
Over the past five years, I’ve watched as the public sector has become more comfortable with, and in some cases has even embraced and pushed forward, the use of “social media technology” and “enterprise 2.0 software” to transform the way government work is done. The promise of technological conveniences is truly enticing, especially to an increasing impatient, technology equipped workforce, who have grand visions for the future of government. A large part of the change is lead by “Digital Natives” – people who have grown up in a connected world and have different attitudes, approaches and habits than those in preceding generations. And, while there is no doubt that the way we work in government is changing at a speed that is increasingly uncomfortable for many digital skeptics, a number of questions remain unanswered about what the future of government truly looks like in this new world. For example, what are the implications of growing up in a society that always remembers and never forgets? What are the ramifications for organizations navigating a world with more and more digital interactions and communications? What does this mean for government leaders who are trying to cope with the information overload, which is only amplified by each new wave of technology?
These are a few of the questions we will be discussing at the Nobel Public Services Summit in Stockholm this December. In a session called “A Public Sector Where Digital Natives Thrive” we will be exploring how the public sector will evolve in the Digital Age and we will compare and contrast the roles of the Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, and Digital Skeptics in this new digital landscape.
We hope to create an interactive, technology-enabled session so that YOU can participate alongside (digitally speaking) with the public sector delegates to collaborate, debate, and vote on a number of discussion related questions. During the event we will use #PSS09 and #PSS09DN. But, in preparation for the session, we are asking for your participation in helping us answer three questions related to the future of government in the digital age which are included below. We’ve setup three easy ways for you to share your input – a simple web interface, a twitter poll, or texting capability. Additionally, we hope that you will share your thoughts with us by leaving a comment here.
So, what do YOU think?
1. Should privacy be sacrificed for transparency?
Vote one of 3 Ways:
a. Online poll
b. Twitter – tweet @poll 46463 for Yes, @poll 46464 for No
c. Text to +447624806527 – 46463 for Yes, 46464 for No
2. Should the integration of devices, workplaces and “boundary-less” organizations be a top priority for the public sector?
Vote one of 3 Ways:
a. Online poll
b. Twitter – tweet @poll 46462 for Yes, @poll 46465 for No
c. Text to +447624806527 – 46462 for Yes, 46465 for No
3. Should public sector workers be allowed to post content in real-time using social media technologies without management approval?
Vote one of 3 Ways:
a. Online poll
b. Twitter – tweet @poll 46466 for Yes, @poll 46467 for No
c. Text to +447624806527 – 46466 for Yes, 46467 for No





We are started, and Craig Fugate, the Administrator of FEMA, just gave his keynote. Sitting 3 miles away from NASA Ames Research Center at the 
"This image represents a portion of the central uplift within the crater Copernicus. The image, LOV-152-H1, was taken by Lunar Orbiter V on 16 August 1967 at an altitude of 103 km. The spacecraft was looking straight down at the crater as it snapped this picture series. The resolution of this image is 2.2 meters/pixel. You can see the increase in contrast and resolution that LOIRP has attained when you compare the high resolution USGS image and the one obtained by LOIRP on 10 December 2009." 
Keith's note: On Thursday, 10 December 2009, we'll be doing a live webcast from the Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project (LOIRP) at "McMoon's" i.e. Building 596 at the NASA Ames Research Park. 

Keith's note: This image was taken on 21 November 1996 by Lunar Orbiter II at an altitude of 44 miles. The image is taken from frame 92, Framelet 445, and has resolution is 0.98 meters/pixel. As such the large boulder that has left a trail is around 6-7 meters in diameter. The image on the left shows the highest resolution image available online at LPI. On the right is the raw unproceesed image we retrieved this afternoon. While the large boulder's trail is seen in both images, the details of that trail and the rest of the boulder field are much sharper in our newly retrieved image. 

Keith's note: These images are taken from Lunar Orbiter II image LOII_092H1 Framelet 522. On the left is the highest resolution scanned version available online at LPI (or USGS). On the right is our partially processed version that we retrieved this morning. In addition to providing a much sharper image, note that our new image also allows contrast to be controlled such that features can seen in the areas that are darkened in the older image. 
Reader's note: I believe your posting in regard to this topic and the comments it has generated have missed the mark given that the original reason for this survey as conveyed in the e-mails announcing it has not been included. The real question that should be asked is what in the world does any of this have to do with the "Langley Message?"


Keith's note: For an agency that has tens of thousands of employees inside the firewall, you (at least) need a zero on this number in order to call it a success - especially when you consider what these employees (and their kids) use out in the real world. Then again, it is a good start. I can clearly recall what it took back in the 80's for my supervisors at NASA to start using email - personally (instead of having their secretaries check it once a week).