As the Chick-fil-A Flap Shows, the Brands We Buy Are Increasingly a Values Proposition – Christianheadlines.com

(RNS) It was a culture-war white flag. Chick-fil-A, the Christian-led fried chicken fast food chain that had become a cause clebr among conservatives for its family values including donations to anti-LGBTQ groups like the Salvation Army announced this week that it would no longer be making donations to the Salvation Army or the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, another faith-based group often under fire for its anti-LGBT stance.

Conservatives were quick to throw Chick-fil-A under the bus. The left will never be satisfied, Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro told Fox News. Once you give an inch to the left with regard to your fundamental principles, the left will never stop Theyre going to lose a lot of supporters on the right who feel like they surrendered to nasty, censorious cancel culture.

Meanwhile, Orthodox Christian writer (and American Conservative blogger) Rod Dreher angrily tweeted, Just gave ten bucks to Salvation Army bell ringer because of those stupid chicken cowards.

Chick-fil-As decision to stop donating to socially conservative groups may have been a capitulation to market forces. But both its original donations and its about-face say less about the demands of cancel culture than about the contemporary American spiritual marketplace, in which brands conservative and progressive alike have come to double as purveyors of value-laden ritual.

Buying the right product, boycotting the right product and, of course, pointing out the virtue of ones choice on social media have all become formalized ways of allying oneself with a metaphysical or ethical value system.

Indeed, it seems to be (the perception of) morality, rather than, say, sex or money or glamor that governs most contemporary brands marketing strategies. According to a 2018 study by Vices branding arm, Virtue, 54% of millennials say they were hungry to spend their money on brands that enhance(d) their spirit and soul. Seventy-seven percent say they sought out brands that shared their values.

For progressives, these brands have in recent years included the razor company Gillette, whose recent high-profile commercial campaigns have included one titled Be the Best a Man Can Be which encouraged men to call each other out on their behavior and another that featured a father helping his transgender son shave for the first time. (Less successfully, brands like Pepsi have made headlines with a spectacularly ill-advised Black Lives Matter themed advertisement starring Kendall Jenner.)

But for Christian conservatives, there was both Chick-fil-A and Christian craft chain Hobby Lobby, which spearheaded a Supreme Court case over its denying coverage of contraceptives to its employees on religious grounds.

Both progressive and conservative brands, however, fundamentally prop up the same hyper-capitalist ideology: one that envisions the spending of money as inextricable from affirmations of ones values.

In the absence of moral communities held together by more concrete ties blood, neighborhood, church we can buy our way into looser ones, feeling that were participating in a movement simply by purchasing its physical representation.

But as Chick-fil-As reversal reminds us, these corporate allegiances are less moral charges than they are carefully calculated business decisions. In this case, are Christian conservatives more or less desirable, as a consumer demographic, than online social justice advocates? Is the LGBT community a better fan base to market to than, say, Republican soccer moms?

As our spending habits and our ideologies become ever more entwined, more and more companies will make calculations about which values they want to advertise and to whom. Our values, to these companies, regardless of their political affiliation, lie in the extent to which we can be reduced to a moral and ethical tribe and effectively sold things to solidify our membership in them. In buying our values, we become little more than these companies marks.

To reduce Chick-fil-A to caving to political correctness, therefore, is to overlook the way in which the entire system of capitalist value-consumption, from woke capitalism to the branding of MAGA hats, is inexorably wedded to the profit margin.

Ideologies have become things for us to buy and sell. We should expect that the people selling them to us treat them and us as products.

(The views expressed in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)

READ THIS STORY AT RELIGIONNEWS.COM.

Article originally published by Religion News Service. Used with permission.

Photo courtesy:RNS/John L. Reed/Creative Commons

The rest is here:

As the Chick-fil-A Flap Shows, the Brands We Buy Are Increasingly a Values Proposition - Christianheadlines.com

Hockey Canada’s decision to change minor hockey division names was overdue and is for the better – The Hockey News

News

When Hockey Canada's renamed minor hockey divisions come into effect next season, it will not only eliminate confusion, but will make the game more inclusive by eliminating some offensive terminology.

Shannon Coady is a little person who has been involved in hockey in Newfoundland for almost every one of his 42 years. When he was forced to quit playing hockey at the age of 14 because the local association and his parents wouldnt allow it, he became a stick boy for the AHLs St. Johns Maple Leafs after winning a contest in the local newspaper. During his interview when he was told to grab a pair of shin pads off the top of a players stall, he jumped on the seat and grabbed them. The team called and offered him a job the next day.

Coady went on to work his way up to assistant equipment manager with the Baby Leafs, and came to Toronto to work a couple of playoff rounds. He held the same posts with the QMJHLs St. Johns Fog Devils and later the AHLs St. Johns IceCaps when the Winnipeg Jets and Montreal Canadiens had their affiliate there.

The 1991-92 Baby Leafs, coached by Marc Crawford and with a playing assistant coach by the name of Joel Quenneville, had a couple of Francophone and European players who couldnt pronounce his name properly, so they just used Shaq, in deference to 7-foot-1 Shaquille ONeal, who was in his final year at the Louisiana State University en route to a Hall of Fame career in the NBA. The nickname stuck and people still refer to Coady by that name. It never bothered him. In fact, for a couple of years he even operated his own business called Shaqs Skate Sharpening.

You may have heard earlier this week that Hockey Canada has changed the names of its divisions to reflect age groupings, starting with Under-7 and going right up to Under-21. You may have also heard some of the chatter, likely from some of the same people who think Redskins is an acceptable thing to label someone, that as a society weve become a bunch of easily offended snowflakes obsessed with political correctness. (One thing that has always intrigued: The fact that when people criticize that term, they always seem to focus on the political part and never the correct part.)

Coady never got too worked up that one of the divisions was referred to as Midget, even though that word has become taboo in society. In fact, its pretty much the equivalent of the N word for those with achondroplasia, or dwarfism. But it never quite sat right with him. I never liked it, Coady said. Im 42 and its been around for as long as I can remember. As I got older, I dont have a word for itI just didnt think it was right. And I dont think it would ever fly in different sports.

As much as anyone, Coady realizes its the name of an age division in hockey and those who have used it have nothing against him and there is no intention to offend anyone. But words do matter and when you accept them you tacitly accept the negative connotation that comes with them and the power imbalance it creates. But more than anything, the name changes to reflect the age of players just makes sense on so many levels. Its the way the rest of the world has gone when it comes to hockey and its about time Canada followed suit.

When it comes down to it, none of the names of minor hockeys divisions makes sense. Do you have any idea what a Bantam really is? Its a small, aggressive chicken. What on Earth does that have to do with teenaged hockey players? Do you know where the word tyke originates? It comes from an old Norse term for a female dog and was later used in Middle English to describe a lazy man. Again, not a lot of parallels to young hockey players. Atom, Squirt, Peewee not sure who came up with these names all those years ago, but there seems to be a real obsession with lack of size here.

Good on Hockey Canada for refusing to remain stuck in the past. The age changes come into effect for next season and it will take a while for them to stick. For example, the world-famous Quebec Pee-Wee Tournament has no intention of changing its name, which is fine. But if, as a national governing body, you can eliminate confusion and make the game more inclusive at the same time, all the better.

Want more in-depth features, analysis and an All-Access pass to the latest content?Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

Tags: news, minor hockey

Connect:

Ken Campbell

Ken Campbell, The Hockey News' senior writer, is in his second tour with the brand after an eight-year stint as a beat reporter for the Maple Leafs for the Toronto Star. The Sudbury native once tried out for the Ontario League's Wolves as a 30-year-old. Needless to say, it didn't work out.

See the original post:

Hockey Canada's decision to change minor hockey division names was overdue and is for the better - The Hockey News

The Particular Discomfort Neurodivergents Have with Speech Codes – Merion West

The patterns of behavior that characterize a broad part of the autistic spectrum are indirectly viewed as a hindrance towards the 21st-century diversity and inclusion goals.

Introduction

In April of 2017, Arizona State political science professor Will H. Moore took his own life. In the suicide note that he had scheduled to be published around the time of his death, Moore describes how his high-functioning autism obstructed his social relations, as well as his ability to produce and publish his work. Moore describes having reached this juncture after he was reprimandedin a certain wayfor regularly stating his opinions in a manner that unintentionally offended those around him. Being censored, silenced, ostracized or just plain bullied by peers for expressing a set of facts isnt unfamiliar in any way. Douglas Murray describes this phenomenon in his recently published book The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity, where he comments on the cancel culture of the 21st century, as well as the discontinuation of the exploration, discovery and dissemination of truth on university campuses.

A few months after Moores death, four to be exact, another individual with high-functioning autism was punishedthis time for distributing a memo. A former Google engineer named James Damore put out Googles Ideological Echo Chamber for discussion within the company. Unfortunately, on the 5th of August, the memo was released to the public, and Damore was fired shortly thereafter. Damore had created a comprehensive internal study about the gender gap within software engineering. By making use of psychological characteristicsmore widely known as the Big Five personality traitsDamore laid out the differences between the sexes, why this can affect the career choices men and women respectively make, and the gender gap that can result from these differences. Joshua Trebuchon (reasonably) noted in his August, 2017 Merion West piece on the issue that the memo was not without its flaws. As such, Trebuchon discusses the typical minimalist argument on personality difference and suggests that regardless of Damores use of well-established psychological traits and differences, the way that he uses these differences to argue against affirmative action severely exaggerates their significance.

Being socially awkward and not having a way with words myself positions me as a natural target for rebuke, much like Damore. The arguments put forward by autistic people (at least, those people with autism that are in such a position where they can share their perspective), usually, are based on empirical findingsand not on abstract assumptions about how one perceives (or ought to perceive) the world. The Google Memo by Damore, for instance, is based on findings concerning psychological and personality traits that have been in use since the 1960s.

The reality that people with autism tend to be more focused on facts does not imply that they cannot lie, but it is much more demanding for them to consciously construct a falsification of their perspective. This, for instance, is why Moore described in his suicide note how it physically hurt him to tell a white lie. Immanuel Kant would be rather pleased by the difficulty of people with autism to deceive. But, on the contrary, Kant would be less satisfied with the proposition that we, as a society, have seemingly abandoned our desire for truth and rationality. The disgust that is shown from certain neurotypicals towards those who utter a specific set of facts appears to be displayed without rational thought. In what follows, I would like to address the underlying mechanismsor rather the absence of those mechanisms that explain the inability of neurodivergents to follow certain speech codes that are related to the political correctness movement(s).

Autistic Perception

My view on (and experience with) high-functioning autism can be read at-length here, but some of those points may be worth laying out again. Among those points is the notion thatas far as I am concernedwe should not give preference to someones arguments, ideas, or opinions just because they play the auti-card. NeitherGreta Thunberg nor Albert Einstein should get any special treatment (regarding their statements) because of their condition. Ones agreement (or disagreement) with their perspectives should not be created out of sympathy for their conditionbut rather from the empirical or logical strength of their ideas.

I do state this a tad lightly because I am well aware of the various forms of autismand how they affect the lives of those with autism, as well as the people around them. Let me make clear, then, that if I use the term autistic, I am typically referring to high-functioning autistic individuals. That is not to say that it is straightforward who falls in the category of high-functioning and who does not, but this is, in part, because of the highly variable nature of the autism spectrum.

The fact that it can be difficult for neurotypicals to relate to the perspectives often held by neurodivergents makes it not only hard for people with autism to be understood, but this can also give rise to paradoxical tensions regarding the inclusivity of every possible (minority) group. This occurs when the conditions by which a group can indicate that it is being included are incompatible with the conditions related to a different group. It implies that conflict between groups wont be off the table when suddenly everyone is put in the same room. Being fixated on facts could lead, for instance, to someone with autism stating the obvious differences between the sexes, which carries the possibility of accidentally offending others.

Its not as if people with autism are typically elected class president each year or voted to be the most popular kid in school. Because of people with autismslets call them distinctive characteristics, neurotypicals often refrain from approaching neurodivergents. You could, then, say, Whats to lose right? However, both the suicide rate of adolescents with autism and the suicide rates of adults with autism would make it rather difficult to pass off the social issues of people with autism as insignificant. The lack of social communication is highly correlated with the suicide of people with autism.

Is there a clear solution to the conflict concerning the value of free speech and the potential for offensive speech (which can emerge when free speech is protected) to offend other minorities groups? Should the risk of neurodivergents offending other minority groups (e.g. racial, ethnic, sexual and gender) mean that we should shut down those who express potentially upsetting facts? Or, alternatively, without any censorship taking place, perhaps we could teach people how to handle a fixed set of information and the rules that accompany interpreting certain information.

Unsafe Speech

Not only neurodivergents now experience complications with verbal expression. The recent events surrounding journalism students made for another example. At Northwestern University, students were protesting former United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions appearance on campus. The journalism students tried to cover this protest by taking photographs of the student protesters, who were confronted by police when they were attempting to force themselves into the building. The photos that resulted from the protest, which depicted student protesters falling on the ground, eventually produced an apology from the editors of the campus newspaper, The Daily Northwestern, for having reported on the protest. At the heart of the conflict was that the journalism students were, responding to the changing expectations of the students they cover, particularly from those on the political left, while upholding widely accepted standards of journalism. While the latter will eventually result in the potential to cause offense, the former still suggests that most of the students are empathetic towards those who identify with a minority group. Meanwhile, the struggle with neurodivergents often rests on the assumption that their speech is intentional, without any knowledge about the hidden mechanisms that cause it.

We are well aware that telling the perceived truth does not always carry with it a positive effect. If I were to tell a person that he has acne on his face, he likely wouldnt be too pleased with that statement, regardless of its truth. But the unpleasantness that a particular truth carries with it should not imply that we ought to abandon saying it. Geoffrey Miller, for example, notes the impact of censorship in his July, 2018 Quillette article, where he outlines the effect speech codes have on neurominorities:

It [censorship] discriminates against neurominorities. It imposes a chilling effect on unusual brains that house unusual minds. It marginalizes people who may have great ideas, but who also happen to have mental disorders, personality quirks, eccentric beliefs, or unusual communication styles that make it hard for them to understand and follow the current speech norms that govern what is acceptable..

Being ostracized from a group for such a reason as the use of factual language seems ridiculous. The main cause of the isolation many people with autism have from others is related to the inadequacy of the cognitive theory called Theory of Mind, often referred to by its acronym T.O.M. T.O.M is the ability to put yourself in someone elses shoes and assume his or her perspective. As such, the concept is frequently associated with empathy. Oftentimes, people with a form of autism lack this abilityand because of this, they generally experience difficulties forming (social) relationships. Steven Pinker describes T.O.M in his 2002 book The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature by referring to it as, one of the brains most striking abilities. Besides the predictability function of T.O.M, Pinker sees this cognitive theory as something greater than the ability to empathize with others: Our theory of mind is the source of the concept of the soul. The ghost in the machine [meaning, the mind carried in the body] is deeply rooted in our way of thinking about people.

The inability to assume another persons perspective makes it problematic for many with autism to even start a friendship, let alone maintain it. Maintaining such a relationship requires one to be aware both of what can be the compassionate thing to sayand also what can be the hurtful thing to say. Without these general skills, people with autism will, without a doubt, struggle immensely in the body of a social creature. Miller, for instance, suggests that, Aspies [people with Aspergers syndrome] simply dont have brains that can anticipate what might be considered offensive, disrespectful, unwanted, or outrageous by others. This should not be seen as an excuse for autistic people purposely to offend others, but many who lack T.O.M. would agree that its shortage has a substantial negative effect on their social interactions.

The Complexity of the Meta-Interest

Many who have a form of autism hold a profound obsession with a certain subject, interest, or object. Part of the reason for this is to subconsciously narrow the possibility of encountering an anxiety-provoking situation. Their fixation on their interest gives them the predictability that they desire in an uncertain world. They hold what I would call a meta-interest: an incredibly strong obsession with a particular subject, much like an infatuation of the long term. It has to be made clear that a meta-interest and conscientiousness are not related. This signifies that whether or not their meta-interest is linked with their occupation or study, the intensity that they have with the former wont be necessarily comparable to the latter. Apart from the intensity of the interest, the fact-, object-, and sensory-oriented interests are greater in HF-ASD [High-functioning ASD]. This is in contrast to neurotypicals, who are more likely to be interested in say sports or televisionand more likely to be socially-oriented.

A meta-interest is expressed on different occasionsand is expressed without making any exclusions as to whom someone with autism enthusiastically reveals their interest. People with autism dont consider if the recipient of the information would view the subject of their interest with the same passion as the owner of the meta-interest. Pinker acknowledges the struggle that autistic people experience when making connections with other social beings:

A mind unequipped to discern other peoples beliefs and intentions, even if it can learn in other ways, is incapable of the kind of learning that perpetuates culture. People with autism suffer from an impairment of this kind. They can grasp physical representations like maps and diagrams but cannot grasp mental representationsthat is, they cannot read other peoples minds.

Its practically unthinkable for many who are not on the spectrum to fathom the idea of a meta-interestor the extreme difficulty people with autism have in establishing interpersonal relationships. As far as Ive been told, relating to the concept of the meta-interest can be confusing for someone outside the spectrum because it gets associated with the hypothetical cognitive energy someone would have to put in to obtain a similar set of facts and knowledge about a certain subject.

The patterns of behavior that characterize a broad part of the autistic spectrum are indirectly viewed as a hindrance towards the 21st-century diversity and inclusion goals. We have reached the point that certain knowledge is forbidden to ever see the light of day. Murray addresses this anxious feeling that can accompany discussing nearly any subject of import in public:

To speak in public is now to have to find a way to address or at least keep in mind every possible variety of person, with every imaginable kind of claimincluding every imaginable rights claim. At any moment we might be asked why we have forgotten, undermined, offended or denied the existence of a particular person and others like them. It is understandable that the generations now growing up in these hyper-connected societies worry about what they say and expect other people to be equally worried.

Participating in these conflicts whereby you indirectly (and unintentionally) offend someone can be confusing, and, for many, it can be genuinely exhausting. To avoid such a situation, people might reach the conclusion that it is just better to self-censor rather than seek to confront ideas of substance.

Conclusion

But we havent completely lost the road to rationality. Steven Pinker wrote an article in June, 2019 for Skeptic Magazine entitled Why We Are Not Living in a Post-Truth Era. In this essay, he states that our innate rationality hasnt left us. Pinker argues that even by making the claim that humans are irrational beings, there would have to be certain criteria by which we judge rationality. This standard alone would make the irrationality claim rather weak. Like was stated earlier, truth and facts are not always valued enough. For Pinker, this is also one of the reasons why we make use of irrationality:

We all try to come across as infallible, omniscient, and saintly. Rationality can be a nuisance in this campaign, because inconvenient truths will inevitably come to light that suggest we are mere mortals. The dismissal of facts and logic is often damage control against threats to our self-presentation.

These defense mechanisms can be convenient to protect yourself, but they are less helpful to the overall picture regarding progress and truth-finding. This leaves everyone with a question. What do you value more? Your victimhood or intellectual progress? Bret Weinstein argued on Joe Rogans podcast that rather than adhere to the postmodern viewpoint by dismissing the scientific toolkit, we should equip everyone with the means to figure out what is true and what isnt.

Besides, when it comes to appreciating the difference between unintentional and intentional offensive speech, in my view, a part of the solution lies in understandingmeta-interest as a viable concept. This means that to understand someones actions in a particular situation, we should put effort into appreciating the underlying mechanisms that motivate those actionsbecause its not always the case that the ones who utter these messages are driven by some elixir of tyranny:hatred and malevolence.

Lastly, the autism spectrumand the disorders that comprise ithave been (as far as I know) part of the DIE-religion (Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity) since the start. This is hardly surprisingly. As I have suggested earlier, people with autism usually arent scurrying to social media and meet-up groups to form friendships. So exclusion from the normal group actually seems like the way into this movement. Unfortunately, for people with autism, however, their membership in the population with everyone else poses the constant risk of their cancellation, particularly when the political correctness movement continues its fixation on creating speech codes in public settings, such as universities. Regardless of the sincere intentions of the political correctness movement, its effects do not always bring about the expected outcomes its proponents may have hoped for. After all, a world where people simultaneously never get offended but have access to free speech is, after all, an unreachable utopia.

Alessandro van den Berg is an economics teacher in the Netherlands.

Continued here:

The Particular Discomfort Neurodivergents Have with Speech Codes - Merion West

Local and vocal: What does Wexford think of Verona Murphy? – The Irish Times

Large new campaign signs for Verona Murphy have been posted on the grass verges on the approaches to New Ross and Wexford town.

Shes Local & Vocal, the sign reads, with the letter V engulfed in flames.

But if this strikes any passing motorists as a metaphor for the state of her campaign in the Wexford byelection, few people locally seem to take the view that she has been damaged by recent controversies.

Those erupted after Murphy said Islamic State was a big part of the immigrant population, that children as young as three or four may have been manipulated by the terror group and that some asylum seekers might need to be reprogrammed.

Separately, details of an employee relations dispute within the Irish Road Haulage Association, of which she is president, surfaced during the week.

In an interview with South East radio on Thursday, Murphy apologised for the comments on immigration and expressed an understanding of the offence and hurt that I have caused.

Former Fine Gael councillor Willie Fitzharris, who campaigned with Murphy last weekend, does not think her comments will damage her attempt to win the seat vacated by Mick Wallaces election as an MEP.

Shes a good candidate who shoots from the hip, and thats what has landed her in trouble, but thats also what makes her who she is, Fitzharris says. There wouldnt be a bad streak in her. She maybe wasnt wise to word it like she did.

Another Fine Gael source in the area, speaking off the record, says the view within the party locally is that Murphy hasnt been damaged so far by the controversy.

The amount of publicity, shes getting on every radio station, in all the newspapers, Ministers talking about her in the Dil where before has a candidate in a local election been able to get that kind of publicity? 100,000 wouldnt buy you that publicity.

Among those in the haulage industry in Wexford, which employs 4,000 people, Murphy appears to be admired as someone who gets things done. She is given credit for a reduction in road tax for hauliers in October 2015 from around 5,000 to 500-900.

She was very instrumental in the taxation on HGVs being reduced. I think she would have the support of the logistics industry, which is very prominent across south Wexford, says TJ Crosbie, managing director of Autocar Logistics, which is based in New Ross.

Few in Wexford appear to share the view expressed by Fianna Fil leader Michel Martin that Murphy was playing the race card.

Some in the industry suggest the comments were informed by her role in the haulage association, and her perception of the risks faced by truckers coming through ports like Cherbourg rather than general negativity towards migrants.

There was very little talk on Thursday about the employee relations issue that surfaced in that days papers; instead, people were more likely to mention the 16 migrants found in the back of a lorry on a ferry that arrived at Rosslare Europort from France.

Its a big worry for the industry, says one truck driver, who didnt want to be named. They walk out in front of you on the motorway so youll have to slow down. Theyre going around with battery-operated hand grinders to try and open the back of the truck. There wouldnt be much sympathy for them within the industry.

He believes that could have been on Veronas mind when she made her comments.

Murphys home village of Ramsgrange consists of a few houses, a large church, a daycare and family resource centre, as well as a shop, hair salon, pubs and a takeaway, all clustered around a crossroads.

In the Sportsmans Inn, a man who gives his name as Michael says Murphy has brains. Shes educated. She gets things done. She was only being truthful in what she said ... She could have worded it better, and Im sure shes sorry about that now. But shes not racist, by no means.

He points to a news headline on his phone about the 16 found on their way to Rosslare. Shes in the lorry business. Shes had to speak up for drivers. She doesnt deserve the flak shes getting.

Outside Floods shop, which is within sight of the house Murphy grew up in, not everyone has heard of her, and only a handful are aware of the controversy. But those who have are supportive of the local woman.

Verona Murphys not guilty of anything only speaking her mind, says Paddy Meyler, who has known her all her life. Verona Murphy is sound as a pound. She doesnt hang around. Shes not one who ever got anything from anyone else. Anything she has, she earned herself.

Those who know Murphy personally in the area cite her resilience and capability. They talk about how she left home at 14, dropped out of school at 15 and became a single parent to her daughter, Robyn, at 22.

A recent interview in the New Ross Standard describes her long estrangement from her family, and a period spent in homelessness before she bought her first truck aged 21, and her second a few years later. She was still in her 20s when she launched Verona Murphy Transport, which later amalgamated with another company. In her 30s she went back to do her Leaving Cert before doing a law degree.

Farther afield in Wexford town, most shrug off Murphys comments on immigration, and only a minority say they disagree. One of those is John Aldrich, a former professor of zoology at Trinity College Dublin, who has always voted Fine Gael but now says he would be more inclined to vote Green.

I didnt think what she said is appropriate at all, he said. Its nonsensical.

Deborah Doyle, who is working in Readers Paradise bookshop on Selskar Street, had never heard of Murphy before she saw a story on Facebook about the immigration comments. She was appalled.

What would a person be thinking saying that? Thats like a Trumpism. God help families that are just trying to have a better life.

A two-minute walk away, in Rainbow Wholefoods on North Main Street, owner John Linden didnt know a lot about Murphy either until recently, but he believes her comments have been blown up by the media.

Theres a lot of political correctness around migrants. I know theyve been through tough times, and weve got to remember that, but this political correctness around them makes me sick.

Does he make a distinction between political correctness, and the correction of false statements, such as the ones about Isis targeting three-year-olds? Well, you could be right. But, he adds, people are more offended by this whole politically correct landscape. He has, he says, considered changing the name of the store to Politically Incorrect Wholefoods. He still wont vote for her, though, as hed prefer to support a candidate outside the mainstream.

Nigel Hamilton is behind the counter of his shop, WR Hamilton & Son, which sells everything from carbolic soap to penknives.

I wasnt going to vote for her because of comments she made about farmers not being allowed to use the motorway, he says.

As president of the IRHA, Murphy campaigned to have tractor drivers removed from the motorway. But since learning more about her, he has decided to give her his No 2, after Jim Codd of Aont.

I myself left school at 14, so I know what its like to work your way up. Id have to admire her for that.

Hamiltons only objection to Murphys comments about migrants is that she apologised for them.

If we go down the road where someone says what they think, and then apologises for it, are we going to end up in a situation where people are afraid to tell the truth and say what they really think?

There is, he believes, a cohort of people locally who would share her views.

And theyre often the people on the ground with experience of it. Their view, and the view of someone in a big house in Dublin, would be completely different.

Read more from the original source:

Local and vocal: What does Wexford think of Verona Murphy? - The Irish Times

Letters to The Province, Nov. 25, 2019: There is a lack of empathy from both sides of the Don Cherry conversation – The Province

2010: Don Cherry and Ron MacLean of Hockey Night in Canada walk to centre ice in Dundas, Ontario.Dave Sandford / NHLI via Getty Images

Im responding to Norman Ostonals letter Folks will be missing loud Cherry in his loud suits.

Ostonal claims that Don Cherry ought to have been just ignored and allowed to stay, and the so-called offence let slide. Although I agree Cherry should not have lost his job for his remarks, he needs to be held accountable. Ostonal claims that it was Cherrys opinion to support his claim that the whole thing should have been ignored. The problem with this is that even if Cherrys opinion were true in his assumptions, it does not mean that Cherry is free from the consequences of his remarks.

Cherrys words carried significant weight for many people, and although he is free to express his opinion, it does not change the fact that he hurt a lot of people in the process. Ostonal goes on to say that there are many reasons why people, without meaning any disrespect toward veterans, dont bother wearing poppies. However, Cherry is old school and sees things differently, and the implication is made that he should be let off the hook. This is merely an excuse for his actions and an irrelevant reason for justification. As a public figure, he ought to know better, even if he is old school. Ostonal implies further that Cherry should be let off because people know what kind of a person Cherry is and anyone who has seen Cherry should know that he doesnt care what people think of him. This, again, is only an excuse for Cherrys words and an irrelevant reason for justification. Even if Cherry did care what people thought of him, it wouldnt change the nature of what he said.

Cherrys comments and his subsequent firing shed light on a much larger issue of polarization in Canada. The two-sided dialogue about whether Cherry was rightfully sentenced for his social justice crime or wrongfully chastised by the big scary political correctness monster shows how much we lack the ability to have tough conversations.

There is a lack of empathy from both sides of the conversation. It needs to be recognized that Cherrys words were divisive and hurtful to many Canadians, but it also needs to be recognized that well never reach a solution by burning people at the stake for their mistakes. With our recent federal election, it wasnt long ago that our prime minister was facing backlash for his mistakes of blackface. Like Cherry, it needed to be recognized what Justin Trudeau did was wrong, but it was also appropriate that he was not (relatively speaking) crucified for his mistakes. The dialogue about Cherry mirrors so many other political conversations, with two sides unable to hear the other. It is only with empathy that such tensions can be resolved. If in Canadas efforts to embrace diversity we become more divided, what strength is there in such diversity? The strength is not absent in diversity, but it is mute if we allow our immaturity to prevail in our conversations as a society.

Reece Doppenberg, Aldergrove

Further to the letter on private health care, I had a similar experience. I know that seniors go to the bottom of the list. I hope the Supreme Court, if it decides against private health care, that it adds a caveat that politicians will no longer get special treatment and go to the bottom of the list with us.

Jim Briden, Peachland

Letters to the editor should be sent to provletters@theprovince.com.

CLICK HEREto report a typo.

Is there more to this story? Wed like to hear from you about this or any other stories you think we should know about. Emailvantips@postmedia.com.

Read the original:

Letters to The Province, Nov. 25, 2019: There is a lack of empathy from both sides of the Don Cherry conversation - The Province

Teslas Cybertruck Will Face These Five Electric Pickups in 2021 – Forbes

Tesla CEO Elon Musk introduces the Tesla Cybertruck at the Tesla Design Center in Hawthorne, ... [+] California on November 21, 2019.

It was the lone automotive debut that singlehandedly overshadowed the entirety of the L.A. Auto Show last week: Teslas Cybertruck.

For those living under a rock, this was the steampunk-style debut of a wild all-electric wedge of a truck, an evening event not affiliated with the auto show itself. The reveal was awash in heavy strobe lights, fog machines, and on-stage theatrics by Elon himself: after watching Teslas design chief shatter two copies of windows that were supposed to be unbreakable, a frustrated Musk let out an understandable-but-also-live-streamed Oh my f***ing God before joking that the electric automaker would Fix it in post.

The backside of the Tesla Cybertruck, showing its enclosed bed.

The Cybertruck is easily the most polarizing creation of Teslas to date, a trait Musk forewarned us about and which was likely the point. Though Teslas stock closed the Friday after the debut down more than six percent from its close on Thursday before the reveal took place, the media buzz and subsequent 200,000 claimed deposits ($100 each, fully refundable) more than made up for any stock price loss.

Setting aside serious questions about the Cybertrucks crash-test and rollover worthiness, the legality of its lighting design, where Tesla would physically build it, and even how it plans on making that exoskeleton (Musk himself admitted the process doesnt exist yet), Tesla says production begins in late 2021.

By that time, the Cybertruck wont be the only EV pickup in town. In fact, there will be a handful arriving by then or shortly thereafter, many of which will fall under the burgeoning lifestyle truck movement.

Heres a look at the all-electric competition the Cybertruck will face:

Rivian R1T:

The Rivian R1T starts at $69,000 and is due by the end of 2020.

Sitting closer to the luxury end of the EV truck spectrum is Rivians R1T, aimed at the well-heeled outdoorsy type. If the Rivian name rings a bell, its likely because you heard it uttered with Amazon and Ford, two behemoths who have invested in Rivian $700 million and $500 million, respectively. Rivian has also picked up another $350 million from Cox Automotive, the parent company of entities including Kelley Blue Book and Autotrader.com.

All that cash is going to the production of the R1T (truck) and its sister SUV the R1S by 2020 or 2021. The R1T starts at a cool $70,000 before any tax incentives and will come with one of three different battery capacities, the largest promises as much as 750 horsepower and more than 400 miles of range.

Bollinger B2:

The Bollinger B2 will start at $125,000 and will feature a host of innovative, off-road-oriented ... [+] features.

If the Rivians price tag is too pedestrian for you, consider the $125,000 Bollinger B2. This (huge) brick-shaped technological wonder gives you plenty in return for its six-figure asking price. Things you never knew you needed in an EV truck, like a trick hydropneumatic suspension that modulates body roll not unlike the setups in trick supercars, a flip-down rear cabin wall and removable seats for full bed-to-cab access, DC fast charging, and portal axles (a trick off-road vehicles use to boost ground clearance and reduce torque on various drivetrain components, allowing for the use of lighter parts...Ive totally lost you havent I?).

Range is pegged at around 200 miles. Look for the lower-volume Bollinger B2 (and its platform-mate, the B1 SUV) to start arriving in customer hands in 2021.

Ford F-150:

An all-electric Ford F-150 prototype pulls a train of rail cars weighing over one million pounds in ... [+] a July 2019 publicity effort.

Ford has already changed the perception of how you could power a full-size truck once, so dont count them out to do it again. Two generations of F-150 ago, Ford started putting its EcoBoost turbocharged six-cylinder engines in high trim levels that had been dominated by V8 for eons. Critics scoffed that buyers would never make the leap; these days, 62 percent of F-150s come with EcoBoost engines, and now General Motors and Ram offer downsized engines.

The current generation of F-150 is reaching the end of its lifecycle; testing of the new generation set for 2021 is already well underway, and Ford has made it clear it will come in all-electric and hybrid variants.

Despite Fords tie-up with Rivian, its going it alone for this F-150. The automaker has been mum on the F-150 EVs specs, but it did release a video of an EV prototype towing a train of rail cars that weighed over one million pounds.

GM electric truck:

This, but electric? There are rumors that General Motors may revive the Hummer name as an ... [+] all-electric truck brand. Regardless of the name, GM has said an EV truck would arrive in 2021.

Remember the Hummer? Most drivers of Earth-friendly EVs would rather not recall the days when these leviathans roamed freely in grocery store parking lots nationwide. Ironically, there are rumors that General Motors could resurrect the Hummer name for its upcoming all-electric pickup. Or they could capitalize on the immense popularity of the Chevy Silverado and just make an EV version of that.

Regardless of the name on the tailgate, GMs CEO Mary Barra announced (on the same day as the Tesla Cybertruck reveal) that the all-electric truck would land in showrooms by the fall of 2021. Even better news for the green truck fans in the audience? The unnamed model from the unknown brand will actually be the first in a line of all-electric trucks and SUVs from GM.

Lordstown Endurance:

The Lordstown Endurance is due at the end of 2020 and will have a range of around 260 miles.

Perhaps the least-well-known model on this list is the Lordstown Endurance. Yes, thats the same Lordstown that caught President Trumps attention a year ago when G.M. said it planned to close its plant in this Ohio town, citing low demand for the Chevy Cruze compact hatchback and sedan it built there. Trump, in a phone call with G.M.s Barra in May, confirmed that G.M. planned to sell the plant to an EV automaker.

After several months and G.M.s contentious strike in which keeping the plant open and run by G.M. was a central issue the automaker did indeed close Lordstown. It sold the facility to newly-christened Lordstown Motors.

Details on the EV truck are scarce, but the Endurance does promise 260 miles of range, a starting price of around $52,000, and deliveries starting towards the end of 2020.

See the article here:

Teslas Cybertruck Will Face These Five Electric Pickups in 2021 - Forbes

Elon Musk explains why Teslas Cybertruck windows smashed during presentation – The Verge

The unveiling of Teslas Cybertruck last week was full of surprises, but none more shocking than the moment when lead designer Franz von Holzhausen smashed two of the vehicles armor glass windows onstage with a metal ball. It certainly wasnt the result CEO Elon Musk was expecting, who could be heard muttering oh my fucking god under his breath before being forced to complete his presentation in front of the fractured panes.

But Musk says he knows what went wrong, and explained things on Twitter. Right before the metal ball test, von Holzhausen smacked the door with a sledgehammer on stage to prove its durability (and unlike the glass, it was fine), and Musk says this impact cracked base of glass, which is why the windows subsequently smashed when hit by the ball.

This seems plausible, especially as Musk also shared a slow motion video of von Holzhausen performing the same exact test before the event, with the ball bouncing harmlessly off the window. The combined impacts likely weakened the glass, setting the stage for the eventual smash. (Though why the back window broke as well isnt clear: the passenger door didnt get whomped by the sledgehammer.)

At any rate, the smashed glass was just one moment in an event which gave viewers plenty to talk about without the on-stage mishaps. The divisive design and impressive specs of the Cybertruck have caught the worlds attention, and since the unveiling Musk has been drip-feeding bits of information on Twitter to keep people engaged.

Solar panels on the roof that charge the car as it drives? Were doing it, says Musk. A new matte black finish? Sure, he says. The Tesla CEO even suggested a second, smaller version of the Cybertruck would make sense in the long term.

Well have to wait and see how many of these promises become a reality (remember: Musk has been predicting Teslas will have full self driving capability for years) but theres certainly a lot of interest in the Cybertruck. As of Monday morning, Musk said the company had received more than 200,000 preorders for the vehicle, with no advertising & no paid endorsement. All it took was a few smashed windows instead.

See original here:

Elon Musk explains why Teslas Cybertruck windows smashed during presentation - The Verge

A Physics Analysis of Tesla’s Shattered Cybertruck Windows – WIRED

I don't know what to think about Elon Musk anymore. I mean the SpaceX stuff is awesome, and the Tesla car has been pretty cool. But now we have the Tesla pickup truck, unveiled on Thursday. (Simone Giertz did it first!) The Tesla Cybertruck looks oddone person likened it to a futuristic doorstopbut that's fine with me. My problem is with the unveiling itself.

In case you missed it, Musk wanted to demonstrate the trucks ruggedness. They start off by hitting a normal truck door with a sledgehammer. Yes, it makes a dent. What about the Tesla truck? Bam! Not a scratch. It has a thicker steel exterior that makes it impervious to people with sledgehammers.

Oh, and the windows? Theyre made of "Tesla Armor Glass." To compare, Musks assistants drop a metal ball on normal car glass, which cracks. Then they drop it on Teslas special glass, and the ball bounces off. They drop a bigger ball on it from higher up. Nothing. So the guy tosses the ball at the drivers window of the Cybertruckand smashes it.

Well, maybe that was a little too hard, Musk says. So the guy picks up the ball and lobs it as softly as he can at the rear passenger window. Now there are two smashed windows. Awkward.

I dont know, if it were me, Id have tested this demo before doing it live onstage. But, to Musks credit, they just carried on with the show. The whole rest of the presentation was carried out in front of a prototype with broken windows. Bad optics, but you have to admire his aplomb.

What went wrong? Why did Teslas fancy glass survive a dropped ball but not a thrown ball? To find out, we need some physics.

How high was the test ball dropped?

If you drop a metal ball, it speeds up as it falls. So to know how hard it hit the glass in the demo, we need to know the height from which it was released. For the first drop, the stage assistant stands over the glass, raises his arm, and releases the ballthat looks to be a distance of roughly 1 meter. The higher drops are a little trickier. It would have been nice if they just told us, but thats OK, we can estimate it from the amount of time it takes to hit.

If you drop an object, it starts with an initial velocity of zero, and the only force acting on it is gravity. The gravitational force, we know, depends on the local gravitational field (9.8 newtons per kilogram) and the mass of the object.

We also know that the net force must equal the product of mass and acceleration. Notice: Mass is on both sides of the equation, so we cancel out the mass, and we get that the acceleration of a falling object is 9.8 meters per second squared in the downward direction.

Using the definition of acceleration, and rearranging, you can get the following semi-famous equation showing height (y) as a function of time (t):

See more here:

A Physics Analysis of Tesla's Shattered Cybertruck Windows - WIRED

Teslas strategy is incredibly risky but it still makes lots of sense – MarketWatch

Few companies have attracted as much praise, derision, skepticism and enthusiasm as Telsa Motors and its founder Elon Musk. Having interviewed Elon Musk and the Tesla leadership as part of myresearch, one of the questions Im asked most frequently is: how can you make sense of Teslas wild strategies? The latest example is the move to create a Gigafactory for car batteries just outside Berlin.

Part of the challenge in understanding Teslas strategy are the commentators. These range from short selling to star worship. Many ask the wrong questions, such as why Tesla TSLA, +0.99% isnt making any money a question appropriate for a mature business, but not a growth one. While all businesses must be sustainable in the long run, Tesla is like most rapid growth companies that eat up more cash flow than they produce while in the early growth phase.

Read: Teslas Musk and Greenlight CEO lock horns in fiery Twitter feud

Vitaliy Katsenelson: Why Tesla might be the next Apple and Elon Musk the heir to Steve Jobs

But the biggest part of the challenge may simply be understanding Teslas strategy. Why would a new company, already taking on the Herculean task of introducing an entirely new type of car to the market, also take on the incredible risk of building some of the worlds largest battery factories? Or for that matter, a dealership and repair network? Or a charging network? Or, even crazier, a solar power business?

On the surface, it makes no sense and there is no doubt that it introduces more risk to the company, increasing its chances of failure. But when viewed through the lens of the decades of research on technology strategy, Teslas approach takes on a different light.

The big challenge to understanding Teslas strategy is that most of us only look at it from one level of analysis. Namely, when we see Tesla, we see a company that produces cars. But when I teach executives how to invest in future technology, I encourage them to think at multiple levels of the technology stack: not just products, but also components and systems. So lets take a closer look at Tesla.

At the level of the product, although a Tesla looks the same as other vehicles, underneath the hood the vehicle has a fundamentally different architecture, both in terms of hardware and software. This matters because a long research tradition underscores that when incumbents face a new technology architecture, they struggle to understand and adapt.

Even though they can see what the technology is, they struggle to adapt both because they are reluctant to give up the existing capabilities they have perfected over decades and to fully integrate the new ones. Although incumbents may imitate the new architecture, they have a hard time overcoming the way they have done things in the past and to match the superior performance of the new, purpose-built architecture.

You can see evidence of this playing out in the auto industry. Early electric vehicles produced by incumbents on internal combustion engine architectures paled in comparison to the Tesla, and even newer blank slate efforts sometimes dont quite measure up. Its always the little things that get in the way such as the fact that most vehicles built by other manufacturers have up to five separate software systems rather than a single integrated system like a Tesla, which gives a performance advantage.

Read: Tesla Blade Runner pickup truck could be so futuristic that it leaves buyers cold

If we lower our level of analysis to the level of components, rather than products, we see the Tesla strategy in a different light again. What we know about technical systems is that, as they mature, the value migrates to the bottlenecks that control the systems performance.

This is why in the PC industry, Intel INTC, +2.08% has made so much money for decades while hard drive and modem manufacturers made peanuts. Intel controlled the bottleneck to the performance of the PC whereas hard drive manufacturers did not.

The bottleneck for electric vehicles now and in the future is the batteries. If Tesla can dramatically lower the prices of batteries by manufacturing at scale, they lower the barriers to adoption for electric vehicles. But more importantly, the battery bottleneck isnt going away any time soon, which means, if they succeed, Tesla controls the biggest profit pool in the future of auto manufacturing.

Read: Elon Musk says he chose Berlin over U.K. for Tesla battery factory due to Brexit

Lastly, if we raise our level of analysis above components and products, to the level of systems, we see Tesla in yet another light. The truth is that consumers dont want products; they want solutions. Most car makers deliver products. But Tesla tries to deliver a complete experience: car, upgrades, charging, insurance the whole bundle. And as a result, the majority of Tesla owners talk in glowing terms about their Tesla, both because it is a great car, but also a great solution. In what other vehicle do you wake up in the morning to find new self-driving features?

Lets be clear: the risks are high. Tesla has compounded major bet upon major bet by having a multi-level strategy that targets components, products and systems. Everything has to go well to succeed. But if the stars align, its a brilliant strategy at all levels.

Nathan Furr is an associate professor of strategy at Insead outside Paris. This was first published by The Conversation Teslas business strategy is not chaotic its brilliant.

See the article here:

Teslas strategy is incredibly risky but it still makes lots of sense - MarketWatch

Watch Tesla test Model 3 by making it drive into water – Electrek

A Tesla Model 3 in China has been spotted driving into relatively deep water in what appears to be an interesting new testing section of Gigafactory 3 in Shanghai.

There have been some talks about whether or not it is safe to drive your Tesla into relatively deep water, which is generally not recommended.

Much of those talks started a few years ago when Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that the Model S could almost be used as a boat after a Tesla Model S was spotted driving (or swimming) through a flooded tunnel although the CEO made it clear it isnt recommended.

On the other hand, Model 3 has had some issues with driving into water.

Last year, Tesla investigated why bumpers broke off two Model 3 vehicles after driving in heavy heavy rain.

With the start of production of the made-in-China Model 3 vehicles at Gigafactory 3 in Shanghai, it looks like Tesla is doing some interesting flood-proof testing with the cars.

Jay in Shanghai has posted a video of an interesting new testing facility at Gigafactory 3:

As part of the test, it looks like Tesla is driving the Model 3 into quite deep water.

Jay in Shanghai suggests that it could mean Tesla is preparing a flood-proof version of the Model 3.

As per its warranty document, Tesla doesnt cover damages from a flood or driving in deep water:

Fire, explosion, earthquake, windstorm, lightning, hail, flood, or deep water;

Despite not being covered by the warranty, Tesla has been trying to make its vehicles as hermetic as possible.

However, many Tesla vehicles who have been caught by floods have been totaled by insurance companies.

To be fair, thats a problem with most cars, not just Tesla vehicles or electric vehicles.

Lets see if theres anything different with the made-in-China Model 3.

Tesla is reportedly still in trial production at Gigafactory 3 and it is expected to start selling the first Model 3 vehicles to have come out of the factory by the end of the year.

Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

Here is the original post:

Watch Tesla test Model 3 by making it drive into water - Electrek

The Brutalist Tesla Cybertruck is designed to instill fear and draw the battle lines on internal combustion – Electrek

The immediate reaction to Tesla Cybertruck revealed on Thursday is that it looks hideous. But just three days later, after taking a breath, we can begin to tease out the big transformative message spelled out in the Cybertrucks cold-rolled, stainless-steel, bulletproof exoskeleton. Theres a context to Franz von Holzhausens design. A quick look back on the architectural movement known as Brutalism reveals that the Cybertruck has a singular goal: to obliterate the automotive status quo.

The term Brutalism derives from the French phrase for raw concrete, bton brut. Brutalism was born in Sweden in the late 1940s, picked up by young English architects, and fully brought to life by Swiss-French architect Le Corbusier, who coined the phrase. While the name refers to the use of raw concrete, it can be applied to any material thats presented for its raw beauty including steel.

Whats important now is understanding the philosophy behind Brutalism in todays context as an uncompromising honesty and an impulse to disregard tradition, fluff, and conventional bullshit compliance marketing.

The Cybertruck is intentionally ugly. The mood boards in Franzs design studio must be plastered with images of Brutalist buildings, many of which were built in the aftermath of World War II. The experimental architecture took hold in cities shattered by the endless bombings and fighting, wrote Elle Decor, three months ago, in a piece about the return of Brutalism. The goal was to repopulate entire neighborhoods under a new constructional vocabulary.

The art book publisher Phaidon a year ago released the Atlas of Brutalist Architecture. Its description of the Brutalist philosophy could easily apply to the radical reimagining of automotive technology and design.

There is something to be said for artistic radicalism of any kind. The postwar period, with its urgent need for housing projects and public buildings, permitted the construction of elaborate geometric sculptures that didnt look like any previous architecture. It was a time of radical imagining, a time when the past looked awful. Who would want an architecture respectful of tradition when tradition had led to the death camps and Hiroshima? Only the future held promise of improvement.

And who wants to return to the respectful tradition of internal combustion? Tesla sees F-150-style internal combustion as not just needing to be electrified, but for its form to be shattered.

The Cybertruck is not the first Brutalist automotive design intent on disruptions.

As Blake Z. Rong, writing for Hagerty, explained a year ago, the 1980 Citron Karin embraced the capital-W Weird component of the Brutalist aesthetic. He described it as almost literally a pyramid on wheels, a childs drawing brought to life at the 1980 Paris Motor Show. The Cybertrucks design receives the same criticism.

Then, of course, theres John DeLoreans DMC-12, which also used sharp angles fashioned out of big slabs of stainless steel. The DMC-12 also promised a shockingly low price (that was never realized).

The application of the wedge design to an EV comes full circle when you consider the 1970s golf-cart like CitiCar, borne out of the eras fuel crisis.

As a cultural phenomenon, Brutalism is in the middle of a comeback. Hundreds of thousands of always-on millennials see the oddly shaped raw-concrete building as perfect Insta fodder. After a generation of tastemakers called for the demolition of Brutalist buildings as eyesores, there are now campaigns (like #sosbrutalismo) to save those artsy buildings. Von Holzhausen is undoubtedly aware of these trends.

The Tesla Cybertruck is an act of deliberate provocation.

Dezeen, the high-end design publication, reported in May that architects grieved as Londons Welbeck Street parking garage was demolished. I love its sharp geometry and alien appearance, said photographer Jo Underhill, who captured the structure. For me, Welbeck is totally innovative and a unique piece of architecture that will be sorely missed. Its design lifts it from a functioning car park to an iconic building that should be celebrated and cared for, not torn down, and added to the long list of Brutalist structures that are being gradually removed.

Another design publication, Italysdomusweb, perhaps best captured how the Cybertruck represents a watershed moment in automotive design and the EV movement. Its an act of deliberate provocation against the conservative masses of genuinely American pickup truck drivers who dont live in their culturally sheltered East- and West-Coast bubbles. And to think that the Cybertruck was unveiled just four days after Ford tried to remake EV design in the form of its venerable Mustang.

This week drew new Trumpian lines in the EV movement. Ford wants to make cars great again, even if they are battery-powered. But Musk and von Holzhausen have no patience for nostalgia, instead unveiling a futuristic pickup that can handle abundant stray bullets and drive a load of canned meat to your apocalypse shelter in the middle of the soon-to-be post-nuclear desert.

Domusweb concludes:

The Cybertruck is the most uncanny car Tesla ever unveiled. By proposing this design, which rummages for inspiration from pop culture products involving dark and dystopian views of the future, the company is basically buying into a much bleaker vision of the society of tomorrow. Instead of another round, curvy, and streamlined car, Musk is proposing a sharp and extremely aggressive design meant to scare away more than reassure. If until yesterday Teslas vision of the future could be framed as a Jetsons-like idyll, now were quite sure its a Mad Max with evil AI overlords that Musk had in mind all along.

Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

Follow this link:

The Brutalist Tesla Cybertruck is designed to instill fear and draw the battle lines on internal combustion - Electrek

As electric cars and Tesla make headlines, this CEO is betting on charging stations – Fox Business

Blink Charging Company CEO Michael Farkas discusses being the largest owner and operator of electric vehicle stations with 15,000 across the country and shares his thoughts on where the EV industry will go from here.

Michael Farkas, CEO ofBlink Charging Company, joined FOX Business The Claman Countdown on Monday to discuss where he thinks the electric-vehicle industry will go from here.

There's no question about it:The future of mobility is electric, Farkas told Kristina Partsinevelos.

Electric vehicles have been in the spotlight recently, mostly due to Tesla's botched unveiling of its new Cybertruck.

ARMORED WINDOWS SHATTERED AT TESLA TRUCK UNVEILING

If you look at companies for the last 100 years, the most valuable ones have typically been those that fuel the transportation system of their areas, whether it's in the U.S., Europe, anywhere in the world, he said.

Blink Charging Companyis the largestoperator of electric vehicle charging stations with 15,000 across the country

What we're doing is we're taking over for the fuel companies," Farkas said.

Major questions some consumers ask of electric cars are: What if I need to travel a long distance? Can an electric car go as far as I need it to without running out of charge?

These queries don't concern Farkas.

TESLA CYBERTRUCK WILL ACCOUNT FOR 5% OF SALES: INVESTOR

The cars' ranges are increasing, he said. I have a Tesla that drives over 300 miles."

"You really don't need as much range as you think you do. The human body needs to rest during those times.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Farkas acknowledged older model electric vehicles havent met consumer needs, but he said the newer models do.

Now, when you have beautiful cars that drive long distances, that have autonomyand all these unbelievable functionality and features,I think the cars will sell themselves," he said.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Follow this link:

As electric cars and Tesla make headlines, this CEO is betting on charging stations - Fox Business

Hill and Holmes’ impeachment testimony, Netanyahu’s indictment and Tesla’s ‘Cybertruck’ reveal: The Morning Rundown – NBCNews.com

Good morning, NBC News readers.

The top take aways from the week's final public impeachment hearings, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's indictment, and Tesla's less than perfect electric pickup truck reveal.

Here's what we're watching today.

Fiona Hill, President Donald Trump's former top adviser on Russia and Europe, and David Holmes, a counselor for political affairs at the U.S. embassy in Ukraine, testified before the House Intelligence Committee for more than five hours on Thursday capping the week's long list of public hearings in the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry.

Hill accused Republican lawmakers on the House Intelligence Committee of echoing Russian propaganda by promoting the "fictional narrative" that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election.

And Holmes laid out additional details about the critical July 26 call he overheard between Trump and Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to the European Union.

Here are the top takeaways from their testimony.

So after two weeks of public impeachment hearings, where do things stand?

NBC News Jonathan Allen writes in a news analysis that officials handed the House a pile of evidence for impeachment.

Meantime, the world has also been watching.

Diplomatic and foreign policy experts tell NBC News that Trump's habit of deviating sometimes wildly from long-held alliances and diplomatic norms has left many foreign leaders "bewildered" as they "do their best to avoid landmines."

The Trump administration plans to expand its "Remain in Mexico" policy on Friday by sending asylum seekers who cross the border in the Tucson, Arizona, sector back into Mexico to await their court dates, according to an internal email obtained by NBC News.

The expansion would send immigrants claiming asylum in and around Tucson first to El Paso, Texas, then back into Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, according to the email.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was indicted on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust,Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit announced Thursday.

Netanyahu, who has denied any wrongdoing and said he is the victim of a "witch hunt," faces up to 10 years in prison if convicted of bribery and a maximum 3-year term for fraud and breach of trust, according to legal experts.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

The bombshell indictment is likely to prolong the countrys political uncertainty as it looks set to head into its third national election in a year.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk rolled out an electric "Cybertruck" at a launch event on Thursday. But when he sought to show off the vehicle's sturdiness, the test hit a bump in the road.

A sledgehammer swung at the door had no effect, but when a metal sphere was hurled against the window, it shattered. "Room for improvement," Musk joked.

Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.

The Navy is defying Trump's clemency of SEAL Edward Gallagher to save its institutional integrity, Sbastien Roblin writes in an opinion piece.

From pomegranate to pistachios, six easy and delicious ways to upgrade your salad for winter.

Protesters on a bridge use a rope to escape from the police siege on Hong Kong Polytechnic University campus on Monday.

From Hong Kong to the halls of Congress, see more of the most compelling images from the past week here.

"I refuse to be part of an effort to legitimize an alternate narrative that the Ukrainian government is a U.S. adversary, and that Ukraine not Russia attacked us in 2016."

Fiona Hill's opening statement to House investigators in the public impeachment hearings (page 7).

In this era of partisan division, one thing we could all seem to benefit from is a little kindness, a little empathy.

So, it's no coincidence that the new movie "A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood" about the television icon Mr.Rogers is coming out now.

"It feels like everyone is saying to me, 'Oh my gosh, it feels like we need Mr. Rogers more than ever,'" Director Marielle Heller told NBC News in an interview about what inspired the film.

Thanks for reading the Morning Rundown. I hope you have a beautiful weekend.

If you have any comments likes, dislikes drop me an email at: petra@nbcuni.com

If you'd like to receive this newsletter in your inbox Monday to Friday, please sign up here.

Thanks, Petra

Petra Cahill is a senior editor and writer for NBC News Digital. She writes NBC News' Morning Rundown newsletter.

View original post here:

Hill and Holmes' impeachment testimony, Netanyahu's indictment and Tesla's 'Cybertruck' reveal: The Morning Rundown - NBCNews.com

If Tesla and Ford Motor are about to wage war for the electric-car crown, you wouldnt know it from this exchange – MarketWatch

The atmosphere is getting positively electric.

Ford Motor Co. F, +1.24% on Sunday finally lifted the curtain on its first battery-powered sport-utility vehicle, in a debut thats poised to usher in a new era of fierce competition among automobile makers vying for the electric-car crown.

And, most notably, Fords hotly anticipated launch of the Mustang Mach-E could be a big problem for industry darling Tesla TSLA, +0.99% .

But if Tesla boss Elon Musk is worried about the future of his company, his Twitter TWTR, +1.70% feed isnt exactly reflecting it. Heres the tweet he sent out late Sunday night following Fords big announcement:

For its part, Ford responded by saying, Thanks, Elon. We couldnt agree more. See you at the charging station!

Of course, theres a chance thats just some public-facing goodwill at this point. According to Electrek, Musk was upset that Ford chose to unveil the new vehicle at a location near Teslas design center and adjacent to the hangar at the airport in Hawthorne, Calif., that Musk uses for his private jet.

Either way, any bit of good sportsmanship between the two car companies will be put to the test as competition heats up in the coming years. And heat up it will. According to IHS Market, there are 18 electric vehicles for sale in the U.S. now, and that number is expected to grow to 80 by 2022.

The Mach-E, which has a range of 230 miles to more than 300 miles per charge depending on the package, is part of Fords push to have six electric vehicles for sale by 2022. The base version is expected to go from zero to 60 m.p.h. in just over six seconds. The performance GT version will accomplish that in 3.5 seconds.

The base model starts at just under $44,000, while the GT starts at about $65,000. Watch some highlights from the event:

View original post here:

If Tesla and Ford Motor are about to wage war for the electric-car crown, you wouldnt know it from this exchange - MarketWatch

Eun Ji Chung Named as IEEE New Innovator and BMES Rising Star – USC Viterbi School of Engineering

Dr. Karl Jacob Jr. and Karl Jacob III Early-Career Chair Eun Ji Chung. Photo courtesy of Viterbi Staff.

Eun Ji Chung, USC Viterbis Dr. Karl Jacob Jr. and Karl Jacob III Early-Career Chair and Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, has recently been honored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) for her research in nanomedicine and bioengineering.

The IEEE has selected Chung as a NANOMED New Innovator, with the award to be presented at the IEEE International Conference on Nano/Molecular Medicine and Engineering in Gwangju, Korea on 21 24 November. The latest honor recognizes Chungs eminent research activities in the field of nanomedicine and molecular engineering as well as her continuous contribution to the IEEE-NANOMED community.

Meanwhile the BMES will honor Chung with the 2020 Rising Star Junior Faculty Award, to be presented at the BMES Cell and Molecular Bioengineering conference on January 2 6 in Puerto Rico. Chung will be recognized at the conference gala, and will be invited to present at the event. The BMES describes the Rising Star Award as a leading form of recognition of outstanding research in the field of cell and molecular bioengineering.

Chung and her research groupinvestigate molecular design, nanomedicine and tissue engineering to generate biomaterial strategies for clinical applications. A key focus of Chungs labs research involves the design and application of self-assembling, peptide nanoparticles for targeted cardiovascular and cancer treatments, as well as for the treatment of kidney disease.

A faculty member of theUSC Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Chung received her B.A. in Molecular Biology with honors from Scripps College, Claremont, California, and her Ph.D. from the Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences Program and the Department of Biomedical Engineering from Northwestern University.

She was recently named 2019 Orange County Engineering Council Outstanding Young Engineer and a Journal of Materials Chemistry B Emerging Investigator for 2019.

Last year, Chung was awarded the NIH New Innovator Award to develop a new approach to a type of kidney disease, known as autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, the most commonly inherited kidney disorder.

Chung is a recipient of the SQI-Baxter Early Career Award, the American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship, the Postdoctoral Research Grant from the Chicago Biomedical Consortium, and the K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Award from the NIH. She is a member of the Society for Biomaterials, the BMES, and the American Institute for Chemical Engineers.

The rest is here:

Eun Ji Chung Named as IEEE New Innovator and BMES Rising Star - USC Viterbi School of Engineering

UMP named as Best University in Research and Innovation for Non-Research University – QS WOW News

Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP) received The Research and Innovation Excellence Award for Non-Research University category at the recent Malaysias Research Star Awards (MRSA) 2019. The Research and Innovation Excellence Award aims to recognise researchers and universities for their excellent scholarly and innovative outputs. UMP Vice-Chancellor, Professor Ir. Dr. Wan Azhar Wan Yusoff accepted the award from Secretary-General of Ministry of Education, Dato Dr. Mohd. Gazali Abas who represented the Minister of Education, Hon. Dr. Maszlee Malik. Malaysias Research Star Awards was organised by the Ministry of Education with cooperation of Clarivate Analytics to honour the most promising and influential researchers and institutions in Malaysia. The award ceremony was held at Putrajaya, Malaysia on 5 November 2019, attended also by Higher Education Director-General, Datuk Ir. Dr. Siti Hamisah Tapsir and Deputy Secretary-General (Strategic), Dato Kamel Mohamad.

In his acknowledgement Professor Ir. Dr. Wan Azhar expressed that the success was a one-for-all effort and that the achievement was indeed a remarkable feat for UMP, considering it was only established 17 years earlier as one of the five technical universities (MTUN) established in the country. With the slogan Moving Together, he added that UMP would continue to enhance its strength in the fields of engineering, research and service with world-class standard. The effort would be executed in a more creative and innovative engineering and technology ecosystem which could benefit the community as well as empower high-level Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in the country.

In the same event, UMP added another impressive feather on its cap when Associate Professor Dr. Wan Azmi Wan Hamzah received two MRSA awards. Dr. Wan Azmi received Prominent Topics in Research for his outstanding research in the field of heat transfer, accumulating h-index of 27 with a total of 2,083 citations. Out of his 116 publications, 57 had been published in First Quartile (Q1) journals according to Clarivate Analytics. Aged 35, Dr. Wan Azmi was awarded the Young Researcher Award, an award for best researcher under the age of 40. Apart from research publications, he had also come up with several high impact products, results from his research works, which included nano-cooling liquid for vehicle radiator, nano-lubricant for vehicle air-conditioning system and the latest being nano-paint for automotive components.

Other awards presented by Clarivate Analytics were Hot Review Paper (one recipient) and Research and Innovation Excellence Researcher Award (seven recipients).

Elsevier also named 12 researchers as MRSA recipients for categories International Collaboration (three recipients), Prominent Topics in Research (four recipients), Citation Classic (four recipients) and Young Researcher (one recipient).

More here:

UMP named as Best University in Research and Innovation for Non-Research University - QS WOW News

Eight Illinois researchers rank among world’s most influential – University of Illinois News

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. Eight faculty members at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have been named to the 2019 Highly Cited Researchers list, a global listing of scientists who produced the past decades most influential papers, compiled by the Web of Science group, a Clarivate Analytics company.

The list recognizes researchers who produced multiple papers ranking in the top 1% by citations for their field and year of publication, demonstrating significant research influence among their peers, according to Web of Science. It selected 6,216 researchers for their performance in 21 fields and for cross-field influence in scholarly publications from 2008 to 2018.

The Illinois faculty include crop sciencesandplant biologyprofessorElizabeth Lisa Ainsworth(highly cited for cross-field impact), materials science and engineering professor Axel Hoffmann (cross-field), electrical and computer engineering professor Thomas Huang (engineering), geography and geographic information science professor Mei-Po Kwan (cross-field), crop sciencesandplant biologyprofessorStephen P. Long(cross-field), bioengineering professor Shuming Nie (cross-field), plant biology professorDonald Ort(plant and animal science), and mechanical science and engineering professor Arend van der Zande (cross-field).

Lisa Ainsworth, crop sciences and plant biology

Photo by L. Brian Stauffer

Edit embedded media in the Files Tab and re-insert as needed.

Ainsworth leads the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Services Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit. Her research examines genetic variation in crop responses to air pollution and climate change. She received the 2019 Prize in Food and Agricultural Research from the National Academy of Sciences and is an affiliate of the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology at Illinois.

Axel Hoffmann, materials science and engineering

Photo by L. Brian Stauffer

Edit embedded media in the Files Tab and re-insert as needed.

Hoffmann is a Founder Professor in materials science and engineering and a member of the Materials Research Laboratory. His research focuses on topics related to magnetism, such as spin transport, magnetization dynamics and biomedical applications. His work on spin Hall effects has contributed to the development of spintronics, electronic devices that harness electron spin for faster and more efficient computing. Hoffmann is a Fellow of the American Vacuum Society, the American Physical Society and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Thomas Huang, electrical and computer engineering

Photo by L. Brian Stauffer

Edit embedded media in the Files Tab and re-insert as needed.

Huang is the Maybelle Leland Swanlund Endowed Chair Emeritus in Electrical and Computer Engineering. He studies many fields related to computer engineering and artificial intelligence, including human-computer interaction, multimedia signal processing, computer vision, big data and machine learning. He retired from teaching in 2014, but remains active as a researcher. He also is affiliated with the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology.

Mei-Po Kwan, geography and geographic information

Photo courtesy of Mei-Po Kwan

Edit embedded media in the Files Tab and re-insert as needed.

Kwan investigates health, transportation and urban issues using innovative geographic information system methods. Her work encompasses environmental health, human mobility, access to health care, neighborhood effects, sustainable travel and cities, and the application of GIS methods in geographic research. Kwan is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the U.K. Academy of Social Sciences. Among other honors, she received a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2016 and Distinguished Scholarship Honors from the American Association of Geographers in 2011.

Stephen Long, crop sciences and plant biology

Photo by L. Brian Stauffer

Edit embedded media in the Files Tab and re-insert as needed.

Long is the Stanley O. Ikenberry Chair of Crop Sciences and Plant Biology. He uses computational and experimental approaches to improve photosynthetic efficiency, and works to address the effects of climate change on crop yield. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of London in 2013, and has been recognized as a highly cited researcher in the field of plant and animal science every year since 2005. He directs Realizing Increased Photosynthetic Efficiency, a multinational project supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Foundation for Food and Agricultural Research, and the U.K. Department for International Development. He is a member of the IGB.

Shuming Nie, bioengineering

Photo courtesy of bioengineering department

Edit embedded media in the Files Tab and re-insert as needed.

Nie is the Grainger Distinguished Chair in Bioengineering and a professor of chemistry, materials science and engineering, and electrical and computer engineering. He studies nanomedicine, molecular engineering and image-guided minimally invasive robotic surgery. He is as Fellow of the AAAS, the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, and the International Academy of Medical and Biological Engineering.

Donald Ort, crop sciences and plant biology

Photo by L. Brian Stauffer

Edit embedded media in the Files Tab and re-insert as needed.

Ort is the Robert Emerson Professor of Plant Biology and Crop Sciences. His research focuses on improving photosynthesis and addresses crop responses to global change factors including increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature. He leads the Genomic Ecology of Global Change theme in the IGB and was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 2017.

Arend van der Zande, mechanical science and engineering

Photo by Julia Stackler

Edit embedded media in the Files Tab and re-insert as needed.

Van der Zande specializes in multidisciplinary nanoscience; specifically, his group uses two-dimensional materials, such as membranes and thin films, as molecular building blocks to construct new devices with applications in electronics, sensing, energy and more. He has affiliations with the Materials Research Laboratory, the Holonyak Micro and Nano Technology Laboratory, the Beckman Institute and the department of electrical and computer engineering.

Read the original here:

Eight Illinois researchers rank among world's most influential - University of Illinois News

Lenovo ThinkBook and ThinkCentre Malaysia: Everything you need to know – Yahoo Singapore News

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 25 As part of its Smarter Technology For All campaign, Lenovo has introduced two new laptops for Malaysia: the ThinkBook 14 and the ThinkBook 15. Targeted towards SMEs who want an affordable portable option, while still maintaining the quality usually associated with a Think device, the new laptops are being launched alongside the ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano and ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT.

In addition to that, a new partnership between co-working space, Common Ground and Lenovo will see pay-per-use device rentals available for members.

Pricing and availability

The Lenovo ThinkBook 14 and 15 are now available at select local retailers, including Lenovo exclusive stores nationwide. Pricing is as follows:

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 RM3,439 (Recommended starting RRP)

Lenovo ThinkBook 15 RM4,299 (Recommended starting RRP)

Meanwhile, the Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano and Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT are now available for order through the Lenovo Malaysia Sales Team (contact them at LenovoMy@lenovo.com). We dont have exact pricing for the ThinkCentre models, but Lenovo says that prices start at over RM2,000 for the lowest configuration with a 256GB SSD and an 8th Gen Intel Core i3.

Specs

Having been globally launched in September during the IFA 2019, the ThinkBook offers some of the features that the ThinkPad series has in a more consumer-friendly package.

This includes an optional fingerprint scanner that unlocks the laptop like a phone, even when the laptop is asleep. Both models feature 10th Gen Intel Core processors, along with PCIe SSD storage and DDR4 memory configurations.

Part of the appeal for the ThinkBook is ThinkShield authentication and security, along with Lenovo Vantage. You also get a Kensington Lock for the 15 version of the ThinkBook.

Connectivity-wise, youre looking at Wi-Fi 6 support, along with USB-C and USB-A ports, along with a RJ-45 network card. All of that is packed within an anodised aluminium cover with a metallic finish which Lenovo says is a modern finish designed for the new generation of professionals.

Meanwhile, the ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano is the worlds smallest commercial desktop, according to Lenovo. Its one-third of the size of the ThinkCentre Tiny, and weighs in at 505g.

For better space-saving, the device can be mounted behind the monitor, under the table, or anywhere with a VESA mount. You get up to 8th Gen Intel Core vPro i7 processors and SSD storage, along with two M.2 SSD slots and the capacity for up to 16GB DDR4 of memory. Interestingly, the ThinkCentre is powered by USB-C, which means that it can be powered by a compatible monitor.

As for the ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT, Lenovo says that engineering has been done to ensure that the device can handle harsh operating temperatures, with military-standard-tested reliability. Thanks to a heat sink on top of the device, it has a broader thermal range and can withstand from 050 degrees (Celsius).

To find out more, head over to Lenovo Malaysias official website. SoyaCincau

Related Articles Lenovo unveils worlds first foldable PC Lenovos upcoming smartphone could take 100-Megapixel photos Lenovo Z5 Pro GT is an all-screen slider phone with an insane 12GB of RAM

Go here to see the original:

Lenovo ThinkBook and ThinkCentre Malaysia: Everything you need to know - Yahoo Singapore News

By far the best trader in the world, period. – eFinancialCareers

In this erawhere trades are increasingly placed electronically, the trading ability of human beings often comes down to little less than babysitting algorithms and recalibratingsystems to improve performance. However, human traders do still exist and exceptional humans are apparently becoming far harder to find.

One reason Louis Bacon gave for closing Moore Capital Partners last week was competition for staff. "Intense competition for trading talent coupled with client pressure on fees has led to a challenging business model for multi manager funds such as ours," Baconexplained in a letter explaining his decision to return client funds.

It's not clear where all this competition for talent is coming from. Presumably it's from other funds rather than from bankswhich are increasingly content with becoming low-risk electronic market makers. Brevan Howard, for example, is apparently hiring new portfolio managers (PMs)under incoming chief executive Aron Landy. It's just a shame, then, that there aren't more traders around like Bacon himself.

In aencomium for Bacon's trading career, the Financial Timesquotes a former colleague who says Louis was,by far the best foreign exchange trader in the world, period, and recalls that when George Soros placed his legendarybet against sterling in 1992 he called Bacon (then aged 36) for advice on increasing the size of the trade.

Nonetheless, Bacon does seem to have found some talentedtraders to work for him. As we noted last week, various traders from banks joined Moore in the past year, including Goldman Sachs' former global head of rates trading. Bacon's own son also features among the ranks: Louis Dillon Bacon (also known as Dillon Bacon) joined Moore in 2017 after nearly two years at Goldman Sachs according to his LinkedIn profile. Another ex-colleague suggests that Bacon senior might have called it a day far sooner had it not been for all the people he employed.

The real reason funds like Moore have been hurting might have less to do with problems finding goodtalent and more to do with the 'zeitgeist.'Central banks have compressed volatility, while quants have destroyed the shorter-term trading opportunities. Thats why macro has been hurt, the head of another fund(Caxton) tells the FT.

Bacon senioris fine - after a nearly 30 year trading career he's thought to be worth $1.5bn and is now free to pursue his interest in conservation and dispute with a neighbour in the Bahamas (whom he accuses of damagingthe local environment). His staff might not be - Moore employs nearly 400 people; it's unlikely Brevan Howard has that big a need for new PMs. Talent shortages or not, Bacon is offloading his people into a mostly saturatedmarket.

Separately, you might want to get some rest before the next financial crisis arrives.Symon Drake-Brockman, now 58, spoke to the FT about his experience as CEO of the Americas business at RBS in 2008, when it fell to him to de-risk the bank's mortgage book. When he arrived in the U.S. that year, Drake-Brockman said he found employees "in shock." It fell to him to find a solution. For an entire year, he worked from the moment he woke up until midnight and wrote off $3.5bn of mortgages while selling assets at a discount.

Science and engineering majors at elite schools provide the highest return on investment. At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, math majors earned a median of $120,300 after graduation while borrowing just $8,219the lowest debt-to-income ratio for bachelors degrees.(Wall Street Journal)

UBS has been cutting jobs but that's fine - it has atool calledHummingbird thatmatches staff skillsets to open vacancies at UBS within "nano-seconds."(Financial News)

European banks moved $280bn of assets away from the U.S. market as they sought to escape strict capital requirements. Deutsche Bank has cut assets in its American holding company from $203bn to $117bn since 2016 (although it increased assets by $45bn at its main U.S. branch). Credit Suisse cut U.S. assets by 47%. (Financial Times)

Deutsche Bank is not as systemically important as it used to be. (Bloomberg)

Zdenek Turek, the Dublin-basedCitibank Europe Plc Chief Executive Office, says Britain needs to get on with Brexit. "People have made decisions, spent money on platforms that are ready to go but arent fully functioning yet because moves have not happened yet. Only 60 Citi jobs are being moved out of London.(Bloomberg)

I am afraid for my family, and Im afraid people will die, my friends, said Kevin, a 25 year-old who works as a researcher with a financial institution in Hong Kong and who's stuck at Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Hecan't remember what day it is any more and doesn't know if he has a job to go back to.(Financial Times)

Michael Grimes at Morgan Stanley explains the role of a technology banker. "The institutional investors are the price setters; if theyre eager to invest in a company, then we try to predict that and get behind the companies that we think will work well there, or [else] give the company advice that this maybe isnt the right time or maybe this wont be well-received." (Techcrunch)

Grimes also elaborates on the benefit of direct listings. (Techcrunch)

The European Union plans a $3.9bn fund to invest in early stage technology. (Bloomberg)

Credit Suisse is laying people off in its securities finance business. (FOW)

Goldman Sachs is using gender neutral prononouns. (Reuters)

O.K. is seen as passive aggressive by Millennials. You have to say "kk". (New York Times)

Photo byTal GaraonUnsplash

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment youd like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com in the first instance. Whatsapp/Signal/Telegram also available.

Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will unless its offensive or libelous (in which case it wont.)

Read the rest here:

By far the best trader in the world, period. - eFinancialCareers

We’re on the verge of making buildings as strong as diamonds – Fast Company

In Neal Stephensons 1995 novel,The Diamond Age, he imagines a world in which buildings can be constructed of diamond, a material that, thanks to submicroscopic robots and nanoengineering, had become cheaper than glass. As a result, whole cities are made of the worlds hardest material, and skyscrapers glisten in the sun.

We cant yet build with unlimited piles of diamond, no. But Rice University researchers have figured out the next best thing: handling plastic, or even materials such as metal and concrete, in a way that can nearly match diamonds strength.

The findings were just published in the amazingly named academic journal Small. The concept is a bit tricky to grasp, but its implications are easy to understand.

Since the 90s, scientists have theorized that carbon nanotubes could be arranged in what were dubbed tubulanes. The idea was that if you could arrange carbon molecules in a specific zigzagging mesh structure, youd get a material that could go blow for blow with diamond.

Scientists did all sorts of simulations on computers, explains lead author Mohammad Sajadi, and at every step of the way, the promise of tubulanes has been proven out. But nobody can synthesize them, says Sajadi. There are lots of theoretical molecular structures . . . but theyre impractical because you cant make them. As it happens, carbon nanotubes are a notorious case of theory outweighing application, because the way we make carbon nanotubes today is fairly rudimentary: Baking the right stuff in an oven grows carbon nanotubes that have pretty unpredictable shapes rather than the perfectly organized, molecular geometries of tubulanes.

But instead of trying to make tubulanes in a lab, Sajadi and his collaborators did something different: They copied the woven-looking structure of tubulanes, then 3D printed that shape in a readily available plastic polymer. The shapes were identical but rendered at a scale that was orders of magnitude larger than a tubulane would be.

The finding? Tubulanes and these 3D prints have the same trend of mechanical properties, says Sajadi. That means a small block of this printed polymer can literally stop a speeding bullet without shattering or cracking throughout. (A solid cube of the polymer cracked in the same test.) It shows the role of the geometry is still dominant over the role of material. In other words, the shape is whats most important in a building material, not the material itself.

So what is next? Well, perhaps its ironic to say, given the previous paragraph, but Sajadis lab is experimenting with 3D-printing mock tubulanes out of other materials, such as metal and concrete. So far, the approach is still working. All the tested materials are stronger when printed in these shapes than they were as solid blocks. (And incidentally, Sajadis lab is using off-the-shelf 3D printers. You could theoretically do this same experiment at home.)

The implications are wide-ranging. The plastic blocks could be printed in any shape, to make lightweight, bulletproof vests or helmets. They could also work their way into cars. A bumper printed in this way would absorb impact better than the alternatives we have today. If the technique is applied to architecture, Sajadi points out, lighter, stronger brick and walls that can bear more load will allow skyscrapers to reach higher than ever before. (Instead of looking like diamonds, theyd appear more like a gorgeous tapestry of knitted concrete.) At the same time, because these bricks inherently require less material per block, their environmental impact should be lower, too.

And this doesnt just have application in building [on earth], Sajadi offers. Assume you want a stronger structure in space.

Original post:

We're on the verge of making buildings as strong as diamonds - Fast Company