Salman Rushdie’s New Novel is About Political Correctness and the … – Heat Street

Salman Rushdie, the writer marked for death by the Ayatollah of Iran for writing The Satanic Verses, is working on a new novel set in contemporary America.

His new book, The Golden House, is a thriller set against the backdrop of modern-day American culture. It covers the eight-year Obama presidency and incorporates the cultural zeitgeist. It includes the rise of the conservative Tea Party movement, 2014s GamerGate hashtag campaign, social media, identity politics, and the ongoing culture war against political correctness.

In other words, its the modern world through the lens of Salman Rushdie, an author who received numerous death threats and even attempts on his life after he penned a novel critical of Islam.

Many stores refused to carry the book following its publication in 1988, and those that did were targeted by terrorists with firebombs and explosives.

The Iranian government put out a hit on Rushdie, which lasted until 1998, calling on jihadists and their allies to take the authors life.

In more recent years, Rushdie has called for the defense of freedom of speech. As the target of assassination attempts over his ideas and writing, the Booker Prize-winning author is uniquely intimate with the subject.

During the election last year, Rushdie spoke out against the furor over the pro-Trump chalk slogans in Emory University in what became known as #TheChalkening. Campuses that saw the rising incidences of chalk messages banned the calcium carbonate writing tool.

Rushdie called the dust-up silly and said there was no reason for art to be politically correct.

When people say, I believe in free speech but , then they dont believe in free speech, he said. The whole point about free speech is that it upsets people.

Its very easy to defend the right of people whom you agree with or that you are indifferent to, Rushdie said. The defense [of free speech] begins when someone says something that you dont like.

There are no safe spaces against offensive ideas, said Rushdie.

Rushdie has come to lose his confidence in the progressive leftincluding those who once defended his controversial book. Speaking in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo massacre, Rushdie expressed dismay at the leftist protests that followed the PEN writers association to honor the fallen artists and writers.

Speaking to French magazine LExpress, Rushdie said that people learned the wrong lessons from the threats he faced in the 80s and 90s.

Instead of realizing that we need to oppose these attacks on freedom of expression, we thought that we need to placate them with compromise and renunciation.

Ive since had the feeling that, if the attacks against The Satanic Verses had taken place today, these people would not have defended me, and would have used the same arguments against me, accusing me of insulting an ethnic and cultural minority, said Rushdie. We are living in the darkest time I have ever known.

In Rushdies new book, the main villain is described as a ruthlessly ambitious, narcissistic, media-savvy villain sporting makeup and colored hair. Make what you will of that.

The books publishing director at Jonathan Cape, Michal Shavit, describes The Golden House as being about identity, truth, terror, and lies for a new world order of alternate truths. Its out this September.

Ian Miles Cheong is a journalist and outspoken mediacritic. You can reach him through social media at@stillgray on Twitterand onFacebook.

Read more from the original source:

Salman Rushdie's New Novel is About Political Correctness and the ... - Heat Street

Steve Bannon’s Unproduced Movie About Cloning, Nazis, and Walt … – Gizmodo

Steve Bannon, a man who once favorably compared himself to Darth Vader, Dick Cheney, and Satan, speaks with Kellyanne Conway on January 31, 2017 (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Steve Bannon, the white nationalist currently helping President Trump dismantle the United States, has produced a number of low budget conservative films. But the movies that Bannon couldnt get made over the years are even more interesting than the ones that were releasedlike an unmade documentary-style film from 2005 about the dangers of futuristic technology.

The Daily Beast obtained a copy of the proposal for the movie, which was being shopped around Hollywood in the mid-2000s. The working titles were The Singularity: Resistance Is Futile and The Harvest of the Damned. The unproduced film focused on a number of scifi elements, including human cloning, immortality, and eugenics. But based on the proposal, this wasnt just about the dangers of technology gone mad.

The entire film was to have a very ham-fisted political bent, drawing lines between the eugenics programs of the Nazis to the abortion and contraception advocates that were to come. Bannon is staunchly anti-abortion. The proposal even includes a frozen Walt Disney, presumably related to the urban legend that Disney was cryogenically frozen.

The acceleration of technological progress is the central feature of the 20th /21st century, one part of the proposal explains, according to the Daily Beast. We are on the edge of change brought about by Mans ability to create Man, the toolmaker, is on the verge of creating greater-than-human intelligence.

The film appears to have nods to various Illuminati conspiracies about an anti-religious elite that would take over the world and survive a post-humanity landscape. Much of this fear would likely be informed by his staunchly Catholic beliefs. Or at least a conspiratorial version of them.

China, a country that President Trump continues to needle over trade relations and military security, also seems to play a large part in instigating whatever the last futuristic element of the documentary was supposed to entail.

Bannon allegedly secured funding from conservative filmmaker Mel Gibson at one point. But when the Daily Beast asked about that, Gibsons publicist called it fake news.

This is far from the first unmade movie by Bannon (hes listed as a writer, director and producer) thats been making the rounds recently. The Washington Post recently found a 2007 proposal for a futuristic film titled The Islamic States of America. The proposal blamed the media and the Jewish community for allowing radical Islam to overtake the United States due to a culture of tolerance.

One scholar told the Washington Post that Bannons proposal for The Islamic States of America was designed to generate hate against not just Islamists, not just extremists, but Muslims writ large.

Bannon has previously cited Leni Riefenstahl as an influence on his filmmaking career, much to the concern of people knowledgable about the history of Nazi propaganda. Riefenstahls most famous film is 1935's Triumph of the Will, a Nazi propaganda movie that remains one of the most infamous examples to date of mass media that glorifies murderous dictators.

People have said Im like Leni Riefenstahl, Bannon told the Wall Street Journal in 2011 during the debut of his documentary The Undefeated, which celebrates Sarah Palin.

Ive studied documentarians extensively to come up with my own in-house style, Bannon continued. Im a student of Michael Moores films, of Eisenstein, Riefenstahl. Leave the politics aside, you have to learn from those past masters on how they were trying to communicate their ideas.

You can read more about the proposal for The Singularity: Resistance Is Futile at The Daily Beast. Say what you will about the proposal, at least it looks like the Nazis were supposed to be the bad guys in this one.

[The Daily Beast]

Read the original post:

Steve Bannon's Unproduced Movie About Cloning, Nazis, and Walt ... - Gizmodo

Police investigating recent reports of credit card cloning in Aiken … – Aiken Standard

People with credit and debit cards are urged to keep a watchful eye on their account activity as a recent wave of card fraud has left law enforcement investigating multiple reports in Aiken County.

Capt. Eric Abdullah, with the Aiken County Sheriffs Office, said reports of credit card cloning, or skimming, is a common problem. Over the past week, he said there have been several reports of card cloning in the area, some from the same exact location.

John Brooks, of North Augusta, said his debit card was cloned and used on Feb. 3 at the Wal-Mart on Wrightsboro Road in Augusta.

I woke up on (Feb. 4), checked my account and it was $205 short, Brooks said. I looked at my transactions and saw my card had been swiped at Wal-Mart the night before.

Brooks said he went to get a transaction statement from Wal-Mart, where he learned someone had used his information to put money on a gift card.

The Aiken County Sheriffs Office has reports filed on Feb. 2 and Feb. 3, in which three separate residents claimed to have had their card information stolen and used at the same Wal-Mart in Augusta.

I think this problem is getting worse, and it seems like theres not much being done to stop it, Brooks said.

Credit card cloning is a technique where someone obtains credit card information and copies it onto a fake card in order to illegally use it, according to the FBI.

A small, pocketsize device with a scanning slot is typically what is used to steal the information, the FBI's website states.

Brooks said police informed him that when a suspect clones information from someones card they usually use the card within a day or two. He said he believes his information was taken at a fast-food restaurant drive-thru in Aiken County.

I wont be purchasing anything at a drive-thru anymore, he said.

Abdullah said the Aiken County Sheriffs Office will continue to address the situation, but residents can still protect themselves by not providing any credit card or financial information to any person or company they are not familiar with.

He also suggested residents continually keep up with their accounts to make sure nothing is happening that isnt supposed to.

Credit card cloning has become one of the most popular form of credit card fraud over the past few years, growing 87 percent since 2010 and recently resulting in $6 billion in losses nationwide, according to Integrated Family Community Services.

Tripp Girardeau is the crime and courts reporter with the Aiken Standard. Follow him on Twitter at @trippgirardeau.

Read more from the original source:

Police investigating recent reports of credit card cloning in Aiken ... - Aiken Standard

Scientists solve fish evolution mystery – Phys.Org

February 10, 2017 Different species of fish, called cichlids, swim in East Africa's Lake Victoria. More than 700 cichlid species have evolved in the Lake Victoria region over the past 150,000 years. Credit: Florian Moser

A University of Wyoming researcher is part of an international team that has discovered how more than 700 species of fish have evolved in East Africa's Lake Victoria region over the past 150,000 years.

Catherine Wagner, a UW assistant professor in the Department of Botany and the UW Biodiversity Institute, describes the phenomenonunparalleled in the animal and plant worldas "one of the most spectacular examples of the evolution of modern biodiversity."

She and fellow researchers from Switzerland's University of Bern and the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology have demonstrated for the first time that the rapid evolution of Lake Victoria cichlidsbrightly colored, perch-like fishwas facilitated by earlier hybridization between two distantly related cichlid species from the Upper Nile and Congo drainage systems.

The research is published today (Friday) in the journal Nature Communications. The first author on the paper, Joana Meier, is a Ph.D. student Wagner co-supervised at the University of Bern. Wagner, along with Meier's other supervisorsLaurent Excoffier and Ole Seehausenare senior authors of the paper.

Wagner says the rapid evolution of the East African cichlids had puzzled researchers, who didn't understand how a single common ancestor could divide into 700 species so quickly. The discovery that the ancestor of these fish species was actually a mixture of two different ancestors from different parts of Africa makes it "much easier to understand how the immense variety of fishes in this region have evolved," she says.

"An analogy is: If you combined the pieces from two very different Lego setssay, a tractor and an airplaneyou could get a much wider variety of possible structures," Wagner says.

The species that evolved exhibit many combinations of colors and are adapted to different habitats, such as sandy bottoms, rocky shores or open watersranging from the clear shallows to the permanent darkness of the turbid depths, according to a media release from the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology. Depending on the species, cichlids may scrape algae from rocks, feed on plankton, crack open snail shells, forage for insect larvae or prey on other fish, including their eggs or scales.

The hybridization event probably took place around 150,000 years ago, whenduring a wet perioda Congolese lineage colonized the Lake Victoria region and encountered representatives of the Upper Nile lineage. Across the large lakes of this region, the hybrid population then diversified in a process known as adaptive radiation, or evolution of multiple new species adapted to different ecological niches.

While the precise course of events in ancestral Lake Victoria has yet to be reconstructed, it is clear that, after a dry period, it filled up again about 15,000 years ago. Descendants of the genetically diverse hybrid population colonized the lake and, within the evolutionarily short period of several thousand years, diverged to form at least 500 new cichlid species, with a wide variety of ecological specializations. The particular genetic diversity and adaptive capacity of Lake Victoria's cichlids is demonstrated by the fact that more than 40 other fish specieswhich colonized the lake at the same timehave barely changed since then.

The study involved sequencing over 3 million sites in the genome of 100 cichlid speciesa task which, until recently, would not have been feasible.

Wagner's study of evolutionary adaptive radiation earned her the 2015 Theodosius Dobzhansky Prize as an outstanding young evolutionary biologist from the Society for the Study of Evolution.

Wagner has published a range of papers in top-tier journals, including Nature, Nature Reviews Genetics, Evolution and Molecular Ecology. At UW, she and her lab focus on using genetic and ecological data to study the evolution of biodiversity, primarily in freshwater fish. Her research uses population genetic, genomic, phylogenetic and comparative methods to study diversification, from speciation processes to macro-evolutionary patterns of biodiversity.

Wagner received her Ph.D. from Cornell University in 2011, and she was a postdoctoral research associate at the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology before starting as an assistant professor at UW in 2015. She received her bachelor's degree in biology and geology from Whitman College.

Explore further: Study shows evolution does not always mean more diversification

More information: Joana I. Meier et al, Ancient hybridization fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations, Nature Communications (2017). DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14363

When most cells divide, they simply make more of themselves. But stem cells, which are responsible for repairing or making new tissue, have a choice: They can generate more stem cells or differentiate into skin cells, liver ...

A University of Wyoming researcher is part of an international team that has discovered how more than 700 species of fish have evolved in East Africa's Lake Victoria region over the past 150,000 years.

Previous studies of flocks, swarms, and schools suggest that animal societies may verge on a "critical" pointin other words, they are extremely sensitive and can be easily tipped into a new social regime. But exactly how ...

A team at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute has discovered how a promising malarial vaccine target - the protein RH5 - helps parasites to invade human red blood cells. Published today in Nature Communications, the study ...

Antibiotic resistance is a major and growing problem worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, antibiotic resistance is rising to dangerously high levels in all parts of the world, and new resistance mechanisms ...

The number of monarch butterflies wintering in Mexico dropped by 27 percent this year, reversing last year's recovery from historically low numbers, according to a study by government and independent experts released Thursday.

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Firstly one should throw out the equivocation - speciation being mangled with the implied darwinian evolution. The cichlids are still exactly that. They haven't changed into sharks or squid or anything else.

Secondly, this phenomenon is rapid speciation, exactly as the creationists have long been telling people, given the limited supply of genome from Noah's ark. Now people discover this fact and lo and behold they want to create another senseless oxymoron - "Rapid Evolution", implying that the supposed darwinian stuff has happened.

So the bottom line is that the creationists have just been proven right once again and the evolutionists are grabbing the result which negates their religion and turning it into a support for the mythical darwinian nonsense.

I saw the 1 comment in the last commented list and just knew Fred was spouting his nonsense on this one...

No doubt others have observed that if you accept the reality of the effect of genetics (which you appear to do) and the logical outcome of that - you just stated a senseless oxymoron yourself?

Get help. Quickly.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read the rest here:

Scientists solve fish evolution mystery - Phys.Org

Samsung’s Chromebook Pro highlights the category’s continued evolution – TechCrunch


TechCrunch
Samsung's Chromebook Pro highlights the category's continued evolution
TechCrunch
Chromebooks hit a key milestone last May, outselling Macs in the US for the first time ever, by IDC's account. It was a pretty big win for a category oft maligned at launch for its relative lack of functionality. And while the devices are, perhaps, not ...

and more »

Link:

Samsung's Chromebook Pro highlights the category's continued evolution - TechCrunch

Horse evolution bucks evolutionary theory – Science News

A cautionary tale in evolutionary theory is coming straight from the horses mouth. When ancient horses diversified into new species, those bursts of evolution werent accompanied by drastic changes to horse teeth, as scientists have long thought.

A new evolutionary tree of horses reveals three periods when several new species emerged, scientists report in the Feb. 10 Science. The researchers found that changes in teeth morphology and body size didnt change very much during these periods of rapid speciation.

This knocks traditional notions that rapid diversification of new species comes with morphological diversification as well, says paleontologist Bruce MacFadden of the University of Florida in Gainesville. This is a very sophisticated and important paper.

The emergence of several new species in a relatively short time is often accompanied by the evolution of special new traits. Classic notions of evolution say that these traits such as longer teeth with extensive enamel are adaptive, enabling an animal to succeed in a particular environment. In horses, the evolution of such teeth might permit a shift from browsing on leafy, shrubby trees to grazing on grasses in open spaces with windblown dust and grit.

You cant live on a grassland as a grazer and have short teeth, says MacFadden, an expert in horse evolution. Youll wear your teeth down and thats not a recipe for success as a species.

Similarly, a big change in body size can indicate a move to a new environment. Animals that live in forests tend to be smaller and more solitary than the larger herd animals that live in open grasslands.

Paleontologist Juan Cantalapiedra and colleagues compiled decades of previous work to create an evolutionary tree of 138 horse species (seven of which exist today), spanning roughly 18 million years. The tree reveals three major branchings of new species: a North American burst between 15 million and 18 million years ago, and two bursts coinciding with dispersals into Eurasia about 11 million and 4.5 million years ago.

The researchers expected to see evidence of an adaptive radiation, major changes in teeth and body size that allowed the new horse species to succeed. But rates of body size evolution didnt differ much in sections of the family tree with low and high speciation rates. And rates of change in tooth characteristics were actually lower in sections of the tree with fast speciation rates, the team reports.

Its very tempting to see some change in body size, for example, and say, Oh, thats adaptive radiation, says Cantalapiedra, of the Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science at the Museum fr Naturkunde in Berlin. But thats not what we see.

Cantalapiedra and his collaborators speculate that during the periods of rapid speciation, the environment was so expansive and productive that there just wasnt a lot of competition to drive the evolution of adaptive traits. Perhaps, for example, North American grasslands were so rich and dense that there was enough energy for various species to evolve without having to develop traits that gave them an edge.

That scenario might be special to horses, says MacFadden, but it might not. Similarly, classic adaptive radiation scenarios might be true in many cases, but as this work shows, not always.

Continued here:

Horse evolution bucks evolutionary theory - Science News

VOTD: Watch the Evolution of Keanu Reeves’ Acting Career – /FILM


/FILM
VOTD: Watch the Evolution of Keanu Reeves' Acting Career
/FILM
Keanu Reeves has had a broad range of praise and criticism in his career. He's been downright awful, surprisingly good, gleefully stupid endlessly charming, creepy as hell and a total badass throughout several roles in his career. While Keanu Reeves ...
Check Out the Evolution of Keanu Reeves in MoviesTVOvermind

all 21 news articles »

See more here:

VOTD: Watch the Evolution of Keanu Reeves' Acting Career - /FILM

Pokmon Go Eevee evolution: How to evolve Eevee into Vaporeon, Jolteon and Flareon with new names – Eurogamer.net

A hidden reference to the TV show allows you choose the way Eevee evolves.

By Matthew Reynolds Published 10/02/2017

How to evolve Eevee has proven to be one of the bigger talking points in Pokmon Go so far.

In the classic Pokmon games, Eevee can evolve into different elemental varieties based on the use of special items, its happiness level, moves it has available and even the time of day.

With the addition of Candy in Pokmon Go, the way you evolve Pokmon is much simpler, and as such, you cannot use the tried-and-tested method of using one of three elemental stones to turn Eevee into Flareon, Jolteon and Vaporeon. (Some are better than others depending on the situation - find out which you should get first with our Best Pokmon in Pokmon Go page, and our Pokmon Go Type Chart for their relative strengths and weaknesses.)

Once you have caught enough Eevees to evolve one - our pages on finding Pokemon by location, finding which Pokemon hatch from which eggs and locating Pokmon nests near you can help - a neat trick discovered by fans of the game on Reddit will get you the evolution you need.

If you choose to evolve Eevee without any meddling - by feeding it 25 Eevee candy - then it'll turn to one of the above three types at random. However, users have discovered a trick that allows you to target Flareon, Jolteon or Vaporeon, by renaming it in one of the following ways:

Why Sparky, Rainer and Pyro? These are the names of the Eevee brothers from the Pokmon television show, who meet with Ash and the gang in episode 40 to show off their respective Eevee evolutions:

Once you have called your Eevee into one of the above names, you should quit and reload the app to double check the name change has taken place, which is important considering the servers can lean to be on the unreliable side.

Once you've double checked the new name is indeed in place, then evolve the Eevee as you would any other Pokmon by feeding it Candy, and it should take the form of your chosen type.

You can see the trick in action below - and once you're done, you might be interested in reading about other secrets and Easter eggs in Pokemon Go too:

Note that while plenty of users have had success with this method - and that it's been confirmed by developer Niantic itself at this year's San Diego Comic Con - there are a handful of cases where it hasn't worked every time. Some say the trick will only work on the first time you evolve the creature, while others might have caught fowl of server issues not renaming their successfully first time, so be sure to check before you try.

Want more help with Pokmon Go? Read our Pokmon Go tips, tricks, cheats and guides for insights on how to improve your skills, including triggering the Eevee evolution with names for Vaporeon, Jolteon and Flareon, distances for both hatching Eggs at 2km, 5km and 10km and for the Buddy system, where to find Pokmon Go nests in London and beyond, as well as recent updates including new baby Pokmon, finding Ditto and the the seasonal Valentine's Day event update.

If you want to get your hands on one of Eevee's many other evolution in Pokmon Go, you can't just yet.

Unfortunately you can't get all of these evolutions in Pokmon Go right now.

Pokmon Go only features Pokdex entries from the Kanto region - in other words, the original 151 creatures from Red, Blue and Yellow - which means Eevee can only evolve into Flareon, Jolteon and Vaporeon for now.

It'll be interesting to see how game expands to cover more creatures in time, and if so, if there are any tricks required to access these other elemental types.

Original post:

Pokmon Go Eevee evolution: How to evolve Eevee into Vaporeon, Jolteon and Flareon with new names - Eurogamer.net

Banned TED Talk: Rupert Sheldrake The Science Delusion – Collective Evolution

We're creating a positive news network. We need your help.

Rupert Sheldrake is a fascinating member of the scientific world. His TED talk below,calledThe Science Delusion,was controversially censored by the TED community after being aired.

If you have studied any area of science on your own or in school, you may have noticedthere are many differing beliefs in the scientific world. For nearly every theory or fact, there appears to be an opposing one, or many. While this statement seems impossible given that science is supposed to be based on evidencethatproduces provable theories, it is adelusion not to realize that much of what is strictly believed in the scientific world is only believed because it has already been accepted by the mainstream and therefore no longer questionedmuch like what takes place within religion. This is not to say that there arent amazing scientists out there coming up with profound findings and adding powerful contributions to all fields. I simply wish to highlight the factthat, inthe mainstream world,science is stuck, or, perhaps more accurately, we have put a freeze on certain areas of science.

How can science be stuck? You are missing the point of science! Science is not a thing, its a method!

While I totally agree that science is a method, what I am suggestingin this article is that many of the theories we have come tobelievethat science as a pillared institution has produced have been scientifically proven to be incorrect, yet we continue to go along with them. This happens because, in many cases, we are no longer using the scientific method as it is meant to be used. Rather than progressing to the stage in the method where we are supposed to go back and a redevelop a hypothesis after evidence proves the the initial theory wrong, we instead get stuck in maintaining our initial belief because otherfactors likemoney, fear, ego, and pride get in the way.

I have been researching many areas of science, world events, health, etc. over the past sixyears. I did not learn what I know in school, as I left before completing any degrees, and I wholeheartedly believe that my lack of formal education has been a gift in many ways. Very often we can get stuck on the idea that what we have learned in school is absolute Truth. Its prestigious, so it cant be wrong, right? Heck, we paid thousands of dollars for it so it MUST be true. Yet the more I look at the uneducated peoplewho are making scientific discoveries in the world, the more I see educated people becoming livid at their presumption, as if their findings simply couldnt be truebecause they didnt jump through the same hoops.I have heard the statement Its pseudo-science just about anytime a belief is challenged. A new finding requires many peer reviews for it to be taken seriously, but preexisting mainstream beliefs require none and can be written on a cereal box yet still taken for absolute fact. We have a major challenge on our hands in that we truly struggle tokeep our emotions out of how we view and perceive our world. This is not our nature, but simply our egos taking hold of the situation.

Rupert Sheldrake outlines 10 dogmas he has found to exist within mainstream science today. He states that when you look at each of these scientifically, you see that they are not actually true.

1. Nature is mechanical or machine like

2. All matter is unconscious

3. The laws or constants of nature are fixed

4. The total amount of matter and energy is always the same

5. Nature is purposeless

6. Biological heredity is material

7. Memories are stored inside your brain

8. Your mind is inside your head

9. Psychicphenomenalike telepathy is not possible

10. Mechanistic medicine is the only kind that works

One of the biggest problems cancer patients face is that their doctors aren't telling them everything they need to know and patients don't know the right questions to ask.

Our friend (and 13-year cancer survivor) Chris Wark just finished creating a free guide for cancer patients and their loved ones called 20 Questions For Your Oncologist.

See the original post:

Banned TED Talk: Rupert Sheldrake The Science Delusion - Collective Evolution

From Tara Palmer-Tomkinson to Cara Delevingne: the evolution of the It girl – The Guardian

She was famous for being the first person to be famous for being famous Tara Palmer-Tomkinson at her birthday party in 1998. Photograph: Brendan Beirne/REX/Shutterstock

Just over 20 years ago, the society magazine Tatler put Tara Palmer-Tomkinson on its cover, along with fellow socialite Normandie Keith, and proclaimed them the It girls. What does it say about us that we care so much about them? asked the coverline. Their rise, and the rise of Palmer-Tomkinson in particular, always seemed to be about something bigger than the enduring fascination with beautiful young women in paparazzi-friendly dresses. They came at the end of the grunge years, and their privileged lifestyles reflected the start of Londons economic boom, but at the same time their rise seemed to mark the end of the old order.

It was the beginning of the end of the Sloanes, as international bankers and Russian oligarchs started buying up swaths of west London and pricing out the younger generation of English old-money families. It was probably the beginning of the end of going out. Palmer-Tomkinson was famous for her party-going, an idea that seems almost as old-fashioned as if shed been a 20s flapper; now people stay in with Netflix. More than half the UKs nightclubs have closed since 2005, and people have swapped alcohol and cigarettes for Fitbits.

And it came at the tail end of deference to the upper classes. Newspapers were impressed by the raft of society girls connections to the royals, but nobody I knew was. Palmer-Tomkinson was compelling because she seemed like enormous fun, but if you grew up in the 90s, you never thought she or the others (Tamara Beckwith, Keith and later Lady Victoria Hervey) were cool. Even while they were having their moment, the society It girls already seemed old-fashioned. They were naughtier than many of the debutantes of earlier decades, but definitely of the same type. They went out with ridiculous posh men and rarely seemed to leave west London, unless it was for a skiing holiday or a cruise on someones yacht. (Compare that with current aristo It girl Cara Delevingne, whose quirky edge and global Instagram reach means her poshness isnt quite so defining.)

But Palmer-Tomkinson was also the beginning of a huge cultural shift that not many of us could have imagined at the time. She wasnt the first society It girl the 30s and 50s especially had witnessed the rise and fall of extravagant, glittering socialites. But she was, says Wendy Holden, the journalist and novelist who ghostwrote her column in the Sunday Times, famous for being the first person to be famous for being famous. In the 90s, that was considered an insult.

Being called talentless, that is the worst, Palmer-Tomkinson said in a 2012 interview. I can recite every line of Shakespeare. Ive got a really good brain. Of course, I havent earned [fame] and I didnt feel I was worth it, and going to all those endless parties, it made me feel worth a pile of shit. Had Palmer-Tomkinson emerged now, she would never have had to justify herself. Instead, she paved the way for reality TV, Paris Hilton, any number of YouTube and Instagram stars and, of course, the reigning champions of self-promotion, the Kardashians. Criticising them is pointless. These are all cultural fixtures now.

Ellis Cashmore, visiting professor of sociology at Aston University and author of Celebrity Culture, recently discussed Kim Kardashian with a group of sixth-formers. I said: Is she talented? And there was no criticism at all that she was just famous for being famous. They listed what they believed were her talents, such as what she does to attract publicity and the art of the selfie. She cant sing or dance or act, which we, over the 20th century, have decided to call talents, he says. But now we are in a transitional phase where people do different things, which are not talents that are immediately recognisable to older generations.

Palmer-Tomkinson, he says, prefigured this. The development has been so accelerated over the past 15 years. Now, he says, we dont even query why theyre there in the first place. We dont even think about the fact they are present on Instagram or Twitter, which makes them occupy space in our lives. And it has been professionalised social media accounts are carefully crafted, agents and publicists work to extend the longevity of even the most fleeting reality TV stars. There is a clear end goal: to monetise their fame.

Palmer-Tomkinson, by contrast, never seemed calculating. She seemed big-hearted and genuine, fragile and someone who had stumbled into fame and its trappings because it seemed fun, not because of how much money she could make from it. She had this amazing life anyway, she had all these friends, she was having lots of fun, says Holden. Also the persona we created for her was not entirely serious, otherwise no reader was going to sympathise with her. It had to be funny. We made her almost into a comic figure, but I think she could see the point of that, and had lots of funny things to contribute to it.

It does feel like a different time now, where to be a celebrity is to be a brand. This also means, especially for young women in the public eye, fame is largely on their terms with an Instagram account, they dont, like Palmer-Tomkinson did, have to rely on being interesting to newspaper and gossip magazine editors (and she was never more interesting to the tabloids than when she was self-destructing). Many of the people who become famous now are those who engineer it, via TV or social media, and carefully craft it. The element of randomness, the sudden elevation of a funny, spirited posh girl who never particularly asked for it, says Cashmore, has largely disappeared.

While theres no doubt she enjoyed it, Tara definitely took being famous less seriously than people do now, says Holden. I cant imagine her operating 10 social media accounts at once, for instance. I dont think she could have been bothered, and who could blame her?

Excerpt from:

From Tara Palmer-Tomkinson to Cara Delevingne: the evolution of the It girl - The Guardian

Criticism of Darwinism – MOLWICK

The Darwinian theory considers as a driving force in evolution the adaptation to the environment derived from the combined effect of the natural selection and of the random mutations.

There is a brief description of the Theory of Darwin in chapter 9.

Despite the generally acceptation of Darwinism, since its start, it has posed quite a few problems from the scientific point of view and there have always been a criticism of Darwinism.

Before getting into enumeration of the main points of criticism of Darwinism, I would like to analyze why it beat onto the Theory of Lamarck or other evolutionary theories. At the end of this section, after the cited enumeration, I will discuss the current difficulties for its rejection or substitution.

In the second half of the 19th century, the humanist rationalism had extended into all of the scientific circles and found itself in full peak. There were already sufficient indications that the Earth was much older than what had been thought; a scientific theory was needed that would position the human being in the planets history.

Of course, the new theory had to comply with a seemingly scientific condition, and had to completely and radically remove itself from the religious ideas that had hindered the scientific development so much. The old problems of Galileo and Miguel Servet had not been forgotten by the scientific community. Lets hope they never forget!

The Theory of Lamarck seems very logical and reasonable, but it suffered a problem: it was given a leading role in the life outside of the human dimension. There was something inside the plants and animals that, faced with environmental modifications, evolved consciously and guidingly.

On one side, the powerful influence of the religious ideas, still existing today, could not allow losing monopoly of spirituality; and, on the other, the scientific community was not going to openly struggle with the religious powers that be in order to shift conscious and intelligent life on an internal scale to the live organisms different from themselves. Moreover, there wasnt any scientific proof of their existence. In this case, we could talk about thesis, antithesis and synthesis; any theory that resolves the contradictions of the era with a minimum of rigor in its approaches would undoubtedly triumph.

In this context, emerged the Darwinian Theory clearly showing the effects of the evolution of the species and, from the scientific point of view, there was no reasonable doubt that man descended from the ape, and, that we know of, no one has questioned it outside of the strictly religious realm such as the Creationist Theory or Creationism. In fact, even the predominantly religious confessions do not directly attack the Darwinian Theory or pose a strong criticism of Darwinism.

Another interesting aspect is that the title of Darwins work comes about referring to the "evolution of species" and not to the "life evolution" for which it avoids having to define life; this should not be anything easy because it is not well-known whether the existence of life has scientific or rather a philosophical nature.

We are not trying to deny or diminish the great contribution of Darwins theory to modern thought in anthropology, but rather to make a positive criticism of Darwinism delimiting the extension of the theory and to avoid erroneous or defective implications having negative effects in the development of society. It is worth pointing out that any theory of evolution has countless consequences on philosophical and social thinking that pervade any number of individual attitudes and acts; for example, different approaches to certain problems of social justice or to the efficiency of a certain educational system.

The weak points allowing the criticism of Darwinism are numerous and interrelated; nonetheless, we are going to try to indicate them in order of importance from a methodological perspective even if it means repeatedly mentioning some topic by presenting problems of a different nature:

The Darwinian Theory of natural selection tries to explain the disappearance of non-optimal genetic modifications by lesser, or lack of, adaptation of individuals to the environment, but it does not say anything about the origin of modifications or about the processes in which they are carried out.

This is the first argument of criticism of Darwinism because it is implicitly denying or limiting the slightest expression of the very concept of evolution, given that the new beings have the same genetic information as their ancestors with supposed mutations that can have a positive as well as negative effect. (Let us think about the idea of all humans been born with the same potential of intelligence)

The process of evolution is not in the changes in the genetic information but rather the disappearance of the less favorable changes. In Darwins time, there was no genetic knowledge, but they knew that something goes from some generations to others.

Likewise, it is indirectly assumed that where there is no natural selection there is no evolution.

The second issue of criticism of Darwinism is that the main argument of natural selection, or putting it another way: "that which exists is because it has survived and hasnt disappeared" is a tautology for which there is no humanly way to deny it. The only possible criticism is to point out the total lack of scientific severity in it.

The Spanish mountain cats, direct descendants of the wild cats of 20,000 years ago, see better during the day than the domestic cats...

...but its true importance lies in that it proposes a new mechanism of rapid adaptation of the species in very few years (between 15,000 and 20,000) in evolutionary terms.

...The adaptation of animals to their environment takes place by means of the death of certain cells, in this case: neurons, during the second half of fetal development...

El Pas 15-01-1993. Journal of Neuroscience

The model, designed the way it is, only works in long-term in our physical scale. Later, it eliminates short-term evolution and thats the way ideas emerge, reaching completely into present day, like the Homo sapiens in their beginning moments who practically had the same intellectual capacity as nowadays. With that, all that is achieved is unnaturally intensifying the problems of evolutionary leaps.

Implicitly, the Darwinian Theory accepts the randomness of genetic modifications, hence the generally used name of "random mutations", denying the existence of a real driving force of evolution without any scientific proof on this matter, when logic appears to indicate the contrary. The lack of evidence it clear a subject of the criticism of Darwinism.

...complete sequencing of the small human Y chromosome...

...The surprise has been that a fourth are long palindromes: genetic sequences that are read equally from left to right as right to left and consist of two arms.

The investigators think that the palindromes, which contain all of the genes from the testicles, allow the interchange of information within the same chromosome and that thus the mutations are repaired or transmitted.

El Pas 21-06-2003.

Obviously, Darwin did not scientifically show the randomness in all of the cases of the variation in genetic information, nor was it shown later; it is become an axiom.

As far as I know, modern Neo-Darwinism still have not told us which statistical distribution the random mutations follow; it could be the uniform or normal distribution, that of Poison or that of Fisher. Without a doubt, it is a great secret of science or a metaphysical mystery.

Under certain assumptions, the method of evolution by means of random mutations or modifications can be acceptable. We know that some bacteria produce different bacteria in an extremely small proportion. If there were a change in the environmental conditions, such as the acidity of the environment in which they live, those bacteria would be the ones that would survive. After numerous generations, these bacteria would be the ones that make up the new population. At the same time, would produce an extremely small population of bacteria like the initial one that, where appropriate, they would again allow the survival of the species.

This is the common example that used to "prove" Darwins theory of evolution, but it is a very special case, in which generations change at an extremely fast rate with enormous quantities of descendants.

This example of Neo-Darwinism is not completely free of criticism, since the attempted random mutations or modifications are not random modifications of so many elemental letters or units of DNA. But rather that they could easily be understood as pre-established modifications and generated in one or various parts of DNA that make up an efficient set in regard to the different characteristics of the new being and preserving the structural code in its totality. That is, the fact of definitely using the mechanism of natural selection doesnt itself imply that other mechanisms arent used to create diversity in the descendants.

The mysterious origin of the resistance of bacteria.

It is not known yet from where the genes that bacteria borrow to make themselves resistant to antibiotics, for example, really come from. The results of the search for these genes on different grounds have shown to be negative, as explained by professor Jorge Laborda.

El Pas 24-11-2010

Moreover, natural selection does not manage to eliminate the supposedly less adapted variant, given that this evolutionary line is maintained as the same example shows.

However, the most serious issue of the criticism of Darwinism here is the fact that after accepting as proven that the mutations are random, it is also accepted that the contrary is proven. That the mutations are random but by perfectly delimited groups and with specific points of entrance which would be completely incompatible with the first randomness so "proven" according to the scientific method.

In its day, there were criticisms of Darwinism about the lack of the scientific method of this theory; specifically, it is a theory supported by the inductive reasoning from the observation of certain facts and making inferences about generality.

The inductive reasoning is perfectly valid but the generalization that it makes should comply with certain requirements. One of requirements is that whatever example not satisfying the theory implies its refutation. In this respect, we can cite the following cases:

The genetic changes that are obtaining the new techniques do not have a random but guided nature; moreover, the mechanism of the natural selection is not bringing about the appearance of the new beings like in the agriculture field. It could be argued whether these changes made by humans are natural or not, but we have to keep in mind that we humans, except for contrary evidence, make up a part of nature just like the viruses do.

Likewise, we are aware that the viruses make changes in the DNA of the invaded cells, in order to reproduce themselves. It would not be surprising if they could perform another type of changes; for example, with the intention of cheating the immune system in the future, that not even one of these modifications would be transmitted or that one of the reactions would not be transmitted in the genetic sphere as a defense against these aggressions.

Recently, new knowledge of genetic evolution has been emerging that openly contradicts the Darwinian Theory of evolution. They are so numerous that they cannot be mentioned, but some of them are distributed throughout this book in the form of literal quotes from biology news that have been appearing subsequent to the initial formulation of the General Theory of the Conditional Evolution of Life (GTCEL) and, in the majority of the cases, of the very redaction of the book.

More than 200 of the identified human genes seem to be the result of the direct or horizontal transference of the genes of bacteria (without passing through another organism in the evolution)

El Pas 19-02-2001. Conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science

Darwinism has, on one hand, significant shortcomings when it comes to explaining reality. Darwin tried, unsuccessfully, to give sexual differentiation a broader sense than that of pure specialization of certain tasks because he sensed that it was necessary to do so; but his theory did not offer any explanation, except that of having to be one of the best methods of evolution, and for that reason it exists.

Of course, it does not explain why in superior animals the descendants of very genetically close individuals, such as in the case of siblings, is not feasible or presents serious defects.

I have the impression sexual selection, about which Darwin wrote a book, goes conceptual and directly against natural selection. The first one explains the evolutionary tendency while the second one only explains the deletion of some branches of the real evolutionary process.

Any farmer knows perfectly the preeminence of sexual selection versus natural selection. It makes sense that Darwin needed to go to Galapagos Islands to convince about the non-relevance of sexual selection; obviously, no farmer could correct him because they were not in Galapagos Islands.

The irony of the evolution of the life does that to the sexual selection, of stallion or seed, the present engineers, farmers and cattle dealers denominate natural selection. Without a doubt, it must be another conquest or adaptation of the Darwinist Theory.

Another important shortcoming is the almost impossibility of producing the commonly called evolutionary leaps; it is difficult to logically argue a change in the basic structure of the genetic code through mutations. The only option is to resort once again to the long-term evolution with the added advantage that, when we talk about the long-term evolution, we automatically lose the temporal notion. However, the very concept of the evolutionary leap impedes us from using the long-term in evolutionary terms.

Other aspects related to the sexual differentiation and the evolutionary leaps discussed in the section about the objectives of evolution, and that make up part of the main argument of the Conditional Evolution, are completely absent from the approaches of the Darwinian Theory. It makes sense due to the temporal difference of both; but as I will cite much later, the criticism is that neither the Neo-Darwinian Theory nor the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis says anything on this matter. Quite the contrary, they dont exist. The life in the scientific realm has no objective and doesnt make any sense at all!

...that fusion of two bacteria occurred first, and later the mitochondria were added...

... the transition of prokaryotes to eukaryotes' is the greater evolutionary discontinuity in the Earths history. The differences are enormous, and the transition is very sudden.

El Pas 14-03-2001

In view of the previous premises of the criticism of Darwinism, there should be strong reasons for Darwinian Theory of evolution to have lasted throughout the entire 20th century with small conceptual modifications contributed by the trend called Neo-Darwinian and by the Modern Synthetic Theory. In fact, these modifications suppose a mere update of the Darwinian Theory of evolution according to the new scientific discoveries in the subject matter, as we will see when talking about them. For this reason, the theory is still Darwinism for the population in general.

Some of these strong reasons are similar to those that made its acceptance possible. Before I have discussed the formal requirements of a scientific theorys independence from any philosophical or religious approach; nowadays this requirement is still maintained but with an additional problem. To refute the Darwinian Theory now would assume, to a certain extent, that not just rationalism of the 18th and 19th centuries but the whole scientific community of the 20th century have made a serious mistake in embracing an evolutionary theory so weak. Once more, the philosophers are partly right and the scientific method, to which it would have to be added, is not foolproof, especially if it is not correctly applied.

The basic novelty of the General Theory of Conditional Evolution of Life is the consideration of evolution as an internal improvement mechanism of living beings; which transmits to the descendants and that, given the complexity of the involved aspects, uses multiple systems, methods or processes, depending for each case according to its specific conditions.

For a large part of society, the acceptance of the Conditional Evolution, or of any other evolutionary theory assuming the existence of the mentioned internal improvement mechanism of the living beings, would mean a step back. Scientifically recognizing that there seems to be an intelligent evolution guided from the very interior of living beings sounds like a religious idea about life. It distorts the distinction of the human being and attacks the delightful egocentrism of the human species; in other words, it is completely unacceptable on principle.

Another large part of society maintains its religious ideas, and as a result, the comments in the previous paragraph are equally applicable; so in the same words, it is completely unacceptable on principle.

Putting it another way, the Theory of Darwin is a very convenient theory, socially speaking, having a strong idealist component given that denying short-term evolution does not compromise the implanting of certain traits in the genetic sphere related to the desirable equality of opportunities.

In this sense, efforts have been made to keep the essence of the evolutionary theory. However, the mentioned weakness in the previous points 1) and 5) are practically maintained, in spite of the fact that, with the introduction of genetics and the knowledge derived from other advances in science, we can talk about short-term evolution but always on a microscopic scale. These updates have been carried out principally first, by the trend called Neo-Darwinism and, afterwards, by the Modern Synthetic Theory; although the latter tries to distance itself a little more, in my opinion, it does not manage to do it.

The updates have been possible to a great extent due to that we still do not have conclusive proof of the non-random nature of the modification of the genetic information, despite that there well-known are special points of DNA change. In addition, one of the main issues of criticism of Darwinism, that the term "natural selection" has, at times, an almost absurd generalization because of its tautological content.

Everything unknown has come to be considered random a priori, even against logic. This tendency also diminishes or limits itself in the view of the explanations, based on the theory of chaos and the fractal structures, of facts that previously seemed totally random (incidentally, it is the contrary to the famous example of the butterfly)

Despite of the greater comprehension of the sexual differentiation concerning its difference with the germ line evolution and about the sexual equality in society from the scientific point of view; the lack of satisfactory explanations of previous points 7) and 8) allows the criticism of the essence of the Darwinian Theory by methodological means in the fields of biology and genetics. In any case, any rational explanation of the facts to which the mentioned points are referring to will difficult to be compatible with the theory of natural selection.

There have always been authors that do not share the predominant vision, although they have not managed to formulate an alternative evolutionary theory capable of shifting it. And on the other hand, the expression of this attitude conveys of some way, although increasingly less, a professional marginalization and the risk of being described as being close to certain ideologies that have nothing to do with a scientific attitude or the contrary; without a doubt, this is due to the apparent philosophical and social repercussions that can implicate several theories. I say apparent because reality is not going to change by explaining it better one way or another.

The General Theory of Conditional Evolution of Life will suffer this risk largely, by citing the inheritance of intelligence as a recurrent example. I want to take advantage of the occasion to state in defense of this example, which has been, if not the principal, the direct cause of the development of the new evolutionary theory and, therefore, not having been chosen to intentionally attract attention. Furthermore, it is difficult to obtain models of evolution that can be statistically confirmable.

The list of authors would be too long but we can make a special note of Adam Sedgwick (1785-1873), a distinguished English geologist for being one of the first which, regardless of his attack on Darwinian Theory for religious reasons (he was educated in the Creationist Theory which was dominant in his time), after reading his theory, expressed the following:

"You have deserted - after a start in that tram-road of all solid physical truth-the true method of induction..."

It basically says that Darwin, after a beginning in the path of pure physical reality, abandons the true inductive reasoning...

Adam Adam Sedgwick, despite his creationist education, was not opposed to evolution or development in its broad sense. He believed that the Earth was extremely old, as Darwin recognizes in his notes from classes that Adam Sedgwick received at the university.

However, Adam Sedgwick believed in the Divine creation of life during long periods of time Given that, he also said that evolution was a fact of history. His personal objections to the theory of Darwin were the immoral and materialistic nature of natural selection and the abandonment of the scientific method.

In conclusion, the Conditional Evolution understands that natural selection is just one more method of evolution, but it is neither unique, nor general, nor the most important. In addition, from a conceptual point of view, this method is produced in a moment subsequent to the changes in the genetic information that makes up the actual evolution.

On the page on Studies on evolution of intelligence, the EDI Study is explained and its incredible results that confirm the Conditional Evolution are discussed. Besides, the Darwinout experiment is suggested to verify the aforementioned extremes of the new scientific theory, with a much simpler methodology than the one used in the research of the EDI Study, both in its execution and comprehension.

Originally posted here:

Criticism of Darwinism - MOLWICK

The Lord’s Day, Meet Darwin Day and Shudder | The American … – American Spectator

February 12 is Darwin Day, and this year the international celebration falls on a Sunday. Look for theistic Darwinists to reassure churches that Charles Darwin believed in God, or at least that his theory of evolution harmonizes beautifully with Christian theology.

The reality is more complex.

In The Origin of Species, Darwin suggested the idea of a God who created a few original forms and then let the laws of nature govern the outcome. It is just as noble a conception of the Deity to believe that He created a few original forms capable of self-development into other and needful forms, he wrote, as to believe that he required a fresh act of creation to supply the voids caused by the action of his laws.

But later he wrote privately to friend Joseph Hooker, I have long regretted that I truckled to public opinion, and used the Pentateuchal term of creation. And in 1862, he told Harvard botanist Asa Gray there seemed to be too much misery in the world. He could not accept, for example, that a beneficent and omnipotent God would have designedly created [digger wasps] with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of caterpillars, or that a cat should play with mice.

A Devils ChaplainFor Darwin it always came back to the problem of pain. What a book a devils chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering, low, and horribly cruel works of nature! he wrote to Hooker around 1856.

Wounded pride also may have played a role. In his autobiography, Darwin recalled that while on board H.M.S. Beagle he was heartily laughed at by several of the officers for quoting the Bible as an unanswerable authority on some point of morality.

So he reconsidered the Old Testament and later described it as a manifestly false history of the world, with the Tower of Babel, the rainbow as a sign, etc., etc. The Bible, he concluded, was no more to be trusted than the sacred books of the Hindoos, or the beliefs of any barbarian.

Methodological AtheismGray told Darwin that he didnt see why they couldnt have both Darwins theory of evolution and a role for a designing intelligence. Darwin would have none of it, but realizing that a thoroughgoing materialism wasnt an easy sell, he actively concealed this aspect of his thinking. In one notebook he reminded himself to avoid stating how far, I believe, in Materialism.

Darwin promoted his materialistic worldview indirectly by supporting the principle that science should invoke only material causes. According to this methodological rule, you neednt be an atheist to do science, but you should offer only hypotheses consistent with atheism when doing science. Call it methodological atheism. As he told geologist Charles Lyell, I would give absolutely nothing for the theory of Natural Selection, if it require miraculous additions at any one stage of descent.

This methodological dogma is in full bloom today. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism, wrote Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin. Moreover, he added, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.

A Blind EyeOne doesnt hear much about the materialism of Darwin and Darwinism, likely because there has been a longstanding effort to ignore and suppress it. Many of todays theistic Darwinists play this game, but they are hardly the first. So, for instance, Darwins mounting hostility to Christianity was suppressed by his widow, who removed some inflammatory comments from his Autobiography. The following passage was not generally known until restored by his granddaughter Nora Barlow in 1958: Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but was at last complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct.

Rumors of Darwins deathbed conversion are without basis. Darwin put his faith in mindless evolution and lost his faith in God.

Its a shame. Almost 160 years after The Origin of Species appeared, the case for intelligent design is stronger than ever. The origin of the first animal forms in the Cambrian explosion; the origin of the first microscopic life; the cellular world of sophisticated molecular machines; the origin of a finely tuned universe from nothing each is part of a march of discovery since Darwins day that has taken us further and further from a world empty of final meaning, and deeper into one charged with the grandeur of some extraordinary design.

Thats something worth celebrating this Darwin Day, and every Sunday.

Praised by Tom Wolfe as one of our most brilliant essayists, Tom Bethell is author of the new book Darwins House of Cards: A Journalists Odyssey Through the Darwin Debates.

Read this article:

The Lord's Day, Meet Darwin Day and Shudder | The American ... - American Spectator

Ford Bets $1B on Startup Founded by Waymo, Uber Vets – ABC News

Ford Motor is spending $1 billion to take over a budding robotics startup to acquire more expertise needed to reach its ambitious goal of having a fully driverless vehicle on the road by 2021.

The big bet announced Friday comes just a few months after the Pittsburgh startup, Argo AI, was created by two alumni of Carnegie Mellon University's robotics program, Bryan Salesky and Peter Rander.

The alliance between Argo and Ford is the latest to combine the spunk and dexterity of a technologically savvy startup with the financial muscle and manufacturing knowhow of a major automaker in the race to develop autonomous vehicles. Last year rival General Motors paid $581 million to buy Cruise Automation, a 40-person software company that is testing vehicles in San Francisco.

The Argo deal marks the next step in Ford's journey toward building a vehicle without a steering wheel or brake pedal by 2021 a vision that CEO Mark Fields laid out last summer.

The big-ticket deal for the newly-minted company clearly was aimed at getting Salesky and Rande. Salesky formerly worked on self-driving cars at a high-profile project within Google now known as Waymo and Rander did the same kind of engineering at ride-hailing service Uber before the two men teamed to launch Argo late last year.

"When talent like that comes up, you don't ignore that ability," said Raj Nair, who doubles as Ford's chief technical officer and product development head.

The two will develop the core technology of Ford's autonomous vehicle the "virtual driver" system, which Nair described as the car's "brains, eyes, ears and senses."

The decision to turn to Argo for help is a tacit acknowledgement that Ford needed more talent to deliver on Fields' 2021 promise, said one expert familiar with Salesky and Rande.

"This is likely a realization that Ford is behind relative to companies like GM, Audi, Volvo, Waymo and Uber, and is trying to catch up," said Raj Rajkumar, a Carnegie Mellon computer engineering professor who leads the school's autonomous vehicle research.

Salesky said Argo expects to have 200 workers by the end of the year. Argo employees will be given stock in the subsidiary as part of their compensation packages so they will be enriched if Argo's technology becomes a hot commodity.

The equity should set Argo apart from other companies in recruiting scarce tech workers. "There's a war for talent out there," Fields said.

By joining with Ford, Argo gets strong capital backing and expertise on other components needed to run autonomous cars, as well as product development and manufacturing knowledge, Salesky said. In return for its funding, Argo will design its driverless system exclusively for Ford and then have a chance to license the technology to other automakers in the future.

Competitors such as NVIDIA have developed artificial intelligence that learns about different situations as it's tested on roads, something that is almost essential for an autonomous car to function in heavy traffic on city streets.

Ford isn't just racing General Motors and other automakers to gain robotics experience. Uber bought autonomous trucking startup Otto for an estimated $680 million last summer primarily to get Otto's engineers on its team working on driverless vehicles. Otto co-founder Anthony Levandowski, another former Google engineer, is now overseeing Uber's testing of driverless cars in Pittsburgh and Arizona.

AP Auto Writer Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this story.

Here is the original post:

Ford Bets $1B on Startup Founded by Waymo, Uber Vets - ABC News

How drones and robotics may shape the future of conflict under President Trump – PRI

Drone strikes against terrorism suspects have become such a hallmark of US policy, it's easy to forget the technology is only a couple of decades old.

Also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, or remotely piloted aircraft, drones are part of a much bigger robotics revolution sweeping the globe and shaping the contours of conflict in this century.

There are "good guys like environment groups tracking down poachers, and bad guys like ISIS which, Singer says, conducted 60 different drone operations around the battle of Mosul in December 2016 and January 2017. A rebel group, a terrorist group operating a little miniature air force, thats not something we saw before,"Singer says.

Singer, author of Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century and Ghost Fleet: A Novel of the Next World War says all this proliferation poses constant new challenges.

Robotics are also in play in high tension zones like the Persian Gulf and the South China Sea, where China recently seized and later returned an American underwater drone. Singer also worries about unmanned aircraft jousting with each other in the skies, the way Chinese and Japanese drones have done recently.

What happens when one of these things crashes? Or what happens when one of these things accidentally bumps into a manned machine?, he asks. I have my own opinions on how the different laws of war apply, but the point is not everyone shares these understandings."

The technology continues to move ahead and our politics, our policies, our laws, they have a hard time keeping apace with it, he says. I like to describe it this way: technology moves at an exponential pace, whereas our laws move at a glacial pace, if that, and the disconnect becomes wider and wider.

Some critics believe the US executive branch now wields too much unchecked power to kill individual terrorism suspects overseas, without oversight from other branches of government. The use of targeted drone strikes thatstarted under President George W. Bush andsharply increased under President Barack Obama, is expected to continue under President Donald Trump.

Even within US borders, ethical issues have arisen over how and when to use robotics in law enforcement. Last summer we had this episode where the Dallas Police Department used a robot that had been originally designed for bomb disposal and instead they jury-rigged it with a bomb and used it to blow up a sniper, says Singer. So we had an ad hoc weaponized robotic system used in a lethal manner inside the United States.

Singer isnt necessarily saying yay or boo, on this, as he puts it. This is something new, and this question hasnt been figured out, he says. My personal take on it is Im not comfortable seeing each and every little local police department figure this out on their own.

It's too early to say how Trump will use drones and other robotics for law enforcement at home, anti-terrorism efforts and in conflict abroad. Ethical questions persist about Obama's use of drone strikes more than 500 strikes, or 10 times more than George W. Bush, but with a tiny fraction the number ofcivilian casualties caused by the US conventional warfare in Iraq.

Get more Whose Century Is It?

Want to learn more about the ideas, trends and twists shaping the 21st century? You'll learn that and more from Whose Century Is It from host Mary Kay Magistad and PRI's The World.

Beyond ethical concerns, Singer is also concerned about the new administrations dismissive attitude toward science, research and development, what he calls the "crown jewels" for America.

"And when you threaten those, either by defunding programs or restricting access to data, or kicking out or keeping out scientists, you jeopardize the crown jewels,this thing that's been so important to America. ...If were seeing a revolution in technology, in business, in war, the worst thing you can do is try and take away the assets that will allow you to succeed in that revolution.

The United States still has an edge, globally, in military robotics, Singer says, but China is gaining ground fast, and Japan and some European players have an edge in other areas. "If you think about this as a race, and you slow down to a walk and the other guy is running, even if they're behind you, at some point they'll catch up and pass you."

The rest is here:

How drones and robotics may shape the future of conflict under President Trump - PRI

Robotics teams wins at state meet – The Citizen.com

FIRST LEGO League (FLL) robotics teams at Flat Rock Middle and J.C. Booth Middle had a very successful season, winning top honors at their Super-Regional competitions and scoring enough points to advance to the state championship.

The teams were among just 64 in Georgia that earned a spot in the state championship that was held at Georgia Gwinnett College on February 4. The season started out with 672 teams in competition. Turtle Troopers from J.C. Booth Middle won the Robot Programming Award at the Georgia State FIRST LEGO League Championship held at Georgia Gwinnett College.

Although the Mighty Robotic Eagles at Flat Rock Middle did not take home any awards at the state championship, they won the Champions Award at their Super-Regional event, meaning that they were one of the top two teams at the competition. Team members include Olivia Lohr, Vince Phan, Nathan Walding, Jonathan Glass, Javon Sullivan, Triston Torres, Richard Collier, Daniel Antoine, and Russell Phillips. Darryl Hutchinson coaches the team.

Two of the three teams from J.C. Booth Middle took home awards at the state championship. The Turtle Troopers won the Robot Programming Award. Team members are Mikela Zuniga, Jack Hemenway, Nicholas DellaTorre, Rylan Christen, Adeola Batiste, Max Roggermeier, Keelan Garcia, and Marc VanZyl. The coaches are Tony DellaTorre, Dennis Christen, and Gerrie VanZyl.

The HIVE won the Innovative Solution Award. Part of the robotics challenge is finding a solution to a problem identified by the team. This years theme was Animal Allies, each team had to identify a problem that occurs when people and animals interact. The HIVE researched using neem oil to replace pesticides, and save the honeybee population. This team also won the Champions Award at their Super-Regional competition. Team members are Dalton Toner, Chase Evans, Michael Johnson, Caleb Claiborne, Madeline Nolen, Andrei Gazinschi, and Jack Flynn. The coaches are Tim Toner and Chad Evans.

The BLT Warriors were the other team from J.C. Booth Middle that competed at the state championship. Team members are Daniel Scott, Ian Fisher, Julian Gevertz, Colin McKay, Georgie Harris, and Caelyn Grimes. The coaches are Amanda Scott and Stephanie Fisher.

Jason Bingel, STEM and engineering teacher, oversees the robotics program at J.C. Booth Middle.

See original here:

Robotics teams wins at state meet - The Citizen.com

Raptor legs & human hips: Giant leap for walking robots – RT

Robots that walk like humans have been somewhat of a holy grail in the robotics industry for decades but what if, instead of mimicking their creators, they instead mimicked our prehistoric ancestors?

Agility Robotics, a business venture offshoot of the College of Engineering at Oregon State University (OSU), has just unveiled Cassie, the latest leap forward in bipedal robotics, complete with a gait that closely resembles an ostrich or a raptor.

We werent trying to duplicate the appearance of an animal, just the techniques it uses to be agile, efficient and robust in its movement, Jonathan Hurst, Co-founder and CTO of Agile Robotics and associate professor of robotics at OSU,told the University newspaper.

Using a 16-month, $1 million grant from Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) at the Department of Defense, the team at Agility Robotics successfully built Cassie from scratch in under a year, using custom components that met the stringent technical requirements for such a durable and flexible machine.

For instance, Cassie possesses a hip similar to a humans, allowing for forward and backward mobility as well as the ability to rotate, essential for traversing difficult terrain.

READ MORE:Ditch humans or cooperate? Googles DeepMind tests ultimate AI choice with game theory

Its legs feature powered ankles which greatly reduce the amount of shuffling required to stay upright, a rather unnerving trait displayed by so many of her robotic predecessors such as the ATRIAS series.

The ATRIAS prototypes were also developed by the team at OSU to better understand bipedal locomotion and further their understanding of what it would take for a machine to tackle rough terrain.

We learned a few key things with ATRIAS, Hurst explained, when speaking to Spectrum IEEE, ...the legs on ATRIAS are configured as a 4-bar linkage...however, the configuration results in one motor acting as a brake on the other, with a lot of power cycling internally between motors rather than doing work on the world.

This particular flaw was resolved in two ways: firstly, at the design stage, the distinctive avian articulation of the legs reduced the number of motors required.

Secondly, improvements in battery technology, specifically in lithium-ion batteries, have eliminated the need for a safety gantry (an eye sore and major limiting factor in previous walking robots) as well as allowing the majority of mobility processing to take place on board.

The robotics revolution will bring with it enormous changes, perhaps sooner than many people realize, Hurst said to the OSU newspaper, highlighting the speed with which the industry is advancing.

READ MORE:'Fukushima catastrophe ongoing: Leakage on a daily basis

While the team are one day looking to compete with Amazon in automated package delivery, one obvious application for a free-moving bipedal robot would be in disaster relief and emergency response.

Containment efforts in biohazardous or radioactive events, such as the Fukushima disaster in 2011, have often been frustrated by both human fragility and robotic underdevelopment.

Hurst sees Cassie as the next major leap towards a bipedal robotics revolution, If we really understood how to implement dynamically capable legs, there would be so many applications for them, including search-and-rescue, exoskeletons, powered prosthetic limbs, and package delivery.

Cassie is still undergoing testing before a full commercial launch later this year but the team at Agility Robotics have already set the short to medium term goals of adding arms, so that future Cassie prototypes can self-right, as well as incorporating VR elements into future models to allow for telepresence.

Their ultimate goal is to produce sub-$100k robots for a variety of industries.

View post:

Raptor legs & human hips: Giant leap for walking robots - RT

Patriot Robotics Alliance upsets Brentwood Academy Alliances – Clarksville Now

CLARKSVILLE, Tenn. Patriot Robotics VEX team, 405, and Kenwood Knights Sword, 98706K, of Clarksville, TN, along with partner, 97934V team Valiant, from Franklin Road Academy had a huge win at the White House competition on February 4.

These teams formed the 3rd seeded alliance and would surprise the competitors in the final matches.

Patriot Robotics consists of George Michael Huttick, a senior of Rossview High School, Matthew Riley, a freshman, and Adam Riley, a junior, both attend the STEM academy at Kenwood High School.

Team Valiant consists of David Chandler, Conor Ireland and James Munn, all seniors, and freshman Tennent Grace Smith from Franklin Road Academy.

The Kenwood Knights Sword consists of Chance Piefer, Adam Berenger, Jared Bauman and Connor Thomas, all juniors, and freshman Savannah Piefer from the Kenwood STEM academy. The team also includes senior Nathan Bailey.

The independent team Patriot Robotics seeded 3rd after four qualification matches and picked the 6th seeded team Valiant, Franklin Road Academy. They finished off alliance selection by choosing Kenwood Knights Sword to make an incredible alliance. From there the alliance had to fight to get to the finals. Facing the last seeded alliance was not a problem for the teams, however, semifinals proposed a bigger problem.

The semifinals match consisted of the alliance having to face three Brentwood Academy teams that work together on a regular basis. The Brentwood teams had beaten Franklin Road and their alliance at a previous tournament.

405 and its partners pulled off the win and moved onto the finals where they would have to face an alliance of two more Brentwood Academy teams. After not losing a match all day the 3rd seed alliance went in confident and won their last finals match drastically and didnt even let Brentwood Academy score, giving them the outstanding result of 48-0.

Patriot Robotics also pulled off another huge win by also winning the most coveted award in VEX robotics, the Excellence Award.

Now with all of the 3rd alliance teams qualified for state, much practice and work is needed to stay ahead of the reigning former state champions, Brentwood Academy. The state tournament will be held on March 4 at Brentwood Academy where the top 30 teams in the state will go head to head in the knowledge of their robots and how well teams can drive and program their robots.

They have a few weeks to prepare to win 5 of the TN state spots that will get to compete at VEX Worlds Championship in Louisville, KY in mid-April.

Patriot Robotics 405 is the only team representing Tennessee at the U. S. Open National Robotics Championship held in early April in Council Bluffs, Iowa.

Read the original here:

Patriot Robotics Alliance upsets Brentwood Academy Alliances - Clarksville Now

Memphis robotics team headed to Super-Regionals – New Baltimore Voice Newspapers

Five students from Memphis Junior High School will represent their school at the Super-Regional Robotics Championship Tournament in Iowa next month.

These kids will compete against many high school teams, so were excited. They can advance from this to the world competition in St. Louis and there will be teams from China, Japan and Australia there, team mentor Dan Kiehler said.

Members of the FIRST Tech Challenge, or FTC, Robotics Team 8845 The Wild Bees, less formally known as the Wild Bees, initially advanced to the state championship and are one of 15 teams out of over 400 that will represent Michigan at the Super-Regional Championship. The event is a multi-day tournament hosted at the US Cellular Center/DoubleTree Convention Center in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

FIRST, which stands for For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology, is a Manchester, New Hampshire-based nonprofit founded in 1989 to inspire young peoples interest and participation in science and technology.

Teams advance to one of the four Super-Regional Championship Tournaments through high achievement at a state or regional championship event, FIRSTs website states. Each Super-Regional Tournament will host 72 teams, for a total of 288 spots at the championships.

The Memphis team will compete in the North Super-Regional Championship. Winning teams will advance to the St. Louis World Championship.

The robotics team is an afterschool program currently in its third year under the direction of parent volunteers Kiehler and Glen Haack.

Weve been somewhat competitive every year and I think were going to do well at the super-regionals. We have a very good team, Kiehler said.

The six-member team picked up honors and trophies at competitions from September to December before earning an invitation to the national event.

Members of the robotics team work together to design, build and operate a robot.

The members must follow rules and regulations for building their robot for competitions. They must keep the unit to 18 by 18, make sure the tires are the correct size and install a set number of motors.

Once the basics are set, teams create activities for the robots such as picking up a ball, turning in place and using a controller to hit a light on the playing field.

The teams are divided up and each member has an assigned task. For example, two members compete as the operator and driver of the robot in front of the meet judges.

The Wild Bees includes team captain and robot driver Marie Melistas, 12, team captain and operator Tommy Wendling, 13, safety captain Tyler Rabine, 12, business manager Chloe Mills, 14, and community relations manager and mascot Clay Jones, 13. Sixth-grader Riley Roy was part of the team throughout the season but will not be making the trip to Iowa. He left the team at the end of the season due to a scheduling conflict.

Each has a role at the competitions. The team must answer questions from the judges and the duo operating the robot on the game floor has just two and a half minutes to show off their skills. As the mascot for the Wild Bees, Joness time is spent wearing the Memphis Bee costume and dancing to entertain the crowd while his team competes.

Having a lot of support at the various competitions throughout the season has been crucial to the Wild Bees success. Kiehler said in addition to Haack, his sons, Nick, Alex and Zack also serve as mentors to the team at every competition.

The Haacks have done so much the last few years. Without that family there wouldnt be a robotics team here, Kiehler said. And weve had phenomenal support from the team parents this year too.

The dedication of the students is also impressive to Kiehler. They are exposed to science, technology and math concepts throughout the process, he said.

Being committed to attending practices twice a week which turn into almost daily meetings when a major competition is on the calendar is a challenge, but one Melistas enjoys.

You have to have patience to be there trying things again and again. But everyone helps with building the robot and, yes, I would recommend the team to other students. she said.

The club can also be costly with robotic parts, tools and entry fees for competitions. Organizers rely on donations, fundraisers and the occasional grant to fund the team.

A returnable bottle drive and a bake sale have raised some funds for the team but the members of the Wild Bees are brainstorming more ways to earn money for their trip. They are hoping a local sponsor steps forward to pay their national competition entry fee, which could be as much as $1,000.

To find out more about the team, call Dan Kiehler at 810-531-4235 or visit facebook.com/team8845.

Barb Pert Templeton is a freelance reporter. She can be contacted at barbperttempleton.reporter@yahoo.com.

See the original post:

Memphis robotics team headed to Super-Regionals - New Baltimore Voice Newspapers

Deal: New customers can get Google Play Music and YouTube Red free for 4 months – Android Authority (blog)

If you have yet to try out Google Play Music and YouTube Red because you didnt want to pay $9.99 a month, theres some good news. Google has once again launched a promotion that lets new customers try out both services for free for four months.

2 weeks ago

This isnt the first time Google has offered this extended demo periodbut it does give you a much longer time period to experience both of these subscription services without having to pay up $39.96 from your wallet.

If you are not familiar with Google Play Music or YouTube Red, heres the skinny on both. First, you can still access all of the free features of Google Play Music, such as listening to tunes, uploading up to 50,000 of your own songs and access to podcasts and radio stations. However, the paid subscription adds ad-free access to its library of 35 million songs. You can also download your favorite tunes so you can play them offline, which can be helpful if you are on a beach, out in the woods or anywhere else where a cellular or Wi-Fi connection is not available.

The YouTube Red service may be even better. Signing up for that subscription ditches all those annoying video and banner ads from the video service, so you can check out your favorite channels like Android Authorityin full. A subscription also come with background audio support, in case you just want to listen to a video while doing something else on your phone. You can also play videos while offline. Finally, YouTube Red offers access to original video content thats only available on this service, such as movies, sitcoms and more.

Keep in mind that you will still need to type in your debit or credit card info, as you will be charged $9.99 a month after the free four month demo ends. The good news is you can cancel well before then and still get your free demo time, so its almost a win-win.

Read the original post:

Deal: New customers can get Google Play Music and YouTube Red free for 4 months - Android Authority (blog)

Baidu-backer Singaporean Finian Tan bets on the next big thing … – DEALSTREETASIA

Bloomberg

February 10, 2017:

Baidu Inc. is often referred to as Chinas Google with a market value of more than $60 billion. But in 2000, it was an upstart struggling to get any attention from investorsexcept from a guy named Finian Tan.Tan, then head of Asia at DFJ Eplanet Ventures, began investing in the search engine, betting that 1.3 billion Chinese would eventually embrace the internet. When it went public five years later, Tans firm emerged as the bigger beneficiary with a stake larger than the 22 percent held by Baidu co-founder, and now billionaire,Robin Li. Hes making a similar bet on San Diego-based regenerative medicine company Samumed LLC, which is valued at $12 billion.

What attracted Tan was Samumeds approach to treating arthritic knees, hair loss, scarring of the lungs and degenerative disc diseases. The company is pursuing novel therapies for those conditions and cancer with drugs that target a cell-signaling pathway that offers promise in reversing the biological processes of aging.

Only twice in my life I have bet so big on day one, says Tan, 54, a Singaporean who co-founded Vickers Venture Partners in 2005. Samumed is going to make even more money for us.Samumeds chief executive officer is Turkish-American entrepreneur Osman Kibar, who has managed to raise more than $300 million in private funding for the company he founded in 2008. Before that, Kibar was scientific founder of Genoptix Inc., an oncology diagnostics company that Novartis AGbought for $470 million in 2011.Tan began investing in Samumed in 2012. Today, Vickers and its co-investors own about 11 percent, including 3.8 percent held by Vickers. Tans company is the only VC firm backing Samumed with the rest of its funding coming primarily from institutional family offices, the startup said.Investing in biotech startups is innately risky, with uncertainties over regulation and execution, according to Paul Santos, managing partner of Wavemaker Partners in Singapore.

All of these things are beyond your control, he said. From a fund allocation standpoint, if you put so many eggs in one basket, you almost cant miss again. And there are many cases where people missed in a big way, like Theranos. Theranos Inc., a blood-testing startup that once commanded a $9 billion private valuation, has seen most of that evaporate amid regulatory battles and questions over its technology.

Samumeds drug candidates are being tested in five patient studies, according to its website. Its pursuing ways to repair or regenerate human tissues through drugs that target the complex system known as the Wnt pathwaya key process in regulating cell development, cell proliferation and tissue regeneration.Scientific understanding of this biological activity represents a major breakthrough in tackling human diseases, according to Elizabeth Vincan, a senior medical scientist at the University of Melbourne, who convened the first international meeting held in Australia on Wnt in 2014.

The Wnt pathway is one way that cells communicate, and the Wnt pathway tells the cells what they are, where they need to be and what they need to become, she says. Its very important in diverse human diseases, so the Wnt pathway is possibly the most interrogated pathway now in drug development. Vincan continues: The aging process is really just cells getting tired, and if you can rejuvenate them, you can certainly reverse the process.The opportunity to invest in Samumed was presented by Tans partner Khalil Binebine, vice chairman of Vickers. Tan was immediately drawn to Samumeds diverse pipeline of drugs covering multiple therapeutic areas.Typically, his firm follows an unusual vetting process for making investments. Each of its five partners is required to get to know the founders of the companies they are considering backing. When they are ready to make a decision, each investment proposition is given a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). Number 3 isnt allowed because Tan doesnt want any fence-sitters.If one partner loves a deal that everyone else hates, he or she is still allowed to invest as much as $1 million on the startup through the lifetime of a fund. Unanimous deals tend to be the worst deals, Tan says. We are not afraid to be innovative.The probability of companies such as Samumed uncovering the fountain of youth isnt good. Derek Lowe, a medicinal chemist who comments on drug discovery for a blog run by the publishers of the journal Science Translational Medicine, says the overall failure rate for medicines undergoing clinical trials is about 90 percent.

I have not seen anything that makes me think that their chances will be higher than that average, Lowe says. If their investors think differently, they could be in for an unpleasant surprise. Clinical trials are mostly about unpleasant surprises, unfortunately.

Tans path to Vickers includes a variety of roles. He has a Ph.D. in engineering from Cambridge University and has worked at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Credit Suisse First Boston. During his brief stint as a senior public servant in Singapore, he also managed a $1 billion fund to develop science and technology in the city-state.Yet many people attribute Tans success to his famous parties. The proficient networker entertains an average of 200 people a month in his home, combining business with pleasure to pull together connections to spot the best deals and talent in technology.The same approach is applied to managing employees, whom he invitesfor a weekly lunch at his sprawling penthouse apartment overlooking Singapores Sentosa Cove.

On a sunny day in January, a dozen of them gathered around the dining table over crispy chicken, spring rolls, sauteed vegetables and the house specialty, beef noodle soup. New-hires from Credit Suisse and McKinsey & Co. joined the gathering.Its not all science that we do, Tan said. A lot of it is art. And a lot of it is entertainment. There are VCs who give you an umbrella when its sunny, and they take it away when its raining. We have a different ethos.Vickers performance is posted on the companys website. Assets raised under its four funds, including co-investments, total $363 million and have a combined value of $2.1 billion.The net value of its fourth fund has increased more than five times, making it the best performing among the venture capital funds that debuted in 2014, according to data compiled by Preqin at the end of June.Vickers understood and supported our need for flexibility to think and act for the long-term crucial aspects for the time-intensive process of developing a broad platform in tissue regeneration, Samumeds Kibar says. Vickers is currently raising $250 million for a fifth fund that closes in July. Tan plans to invest more in Samumed, one of many startups Vickers is bankrolling globally.

More recently the firm has made investments in SiSaf, a Belfast-based biotech firm that aims to improve drug administration. In Singapore, its led a funding round in lifestyle and fitness startup GuavaPass. Its also backing digital payment service provider MatchMove Payand Spark Systems, a foreign exchange platform. Tan says about 28 percent of the ventures Vickers has backed have failed, compared with an average failure rate of more than 50 percent across the venture-capital industry. Of the deals that have succeeded, he says 36 percent have returned more than five times the initial investment.Most VCs play safe, Tan says. Ive always been radical. For us, its all about home runs.To keep closer watch of his most important bet, Tan recently bought a house in San Diego to be near Kibar at Samumed.As housemaids begin serving dessert at his Singapore home, prepared by his three chefs, Tan, dressed in blue jeans, white t-shirt and blazer, throws a question to his lunch guests: If you are able to grow cells at will, what do you think is the age at which we will die?Then he draws an analogy with a car that can last forever if one can keep changing the worn-out parts. Its the same with the human body, he says. We will never die.Despite the odds,Tan isnt giving up hope of bettering the spoils from his bet on Baidu.

Also read:

Vickers Venture leads $5m Series A round in fitness platform GuavaPass

Vickers Venture hits $63.5m first close for Fund V, confident of beating $250m target

Bloomberg

Tags: Baidu Finian Tan immortality next big thing Singaporean

See the original post:

Baidu-backer Singaporean Finian Tan bets on the next big thing ... - DEALSTREETASIA