It turns out it did not. A new study, by John Boice, Jr. and colleagues, reports the results of 114,270 nuclear weapons test participants that were followed for up to 65 years. Contrary to decades of anecdotal reports, the study concluded that there were no statistically significant occurrence of cancers or adverse health effects from radiation among these soldiers.
OperationBuster-Jangle -Dogatomic bomb test at theNevada Test Site, had troops participating in ... [+] the exerciseDesert Rock I. It had a yield of 21 kilotons of TNT, and was the first U.S. nuclear field exercise conducted with live troops maneuvering on the ground. Troops were six miles from the blast. November 1, 1951.
Significant health effects of mesothelioma from asbestos, as well as berylliosis from beryllium, were observed, as was the case for many Cold War sites that routinely used these materials. But not from radiation
Approximately 235,000 military personnel participated at one of the 230 above-ground nuclear weapons tests in the United States from 1945 through 1962. At the Nevada Test Site, these soldiers participated in military maneuvers, observed nuclear weapons tests, or provided technical support (see figures). At the Pacific Proving Ground they served aboard ships or were stationed on islands during or after nuclear weapons tests.
The conclusion of the study was that no statistically significant radiation associations were observed among these 114,270 nuclear weapons test participants that were followed for up to 65 years.
While many weapons workers, soldiers and people have been monetarily compensated for being at, or downwind of, these sites, the cancer rates of these groups, populations and workers are no higher than the general population and, in many cases, are lower. There is no evidence their cancers came from radiation, and lots of evidence that they did not.
I dont at all mind giving sick people money, but I do mind pretending it has to do with low levels of radiation.
We have seen similar results from the Japanese survivors of the atomic bomb blasts in 1945. The explosion of atom bombs over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 resulted in very high casualties from the blast but left a large number of survivors who had been exposed to radiation at the moment of the blast, at levels that could be reasonably ascertained. Extensive follow-up of a large cohort of survivors (120,000) and of their offspring (77,000) was initiated in 1947 and continues to this day.
Survivors that received huge whole body doses of 1 Gy irradiation (~1000 mSV, ~100 rem) have a significantly elevated rate of cancer (42% increase) but only limited decrease of longevity (about 1 year), while their offspring show no increased frequency of abnormalities and no detectable elevation in mutation rates.
Yet the general public, and indeed most scientists, are unaware of this, and widely believe that irradiated survivors suffered a very high cancer burdens and dramatically shortened life spans, and that their progeny were affected by elevated mutation rates and frequent abnormalities.
This misperception has led to dramatic fears of even low levels of radiation and fears of necessary medical radiological procedures. In other words, people have died because of this unfounded fear of radiation.
In addition, the often-hyped dead zones following nuclear blasts in futuristic scenarios also never materialized, even in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These cities were rebuilt completely and had no radioactive legacy, and no increased incidences of cancer outside of those exposed at the actual moment of the atomic blast in 1945.
St George Utah, the site of the most downwind deposition of fallout from the Nevada Nuclear Test Site, has the second lowest cancer rates in the country. They also had no increased cancers from radiation.
It is very difficult, and very rare, for anyone to be hurt by any dose of radiation obtainable in our society, even working at nuclear sites.
Above-ground atomic bomb test at the Nevada Test Site while troops look on.
Not that we havent messed up in some ways. TheCastle Bravo testin the Pacific was probably the largest generator of fallout in history as it was detonated too close to the ground and the yield was larger than anyone expected.
At 15 megatons, that hydrogen bomb was the largest detonation ever by the United States and was one of the events that led to banning above-ground nuclear tests precisely because of that fallout and its horrible effect on the people of the Marshall Islands.
But that was a rare event.
Contrary to the hype of Fukushima, and even Chernobyl, the observable radiation health effects from both accidents were small. In the case of Fukushima, it was as close to zero as one can get. In the case of Chernobyl, it was still very small.
The reason you might not know this, is that almost everyone uses the wrong model to predict health effects from radiation at these levels, and anyone who gets cancer, which is common in every society, then attributes it to any nuclear or radiation event they can.
Only recently have the global health, nuclear and radiation agencies realized that error and are moving to correct. However, as with most scientists, this change has been quiet and sort of cloaked in scientific jargon. Its also very political since it involves a lot of money and has spanned a lot of time.
But the implications are enormous.
The latest scientific society to make clear that we have been doing this wrong is probably the most qualified to understand this issue the Health Physics Society. The Health Physics Society is the scientific body that includes radiation protection scientists. And they put out a position statement on Radiation Risk In Perspective, in which they advise against estimating health risks to people from exposures to ionizing radiation that are anywhere near natural background levels because statistical uncertainties at these low levels are great.
In other words, any possible adverse health effects resulting from radiation doses below 10,000 mrem (100 mSv) will not be detectable.
Background radiation across the Earth varies from 3 mrem/yr (0.03 mSv/yr) over the oceans to 10,000 mrem/yr (100 mSv/yr) in areas of high elevation made up of granitic rocks. Thus, it is not surprising that populations subjected to radiation levels of 10,000 mrem (100 mSv) or below, either natural or man-made, show radiation effects that are not statistically different from zero.
The reason that we refer to it as not statistically different from zero is that other normal causes of these health effects, particularly cancer, are thousands of times more common and more effective than radiation at producing cancers of all types, so there can never be a population with zero cancers.
As an example, in a general population of 100,000 people in the United States, about 40,000 1,600 people will naturally develop cancer over their lives with no help from radiation. If you subject this same population to radiation levels ten times their normal radiation levels, 40,000 1,600 will develop cancer over their lives.
There will be no difference. But its still a lot of cancer and that scares people.
Such is the case with nuclear workers around the world, people who live next to nuclear plants, downwinders from the Nevada Test Site, the people around Fukushima, nuclear workers at Hanford and other sites, and these soldiers that watched the bomb tests. These groups have no more cancers than the general population, some of them have less.
But the fear of radiation keeps growing. And that fear itself does more harm than good.
See the rest here:
Atomic Weapons Testing While Troops Looked On Did It Increase Their Cancer Risks? - Forbes
- Diagnosing Pleural Mesothelioma with Lung Fluid: The Battle of the Biomarkers - Surviving Mesothelioma - March 24th, 2017 [March 24th, 2017]
- Republican Health Care Bill Includes Asbestos Exposure Funding for Libby Residents - Mesothelioma.com - March 24th, 2017 [March 24th, 2017]
- Pembrolizumab shows promise in treatment of mesothelioma - Science Daily - March 24th, 2017 [March 24th, 2017]
- Veterans with Mesothelioma Benefit from Telephone Triage - Asbestos.com - March 24th, 2017 [March 24th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Survival Rates Slowly Improving - Mesothelioma.net Blog (blog) - March 24th, 2017 [March 24th, 2017]
- Understanding Mesothelioma Caregiver Styles - Asbestos.com (blog) - March 24th, 2017 [March 24th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Patients Turn to Cannabis - AlterNet - March 24th, 2017 [March 24th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma | Overview, Treatment Options and Survivor Stories - March 24th, 2017 [March 24th, 2017]
- Accelerated Approval Granted to Drug in Mesothelioma Research Pipeline - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- New Study Affirms Mesothelioma Survival Benefit with Post-Surgical IMRT, According to Surviving Mesothelioma - Benzinga - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- The Key to Mesothelioma Treatment Success with Immunotherapy - Surviving Mesothelioma - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- New Evidence Supports Post-Surgical IMRT for Mesothelioma Treatment - Surviving Mesothelioma - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- Shorter Mesothelioma Survival Linked to High Platelet Count - Asbestos.com - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Victims Center Now Appeals to All Diagnosed ... - Yahoo Finance - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- Early research suggests first immunotherapy for mesothelioma on the horizon - Medical Xpress - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Bristol-Myers Squibb's Opdivo, Yervoy put the brakes on mesothelioma in phase 2 - FiercePharma - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Methanol from African Plants Kills Mesothelioma Cells - Asbestos.com - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Patients to be Celebrated on National Cancer Survivor's Day - Mesothelioma.net Blog (blog) - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- IO Strategy In Mesothelioma Finally Gets Mapped Out | Seeking Alpha - Seeking Alpha - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- New Blood Test Could Mean Earlier Mesothelioma Diagnosis - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Using Viruses to Boost Mesothelioma Immunotherapy - Asbestos.com - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Resilience Can Help Mesothelioma Patients and Their Families ... - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 7th, 2017 [June 7th, 2017]
- Janet Stanton Schnitzer Remembers Her Father's Mesothelioma Battle - Mesothelioma & Asbestos Awareness Center (blog) - June 7th, 2017 [June 7th, 2017]
- Treating Mesothelioma: A rare, aggressive caner - ABC2 News - June 7th, 2017 [June 7th, 2017]
- Asbestos and Mesothelioma Lawsuits: What to Expect | Nolo.com - June 7th, 2017 [June 7th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Victims Center Now Urges a Roofer/Insulator With Mesothelioma to Call About Why It Is Necessary to ... - PR Newswire (press release) - June 9th, 2017 [June 9th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Patients May Have Another Treatment Option With FDA Expanded-Use Approval of Lung Cancer Drug - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 9th, 2017 [June 9th, 2017]
- A Breath Test for Mesothelioma? - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 9th, 2017 [June 9th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Cancer: 12 Essential Facts - Asbestos News - June 9th, 2017 [June 9th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma - NHS Choices - June 9th, 2017 [June 9th, 2017]
- 15-year Mesothelioma Survivor Living Life By Design - Asbestos.com (blog) - June 9th, 2017 [June 9th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Cancer Overview | Experienced Lawyers Here to Help - June 11th, 2017 [June 11th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Victims Center Now Urges a Diagnosed Machinist to Call for Direct Access to Journeyman-Level ... - PR Newswire (press release) - June 12th, 2017 [June 12th, 2017]
- Honeywell Fails in Appeal Against Mesothelioma Verdict - Mesothelioma.net Blog (blog) - June 12th, 2017 [June 12th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Patients Can See Improved Survival By Reporting Side Effects - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 12th, 2017 [June 12th, 2017]
- What is Mesothelioma? | Surviving Mesothelioma - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 13th, 2017 [June 13th, 2017]
- Cases of Pleural Mesothelioma - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 13th, 2017 [June 13th, 2017]
- The Importance of Cancer Research in Immunotherapy - Mesothelioma.com (blog) - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- Hopes High for Mesothelioma Immunotherapy Treatment ... - Mesothelioma.net Blog (blog) - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- Asbestos Sprayers Face Higher Lifetime Mesothelioma Risk ... - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- Remembering Loved Ones Lost to Mesothelioma, Looking Forward to Progress in Treatment - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- Chicago Public Schools Ignoring Asbestos Problem - Mesothelioma.com - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Length of Time Between Surgeries a Marker for Mesothelioma Survival - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Survivor Deals with Pain 15 Years After Surgery - Asbestos.com (blog) - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Nivolumab and Ipillimumab Show Promise in Treating Mesothelioma Recurrence - Mesothelioma.com - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Patients Should Heed FDA Warnings Regarding Miracle Cures - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Patients May Benefit from Marijuana Research - Mesothelioma.net Blog (blog) - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- The Challenges of Research in Immunotherapy - Mesothelioma.com (blog) - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- Despite Mesothelioma Diagnosis, Dad Loved Father's Day - Asbestos.com (blog) - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- I Want to Keep Writing About Mesothelioma and My Family's Journey Because It Matters - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Clinical Trial Opens with High Expectations - Asbestos.com - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- Cediranib May be Safe Supplement to Mesothelioma Treatment - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- New Trial Finds VEGF-Inhibitor May Safely Boost Mesothelioma ... - Benzinga - June 18th, 2017 [June 18th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Symptoms - Identify Early Warning Signs - June 18th, 2017 [June 18th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Victims Center Now Urges a Diagnosed Construction Worker or Plumber to Call for Instant Access to the ... - PR Newswire (press release) - June 20th, 2017 [June 20th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Treatment May Benefit From New Discovery ... - Mesothelioma.net Blog (blog) - June 20th, 2017 [June 20th, 2017]
- The Influence of BAP1 on Mesothelioma Survival - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 20th, 2017 [June 20th, 2017]
- Clinical Trial to Assess If Radiation Therapy Can Bring Effective Relief from Mesothelioma Pain - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 20th, 2017 [June 20th, 2017]
- Asbestos Exposure Attorneys - Mesothelioma Lawsuits ... - June 20th, 2017 [June 20th, 2017]
- Can a Breath Test Diagnose Mesothelioma in the Early Stages? - Asbestos.com - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Compensation Center Now Urges an Electric Utility Worker or Electrician with Mesothelioma to Aim High ... - PR Newswire (press release) - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Nurse Explains Mesothelioma Staging - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- 5 Questions: Treatment options exist for mesothelioma - Las Vegas Review-Journal - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Steve McQueen's Wife Pushes for Asbestos Ban - Mesothelioma.com - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Remembering Mesothelioma Victims in the UK - Mesothelioma.com (blog) - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Peritoneal Cancer Index: What it Means for Mesothelioma Patients - Mesothelioma & Asbestos Awareness Center (blog) - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Risk Continues to Rise for Decades After Asbestos Exposure - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- Nintedanib Combination Delayed Progression in Malignant Mesothelioma - Cancer Network - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- Polish Study Confirms That Mesothelioma Risk Only Increases With ... - Mesothelioma.net Blog (blog) - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- The Mesothelioma Victims Center Now Urges a Diagnosed Navy ... - PR Newswire (press release) - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- Targeted Therapy May Soon be Primary Approach for Mesothelioma Treatment - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog) - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- Time Between Surgeries Helps Predict Mesothelioma Survival - Asbestos.com - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- Testicular and Cardiac Mesothelioma - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Veterans Center - Access Benefits & VA Claims - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- Malignant Mesothelioma (Asbestos Cancer) > The Mesothelioma ... - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Law Firm | Sokolove Law - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- MicroRNAs May Be Key to Better Immunotherapy for Mesothelioma - Surviving Mesothelioma - June 24th, 2017 [June 24th, 2017]
- Mesothelioma Survival Rate | Factors Affecting Survivorship - June 24th, 2017 [June 24th, 2017]
- Scientists "Turn Off" Tumor-Protecting Protein in New Mesothelioma Study, According to Surviving Mesothelioma - Benzinga - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]
- Symptoms of Mesothelioma - Critical Signs to Watch For - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]