In summary
Proposition 14 asks voters to spend nearly $8 billion to continue the stem cell research program at a time when the coronavirus pandemic has decimated the state budget.
For the second time in 16 years, California voters will decide the fate of the states multi-billion dollar stem cell research program that established the state as a worldwide leader.
How the times have changed.
In November, as the pandemic drags on, Proposition 14 asks voters to spend nearly $8 billion to continue the program during a period when the research environment has significantly evolved and coronavirus has battered the states budget.
The bond measure would approve $5.5 billion in bonds to keep the states stem cell research agency running and grants flowing to California universities and companies.
At least $1.5 billion would be earmarked for brain and central nervous system diseases like Alzheimers and Parkinsons. The overall cost of the bonds and their interest totals about $7.8 billion, according to the state legislative analyst. The state would pay about $260 million annually for 30 years, or about 1 percent of Californias annual budget.
Proposition 14 is essentially a repeat with a bigger price tag and a few tweaks of Proposition 71, which California voters approved in 2004 after then-President George W. Bush prohibited, on religious grounds, all federal funding of any stem cell research using human embryos.
The bond measure would approve $5.5 billion in bonds to keep the states stem cell research agency running and grants flowing to California universities and companies.
That groundbreaking measure authorized $3 billion in state bonds to create the states stem cell research agency, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, and fund grants for research into treatments for Alzheimers disease, cancer, spinal cord injuries and other diseases.
The institute has nearly used up its original funding, so Prop. 71s author, real estate investor and attorney Robert N. Klein II, led a new effort to get Prop. 14 on the November ballot.
This time, embryonic stem cell research is in a much different place, with federal funding no longer blocked and more funding from the biotech industry.
Voters will want to consider what Californias previous investment in stem cell research has accomplished. Its a nuanced track record.
While many scientific experts agree that Prop 71 was a bold social innovation that successfully bolstered emerging stem cell research, some critics argue that the institutes grantmaking was plagued by conflicts of interest and did not live up to the promises of miracle cures that Prop. 71s supporters made years ago. Although the agency is funded with state money, its overseen by its own board and not by the California governor or lawmakers.
The agency had done a very good job of setting priorities for stem cell research, including research using human embryos, and doling out $300 million annually to build up California as a regenerative medicine powerhouse, according to a 2013 evaluation by the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine.
But the report also found that because the institutes board is made up of scientists from universities and biotech firms likely to apply for grants, board members had almost unavoidable conflicts of interest.
Because human stem cells can develop into many types of cells, including blood, brain, nerve and muscle cells, scientists have long looked to them for potential treatments for currently incurable diseases and injuries. Researchers use two types of stem cells: embryonic stem cells, derived from unused human embryos created through in vitro fertilization, and adult stem cells, which are harder to work with but in some cases can be coaxed in a lab into behaving more like embryonic stem cells.
From the start, stem cell research has been ethically charged and politically controversial because human embryos are destroyed in some types of studies. Federal restrictions on the research have waxed and waned, depending on which political party holds power. While former President Bush restricted federal money for embryonic stem cell research, former President Obama removed those restrictions.
The Trump administration has restricted government research involving fetal tissue but not embryonic stem cells. However, anti-abortion lawmakers have called on the President to once again end federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
California-funded research has led to one stem cell treatment for a form of Severe Combined Immunodeficiency known as the bubble baby disease. Children with the rare disease dont make enough of a key enzyme needed for a normal immune system. Without treatment, they can die from the disease if not kept in a protective environment. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is now reviewing the treatment but has not yet approved it for widespread use.
Although many of the agencys early grants were for basic science, the institute also has supported 64 clinical trials of treatments for many types of cancer, sickle cell disease, spinal cord injuries, diabetes, kidney disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, commonlyknown as Lou Gehrigs disease.
A June 2020 analysis by University of Southern California health policy researchers estimated that taxpayers initial $3 billion investment in the research institute helped create more than 50,000 jobs and generated $10 billion for the states economy.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has endorsed Proposition 14, and other supporters include the Regents of the University of California, the California Democratic Party, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, patient advocacy groups like the March of Dimes, and some local politicians and chambers of commerce.
Supporters have raised more than $8.5 million, including about $2 million from billionaire Dagmar Dolby, to pass the measure, according to California Secretary of State campaign finance reports.
The passage of Proposition 71 helped save my life, Sandra Dillon, a blood cancer patient, wrote in a San Diego Union-Tribune commentary supporting Proposition 14. She wrote that she had benefited from a drug developed with Institute-funded research that has been designated by the FDA as a breakthrough therapy.
It is unimaginable to think that Californians would vote to discontinue this amazing effort I dont know where I would be or what condition I would be in if it wasnt for the investment Californians made nearly two decades ago.
I think the agencys done good work, but this was never planned to be funded forever with debt.
Lawrence Goldstein, a UC San Diego professor of cellular and molecular medicine and stem cell researcher, said the grants were instrumental in furthering his research on treatments for Alzheimers disease and that Prop. 14 will help create new jobs. The agency has funded a great deal of very important stem cell medical research thats already produced terrific results and has the prospect of saving many more lives in the decade to come, he said.
Opponents include one member of the institutes board and a nonprofit that advocates for privacy in genetic research. They contend that the proposition seeks too much money and does not sufficiently address the conflicts of interest that cropped up after Prop. 71 was passed. They also note that private funding, including venture capital, for stem cell research has grown in recent years. Opponents had raised only $250 by late September, from a single contribution by the California Pro Life Council.
The editorial boards of some of Californias biggest newspapers also have opposed the measure, including the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register, the San Francisco Chronicle and the San Jose Mercury News/East Bay Times. The Fresno Bee, Modesto Bee, and San Luis Obispo Tribune newspaper editorial boards support Prop 14.
Jeff Sheehy, the only institute board member not to support Proposition 14, told CalMatters that the research environment has changed since voters initially approved state funding for stem cell research in 2004 and that California should prioritize other needs like education, health care, and housing.
I think the agencys done good work, but this was never planned to be funded forever with debt, Sheehy said. At this point the state cant afford it; were looking at a huge deficit.
Read more here:
Prop. 14: In the COVID age, can California still afford its stem cell research program? - CALmatters
- Podcast 9 Athens part 3 and news - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Podcast 10 Athens part 4 - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Podcast 11 Athens Part 5 - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 12 Cardiac Nuclear Medicine in the UK - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Podcast 13 Choline PET and prostate cancer - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode14 ED function and Dysponea - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- ep 15 Collimator Choice and Reconstruction algorithm - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 16 Dr Strauss on vulnerable plaque - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode17 Chemical Stress - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 18 Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Diabetes - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 19 The INSPIRE trial - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- 20 Dual isotope with a difference - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 21 The real effect of stress - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 22 D-SPECT - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 23 VQ Reprise - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 24 Hepatobiliary Nuclear Medicine - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 25 Sleep Apnea - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 26 Imaging Post Traumatic Stress Disorder - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 27 Cardiac Stem Cells - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 28 Molly Supply - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 29 Melanoma therapy interview with Dr Ekaterina Dadachova - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 30 Viral Therapy - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 31 breast radiotherapy using radioisotopes - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 32 news from snm - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 33 EBV Imaging and Therapy - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Episode 34 Dr Lele SNM India 2009 - December 14th, 2009 [December 14th, 2009]
- Episode 35 Dr Andrew Scott from the Ludwig institute - January 10th, 2010 [January 10th, 2010]
- Episode 36 CardiArc - February 25th, 2010 [February 25th, 2010]
- Episode 37 Dr Modder Radiosynoviorthesis (Radiation Synovectomy) - March 31st, 2010 [March 31st, 2010]
- Episode 38 Indian Nuclear Medicine With Dr Malhotra and Dr Krishna - May 28th, 2010 [May 28th, 2010]
- Episode 39 Prof Ora Israel The Utility of Hybrid Imaging - July 13th, 2010 [July 13th, 2010]
- Episode 40 New V/Q SPECT developments - October 11th, 2010 [October 11th, 2010]
- Episode 41 scintimun - February 14th, 2011 [February 14th, 2011]
- Episode 42 Radio-Isotope Supply into the future - March 6th, 2011 [March 6th, 2011]
- Podcast 4: DNA therapy - April 24th, 2011 [April 24th, 2011]
- Sorry about the delay a new podcast will be out soon! - April 24th, 2011 [April 24th, 2011]
- Podcast 5 Flash 3D - April 24th, 2011 [April 24th, 2011]
- Podcast 6 Affibody - April 24th, 2011 [April 24th, 2011]
- Podcast 7 EANM 2006 Athens Part 1 - April 24th, 2011 [April 24th, 2011]
- Podcast 8 Athens Part 2 - April 24th, 2011 [April 24th, 2011]
- Episode 43 Rapidscan Part 1, 720P high quality video version - May 1st, 2011 [May 1st, 2011]
- Episode 43 Rapidscan Part 1, Ipod quality video - May 1st, 2011 [May 1st, 2011]
- Episode 43 Rapidscan Part 1, Audio version - May 1st, 2011 [May 1st, 2011]
- Episode 45 Mummies with cardiovascular disease video - May 21st, 2011 [May 21st, 2011]
- Episode 45 Mummies with cardiovascular disease audio edition - May 21st, 2011 [May 21st, 2011]
- Episode 46 Dr Gordon DePuey Choosing Reconstruction clinical perspective - August 7th, 2011 [August 7th, 2011]
- Episode 46 Dr Gordon DePuey Choosing Reconstruction clinical perspective audio version - August 7th, 2011 [August 7th, 2011]
- Episode 47 Cardiac Image Fusion With Dr Kaufmann - September 18th, 2011 [September 18th, 2011]
- Episode 47 Cardiac Fusion with Dr Kaufmann video version - September 18th, 2011 [September 18th, 2011]
- Dear Steve, I am and many more like me are your one more thing. - October 9th, 2011 [October 9th, 2011]
- EPISODE 48 PET MRI camera from Siemens with Dr Georgi audio - October 23rd, 2011 [October 23rd, 2011]
- EPISODE 48 PET MRI camera from Siemens Dr Georgi video - October 23rd, 2011 [October 23rd, 2011]
- Silicon Biosystems to Present Single-Circulating Tumor Cell Molecular Characterization at the Fourth World CTC Summit - April 25th, 2012 [April 25th, 2012]
- Leukaemia cells have a remembrance of things past - April 25th, 2012 [April 25th, 2012]
- Technologist Education Requirements Can Help Cut Repeat Scans - April 25th, 2012 [April 25th, 2012]
- HKU Collaborative Research Discovers A Novel Molecular Mechanism Of A New Anti-HIV-1 Drug Candidate - April 25th, 2012 [April 25th, 2012]
- Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis and the Nephrotic Syndrome - Part 1 Clinical - Video - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Electro-Medicine : Biological Physics - The Molecular Basis of Alzheimers Disease - Video - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- osdd heterocyclic compounds and molecular medicines - Video - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Molecule to Medicine: The Biomarker Frontier - Video - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Fulfilling the Promise of Molecular Medicine in a Developmental Brain Disorder - Video - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Focus on Stefanie Dimmeler - Video - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Dundee - May 4th, 2012 [May 4th, 2012]
- Nanotechnology In Medicine: Huge Potential, But What Are The Risks? - May 5th, 2012 [May 5th, 2012]
- Cutting Edge Technology Coming To DMH - May 5th, 2012 [May 5th, 2012]
- This Week in Experimental and Molecular Pathology - May 5th, 2012 [May 5th, 2012]
- Researchers' discovery offers hope for cancer, heart disease miracle drugs - May 7th, 2012 [May 7th, 2012]
- Penn State student Zachary Hostetler from Garnet Valley is being honored as a student marshal - May 7th, 2012 [May 7th, 2012]
- NCKU Student Wins Prestigious Award for Anti-Cancer Research - May 10th, 2012 [May 10th, 2012]
- In-Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) Market (Clinical Chemistry, Immunoassays, Molecular Diagnostics, Hematology Analyzers ... - May 10th, 2012 [May 10th, 2012]
- Pitt team uses genomics to identify a molecular-based treatment for a viral skin cancer - May 10th, 2012 [May 10th, 2012]
- Genomics used to identify a molecular-based treatment for a viral skin cancer - May 10th, 2012 [May 10th, 2012]
- 2 molecular biologists get $500K medical prize - May 13th, 2012 [May 13th, 2012]
- 2 molecular biologists share $500K medical prize - May 13th, 2012 [May 13th, 2012]
- Lab21 Unveils New Molecular Analysis Services at Greenville Site - May 13th, 2012 [May 13th, 2012]
- 2 molecular biologists from NYC to share $500K medical prize for pioneering research on cells - May 13th, 2012 [May 13th, 2012]
- Two Molecular Biologists Get $500K Medical Prize - May 13th, 2012 [May 13th, 2012]
- Pair of molecular biologists receive Albany Medical Center Prize - May 13th, 2012 [May 13th, 2012]
- CNIO scientists successfully test the first gene therapy against aging-associated decline - May 16th, 2012 [May 16th, 2012]
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey Aims to Advance Personalized Cancer Treatments Through 'Precision Medicine' - May 16th, 2012 [May 16th, 2012]