Aktion T4 – Wikipedia

Aktion T4 (German, pronounced [aktsion te fi]) was a postwar name for mass murder through involuntary euthanasia in Nazi Germany.[4][b] The name T4 is an abbreviation of Tiergartenstrae 4, a street address of the Chancellery department set up in the spring of 1940, in the Berlin borough of Tiergarten, which recruited and paid personnel associated withT4.[c] Certain German physicians were authorized to select patients "deemed incurably sick, after most critical medical examination" and then administer to them a "mercy death" (Gnadentod). In October 1939 Adolf Hitler signed a "euthanasia note" backdated to 1 September 1939 which authorized his physician Karl Brandt and Reichsleiter Philipp Bouhler to implement the programme.

The killings took place from September 1939 until the end of the war in 1945; from 275,000 to 300,000[a] people were killed at extermination centres in psychiatric hospitals in Germany and Austria, occupied Poland and the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia (now the Czech Republic). The number of victims was originally recorded as 70,273 but this number has been increased by the discovery of victims listed in the archives of former East Germany.[1][12][d] About half of those killed were taken from church-run asylums, often with the approval of the Protestant or Catholic authorities of the institutions. The Holy See announced on 2 December 1940 that the policy was contrary to the natural and positive Divine law and that "the direct killing of an innocent person because of mental or physical defects is not allowed" but the declaration was not upheld by some Catholic authorities in Germany. In the summer of 1941, protests were led in Germany by Bishop von Galen, whose intervention led to "the strongest, most explicit and most widespread protest movement against any policy since the beginning of the Third Reich", according to Richard J. Evans.

Several reasons have been suggested for the programme, including eugenics, compassion, reducing suffering, racial hygiene, economy and pressure on the welfare budget. Physicians in German and Austrian asylums continued many of the practices of Aktion T4 until the defeat of Germany in 1945, in spite of its official cessation. The informal continuation of the policy led to 93,521 "beds emptied" by the end of 1941.[e][f] Technology developed under Aktion T4 was taken over by the medical division of the Reich Interior Ministry, particularly the use of lethal gas to kill large numbers of people, along with the personnel who had participated in the development of the technology and later participated in Operation Reinhard.

The technology and personnel developed were instrumental in implementing the Holocaust. The programme was authorized by Hitler but the killings have since come to be viewed as murders in Germany. The number of people killed was about 200,000 in Germany and Austria, with about 100,000 victims in other European countries.[d][12][24][25]

At the beginning of the twentieth century, the sterilisation of people carrying what were considered to be hereditary defects and in some cases those exhibiting what was thought to be hereditary "antisocial" behaviour, was a respectable field of medicine. Canada, Denmark, Switzerland and the US had passed laws enabling coerced sterilisation. Studies conducted in the 1920s ranked Germany as a country that was unusually reluctant to introduce sterilisation legislation. In his book Mein Kampf (1924), Hitler wrote that one day racial hygiene "will appear as a deed greater than the most victorious wars of our present bourgeois era".[when?]

In July 1933 "Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring" prescribed compulsory sterilisation for people with conditions thought to be hereditary, such as schizophrenia, epilepsy, Huntington's chorea and "imbecility". Sterilisation was also legalised for chronic alcoholism and other forms of social deviance. The law was administered by the Interior Ministry under Wilhelm Frick through special Hereditary Health Courts (Erbgesundheitsgerichte), which examined the inmates of nursing homes, asylums, prisons, aged-care homes and special schools, to select those to be sterilised. It is estimated that 360,000 people were sterilised under this law between 1933 and 1939.[30]

The policy and research agenda of racial hygiene and eugenics were promoted by Emil Kraepelin. The eugenic sterilization of persons diagnosed with (and viewed as predisposed to) schizophrenia was advocated by Eugen Bleuler, who presumed racial deterioration because of mental and physical cripples in his Textbook of Psychiatry,

The more severely burdened should not propagate themselves If we do nothing but make mental and physical cripples capable of propagating themselves, and the healthy stocks have to limit the number of their children because so much has to be done for the maintenance of others, if natural selection is generally suppressed, then unless we will get new measures our race must rapidly deteriorate.

Within the Nazi administration, the idea of including in the program people with physical disabilities had to be expressed carefully, given that one of the most powerful figures of the regime, Joseph Goebbels, had a deformed right leg.[g] After 1937 the acute shortage of labour in Germany arising from rearmament, meant that anyone capable of work was deemed to be "useful" and thus exempted from the law and the rate of sterilisation declined. The term "Aktion T4" is a post-war coining; contemporary German terms included Euthanasie (euthanasia) and Gnadentod (merciful death). The T4 programme stemmed from the Nazi Party policy of "racial hygiene", a belief that the German people needed to be cleansed of racial enemies, which included anyone confined to a mental health facility and people with simple physical disabilities.

Karl Brandt, personal doctor to Hitler and Hans Lammers, the head of the Reich Chancellery, testified after the war that Hitler had told them as early as 1933when the sterilisation law was passedthat he favoured the killing of the incurably ill but recognised that public opinion would not accept this. In 1935, Hitler told the Leader of Reich Doctors, Gerhard Wagner, that the question could not be taken up in peacetime, "Such a problem could be more smoothly and easily carried out in war". He wrote that he intended to "radically solve" the problem of the mental asylums in such an event. Aktion T4 began with a "trial" case in late 1938. Hitler instructed Brandt to evaluate a family's petition for the "mercy killing" of their son who was blind, had physical and developmental disabilities.[h] The child, born near Leipzig and eventually identified as Gerhard Kretschmar, was killed in July 1939. Hitler instructed Brandt to proceed in the same manner in all similar cases.

On 18 August 1939, three weeks after the killing of the boy, the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registering of Hereditary and Congenital Illnesses was established. It was to register sick children or newborns identified as defective. The secret killing of infants began in 1939 and increased after the war started; by 1941 more than 5,000 children had been killed. Hitler was in favour of killing those whom he judged to be lebensunwertes Leben (Life unworthy of life). In a 1939 conference with Leonardo Conti, Reich Health Leader and state secretary for health in the Interior Ministry and Hans Lammers, Chief of the Reich Chancellerya few months before the "euthanasia" decreeHitler gave as examples the mentally ill who he said could only be "bedded on sawdust or sand" because they "perpetually dirtied themselves" and "put their own excrement into their mouths". This issue, according to the Nazi regime, assumed new urgency in wartime.

After the invasion of Poland, Hermann Pfannmller said

Fr mich ist die Vorstellung untragbar, dass beste, blhende Jugend an der Front ihr Leben lassen muss, damit verblichene Asoziale und unverantwortliche Antisoziale ein gesichertes Dasein haben. (It is unbearable to me that the flower of our youth must lose their lives at the front, while that feeble-minded and asocial element can have a secure existence in the asylum.)

Pfannmller advocated killing by a gradual decrease of food, which he believed was more merciful than poison injections.

The German eugenics movement had an extreme wing even before the Nazis came to power. As early as 1920, Alfred Hoche and Karl Binding advocated killing people whose lives were "unworthy of life" (lebensunwertes Leben). Darwinism was interpreted by them as justification of the demand for "beneficial" genes and eradication of the "harmful" ones. Robert Lifton wrote, "The argument went that the best young men died in war, causing a loss to the Volk of the best available genes. The genes of those who did not fight (the worst genes) then proliferated freely, accelerating biological and cultural degeneration". The advocacy of eugenics in Germany gained ground after 1930, when the Depression was used to excuse cuts in funding to state mental hospitals, creating squalor and overcrowding.

Many German eugenicists were nationalists and antisemites, who embraced the Nazi regime with enthusiasm. Many were appointed to positions in the Health Ministry and German research institutes. Their ideas were gradually adopted by the majority of the German medical profession, from which Jewish and communist doctors were soon purged. During the 1930s the Nazi Party had carried out a campaign of propaganda in favour of euthanasia. The National Socialist Racial and Political Office (NSRPA) produced leaflets, posters and short films to be shown in cinemas, pointing out to Germans the cost of maintaining asylums for the incurably ill and insane. These films included The Inheritance (Das Erbe, 1935), The Victim of the Past (Opfer der Vergangenheit, 1937), which was given a major premire in Berlin and was shown in all German cinemas, and I Accuse (Ich klage an, 1941), which was based on a novel by Hellmuth Unger, a consultant for "child euthanasia".

In mid-1939 Hitler authorized the creation of the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registering of Serious Hereditary and Congenital Illnesses (Reichsausschuss zur wissenschaftlichen Erfassung erb- und anlagebedingter schwerer Leiden), headed by Dr. Karl Brandt, his physician, and administered by Herbert Linden of the Interior Ministry as well as SS-Oberfhrer Viktor Brack. Brandt and Bouhler were authorized to approve applications to kill children in relevant circumstances, though Bouhler left the details to subordinates such as Brack and SA-Oberfhrer Werner Blankenburg.

Extermination centres were established at six existing psychiatric hospitals: Bernburg, Brandenburg, Grafeneck, Hadamar, Hartheim, and Sonnenstein. One thousand children under the age of 17 were killed at the institutions Am Spiegelgrund and Gugging in Austria. They played a crucial role in developments leading to the Holocaust. As a related aspect of the "medical" and scientific basis of this programme, the Nazi doctors took thousands of brains from 'euthanasia' victims for research.

From August 1939, the Interior Ministry registered children with disabilities, requiring doctors and midwives to report all cases of newborns with severe disabilities; the 'guardian' consent element soon disappeared. Those to be killed were identified as "all children under three years of age in whom any of the following 'serious hereditary diseases' were 'suspected': idiocy and Down syndrome (especially when associated with blindness and deafness); microcephaly; hydrocephaly; malformations of all kinds, especially of limbs, head, and spinal column; and paralysis, including spastic conditions". The reports were assessed by a panel of medical experts, of whom three were required to give their approval before a child could be killed.[i]

The Ministry used deceit when dealing with parents or guardians, particularly in Catholic areas, where parents were generally uncooperative. Parents were told that their children were being sent to "Special Sections", where they would receive improved treatment. The children sent to these centres were kept for "assessment" for a few weeks and then killed by injection of toxic chemicals, typically phenol; their deaths were recorded as "pneumonia". Autopsies were usually performed and brain samples were taken to be used for "medical research". Post mortem examinations apparently helped to ease the consciences of many of those involved, giving them the feeling that there was a genuine medical purpose to the killings. The most notorious of these institutions in Austria was Am Spiegelgrund, where from 1940 to 1945, 789 children were killed by lethal injection, gas poisoning and physical abuse.[65] Children's brains were preserved in jars of formaldehyde and stored in the basement of the clinic and in the private collection of Heinrich Gross, one of the institution's directors, until 2001.

When the Second World War began in September 1939, less rigorous standards of assessment and a quicker approval process were adopted. Older children and adolescents were included and the conditions covered came to include

... various borderline or limited impairments in children of different ages, culminating in the killing of those designated as juvenile delinquents. Jewish children could be placed in the net primarily because they were Jewish; and at one of the institutions, a special department was set up for 'minor Jewish-Aryan half-breeds'.

More pressure was placed on parents to agree to their children being sent away. Many parents suspected what was happening, especially when it became apparent that institutions for children with disabilities were being systematically cleared of their charges and refused consent. The parents were warned that they could lose custody of all their children and if that did not suffice, the parents could be threatened with call-up for 'labour duty'. By 1941, more than 5,000 children had been killed.[j] The last child to be killed under Aktion T4 was Richard Jenne on 29 May 1945 in the children's ward of the Kaufbeuren-Irsee state hospital in Bavaria, Germany, more than three weeks after U.S. Army troops had occupied the town.[68]

Brandt and Bouhler developed plans to expand the programme of euthanasia to adults. In July 1939 they held a meeting attended by Conti and Professor Werner Heyde, head of the SS medical department. This meeting agreed to arrange a national register of all institutionalised people with mental illnesses or physical disabilities. The first adults with disabilities to be killed en masse by the Nazi regime were Poles. After the invasion on 1 September 1939, adults with disabilities were shot by the SS men of Einsatzkommando 16, Selbstschutz and EK-Einmann under the command of SS-Sturmbannfhrer Rudolf Trger, with overall command by Reinhard Heydrich, during the genocidal Operation Tannenberg.[k] All hospitals and mental asylums of the Wartheland were emptied. The region was incorporated into Germany and earmarked for resettlement by Volksdeutsche following the German conquest of Poland.[72] In the Danzig (now Gdask) area, some 7,000 Polish patients of various institutions were shot and 10,000 were killed in the Gdynia area. Similar measures were taken in other areas of Poland destined for incorporation into Germany. The first experiments with the gassing of patients were conducted in October 1939 at Fort VII in Posen (occupied Pozna), where hundreds of prisoners were killed by means of carbon monoxide poisoning, in an improvised gas chamber developed by Dr Albert Widmann, chief chemist of the German Criminal Police (Kripo). In December 1939, Reichsfhrer-SS Heinrich Himmler witnessed one of these gassings, ensuring that this invention would later be put to much wider uses.

The idea of killing adult mental patients soon spread from occupied Poland to adjoining areas of Germany, probably because Nazi Party and SS officers in these areas were most familiar with what was happening in Poland. These were also the areas where Germans wounded from the Polish campaign were expected to be accommodated, which created a demand for hospital space. The Gauleiter of Pomerania, Franz Schwede-Coburg, sent 1,400 patients from five Pomeranian hospitals to undisclosed locations in occupied Poland, where they were shot. The Gauleiter of East Prussia, Erich Koch, had 1,600 patients killed out of sight. More than 8,000 Germans were killed in this initial wave of killings carried out on the orders of local officials, although Himmler certainly knew and approved of them.

The legal basis for the programme was a 1939 letter from Hitler, not a formal "Fhrer's decree" with the force of law. Hitler bypassed Conti, the Health Minister and his department, who might have raised questions about the legality of the programme and entrusted it to Bouhler and Brandt.[l]

Reich Leader Bouhler and Dr. Brandt are entrusted with the responsibility of extending the authority of physicians, to be designated by name, so that patients who, after a most critical diagnosis, on the basis of human judgment [menschlichem Ermessen], are considered incurable, can be granted mercy death [Gnadentod].

The killings were administered by Viktor Brack and his staff from Tiergartenstrae 4, disguised as the "Charitable Foundation for Cure and Institutional Care" offices which served as the front and was supervised by Bouhler and Brandt. The officials in charge included Dr Herbert Linden, who had been involved in the child killing programme; Dr Ernst-Robert Grawitz, chief physician of the SS; and August Becker, an SS chemist. The officials selected the doctors who were to carry out the operational part of the programme; based on political reliability as long-term Nazis, professional reputation and sympathy for radical eugenics. The list included physicians who had proved their worth in the child-killing programme, such as Unger, Heinze and Hermann Pfannmller. The recruits were mostly psychiatrists, notably Professor Carl Schneider of Heidelberg, Professor Max de Crinis of Berlin and Professor Paul Nitsche from the Sonnenstein state institution. Heyde became the operational leader of the programme, succeeded later by Nitsche.

In early October, all hospitals, nursing homes, old-age homes and sanatoria were required to report all patients who had been institutionalised for five years or more, who had been committed as "criminally insane", who were of "non-Aryan race" or who had been diagnosed with any on a list of conditions. The conditions included schizophrenia, epilepsy, Huntington's chorea, advanced syphilis, senile dementia, paralysis, encephalitis and "terminal neurological conditions generally". Many doctors and administrators assumed that the reports were to identify inmates who were capable of being drafted for "labour service" and tended to overstate the degree of incapacity of their patients, to protect them from labour conscription. When some institutions refused to co-operate, teams of T4 doctors (or Nazi medical students) visited and compiled the lists, sometimes in a haphazard and ideologically motivated way. During 1940, all Jewish patients were removed from institutions and killed.[m]

As with child inmates, adults were assessed by a panel of experts, working at the Tiergartenstrae offices. The experts were required to make their judgements on the reports, not medical histories or examinations. Sometimes they dealt with hundreds of reports at a time. On each they marked a + (death), a - (life), or occasionally a ? meaning that they were unable to decide. Three "death" verdicts condemned the person and as with reviews of children, the process became less rigorous, the range of conditions considered "unsustainable" grew broader and zealous Nazis further down the chain of command increasingly made decisions on their own initiative.

The first gassings in Germany proper took place in January 1940 at the Brandenburg Euthanasia Centre. The operation was headed by Brack, who said "the needle belongs in the hand of the doctor." Bottled pure carbon monoxide gas was used. At trials, Brandt described the process as a "major advance in medical history". Once the efficacy of the method was confirmed, it became standardised, and instituted at a number of centres across Germany under the supervision of Widmann, Becker, and Christian Wirth a Kripo officer who later played a prominent role in the extermination of the Jews as commandant of newly built death camps in occupied Poland. In addition to Brandenburg, the killing centres included Grafeneck Castle in Baden-Wrttemberg (10,824 dead), Schloss Hartheim near Linz in Austria (over 18,000 dead), Sonnenstein Euthanasia Centre in Saxony (15,000 dead), Bernburg Euthanasia Centre in Saxony-Anhalt and Hadamar Euthanasia Centre in Hesse (14,494 dead). The same facilities were also used to kill mentally sound prisoners transferred from concentration camps in Germany, Austria and occupied parts of Poland.

Condemned patients were transferred from their institutions to newly built centres in the T4 Charitable Ambulance buses, called the Community Patients Transports Service. They were run by teams of SS men wearing white coats, to give it an air of medical care. To prevent the families and doctors of the patients from tracing them, the patients were often first sent to transit centres in major hospitals, where they were supposedly assessed. They were moved again to special treatment (Sonderbehandlung) centres. Families were sent letters explaining that owing to wartime regulations, it was not possible for them to visit relatives in these centres. Most of these patients were killed within 24 hours of arriving at the centres, and their bodies cremated. For every person killed, a death certificate was prepared, giving a false but plausible cause of death. This was sent to the family along with an urn of ashes (random ashes, since the victims were cremated en masse). The preparation of thousands of falsified death certificates took up most of the working day of the doctors who operated the centres.

During 1940, the centres at Brandenburg, Grafeneck and Hartheim killed nearly 10,000 people each, while another 6,000 were killed at Sonnenstein. In all, about 35,000 people were killed in T4 operations that year. Operations at Brandenburg and Grafeneck were wound up at the end of the year, partly because the areas they served had been cleared and partly because of public opposition. In 1941, however, the centres at Bernburg and Sonnenstein increased their operations, while Hartheim (where Wirth and Franz Stangl were successively commandants) continued as before. As a result, another 35,000 people were killed before August 1941, when the T4 programme was officially shut down by Hitler. Even after that date, however, the centres continued to be used to kill concentration camp inmates: eventually some 20,000 people in this category were killed.[n]

In 1971, Gitta Sereny conducted a series of interviews with Stangl, who was in prison in Dsseldorf after having been convicted of co-responsibility for killing 900,000 people as commandant of the Sobibor and Treblinka extermination camps in Poland. Stangl gave Sereny a detailed account of the operations of the T4 programme based on his time as commandant of the killing facility at the Hartheim institute. He described how the inmates of various asylums were removed and transported by bus to Hartheim. Some were in no mental state to know what was happening to them, but many were perfectly sane, and for them various forms of deception were used. They were told they were at a special clinic where they would receive improved treatment, and were given a brief medical examination on arrival. They were induced to enter what appeared to be a shower block, where they were gassed with carbon monoxide (the ruse was also used at extermination camps).

The SS functionaries and hospital staff associated with Aktion T4 in the German Reich were paid from the central office at Tiergartenstrasse 4 in Berlin from the spring of 1940. The SS and police from SS-Sonderkommando Lange responsible for murdering the majority of patients in the annexed territories of Poland since October 1939, took their salaries from the normal police fund, supervised by the administration of the newly formed Wartheland district; the programme in Germany and occupied Poland was overseen by Heinrich Himmler. Before 2013, it was believed that 70,000 persons were murdered in the euthanasia programme, but the German Federal Archives reported that research in the archives of former East Germany indicated that the number of victims in Germany and Austria from 1939 to 1945 was about 200,000 persons and that another 100,000 persons were victims in other European countries.[12][24][93] In the German T4 centres there was at least the semblance of legality in keeping records and writing letters. In Polish psychiatric hospitals no one was left behind. Killings were inflicted using gas-vans, sealed army bunkers and machine guns; families were not informed about the murdered relatives and the empty wards were handed over to the SS.

After the official end of the euthanasia programme in 1941, most of the personnel and high-ranking officials, as well as gassing technology and the techniques used to deceive victims, were transferred under the jurisdiction of the national medical division of the Reich Interior Ministry. Further gassing experiments with the use of mobile gas chambers (Einsatzwagen) were conducted at Soldau concentration camp by Herbert Lange following Operation Barbarossa. Lange was appointed commander of the Chemno extermination camp in December 1941. He was given three gas vans by the RSHA, converted by the Gaubschat GmbH in Berlin and before February 1942, killed 3,830 Polish Jews and around 4,000 Romani, under the guise of "resettlement". After the Wannsee conference, implementation of gassing technology was accelerated by Heydrich. Beginning in the spring of 1942, three killing factories were built secretly in east-central Poland. The SS officers responsible for the earlier Aktion T4, including Wirth, Stangl and Irmfried Eberl, had important roles in the implementation of the "Final Solution" for the next two years.[o] The first killing centre equipped with stationary gas chambers modelled on technology developed under Aktion T4 was established at Beec in the General Government territory of occupied Poland; the decision preceded the Wannsee Conference of January 1942 by three months.

In January 1939, Brack commissioned a paper from Professor of Moral Theology at the University of Paderborn, Joseph Mayer, on the likely reactions of the churches in the event of a state euthanasia programme being instituted. Mayer a longstanding euthanasia advocate reported that the churches would not oppose such a programme if it was seen to be in the national interest. Brack showed this paper to Hitler in July, and it may have increased his confidence that the "euthanasia" programme would be acceptable to German public opinion. Notably, when Sereny interviewed Mayer shortly before his death in 1967, he denied that he formally condoned the killing of people with disabilities but no copies of this paper are known to survive.

There were those who opposed the T4 programme within the bureaucracy. Lothar Kreyssig, a district judge and member of the Confessing Church, wrote to Grtner protesting that the action was illegal since no law or formal decree from Hitler had authorised it. Grtner replied, "If you cannot recognise the will of the Fhrer as a source of law, then you cannot remain a judge", and had Kreyssig dismissed. Hitler had a fixed policy of not issuing written instructions for policies relating to what could later be condemned by international community, but made an exception when he provided Bouhler and Brack with written authority for the T4 programme in his confidential letter of October 1939 in order to overcome opposition within the German state bureaucracy. Hitler told Bouhler that, "the Fhrer's Chancellery must under no circumstances be seen to be active in this matter." The Justice Minister, Franz Grtner, had to be shown Hitler's letter in August 1940 to gain his cooperation.

In the towns where the killing centres were located, many people saw the inmates arrive in buses, saw the smoke from the crematoria chimneys and noticed that the buses were returning empty. In Hadamar, ashes containing human hair rained down on the town. The T4 programme was no secret. Despite the strictest orders, some of the staff at the killing centres talked about what was going on. In some cases families could tell that the causes of death in certificates were false, e.g. when a patient was claimed to have died of appendicitis, even though his appendix had been surgically removed some years earlier. In other cases, several families in the same town would receive death certificates on the same day. In May 1941, the Frankfurt County Court wrote to Grtner describing scenes in Hadamar where children shouted in the streets that people were being taken away in buses to be gassed.

During 1940, rumours of what was taking place spread and many Germans withdrew their relatives from asylums and sanatoria to care for them at home, often with great expense and difficulty. In some places doctors and psychiatrists co-operated with families to have patients discharged or if the families could afford it, transferred them to private clinics beyond the reach of T4. Other doctors "re-diagnosed" patients so that they no longer met the T4 criteria, which risked exposure when Nazi zealots from Berlin conducted inspections. In Kiel, Professor Hans Gerhard Creutzfeldt managed to save nearly all of his patients. Lifton listed a handful of psychiatrists and administrators who opposed the killings; many doctors collaborated, either through ignorance, agreement with Nazi eugenicist policies or fear of the regime.

Protest letters were sent to the Reich Chancellery and the Ministry of Justice, some from Nazi Party members. The first open protest against the removal of people from asylums took place at Absberg in Franconia in February 1941 and others followed. The SD report on the incident at Absberg noted that "the removal of residents from the Ottilien Home has caused a great deal of unpleasantness" and described large crowds of Catholic townspeople, among them Party members, protesting against the action. Similar petitions and protests occurred throughout Austria as rumors spread of mass killings at the Hartheim Euthanasia Centre and of mysterious deaths at the children's clinic, Am Spiegelgrund in Vienna. Anna Wdl, a nurse and mother of child with a disability, vehemently petitioned to Hermann Linden at the Reich Ministry of the Interior in Berlin to prevent her son, Alfred, from being transferred from Gugging, where he lived and which also became a euthanasia center. Wdl failed and Alfred was sent to Am Spiegelgrund, where he was killed on 22 February 1941. His brain was preserved in formaldehyde for "research" and stored in the clinic for sixty years.

The Lutheran theologian Friedrich von Bodelschwingh (director of the Bethel Institution for Epilepsy at Bielefeld) and Pastor Paul-Gerhard Braune (director of the Hoffnungstal Institution near Berlin) protested. Bodelschwingh negotiated directly with Brandt and indirectly with Hermann Gring, whose cousin was a prominent psychiatrist. Braune had meetings with Justice Minister Grtner, who was always dubious about the legality of the programme. Grtner later wrote a strongly worded letter to Hitler protesting against it; Hitler did not read it but was told about it by Lammers. Bishop Theophil Wurm, presiding the Evangelical-Lutheran Church in Wrttemberg, wrote to Interior Minister Frick in March 1940 and the same month a confidential report from the Sicherheitsdienst (SD) in Austria, warned that the killing programme must be implemented with stealth "in order to avoid a probable backlash of public opinion during the war". On 4 December 1940, Reinhold Sautter, the Supreme Church Councillor of the Wrttemberg State Church, complained to the Nazi Ministerial Councillor Eugen Sthle for the murders in Grafeneck Castle. Stahle said "The fifth commandment Thou shalt not kill, is no commandment of God but a Jewish invention".

Bishop Heinrich Wienken of Berlin, a leading member of the Caritas Association, was selected by the Fulda episcopal synod to represent the views of the Catholic Church in meetings with T4 operatives. In 2008, Michael Burleigh wrote

Wienken seems to have gone partially native in the sense that he gradually abandoned an absolute stance based on the Fifth Commandment in favour of winning limited concessions regarding the restriction of killing to 'complete idiots', access to the sacraments and the exclusion of ill Roman Catholic priests from these policies.

Despite a decree issued by the Vatican on 2 December 1940 stating that the T4 policy was "against natural and positive Divine law" and that "The direct killing of an innocent person because of mental or physical defects is not allowed", the Catholic Church hierarchy in Germany decided to take no further action. Incensed by the Nazi appropriation of Church property in Mnster to accommodate people made homeless by an air raid, in July and August 1941 the Bishop of Mnster, August von Galen, gave four sermons criticizing the Nazis for arresting Jesuits, confiscating church property and for the euthanasia program. Galen sent the text to Hitler by telegram, calling on

... the Fhrer to defend the people against the Gestapo. It is a terrible, unjust and catastrophic thing when man opposes his will to the will of God... We are talking about men and women, our compatriots, our brothers and sisters. Poor unproductive people if you wish, but does this mean that they have lost their right to live?

Galen's sermons were not reported in the German press but were circulated illegally as leaflets. The text was dropped by the Royal Air Force over German troops. In 2009, Richard J. Evans wrote that "This was the strongest, most explicit and most widespread protest movement against any policy since the beginning of the Third Reich". Local Nazis asked for Galen to be arrested but Goebbels told Hitler that such action would provoke a revolt in Westphalia and Hitler decided to wait until after the war to take revenge.

In 1986, Lifton wrote, "Nazi leaders faced the prospect of either having to imprison prominent, highly admired clergymen and other protesters a course with consequences in terms of adverse public reaction they greatly feared or else end the programme". Evans considered it "at least possible, even indeed probable" that the T4 programme would have continued beyond Hitler's initial quota of 70,000 deaths but for the public reaction to Galen's sermon. Burleigh called assumptions that the sermon affected Hitler's decision to suspend the T4 program "wishful thinking" and noted that the various Church hierarchies did not complain after the transfer of T4 personnel to Aktion Reinhard. Henry Friedlander wrote that it was not the criticism from the Church but rather the loss of secrecy and "general popular disquiet about the way euthanasia was implemented" that caused the killing to be suspended.[118]

Galen had detailed knowledge of the euthanasia program by July 1940 but did not speak out until almost a year after Protestants had begun to protest. In 2002, Beth A. Griech-Polelle wrote that,

Worried lest they be classified as outsiders or internal enemies, they waited for Protestants, that is the "true Germans", to risk a confrontation with the government first. If the Protestants were able to be critical of a Nazi policy, then Catholics could function as "good" Germans and yet be critical too.

On 29 June 1943, Pope Pius XII issued the encyclical Mystici corporis Christi, in which he condemned the fact that "physically deformed people, mentally disturbed people and hereditarily ill people have at times been robbed of their lives" in Germany. Following this, in September 1943, a bold but ineffectual condemnation was read by bishops from pulpits across Germany, denouncing the killing of "the innocent and defenceless mentally handicapped and mentally ill, the incurably infirm and fatally wounded, innocent hostages and disarmed prisoners of war and criminal offenders, people of a foreign race or descent".

On 24 August 1941, Hitler ordered the suspension of the T4 killings. After the invasion of the Soviet Union in June, many T4 personnel were transferred to the east to begin work on the final solution to the Jewish question. The projected death total for the T4 program of 70,000 deaths had been reached by August 1941. The termination of the T4 programme did not end the killing of people with disabilities; from the end of 1941, the killing of adults and children continued less systematically to the end of the war on the local initiative of institute directors and party leaders. After the bombing of Hamburg in July 1943, occupants of old age homes were killed. In the post-war trial of Dr. Hilda Wernicke, Berlin, August, 1946, testimony was given that "500 old, broken women" who had survived the bombing of Stettin in June 1944 were euthanized at the Meseritz-Oberwalde Asylum. The Hartheim, Bernberg, Sonnenstein and Hardamar centres continued in use as "wild euthanasia" centres to kill people sent from all over Germany, until 1945. The methods were lethal injection or starvation, those employed before use of gas chambers. By the end of 1941, about 100,000 people had been killed in the T4 programme. From mid-1941, concentration camp prisoners too feeble or too much trouble to keep alive were murdered after a cursory psychiatric examination under Action 14f13.

After the war a series of trials was held in connection with the Nazi euthanasia programme at various places including: Dresden, Frankfurt, Graz, Nuremberg and Tbingen. In December 1946 an American military tribunal (commonly called the Doctors' trial) prosecuted 23 doctors and administrators for their roles in war crimes and crimes against humanity. These crimes included the systematic killing of those deemed "unworthy of life", including people with mental disabilities, the people who were institutionalized mentally ill, and people with physical impairments. After 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of 1,500 documents, in August 1947 the court pronounced 16 of the defendants guilty. Seven were sentenced to death and executed on 2 June 1948, including Brandt and Brack.

The indictment read in part:

14. Between September 1939 and April 1945 the defendants Karl Brandt, Blome, Brack, and Hoven unlawfully, wilfully, and knowingly committed crimes against humanity, as defined by Article II of Control Council Law No. 10, in that they were principals in, accessories to, ordered, abetted, took a consenting part in, and were connected with plans and enterprises involving the execution of the so called "euthanasia" program of the German Reich, in the course of which the defendants herein murdered hundreds of thousands of human beings, including German civilians, as well as civilians of other nations. The particulars concerning such murders are set forth in paragraph 9 of count two of this indictment and are incorporated herein by reference.

Earlier, in 1945, American forces tried seven staff members of the Hadamar killing centre for the killing of Soviet and Polish nationals, which was within their jurisdiction under international law, as these were the citizens of wartime allies. (Hadamar was within the American Zone of Occupation in Germany. This was before the Allied resolution of December 1945, to prosecute individuals for "crimes against humanity" for such mass atrocities.) Alfons Klein, Karl Ruoff and Wilhelm Willig were sentenced to death and executed; the other four were given long prison sentences. In 1946, newly reconstructed German courts tried members of the Hadamar staff for the murders of nearly 15,000 German citizens at the facility. Adolf Wahlmann and Irmgard Huber, the chief physician and the head nurse, were convicted.

The Ministry for State Security of East Germany stored around 30,000 files of Aktion T4 in their archives. Those files became available to the public only after the German Reunification in 1990, leading to a new wave of research on these wartime crimes.

The German national memorial to the people with disabilities murdered by the Nazis was dedicated in 2014 in Berlin.[146][147] It is located in the pavement of a site next to the Tiergarten park, the location of the former villa at Tiergartenstrasse 4 in Berlin, where more than 60 Nazi bureaucrats and doctors worked in secret under the "T4" program to organize the mass murder of sanatorium and psychiatric hospital patients deemed unworthy to live.[147]

Books

Conferences

Journals

Newspapers

Websites

Books

Journals

Websites

Continue reading here:

Aktion T4 - Wikipedia

Welcome to Home Pet Euthanasia of Southern California …

If you are visiting our website, chances are that you either have already made the decision that it is time to let go of your pet or the time is drawing near and you want to be prepared. You probably are looking for a way to make this transition easier for your pet, to lessen his suffering, make it painless and stress free. Above all, you are looking for a caring and compassionate person to be there for your baby and for your family in such a difficult time.

Your pet may have severe arthritis, cancer, kidney failure, some other debilitating disease or he or she is just very old. He or She has been part of your life for many years, may have helped you through tough times, has been a faithful companion. Now, you see it in your pet's eyes. The love is still there but you also see suffering.

There is a huge difference between saying goodbye in the privacy and comfort of your home versus taking your pet to the vet's for that last, dreaded trip.

In a few words: compassion, caring, in the safety of your home, relaxed, peaceful, stress-free, no cold, stainless steel, ... To read more about why you should choose a home euthanasia, click here.

You undoubtedly want your pet to be comfortable at home with you in his last moments. You want your pet to feel your reassuring touch. You want him to be on his soft, comfortable bed. You want these last moments to be stress-free, peaceful, at home, in familiar surroundings. No cold, stainless steel table, perhaps you want him lying next to you. You want this moment to be quiet, calm, and for your baby to be in gentle, caring, kind and loving hands.

What do you do when the time has come? How do you make it easier on your pet, on your family and on yourself? How do you know the time has come? Do you know what to expect? These are all questions that will be answered on this website.

We offer a compassionate, caring and gentle pet euthanasia service done in the comfort of your own home so that your beloved pet doesn't have to be put in a stressful situation, having to be lifted into the car, going into a noisy, busy veterinary hospital to spend the last few moments of his or her life on a cold stainless steel table.

We primarily service the areas of Orange County, Riverside County, Los Angeles County, part of San Diego County, part of Ventura County and part of San Bernardino County. But wherever you are in the world, the information on our website will help you through this difficult event of your life that is the passing of your pet. We will gently guide you through the difficult decisions you will have to make and ensure that you have full understanding of what is ahead.

Read more.

Go here to read the rest:

Welcome to Home Pet Euthanasia of Southern California ...

The Childfree Life – Official Site

This childfree website is a supportive environment for people who dont have kids and dont plan to have children in the future, as well as those who are still considering whether to have children.

Deciding not to have children, for whatever reason, can make you feel like an outcast, and the object of many negative stereotypes. The childfree choice is easy for some people, but for others it can become a quandary that lasts for years. Having no children means you may lose friends to the demands of parenthood or because you no longer have much in common. You may even find yourself facing strong pressure to conform from people close to you. Being childfree is a decision that cannot always be easily explained or understood.

We offer articles and resources for those who dont want children or cant have children, and invite you to join us in The Childfree Life forums for an honest discussion with like-minded people about all aspects of life without children.

Once upon a time, there was a group of intelligent, thoughtful, funny and wise people who met on another internet forum, and talked at length about their childfree lives, choices, and problems. As this forum was on a womens site, mothers that dropped in saw fit to complain about what they read. They didnt like our language, our opinions, or our choices. The site owner (a parent) agreed. As a result, the rules were changed, the site was censored, accounts were deleted, and the group felt the need to move on. We took that opportunity to create a new home for ourselves, and for other moderate childfree people. The Childfree Life is the result. We hope you enjoy it.

Theres a number of great childfree resources on the web, and more are springing up every day. Were a growing movement, but as yet, theres not a huge public awareness of who we are, what we represent, our hopes, dreams and motivations. Wed like to change that. Our vision is to become a hub of the online CF community, a central location for articles, resources, and thoughts about all things childfree, including the best and busiest forum on the web. We know that some of the childfree communities are a little hardcore for the average person, but theres a lot of parent-pleasing on the more women-oriented sites. Wed like to be somewhere in the middle a moderate voice, if you will.

We welcome the opinions and questions of childfree people of both genders, and supportive others. Were here to lend a sympathetic ear, give an opinion, and support people without judgment in their childfree choices.

See the article here:

The Childfree Life - Official Site

Discover The Palm Beaches FL | Official Palm Beaches …

The sun is shining. The palms are swaying in the breeze. The big fish are biting in the Atlantic. Welcome to a typical day in The Palm Beaches.

From sea captains to captains of industry, The Palm Beaches have welcomed visitors of every stripe from the start. That spirit of hospitality continues today. This is a place where the list of family activities, cultural attractions and outdoor adventures are as numerous as the memories youll make while youre here. And if you prefer to do nothing at all? Let us show you to your beach cabana.

So jump inthe waters fine. Scroll to explore things to do, places to visit, festivals to attend and so much more. Were glad youre here (and we know you will be, too).

Whether youre here for a week or an afternoon, The Palm Beaches area playground for every traveler, budget and interest. Relax on one of our tropical beaches. Enjoy fishing, boating, paddling or snorkeling in our pristine waterways. Indulge in retail therapy on Worth Avenue or one of our outdoor malls. Discover our wilder side at Lion Country Safari or the Florida Everglades. Golfer in the family? Hit legendary links at resorts like The Breakers and PGA National Resort & Spa. And were just getting warmed up.

Visiting The Palm Beaches is an event in itself, butour year-round lineup of festivalswill give you even more reason to visit. Watch MLB all-stars slug it out during Spring Training, see golfs top-ranked players compete for PGA tournament glory or enjoy the Sport of Kings during Palm Beach International Polo Season. Sample culinary creations from Floridas top chefs at the Boca Bacchanal or Palm Beach Food & Wine Festival. Treat your kidsor your inner childto old-fashioned family fun at the South Florida Fair. And youll always catch good vibes at SunFest, one of South Floridas biggest music festivals.

With so much to see and do in The Palm Beaches, let us help youplan your perfect escape. Whether youre flying or driving, getting here is a breeze. Download maps and other planning tools, or build a custom itinerary based on your budget and interests. And for a closer look at the areas best dining, lodging, attractions and more, get your free Official Visitors Guide to The Palm Beaches today.

See the original post here:

Discover The Palm Beaches FL | Official Palm Beaches ...

About Neurotechnology: company information and white paper

Neurotechnology was founded with the key idea of using neural networks for applications such as biometric person identification, computer vision, robotics and artificial intelligence.Much to our delight, we were able to endure the "neural networks winter" by using and expanding this expertise all through 2012, the year that brought explosive developments in the concept and infrastructure of deep neural networks.This allowed us to quickly take advantage of the emerging opportunities that came with the new wave of deep learning and triggered an entire range of new projects in object recognition and other applications.Currently, our team is comprised of more than 100 employees, 15% of whom hold a Ph.D. and half of our employees are actively involved in R&D activities.

Neurotechnology was founded in Vilnius, Lithuania in 1990.The following year we released our first fingerprint identification system for criminal investigations.Our further research endeavors resulted in the first fingerprint identification algorithm for civil uses, which was made public in 1997.In 2002, our researchers began developing a solution for recognizing faces and we released our first facial recognition product in 2004.This was followed by our algorithm for iris recognition released in 2008.In addition, since 2011 we have maintained an ongoing research program in voice recognition.

Once we conceived of the benefits of fusing several biometric modalities, we directed our efforts toward building a multi-biometric product.Released in 2005 under the name MegaMatcher Software Development Kit, the initial version could support recognition of fingerprints and faces.Modalities for iris and voice recognition were added later.From the date of its release in 2005, our MegaMatcher SDK gained acceptance as a key solution in large and national-scale projects related to issuance of passports, de-duplication of voters, etc.For instance, our customers in Bangladesh used the technology for de-duplication of voters in their 2008 election.As another example, the MegaMatcher SDK has been used for passport issuance for Indonesian nationals since 2009.There are many more similar projects as well.

Since applications of this type put extreme requirements on 1:N matching performance, we have spent a lot of our R&D effort on solving this problem.To speed the matching process, we released MegaMatcher Accelerator in 2009.Originally it was used for the fingerprint modality only, but then we added face and iris modalities.In 2016, we released MegaMatcher ABIS to provide the best solution for customers willing to have end-user software instead of an SDK.In 2018, we used MegaMatcher ABIS during the large-scale voter de-duplication campaign in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.We carried out a number of similar projects in other countries as well.

In response to market demands, since 2000 we have also been involved in developing a range of products for smartcard-based biometrics and embedded applications, as well as some end-user products.

In 2004, to better accommodate the growing volumes of research in artificial intelligence, the company founded its robotics division, which began research in the field of mobile autonomous robots.

In 2009, to assist our customers in selecting suitable hardware for their implementations of biometric systems, we started Biometric Supply.This subsidiary offers a wide range of fingerprint readers and iris scanners from multiple manufacturers.

The year 2012 was rich with events for Neurotechnology.To take advantage of the new opportunities brought by rapid growth of cloud technologies, we started SkyBiometry.This subsidiary now provides face detection and recognition software as a cloud-based service.Also in 2012, a strategic decision was made to start a division in Sri Lanka.The team of developers there is now the prime force in developing our biometric solutions for attendance systems.

In 2014, Neurotechnology released SentiBotics, a ready-to-use robotics development kit.The same year, the company established the Ultrasound Research Group to undertake research in the fields of ultrasonic particle manipulation, parametric array and transducer technology.

In almost 30 years of our activity, we have accumulated substantial experience in the area of neural networks.This allowed us to develop a multitude of product capabilities based on deep learning as well as customer applications.

Deep neural networks are able to solve many problems - such as image classification, object detection, or instance segmentation - more efficiently than traditional computer vision algorithms.To facilitate this process, we have built a technology that has tools to support developing AI-based object recognition applications.

In the area of face recognition, the last few years witnessed a dramatic reduction in error rates brought by new algorithms that are based on convolutional neural networks (CNN).Our company started using CNNs for the task of face recognition in 2013.The first application of neural networks alone resulted in an improvement in the accuracy of unconstrained face recognition by a factor of 15 times! We expect further improvements in face recognition performance due to explosive development of architectures and techniques related to CNNs.

As deep learning techniques kept proliferating other areas, we were ultimately able to employ our face recognition algorithms under the conditions of real-time surveillance.By being able to recognize and track other objects - such as pedestrians and all kinds of vehicles (cyclists, bikes, cars, busses, trucks, etc.) - in adjacent video frames, we can extract various pieces of information about those objects, for example the color of the vehicle or the direction of its movement.There is a separate modality for recognizing license plates of vehicles using neural networks.

Our latest improvements in other biometric modalities are also driven by extensive research in deep neural networks.This includes the most interoperable fingerprint algorithm in the world (ranked the first in the NIST MINEX interoperability category), the second most accurate iris recognition technology and the new version of our algorithm for speaker identification.

As another illustration of our achievements in using deep learning, Neurotechnology's researchers won first place in the 2017 Kaggle competition with a computer vision solution for classifying fish species.

We seek to distill our knowledge and understanding of how natural intelligence operates into deep-learning-based algorithms, and we see this approach as the shortest path toward achieving General AI.Neurotechnology also runs Deep Learning Paper Reviews, a series of open-access events devoted to sharing and discussing recent ideas in the field.

We have a reputation for developing a range of products for biometric identification of fingerprints, palm prints, faces, irises and voices.Since the release of our first fingerprint identification system, we have delivered more than 200 products and version upgrades for identification and verification of objects and personal identity.Over 3,000 system integrators, security companies and hardware providers in more than 140 countries integrate our algorithms into their products.

With a combination of fast algorithms and high reliability, our company's fingerprint, face, iris and voice biometric technologies can be used for access control, computer security, banking, time attendance control and law enforcement applications, among others.

With millions of customer installations worldwide, our products are used for both civil and forensic applications, including border crossings, criminal investigations, systems for voter registration, verification and duplication checking, passport issuance and other national-scale projects.

Neurotechnology's fingerprint identification algorithms have shown some of the best results for reliability in major biometric competitions and evaluations, including the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) Minutiae Interoperability Exchange III (MINEX III), Proprietary Fingerprint Template Evaluation II (PFT II) and Fingerprint Vendor Technology Evaluation for the US Department of Justice (FpVTE 2012).Previously, the fingerprint recognition algorithms have received awards in the International Fingerprint Verification Competitions (FVC2006, FVC2004, FVC2002 and FVC2000).

In 2018, our iris recognition algorithm was tested in the NIST Iris Exchange (IREX) Evaluation and was recognized as the second most accurate among those tested.The accelerated version of the algorithm was nearly 50 times faster than any other matching system in the NIST IREX IX evaluation.Previously, Neurotechnology showed outstanding results in the IREX, IREX III and IREX IV evaluations.

To meet the demands of a variety of applications, we developed many advanced algorithms based on computer vision.For instance, they are used in SentiSight.ai, our interactive web platform for developing AI-based object recognition applications.The platform has tools designed to support interactive model training - without coding - and faster image labeling, thus reducing the amount of user effort spent on data mining.We also run projects tailored to the specific needs of our customers.

Our technology for real-time surveillance was designed to support biometric face identification of moving pedestrians using live video streams from high-resolution digital cameras.The technology is used for passive identification, when passers-by do not make any efforts to be recognized.Possible uses for this technology include law enforcement, security, attendance control, visitor counting, traffic monitoring and other commercial applications.

Some of our ealier R&D efforts related to computer vision also involved technologies for eye movement tracking and 3D object model reconstruction.

Our current R&D effort in robotics is focused on the "programming by demonstration" approach and its practical implementation in various neural network structures. During our experiments we not only gained experience with different types of neural networks (e.g., various CNN's, RNN's, including RNN's with external memory, the self modifying RNN and the CMP, Cognitive Mapping and Planning), we also developed our own theoretical innovations.

SentiBotics, our ready-to-use robotics development kit, allows rapid development and testing of mobile robots. The kit includes a mobile robotic platform with a 3D vision system, a modular robotic arm and accompanying ROS-based software we have built on our own, with complete source code and programming samples.

Our Ultrasound Research Group undertakes research in the fields of ultrasonic particle manipulation, parametric array and transducer technology.It develops novel algorithms, hardware and electronics solutions for ultrasonics applications.Currently, the group is developing a new, patent-pending 3D printing and assembling technology based on ultrasonic particle manipulation.This new technology is intended to expand capabilities of existing 3D printing and assembling processes.In 2018, the group also filed a patent for a novel ultrasonic electrostatic transducer technology.These transducers were developed primarily for use in parametric array systems.

More:

About Neurotechnology: company information and white paper

Neurotechnology for Brain Injury Fact Sheet | BrainLine

You or someone you care about has sustained a brain injury. You have heard that there are many advances and interesting research occurring in the treatment and management of brain injuries. This article will help inform you about neurotechnology, a new field that offers technical devices and therapies for persons living with brain injury. This article will also review some important aspects of neurotechnology, including the types of technologies and important issues to consider before pursuing the use of a device or therapy. One way in which this article might be useful is to serve as the basis for discussion with a trained medical professional who is familiar with your specific condition.

Neurotechnology is a broad term used to refer to medical electronics used to interact with the human nervous system. The field has made rapid advancements in recent history: components have shrunk, electronics improved, and we, as a society, have become more accepting of interacting with technology. For instance, think about how common a heart pacemaker is today compared to only two decades ago. Devices are available commercially for brain injury treatment in such areas as pain management, breathing assistance, rehabilitation techniques and diagnostic practices. There are also many new technologies being investigated in research centers. These devices cannot reverse the damage to the brain. They are tools that can be used, for instance, to combat secondary conditions, provide further independence or to aid in the rehabilitation process.

The basis of neurotechnology is the electrical signals the body uses to send messages. Electrical stimulation is the primary feature of this technology. Even though a muscle is paralyzed, it does not mean that the muscle cannot contract when it is stimulated. For those with mobility impairments that do not have peripheral nerve damage, electrical stimulation may be utilized; it is being demonstrated through exciting new technologies. The technologies are also being reviewed to excite neurons in the nervous system.

In the 1950s, the first attempt was made to apply electrical stimulation to the phrenic nerve to allow a person to breathe without a ventilator. This gradually developed into a field of science called FES (Functional Electrical Stimulation). FES encompasses a variety of therapeutic techniques and treatments used to activate muscles that may not be functioning properly due to injury, disease or a physical abnormality. Over the decades, this field of science that combines medicine, biomedical engineering and technology evolved into what is now called neurotechnology.

Areas of Neurotechnology

Neurotechnology can be divided into four areas: Neuromodulation, Neural Prostheses, Neural Rehabilitation, NeuroPharmaceutical, and NeuroSensing and Diagnostics. Each area has a distinct definition however some devices may be applicable to more than one area.

These four segments make up the innovative field of neurotechnology. This is an emerging field; it is essential that the consumer carefully consider each device, therapy or treatment protocol before choosing to participate.

Important Considerations of Use

Below are some important considerations to review prior to participating in a therapy, treatment or device use.

Individuals interested in neurotechnology treatments, therapies or devices should consider the time commitment and financial requirements and be evaluated and supervised by a clinician specializing in brain injury.

It was formerly an article of faith among scientists that damage to the brain was permanent, and neurons, once destroyed by trauma, could not regenerate. Decades of research into the brain have shown otherwise. There is a growing wave of scientific evidence for regenerative processes in the brain, and proof for the brain's innate plasticity the natural capacity of the brain to rewire itself, to form new connections and re-model existing ones.

Cortical maps of the brain have shown the ability to modify bodily areas by sensory input and experience. Such studies about spatial navigation areas in the brains of taxi-drivers or areas corresponding to the motor maps of fingers in Braille readers demonstrate such capabilities of the brain. Axons, the projections that connect different cortical zones, continue to develop well into adulthood. Therapies guided by principles of neuroplasticity can encourage axonal regrowth, compensating for damaged neural tissue instead of re-growing it. There are neuronal assemblies, such as the hippocampus, which appear to possess limited regenerative properties, but research into this phenomenon is in its infancy. Nonetheless, as young as it is, the field of neuroplasticity is cause for cautious optimism among persons with brain injury and their families.

This research has obvious therapeutic implications for the treatment of brain injury. Doctors who specialize in the physical rehabilitation of patients with stroke have drawn on neuroplasticity research in devising therapies such as constraint-induced therapy, which forces use of the side of the body affected by stroke, by restricting use of the unaffected side. Forced to use the affected arm intensively and repetitively for weeks, stroke survivors will often see gains in their ability to use the impaired limb. Other more low-tech therapies drawing on the concept of neuroplasticity include compensatory therapies. The person with brain injury is trained to use a reminder system such as a notebook or calendar to compensate for memory or cognitive deficits. The continued use of such systems is hoped to encourage the growth of new habits, and, it is assumed, new axonal connections between regions of cortex spared by brain injury.

One of the most exciting realms of therapeutic technology, guided by the principles of research, is neurotechnology. This fact sheet outlines some of the current research areas in this field and offers practical guidelines for taking advantage of these advances. Families and persons with brain injury should be aware of these findings, and discuss them with their doctors. The inherent limitations in recovery caused by the loss of neural tissue can be balanced with the capacity for recovery offered by therapy and technology.

There are no quick-fix-its for brain injury just as there is no cure-all for any chronic health condition. We do not intend to offer false hope or make promises beyond what qualified medical professionals can make. Nonetheless, research into the regenerative properties of the brain can serve as a silver lining in the cloud of trauma and impairment caused by brain injury.

Go here to read the rest:

Neurotechnology for Brain Injury Fact Sheet | BrainLine

Basic Income Guarantee – Your Right to Economic Security …

"This book is a great idea - brilliantly stated. Some may think it's ultra-liberal, as they did when I proposed a similar idea in 1972. I see it as true conservatism - the right of income for all Americans sufficient for food, shelter, and basic necessities. Or, what Jefferson referred to as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - U.S. Senator George McGovern, 1972 Democratic Party Presidential Candidate

"Sheahen and I are as far apart on political philosophy and the causes of the nation's current mess as two people can be, but we both think that a basic income guarantee has to be part of the solution. That says something about the potential of this important idea whose time, as we both hope, is coming. Basic Income Guarantee will help make that happen." - Charles Murray, author of In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State

"Basic Income Guarantee is a fascinating, lucid presentation of a complex subject. Sheahen asks and answers the questions of what a just society should and could do to overcome income insecurity. Given our prolonged economic malaise, everyone in America should be thinking about it." - Theresa Funiciello, author of Tyranny of Kindness and head of Social Agenda

"Absent as an issue for almost fifty years, Allan Sheahen places the idea of a basic income for all Americans squarely back on the national agenda. In plain English, this radical idea is not only clearly explained but answers even the toughest objections that can be raised. This book should make sense even to my most dysfunctional colleagues in Congress." - Bob Filner, U.S. Congressman of San Diego and former chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee

View post:

Basic Income Guarantee - Your Right to Economic Security ...

Transhumanism: The History of a Dangerous Idea: David …

Transhumanism is a recent movement that extols mans right to shape his own evolution, by maximizing the use of scientific technologies, to enhance human physical and intellectual potential. While the name is new, the idea has long been a popular theme of science fiction, featured in such films as 2001: A Space Odyssey, Blade Runner, the Terminator series, and more recently, The Matrix, Limitless, Her and Transcendence.

However, as its adherents hint at in their own publications, transhumanism is an occult project, rooted in Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry, and derived from the Kabbalah, which asserts that humanity is evolving intellectually, towards a point in time when man will become God. Modeled on the medieval legend of the Golem and Frankenstein, they believe man will be able to create life itself, in the form of living machines, or artificial intelligence.

Spearheaded by the Cybernetics Group, the project resulted in both the development of the modern computer and MK-Ultra, the CIAs mind-control program. MK-Ultra promoted the mind-expanding potential of psychedelic drugs, to shape the counterculture of the 1960s, based on the notion that the shamans of ancient times used psychoactive substances, equated with the apple of the Tree of Knowledge.

And, as revealed in the movie Lucy, through the use of smart drugs, and what transhumanists call mind uploading, man will be able to merge with the Internet, which is envisioned as the end-point of Kabbalistic evolution, the formation of a collective consciousness, or Global Brain. That awaited moment is what Ray Kurzweil, a director of engineering at Google, refers to as The Singularly. By accumulating the total of human knowledge, and providing access to every aspect of human activity, the Internet will supposedly achieve omniscience, becoming the God of occultism, or the Masonic All-Seeing Eye of the reverse side of the American dollar bill.

Read more from the original source:

Transhumanism: The History of a Dangerous Idea: David ...

Nootroo – The Gold Standard In Nootropics

Synergistic Effects

Researchers studying deficient brains in older populations are constantly working to activate the cholinergic system, as the neurotransmitter acetylcholine is directly implicated in memory. Normally, administering choline alone can increase cholinergic transmission and raise the levels of acetylcholine in the brain.

However, in some older patients, their cholinergic systems are so deteriorated, that they are unable to turn the choline into acetylcholine. The scientists theorized that if they could administer choline, while simultaneously administering a compound that could correct for the critical age-related neuronal deficiencies, it might enable the choline to be properly metabolized.

When they learned that piracetam enables the central nervous system to function more effectively, the researchers decided to run an experiment on aged rats. They administered choline, piracetam, alone as well as the combination of the two.

Both choline and piracetam alone seemed to have a somewhat positive, albeit limited effect. However, when they combined piracetam and choline, the results were considered "profound." See the dramatic difference the combination makes in the gold bar labeled "C+P" in the accompanying graph.

Our Gold & Silver stacks are based on the principles behind this synergistic combination of ingredients.

Read the rest here:

Nootroo - The Gold Standard In Nootropics

Atheist Websites Directory

Atheist Websites Directory

This directory includes most of the top atheist websites plus some useful small sites. Note that the category structure is necessarily imperfect since some sites in the list could fit into more than one group. Also note that several categories contain links to articles and other resources that might interest an atheist.

Choose a category

General Websites

Many of the sites in this section represent large organizations, but some were created by individuals or small groups. In most cases the link points to the home page.

American Atheists - This pioneering atheist organization was founded in 1963 by Madalyn Murray O'Hair after her successful legal battle against mandatory prayer in U.S. public schools. Since then the organization has engaged in numerous other legal actions to support the separation of church and state, and to end discrimination against non-Christians. Its other activities include publishing books, organizing demonstrations, and providing college scholarships. It also maintains the largest archive of atheist literature in the United States. The website is frequently updated with reports on the latest legal actions, demonstrations, and public controversies relating to atheism.

Freedom From Religion Foundation - This non-profit foundation, which was incorporated in 1978, fights attempts by U.S. religious organizations to use the powers of government to promote religion. Its attorneys have taken part in many legal battles on issues such as the separation of state and church, organized prayer in public schools, and efforts to use taxpayer money to fund religious schools. Another ongoing activity is the effort to protect the rights of women, gays, and minorities from attacks by church groups.

Atheist Alliance International - The goal of this organization, which has affiliates in more than 20 countries, is to create more compassionate and better-informed societies. Its members believe that human activities should be based on reason and science rather than religion or superstition. The U.S. affiliate, Atheist Alliance America, presents the annual Richard Dawkins Award to individuals who make outstanding contributions to freethought.

Evil Bible Website - The main purpose of this well-known site is to spread the terrible truth about Christianity. It points out that the Christian God, according to the bible, has been directly responsible for numerous mass-murders and other atrocious acts. The articles on the site discuss the specific biblical passages which describe these terrible crimes. There are also descriptions of the mass murders and various other atrocities committed by Christians from ancient times to the present day. Many of the articles on the site were written by Charlotte Schnook.

The Freethinker - This is the website of The Freethinker magazine, which has been continuously published in England since its launch in 1881, and is generally regarded as the world's oldest surviving freethought publication. The Victorian age in which it was launched was very hostile to atheists, and after an 1882 issue of the magazine included some irreligious cartoons, its founder G.W. Foote was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment with hard labor for violating England's anti-blasphemy law. More than a century later the publication's long campaign against that law finally helped get it repealed. The magazine also played an important role in the movement to legalize birth control in England. This tradition of activism still continues, and is quite apparent to anyone who visits the website.

The Secular Web (Infidels.org) - This is one of the oldest, largest, and most comprehensive freethought resources on the internet. Established in 1995, it contains many articles by prominent scholars, scientists, and historians. The articles cover almost every aspect of the atheism versus religion debate, as well as many related topics in the fields of science, religion and history. This is an excellent resource not only for someone who is just learning about atheism, but also for anyone interested in doing research on the subject.

Rational Response Squad - This well-known site is home to a community of activist free-thinkers who want to promote rational thinking in all matters. Various articles on the site describe the benefits to humanity that have been brought about by logical thought and scientific methods, and compare those benefits to the problems caused by religion and superstition. Anyone can make a contribution by writing articles and participating in an active forum.

The Freethought Society - Founded in 1993 by Margaret Downey, this quickly became one of the most active and influential freethought organizations in the United States. It is especially noteworthy for the militancy of its efforts to bring an end to discrimination against non-theists. Many of its activities, such as organizing protests and putting up billboards, are based on the belief that a strong public voice is necessary to overcome the prejudice against secularists that currently pervades American society. The long-term goal is to help bring about a world in which any freethinker can express his or her beliefs without fear of discrimination or retaliation.

Atheist Revolution - This top site is a valuable resource for skeptics, agnostics, atheists, progressives, or anyone who wants to help bring about a better world. It is especially helpful in revealing the harm caused to society by organized religion, particularly the hate and violence that result from Christian extremism. It points out examples of this harm through frequent posts about recent acts of repression and violence perpetrated by religious groups. It also offers links to other websites and blogs that contain related information.

Center for Inquiry - This nonprofit umbrella organization oversees a diverse group of projects intended to promote science, freedom of inquiry, and secular humanist values. One of its best-known projects is "On Campus", an outreach program that helps secular students organize and operate school groups. Another program, the "Freethought Books Project", provides donations of freethought literature to prisoners and inmates in mental hospitals. The organization is also the sponsor of the annual "Women in Secularism" conference. Other activities include political lobbying, educational projects, and preservation of secular literature. The organization's headquarters is in Amherst, New York, but it also has offices in many U.S. cities as well as many countries. The website contains a press center, a store, and a forums section.

The Center for Inquiry also provides support for the work of two major affiliates, the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and the Council for Secular Humanism, and helps publish their respective periodicals, Skeptical Inquirer and Free Inquiry.

Update (01-24-2016) -- In January 2016 a merger was announced in which the Richard Dawkins Foundation became a new division of the Center for Inquiry.

Atheist Empire - This resource, which was established in 1998, is a good place to find general information about atheism. One especially valuable part of the site is the "Great Minds" section, which describes the philosophical views of famous thinkers such as Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Susan B. Anthony, Sigmund Freud, Voltaire, Einstein, and Carl Sagan. Another section contains statistical data on the numbers of adherents of various religions in comparison to the number of atheists and other non-believers. There is also a guide to films and movies that express anti-religious views.

Religious Tolerance - This main purpose of this website is to promote mutual understanding and tolerance among people of all beliefs. Its underlying premise is that every individual should be free to form his or her own opinions and that no one group has the right to impose its practices or beliefs on other groups. It also serves as an educational resource, and contains an archive of more than three thousand articles and essays on a variety of subjects relating to religion, atheism and skepticism. Overall, this is one of the most-visited freethought sites on the internet.

NoBeliefs.com - Launched in 1997, this is still one of the most popular websites for atheists and freethinkers. Many of the numerous articles explain how religion is the root cause of much of the ignorance, intolerance, and violence that has plagued humankind throughout history. The site also contains news reports, a list of common fallacies relating to religion, and a section of book reviews.

The Atheist Scholar - This is an excellent resource for anyone interested in learning about atheism. It contains many well-written articles covering such subjects as the history of atheism, science vs. religion, atheist ethics, atheism and the law, atheist demographics, biblical criticism, and "the new atheism". There are also sections dedicated to atheist films, atheist fiction, and personal narratives of non-believers. All of the articles are very informative, yet easy to read and understand.

American Humanist Association - This organization was founded in 1941 for the purpose of promoting humanism in all societies. Based in the United States, its specific activities include advocating for the full separation of church and state, improving public education, promoting scientific and medical research, and creating a true American democracy. It also publishes the award-winning magazine, the Humanist.

Arguments for Atheism - If you are looking for a general guide to the major arguments for atheism and against religion, you can find it here. Various articles discuss such topics as the existence of evil, the harmful effects of religion on society, God's silence, and moral values. In addition, the site contains articles about the history of atheism, some quotations by famous atheists, and a list of references.

Ask the Atheist - Do you have a question for an atheist? This website provides a simple fill-in form that allows you to ask it, and a reply will normally be posted on the site within a few days for everyone to read. Several very knowledgeable individuals help to provide answers, and the discussions can be expanded by comments from readers. In addition to asking new questions, you can also search for a specific topic in an archive of hundreds of previously-answered questions. Many of these archived questions relate to problems that atheists may encounter in everyday life when dealing with people of different belief systems. Overall this site provides a very large amount of helpful information.

Skeptic Friends - This site was created to promote logic, critical thinking, and science as the best way for a person to arrive at his or her personal beliefs and moral values. Members may conduct polls, submit articles for possible publication on the site, and discuss various religious issues in a group of forums.

Return to Top of Page

Online Communities

Reddit Atheism Forum - With more than a million members, this is undoubtedly the largest and most active atheism forum on the web. Even if you don't join and participate in the discussions, it is still an excellent place to keep up with the latest news stories of interest to atheists. In addition, you will always find many discussions relating to important moral, social, and political issues of modern society, as viewed from a secularist perspective.

Atheist Nexus - This is a major social networking site for non-Christians. Each person who joins is given his or her own profile page for displaying personal information and photos. Members may also express their views in forums, make blog posts, join special groups, announce events, and upload videos.

Talk Freethought - This is one of the better-known and most active freethought forums on the internet. In addition to the usual discussions about philosophy, science, religion, and morality, there are sections devoted to secular lifestyles, popular culture, and humor. The lifestyles section contains a special "Atheists' Testimony Thread" in which members can describe what led to their personal "de-conversions" from religion. Note: This site was formerly called the "Freethought Rationalism Forum", but was re-launched under the current name in 2014.

Richard Dawkins Foundation - The well-known atheist scientist and author Richard Dawkins created the Foundation for Reason and Science in order to promote critical thinking, and to combat ignorance, superstition, and religious intolerance. This popular site covers a broad range of topics not only in religion, but also in science, politics, and current events.

Update (01-24-2016) -- In January 2016 the Richard Dawkins Foundation and the Center for Inquiry announced that the two organizations are merging, with the Richard Dawkins Foundation becoming a new division within the Center for Inquiry.

Ex-Christian - An online community for former Christians, this site includes a "testimonies" section in which people explain why they can no longer accept the tenets of their previous religion. Members can also discuss their personal views and other matters in an active forum. The site also includes videos, articles, and a gallery of images.

Atheist Zone - This prominent news and social networking site serves as an internet gathering place for atheists, skeptics, liberals, and anyone else interested in talking about the problems caused by organized religions, and how atheism is a logical alternative. The site includes a forum, a retail shop, and a wiki which may be edited by any member. Note: This website was previously called "Think Atheist".

Secular Cafe - This online gathering place serves as a venue for secularists who want to discuss important issues in a friendly relaxed environment. There are individual forums for politics, religion, morality and various other subjects. Everyone is welcome regardless of their personal views, provided that they don't engage in abusive or disruptive conduct.

Atheist Republic - This online community has attracted a diverse group of contributors from many different backgrounds. Its website provides opportunities for blogging, participating in forum discussions, uploading images, and other activities. There are also news stories, a section of statistics about atheism, and a store. One of the strengths of this community is its international makeup, which makes it a place where atheists from different societies can meet and exchange ideas.

Atheist Universe - This is another diverse international community with an easy-to-use website that includes an active forum, member blogs, and links to other resources.

AtheistForums.com and AtheistForums.org - These are two of the oldest and best-established basic atheist forum sites on the web. Although they have the same name, "Atheist Forums", they were created independently, and there is no connection between them. But they are similar, and some people have joined both of them and visit both regularly. There are often some very knowledgeable participants in basic forums of this type, and some of the best discussions take place in them.

Happy Atheist Forum - This is another well-established atheist forum site. There are many individual discussion sections where members can express their views in areas such as social issues, current events, and politics.

Ain't No God - In addition to participating in discussion threads, members of this forum can also post images and create their own blogs.

Debating Christianity and Religion Forum - This forum is specifically designed to encourage discussions about various human belief systems. Many atheists have joined for the purpose of engaging in direct debates with Christians.

Skeptics Guide to the Universe Forums - This forum site was originally created for discussions of the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe weekly podcasts produced by the New England Skeptical Society. Typical subjects of these podcasts include myths, superstitions, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and purported paranormal phenomena. Participants in the forum can also start discussions about other subjects as well. Due to the popularity of the podcasts, this has become one of the largest and most active online groups for skeptics and free-thinkers.

Other Online Communities:

Raving Atheists Forum

Yahoo Answers Religion -- Very active and fierce

The Vegan Atheist Forum

Return to Top of Page

Blogs and Blog Hubs

Debunking Christianity - As its name suggests, this top blog focuses on exposing the illogical and fallacious aspects of the Christian religion. There are also links to many similar blogs and websites, as well as to the sales pages of dozens of books that might be of interest to atheists.

Free Thought Blogs - This is a hub for some of the best-known freethought blogs, including the Atheist Experience and Pharyngula. Most of these blogs were originally scattered around the web at various other locations, but were later moved here.

Patheos Atheist Channel - Another group of prominent freethought bloggers can be found here. These include the Friendly Atheist, Unreasonable Faith, and Daylight Atheism.

The Orbit - This hub, which was launched in March 2016, is home to a number of prominent atheist and freethought bloggers. One main purpose of the site is to encourage more activism within the secular community, especially in confronting social injustices and other problems of modern society.

Skepchick - This was originally the website of Rebecca Watson, who launched it in 2005, but it was later expanded to include contributions by other writers. One of the goals is to promote skepticism and critical thinking among women around the world. In recent years additional sites have been added to form the Skepchick Network, which includes Queereka (LGBTQ issues), School of Doubt (education), Mad Art Lab, and Teen Skepchick. Although most of the writers are women, men can also contribute.

Center for Inquiry Group Blog - This blog includes posts from leading members of the Center for Inquiry staff as well as other prominent freethinkers and guest posters. There is also a daily digest of atheist news reports called "The Morning Heresy".

Daylight Atheism - This well-known blog was created by writer Adam Lee in 2006, with the goal of helping to bring nonbelief out into the daylight. Eventually, after many years as an independent site, Daylight Atheism was incorporated into the Patheos website as a separate section. In mid-2018, veteran newspaper editor James A. Haught joined the blog as a regular contributor.

Atheist Ethicist - This prolific blogger often writes about the ethical choices we must make in our lives, and how they are affected by both basic human nature and the influence of culture and society.

Common Sense Atheism - Frequent insightful posts about important religious and social issues have brought this blogger to prominence.

Atheist Media Blog - Go to this blog to keep up with news reports and media stories relating to controversial scientific, religious, and social issues.

The Atheist Blogroll - More than 1000 atheists have started using blogs to express their views and substantiate their beliefs. For a list of many of them, go to this blogroll.

Skeptic Ink Network - This is an internet hub for a group of skeptic bloggers who try to address important questions in philosophy, religion, secularism, and related areas. This is a fairly new web hub, but it has already attracted a diverse group of writers from many different countries and backgrounds.

Return to Top of Page

Humor and Satire

Landover Baptist Church - A spoof of organized religions, this site takes a humorous look at typical Christian attitudes toward race, sex, abstinence, biblical inerrancy, and salvation. For example, a section on "Godly Health" contains a fake ad for a "Salvation Pill" which will help strengthen a believer's faith. The site also includes a forum, a store, and a news archive.

The Evil Atheist Conspiracy - This hilarious parody of Christian beliefs about atheism describes how a diabolical organization of the godless is secretly controlling the earth and trying to wipe out everything that is honest, decent, and good. Of course no such organization actually exists, but the article describes some of the horrible evil things it would be doing if it did exist.

Un-intelligent Design - Some people believe that the universe was designed by some higher power, but that this higher power did a really lousy job of it. One often-cited example of bad design is the existence of mosquitoes, ticks, and other blood-suckers, which a better design wouldn't have included. Some people also argue that human beings could have been better designed, perhaps by being given more intelligence and less propensity to resort to violence. Many atheists regard such design defects as just more evidence that there are no gods.

Note: De-baptism Ceremonies - Most American atheists were raised as Christians and didn't see the truth until after they became old enough to start thinking for themselves. A de-baptism ceremony gives them an opportunity to "undo" their earlier baptisms as infants or young children, when water was sprinkled on their heads as part of a church ritual. In recent years several mass de-baptisms of large groups have been carried out at freethought conventions, and also at special De-Baptism Bashes. Some atheists have even tried to get their names removed from old church baptismal rolls because they were infants at the time and didn't give their consent.

Jesus and Mo - Launched in 2005, this hilarious weekly comic strip features the "holy roomies" Jesus and Mo (Mohammed). This is one of the best-known and most widely-praised irreligious cartoon sites on the web.

God Thinking about Retirement - Because the universe is so big, and keeps getting even bigger, God is tired of having to watch over everything, and feels bummed out. He also feels that he's not really needed anymore, since the universe pretty much runs itself. So he's thinking about retiring.

Note: God's Mistakes - If, as some believe, the Christian god originally intended to create a perfect earthly paradise for all humankind, then his efforts apparently went awry. But his lack of success might be partly due to his own blunders. Here are four of his possible mistakes.

1. He Created the Devil -- Many people have wondered why God created Satan. But whatever his reasons, he may have later regretted doing so, because the bible says that Satan will eventually be brought to justice and punished with eternal torment in hell. However that hasn't happened yet, and in the meantime the loathsome fiend has roamed free for thousands of years, and has used that time to pursue his evil activities all over the earth.

2. He Didn't Give Adam and Eve Enough Willpower -- Unfortunately, when God made Adam and Eve, he didn't give them enough willpower to resist the temptations of the talking serpent. Many Christians regard the resulting "Fall of Mankind" as the basic cause of all the misery and suffering subsequently experienced by the human race. Of course God could have avoided the whole thing by not creating the talking serpent in the first place.

3. He Didn't Reveal Himself to Everyone -- God wants all people to worship him and to obey his commandments. But instead of telling this to everyone directly, he initually only revealed it to the ancient tribe of Hebrews, and instructed them to carry the message to everyone else. But due to wars, enslavements, and other difficulties, the Hebrews and their descendants weren't able to take the message to most parts of the world. As a result, when Jesus came to earth, part of his mission was to launch a new effort to spread the word. Even so, millions of people have lived and died without ever getting the message.

4. He Hasn't Let Jesus Finish the Job -- Evidently Jesus wasn't able to get everything done during his first appearance on the earth, because he told his followers that he would return later to finish the job. He didn't explain why he couldn't do everything in one visit. At any rate, many Christians expect his Second Coming to miraculously bring an end to all violence, oppression, injustice, and misery. But humankind has suffered through 2000 more years of those same problems, with everyone wondering why he still hasn't returned.

Comics of Watson Heston -- One section of this page contains links to some 19th-century cartoons drawn by Watson Heston. You might find it interesting to look at the style of humor that was popular in that era.

Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - Members of this church devote themselves to what is probably the only edible god known to humankind. This god was secretly worshiped by pirates for hundreds of years, but became known to the general public in 2005, and the church now has thousands of members called Pastafarians. Many of the beliefs are based on a collection of inerrant sacred scriptures called The Loose Canon: A Really Important Collection of Words.

The Invisible Pink Unicorn - This goddess is another deity who has recently been gaining many devotees. Oddly, although she is invisible, she is also pink. Some Christians have claimed that she doesn't really exist, but none of them have proved it.

Note: The Final Battle - As all true Christians already know, the Forces of Evil and the Forces of Good are currently fighting a great battle for the Soul of America. Prophecies in the Bible predicted this battle, and signs that it has finally begun are clearly visible to all godly people.

Aside: For anyone who isn't godly enough to see these signs, here is a list of some of them:-- Lawlessness and crime are rampant.-- Storms and earthquakes are becoming more violent.-- Communists and atheists have infiltrated the highest levels of government.-- Wickedness and depravity are spreading through society like cancers.-- Political turmoil has created the perfect opportunity for the Antichrist to appear.

Although the great battle is still in an early stage, the Forces of Evil are already using nefarious tricks and vile tactics to try to gain an advantage. Christians need to realize that this will be a long desperate struggle, and that the final fate of all humankind is hanging in the balance. Luckily the prophecies say that the Forces of Good will ultimately triumph, and that all wicked people will be condemned to eternal torture in hell. Of course true Christians don't have to worry anyway, because they know that sooner or later the Rapture will occur and take them to the safety of Heaven. But in the meantime the great war rages on, and true believers must learn to see through the media's deceptions and gain a full understanding of what's really happening in this great struggle for the Soul of America.

Born Again Pagan - If you're want some good laughs, go to this great all-around humor website. You'll find amusing cartoons, funny jokes, and witty quotes.

Note: The Omphalos Hypothesis - Some Christians interpret the bible to mean that God created the earth about 6000 years ago, although geological evidence indicates that our planet is at least four billion years old. When asked about this discrepancy, some Christians will explain it by saying that God intentionally tried to make the earth look much older by "planting" fake evidence such as bogus dinosaur fossils. God did this, these Christians will say, in order to find out who can be tricked into adopting false beliefs like evolution. Any people who can be tricked in this way obviously don't have enough faith, and God will deal with them accordingly.

The idea that God planted fake evidence about the earth's age, as a way to trick people into false beliefs, is known as the Omphalos Hypothesis. But some Christians have wondered why God would need to resort to tricks in order to determine who doesn't have sufficient faith. This line of thought has led to the theory that it must have actually been Satan who created all of this fake geological evidence, so that he could use it to lead people astray.

Funny Atheism - This small site contains a nice collection of humorous anti-religious jokes and cartoons.

Mr. Deity - Most of the episodes in this well-known series of short witty films are parodies of Christian beliefs about their God. The role of Mr. Deity (God) is played by Brian Keith Dalton, who is also the original creator and main script writer. The first episode appeared on Youtube in 2006, and the whole series is still available for viewing there.

Question: Why was Jesus crucified?

Answer: God wanted to forgive everyone's sins, but he couldn't do it unless somebody paid for them first.

The Satanic Temple - This group stages public events which use parody to fight religious hate and bigotry. It is best-known for designing and creating a large solid-bronze statue of Baphomet (Satan).

Fundies Say the Darndest Things - This is a collection of thousands of bizarre statements that have been made by fundamentalist Christians in recent years. Although most of the quotes are hilarious, unfortunately many are also bigoted, false, delusive, and in some cases, even terrifying. This site also has a separate collection of vile, hateful, but sometimes hysterically-convoluted quotes from political and religious extremists.

Note: Some Questions to Ask Christians

-- Why do men have nipples on their chests?

-- When Jesus came to earth, why did he arrive in the form of a human baby?

-- Did God know beforehand that Adam and Eve would eat the forbidden fruit?

-- Why doesn't God guide tornadoes away from churches?

-- Did Mary feel any labor pains when she gave birth to Jesus?

-- Did God make a mistake when he picked the Jews to be his chosen people?

More Humor Sites -- There are many other humor sites for freethinkers on the web. If you want some more laughs, you can start by going to the following resources:

Atheist Humor on Pinterest

Fundalmentalist Funhouse

Christwire

Archive of Some Classic Religion Jokes

See the rest here:

Atheist Websites Directory

President Obama on Atheism | Real Time with Bill Maher (Web Exclusive)

Subscribe to the Real Time YouTube: http://itsh.bo/10r5A1B

Bill asks President Barack Obama about a growing and underrepresented part of the electorate: nonbelievers.

Connect with Real Time Online:Find Real Time on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MaherFind Real Time on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealTimersFind Real Time with Bill Maher Official Site: http://itsh.bo/HttKcM.Find Real Time with Bill Maher on HBO GO http://itsh.bo/iioY87.Find Real Time with Bill Maher on Connect: http://connect.hbo.com/real-time-bill...Find Real Time on Instagram: http://instagram.com/realtimersThe Real Time blog: http://www.real-time-with-bill-maher-...Find Real Time merchandise: http://itsh.bo/1p0Doxu

It's HBO.

Connect with HBO OnlineFind HBO on Facebook: http://Facebook.com/HBOFollow @HBO on Twitter: http://Twitter.com/HBOFind HBO on Youtube: http://Youtube.com/HBOFind HBO Official Site: http://HBO.comFind HBO Connect: http://Connect.hbo.comFind HBO GO: http://HBOGO.comFind HBO on Instagram: http://Instagram.com/hboFind HBO on Foursquare: http://Foursquare.com/hboFind the HBO Shop: http://itsh.bo/billmahershop

Check out other HBO ChannelsHBO: http://www.youtube.com/hboGame of Thrones: http://www.youtube.com/GameofThrones HBO Sports: http://www.youtube.com/HBOsports HBO Documentary Films: http://www.youtube.com/HBODocs Cinemax: http://www.youtube.com/Cinemax HBO Latino: http://www.youtube.com/HBOLatino

More here:

President Obama on Atheism | Real Time with Bill Maher (Web Exclusive)

Cyborg | Teen Titans Go! Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

CyborgSpecies

Cybernetically Enhanced Human

Victor Stone, also known as Cyborg, is a member of the Teen Titans and one of the main protagonists in Teen Titans Go!. Enhanced with high-tech upgrades and weapons, he's an enthusiastic asset to the team... sometimes.

The voice actor for Cyborg in the original cartoon, Khary Payton, reprises his role in this series.

Before his career as a cybernetic superhero, Victor Stone was a gifted football athlete. By far the best player on his high school team, he had a nonstop drive and was always striving for better.[1] Unfortunately, after getting involved in street gangs, Victor took a turn down the wrong road.[2]

As seen in the episode "Flashback", Victor desired a more fulfilling life, a life of heroism. Although he lacked any superpowers, his strenuous diligence finally landed him an audition for the Teen Titans, a new team of heroes in Jump City. Victor's initial attempt to join failed miserably, and during the tryouts, he was gravely injured in a combat exercise. However, after a quick trip to the hospital, Victor was rebuilt with a high-tech robotic exoskeleton. Although parts of his humanity were lost, Victor, now known as Cyborg, gained unbelievable upgrades and powers. Eventually, he and a bunch of other misfits led by Robin were able to overcome their deficiencies and become members of the Titans.

Since then, Cyborg has been a somewhat lazy yet still invaluable component of the team. He's often one of the big guns when saving the city, as well as some big fun, too.

"Cyborg is a laid-back, half-teen, half-robot who's more interested in pizza and video games than in fighting crime."[3]

Even though he's entrusted with the extremely important job of protecting Jump City, Cyborg usually takes a lazy, lethargic approach to his assignment. Nothing in the world pleases him more than pizza, burgers, pie, and kicking back with Beast Boy. In fact, in the episode "Double Trouble", Cy and Beastie spent a solid month playing video games and eating pizza. For him, the word "responsibility" itself is scary, as seen in "Staring at the Future".

Night begins to shine...

Apart from that, Cyborg is the primary source of energy and fun on the team (the polar opposite of Raven). He's constantly starting parties and having a blast with his team members. Of course he can get a little annoying at times, but for the most part, the other four often see him as an older brother to look up to in their lives.

Ooouuu, unbeatable upgrades!

No one rips off Cyborg's arm without getting a missile to the face.

To see the multiple outfits of Cyborg throughout the series, click here.

Besides looking super rad, the robotic suit that Cyborg's encased in grants him an extensive laundry list of superpowers, skills, and transformations. Below is a list of Cyborg's main abilities; to view a complete list of his powers, visit this page.

Throughout Teen Titans Go!, Cyborg has taken on quite a few personas and different forms. Featured below are only his most notable versionsa complete list can be found by following this link.

That's a nice sandwich you got there, dude...

Read the original here:

Cyborg | Teen Titans Go! Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

NASA Ozone Watch: Latest status of ozone

View the latest status of the ozone layer over the Antarctic, with a focus on the ozone hole. Satellite instruments monitor the ozone layer, and we use their data to create the images that depict the amount of ozone.

Click any map image to bring up a new page with a high-resolution image.

Watch a movie of the daily progression through a season or the annual progression of the means for a month. A table of all ozone movies are available in our multimedia section.

Ozone is a colorless gas. Chemically, ozone is very active; it reacts readily with a great many other substances. Near the Earths surface, those reactions cause rubber to crack, hurt plant life, and damage peoples lung tissues. But ozone also absorbs harmful components of sunlight, known as ultraviolet B, or UV-B. High above the surface, above even the weather systems, a tenuous layer of ozone gas absorbs UV-B, protecting living things below.

The Dobson Unit (DU) is the unit of measure for total ozone. If you were to take all the ozone in a column of air stretching from the surface of the earth to space, and bring all that ozone to standard temperature (0 Celsius) and pressure (1013.25 millibars, or one atmosphere, or atm), the column would be about 0.3 centimeters thick. Thus, the total ozone would be 0.3 atm-cm. To make the units easier to work with, the Dobson Unit is defined to be 0.001 atm-cm. Our 0.3 atm-cm would be 300 DU.

Each year for the past few decades during the Southern Hemisphere spring, chemical reactions involving chlorine and bromine cause ozone in the southern polar region to be destroyed rapidly and severely. This depleted region is known as the ozone hole. The area of the ozone hole is determined from a map of total column ozone. It is calculated from the area on the Earth that is enclosed by a line with a constant value of 220 Dobson Units. The value of 220 Dobson Units is chosen since total ozone values of less than 220 Dobson Units were not found in the historic observations over Antarctica prior to 1979. Also, from direct measurements over Antarctica, a column ozone level of less than 220 Dobson Units is a result of the ozone loss from chlorine and bromine compounds.

Excerpt from:

NASA Ozone Watch: Latest status of ozone

Just Another Day on Aerosol Earth

Take a deep breath. Even if the air looks clear, it is nearly certain that you will inhale millions of solid particles and liquid droplets. These ubiquitous specks of matter are known as aerosols, and they can be found in the air over oceans, deserts, mountains, forests, ice, and every ecosystem in between.

If you have ever watched smoke billowing from a wildfire, ash erupting from a volcano, or dust blowing in the wind, you have seen aerosols. Satellites like Terra, Aqua, Aura, and Suomi NPP see them as well, though they offer a completely different perspective from hundreds of kilometers above Earths surface. A version of a NASA model called the Goddard Earth Observing System Forward Processing (GEOS FP) offers a similarly expansive view of the mishmash of particles that dance and swirl through the atmosphere.

The visualization above highlights GEOS FP model output for aerosols on August 23, 2018. On that day, huge plumes of smoke drifted over North America and Africa, three different tropical cyclones churned in the Pacific Ocean, and large clouds of dust blew over deserts in Africa and Asia. The storms are visible within giant swirls of sea salt aerosol (blue), which winds loft into the air as part of sea spray. Black carbon particles (red) are among the particles emitted by fires; vehicle and factory emissions are another common source. Particles the model classified as dust are shown in purple. The visualization includes a layer of night light data collected by the day-night band of the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) on Suomi NPP that shows the locations of towns and cities.

Note: the aerosol in the visualization is not a direct representation of satellite data. The GEOS FP model, like all weather and climate models, used mathematical equations that represent physical processes to calculate what was happening in the atmosphere on August 23. Measurements of physical properties, like temperature, moisture, aerosols, and winds, are routinely folded into the model to better simulate real-world conditions.

Some of these inputs come from satellites; others come from data collected by sensors on the ground. Fire radiative power data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors on Aqua and Terra is one type of satellite data that was assimilated directly into the model. This type of data includes information about the location and intensity of firessomething that the model uses to help calculate the behavior of black carbon plumes.

Some of the events that appear in the visualization were causing pretty serious problems on the ground. On August 23, Hawaiians braced for torrential rains and potentially serious floods and mudslides as Hurricane Lane approached. Meanwhile, twin tropical cyclonesSoulik and Cimaronwere on the verge of lashing South Korea and Japan. The smoke plume over central Africa is a seasonal occurrence and mainly the product of farmers lighting numerous small fires to maintain crop and grazing lands. Most of the smoke over North America came from large wildfires burning in Canada and the United States.

NASA Earth Observatory images by Joshua Stevens, using GEOS data from the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office at NASA GSFC. Story by Adam Voiland.

See the original post here:

Just Another Day on Aerosol Earth

Take a Virtual Ride Through the Boring Company’s First Tunnel

Can’t Hardly Wait

You don’t have to wait until next month to get a sneak peak inside the Boring Company’s first tunnel.

On October 21, Elon Musk tweeted that construction on his company’s two-mile-long test tunnel in Hawthorne, CA, was nearing completion. He claimed the Boring Company would host an opening party for the tunnel on December 10, at which time the public would get a chance to take free rides through it.

This weekend, Musk confirmed via Twitter that the December 10 date was still a go — and shared a remarkable time-lapse video of a tunnel walkthrough.

Sneak Peak

Be forewarned that the below clip is pretty hypnotic. We’re not doctors, but if you’re prone to seizures, you might want to skip watching this one.

Tunnel Trance

In his tweet Musk called the tunnel “disturbingly long,” but the two miles it covers might eventually seem like a short jaunt. After all, the ultimate plan is a network comprising hundreds of layers of tunnels dug out below the greater Los Angeles area.

This test tunnel is just the start of that vision, and if watching the walkthrough makes you want to experience the tunnel firsthand, just make sure you’re in the Hawthorne area on December 10.

READ MOREElon Musk Shares First-Look Into the Boring Company’s ‘Disturbingly Long’ Tunnel [Business Insider]

More on the Boring Company: Elon Musk: First Boring Company Tunnel Will Open December 10

Visit link:
Take a Virtual Ride Through the Boring Company’s First Tunnel

A New Nanobot Drills Through Your Eyeball to Deliver Drugs

Mobile Bots

Famed futurist Ray Kurzweil thinks tiny robots will flow through our bodies by 2030 to help us stay healthy. We now have one more reason to believe he’s right.

Compelling nanobots to move through liquids such as blood has proven tricky but doable. It’s been much harder to get tiny bots to navigate dense tissues, such as those found in the eyeball, without damaging them.

Thanks to a bit of design ingenuity, though, an international team of researchers has managed to create a nanobot that can do just that.

Teflon-Inspired

The team describes how a few key design features gave their propeller-shaped nanobot that unique ability in a paper published Friday in the journal Science Advances.

First, the bot is incredibly tiny, approximately 200 times smaller in diameter than a human hair. Second, a non-stick coating helps it slip through dense tissue. And finally, the inclusion of a bit of magnetic material in the nanobots makes them easy to steer with an external magnetic field.

To test the nanobots, the researchers injected tens of thousands of them into a dissected pig’s eye. Using a magnetic field, they were able to direct the swarm to the retina at the back of the pig’s eye — just as they’d hoped.

Drugs On Demand

Eventually, the researchers believe this technique will allow them to deliver drugs directly to hard to reach parts of the human body — not just the back of the eyeball.

“That is our vision,” researcher Tian Qiu said in a press release. “We want to be able to use our nanopropellers as tools in the minimally-invasive treatment of all kinds of diseases, where the problematic area is hard to reach and surrounded by dense tissue. Not too far in the future, we will be able to load them with drugs.”

READ MORE: Nanorobots Propel Through the Eye [Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems]

More on nanobots: Kurzweil: By 2030, Nanobots Will Flow Throughout Our Bodies

See the original post:
A New Nanobot Drills Through Your Eyeball to Deliver Drugs

The Inventor of the Web Says It’s Broken and Net Neutrality Can Fix It

It’s Alive

Tim Berners-Lee, who’s often credited with inventing the World Wide Web in 1989, sees a modern Frankenstein’s Monster in how his creation is being used today.

That’s the gist of Berners-Lee’s comments at Monday’s Web Summit tech conference, where CNBC reported that he laid out ground rules for a new “Contract for the Web“and called for a return to net neutrality.

Crowd Surfing

The new contract, published by Berners-Lee’s World Wide Web Foundation, calls for safeguards that protect users’ data from being sold, stolen, or misused. Looking back at the history of the web, Berners-Lee argued that without explicit protections against them, hate speech, misinformation, and abuse have been allowed to proliferate online.

If you’d asked me 10 years ago, I would have said humanity is going to do a good job with this,” Berners-Lee told CNBC. “If we connect all these people together, they are such wonderful people they will get along. I was wrong.”

Bad Feeling

Apparently Facebook and Google, two of the largest perpetrators of privacy violations and unscrupulous online activity, have already signed onto the contract. It raises the question of how useful such an agreement could possibly be, given the fact that these tech giants are unlikely to sign anything that would hurt their bottom line.

All the same, anything that helps restore net neutrality is a good thing, especially if Berners-Lee is willing to throw his weight around.

READ MORE: The inventor of the web says the internet is now at a ‘tipping point’ — and reveals a plan to fix it [CNBC]

More on net neutrality: Net Neutrality Is Officially Gone. Here’s How This Will Affect You.

Read more from the original source:
The Inventor of the Web Says It’s Broken and Net Neutrality Can Fix It

General Motors Will Give You $10,000 to Name Its New eBike

What’s In a Name?

Want to flex your creative muscles for a chance to win $10,000?

On Friday, General Motors (GM) unveiled two new electric bike designs it plans to begin selling in 2019, one compact and the other foldable. Each boasts a pair of wheels, a battery-powered motor, and a slew of safety features. What they don’t have, though, is a name — and that’s where you come in.

Ten (eBike) Racks

In the press release announcing the new eBikes, GM also launched a contest to name its eBike brand. The person who submits the winning name will receive a prize of $10,000, while nine runners-up will each receive $1,000.

If you’d like to get in on this naming contest, you have until November 26 at 10 a.m. EST to submit your suggestion via the contest website, which includes further details.

Electric Love

GM is far from the first major auto manufacturer to design an eBike. However, it is rare to see the vehicles actually make it to market — after all, each eBike sold could translate to one fewer car sale.

Still, GM has claimed repeatedly that it is committed to electric vehicles, and the eBike could be one more example of that commitment in action.

Other than the 2019 release date, the press release is pretty short on details. How far can these eBikes travel on a single charge? Will they be part of a bike-sharing network? Who knows?

But with $10,000 up for grabs, the question most people are probably pondering is, “What the heck should we call these things?”

READ MORE: General Motors Is Building an eBike and Wants You to Name It [General Motors]

More on electric bikes: Tow an SUV With This Incredible Electric Bike

See more here:
General Motors Will Give You $10,000 to Name Its New eBike

Having a Bad Day? An Adorable Video Shows AI Learning to Get Dressed

Rise and Shine

Most animators would agree: making a cataclysmic explosion destroy a planet is easy, but human figures and delicate interactions are hard.

That’s why engineers from The Georgia Institute of Technology and Google Brain teamed up to build a cute little AI agent — an AI algorithm embodied in a simulated world — that learned to dress itself using realistic fabric textures and physics.

Blessed

The AI agent takes the form of a wobbling, cartoonish little friend with an expressionless demeanor.

During its morning routine, our little buddy punches new armholes through its shirts, gets bopped around by perturbations, dislocates its shoulder, and has an automatic gown-enrober smoosh up against its face. What a day!

Great Job!

Beyond a fun video, this simulation shows that AI systems can learn to interact with the physical world, or at least a realistic simulation of it, all on their own.

This is thanks to reinforcement learning, a type of AI algorithm where the agent learns to accomplish tasks by seeking out programmed rewards.

In this case, our little friend was programmed to seek out the warm satisfaction of a job well done, and we’re very proud.

READ MORE: Using machine learning to teach robots to get dressed [BoingBoing]

More on cutesy tech: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up: Amazon Warehouse Robots Slipped On Popcorn Butter

The rest is here:
Having a Bad Day? An Adorable Video Shows AI Learning to Get Dressed

More Robots Means Fewer Seasonal Workers for Amazon This Holiday

Alexa, Buy Me a Gift

The holiday season is upon us, and Amazon is getting ready for the seasonal onslaught with 100,000 additional warehouse hires.

That’s about 20,000 fewer than last year. According to analysts, the drop is because the company’s automation efforts are succeeding.

Automating Santa

In 2012, Amazon bought Kiva Systems — the maker of little orange robots that are quickly becoming the gold standard in warehouse distribution center automation.

They are proving particularly useful in Amazon’s fulfillment centers, where they move orders around massive warehouses quietly and efficiently — and without complaining about horrendous working conditions. The result: fewer human workers.

Prime Real Estate

Automation has also brought much higher productivity to Amazon’s many smaller distribution centers.

And it’s packing as many robots into each of them as it can. The company is planning on using cubic instead of square feet to measure the size of its warehouses thanks to multi-story warehouse systems, CNBC reports.

And if you’re one of the unlucky few warehouse workers working grueling overtime during the holiday season: happy holidays.

READ MORE: Reduced holiday temp hiring is a sign Amazon is turning to more automation and robots: Citi [CNBC]

More on Amazon robots: Amazon Is Ramping up Its (Still Rather) Secretive Home Robot Project

Continued here:
More Robots Means Fewer Seasonal Workers for Amazon This Holiday