Very rarely are you standing two feet away from a person and staring at them for an hour like that, unless youre getting in conflict or about to mate, he says. When you have faces staring at you like this, the arousal response kicks in, that fight-or-flight mode. If youre in fight-or-flight mode all day, its taxing to do these meetings.

Microsoft hopes Together Mode will make videoconferencing feel less taxing. In Zooms gallery mode, for example, it can be hard to figure out who is speaking and who wants to speak. Together Mode solves this, in theory, by putting a participant in the same seat on everyones screen. That means if a person pipes up in the upper right hand corner of the virtual room, everyones gaze moves at about the same time to focus on that person; if someone interrupts from the middle, heads and eyes shift in that direction. In internal tests, Microsoft claims, users felt less fatigued and more focused in Together Mode.

But whether Together Mode encourages quieter or often ignored members of a team to speak up is yet to be seen. Despite the promise of a more democratic virtual platform, women have had a more difficult time making their voices heard. Teams, Meet, and Zoom have all incorporated a hand-raising function to help, and guides for supporting female colleagues in this setting have become increasingly common.

I think Together Mode gives people the tools to do better, but it doesnt guarantee people will be better, says Jaron Lanier, a research scientist at Microsoft whos considered a world expert in mixed reality.

Another nagging issue is, well, your face. In a demo, I found myself trying to adjust my seating so that I would not appear too big or too small, something Lanier claims is helpful in democratizing participation. But it meant I often lost track of the discussion as I self-consciously corrected my posture. And perhaps self-consciousness is the root of the problem to begin with.

The ideal technology would let you disappear so you would stop being aware of yourself, says Amber Davisson, an associate professor of communication at Keene State College. Davisson, who researches the intersection of intimacy, communication, and technology, says the way videoconferencing tries to emulate meetings contrasts with how humans normallyinteract.

When Im sitting in my class and teaching, Im not looking at myself, she says. [Videoconferencing] is anxiety-causing and we can never relax; were way too aware of ourselves. The best technology would eliminate your face so you can look at everyone and they can look at you, and you dont see yourself.

One thing Davisson says is working in Together Modes favor is the non-personal background and predictable seating layout. Personalized Zoom backgrounds can be fun, but Davisson says having an agreed-upon, bland background like the ones offered by Together Mode eliminates the brains confusion of personal and professional.

That conceptof delineating work and home as the two spaces coalesceis ultimately the challenge of videoconferencing during a pandemic. We need a safe place to fall apart, and we used to think that was home, she says. But we do work and school in our homes now. Our only private space has been invaded, and its a lot for our brains to compute.

See original here:

Microsofts solution to Zoom fatigue is to trick your brain - MIT Technology Review