The evolution of web design in the 2010s – The Next Web

Creative web design in the 00s was dominated by websites made with Flash. Sites such as tokyoplastic, Whos We Studios, Get The Glass, and We Choose the Moon set pulses racing across the globe.

However, in 2010, that was all about to change. A double whammy pretty much wiped Flash out in one fell swoop.

In April 2010, Steve Jobs wrote his Thoughts on Flash and the aftershock was of epic proportions. Almost overnight, Flash became the darkness of the web and was shunned widely. Many defined this moment as The Death of Flash.

With the 2010 launch of Google Creative Labs The Wilderness Downtown, an interactive short film for Arcade Fires We Used to Wait track, utilizing Googles Chrome Browser, Google Maps and most importantly HTML5, the final nail was hammered into Flashs coffin.

On the one hand, it seemed as though the rug had been pulled out from beneath Flash but, this game changing website from Google showed what could be achieved without the need for any browser plug-ins. This was a defining moment in the future of web design.

Credit: The Wilderness Downtown, 2010By 2012 the web design landscape further changed as brands no longer needed a website presence, as the new way to reach their audiences would be via social media, especially with new branded Facebook Pages, and the ability to tap into over 1 billion active Facebook users, which, in itself was an incredible statistic as, at that time, there were 2.5 billion active internet users.

Googles Chrome browser became the browser of choice for most new, creative, and cutting-edge websites and the Google Creative Labs team, again, pushed the entire web design landscape forward by launching a next generation project that merged the boundaries of online and offline.

Chrome Web Lab, was an example of what the future of digital could hold. Here you could visit the Science Museum in London to experience five experiments in real time, or, you could get the experience, live via your browser, 24 hours per day.

Credit: Chrome Web Lab, 2012As we hit 2014, Mozillas WebGL had established itself as the cutting-edge solution for visual prowess on desktop and with the release of iOS 8, the masses could finally be reached on mobile browsers too. In the same year WebVR via Oculus Rift showed a glimpse of virtual reality on the web, but the entry level hardware was an issue for many and was changed when Google, also in 2014, launched their DIY VR headset, Google Cardboard.

Whilst VR was beginning to really take off, especially the hype around it, it was about time mobile browsers could support 3D. The timing couldnt have been more perfect with the launch of Retina HD displays on the iPhone 6 and 6+ in September 2014.

We were also seeing more creativity happening outside of the browser window and interactive work being taken into the real world with real-time interaction. Unnumbered Sparks, a project by Aaron Koblin allowed visitors to use the web on their smartphone to paint vibrant trails of light on a massive aerial sculpture.

Credit: Unnumbered Sparks, 2014In 2015 a first for websites happened. Over 43 percent of the worlds population were now active internet users and even though the amount of users was still rising, the amount of websites dropped from 1 billion to 863 million. This was one of the biggest indicators of how brands were turning their backs on traditional websites and promotional microsites and were throwing their budgets into social media.

Responsive websites and mobile first thinking was seeing a rise in cookie cutter websites and single page parallax scrolling websites, thanks to the likes of Nike Better World, launched four years earlier in 2011.

By the middle of the decade we witnessed an exodus of sorts by the most creative in the industry, agencies, and individuals, shifting their focus away from websites and into real world interactions and experiential projects. Many moved into film and games and away from the web entirely.

In 2016, we saw artificial intelligence come to the web and AR become a household acronym with the launch of Pokmon GO, a location-based augmented reality game that took the world by storm.

The game was released on July 6 for Android and iOS and was downloaded more than 10 million times within a week. It became the fastest growing app in history with an estimated 45 million active users in the US at its peak.

Credit: Pokmon GO, 2016In 2017 Adobe announced the true end of Flash, that by the end of 2020 they would stop updating and distributing the Flash Player.

The creative web experiences of the past had become non-existent and the huge focus for brands remained with the power of social media as could be seen with the Game of Thrones HBO Fire & Ice Facebook Live Video event, which saw millions of fans from around the world, myself included, trying to melt a huge block of ice by live commenting FIRE or DRACARYS to add extra flame power.

A further glimpse of how websites were no longer the way to engage audiences, other than becoming informational portals, Audis Enter Sandbox became a traveling in-store installation that let you test drive an Audi Q5 in virtual reality, on a self made track made out of sand. The physical sandbox itself was turned into a virtual playground using a depth-sensing camera which rendered the sandbox into a 3D environment that you could explore with the Q5. The brief of the project was to bring back the joy from distant memories of playing with cars in a sandbox.

We also began to see the first branded experiences using HoloLens (after its official launch in 2016) for the Smurf film franchise, which turned the real world into an augmented Smurf playground. The Lost Village immersed fans in the world of Smurfs via the HoloLens experience in ways we hadnt seen before, with the little characters sprouting up out of the floor and around the user.

There was a time when everyone wanted or needed a website, but with the likes of Instagram, you no longer needed a website. In some ways, Instagram became the website of choice for many, especially the new wave of influencers.

With the launch of Instagram Stories in August 2016, it didnt take long for some to create a hack that would transform the social platform into a DJ Simulator. The official Bacardi Instagram account could be transformed into a set of turntables by simply clicking on the Bacardi logo and then controlling the turntables was as simple as skipping back and forth within the story to jump between different clips of scratches, beats and samples.

By 2018 projects like World Draw would capture audiences in group experiences and would attract over 300,000 creators from all over the world and would command festival like big screen interactive experiences.

Credit: World Draw, 2018

As we approach the end of the decade the one overriding factor is that the most exciting creativity we are seeing is not sat at a desk in front of a screen. The likes of Hive Drive gives us a glimpse of where creativity is heading with its Hive Drive location-based AR experiment that lets people explore a virtual beehive behind a window.

By walking around the windows, passersby can interact with the bees in the hive to learn more about bees and their role in the ecosystem in a fun and fact-filled way.

As we enter 2020, we can clearly see how the terms digital and interactive no longer mean a world online. Digital is no longer confined to web browsers as it was for so many years. The future of web design within the browser itself is limited and could easily go right back to the first website by being purely informational and less experiential. The interactive experiences that connect us on a more emotional level are happening in our daily lives and outside of the confines of web browsers.

With AR, in particular, we will become the browsers of the past and the window of the future as we explore new virtual worlds where our physical bodies become the only hardware required.

Published December 19, 2019 20:00 UTC

Link:

The evolution of web design in the 2010s - The Next Web

Persecution and Redemption: The evolution of Hanukkah and its symbolism about Jewish survival – Milwaukee Independent

Every December Jews celebrate the eight-day festival of Hanukkah, perhaps the best-known and certainly the most visible Jewish holiday.

While critics sometimes identify Christmas as promoting the prevalence in America today of what one might refer to as Hanukkah kitsch, this assessment misses the social and theological significance of Hanukkah within Judaism itself.

Early history

Though it is 2,200 years old, Hanukkah is one of Judaisms newest holidays, an annual Jewish celebration that does not even appear in the Hebrew Bible. The historical event that is the basis for Hanukkah is told, rather, in the post-biblical Books of the Maccabees, which appear in the Catholic biblical canon but are not even considered part of the Bible by Jews and most Protestant denominations.

Based on the Greco-Roman model of celebrating a military triumph, Hanukkah was instituted in 164 B.C. to celebrate the victory of the Maccabees, a ragtag army of Jews, against the much more powerful army of King Antiochus IV of Syria. In 168 B.C., Antiochus outlawed Jewish practice and forced Jews to adopt pagan rituals and assimilate into Greek culture.

The Maccabees revolted against this persecution. They captured Jerusalem from Antiochuss control, removed from the Jerusalem Temple symbols of pagan worship that Antiochus had introduced and restarted the sacrificial worship, ordained by God in the Hebrew Bible, that Antiochus had violated.

Hanukkah, meaning dedication, marked this military victory with a celebration that lasted eight days and was modeled on the festival of Tabernacles (Sukkot) that had been banned by Antiochus.

How Hanukkah evolved

The military triumph, however, was short-lived. The Maccabees descendants the Hasmonean dynasty routinely violated their own Jewish law and tradition.

Even more significantly, the following centuries witnessed the devastation that would be caused when Jews tried again to accomplish what the Maccabees had done. By now, Rome controlled the land of Israel. In A.D. 68-70 and again in A.D. 133-135, the Jews mounted passionate revolts to rid their land of this foreign and oppressing power.

The first of these revolts ended in the destruction of the Second Jerusalem Temple, the preeminent center of Jewish worship, which had stood for 600 years. As a result of the second revolt, the Jewish homeland was devastated and countless Jews were put to death.

War no longer seemed an effective solution to the Jews tribulations on the stage of history. In response, a new ideology deemphasized the idea that Jews should or could change their destiny through military action. What was required, rabbis asserted, was not battle but perfect observance of Gods moral and ritual law. This would lead to Gods intervention in history to restore the Jewish peoples control over their own land and destiny.

In this context, rabbis rethought Hanukkahs origins as the celebration of a military victory. Instead, they said, Hanukkah should be seen as commemorating a miracle that occurred during the Maccabees rededication of the temple: The story now told was how a jar of temple oil sufficient for only one day had sustained the temples eternal lamp for a full eight days, until additional ritually appropriate oil could be produced.

The earliest version of this story appears in the Talmud, in a document completed in the sixth century A.D. From that period on, rather than directly commemorating the Maccabees victory, Hanukkah celebrated Gods miracle.

This is symbolized by the kindling of an eight-branched candelabra (Menorah or Hanukkiah), with one candle lit on the holidays first night and an additional candle added each night until, on the final night of the festival, all eight branches are lit. The ninth candle in the Hanukkiah is used to light the others. Throughout the medieval period, however, Hanukkah remained a minor Jewish festival.

What Hanukkah means today

How then to understand what happened to Hanukkah in the past hundred years, during which it has achieved prominence in Jewish life, both in America and around the world?

The point is that even as the holidays prior iterations reflected the distinctive needs of successive ages, so Jews today have reinterpreted Hanukkah in light of contemporary circumstances a point that is detailed in religion scholar Dianne Ashtons book, Hanukkah in America. Ashton demonstrates while Hanukkah has evolved in tandem with the extravagance of the American Christmas season, there is much more to this story.

Hanukkah today responds to Jews desire to see their history as consequential, as reflecting the value of religious freedom that Jews share with all other Americans. Hanukkah, with its bright decorations, songs, and family- and community-focused celebrations, also fulfills American Jews need to reengage disaffected Jews and to keep Jewish children excited about Judaism.

Poignantly, telling a story of persecution and then redemption, Hanukkah today provides a historical paradigm that can help modern Jews think about the Holocaust and the emergence of Zionism. In short, Hanukkah is as powerful a commemoration as it is today because it responds to a host of factors pertinent to contemporary Jewish history and life.

Over two millennia, Hanukkah has evolved to narrate the story of the Maccabees in ways that meet the distinctive needs of successive generations of Jews. Each generation tells the story as it needs to hear it, in response to the eternal values of Judaism but also as is appropriate to each periods distinctive cultural forces, ideologies, and experiences.

Read more:

Persecution and Redemption: The evolution of Hanukkah and its symbolism about Jewish survival - Milwaukee Independent

Heres What $100 in Bitcoin Would Have Made Next To The Decades Best Investments – newsBTC

Bitcoin may be trading at prices that seem low in comparison to the crypto assets all-time high price or $20,000, or even its recent local high of nearly $14,000 but in reality, its the best performing investment of the last decade.

Lets see how the number one cryptocurrency by market cap, and even the number two crypto, stack up against other top investments of the last ten years.

Bitcoin was the first-ever cryptocurrency, designed by the mysterious cypherpunk Satoshi Nakamoto. At its inception, it was merely a concept for what would ultimately become the worlds first peer to peer digital cash system, worth just a fraction of pennies at its creation.

Related Reading | Spot Versus Tether Exchanges: Can Bitcoin Price Itself Be a Buy or Sell Signal

It was mined by computers by early supporters of the emerging technology and then traded for cash on exchanges. One early Bitcoin user who made the first public transaction for physical goods traded 10,000 BTC for two pizzas.

Today, the asset is trading at roughly $7200, down nearly 50% from the years high and nearly two-thirds down from the all-time high price it set at the peak of crypto fanaticism in 2017.

But despite ongoing price decline and downtrend, the first-ever cryptocurrency still beats out all other top performing investments of the last decade.

A $100 investment in Bitcoin with an ROI of 62,500% would have resulted in a gain of $62,500. A $1,000 investment, over $625,000, and a $10,000 investment would have netted the investor over $6.25 million.

A similar $100 investment in top stocks such as Amazon or Apple would have only amounted to $1,250 or $840 in gains.

According to the list below, a single $100 investment in Bitcoin would have outperformed a $100 investment in each of the rest of the list combined.

Even a $100,000 investment in a cultural phenomenon like Netflix wouldnt have brought as much return on the initial investment as $10,000 invested into Bitcoin.

While Ethereum has recently had a bit of a negative stigma surrounding it, even being dubbed a double-digit shitcoin, it has still outperformed all other assets on the list aside from Bitcoin itself.

Ethereum was sold as an ICO at just pennies on the dollar, and at its all-time high reached $1,400. The cryptocurrency is trading at just 90% of that high at roughly $125 currently but has still brought investors gains of over 17,900%.

Related Reading | These Five Altcoins Crushed Bitcoins 2019 Returns

This means that just a $100 invested in Ethereum would have resulted in a $17,900 return. And while this is under just one-third of what the earliest Bitcoin investors were able to churn out of the asset, investors in the number two crypto by market cap also struck it rich compared to most of the worlds biggest stocks.

More:

Heres What $100 in Bitcoin Would Have Made Next To The Decades Best Investments - newsBTC

Here are all the ways bitcoin could help address income inequality in the 2020s – Business Insider

captionBitcoin is making a breakthrough within developing countries.sourceChris Weller/Business Insider

The mysterious nature of bitcoin has led to common misperceptions about its use, with many in the mainstream relegating it to the realm of hackers and gamers.

The history of cryptocurrency shows quite a different purpose: Bitcoin was actually created with the intention of bridging the global wealth gap. The domain name bitcoin.org was registered online in the midst of the Great Recession of 2008. Soon after, the mysterious and purported creator of bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, released statements explaining the electronic cash-to-cash system was developed as a means to fight centralized currency manipulation.

Nevertheless, wealth inequality has become so drastic that many in the lower and middle classes cant afford to own bitcoin dollars. Inequality in the US has reached a record high since the US Census started tracking it five decades ago, with the federal data showing evidence of a shrinking middle class.

Though the global economy continues to face substantial pressures, experts say the growing popularity of bitcoin might help return it to its intended use: fighting income inequality.

Whats unique about bitcoin is that it functions on another network, one thats a lot more transparent than a corporate bank. Every bitcoin transaction is always recorded in its public archive the blockchain.

Blockchain is the record of all exchanging cryptocurrencies, essentially digital money, between two parties. It is an independent, shared encrypted database of money entries think of it as a shared Google Doc. Bitcoin is one type of cryptocurrency among others like litecoin, ethereum, and ripple.

Mark Yusko, the CEO and CIO of investment advisory company Morgan Creek Capital Management, told Business Insider that he believes the blockchain network and its fundamental growth can be leveraged to alleviate income inequality. Yusko is known to be a longtime cryptocurrency bull, drawing investors toward more exposure with bitcoin.

The government and the elites want to have all the wealth, so they manufacture inflation and the wealth flows to the top, he said. And thats why we have the greatest wealth inequality in the history of mankind. Bitcoin helps solve that because now we can opt out as an owner of assets from that fiat system.

The hedge-fund chief explained one of the main economic problems Americans face today is not owning any or enough assets like real estate property and stocks. Not having money to invest in markets and living from paycheck to paycheck is a major setback for the poor and middle class.

There are more opportunities to acquire assets through blockchain technology. For instance, bitcoin is now accepted in some real estate markets, where investors can own parts of a building if they cant afford the whole unit, reports CNBC. This new business model can help distribute wealth and widen the investor demographic. It can also open possibilities of owning property across international borders.

While encouraging people to own assets is a way to fight income inequality in the US, developing countries need a different game plan.

As more people around the world own smartphones, bitcoin has the potential to reach even more users in the 2020s. Because cryptocurrency is only transferred electronically, having the most basic internet connection immediately helps anyone access and trade the currency.

Attention toward expanding the crypto space in developing countries first emerged in 2017, when fintech expert Anton Dzyatkovsky cofounded MicroMoney, a money-lending app targeting Southeast Asian countries like Myanmar, Thailand, and the Philippines that provides services to help people build a credit history on the blockchain. There are 1.7 billion people around the world who dont have bank accounts and cant access loads, according to The World Bank. Bitcoin has the potential to reach this demographic and provide those financial services.

We are proud of the fact that we can help people who have no access to the classical, but outdated centralized economy of the bank, Dzyatkovsky told Business Insider.

Cryptocurrency is also making a breakthrough in Latin America, Business Insider reports. In 2018, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency by 95% due to hyperinflation, prompting more than 400,000 Venezuelans to flee from the economic collapse. After the government issued a new cryptocurrency called petro, the fleeing citizens were able to make cross-border transactions without relying on paper money. The petro is still used in 2019.

In another case in 2017, an anonymous bitcoin millionaire going by the alias Pine committed $5 million worth of bitcoin donations to GiveDirectly, an organization thats running the worlds largest basic income experiment in Kenyan villages. The bitcoin dollars went toward giving people access to clean water and sending money directly to people living in poverty who are facing food shortage, school fees, and home repairs.

If this money were to be given to everybody, this would be a very good thing, Edwin Odongo Anyango, a 30-year-old day laborer at one of the Kenyan villages, told Business Insider. What this money does is it creates hope. And when people have hope, they are happy.

Read the original here:

Here are all the ways bitcoin could help address income inequality in the 2020s - Business Insider

Catholic Exorcist Warns of Rise in ‘Aggressive Satanism’ Among Young People – Newsweek

Exorcist Father Francois Dermine for the Archdiocese of Ancona-Osimo in Italy said the problems of society can be blamed on a rise in "aggressive Satanism" in an article in Crux.

Dermine said young people can be especially affected by demonic energies because of secularism, imagery in video games and a lack of role models.

"Secularization leaves a void," Dermine said. "Young people do not have anything to satisfy their spiritual and profound needs. They are thirsting for something, and the Church is not attractive anymore."

Dermine called the involvement of young people in a culture that celebrates the demonic a "Satanist mentality," saying that those who are engaged with that culture "can become evil themselves very easily."

Young people are in greater danger according to Dermine because of the instability of modern families.

"Education of young people is poorer and poorer," Dermine said. "Couples are collapsing. Children are left alone; they are destabilized, and they don't have any defenses."

"If [children] have received love in their own families, it would be much more difficult to follow these kinds of ideologies," Dermine continued. "It would be much more difficult to penetrate their minds. If the adult world does not offer alternatives, it is more difficult for younger generations to adopt a stable way of life."

Violence in the world can also be blamed on Satanism which Dermine sees as a "concrete risk."

"We must not underestimate this," Dermine said, "because violence among young people is becoming more and more diffused. A violent mentality is very dangerous for our society, very, very dangerous. Our society risks collapse if it continues like this."

Dermine has been an exorcist for the Catholic Church for over 25 years, even giving lectures on exorcism, a practice Lucien Greaves of The Satanic Temple has called "backward" and "harmful."

"Where Christianity is involved, even flagrantly and directly, it will be entirely ignored," wrote Greaves on Patheos in November. "This double-standard is so culturally-entrenched as to go often unnoticed even by those who recognize its injustice once pointed out."

"If any other religious identity in the West, outside of Christianity, openly practiced rituals of such simple-minded magical thinking with even half the rate of death attributed to exorcism," Greaves continued, "there would be a full-scale panic, with an outcry to ban the practice, as well as the religion that sanctioned it."

In an email to Newsweek, Greaves repudiated Father Dermine's statements.

"Even for a man who believes himself a type of wizard who combats invisible monsters, the exorcist's comments related to the alleged threat that Satanism poses to children shows a remarkable and unrepentant willful ignorance of the horrific recent history of child abuse accrued by the morally bankrupt Church he represents," Greaves wrote.

"Seemingly fully aware that the Modern Satanism he decries is non-theistic in nature, and characteristically divorced from reality, he suggests that superstitious tribalism is the cure, rather than the cause, of all contemporary woes. In reality, it seems apparent that our social problems will never be resolved by self-professed claimants to a divine and unquestionable Truth, but that we would all do better to cultivate social norms that celebrate pluralism, mutual respect, and accountability."

"If indeed such values be virtuous," Greaves concluded, "then The Satanic Temple is unquestionably more moral than the Catholic Church."

While the Catholic church allegedly does not keep records on how many exorcisms are performed, the Vatican has recently opened up its yearly training program, the Course on Exorcism and Prayer of Liberation, to practitioners of all Christian denominations.

Continue reading here:

Catholic Exorcist Warns of Rise in 'Aggressive Satanism' Among Young People - Newsweek

Republicans are the party of civil liberties as Democrats walk away | TheHill – The Hill

Since the heyday of the civil rights movement, Democrats have touted themselves as torchbearers of the Jeffersonian principles of individual rights of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. The Founders considered it axiomatic that the government should have strict limits and the rights of the individuals were not to be constrained. But Democrats have sadly shifted their priorities. The left wing increasingly favors intrusion in all aspects of American life and advocates policies diminishing personal rights in favor of state power and jeopardizing the social contract.

Joined by activist groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Human Rights Campaign, liberals argued for years that the Christian right was coming to take away your personal autonomy. Slogans such as my body my choice underscored a powerful conviction that the government should not interfere with your ability to live your life as you see fit. From marriage to police surveillance and from abortion to free expression, Democrats gained votes by advertising themselves as the defenders of individual rights in this nation. For years, they could claim that title.

In the era after the demise of Jim Crow, the cultural and political left vastly expanded the reach and breadth of institutions and ideologies devoted to the protection of individuals rights and free will. Progressive intellectuals championed the moral imperatives of free speech and expression as keys not only to an effective academic environment but a thriving economy and polity. Universities represented our bastions of learning and debate. During the tumultuous 1960s and 1970s, campuses brimmed with ideas to improve the nation and the world, many of which were wrong, but at least open for discussion. The American Civil Liberties Union had insisted on the fundamental right to speech even for the most odious of causes.

But times have certainly changed. Widespread calls for safe spaces, incessant demands of progressives to be comfortable, and constant disruptions of conservative talks on campuses have replaced the rallies championing the First Amendment. Airing an opinion about biological science, including one universally accepted throughout the entirety of human history barring the last five years, was startingly sufficient for author J.K. Rowling to be exiled from the realm of acceptable speakers. The advocacy of free market principles is even on the precipice of being deemed hate speech. Free speech has firmly given way to groupthink with a constant race to the bottom. Only the most woke survive in this heated political environment, to the detriment of healthy debate in our country.

All of this leads the Democratic candidates competing for 2020 and their counterparts in Congress to increasingly become nanny staters. Against the First Amendment are proposals to restrict the use of money to affect policy under Democratic proposals to constrain lobbying, shut down free speech under Democratic proposals ostensibly aimed at hate speech but which really aim to shut down conservative speech, and reduce the ability to exercise religious conscience under Democratic proposals to strip churches of tax exempt status. Little remains of leaving people free to run their own lives. Instead, the new doctrine is more related to the idea that everything is political. All within the state and nothing outside the state, is not just a frightening concept on its own, but effectively an unintentional carbon copy of the core philosophy of Benito Mussolini.

While Republicans are certainly not perfect on civil liberties by any means, the strong libertarian streak that runs through the party still demonstrates itself in many ways. Although President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump lashes out at Pelosi on Christmas, decries 'scam impeachment' Christmas Day passes in North Korea with no sign of 'gift' to US Prosecutors: Avenatti was M in debt during Nike extortion MORE is a flawed messenger for the argument that Americans should be left to simply pursue their own best interests, he is actively working to move power from the Washington swamp back to the states and to your wallet. If Trump is not good enough on civil liberties for your appetite, the reality is Democrats are far worse.

Their proposals are straight from the Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Jimmy Carter days of seeking to fix everything through federal mandates. Elizabeth Warren wants to set up a series of government funded daycare centers that not only will cost taxpayers $70 billion, but will also replace traditional family bonds with the state. There is no more basic right than familial autonomy, which would sink away if such plans were enacted into law. Bernie Sanders pushes more extreme ideas, opposing the ability for homeowners to control their own dwellings. As the mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg is most remembered by the long list of activities he chose to ban, from large sodas to styrofoam packaging to loud music.

These are not policies of a civil liberties party. They are inducements to relinquish our autonomy to Washington. Anyone who believes that is a fair trade is marching the nation down the road to serfdom. As Gerald Ford famously declared, A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.

Kristin Tate is a libertarian writer and an analyst for Young Americans for Liberty. She is an author whose latest book is How Do I Tax Thee? A Field Guide to the Great American Rip-Off. Follow her on Twitter @KristinBTate.

Excerpt from:

Republicans are the party of civil liberties as Democrats walk away | TheHill - The Hill

Holcomb and cell phones: The inch that becomes a mile – Greenfield Daily Reporter

Leo Morris Submitted photo

Back in the dark ages when mandatory seat belt use was relatively new in Indiana, I had a colleague who liked to say that she never nagged people about buckling up when they were riding with her. In fact, she never mentioned it to her passengers.

Why? she was inevitably asked.

Natural selection was her answer.

I like to use that story as a good analogy for what I consider proper government. She gives people the information needed to make good choices, sometimes offers incentives for making good choices and can even provide the mechanisms to make good choices easier. But if people insist on making poor choices anyway, well, thats on them.

Of course, our government driver (to continue the analogy) seldom stops when she should. She employs various coercive tactics to get those passengers in line. (Yes, I am being deliberate in the choice of pronoun; were talking about the nanny state, after all.)

Such as, buckle up or this car isnt moving. Or, if you dont buckle up, I will harangue you mercilessly for the whole trip. Or, the penalty for not buckling up, payable at the end of the journey, will be a hefty fee that I will send collectors out to get from your childrens children into the 10th generation.

In my experience, people who advocate for government solutions, and even bigger and more expensive government when those solutions fail to materialize, seldom have to justify themselves. They are merely following the spirit of the age, no explanations required.

But those of us who advocate government restraint or, heaven forbid, limited government, are always put on the defensive. We are either insensitive to human misery to the point of heartlessness or hopelessly ignorant of the need for immediate action to avert imminent disaster.

In all the response I get to these columns (thank you very much), by far the most common form of criticism is from readers who misinterpret, either carelessly or deliberately, the libertarian thrust of my government critiques.

I always mean, in those pieces, the least government necessary, which, believe it or not, was a founding principle of this country. They always insist I really meant, no government at all, then proceed to deliver the Gotcha! they think I deserve.

What about the fire department when your house is burning down, they will ask, or the police department when youre robbed? What about that pothole you want filled in?

Arent those all socialism, you self-serving hypocrite?

Actually, no, theyre not. They are legitimate government functions.

My favorite Gotcha! showing up in my email with tiresome regularity is, So, I guess youve refused your Social Security payments, huh?

No, I have not. Had I the opportunity to opt out and use the money for my own retirement investments, I would have done so. But participation was mandatory. To whom am I trying to prove what if I dont take money out of the system I was forced to put money into?

The tenet of libertarianism people seem to have the most trouble grasping, though it really should be the easiest, is that government legitimately tries to keep us from hurting each other but risks overstepping its bounds when it tries to keep us from hurting ourselves. Autonomy should be sacred.

So, I find myself having to explain that, no, I do not object to Gov. Eric Holcombs proposal to ban Hoosier motorists from using their cellphones while driving unless theyre hands-free.

There are rules for the road that are open to challenge on libertarian grounds. There is no reason to require me to use seat belts when driving or wear a helmet when riding a motorcycle except to keep me from behaving stupidly.

But there are also rules that protect me from others stupid behavior, such as the one against driving while drunk.

Mandating hands-free-only cellphone use falls into the latter category. I am the one you might run into while youre fiddling with that stupid phone.

See? Simple.

Of course, there are a couple of potholes in the road an earnest libertarian should be aware of whenever he gives in and acknowledges that, yes, OK, fine, government should do this.

One is the maxim that by the time government acts, government action is usually beside the point. Most cellphones today have Bluetooth, and most new cars have systems that sync to it, so its likely the moment you get behind the wheel your phone automatically become hands-free.

The other is when government is given the legitimate inch, it will go the illegitimate mile. Setting reasonable speed limits is a legitimate function, but it requires local knowledge of local conditions. But few were shocked to see a national 55 mph limit that, for a time, was the most ignored law in America.

If Holcomb gets his way with cellphones, all sorts of distracted driving will be on the endangered list, everything from playing the radio to scarfing down those fries you got from the drive-thru. Then dont be surprised if there are hefty fines for talking to your in-car companions and there are calls for hands-free nose-picking.

Government will always always, always, always go too far.

I know you might not believe that. But the evidence is plentiful if you choose to ignore it, thats on you.

I respect your autonomy.

And, you know. Natural selection.

Leo Morris is as columnist for The Indiana Policy Review. Contact him at leoedits@yahoo.com or send comments to editorial@therepublic.com.

See the original post here:

Holcomb and cell phones: The inch that becomes a mile - Greenfield Daily Reporter

National View Column: Watch for a Trump-Trump ticket and more in 2020 – Duluth News Tribune

JANUARY: Senate Republicans reject both House impeachment articles, but four Republicans join the 47 Democrats to provide a majority voting the president obstructed Congress. The Des Moines Register endorses Joe Biden, saying the former vice president's experience means he'll be "a president we won't have to train." Trump fires FBI Director James Wray, nominating Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan to replace him. Ukraine President Zelenskiy renews plea for White House meeting with Trump.

FEBRUARY: Baltimore Ravens win Super Bowl. Iowa caucuses finish in a tight four-way race with Mayor Pete Buttigieg getting the most votes and Sen. Bernie Sanders the most delegates. Biden is a close third, followed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren. Sanders repeats his New Hampshire primary win, followed closely by Mayor Pete, Biden, and Warren. Biden edges Sanders in Nevada and trounces the field in South Carolina, followed by Sanders, Mayor Pete and Warren.

MARCH: On Super Tuesday, Biden wins Texas, Virginia, and four other states. But Buttigieg wins California, Colorado, Minnesota, North Carolina and Warren's home state of Massachusetts, taking the delegate lead. Sanders, like Alf Landon, wins only Maine and Vermont. Ex-New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg peaks at 8% in California and nets just three delegates. The next week, Sanders edges Biden and Buttigieg in Michigan, and Biden wins two states. But Buttigieg wins four and follows that up March 17 by beating Sanders and Biden in Arizona, Illinois, Ohio, and Florida. Trump clinches the GOP nomination.

APRIL: Mike Pompeo resigns as secretary of state to seek the Kansas Senate seat. Buttigieg edges Sanders and Biden in Wisconsin, extending his delegate lead. Warren and Bloomberg drop out, leaving businessman Andrew Yang, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and ex-Rep. John Delaney still competing. Cowboys name Troy Aikman as new coach. Trump picks Mike Pence as secretary of state, announcing the vice president asked for a switch. Reports say Trump asked Zelenskiy, still awaiting a White House meeting, if he has any dirt on Mayor Pete. Buttigieg wins New York, Maryland, and Pennsylvania primaries.

MAY: Biden drops out of Democratic race and endorses Buttigieg, who wins Indiana. Sanders, Yang, Gabbard, and Delaney refuse to concede. Trump and Vladimir Putin accept Zelenskiy's invitation for a July summit in Kyiv, during the Democratic Convention. The Supreme Court again upholds the Affordable Care Act's constitutionality, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the majority opinion.

JUNE: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un rejects Trump bid for new summit, urging withdrawal of all U.S. troops from South Korea. Trump says he is willing to go halfway. The Washington Capitals win their second Stanley Cup in three years while the L.A. Lakers win the NBA title. The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, says Trump must provide financial information to Congress and New York authorities.

JULY: Polls show Trump leading Pete Buttigieg by 6 points and winning 30% of black and Hispanic votes. Democrats make the former South Bend mayor the youngest major party nominee ever, with Stacey Abrams of Georgia as his running mate. At the Kyiv summit, Trump hails Putin's efforts for global peace. Zelenskiy declines comment.

AUGUST: Trump stuns the Republican Convention by naming Senior Adviser Ivanka Trump his new running mate. After brief flurry for Rep. Mark Meadows, the GOP Convention confirms a Trump-Trump ticket. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, spurning the Libertarian nomination, endorses the Buttigieg-Abrams ticket. Pompeo loses the Kansas GOP Senate primary to Kris Kobach.

SEPTEMBER: Trump announces he'll only debate ex-Mayor Pete once, but running mate Ivanka Trump will hold three debates with Democrat Abrams. Ukraine President Zelenskiy discloses Buttigieg's grandfather was involved in anti-NATO terrorism. Though Buttigieg denies it, noting his family came from Malta, not Ukraine, Trump invites Zelenskiy to the White House.

OCTOBER: After Abrams wins the first VP debate over Ivanka Trump, she cancels the next two. Zelenskiy admits he fabricated a Buttigieg story to get a White House invite. After the presidential debate, polls show ex-Mayor Pete has evened the race against Trump. The New York Yankees defeat the L.A. Dodgers in the World Series.

NOVEMBER: Democrats' Buttigieg-Abrams ticket, riding a popular vote majority of 4.5 million votes, wins the election with a bare 270 electoral votes. Trump holds Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. But Democrats win Arizona's 11 electoral votes and clinch the election with Abrams' Georgia (16) and Buttigieg's Indiana (11), where analysts blame backlash over Trump dropping Pence for a 9,900-vote Democratic margin. Trump, alleging widespread fraud, challenges Indiana result. Trump edges Buttigieg in Texas, but Democrats regain control of the Texas House, 76-74. Democrats hold the U.S. House and, in a surprise, gain three Senate seats, losing Alabama but winning Arizona, Colorado, Kansas and Maine. By winning the presidency, VP-elect Abrams gives Democrats control of 50-50 Senate.

DECEMBER: Recounts confirm Democrats' Indiana win, and the Electoral College confirms Buttigieg's election. He names Joe Biden as secretary of state, and, seeking bipartisan support, picks Utah Sen. Mitt Romney as secretary of defense. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi retires to become U.S. ambassador to the Vatican. Trump pardons himself, Mike Flynn, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, but New York authorities say they'll press criminal proceedings against him in January. House Republicans call for impeachment inquiry into Buttigieg's ties to Ukraine.

Carl P. Leubsdorf is the former Washington bureau chief for the Dallas Morning News. He can be reached at carl.p.leubsdorf@gmail.com.

Read more:

National View Column: Watch for a Trump-Trump ticket and more in 2020 - Duluth News Tribune

Are Conservatives Soul-Searching in the Wrong Places? – CNSNews.com

(Photo byThoas Samson/AFP via Getty Images)

A brutal business climate and societal breakdown have brought major changes to America. In response, many Americans, especially conservatives, are soul searching for something more compassionate for those left behind. Unfortunately, they are looking in the most unlikely places: business and government. They will likely be searching for a long time.

The controversy over this shift in mentality erupted with the publication of a Wall Street Journal advertisement in which major firms pledge a commitment to stakeholder capitalism, which holds businesses should be run having all society, not just shareholders, in mind. Sen. Marco Rubios (R-Fla.) stirred the pot with his recent speech at Catholic University, where he explored what he called common-good capitalism.

The thesis is that the modern American economy does not care for everyone. It falls short by concentrating only on return on investment to shareholders. Businesses need to think in terms of more general obligations to workers and communitystakeholders in the overall economy. Since business cannot provide for all social needs, state systems must also be put in place. The soul-searchers say it is time to admit that the federal government might indeed have a role in helping those left behind.

Challenging the Conservative Orthodoxy

Such thinking is especially hard for conservatives to accept. It challenges the reigning orthodoxy that has long held to low taxation, decreased federal spending, scrapping socialist government meddling and regulation, and free and fair markets as a means of providing for the common good. The movement maintains a Reaganesque distrust of government and a rightful distaste for its eternal programs. The libertarian right relegates the solving of most problems to markets.

However, there is no denying that something is missing from todays superficial and materialistic society. Countless people are suffering materially and especially spiritually, whether it be from anxiety, depression, opioids or family breakup. Society seems to have lost its soul. Hence, the searching.

As a result, many conservatives now question old assumptions about market reliability or the evils of government social largess. They are looking for new models for business and government to help find a soul for society that will help people cope. They assume these are the only two institutions from which all solutions flow.

The Limitations of Markets

These are strange places to look for solutions. Modern economy and government are sterile institutions built upon mechanical models and systems. To have recourse to them is to look for materialistic solutions for spiritual problems.

Modern capitalism, as it now operates, is not meant to be soulful. It is meant to produce material stufflots of stuff. It works like a machine producing efficiently, quickly and abundantly. Modern markets scour the globe looking to maximize efficiency and distribute risks. While such efforts do benefit society greatly, their primary purpose is directed toward trading, not giving.

Markets work in function of commutative justice. This form of justice requires a fair exchange of goods or services between contracting parties. It facilitates transactions by requiring, as nearly as may be, a near equal payment be rendered for the near equal value of a good or service.

Markets do not work in function of charity. Charity cannot govern economic transactions since, for an economy to function justly, each party must be strictly given its due. To insist that charity be made part of economic theory would put the charitable at a disadvantage and leave the marketplace in the hands of the hard-hearted or dishonest.

Thus, efforts to baptize modern capitalism by insisting upon integrating charity into its program will inevitably fail. Soul-searching conservatives might encourage entrepreneurs to practice charity in their dealings, as indeed many do. However, the cold mechanical processes of modern capitalism remain morally indifferent and soulless. They will not renew the face of the earth (Ps. 103:30), no matter how they are tweaked.

The Limitations of Big Government

The same comments can be made about modern government. If any institution can be called soulless, it is the anonymous, bureaucratic machinery of big government. Its bloated systems offer to be everything to everyone while suffering from a lack of the efficiency of business.

A government is supposed to be the political system and institutions by which the State is administered and regulated. It should be oriented toward the common good by providing a general framework by which society can prosper. It also is not directed toward giving but administering.

The sad reality is that modern government is usually big government. It does not provide for the common good but buries it under its massive structures.

Decades of social programs have proven that big government, like markets, is not meant to work in function of charity. Big government distributes its largess with cold indifference and sterile rules. Once entrenched, its self-perpetuating programs tend to prolong not diminish poverty at great cost to the nation.

Looking for Americas Lost Soul

Looking for Americas lost soul in business and government is not the right move. These institutions themselves are not bad, but they are directed to other purposes. The modern versions of these institutions are further handicapped by their cold mechanical structures and systems that can lead to abuse and frenetic intemperance.

Some conservatives have the idea that their message can be more palatable if it is dressed up with secularized systems of charity and government oversight. However, to replace one mechanical system with another does not address the soulless component that is missing.

That is not to say that these institutions cannot be instruments for a return to a more soulful America. Like all instruments, their use depends upon the motives of those using them. The human element is the most crucial part of their functioning.

A Needed Moral Regeneration

If America is to find its soul, a moral regeneration is needed that will address the causes of societys breakdown. It should not focus on symptoms. As it stands, everything is upside down.

Soul-searchers must seek out those institutions that are especially directed toward moral regeneration, not the mechanical workings of society. The God-given institutions of the family and the Catholic Church are two important natural regenerators that work in function of charity. They can transform society.

When all society is infused with family-like relationships and religious, moral observance, business and government can then play their essential role in fostering (not controlling) virtuous life in common.

However, such a message is not what people want to hear. It involves restraint, sacrifice, responsibility and accountability amid a culture that teaches the contrary. It is much easier to solve problems by creating stop-gap aid programs that never stop. Better to tweak the system than revamp fundamentals.

Only true Christian charity can overcome the selfish interests that cloud the soul-searching process. For charity is that supernatural virtue by which people love God above all things for His own sake, and their neighbors as themselves for the love of God.

The present soul-searching must either lead to God or end in failure.

John Horvat II is a scholar, researcher, educator, international speaker, and author of the book Return to Order: From a Frenzied Economy to an Organic Christian Society--Where We've Been, How We Go Here, and Where We Need to Go. He lives in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, where he is the vice president of the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property.

Follow this link:

Are Conservatives Soul-Searching in the Wrong Places? - CNSNews.com

The Buzz 12.26.19 – Monterey County Weekly

WHOS IN TOWN?

This week is a good time to visit the shoreline and scan the horizon for the spouts ofgray whalesmigrating southward from their feeding grounds in Alaska to the calving lagoons of Baja California. A few single sightings have been logged this month and more are expected through January. Last year the number of gray whale sightings among local whale watching boats jumped during Christmas week. According to theNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, pregnant females typically come through first. Adults can reach 46 feet in length and weigh up to 35 tons. Calves are about 17 feet long at birth, and by the time they reach Monterey Bay headed north in spring, theyre about 20 feet, according to the Monterey Bay Aquariums gray whales webpage. In total, gray whales travel approximately 10,000 miles each year.

Remember the days in which you had to be a registered Democratic to vote in a Democratic primary election or a Republican to vote in a Republican primary? Those days are over. In 1996, California voters opted to switch to a system of open primaries, but in 2000, Prop. 198 was overturned by theU.S. Supreme Court, which found the voting system violated the First Amendment right of freedom of association. The State Legislature came back with a modified system that took effect in 2001: A political party may choose to let no-party-preference voters (also known as independents) vote in their presidential primaries. For the March 3, 2020 election, NPP voters may request primary ballots from theDemocratic Party,Libertarian PartyandAmerican Independent Party. (Not on that list is theRepublican Party, in which PresidentDonald Trumpis seeking re-election.) In Monterey County, NPP voters outnumber Republicans, but not Democrats. TheMonterey County Elections Departmenthas sent out 36,442 cards to unaffiliated voters asking them if they want a partys primary ballot, and as of press time has received requests from only 2,217 voters.

The Weekly is powered by the generosity of readers like you, who support our mission to produce engaging, independent and in-depth journalism.

Show Your Support

Learn More

Golf can be intimidating for a first-timer. If a novice player would step onto the famedPebble Beach Golf Linksfor a round, he or she might give up the game for good or so saysBryon Bell, the president ofTGR Design. The golf course design firm headed byTiger Woodsis in the process of laying out a new par-3 short course on the site of the formerPeter Hay Golf Courseat Pebble Beach. Bell and his team plan a course that will be family-friendly, playable for young golfers the longest holes measuring just over 100 yards yet still offering a chance for veteran golfers to work on their short game. Its about bringing people together, Bell says. Thats our goal. TGR Design is early in the process (we have some hurdles, Bell adds) but looks to be on track for a fall 2020 grand opening, at which point even hackers can have a go at Pebble Beach.

Pacific Grove Unified School DistrictSuperintendentRalph Porrasbegan noticing a disturbing trend among suspensions coming across his desk this fall, he toldP.G. City Councilon Dec. 18. Over a 60-day period most were connected to tobacco vaping-related products. Ive been in education for 30 years and Ive seen a lot of trends, Porras says. This one is insidious and it worries me a lot. Despite widespread news stories about vaping-related illnesses and deaths, vaping is on the rise among students Porras says its true among all schools in Monterey County. (TheU.S. Centers for Disease Controlreports more than 2,500 hospitalizations and 54 deaths due to the illness.) Porras sent a letter to parents describing what vaping devices look like. We dont know where they are getting them and thats half the concern, he says.

Read more:

The Buzz 12.26.19 - Monterey County Weekly

Church of England has ‘swallowed political correctness wholesale’, Queen’s former chaplain says, as he converts to Catholicism – The Telegraph

The Church of England has "swallowed political correctness wholesale", the Queen's former chaplain has said, as he announces that he is leaving the Anglican church to convert to Catholicism.

Dr Gavin Ashenden, who served the Queen from 2008 to 2017, said that the Church is increasingly bowing to the non-negotiable demands of secular culture and has remained astonishingly silent when it comes to defending Christian values.

Dr Ashenden stepped down from his role in the Church after objecting to the Quran being read during an Anglican service.

He has now chosen to convert to Catholicism because he believes it has the courage, integrity and conviction to hold the Christian ground.

Freedom of speech is slowly being eroded; those who refuse to be politically correct risk accusations of thought crime and Christians are being unfairly persecuted, he wrote in the Mail on Sunday. And where is the Church of England in this crucial culture war? Is it on the front line? Not that I can see. If anything, it has switched sides.

This isnt just a shame, its a calamity.

Too often, called upon to defend Christian values, it has remained astonishingly silent. Nowhere is this starker today than in the highly-charged debate over transgender rights, particularly regarding children and teenagers.

The rest is here:

Church of England has 'swallowed political correctness wholesale', Queen's former chaplain says, as he converts to Catholicism - The Telegraph

Mullane: A rock and roll Christmas this year and every year – Waynesboro Record Herald

Now its easy to make fun of millennials. They tend toward self-parody with their tattoos, manbuns, complicated coffee orders, fussy beer, over reliance on data, and gender-benderism.

Christmas gift giving is a chore.

You get what you think is right for people, but there are mistakes. A few Christmases ago, a friend got his wife a new upright vacuum cleaner. He posted a pic of the machine on Facebook prior to wrapping. A woman commented, Unless that thing has a diamond bracelet wrapped around the handle, dont do it!

Theyre still together, so I guess it worked out.

The best are the gifts that are instantly loved. That streak of joy that crosses their face when they open and realize what it is. Nothing like it. Youre just as happy, too. And you learn again that its the giving not the receiving that matters more.

And thats my problem this year. Theres a person Id like to get a gift for, a gift that would bring something missing in their life, which is joy. Actually, its not just one person, but a whole generation, the millennials. They are the Americans who turned 23-38 this year. All year Ive read about them. Its usually bad press. They are, according to reports and surveys and studies, the most unhappy of the living generations of Americas.

Now its easy to make fun of them. They tend toward self parody with their tattoos, manbuns, complicated coffee orders, fussy beer, over reliance on data, and gender-benderism.

Even my own kids and their teenage friends, who will soon replace the millennials (Gen Z or zoomers as they call themselves) make fun of millennials and their college debt and in-your-face political correctness.

America is a bubbling cauldron of racism, sexism, homophobia and other intractable social pathologies that requires heavy-handed social media tactics and government policies to correct. The future is dystopian, where CO2 leaves Mother Earth a Wall-E world denuded of green, where the oceans rise and life withers. Man, thats bleak.

It is no wonder that millennials figure prominently in Americas deaths of despair from suicide and opioid overdoses and other addictions. Two weeks ago, a business journal took a look at the state of millennial well-being and published it under this headline Lonely, burned out and depressed: The state of millennials mental health entering the 2020s.

Egad.

As I close in on 60, Im at a loss to explain the generational malaise.

I was born at the end of the baby boom, during the Camelot Era. Optimism was in the air. You breathed it as you grew up. Not that there werent bad things to feel depressed and angry about Vietnam, Nixon, gas rioting, a lot of other stuff, too. We had Klan rolling around Bucks County back then.

But the Big One was the Cold War, what Kennedy called our long twilight struggle between good and evil. (God-fearing America good, godless commie USSR evil.)

It hung over us 24/7. We on the East Coast knew wed be vaporized in a nuclear battle. The worst secret in Levittown was the Nike missile base off Route 413. In World War III, those nukes would rise from their silos and blast off toward the USSR. Our outgoing missiles would pass their incoming, and then our world would end. It was called MAD mutual assured destruction. Afterward, The living would envy the dead, it was said.

As kids we learned this in school, along with our numbers and colors and letters of the alphabet. But we didnt let it get to us, or conquer us. Im not sure why. Maybe it was that wonderful American optimism. Or maybe it was the music, rock and roll. You cant underestimate it. Rock music changed attitudes and emotions faster than any illicit drug. Maybe thats why it was so popular. It bards were taken more seriously than any network anchor, pundit, college professor, public intellectual or socialist socialists considered cranks in those days.

Top 40 radio, prehistoric compared to todays digital streaming services, provided the joyful cultural oxygen breathed by young Americans, maybe more than its credited.

The other night, I came across an old holiday video produced in 1983 for MTV. Its the obscure Rock and Roll Christmas by George Thorogood and the Destroyers. Its a fast, hard rock, blues and boogie tune, which was Thorogoods signature. Its done live, and the set is packed with kids dancing, some badly, but all having a great time, which is all that matters when youre rocking.

Thorogood was from Delaware, and he and bands like his were popular in the Philadelphia area at that time. Watching that video is how I remember it being back then out with friends, dancing with girls we didnt know, rocking til close. And everyone had plans, more or less. Everyone was figuring it out. Christmas was bright. The future was bright. You could see how happy this made your parents, too, that you were having a good time and had plans and were on your way.

I wish I could wrap that rock energy and optimism and fun and give it to the millennials this Christmas, and every Christmas until that joy comes, and despair vanishes.

JD Mullane can be reached at 215-949-5745 or at jmullane@couriertimes.com.

Read the original:

Mullane: A rock and roll Christmas this year and every year - Waynesboro Record Herald

Italy’s Far Right Charges the Pope With Culinary Heresy for Serving Pork-Free Pasta – Foreign Policy

Few things in Italy are more sacred than food. When the pope offered a lunch to the poor of Rome on Nov. 17, it was the menu, rather than the gesture, that made headlines. The pontiff, already unpopular on the right, came under attack from the conservative media because the lasagna his holiness served for lunch was pork-free. The Vatican had figured out that some of the guests would be Muslim and provided a halal meal, and the Italian right took this as a double insult: Not only did Pope Francis show compassion toward immigrants, but he also did so by butchering the recipe for a standard of Italian cuisine that traditionally requires a mixture of beef and pork.

In a recent TV appearance, the leader of the far-right League party, Matteo Salvini, bashed the European Union because an EU directive requiring the traceability of food makes life harder for Italian nonnas who sell homemade pasta in the southern city of Bari. If you come to Bari and you dont like St. Nicholas and focaccia, go back to your country, he said, referring to the citys patron saint and to one of its culinary specialties. No one had raised an issue with focaccia, but Salvinis defense was preemptive, to make it clear that we do not need to change our traditions.

In Italy, food has become the epicenter of a culture war waged by right-wing parties and their media allies against multiculturalism and European bureaucrats. To the right, traditional cuisine has become not only a source of national pride but also a signifier of national identity, which they believe to be threatened by multiculturalism and political correctness. They vow to defend lasagna and tortelliniwhose original recipes require a mixture of pork and beef and a mixture of pork and prosciutto, respectivelyfor the same reason they defend Christmas nativity scenes and crosses in public schools: to exclude Italys Muslim residents, whose religious practice includes avoiding pork, from Italian culture. (Jews, whose religion also prohibits eating pork, are just not part of the equation in his rhetoricthere are not many Jews in Italy, not all of them keep kosher, and those who do rarely attend public schools, so its unusual for a Jewish Italian to protest that pork is served in cafeterias.)

After the pope served pork-free lasagna, a prominent conservative Catholic author Antonio Socci wrote an opinion piece in Libero, a right-wing newspaper, accusing Francis of having subscribed to a suicidal, multiculturalist ideology that leads to the rejection of all that is Christian or Western. Pork-based lasagna, argued Socci, is a backbone of Italian civilization, like wine and Parmesan cheese.

The popes lasagna controversy wasnt an isolated incident. When the archbishop of Bologna, Matteo Zuppi, hosted a dinner for the poor in October, on the day of citys patron saint, he came under fire for a similar reason. The Archbishop served tortellini, the famous ring-shaped stuffed pasta traditionally filled with prosciutto or pork chops. But to make them palatable to Muslim guests, Zuppi ordered that some of them be stuffed with chicken instead. The choice enraged Salvini, who accused the archbishop of erasing Italys history.

Among those outraged by the chicken tortellini is Andrea Indini, an editor for the conservative newspaper Il Giornale,who wrote an article In Defense of Tortellini (and of Tradition). In an interview, Indini said that deviating from the traditional recipe of tortellini is dangerous because it could result in distorting our society, even more than globalization is already doing. He particularly objected to the fact that the original recipe was changed to suit a different culture: The idea to change tortellini not to bother Muslims is like a provocation, Indini said. Tradition is important, and it starts from little things.

While the populist right is vowing to defend tradition against immigrant cultures and globalization pretty much everywhere, theres something exquisitely Italian in the focus on food. That can be partially explained by the fact that food does have a special place in Italian culture: Many Italians cringe at the idea of Hawaiian pizza, seeing the addition of pineapple to a pizza as a culinary crime, regardless of their political orientation, and online you can find several videos of Italian nonnas expressing their shock on how their cuisine is distorted abroad.

But Davide Maria De Luca, a political reporter from the online news outlet Il Post, believes theres also another explanation: Italy is a country with a very low patriotism, so they weaponize the recipe of tortellini or lasagna. Likewise, in France, food has been weaponized against Muslim immigrants: Members of the right-wing politician Marine Le Pens party have campaigned against kebab shops, and the Bloc Identitaire nationalist movement has organized festivals dedicated to saucisson, a thick French sausage, and red wine.

The right-wing rhetoric of food purism in Italy started in the late 1990s, coinciding with the first large immigration wave from North Africa and the rise of the League. At the time, the League was a separatist party based in the wealthy North (back then, it was called the Northern League), but it also opposed immigration. Combining these two agendas, the party came up with the slogan Yes to polenta, no to couscous. (Polenta is popular in the Northern Italian Alps.)

But it was only in recent years that so-called alimentary sovereignty became a major political topic. In 2017, the right-wing city government of Trieste banned ethnic food from the cafeterias of public schools to protect our traditions. In 2018, Genoas conservative mayor banned opening of international restaurants in some streets of the city center, also in the name of European traditions. A few years earlier, a French mayor, Robert Menard of Beziers, announced he would block the opening new kebab shops, because they have nothing to do with our culture.

Right-leaning politicians are trying hard to look like foodies. The leader of the post-fascist party Brothers of Italy, Giorgia Meloni, has posted a series of cooking videos online: Meloni, who has recently surpassed Salvini in individual popularity, prepares a caprese salad (not a hard task: just layer mozzarella, tomatoes, basil, and olive oil) while lashing against the EU. Salvinis online presence revolves around food as much as it does around politics: The League leader is constantly posting pictures of his lunchor dinner, or afternoon snackand, when he travels across the country, he makes sure to include the local delicacies of the region he is visiting.

Despite the Italian rights emphasis on traditional food as if it were something unchanged throughout history, and therefore unchangeable, the household names of Italian cuisine often have a foreign origin or influence. And their recipes have changed over time.

Everyone thinks that the food they eat is typical of the place where they live, but most of it came from outside in more or less distant times, said Marco Aime, an anthropologist from the University of Genoa. For example, spaghetti are of Chinese origin, and tomato was introduced from America.

Polenta, so dear to the League, is made from corn, also introduced from the Americas. Many Sicilian recipes, including pasta con le sarde and couscous (yes, theres Sicilian couscous) were introduced by the Arabs during the Muslim domination of the island in the 9th century. Sorbet, a must in Italian cuisine, has an Arabic etymology.

Massimo Montanari, a food historian at the University of Bologna, said that every tradition is temporary and born on the innovation of the past. For instance, tortellini were invented in the Middle Ages, and stuffing them with chicken or turkey was considered normal until the 19th century. The supposed pork-only rule came later (pork was cheaper, and the stuffed pasta could be made from butchers scraps).

But although historically inaccurate, the idea that the countrys culinary tradition is immutable and therefore should be protected from foreign influence and change has become ingrained in Italys right-wing discourse. When a high school teacher made headlines in November for publicly threatening to fail some of his students because they participated to an anti-nationalist protest, the Italian media was quick to point out that the teacher, Giancarlo Talamini, had a personal website in which he proudly declared that he was a racist because I love polenta and tortellini.

Fabio Parasecoli, a professor of food studies at New York University, calls it gastropopulismo. Food, he argues, has become a proxy to describe national identity, and its something everyone can relate to. Food is about what you are. Its an easy tool, in the sovereigntist discourse, because it touches some intimate chords, Parasecoli said. Food brings the great global issues into everyday life.

Gastropopulism, Parasecoli said, originated from the left, with movements like Slow Food and left-wing intellectuals reviving the local food culture from deindustrialized areas. Today, this kind of rhetoric is more popular on the right, but it is still in deindustrialized areas that it enjoys more popularity. De Luca, the political journalist, noted that culinary nostalgia has a particularly strong grip in the countrys northeast, a League stronghold. The Veneto province, once the economic engine of Italy, now sees his young people emigrate to Milan or abroad, he said. In this climate, food has become a comforting tradition to cling to.

But this fetishization of food as tradition raises a question: In a country like Italy, who gets to decide whats tradition and whats not? After all, in almost 3,000 years of history, the Italian peninsula has experienced a wide range of influences and invasions. First it was the Phoenicians from the Levant, then the Romans, bringing culinary influence from all over their vast empire. After the empire collapsed, Germanic tribes and Arabs took turns invading different parts of the peninsula, while Austria and Spain colonized it in more recent times.

The Arabs introduced couscous and sorbet; the Austrians brought schnitzel, which in Italy is called cotoletta alla Milanese; the renowned cioccolato di Modica, a specialty of the Sicilian town of the same name, is a product of the Spanish domination until Italy was eventually unified, in the late 19th century, under the rule of a French-speaking king.

Seen in this context, culinary tradition is a political construct. Its the invention of tradition, said Parasecoli, the NYU historian. But, invented or not, tradition can become a powerful rhetorical weapon: It defines your identity, a pillar, a stronghold from which you can kick out outsiders.

Food in particular strikes a chord, because its often intertwined in personal memories, our personal history, and our deepest sense of identity. The idea that the food that we grew up with could be taken away by the forces of globalization is a powerful rhetorical asset, even if its an inaccurate one.

Read the original post:

Italy's Far Right Charges the Pope With Culinary Heresy for Serving Pork-Free Pasta - Foreign Policy

The most-read agency stories of 2019 – PRWeek

Geo Group calls out Edelman for dropping it as a clientJuly 31

Edelman grabbed unwanted national headlines in July, after finding itself at the intersection of politics and employee purpose. After thinking about adding private prison company the Geo Group as a client, the agency dropped the account in the face of employee complaints over work the company does for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Geo Group accused the agency of bowing to political correctness.

Andrew Garson charged with wire fraudOctober 2

Sometimes, bad news come in twos, not threes. The second-most-read agency piece was the story of Andrew Garson, who was arrested for a scheme involving two PR firms he worked for: MWWPR and WME-IMG. Garson allegedly billed MWW for client expenses he incurred while at Catalyst, a firm that eventually became part of Endeavor.

USAA names Weber Shandwick lead corporate agencyAugust 2

In August, the service-member-focused insurer and bank USAA picked Weber Shandwick as its lead corporate communications firm, with work led by the agencys Washington, DC, office.

How a crass social media star became an agency copywriterNovember 27

Is the jump from crass social media influencer to copywriter that big? Marketing firm EP+Co didnt think so. The firm hired Sarah Schauer, who had 850,000 followers on Vine, prior to the platforms demise, as well as 20,300 followers on Instagram and 137,000 on Twitter.

Freuds hires ex-Clinton campaign adviser Latham to oversee radical changesAugust 18

The fifth-most-read story concerned Freuds hiring back former employee Sara Latham, who was also a senior adviser for Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential bid. Latham had worked at the shop between 2003 and 2005 and was rejoining to help Freuds implement structural changes.

Read more:

The most-read agency stories of 2019 - PRWeek

Spoofing the Argus-Courier – Petaluma Argus Courier

Back in the 1970s and 80s when the Argus-Courier was a daily newspaper, the news and photo staff produced a special edition once a year that was never seen by the general public. It was the annual spoof edition that was assembled in December and distributed to employees at the newspapers holiday party.

The edition, usually four to six pages, was called the Anguish-Carrier.

It was a different time, before political correctness, Human Resource departments and the Me-Too Movement. The Anguish-Carrier editions were humorous, risqu and borderline inappropriate. They poked fun at fellow employees.

And they were always eagerly anticipated at the annual holiday party.

But today, for obvious reasons, they would not be permitted.

And if employees were to produce them, it would likely be grounds for dismissal.

The spoof editions were printed for more than 10 years, before the publisher in 1989 put an end to them because of a story that took a dig at him. Until today, the Anguish-Carrier was known only to employees of the newspaper. A few copies, yellowed by time, have been saved for posterity.

The motto of the Argus-Courier in those days, printed below the front-page flag, was Serving Sonoma County since 1855. The Anguish-Carrier flag was placed above the phrase Milking Sonoma County since 1855.

Recently, several former Argus-Courier employees from that era got together to share their recollections about the Anguish-Carrier editions. And they laughed heartily as they looked over copies of the spoof editions from 40 years ago.

Doug Brown, a photographer at the Argus-Courier from 1979 to 1989, recalled, My most vivid memory was the last edition.That November, a baby duck got cut on a fish hook in the lake at Lucchesi Park.Someone took him to Petaluma Valley Hospital.A surgeon removed the hook and gave the duckling a stitch to close the wound. I took photos of the procedureand they were published with the story.

As the deadline for the Anguish-Carrier approached, he continued, I wrote an article called Save the Bird.It was about how the publisher had a heart attack and needed a heart replacement.The search was on for a heart, but we couldnt find a heart small enough.Finally, we found a baby bird that had a suitably small heart, but once the procedurestarted, everyone began yelling, Save the bird!

Brown added, This was during the time the editorial and photo departments were trying to unionize. On December 26, after seeing the Anguish-Carrier,the publisher came storming out of his office screaming, Who the f--- wrote this? It was me and I signed the article By Dog Bowser.I know the entire editorial staff knew who wrote it, but not a finger was pointed, or a word uttered.

The publisher put the kibosh on the Anguish from that moment on.

One of my favorite memories about working at the Argus-Courier was writing for the Anguish, said Brown.

Jeff Weber, who worked in the newsroom from 1980 to 1985, recalled contributing several Anguish articles during his five years at as a reporter and Saturday edition editor.

The one I remember best was a not-so-subtle parody of the sports editor, whose tenure was relatively short -- perhaps because he faced the unenviable task of following in the footsteps of the legendary Casey Tefertiller. (Tefertiller went on to work as a sportswriter for the San Francisco Examiner and wrote several books about Wyatt Earp and the American West.)

More here:

Spoofing the Argus-Courier - Petaluma Argus Courier

2019: A Year in Reading – National Review

Winston Churchill(Library of Congress)Mostly about politics ancient and modern

As the decade comes to a close, I would like to thank National Reviewfor giving me the opportunity to put forward this annual list of books that you should read.This is my seventh list since 2013.For this one, I have put a lot more emphasis on political books because, like most thinking Americans, I am striving to understand our dynamic and unpredictable landscape. Incredibly useful in this regard were two books by authors well-known to NR readers: Alienated America, by Tim Carney, and The Smallest Minority, by Kevin D. Williamson.

In Alienated America, Carney captures the enormous differences in 21st-century American between tight-knit communities and alienated communities, and the political implications of those differences. He sees religion as a stabilizing force, noting that popular culture likes to paint the dark picture of religion in America, but the actual data point the other way. Carney observes, however, that religions ability to stabilize social institutions and create community is increasingly limited as younger generations turn away from any faith at all. He notes rather grimly that if you have to choose between plentiful worry-free sex and church, then church is fighting an uphill fight.

Williamsons The Smallest Minority also looks at todays America and finds a country where too many citizens are unwilling to tolerate differing opinions. The chief pleasure of Williamsons book is the way his critique is presented in strong and evocative writing. Williamson is like a jazz master with English. He may not follow all the traditional rules, but youre impressed with what he can do with language and metaphor to drive an argument home. His riffs off the main melody includes syncopating, laugh-out-loud humor. His description of his brief ordeal with The Atlantic magazine is Williamson at his best and a reminder that NR is fortunate to have him back.

Another writer familiar to NR readers is Michael Brendan Dougherty. His moving memoir, My Father Left Me Ireland, tells the story of his growing up with an absent father, in the form of letters he wrote to his father as an adult. Along the way, he has moments of great insight into family, fatherhood, and Irishness, including this one, about the Irish language: When the Irish compare the language revivals of Hebrew and Irish, they are tempted simply to despair of Irish ability. The similarities are hard to miss. Each language movement talked about itself as an attempt to recover their respective nations manhood. . . . And each of the language revivals was meant to foreshadow and undergird the building of a viable nation state.

The year 2019 was a good one for biographies, and some of the best were Matriarch, by Susan Page; Our Man, by George Packer; Touched with Fire, by David Lowe; and of course Churchill, by Andrew Roberts.

Matriarch, about Barbara Bush, tells the story of one of the most important and unsung women of the 20th century. Wife of one president and mother of another, she was a quick-witted and wise adviser who was often underestimated by those who couldnt get past the white hair and the string of pearls. One of the misunderestimaters was Nancy Reagan, who was chronically rude to Barbara when Nancy was the first lady, but she got her comeuppance in later years. When Nancy falsely claimed that Barbara snubbed ex-president Reagan, Barbara did not hold back, telling Nancy, And we did have your wonderful husband to the White House, and dont you ever call me again! That was the last non-perfunctory conversation the two women ever had.

Our Man, referring to the Democratic foreign-policy adviser Richard Holbrooke, explains why a man who never had any of the top jobs in American foreign policy was still influential enough to merit a substantial biography. He may never have made it to his lifelong goals of being secretary of state or national-security adviser, but he sure acted as if he belonged. As an assistant secretary of state under Clinton, Packer reports, At meetings in the situation room, [Holbrooke] would start out seated against the wall with the other plus-ones, but soon his chair began to slide forward until it was wedged at the table between the cabinet officers, to their intense annoyance. This behavior understandably created some enemies. Packer tells of a young Susan Rice flipping the bird to an arrogant and condescending Holbrooke, and later getting congratulated for doing so by Secretary of State Madeline Albright.

Touched by Fire, about the Jewish civil-rights lawyer Morris Abram, was a total and pleasant surprise. I vaguely knew of Morris as a long-time Jewish organizational leader, but he had a fascinating life, serving, among many other things, as a formidable sparring partner for National Review founder William F. Buckley, who called him one of the most ferocious advocates in my experience. Abram also mentored future homeland-security secretary Jeh Johnson, who was amazed that Abram liked lowbrow snacks, just like anyone else. As Johnson recalled, It was like yodels or Twinkies or Ring Dings. Im addicted to those things. I was 27 years old at the time. It was a validation for me to see the great Morris Abram eating junk food. Although Abram initially gained fame as a liberal, he drifted to the right in response to many of the excesses of the Left, and his taste in reading improved greatly over the years. Late in life, Lowe observes, Abram wrote to his son Morris Junior that [Joseph] Epstein, whom he said had been forced from his position as editor of The American Scholar for reasons of political correctness, had become one of his favorite essayists. In Geneva, he would look forward to receiving the latest issue of the neoconservative magazine Commentary and proceed to read it from cover to cover the morning of its arrival, making notes in the margins of each article.

NR readers do not need to be told to read a biography of Winston Churchill by Andrew Roberts, especially one as good as this one. Its worth reading the 1,000 or so pages just to get to this observation about the elderly Churchill seeing some of his acquaintances pass on: As a drinker, smoker and carnivore, outliving teetotalers and vegetarians never failed to give Churchill immense satisfaction.

Barry Strausss 10 Caesars is not a biography, but a history of the ten most important Roman emperors, in his expert opinion. Strauss has a gift for making the ancients come alive, and he does not disappoint here. When describing Hadrian, for example, he notes that Hadrians traveling entourage, complete with imperial secretaries, bureaucrats, hangers-on, servants, his wife and her staff, was the second Rome; the government on the move. It was the Air Force One of the ancient world. I understood the key Roman emperors much better after reading Strausss book.

Ben Shapiros Right Side of History also starts in the ancient world and brings things up to the present in a breezy, whirlwind tour of western civilization. While he rightfully lauds the accomplishments of the West, he cautions that modern man may not exactly be making the most of what our ancestors have built. As Shapiro says, We might not think of binge-watching Stranger Things as an iron yoke upon our neck, but if television is our best reason to live, were not really living. Rejoice in the purpose G-d gives you.

David McCullough has written many excellent works of history, and The Pioneers, his look at the movers from the 13 colonies to what is now the Midwest, is no exception. What stood out most about this book, though, was the acknowledgements section, in which he explains what attracted him to the topic, the libraries and archives he needed to tell the story, and his multi-decade effort to pursue it. Another book that makes great use of a library is Dan Rabinowitzs The Lost Library, which tells the Indiana Jonesworthy tale of Eastern Europes greatest Jewish library, its conquest by the Nazis, and the post-war struggle over the librarys contents.

Finally, I recommend Jack Goldsmiths In Hoffas Shadow. Goldsmith, a senior Justice Department official under George W. Bush, got that position only by renouncing his stepfather, Chuckie OBrien, a longtime aide to Jimmy Hoffa suspected by the FBI of delivering Hoffa to his still mysterious demise. OBrien achieved his own sort of infamy from the FBIs attention. As Goldsmith writes of Chuckie, It takes a special life and a special character to be portrayed by Robert Duvall, Paul Newman, and Danny DeVito in three quite different roles and three major motion pictures. Goldsmith makes the case that he was wrong to renounce Chuckie, and the FBI was wrong to accuse him. He also gives a great portrayal of the fiery and charismatic Hoffa. Regarding Hoffas teamster rival Frank Fitzsimmons, Goldsmith informs us that one sign of Hoffas visceral, almost childlike hatred was that he taped a picture of Fitzsimmons face under the downstairs toilet seat. While Hoffa could be immature, he could also be wise. As Chuckie recalled, I didnt know what the Wall Street Journal was until Mr. Hoffa said, You read this, you read Time, Newsweek, and find a book and read it and youll be able to handle yourself with anybody. Good advice to follow.

With the 2010s over, many people like to make pledges or resolutions regarding their plans for the next decade. My pledge to you, dear reader, is to keep reading, and I hope you do the same. Doing so will allow you to handle yourself with anybody, and somewhere, in some still undiscovered place, Jimmy Hoffa will appreciate it.

Visit link:

2019: A Year in Reading - National Review

Letter: Dems cannot beat Trump on issues | Opinions and Editorials – Aiken Standard

Democrats must realize they cannot beat Trump based on his achievements, but can only denigrate his presidency, so another political inquisition has been held. Leading candidates for the Democrats include the mentally slow and possibly corrupt Joe Biden and two socialists fighting about who can steal the most money from those who earned it.

Bidens staff has limited his non-scripted public appearances due to gaffes. Bidens sons companies received over $300 million from a corrupt Ukrainian energy company and a $1.5 billion loan from the Chinese for what?

Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warrens economic policies will transform American competitive values into a socialist system that has failed or is failing in every instance it has been tried. Irony would be that any working American would support giving more of their money and power to our inefficient government while the people of Hong Kong, who are now living the perils of social communism, are fighting for capitalism and against increased government interference in their lives.

What have the Democrats done recently to improve your life? Democratic strategy is to push us apart by promoting divisiveness based on whatever issue they can stir up race, sex, environment, religion, political correctness, money, etc. Now it is a sin to be financially successful. Current Democratic candidates offer no solutions for improving Americas productivity and standing in our competitive world. Instead, they promote giveaways to buy votes using the money earned by hard-working Americans. You may dislike Trumps bluntness; but he is effectively implementing.

John Harley

Aiken

View original post here:

Letter: Dems cannot beat Trump on issues | Opinions and Editorials - Aiken Standard

The Gripes of a Trump Supporter – Townhall

|

Posted: Dec 26, 2019 11:31 AM

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

I consider Donald Trump one of the greatest presidents this country has ever known. He exudes love of America, boldly pursues excellence, and governs based on incisive common sense rather than nauseating political correctness.

That said:

1) Why are Roger Stone and Paul Manafort still languishing in legal purgatory? These men were pursued by the Justice Department Trump'sJustice Department for one reason only: They helped Trump become president. Yet, so far Trump has let them hang out to dry.

Democrat lobbyist Tony Podesta committed essentially the same crime for which Manafort was targeted. Yet, the Justice Department decided to grant Podesta immunity and go after Manafort. Why didn't it grant Manafort immunity and go after Podesta? You know the answer. Washington is a swamp.

Roger Stone, meanwhile, had his home raided in the middle of the night by the FBI for lying during a sham investigation. He cant even publicly speak about his case now because a totalitarian judge has so ordered. Amazingly, though, when asked on Tuesday whether he would pardon Stone, Trump replied, I hadn't thought of it.

He hadnt thought of it? Pray tell, why not? Stone is suffering because of his 40-year friendship with the president. If Trump is loyal to his friends as I and so many other Trump supporters like to believe he must pardon Stone and Manafort immediately.

2) Why has such little progress been made on the border wall three years into Trump's presidency? Of course, Trump alone is not to blame for the barely-existent wall. Congress has been stonewalling him every step of the way. But Trump has several cards to play. First, he can arguably forge ahead without congressional help considering that defending the country from invasion is a presidential duty.

Second, Trump can veto any major funding bill that doesnt give him sufficient funds for the wall. It's hard to imagine him not winning the ensuing standoff. How would House Democrats defend their refusal to fund the wall? By claiming that a million illegal immigrants annually is good for America? Thats not exactly a winning argument with most voters.

3) Why are we still in Afghanistan? American troops have been stationed and dying there for 18 years. Why?

4) Why did Trump sign the $1.4 trillion spending bill last week? In March 2018, a frustrated Trump promised never to sign another rushed spending bill with so much waste. The only reason he was willing to sign one then, he said, is because the military desperately needed to be rebuilt.

Does the military really need all the money it asks for? I doubt it. But let's leave that question aside. Trump signed the bill; the military got $700 billion. The year before that, it also received $700 billion. And now it just received an additional $700 billion.

In total, the military has received over $2 trillion under Trump to rebuild what was already the most powerful fighting force in the world. If that figure is somehow not high enough, what is the target number? How many more outrageous spending bills will Trump sign before the military is considered rebuilt? At the very least, Trump owes us that information.

I'll end how I started: I love Trump. I worked to get him elected in 2016 and constantly bless God that he's our president. He's a breath of fresh air and an inspiration to me personally. He has also fulfilled most of the promises he made to his supporters. But he has disappointed in a few areas, and Trump fans shouldnt be satisfied until he gives us, not merely a good presidency, but as Trump might say the best presidency.

Original post:

The Gripes of a Trump Supporter - Townhall

Poll Finds 88% of College Students Say its not Offensive to Wish Strangers a Merry Christmas – legal Insurrection

the results might be surprising given the chokehold political correctness has on college campuses today

This is a bit of good news for the holiday. Merry Christmas!

The College Fix reports:

POLL: 88% of college students say its NOT offensive to wish Merry Christmas to a stranger

It appears the political correctness grinch hasnt entirely stolen away the Christmas joy on campuses.

The vast majority of students recently surveyed said it is not offensive to wish Merry Christmas to a stranger, according to a College Fix poll.

The online poll asked roughly 1,000 college students: Is it offensive to wish Merry Christmas to a stranger? Eighty-eight percent responded it is not. Another 8 percent said they were not sure. And finally 4 percent said yes, it is offensive.

While the results might be surprising given the chokehold political correctness has on college campuses today, they ring similar to a national poll taken in 2016 of 1,224 registered voters that found only 3 percent of respondents were personally offended by Merry Christmas.

The student poll was conducted last week exclusively for The College Fix by College Pulse, an online survey and analytics company focused on college students.

The Fix poll questioned roughly 1,000 students 294 Democrat students, 531 independents and 171 college Republicans. Eight percent of Democrat students said its offensive to wish someone a Merry Christmas, 3 percent of independent students said it was, and only 1 percent of Republican students found it offensive.

Visit link:

Poll Finds 88% of College Students Say its not Offensive to Wish Strangers a Merry Christmas - legal Insurrection

Reflections from the Ohio middle on an impeached president: Roger Kruse – cleveland.com

MIDDLEFIELD, Ohio -- How does one make sense out of the political circus that continues to play out before our eyes? Is Donald Trump just a victim of a witch hunt motivated by opponents out to bring him down? Did Democrats piece together a flimsy collection of evidence that really doesnt add up to any impeachable offense? Or is President Trump finally facing the music of his own reckless leadership style? Has he consistently played footloose and fancy-free with the law of the land, carelessly pursuing an agenda that benefits himself?

What is the truth of the matter? Can anyone put forward an opinion that approaches fairness and neutrality, or are we all prisoners to our own presuppositions and slanted political outlook?

As a 67-year-old guy from middle-class America, I grew up rooting for John F. Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey while voting for Jimmy Carter. Yet it is a mistake to tag me as a Democrat. I also voted for Ronald Reagan and the Bushes, both father and son. To be honest, in the last presidential election I voted for neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump. I wrote in a name not on the ballot.

Roger Kruse at his home in the Geauga County village of Middlefield, Ohio

Presently, I am decidedly conservative but looking for candidates that show some degree of integrity, wisdom, and ability to lead effectively. In these days of political divisiveness, we need leaders who can unite us and guide us toward cooperation and consensus. There will always be differences. That will never change. However, diversity of outlook can produce strength, balance, and a sort of hybrid of political policy and action. We just need a leader who will show us the way!

Most certainly, Donald Trump has inflicted trouble upon himself. A man reaps what he sows. The president has consistently displayed arrogance and a mean-spiritedness. He laments fake news but cranks it out himself every day.

He does deserve some credit for an economy humming along in robust health with low unemployment numbers. He also stands up to unfair trade practices and makes judicial appointments defined by a constitutional stance. I even like the fact that he eschews political correctness, defying media pressure to conform to their ideology. However, an effective leader must inspire, unite, and show by example how Americans can work together. Our president has consistently belittled and insulted opponents and treats his own Cabinet members with surprising disrespect!

It is unlikely that our president will change his stripes. It is also improbable that the U.S. Senate will convict and remove him from office. For those looking for change, the ballot box is still the best way for each citizen to determine who will lead us every four years. His impeachment could, in fact, backfire on Democrats. On the other hand, a good many Americans are weary of Mr. Trumps incessant tweets and his braggadocio style of self-promotion. The truth is, none of us knows just how the election will play out. We can only hope and pray that the American people will make the best choice!

Roger Kruse is a proud American convinced that our democracy is a precious gift that invites our participation as well as protection. After growing up in Solon, he met wife Glenda in India in 1980, and they have raised five children on four rural acres in Geauga County.

****************************

Have something to say about this topic? Use the comments to share your thoughts. Then, stay informed when readers reply to your comments by using the Follow option at the top of the comments, and look for updates via the small blue bell in the lower right as you look at more stories on cleveland.com.

See the original post here:

Reflections from the Ohio middle on an impeached president: Roger Kruse - cleveland.com