Liberal Democrats explain why they aren’t standing down in East Devon as part of Unite to Remain pact – Devon Live

Liberal Democrats have said thatthere could be no guarantee of how Independent candidate Claire Wright would vote regarding Brexit if she were elected in East Devon.

Unite to Remain last week identified 60 seats where a deal had been struck between the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and the Green Party, in a move to defeat Conservative candidates, including in Exeter and Totnes.

The non-party campaign group has revealed that it also proposed Claire Wright and whose 21,000 votes in 2017 make her the clear challenger to the Tories but were unable to persuade the Lib Dems or Greens to stand aside.

Unite to Remain director Peter Dunphy said the organisation had not included East Devon in the list of candidates but urged Remain voters to back Claire Wright as the best chance to wrest the seat from Tory control.

He said: It was not possible to gain cross-party agreement for a single candidate in every key constituency that we considered.

Ultimately it has been up to the political parties in consultation with local members to make these tough choices.

Sadly, we were unable to gain Unite to Remain all-party agreement in East Devon where we had proposed Claire Wright as the clear challenger to the Conservatives.

Our suggestion therefore is to follow the excellent tactical voting advice of Best for Britain and Gina Millers Remainunited to support the Remain candidate with the best chance of victory, which in the case of East Devon is the Independent Claire Wright.

Both the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party though have announced candidates for the East Devon seat. Eleanor Rylance, who represents Broadclyst on East Devon District Council, is standing for the Lib Dems, while Henry Gent, a Broadclyst parish councillor, will stand for the Green Party.

Explaining why the Lib Dems have not stood aside, Stuart Mole, Media Relations Officer, said that it was important that all who wish to vote Lib Dem should have the chance to do so and that there could be no guarantee of how Ms Wright would vote regarding Brexit if she were elected.

Mr Mole said: The Unite 2Remain national agreement covers around 60 constituencies. In England, this involves the Lib Dems, the Greens and prominent parliamentary campaigners currently without party affiliation who have a proven track record in campaigning for Remain.

At no time has it been proposed to local Liberals by the Liberal Democrats, by Unite2Remain or indeed by Claire Wright that the agreement should be extended to East Devon. Nor, to our knowledge, has the local Green Party been approached either.

Claire Wright has been a low-key supporter of Remain up to now and the fuller statement of her views on Brexit, promised some weeks ago, has yet to materialise. There could also be no guarantee of how she might specifically vote on Brexit, were she to be elected to Parliament.

The Liberal Democrats are fighting a vigorous national campaign with a charismatic new Leader, in Jo Swinson, who we would like to see as prime minister.

We offer a strong and distinctive message on remaining in the European Union by revoking Article 50 but we also are offering a raft of important policies on climate change, the economy and public services, to name a few.

It is important that all who wish to vote Lib Dem should have the chance to do so. Eleanor Rylance was unanimously reaffirmed as our candidate for parliament in East Devonlast month and we have high hopes of her doing very well.

On Ms Wrights website, under her views on Brexit, it says: The government should offer the people a democratic say on the agreement by way of a confirmatory vote. I would campaign to remain.

At the 2017 General Election, Wright, received 35 per cent of the vote compared to the Lib Dems two per cent.

She said that she had never approached any of her rivals or asked them to give her a free run but welcomed the Unite to Remain endorsement and insisted voters could make their own decisions about whether to vote tactically based on past results.

Ms Wright, who is also a Devon County councillor for the Otter Valley ward, said: I have never asked for any favours from my rivals and I respect their decision to stand and fight for the seat.

Of course, running as a sole candidate against the Conservatives would appear to give me a better chance but I am not asking anyone for an easy ride.

I have fought a fair and positive campaign twice, without assistance, increasing my share of the vote without resorting to personal attacks and I dont intend to start now.

I would now urge my supporters to concentrate all of their energy on getting this people-powered campaign over the line.

And, of course, we must avoid the danger presented by Boris Johnsons withdrawal agreement which could condemn us to years of trade negotiations and threaten the NHS by offering the public a democratic vote which includes the option of Remain.

She is set to launch her manifesto atTheInstitute in Yonder Street in Ottery St Mary on Wednesday night, from 7.30pm to 9pm.

She added: My manifesto is based on the issues the people of East Devon have told me matter most. The past few years have demonstrated that the party system is broken. It is time for change.As an Independent, I would have exactly the same rights as other MPs and would work cross-party to achieve my manifesto pledges.

I am different. I have no party whip to tell me how to vote. I am free to speak and free to act. And free to fight for the issues that the people of East Devon care about the most.

This election is very unpredictable and presents a rare opportunity for residents to elect an MP who truly cares and puts them first.

The seat has only ever been held by the Conservatives, but the previous MP for the area, Sir Hugo Swire, is standing down.

Simon Jupp was chosen at a selection meeting at Exmouth Community College on Saturday as the new Conservative candidate for the area.

The former journalist, who has worked on local radio across Devon before moving to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, was born in Plymouth.

The 34-year-old started his broadcasting career aged 15 before moving to the Afternoon Show at Plymouth Sound and later launching Radio Plymouth and presenting on Radio Exe.

He said: Im very proud to be selected as the Conservative Parliamentary candidate for East Devon.

Im determined to ensure the democratic will of East Devon is delivered and Im looking forward to continuing to knock on doors, listening to local people and addressing their concerns.

Sir Hugo Swire has done so much over the past 18 years for East Devon. The community hospital at Ottery St Mary would not have been saved without his intervention.

Most recently Mr Jupp has worked as a Special Advisor to the Foreign Secretary, Dominic Raab.

Michael Amor, of the Brexit Party, had previously announced that he was going to stand in East Devon.

But today, Nigel Farage, Brexit Party Leader, announced that it will not stand candidates in the 317 seats won by the Conservatives at the 2017 general election, so it is expected that Mr Amor will no longer contest the seat.

Daniel Wilson, 37, from Exmouth, is also standing for the Labour Party.

Candidates have until 4pm on Thursday, November 14, before nominations close, so additional candidates may also be contesting the seat.

More here:

Liberal Democrats explain why they aren't standing down in East Devon as part of Unite to Remain pact - Devon Live

Liberals regroup in Ottawa, trying to reconcile climate action with western alienation – CBC.ca

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is meeting with incoming and outgoing Liberal MPs in Ottawa today to talk about approaches tothe issueof climate change on one hand and to growing tensions over the stalled western energy economy on the other.

Making his way into the informal meeting in OttawaThursday afternoon, Trudeau said giving Alberta and Saskatchewan avoice after a Liberal electoral shut-out is a "significant" matter for him.

"I've been reaching out to premiers, to mayors, to business leaders, to colleagues and former colleagues," he said. "There's a lot of work to do to make sure that we're governing for the entire country."

Trudeau described today's meeting as an opportunity to reflect on what they heard from Canadians during the 40-day election campaign, and to discuss how to respond to those concerns going forward. He said it's also achance to talk about how defeated MPs can play a continued role, and to express gratitude for their past efforts.

Trudeau's Liberals went from third-party status to a landslide majority in 2015. This time, the party was reduced to a minority, with157 seats.

Two top cabinet ministers were defeated on Oct. 21. Saskatchewan's Ralph Goodale and Alberta's Amarjeet Sohi werevoted out in the two-province shut-out a damning indictment of the Liberals' response togrowing economic uncertainty in the region.

Goodalesaid Trudeau isnow examiningevery procedural and structural option for dealing with the lack of Liberal MPs in the region, but added the more important task is addressing the underlying roots of western discontent.

"The more critical thing is the substantive issue of understanding, clearly and deeply, what the issues were and are that are deepest concerns to western Canadians, and to make sure those issues are addressed in a conscientious way that builds Canadian unity," he said.

Goodale said it's crucial for the government to offer reassuranceto those worried about economic security so theycan "enjoy and celebrate (prosperity)just like everyone else across the country."

The outgoing minister acknowledged that pushing ahead with a robust climate changeagenda will be challenging in the face of mounting frustrations in the West over the carbon tax and the lack of adequateoil pipeline capacity to the coast.

"There's a very challenging circle to square here. A majority of Canadians on election night voted very clearly for the completion of the Trans Mountain expansion. A very strong majority of Canadians also voted for more vigorous ambition with respect to climate change," he said.

"And finding the ways to bring all of that together, as the government and the prime minister [have] said for years proper policy with respect to the economy and energy need to go hand-in-hand with proper policy with respect to the environment."

After the meeting,Catherine McKenna, who held the environment minister when the election started, said finding that balance is possible if the country comes together.

"When we talk about the environment and the economy going together, we actually mean it. Of course we need to figure out how to bring the country together. There is no bigger issue than national unity. But we also need to tackle climate change and we can do this," she said.

Returning Liberal MPFranois-Philippe Champagne said Canadianssent the Liberals a "message of humility"and they heard it loud and clear.

"We're not here boasting. We're here humble. We're here listening, we're here making sure that we plan the future together," he said.

Another minister, Jim Carr who was recently diagnosed with blood cancer said the message he heard repeatedly at the doorsteps during the campaign is that Canadians are seeking unity in the country.

"There isn't muchof an appetite for division, and for division politics. People are searching for common ground and that's a very important message," he said. "We can have our disputes and we ... are robust in the way we articulate those disputes. But there is a time for a nation to come together, and that time is now."

Marc Garneau, the transport minister when the election began, said the reunion with outgoing MPs was an emotional one.

"It's not easy to be a politician. And when you put your heart and soul into something and it doesn't work out, it's not easy to take," he said. "But they were all very, very proud.

As McKenna left the meeting, she was asked if she expectsto remain in the environment portfolio. She said that she serves at the pleasure of the prime minister and will do "whatever is required."

"Climate change is not a one-portfolio issue. It's everything. It's the economy, it's transportation... It's how we build our houses, it's reconciliation with Indigenous peoples," she said.

"I am happy to do whatever I am asked. It is a real honour and privilege to be in this job."

Trudeau will swear in his new cabinet on Nov. 20. He will set the date for the new Parliament to begin after meeting with opposition leaders next week.

Read this article:

Liberals regroup in Ottawa, trying to reconcile climate action with western alienation - CBC.ca

The Liberal Democrats’ Skills Wallets will help people thrive in the modern economy: here’s why – FE News

The economy is changing fast but successive governments have not prepared people for the challenges ahead.

As technology improves and our population ages, almost half of workers today will have to retrain in their lifetime.

You would think that addressing these economic challenges would be central to any political partys manifesto.

But instead, the Conservatives and Labour will fight this election justifying the economic damage they will do with their competing versions of Brexit.

By contrast, Liberal Democrats will stop Brexit altogether and invest in our public services.

But we also want to build a brighter future by tackling these longer-term economic challenges too.

Thats why our former leader, Sir Vince Cable, created an Independent Commission on Lifelong Learning.

It would consider how we can remove the barriers that stop people getting the education, skills and training they will need to thrive in the future economy and take the next step on the career ladder.

Under our proposals, every adult in England would be given an online Skills Wallet, giving people the power to decide what, how and when they earn:

Study one module or an entire course the choice is up to you.

Learners would be given free careers guidance to help them pick a course that will meet their personal or career development aims, and the Office for Students would be given an expanded remit to monitor course quality.

This is a matter of fairness. Anyone could need to go back to education, to change careers, get a promotion or pick up a new hobby.

Liberal Democrats are putting education at the heart of this election campaign, with a plan to provide free childcare, reverse school cuts, invest in colleges and boost the quality and quantity of apprenticeships. Everyone, no matter their age or background, has the right to an education, to learn new skills, nurture creativity and develop their talents.

With Skills Wallets, everyone will have the power to learn new skills and develop existing ones, so that they feel happier, healthier and have the knowledge they need to thrive in the modern economy.

Layla Moran is the Liberal Democrat Shadow Education Secretary

Advertisement

You are using adblocker please support us by whitelisting http://www.fenews.co.uk

You are now being logged in using your Facebook credentials

View post:

The Liberal Democrats' Skills Wallets will help people thrive in the modern economy: here's why - FE News

Liberals gather en masse to honour Tony Abbott’s 25 years in politics – Sydney Morning Herald

Loading

During the event, Mr Abbott said he and Malcolm Turnbull owed Mr Morrison a "tremendous debt" after this year's election victory.

He said Mr Morrison had saved the federal government from being judged "an embarrassing failure" with his "near miraculous" win in May.

"Had we lost this election, this government would have been judged an embarrassing failure," Mr Abbott said.

"So I might have started it - but frankly Scott, you have saved it.

"And for that, I do not normally bracket myself with Malcolm Turnbull, but Malcolm Turnbull and I both owe you a tremendous debt."

The $175-a-head dinner ($130 for members) was held at the sprawling Miramare Gardens estate in Terrey Hills, just outside Mr Abbott's former electorate of Warringah. Last year the venue featured in the pages of Vogue magazine when former Miss Universe Australia Monika Radulovic married artist Alesandro Ljubicic.

Every member of the NSW Liberal Party was invited, including Mr Turnbull, although senior party sources indicated the former member for Wentworth was not called upon to speak.

Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton, former speaker Bronwyn Bishop and Liberal MP Craig Kelly arrive at the dinner.Credit:AAP

Selected attendees were invited to a private pre-dinner drinks function at 6.15pm. Liberal Party state director Chris Stone asked them to please "share only the dinner details" with their guests.

Big names on the guest list were NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian, federal cabinet ministers Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton and Energy Minister Angus Taylor, Mr Abbott's former chief-of-staff Peta Credlin and Liberal vice-president and Q&A star Teena McQueen.

Loading

Seated at the head table with Mr Abbott, Mr Morrison and Mr Howard were Liberal MP Kevin Andrews, Liberal senator Eric Abetz and former deputy prime minister Warren Truss, among others.

It was a decidedly cross-factional evening in attendance if not in spirit. Mr Abbott's conservative allies were joined by a healthy contingent of NSW moderates including Families Minister Gareth Ward, federal MP for Mackellar Jason Falinski, Manly state MP James Griffin and North Shore state MP Felicity Wilson.

Numerous business figures from the northern beaches were also there, including former Woolies boss Roger Corbett (who is also president of the Liberal electorate conference in Warringah), former Sydney Airport chairman Max Moore-Wilton, UNICEF boss and former NRMA head Tony Stuart and philanthropist couple Kay van Norton Poche and her husband Greg, who founded Star Track Express.

The invitation went out to every member of the NSW Liberal Party.

Mr Abbott's wife Margie was forced to miss the celebration as she was in hospital recovering from a lumpectomy, but the former PM was joined by his sister Christine Forster who praised her brother as "an amazing asset to our country" despite their documented differences on marriage equality.

NSW Liberal Party president Philip Ruddock - who will be returned to that position unopposed at Saturday's state council meeting - was due to give the vote of thanks. He said members' interest in the sold-out event was unprecedented.

"We've had an enormous number of people who wanted to be there but couldn't people who recognise [Mr Abbott's] very significant and outstanding contribution to Australia," he said.

"People don't always agree on every issue, but they recognise that his service has been unique and extraordinarily special."

Guests gave Mr Abbott a standing ovation when he entered, and the 1000-strong crowd sang Advance Australia Fair before tucking into an entree of carpaccio di bresaola and mains of braised beef cheeks or crispy skin salmon fillet.

Mr Abbott was also bestowed with a lifetime service award, the highest award that can be given to a member of the NSW Liberal Party.

He entered Parliament in 1994 at a byelection and held the seat of Warringah for 25 years. During that time he served as a minister in the Howard government, including in the health portfolio, and then led the Liberal Party into government in 2013 with a decisive victory over Kevin Rudd's Labor.

But he was deposed when Mr Turnbull challenged him for the top job in 2015, following a period of instability in the government and backbench dissatisfaction with his judgment and his office. At the May election, Mr Abbott lost his seat due to a massive swing to independent Zali Steggall, a former Olympic skier.

Michael Koziol is a political correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

See original here:

Liberals gather en masse to honour Tony Abbott's 25 years in politics - Sydney Morning Herald

Liberals told to be more humble, address Western Canada concerns, as caucus meets – National Post

Liberal MPs were sounding a more conciliatory tone Thursday as they gathered for the first time since losing 20 seats and their parliamentary majority.

The party went from 177 MPs to 157 in the last election and were shut out of two western provinces. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the meeting was an opportunity to hear from MPs and think about the next steps.

This a moment to gather, amongst friends, to reflect on the experiences we have had over the last few months.

Heritage minister Pablo Rodrguez said the party was given a mandate but also has to reflect on what went wrong.

We have to look at the results, some of our colleagues are not here anymore and we have to understand why, he said.

He said the party will have to be, more humble, listen more and have a lot of corroboration with other parties.

We have a mandate to govern Canada but that mandate also comes with the necessity to discuss, to negotiate with other parties.

Quebec MP Steve MacKinnon said the partys starting point is going to be the platform it ran on but they will also have to be flexible.

Clearly, we dont have the majority of votes and so we are going to have to talk to our friends across the way and see where we can find common ground.

He said the party will approach negotiations with the glass half full.

You start from the belief that everyone wants the right outcomes for Canada and for Canadians, believe in peoples good faith and stick to your principles. Principles cant be negotiated.

Trudeau said he will wait until after he meets with opposition leaders next week to decide when parliament will resume. He has scheduled meetings with every opposition party leader and has announced he will reveal his cabinet on Nov. 20.

He also said he is still working to address how the government will manage the lack of MPs from Saskatchewan and Alberta when putting together the cabinet.

There is a lot of work to do to make sure we are governing for the entire country.

Ralph Goodale, who lost the seat in Saskatchewan he had held for more than two decades, said Trudeau would find ways to have those provinces represented but more importantly is addressing the issues.

The more critical thing is the substantive issue of understanding, clearly and deeply, what the issues were, and are, that are of deepest concern to western Canadians.

Goodale said people in his riding are concerned about the economy.

That was the issue that was raising the anxiety level across western Canada and it will be very important for the government to provide the necessary reassurance.

Outgoing Natural Resources minister Amarjeet Sohi, who lost his seat in Edmonton, said getting the Trans Mountain pipeline done is essential.

Having the construction underway and completing that project on time, absolutely is important to responding to western Canadian concerns, he said.

He also said the government should emphasize what the energy industry has done for Canada.

One way for us to move forward is to continue to stress the importance of oil and gas to Alberta, to Canada. And how oil and gas and the whole energy sector has contributed to the prosperity of every Canadian.

Email: rtumilty@postmedia.com | Twitter:

See the article here:

Liberals told to be more humble, address Western Canada concerns, as caucus meets - National Post

The Big Read Poppy: Human After All, the NME interview – NME.com

Think you know Poppy, the robo-pop sensation and maker of mesmerising YouTube videos, all in the guise of a sentient Artifical Intelligence? So did NME Deputy Editor Dan Stubbs when he went to meet the LA-based star at a London fetish dungeon, only to find Poppy is more human than we might have thought. Breaking character for the first time, Poppy reveals more than ever before about her work, her life and why she wants to bring down the internet. PHOTOS: JENN FIVE

Have you ever been browsing the help page of a website when a text box pops up inviting you to a live chat with a customer service operative? You click and enter your query, only for it to quickly become apparent that youre talking to a chatbot. Its a bit like a normal conversation, except the voice on the other end picks from a selection of vacuous, tangential phrases and keeps asking you if youre happy, as if youre speaking to a Love Island contestant whos coming up on ecstasy.

That experience is pretty much what Id geared myself up for when it came to interviewing Poppy for her first NME Big Read. For those not already familiar, Poppy is many things: a pop star, an actor, a director, a composer of ambient music, a religious leader (at her own Church Of Poppy), a DJ, a comic-book character, a smash hit YouTuber, a provocateur, a performance artist and a master of multiple media. One thing she is not, she has previously insisted, is human.

Until now.

We meet at a torture dungeon in Walthamstow, North-East London. And no, I dont remember stumbling upon one of those in the Yellow Pages either. Its best thought of as a gymnasium designed by Pinhead from Hellraiser, dark and leathery and full of metal hooks, and all the apparatus is disconcertingly greasy to the touch. Hanging around there for a few hours while Poppys NME photoshoot takes place, you find yourself idly leaning on some piece of kit or other only to realise its a sex gurney with stirrups and bondage rings.

Poppy, it must be said, is perfectly at home here: shes arrived accompanied by her collaborator and creative partner, Titanic Sinclair (real name Corey Mixter), a selection of PVC outfits and a massively oversized, sculptural leather overcoat that her friend Marilyn Manson might wear. Thats right, her friend Marilyn Manson, whose 50th birthday she attended this year. What do you get the goth rock icon who has everything? My presence, she replies.

That friendship and NMEs, er, sexhorror photoshoot make sense if youve been following Poppys career lately. Last year on Halloween the American singer put out Am I A Girl?, an album of candy-flavoured robo-pop that, sonically, put her in league with the PC Musics of the world. Stylistically it presented her as the real-life Ashley O months before Black Mirror and Miley Cyrus got there.

Poppy claims to have not seen that particular episode of the dystopian Netflix drama, despite the fact that the story about a transhuman pop star who covers Nine Inch Nails tracks seems directly influenced by her own career. Ive heard about it a lot, she says. Curiosity hasnt got the better of you? I dont really like shows that lots of people like, she says. If someone suggests a certain thing then Ill intentionally not watch it. Its just me being stubborn.

Am I A Girl? and the preceding Poppy.Computer, from 2017 were seemingly targeted at people who fetishise Japanese kawaii culture and futurism equally. Her forthcoming album, I Disagree, due on January 10 next year, promises to be a different beast: specifically, one with devil horns. It finds Poppy embracing the tinnitus-inducing thrash of heavy metal alongside those cute, catchy choruses.

Its a stylistic shift that follows testing times, including a lawsuit, a high profile beef, and a second bad record deal more of which later. This, then, is heavy metal as catharsis. I try to channel all of my anger steam into my artand maintain some form of composure, even when I feel I want to end everything, she says, troublingly. End herself or end the world? The world.

So you were feeling quite angry about some things? Yeah, but I would say it feels natural too. When we were making Am I A Girl? we were driving to the studio and listening to a lot of heavier music. I would go in and write a rainbows and butterflies song and I was like, OK, theres a disconnect here

Poppys reinvention is the kind of gear-change that might cost an artist a portion of their audience, but fans on YouTube seem to be getting the right idea. I run Poppy through some of their comments on her recent track Concrete, which is probably the best example of Poppys new direction, as its both sweet and heavy with deeply, deeply disturbing lyrics fetishising the idea of being buried alive in concrete. Poppy says she would kill time with a lot of thumb twiddling if that happened in real life.

So here goes with the comments:

This song makes me comfortable and uncomfortable at the same time. Im confused.

Poppy: Ive become comfortable with being uncomfortable. If things are comfortable, I get anxiety.

Another: This is what having bipolar disorder feels like.

Poppy: That makes sense.

Shes clearly a victim of MK Ultra mind control, guys.

Poppy: Clearly. I like conspiracy theories. Ive seen one or two videos online about (CIA experiment) MKUltra. I know a thing or two.

And another: Its like if Slipknot, Babymetal, Queen and The Beach Boys made a song together. I dont hate it.

Poppy: I like that one.

Theres an example of Poppys self-confessed stubbornness when she and I are walking from the photoshoot to a nearby pub. Poppy drags a shiny black suitcase with one hand and holds a polystyrene head in the other. On the head is a blonde wig, which Titanic Sinclair has just named Moppy. Poppy rejects the offer of help in carrying either, which causes problems when a fan spots her Poppeeeeeeeee! comes the shout and she very quickly picks up the pace, suitcase bouncing behind her.

When we make it into the pub, she heads for a table in the furthest, quietest corner. On the way there, making chit-chat about her interests (she loves fail videos and crime documentaries, she says, and rarely sleeps), I had broached the subject: when, exactly, is she going to start pretending to be a robot? Well, she says. Well see.

Previous interviewers particularly the infamous US shock-jock Howard Stern have made a sport of trying to get Poppy to break character, or even simply to laugh. Even out of the public eye, Poppy carries herself with an air of almost supernatural composure. She sits bolt upright, doesnt slouch, and speaks carefully and with great consideration in a soft, southern American accent. Shes fiercely intelligent and quietly assured. She drinks black coffee and frequently cracks her knuckles, which snap so loudly you wonder if theres a metal skeleton in there after all.

An exaggeration of this emotionally guarded person is the one that Poppys fans have become obsessed with. In some of her YouTube videos, she asks endless questions of the viewer about their relationship with social media, and whether they validate themselves through followers. In others, she experiences crises about the nature of her own existence. In some, black goo oozes from her mouth. Theyre videos that challenge the viewer in a number of ways: not much happens, it happens very slowly, and though theyre absolutely PG rated you probably wouldnt want to be caught watching them at work. Theyre much like the trend for ASMR videos, in which people whisper and click and generally make the viewer feel a bit strange in a way they cant quite put their finger on.

Theres a supporting cast, too: Poppy has an occasional enemy, Charlotte, whos a mannequin, and a friend, whos a plant. I remind her of the latter as she tucks into vegetable crudites in the pub. People keep pet pigs and still eat pork, comes the response.

That stupid question about the ethics of eating salad when your sole companion is a houseplant and about a zillion others like it are essentially rendered moot when it becomes apparent that Poppy is breaking character today. I find myself feeling the weight of trying to work out the things fans would most like to know and the things Ive always wondered about this singular artist.

Poppy likens her stylistic shift naive pop AI to rock hellion to David Bowie killing off Ziggy Stardust at the Hammersmith Apollo, reasoning its an artists prerogative to change. Is this interview set to be Poppys big reveal: a kind of Pinocchio moment where she declares herself a real life girl? I feel the same [as before], she says. I just feel more certain.

Information about the person behind Poppy isnt exactly a state secret. Wikipedia has her as Moriah Rose Pereira, born January 1, 1995. When I ask her about her age, its one of the few times shes guarded. I dont know, you know. I dont know. Its not what my Wikipedia says.

So what else is wrong on your Wikipedia page?

I think the dates are weird. Most of the rest, its OK.

Youre not tempted to change it?

No. Theres an element to Wikipedia that I think you know how they ask you for donations on the homepage? Im just like, Just let it go. We dont need it. I dont think the general public should be able to change information like that. I had a Google Home for a short time and of course, I had to ask it, Hey Google, whos Poppy? And it would rattle off all this information just from Wikipedia and it was all wrong, and I thought it was really funny.

So, OK, you switch the Google Home on how far down your list of questions is that one? Be honest.

It was after a little while, she says. Theres a video that Titanic and I shot where Im smashing my Google Home afterwards. I thought it would smash a lot easier than it did.

Do you trust that kind of technology?

No.

But the Poppy we know loves AI and the idea of computer learning, right?

Im trying to move backwards. Im trying to get rid of my technology. In turn its going to make it harder to get a hold of me and my friends mad at me but its OK.

Are they going to have to fax you?

Im thinking carrier pigeon.

When previous interviewers have asked where Poppy lives, the reply would be the internet. Actually, she confirms, she grew up in Nashville, Tennessee, and lives, not-quite-alone, in Los Angeles, California. I have a Sphynx cat. Hes the demon man of my home. His name is Pi and he I think he was sent to ruin my life, she says.

Its easy to imagine Poppy being an outsider in Nashville, typically the home of country music and cowboys rather than robots, and a place she describes as having that small town feeling. Its equally easy to see her being on the fringes in Hollywood. She describes her life there as feeling like Im in the middle of a lot of things, but with my journal out, just watching. So youre an anthropologist? I guess so, she says. I think everybody would say that about me. When Im in a room, Im looking everywhere. I think I would be a spy if I wasnt a singer.

Though a keen dancer, Poppy spent much of her childhood alone in her bedroom. I would intentionally isolate myself from a lot of things, she says. She did half of her education in public school, where she was bullied, and completed her studies early in homeschool. I didnt have a positive experience [at public school], says Poppy. I barely said any words, so that kind of opened me up, in a way, to be the target of everyones teasing.

For what things?

Being skinny and quiet.

Homeschool conjures images of a parent playing the teacher role. Actually, says Poppy, she did her studies alone in her bedroom, where the internet was my teacher. When you consider that image a slight, quiet girl, sat alone in a room with only the internet for company, diligently racing through the curriculum its not too difficult to join the dots to Poppys character on YouTube. Yeah, it does actually make sense when you think about it, she says, as if this might, improbably, be a fresh thought. I like that. If I could just have that be my legacy famous for being alone in a white room Id be happy with that.

The move to LA came when Pereira signed her first record contract, a major label deal under the name ThatPoppy. Having already left the family home, she relocated without telling a soul. I kept everyone in the dark because I didnt want anyone to get in the way, she says.

Poppy met Titanic Sinclair, an artist, musician and director, through a mutual friend within a few months of moving to LA, and instantly hit it off. At the photoshoot, Sinclair had described his first encounter with Poppy as being like meeting David Bowie, so shook was he by her creative force.

Meanwhile, Poppys frustration with her music career was growing. I went through the circus at that label, the changing of the representatives or whatever, and I was coming to find out I was actually just in a really bad deal, she says.

When Poppy and Sinclair began making YouTube videos together, it caused further friction with the label. I was being discouraged from making the videos, and in turn, Titanic and I were like, Were not gonna listen, so we made twice or triple the amount, she says. And that was when [the label] started to react. They were like, Hey, we dont think we should make these videos. Why are you making these videos? I was like, Why are you working at a record label?!

Whether or not they had approval, Poppy and Sinclair had hit on something with their channel. Theres an element of Kubricks 2001 A Space Odyssey about the videos, in their glacial pacing, ambient soundscapes, medical lighting and stark visuals. Though they share DNA with your average YouTuber content, they subvert the conventions: there are no jump cuts, theres no begging for likes and follows. Where your average YouTuber goes to pains to welcome the viewer into their world, Poppys videos make you feel like youre peering into a world you shouldnt be seeing. Yet by incrementing the play count by one, or liking, or commenting the viewer becomes part of the piece.

Poppys character fascinated by the world, a model of pure innocence partly came from her interest in the Myers-Briggs test, a personality test that encourages respondents to answer as they would when they were a child, which she has completed multiple times. I would say that [the Poppy character] is directly linked to how I was when I was untouched by the world, the most innocent way of thinking, she says.

I put it to Poppy that if any of her clips were exhibited in a gallery, it would be considered differently. But because its on YouTube, its considered

YouTube content?

Yes.

Which is a little bit frustrating because YouTube is just the medium that we chose to put it on, you know? We could have been on Vimeo, or PornHub, or whatever it may be, but YouTube was the one. And this goes into a bigger conversation about how social media is ruining everything.

Sorry, what? Poppy, the character, is fascinated by social media, isnt she? Obsessed with it even.

I think that at the beginning, social media was a good thing, but as of recent times, the angry internet mobs and misinformation and X, Y and Z, I think its now its a pendulum, so it started out good, now its bad and I think it will fall somewhere in the middle, hopefully. Otherwise well just need to create a new internet, which I hope I can do one day.

What would the PoppyNet look like?

Thered be a nominal fee. Thered be a screening process. You know, What are your intentions here? And no memes.

No memes?!

They just clog the servers.

Poppys own pendulum has swung from good to evil lately. Allowing that to happen meant listening to her gut more. I wanted to put forward this very composed and refined body of work and I so strongly believed in that that I wasnt really willing to listen to this other part of me, you know? Like the devil and the angel on [my] shoulders, she says. Im working more on impulse than before.

The shift is understandable because, in the past year, life has thrown Poppy its fair share of digital lemons. Having struggled on a major, Poppys subsequent label home proved an awkward fit, too. It wasnt really a functioning label, which I can say now, she says. It was more of a tax write-off. There wasnt a lot of consistency going on there. The partnership has now been dissolved, and Poppy is currently signed to prog metal label Sumerian Records.

Meanwhile, the dynamic between Poppy and Sinclair has been under scrutiny. Some taking the pairs artistic creations a little too seriously have been questioning whether theres an issue of coercion there. Actually, says Poppy, the opposing characters: her as the naif, him as the sinister svengali, are just part of the storyline. The narrative that we created in order to tell the story of the first album was very much Titanic is the bad guy and hes the leader, which I think is funny because its not true, says Poppy. It is very much 50:50, the effort.

In April 2018, a former creative and romantic partner of Titanic Sinclair, who goes by the name Mars Argo (real name Brittany Sheets), claimed that Poppys character was ripped off from her, and that Sinclair had been emotionally and physically abusive to her following their relationship. In May, Poppy issued a statement describing Argos actions as a desperate grab for fame, and in September the case was settled out of court, with no money exchanging hands and none of the parties acknowledging liability of wrongdoing.

Later that year Poppy had a run-in with the highly respected Canadian artist Grimes over their Am I A Girl? collaboration Play Destroy. Poppy said shed been bullied into submission by [Grimes] and her team of self-proclaimed feminists. Grimes responded publicly, posting a message saying, Poppy you dragged me into a disgusting situation and wont stop punishing me for not wanting to be part of it, I dont want to work with you, you leaked the song anyway.

Oddly, Grimess subsequent single, We Appreciate Power, sung from the perspective of an ambitious AI, seemed to be a land grab for Poppys own turf. Poppy is reluctant to dredge any of it up again today.

Its kind of dead news, she says. And my new album is good, so

It does seem like you probably admire Grimes in some ways. Is it quite sad when that sort of thing happens publicly, her posting about your professional behaviour on the internet?

I think Im just used to the way the internet works and the lifespan of the news cycle.

What was your learning from Mars Argos lawsuit last year?

I just learned more about Hollywood.

Did it make you like Hollywood more or less?

It solidified my view of Hollywood.

Will you elaborate on that?

Everything is not as it seems. That can be your headline.

If Poppys recent experiences led to the end of her wide-eyed AI innocence, you hope it might lead to her being recognised for the furiously creative force she is. Playing devils advocate, I put it to Poppy that it would be easy to look at some of her previous work and think, This is willfully vacuous. A track on Am I A Girl?, the Diplo collaboration Time Is Up, is absolutely on point with the 2019 zeitgeist of climate change activism and, coming from another artist, it may have been hailed as a culturally important moment. Coming from Poppy, it went unnoticed as the musings of a robo-girl.

Poppy agrees that the concept may have clouded the message. With pop music and my experience with it, it was interesting to like with the first album, to me its pop, but lyrically the subject matter of the songs is not digestible to anyone whos not understanding of why this album exists, you know, she says. I think with the new album, you could come out of nowhere and listen to it for the first time and get what you want from it.

I ask if her character, demeanour and gender led to her not being taken seriously in dealings with labels and collaborators, the business side of music. Not to go into gendering it and having it be about being male or female, but typically in a situation like that [people] would look at Titanic for the ideas and the commands, she says. But I find it funny, because thats not actually the case. Its very collaborative. People would be surprised.

Three weeks later, on October 31, Poppy returns to the UK to play a special show for NME. Shes on tour in the US, and has come over on an off-day especially for us. Yesterday she was, improbably, performing in the ring at a World Wrestling Entertainment event in Florida; tomorrow she plays a headline show in Texas. Tonight, shes at the Shacklewell Arms in Dalston playing a headline DJ set at NMEs Ghouls To The Front the Halloween edition of our Girls To The Front series, which celebrates female and non-binary artists.

Her associate arrives first to scope out the venue. He quickly deems the grungy dressing room not Poppys vibe, which, considering we last had her in an S&M dungeon, speaks volumes about The Shacklewell Arms, and says shell arrive just before stage time instead of hanging around. And sure enough, at 9pm Poppy turns up in a black-and-white PVC catsuit, face painted like the nightmarish clown Pierrot, pitch black lips emphasising a fixed smile.

Making no bones about the lack of live DJing going on, Poppy spends much of the set reading a graphic novel handed to her by a fan, making a sport of very slowly, very purposefully turning the pages as banging techno and quotes from horror films blast out of the speakers. Poppy doesnt dance or speak, preferring to let a sample of her saying Im Poppy do the latter for her.

Read this article:

The Big Read Poppy: Human After All, the NME interview - NME.com

Jonathan Kay: What to make of racism, sexism and homophobia from the same people lecturing us about bigotry – National Post

An extraordinary column appeared on the website of Canadian Lawyer on Tuesday. Titled, B.C. Brazilian waxing case a step backward for trans human rights cases, says lawyer, the article presented an interview with self-described transgender human rights activist Adrienne Smith, who laments that the recent legal setback to scrotal-waxing enthusiast Jessica Yaniv (JY) is going to put a chill on trans rights human rights litigation in British Columbia. Thats a rather eyebrow-raising claim given that an exhaustive judgment written up by the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal showed Yaniv to be a vexatious racist and grifter whod deliberately targeted Vancouver-area immigrant women who didnt have the means to fight back. Incredibly, Smith complains that, in the words of the interviewer, a good lawyer would have prevented Yaniv from expressing the racist animus behind the human-rights grifting campaign. Which is to say: This human rights activist regards JYs racism as unfortunate but mainly because it got in the way of a trans-positive judgment.

It may seem odd to see a progressive go on record to yatta-yatta-yatta racism in this way. (JY has referred to Canadians with South Asian heritage as turban fs who should not be allowed in Canada.) But it is not so shocking as it once was: One of the unsettling aspects of progressive cultism is that its acolytes see their cause as so morally urgent that it justifies tactics that would horrify them if they were employed by the other side.

This is most evident in the debate over trans rights, which now features regular scenes of angry woke men mansplaining gender to feminists. Online, trans-rights extremism has unleashed open season on feminists and lesbians, with some of the charming tag lines being Let me know if ur a TERF (trans-exclusive radical feminist) so I can beat the st out of you, Burn them all, and Sk my girl-ck. At the anti-Meghan Murphy protest in Vancouver on Saturday, a woman carried a mock guillotine emblazoned with the words Step Right Up TERFs! When youre so woke that you forget how to spell MeToo, and killing women becomes a punch line.

Some of Canadas most impassioned and dogmatic anti-racists, when riled up, sometimes betray their own racism. At that same anti-Murphy protest, local activist Amanda Jabbour repeatedly accused an Asian woman attending the event with a non-Asian man of being a mail-order bride, even continuing her bizarre taunting after her bigotry was called out. Later on, when video of the event surfaced, her equally progressive employer, PACE Society, put out a statement larded up with social-justice jargon, without offering any apology to the Asian woman whod been targeted. (PACE Society creepily promised everyone a third party accountability pod, whatever that is.)

Some of Canadas most impassioned and dogmatic anti-racists, when riled up, sometimes betray their own racism

Meanwhile, this week on Canadian social-justice Twitter, perpetually aggrieved activist Ryan McMahon put out a call to his followers for ideas on what are we doing about the Canadian media and pundit types that (excuse) the alt-right and who disguise the truth (as McMahon sees it) that such alt-right forces are akin to Nazis. Among the various obscene and violent suggestions offered in the comments that follow: that such conservative pundits be put in concentration camps that should then be burned down. Because everyone knows thats the best way to fight Nazis. Meanwhile, over at Briarpatch a Canadian magazine that inhabits a sort of exalted, interstellar level of social-justice wokeness an essayist writes of an Indigenous-prophesized mass-extinction apocalypse that will annihilate whites while Indigenous people apparently remain safe on their reserves. Like a reluctant Oskar Schindler, the author asks Do we owe non-Indigenous people saving? Apparently not. Oh, well.

Needless to say, racism, homophobia and sexism are flourishing on the right side of the political spectrum sometimes with deadly results. But when this bigotry is observed, it is (rightly) exposed and criticized. The same isnt true on the other side. Being so certain that they walk with angels, most progressives never bother looking down to see whats stuck to their shoe.

Anti-Semitism within hard-left anti-Zionist circles has been a problem for decades. But that is now metastasizing into a more general phenomenon, with the result that the social-justice movement increasingly seems like an exercise in hypocrisy and psychological projection. As with the town that had to be destroyed to be saved, bigotry is now being weaponized in the name of fighting bigotry.

Jonathan Kay is Canadian Editor of Quillette.

Go here to see the original:

Jonathan Kay: What to make of racism, sexism and homophobia from the same people lecturing us about bigotry - National Post

How Australian viewers are reacting to ‘Years and Years’ – SBS

Australian TV audiences are taking to social media to debrief on the new SBS series Years and Years; the somewhat dystopian drama which has been likened to a more realistic - and therefore terrifying - version of Black Mirror.

The critically acclaimed six-part series, which stars Emma Thompson, is set in 2019 Britain and follows its central characters through until 2034 - giving viewers a bleak glimpse at what life might be like in 15 years.

Donald Trump has just won a second term. The US has launched a missile. The international refugee crisis is worsening. Panic around the climate crisis is escalating. And technology has reached the point where phones have become 'skin plants' and humans are able to download their bodies to 'the cloud' as data, becoming trans-human.

Basically, it explores all the worrying trends we're observing in our real day-to-day lives.

The "frightening but fascinating" series follows the entirely unremarkable middle-class Lyons family, who initially move about their daily lives largely unaffected by the increasing political chaos that surrounds them - until they're left with no choice but to sit up and take notice.

The work of Doctor Who's Russell T. Davies, Years and Years brings together sci-fi and drama - with a little bit of dark comedy - to build up an all-too relatable Orwellian tale which forces viewers to reflect on the state of our world today, asking: what if things don't get better?

"WOW, can not hype this show up enough, was really excited when episode one finished and I realised episode 2 was playing right after it!" One viewer tweeted. "By the looks of the preview were in for even more depressing futuristic adventures!"

Another added: "Found it [Years and Years] by accident but what a compelling show. A possible future we may encounter. Highly highly recommended."

The themes depicted on the show are so close to home, that some viewers began to wonder whether Australian politicians were tuning in.

"I hope Pauline Hanson doesn't watch #YearsAndYears," one Twitter user wrote. "She might get some ideas."

Others drew attention to the notion that, while Years and Years is a work of fiction, current global politics are heading in the same "scary" direction.

"What an amazing & scary show," one viewer tweeted.

"A very believable dark future we have already started."

The show's real-world ties weren't accidental, either.Speaking about the show, Davies recently said: Its a look at the future, but you feel it."

"It could be sterile or it could be angry or it could be preachy or it could be cold, but this is how we all experience it. Were all experiencing Trump. This is how were all experiencing Brexit, here. Its via your family and your friends and the chats you have.

"This is the experience of history.'

However, if the show's first two episodes are anything to go by, it's not our history that we should be worried about. It's our future.

Read the original post:

How Australian viewers are reacting to 'Years and Years' - SBS

Cooper: Teacher town hall should talk future, not rehash the past – Chattanooga Times Free Press

One week from today a group of Hamilton County Schools teachers will hold a town hall gathering on teacher pay and public education funding.

We have frequently raised our voice for better teacher pay and certainly support their freedom in making their concerns known. But we wonder what they believe can or will happen before fiscal 2021 budget discussions begin next spring.

Earlier this year, Hamilton County Mayor Jim Coppinger presented a budget for fiscal 2020 that would have given district teachers a 5% raise and used whatever clout he had to persuade Hamilton County commissioners to approve it. But commissioners, objecting not so much to the teacher pay as to the large tax increase that would be required to fund those raises if passed, voted it down.

The Hamilton County Board of Education, in negotiations with teachers' representatives, then sent Coppinger a budget that included no raises for teachers and certified staff (including the money allocated by the state for a 2 1/2% raise). Instead, a onetime bonus that would come from its rainy day fund was included.

Commissioners, believing this is what school board members and teachers decided they wanted, passed the budget.

So we wonder why teachers planning the town hall haven't taken board members and their negotiators to the woodshed and thrashed them a bit in telling them, no, this is not what we wanted. And maybe they have, but it seems like taking their concerns public is akin to shutting the barn door after the horses have left.

Members of the public, after all, have spoken through their county commissioners. In fact, we believe they think as we do that teachers do deserve higher pay but that a 34-cent property tax hike to pay for the salary increases and a myriad of needs the district put in its budget request was too much to ask at one time.

The county commissioners who voted against the tax rise said as much.

The town hall is scheduled for Sunday, Nov. 17, at 3 p.m., at the Brainerd Youth & Family Development Center, 1010 N. Moore Road.

And members of the public, of course, weren't consulted when school board members and teacher negotiators agreed on their substitute budget and the onetime bonus. They might have hoped, as we did, that salaries might be the center of negotiations this year and then the other district needs would be dealt with as part of budget talks in fiscal 2021.

But those teachers, apparently unhappy with what their own negotiators, did later prevailed upon County Commissioner David Sharpe to raise the possibility of a wheel tax to, in essence, pay for teacher salary increases. In the relative blink of an eye, a resolution was drawn up and submitted.

A vote would be taken to put a wheel tax question on the presidential primary ballot next spring. If the resolution was approved, Hamilton County voters would decide whether they wanted an annual $60 tax on vehicles, with the money going to public schools.

Although we believed there wasn't enough discussion on the ramifications of such a tax, we believed that a public vote on adding such a tax was a proper approach. We don't believe such a tax would have passed, but it would have solidified voters' immediate thoughts on issues involving their wallets.

Nevertheless, commissioners did not approve the resolution, so no referendum will appear on next year's ballot. In this case as in the proposed 34-cent tax rise, we believe commissioners heard from their constituents. We figure they probably heard something like: "We're never going to vote for a wheel tax, so why put it on the ballot?"

But back to the teachers and their dissatisfaction over salaries. Perhaps this is just their first salvo for the 2021 budget. If that is the case, we hope instead of rehashing all that has happened this year, they'll concentrate on what they'd like to see happen next year.

Banging the drum for a huge property tax increase will be a waste of their breath. The public has said twice through its commissioners this year that it doesn't support one. So it might be instructive to ask members of the public who are not teachers who turn out for the town hall what if anything they believe they could support in terms of a property tax increase, or how important they believe teacher salaries are as compared to other district needs or whether consolidation or closure of some schools should be sped up to save the district money.

A town hall can be helpful and may solidify what the public might support, but a rally to call out commissioners who voted against the tax increase or the wheel tax resolution, or to rehash any funding for fiscal 2020 a fiscal year already underway is a tale full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Read more here:

Cooper: Teacher town hall should talk future, not rehash the past - Chattanooga Times Free Press

Factbox: Key Points of Spanish Pact for Leftist Government – The New York Times

MADRID Spain's Socialist acting Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and the leader of far-left Unidas Podemos, Pablo Iglesias, signed a preliminary agreement on Tuesday aiming to form what they called a "progressive" coalition government.

They will need more parties to join them to have a majority in parliament.

Following are the key points of the deal:

* Make Spain a point of reference in social rights in Europe; defend freedom, tolerance and respect democratic values

* Consolidate economic growth and job creation, combat precarious labour conditions

* Fiscal justice and budget balance. Spending controls are essential for solid and lasting wellbeing of the state

* Guarantee coexistence in Catalonia and normalise political life there after a secession crisis by promoting dialogue and seeking understanding, always based on the Spanish Constitution

* Strengthen autonomy of the regions, guaranteeing equality for all Spaniards

* Fight corruption

* Protect public services, especially in education and healthcare

* Ensure the sustainability of the pension system and pension adjustments to the cost of living

* Housing as a right and not a commodity

* Fight climate change

* Strengthen small and medium-sized companies, make a push for reindustrialisation

* Ensure the right to dignified death, euthanasia

* Safeguard diversity, fight male chauvinist violence, promote gender equality.

(Reporting by Belen Carreno and Andrei Khalip)

See the rest here:

Factbox: Key Points of Spanish Pact for Leftist Government - The New York Times

Natural gas drilling credits eat up royalty revenue from extraction industry: report – Vancouver Sun

Gas is flared as waste from a shale formation where gas and oil extraction using hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, takes place in California. Deep well and horizontal drilling is used extensively in fracking, which was used to extract natural gas from 98 per cent of wells brought into production in 2017, according to the B.C. Oil and Gas Commission.David McNew / Getty Images files

Credits issued by the provincial government to natural gas companies could cost taxpayers more than $2 billion in foregone revenue, according to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

Between 2016 and 2018, about $1.2 billion in credits for deep-well and horizontal drilling were issued to gas producers, who can use them to reduce future natural gas royalty payments to the government when wells go into production.

B.C. collected $145 million in natural gas royalties in the 2017-18 fiscal year and $164 million in 2018-19, according to the budget and fiscal plan.

The deep well credit program has been in place for 17 years to compensate companies for the higher costs associated with so-called unconventional gas production, which is now so common that the credits are an embedded subsidy to the industry, said CCPA policy analyst Ben Parfitt.

Is the government lowering royalty fees and effectively propping up fossil fuel extraction that would otherwise be unprofitable? wonders a report by the CCPA, a progressive think tank.

The top three credit earners in the gas field in 2017-18 accrued $344 million in credits: Cutbank Encana Partnership, Painted Petroleum and Tourmaline Oil Corp. In all, 26 companies earned $703 million in deep well credits last year, the documents show.

Gas producers have $2.6 billion in credits already on the books, according to B.C.s most recent public accounts report.

These are revenues that are being foregone, said Parfitt, who obtained credit figures with a Freedom of Information request. Down the line, those credits are reimbursed in the form of lower royalty payments.

The program was initiated as an incentive to take on more expensive extraction projects, which Parfitt argues have now become mainstream.

Deep well and horizontal drilling is used extensively in hydraulic fracturing, which was used to extract natural gas from 98 per cent of wells brought into production in 2017, according to the B.C. Oil and Gas Commission.

Virtually all the new wells being drilled in B.C. are deep wells and horizontal wells for to extract natural gas and valuable liquids such as condensate, which is used to dilute bitumen, said Parfitt. But when it comes time to pay the province the taxpayers for those extracting those products, the royalties are reduced.

The governments three-year fiscal plan notes that the royalty rate is expected to decline in the next two years due to increased utilization of royalty programs and infrastructure credits.

What we would like to know is how much those (gas) companies are actually paying in royalties for a publicly owned resource, and its been like pulling teeth with this government, said Parfitt.

What forest companies pay for cutting trees on public lands is freely available to the public online, he noted.

Energy Minister Michelle Mungall defended the program earlier this year, noting that companies can only use credits to reduce their royalty rate, not to avoid royalties altogether. She added, many of the credits that (Green party Leader Andrew Weaver) speaks of will actually likely never be used as the wells are closed.

With a file from Vaughn Palmer

rshore@postmedia.com

CLICK HERE to report a typo.

Is there more to this story? Wed like to hear from you about this or any other stories you think we should know about. Email vantips@postmedia.com.

Read the original here:

Natural gas drilling credits eat up royalty revenue from extraction industry: report - Vancouver Sun

Letter to the Editor: An Appraisal of Macri – Americas Quarterly

In response to Federico Sturzeneggers Oct. 31 article for AQ, a reader writes:

While the Oct. 27 election results in Argentina werent surprising Alberto Fernndez defeated incumbent Mauricio Macri, whose four years in office left a veritable economic and social scorched earth former Central Bank president Federico Sturzeneggers analysis of Macris tenure was rather surprising. For starters, his statements on freedom of the press and the independence of the justice system are not supported by actual events. Opposition media owners were persecuted and imprisoned under false pretenses, as recent reports have shown, and the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers requested information regarding serious allegations about the executives meddling in the justice system.

Sturzenegger does get it partially right on two counts. First, Macris presidency is a failure in economic terms. Second, that failure cannot be blamed on the previous government or on bad luck, but entirely due to policies implemented by his government. However, the rest of Sturzeneggers statements on the economythe focus of my letterare troubling.

The writer takes for granted that the mainstream economics view is the only point of view, and that inflation is a result of the fiscal deficit. But with Argentinas economy functioning well below full capacity (currently below 60%), there is clearly room for more demand without it being inflationary. Why, then, did yearly inflation more than double?

We can start by looking at the floating exchange rate championed by Sturzenegger, a highly problematic policy in a country like Argentina where foreign exchange shortages are a recurring problem. Price formation in Argentina is closely linked to fluctuations in the exchange rate and when it increases, so do prices. Furthermore, the government linked key prices to the dollar, including electricity, gas, fuel and transport. The elimination of export taxes on primary products, a mechanism used to decouple domestic prices from world prices, also meant basic foodstuffs (wheat, maize, beef, dairy products) were now linked directly to world prices, leading to increases in lockstep with the exchange rate.

Add to that a broad deregulation of capital flows resulting in a lot more foreign exchange flowing out of the country than into it. Regulations were also changed to allow exporters to keep their revenue in foreign currency abroad instead of changing to pesos locally, further aggravating the dollar shortage and pressuring the exchange rate upward, with the expected impact on the price level.

Therefore, the Macri administrations inability to control inflation was due to the combination of floating exchange rate policy, deregulation and the dollarization of key prices, not the fiscal deficit. This, of course, means that the policies implemented by the central bank to try to control inflation were not only not attacking the root problem but making it worse.

The second major problem, alluded-to only in passing by Sturzenegger, is the massive debt accumulation by the Macri administration. Sturzenegger states that the government had financed itself with short-term dollar debt, which was easily available until early 2018. That statement contains a substantial conceptual confusion: Government spending is in pesos and the government has no need to borrow in foreign currency for expenditures in the national currency.

This confusion led the Macri administration to double Argentinas public debt, in fact financing record levels of capital flight, debt service and the trade deficit (that turned to a surplus in 2018 thanks to a substantial economic recession). The current debt levels and service schedule are a veritable financial time bomb for the next government that will be difficult to deactivate.

The conceptual and theoretical confusions of the Macri administrations neoliberal economists highlight the importance of real-world economics as opposed to mainstream academic textbook models. Sturzeneggers fascination with general equilibrium models and self-adjusting external balances through floating exchange rates may work in the mainstream textbooks, but not in a periphery country like Argentina.

-Alan B. Cibils,Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, November 12.

Continued here:

Letter to the Editor: An Appraisal of Macri - Americas Quarterly

The U.S. held over 69,000 migrant children in government custody in 2019 – Mashable

Government data reveals that in 2019, the U.S. held a record 69,550 migrant children in government custody, according to reporting from the Associated Press.

That number is up 42 percent from 2018's fiscal year. United Nations researchers say this means the U.S. has the largest number of children separated from their parents, the AP says. Of the 69,550 children, 4,000 still remain in government custody, where more detained children and teens arrive weekly. Others have already been deported, while some have since reunited with family members in the U.S.

According to the AP, the stringent immigration policies employed by the Trump administration have increased the amount of time children spend in detention centers. These centers sometimes have squalid and overcrowded living conditions.

"Its happening even though the U.S. government has acknowledged that being held in detention can be traumatic for children, putting them at risk of long-term physical and emotional damage," the AP explains.

A teen from Honduras who was detained for four months in a detention center away from his mother spoke to the AP about his experience.

"There was something there that made us feel desperate. It was freedom. We wanted to be free," he said. There was despair everywhere."

View post:

The U.S. held over 69,000 migrant children in government custody in 2019 - Mashable

Greg Grandin and the End of the Myth (Review) – NACLA

In this era of Make America Great Again baseball caps and undeserved nostalgia for an unjust past, it is a welcome tonic to read a well written, engaging historical overview of the settler colonialism that drove this countrys creation. The historian Greg Grandins new book The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America fits that bill perfectly.

The End of the Myth shows how the Founding Fathers of the United States held up westward expansion as a crucial part of the prosperous future they saw for white men in North America. Benjamin Franklins version of political economy described the vast lands of the continent as a safety valve that ensured families would grow, wages would stay high, and demand would keep up with supply. For Thomas Jefferson, Grandin writes, The ability to migrate wasnt just an exercise of natural rights but the source of rights, or at least their historically necessary condition. Liberty was made possible by the right to colonize, letting freemen, when their freedom was threatened, move on to find free land and carry the torch from one place to another. And in James Madisons Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison argues that citizens spread over a large space are less likely to discover their own strength, and to act in unison with each other. Madison wrote that by extending the size of the country, you take in a greater variety of parties and interests, thus avoiding mob rule or consolidation of power in the hands of a few.

Grandin shows how wars against Native Americans led to wars of conquest outside the U.S., including in Latin America. By the Trump Era, Grandin argues, these wars had largely run their course, resulting in a retreat to increasingly brutal U.S.-Mexico border repression as a symptom of the U.S. empires inward turn.

The fixation with expansionism did not diminish with time. In 1824, President James Monroe wrote, There is no object which as a people we can desire which we do not possess or which is not within our reach. And, as the white men at the helm of the new nations government all agreed, what was within their reach was theirs to take.

Disagreements emerged among the governing classes about how to deal with the Indigenous populations living on land that white elites and their settler underlings felt entitled to. Thomas Jefferson, a slaveholder who saw himself as a man of the Enlightenment, argued that Native Americans should be compelled to assimilate into white society and give up their hunting and fishing grounds to settlers. This assimilation was to be accomplished through predatory debt: Jefferson explained that when debts get beyond what the individuals can pay, they become willing to lop them off by a cession of lands. Of course, if they resisted, Jefferson wrote, Native Americans must see we have only to shut our hands to crush them. Ultimately, Jefferson was willing to accept extermination if forceful persuasion failed.

On the more completely bloodthirsty end of the spectrum, Andrew Jackson dispensed with any pretenses to kinder, gentler conquest. As a lawyer, Jackson profited significantly from theft of Native lands by processing white settler claims. By the time he was elected president in 1828, Jacksons approach to westward expansion relied on three core policies: Indian removal, war with Mexico, and the defense and extension of slavery. Rabidly racist, Jackson threw supremacist raw meat to his low-income, sparsely educated white base. As Grandin writes, Jacksonian settlers moved across the frontier, continuing to win a greater liberty by putting down people of color, and then continuing to define their liberty in opposition to the people of color they put down.

In Jacksons first term, the Indian Removal Act pushed tens of thousands of Native Americans off their lands, opening it up to poor whites who otherwise would have been increasingly malcontent in overcrowded cities. Those lands also became part of the slave economy.

War as Empire Building

The U.S. war on Mexico, declared by President James Polk in 1846, deepened cycles of racist hatred in the service of empire building. At the end of his life, Ulysses S. Grant looked back on his role in helping to win that war and called it one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation. Rape and slaughter of civilians and war refugees was common. A U.S. officer described the atrocities: The smiling villages which welcomed our troops on their upward march are now black and smoldering ruins, the gardens and orange groves destroyed, and the inhabitants have sought refuge in the mountains. He concluded, The march of Attila was not more withering and destructive. All-Mexico Jacksonians pushed for the annexation of the entire country. The eastern U.S. press fed war fever by picturing Mexicans as barely human, with the New York Herald describing Spanish, African, and Native American mixing in Mexico as leading to the imbecility and degradation of the Mexican people. The Heralds editor pronounced, Amalgamation has always been abhorrent to the Anglo-Saxon race on this continent.

Grandin does an effective job of putting mid-19thcentury U.S. politics into a global context. He points out that in 1848, European countries saw worker revolts which were ultimately defeated but led to radical reforms, including pensions, welfare, education, and health care. As to workers in the United States in the same period, Grandin explains, instead of waging class war upward on aristocrats and ownersthey waged race war outward, on the frontier. During the 1848 presidential election, Zachary Taylor, who won the presidency, was pictured in a popular political cartoon sitting atop a pyramid of skulls holding a bloody sword.

After the civil war ended, westward movement of whites went into overdrive. Under the Homestead Act, the federal government gave almost three hundred million acres of public land to around four hundred thousand families. As Native Americans continued to be pushed off their ancestral lands, the largest chunks of territory seized went to the most powerful corporations and conglomerates. These giveaways were tied to massive corruption and fraud in the U.S. government of the 1870s and 1880s. This period also saw the opening of new overseas markets for U.S. agricultural and manufacturing exports.

By the 1890s, the historian Frederick Jackson Turner would write that the frontier was a magic fountain of youth in which American continually bathed and was rejuvenated. Turner, a professor at the University of Wisconsin who presented his Frontier Thesis at the Worlds Congress of Historians and Historical Studies in 1893, also wrote, The existence of an area of free land, its continuous recession, and the advance of American settlement westward, explain American development. Grandin stresses how influential Turner was on other historians, and shows how much Turner played down the less flattering history of American development. Dismissing the importance of enslaved Africans in building US wealth, Turner wrote, When American history comes to be rightly viewed, it will be seen that the slavery question is an incident.

Grandin contrasts Turners airy generalizations with brutal realities on the ground. Those realities are accurately depicted via the pronouncements of Theodore Roosevelt, who wrote, The settler and pioneer have at bottom had justice on their side: this great continent could not have been kept as nothing but a game preserve for squalid savages, and Andrew Jackson, who encouraged soldiers under his command to pant with vengeance and turn themselves into engines of destruction while butchering Creeks.

In 1890, the U.S. census office stopped using frontier to describe any western territory, noting that given the large white population in the west, there can hardly be said to be a frontier line. But overseas expansion soon gobbled up new lands beyond the continental United States. Washingtons 1898 annexation of Hawaii and declaration of war on Spain started the process, soon to be followed by the seizure of Puerto Rico, Guam, and Manila, and the establishment of a protectorate over Cuba. In 1902, Woodrow Wilson, a firm believer in U.S. wars of conquest in the Pacific and the Caribbean, praised these developments, saying, We made new frontiers for ourselves beyond the seas.

These new wars served to unite confederates with their former enemies in the north. In Grandins words, In each military occupation and prolonged counterinsurgency they fought, southerners could replay the dissonance of the confederacy again and again. They could fight in the name of the loftiest idealsliberty, valor, self-sacrifice, camaraderiewhile putting down people of color.

The Border and the Frontier

Throughout the 20th century, U.S. presidents used the word frontier to build support for wars on foreign soil. John F. Kennedy used it to describe the Vietnam War and various Third World counterinsurgency campaigns. Ronald Regan argued that his own counterinsurgency wars in Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Angola were on the Freedom Frontier. Then, in 1989, George H.W. Bush said, We saw the frontier beyond the stars, the frontier within ourselves. In the frontiers ahead, there are no boundaries.

Grandin argues that limits to seemingly interminable U.S. wars began to appear after George W. Bushs invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. In 2004, W. told the world, We will extend the frontiers of freedom. But, Bushs declaration of mission accomplished notwithstanding, the outward push turned into an endless slog. Grandin writes: Had the occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq not gone so wrong, perhaps Bush might have been able to contain the growing racism within his partys rank and file by channeling it into his Middle East crusade, the way Ronald Reagan broke up the most militant nativist vigilantes in the 1980s by focusing their attention on Central America. Instead, thousands of broken young men and women were cycled out of Bushs wars back home to a nation hollowed out by stratospheric military spending, fiscal austerity, and massive job loss due in part to trade agreements like NAFTA, which a Clinton cabinet member had referred to as the moral equivalent of the frontier in the nineteenth century.

Grandins take on Barack Obama is a welcome contrast to mainstream punditry that offers rosy, misty-eyed assessments of Obamas tenure in the White House. Grandin convincingly lays out how Obamas election was red meat to homegrown racists, their ranks swelled by returning vets. Obamas commitment to Clinton-style trade deals did nothing to improve conditions for the millions of Americans living in poverty. Although he managed to serve two terms, the economic impact of trade agreements with Panama, Colombia, and South Korea, along with his tepid approach to regulating the banking sector that had almost tanked the economy in 2008, gave plentiful ammunition to right wing faux-populists. As Grandin notes, [Obama] kept reaching for a center that no longer existed, that he seemed to think he could reconstitute by the power of his rhetoric and infiniteness of his patience.

The End of the Myth argues that by the time of the Obama administration, the safety valve of externally directed aggression via warfare on the periphery was no longer working. In Grandins view, The country lost its ability to channel extremism outward, and the kind of chaos that the United States had released in the Persian Gulf was increasingly mirrored at home, in an escalating spiral of jihadist massacres, mass school shootings, and white-supremacist and masculinist rampages [] the violence that had been associated with moving outward in the world, which gave the illusion of leaving problems behind, now just accumulates.

Grandin sees the U.S.-Mexico border as a prime site of that accumulation of violence. The border has long been a source of racist terror.The KKK played a key role in the anti-Mexican terror campaigns of the early 1920s, when whites responded to an influx of cross-border refugees from the Mexican Revolution with horrific violence. The Klan had more than a million members at the start of the 1920s, with 200,000 of them in Texas. In addition to demonizing and terrorizing Jews and African Americans, Klan members targeted Mexican migrants as far north as Oregon. Along the border, the New York Times observed in 1923, The killing of Mexicans without provocation is so common as to pass almost unnoticed. The KKK, which had infiltrated both local police forces and state national guards, was often behind such murders.

White supremacists clamored for restrictions on Mexican immigrants in the early 1920s, but business interests profiting handsomely from the toil of brown bodies kept legal barriers to cross-border travel to a minimum. But, Grandin explains, Having lost the national debate when it came to restricting Mexicans, and fearing they were losing the larger struggle in defense of Anglo-Saxonism, white supremacists took control of the newly established U.S. Border Patrol and turned it into a vanguard of race vigilantism. Klan members joined the Border Patrol in large numbers, and sated their hatred of brown people by beating, shooting, and hanging migrants.

Contemporary white racism toward brown people was blatantly exploited by Donald Trump in his improbable seizure of the presidency. At the border, Grandin observes, Trump policies build on past deportation regimes and [turn] structural cruelties into spectacular cruelties.

To ask the question that has been on the lips of everyone I know since November 2016, what is to be done? Here is Grandins take, which rings true to me, in the conclusion to his books epilogue:

Maybe after Trump is gone, what is understood as the political center can be reestablished. But it seems doubtful. Politics appears to be moving in two opposite directions. One way, nativism beckons; Donald Trump, for now, is its standard-bearer. The other way, socialism calls out to younger voters who, burdened by debt and confronting a bleak labor market, are embracing social rights in numbers never before seen. Coming generations will face a stark choice a choice long deferred by the emotive power of frontier universalism but set forth in vivid relief by recent events: the choice between barbarism and socialism, or at least social democracy.

Following that summation, The End of the Myth closes with A Note on Sources and Other Matters that is packed with references to works consulted in its writing. The range of sources is an impressive testimony to Grandins meticulous attention to detail.He is certainly a left-wing dissident, but theres nothing doctrinaire or formulaic about his approach: He writes to uncover the truth and elucidate, not to preach.He challengesconventional wisdom while writing in a lively engaging voice that is both articulate and penetrating in its insights. He has packed The End of the Myth with so much fascinating history that, like me, you may feel compelled to read the book a second time. I cant recommend it highly enough.

Ben Terrall is a San Francisco-based writer whose work has appeared in CounterPunch, In These Times, The San Francisco Bay Guardian, Noir City, January Magazine, and other outlets.

Disclaimer: Greg Grandin is a NACLA board member

More:

Greg Grandin and the End of the Myth (Review) - NACLA

Lawmakers huddle to plot next steps on the budget – Politico

With Connor OBrien

Editor's Note: This edition of Morning Defense is published weekdays at 10 a.m. POLITICO Pro Defense subscribers hold exclusive early access to the newsletter each morning at 5:30 a.m. Learn more about POLITICO Pro's comprehensive policy intelligence coverage, policy tools and services at politicopro.com.

Story Continued Below

Top House and Senate budget lawmakers plan to meet this evening to figure out the way forward for the fiscal 2020 budget.

Lawmakers say Turkeys president shouldnt meet with President Donald Trump on Wednesday.

The Pentagon chief says an Army officer who testified in the impeachment inquiry shouldnt face retaliation.

HAPPY TUESDAY AND WELCOME TO MORNING DEFENSE, where we're always on the lookout for tips, pitches and feedback. Email us at dbrown@politico.com, and follow on Twitter @dave_brown24, @morningdefense and @politicopro.

HAPPENING TONIGHT: The four top appropriators on Capitol Hill Sens. Richard Shelby and Patrick Leahy, and Reps. Nita Lowey and Kay Granger will meet tonight to breathe life into plans to pass a budget even as the clock ticks down to the end of the current continuing resolution, POLITICOs Caitlin Emma reported last week.

That includes figuring out how to deal with Trumps plans to divert funding for the border wall. Were going to talk about everything any way to move the process, Shelby said. We have to do the best we can as soon as we can.

And while everyone agrees that the impeachment proceedings are sucking the oxygen out of the quest to pass appropriations bills, The Associated Press writes that the hearings bring one benefit.

The odds for a spending deal could be helped by the apparent sidelining because of impeachment of acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and budget office chief Russell Vought, two hard-liners with whom [Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has clashed in the past.

AID WITH STRINGS ATTACHED: Aides to President Donald Trump are drafting plans to condition U.S. aid to other countries on how well they treat their religious minorities, two White House officials said, POLITICOs Nahal Toosi and Gabby Orr report.

The proposal is expected to cover U.S. humanitarian assistance, and could also be broadened to include American military aid to other countries. If the proposal becomes reality, it could have a major effect on U.S. assistance in a range of places, from Iraq to Vietnam.

Subject to change: Two White House officials ... stressed that the idea is in its early stages and an executive order is still being drafted, meaning questions about, say, whether military aid will be covered remain unanswered.

NSC SHRINKAGE: White House national security adviser Robert OBrien is moving quickly to shrink and reshape his staff rattling some nerves already frayed by the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, Toosi reports.

The changes at the National Security Council are both sweeping and minute: several dozen policy roles will be eliminated as staffers return to their home agencies or leave government in the coming two months; at least two NSC divisions are being phased out completely; a third, meanwhile, has been handed off to a separate White House-based group.

CALL THE WHOLE THING OFF: A bipartisan group of House lawmakers is urging Trump to call off a Wednesday meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, citing the countrys cross-border incursion into Syria last month, our colleague Connor OBrien reports.

The incursion has had disastrous consequences for U.S. national security, has led to deep divisions in the NATO alliance and caused a humanitarian crisis on the ground, the 17 lawmakers write. "Given this situation, we believe that now is a particularly inappropriate time for President Erdogan to visit the United States, and we urge you to rescind this invitation.

Related: Behind Trump-Erdogan 'bromance,' a White House meeting to repair U.S.-Turkey ties, via Reuters.

ABOUT THAT OTHER FREEZE: House lawmakers are demanding to know more about the administrations freeze of aid to Lebanon, Al-Monitor reports.

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., and Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla., have written a letter to White House Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney to find out why the White House put a hold on $105 million in foreign military financing to Lebanon in October.

We are confounded by the decision to hold this assistance, they wrote, asking Mulvaney to fill in the blanks by Friday.

HAPPENING TODAY: Sen. Todd Young, a Republican member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, discusses U.S. national security and geopolitical challenges at 11:30 a.m. at the Hudson Institute. And Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Jim Risch talks about China's political and economic influence in Europe at 3 p.m. at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

NO RETALIATION: Defense Secretary Mark Esper says an Army officer who testified in the impeachment inquiry shouldnt face retaliation, Reuters writes.

He shouldnt have any fear of retaliation, Esper told reporters traveling with him to New York. Thats DoDs position.

Esper added that hes spoken to Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy about the need to protect the officer, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, along with anyone else who comes forward.

Coopers take: Trumps decision to freeze military aid to Ukraine this summer sent shockwaves through the administration as different corners scrambled to figure out what was going on, according to testimony by Pentagon official Laura Cooper released Monday night, per POLITICOs Andrew Desiderio and Kyle Cheney.

She also learned through the White House that the holdup was somehow related to concerns about corruption.

The House also released the transcript of Christopher Anderson, a top aide to Kurt Volker, the administrations point man on Ukraine negotiations.

In his testimony, Anderson recounts that Trump once called then-national security adviser John Bolton at home after seeing a CNN report that a U.S. destroyer would be conducting a freedom-of-navigation operation in the Black Sea in a message to Moscow.

The operation was canceled.

THE INVISIBLE MAN: Foreign Policy is out with a new piece on Espers growing influence in the administration and his relationship with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, drawing differences between the two West Point grads leadership style.

A senior Defense Department official notes that Esper defers to Pompeo, even though the former has a larger agency.

Ive seen this now half-a-dozen times, the official noted. Whenever Pompeo calls, Esper clears the room and closes the door. People have noticed. I dont think that Pompeo runs Esper, but its a bad look.

Another official took note of how Esper handled Trumps surprise decision to pull U.S. troops from northern Syria.

Esper was more than a good soldier on this one, the official said. He was tireless. He spent that weekend on the telephone, talking to his counterparts, worked with the [Pentagons] anti-ISIS task force until all hours and then appeared on news programs to defend the president. It was an impressive performance.

Code of silence: Recently retired senior officers are struggling over whether to speak out against Trumps policies, according to a story in The Atlantic.

Following one of Trumps most controversial defense-policy decisions yetthe announcement that he would take U.S. troops out of the way of a Turkish assault on Americas Kurdish counter-ISIS partnerswe made efforts to contact more than two dozen four-star generals and admirals who retired under Trump to see whether they believed the moment warranted breaking silence.

Only three agreed to speak on the record, including former Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joe Dunford, who spoke out in defense of Vindman.

Another was retired Army Gen. Vince Brooks, who said hes uneasy with how Trump treats the Pentagon.

I think what youre seeing is a growing concern that that military advice is not being sought, and if sought, is not being considered, he said. I share the concerns as well.

KEEP THE PACT: The chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff called on South Korea to stay in a military information-sharing pact with Japan, part of a high-level U.S. push to hold together the agreement between two of its closest allies days before it is due to expire, The Wall Street Journal writes.

Gen. Mark Milley, who is visiting Japan and South Korea on his first overseas trip as chairman, told reporters on a military jet before landing in Japan on Monday that strong three-way military coordination was needed to face threats in the region.

UN reports increasing violations of Iran nuclear deal: The Associated Press

Afghanistan to swap Taliban militants for American, Australian captives: Reuters

US troops at Syria base say they'll keep pressure on IS: AP

USAF logs fewer severe aviation mishaps in fiscal 2019: Air Force Magazine

2 veterans serving in Congress want the Global War on Terrorism memorial built on the National Mall: Task & Purpose

Read more from the original source:

Lawmakers huddle to plot next steps on the budget - Politico

UW pushes for bill to fund project that finds and identifies missing soldiers – The Badger Herald

The University of Wisconsin is advocating for Senate Bill 446 to provide funding for research to find and identify Wisconsin soldiers who are missing.

Torrey Tiedeman, the communications and outreach coordinator of the Missing in Action Recovery and Identification project, said the purpose of the project is to advance the recovery of missing-in-action service members from overseas by using different practices and student volunteers across the UW system.

According to the projects website, it brings together four scholarly disciplines: history, archaeology, forensic anthropology and genetic analysis. These areas work together to survey sites and exhume and identify remains. These teams are composed of students, researchers, student veterans, alumni and volunteers.

The researchers specializing in archaeology and genetics have been working with the United States Department of Defense since 2013 to identify missing U.S. soldiers, according to AP News.

State lawmakers sign bill to fund UW project to find missing soldiersState lawmakers seek to fund the University of Wisconsins project to find missing soldiers, with 88 lawmakers signing a bill. Read

State Sens. Roger Roth, R-Appleton, and Dale Kooyenga, R-Brookfield, and state Reps. Ken Skowronski, R-Franklin, and Christine Sinicki, D-Milwaukee, are the lead authors on the bill. It will provide $360,000 to the project over the next two fiscal years if passed.

Tiedeman said that since 2014, the project has found and identified three soldiers, all of whom were killed in France during World War II. These recovery missions are assigned to the UW MIA-RIP and funded by the DOD, according to AP.

Angela Roidt, communications director for Roth, wrote in an email that some projects can cost $1.5 million and take up to two years to complete, and due to the success of its past missions, the U.S. Department of Defense began partnering with similar programs throughout the country.

The DOD has not assigned the team any Wisconsin MIA cases, which is why the state is helping with this bill, Roidt wrote.

Charles Konsitzke founded the project and is the team leader. Konsitzke is also the associate director for the UW Biotechnology Center, which hosts the projects. He said he started this project because a civilian asked UWBC to help them find a missing soldier. Konsitzke said he doesnt have personal connections to any missing-in-action soldiers, but he did come from a military family. He said he felt motivated from witnessing how academics can further the search for soldiers.

Roth is a lead author on the bill and circulated it for support among his legislative colleagues in the senate and the assembly. Twenty-seven state senators and 61 representatives have signed onto SB 446 since its introduction Sept. 23.

UWPD to add officer position off campus in Langdon St. areaThe University of Wisconsin Police Department will add an officer position on Langdon St. and the surrounding downtown area to Read

Roidt wrote in an email that Wisconsin has 1,500 missing-in-action service members of the 82,000 nationwide.

Families all over the state are missing their loved ones without the closure of knowing what happened to them, Roidt wrote.

Roidt also wrote that Roth served four tours in the Middle East. He was deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and three times in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Roth is a military officer in the Wisconsin Air National Guard holding the rank of first lieutenant. Roths military experience allows him to understand the sacrifice of those who serve, as well as their families, made for our freedom.

It is our duty to give every effort and attempt to bring their remains back home to their families, Roidt wrote.

The bill will benefit both the Wisconsin missing-in-action soldiers and their families at a lower cost and with greater effectiveness because of the resources UW would have access to. Roidt wrote that with the increase in funding under the bill, the project could conduct recovery missions in areas of the world that are off limits to DOD missions.

Wisconsin has led the nation on missing-in-action recovery projects. With this bill, Wisconsin could become the first state in the nation to fund the projects mission, Roidt wrote.

Finance Committee rejects adding new officers to MPDMadison Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway and the City of Madison Finance Committee met for eight hours Monday night to discuss the Read

This project has worked closely with the Defense Prisoners of War/Missing in Action Accounting Agency since 2016.

[The project] is tasked with recovery missions from the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, Tiedeman said.

The DPAA provides the UW project available information on the case, equipment and some of their own personnel.

Tiedeman has a military background. He said the project has enabled him to continue serving without being in the military.

Excerpt from:

UW pushes for bill to fund project that finds and identifies missing soldiers - The Badger Herald

Betsy DeVos Might Outlast Them All – HuffPost

Betsy DeVos confirmation hearing in January 2017 made her a universal punchline. When asked about her thoughts on guns in school, she famously pointed to the need to protect students from grizzly bears. When asked about her opinions on exams that measure proficiency versus those that measure growth, she could barely stammer out an answer. In a Republican-majority Senate, the billionaire mega-donor was barely confirmed to her position, a humiliating turn that required Vice President Mike Pence to cast the tie-breaking vote.

Two years later, DeVos remains among the least popular Cabinet members in a historically unpopular administration. Yet, somehow, even as her peers dropped like flies former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson the education secretary has remained standing.

HuffPost spoke with over a dozen people about DeVos longevity, including former colleagues at the Department of Education, former co-workers in the advocacy space, and several political opponents who continue to root for her downfall.

For the most part, despite her wild unpopularity, they chalk up DeVos success to President Donald Trumps relative disinterest in education, her comparative lack of ethical conflicts and scandal, and her connections to the evangelical community, a group that serves as an important voting bloc for the president.

But they also point to her wholehearted belief in the righteousness of her agenda and persistence in seeing it through. Many of both her supporters and opponents say theyre not surprised shes lasted this long, describing her in similar terms determined, dedicated, resolute though vehemently disagreeing on what these traits mean for students.

Her boosters and detractors seem to agree: Whether people hate or love what shes doing, shes doing it because she truly believes in it.

Will Heath/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images via Getty ImagesKate McKinnon plays Betsy DeVos on "Saturday Night Live" on March 17, 2018.

A Confirmation Hearing Disaster And Troubles In Trumpland

DeVos confirmation hearing earned her a portrayal by Kate McKinnon on Saturday Night Live and a message from the White House detailing the inadequacy of her performance, according to a former administration official.

But since then, Trump has mostly stayed out of her way, whether out of disinterest or distraction. DeVos has similarly worked to avoid conflict with Trump and the pitfalls of self-promotion, quietly pressing forward with her education agenda.

She has unsuccessfully worked to drum up interest in a federal school choice program and shes slashed guidance that promotes civil rights in schools. She has moved to give colleges especially for-profit ones with sometimes fraudulent practices more freedom from oversight, despite a litany of judicial challenges.

She keeps doing what she said she was gonna do, what shes always done and what she was hired to do, said Jeanne Allen, CEO of the Center for Education Reform, who has crossed paths with DeVos over the years as an advocate for school choice.

Her clashes with the president have generally been infrequent and insignificant: DeVos heard from the White House early on when she issued a botched statement calling HBCUs historically black colleges and universities formed in response to systemic discrimination pioneers in school choice. When she flubbed a 60 Minutesinterview in March 2018, she also heard from her boss, said a former staffer.

DeVos has mostly navigated her way through the bumps, though even when it comes to larger issues of policy and communication publicly carrying the presidents water.

When Trump charged DeVos with running the Federal School Safety Commission after the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, he made her the face of an initiative she had relatively little say over, sources told HuffPost.

To DeVos dismay, the White House used the commission to emphasize schools ability to arm personnel. DeVos didnt necessarily disagree with such proposals she is dedicated to the idea of local control and allowing districts to make such choices for themselves but she didnt see the need to highlight such an option. And then, as the president waffled on whether the commission should look at potential age restrictions on firearms, she was left to look foolish, at one point describing the commission as a group that would study school shootings but not guns.

DeVos most publicly pushed back against the president in March after he took credit for saving proposed cuts to the Special Olympics. Until that point, DeVos had toed the administrations line over the cuts, even amid widespread public outrage. The cuts had been proposed every year and were most recently pushed by Mick Mulvaney, the director of the Office of Management and Budget and acting White House chief of staff despite DeVos opposition.

I am pleased and grateful the president and I see eye-to-eye on this issue, and that he has decided to fund our Special Olympics grant, DeVos said in a statement at the time. This is funding I have fought for behind the scenes over the last several years.

In response to this article, DeVos office emphasized her strong working relationship with President Trump.

Its evident in their collaborative efforts to protect First Amendment rights on college campuses, make American STEM education (and the future STEM workforce) the envy of the world, their work on school safety, and most of all, their partnership on the Education Freedom Scholarships Proposal, spokesperson Angela Morabito said.

The Education Department denied there had been any conflict between DeVos and the White House on the Federal School Safety Commission, emphasizing that the secretary believes every school and community has its own unique needs, one size does not fit all, and the people closest to the problem must be empowered to solve it.

DeVos Determination

Carolyn Kaster/APEducation Secretary Betsy DeVos, left, accompanied by Education Department Budget Service Director Erica Navarro, testify at a hearing on the Education Department's fiscal 2018 budget on May 24, 2017.

Eliza Byard, president of LGBTQ civil rights group GLSEN, recalls DeVos painfully pushing school choice during a meeting with advocates of transgender youth, right after the Education Department rescinded guidance designed to protect these students. Amid a discussion about safety concerns for these children, DeVos awkwardly promoted school choice, despite the fact that private schools in voucher programs are in fact legally allowed to ban LGBTQ students and many of them do.

The thing that is painful and alarming and infuriating about that is there were already things in place solving those problems and they were ripped apart, Byard said.

Indeed, Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, uses harsh words to describe DeVos. But theres one word Weingarten wont use: chameleon.

She is who she is.She doesnt pretend to be pro-public education, she doesnt pretend to be pro-student. She is pro-privatization, she is pro-big business, she is pro-the student lender industry, said Weingarten, who leads a teachers union of about 1.7 million members that recently sued DeVos over alleged mismanagement of a student loan forgiveness program.

But those who have worked with DeVos both inside and outside the Education Department maintain that while she might have tunnel vision, her motives on this issue are pure. They describe her as driven by altruism rather than opportunism, a trait that may separate her from her peers in the Trump administration. Whether misguided or not, she truly sees choice as a prerequisite for meaningful educational improvement that could especially benefit low-income children of color.

I think Betsy DeVos has the best of intentions. Her desire to expand choice, especially for poor kids and kids of color, comes from a big heart and interest in seeing kids in America do better, said Michael Petrilli, president of the right-leaning Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

To the degree shes been cast as some kind of villain, thats not who she is. You might think she has bad ideas, but she doesnt have bad intentions.

Deliberate and Methodical

Former employees and associates say they understand why its easy to see DeVos as a villain. But they work to rationalize her actions, painting her motivations and personality in plain terms.

When she takes steps to protect at times predatory for-profit colleges well, she thought the Obama administration treated these institutions unduly harshly and that the free market should be left to work its magic unencumbered, regardless of the casualties. (Courts have consistently ruled against DeVos in several of her attempts to roll back protections for victims in these cases, in one instance calling her actions arbitrary and capricious.)

Shes not an outwardly warm and fuzzy type person that doesnt mean shes cold and distant but it certainly doesnt mean she approaches her job or issues that come across her desk as: How can we screw up students lives today? said one former education staffer.

And,according to a former employee, her most recent wave of scandals which resulted in her being held in contempt of court after the Department of Education continued to collect money from defrauded students despite a ban on doing so was more of an accidental snafu in a cumbersome system than any type of sinister DeVos-led plot. (The judge in that case previously said she was astounded, really, just really astounded at the departments sheer scale of violations.)

Pretty simply, it was nothing more complicated than an operational glitch, said A. Wayne Johnson, who was the Department of Educations chief strategy and transformation officer before resigning in October and endorsing a mass cancellation of student debt. Wayne described DeVos as an inspirational leader, and the best example of what a committed public servant is about.

Her decisions are characteristically deliberate and methodical. Early in the administration, when DeVos sparred with Trump and Sessions over the decision to repeal joint Department of Education and Department of Justice guidance designed to protect transgender students, it was less out of concern for those students than concern for a lack of process,sources said.

While former employees suspect that DeVos may have ultimately decided to rescind the guidance which called on schools to allow transgender students to use the bathroom that aligned with their gender identity she would have preferred to have engaged with a wide range of stakeholders first.

Maria Danilova/APProtesters demonstrate during a speech by Education Secretary Betsy DeVos at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government on Sept. 28, 2017. Asked about protections for transgender students, DeVos said she was committed to making sure all students are safe. But she rescinded guidance that allowed transgender students to use bathrooms that matched their gender identity.

They maintain that shes not personally homophobic or racist despite slashing a number of pieces of guidance designed to protect vulnerable groups just disdainful of federal overreach. When a group of Harvard students unfurled a sign calling her a white supremacist during a September 2017 speech, she was particularly hurt, they said.(In response to a question about this incident, Education Department spokesperson Morabito said DeVos wants to focus on students, not on herself, and certainly not on personal attacks that have no basis in truth.)

But these depictions are a far cry from how her detractors describe DeVos and the impact of her actions.

She never pretended she knew anything about schools or public schools, said Weingarten. [The Department] hasnt dealt with the student loan crisis. Instead, theyve just walked away from obligations to students, or theyve made it worse.

Others wonder if, when it comes to school choice, DeVos is actively hurting the cause she most wants to promote. Theres scant expectation she will succeed in pushing any type of federal program an initiative at odds with her love of small government. Using her bully pulpit as education secretary to promote school choice seems like her greatest hope for expanding programs around the country, but DeVos is an unpopular Cabinet member in a historically unpopular administration. School choice once drummed up bipartisan support, but DeVos has helped make the issue radioactive for centrists and Democrats, Petrilli says.

After writing a letter of support to Congress upon DeVos nomination, he now wishes she would just step down.

She seems like someone who is determined to show grit and perseverance and demonstrate she was going to follow through [with the job.] I think she deserves a lot of credit for that, he said. My only argument is two years is plenty to demonstrate that. She could have stepped down after the midterm election and felt quite good.

DeVos office vehemently denies that the issue of school choice has been in any way harmed by her tenure, saying that it continues to gain popularity across states.

The only vocal national opponents of education freedom are seeking the endorsement of the teachers union, said Morabito. They are the ones who ought to be asked to explain why the issue has suddenly become divisive.

Secretary DeVos is dedicated to advancing Education Freedom, Morabito continued. She has worked tirelessly to keep the focus on the cause allowing every student in America to access a high-quality education thats right for them.

But her last day also cant come soon enough for advocates like Byard, who says DeVos has already perpetuated so much harm in the everyday lives of vulnerable students.

I wish something would get through to her, Byard said. Were parents and were people who care deeply about children. And were scared.

This article has been updated to include comments from an Education Department spokesperson.

REAL LIFE. REAL NEWS. REAL VOICES.

Help us tell more of the stories that matter from voices that too often remain unheard.

Go here to read the rest:

Betsy DeVos Might Outlast Them All - HuffPost

Arlene Blencowe thinks she’s earned another title shot with win over Leslie Smith at Bellator 233 – MMA Junkie

THACKERVILLE, Okla. Arlene Blencowe thinks shes positioned herself as the No. 1 contender after this past Friday.

She defeated Leslie Smith by unanimous decision at Bellator 233, outpointing her on the strength of her jab en route to a 30-27 sweep on the judges scorecards.

Blencowe (13-7 MMA, 6-3 BMMA) was narrowly edged out by current 145-pound champion Julia Budd nearly two years ago at Bellator 189 for the womens featherweight title. It was her second loss to the champ.

Since then, Blencowe has won three in a row and thinks shes done enough to get the next title shot against the winner of Budd and Cris Cyborg, who are set to fight for Budds title at Bellator 236 on Jan. 25.

Obviously, since my controversial split decision loss to Julia, Ive just worked my way back into the next title shot, Blencowe told MMA Junkie after her win over Smith. I knew just getting wins is what I needed. I got two stoppage wins. I was hoping for a third win by stoppage, but we also knew that Leslie was a tough girl, so she doesnt go down easy. But I definitely I think Ive earned my spot to get another shot at the title.

And while avenging her loss to Budd is definitely on her mind, a stylistic matchup against Cyborg is also something that interests her.

To be honest, if its Julia, yeah, that would be awesome, Blencowe said. Ive got some redemption to do there. But Cyborgs another awesome fight. Id love to stand in there and bang it out with her. Ill just be sitting back in January, just excited to watch a good, quality fight, and I think both girls are going to be absolutely awesome.

More:

Arlene Blencowe thinks she's earned another title shot with win over Leslie Smith at Bellator 233 - MMA Junkie

Janay Harding: Bellator women’s featherweight division is ‘almost out of reach for the UFC now’ – The Body Lock

On November 8, Bellator will once again showcase the talent of their roster with an exciting Friday night card in Thackerville, Oklahoma, headlined by highly touted middleweight John Salter. Also competing that night is UFC veteran Leslie Smith, who will be making her promotional debut, and King Mo Lawal, who is coming out of retirement for one last fight.

Not only is the main card full of intriguing bouts, so too are the preliminaries. Undefeated prospects Logan Storley and Jordan Young have the opportunity to extend their professional records to 11-0 and 12-0, respectively, and if successful come Friday, will continue climbing the ladder in Bellator.

Also fighting on the prelims is Janay Hollowpoint Harding (5-3), a bantamweight who has recently moved to featherweight in search of championship gold. The Australian will be taking on brawler Amanda Bell, who will be looking to rebound from her July defeat.

Harding spoke to John Hyon Ko of The Body Lock about her upcoming bout and her journey to becoming a well-rounded fighter.

Janay Harding will step into the Bellator cage for the fourth time this Friday. Although she suffered defeat in her first outing for the promotion, Hollowpoint has bounced back with two dominant wins, with the latest coming in March.

In her last fight, Harding outclassed Russian submission maestro Marina Mokhnatkina for three rounds to score a unanimous decision victory. Despite controlling her opponent for the full 15 minutes, the 25-year-old was critical of her performance, stating that she was disappointed.

There was a lot I was disappointed in, Harding said.

For me, it wasnt my best performance, I think mentally I wasnt in the fight. We made a few changes in the [training] camp so I think a combination of increased muscle mass and just not being used to my new physique did make a bit of difference in how technical I was, especially [going] into the third round. I was just a bit sloppy and obviously gassed quite a bit. I was still happy to come away [with the win] and be dominant.

As of late, Harding and her team have begun putting a newfound focus on her grappling game, which was critical considering the level of jiu-jitsu her opponent possessed.

I was just really looking forward to showcasing my jiu-jitsu against someone who has such [a] high [level of] jiu-jitsu. And just being able to show that as much as Im a striker Ive been working on my jiu-jitsu this whole time and I have solid jiu-jitsu as well. Its just not something I gravitate towards in [terms] of my performance, so it was really good to test that stuff.

Last month, Bellator unveiled the signing of one of the greatest female mixed martial artists of all time: Cris Cyborg. Shortly after this, they announced that she would get an immediate title shot against the companys featherweight queen Julia Budd.

Harding weighed in on the former UFC stars immediate title shot, and who she thinks will walk away with the featherweight crown.

They are both such great caliber opponents for one another, and I think thats a matchup that they have both been waiting for for a very long time, Harding said.

Julias such a strong champion that its kind of the first matchup that comes to mind thats going to be Cris biggest challenge. Im happy that she gets the title fight and interested to see who walks away with the title.

I do think she [Cyborg] is slowing down a tiny bit, just because of her age, and because of her age in this sport [which] makes a big difference. So I think technically theyll go head to head in a few different sections. I think well get to see a few different areas from both women and then whoever makes the best decisions comes out on top. I really dont think its going to be one of those quick finishes from either girl, but either way, itll be interesting.

The arrival of Cyborg in Bellator is not only huge for the promotion financially but crucial to the success of their 145-pound division. Along with their champion, many other of the female featherweights on the roster have spoken publically about the strength of Bellators featherweight division; they were able to create something the UFC was so desperately trying to force.

Janay Harding is one of many who feel like Bellator is the premier destination for all female featherweights, and credits Cris Cyborg for being a non-stop advocate for the division.

Even when I got signed Cris shared that on her story shes always been a massive advocate of just growing the sport, especially the featherweight division for females, said Harding.

In the last two years its just really skyrocketed, and I think theyve extended the gap between the UFC and Bellator featherweight division. So much so that its almost out of reach for the UFC now.

If I become a titleholder in Bellator, Im not only world champion, Im world champion in the deepest featherweight division on earth.

On November 8, Janay Harding will square off against highly experienced Amanda Bell, who will be hungry to return to the win column. Bell has won two of her four Bellator bouts, both via TKO.

I think shes a fantastic opponent exclaimed Harding, her record isnt the best of course, but shes fought some of the best people, which makes a massive difference and it just gives [her] so much more credibility.

For me, thats a great fight. I love to be challenged, and not only am I challenged, but I do feel like my style works perfectly against hers. That kind of thing will just allow me to showcase my skills and showcase the fact that I am super worthy to be up the top end of these featherweight female rankings.

Her opponent is known to be a brawler, meaning she likes to stand and bang in order to dictate the victor. Harding must be wary of this, as 4 of Bells 6 wins have come via knockout.

Nonetheless the Australian remains certain that she will display her full skillset, which will leave doubters over how well rounded she really is.

I want to utilize every skill I have. I want to make sure that Im showcasing the fact that Im an all-round fighter like I attempted last time. I just wanted to reiterate that I have a solid ground game and I have a solid all-round MMA game.

Although she is the biggest female signing in the promotions history, Cris Cyborg wasnt the first to jump ship from the UFC to Bellator. At the start of the year, the companys president Scott Coker revealed that former UFC bantamweight Leslie Smith had signed a contract, and would be competing at featherweight.Smith made her promotional debut in July, picking up a majority decision victory of Sinead Kavanagh.

Smith will also be competing on November 8 against Arlene Blencowe, who happens to have a stoppage victory over Harding. The Australian has her sights set on both women and is confident a fight could materialize with the two in the future.

When Leslie got signed I was super interested in that fight for myself, Harding told John Hyon Ko.

And of course Ive always been interested in that rematch with Arlene and Im sure well get our time, no doubt now that were in the same promotion. But Im just interested to see how they go: obviously Leslie had a great run in the UFC and shes a veteran on her own accord, but Arlene has incredible skills, especially in the striking. Shes so heavy-handed that I think Leslie will have a little bit of trouble with that. But either way, I think itll make a great fight.

Read More

3 ideal opponents for Sergio Pettis Bellator debut

Michael Chandler vs. Benson Henderson II set for Bellator Japan

After main event win over former champ, Lorenz Larkin eyes Bellator Japan card

Fedor Emelianenko to face Quinton Rampage Jackson at Bellator x RIZIN event on 12/29

See the article here:

Janay Harding: Bellator women's featherweight division is 'almost out of reach for the UFC now' - The Body Lock

Is Jorge Masvidal now the undisputed BMF? We put together a 32-fighter bracket to find out – The Athletic

Jorge Masvidal is the first official BMF in UFC history, but no one would argue that the 34-year-old welterweight from Miami is the first of his kind.

The UFC, now in its 26th year in the BMF business and an athletic pursuit that went from no-holds-barred to mixed martial arts, has provided a platform for the toughest, surliest, determined, talented and driven people in sports. In the choppy wake following Saturdays UFC 244 card at Madison Square Garden, lets put into context where Masvidal ranks among the all-time BMFers out there.

What better way to flesh that out than a 32-fighter tournament?

Back in the day, this is how the toughest kid on the block was identified, and for our purposes, it makes good sense.

This is how it works:

One fighter from each calendar year between 1993 and 2019 is represented. Five wild card fighters have been selected to fill out the...

Read more from the original source:

Is Jorge Masvidal now the undisputed BMF? We put together a 32-fighter bracket to find out - The Athletic