Remembering Tom Bethell: Wordsmith of Courage and Controversy – KMJ Now

There was a feeling of excitement and relief from me upon the delivery in June of House of Cards: A Journalists Odyssey Through The Darwin Debates, by Tom Bethell, who died Friday at age 84.

Everyone who saw him at the traditional Latin Mass at St. Thomas the Apostle Church in Washington D.C. knew that faithful worshiper Bethell was ailing. His completion of this final testimony on the controversy that has surrounded Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution and those who questioned it since the 19th Century was in doubt.

But with the devotion of wife Donna and the prayers of his fellow traditional Roman Catholics, Bethell saw his magnum opus come to life as he himself was near death. In his twilight days, he happily signed copies to his legions of friends.

For Tom Bethell, senior editor of the American Spectator and Media Fellow of the Hoover Institution, his clash with Darwinism began with an article he wrote in Harpers Magazine in February 1976. Entitled Darwins Mistake, the article disputed Darwins theory of evolution and concluded it was on the verge of collapse with so many giving it scrutiny and concluding it was in error.

He also said that Darwins theory of natural selection (the survival and reproduction of a species due to characteristics of a particular organism) had been quietly abandoned by erstwhile supporters and that it was in fact a tautology (something subject to varied interpretations).

Strong medicine, all right, especially at a time when Darwins theories were taught as fact in biology classes worldwide. Biologists quickly sought to dispute Bethells claims and paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould wrote a response in Natural History Magazine.

Soon Bethell would find himself engaged in stormy encounters over the issue he had raised with Harvard biologist Richard Lewontin and famed philosopher of science Karl Popper.

But Bethells words and analysis were clearly having an impact.

Although I have been a skeptic about Darwins theory of evolution since taking my high school biology class, his book for Regnery, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science, was instrumental in transforming me into a Creationist and strong anti-Darwinist, Allan Ryskind, former editor and co-owner of the national conservative weekly Human Events told Newsmax.

Ryskind recalled how he was brought up to believe in evolution, which my great high school biology teacher thought was true. But the textbook we used at Beverly Hills High and then another one at UCLA, made me dubious, even though the textbooks themselves were pro-evolution. But it was Toms book and the intellectual heft he brought to the debate that, for me at least, clinched the case against the Darwinian view. I will be forever grateful for his good works on Planet Earth.

Born and raised in London, England, the young Bethell had studied science and mathematics at Downside School and Trinity College at Oxford. After coming to the United States, he taught math at Woodberry Forest School in Virginia from 1962-65.

But, as Bethells friends liked to say, journalism was his great love after [wife] Donna. He was Washington editor of Harpers and later for the Washington Monthly.

In the 1970s, Bethell took on an unusual side assignment: he was hired as a researcher by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison for his celebrated prosecution of businessman Clay Shaw as a part of a conspiracy in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Bethell, who later wrote about his work on the case, came up with no evidence Shaw was involved and, after an hours deliberation, a jury acquitted Shaw.

Tom Bethell loved ideas, words, and discourse even as it inevitably spawned controversy. While he didnt always change the minds of those to whom he touched, it is inarguable he touched the lives of many and almost surely made them think a little more.

John Gizzi is chief political columnist and White House correspondent for Newsmax. For more of his reports, Go Here Now.

2021 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

More:

Remembering Tom Bethell: Wordsmith of Courage and Controversy - KMJ Now

What Is Mutual Aid? | How to Get Involved in the Community Movement – MarieClaire.com

Andrew LichtensteinGetty Images

Mutual aid has existed as long as people have been around, says Mariame Kaba, an educator and organizer in New York City who, in March 2020, collaborated with U.S. representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on a mutual-aid workshop and the release of a COVID-19 mutual-aid digital tool kit. But theres a reason youve been seeing pictures of people filling a community refrigerator and videos of folks handing out clothing on the street accompanied by #mutualaid all over your social feeds lately. Were dealing with a disaster of massive proportions, [COVID-19], that most people have never lived through in their lifetime, Kaba says. When you are in this kind of a situation, you figure out ways to relate to other people that allow you to actually survive. Thats why people are paying attention to it; they have no choice.

Its important to be clear on what mutual aid really is (it can loosely be described as caring for others while working to improve our world)and isnt (charity). This is more than the giving or taking of goods or services; its a relationship that youre building. Its called mutual aid, so its not just the [assistance] that matters, says Kaba, its the reciprocity of itthat youre in a community with other people. From that association, you build connections in a way that you dont with a singular feel-good actions. (Not that theres anything wrong with those)

Its to create a new society; its to create a new community.

Its not just You do one thing for me, and then I never talk to you again, continues Kaba. Its to create a new society; its to create a new community. The idea is that once people are interacting in this way, they see more and more ways to work together to help one another, leading to greater transformation.

The key to understanding it is a 1902 essay collection by Peter Kropotkin. In Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution, the Russian anarchist philosopher looked at mutually beneficial cooperation in human and animal societies, sort of the opposite of social Darwinism. For a deeper understanding of the modern version, try the primer Mutual Aid: Building Solidarity During This Crisis (and the Next), by Dean Spade (Verso, 2020). Spade outlines how the systems we currently have in place are not set up to meet peoples needsas weve seen highlighted by last years major global disruption.

But its not only worth practicing during a pandemic. Mutual aid is for when wealth is concentrated in one layer of society, when the health-care system is flawed, and when people can work full-time but still be unable to pull their families out of poverty. In other words, mutual aid is timelyand timeless.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Follow this link:

What Is Mutual Aid? | How to Get Involved in the Community Movement - MarieClaire.com

A True Portrait of Tom Bethell – Discovery Institute

Photo: Tom Bethell, by Laszlo Bencze.

Sometimes words can capture, partly, a human personality, or at least give a glimpse. Other times a photo or other portrait speaks eloquently in a way that words cant. Photographer Laszlo Bencze has taken photos of intelligent design proponents and Darwin skeptics, including several portraits of journalist Tom Bethell, whose passing I noted here yesterday. Tom was 84 years old. Bencze sent a beautiful and expressive photo of him, reproduced above with permission, along with this:

I am very saddened to hear of Tom Bethells death. Not only was he pivotal in my turning away from Darwinism due to his 1976 Harpers article, which I clipped from the magazine and still have, but we also became friends during one of his visits to California. He allowed me to do an edit on his book,Darwins House of Cards. It was so well written that my suggestions were rather minor. He was erudite and a true gentleman.

The photo was taken in Laszlos living room in 2013. Im no photographer but it seems to me that what the artist is trying to do is capture an image not just of the subjects body but of his heart, whatever we understand that to mean (personality, will, spirit), maybe even his soul. In my estimation, this portrait succeeds.

This occurs to me, not pertaining to Tom Bethell alone. Take a moment to browse Laszlos other photos. I was struck by his images of Flannery OConnors home, including one of her typewriter and writing desk. The photo is accompanied by this quotation from a letter she wrote:

A story really isnt any good unless it successfully resists paraphrase, unless it hangs on and expands in the mind. Properly, you analyze to enjoy, but its equally true that to analyze with any discrimination, you have to have enjoyed already

The same might be true of photos or of people. Were reminded of this when people die, and at other times.

I was going to say that the way Toms right eye is illuminated, in a penetrating manner, speaks to me. Suggesting a penetrating intellect, or some such thing. But you know what? That falls absurdly flat. When we try to paraphrase summarize, or indicate in words what draws us to someone or something and find that it successfully resists paraphrase, then we know were in the presence of something very good. The more secure the stronghold against paraphrase, the more special the object of our failed praise.

See more here:

A True Portrait of Tom Bethell - Discovery Institute

Iconoclast: Farewell to Tom Bethell – Discovery Institute

Photo: Tom Bethell, via Discovery Institute.

As a Darwin skeptic, journalist Tom Bethell preceded almost everyone I know. His groundbreaking attack on evolutionary theory in Harpers Magazine appeared in 1976. It is my sad duty to report that Tom passed away on Friday. We will have more to say about him. As to his gifts as a writer and thinker, I reviewed his wonderful book Darwins House of Cards back in 2017. From, Tom Bethells Rebuke to Fellow Journalists: A Skeptical Look at Evolution IsNotBeyond Your Powers:

Not a religious apologist or a cheerleader for any competing view, but rather an old-fashioned skeptic, Bethell has been doubting Darwin since he was an undergraduate at Oxford University. I admit hes a longtime friendly acquaintance and a contributor to Evolution News, so Im not unbiased. But others who, like me, have followed him for years agree in savoring his work.

That includes some eminent names. Novelist Tom Wolfe has called him one of our most brilliant essayists, and Andrew Ferguson at The Weekly Standard, a great writer himself, says, As a journalist, Tom Bethell is fearless. As a storyteller and stylist he is peerless. All his gifts are on generous display in this fascinating and admirable book.

He has been writing about Darwin (among many other subjects, of course) for forty-plus years, beginning with an article in Harpers in 1976. Wry, unfailingly clear, never technical, yet astonishingly well informed, he has produced what might be the Platonic ideal of an introduction to an often challenging and certainly controversial subject. He covers the waterfront, probing the strength of Darwinian thinking with reference to common descent, natural selection, extinction, homology, convergence, the fossil record, biogeography, cladistics, Lenskis long-term experiment with bacteria, and much more.

He concludes that while confidence in the pillars of Darwinism common descent and innovation through natural selection hit their high-water mark at the celebration of the Origin of Species in 1959, the evidence has steadily and increasingly gone against the theory. The whole edifice rested on a 19th century faith in Progress, propped up by a dogmatic commitment to materialism. As the former falters, the structure is in danger of collapse.

To have won the admiration of Tom Wolfe is no small accomplishment for a journalist. Bethell was a vivid personality and highly independent. He could be entertainingly irascible, as he demonstrated in an email list in which we both participated. He was also loyal. I thought of him recently in connection with another journalist I knew, Joseph Sobran. As some may recall, Joe Sobran self-destructed, in career terms, and was forced out at National Review. By the end of his life, he had reconciled with his former employer, William F. Buckley Jr. But in the years when as far as Im aware, everyone else in the world of conservative journalism had dropped Sobran as too toxic, Tom Bethell, I know, remained his close friend. That struck me as a tribute to Toms character. A gift for loyalty and friendship is undoubtedly even more precious than a gift for thought, analysis, or writing.

I remember having an exchange with Tom about the meaning of his last name, which seems to correspond to the Biblical place name Beth El, meaning House of God. He has gone on now to that House. All his friends at Discovery Institute wish Toms wife Donna much comfort. You can see him below in a video we released, Iconoclast: One Journalists Odyssey through the Darwin Debates.

Read more from the original source:

Iconoclast: Farewell to Tom Bethell - Discovery Institute

Random Evolution Doesn’t Produce Algorithmic Functions in Animals – Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence

In a recent article Evolution and artificial intelligence face the same basic problem, Eric Holloway addressed the conundrum faced by artificial intelligence theorists: How can a random process with no insight into the environment increase information about that environment within evolving DNA sequences and/or artificial intelligence programs. By what mechanism can randomness know anything? Dr. Holloways challenge goes to the heart of the problem with the materialist worldview regarding origins, evolution, and ultimately intelligence.

Imagine you knew absolutely nothing about roller skates. Then you awoke this morning to find your ankles and feet permanently installed into roller skates. Instantly, everything you understood about walking and running is worthless.

Getting onto your feet at all is risky. Standing is your second awful challenge. To move, you cant walk; you must glide. To turn is a mysterious twist-and-lean maneuver. Stopping means grabbing onto something stationary or just falling down a lot. Dont even think about moving backward. When you finally gain some skating skills through endless struggles, you find skates are great for speed on paved surfaces. But they are slow and dangerously ill-suited for gravel, grassy terrain, or staircases. You will certainly miss your feet in their natural state.

This thought experiment captures the fundamental distinction between biological hardware and biological software. We have hardware for locomotion: ankles and feet. We need the know-how, the methods, the sequence of commands the software to operate that hardware. Feet dont walk us, nor do they walk independently of us. Rather, we walk using feet. When the hardware changes, for example, if feet were to become roller skates, the software must change radically too.

If you dont figure out how to move around on skates instead of feet, your chances of surviving and thriving greatly diminish. Having to think specifically about every step or glide would drain your energy, so you need to develop the sort of muscle memory with skates as you previously had with feet.

Bottom line: You must change your software to operate new or modified hardware. In the same way, when an animals biological hardware changes, that animals operating software must also change to match the hardware changes.

Somehow, when we think about evolution, the problem of hardwaresoftware coordination is ignored. Take, for example, the neo-Darwinian claim that modern birds evolved from reptile-like dinosaurs. Discussions of dinosaur-to-bird evolution talk about the hardware changes: scales became feathers, legs became wings, cold-blooded (exothermic) physiology became warm-blooded (endothermic) physiology, tooth-filled mouths became beaks, and so on. All of these monumental changes in hardware present enormous operational challenges that incremental mutations somehow solved over millions of years. But totally missing is any account of the evolution of the necessary software.

Assume for the moment that unguided mutation could actually modify a reptile and install the wing apparatus, including all the muscles and feathers. For the early stubby proto-wing to give the modified reptile the survival advantage necessary to win in natural selection, the reptile must know how to use the proto-wing. A reptile with proto-wings instead of legs is like a human with roller skates instead of feet. The reptile must have the biological software to operate the proto-wings successfully. Whatever software the legged reptile had, it wont operate a proto-wing. The stubby-winged reptile is worse off than his legged brothers and sisters, not better, and wont win the natural selection prize.

So lets generously give a reptile a full set of beautiful wings with feathers and the powerful muscles needed. We have doomed the poor creature. She wakes up to the world, clueless about how to use the wings. She cant walk like her legged siblings. She cant fly because she lacks the software, in the sense of neurological adaptations, to launch, flap, soar, glide, turn, and land.

Operating feet or skates, legs or wings, is algorithmic. Robert Marks, Michael Egnor, and Winston Ewert have all argued that the mind is distinct from the brain, at least in humans, and that consciousness does not arise in the brain alone. William Dembski has suggested that consciousness could potentially be the result of material features that are intelligently designed. It is a fair question whether consciousness, human reason, and subjective preferences are algorithmic or non-algorithmic. But those elements of mind function well above walking or even flying in terms of complexity or comprehensibility; the ordinary operations of movement are algorithmic because they can be programmed into computers.

When walking or skating, we develop muscle memory. Our brains and nervous systems internalize the procedures for these tasks. We dont think about them, we just engage them. The toddler toddles around looking for the kitten he wants to play with and finds it prudently perched on a ledge out of arms reach. The toddler doesnt think about having to walk while trying to carry out that intention. Doubtless, reptiles dont think about walking, and birds dont think about flying. They just expect the subroutines in their brains to carry out the tasks.

According to the materialist view, every feature of life is explainable using cause-and-effect physics and chemistry. Neo-Darwinism (the theory that natural selection acting on random mutation builds complex, functional structures) still seems to be the dominant materialist account of the existence of animal species. To properly claim that throne, however, neo-Darwinism must explain not only how hardware features mutated into existence but also how the biological operating software came into existence and could then be modified successfully in dramatic ways.

Walking and flying are two animal functions that are often called behaviors. I scoured the Encyclopedia of Evolution (2002) a few years ago but found no substantive explanation for the origins and implementation of behaviors.

Computer systems within robots can engage in behaviors and we can see and modify the software code that was designed for the purpose. Ive been reading articles about dinosaur-bird evolution, but none have described where and how the walking and flying software is encoded and stored in the animals bodies or brains. No article Ive seen reveals the mechanism for modifying behavioral software in animals, let alone how the algorithm for walking in two dimensions can be modified by undirected mutation to become the algorithm for flying in three dimensions.

Materialist thinkers contend that every feature of brain, mind, and consciousness arose via cause-effect physics and chemistry accounted for by neo-Darwinism. In that case, they first need to explain how biological software is created and stored in animals, and then how such software can be mutated by accident just in time to operate new biological hardware. Solve those problems first, before claiming human consciousness is mere biochemistry.

Note: See also the detailed presentation about bird flight prepared by Professor Gary Ritchison, Eastern Kentucky University here and here.

Photo credits:

Figure 1: Roller skates is by Ryan McGuire at Pixabay.

Figure 2: Foot by HeelsandFeet is licensed under CC BY 2.0

Figure 3: Feathered Dinosaur: File:Harpymimus steveoc.jpg by Steveoc 86 is licensed under CC BY 2.5

Figure 4: Archaeopteryx closer to a bird by Luna04 at French Wikipedia is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0

You may also enjoy: Evolution and artificial intelligence face the same basic problem. Think of the word ladder game, where we transform one word into another by changing only one letter at a time. (Eric Holloway)

Read more:

Random Evolution Doesn't Produce Algorithmic Functions in Animals - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence

One People, One House: The truth about race IS there is no race – masslive.com

The morning after Donald J. Trumps stunning presidential electoral victory in 2016 my very smart lawyer-daughter observed, Abbie, I think we simply underestimated the level of white rage in the country following the Obama years.

I believe she was absolutely correct. My daughter, her husband and their 9-year-old daughter had stumped for Bernie Sanders in their hometown of Worcester and in New Hampshire. Her younger brother, though, a hip-hop artist with a degree in political science, had toured the Tea Party Midwest the year before, noticed a marked, compelling sense of reactionary white alienation in the region and had warned of an upset for the Democrat shoo-in liberals. He, too, was correct, of course.

Past IS prelude. The storming of the nations Capitol on Jan. 6, just like Trumps 2016 storming of our nations historically fickle experiment in democracy, was telegraphed, forewarned. Many Americans of conscience could feel it, they just couldnt see it. Or, they didnt want to.

Like many social upheavals in our nations relatively brief history, the role of white supremacy, that demonic vice originally engineered by the American 1% and their minions to be as destructive as it is deniable by our ardent, white working classes, is seminal.

Denial is racisms heartless enabler, a practiced self-defense to make the uncomfortable comfortable, most often through gross distortions of real life, of reality. Our best chance at national racial redemption is to truthfully tell the stories and histories of American racism and white supremacy.

Kamal Ali, Associate Professor of Ethnic & Gender Studies at Westfield State University, left, organized a rally outside of West Springfield High School Wednesday to protest alleged abuse of Muslim sisters by fellow students over a period of years. They were joined by students from Westfield State University, Holyoke Community College and the University of Massachusetts Amherst. April 30. 2014 (Michael S. Gordon/The Republican) Staff-ShotThe Republican file

If were going to live under one roof as an indivisible American people, with liberty and justice for all of us, it is absolutely essential that we educate ourselves on certain undeniable contradictions and distortions that have, over time, assumed the mantel of truth.

The back story of white racism is part of the apocryphal story of race and our nations ruling class obsession to create a scientific rationale for imperial slavery on one hand, while maintaining the equally dangerous, galling hypocrisy of a totally false Christian respectability on the other.

The truth about race is there IS no race. There are no genetic markers, or visible ones for that matter, that we find in one so-called race that we dont find in another race.

All anatomically modern humans, homo sapiens, are descendants from a common Black biological ancestor from Africa, most likely East Africa. For most of us this truth is like learning the Earth is not flat, so addicted are we to the European illusion that race is science, and a determiner of ability, performance and culture. That belief did not develop by happenstance or coincidence.

The slave system established in the Americas and the Caribbean delivered unimaginable profits in the United States and Europe. Resultantly, the contest to portray enslaved or oppressed people as pagans or subhuman heathens whose subjugation by superior white cultures was not only normal, but the decree of almighty God, began in earnest.

Beginning in the early 18th century highly motivated clergymen, physicians, philosophers, jurists and lay scientists were hard at work attempting to classify what they supposed were different racial groups along a hierarchical ladder, with whites and other western Europeans at the top, and darker races at the bottom. These were men, by the way, who represented the intellectual elite of Europe and America, not a bevy of charlatans and conspiracy theorists of the type we know and love today.

The idea was to prove, empirically, the superiority of whiteness as justification for the continued exploitation, globally, of inferior races. In short, early 18th century anthropologists, as they came to be known, tended to follow a biblical or monogenetic view of humankind that implied all humans were of one species but varied in appearance and capabilities.

But even the Bible thumpers were patently racist, describing folk who looked like my family as not the white mans equal, who were meant to be servants of servants, and who believed slavery is justifiable. Thomas Jefferson, slave holder and father of four surviving children with half-caste Sally Hemmings, the Beyonce of her time, suspicioned Blacks were a distinct race, but was absolutely convinced of their dulltasteless inferiority to white folk.

By the 19th century the science had devolved to the point where blacks and other racial minorities were seen as different species altogether, and were summarily, in their view, written out of the human family. What these anthropologists were really up to, their smoke-and-mirror experiments with cranial capacity, head shape, hair texture and brain color notwithstanding, was affirming their own preconceived prejudices and formally justifying the racial inequality, oppression and immorality of their world.

In 1859, a year or so before the Civil War, Charles Darwin published his work of authentically scientific, biological literature popularly known as The Origin of Species. However, the formal title of his work, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, is clear in its intent to label a publication that would, in part, underscore and affirm the glaring inequities in the prevailing racial landscape, which it did.

Pseudo-scientists like Herber Spencer and Francis Galton (Darwins British cousin) used Darwins work to usher in a more sophisticated strain of racism known Social Darwinism, which then metastasized into Eugenics a huge tent that offers cover for a variety of the not-so-subtle racist incarnations of today.

This photo from 2018 shows James F. Hennessey Award recipients Kamal H. Ali, left, and John Bracey, right, with their wives, Ayesha Ali and Ingrid Bracey, at the Greater Springfield NAACP Centennial Freedom Fund Banquet. The Hennessey award is the highest honor given by the organization and recognizes individuals for their efforts in eliminating racial discrimination and promoting civil right.The Republican file

The corrupting strands of racism and racial supremacy, bigotry and intolerance braided into American law and governance, public and private policies and practices before and since our nations inception, must be targeted, isolated and done away with. How else can our national home be a comfortable home, an equitable home, a loving home to everyone living there?

The historical complicity of the U.S. Supreme Court and lower courts in the establishment and maintenance of slavery, segregation, voter suppression; the Congressional denial of Black and brown folk access to Social Security, and Black veterans to G.I. Bill grants supporting housing and education; the banks red-lining of urban neighborhoods while exposing Blacks to predatory mortgage practices; the criminal justice systems collusion with state courts to unleash the scourge of mass incarceration on urban poor communities, then deny released inmates civil and legal status: these malevolent practices, among a litany of other abridgments of colored folks human rights are reprehensible. So, too, are the innumerable racist affronts to the ability of Black, white, yellow and brown people to enjoy, with dignity, the full array of opportunities that are integral to the America their labor and extreme sacrifice has produced.

We can and must do better. And, I suggest we do it sooner rather than later. The barbarians arent at the gate, theyre in our House!

Kamal H. Ali, who grew up in Springfield, retired in 2016 from Westfield State University, where he holds the position of professor emeritus in the Department of Ethnic and Gender Studies. He is the former director of the universitys Office of Minority Affairs and the universitys Urban Education and Student Support Services programs. Ali is also a founder and trustee of the Islamic Society of Western Massachusetts and an imam-chaplain for Muslim inmates at the Hampden County House of Correction.

Related content:

Continue reading here:

One People, One House: The truth about race IS there is no race - masslive.com

Diversity Dialogues Raise Issues of Women’s Rights, Sexual Identity and Individual Freedom – University of Arkansas Newswire

Shirin Saeidi, assistant professor of political science serving as University Housing's Faculty in Residence for the north end of campus, will sponsor a series of talks this academic year addressing several social topics.

Saeidi planned a series of dialogues with on-campus residential students on topics that include vaccinations, woman's rights, sexual identity and what freedom means.

The first dialogue of the spring semester had Adam Blehm and Blake Hereth as guest speakers focusing on public health and compulsory vaccinations. Blehm is a doctoral student in philosophy and Hereth is an assistant professor of philosophy. They recently published a paper on the debate surrounding mandatory vaccination.

Students had the opportunity to participate in the discussion and interact with faculty members throughout the presentation.

"My favorite part of the Diversity Dialogue regarding the COVID-19 vaccination was when the differing arguments on mandatory vaccination were presented. Seeing the logic and information behind each side's opinion was rather helpful in formulating my own stance on the subject," said freshman psychology major, Andrew Ruegsegger.

"That's why I think the Diversity Dialogue sessions are so critical for the student community understanding the various reasons by which people arrive at their beliefs allows us to form our own educated, moderate and diverse opinions."

Ruegsegger encourages other students to join the conversation and benefit from the explored areas. Topics he would like to see in future sessionsinclude safety measures for women working in food delivery services, ridesharing, and other jobs where one-on-one interactions are required.

This series is open to students, faculty and staff. The Diversity Dialogues are a hybrid series where participants can join via Zoom or in-person at Morgan Hall room 108. Student participants also have the chance to win an Amazon gift card for their contribution to the discussion.

RSVPs to the Diversity Dialogue Series are done through Living Learning Communities' pages on HogSync.

Saeidi, organizer of the dialogue series, shares that "the purpose of the Diversity Dialogue is to introduce students to the various forms of inequality and discrimination that exists in our world, and how we can address them collectively."

She believes conversations about diversity and inclusion are crucial at this moment in time.

"It is urgent for our students to have access to leading scholars, activists and artists concerned with different aspects of US politics and society. Such conversations will facilitate progressive change and connect us better locally."

This is Saeidi's second semester as a Faculty in Residence and she continues to bring light to the current issues that contribute to the evolving dynamic of society.

During Fall 2020, the Diversity Dialogue Series hosted conversations about cultural competence, public discourse, becoming an ally in the fight against racism and the psycho-historical and socioeconomic development of "Latinx" individuals in the United States.

All events will be held at 7 p.m. Wednesday.

About University Housing. University Housing is a department within the Division of Student Affairs serving a residential community of around 6,200 on-campus students. More than 200 students find employment opportunities with University Housing each year. We offer educational programs that support the success of students and services that help students focus on academics at the University of Arkansas. Living on campus starts with a housing contract.

About the Division of Student Affairs. The Division of Student Affairs supports students in pursuing knowledge, earning a degree, finding meaningful careers, exploring diversity, and connecting with the global community. We provide students housing, dining, health care resources, and create innovative programs that educate and inspire. We enhance the University of Arkansas experience and help students succeed, one student at a time.

See the original post:

Diversity Dialogues Raise Issues of Women's Rights, Sexual Identity and Individual Freedom - University of Arkansas Newswire

Capitol Talk: Antifa; ‘Religious Freedom’, And Limits On Local Control – MTPR

Capitol Talk: Antifa; 'Religious Freedom' And Limits On Local Control

Bills heard this week at the Capitol seek to: limit the ability of local governments and health departments to require restrictions during a public health emergency; limit services to LGBTQ people in the name of religious freedom; make Montana a right-to-work state; declare antifa a domestic terrorist organization even though there isn't such an organization.

And after years of criticizing dark money groups, former Gov. Steve Bullock raises eyebrows by taking a position with a PAC tied to dark money.

Listen now onCapitol Talkwith Sally Mauk, Holly Michels and Rob Saldin.

Sally Mauk Holly, the House on a mostly-party-line vote has passed a bill that would prohibit local government and health officials from forcing local businesses to take health precautions, like wearing masks that are designed to prevent the spread of disease.

And Republican supporters say this is a way to protect those businesses from being hurt economically. But Democratic opponents and others say it will hinder efforts to control things like the COVID pandemic that we're all experiencing right now.

Holly Michels This bill is actually one of quite a few that are moving through. I think at one point there was more than two dozen I counted that aim to do things like limit local health authority in a pandemic and also there's some that would try to limit the governor's power.

But this one would really remove any power from local governments to make businesses follow public health orders like closures, limits on hours, capacity, masks and it would also stop governments from issuing fines for businesses that don't comply with those orders.

Rep. Jedediah Hinkle from Belgrade is carrying this, and he's arguing that businesses have suffered because of these mandates.

In debate before the full House, Hinkle and other Republicans who spoke in support of the bill really didn't talk about public health very much, just about the economic fallout from the virus. Hinkle talked about businesses that have closed in his community, ones that are teetering on the edge, but we did hear Democrats who oppose the bill talked a lot about public health.

Rep. Tom France of Missoula said that there's the very real possibility of another virus, something worse than COVID, and if this bill passes, it would put communities in a real bind in the future. We also heard from Democrats there's heightened concern because last week Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte lifted the statewide mask mandate.

And what Gianforte said is he thinks local governments and businesses are best equipped to make decisions for their own communities and right now, they have that ability to put in more restrictive mandates. But this bill, if it were to pass and Gianforte were to sign, it would take that away.

Mauk And of course, we don't at this point know if the governor would sign it or not. He hasn't really indicated that.

Michels No. We asked this week specifically on this bill, and like a lot of other bills, Gianforte said that he wouldn't speak about his actions until the bill reaches his desk. But Gianforte, again, has said that local businesses, local government should be the ones making these decisions. And, of course, local businesses do have control over what happens on their property.

Mauk Rob, former Gov. Steve Bullock has a new job co-chairing a super PAC called American Bridge 21st Century, and this PAC has strong ties to a dark-money group called American Bridge.

This wouldn't necessarily be newsworthy, except Bullock has been a longtime critic of dark money groups. And to say this new job reeks of hypocrisy I think would be an understatement, Rob.

Rob SaldinYeah, well, Sally, I mean, you're right. Bullock's most prominent issue, arguably dating back to his days as attorney general, has been dark money and trying to reduce the influence of money in politics. And now here he is signing on to co-chair the super PAC that has a dark-money affiliate.

Now, the hypocrisy charge is certainly not new on this front: Bullock and Tester too, who's also very much associated with campaign finance reform have both been hit with the hypocrite charge in the past. The allegation is basically that these guys are out there running around piously condemning the supposed evils of money in politics and then they go off and engage in the very activities that they denounce.

Well, in the past, that's never struck me as a particularly compelling charge, because it's entirely reasonable in my mind to say, one, that the rules of the game ought to be changed. But two, until they are changed, it's unreasonable that I should unilaterally disarm and put myself at a huge disadvantage in the election.

And so the real key distinction in my mind has always been between those who think that money, and particularly dark money, have too big of a role in our politics and those who don't think that that's a problem. And it's always been clear where Bullock stands on that.

But Sally, I think you're right, this case is different. Bullock is now a private citizen. He certainly didn't have to sign up to co-chair this super PAC with the dark-money wing. So the hypocrisy charge seems to me to have more merit in this instance.

Mauk Holly, Kila Rep. Carl Glimm is sponsoring a bill called the Montana Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and this act would basically allow someone to use their religion as a reason not to provide service to an LGBT person.

Missoula Democrat Bryce Bennett, who's gay, gave emotional testimony against the bill. Here's what he said:

"This bill is very personal to me, and the testimony that we heard today was personal to me as well because I have lived those experiences. This bill would allow people like me to be denied housing, to be kicked out of restaurants, to be denied health care, to be fired from my job, not because of something that I did but simply because of who I am."

Mauk And the bill's sponsor, Holly, denies that that would be the bill's effect, but it's hard to argue otherwise, I think.

Michels Yeah, what this bill says is people don't have to do things that burden their religious expression, and it would also allow people to make arguments in court based on claims their ability to exercise religious beliefs had been limited.

Supporters have argued that it would safeguard religious freedoms against government interests, but we heard a lot of opponents to the bill give testimony, like Bennett's, that was pretty impactful, talking about concerns that this would just really affect their ability to get jobs, rent, apartments, you know, have plumbers come over to work on their house.

We had just four supporters of the bill, they were saying it would do things like stop florists from having to provide services for a same-sex wedding. But opponent after opponent ... you know, there's one who talked about he was worried the doctors would not provide him with necessary medical care.

Sen. Glimm, he countered, from what we heard from Sen. Bennett there, Glimm saying that he doesn't believe that would be the outcome of the bill. But we do know there's a similar federal law this is modeled off of that's gone through court several times.

One ruling in 2008 said it couldn't be used to justify discrimination against employees, but in 2019, a judge said that this federal law, again, could allow providers or insurers to deny health care treatment or coverage.

And this is sort of a theme in recent days at the Capitol. We've seen tensions collide between a lot of these so-called religious freedom bills and then LGBTQ rights. There's this hearing, there's another one on campus free speech laws and we've heard from people advocating for rights of LGBTQ people that this is just something that's been a lot more pressured this session.

We're looking at the first Republican governor in 16 years, and a lot of legislation like this has been vetoed before by Democratic governors, so there might be different outcomes and it's definitely something that's been a central theme of this last week up at the Capitol.

Mauk Rob, similar bills have passed in other states and that has prompted boycotts in some instances that have hurt those states' economic bottom lines.

SaldinSure, Sally, and there's actually some longer history to that sort of pressure.

You know, this was a thing back in the day when the Martin Luther King holiday was being debated. Arizona's resistance to that led the NFL to yank the Super Bowl out of Pheonix one year. South Carolina faced a similar boycott from the NCAA back when the Confederate flag was flying over the state capitol.

And then, as you suggest Sally, right, more recently, you've got these LGBT issues that have led to boycotts of various sorts.

Probably most notable was North Carolina. North Carolina faced a backlash over the so-called "bathroom bill," including, once again, the NCAA. And you had Bruce Springsteen and Pearl Jam, among others, canceling concerts, this sort of thing. Idaho is another place where this has been an issue.

Idaho is apparently currently under scrutiny by the NCAA, and might have Boise as a host site for the NCAA tournament moved elsewhere. So yes, there are some potential economic costs to this kind of legislation for sure.

Mauk Holly, another bill sponsored by Republican Caleb Hinkle would make Montana the 28th so-called "right to work" state. And this bill drew a lot of opposition, not just from union workers, as one would expect, but also from some prominent employers.

Michels Yeah, there were a lot of people opposed to this bill. What it would do is prohibit the requirement of belonging to a union as a condition of employment, and it would also bar private-sector unions from requiring non-members covered by bargaining agreements to pay union dues.

On the public union side, there's already been significant changes after a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2018 that said public sector unions can't collect fees for bargaining on behalf of non-members. But that's not something that applies to private sector unions.

We heard, you know, from who you'd expect: AFL-CIO, other big unions that this bill would hurt their ability to negotiate fair wages and good benefits. They also said that many of them already bargain on behalf of workers even if they don't pay dues.

One opponent was a steel worker who works at the Stillwater Mine, and he was saying that a lot of employees and union members are saying these union jobs are their ticket to the middle class. This worker also made a pretty interesting point that, he was saying himself and a lot of union members are politically conservative which felt like he was trying to say to the committee, "You know, this isn't just liberals or Democrats that are opposing the bill, but it's politically-conservative folks, too."

But like you said, two of the state's larger employers, the company that operates the Stillwater Mine and other operations and NorthWestern Energy, also spoke in opposition to the bill. They argued it would create division between the work force and harm productive relationships that they say exist between the union and employers.

There were individuals who backed the bill, but most of the support we heard came from groups like the national right to work organization, Montana Right to Work and Americans for Prosperity. These groups argue that what they called "forced unionism" doesn't really make sense, and that if a union was doing a good job advocating for people, it wouldn't need to require dues.

But there was, like you said, a lot more opposition. There were so many people opposed that we hit a point in the hearing where people were just limited to giving their name and their employer any affiliation they had just because they ran out of time for opponents.

I think it's interesting, too: one layer to this is during the election, now Lt. Gov. Kristen Juras told people at a campaign stop in Sydney that Gov. Greg Gianforte, if he were to become governor, wouldn't veto a right-to-work bill.

The campaign later had Juras clarify that she says she hadn't spoken to Gianforte when she made that statement, and it wouldn't be a priority for them. The campaign also tried to say audio that came from this event was edited.

But even though it's not a priority for Gianforte, it is for at least some Republican legislators, so it'll be something he'll have to weigh in on if it reaches his desk.

Mauk Rob, another Republican-sponsored bill would designate antifa as a domestic terrorism group, even though there is no antifa organization, per say.

SaldinRight. Antifa obviously stands for antifascist. It's this kind of very loose, amorphous network of hard-left activists and they absolutely have been involved in violence in parts of the country, which is appalling but they've also, I think, arguably been blown up into something a little bigger than they actually are.

Notably, former President Trump talked about antifa a great deal, falsely claiming, for instance, that it was antifa, not his own supporters, who were behind the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6. But, you know, Sally, you noted that critics of the bill point out that here in Montana, we haven't actually had any antifa activity.

Now, supporters of the measure say they want to send a message that antifa isn't welcome in Montana, but that doesn't pass muster with opponents, who say this is a silly distraction, especially when we have much more serious threats from far-right-wing extremists.

But you know Sally, the thing that stood out to me this week as being most notable is that at the beginning of the week, this bill had over 50 co-sponsors. But after a hearing, over half of those co-sponsors withdrew their support, which is extremely unusual.

And it seems that the primary reason for those members doing that is that the bill's sponsor, Braxton Mitchell of Columbia Falls, wasn't willing to add other extremist groups to his list of domestic terror organizations. So, you know, bottom line, losing over half of your co-sponsors certainly doesn't bode well for the future of this bill.

Mauk Holly and Rob, thank you. Talk to you again next week.

SaldinThanks Sally.

Capitol Talk is MTPR's weekly legislative news and analysis program. MTPR's Sally Mauk is joined by Lee Newspapers State Bureau Chief Holly Michels and UM Political Science Professor and Mansfield Center Fellow Rob Saldin. Tuneduring the legislative sessionFridays at 6:44 p.m.,via podcastorlisten online.

Read the original:

Capitol Talk: Antifa; 'Religious Freedom', And Limits On Local Control - MTPR

John Mayall: The blues have given me musical freedom – Olean Times Herald

John Mayall doesn't compare his success to that of his former Bluesbreakers bandmate Eric Clapton

The 87-year-old blues legend recruited the 75-year-old guitar hero to join his influential group John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers in 1965.

Over the years, the band featured the likes of the late Peter Green, Mick Fleetwood and John McVie of Fleetwood Mac and former Rolling Stones strummer Mick Taylor and inspired a whole generation of blues and rock legends.

Mayall, dubbed The Godfather of British Blues, insists the most important thing to him is being an authentic artist rather than chasing fame and he has always been happy for Clapton regarding his many achievements in the music business.

When asked if he had ever envied Clapton, Mayall said: I dont think it really works that way. You do whats natural to you and see if it works for the public in the same way it does for you."

Speaking exclusively to BANG Showbiz, he continued: My philosophy has always been to work as honestly as I can with the kind of music that was natural to me, to put those songs into words, its a great feeling to have had that freedom.

Clapton quit the Bluesbreakers in July 1966 and was replaced by Green. He was then invited by late drummer Ginger Baker to play in his new group Cream, the now-iconic band which also featured former Bluesbreakers member Jack Bruce.

Before Cream, Clapton was not well known in America, and had left his other group, The Yardbirds, before their track 'For Your Love' hit the US top 10.

Mayall also insisted he would never work with just any musician and is very selective when it comes to his collaborators.

The Bare Wires rocker said: You know you do something which is natural to you and natural to the musicians you are working with. I dont think theres been any point in my career where Ive ended up sticking with someone I wasnt really fully into ... Ive had total freedom really; I think one of the good things about being a bandleader is you get to choose who you want to work with.

Mayall - who was awarded an OBE in 2005 for being a pioneer of blues music also admitted music has always been a source of "improvisation and exploration" for him since he was a child.

He said: I dont think anybody really knows what draws them into any kind of music. I think it was a good thing for me to find something I was attracted to. Its not just blues. It's jazz. Its the whole thing. Its the improvisation and its the exploration through music and the feelings.

John Mayall: The First Generation' a 35 CD limited edition box set - is out now via Madfish Records through Snapper Music.

Go here to read the rest:

John Mayall: The blues have given me musical freedom - Olean Times Herald

Greta comes out in support of Disha, says freedom of speech and right to peaceful protest non-negotiable – The Tribune India

Tribune Web Desk

Chandigarh, February 19

Lending support to the call for setting free Disha Ravi, who was arrested by Delhi Police for allegedly editing the controversial farmer protest toolkit, climate activist Greta Thunberg on Friday said that freedom of speech and right to peaceful protest were non-negotiable human rights and these must be a fundamental part of any democracy.

The tweet comes six days after Disha was arrested by a Cyber Cell team of the Delhi Police from Bengaluru and over two weeks after Greta was booked on charges of criminal conspiracy and promoting enmity.

Greta in her tweet said: Freedom of speech and the right to peaceful protest and assembly are non-negotiable human rights. These must be a fundamental part of any democracy.

Disha, a 21-year-old climate activist, has been accused of editing the controversial farmer protest toolkit posted on Twitter by climate campaigner Greta and was sent to five days police custody by a Delhi court on Sunday.

Greta had shared the toolkit to lend her support to the farmers agitation against the three farm laws, but later deleted it.

In the document, various urgent actions, including creating a Twitter storm and protesting outside Indian embassies, were listed which were needed to be taken to support the farmers protest.

Greta had taken to the microblogging site to express her concerns over farmers agitation and shared a post stating solidarity with the farmers.

I still #StandWithFarmers and support their peaceful protest. No amount of hate, threats or violations of human rights will ever change that. #FarmersProtest, she had tweeted.

Taking cognisance of her tweets in support of farmers agitation, Delhi Police had registered a case against the Swedish teen climate campaigner under Sections 120B and 153-A of the Indian Penal Code (OPC) on charges of criminal conspiracy and promoting enmity on February 4.

View original post here:

Greta comes out in support of Disha, says freedom of speech and right to peaceful protest non-negotiable - The Tribune India

Mosaic Announces Long-Term Partnership with Freedom Forever – PRNewswire

OAKLAND, Calif., Feb. 18, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --Mosaic, the leading financing platform for U.S. residential solar and energy-efficient home improvement projects, today announced a unique, multiple-year partnership with one of the fastest-growing residential solar power providers in the country,Freedom Forever.

This partnership marries Mosaic's credit expertise and innovative technology with the most efficient solar sales and installation organization nationwide.As a result, Freedom Forever can now offer its customers the most attractive solar financing rates and boost the adoption of residential solar power.

"Lowering the cost of solar enables dealers to help more families make the switch to clean energy," said Billy Parish, founder, and CEO of Mosaic. "This partnership will accelerate Freedom Forever's already impressive growth by powering their robust sales organization with Mosaic's industry-leading financing platform. As we align and enhance our companies' technologies and operations, it will be faster and easier to offer more financing options to more people. It's a win-win."

Mosaic's financing solutions make it possible for homeowners to invest in sustainable energy home improvement projects, such as generating and storing solar energy. Empowering providers such as Freedom Forever to offer the best financing broadens the residential reach of clean energy.

"We have become one of the fastest-growing residential solar providers because we are always looking for new ways to say 'yes' to solve climate change," said Brett Bouchy, CEO of Freedom Forever. "What makes me so excited about this partnership with Mosaic is their innovative technology, years of proven financial performance, and high approval rates. The end result is a better sales process and industry-leading conversion rates for our authorized dealers. Mosaic, like Freedom Forever, is agile and responsive to the needs of their customers. Together, we will be able to offer solar to more people, in more states, beginning right now."

About Mosaic

Mosaic makes financing solar, solar-plus energy storage systems, and other home improvements accessible and affordable for homeowners by providing the simplest borrower experience in the industry. Customers are referred by approved solar installers and home improvement contractors and can qualify instantly for no money down loans with fixed interest rates and multiple term options. For our network of hundreds of solar installers and home improvement contractors, Mosaic provides a streamlined financing platform to drive sales growth. Since 2012, Mosaic has helped more than 125,000 households go solar with its financing products. For more information, visitwww.joinmosaic.com.

Financing applied for and processed through the Mosaic platform is originated by Solar Mosaic, Inc. or one of its lending/financing partners. All PowerSwitch ZERO and other Home Improvement Loans through the Mosaic platform are made by WebBank, Member FDIC, Equal Housing Lender.

About Freedom Forever:

Freedom Foreverand its family of companies focuses on residential solar installations that deliver best-in-class Engineering, Procurement, and Construction for its dealer network. Since 2011, Freedom Forever has enabled its dealer network to succeed with a premium offering and aggressive pricing flexibility. Freedom Forever's 25-year production guarantee provides the ultimate peace-of-mind for homeowners reluctant to make a big investment when purchasing their solar systems. With Freedom Forever, homeowners know what they're getting every time. For more information, please visithttps://freedomforever.com.

SOURCE Mosaic

Home

Original post:

Mosaic Announces Long-Term Partnership with Freedom Forever - PRNewswire

Creative freedom restricted by cloaking it in religion – The Hindu

Haasyam, Jayarajs penultimate work in the Navarasa series, part of IFFKs International Competition section

Award-winning filmmaker Jayaraj has been a genre hopper of sorts. From outright crowd-pleasers like Johnnie Walker and Thilakkam to the ambitious Navarasa series, the filmmaker has swung between extremes while being pilloried for his alleged affinity towards right wing politics. Attending the Kochi leg of the International Film Festival of Kerala (IFFK) where Haasyam, his penultimate work in the Navarasa series, was screened in the International Competition section, Jayaraj talks about his works and the present climate of fear hampering creative freedom.

Do you think filmmaking is being straitjacketed by the prevailing political climate?

There is a sense of fear that wasnt there in the past. One has to think before doing anything. The creative freedom is being restricted by cloaking it in religion, which is the biggest tragedy of the supposedly progressive times. I try to steer away from potentially controversial things, which in itself is a lack of creative freedom.

With the ambitious Navarasa series nearing completion with only one more film left to be made, is there a sense of emptiness? Which was the most challenging work?

That is something I ask myself. It is the same feeling as a sprinter who has breached the record and is left with nothing more to achieve. I will be content if I am able to finish that series. It has to be Karunam as it featured an aged couple in a restricted space. Apart from Karunam in the Navarasa series, Deshadanam was my other major experiment and and both were well received and successful financially as well.

I have been accused of different things at different times. I could be called the most rebellious Leftist for making a film like 4 the People while I am stamped a right winger to this day for making Paithrukam.

What are your plans for the next movie, Sringara, the last one in the Navarasa series?

I am still undecided as it has many shades. I even spoke with MT sir [M.T. Vasudevan Nair] on what constitutes the right interpretation of Sringara. I had a somewhat similar dilemma in the making of Haasyam (humour), which also has many shades before I decided on black humour.

I have just completed shooting the movie Niraye Thathakalulla Maram, which is an independent movie, and the edit is under way.

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day's newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper, crossword and print.

Dear subscriber,

Thank you!

Your support for our journalism is invaluable. Its a support for truth and fairness in journalism. It has helped us keep apace with events and happenings.

The Hindu has always stood for journalism that is in the public interest. At this difficult time, it becomes even more important that we have access to information that has a bearing on our health and well-being, our lives, and livelihoods. As a subscriber, you are not only a beneficiary of our work but also its enabler.

We also reiterate here the promise that our team of reporters, copy editors, fact-checkers, designers, and photographers will deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.

Suresh Nambath

Continue reading here:

Creative freedom restricted by cloaking it in religion - The Hindu

Statutes of Liberty: Freedom of Information Act Requests are Free for Immigrants and U.S. Citizens – ARLnow

This sponsored column is by James Montana, Esq. and Doran Shemin, Esq., practicing attorneys atSteelyard LLC, an immigration-focused law firm located in Arlington, Virginia. The legal information given here is general in nature. If you want legal advice,contact Jamesfor an appointment.

The best things in life are free. The best things in law are expensive, with one exception: Freedom of Information Act requests, which are free, free, free.

The Freedom of Information Act is, as readers surely know, a useful tool for journalists and ordinary citizens to obtain information about what our government does. But it is extremely useful and vastly underused in the immigration context. Submitting FOIA requests for immigration records is a simple process that helps immigrants and practitioners alike by giving us a look at someones entire immigration history.

FOIA requests are filed with USCISs National Records Center online or by mail on a simple form called the G-639. The form can be used to request specific documents, such as an old application or certificate of naturalization, or an individuals entire immigration file. There is no charge unless the government sends a bill; in our experience, the government never, ever does.

The results of FOIA requests have given us some of our most exciting cases. Weve found:

Any time you have questions about what happened in an immigration case or if youve lost your documents, file an FOIA!

FOIAs are also helpful for American citizens researching family history. You can submit a G-639 seeking the records of a deceased family member using an obituary or death certificate. For example, Doran wanted to learn more about her grandmother Lillians immigration history and submitted an FOIA request to USCIS with a copy of her grandmothers obituary.

In the FOIA results, Doran received a copy of Lillians Argentine birth certificate, a copy of Lillians visa application and Lillians application for U.S. citizenship. Doran also learned that her grandmother did not legally change her name from Luisa to Lillian until Lillian became a U.S. citizen in 1956. All of this information was sitting in a government office waiting to be discovered and would have otherwise been unknown.

Analyzing FOIA results are some of our favorite things to do at our office. Were happy to help our clients request their file and make recommendations about how to move their cases forward. We do an FOIA request at no extra charge whenever we think it is necessary as part of a consultation information wants to be free, and we want to help you liberate it.

Weve participated in the immigration FOIA review process at an even nerdier level helping sue USCIS to try to compel the production of allegedly exempt material but thats a story for another day. For now, our message is: File an FOIA request! Youll learn a lot, and your future lawyer will be deeply grateful.

As always, we welcome any thoughts or comments and will do our best to respond.

Read this article:

Statutes of Liberty: Freedom of Information Act Requests are Free for Immigrants and U.S. Citizens - ARLnow

Woman who fought for racial equity as a Freedom Rider reflects on the past, gives outlook on the future – WLWT Cincinnati

REMEMBERS THE HORRORS OF THE RACIAL STRIFE AND VIOLENCE IN THE DEEP SOUTH >> WE KNEW THAT EVERY TIME THAT WE TOOK A RIDE, THAT IF W DIED, WE DIED. ASHLEY WAS THERE A FEAR THAT YOU ARE NOT DOING THE RIGHT THINGS OR GOING TO THE RIGHT PLACES? THAT YOU WOULD BE STOPPED BY POLICE OR HARASSE >> IF THEY TELL YOU MOVE -- IF YOU GOT ON A METRO BUS AND A WHITE PERSON WANTED YOUR SEAT, THEY COULD INSIST THAT YOU MOVE AND GO TO THE BACK OF THE BUS. IF YOU DID NOT DO WHAT THEY SAID , HE WOULD BE ARRESTED, SO YOU ALWAYS HAD TO DO IT, OR YOU PAID THE CONSEQUENCES. ASHLEY AT 21 BETTY DANIELS ROSEMOND THEN BETTY DANIELS DECIDED TO LEAVE SCHOOL AT LSU TO JOIN THE FREEDOM RIDERS. >> I WENT THROUGH SOME OF THE TRAINING. ONE OF THE GIRLS SLAPPED ME AND ALMOST KNOCKED ME DOWN, BUT THAT WAS PART OF YOUR TRAINING, TO SEE IF YOU COULD -- IF YOU WOULD RETALIATE. YOU COUL NOT RETALIATE. ASHLEY BETTY AND 4 OTHERS WENT ON A FREEDOM RIDE FROM NEW ORLEANS TO MOBILE, ALABAMA JUST DAYS AFTER ANOTHER GROUPS BUS WAS BOMBED. ON THE WAY BACK, WHEN WE GOT TO A LITTLE TOWN IN MISSISSIPP NOW, FREEDOM RIDERS WERE TESTERS. THEIR JOB WAS TO TEST THE FACILITIES TO SEE IF THEY WERE FOLLOWING THE LAW. MY JOB WAS TO MAKE A PHONE CALL. WHEN I GOT TO THE PHONE BOOTH, A TRUCK OF MEN IN A PICKUP TRU WHITE MEN PULLED UP AT THE , LITTLE BUS STATION. THEY LITERALLY DRAGGED FRANK AND THRE GIRLS OUT, PUT THEM IN THE BACK OF A TRUCK AND DROVE OF NOW I KNEW IF THEY FOUND ME. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ANOTH LYNCHING THAT NIGHT. ASHLEY: ALL OF THIS BECAUSE YOU ARE BLACK? >> OF COURSE. EVERYTHING WAS BECAUSE OF THAT. YOU JUST DID NOT STAND A CHANCE. ASHLEY: AND HERE WE SIT TODAY IN 2021, WEVE HAD OUR FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT HAVE HAD OUR FIRST FEMALE AND BLACK AND SOUTH ASIAN VICE PRESIDENT. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT WHERE WE ARE TODAY? >> OH, I FEEL GOOD. I REALLY DO. GOOD TO KNOW THAT PEOPLE WERE STILL WILLING TO TRY TO SEE TH CHANGE WILL COME AND THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE WHO RISKED THEIR LIFE TO SEE THAT THIS HAPPEN ASHLEY DO YOU FEEL THAT WE HAVE ACHIEVED OR ARE CLOSE TO THE DREAM THAT D KING SPOKE OF? >> WE HAVE WORK TO DO. IT IS NOT OVER UNTIL GOD SAYS IT IS OVER. THE BIBLE SAYS W MUST LOVE EACH OTHER, LOVE OUR NEIGHBOR AS OURSELVES. WE ARE COMPELLED TO LOVE ONE ANOTHER. THAT IS WHAT IS MISSING IN THE WORLD TODAY. ASHLEY IT WAS MY COMPLETE HONOR TO SPEAK WITH HER. TODAY, THE 81-YEAR-OLD WHO JUST RECENTLY STOPPED WORKING LAST YEAR STILL SPEAKS TO AUDIENCES ABOUT THE WORK THEY DID AND THE HOPE OF A BETTER FUTUR SHE PLANS TO RELEASE A BOOK OF HER POETRY SOON. SHE SAYS WHAT DROVE HER THEN AND WHAT SHOULD DRIVE US ALL, IS TO BE THE CHANGE WE WANT TO SEE IN THE WORL TO SEE MORE OF OUR CONVERSATIONS IN OUR HISTORY AND HOPE SERIES GO TO THE PROJECT COMMUNITY SECTION OF WLW

Woman who fought for racial equity as a Freedom Rider reflects on the past, gives outlook on the future

Updated: 5:59 PM EST Feb 16, 2021

Betty Daniels Rosemond, 81, grew up with Jim Crow laws and segregation being the norm in New Orleans, Louisiana. She saw firsthand how racism held her family back when her mother tried to vote or buy a home and was ultimately denied.She decided she wanted to be a part of a movement that was changing the country, so she joined CORE, or the Congress of Racial Equality, to become a Freedom Rider."We knew every time we took a ride that if we died, we died," Rosemond said.Rosemond said there was a general fear growing up that she could be stopped by police or harassed at any moment for simply being out.You would be stopped, but you had to, if they tell you to move, for instance, if you got on a metro bus, and a white person wanted your seat, they could insist that you move and go to the back of the bus because that part was for Black people, she said. And if you didn't do what they said, you will be arrested. So there was always you had to do it, or you pay consequences."At 21, she decided to leave school at Louisiana State University to join the Freedom Riders."I went through some of the training and one of the girls slapped me and almost knocked me down, but that was part of your training to see if you retaliate, and you couldn't retaliate," Rosemond said.Betty and four others went on a Freedom Ride from New Orleans to Mobile, Alabama, just days after another group's bus was bombed.On the way back, when we got to a little town in Mississippi, now, Freedom Riders were testers. Their job was to test the facilities to see if they were following the law," said Rosemond.Her job was to make a phone call back to their headquarters in New Orleans."When I got to the phone booth, a truck of men in a pickup truck, white men, pulled up at the little bus station. They literally dragged Frank and three girls out, put them in the back of a truck and drove off. Now, I knew if they found me, it would have been another lynching that night," Rosemond said.We asked Rosemond how she feels now that the nation has seen its first Black president, and its first female, Black and Southeast Asian vice president. Oh, I feel good. I really do, she said. Its good to know that people were still willing to try to see that change will come and there are still people who risked their life to see that this happens."Rosemond said she believes we're close to the dream that Dr. King spoke of, but there's still work to do."You know, we have work to do it. It's not over until God says it's over. The Bible tells us this, that we must love each other, love our neighbor as ourselves, we are compelled to love one another. And that that's what's missing in the world today," Rosemond said.

Betty Daniels Rosemond, 81, grew up with Jim Crow laws and segregation being the norm in New Orleans, Louisiana.

She saw firsthand how racism held her family back when her mother tried to vote or buy a home and was ultimately denied.

She decided she wanted to be a part of a movement that was changing the country, so she joined CORE, or the Congress of Racial Equality, to become a Freedom Rider.

"We knew every time we took a ride that if we died, we died," Rosemond said.

Rosemond said there was a general fear growing up that she could be stopped by police or harassed at any moment for simply being out.

You would be stopped, but you had to, if they tell you to move, for instance, if you got on a metro bus, and a white person wanted your seat, they could insist that you move and go to the back of the bus because that part was for Black people, she said. And if you didn't do what they said, you will be arrested. So there was always you had to do it, or you pay consequences."

At 21, she decided to leave school at Louisiana State University to join the Freedom Riders.

"I went through some of the training and one of the girls slapped me and almost knocked me down, but that was part of your training to see if you retaliate, and you couldn't retaliate," Rosemond said.

Betty and four others went on a Freedom Ride from New Orleans to Mobile, Alabama, just days after another group's bus was bombed.

On the way back, when we got to a little town in Mississippi, now, Freedom Riders were testers. Their job was to test the facilities to see if they were following the law," said Rosemond.

Her job was to make a phone call back to their headquarters in New Orleans.

"When I got to the phone booth, a truck of men in a pickup truck, white men, pulled up at the little bus station. They literally dragged Frank and three girls out, put them in the back of a truck and drove off. Now, I knew if they found me, it would have been another lynching that night," Rosemond said.

We asked Rosemond how she feels now that the nation has seen its first Black president, and its first female, Black and Southeast Asian vice president.

Oh, I feel good. I really do, she said. Its good to know that people were still willing to try to see that change will come and there are still people who risked their life to see that this happens."

Rosemond said she believes we're close to the dream that Dr. King spoke of, but there's still work to do.

"You know, we have work to do it. It's not over until God says it's over. The Bible tells us this, that we must love each other, love our neighbor as ourselves, we are compelled to love one another. And that that's what's missing in the world today," Rosemond said.

Continue reading here:

Woman who fought for racial equity as a Freedom Rider reflects on the past, gives outlook on the future - WLWT Cincinnati

Rescue horses move to Freedom to teach, provide therapy for people in need of rescue – Boothbay Register

FREEDOM On one side of a window, an elderly person with dentures looks out at the same time as a mini horse with no top teeth peers in.

Belfast nursing home residents will soon have a day when horses clip clop through the parking lot. For residents game to get a little close to brush their hands against the fur a small paddock meet-and greet circle will be set up as well. The equines love attention, love to work, and love to bond.

Grateful Pony Art and Equestrian Center has settled into the town of Freedom, expanding its existing programs and pursuing potential futures as it sows a transplanted organization into the local roots.

Four rescue horses freely roam the new Smithtown Road property. They sidle up to the doors and windows of the main house, peer through the glass, and if given the opportunity, invite themselves in. Some of them love being in front of cameras, assisting in phone conversations, and posing for portraits.

This is the reality for Danielle Roberts, who, along with her husband and son, moved her certified equine therapy program from Connecticut to rural Maine in October 2020.

The platform for Roberts therapy is arts and crafts: on the road with mini horses, on site around the barn, or online during COVID. She and her team work with all groups: children, teens, families, spectrum, special needs, addiction, disabled Veterans, and (someday) caregivers, first responders, and residential facilities. Roberts personal passion is for older folks, Veterans, and homeless women, though shes watched children grow, and celebrates all breakthrough moments with her endless passion for equine therapy, the people it serves, and the community around her.

Whats more gratifying than helping someone I dont really know? said Roberts. Its just the best feeling to make someones day with a pony, and a piece of art they can keep forever... And making sure that with our traveling therapy program we can go back to the people that we have helped, and continue to be a part of their lives.

In her sessions, the vibes are with the horses. And the horses are well aware.

When Roberts conducted her first COVID-19-safe group teleconference session (for grieving children), she had no idea how shed incorporate a live horse into the activity. Her concerns quickly faded when one horse strutted up to the video camera and posed for self portraits, standing still for 45 minutes.

Onsite, the horses might linger over the picnic tables as clients work or dont work, if they choose. Some clients help in the stables, finding their personal purpose through gratifying responsibilities. Regardless of program, any stress for the clients tends to fade away as a long snout hovers over a shoulder.

Roberts has stories of non-verbals who suddenly speak, of people whose hidden talents only surface after being around Hersey, Hiro, Kit Kat, and Snickers, each of which has a story to tell.

In their own way, they nicker, they whinny, they show you their body language, and thats what I teach, to explain to people how theyre feeling.

Roberts once described to a blind client the appearance of a horse that happened to be afraid of a slinky brought by another client as a comfort item. Roberts asked the blind woman what she thought the pony needed. When the woman said the pony needed a hug, the pony leaned down and kissed her on the neck.

Another time, a different horse refused to participate in an activity. A non-verbal client in the group started making stressed grunting noises and pointed to her own abdomen as if in pain. The staff were left with confusion, but not the horse. The horse strolled over to the woman, nestled its head above her head, and fell asleep. The woman laughed, breaking the spell of her rising anxiety attack.

Horses are smart, said Roberts. They can connect with people. And because of their own backgrounds aging, being saved from slaughter, going through surgery, mourning friends, losing their teeth from a stress-triggered jaw joint problem called cribbing the clients can relate.

People really connect on this level that is so healing for the horses as well as the human, she said. The horses get so excited when they see groups come. Like youre here for me, I get to teach you.

Roberts said she cannot pick which horse will bond with which person. The horses pick the person, and then they fight over the attention.

Along with adopting rescue horses, and providing therapy, The Grateful Pony is open to helping other organizations create their own equine therapy programs. Its also interested in partnering with local businesses for fundraising efforts when Grateful Pony obtains its 501c6 nonprofit status within the next month

Its not about the money, according to Roberts.

Its the gift of the experience, she said.

For more information:www.brightstrides.org

Reach Sarah Thompson at news@penbaypilot.com

Follow this link:

Rescue horses move to Freedom to teach, provide therapy for people in need of rescue - Boothbay Register

Sudan: Forces of Freedom of Change refuses army appointments as governors – Middle East Monitor

A leader in the Forces of Freedom and Change coalition, one of the components of the ruling council in Sudan, said the movement has refused to see military leaders governing states which are facing security problems.

The military component of the Sovereignty Council suggested that some states which have been classified as having "fragile" security situations, such as Kassala, the Red Sea, West Kordofan and West and Central Darfur, be governed by military leaders.

The Sudan Tribune newspaper quoted the leader of the Freedom and Change Alliance, Ahmed Hazrat, as saying: "We do not believe that a military governor can control the situation more than a civilian."

He added, "In principle, there is no acceptance. There are also no justifications for the military to assume the rule of governors."

He indicated that the governors of the states are nominated by Freedom and Change and appointed by the prime minister.

Temporary governors were appointed to the states on 22 July 2020 by the prime minister.

READ: Ethiopia would welcome Turkish mediation in border conflict with Sudan

Visit link:

Sudan: Forces of Freedom of Change refuses army appointments as governors - Middle East Monitor

Freedom Foods sees another CFO depart troubled Australian dairy business – just-food.com

Freedom Foods' share remain suspended at its own request

Graham's departure marks another executive to leave the New South Wales business, which has been bogged down for almost a year investigating possible fraudulent activity in its accounts dating back to June, and more recently agreed a AUD200m (US$156.7m today) capital injection from its majority shareholder Arrovest, led by the Perich family, as part of a recapitalisation exercise.

Its share remain suspended on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) at Freedom Foods' request, and have not traded since last June. The company has repeatedly extended the suspension as it seeks to resolve the crisis at hand.

Freedom Foods producesconsumer-dairy products, dairy ingredientsand plant-based beverages. In December, the company announced the sale of its cereal and snacks division to local peerThe Arnott's Group, owned by US private-equity firm KKR, for AUD20m.

The financial saga at Freedom Foods resulted in the resignation of CEO Rory Macleod in June, the same month CFOCampbell Nicholas also quit the business, followed by vompany secretary Trevor Allen. Michael Perich is currently serving as interim chief executive.

Jose Lemoine, who stepped in as CFO when Nicholas departed, will now occupy the same executive position again with immediate effect.

"Ms. Lemoine has been working within the company's finance team since November 2020," Freedom Foods said in thefiling with the ASX. "The board of Freedom Foods Group thanks Ms. Graham for her service and commitment to the company and wishes her well in her future endeavours."

In January, Freedom Foods' chairman Perry Gunner noted in another ASX filing that the company was reviewing the potential disposal of its "Speciality Seafood" division, which would leave the business engaged in dairy and nutritionals and plant-based beverages.

Perich noted in the same document: "Wehave been reviewing every product line, every site, every sales channel and every market segment to ensure we are focused on those with the greatest potential. We are removing or repositioning products that are not delivering value and investing in the ones that are."

Those comments were issued on the back of Freedom Foods' financial results for the fiscal year to 30 June 2020, the most recent numbers. All of the company's 2019 accounts have been restated.

Revenue climbed 26% to AUD461.8m, but losses permeated the rest of the results. EBITDA was in the red to the tune of AUD96.7m, widening from the previous year's loss of AUD118.6m.

Net profit after tax was a loss of AUD174.5m, down from a corresponding loss of AUD145.8m. Net debt stood at AUD275.2m, up from AUD122m in the prior 12 months.

Read more:

Freedom Foods sees another CFO depart troubled Australian dairy business - just-food.com

Opinion | Give Fred Gray the Medal of Freedom, because no one deserves it more – alreporter.com

Last updated on February 18, 2021, at 05:49 pm

Alabama Congresswoman Terri Sewell has to be wrong. The letter she sent Wednesday to President Joe Biden asking that Tuskegee attorney Fred Gray Sr. receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom must have been sent in error.

Because surely theres no way that Fred Gray hasnt received the Medal of Freedom yet.

I know Sewell doesnt make many mistakes, but that simply cant be true. It cant be true that Gray is behind the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, Richard Petty and Bear Bryant. I mean, make whatever arguments youd like for those guys, but they aint no Fred Gray.

Doubt me?

Did any of those guys manage to get Martin Luther King Jr. acquitted of tax evasion by an all-white jury in Alabama in 1960 at the height of the Civil Rights Movement?

Because Fred Gray did that.

Did any of them represent Rosa Parks after her infamous arrest on a Montgomery bus, and also help plan and orchestrate the Montgomery Bus Boycott?

Because Fred Gray did that, too.

Did any of them file and argue the lawsuit that led to the desegregation of Alabamas colleges and universities?

Because, yep, Fred Gray did that, as well.

What about did any of them represent Vivian Malone and James Hood, ensuring they could get past George Wallace as he stood in the schoolhouse door?

Yeah, he did that, too.

What about winning the first-ever voting rights case for a group of Tuskegee teachers any of them do that?

Because Gray did.

Look, I could go on and on and on like this for quite some time because very few people have changed America more than Fred Gray. You could almost pick any civil rights case from 1955 to 1975, and youd very likely find Gray as the attorney of record.

He was Kings personal attorney for years, helping him successfully navigate a never-ending maze of legal issues. He was Parkss attorney. He repd Black teachers and Black students. He defended the NAACP.

It was Gray who filed and won the lawsuit that gave marchers the right to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma and march all the way to Montgomery a march that ended with the Voting Rights Act.

Heck, without Gray, there wouldnt have been a Bus Boycott. Not only did he help plan the whole thing and defend Parks, but he also defended Claudette Colvin in a prior case that led to law changes regarding racial segregation on the buses.

He successfully fought off the state of Alabama when it attempted to outright ban the NAACP from operating in the state.

And it was Gray who, in the 1970s, defended the participants of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, winning a $10 million verdict and getting a formal apology for those participants and their families from then-President Bill Clinton. (That verdict also dramatically altered the way government studies were performed and documented.)

Gray told me once during an interview that it was his goal coming out of law school to fight segregation everywhere I could.

I didnt want to just desegregate the buses in Montgomery, he said. I wanted to desegregate everything.

And, dammit, he pretty much has.

Which is why its patently absurd that Gray hasnt received every honor and medal that can be handed out for helping to make America a better, fairer country.

In her letter to Biden, Sewell says of Gray:

As a Black lawyer and as Alabamas first Black Congresswoman, I am a direct beneficiary of Grays lifelong work in the fight for justice, inclusion and equity for all. His litigation in groundbreaking cases like Browder v. Gayle can be seen as not only directly responsible for integrating institutions in Alabama, but all across America. An iconic figure and pioneer of the Civil Rights Movement, I can think of few people more deserving of the Presidential Medal of Freedom than Fred Gray.

Gray changed the world for Sewell and millions of other Black Americans, and he made America a much, much better place for all of us.

And like Sewell, I cant think of anyone more deserving of the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

View original post here:

Opinion | Give Fred Gray the Medal of Freedom, because no one deserves it more - alreporter.com

The scars of solitary: Albert Woodfox on freedom after 44 years in a concrete cell – The Guardian

Every morning for almost 44 years, Albert Woodfox would awake in his 6ft by 9ft concrete cell and brace himself for the day ahead. He was Americas longest-serving solitary confinement prisoner, and each day stretched before him identical to the one before.

Did he have the strength, he would ask himself, to endure the torture of his prolonged isolation? Or might this be the day when he would finally lose his mind and, like so many others on the tier, suddenly start screaming and never stop?

On Friday, Woodfox will wake up in a much better place. He will find himself in his three-bedroom home in New Orleans, the city of his birth. There will be colourful pictures on the wall, books to read, not an inch of brutal concrete in sight. It will be soothingly quiet no cries and howls bouncing off the walls, no metal doors clanging. Once up, he can step outside and look up at the open sky, a pleasure withheld from him for almost half a century.

It will be a good day. Today he will celebrate his 74th birthday. Today he will mark the fifth anniversary of his freedom.

On 19 February 2016, on his 69th birthday, Woodfox walked free from prison after more than 43 years inside. Almost all that time he spent in solitary confinement, on a life sentence for a murder which he did not commit.

His experiences as a former Black Panther in Angola, Louisianas notorious state penitentiary and the largest maximum-security prison in the US, tested his mental fortitude to the limit and beyond. It made him dig deep into reserves of compassion and resilience he never knew he had, and forced him to learn how to live in the absence of human touch.

Five years on from his release, he might chuckle a little to himself at the irony of today. This may be his birthday and the anniversary of his freedom, but he will spend the day in physical isolation along with most Americans who, courtesy of Covid, have spent the past year getting a tiny taste of what life in solitary really means.

Who would have thought that all those years in solitary would have prepared me for living through this pandemic? Woodfox said when we meet on Zoom. People always want to know what its like. I used to tell them, Why dont you spend 24 hours in your bathroom and find out for yourself. Well, thats no longer necessary this pandemic has forced everyone to isolate and they are freaking out!

One of Woodfoxs techniques for surviving years alone in a 6ft by 9ft cell was to compose a list of what he would do were he to be set free. Most of the lists items were strikingly mundane: he would have dinner with his family, drive a car, go to the store, have a holiday, eat some good old home-cooking.

Other desires were more substantive. He would get to know his daughter Brenda, whom hed had when he was 16 but hardly knew. He would go to the grave of his mama, Ruby Edwards Mable, who died while he was behind bars. And he would visit Yosemite national park in California, which he had fallen in love with watching National Geographic on his cell TV.

Over the past five years, he has ticked every single item on his list. A day after he walked free in 2016, he went to Rubys grave and told her: Im free now. I love you. He has forged a strong bond with his daughter and her children. His brother Michael, a master chef by trade, comes regularly to his house to cook him stuffed crab, hot sausage or his favourite, smothered potatoes. Hes even adopted a stray dog he came across out by Lake Pontchartrain. He named him Hobo.

Not all of it has been easy. In the early days of his release, Woodfox had to retrain his body to do things it hadnt done for decades, like walking up and down stairs or sitting without shackles and leg irons. There have been a lot of first-time experiences that were both exciting and scary: first flight on a plane, first visit to a university to speak about solitary confinement, and the one we all share first time on Zoom.

He was anxious for quite a while about how he would fare in the outside world. He had been separated so long from his family, and he was apprehensive too about his childhood neighborhood of Trem, which as a teenager he had plagued with acts of petty crime and fighting. I went into prison as a kid and emerged almost 70, this patriarchal figure. So how do you fit in? When I left society, my daughter was a baby; now shes a grown woman with three kids and four grandkids and great-grandkids beneath. And the community. When I left Trem I was a predator on my own people. How could I make amends?

To his relief, both sides have worked out fine. He is a present and much-loved grandfather and great-grandfather, pandemic notwithstanding. Through childhood friends, he attended meetings with community groups and apologized for what he had done back in the 1960s, asking for forgiveness. They gave me a second chance, and since that time Ive been working hard to earn the trust they put in me, he said.

Some of the hardest things have been the least expected. He has felt a disturbing disconnect between the world as he knew it from his prison cell all mediated for him through TV, books and magazines that he fought hard for years to be allowed access to and the actual physical world that now accosts him in all its raw, unfiltered splendour.

He did make that longed-for trip to Yosemite, and almost wished he hadnt.

It was far rougher than I thought it would be. We went to this waterfall way up the side of the mountain. It was quite a task getting there, going up, up and up. The waterfall was so high theres a massive spray where the water hits the rocks, and as I turned into it, it was like someone had thrown a bucket of ice-cold water on me. It was a wonderful experience, in hindsight, but in the moment, I was, What the hell am I doing here? In the cell it looked so magnificent, but when I got there I realized, you know, this is real.

Numerous scientific studies have found that when human beings are cooped up in isolation, the experience can cause psychological damage that can be irreversible or even fatal. It can induce panic, depression, hallucinations, self-harming and suicide and should not extend under international rules set by the UN beyond 15 days.

Woodfox endured not 15, but 15,000 days in solitary.

He was held on the tier known as closed cell restricted, or CCR, where prisoners were locked up alone for at least 23 hours a day. He went into CCR in April 1972, aged 25, and remained in it almost without pause until his release aged 69 in 2016.

Ostensibly, the punishment was meted out to Woodfox and his fellow member of a group of solitary prisoners who became known as the Angola 3, Herman Wallace, after they were accused and convicted of murdering a prison guard, Brent Miller. A mass of documentation gathered over years by his tireless defense lawyers points to them having been framed.

There was ample forensic evidence at the scene of the murder, including a bloody fingerprint, yet none of it implicated Woodfox and Wallace. Both men, who were serving separate sentences for robbery at the time, had alibis. It emerged after the trial that the main state witness against them, a fellow prisoner, had been paid for his testimony in cigarettes and promises of a reduced sentence.

Despite all that, and many other discrepancies, all-white juries took less than an hour to convict both men in separate trials.

There is also an abundance of evidence that supports the real reason why the pair later joined by the third member of the Angola 3, Robert King were held for so long in the harshest form of captivity. Three years before they were framed for Millers death, Woodfox and Wallace set up an Angola prison branch of the Black Panther party.

They saw it as a way to fight for racial justice in an environment in which none existed. Angola was built on the site of an old cotton plantation where slaves were bred and put to work in the fields. The location was named after the African country that supplied most of the slaves.

In 1971, when Woodfox formed the Panther chapter, the prison continued to operate a system of slave labour in all but name. Black prisoners, segregated from white inmates, were sent out into the baking sun to pick cotton for two cents an hour.

When Miller was stabbed to death and culprits needed to be rounded up swiftly, the Black Panther troublemakers were a convenient target. They were thrown into solitary where they remained, year after year, decade after decade, long after the Black Panther party itself had ceased to exist. Many years into their time in CCR, the warden of Angola admitted under oath in legal depositions that they were being held in CCR because of their Pantherism.

If the Angola authorities thought that they could break Woodfox on the rack of solitary confinement, they hadnt counted on his powers of resistance. And they hadnt factored in the principles and values instilled within him by the Black Panther movement, which he says literally saved his life.

The Panthers gave me a sense of self-worth, that I did have something to offer to humanity, he said. More than anything, it made me realise that the person I had become was not determined by me, but by the institutional racism of this country. My life had been set in survival mode.

Woodfox came to believe that he could change his own destiny by simple force of willpower. Everything solitary does to you, we managed to survive it. Not just to survive, but prosper as human beings. I wasnt sure whether I would ever be physically free, but I knew that I could become mentally and emotionally free.

In his 2019 book Solitary, a finalist for the Pulitzer prize, Woodfox describes how he managed to stay sane. He immersed himself in prison library books by Frantz Fanon, Malcolm X, Marcus Garvey. He studied law for his appeals. He organised maths tests and spelling bees, played chess and checkers, shouting quiz questions and board moves through the bars of his cell to fellow solitary prisoners down the tier.

His proudest achievement was teaching another inmate to read.

Our cells were meant to be death chambers but we turned them into schools, into debate halls, Woodfox told me. We used the time to develop the tools that we needed to survive, to be part of society and humanity rather than becoming bitter and angry and consumed by a thirst for revenge.

The evident pride in his voice about how he had refused to be broken prompted me to ask a perverse question. Did he miss anything about Angola?

He replied without hesitation. Yeah. I miss the time that I had. One day it dawned on me: I just dont have the time that I used to in prison. In solitary, I had 24/7 to do what I wanted. I had structure, a program. In society there are so many more distractions, so many more demands made on you. In Angola, in the cell, I didnt have a choice.

Albert Woodfox may have survived 43 years in solitary, but it came at a price. Over the past five years, he has observed in himself the long-term damage inflicted by conditions that the UN has denounced as psychological torture.

Sometimes I wake up and Im not aware where Im at. Im confused for seconds or minutes. Im used to waking up seeing concrete and bars, not pictures on the wall, and for a moment its like, Where the hell am I?

Claustrophobia was something he wrestled with throughout his four decades in solitary. At times, he would sleep sitting up to try to fend off the sensation of the cell walls bearing down on him.

He still has claustrophobic attacks every few months or so. Once he was in the bleachers at a sports stadium watching his great-niece and nephew compete when he started having telltale signs. We were sitting there and all of a sudden I felt I was being smothered, like the atmosphere closing in, pushing down on me. I went outside and just walked and walked. That was a surprise I didnt know you could be in a stadium with a couple of thousand people and it happen to you.

His awareness of the scars he still keeps him eager to fight for change, as he has throughout the past five years. He helped found a non-profit, Louisiana Stop Solitary, to press for reform in Angola and other state prisons. Its a long struggle. Last year Louisiana banned the use of solitary confinement for pregnant women, the first reform in the states use of the practice in more than a century. But the state continues to rank No 1 in the solitary league table, with rates that are four times the national average.

Woodfox has taken his message around the globe, traveling extensively across North America and Europe with King by his side (Herman Wallace died of cancer in 2013, two days after the authorities begrudgingly let him out). Woodfox uses the power of his story to press for an end to solitary confinement, which nationally still holds 80,000 US prisoners in its brutal grip.

Last October, he became a central character in 12 Questions, the album by Fraser T Smith in which the super-producer enlists artists and activists to help him explore critical issues of our time.

Smith asked Woodfox a simple question: Whats the cost of freedom? The resulting conversation, according to Smith, was life-changing.

Smith told the Guardian he came away from the encounter with the overwhelming sense that Albert did become free in that 6ft by 9ft cell. To hear someone who has actually lived it tell you that no matter horrendous your external situation, you can be free in your mind that was mind-blowing for me.

In his book, Woodfox writes that he had the wisdom to know that bitterness and anger are destructive. I was dedicated to building things, not tearing them down.

And now that hes out, what does he make of the political turmoil engulfing the US?

Im more optimistic than Ive ever been. Im 74, so Ive seen a lot of upheaval in this country, and the Capitol insurrection was a defining moment in American society. Its made people realise that democracy is fragile, it can be destroyed, that its only as strong as those who believe in it.

When Woodfox first emerged from captivity five years ago, he was amazed by the number of Confederate flags he saw stuck on windows or on car license plates. It took him about three weeks, he said, to appreciate that the apparent improvements in Americas approach to race since he had been in prison were purely cosmetic.

I came to see that America was still a very racist country. It had become coded I guess you could say racism had put on a suit and tie. But it was still there. Donald Trump was making it safe to be a racist.

So where does all that optimism come from? It comes in part, he explained, from the Black Panthers manifesto. The party may not exist any more, but Woodfox still holds tight to its values: We want an immediate end to police brutality, We want decent housing, fit for shelter of human beings, We want education that teaches our role in present-day society.

There is an unmistakable echo with Black Lives Matter, the second source of Woodfoxs optimism. The sacrifice of so many black men and women and young kids in this country has made Black Lives Matter a rallying cry throughout the world, he said.

In the end, Woodfoxs meditations on isolation, resilience and the cost of freedom always bring him back to something more personal. Or someone: his mother Ruby. She may not have been able to read or write, but over the years he has come to know her as his true hero.

The closest he ever came to cracking in solitary, to starting to scream and never stopping, was when the Angola prison authorities refused to let him attend her funeral in 1994. As he looks back today on his five years as a free man, and the 43 years in a concrete cell that preceded them, he finds himself thinking more and more about her.

You start remembering things, things she said, how she said them. My mom was functionally illiterate, but I never saw them break her, I never saw a look of defeat in her face no matter how hard things got. I grew into my mothers wisdom. I carry it within me.

Continue reading here:

The scars of solitary: Albert Woodfox on freedom after 44 years in a concrete cell - The Guardian

Biden Has No Time to Lose on Freedom of Navigation Operations Against China – Foreign Policy

Few foreign-policy challenges confronting the Biden administration are more daunting than China. With recent headlines drawn toward trade wars, repression in Hong Kong, COVID-19 conspiracy theories, the intimidation of Taiwan, concentration camps in Xinjiang, and the China-India border crisis, its easy to forget that the South China Sea, despite being quieter than it was in the mid-2010s, remains one of the most controversial and volatile disputes in U.S.-China relations. The two countries differences over freedom of navigation in the vital waterway constitute the only bilateral dispute that has repeatedly produced hostile or dangerous encounters between Chinese and U.S. military platforms in close proximity with escalation risks.

Over the past decade, a series of provocative Chinese claims and actions in the South China Sea have opened a gaping geopolitical fault line with the United States, including its unlawful nine-dash line claim, its occupation of the disputed Scarborough Shoal, its creation and militarization of seven artificial islands in the Spratlys, and its use of a vast maritime militia to bully and coerce its neighbors. But it is Beijings attempts to restrict freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, particularly for U.S. warships, that has generated the most concern in Washington and provoked the most robust policy response.

The U.S. Freedom of Navigation operations (FONOP) program, which sees U.S. naval vessels challenge unlawful and sweeping maritime claims that are inconsistent with customary international law, was bought from obscurity into international headlines in the mid-2010s when China began construction of its artificial islands in the South China Sea.

After a hiatus of several years, the Obama administration began conducting FONOPs near Chinese outposts in 2015. The number of annual FONOPs in the South China Sea swelled under the Trump administration, prompting mounting anger from Chinese officials who deemed U.S. operations as blatant navigation hegemony and a military provocation.

The Biden administration is expected to continue regular FONOPs in the South China Sea, but the pace of operations and the Chinese claims challenged are up for debate. As U.S. President Joe Biden deliberates his South China Sea strategy, the administration should recall and avoid some of the stumbles that characterized the Obama administrations early FONOP policies. Operations should be regular and routine, ideally at a pace of at least two per quarter, in addition to being depoliticized and not sensationalized. Finally, FONOPs cannot be viewed as a bartering tool to solicit Chinese cooperation in other areas: Freedom of navigation must remain nonnegotiable.

Since 1979, the U.S. Defense and State Departments have jointly run the FONOPs program, which challenges maritime claims the United States finds inconsistent with international law. China is far from the only country targeted by the program. In 2019, the U.S. government used FONOPs to challenge unlawful claims of 22 countries. However, since the construction of Chinas artificial islands in the mid-2010s, U.S. FONOPs in the South China Sea have attracted greater international attention and greater Chinese ire.

Based on publicly available information, the United States conducted one FONOP directed at excessive Chinese maritime claims in 2015, three in 2016, four in 2017, six in 2018, eight in 2019, and nine in 2020, although the number of actual FONOPs may be higher than those publicly reported. In 2019, U.S. FONOPs challenged a variety of unlawful Chinese claims in the East and South China Seas, including Chinas demand that foreign warships obtain prior permission from Beijing for innocent passage through Chinas territorial sea.

Chinas Ministry of Foreign Affairs claimed U.S. FONOPs have gone beyond the scope of freedom of navigation. It is a political provocation, and the purpose is to test Chinas response. U.S. freedom of navigation is actually deprivation of others freedom, according to China Military, a publication run by the Chinese military, and an excuse for its gunboats to run wild in other countrys territorial waters.

In public, Chinese officials often claim Beijing would never seek to restrict freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.

In public, Chinese officials often claim Beijing would never seek to restrict freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. When has freedom of navigation in the South China Sea ever been affected? asked Adm. Sun Jianguo at a 2016 closed forum. It has not, whether in the past or now, and in the future, there wont be a problem as long as nobody plays tricks.

However, Chinese scholars and officials, including Sun, have repeatedly revealed that when they speak of freedom of navigation, they refer only to commercial vessels, not military vessels. China doesnt believe the United States military surveillance and reconnaissance in Chinas exclusive economic zone is freedom of navigation, said an opinion reporter for China Daily. No freedom of navigation for warships and airplanes, added Chinese Ambassador to the Philippines Zhao Jianhua.

This is not merely a rhetorical dispute. Since the turn of the century, Chinese ships and aircraft have repeatedly harassed or intimidated U.S. military vessels operating lawfully in Chinas 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and 12-nautical-mile territorial sea. International law grants China exclusive economic rights in its EEZ but not the right to regulate most foreign military activities. And although China can demand prior authorization for foreign military operations in its 12-nautical-mile territorial sea, it must respect the right of innocent passage for foreign warships there.

Disputes over freedom of navigation are not new to U.S.-China relations. Beijing has long objected to U.S. close in surveillance activities near Chinese territory despite U.S. operations adhering to international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). (China, which helped draft UNCLOS, ratified the convention in 1994. The U.S. Senate has not ratified UNCLOS, but U.S. policy recognizes and aligns with UNCLOS provisions on maritime entitlements and freedom of navigation.)This rift was exacerbated by Chinas construction of artificial islands in the South China Sea.

In late 2013, China began dredging what would eventually be thousands of acres of sand on seven disputed rocks and low-tide elevations in the Spratly Islands, transforming the features into seven large, militarized artificial islands. However, it wasnt until early 2015 that they were drawn into the international spotlight when the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative published high resolution satellite images of the growing Chinese outposts.

National security experts quickly began calling for the Obama administration to conduct FONOPs within 12 nautical miles of the artificial islands, correctly predicting China would seek jurisdiction around the outposts inconsistent with international law, including attempting to restrict U.S. freedom of navigation.

Yet, Washington deliberated for months. In June 2015,Daniel Russel, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs, sent a peculiar and confusing signal by saying, As important as [the] South China Sea is its not fundamentally an issue between the U.S. and China.

The long deliberation prompted an escalating game of diplomatic chicken with Beijing. China will never tolerate any military provocation or infringement on sovereignty from the United States or any other country, just as the United States refused to 53 years ago [during the Cuban Missile Crisis], according to the China Daily in 2015. This is our backyard; we can decide what vegetables or flowers we want to grow, said Senior Col. Li Jie of the Peoples Liberation Army Navys Military Academy.

In September 2015, for the first time, Chinese naval vessels entered U.S. territorial waters following a naval exercise with Russia, passing through Alaskas Aleutian Islands precisely as the state was hosting a rare visit by President Barack Obama. The following month, a senior Chinese military officialtold Newsweek,There are 209 land features still unoccupied in the South China Sea, and we could seize them all.

Eventually, the Obama administration called Chinas bluff. In late October 2015, the USS Lassen conducted a FONOP near Subi Reef, one of Chinas artificial islands in the Spratlys. However, even that delayed operation drew criticism. With several Chinese artificial islands and several forms of FONOPs to choose from, the administration opted for exercising innocent passage within 12 nautical miles of Subi Reef, the weakest type of FONOP the U.S. could have chosen, according to international law expert Julian Ku. And to make matters worse, limiting the FONOP to innocent passage could actually strengthen Chinas sketchy territorial claims in the region. Even sympathetic experts found the FONOP to be poorly managed with a lack of clarity and potentially a huge blunder.

In the years to follow, FONOPs in the South China Sea became more robust and routine, but the hesitation and seeming politicization of the first operation risked feeding the impression that freedom of navigation was negotiable. Ely Ratner, former deputy national security advisor to then-Vice President Joe Biden, has argued the United States was insufficiently resolute in its response to early Chinese provocations in the South China Sea, resulting in incremental gains for China as a result.

The Biden administration needs to avoid these early missteps and instead, conduct a rigorous and clear program. Beginning in 2021, the Biden administration should pursue a regular schedule of FONOPs in the South China Sea at least twice per quarter, the pace established in 2019 and exceeded in 2020. On Feb. 5, the USS John McCain reportedly conducted the first South China Sea FONOP of the Biden administration, accompanied by an unusually detailed readout of the operation.

Should Chinese attempts to restrict U.S. freedom of navigation escalate, the administration should be prepared to increase the tempo and consider new flavors of FONOPs. Naval War College professor James Kraska recommends bolstering FONOPs by using not just single ships and airplanes but squadrons, such as surface action groups and aircraft carrier and expeditionary strike groups.

FONOPs should continue to include military maneuvers within 12 nautical miles of low-tide elevations (LTEs) subsequently transformed into artificial islands by Chinese land reclamation. International law is clear: LTEs cannot be reclassified as natural islands entitled to a territorial sea and EEZ. Any Chinese attempts to claim an undefined military alert zone around the outposts or restrict navigation is unlawful.

FONOPs should also be depoliticized and not sensationalized. The Obama administration was criticized for seeming to delay or downgrade FONOPs to avoid offending Beijing at a time the administration was seeking Chinas cooperation on issues like climate change and North Koreas nuclear program. Beijing will undoubtedly try to tempt the Biden administration into similarly unbalanced compromises as recent, testy exchanges over climate change showed.

At the same time, FONOPs should not be high-publicity affairs. In some ways, international fanfare can undermine the intended objective. Regular, routine operations and transits of the South China Sea are arguably just as effective at signaling U.S. nonrecognition of Chinas unlawful claims. Experts Isaac Kardon and Peter Dutton believed consistent practice of free navigation, not the reactive FONOP, is the policy best suited to respond to Chinese assertiveness in the [South China Sea]. This is especially true in areas such as the Spratly Islands where China has made no actual legal claims to challenge.

Although U.S. allies have thus far shown little interest in conducting joint FONOPs in the South China Sea, Gregory Poling, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, argues the U.S. government should seek to persuade like-minded partners to conduct their own FONOPs independently. The vast majority of the worlds capitals find Chinas claims in the South China Sea ludicrous. It would be harder for China to sell the false narrative that the South China Sea is a bilateral dispute with the United States if other countries were more robust in their exercise of freedom of navigation in the South China Sea like Australia is.

FONOPs are no panacea for the South China Sea, but they are a uniquely effective tool for advancing the United States most vital interest there. In October 2019, Kurt Campbell, the Biden administrations new Indo-Pacific tzar, affirmed in no uncertain terms, I think the most important dimension of the South China Sea [dispute] is freedom of navigation. Defending the United States varied interests and addressing Chinas multilayered challenges in the South China Sea will require a much broader U.S. strategy. But FONOPs are a key pillar ofnot a distraction fromthat strategy.

Read the rest here:

Biden Has No Time to Lose on Freedom of Navigation Operations Against China - Foreign Policy