to daily gun carry. Attend credible advanced training on at least an annual basis. Spend time on the gun range as often as you can. Take part in a course on realty based training, it will help you make solid decision under stress if the day ever comes you have to defend yourself or family.

Firearms enthusiasts and defensive minded folks today are in the fight of their life when it comes to gun ownership and their continued ability to defend themselves, a fundamental right of any human being. All the while those that wish to disarm you ironically enjoy protection from armed security. Its time to get serious and step up to the plate, make yourself heard, and make it known you are not giving up your Second Amendment rights. Those rights are just a critical as the First, Third, or Fourth, and so on. Our founding fathers foresaw these issues and established a path to follow and adhere to against tyranny. Please dont take it for granted.

Image courtesy shutterstock

Visit link:

Five Steps You Must Take Today To Defend Your Gun Rights - OutdoorHub

1600: Iran hawks bare their talons at Trump – Newsday

Making America gun-shy?

Some of the most strident Iran war hawks who counted President Donald Trump as a leader of the flock are coming to fear that he's becoming a bird of a more dovish feather.

After Trump announced Wednesday that he would ratchet up sanctions against Iran in the coming days, Sen. Lindsey Graham said that wasn't enough to answer the attack on Saudi oil facilities for which U.S. officials are holding Iran responsible.

Sanctions so far havent worked and I doubt they ever will. So I think an appropriate military response is in order," Graham said. Asked about Trump's Tuesday night tweet rebuking him for saying Iran saw Trump's previous hesitance to use force as a "sign of weakness," Graham replied, "The Iranians are your target audience, not me."

Trump shot back with a reminder of the Iraq War debacle. It's very easy to attack, but if you ask Lindsey, ask him how did going into the Middle East, how did that work out? And how did going into Iraq work out?"

It wasn't just Graham. In a broad attack on Trump's deal-seeking, ex-national security adviser John Bolton on Wednesday told a private Manhattan luncheon for a conservative think tank that any negotiations with North Korea and Iran were doomed to failure and Trump's aborted invitation to meet with the Taliban at Camp David was disrespectful to the victims of 9/11, Politico reported. Trump hit Bolton again for his Bush-era role. "He got stuck in quicksand and we became policemen for the Middle East," the president said.

Still, Trump said, "If we have to do something, we'll do it without hesitation. Reverting to the ominous-sounding rhetoric he has used in past tensions, Trump said, "There are many options Theres the ultimate option, and there are options that are a lot less than that. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who visited Saudi Arabia, said the strike against the oil installation was "an act of war." Trump wouldn't go that far.

Not all GOP hawks are as gung-ho as Graham and Bolton to launch a reprisal attack. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) has warned, "Such a conflict would be difficult to de-escalate." Iran, which has denied involvement in the attack, warned the U.S. it will retaliate in a "rapid and crushing" manner if it is targeted. For more on the Iran tensions, see Newsday's story by Laura Figueroa Hernandez.

Get the latest breaking news as it happens.

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our privacy policy.

Will flattery get you the job of Trump national security adviser? It didn't hurt Robert O'Brien. Back in April, Trump tweeted that he had been praised by O'Brien as "the greatest hostage negotiatorthat I know of in the history of the United States."

That was a fair summary of O'Brien's comments regarding his efforts as a special presidential envoy in getting Americans freed from captivity by foreign fighters and governments. "The president has had unparalleled success in bringing Americans home without paying concessions, without prisoner exchanges, but through force of willand the good will that hes generated around the world, O'Brien said.

Earlier this year, Trump directed OBrien to attend court proceedings in Sweden after American rapper A$AP Rocky was arrested in Stockholm on assault charges. The veteran diplomat served in the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations. He also worked for Bolton and shared his view, and Trump's, that Obama's Iran nuclear deal was a mistake. For more, see Newsday's story by Figueroa.

Trump made a promise to a foreign leader that a U.S. intelligence official found troubling enough to file a formal whistleblower complaint with the inspector general for the intelligence community, The Washington Post reported.

The inspector general, Michael Atkinson, determined that the complaint was credible and serious enough to be considered a matter of urgent concern a legal threshold that ordinarily requires notification of congressional oversight committees.

But acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguirehas refused to share details about Trumps alleged transgression with lawmakers, setting off a battle with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff.

The complaint was filed on Aug. 12. The Post said its sources were two former U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

Constitution Week is going by like any other week in the Trump era, with the president making no effort to get the public to revere the founding document he's sworn to uphold, writes Newsday's Dan Janison.

The Constitution assigned coequal powers to the three branches of government, but Trump is stonewalling congressional subpoenas. That's in keeping with his novel interpretation that "I have an Article 2 where I have the right to do whatever I want as president."

A presidential push to end California's separate car emissions regulations underscored a historic role reversal in which progressives now invoke states' rights. Birthright citizenship is enshrined in the 14th Amendment, yet Trump muses he could take it away by fiat. Reasonable searches per the Fourth Amendment? Trump pardoned a former Arizona sheriff who defied federal court orders to stop abusing his office in pursuit of undocumented immigrants.

He jokes about staying in office beyond two terms. The 22nd Amendment says no.

Seeing what Obama did and doing the opposite is an ethos for Trump. So are key elements of his approach to decision-making, a contrast evident from Obama's remarks at a data analysis company's event in San Francisco Wednesday.

One thing "that's helpful is not watching TV or reading social media," Obama said. "Those are two things I would advise, if you're our president, not to do. It creates a lot of noise and clouds your judgment." His comments were reported by Business Insider.

The curtain may be coming down on Trump's buddy act with Benjamin Netanyahu. The president said he had not spoken to the Israeli prime minister since his future in office was put in doubt by Tuesday's elections.

"Look, our relationship is with Israel. We'll see what happens," Trump said.

During his election campaign, Netanyahu played up his personal relationshipwith Trump.

A few days before his trip to California, Trump mystified officials there with his interest in problems of homelessness in Los Angeles, San Francisco and other cities. When he finally spelled out his concerns, it became clearer which one was uppermost: the blight on high-end real estate.

"In many cases, they came from other countries and they moved to Los Angeles or they moved to San Francisco because of the prestige of the city, and all of a sudden they have tents, Trump said. Hundreds and hundreds of tents and people living at the entrance to their office building. And they want to leave.

In Los Angeles and San Francisco, Trump said, people are living on the best highways, our best streets, our best entrances to buildings where people in those buildings pay tremendous taxes, where they went to those locations because of the prestige.

Trump has spoken vaguely of a federal intervention to sweep the homeless off the streets, leaving many unanswered questions. Local officials wrote to Trumpseeking more funds for programs like housing vouchers. HUD Secretary Ben Carson, answering for Trump, said no, blaming "state and local policies" in the Democratic-dominated California, such as an "over-regulated housing market."

Trump visited new section of border barrier east of San Diego and was so enthusiastic about its features that the commanding general of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers tried gently to caution him not to give away secrets.

They're wired, so that we will know if somebody's trying to break through, and you may want to discussthat a little bit, general," he said to Lt. Gen. Todd Semonite.

Semonite hesitated: "Sir, there could be some merit in not discussing that."

Trump responded: "I'll just tell you they're wired, OK?

After the news conference, Trump signed a slat with a Sharpie.

View original post here:

1600: Iran hawks bare their talons at Trump - Newsday

In era of legal pot, can police in U.S. search cars based on odor? – Japan Today

Sniff and search is no longer the default for police in some of the 33 states that have legalized marijuana.

Traditionally, an officer could use the merest whiff of weed to justify a warrantless vehicle search, and whatever turned up pot, other kinds of illegal drugs, something else the motorist wasn't allowed to have could be used as evidence in court.

That's still true in the minority of states where marijuana remains verboten. But the legal analysis is more complicated in places where pot has been approved for medical or adult use, and courts are beginning to weigh in. The result is that, in some states, a police officer who sniffs out pot isn't necessarily allowed to go through someone's automobile because the odor by itself is no longer considered evidence of a crime.

"It's becoming more difficult to say, 'I smell marijuana, I can search the car.' It's not always an automatic thing," said Kyle Clark, who oversees drug impairment recognition training programs at the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

For nearly 100 years, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized an "automobile exception" to the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches and seizures, giving law enforcement the right to conduct a warrantless search if there is reason to suspect a vehicle is hiding contraband or evidence of a crime. Police have long used the exception to conduct vehicle searches based on the pungent, distinctive odor of pot.

Increasingly, motorists in states where marijuana is legal in some form are pushing back when police insist on a search especially if that search yields evidence of a crime.

Last month, a Pennsylvania judge declared that state police didn't have a valid legal reason for searching a car just because it smelled like cannabis, since the front-seat passenger had a medical marijuana card. The search yielded a loaded handgun and a small amount of marijuana in an unmarked plastic baggie evidence the judge suppressed.

"The 'plain smell' of marijuana alone no longer provides authorities with probable cause to conduct a search of a subject vehicle," Lehigh County Judge Maria Dantos wrote, because it's "no longer indicative of an illegal or criminal act." She said that once the passenger presented his medical marijuana card, it was "illogical, impractical and unreasonable" for troopers to conclude a crime had been committed.

Prosecutors have appealed the ruling, arguing the search was legal under recent state Supreme Court precedent. But they acknowledge that marijuana odor is an evolving issue in the courts.

"We want to get it right," said Heather Gallagher, chief of appeals in the district attorney's office. "We need guidance, so law enforcement knows what to do."

Other states' courts have curtailed searches based on odor.

Massachusetts' highest court has said repeatedly that the smell of marijuana alone cannot justify a warrantless vehicle search. In Vermont, the state Supreme Court ruled in January that the "faint odor of burnt marijuana" didn't give state police the right to impound and search a man's car. Colorado's Supreme Court ruled in May that because a drug-detection dog was trained to sniff for marijuana which is legal in the state along with several illegal drugs, police could not use the dog's alert to justify a vehicle search.

"Smell alone is gradually becoming no excuse for getting around the Fourth Amendment," said Keith Stroup, legal director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. "It's a major development, and it's going to provide a layer of protection that we lost sometime in the past."

But not every court has ruled against sniff and search.

Maryland's high court quoted the title of Bob Dylan's "The Times They Are A-Changin'" in ruling last month that police did an unlawful body search of a motorist whose car smelled of marijuana and contained a joint on the center console. But the court also decided that police were entitled to search the car itself, noting that marijuana is still considered contraband despite the state's medical marijuana program, and people have a "diminished expectation of privacy" in an automobile.

Judges have also ruled that marijuana odor can be used in conjunction with other factors to support a search. If the smell is overpowering, for example, an officer might conclude the motorist has a quantity of cannabis far in excess of what's allowed. Driving under the influence of marijuana is illegal in all 50 states, so police are free to search the car of a driver who shows signs of impairment.

The longstanding federal ban on marijuana, and whether a state's marijuana law is broad or narrow in scope, are additional factors that courts have considered, said Alex Kreit, visiting professor at the Drug Enforcement and Policy Center at Ohio State University's law school.

On patrol, some officers are taking heed of the changing landscape.

In Michigan, medical marijuana patient Craig Canterbury said he produced his ID card after state police told him they smelled marijuana in his van during a traffic stop last year.

"They looked at the card, made sure it was legal, and that was that," Canterbury said. He said he wouldn't have agreed to a vehicle search "because I had shown we were legal."

When David Boyer, former Maine political director of the Marijuana Policy Project, was pulled over for speeding last year, the officer said she smelled marijuana in his car. Boyer, who said he had consumed cannabis at a friend's house several hours earlier, reminded the officer it was legal in Maine and told her he wasn't under the influence.

"She pushed back a little bit on it but ultimately, I just got the speeding ticket," Boyer said.

The officer didn't ask to search the car.

See the rest here:

In era of legal pot, can police in U.S. search cars based on odor? - Japan Today

Muskogee police to again conduct checkpoint stops despite questionable constitutionality – muskogeenow.com

By Leif M. Wright

Despite questions of whether it is constitutional to stop drivers who are not suspected of a crime and a controversy about it last year, Muskogee police are again declaring that they will start conducting roadside checkpoints in Muskogee intersections to check for the following crimes:

The department states that the overall goal is to reduce criminal activity and enhance the safety of our motorists.

While the US Supreme Court has found that DUI checkpoints are violating drivers Fourth Amendment rights against illegal search, the court left it up to the states to determine whether to use them anyway. Eleven states have made them illegal, including Texas, but not Oklahoma. In dissenting the US Supreme Court decision, Justice Clarence Thomas said I rather doubt that the framers of the Fourth Amendment would have considered reasonable a program of indiscriminate stops of individuals not suspected of wrongdoing.

A roadblock whose primary purpose is ultimately indistinguishable from the general interest in crime control violate[s] the Fourth Amendment. City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 48, 121 S. Ct. 447, 148 L. Ed. 2d 333 (2000). In addition, the court ruled [A] general roadblock .established on the chance of finding someone who has committed a crime is quite clearly unconstitutional. The decision, which legally called traffic stops seizures, also noted that the general interest in law enforcement simply does not outweigh the liberty interests of those seized, however brief the seizure may be

Muskogee Polices press release about the stops this month states the objective of the roadside safety checks is to deter and/or identify persons operating motor vehicles that are breaking the laws listed above, which falls under the purview of the Supreme Courts decision affirming that such stops are illegal.

Read more:

Muskogee police to again conduct checkpoint stops despite questionable constitutionality - muskogeenow.com

America’s dysfunctional democracy – Spiked

Apart from a more or less common language, the US and UK share a distressing trend the decline of democracy and justifiable popular frustration with politics. You dont need a think-tank to tell you as much, but its worth noting that a 2018 survey by the Pew Research Center found similar rates of dissatisfaction with democracy in both countries: 58 per cent of American respondents and 55 per cent of respondents in Britain had decidedly negative views about the health of their democracies. These percentages seem remarkably low considering parliaments voter-defiant paralysis over Brexit and the lawlessness, chaos and corruption of the Trump Show. But the Pew survey is over a year old; rates of dissatisfaction, if not disgust, should be higher in both countries today, although in the US a lot of people are simply worn out by daily outrages.

But fear and fury, more than weariness, mark the predominant public response to the horrifyingly predictable series of mass shootings and the failure of politicians to enact what many agree are reasonable gun regulations. An unusually strong majority of Americans (89 per cent) support expanded background checks for public and private gun sales; 86 per cent support red flag laws allowing seizures of guns from people found by a court to be dangerous. The Democratic-controlled House has passed a strong background-check bill, but Republican Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell has refused to allow a Senate vote on it. Hes waiting for permission from the president, whos waiting for permission from the NRA and, perhaps, his pollsters, or his id.

The irrelevance of public opinion to public officials is surely one sign of democracys decline. But even in our dysfunctional system, the unusually strong bipartisan consensus in favour of regulating gun ownership (at a time of extreme polarisation), may yet produce some legislative results: around eight in 10 Republicans and gun-owning households support background checks. Red-flag laws enjoy bipartisan support in the Senate, as Republican senator Marco Rubio argued in a New York Times op-ed. Corporate America is also beginning to speak out in favour of gun-safety regulations. The CEOs of 145 companies have sent a letter to the Senate calling for action on background checks; Walmart has asked customers not to carry guns in its stores. All things considered, Trump may okay some modest gun laws, and McConnell may allow the Senate to pass them. But gun-safety advocates should hesitate to allow hope to prevail over experience.

How do we account for the chasm between public opinion and political action on guns? For years it has reflected, in part, the political and financial power of the NRA, which is perhaps beginning to wane. But its also a testament to the anti-democratic nature of the US Senate, where conservative Republican, red-state voters enjoy greatly disproportionate representation. Wyoming, for example, with a population of about 600,000, elects two Senators, just like California population of about 40million. The Senate enacts laws and appoints judges governing the entire country, but it often favours the opinions of a small segment of it (which is why federal courts are increasingly hostile to abortion rights). Passage of new gun regulations may depend on the support of conservative, rural gun owners, or at least their diminished opposition.

How stable is the bipartisan consensus on guns? Democrats calling for more controversial measures, like bans on sales of assault weapons and buy-back programmes, will find out. Opposition to what many might consider reasonable gun regulations has long been fuelled by fears that they represent initial steps in a punitive campaign to limit or even prohibit gun ownership. Presidential candidate Beto ORourke threatens to make those fears come true. Responding to a mass shooting in his hometown of El Paso, he has unequivocally called for the confiscation of assault weapons, to the applause of many in the Democratic base.

Absent another political earthquake, ORourke will not be the Democratic nominee, and, in any event, neither the president nor Congress has the constitutional power to confiscate guns. A ban on assault weapons could conceivably pass muster under the Second Amendment, but Fourth Amendment freedoms from unreasonable searches and seizures would and surely should bar law-enforcement officials from barging into private homes looking for weapons to confiscate. So, ORourke will not succeed in seizing assault weapons, but he could manage to lessen bipartisan support for new gun laws. The NRA should send him a thank-you note. Public opinion has to be exceptionally strong and united to prevail in our weak and divided democracy.

Wendy Kaminer is an author, a lawyer and a former national board member of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Here is the original post:

America's dysfunctional democracy - Spiked

How Far Away Is Immortality? – Science 2.0

It was quite unlike any other acceptance speech of the UEFA Presidents award. In a rather philosophical address before the Champions League draw in Monaco, former football player and actor Eric Cantona claimed: Soon the science will not only be able to slow down the ageing of the cells, soon the science will fix the cells to the state, and so we become eternal.

But what was he actually talking about and does it hold up? In the context, the statement seemed out of place, perhaps even slightly mad. Theres pathos in seeing aged sportsmen too once sublime athletes now reduced to a snails pace and going grey. And this gets to the heart of the human condition it is defined by limitations, most notably ageing and death. Cantona though, wears his age gracefully if unconventionally, much like he played the game.

But there was more than madness in Cantonas words. The point he is making is important. As a species, we are on the cusp of creating technologies that may fundamentally alter our capacities, promising radical potentialities and perhaps even immortality.

The emerging technologies that make this thinkable include nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science (NBIC). Transhumanism is the faith in these converging technologies to give rise to human enhancement.

There is indeed work going on to reverse ageing with some believing we may be able to halt it altogether. And increasingly potent artificial intelligence (AI) may aid this process. In his book Superintelligence, philosopher Nick Bostrom suggests AI may soon exceed human-level intelligence resulting in an intelligence explosion. Such a scenario makes anything thinkable, and he believes it could happen in a few decades.

We have seen great strides in science and technology over the past century, some of which have resulted in increased global average life expectancies. At the same time, there are increasing numbers of existential threats, such as nuclear weapons and climate change. This points to a limitation of human reason that does not elude Cantona: Only accidents, crimes, wars, will still kill us. But unfortunately, crimes, wars, will multiply.

The problem is a duality to human reason. We can interrogate the world with the scientific method that enables us to create technologies which empower us instrumental reason. How to use these advances remains a problem, a question of moral reason.

Indeed Cantonas suggestion that wars and crimes will multiply emphasizes that instrumental reason can progress while moral reason regresses. Technical progress does not ensure moral progress, as was powerfully demonstrated by the two world wars of the 20th century and the many ensuing conflicts since. The climate crisis and our current political malaise also illustrate this.

Cantonas speech opened with a quote from Shakespeares King Lear: As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods,/ They kill us for their sport. The quote is also prescient. Much transhumanist literature is dedicated to the idea of humans becoming gods. But what kind of gods?

The current gods of transhumanist progress are defense agencies and tech giants. As AI guru Ben Goertzel points out: AI is currently used for selling, spying, killing and gambling. We may therefore be set to become inhuman, not posthuman gods.

A telling part of Cantonas speech is the reaction to it. The word most commonly used to describe it is bizarre. What makes it bizarre is not the content, as much as the context. In such a scenario ex-players are expected to offer up platitudes rather than philosophies of human existence.

So, as we are developing such powerful technologies, what is the context? It is advanced capitalism, and it does involve selling, spying, killing and gambling. Such is the all-encompassing nature of this system that we barely recognize it as a context at all it is a given.

Capitalism also embraces instrumental rationality it fulfills its demand for palpable progress and growth. It does not have much time for questions of morality. Markets bypass moral questions by asking is there a buyer, is there a seller and what is the price.

Mathematics and science are the formalized methodologies of instrumental rationality. It is no surprise then that humans themselves are increasingly subject to this process of quantification. Surveillance provides data, the new oil that boosts information capitalism. Humans are now the mines. This is the bizarre world of transhumanist development in the context of advanced capitalism.

In its most hubristic and unquestioning form, bolstered by unapologetic and brash advanced capitalist logics, transhumanism poses myriad threats: from automation unemployment to the end of democracy, to the risk that humans will branch into different species, making questions of inequality infinitely more urgent. Even if immortality arrives it will be accompanied by crimes, wars and accidents as Cantona states.

But there are alternative ways to think about the future. Posthumanism also deals with our uncertain future, but focuses especially on moral questions. It aims to think ethically beyond the human, emphasising a responsibility towards the wider nature of which we are a part. Posthumanists are bonded by the compassionate acknowledgement of their interdependence with multiple, human and non-human others.

It is time we asked ourselves what aspects of being human we most value. For me, compassion, kindness, appreciation of nature, art and humor are paramount those aspects most strongly connected with the moral aspect of human reason. Instrumental reason will continue at pace, and perhaps to the cost of these human idiosyncrasies imperfect, inexact, unquantifiable.

As a Liverpool fan (sorry Eric), I was happy with the Champions League draw and Van Dijks award, but in the grand scheme of things Cantonas speech was the most important moment of the event. It reminds us that a radically different future looks to be on the way, and our current social systems and cultural beliefs mean that we are in no position to take advantage of it.

Cantona finished with simply Thank you. I love football. To that, I can only say, thank you, Eric. I love football too.

By Alexander Thomas, PhD Candidate, University of East London. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Go here to read the rest:

How Far Away Is Immortality? - Science 2.0

Producers are losing millions in royalties every year here’s what you can do about it – DJ Mag

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

Setlists and analogous data only tell a small part of the story, and can be easily gamed though PRS stress that this is fraud, and that they and other PROs do and will prosecute. MRT is only in a very small number of venues, or isnt used at all. Cloud DJing will go somewhat towards solving the issue, but its a long way off being widely adopted or adopted at all and when it is, it relies on accurate metadata. So, what can be done, right now, to make sure you and others get paid accurately? Established artists employ teams to ensure theyre being paid, especially if they crossover with mainstream radio play, but its in the underground clubs where the newest, unsigned music is played.

PROs may be right when they assume your provincial discotheque is playing the Top 40, but youre less likely to hear the same tracks every night in an underground club, something that PRS confirms. The takeaway from the data from those [underground] venues is that theres definitely less repetition, which means we need to monitor more of them. These new methods give us a highly accurate picture of the music played in those venues.

The number one thing any electronic music producer can do now is to register with a PRO. If youre not registered, or your tracks arent registered, you will get nothing thats the one constant here. As mentioned above, the most recent figures from AFEM suggest that, at any given time, 40% of the Beatport Top 100 is not eligible to get royalties. Another huge own goal. If youre a DJ, submit your setlists. If you dont get a form, you can do it retrospectively online, for free (go to prsformusic.com for more information) for up to 12 months after a gig. And if you dont remember everything, thats fine.

My advice to people is that you fill in a representative setlist of a period of time. The very minimum you should be doing is once a year, but ideally every three months. Just put the [tracks] youre playing most of the time, Howard explains. If you cant remember what you played or when you played it, your rekordbox histories are your friend. Plug in your USB, select histories from the dropdown menu, and you can revisit every setlist that USB was used for. You can also share it to your Public KUVO profile.

DJ, producer and label owner Posthuman whose recent tweets sparked an awareness drive around submitting setlists and DJ/producer royalties summed it up as so: Many small artists write tracks that are big in the clubs and festivals, but they sell so little copies that theres next to no profit for them. It could really make a difference, and it would cost DJs nothing to do except a little time and effort. Its a question of ethics and effort to get this cash to the artists [to whom] its due.

Whether you think the current system is broken or simply a product of a complex and somewhat dated necessity, the fact remains that, at a time when revenue streams for DIY and independent music producers are extremely narrow, the money theyre due is not making its way to their pockets. No one disputes that, but how much of it ends up in the wrong place is up to the industry as a whole.

No one body, group or organisation is to blame, and where theres money at stake, therell always be gatekeepers trying to retain the status quo that benefits them, or wholl point the finger to avoid culpability. PRS is trying to solve the problem, but without data, it cant take a case study to its board to change policy to help do so. That data comes from DJs, especially those playing the underground circuit.

If thats you, and youre jaded by PROs, or feel theyre weighted in favour of the majors, youre condemning the situation to remain stagnant. Not submitting a setlist because you feel PRS is stacked towards the majors, means PRS will continue to be stacked towards the majors, says Mark Lawrence. Thats the point that hurts the industry the most. Where Ill share some cynicism with cynics is, PRS are getting the money anyway, and [if] people choose not to report setlists and choose not to be accurate, that money will be distributed anyway. Its up to us to make it accurate.

Here is the original post:

Producers are losing millions in royalties every year here's what you can do about it - DJ Mag

Why you should be worried about teacher salaries in Michigan – Detroit Free Press

Elementary school classroom(Photo: dolgachov, Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Here's the last decade in Michigan education:

Schools are getting worse. Teachers are getting paid less. We've barely increased state education spending. We're not paying what we owe for teacher pensions and retiree health care, and aroads funding plan proposed by Lansing Republicans could make all of it worse.

It's a lot.

If you have kids in school, it's pretty clear why you should care about all of this stuff. But even if you're childfree, or your kids are grown, ifyou care about schools, education, kids, the state's ability to attract and keep businesses, all of that should be troubling.

Basically, it's better for all of us if our schools don't stink. And we can fix it but only if we're honest about what's going wrong.

Michigan teacher pay is ranked 13th highest in the nation, on average, with a trendline over the last 10 years that's at least stable.

But adjust those salaries for inflation, as the nonpartisan policy shop Citizens Research Council did in a report published last week, and the trend is very different. From 2008 to 2018, if you measure teacher payagainst the increasing costs of goods and services, teachers are actually getting paid 10% less.

The state collects taxes from across the state and distributes it to districts according to the number of students enrolled in each. That's how the state tries to equalize funding across districts.

And again, on paper, those numbers don't look so bad. During the recession, state government cut per-pupil funding, but it's been inching up since 2014.

When you adjust for inflation, the Citizens Research Council found, the state spentbarely more on schools in 2018 than it did in 2008, about 3%.

And most of that increase is paying for teacher pensions and retiree health care.

The state's teacher pension system has what's called "unfunded liabilities." In other words, it is paying out more in retirement and retiree health care benefits than it has in assets. A pension system accrues unfunded liabilities when its investments don't earn as much as expected, or when the government that supports it isn't making big enoughpayments or both.

More: Michigan schools stink because we stopped paying for them | Editorial

When that happens, the school districts that pay into the system are supposed to pay more. Districts have been doing that since former Gov. Rick Snyder reformed the teacher pension system in 2012. But making bigger pension payments means fewer of the dollars Lansing sends to local districts are making it into classrooms.

This is a problem that is not complicated to forecast: Not enough students are enrolling in teacher training programs, and baby boomer-aged teachers are approaching retirement. Shortages in critical areas, like math or special needs, have become commonplace.

Lower-income districtsgenerally feel the brunt of shortages first.

But it's only going to get worse.

At the same time, teachers have become a punching bag for some lawmakers, who point to teacher salaries, teacher pensions and teacher performance as the root of all the state's education problems, from unbalanced budgets to slipping test scores.

More: Kaffer: How Michigan is failing our teachers

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's proposed budget included a 45-cent gas tax hike, a levy that would generate sufficient funds to fix our roads, and free upmore dollars for education.

Lansing Republicans successfully fought Whitmer's proposed tax increase to a standstill, without offering any viable alternative.

But one plan proposed by GOP lawmakers would, in essence, borrow against the state's teacher pension fund: Those lawmakers say the state should borrow $10 billion, invest it, and use the proceeds from that investment to pay for part of teacher pensions and to fix the state's roads.

It's a terrible plan, for a lot of reasons expecting a stable rate of return over the lifetime of $10 billion in debt is wishful thinking, and there's likely a recession coming.

But the Citizens Research Council report highlights another problem with the GOP plan: If the investment income Republicans would rely on to pay for teacher pensions and retiree benefits dried up, school districts would be on the hook for even bigger payments, meaning even fewer dollars would be spent in the classroom.

If lawmakers would recognize a few facts:

We have to start now, to stop the worsening teacher shortage. In an essay for Forbes, contributor Peter Greene argues against using the term "teacher shortage." It implies, Greene writes, inevitability, when the reality is, students aren't training to become teachers because we have made teaching a less attractive profession. Make teaching attractive, and voila the teacher shortage will disappear.

Without more high quality teachers, our schools won't improve.

Good schools cost money. There are stacks of reports that say we're not paying enough, even in some of our most successful districts., and definitely not in those where student performance lags.

Teachers who want to be paid fairly or at least for their salaries to keep pace with inflation aren't greedy.

Mixing teacher pensions and roads is a terrible idea.

If we can't agree that it is important to improve our schools, we should probably hang it up.

Nancy Kaffer is a Free Press columnist. Contact: nkaffer@freepress.com.

Read or Share this story: https://www.freep.com/story/opinion/columnists/nancy-kaffer/2019/09/18/teacher-salaries-michigan-pay-schools/2314368001/

See the article here:

Why you should be worried about teacher salaries in Michigan - Detroit Free Press

Why breast cancer was called ‘Nun’s disease" – Florida Today

Breast cancer has been called Nun's disease because of the high number of nuns affected dating back to the 1700s.(Photo: fstop123 / Getty Images)

Have you heard the termNun's Disease?

My guess is you may not have as the phrase has become somewhat outdated over time.

The inception of the term became popular hundreds of years ago due to the high number of nuns being diagnosed with breast cancer, compared to diagnoses in the non-nun population of women.

As early as 1700, Dr. Bernardino Ramazzini, an Italian physician, considered to be the founder of "occupational medicine"recognized there was one female profession whose members were far more likely to die from breast cancer than any other female community, and that was the nun occupation.

Dr. Emran Imami is certified by the American Board of Surgery and is an invited Fellow of the prestigious American College of Surgeons.(Photo: PROVIDED PHOTO)

So why is this?

The answer is that lifelong nuns, comparable to all women who have not been reproductive, are at an increased risk of breast cancer, along with ovarian and uterine cancers, compared with women who have given birth.

Evidence supporting the Nun's Disease theory points to the protective side-effects of having children and breastfeeding in decreasing the chances of breast cancer.

As an example, the link connecting breast cancer and reproduction was long suspected, but not proven until a British study evaluated data from more than 150,000 women in 30 countries.

The outcome of the research continued to point to hormone related fluctuations in estrogen levels during pregnancy and while breastfeeding, decreasing breast cancer diagnoses in women who had reproduced.

In addition, a 1920s British physician, Dr. Janet Lane-Claypon, did epidemiological research that demonstrated the number of children a woman had, length of lactation, and age of first pregnancy also affected the accumulative risk of a breast cancer diagnosis.

According to WebMD, a woman has a 7% decreased risk of breast cancer per birth, and her chances drop another 4% for every year of breastfeeding.

In line with WebMD, sources from the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation state, women who give birth for the first time after age 30 are up to two times as likely to develop breast cancer as women who have their first child before the age of 20.

In addition, women who have children over the age of 35 have a slightly higher risk for breast cancer than women who dont have children at all.

Its also estimated that 5 percent of breast cancers could be prevented every year if women were to breastfeed their children for an extra six months.

If you have chosen to remain child free, the most realistic approach to reducing breast cancer is to focus on early detectionand be aware of any genetic risk factors that could contribute such as a family history; its also important to focus on reducing dietary risks such as not smoking, drinking excessively, maintaining a healthy dietand exercising regularly.

Of course, the best trajectory is to do monthly self-breast exams and take preventative clinical measures.

Self-breast exams will help detect changes that might be indicative of growths such as cancer tumors.

It's important to note that self-examinations are solely not enough, as breast screenings and mammograms are evidenced based and a must for early detection.

The American College of Radiology has reported that mammography has reduced breast cancer mortality in the United States by almost 40% since 1990.

More: Health pro: Imami carries on family tradition

More: Radiation options for breast cancer patients

More: Micropigmentation like a tattoo that makes hair look fuller

Duringthe past several years there have been several updates, changes, and confusion regarding guidelines and safety precautions for breast screenings, so here is what you need to know.

The American College of Physicians (ACP) offers four recommends for women:

1.In average-risk women aged 40 to 49 years, clinicians should discuss whether to screen for breast cancer with mammography before age 50 years. Discussion should include the potential benefits and harms and a woman's preferences. The potential harms outweigh the benefits in most women aged 40 to 49 years.

2. In average-risk women aged 50 to 74 years, clinicians should offer screening for breast cancer with biennial mammography.

3. In average-risk women aged 75 years or older or in women with a life expectancy of 10 years or less, clinicians should discontinue screening for breast cancer.

4.In average-risk women of all ages, clinicians should not use clinical breast examination to screen for breast cancer.

Simply, the goal of mammography is the early detection of breast cancer, typically, through detection of characteristic masses or microcalcifications.

Annual mammograms can help detect breast cancer in the earliest stages, when it is most treatable, while also detecting changes that a woman would not notice on her own, until months later.

The US Census Bureau Population Survey stated in 2014, 47.6 percent of women between the ages of 15 and 44 had not had children, an increase of 46.5 percent from 2012.

These statistics represent the highest percentage of childless women since the bureau began tracking the data back in 1976, and sure to be influencing the increased breast cancer diagnoses in our country.

According to BreastCancer.org, one in eight women (about 12-percent) will develop invasive breast cancer over the course of her lifetime.

This year, an estimated 268,600 new cases of invasive breast cancer were expected to be diagnosed, along with 62,930 new cases of non-invasive breast cancer.

For women who have chosen to be childfree, or considered to be of high-risk for breast cancer, they should seek a breast surgeon to quantify those risks; while discussing the potential diagnostic role of a breast MRI and/or medications to reduce risk.

Childfree or not, high risk or not, its important to focus on preventative breast health, to keep any potential breast cancer risks at a minimum.

Emran Imami, MD, MBA, FACS, is the Medical Director of TEPAS Breast Center. He is certified by the American Board of Surgery, a Fellow of the American College of Surgeon, a member of the American Society of Breast Surgeons, and a member of American Association of Cosmetic Surgery. For more information go to http://www.TepasBreastCenter.com, or call on TEPAS Breast Center at 321-312-4178.

Read or Share this story: https://www.floridatoday.com/story/life/wellness/2019/09/17/why-breast-cancer-called-nuns-disease/2340315001/

Original post:

Why breast cancer was called 'Nun's disease" - Florida Today

‘High-Seas’ Season 2 On Netflix? But When? Release Date Updates And Other Latest News – The Digital Wise

High Seas is a Spanish mystery series which is released on Netflix on May 24th, 2019. The first season stars Ivana Baquero, Alejandra Onieva, Jon Kortajarena, Eloy Azorn, Chiqui Fernndez, Tamar Novas, Daniel Lundh, Natalia Rodrguez, Laura Prats, Ignacio Montes, Begoa Vargas, and Manuela Vells.

The series has eight episodes and sees the cast set sail on a luxury ship, but not all is as it appears as several murders happen on their voyage. The show is based in the 1940s and is exclusive to Netflix around the world.

The show was continued for a second season on June 2019 and will be returning to Netflix on November 2019.

There is not any official word from the cast or production team, but a number of outlets in Spain have already reported a second season being in development. Marca, which is a large news organization, verifies that the series is coming for season 2. It said, High Seas is already filming its second season, as confirmed on Wednesday by a spokesman for the company.

One of the actresses has also spoken about where the second season can go. She said, If in the first one they were opening more plots and more mysteries, in the second one it is another turn more, it is not more of the same.

On June 5th, Netflix officially declared that High Seas is renewing for a new season by a Tweet on Netflixs Latin America account.

Previously, it was predicted that High-Seas Season 2 would appear on Netflix in 2020. However, in mid-September 2019, it was announced season 2 would arrive on Netflix on November 22nd, 2019.

In a Facebook post also announcing the date of season 2 it reads (translated from Spanish): Hold on to what you can, a storm is coming with waves of great changes. The second season of #AltaMar docks on November 22.

Read more from the original source:

'High-Seas' Season 2 On Netflix? But When? Release Date Updates And Other Latest News - The Digital Wise

High seas fishery patrol completed – Scoop.co.nz

Wednesday, 18 September 2019, 10:24 amPress Release: New Zealand Defence Force

A multi-national, interagency, high seas fisheries patrol insupport of the sustainable management of Pacific tunafisheries has recently concluded with high levels ofcompliance found.

Although bad weather affected thepatrol, nine fishing vessels were inspected with threealleged offences detected during the patrol.

A positivetrend apparent was the increased level of compliance withinthe licensed fleet compared with previous years. Rules areput in place on the high seas by the Western Central PacificFisheries Commission (WCPFC) which are designed to not onlyprotect the tuna stocks from overfishing but to alsominimise fishing impact on the surrounding marine ecosystem.

The New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) provides operationalsupport to the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) forfisheries patrols.

Royal New Zealand Navy offshore patrolvessel HMNZS Otago patrolled international waters adjacentto the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of New Zealand,Samoa, Tokelau, American Samoa, Cook Islands, Tonga and Fijiwhile Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion aircraftsupported the patrol with forward air support. The patrolwas also carried out in conjunction with Australia, Franceand the United States.

Maritime Component Commander,Commodore Tony Millar, Acting Commander Joint Forces NewZealand, said the NZDF regularly worked with MPI bydeploying ships and aircraft to assist New ZealandsPacific neighbours with fisheries monitoring andsurveillance activities.

These patrols are important asthey support our Pacific neighbours in the sustainablemanagement of the Pacific tuna fisheries, CommodoreMillar said.

The Commanding Officer of HMNZS Otago,Lieutenant Commander Ben Martin, said the ship supported MPIwith boarding teams, and maritime aviation via the SH2ISeasprite helicopter that was embarked on the ship.

Otago was involved in extensive patrols over a largearea of the South West Pacific, hailing and boarding fishingand transhipment vessels. The boardings found a number ofcompliant and non-compliant vessels, he said.

Thepatrols are carried out to ensure compliance with theWestern Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Treaty whichwas established in 2000 for the conservation and sustainablemanagement of highly migratory species including tuna,billfish and marlin.

During the inspections, catch recordsare checked, holds are inspected and the boarding partymakes sure the vessels fishing equipment meetsregulations.

MPI spokesperson Steve Ham, FisheriesCompliance Manager, said that overall the levels ofcompliance were high but the non-compliance identifiedshowed the importance of boarding inspections at sea.

Allmatters of non-compliance had been referred back to theresponsible flag state for investigation, he said. Inprevious years non-compliance like this had resulted insanctions such as fines, skippers removed from the fisheryand companies having fishing permits revoked.

One memberof the boarding party was HMNZS Otago Able ElectronicTechnician (AET) Timothy Ong, who speaks Mandarin and wasable to communicate with Chinese fishing captains, gainingvaluable information about their fishing activities.

Itwas also during the patrol in the Pacific that the crew of aP-3K2 Orion located a Chinese fishing vessel damaged by fireand arranged for the ships sister ship to rendezvous withthe stricken vessel. The next day the P-3K2 located a memberof the ships crew who had gone overboard, dropping a liferaft to the man who had been in the water for about 50 hoursby that stage. All 18 crew members were rescued.

Scoop Media

Scoop Citizen Membership ScoopPro for Organisations

The rest is here:

High seas fishery patrol completed - Scoop.co.nz

Who owns the sea? – New Internationalist

17 September 2019

The coming months are critical if we are going to stop the damaging free-for-all that is the current status quo and save the worlds oceans for our common future. Vanessa Baird examines the prospects.

Theres a cartoon that oceanographer Lisa Levin uses in her lectures. It shows a group of women having coffee. One is saying: I dont know why I dont care about the bottom of the ocean, but I dont. Its from The New Yorker, dated 1983, and its safe to say it probably reflected the feeling of the vast majority of people at the time.

Whatever has happened in the intervening decades, that, at least, may have changed. Its so much easier today to feel for the seas.

We now know that the vast, once seemingly empty, body of blue is teeming with precious and precarious life. And we know much more about the human role in endangering so many of its creatures. A turtle, with a plastic straw stuck poignantly in its nostril. A baby whale, clutching to its ailing mother. A dolphin expiring from exhaustion, tangled in a fishing net.

We know the sheer colour and wondrous beauty of sea life. Bioluminescent fish that dazzle in the dark deep, where no light penetrates except the magical flashes that sea creatures themselves create. Awesome underwater mountains and kelp forests that seem like the stuff of rich fantasy.

Such images have been brought into the homes of millions by the Blue Planet television series, narrated by David Attenborough, providing us with an iconography of marine conservation that commands an almost sacred potency. Earlier this year, the naturalist and filmmaker achieved rock-star status, appearing, at the age of 93, at this years Glastonbury festival in the west of England.

But, more important, he has helped turn a vast anonymous expanse into something people care about, feel connected to, might even want to save.

Who owns the sea, that body of water that covers two-thirds of the planet? Can you really draw lines on water, circumscribe it with laws?

The idea of an international law of the sea has a long history. In 1609 Dutch jurist Hugo Grotius published a treatise called The Freedom of the Seas or the Right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian Trade. The subtitle is a bit of a giveaway.

Most international law in relation to the high seas is virtually unenforceable

He began by saying: Every nation is free to travel to every other nation and to trade with it.

In 1982, after a decade of negotiation, a new UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) came into being.

This enshrined Grotius freedom of the seas but with more detailed national rights and privileges. It extended the territorial sea where a coastal state is free to set laws, regulate, and use any resource from 3 to 12 nautical miles.* Vessels of all nations have the right of innocent passage through all such territorial waters. Fishing, polluting, weapons practice and spying are not considered innocent, and submarines and other underwater vehicles are required to navigate on the surface and to show their flags.

The 1982 Convention also introduced a new 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), within which the coastal nation has sole exploitation rights over all natural resources. In some cases, this can be extended even further.

Most of the seas 64 per cent of the oceans surface remain high seas or areas beyond national jurisdiction, a free-for-all region.

The Convention has been signed by 167 countries and the European Union. The US has never ratified it, which is ironic given how often it uses its rhetoric when aggressively patrolling key waters to secure freedom of navigation. Nor, incidentally, has Iran.

When it was first being discussed, the Law of the Sea was welcomed by many. Dorrik Stow, now oceanography professor at Scotlands Heriot Watt University, recalls: I was very enthusiastic about it as a student. There was such a huge ocean out there that should be beneficial to humankind.

But what followed was a resource grab of epic proportions by richer coastal nations. I dont think the Law of the Sea has done anything for poorer communities or landlocked nations or the world in general, Stow now concludes.

Meanwhile, its enshrining of the freedom of the high seas has in some ways enshrined lawlessness. Steven Haines, professor of international law at Londons Greenwich University, says: Most international law in relation to the high seas is virtually unenforceable.

He sees the international system for registering ships as a significant part of the problem. It doesnt work. If you talk to people who have vested interests they will say its working fine, but thats simply not the case.

Its said that we have the ocean to thank for every second breath we take. We are not exactly showing our gratitude.

Under UNCLOS, only flag states (the main ones being Panama, Liberia, Marshall Islands, Hong Kong and Greece) have jurisdiction over their registered ships in international waters. But they dont, or cant, effectively police their ships or what happens on them. There is no police force for the high seas and no criminal justice system that applies there.

A recent case is emblematic: a British teenager, allegedly raped on board a Panama-flagged cruise ship in international waters in the Mediterranean, was unable to obtain justice because the Spanish court in Valencia, where the ship docked, did not have the jurisdiction to try the case. Her alleged attacker was freed.

Today many experts agree that the Law of the Sea is not fit for purpose. It has proved unable to deal with many challenges that were less apparent in the 1980s, such as modern slavery on ships, people-trafficking, piracy, overfishing, plastics pollution and climate change.

The high seas are, by and large, a zone where weak laws and poor governance allow the powerful to plunder and human rights abuses to go unchecked. Something close to anarchy prevails.

A handful of mainly rich nations exploit marine life for profit under the freedom to the high seas granted by UNCLOS. The Convention does include some duties to conserve living marine resources and protect and preserve the environment, including rare or fragile ecosystems and habitats, but these are largely ignored.

Though vast and forgiving, the seas are now in crisis, stressed to the limit by a range of human activities. For example, nearly90 per cent of the worlds marine fish stocks are now fully exploited,over-exploited or depleted, according to the UN.

The extension of fishing into the high seas, and the deep seas, has put pressure on large migratory fish and marine animals: sharks, some types of tuna, whales, dolphins and turtles, are especially at risk.

Industrial fishing is the most harmful. Bottom trawling, which involves dragging a large net and heavy gear across the sea floor, is generally considered the most aggressive method, destroying fragile deep-sea habitats. Just six fishing powers China, Taiwan, Japan, Indonesia, Spain and North Korea account for 77 per cent of the global high-seas fishing fleet.

If industrial high-seas fishing is bad for marine creatures, its not much cop for humans either. A recent report on modern slavery at sea showed that it was endemic in the Pacific, the source of most of the worlds tuna. Only 4 out of 35 leading brands surveyed had systems in place to detect slavery in their supply chains, which are complex and opaque.

Plastics pollution in the seas is now headline news. The oceans are awash with the stuff. Most originates on land as waste which then enters the river system, before flowing into the sea 12 million tonnes a year. Much consists of single-use plastic containers and packaging.

Ocean currents carry this plastic waste over vast distances and to great depths. Spare a thought for US explorer Victor Vescovo who recently descended 11 kilometres to the deepest place in the ocean, the Pacifics Mariana Trench and found a plastic bag and sweet wrappers. Spare more thoughts for all the marine creatures that are eating plastic, often mistaking it for nutritious plankton. The trouble with plastic is that although it might eventually break down into smaller particles, it lasts forever.

Human activity on land is responsible for another growing marine problem eutrophication. This is the creation of oxygen-depleted dead zones in the sea.

The ISA has a serious conflict of interest. It is supposed to protect the seabed at the same time as enabling its exploitation.

Each summer, a 20,000 square-kilometre dead zone forms in the Gulf of Mexico near the Mississippi Delta. Cause of death: pig shit and artificial fertilizer from Iowa.

Yes. You read right. Two thousand kilometres up the Mississippi River is the US pig-breeding and soy and corn belt. Massive amounts of waste, including nitrates and phosphates, are produced by industrial farming methods; prodigious quantities of pig manure and artificial fertilizer are used on the crops. The chemicals contaminate the groundwater and then flow into the Mississippi-Missouri river system, which ends in the Gulf of Mexico. There, the nitrates and phosphates over-fertilize the sea, causing the formation of oxygen-starved areas devoid of life.

Scientists now know much more about the intricate relationship between the oceans and the atmosphere and what it means for climate change (see page 21). The ocean is like a gigantic sponge, explains Stow, holding 50 times more carbon and carbon dioxide than the atmosphere. It absorbs more than a quarter of the carbon dioxide produced by human activity. But all that excess carbon is leading to acidification of the seas as the CO2 dissolves, releasing hydrogen ions, lowering the waters pH value and increasing its acidity. Called climate changes evil twin, acidification kills off coral reefs, which provide habitats for 25 per cent of marine species.

A healthy sea absorbs CO2 and cools down the world, while its abundant plant-life produces much of the oxygen we need on land. Its said that we have the ocean to thank for every second breath we take. We are not exactly showing our gratitude.

There are diverse ways in which we are treating the ocean badly as a limitless dustbin for all manner of waste, chemical, nuclear, industrial, shipping, human; as a living storehouse that can be endlessly plundered without a thought for replenishment.

We know, for example, of the lasting damage done by fossil fuel exploitation. BPs Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010 is fresh in the memory. A ban on further oil exploration in the fragile and environmentally challenged Arctic and Antarctic should be a no-brainer.

We should keep away from them, says Stow, simply.

But what about the new initiatives that are increasingly seen as drivers of a future, high-tech blue economy?

In July protesters gathered in Kingston, Jamaica, where the International Seabed Authority (ISA) was holding a major meeting. This body is responsible for managing the seabed and ocean floor beyond national jurisdictions and its trying to finalize regulations for seabed mining by the end of 2020. The protesters were calling for a 20-year moratorium on deep-sea mining.

Large swathes already have been licensed to companies by the ISA for mineral exploration, many in areas of high biodiversity value. But scientists warn that mining will cause irrevocable damage to vulnerable deep ocean ecosystems which also play a key role in controlling our climate. A simulated mining operation conducted 26 years ago in the sea off Peru shows biological damage enduring to this day.

The ISA has a serious conflict of interest. It is supposed to protect the seabed at the same time as enabling its exploitation. Environmentalists and some marine scientists say it is too close to the mining industry and is failing to encourage informed public debate about the risks. The company DeepGreen is a vocal proponent for deep-sea mining at the ISA and is working with shipping giant Maersk and mining transnational Glencore.

Marine bioprospecting is another controversial area. There has been a corporate rush to acquire marine patents. At present there are no clear rules governing the use of marine genetic resources and there are major issues around the access to these resources and how any resultant benefits should be distributed.

All that might be about to change. Representatives from 190 countries are taking part in the Intergovernmental Conference on the Protection of Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ), which at the time of writing is about to enter the third of its four rounds. It is due to complete in mid-2020 and will pave the way to a new Global Ocean Treaty.

This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to get ocean governance that puts conservation and sustainable use first, says Liz Karan, senior manager for the high seas programme at Pew Charitable Trusts.

The aim is to develop an international, legally binding instrument to enable the protection of marine life and habitats outside national jurisdiction.

Issues on the table include: the need for comprehensive environmental impact assessments for activities on the high seas; capacity building for management and conservation; the international sharing of benefits from marine genetic resources; and the use of area-based management tools, including marine protected areas (MPAs). The outcome will need to be radical, ambitious and properly enforced, if it is to work.

Just asking existing institutions to do their job better will not go far enough, says oceanographer Callum Roberts at the UKs University of York. Those existing institutions include regional fisheries management organizations, the International Seabed Authority and the International Maritime Organization.

There is a deep level of dysfunction at the heart of many of these organizations, says Roberts. Putting them in charge of environmental protection would be a disaster. They urgently need reforms in the way they operate, as part of the Treaty. Some other body, with legal teeth and powers to sanction non-compliance with rules, must be created to co-ordinate and deliver protected areas.

Roberts is lead author of a bold and comprehensive report published by Greenpeace, which lays out a blueprint to protecting 30 per cent of the worlds oceans by 2030.

We are currently achieving less than half of the 10 per cent by 2020 figure agreed under the Convention on Biological Diversity.

But the reports authors say that 30 per cent is the minimum required to save the seas and that this can be achieved by creating a planet-wide network of ocean sanctuaries, making large areas of international waters off limits for fishing and extractive industries. The sanctuary network is designed to use data such as the distribution of sharks, whales, seamounts, trenches, hydrothermal vents, fishing fleets, mining claims and so forth. It takes into account wider environmental change and uncertainty and uses sea surface temperature to identify places likely to change more slowly or adapt more readily to rising temperature stress.

In the past, marine protected areas (MPAs) have been criticized for being too weak, for failing to stop over-exploitation, or for threatening the livelihoods of local traditional fishers.

I think many of the uncertainties about how MPAs work have now been resolved by science, says Roberts. We know they are powerful tools that will deliver a wide range of benefits if done well. Many people who think they will lose turn out not to when MPAs are established, often becoming supporters of protection. People are afraid of what they dont know. We should be more afraid of a future without protected areas, since protection is critical to help us mitigate the impacts of global climate change and adapt to its effects.

The oceans are our shared common heritage, but the current Law of the Sea does not deliver equity by a long chalk. In 2010 Australian philosopher Denise Russell wrote, with some prescience: A formidable force involved in the fate of the oceans favours a largely unregulated sea. This is the group of corporations that make use of the oceans in diverse ways The Law of the Sea is now part of the problem with oceans and radical reorganization of ocean ownership is needed. Instead of a free-for-all, the high seas should be owned by the international community and regulated to ensure equity between nations and generations.

This is the moment for the big push, to demand that our leaders agree a strong Global Ocean Treaty in 2020 with the creation of a body with enforcement powers to protect the seas, their life forms and life on Earth.

As David Attenborough said at the end of his Blue Planet 2 series: Never before have we had such awareness of what we are doing to the planet. Never before have we had such power to do something about it.

*One nautical mile is equivalent to 1.15 land miles and 1.85 kilometres.

PERSONAL ACTION

Give eating fish a miss or eat less. Be picky about sustainability (mcsuk.org has a useful good fish guide) and whether your food is the product of slavery at sea. Eating more meat wont help fish stocks at least a fifth of fish feeds industrial farm animals like pigs and chicken. Farmed fish also uses fishmeal and chemicals, but some fish farming ranks high in terms of sustainability.

Avoid goods wrapped in plastic wherever possible. Urge stores to stock non-plastic options and governments to legislate against plastic waste.

Cut back on your own CO2 emissions, through low carbon transport and dietary choices and consumption habits. While personal efforts are definitely worthwhile, the scale of the problem requires action at a national and international political level, too. These groups can help you take it to another level

INTERNATIONAL

Greenpeace International: Research, campaigns, action.

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society: Practical action on illegal fishing and marine wildlife protection.

Human Rights at Sea: The only international human rights organization of its kind.

Deep Sea Conservation Coalition: Umbrella for 70 organizations worldwide working to protect cold-water corals and vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems.

High Seas Alliance: Has a useful online tracker on state of ocean treaty talks.

Stop Illegal Fishing: Global South-based grassroots action, campaign and research.

AOTEAROA/NEW ZEALAND

Our Seas Our Future: Aims to protect the countrys coastal and marine ecosystems.

AUSTRALIA

Australian Marine Conservation Society: National charity dedicated solely to protecting ocean wildlife.

BRITAIN

Marine Conservation Society: Scientists and others passionate about creating a sustainable future for our seas.

Friends of the Earth: Calling for plastics law to stop ocean pollution.

CANADA

Oceana

Established to restore Canadian oceans to be as rich, healthy, and abundant as they once were.

US

Ocean Conservancy: Working for the protection of special marine habitats and to reducing the human impact on ocean ecosystems.

This article is fromthe September-October 2019 issueof New Internationalist.You can access the entire archive of over 500 issues with a digital subscription.Subscribe today

Patreon is a platform that enables us to offer more to our readership. With a new podcast, eBooks, tote bags and magazine subscriptions on offer,as well as early access to video and articles, were very excited about our Patreon! If youre not on board yet then check it out here.

Support us

View post:

Who owns the sea? - New Internationalist

Best of Orange County 2019: Best grocery store – OCRegister

1. Trader Joes

Multiple locations;traderjoes.com

Trader Joes, which again takes the top spot in this years voting, tends to make people think they didnt know what had been missing from their lives until they went up and down the aisles.

The variety of quality, affordable products makes it easier to try something new, the sample station serves as inspiration for recipes and even that nights dinner, and the staff is noticeably knowledgeable and friendly.

The store focuses on its private-label products as a way to keep costs and thus prices low, with shoppers reaping the benefits.

The Trader Joes origin story involves the high seas, Disneylands Jungle Cruise and granola. Founder Joe Coulombe, inspired by his reading and the theme park ride, opened the first store in 1967 in Pasadena with a nautical theme and the conceptthat it was run by traders on the high seas.It really took off five years later when Trader Joes private-label granola went viral, to use a modern-day term.

Today, Trader Joes pays homage to the cult status of its favorites with its annual Customer Choice Awards, now in its 10th year. The frozen Mandarin Orange Chicken again took favorite overall honors, the frozen Creamy Spinach and Artichoke Dip was voted favorite appetizer, the Danish Kringle was the favorite bakery item and Peanut Butter-Filled Pretzels the favorite snack, among others.

There are 20 stores currently in Orange County, with one set to open soon on Imperial Highway in La Habra. From its Southern California roots, Trader Joes now has about 490 stores in 41 states and the District of Columbia and counting. Committed customers who move to an area of the country without one reasonably close by are known to lobby the company to end their Trader Joes desert status.

2. Sprouts Farmers Market

Multiple locations; sprouts.com

The Sprouts Farmers Market chain is built on the belief that healthy food should be affordable, and it has gone out of its way to provide thousands of attribute-based items, such as organic, gluten-free, vegan and plant-based, that are also budget-friendly.

Sprouts has nearly 20 stores in Orange County, including its latest in Lake Forest.

An estimated 50 percent of Sprouts business is in produce, according to an industry expert, and you will find that section front and center at each store. Stores also include a butcher shop and fish market, bulk foods and more. For quick meals, Sprouts Market Corner Deli offers made-to-order sandwiches, a salad bar, prepared entrees and side dishes, sushi made in-store and fresh juice.

Sprouts was founded by Boney family members who were longtime grocers in San Diego. The first store opened in 2002 in Chandler, Ariz.; today, there are more than 300 stores in 22 states.

3. Whole Foods Market

Multiple locations; wholefoodsmarket.com

Organic food now may be mainstream, but Whole Foods Market was a game-changer when it opened its first store in 1980. Its popularity is based on customers trust in its quality-based standards.

We are the only USDA-certified organic grocery retailer out there and our standards prohibit over 100 preservatives, flavors, colors and other ingredients commonly found in food to meet our goal of satisfying and delighting our customers, says Frank Scalzo, associate store team leader at Whole Foods Market in Tustin.

We have a very wide demographic, Scalzo says. Whether more family-oriented or a mix of young and old, all of Whole Foods Market stores offer new lower prices to serve the wide array of customers.

Speaking of prices, the effects of the now 2-year-old Amazon-Whole Foods deal are especially apparent to Amazon Prime members, who can take advantage of special deals and delivery offers at Whole Foods.

Since that first Whole Foods store opened nearly 40 years ago in Austin, Texas, the chain has built up to about 500 stores in 42 U.S. states as well as Canada and the United Kingdom.

Its Orange County stores in Tustin, Irvine, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Laguna Beach, Laguna Niguel and Brea.

Read the rest here:

Best of Orange County 2019: Best grocery store - OCRegister

Man stranded on Northern Michigan pier by high waves, rescued by Coast Guard – MLive.com

ELBERTA, MI - High waves stranded a man on a pier in northern Michigan before he was rescued by the U.S. Coast Guard.

What became a life-threatening situation started as an night-time fishing trip on the Elberta pier, according to Coast Guard officials.

The man, who was in his 40s and not local to the Frank-Elberta area, planned to stay overnight on the pier on Thursday, Sept. 12. He woke Friday morning to find he couldnt get back to shore because 3- to 4-foot waves were crashing over the walkway, said Petty Officer Trent Ayer of Coast Guard Station Manistee.

He was rescued around 11 a.m. on Friday, Sept. 13, and handed over a gear box before getting on the Coast Guard vessel, Ayer said.

The man clung to the lighthouse as Coast Guard personnel nosed a boat up to the pier to rescue him.

With the water level so high this year, when theres 3 to 4 footers, its hard to walk to walk on the piers, Ayer said.

Ayer estimates the man was on the pier for more than 12 hours.

A local man, Glenn Rice, captured the rescue on video and posted it to YouTube.

While this situation worked out well, it could have gone the other way, Ayer said. With record or near-record high water levels around the Great Lakes this year, piers are more dangerous, he added.

During this year of record and near-record lake levels in the Great Lakes, drownings in Lake Michigan stand at 36, according to Great Lakes Surf Rescue Project. There have been 76 in all five Great Lakes as of Sept. 18.

Ayer advises checking the weather before heading out on the water - whether its a pier or a boat, Lake Michigan or an inland lake - and always bringing a life jacket.

If there are high seas or wind of 15 knots or more, its probably not a good idea, especially with the high water levels this year, Ayer said. Its not worth your life to go out there.

Read the original:

Man stranded on Northern Michigan pier by high waves, rescued by Coast Guard - MLive.com

I’ve become the worst kind of Sea of Thieves pirate: the outpost ambusher – PC Gamer

All's fair in Sea of Thieves. Sinking other ships and taking their treasure. Betraying your alliance so you can take all of the loot instead of just half. Four-man galleons ganging up on solo sloops. We're pirates, after all, and pirates aren't to be trusted.

But I have become the worst kind of Sea of Thieves pirate. I'm an outpost ambusher. And while I feel some degree of shame over this, it's not nearly enough shame to change my ways.

The outpost ambusher doesn't fight pirates on the high seas or go sword-to-musket with them on an uninhabited island. He waits at an outpost for another ship to arrive, a ship he knows is carrying treasure. He sinks his own ship ahead of time so the arriving pirates won't know he's there. He plants explosive barrels and detonates them from a safe distance, killing the other pirates just as they're about to cash in their loot. And then he rushes in to grab the treasure and quickly sell it himself.

That treasure was fought for and earned (or at least legitimately stolen) and was probably carried dozens of nautical miles to get there. The outpost ambusher carries it the last few feet and takes 100% of the profit.

That's what I've become in Sea of Thieves. An ambusher. A rat. I don't do it often, and I don't join a session with the express intent of ambushing other pirates at outposts. But when the opportunity for an outpost ambush presents itself, I don't hesitate for a second, and I've done it enough times that I can't pretend it's an anomaly. I will do it again.

The first time I ambushed pirates at an outpost in Sea of Thieves, months ago, it wasn't really my plan. I'd been playing solo, sailing around in my little sloop, pulling treasure out of randomly spawning shipwrecks. Then I'd head to seaposts and outposts to sell what I'd found, and along the way I'd usually fight a kraken or a megalodon and gather a bit more loot from them. It's an enjoyable solo loop, perfect for an hour or two of low-stakes play.

I was done playing for the night, so I headed toward the nearest outpost to sell the remaining loot I had. It was Plunder Outpost, which is right next to Lost Gold Fort, a skeleton stronghold. As I got close to Plunder Outpost, I noticed a player galleon anchored near the fort, which meant a crew was there battling waves of skeletons for a massive pile of loot. As I arrived at Plunder, the big skull cloud over the fort vanished, which meant the galleon crew had won.

It occurred to me that they'd probably head straight to Plunder Outpost, where I was, to sell everything. It would probably only take them a few minutes to load their ship and sail over. I realized I could be there waiting for them and their treasure-filled ship. Plus, I had some explosive barrels with mewhen I play solo I always pick up a few in case I get chased by other players.

I figured they would probably bring the most valuable chest to the merchant's tent first, so I placed an explosive barrel inside the tent. I scuttled my ship on the far side of the island so my mast wouldn't give me away. Then I hopped onto a roof of one of the vendors where I had a clear shot at the barrel I'd placed. I used the sleeping emote to lie down, and watched as they sailed over and docked.

It all worked perfectly except for the part where I completely failed. I'd guessed right: the first pirate off the galleon headed to merchant's tent carrying the expensive stronghold chest. I fired a sniper round and detonated the barrel, which killed him instantly, but I'd let him get too close to the tent. He'd managed to sell the crate a moment before he died. When I scurried over, there was nothing there but his dissipating ghost.

The rest of the treasure was in a rowboat that had been lowered to the water, but it was so crammed with loot I couldn't grab the stuff I really wanted. I only got a few pieces of low-value treasure out before the rest of the crew killed me.

Less than a week later, I wound up in almost the exact same situation again. I was heading toward Plunder Outpost, ready to call it a night, and I saw yet another galleon over at Lost Gold Fort. I had two explosive barrels this time, so I thought I'd try my ambush again.

This time, there was a bit of a twist. Shortly after the skull cloud vanished, I saw a sloop headed toward the fort. I could make out some distant cannonfire and through my spyglass I saw the masts of the galleon fall over. Several minutes later, I saw the sloop making its way toward the outpost where I'd scuttled my ship and was waiting. The sloop crew had sunk the galleon and taken all that treasure! And now I was going to try to take it from them, even though they'd put in the hard work of killing the pirates who'd put in the hard work to take down the fort. I'd be putting in no work at all because I'm a filthy rat.

This time my sniper shot was well-timed: I took out the pirate before he could sell the stronghold chest. I grabbed it, sold it, then took my second explosive barrel onto the sloop and nuked it. The pirate (who was apparently alone) respawned to find his ship already sinking, and we fought toe-to-toe on the beach. I managed to kill him and with his sloop destroyed he couldn't respawn. The pile of treasure he'd defeated the galleon crew for was floating in the water, all mine. It's the rattiest thing I've ever done, stealing from a legitimate thief.

I didn't try it again for a long, long while after that. Like I said, I'm a rat but an impatient one. I'm not going to spend my entire night lying on the roof at an outpost hoping someone sails over: I only ambush when the opportunity is already developing. Case in point, the other night.

I'd spent about 15 minutes crossing the sea in my sloop headed toward a reaper's chest, which appear in special, haunted shipwrecks you can see from anywhere on the map. Just as I was arriving I saw another sloop had beat me to it. A real pirate would chase them down and put some cannonballs in their hull, and maybe even sink them before they got the chest onboard.

But I'm no real pirate, so instead I headed to Sanctuary Outpost, the closest port. You sell the reaper's chests in the pub, so I scuttled my ship, dragged my barrel into the pub, placed it by the front door, and waited. Sure enough, a few minutes later I saw the sloop pulling up to the dock. When the pirate ran into the pub, I blew up the barrel and collected the chest myself.

I just wanted the chestI had spent all that time sailing toward it and so I felt vaguely (and wrongly) entitledbut after killing the second pirate I boarded their ship and stole a mermaid gem, too.

What can I say? I hate players like me. I'm a rat. I'm the worst kind of pirate. I'm an outpost ambusher. I'm not playing Sea of Thieves, I'm playing Sea of Thieves of Thieves.

So, if you've got a ship full of treasure and you're headed for an outpost, don't feel safe just because you don't see a sloop waiting there. Check the tents and pubs for barrels before you go rushing in with loot. And if you find me hiding nearby with a sniper rifle, kill me quickly and mercilessly. It's what I deserve and it's the only way I'll stop.

Continued here:

I've become the worst kind of Sea of Thieves pirate: the outpost ambusher - PC Gamer

Conquer the seas in Battlewake Available now on Steam – googame.net

The seas are yours: Battlewake now available on Steam, Oculus Rift, PS VR & Viveport. Survios, best known for acclaimed combat games Raw Data and Creed: Rise to glory, has set sail with its original title, Battlewake, on PlayStation, SteamVR, Oculus Home, and Viveport.

Watch the trailer here:

Avast, matey! Thar be high-seas mayhem ahead in Battlewake, a rip-roaring pirate combat game exclusively for virtual reality from the creators of Raw Data and CREED: Rise to Glory. Become four mythical Pirate Lords, captain a massive, upgradable battle-ready ship and wield ancient magic as you embark on a larger-than-life nautical war for the ages full of magic, mystery, and mayhem. Are ye ready to seize the wheel of destiny?

This seafaring action combat game Battlewake made exclusively for virtual reality (VR), turns players into super-powered Pirate Lords fighting for the ultimate dominion. Also, captain a massive battle-ready ship, navigate lush, elemental seascapes and embark on a larger-than-life nautical war for the ages.

Are you excited about Battlewake available on Steam? Then, let us know your thoughts in the comments below or through our social media onFacebook,Twitter, andInstagram. Also, dont forget to subscribe to ourYouTubechannel for exclusive gameplay and live streams!

Are you a Sword Art Online fan? Then, watch the New Sword Art Online Alicization Lycoris game content, check out its newest trailerhere.

See more here:

Conquer the seas in Battlewake Available now on Steam - googame.net