Universal basic income: guarantee pay as way to improve quality of life – WatertownDailyTimes.com

'); //-->

With an impending robot revolution expected to leave a trail of unemployment, some Silicon Valley tech leaders think they have a remedy to a future with fewer jobs: free money for all.

Its called universal basic income, a radical concept that would provide all Americans with a minimum level of economic security. The idea is expensive and controversial it guarantees cash for everyone, regardless of income level or employment status. But prominent tech leaders including Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Sam Altman, president of startup accelerator Y Combinator, support it.

We should make it so no one is worried about how theyre going to pay for a place to live, no one has to worry about how theyre going to have enough to eat, Altman said in a recent speech in San Francisco. Just give people enough money to have a reasonable quality of life.

Altman is funding a basic income experiment in Oakland, Calif., as the concept gains momentum in the San Francisco Bay Area. Policy experts, economists, tech leaders and others convened in San Francisco last month for a workshop on the topic organized by the Economic Security Project, of which Altman is a founding signatory. The project is investing $10 million in basic income projects over the next two years.

Stanford University has created a Basic Income Lab to study the idea, and the San Francisco city treasurers office has said its designing tests though the department said it has no updates on the status of that project.

Proponents say the utopian approach could offer relief to workers in Silicon Valley and beyond who may soon find their jobs threatened by robots as they get smarter. Even before the robots take over, some economists say, basic income should be used as a tool to fight poverty. In the Bay Area where the rapid expansion of high-paying tech companies has made the region too expensive for many to afford it could help lift those the boom has left behind.

Unlike traditional aid programs, recipients of a universal basic income wouldnt need to prove anything not their income level, employment status, disability or family obligations before collecting their cash payments.

Its a right of citizenship, said Karl Widerquist, a basic income expert and associate professor at Georgetown Universitys School of Foreign Service in Qatar, so were not judging people and were not putting them in this other category or (saying) youre the poor. And I think this is exciting people right now because the other model hasnt worked.

That means a mother living at the poverty line would get the same amount of free cash as Mark Zuckerberg, Widerquist said. But Zuckerbergs taxes would go up, canceling out his basic income payment.

The problem is that giving all Americans a $10,000 annual income would cost upwards of $3 trillion a year more than three-fourths of the federal budget, said Bob Greenstein, president of the Washington-based Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. Some proponents advocate paying for it by cutting programs like food stamps and Medicaid. But that approach would take money set aside for low-income families and redistribute it upward, exacerbating poverty and inequality, Greenstein said.

Still, some researchers are testing the idea with small basic income experiments targeting certain neighborhoods and socio-economic groups.

Y Combinator the accelerator known for launching Airbnb and Instacart is giving 100 randomly selected Oakland families unconditional cash payments of about $1,500 a month. Altman, who is footing most of the bill himself, says society needs to consider basic income to support Americans who lose their jobs to robots and artificial intelligence. The idea, he said in his San Francisco speech, addresses the question not enough people are asking: What do we as the tech industry do to solve the problem that were helping to create?

Increased use of robots and AI will lead to a net loss of 9.8 million jobs by 2027 7 percent of U.S. positions, according to a study that the Forrester research firm released last month. Already, the signs are everywhere. Autonomous cars and trucks threaten driving jobs, automated factories require fewer human workers, and artificial intelligence is taking over aspects of legal work and other white-collar jobs.

Proponents of universal basic income have varying ideas of how much money people should get to give them a decent quality of life. Clearly $1,500 a month isnt enough in the Bay Area, but Altman says in a world of robots the cost of living would go down some experts predict that automation would lower production costs. In the meantime, an extra $1,500 still could have a big effect on Oakland residents like Shoshanna Howard, who said the salary she makes working at a nonprofit barely covers her cost of living.

I would pay off my student loans, she said. And I would put whatever I could toward savings, because Im currently not able to save for my future.

Interest in basic income rose in the 1960s and 1970s, when small pilot studies were conducted in states including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Iowa and Indiana, and in Canada. Some studies showed improvements in participants physical and mental health, and found children performed better in school or stayed in school longer. But some also showed that people receiving a basic income were inclined to spend fewer hours working. Other data suggested that married participants were more likely to get divorced. Some experts say the cash payments reduced womens financial dependence on their husbands.

Y Combinator plans to expand its experiment to 1,000 families. YC researchers are using the small Oakland pilot to answer logistical questions such as how to select participants, and how to pay them. The researchers have said theyre focusing on residents ages 21 through 40 whose household income doesnt exceed the area median about $55,000 in Oakland, according to the latest Census data. They expect to release plans for a larger study this summer.

Y Combinator announced its Oakland project last spring, but since then has kept many details under wraps. That tight-lipped approach concerns some community members who question whether the group did enough to involve Oakland residents and nonprofits.

Jennifer Lin, deputy director of the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy, said her organization reached out to YC about a year ago, but never heard back. It makes me question what Y Combinator has to hide, she said.

Elizabeth Rhodes, YCs basic income research director, said the group is working with city, county and state officials, and has met with local nonprofits and social service providers.

We want to be as transparent as we can, but protecting the privacy and well-being of study participants is our first priority, she wrote in an email.

Meanwhile, Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., is pushing for a plan that has been described as a first step toward universal basic income. Khanna this summer plans to propose long shot $1 trillion expansion to the earned income tax credit that is already available to low-income families. But unlike a basic income, that money would go only to people who work.

Theres a dignity to work, Khanna said. People, they dont want a handout. They want to contribute to the economy.

View post:

Universal basic income: guarantee pay as way to improve quality of life - WatertownDailyTimes.com

Letters: Guaranteed income guarantees sloth – The Province

Protesters gather outside the Balmoral Hotel on East Hastings Street in Vancouver on May 30 to vent against the living conditions of the tenants. Jason Payne / PNG

Re: BIG idea: How basic income could improve health, Opinion, June 2.

The Basic Income Guarantee is a great way to foster dropping out of school and quitting your job. Or better yet, working under the table and supplementing your cash income with a BIG allowance.

Nowhere does Rosana Salvaterra suggest that this free cash would have a time limit, so why would anyone want to work for anything near minimum wage, even at $15 per hour when they can stay home and get paid, no questions asked?

What these so-called experts who promote the benefits like improved health care under this plan never provide is the answer to who will pay for this when we have several million Canadians sitting at home waiting for their cheque?

I know my health will improve when I can sleep in and then stroll down to the pub and buy a pint with all of that free money rather than putting in a hard-days work. After all, it has been proven that lots of sleep benefits your health.

Perry Coleman,Delta

Action, not crocodile tears, needed to deal with slumlords

Re: Frustrated tenants storm city hall. Disgusting: Residents claim Balmoral Hotel has been declared unsafe, but owners have done nothing to fix it, June 2.

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson needs to know people want action, not his crocodile tears pretending he cares. The Sahotas have been allowed to continue running their Downtown Eastside hotels into the ground and treating the people who live there like garbage.

Last time there were stories regarding this family and its pathetic treatment of people, I can remember Robertson saying he would have repairs done and bill them to the Sahota family. So much for that idea.

Robertson is allowing them to run buildings into the ground, so they can be declared unfit, then everyone will he evicted and theyll tear them down and put in more pricey shoeboxes, making that family extremely rich.

Shawn Storey, Surrey

Losers want to change the rules

Here we go again. It seems it doesnt matter if its ping-pong, football or politics, once the competition is over the losers want to change the rules.

Our forefathers left us living in the best province in the best country under our present electoral system. Now, these perennial losers want to change the rules. We cant allow this to happen.

Alvin Towriss, Hope

Prince Rupert a better place for pipeline terminus

The big news of the day now seems to be stopping the Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion to Burnaby. Everyone Ive talked to agrees that the pipeline is important for Canada, but not to a final destination in Burnaby.

Prince Rupert is the logical place that we all agree on. Cant these government people realize that we already have cargo ships from around the world, cruise ships, local ferries, seaplanes, company and private yachts, tugs with log booms, etc., plying Vancouver Harbour, to say nothing about even more traffic in the Juan de Fuca Strait heading to Seattle as well as Vancouver and up the Inside Passage.

Prince Rupert has a straight outward passage to the open Pacific Ocean.

John Hyndman, Langley

Eviction washeartless

Re: Orphaned Abbotsford siblings given eviction notice, June 1.

The landlords eviction of this family after the year they have endured is despicable and heartless. The rent is being paid, so its hard not to think that their ruthless decision is based on renting it out for more money than concern for their coming family.

Hopefully, with The Provinces coverage of this familys plight, a landlord with heart and soul will come forward with a new place for them to live.

Tom Gray, North Delta

CLICK HERE to report a typo.

Is there more to this story? Wed like to hear from you about this or any other stories you think we should know about. Email vantips@postmedia.com.

See more here:

Letters: Guaranteed income guarantees sloth - The Province

Digital Twin Spawns Automation Efficiencies – Automation World

The Digital Twin concept is steadily gaining groundin the product development worlda means of creating a virtual representation of physical assets, including modeling behaviorfor validation and test purposes. This process, which promises to reduce reliance on costly prototypes while accelerating time to market, is now starting to take root in the plant floor environment as a way to garner efficiencies for production and, in some cases, set the stage for predictive maintenance.

Unlike the product development space, where the definition is more universal, the concept of a digital twin varies among automation providers, depending on where their offerings fit in the automation stack. Some companies with deep roots in 3D CAD modeling like Dassault Systmes and Siemens see the digital twin as a way to define and optimize factory floor layout and production processes in a virtual world prior to putting physical assets in place and flipping the switch on production.

Other companies like Emerson Automation and Beckhoff consider the digital twin as a tool for validating and optimizing control systems and automation processes in the virtual worlda tactic that lends itself to a variety of use cases, including operator training and virtual commissioning. Other companies, like GE Digital, have a broad and ambitious game plan for the digital twin, leveraging it for everything from asset performance management to predictive and prescriptive maintenance, the latter combining a digital model with Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) connectivity, real-time operational and historical data, as well as machine learning and analytics.

In an entirely different interpretation, some players conflate the concept of a digital twin with virtualization, the now mainstream IT technology that abstracts operating systems, applications, networks and storage from the underlying hardware or software so the process is no longer dependent on a specific physical platform, allowing for greater flexibility and scale. For example, Wind River Titanium Control is an open standards-based, on-premise cloud infrastructure that creates a digital twin of a plants legacy equipment, allowing it to become a full participant in IIoT by creating a real-time data channel between the traditional physical controllers and automation systems and its virtual representation.

Despite the murkiness of the digital twin concept, one thing is clear: It doesnt constitute any one idea, any single set of simulations or analytics or even a specific product category. A digital twin is a whole set of analytics that look at different aspects of how an asset performs, says Matt Wells, general manager of automation software at GE Digital. What we found is not one analytics model has all the answers.

Twinning thesmart factory Currently, one of the more prominent use cases for the digital twin is validating plant floor layouts and simulating logistic processes as part of a digital manufacturing portfolio. At Dassault, the concept of a connected production digital twin is a virtual 3D replica of an actual physical structurerobots, conveyors, CNC machines and other plant floor assetsalong with a simulation of the actual production processes of a smart factory, according to Prashanth Mysore, portfolio technical director of digital manufacturing at Dassault.

Under pressure to improve quality and responsiveness, reduce costs and strive for continuous improvements, manufacturers have an opportunity with the production digital twin to react more responsively to various internal and external disruptive events driven by mass customization needs. Specifically, Mysore says, manufacturers embracing a digital twin strategy can increase productivity and manufacturing efficiency by reducing variability and synchronizing material. They can also improve quality and compliance by validating processes virtually to ensure they are right the first time in addition to running multiple what-if scenarios to analyze production options and ensure worker safety and productivity.

A 3D replica of the actual physical plant is not the end of the road for the digital twin, Mysore says. The digital twin is also used to connect production with materials management, quality processes, and labor and maintenance processes.

As part of its 3DExperience platform for global industrial operations, Dassault makes its version of the digital twin come to life through its Delmia digital manufacturing portfolio, which includes numerous simulation tools as well as manufacturing operations management (MOM) capabilities resulting from its Apriso acquisition and operations planning and optimization functionality from its buyout of Quintiq.

A digital twin or dynamic software representation of an entire plant or an offshore oil rig, for example, can serve a variety of use cases across an entire automation and process control project lifecycle, according to Ronnie Bains, business manager for dynamic simulation and process optimization at Emerson Automation Solutions. Emerson customers are leveraging digital twins to support the initial design of a facility, to build actual processes and control systems, and to understand whether what is being built can function at the proper throughput.

If youre doing something incorrectly and you dont have such simulation, you dont find out about the potential impact until much later in a projects process, Bains explains. With a digital twin, you can identify areas of concern and design flaws early on and fix them as opposed to when things are built out and its more expensive.

As part of its Multi-Purpose Dynamic Simulator systems, Emersons DeltaV Simulate capabilities allow companies to test control logic and operator graphics in a virtual commissioning scenario, minimizing potential errors and streamlining the startup process. The same technology can also be leveraged to assist in training operators in unique processes. The level to which the digital twin is applied varies from customer to customer, Bains says. For some, its just for training; for others, its the full lifecycle.

For its part, Beckhoff has assembled a set of tools for its TwinCAT automation suite that extends into the realm of digital twin, specifically for upfront virtual testing and commissioning. Via support for the vendor-neutral Functional Mock-up Interface (FMI), Beckhoff has created interfaces between its platform and popular model-based design and simulation tools like MathWorks Matlab and Simulink and Maplesofts MapleSim to allow for acquisition and visualization of real-time parameters while creating a closer connection between physical and digital models. The ability to import simulated code and run it directly on a physical system enables machine builders to test before setup, aiding in reliability and shortening time to market, according to Daymon Thompson, an automation specialist at Beckhoff.

At Rockwell Automation, the whole premise of the digital twin is to remove the need for the physical asset, whether its to test the actual hardware or control systems, notes Andy Stump, business manager for the companys software portfolio. Rockwells Studio 5000 Logix Emulate software enables users to validate, test and optimize application code independent of physical hardware while also allowing connectivity to third-party simulation and operator training systems to help teams simulate processes and train operators in a virtual environment.

In this context, a digital twin can be employed to provide a safer, more contextualized training environment that focuses on situational experience. It helps with emergency situations, starting up and shutting downthings you dont encounter ever day, Stump explains.

A digital twin of a control system created in the Logix Emulate tool could also be tapped for throughput analysis, Stump adds, ensuring, for example, that a packaging machine could handle a new form factor without having to actually bring down the machine to test the new design. Any time you take a machine out of production, its expensive, he says. If you can estimate that a machine is going to be down 60 percent of the time running what-if scenarios in a digital twin, theres a lot of money to be saved.

Moving forward, Rockwell will leverage new technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) to enhance its vision for a digital twin. At the Hannover Fair in April, the company demonstrated a next-generation, mixed-reality virtual design experience using its Studio 5000 development environment with the Microsoft HoloLens VR headset.

For Siemens, the concept of a digital twin straddles both product design and production. In a production capacity, the digital twin exists as a common database of everything in a physical plantinstrument data, logic diagrams, piping, among other sourcesalong with simulation capabilities that can support use cases like virtual commissioning and operator training. Comos, Siemens platform for mapping out a plant lifecycle on a single data platform, and Simit, simulation software used for system validation and operator training, now have tighter integration to support more efficient plant engineering and shorter commissioning phases, says Doug Ortiz, process automation simulation expert for Siemens. In addition, Comos Walkinside 3D Virtual Reality Viewer, now with connectivity to the Oculus Rift Virtual Reality 3D glasses, enables a more immersive experience, allowing plant personnel to engage in realistic training and virtual commissioning exercises, he says.

Customers want to get plants from the design stage to up and running in the shortest period of time and these tools are paramount for that, Ortiz says. The digital twin is great to use for any plant for the lifecycle of that unique plant.

Improvedmaintenanceopportunities While most companies in the automation space are settling in with the digital twin for roles in operator training, virtual commissioning and optimization, there is still not a lot of activity leveraging the concept for predictive and preventive maintenance opportunities. The exception might be GE Digital, which is clearly pushing this use case as its long-term vision.

GE Digital sees four stages of analytics that will be impacted by digital twin and IoT:

GE Digital showed off a digital twin representation of a steam turbine to showcase what is possible in the areas of predictive and prescriptive maintenance at its Minds + Machines conference last November.

A digital twin is a living model that drives a business outcome, and this model gets real-time operational and environmental data and constantly updates itself, said Colin J. Parris, vice president of software research at GE Globals research center, during the presentation. It can predict failuresreduce maintenance costs and unplanned outages, andoptimize and provide mitigation of events when we have these types of failures.

Though the digital twin is certainly making headway in production, its still in its early days. Digital twin is definitely hot right now, but it really depends on what the customer is trying to achieve and what they are trying to model, says Bryan Siafakas, marketing manager in Rockwell Automations controller and visualization business, adding that its just a matter of time. There is a huge upside in terms of productivity savings and shortened development cycles.

Continued here:

Digital Twin Spawns Automation Efficiencies - Automation World

HPE updates OneView with new automation features and DevOps integrations – TechRepublic

On Monday, at HPE Discover 2017 in Las Vegas, HPE introduced updates to its OneView software that could make it a more useful tool for DevOps practitioners. Announcements included improved infrastructure automation, container support, and new partner integrations.

For those unfamiliar, OneView is a "software-defined intelligence that automates complex tasks," which could help simplify lifecycle operations, speed app delivery, and improve DevOps delivery on certain HPE products, according to an HPE press release.

Improved automation means that OneView will get a boost in its ability to manage infrastructure and firmware, the release said, which could help to lower lifecycle management costs. OneView will support HPE Synergy, ProLiant BL, DL and ML, HPE Apollo, and HPE Superdome X servers, the release said.

SEE: HPE partners with Docker on hybrid infrastructure play

For container support, Docker will now be available bundled with HPE Synergy and HPE Pointnext, with automatic storage provisioning and additional tools that will make it possible to run Docker Enterprise Edition, the release said.

HPE Synergy, the firm's modular composable infrastructure system, is getting a Mesosphere integration as well, allowing for automated Mesosphere Enterprise DC/OS deployments on HPE infrastructure, the release said. A new strategic alliance between HPE and Mesosphere was also announced, to provide customers with a more effective way of leveraging containers and the cloud.

Troubleshooting on HPE OneView is also being made easier with a new ServiceNow integration, while a Densify.com integration will use predictive analytics to help IT more intelligently place and manage workloads. According to the release, Red Hat OpenShift is also integrating with HPE OneView to automate container provisioning and boost app delivery as well.

HPE also noted that the firm was working on a Redfish toolkit for OneView, that would make it easier for customers to use Redfish without as much scripting. Additional tools will make it simpler to deploy and manage HPE hardware on a Cisco ACI network.

Finally, four months after acquiring SimpliVity, HPE is offering an HPE SimpliVity hyperconferged solution on the HPE Proliant DL380, guaranteeing "90% data efficiency and an under a minute back up restore," the release said.

Image: iStockphoto/Natali_Mis

See more here:

HPE updates OneView with new automation features and DevOps integrations - TechRepublic

Freight Farms Lands $7.3M as Agriculture Meets Data & Automation – Xconomy

Investors have planted $7.3 million in Freight Farms to help the Boston-based startup bring its micro-farms to more places around the globeand potentially even beyond.

The investors in the Series B round include return backer Spark Capital, also based in Boston. The news was first reported by the Wall Street Journal on Monday. Freight Farms total venture capital haul now exceeds $12 million, according to SEC filings.

The company sells shipping containers filled with hydroponic farming systems that can grow a variety of lettuces, herbs, and other greens. The system is designed to operate with minimal hands-on work by humans. It employs LED lights and automated watering and fertilizing technology. Operators can monitor the farm through a live camera feed, and they can use an app to control the climate within the shipping container and shop for growing supplies. The company has said the system uses less water than traditional farming methods, and because its housed inside a shipping container, it doesnt require pesticides or herbicides.

Freight Farms has deployed more than 100 of these farming systems across the U.S. and in several countries. Customers include urban farmers, traditional farms, produce distributors, and universities.

The startup was formed in 2010 by Brad McNamara and Jon Friedman, who previously worked on rooftop hydroponic gardens.

Freight Farms is trying to take advantage of the growing interest in local food sourcing, as its shipping containers can be set up close to where food gets sold or consumed. It also aims to enable year-round food production in challenging localesthink the snowy mountains of Colorado, or even space. Freight Farms and Clemson University are working on a NASA-funded project exploring ways to grow food in harsh climates and, potentially, deep space.

Freight Farms also fits with trends in agriculture around automation and using digital tools. Thats a key reason why Spark made another investment.

Modular, Internet-connected, and highly automated commercial farms will play an important role in bringing local and affordable produce to communities all over the world, Sparks Todd Dagres and John Melas-Kyriazi wrote in a blog post about the new investment. Value will accrue to those who own the technology layer of this farming stack (hardware + software) as data and automation become increasingly important drivers of low-cost production.

Agricultural technology companies are taking various approaches to indoor farming. Like Freight Farms, Atlanta-based PodPonics sells tech-enabled mini-farms inside shipping containers. Businesses such as New York-based BrightFarms and Harrisonburg, VA-based Shenandoah Growers produce food inside greenhouses. And startups like Grove and SproutsIO, two Boston-area firms, sell micro-farming systems to consumers for growing food inside their homes.

Jeff Engel is a senior editor at Xconomy. Email: jengel@xconomy.com

Link:

Freight Farms Lands $7.3M as Agriculture Meets Data & Automation - Xconomy

Labelexpo Europe 2017 presents Industry 4.0 with Automation Arena – Labels and Labeling

By Staff writer 06 Jun 2017Read later

The organizer of Labelexpo Europe has confirmed details of the Automation Arena, a ground-breaking new feature debuting in 2017 at the label and package printing industrys preeminent trade fair.

Industry 4.0 is the current trend of automation and data exchange in manufacturing technologies. Demonstrating this shift towards combining industry with the Internet of Things, the Automation Arena is a practical live workshop featuring two automated press lines for digital and conventional label production. It will show visitors how information management can integrate workflow and automate production, working towards better performance, reliability and profitability for todays printer.

Located in Hall 11, the Automation Arena is being held in collaboration with Cerm, Esko, Xeikon, MPS, Kocher + Beck, AVT, Rotocontrol, Matho and Wasberger. Three half-hour long real-time presentations will run daily at 11:00, 13:00 and 15:00 over the shows first three days and once at 11:00 on the final day. These sessions will be filmed live and relayed via large screens to show visitors every single, detailed aspect of the job.

The print jobs run during the Automation Arena will be produced using digital and conventional printing technology. Job creation, artwork uploading and MIS order processing steps will take place in Cerms system before the pre-flighting, quality checks, proofing and customer approval are progressed using Eskos software platform and automation engine. This will be followed by Cerm scheduling, ink and substrate checking, tool ordering and the sending of JDF files, ready for printing. Both presses will utilize AT740 film from Avery Dennison, with inks supplied by Flint Group.

The conventional print runs will be produced on an MPS EF 430, 8-color press with no gear cylinder connection, intelligent pressure setting and zero waste roll change which in turn will be fitted with a Kocher + Beck UR Precision 440 U non-stop splicer unwind and AVTs Helios inspection technology. A Rotocontrol RSC 340 WFL slitter and turret rewinding unit will also feature with Wasbergers fully automatic Core Cutter S and Mathos EM180 Cuttopipe waste removal system.

For digital prints, job files differing from the conventional print runs will be sent to a Xeikon X-800 digital front end for batching, step and repeat and preparation of job identification, die-cut, inspection and turret rewinder barcodes for printing on a Xeikon 3300 press with an in-line laser die-cutting unit. When the Xeikon press starts its run, the audience will be able to see the different identification barcodes in operation, AVT defect detection, laser die-cutting set-up and rewinder automation.

The final stages in the job automation process will return to the Cerm operator and the audience will be taken through steps including warehousing, job picking, shipping carrier allocation, customer notification and invoicing.

Jade Grace, Labelexpo Europe project director, commented: This type of tradeshow feature has never been done anywhere before. The Automation Arena will clearly demonstrate to Labelexpo visitors that automation is not only the promise of tomorrow, but that it's available today.

To remain profitable, printers need to plan ahead by integrating their pre-press and production workflows with their management operations and connecting their entire supply chain. Printers automating their business will boost their competitiveness and become more agile with lower costs, increased productivity and better reliability, leading to higher profit margins. The Automation Arena will give attendees a good insight into the benefits of automation and a taste of how label and packaging production may evolve over the next five to ten years.

Labelexpo Europe 2017 will also feature a dedicated master class on MIS and workflow automation on September 26. Organized by the Label Academy, the five-hour master class will be presented by Mike Fairley and focus on how electronically managing an efficient and profitable 21st Century operation is able to offer an integrated management information system.

Labelexpo Europe 2017 takes place September 25-28, with online visitor registration available now and an early bird discount rate available until September 15.

Read Mike Fairleys Automate to survive opinion article here

Read an article on automation at the supplier level here

View original post here:

Labelexpo Europe 2017 presents Industry 4.0 with Automation Arena - Labels and Labeling

Internet-Ready Actuators and a World in Motion – Automation World

Actuatorswhether powered by electricity, air or some type of fluidare an integral part of creating movement in any production process. Long viewed as commodities, with strict limits on form factors and functions, their technical capabilities are beginning to change as suppliers respond to customer demands for more information to improve device reliability and process productivity.

The idea that information from actuators, including motors and drives, can be used to improve the operation of those devices is not a new one. After all, control systems have been monitoring and managing production systems for years. But by using actuators with the ability to connect to the Internet, its easier to see how an individual device is operating from outside the production system, separate from the mass of process information. Its one of many next steps on the road to what is being described as smart manufacturing.

Although much of the focus now is on using Internet-ready actuators for predictive maintenance to reduce production downtime, most experts say even greater benefits will accrue in the future from being able to optimize the functioning of a production process and its individual components.

In the past, it was difficult to gauge how an individual device was functioning or why it was failing because data was limited or maybe not available at all, explains Rich Mintz, marketing manager for low-voltage motors and drives at Siemens. Now, if an actuator is compatible with Ethernet, it may be able have its own IP address, so data could be viewed on a web page. But were starting to see diagnostic data on another layer, a platform for viewing the data thats being generated by the device and that you can use for analysis, whether its detecting what caused a fault or predicting faults before they can occur.

This diagnostic data can exist outside the proprietary process datasometimes in the cloudso that third parties can also help with data analytics while maintaining security. Its condition monitoring with a purpose, Mintz says. The point is to turn data into information: Im overheating because this is happening and heres what you need to do to fix it.

The goal of making actuators with Internet of Things (IoT) connections is to find ways to help customers with their process problems, notes Ranjani Balasubramaniam, director of large drives strategies and programs at Siemens. Since additional capabilities are now available, we need to make sure the benefits are well understood by the customer.

She cites industries that deploy large motors as a critical part in their processes, such as mining, oil and gas production, paper and power generation, as most likely to benefit from IoT-ready actuators. This is not only because these motors consume a great deal of electricity, but because downtime can be extremely expensive, both in terms of lost production and the difficulty in restoring operations, especially in remote locations.

But even a small motor can play a critical role in a process. If how a device is functioning affects product quality, process continuity, redundancy or safety, then its worthwhile to invest in getting more information about how its operating, Balasubramaniam says.

Like many other automation suppliers, Siemens has begun to offer device-monitoring services for its customers, in its case monitoring mobile mining equipment using lifetime analytics. Were able to help customers visualize data from their machines, so theyre better able to understand whats happening and why, Balasubramaniam adds.

Ethernet simplifiesconnectivity Though Internet-ready devices dont usually look much different than the traditional versions, they do require a physical port to allow a device to make an Ethernet connection. These devices also often have an embedded Ethernet-based protocol that makes it easier to connect them to a network or the cloud. Some suppliers are also working to develop wireless interfaces.

You can make this kind of connection from a traditional fieldbus network, but its much more difficult technically. Another Ethernet benefit is that its capable of transmitting larger amounts of data than traditional fieldbus.

If you know how healthy the devices in your production process are, you can take proactive steps to minimize downtime, says Nuzha Yakoob, senior product manager for electric automation at Festo. Thats the whole purpose for having Internet-ready actuators: so that you can monitor vibrations, temperatures, rotor status or any number of other conditions that could affect equipment operations.

Ethernet connectionsas opposed to closed systems like CANopen or DeviceNetmake it easier to exchange data and monitor production equipment remotely over a wide area network or through the cloud, Yakoob explains. Companies in the petrochemical industry, for example, are finding Ethernet extremely useful for monitoring process and production systems, which are often spread over large geographical areas, she says. The ability to share information between facilities or with the supply chain is even more important for companies that operate globally. Factors like these are driving the adoption of Internet- and Ethernet-ready devices.

One of the advantages of IoT-ready controllers is two-way data exchange. This allows you to share data to a SCADA system or the cloud, but it also makes it easy to push data down to electric or pneumatic devices for parameterization or configuration, Yakoob says. At Festo, we use the open standards protocol IO-Link, which can push data into IO-Link master devices that are employed on various machines to regulate pressure, monitor temperatures and sense positions or other values. We also use the OPC UA open standard for data exchange. These standards simplify machine communications.

Sensors as a bridge While electromechanical and electronic devices have been relatively easy to modify to accommodate Ethernet and Internet communications, pneumatic actuators must find ways to overcome the restrictions placed on them by traditional standards.

To put electronics into pneumatic actuators you would have to change their size in terms of length and width, so they would no longer fit the NFPA standards, explains Mark Densley, head of product management for controls at Aventics.

Makers of pneumatic systems like Aventics are getting around this barrier by using sensors as a bridge to access device data such as speed, velocity or whether cushioning is deteriorating. Sensors allow us to manipulate data and turn it into something we can interpret and transmit over Ethernet using the OPC UA standard, which provides a universal language for communicating between different machines, he says.

Maintenance is another challenge that must be overcome in the transition to devices that use electronics, according to Densley. Workers who are familiar with how pneumatic devices work may not know as much about electronics or control systems, he says. Its up to us as a manufacturer to make it easy.

Smart pneumatic monitors are able to communicate using many different standards and are completely independent, so they dont interfere with process control running on fieldbus. Software modules are optimized for typical pneumatic applications, such as pressured air consumption, leakage detection by consumption monitoring and correlation with process information, wear monitoring for actuators and shock absorbers, and counting switching cycles.

Intelligent pneumatics combine hardware, electronics, software and data, Densley explains. While the increasing volume of data transfer will stress controls and IT networks, local data analysis and creation of information can provide a solution. Decentralizing valve electronics, for example, will support modularization and networking.

Encouraging propermaintenance Transitioning to IoT could help overcome a perennial problem at many manufacturing sites: the attitude that equipment should be run to failure rather than following proper maintenance practices. Equipment often isnt maintained or is subjected to heavier duty use than it was designed for, so that it fails when people dont expect it, Densley says. When Ethernet and the Internet make condition monitoring and predictive maintenance easier, companies will begin to see the advantages because theyll experience less downtime and greater productivity from their equipment investment.

Manufacturers usually focus on three priorities when they adopt an IoT architecture: condition monitoring, lifecycle analysis and energy efficiency. For example, control valves usually have a lifecycle of 140 million cycles. Using web access to monitor cycle counts allows you to predict when the valve will fail, Densley explains. The capability to generate this data is built into the valve and the I/O module can transmit the information to an OPC server or a gateway.

Plant personnel are less interested in knowing exactly whats going on with the actuator than in how the equipment and the production process are performing, he adds. With two-position sensing, for example, you can monitor when a cylinder enters the cushioning area and when it leaves. This helps you determine if shock absorbers are wearing, which would tell the operator to use more air in the process.

Its not just manufacturers that want to know how well machines are operating. OEMs have a vested interest as well, Densley says. OEMs make money selling spare parts, but not until the warranty expires. Theyre looking at remote monitoring as a way to prevent downtime while a machine is under warranty, because they dont want to have to pay the cost of fixing it.

Original post:

Internet-Ready Actuators and a World in Motion - Automation World

6 Questions to Ask When Considering Home Automation: A Beginner’s Guide – Zing! Blog by Quicken Loans (blog)

Home automation is not a Jetsons-era future. Its here now, and the possibilities are endless. From an ever-expanding list of compatible home tech products to DIY hacks, the industry is growing by leaps and bounds.

Heres home automation 101 to cover your biggest questions and the must-have devices for smart home beginners.

What Is Home Automation?

Also called smart home technology, home automation is the electronic control of household activities. More advanced automation connects home features to a network in order to control, program and monitor their use. This device network is referred to as the Internet of Things.

Automated homes utilize a centralized system for simple and more complex home features and appliances, like controlling lights, locks, heating and cooling systems, indoor and outdoor cameras, security systems, blinds, sound systems and even coffee pots.

Most products use software that remotely controls home features through a device connected to the internet; for example, a homeowner can lock their front door from the office using their smartphone. Home automation also refers to the use of sensors, like an HVAC system automatically turning on and off based on home occupancy.

What Is Home Automation Good For?

Its not an expensive luxury reserved for the wealthy or even a home feature only accessible to techies. Technology today is almost limitless, featuring devices for every room of your house. Plus, homeowners arent just buying these devices for the tech aspects; smart technology has some obvious benefits.

What Features Do I Need?

Start by analyzing your needs. Whats your end goal? Maybe you crave more personalization or convenience or security. Home features that have the power to be automated today are fairly endless, so homeowners have lots of options.

Dont forget to also determine your budget going forward, the method that works for you to incorporate smart technology into your home and the time you want to invest. You dont want to get the wrong technology for your home or your bank account.

What Devices Should I Start With?

One of the easiest ways to begin automating your home is to buy a smart plug. These plugs allow you to control any electrical home device, from a lamp to an electronic pet feeder. From there, you can continue adding products based on what you need and want.

Though transforming an entire home into a smart home can feel daunting, one solution is beginning with a single room. If you spend the most time in your kitchen, automate kitchen appliances first with a smart crock pot or smart toaster oven. If the living room is your favorite place to relax, you can use a Roku device to control your TV with your phone and Philips Hue lights to adjust the mood lighting depending on the program youre watching. What Are the Must-Have Home Automation Products?

Top sellers on Amazon include smart light switches, smart LED lightbulbs and the Amazon Echo speaker (a voice-activated smart hub). Based on versatility and ease of use, The Wirecutter ranks voice-controlled speaker Google Home, Chamberlain MyQ Garage door controller, SkyBell doorbell camera and the NETGEAR Arlo Pro security camera as a few of their must-have products.

Can a Renter Automate Their Home?

Even if youre temporarily leasing an apartment or home, you can still automate your rental unit and take the automated devices with you to your next living space. Many smart devices dont need full installation into a homes electrical wiring, and most features that need to be hardwired, like light switches, can still be uninstalled.

Home automation is so simple and accessible that its easy to turn a traditional home into a home tech wonder. Were at the cusp of a growing and increasingly more affordable field of automated products. To start from square one, begin small with a capability or two, and then build in more to grow your automation network.

Have you considered implementing home automation products? What do you look forward to enjoying most about the technology? Let us know in the comments below!

Subscribe to Zing! blog

Want to impress your friends and family with the knowledge we'll drop on ya? If so, subscribe now for tips on home, money, and life delivered straight to your inbox.

Follow this link:

6 Questions to Ask When Considering Home Automation: A Beginner's Guide - Zing! Blog by Quicken Loans (blog)

DevOps automation boosts performance – BetaNews

The highest performing organizations have automated 72 percent of all configuration management processes. And those same high performers spend much less time (28 percent) in manual configuration processes that stall innovation and deployments.

In comparison, low performers are spending almost half of their time (46 percent) on manual configuration. These are among the findings of the latest State of DevOps Report by Puppet, which surveyed 3,200 respondents from organizations of all sizes and across multiple industries.

For the first time, the report also considered leadership types and how they affect performance. The results show that high-performing teams have leaders with the strongest behaviors across five characteristics. These include vision, inspirational communication, intellectual stimulation, supportive leadership and personal recognition. Leaders that exhibit a lower percentage of these characteristics tend to have lower performing teams.

Lean product management practices come under the spotlight too, and the report concludes that they help teams ship features that customers want, more frequently. This faster delivery cycle lets teams experiment, creating a feedback loop with customers, ultimately benefiting the entire organization.

"Every company relies on software to make its business more powerful, forcing IT organizations to evolve and ship software on demand," says Nigel Kersten, chief technical strategist at Puppet. "The results of the 2017 State of DevOps Report show that high-performing IT teams are deploying more frequently and recovering faster than ever before, yet the automation gap between high and low performing teams continues to grow. The report will help organizations understand how to identify their own inhibitors and embrace change on their DevOps journey."

You can find out more in the full report which is available to download from the Puppet website.

Photo Credit: anathomy/Shutterstock

Read more:

DevOps automation boosts performance - BetaNews

Slavery law to protect supply chains backed by big companies – The Australian Financial Review

Andrew "Twiggy" Forrest recently donated $75 million towards removing "modern slavery from human history".

Extortion, blackmail, cash back scams and slavery are happening every day under our noses. It is also happening in the supply chains of businesses, either through labour hire companies, or suppliers.

Under new legislation to be proposed by the federal opposition on Monday, big business will be forced to clamp down on slavery in their supply chains by reporting publicly and annually all efforts to identify and stop slavery.

Slavery and underpayment of wages is a scourge on our nation.

According to the Global Slavery Index, there are more than 45 million slaves, with two thirds in the Asia-Pacific region and 4300 slaves in Australia through human trafficking, forced labour and servitude.

The ALP will announce a plan to implement an Australian Modern Slavery Act, which will be publicly available and include specific reporting requirements. It will also back the appointment of an Anti Slavery Commissioner to combat the growing scourge of slavery around the world.

It follows a decision in the UK in 2015 to introduce a Modern Slavery Act.

It also comes in the middle of an inquiry launched in Australia earlier this year into establishing a modern slavery act. The inquiry, chaired by Liberal senator David Fawcett, attracted 92 submissions.

The Business Council of Australia and the union movement have all thrown their weight behind the proposed new legislation.

Recently mining magnate Andrew Forrest donated $75 million towards removing "modern slavery from human history".

Indeed Wesfarmers lodged a submission to the inquiry which said "the breadth, depth and interconnectedness of our supply chain make it challenging to manage ethical sourcing risks including child labour, forced labour, right to freedom of association and underpayment."

It says it believes the vast majority of its supply chain operates ethically, however we have identified and acted on breaches by some of our suppliers, and it is clear from public reports that other companies have been challenged in this area." It backs a Modern Slavery Act.

Woolworths has also backed new laws that include uniform reporting "specifying the types of information and the level of detail to be disclosed would be helpful for organisations, and for consumers to be able to more readily compare the efforts of different companies".

Slave labour and systemic underpayment of wages is the dark underbelly of our labour market. It is egregious, unethical and undermines our humanity. It is why all sides of politics must come together to introduce legislation sooner rather than later.

The issue of wage fraud was raised in parliament last week in relation to companies including franchise giant Domino's.

"What I would say is that we have a number of lines of inquiry underway at the moment what enforcement outcomes might flow from this will depend on the culpability of all parties involved, and we need to assess Domino's' own possible involvement in what has gone on," Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James told a Senate hearing last Tuesday.

James' confirmation that the regulator's investigation into wage fraud was ramping up and widening to Domino's head office no doubt sent chills through the pizza giant.

A day later, on May 31, Domino's quietly released an ASX statement that said its own investigations into wage underpayments had been delayed by up to six months. "The process is taking longer than anticipated," the statement said.

The statement was understated but it ignited investor fears. As one investor said:"A six-month delay is significant because it implies there is much more to look at than originally anticipated."

News in the same week that Domino's would buy the remaining 25 per cent of a business in Japan spooked investors, sparked a short selling frenzy and triggered a downgrade by two broking houses.

By the end of the week Domino's was one of the top 10 most shorted stocks and shares had fallen more than 7 per cent, with much of the turnover attributed to short selling.

Domino's is facing a series of headwinds. Concerns range from the extent of fraudulent activity within its franchise network, the success or otherwise of Domino's expansion overseas, particularly in France, the impact of the added cost burdens on franchisees from rising labour and food prices and the revitalisation of chief rival Pizza Hut under new ownership.

Its advertising fund also came under the spotlight in parliament last week following an investigation by the ACCC into breaches of its franchising code in relation to its multimillion-dollar advertising fund that receives contributions from store owners of between 4-6 per cent of sales to pay for advertising and marketing campaigns.

The ACCC's investigation culminated in fines of $18,000 but Greens Senator Lee Rhiannon wasn't convinced that the investigation or penalties were tough enough.

Senator Rhiannon asked ACCC chairman Rod Sims whether the investigation extended to some of the expenses being booked through the advertising fund.

She questioned whether some of the expenses were "legitimate" advertising fund expenses. "They include mystery shopping; chief executive Don Meij's personal website; legal fees regarding protecting their trademarks; and seminars at head office. Have you looked into this?"

Sims told her he didn't believe the investigation included an examination of the expenses but said: "I repeat again: Domino's is certainly on notice in terms of its behaviour in relation to the [franchising] code."

The various investigations into Domino's and political interest in the company has added to investor nervousness.

So too was the decision by Bain Capital to put its 25 per cent stake in a Japanese operator back to Domino's by August 28. The deal is expected to cost Domino's around $50 million but not everyone is convinced that Japan will be the growth story Domino's projects.

Morgans, a strong supporter of the company, has tempered its bullishness in the stock with a downgrade to "hold" from "add" and changed its target price range from $88.38 down to $65.62 after lowering its forecasts in key divisions.

Separately, Deutsche Bank, in its report "Pizza Profits should be shared," downgraded its recommendation to "sell".

At the heart of Deutsche bank analyst Michael Simotas' report is an analysis of the relationship between franchisees and Domino's and a comparison with the UK and the US.

Simotas contends that Domino's overall margins expanded around 50 per cent over the past five years at the expense of franchisees. "This has left Australian franchisees with inferior profits, margins and returns relative to their US and UK peers," he said.

It said Domino's own guidance implies it will need to take even more of the profit pool. "We don't think this is sustainable, and with around 90 per cent of rollout predicated on store splits, we see risk to store and/or margin targets."

Domino's argues that there is no correlation between profitability and franchisees underpaying workers. It says its business model is fair and franchisees do well out of it.

But until it gives more details of how many stores lose money, how many break even, how many make less than $100,000 EBITDA a year and so on, more reports and speculation like this one will remain.

Until the wage fraud scandal emerged earlier this year, Domino's has had a dream run. Its share price hit a record high of $80 on August 18, 2016 and short selling was minimal.

Fast forward to today and Domino's is one of the top 10 most shorted stocks on the ASX. According to shortman.com.au almost 12 per cent of shares in the company have now been short sold.

Short sellers are betting that Domino's share price will fall. They borrow stock from stock lenders in the hope that they will replace it at a later date when the shares fall lower.

Domino's releases its full-year results in August. It promises to be an interesting conference call, with investors and franchisees listening carefully to their answers.

Continue reading here:

Slavery law to protect supply chains backed by big companies - The Australian Financial Review

Paying Inmates Minimum Wages Helps the Working Class … – Bloomberg

It was just a movie.

Its a movie cliche -- a bunch of men in white-and-black striped pajamas, with chains around their ankles, breaking rocks in a quarry under armed guard. The media has taught us that prison labor is the natural state of the world -- a way to make the punishment for wrongdoing a little more unpleasant, and a way to make criminals sweat off whatever sinister restlessness drove them to crime.

But the reality is that prison labor is just a way that governments try to recoup some of the cost of incarceration, by farming out their prisoners as captive labor. That might help governments bottom line a little bit, but it creates devastating competition for low-wage American workers.

The U.S. locks up an extraordinary number of people. Its incarceration rate is the highest in the world and at least twice that of any other advanced economy, and significantly higher than authoritarian Russia. Of incarcerated Americans, about a million and a half are in prison. That number surged in the 1980s and hasnt fallen much from its peak in the mid-2000s. A 2016 report by the Sentencing Project shows the dramatic change:

That enormous prison population represents a vast pool of ultra-cheap labor. A recent report by the Prison Policy Initiative found that the average wage of a prison worker is 93 cents an hour, and the lowest reported wage was 16 cents.

Compare that to the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. How can a free American worker compete with an inmate laborer making less than one-tenth that amount? Even if prisoners are less productive than free workers, the wage difference is overwhelming.

Nor are these prison workers breaking rocks, like in the old movies. In the modern day, the government contracts them out to private companies, offering inmates as a way to boost the bottom line. Over the years, prisoners have packaged coffee for Starbucks Corp. and wrapped software for Microsoft Corp. They manufacture furniture, schools supplies and food products. They make dental products, train animals, work in call centers and even pick cotton.

All of these activities put prisoners in direct competition with blue-collar American workers; the latter has essentially no chance. In recent years, there have been political uproars over guest workers, unauthorized immigrants and offshoring U.S. jobs to low-wage countries such as Bangladesh. But low-wage immigrants dont do much to lower native-born wages, and laborers in Bangladesh dont have the tools or the proximity to compete directly with most American workers.

If you want to ease the pressure on the beleaguered U.S. working class, paying prisoners more is the best bet. Mandating that prison labor receive the federal minimum wage would open up lots of job opportunities for low-wage workers on the outside.

It would also be the moral thing to do. Detractors often call the prison labor system slavery, and while there are differences between modern prison labor and the slavery system of the old South, the similarities are way too close for comfort. The U.S. has always valued free labor over compulsory work -- as historians have documented, this was one reason slavery aroused such ire in the antebellum North.

Prison labor therefore goes against traditional American values and humanitarian concerns alike. Writers who have gone to watch the prison labor system in action report being stunned by how widespread and accepted this un-American system has become, especially in states like Louisiana with high rates of incarceration.

Morality also demands that prisoners should receive more of the money that customers pay for their services. Currently, inmates receive only about a quarter of that money, including the portion that goes to victim reparation funds.

Reduced demand for prison labor due to higher wages, especially if prisoners are allowed to keep more of what they earn, would mean government finances will take a hit. Incarceration is expensive, costing about $30,000 a year for a federal inmate. But maybe raising the cost of throwing Americans in prison is a good thing.

Clear thinking from leading voices in business, economics, politics, foreign affairs, culture, and more.

Share the View

The incredibly high U.S. incarceration rate is a strong indication that the country is locking people away for crimes that dont really require it, such as drug use or petty theft. But recently, high costs are forcing states to reduce their prison populations. Presumably, that will limit incarceration to those who really need to be locked up. The end of mass incarceration will also help the economy and reduce inequality -- some estimates claim that the practice of imprisoning millions of Americans has increased the countrys poverty rate by 20 percent, even before taking into account the wage competition from cheap prison labor.

So paying prisoners the minimum wage shouldnt be seen as an act of charity. It will take pressure off of working-class American laborers, encourage governments to reduce mass incarceration, and move the country back toward valuing free labor.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story: Noah Smith at nsmith150@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Greiff at jgreiff@bloomberg.net

Original post:

Paying Inmates Minimum Wages Helps the Working Class ... - Bloomberg

Big business backs Labor call for new anti-slavery legislation – The Sydney Morning Herald

Big businesshas backed aLabor Party push for new laws toforce major Australian companies to report on modern slavery in their supply chains.

Federal Laborwill on Monday announce the newpolicy and call for the introduction of a Modern Slavery Act toimpose newrequirements onbig businessto report onslavery and human trafficking in their supply chains. The policy includesthe introduction of a publicly available list of companies that wouldbe required to develop policies on and monitor any signs of the problem.

Labor also wants an independent anti-slavery commissioner like in Britain toaddress alack of enforcement of laws against slavery and to help businessesprotect supply chains.

The Business Council of Australia, which represents the chiefs of Australia's top companies, said it welcomed Labor's commitment to the introduction of a Modern Slavery Act.

"Greater global trade has boosted Australians' living standards, but it has also increased the risk that products and services are tainted by the use of forced labour," a Business Council spokesman said.

"Increased transparency will help customers, investors and business partners more easily distinguish whether companies are acting morally and working to maintain clean supply chains. Transparency also makes competition between businesses fairer.

"Large businesses are rightly taking a leadership role in promoting and supporting clean supply chains, and we look forward to consulting with Labor on the detail of its proposal."

Mining magnate Andrew Forrest late last year challenged Australian business leaders to wipe slavery out of their supply chains and has backed calls for tougher rules in this country.

Hewas shocked to find evidence of slavery within the supply chain of his Fortescue Metals Group in 2012.

Federal Labor's spokeswoman for Justice, ClareO'Neiland Opposition Leader Bill Shorten will on Monday announce itsnew policymodelled on Britain's Modern Slavery Act.

"For the first time, we are making it crystal clear that big businesses need to know what's happening in their supply chains," Ms O'Neil said.

"Every day, we probably pick up a product, wear a piece of clothing, use a resource or consume something which has been touched by a slave.

"We have a clear moral responsibility to tackle this problem.

"This policy represents a major shift in thinking about our responsibility as businesses and consumers for modern slavery."

Labor's callfor a Modern Slavery Act goes further than theexisting British law by mandatingand not simply suggesting that companiesreport on their supply chains and any areas of risk involvingslavery and human trafficking. Companies would also face penalties for non-compliance.

Ms O'Neil said two-thirds of people trapped in slavery worldwideare reported to be in the Asia-Pacific region and itwas estimated4300weretrapped in slavery in Australia.

In February, federal Attorney-GeneralGeorge Brandislaunchedaninquiry into whether amodern slavery act should be introduced in Australia.

The inquiry has been asked to look into the extent of modern day slavery includingforced labour and wage exploitation, involuntary servitude, debt bondage, human trafficking, forced marriage and other slavery-like exploitationin Australia and globally withreference to Britain's 2015 Modern Slavery Act.

The Senate committee has been asked to identifyinternational best practice used by governments, companies, businesses and organisations to prevent modern slavery in domestic and global supply chains, with a view to strengthening Australian legislation.

Excerpt from:

Big business backs Labor call for new anti-slavery legislation - The Sydney Morning Herald

The Myth of the Kindly General Lee – The Atlantic

The strangest part about the continued personality cult of Robert E. Lee is how few of the qualities his admirers profess to see in him he actually possessed.

Memorial Day has the tendency to conjure up old arguments about the Civil War. Thats understandable; it was created to mourn the dead of a war in which the Union was nearly destroyed, when half the country rose up in rebellion in defense of slavery. This year, the removal of Lees statue in New Orleans has inspired a new round of commentary about Lee, not to mention protests on his behalf by white supremacists.

The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

There is little truth in this. Lee was a devout Christian, and historians regard him as an accomplished tactician. But despite his ability to win individual battles, his decision to fight a conventional war against the more densely populated and industrialized North is considered by many historians to have been a fatal strategic error.

But even if one conceded Lees military prowess, he would still be responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans in defense of the Souths authority to own millions of human beings as property because they are black. Lees elevation is a key part of a 150-year-old propaganda campaign designed to erase slavery as the cause of the war and whitewash the Confederate cause as a noble one. That ideology is known as the Lost Cause, and as historian David Blight writes, it provided a foundation on which Southerners built the Jim Crow system.

There are unwitting victims of this campaignthose who lack the knowledge to separate history from sentiment. Then there are those whose reverence for Lee relies on replacing the actual Lee with a mythical figure who never truly existed.

In the Richmond Times Dispatch, R. David Cox wrote that For white supremacist protesters to invoke his name violates Lees most fundamental convictions. In the conservative publication Townhall, Jack Kerwick concluded that Lee was among the finest human beings that has ever walked the Earth. John Daniel Davidson, in an essay for The Federalist, opposed the removal of the Lee statute in part on the grounds that Lee arguably did more than anyone to unite the country after the war and bind up its wounds. Praise for Lee of this sort has flowed forth from past historians and presidents alike.

This is too divorced from Lees actual life to even be classed as fan fiction; it is simply historical illiteracy.

White supremacy does not violate Lees most fundamental convictions. White supremacy was one of Lees most fundamental convictions.

Lee was a slaveownerhis own views on slavery were explicated in an 1856 letter that it often misquoted to give the impression that Lee was some kind of an abolitionist. In the letter, he describes slavery as a moral & political evil, but goes on to explain that:

I think it however a greater evil to the white man than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is known & ordered by a wise Merciful Providence. Their emancipation will sooner result from the mild & melting influence of Christianity, than the storms & tempests of fiery Controversy.

The argument here is that slavery is bad for white people, good for black people, and most importantly, it is better than abolitionism; emancipation must wait for divine intervention. That black people might not want to be slaves does not enter into the equation; their opinion on the subject of their own bondage is not even an afterthought to Lee.

Lees cruelty as a slavemaster was not confined to physical punishment. In Reading the Man, the historian Elizabeth Brown Pryors portrait of Lee through his writings, Pryor writes that Lee ruptured the Washington and Custis tradition of respecting slave families, by hiring them off to other plantations, and that by 1860 he had broken up every family but one on the estate, some of whom had been together since Mount Vernon days. The separation of slave families was one of the most unfathomably devastating aspects of slavery, and Pryor wrote that Lees slaves regarded him as the worst man I ever see.

The trauma of rupturing families lasted lifetimes for the enslavedit was, as my colleague Ta-Nehisi Coates described it, a kind of murder. After the war, thousands of the emancipated searched desperately for kin lost to the market for human flesh, fruitlessly for most. In Reconstruction, the historian Eric Foner quotes a Freedmens Bureau agent who notes of the emancipated, in their eyes, the work of emancipation was incomplete until the families which had been dispersed by slavery were reunited.

Lees heavy hand on the Arlington plantation, Pryor writes, nearly led to a slave revolt, in part because the enslaved had been expected to be freed upon their previous masters death, and Lee had engaged in a dubious legal interpretation of his will in order to keep them as his property, one that lasted until a Virginia court forced him to free them.

When two of his slaves escaped and were recaptured, Lee either beat them himself or ordered the overseer to "lay it on well." Wesley Norris, one of the slaves who was whipped, recalled that not satisfied with simply lacerating our naked flesh, Gen. Lee then ordered the overseer to thoroughly wash our backs with brine, which was done.

Every state that seceded mentioned slavery as the cause in their declarations of secession. Lees beloved Virginia was no different, accusing the federal government of perverting its powers not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern Slaveholding States. Lees decision to fight for the South can only be described as a choice to fight for the continued existence of human bondage in Americaeven though for the Union, it was not at first a war for emancipation.

During his invasion of Pennsylvania, Lees Army of Northern Virginia enslaved free blacks and brought them back to the South as property. Pryor writes that evidence links virtually every infantry and cavalry unit in Lees army with the abduction of free black Americans, with the activity under the supervision of senior officers.

Soldiers under Lees command at the Battle of the Crater in 1864 massacred black Union soldiers who tried to surrender. Then, in a spectacle hatched by Lees senior corps commander A.P. Hill, the Confederates paraded the Union survivors through the streets of Petersburg to the slurs and jeers of the southern crowd. Lee never discouraged such behavior. As the historian Richard Slotkin wrote in No Quarter: The Battle of the Crater, his silence was permissive.

The presence of black soldiers on the field of battle shattered every myth the Souths slave empire was built on: the happy docility of slaves, their intellectual inferiority, their cowardice, their inability to compete with whites. As Pryor writes, fighting against brave and competent African Americans challenged every underlying tenet of southern society. The Confederate response to this challenge was to visit every possible atrocity and cruelty upon black soldiers whenever possible, from enslavement to execution.

As the historian James McPherson recounts in Battle Cry of Freedom, in October of that same year, Lee proposed an exchange of prisoners with the Union general Ulysses S. Grant. Grant agreed, on condition that blacks be exchanged the same as white soldiers. Lees response was that negroes belonging to our citizens are not considered subjects of exchange and were not included in my proposition. Because slavery was the cause for which Lee fought, he could hardly be expected to easily concede, even at the cost of the freedom of his own men, that blacks could be treated as soldiers and not things. Grant refused the offer, telling Lee that Government is bound to secure to all persons received into her armies the rights due to soldiers. Despite its desperate need for soldiers, the Confederacy did not relent from this position until a few months before Lees surrender.

After the war, Lee did counsel defeated southerners against rising up against the North. Lee might have become a rebel once more, and urged the South to resume fightingas many of his former comrades wanted him to. But even in this task Grant, in 1866, regarded his former rival as falling short, saying that Lee was setting an example of forced acquiescence so grudging and pernicious in its effects as to be hardly realized.

Nor did Lees defeat lead to an embrace of racial egalitarianism. The war was not about slavery, Lee insisted later, but if it was about slavery, it was only out of Christian devotion that white southerners fought to keep blacks enslaved. Lee told a New York Herald reporter, in the midst of arguing in favor of somehow removing blacks from the South (disposed of, in his words), that unless some humane course is adopted, based on wisdom and Christian principles you do a gross wrong and injustice to the whole negro race in setting them free. And it is only this consideration that has led the wisdom, intelligence and Christianity of the South to support and defend the institution up to this time.

Lee had beaten or ordered his own slaves to be beaten for the crime of wanting to be free, he fought for the preservation of slavery, his army kidnapped free blacks at gunpoint and made them unfreebut all of this, he insisted, had occurred only because of the great Christian love the South held for blacks. Here we truly understand Frederick Douglasss admonition that "between the Christianity of this land and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference."

Privately, according to the correspondence collected by his own family, Lee counseled others to hire white labor instead of the freedmen, observing that wherever you find the negro, everything is going down around him, and wherever you find a white man, you see everything around him improving.

In another letter, Lee wrote You will never prosper with blacks, and it is abhorrent to a reflecting mind to be supporting and cherishing those who are plotting and working for your injury, and all of whose sympathies and associations are antagonistic to yours. I wish them no evil in the worldon the contrary, will do them every good in my power, and know that they are misled by those to whom they have given their confidence; but our material, social, and political interests are naturally with the whites.

Publicly, Lee argued against the enfranchisement of blacks, and raged against Republican efforts to enforce racial equality on the South. Lee told Congress that blacks lacked the intellectual capacity of whites and could not vote intelligently, and that granting them suffrage would excite unfriendly feelings between the two races. Lee explained that the negroes have neither the intelligence nor the other qualifications which are necessary to make them safe depositories of political power. To the extent that Lee believed in reconciliation, it was between white people, and only on the precondition that black people would be denied political power and therefore the ability to shape their own fate.

Lee is not remembered as an educator, but his life as president of Washington College (later Washington and Lee) is tainted as well. According to Pryor, students at Washington formed their own chapter of the KKK, and were known by the local Freedmens Bureau to attempt to abduct and rape black schoolgirls from the nearby black schools.

There were at least two attempted lynchings by Washington students during Lees tenure, and Pryor writes that the number of accusations against Washington College boys indicates that he either punished the racial harassment more laxly than other misdemeanors, or turned a blind eye to it, adding that he did not exercise the near imperial control he had at the school, as he did for more trivial matters, such as when the boys threatened to take unofficial Christmas holidays. In short, Lee was as indifferent to crimes of violence toward blacks carried out by his students as he was when they were carried out by his soldiers.

Lee died in 1870, as Democrats and ex-Confederates were commencing a wave of terrorist violence that would ultimately reimpose their domination over the Southern states. The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866; there is no evidence Lee ever spoke up against it. On the contrary, he darkly intimated in his interview with the Herald that the South might be moved to violence again if peace did not proceed on its terms. That was prescient.

Lee is a pivotal figure in American history worthy of study. Neither the man who really existed, nor the fictionalized tragic hero of the Lost Cause, are heroes worthy of a statue in a place of honor. As one Union veteran angrily put it in 1903 when Pennsylvania was considering placing a statute to Lee at Gettysburg, If you want historical accuracy as your excuse, then place upon this field a statue of Lee holding in his hand the banner under which he fought, bearing the legend: We wage this war against a government conceived in liberty and dedicated to humanity. The most fitting monument to Lee is the national military cemetery the federal government placed on the grounds of his former home in Arlington.

To describe this man as an American hero requires ignoring the immense suffering for which he was personally responsible, both on and off the battlefield. It requires ignoring his participation in the industry of human bondage, his betrayal of his country in defense of that institution, the battlefields scattered with the lifeless bodies of men who followed his orders and those they killed, his hostility toward the rights of the freedmen and his indifference to his own students waging a campaign of terror against the newly emancipated. It requires reducing the sum of human virtue to a sense of decorum and the ability to convey gravitas in a gray uniform.

There are former Confederates who sought to redeem themselvesone thinks of James Longstreet, wrongly blamed by Lost Causers for Lees disastrous defeat at Gettysburg, who went from fighting the Union army to leading New Orleanss integrated police force in battle against white supremacist paramilitaries. But there are no statues of Longstreet in New Orleans.* Lee was devoted to defending the principle of white supremacy; Longstreet was not. This, perhaps, is why Lee was placed atop the largest Confederate monument at Gettysburg in 1917, but the 6-foot-2-inch Longstreet had to wait until 1998 to receive a smaller-scale statue hidden in the woods that makes him look like a hobbit riding a donkey. Its why Lee is remembered as a hero, and Longstreet is remembered as a disgrace.

The white supremacists who have protested on Lees behalf are not betraying his legacy. In fact, they have every reason to admire him. Lee, whose devotion to white supremacy outshone his loyalty to his country, is the embodiment of everything they stand for. Tribe and race over country is the core of white nationalism, and racists can embrace Lee in good conscience.

The question is why anyone else would.

* This article originally stated that there are no statues of Longstreet in the American South; in fact, there is one in his hometown of Gainesville, Georgia. We regret the error.

View post:

The Myth of the Kindly General Lee - The Atlantic

Two Democratic hopefuls for Va. governor on schools, Metro and the minimum wage – Washington Post

By Ralph Northam and Tom Perriello By Ralph Northam and Tom Perriello June 4

Editors note: On Friday, The Post conducted an email debate between Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam and former congressman Tom Perriello, Democratic candidates in Virginias 2017 gubernatorial election. The questions were asked by Post editorial board member Lee Hockstader. The transcript has been edited for style and clarity.

[Meet the candidates running to become Virginias next governor]

Lee Hockstader: Polls suggest many primary voters are struggling to decide between the two of you, which might reflect the civility of your race or how narrow the policy differences are.

Dr. Northam, youve suggested youd work better with the Republican-controlled legislature than your opponent, by dint of your experience and relationships in Richmond, but it seems a stretch to think GOP leaders in the General Assembly will allow any Democratic governor to claim a major victory. Mr. Perriello, youve made a case for yourself as a younger, very liberal candidate with what you call bold ideas, but a lot of those ideas like soaking the rich with a tax hike to provide two years of debt-free community college for any Virginian are simply non-starters for Republicans, no matter how much you campaign in conservative parts of Virginia.

What can each of you say to sharpen the distinctions between you so voters can understand how you would govern differently? Why are you a better bet than your opponent?

(Dalton Bennett/The Washington Post)

[GOP hopefuls for Va. governor debate Metro, the opioid epidemic, Confederate statues]

Ralph Northam: With over a decade of experience working in Richmond, Ive developed relationships with leaders of both parties. In fact, one of my first experiences in the legislature [was] to lead the fight to pass a smoking ban in restaurants. While it failed the first time, I learned some lessons after taking a licking, brought Republicans to the table to talk about the benefits for Virginia. The very next year, we passed the ban and then-Gov. [Timothy M.] Kaine signed it into law. The way we got it done was to explain how much it was hurting our economy and costing our health care. We were able to succeed despite Big Tobaccos efforts.

I led similar efforts to establish firm guidelines for dealing with concussions in Virginias student athletes. As a pediatric neurologist, I could leverage my expertise, and my colleagues respected that experience because of the relationships I established.

Having been a member of Kaines climate change commission, I led the charge to gather bipartisan support for resiliency to combat sea-level rise. Ive continued that leadership under Gov. [Terry] McAuliffes administration.

Finally, I educated people on both sides of aisle on the transvaginal ultrasound bill, and because of my conversations, we were able to remove the transvaginal portion of the mandate.

So, Ive got a proven record of bringing together bipartisan support and doing whats in the best interest of Virginia, and I can do the same as governor.

Tom Perriello: The track record of solving problems within the confines of Richmond hasnt worked. What Ive done both here and abroad is bring people together, from the grass roots, to solve problems that pundits and observers said were impossible. I think thats a useful skill set. The Virginia Way stopped working for average Virginians a long time ago; what we need is a new way that builds solutions directly among the people, across region and race.

(Dalton Bennett/The Washington Post)

Thats why in this campaign, I am the only candidate to offer a fully paid-for plan that guarantees universal pre-K and two years of truly free community college. I designed this plan not inside my own head; these are ideas Ive heard at more than 350 public events across Virginia, including many in Trump country. Im the only candidate from either party whos rejected Dominions campaign contributions. Im the only candidate clearly opposed to two fracked-gas pipelines that would cut across Virginia. I was the first candidate to call for a living wage of $15 an hour, to put fixing our criminal-justice system and ending the racial wealth gap on the table, to say Virginia should join an interstate climate alliance to confront climate change, and to call for enshrining the right to choose in our state constitution. This is about being bold and leading on the major issues affecting Virginia. I think leadership is about identifying the problem and solutions and building a political coalition to make them happen. I find voters across the political spectrum responding to our willingness to put policy details and real tough decisions on the table.

Hockstader: Dr. Northam, doesnt Mr. Perriello also have a proven record as a leader?

Northam: I believe its a matter of experience in Richmond, a health-care provider and veteran versus experience in Washington, D.C., and elsewhere. The politics of getting things done in Richmond can be very complicated, and it takes someone who has spent the time to know the issues and develop the relationships with key members of both parties to make progress.

Perriello: I bring executive experience from outside of Richmond and outside of politics to the table, like Govs. McAuliffe and [Mark R.] Warner did, and people have seen that leadership in this race where weve set both the tone and policy agenda.

Northam: While its easy to say that from someone who has not been in Richmond, I believe there are Democratic leaders across Virginia, including Sens. Kaine and Warner, and Gov. McAuliffe, who would say that weve made tremendous progress, and understand there is more to be done.

Hockstader: Mr. Perriello, hasnt Dr. Northam, to use your words, also identified problems and solutions?

Perriello: We appreciate that Dr. Northam has agreed with many of the policy positions that weve led on and introduced into this campaign. I believe that our campaign, talking about both needing to be a firewall against the hate and bigotry of the Trump administration and enacting a bold agenda of turning a cycle of debt to a cycle of opportunity in Virginia, has been unique in this primary. I also am the only candidate whos identified exactly how I will pay for my full agenda, and we find that voters across the political spectrum appreciate that a great deal.

Northam: Since he has not been in Richmond, he may not be aware that I have been fighting for things like gun safety reform, preventing offshore drilling, reproductive rights and pre-K for years.

My proposals, like my G3 program, will improve the economy, train the workforce, and are fiscally responsible. This can get done in Richmond. My total proposals equal $67 million and can be funded through comprehensive tax reform and economic growth, and are not reliant on a billion-dollar tax increase that will not pass the General Assembly.

Perriello: There is no scenario in which proposals like truly universal pre-K, raising teacher pay and paid leave cost only $67 million. A billion-dollar revenue plan did pass under a Republican governor with your support. So what is the distinction when this is for a progressive working-families agenda? To be clear: We dont raise taxes by a billion dollars; the plan includes spending cuts, tax reform and closing loopholes for big corporations as well.

Hockstader: Dr. Northam, would you care to respond to your opponents skepticism regarding the cost of your program proposals?

Northam: Im proud to have used all the tools available to Virginia, including securing a federal grant to fund the program. While there is more work to be done, we were able to open up 13,000 more new pre-K slots in Virginia last year. Thats a good start.

The only way to address these solutions is to have the relationships and bipartisan coalition necessary to get the job done. I took a key role in the transportation plan that was passed, and as governor I plan to be part of the solution to creating a floor in the gas tax with bipartisan support. We must make sure we adequately fund Virginias transportation system.

You have laid out policy proposals for well over a billion, and a tax increase of over a billion dollars; whats left for transportation?

Perriello: My proposal is not a billion-dollar tax increase, and suggesting it is sounds more like something that would come out of Ed Gillespies mouth than a Democrats! It includes major spending cuts and closing loopholes that benefit corporations to level the playing field for small businesses and invest in education.

Northam: I think we can both agree that Ed Gillespies tax plan is a farce and nothing more than a giveaway to the rich.

According to your campaign, your plan increases revenue by more than $1.1 billion.

Hockstader: Would either of you support removing and relocating the statue of Robert E. Lee in the Old Hall of the Virginia House of Delegates? How about the statue of Stonewall Jackson on the grounds of the state Capitol? If so, why? If not, why not?

Northam: I believe these statues belong in a museum but that the decision belongs to local communities. In this instance, the power rests in the General Assembly, and its a worthy conversation for us to have.

In order to be a more inclusive society, we need to elevate the parts of our complicated history that have all too often been ignored.

This means memorializing people like Barbara Johns and Oliver Hill, but also men like Samuel Wilbert Tucker, who was the leading attorney for the NAACP in the state of Virginia in the 50s and 60s and coordinated the sit-in at the Alexandria library in 1939. Or Mozella Jordan Price , who became supervisor of African American schools in Appomattox County in 1919 and served until 1963.

We need to remember the painful aspects of history and not omit them simply because they are difficult to discuss.

It is why the 400th anniversary of the arrival of African slaves at Fort Monroe is so important to commemorate, and we must do so in a way that helps spur a conversation about the more painful parts of our history.

Perriello: I strongly support the valuable conversation we are having about how we memorialize, and frankly understand, our past. In my home town of Charlottesville and Albemarle County, a majority of human beings during the Civil War were black. And it is important that we not discount their lived experience by three-fifths. I have worked on truth and reconciliation commissions in other countries, and often it is the process of these decisions the conversation that is as important as the outcome. I have called for a commission on racial healing and transformation, building on tremendously valuable local initiatives to look systematically at these questions.

Growing up in Virginia, our textbooks gave Reconstruction less than a page, but it is one of the most profound moments of our history. We cannot understand todays racial wealth gap where the median net worth of an African American family is one-eleventh that of the median white family but jumping from slavery to today with a brief stop at Jim Crow. We must understand that most of these memorials were put up not after the Civil War but during moments of racial progress for African Americans. This does not need to be seen as a zero-sum game but as a great puzzle that we ask all Virginians to solve about our past to form a fuller picture for our future.

Hockstader: Mr. Perriello: remove Stonewall and Lee from the Capitol or not?

Perriello: I personally believe the right outcome will be to move them, but I have learned as someone who has done transitional justice professionally that designing a truly inclusive process and addressing all these issues together, rather than one-off, is more effective for the ultimate goal of healing, transformation and a truly accurate history.

Hockstader: Youve both proposed a minimum wage of $15 an hour, more than double the states current rate. Some economists would say thats at odds with each of your stated goals to juice Virginias growth rate, which currently stands at 48th among the states. Your responses?

Perriello: Actually, economic data clearly shows that raising the minimum wage is a growth strategy. One of the greatest barriers to real growth over the past two decades has been the myth of trickle-down economics. In dozens of past experiences of federal and state minimum-wage increases, job creation has risen and small business has benefited, including the restaurant and hospitality sectors that claim concern. This is because no successful business looks at only one side of their ledger sheet costs they look at the net between costs and revenue. When the working and middle class have more disposable income, it is our greatest indicator of real growth.

This is also about something our conservative allies can appreciate, which is that raising the minimum wage reduces welfare rolls. It moves more people off of public assistance and into taxpaying jobs. Over recent decades, welfare benefits have not gotten effectively better but the benefits of working have gotten far worse. Just keeping with inflation would have us at a $10-an-hour minimum wage, and if wages had kept with productivity, it would be at $22 an hour. What studies have shown repeatedly is that a mother going to work for less than $15 an hour will typically lose money by going to work, largely due to child-care costs, transportation costs and lost benefits. We need to make work pay to grow the economy, and that is something liberals and conservatives should agree on.

This is why a more conservative state like West Virginia has raised the minimum wage but a gerrymandered legislature here in Virginia has not.

Northam: Virginias minimum wage is pegged to the federal minimum wage, which right now is $7.25 an hour and hasnt risen in nearly 10 years. That means that right now Virginias minimum wage provides less than 40 percent of a living wage for an adult, and one-fifth of a living wage for an adult Virginian with two children.

The facts are clear: Our economy can afford a $15 minimum wage if its phased in responsibly over time. Today, our low-wage workers earn less per hour than someone working at their level did 50 years ago. Thats just unacceptable, especially considering our economy has grown dramatically over the past 50 years.

Oftentimes, I hear critics tell me that a $15 minimum wage is not needed in rural Virginia. Yet they leave out the lack of transportation options available to them and the higher expense of driving in those areas. We should be mindful that folks across Virginia are consumers, and more money in their pockets means more money they can spend at our businesses.

Hockstader: Another question for both of you: As you know, theres no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but Arlington County seems to qualify: Its sheriff wont honor ICE detainers to hold undocumented immigrants in jail past their release date unless ICE secures a warrant issued by a court.

Do you regard Arlingtons stance as admirable, and would you encourage other localities in Virginia to emulate it?

Northam: I believe Arlingtons stance has been defended by Attorney General [Mark R.] Herring in 2015. His opinion stated that detainer request are optional. This mirrored the decisions by other states and local governments, and President [Barack] Obamas Department of Homeland Security. Arlington is well within their legal bounds to take this action. I should add that I was proud to break a tie when Republicans tried to scapegoat immigrants for political gain. They knew full well there are no sanctuary cities in Virginia, but they put up a bill to scare immigrant communities. Thats not right. I was glad to put a stop to it.

Perriello: We support Arlington and others using all options for non-cooperation with the unconstitutional and unconscionable directives of the Trump administration. Within the bounds of the law, I will ensure that Virginia uses all powers possible to remain an inclusive state that ensures the dignity and security of all who live here. This includes discouraging the 287(g) partnerships that blur the distinction between deportation agents and local law enforcement in ways that undermine public safety. The day President Trump threatened to cut off funding, I called this out as an empty threat at odds with the anti-commandeering jurisprudence of our Constitution. Circuit courts have now reached that same conclusion. We must ensure safe, dignified spaces particularly our schools, houses of worship and clinics and make sure families do not go to bed at night terrified they may be separated at any moment from their children.

Hockstader: Arguably, there are at least two sanctuary counties: Arlington and Chesterfield. Do you admire their policies and would you like to see them proliferate in the commonwealth?

Northam: There simply are no sanctuary cities in Virginia. Cities and counties have the authority to release prisoners who are eligible for release, and Arlington and Chesterfield are exercising that authority. The attorney general has ruled that federal detainer requests are optional, and I support his opinion.

Hockstader: In response to the opioid epidemic, from which three Virginians die daily, would you support Virginia bringing a lawsuit against drug manufacturers like the one Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine announced this week?

Perriello: Yes. I have repeatedly called out Big Pharma for their role in this crisis, including during multiple visits to clinics in Southwest Virginia. I showed my willingness to stand up to the drug lobby during the fight for Obamacare, including my vote for an early, stronger version that allowed Medicare to negotiate cheaper prescription drug rates. This is also why we support the use of medical marijuana as a more effective element of care that does not come from Big Pharma.

Northam: This is a multifaceted challenge. As a provider, Ive been traveling around educating other providers, as well as those in training, to ensure proper management of both acute and chronic pain. As lieutenant governor, Ive led Virginias effort to combat this crisis. This includes increasing funding for community service boards so that we now have same-day access, giving the public through the commissioner of health a blanket prescription for naloxone to reverse the deadly side effects, and working with Attorney General Herring to stop the influx of opioids, as those are now being laced with fentanyl and carfentanil.

Attorney General Herring has made some moves forward on this. I appreciate the spirit of Attorney General DeWines lawsuit, and if Attorney General Herring believes there is a case to be made, I would support his decision.

Hockstader: Turning to a local issue central to the concerns of many Northern Virginians, how would you fix Metro and help meet its anticipated need for at least $15 billion in additional capital funds over the coming decade? Specifically, would you support a regional sales tax in which Northern Virginia would be assessed in coordination with suburban Maryland and the District of Columbia?

Northam: I dont think there is any question among leaders in Virginia, D.C. and Maryland that we need to fix Metro and find a dedicated revenue source for the system. It is an economic driver for the entire region, and one of the biggest economic drivers in Virginia.

However, as you well know, the complex political landscape across differing local and state governments makes this reality hard to achieve. So the first thing we need to do is create an unprecedented level of transparency and accountability for the governance and operation of the system. Restoring trust for riders, residents and policymakers is the only way we can change the current dynamic.

Second, as with tax reform, the legislature is going to reject any dedicated funding plan they feel is forced upon them. To prevent that, I will use the LaHood commission report to guide negotiations with Republicans in Richmond and Northern Virginia stakeholders to find a fair agreement on funding Metro, and to work with our neighbors in D.C. and Maryland.

Ive long worked with Republicans and Democrats to ensure we have the necessary funding for transportation, even campaigning in 2007 that new revenue was needed to fix a transportation system that hadnt seen investment since 1986. I wanted to break the gridlock in Richmond and on our roads. I think Ive done a little of both by supporting bipartisan transportation packages.

I know this cant be done without working together. Theres no one in the race better equipped than me to do that, because I have the record of delivering results for Virginia.

Perriello: WMATA has both governance and revenue problems that are being greatly exacerbated by the current safety problems and service disruptions that have substantially reduced ridership. I would support this or other initiatives that would produce the necessary investments in our regional public transportation options. I have lived for the past six years in Alexandria and understand these problems both as a consumer and as a manager. When I worked at the State Department, members of my team wouldnt know on any given day if they were going to make it into work by 7 or 9 a.m., or make it home by 7 or 8:30 p.m. from work. When I oversaw the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review for President Obama, we looked at the transportation challenges in Northern Virginia as a national security threat, both because of the vulnerabilities it introduced and because it is getting harder to recruit and retain top national security personnel as costs rise and quality of life is eroded based on traffic. We have to ensure the region can tackle this problem.

Hockstader: So you would support a regional sales tax, Mr. Perriello? In your view, is any other means of raising substantial sums of new revenue preferable to a regional sales tax? And would you support scrapping binding arbitration do you see that as part of the governance problem to which you refer?

Northam: Fair compensation and benefits for workers must be respected. Ultimately, we need to build a system of transparency and accountability within Metro. However, without out a dedicated revenue source, any other reforms will not be enough.

Perriello: Here, we disagree. I think the solutions coming out of Richmond on transportation have not come close to getting the job done. It has produced gridlock in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads and disastrous toll deals for tunnels. The Virginia Way approach stopped working with the radical gerrymandering years ago, and Virginians are paying a big price for it. Political change comes from building consensus and support across Virginia that we then take to Richmond.

To your question, Lee: As I said above, yes, I would support the regional sales tax. Our preference is for whatever revenue source and governance reforms can garner sufficient support to solve the problem.

Hockstader: Would you support a dedicated regional sales tax, Dr. Northam?

Northam: I agree with my friend [state] Sen. [George L.] Barker, who said, and I paraphrase, that we need a shared approach with states and localities, and localities having a big stake. The panel that recommended the regional sales tax made a mistake by not involving local political leaders. We need substantive discussion and debate in order to achieve consensus. In Virginia, the entire commonwealth needs to be on board, and they wont be if they are dictated to. We cant hamstring ourselves before we start the discussion in Richmond. It should be an option, but the discussion in Richmond and across Virginia needs to happen first.

Hockstader: Gov. McAuliffe released the outlines of a climate plan last month that calls for pricing carbon dioxide emissions and joining with other states to trade pollution credits. Do you support this idea, and is it appropriate to act on it without the legislatures consent? How would you flesh out the plan?

Northam: Yes, I support it, and applauded him when it was announced. I think Gov.McAuliffe was well within his authority to make that decision. In light of Donald Trumps idiotic and disastrous decision to leave the Paris agreement, its even more important for states to lead. This is why I announced today that I would bring Virginia into the United States Climate Alliance, and I would continue Gov. McAuliffes carbon reduction executive directive.

Perriello: We strongly support Gov. McAuliffes decision as vital for protecting our climate and for ensuring Virginia stops falling behind on the clean-energy jobs and businesses of today. Virginia has the second-most-vulnerable coastline in America, and the ecological treasure and economic driver of the Chesapeake Bay stands at risk. We must pursue strong measures under this new rule to make Virginia a leader on climate and clean energy. Thats why I was the first candidate to commit to the new interstate climate alliance and the only candidate to refuse donations from Dominion Power and oppose two fracked-gas pipelines in Virginia. These positions, interestingly enough, are widely popular among third-party and Republican voters we meet across the state, who see a monopoly approach to energy production as long out of date.

The private sector can help drive solutions, if we create a modern framework of incentives. I have spent much of my life advancing these common-sense reforms, including through the cap-and-trade bill in Congress and new energy business investments in Southside Virginia. We have fallen behind North Carolina on solar energy and risk losing the wind industry to Maryland because our utilities have too much power in Richmond. Dominion is full of good, smart people stuck in a very bad monopoly business model. We should be creating the space for farmers and small-business owners to take over the energy production of the future. It creates more jobs, more efficiency and more local business.

President Trumps disastrous move to pull out of the Paris agreement only reinforces the importance of strong state leadership on fighting climate change. I will ensure that Virginia becomes a leader on climate sustainability, distributed energy production and smart-grid technology.

Hockstader: Final question: High-quality charter schools have proved to be a successful alternative for many students, particularly children at high risk. It is one reason that they were promoted by the Obama administration. So explain why you want to continue to keep them out of Virginia when there are schools in many communities that have so consistently failed their students many of them in predominantly black and low-income areas and when there is no hope of change or improvement.

Perriello: The only problem with this question as posed is, well, evidence. The performance of charter schools has simply not exceeded performance within the system, despite years of investments. There have also been many legitimate concerns raised in how these have proceeded. Vouchers are also a plan that often make policymakers feel good about the few cases they appear to help, instead of focusing us on how to fix the system as a whole. We need to recruit and retain good teachers, which is why Im the only candidate who has put revenues on the table to improve teacher pay, increase counselors in schools and add universal pre-K. Early-childhood development is a far more effective investment in quality outcomes. We are also expanding options to restore career and technical training programs in high schools, and Im the only candidate to provide two years of apprenticeship programs, trade school or community college education.

The evidence does, however, show one clear trend, which is that schools in areas of concentrated poverty are far more likely to be underperforming. Instead of blaming the teachers and principals, we should ask why we have not done more to reduce poverty. In Virginia, we pay poverty wages of $14,000 a year to countless struggling parents. I meet parents every week who work two full-time jobs for less than $30,000 and add another 10 hours of commute time to get to a community with quality schools where they can afford to live. Every one of them would rather be at home helping with homework and cooking a healthy meal. These are not bad parents. They are exceptional parents who are finding ways to keep the lights on for their kids in an economy that is crushing the poor and working class. Some of the solutions to our education performance must be found outside the classroom, in restoring the broken promise of social mobility and economic security for all Virginians.

Northam: I grew up on a small farm on the Eastern Shore. My opportunities began with my public school education. Knowing that, its one of the reasons I have been a big supporter of public education in Virginia. My wife, Pam, was a K-5 science teacher, so she has been a major influence on me as well.

Its one of the reasons I was proud to support raising teacher pay in the state Senate and as lieutenant governor. But teacher pay in Virginia ranks 30th in the nation, while we rank 10th in per capita personal income. If were going to recruit and retain talented, good teachers, we have to step up to the plate and put our money where our mouth is and say were going to make K-12 education a priority. Ive also been proud to work on reforming Standards of Learning so that we teach our children how to think creatively rather than multiple-choice tests. This will go a long way toward helping children and educators.

I have also been involved as part of the Childrens Cabinet modifying our high school curriculum to emphasize vocational and technical training, preparing our students for higher-paying, high-tech STEM-related 21st-century jobs.

With regards to charter schools or vouchers, we need to make sure that we fund K-12 first before we move on to other things like charter schools.

The fundamental reason charter schools have not moved forward on a wider scale in Virginia is because every proposal to come through the General Assembly would limit the local school boards authority to grant the charter. Making sure these decisions are left to our local leaders and those closest to the communities is vital. Second, the charter proposals seen in Virginia would ultimately divert much-needed funding from school divisions, often those that are in the most need.

Wed be better off revising Standards of Quality formulas to better eliminate disparities among different regions across the commonwealth and so that every child in Virginia has the same opportunity to quality education regardless of where they live.

Finally, I am proud that we secured federal dollars to fund 13,000 pre-K slots for low-income children. With the goal of universal access to pre-K, tax dollars can be better spent expanding access to all Virginia children.

Hockstader: Thank you to you both. We appreciate you joining this forum today.

See the article here:

Two Democratic hopefuls for Va. governor on schools, Metro and the minimum wage - Washington Post

New York public college offering course called ‘Abolition of Whiteness’ – Fox News

A public college in New York City is offering an undergraduate class called the "Abolition of Whiteness," adding to what critics say is a growing number of courses aimed at the study of "whiteness" at colleges and universities around the country.

Hunter College -- a public school in Manhattan that is part of the City University of New York -- is advertising a course in its Fall 2017 catalog that examines "how whiteness and/or white supremacy and violence is intertwined with conceptions of gender, race, sexuality, class, body ability, nationality, and age."

The "Abolition of Whiteness," taught by Prof.Jennifer Gaboury, can be taken as either a women and gender studies course or a political science class, according to the school's online course catalog.

Hunter College in New York City.

The class has drawn ire on conservative media sites, such as the Daily Caller and Campus Reform, where some readers expressed outrage over the course's title. Critics say the course is part of a rise in white studies classes in higher education, which they claim are "divisive" and detrimental to student learning.

"These courses really pound a wedge between people based on race," said Arizona State Rep. Bob Thorpe, who had tried to ban a course at Arizona State University called "Whiteness and Race Theory."

"They're not bringing people together and creating unity on the college campus," Thorpe told Fox News.

"The taxpayers are funding these kinds of courses as well," said Thorpe, claiming, "You're not really seeing these classes in private institutions."

But educators and those who work in academia say such classes are being distorted and critics are failing to recognize a fundamental purpose of higher education:to make students think for themselves.

"Academic freedom protects the right for people to teach things that some might consider divisive," said Hans-Joerg Tiede of the American Association of University Professors.

"A provocative title may encourage students to really think about the issues," said Tiede, who likened criticizing course titles -- like the one at Hunter College -- to judging a book by its cover.

These courses really pound a wedge between people based on race.

Georgetown University, for instance, a private Catholic school, offers a popular theology course called, "The Problem of God," which "grapples with deep and difficult questions about life, meaning purpose and fulfillment," according to Georgetown's website.

"It explores the notion of God and fundamental aspects of belief in such a being," says the school, where theology courses are a requirement for undergraduate students.

"I am sure there may be people who look at Georgetowns course catalog and consider the class title to be offensive," noted Tiede.

Tiede said he was not familiar with the "Abolition of Whiteness" course being offered at Hunter College but said the class was likely reviewed by a committee of people before it was approved. Neither the school nor the professor was immediately available for comment when contacted by Fox News. A syllabus for the course was not available online.

"A course like this could investigate a number of issues regarding race relations in the United States," Tiede said.

"Unfortunately, you have a far-right, outrage machine out there that is trolling the internet for titles that may upset some readers and to use that to sort of stoke resentment against higher education," added Tiede. "Im not questioning the right to do that I just don't think its productive or promotes the rights that higher education seeks to encourage."

Thorpe, meanwhile, disagrees, saying such "white studies" courses only reinforce prejudices -- and may in some cases spur violence -- against a particular group.

Thorpe and other critics note that such "polarizing" courses on white studies are on the rise across higher education institutions around the country.

A class at Ohio State University, titled "Crossing Identity Boundaries," teaches students how to detect microaggressions and white privilege. And the University of Wisconsin-Madison offers a course called, "The Problem of Whiteness," which has been roundly criticized by state Republican lawmakers.

"I am extremely concerned that UW-Madison finds it appropriate to teach a course called, The Problem of Whiteness, with the premise that white people are racist,Rep. Dave Murphy, chairman of the Wisconsin Assemblys Committee on Colleges and Universities,told theMilwaukee Journal Sentinel in a December 2016 interview.

"If you had a class that said 'the problem with women' or 'the problem with blacks' it would never happen," Thorpe said of the course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

"I think of Martin Luther King's famous words about how we should judge a person based on the content of their character and not the color of their skin," said Thorpe. "You would think that this would be a fairly settled issue but it is not."

See original here:

New York public college offering course called 'Abolition of Whiteness' - Fox News

NYC college offers Abolition of Whiteness course – My9NJ

NEW YORK (CHASING NEWS) -- Hunter College is offering a course next fall called The Abolition of Whiteness. The course will examine whiteness, white supremacy and violence.

The class will be taught by Jennifer Gaboury, associate director of the school's Women and Gender Studies Program.

According to her bio on the Hunter College website, her work is related to issues of masculinities, feminisms, and politics; she is currently working on a project related to race and sex segregation in public bathroom facilities.

"As a white person the best thing I can do with this kind of issue is educate myself," said Hunter College student Jessica Creason.

But is the class potentially divisive or is it a way to challenge young people to think freely? There was a spirited discussion in the Chasing News studio.

"Is it how to abolish whiteness? Is it a racist class?" host Bill Spadea asked.

"Our infrastructure is built on everything Western that comes from Europe," chaser Ashley Johnson explained. "There is the notion that you and I are not the same, and it's understanding what role that has played in society. You don't see me like you see your cousin.

"When you first see me, you see me as a black woman," Johnson told Spadea.

"How do you know I see you as a black woman first?" Spadea asked.

University of Penn professor Chad Dion Lassiter, a national expert on race relations and president of Black Men At Penn, joined the discussion.

"We've always had 'whiteness courses' at Penn," Lassiter said. "We need courses like this. They shouldn't be rooted in making whites feel bad. They should definitely be rooted in talking about the intersectionality of white privilege.

But does white privilege even exist?

"I don't think so," Spadea said.

More:

NYC college offers Abolition of Whiteness course - My9NJ

Why Is Sex Work Not Seen As Work? Part 1 – Feminism in India (blog)

Sex work is adult consensual provision of sexual services for money. What part of this definition challenges the notion of work? A service provided for money? A service provided by adults for money? A service provided consensually by adults for money? None of the above. The minute the service is described as a sexual one, the understanding that it is work changes drastically. This article would like to explore the nature of work in Dhanda (sex business).

Sex work is also monogamous or polygamous sexual partnerships within a commercial context. These two constructions, one of provision of sexual services and the other of sexual partnerships, both for the exchange of money remain contentious mainly because of the perception of the easy availability of women to cater to male lust. Arguments of the market controlling the sexual terrain and power equations that privilege men over poor women both as economic and social victims dominate the discourse.

Sex work is adult consensual provision of sexual services for money. What part of this challenges the notion of work?

Moralists are offended by the notion that casual sex with multiple partners could be a physical act stripped of emotion, could be initiated by women, used in a commercial context and even be pleasurable. The immoral whore image followswomen who are ostracised by a judgemental society that approves the criminalisation of sex work.

Within India, the Dalit movement has held that upper caste men use women from lower castes to satisfy their carnal needs mainly as an expression of caste dominance. The caste-based Devadasi system in many parts of India, and the Bedia tribe are the examples used in this analysis. The forced rehabilitation of devadasis and the anti-devadasi lawin Karnataka has forced devadasis to leave their natal homes in Karnataka and migrate for work to Maharashtra in large numbers.

Another strand of thought, as Cheryl Overs explains, is expressed by conservative feminist attitudes which are arranged around a theory in which sex work is defined as both indivisible from slavery inevitably involuntary and inherently violent and as a driver of the objectification and oppression of women.The idea that no woman can come into sex work on her own and that all women are forced, deceived, lured, bonded to loan sharks and trafficked into sex work for sexual and economic exploitation is also firmly held.

The advent of HIV/AIDS in the 1980s saw governments make great efforts to target sex workers in global and national responses to the HIV epidemic. Sex workers were considered vectors of the spread of HIV, and governments were determined to save the bridge population of men, using sex work interventions only as a means of protecting respectable women from HIV. In small pockets around the world, sex workers turned this around and made it an opportunity to mobilise attention to the health, safety and rights of sex workers.

The idea that no woman can come into sex work on her own and that all women are forced is firmly held.

However, as Joanne Csete points out, this picture was complicated by politically powerful faith-based constituencies, an anti-trafficking movement that denied the agency and rights of sex workers, and powerful funders. The United Nations positions demonstrated some leadership on sex worker rights early in the epidemic but later appeared to acquiesce to prohibitionist views.

Anti-trafficking activists who have gained support from radical feminists have argued that sex work itself is violence mainly because the entry into sex work is involuntary, forced, and through deception women are lured and sexually exploited by unscrupulous traffickers. Their argument especially about minor girls is valid but the underpinning of abolitionism that governs their arguments takes the focus away from finding and punishing the traffickers to rescuing and rehabilitating sex workers without consent.

The fracture in this method comes from the idea that all women are trafficked and thus consent is not necessary in such an indiscriminate rescue and rehabilitation plan. Needless to say, though sex workers are the best placed to fight traffickers there are no programmes to strengthen them by the anti-trafficking, anti-sex work organisations.

Most laws and policies on sex work reflect that though sex work is not illegal in India, there are laws such as the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act that continue to criminalise women in sex work and those who support her work such as third parties. The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, enacted in 1956, was initially the Suppression of Immoral Traffic Act (SITA), and in 1986, the name was changed to Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act or ITPA. The legislation (ITPA) penalises acts such as keeping a brothel, soliciting in a public place, living off the earnings of prostitution and living with or habitually being in the company of a prostitute.

consent is not seen as necessary in such an indiscriminate rescue and rehabilitation plan.

In a departure from criminal jurisprudence, which clearly indicates the stigmatisation of sex workers, the ITPA has paradoxical offences like detaining a personwith or without his consent in premises where sex work is carried onor taking a person, with or without his consent for the purpose of prostitution. Again, the provisions dealing with raid and rescue make no distinction between adults and minors. Ordinarily, in the case of adults, consent or the lack of it is a crucial factor in offences like abduction or illegal confinement which determines whether or not an act is to be dubbed criminal. The legislation gives power to a magistrate to order the removal of a prostitute living within the local limits of his jurisdiction from the area.

Abolitionists who hold dear some or all of the above positions on sex work argue that sex work is violence against all women and should be done away with altogether. The most powerful argument is the one that links poverty, caste, pure womanhood, sacredness, force of circumstances and unscrupulous traffickers to argue for the abolition of sex work and the rescue of the unfortunate victim from an uncaring state and an indifferent society.

Also Read:Sex Workers Discuss & Give Suggestions To The Anti-Trafficking Bill Draft 2016

Overs, C. Sex Workers and Feminists: Personal Reflections in The Business of Sex, ed. Laxmi Murthy and Meena Saraswathi Seshu, 2013, Zubaan Books.

Csete, J. Victimhood and Vulnerability: Sex Work and the Rhetoric and the Reality of the Global Response to HIV/AIDS inThe Business of Sex, ed. Laxmi Murthy and Meena Saraswathi Seshu, Zubaan Books, 2013.

A Walk Through the Labyrinths of Sex Work Law, The Business of Sex, ed. Laxmi Murthy and Meena Saraswathi Seshu.

Featured Image Credit: Kolkata On Wheels

Continue reading here:

Why Is Sex Work Not Seen As Work? Part 1 - Feminism in India (blog)

Why The Tories Are Not My Cuppa – HuffPost UK

On Thursday, Britain heads to the polls to cast a vote that will determine which political party will shape the next five years. Here is why the Tories are absolutely not my cup of tea:

Conservatives put the 'n' in cuts

Conservative cuts have ruthlessly hurt society in a number of ways, particularly the most vulnerable people:

1. Since the Tories took office in 2010, homelessness has doubled. Their failure to build affordable housing, cuts to social services and inaction on soaring private rental costs have plunged us into a housing crisis.

There is the highest number of people in work without a home than ever before. This completely undermines the Tory rhetoric of 'hard workers will be rewarded'. While helping out at a winter homeless shelter for the past couple of years I have been horrified to discover how many of the guests have jobs - on minimum wages and zero-hour contracts.

2. Tory austerity has caused disabled people deep distress. Policies like "fit to work" and the abolition of disability living allowance has left people like Alex in a degrading and humiliating state, unable to afford necessary medicine and facilities.

3. May's cuts to essential services such as the police force has hindered our security and put our lives in danger. Watch this former senior Met officer expose the Tory lies about officer numbers following the London Attacks:

The list of detrimental cuts goes on.

Conservative means backwards Conservative literally means keeping old-fashioned traditions in place. This prevents progress. Their pledges reflect the extent to which Tory priorities are outrageously past their sell by date; take for instance:

Fox hunting Colonialist sentiment Bizarre war with Spain regarding Gibraltar Stiff blue passports (anti-EU cohesion)

I sit here wondering: How have Theresa May's political priorities outgrown her haircut?

Brexit divisions and distractions

Under David Cameron, the Tories unintentionally triggered a departure from the EU which has deeply and detrimentally divided the nation. Brexit has fostered, perpetuated and normalised a climate of xenophobic hatred and violence, evident in figures that reveal a rise of up to 100% in hate crime across England and Wales since the referendum.

Here is the cherry on the cake: instead of focusing on Brexit negotiations, Theresa May decided to call a snap general election. This has totally detracted from Brexit negotiations. Yet she audaciously attacked Jeremy Corbyn for having the wrong priorities when he called on her to do a TV debate. Interestingly, she agreed to do a TV Q&A instead.

Big business breaks are bad business: from BHS to bathroom births

Symptomatic of the lack of corporate regulation we have the wonderfully corrupt and greedy Philip Green, Mike Ashley's inhumane third world factories and empty houses owned by foreign property moguls amidst a housing crisis. The only thing trickle down about the Tories policy on conglomerates is the poor lady's water that broke in a Sports Direct toilet where she had to give birth because of their harsh penalties for missing work. Yet the Tories adamenty refrain from regulating and taxing big businesses more effectively.

Our human rights are at risk

Tories want to scrap the Human Rights Act (HRA) after Brexit. I don't know about you, but I like my human rights. The HRA helps to protect the most vulnerable people, from domestic violence victims to LGBT people. The Tories proposed Bill of Rights will allow the government to pick and choose which rights to protect, essentially jeopardising many of our current rights.

"Difficult and embarrassing" deadly foreign policy

Saudi relations *cough*. It is time to talk about who is funding and fuelling the war on terror Theresa; stop dealing arms with Saudi Arabia if you want to tackle extremism.

Additionally, Saudi is using UK bought cluster bombs to explode innocent children and civilians in Yemen. Complicity in Yemen's civil war, is not a good look for a first world democracy that should set an example when it comes to human rights standards.

Theresa Dismay, dark leader of the underworld

She has proved herself to be highly uncertain, untrustworthy and unstable. That is not a strong leader. How can you vote for a politician in a general election who lied about calling an election in the first place? As Captain SKA's #2 hit goes - she's a LIAR LIAR.

What to do?

DO vote. We are privileged to have the opportunity to exercise our democratic right to vote. Even if you want to spoil your ballot, turn up to your polling station. It really, really matters.

DON'T be politically tribal. Party politics is petty. Be tactical with your vote. You can find out how to be tactical here.

Under the Conservatives, since 2010 the fat cats have got fatter at the cost and neglect of the poor and most vulnerable in society. Let's not let them continue. Cheers to anti-Tory cuppas!

Read this article:

Why The Tories Are Not My Cuppa - HuffPost UK

10 Intellectual Property Strategies For Technology Startups – Forbes


Forbes
10 Intellectual Property Strategies For Technology Startups
Forbes
By Richard Harroch and Neel Chatterjee. Intellectual property issues often are among the most important considerations that a technology startup will encounter. A startup will face numerous issues involving developing a product, hiring qualified ...

Read the original post:

10 Intellectual Property Strategies For Technology Startups - Forbes