NATO – State

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

Formed in 1949 with the signing of the Washington Treaty, NATO is a security alliance of 28 countriesfrom North America and Europe. NATO's fundamental goal is to safeguard the Allies' freedom and security by political and military means. NATO remains the principal security instrument of the transatlantic community and expression of its common democratic values. It is the practical means through which the security of North America and Europe are permanently tied together. NATO enlargement has furthered the U.S. goal of a Europe whole, free, and at peace.

Article 5 of the Washington Treaty -- that an attack against one Ally is an attack against all -- is at the core of the Alliance, a promise of collective defense. Article 4 of the treaty ensures consultations among Allies on security matters of common interest, which have expanded from a narrowly defined Soviet threat to the critical mission in Afghanistan, as well as peacekeeping in Kosovo and new threats to security such as cyber attacks, and global threats such as terrorism and piracy that affect the Alliance and its global network of partners.

In addition to its traditional role in the territorial defense of Allied nations, NATO leads the UN-mandated International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan and has ongoing missions in the Balkans andthe Mediterranean; it also conducts extensive training exercises and offers security support to partners around the globe, including the European Union in particular but also the United Nations and the African Union.

Original post:

NATO - State

Nato News

Reuters Sat 26 Apr 2014 Mediators held in Ukraine as U.S. readies new Russia sanctions SLAVIANSK, Ukraine/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States and the European Union are expected on Monday to impose new sanctions on Russian individuals, sources said on Friday, as the Ukraine crisis... (photo: EC / EU) EUropean Union Photos Russia Ukraine Wikipedia: Russia WorldNews.com Fri 25 Apr 2014 When Nature Attacks: Geopolitics of Avalanches Article by WN.com correspondent Dallas Darling "Humankind was put on earth to keep the heavens aloft. When we fail, creation remains unfinished." -The Kotzker rebbe Recent avalanches in the mountains... (photo: WN / Imran Nissar) Geopolitics Natural Disaster Photos War On Terror Wikipedia: Geopolitics Top Stories more Headlines Belfast Telegraph Thu 24 Apr 2014 Russian troops mass near Ukraine Ukrainian forces have moved in and killed at least two pro-Russia insurgents in the country's tumultuous east, an escalation that prompted new threats from Russian... (photo: Russian Presidential Press and Information Office) Defense Moscow Photos Ukraine Wikipedia: 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine Business Insider Wed 23 Apr 2014 The 11 Most Powerful Militaries In The World Asymmetrical wars in Afghanistan, Vietnam, and now in Syria demonstrate all too clearly that relatively small numbers of belligerents can carry out successful military... (photo: AP / Mark Lennihan) Defence Militaries Photos Wikipedia: List of countries by military expenditures World National Journal Wed 23 Apr 2014 U.S. Sending Troops to Eastern Europe, Must Turn Over Info on CIA Prisons, Apaches Headed to Egypt By Jordain Carney Follow on Twitter April 23, 2014 By Jordain Carney ( @jordainc) Welcome to NJ's Early Bird, today's best national security, defense, and foreign policy... (photo: USMC / Zachery B. Martin) Egypt Europe Photos Troops Wikipedia: Troop Novosti Tue 22 Apr 2014 ANALYSIS: NATO Build Up in Poland Threatens International Stability WASHINGTON, April 22 (RIA Novosti), Lyudmila Chernova NATOs military build-up in Poland is a dangerous and provocative development which might lead to... (photo: US DoD) Nato Photos Poland Washington Wikipedia: NATO The Daily Telegraph Tue 22 Apr 2014 US troop numbers in Afghanistan may drop below 10,000 Related Articles Deal for US troops to stay in Afghanistan 'will be signed soon' 07 Dec 2013 The 'living hell' of patrol in Afghanistan 02 Dec 2013 Karzai's refusal to... (photo: USMC / Zachery B. Martin) Afghanistan Karzai Photos US Troops Wikipedia: Afghanistan Khaleej Times Mon 21 Apr 2014 Bidens Ukraine agenda Diplomatic pressure is now showing on Russia. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrovs remark that Ukraine is to be blamed for violating the Geneva accord is incomprehensive... (photo: AP / Sergei Chuzavkov) Geneva Photos Russia Ukraine Wikipedia: Joe Biden

View original post here:

Nato News

NATO to deploy recon flights over Poland

An Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) plane such as this will be deployed to Poland amid heightened tensions with Russia. Photo: AFP

Ukraine crisis: Latest news

Brussels: NATO says it will deploy AWACS reconnaissance aircraft to fly over Poland and Romania as part of alliance efforts to monitor the crisis in Ukraine.

The flights "will enhance the Alliance's situational awareness," a NATO official said on Monday.

They added that "all AWACS reconnaissance flights will take place solely over Alliance territory."

Advertisement

"This decision is an appropriate and responsible action in line with NATO's decision to intensify our ongoing assessment of the implications of this crisis for Alliance security," the official said.

The NATO announcement comes as Washington and Moscow traded barbs over rival proposals to ease the crisis, with each challenging the other to show they were really interested in a peaceful outcome.

The AWACS - Airborne Warning and Control System - will fly missions from their home airbase in Geilenkirchen, Germany, and from Waddington in Britain.

The AWACS aircraft are one of the most sophisticated command and control vehicles in the NATO armoury, capable of monitoring huge swathes of airspace.

More here:

NATO to deploy recon flights over Poland

Keynote Address by Shri Shivshankar Menon, NSA at International Seminar on Kautilya – Video


Keynote Address by Shri Shivshankar Menon, NSA at International Seminar on Kautilya
International Seminar on Kautilya April 9, 2014 Organised by Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA), New Delhi For more details visit http://idsa....

By: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

Link:

Keynote Address by Shri Shivshankar Menon, NSA at International Seminar on Kautilya - Video

Posted in NSA

An Inside Look at the NSA With Whistleblower William Binney (Part 1 of 2) – Video


An Inside Look at the NSA With Whistleblower William Binney (Part 1 of 2)
In this video WeAreChange gets an unique inside look at inner workings and evolution of the NSA with NSA Whistleblower William Binney. Binney describes his work with the National Security...

By: WeAreChange

Read the original:

An Inside Look at the NSA With Whistleblower William Binney (Part 1 of 2) - Video

Posted in NSA

Former NSA Head To Become Columnist For Conservative Paper To Discuss Intelligence – Video


Former NSA Head To Become Columnist For Conservative Paper To Discuss Intelligence
Former General Michael Hayden, former head of the NSA, has a new gig writing for the conservative Washington Times. His column will be titled "Inside Intelli...

By: WochitGeneralNews

Visit link:

Former NSA Head To Become Columnist For Conservative Paper To Discuss Intelligence - Video

Posted in NSA

Protections for e-data clear Senate committee

By Marianne Goodland

Journal-Advocate legislative reporter

A resolution to add "electronic data" to the Colorado constitution's equivalent of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution got unanimous support this week from a Senate committee.

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday gave a 5-0 vote to Senate Concurrent Resolution 14-002, sponsored by Sen. Greg Brophy (R-Wray) and Senate President Morgan Carroll (D-Aurora). The resolution, which asks for voter approval in November, would add "electronic data" to the list of items protected from unreasonable search and seizure in Article 2, Section 7 of the Colorado constitution.

The resolution now goes to the full Senate. Two-thirds of the Senate, or 24 votes, are needed for the resolution to go on to the House.

While the committee was unanimous in its support of SCR 2, the legal community was not. Opposition came from the Colorado Attorney General, police chiefs, and the Colorado District Attorneys' Council. The Colorado County Sheriffs' Association, the Libertarian Party and the Colorado chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) all spoke in favor of SCR 2.

The courts are weighing this question now, said Brophy in introducing the resolution. "It's appropriate that the Legislature also weigh in." He noted that electronic data should be private, the same as if it were stored in a file cabinet in the home. But government agencies aren't treating it that way and are looking at this data without a warrant, he explained.

Papers and other effects are already protected in the state constitution, but electronic data is the modern equivalent, Carroll said. Law enforcement should interpret it that way, but they don't always do that. "There should be a reasonable expectation of privacy" for electronic data.

Carroll also noted that any data that is encrypted or password protected should be protected under the law, even when it is stored in cyberspace, or the Cloud. "I don't forego a reasonable expectation of privacy when I enter a physical public domain" such as Civic Center Park in Denver, she said. The same should apply to electronic data stored in the Cloud.

Deputy Attorney General Matthew Durkin said the resolution was unnecessary, since the state and federal constitutions already protect electronic data, even if it is not listed. Electronic data is not defined in the resolution, he said, and it could be interpreted in many different ways. Instead, citizens should rely on the judicial branch to make to make that determination, which they have done for more than 200 years.

Continued here:

Protections for e-data clear Senate committee

Second Amendment – U.S. Constitution – FindLaw

Amendment Text | Annotations

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Prior to the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller,1 the courts had yet to definitively state what right the Second Amendment protected. The opposing theories, perhaps oversimplified, were (1) an "individual rights" approach, whereby the Amendment protected individuals' rights to firearm ownership, possession, and transportation; and (2) a "states' rights" approach, under which the Amendment only protected the right to keep and bear arms in connection with organized state militia units.2 Moreover, it was generally believed that the Amendment was only a bar to federal action, not to state or municipal restraints.3

However, the Supreme Court has now definitively held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that weapon for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Moreover, this right applies not just to the federal government, but to states and municipalities as well.

In Heller, the Court held that (1) the District of Columbia's total ban on handgun possession in the home amounted to a prohibition on an entire class of "arms" that Americans overwhelmingly chose for the lawful purpose of self-defense, and thus violated the Second Amendment; and (2) the District's requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock also violated the Second Amendment, because the law made it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense.

The Court reasoned that the Amendment's prefatory clause, i.e., "[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," announced the Amendment's purpose, but did not limit or expand the scope of the operative clause, i.e., "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Moreover, the prefatory clause's history comported with the Court's interpretation, because the prefatory clause stemmed from the Anti-Federalists' concern that the federal government would disarm the people in order to disable the citizens' militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule.

Further, the Court distinguished United States v.Miller,4 in which the Court upheld a statute requiring registration under the National Firearms Act of sawed-off shotguns, on the ground that Miller limited the type of weapon to which the Second Amendment right applied to those in common use for lawful purposes.

In McDonald v. Chicago,5 the Court struck down laws enacted by Chicago and the village of Oak Park effectively banning handgun possession by almost all private citizens, holding that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Second Amendment right, recognized in Heller, to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense.

The Court reasoned that this right is fundamental to the nation's scheme of ordered liberty, given that self-defense was a basic right recognized by many legal systems from ancient times to the present, and Heller held that individual self-defense was "the central component" of the Second Amendment right. Moreover, a survey of the contemporaneous history also demonstrated clearly that the Fourteenth Amendment's Framers and ratifiers counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamental rights necessary to the Nation's system of ordered liberty.

Read more from the original source:

Second Amendment - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw