Articles in this Series:    1)     R. Gordon Wasson: The Man, the Legend, the Myth.    Beginning a New History of Magic Mushrooms, Ethnomycology,and    the Psychedelic Revolution. By Jan Irvin, May 13,    2012    2)     How Darwin, Huxley, and the Esalen Institute launched    the 2012 and psychedelic revolutions  and began one of the    largest mind control operations in history. Some brief    notes. By Jan Irvin, August 28, 2012    3) Manufacturing the Deadhead: A Product    of Social Engineering, by Joe Atwill and Jan Irvin,    May 13, 2013    4) Entheogens: Whats in a Name? The Untold History of    Psychedelic Spirituality, Social Control, and the CIA,    by Jan Irvin, November 11, 2014    5)     Spies in Academic Clothing: The Untold History of MKULTRA and    the Counterculture  And How the Intelligence Community    Misleads the 99%, by Jan Irvin, May 13, 2015            PDF version:     Download latest version v3.5 - Nov. 20, 2014  
    Computer generated Text-Aloud audio    version:
    Youtube computer generated version with onscreen    citations:    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYmScOSmlxU  
    Franais: (Full text translated to French)    http://triangle.eklablog.com/l-histoire-secrete-de-la-spiritualite-psychedelique-a125061104  
    Franais (French) translation PDF: http://www.gnosticmedia.com/txtfiles/Histoire-secrte-spiritualit-psychdlique.pdf  
    Today there are many names for drug substances that we commonly    refer to as hallucinogens, psychedelics,    psychoactives, or entheogens, et al. But    it hasnt always been that way. The study of the history and    etymology of the words for these fascinating substances takes    us, surprisingly, right into the heart of military    intelligence, and what became the CIAs infamous MKULTRA mind    control program, and reveals how the names themselves were used    in marketing these substances to the public, and especially to    the youth and countercultures.[1]  
    The official history has it that the CIA personnel involved in    MKULTRA were just dupes, kind of stupid, and, by their    egregious errors, the psychedelic revolution happened     thwarting their efforts. The claim is that these substances    got out of the CIAs control. Words like blowback and    incompetence are often tossed around in such theories    regarding the CIA and military intelligence, but without much,    if any, supporting evidence.  
    Its almost impossible today to have a discussion regarding the    actual documents and facts of MKULTRA and the psychedelic    revolution without someone interrupting to inform you how it    really happened  even though most often they have never    studied anything on the subject.  
    As we get started, I would like to propose that we question    this idea of blowback: Who does it benefit to believe that it    was all an accident and that the CIA and military intelligence    were just dupes? Does it benefit you, or them? It might be    uncomfortable for a moment for some of us to admit that maybe    they (the agents) werent so stupid, and maybe we were the ones    duped. Sometimes the best medicine is to just admit hey, you    got me and laugh it off. For those of you whove heard these    blowback theories and havent considered the possibility that    the CIA created these movements intentionally, this article may    be challenging for you, but stick with it, as it will be worth    your while.  
    Now were ready. Because, defenses aside, a more honest, and    less biased, inquiry into the history and facts reveals,    startlingly, something quite different from the popular myths.    This paper reveals, for the first time, how the opposite of the    official history is true, and that the CIA did, in fact, create    the psychedelic revolution and countercultures  intentionally.  
    As Ill show in this article, the goal had changed and they    wanted a name that would help sell these substances to the    masses as sources of spiritual enlightenment rather than    insanity. In their book The Psychedelic Experience: A    Manual Based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead, we see    doctors Timothy Leary, Ralph Metzner, and Richard Alpert    explain:  
      Of course, the drug dose does not produce the transcendent      experience. It merely acts as a chemical key  it opens the      mind, frees the nervous system of its ordinary patterns and      structures. The nature of the experience depends almost      entirely on set and setting. Set denotes the preparation of      the individual, including his personality structure and his      mood at the time. Setting is physical  the weather, the      room's atmosphere; social  feelings of persons present      towards one another; and cultural  prevailing views as to      what is real. It is for this reason that manuals or      guide-books are necessary. Their purpose is to enable a      person to understand the new realities of the expanded      consciousness, to serve as road maps for new interior      territories which modern science has made accessible.[2]      Timothy Leary, Ralph Metzner, Richard Alpert    
    But what was the purpose of all of this? They state The nature    of the experience depends almost entirely on set and setting.    As well discover on this etymological trip, it was all about    marketing  the CIAs marketing  regarding set and setting.    Sound like a whacky conspiracy theory yet? As well soon    discover, its not. The CIAs MKULTRA program was very real,    was exposed before Congress in the Rockefeller and Church    Commissions, and was all over the news media in the 1970s. But    that was 40 years ago and this is now. So why should we care?    Because much of the program wasnt revealed in the 1970s and    persists to the present, and it affected just about everyone.    It wasnt limited to just a few thousand victims of the CIAs    secret human experiments. There were actually many more victims     millions more. You may have been one of them.  
    As well see, this idea that the psychedelic revolution and    counterculture were intentionally created affects most of us:    the youth caught up in drug use, the parents, the anti-war    movement, those involved in the psychedelic revolution or in    politics; as well as artists, or people who use these    substances for spirituality, or even anyone whos ever spoken    the word psychedelic. It affects us because, as well see,    thats what it was meant to do.  
    In the early years of research into these drugs, psychology    researchers and military intelligence communities sometimes    called them, aside from hallucinogen, by the name    "psychotomimetic" which means    psychosis mimicking. The word hallucinogen, to generate    hallucinations, came just a few years before psychotomimetic.    The same year that psychotomimetic was created we also saw the    creation of the word psychedelic  which means to    manifest the mind. The last stage of this etymological    evolution, as well see, was the word entheogen     which means to generate god within. Well return to    hallucinogen and these other words in the course of our    journey.  
    While these words may have told what these substances do in the    intelligence communitys collective understanding, accurate or    not, they are loaded with implications. Suggestibility,    otherwise known as set and setting, is one of them. The study    of the history of these words, their etymology, reveals how    MKULTRA researchers covered up and kept covered up  until now    that is  this aspect of the MKULTRA mind control program.  
    In the 1950s most CIA candidates and agents were required to    take psychedelic or hallucinogenic drugs to prepare them for    chemical and biological warfare attack. This requirement didn't    turn the agency into hippies. As this article will show,    marketing and PR people that the Agency later hired created    that end result.  
      19 November 1953    
      MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD    
      The Medical Office commented also on the draft memorandum to      DCI from Director of Security, subject: Project      Experimental Project Utilizing Trainee Volunteers; to the      effect that it was recommended the program not be confined      merely to male volunteer trainee personnel but that the field      of selection be broadened to include all components of the      Agency and recommended that the subject memorandum be changed      as appropriate to the broadening of such scope. The Project      committee verbally concurred in this recommendation.      [][3]      ~ CIA MKULTRA files    
    As Jay Stevens, author of Storming Heaven, reveals in    the following quote, suggestibility plays a large part in the    way psychedelic drugs work.  
      To drive someone crazy with LSD was no great accomplishment,      particularly if you told the person he was taking a      psychotomimetic and you gave it to him in one of those pastel      hospital cells with a grim nurse standing by scribbling      notes.[4]      ~Jay Stevens    
    Psychotomimetic (psychosis mimicking) is a word    loaded with implications, suggestibility being the most    important.  
    This is something that Aldous Huxley, Dr. Timothy Leary, R.    Gordon Wasson and others made clear in their books and    articles. In order to suggest what the creators of the    psychedelic revolution wanted, they had to pay particular    attention to the name(s) used for these substances.  
      What's in a name? ... Answer, practically      everything.[5]      ~ Aldous Huxley    
    However, for marketing and PR purposes, the word    psychotomimetic was abandoned, or remarketed, not long after it    was created in 1957.  
    But why is all of this important?  
    As Huxley just admitted above: What's in a name? ... Answer,    practically everything.  
    Insanity, or psychosis mimicking, or even generating    hallucinations, arent attractive terms and dont work well for    marketing purposes  or for the outcome of the psychedelic    or, more importantly, the entheogenic experience.  
    Though this may sound implausible at first, the purpose of    making these substances more attractive was to intentionally    sell them, and not just to patients in hospital wards and to    those in a chair with their therapists, but, especially, to the    youth and countercultures of the world  a nefarious purpose    indeed. Here Leary reflects on Arthur Koestlers work regarding    juvenilization:  
      From Koestler I learned about juvenilization, the theory that      evolution occurs not in the adult (final form) of a species      but in juveniles, larvals, adolescents, pre-adults. The      practical conclusion: if you want to bring about mutations in      a species, work with the young. Koestlers teaching about      paedomorphosis prepared me to understand the genetic      implications of the 1960s youth movement and its rejection of      the old culture.[6]      ~ Timothy Leary    
    The understanding of suggestibility, or set and setting,    including the name given these substances, is everything in how    psychedelics work and were studied (and used) by the CIA for    social control.  
    What could the name be replaced with? This was the problem set    before those interested in remarketing these substances to the    youth, counterculture and artists around the world. When    discussing how to market these drugs with Humphry Osmond,    Aldous Huxley remarked:  
      About a name for these drugs - what a problem![7]      ~ Aldous Huxley    
    Over a couple decades this project would be undertaken by two    different teams: Aldous Huxley, Humphry Osmond and Abram    Hoffer; and the second, headed by Professor Carl A. P. Ruck of    Boston University, included R. Gordon Wasson, and also Jonathan    Ott, Jeremy Bigwood and Daniel Staples.  
      Some of us formed a committee under the Chairmanship of Carl      Ruck to devise a new word for the potions that held Antiquity      in awe. After trying out a number of words he came up with      entheogen, god generated within, which his      committee unanimously adopted[].[8]      ~ Gordon Wasson    
    And though they defend them, Martin Lee and Bruce Shlain reveal    some of these remarketing tactics in Acid Dreams:  
      The scientist who directly oversaw this research project was      Dr. Paul Hoch, an early advocate of the theory that LSD and      other hallucinogens were essentially psychosis-producing      drugs. In succeeding years Hoch performed a number of bizarre      experiments for the army while also serving as a CIA      consultant. Intraspinal injections of mescaline and LSD were      administered to psychiatric patients, causing an "immediate,      massive, and almost shocklike picture with higher doses."    
      Aftereffects ("generalized discomfort," "withdrawal,"      "oddness," and "unreality feelings") lingered for two to      three days following the injections. Hoch, who later became      New York State Commissioner for Mental Hygiene, also gave LSD      to psychiatric patients and then lobotomized them in order to      compare the effects of acid before and after psychosurgery.      ("It is possible that a certain amount of brain damage is of      therapeutic value," Hoch once stated.) In one experiment a      hallucinogen was administered along with a local anesthetic      and the subject was told to describe his visual experiences      as surgeons removed chunks of his cerebral cortex.[9]      ~ Martin Lee and Bruce Shlain    
    In the following quote the authors reveal their bias in the    situation, arguing for the spiritual aspects, while  in the    same book  denying the psychosis aspects and that the    psychedelic revolution was intentionally created by the CIA:  
      Many other researchers, however, dismissed transcendental      insight as either "happy psychosis" or a lot of nonsense. The      knee-jerk reaction on the part of the psychotomimetic      stalwarts was indicative of a deeply ingrained prejudice      against certain varieties of experience. In advanced      industrial societies paranormal" states of consciousness are      readily disparaged as "abnormal" or pathological. Such      attitudes, cultural as much as professional, played a crucial      role in circumscribing the horizon of scientific      investigation into hallucinogenic agents.[10]      ~ Martin Lee and Bruce Shlain    
    Here Lee and Shlain resort to name calling and ridicule, for    example referring to psychotomimetic stalwarts and deeply    ingrained prejudice, as the foundation of their argument    rather than looking at the evidence itself  which sounds    ironic in a book about the CIA using these same substances for    mind control. And who were these psychotomimetic stalwarts?    Was it only Dr. Hoch? As well see, Lee and Shlain seem to also    be referring to Aldous Huxley, Humphry Osmond, Albert Hofmann    and Sasha Shulgin.  
    Lee and Shlain, while partially exposing MKULTRA, then promote    the idea that the psychotomimetic theory was invalid. They    continue:  
      Despite widespread acknowledgment that the model psychosis      concept had outlived its usefulness, the psychiatric      orientation articulated by those of Dr. Hoch's persuasion      prevailed in the end. When it came time to lay down their      hand, the medical establishment and the media both "mimicked"      the line that for years had been secretly promoted by the CIA      and the militarythat hallucinogenic drugs were extremely      dangerous because they drove people insane, and all this talk      about creativity and personal growth was just a lot of hocus      pocus. This perception of LSD governed the major policy      decisions enacted by the FDA and the drug control apparatus      in the years ahead.[11] [emphasis added] ~ Marty Lee and Bruce      Shlain    
    Here we see the idea that the psychosis concept had outlived    its usefulness. What does that mean exactly? Its an ambiguous    statement. Most assume it to mean that the substances didnt    actually create psychosis. But is that true? What if, instead,    due to the above-mentioned suggestibility factor and set and    setting, they decided to remarket these drugs as spiritual    rather than psychotic? If we entertain this idea, we realize it    could take just a new name to change not only everything about    the outcome of the experience, but how quickly the youth and    counterculture would adopt them. Well expand on this idea    throughout this article.  
    On a side note, it should probably be mentioned that it was    actually Timothy Leary and Arthur Kleps who went (along with    Walter Bowart and Allen Ginsberg) before Congress in 1966    recommending regulation. You cant have a good youthful    rebellion with legal substances!  
      Senator Dodd. Don't you think that the drug needs to be put      under control and restriction?    
      Dr. LEARY. Pardon, sir.    
      Senator Dodd. Let me rephrase my question. Dont you feel      that LSD should be put under some control, or restriction as      to its use?    
      Dr. LEARY. Yes, sir.    
      Senator Dodd. As to its sale, its possession, and its use?    
      Dr. LEARY. I definitely do. In the first place, I      think that the 1965 Drug Control Act, which this committee, I      understand, sponsored, is the high water mark in such      legislation.    
      Dr. Leary. Yes, sir. I agree completely with your bill, the      1965 Drug Control Act. I think this is---    
      Senator Dodd. That the Federal Government and the State      governments ought to control it?    
      Dr. Leary. Exactly. I am in 100 percent agreement with the      1965 drug control bill.    
      Senator Kennedy of Massachusetts. So there shouldnt be---    
      Dr. Leary. I wish the States, I might add, would follow the      wisdom of this committee and the Senate and Congress of the      United States and follow your lead with exactly that kind of      legislation.    
      Senator Kennedy of Massachusetts. So there should not be      indiscriminate distribution of this drug should there?    
      Dr. Leary. I have never suggested that, sir. I have never      urged anyone to take LSD. I have always deplored      indiscriminate or unprepared use.[12]    
    As the University of Richmond website relates:  
      Leary was one of many experts who testified at the 1966      subcommittee hearings, which showed both ardent support and      uncompromising opposition to LSD.[] Just several months      after the subcommittee hearings, LSD was banned in      California. By October 1968, possession of LSD was banned      federally in the United States with the passage of the      Staggers-Dodd Bill, marking a tremendous step towards the      War On Drugs campaign that would arise in the      1970s.[13]    
    But who within the CIA had promoted this term    psychotomimetic?  
    For a moment, lets turn to the Oxford English    Dictionary, where, under the definition of    psychotomimetic, it states:  
      psychotomimetic, a. and n.    
      A.A adj. Having an effect on the mind orig. likened to that      of a psychotic state, with abnormal changes in thought,      perception, and mood and a subjective feeling of an expansion      of consciousness; of or pertaining to a drug with this      effect.[14]    
    Under the quotations in the OED for psychotomimetic,    we further see that R. W. Gerard is listed for 1955, and the    second entry for 1957 is from Dr. Humphry Osmond:  
      1956 R. W. Gerard in Neuropharmacology: Trans. 2nd Conf.,      1955 132 Let us at least agree to speak of so-called      psychoses when we are dealing with them in animals. Along      that same line, I have liked a term which I have been using      latelypsychosomimeticfor these agents instead of      schizophrenogenic. 1957      Neuropharmacology: Trans. 3rd Conf., 1956 205 (heading)      Effects of psychosomimetic drugs in animals and man.      1957 H. Osmond in Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.      LXVI. 417 The designation psychotomimetic agents for those      drugs that mimic some of the mental aberrations that occur in      the psychoses had been suggested by Ralph Gerard and seemed      especially appropriate.[15] [emphasis added]    
    If we read the OED entry carefully, what we see above    is that Gerard actually used the term psychosomimetic  with    an s, rather than psychotomimetic with a t. In fact, it    appears from the OED that it was Osmond himself who    was first to begin using the term psychotomimetic,    which was also adopted by the CIA and military for their    purposes. This same Osmond, as well soon discover, just months    later created the name psychedelic for these    substances. Notice that Osmond states The designation    psychotomimetic agents [] seemed especially appropriate.    That Osmond created the word psychotomimetic is a fact that Lee    and Shlain seem to want to avoid.  
    In another interesting quote in the OED from 1970, we    see none other than Sasha Shulgin referring to ibogaine as a    psychotomimetic:  
      1970 A. T. Shulgin in D. H. Efron Psychotomimetic Drugs 25      Ibogaineis another example in the family of      psychotomimetics, with complex structures and no resemblance      to known metabolic materials.[16]    
    Was this a slip by authors Lee and Shlain revealing that Osmond    and Shulgin were CIA?  
    It is true, in fact, that both worked for the government. While    Shulgin worked for the DEA, he was also a member of the    infamous Bohemian Club[17]; and as we'll see below, Osmond is    revealed in the CIAs MKULTRA documents.[18] But lets not get ahead of ourselves.    Well come back to this shortly.  
    In 1954, pre-dating the OEDs reference to Huxleys    close friend Humphry Osmond, in The Doors of    Perception Huxley stated:  
      Most takers of mescalin [sic] experience only the      heavenly part of schizophrenia. The drug brings hell and      purgatory only to those who have had a recent case of      jaundice, or who suffer from periodical depressions or      chronic anxiety.[19]      ~ Aldous Huxley    
    He continued:  
      The schizophrenic is a soul not merely unregenerate, but      desperately sick into the bargain. His sickness consists in      the inability to take refuge from inner and outer reality (as      the sane person habitually does) in the homemade universe of      common sensethe strictly human world of useful notions,      shared symbols and socially acceptable conventions. The      schizophrenic is like a man permanently under the influence      of mescaline[20]      ~ Aldous Huxley    
    In Heaven and Hell Huxley went on:  
      Many schizophrenics have their times of heavenly happiness;      but the fact that (unlike the mascalin [sic] taker)      they do not know when, if ever, they will be permitted to      return to the reassuring banality of everyday experience      causes even heaven to seem appalling.[21]      ~ Aldous Huxley    
    In their letters, Aldous Huxley and Humphry Osmond were very    concerned over what to call these substances, but why should    the public have cared what these two people wanted to call    them? They were still mostly secret at this time and hardly    anyone knew about them  except through marketing efforts and    publications. Furthermore, why were Huxley and Osmond so    concerned, and why would it be a problem, unless there were an    ulterior motive?  
    The issue here is a Bernaysian/Koestler-type marketing    strategy. With a word like psychotomimetic these substances    would have never taken hold in the youth and countercultures.    It was fine for underground LSD and other studies by the    intelligence community, but for the new purpose, theyd need a    new name. From Huxleys letters in a book titled    Moksha, we find:  
      740 North Kings Road,      Los Angeles 46, Cal.      30 March, 1956    
      Dear Humphry,    
      Thank you for your letter, which I shall answer only briefly,      since I look forward to talking to you at length in New York      before very long. About a name for these drugs - what a      problem! I have looked into Liddell and Scott and find that      there is a verb phaneroein, "to make visible or manifest,"      and an adjective phaneros, meaning "manifest, open to sight,      evident." The word is used in botany - phanerogam as opposed      to cryptogam. Psychodetic (4) is something I      don't quite get the hang of it. Is it an analogue of      geodetic, geodesy? If so, it would mean mind-dividing, as      geodesy means earth-dividing, from ge and daiein. Could you      call these drugs psychophans? or phaneropsychic drugs? Or      what about phanerothymes? Thymos means soul, in its primary      usage, and is the equivalent of Latin animus. The      word is euphonious and easy to pronounce; besides it has      relatives in the jargon of psychology-e.g.      cyclothyme. On the whole I think this is better      than psychophan or phaneropsychic. []    
      Yours, Aldous    
      "To make this trivial world sublime,    
      Take half a gram of phanerothyme.    
        (4) Osmond had mentioned psychedelics, as a new name for        mind-changing drugs to replace the term psychotomimetics.        Huxley apparently misread the word as "psychodetics," hence        his mystification. Osmond replied: "To fathom        Hell or soar angelic, Just take a pinch of psychedelic.      
        Huxley still did not get the spelling, which he made        psychodelic [Smith's note]. Huxley invariably uses        psychodelic for psychedelic, as he and others thought the        latter term incorrect. Huxley's spelling has been retained,        as this was undoubtedly his preference. However, it fails        one criterion of Osmond, which is that the term be        "uncontaminated by other associations."[22] [emphasis added]      
    Why was it important to meet the criterion for the new word to    be uncontaminated by other associations? They dont say, but    we can surmise that its because of this remarketing strategy    and they needed to be careful of the term chosen. The word    psychodelic contains psycho, but psycho carries negative    associations. This explains why psychedelic is the only word    in the English language to use psyche rather than psycho     the criterion it failed was complete avoidance of any name that    could imply a negative experience. Lee and Shlain in Acid    Dreams give their version of the story thus:  
      The two men had been close friends ever since Huxley's      initial mescaline experience, and they carried on a lively      correspondence. At first Huxley proposed the word      phanerothyme, which derived from roots relating to      "spirit" or "soul." A letter to Osmond included the following      couplet:    
      To make this trivial world sublime,    
      Take half a Gramme of phanerothyme.    
      To which Osmond responded:    
      To fathom hell or soar angelic    
      Just take a pinch of psychedelic.    
      And so it came to pass that the word psychedelic was      coined. Osmond introduced it to the psychiatric establishment      in 1957. Addressing a meeting of the New York Academy of      Sciences, he argued that hallucinogenic drugs did "much more"      than mimic psychosis, and therefore an appropriate name must      "include concepts of enriching the mind and enlarging the      vision." He suggested a neutral term to replace      psychotomimetic, and his choice was certainly vague      enough. Literally translated, psychedelic means      "mind-manifesting," implying that drugs of this category do      not produce a predictable sequence of events but bring to the      fore whatever is latent within the unconscious. Accordingly      Osmond recognized that LSD could be a valuable tool for      psychotherapy. This notion represented a marked departure      from the military-medical paradigm, which held that every LSD      experience was automatically an experimental      psychosis.[23]      ~ Marty Lee & Bruce Shlain    
    Its ironic that they claimed the term psychedelic, for mind    manifesting is neutral. A more appropriate word to describe    it would be ambiguous. But notice that its gone from    mimicking psychosis to manifesting the mind. And just    months earlier Osmond was promoting the word    psychotomimetic, which he said seemed especially    appropriate. Here Lee and Shlain admit that Albert    Hofmann was involved with this public relations scheme:  
Visit link:
Entheogens: Whats in a Name? The Untold History of ...