With his car keys, Geoff Baird attacked a box that had justcomefrom China to the parking lot at a UW Medicine office in Seattles Northgate neighborhood. Baird, who manages UW Medicines laboratories, ripped greedily into the cardboard.
Tubes and swabs! he called out, holding a vial with hot-pink liquid sloshing inside.
Amazon workers unloaded another 83 boxes filled with critical COVID-19 testing kits. Baird rushed to his lab to verify their quality.
Hopefully its not Q-tips and Kool Aid, he said.
The unboxing was a climactic scene in a frenzied, weekslong global logistics project involving Anita Nadelson, a Seattle businesswoman who typically imports items like dry erase boards; a mystery doctor who is a brother-in-law of the boss of Strawberry, a Chinese saleswoman and business contact of Nadelson; and Jeff Wilke, one of the most powerful executives at Amazon.
Their story and the international cast of characters brought together for this public-health mission illustrates the lengths authorities and scientistsare willing to take to increasetesting, perhaps the most important metric as officials consider lifting social- and physical-distancing restrictions.
If you loosen up before you have the ability to really ramp up your testing and case finding and contact tracing, this epidemic can rebound quite vigorously, said Dr. Jeff Duchin, health officer at Public Health Seattle & King County.
But without test kits, laboratories cant produce more results.
For weeks, Washington state has been short on testing kits containing nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs anda liquid that preserves specimens for diagnostic testing.
Baird, the interim chair of the University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, said the UW Medicine Virology Lab can process some 5,000 specimens a day. On Tuesday, the lab processed just 1,953, according to the labs Twitter account.
We can do more testing than what we are doing, Baird said, adding that in recent weeks he had been barraged with requests from health officials and hospitals for testing kits. Its an important bottleneck.
The solution he sought underscores just how fragile the medical supply chain remains, how competitive the market for has become.
The nationwide shortages of testing materials fall into two main categories: the supplies needed to take a sample and transport it to the laboratory, and the items needed for analysis.
Its like everyone is trying to bake a cake at the same time, said Dr. Yvonne Maldonado, a professor of health research and policy at Stanford Medicine. There are shortages of everything in the recipes.
NP swabs thin sticks with furry tips that medical professionals stick up a persons nose until they can scrape the palate where the nasal and oral cavities meet are running low nationwide.
Once the sample is taken, its placed into a vial with a solution called viral transport media, meant to keep the specimen from drying and disintegrating.
Right now, orders for transport media are backlogged. To make up for the shortage, some labs have been producing their own solution. Nonetheless, many hospitals are still lacking.
Even though anyone can get tested, people who have test kits are essentially rationing them to patients with the most severe symptoms, said Cassie Sauer of the Washington State Hospital Association.
On the analysis side, a chemicals shortage has plagued testing nationally for about a month, said Omai Garner, the lab director of clinical microbiology for UCLA Health.
It has been a constant struggle, a constant negotiation with vendors, said Garner, whose lab performs about 800 COVID-19 tests a day.
Under the initial test procedure approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), labs needed a particular chemical to extract RNA from the virus, Garner said. Supplies quickly dwindled.
The federal governments approval of more types of tests partially closed that gap. Now, labs depend on commercial-testing manufacturers to provide kits with a proprietary assortment of solutions or chemicals, collectively known as reagents. The manufacturers themselves are now running short on reagents. Thats slowed the production of lab test kits.
If companies dont have enough manufacturing capabilities to meet the need, then that has to be addressed at the federal level, Garner said.
In Washington state, hospitals have mostly had to fend for themselves in the marketplace for testing supplies, Sauer said, although the state has been procuring some materials. Theres no central way to monitor facilities testing inventory in the state.
Shortages have been nearly constant. Less than a week after the COVID-19 outbreak was first identified at a King County nursing facility, local health officials already were asking for testing kits.
Public Health Seattle & King County on March 4 sent state officials a list of supplies it needed for the Life Care Center of Kirkland staff, asking for 200 nasal and throat swabs, and the same number of test tubes to transport the specimens,according to records reviewed by The Seattle Times.
During roughly two weeks in March, government agencies and healthcare organizations submitted at least 45 requests for swabs or testing supplies, according to a Times review of Washington state Military Department request logs.
The path toward new swab supplies began with a simple gesture from a friend.
Been asking my factories in China to try to get N95 masks, Nadelson, co-owner of a design firm, texted Baird on March 16. A supplier had offered 30. Is that worth having sent, or wait for more?
Better to wait, Baird wrote. N95 respirators are needed by the thousands.
The real shortage nationally is nasopharyngeal swabs, he told Nadelson, launching her on a quest.
Nadelson began by scrolling through Alibaba, the online Chinese commerce giant, then contacting and whittling down the factories she thought could provide equipment whiletexting Baird for technical advice.
We work with 25 factories in China, Nadelson said of her company, Three By Three Seattle. I know how to get anything made.
She soon settled on the most promising manufacturing prospect, and asked a trusted sales contact known to Nadelson as Strawberry, who works nearby in Shenzhen, to check out the plant.
Strawberry collected sample test kits, but struggled to ship the liquid. With air freight disrupted, it would take weeks for samples to arrive in Seattle.
Then, Strawberry hit on a promising lead. Her boss had a family connection to a doctor in Hubei, the Chinese province hardest hit by COVID-19. The doctor, whose identity is not known to Nadelson or Baird, could place an order for swabs with the factory, which also supplied health workers in Wuhan. Were they interested?
Geoff decided early on he was going to take this big leap of faith, Nadelson said. They put in an order for 80,000 kits for UW Medicine, hoping to distribute the kits throughout the state, and Seattle Childrens added to their order another 20,000 kits.
Nadelson fronted $125,000 later to be reimbursed by UW Medicine.
But layers of red tape, customs regulation and international shipping logistics problems complicated by COVID-19s impact on worldwide freight and supply chains remained troublesome, and Baird wanted the tests stateside, and fast.
He fired off an email to Jeff Wilke, CEO of Worldwide Consumer at Amazon, whose contact information Baird had from a mutual connection.
Amazon has made a humanitarian and a public relations push to source and deliver medical supplies in COVID-19s wake.
On the afternoon of March 30, Baird asked if we had any resources in China that could fly them here in a hurry, Wilke said in a statement to The Seattle Times. Amazon found space on a chartered flight last Saturday.
Baird obsessively tracked the flights progress to Seattle.
It could be the great Shanghai airlift of 2020, Baird said, while the supplies were airborne. Or, I could have bought 100 grand in packing peanuts.
After the jubilant unpacking and back at the UW Medicine Virology laboratory, the mood shifted. A crestfallen Baird met in the laboratory lobby with Dr. Jason Love, a pathologist for MultiCare hospitals in the Tacoma area.
Instead of NP swabs, the Chinese factory had sent nasal swabs, for use in the nostrils.
Cotton, Baird said, as if it were a dirty word, fearing the swabs contained material not suited for COVID-19 testing.
Im disappointed, Love said, trying to figure out how he could stretch strained supplies further.
But spirits for both men lifted on Monday amid new developments.
Baird determined both the nasal swabs, which were actually polyester, and the transport media were acceptable for COVID-19 testing.
Its going to work for us and help a lot of people, Baird said.
And a new preliminary preprint study of about 500 patients at the Everett Clinic, who sampled themselves inside their vehicles, showed that nasal swabs could be effective.
Sample collection for new coronavirus tests with nasal swabs were nearly as accurate as sampling as the NP swabs, according to test results from a study published Monday on the preprint server medRxiv, which has yet to be peer-reviewed. The preliminary study did not examine asymptomatic patients.
The Food and Drug Administration added the nasal swab sampling for COVID-19 to its clinical guidelines on March 23 and the CDC followedMarch 24.
Dr. Yuan-Po Tu, the lead author of the preprint, said sampling with nasal swabs could help preserve key personal protective equipment. Medical professionals must wear protective equipment when administering NP swabs because patients often cough or sneeze during the more invasive procedure.
By having the patient collect the specimen themselves, all you need is a surgical paper mask and you just stand back and you watch, Tu said.
Michael Teng, an associate professor in internal medicine at the University of South Florida who was not involved in the preliminary report, said its findings track with similar studies of other respiratory viruses, and added that nasal swabs could be less effective at detecting the virus in people without symptoms, an important consideration as public health strategies increasingly rely on broader testing.
Baird said there is no perfect sampling method. All tests have false negative rates because the virus lives in the lungs primarily.
Also on Monday, experts began to suggest COVID-19 cases may have crested in volume and started to trend downward. That eases demand on test kits.
Love on Wednesday said he was feeling more optimistic about swab supply because his lab was no longer maxing out its machinerys capability. COVID-19 testing needs have fallen off at his hospitals significantly.
Duchin said health officials would take 20,000 of the swabs procured by Baird and Nadelson, saying they would fill gaps in supply at places like shelters and long-term care facilities.
Also on Monday, a package arrived that buoyed Bairds mood. It included samples of NP swabs from one of the first factories Nadelson contacted in March.
Theyre perfect, Baird said. I think weve opened up a supply line.
Staff reporters Ryan Blethen and Daniel Gilbert contributed to this report.
Follow this link:
- Yes, But. The Annotated Atlantic. - November 7th, 2009 [November 7th, 2009]
- Health Insurance Benefit Costs by Region - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- For an Operator, Please Press... - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Pollyanna With a Pen: Maine Governor Signs 18 New Health Care Bills into Law - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- AMA Sounds the Alarm, Medicare Making Yet Another Attempt to Cut Reimbursement - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Mass Governor Asks Blue Cross to Keep Higher Employer Contribution - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Lifespan and Care New England Plan Monopoly (Again) - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Dirigo Health: Con Artists, Liars, and Thieves? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- New Orleans: Health Challenges - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- August a Flurry of Activity - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Maine's Dirigo Health Savings One-Third of Original Estimate - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- “Methodolatry”: My new favorite term for one of the shortcomings of evidence-based medicine - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Suzanne Somers’ Knockout: Dangerous misinformation about cancer (part 1) - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- A science-based blog about GMO - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- A Not-So-Split Decision - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Military Medicine in Iraq - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- The effective wordsmithing of Amy Wallace - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- A Science Lesson from a Homeopath and Behavioral Optometrist - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Join CFI in opposing funding mandates for quackery in health care reform - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Mainstreaming Science-Based Medicine: A Novel Approach - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Those who live in glass houses… - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- J.B. Handley of the anti-vaccine group Generation Rescue: Misogynistic attacks on journalists who champion science - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- When homeopaths attack medicine and physics - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- The cancer screening kerfuffle erupts again: “Rethinking” screening for breast and prostate cancer - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- All Medicines Are Poison! - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- When Loud Wins: Will Your Tax Dollars Pay For Prayer? - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- It’s All in Your Head - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- The Skeptical O.B. joins the Science-Based Medicine crew - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- The Tragic Death Toll of Homebirth - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- What’s the right C-section rate? Higher than you think. - November 8th, 2009 [November 8th, 2009]
- Recombinant Human Antithrombin – Milking Nanny Goats for Big Bucks - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Does C-section increase the rate of neonatal death? - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Man in Coma 23 Years – Is He Really Conscious? - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Why Universal Hepatitis B Vaccination Isn’t Quite Universal - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Ontario naturopathic prescribing proposal is bad medicine - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Naturopaths and the anti-vaccine movement: Hijacking the law in service of pseudoscience - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- The Institute for Science in Medicine enters the health care reform fray - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Neti pots – Ancient Ayurvedic Treatment Validated by Scientific Evidence - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Early Intervention for Autism - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- A temporary reprieve from legislative madness - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- A critique of the leading study of American homebirth - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Lose those holiday pounds - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Endocrine disruptors—the one true cause? - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Evidence in Medicine: Experimental Studies - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Midwives and the assault on scientific evidence - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- The Mammogram Post-Mortem - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- An Influenza Recap: The End of the Second Wave - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- The End of Chiropractic - December 13th, 2009 [December 13th, 2009]
- Cell phones and cancer again, or: Oh, no! My cell phone’s going to give me cancer! (revisited) - December 20th, 2009 [December 20th, 2009]
- Another wrinkle to the USPSTF mammogram guidelines kerfuffle: What about African-American women? - December 20th, 2009 [December 20th, 2009]
- Acupuncture, the P-Value Fallacy, and Honesty - December 20th, 2009 [December 20th, 2009]
- The One True Cause of All Disease - December 20th, 2009 [December 20th, 2009]
- Communicating with the Locked-In - December 20th, 2009 [December 20th, 2009]
- Are the benefits of breastfeeding oversold? - December 20th, 2009 [December 20th, 2009]
- Measles - December 20th, 2009 [December 20th, 2009]
- Radiation from medical imaging and cancer risk - December 21st, 2009 [December 21st, 2009]
- Multiple Sclerosis and Irrational Exuberance - December 21st, 2009 [December 21st, 2009]
- Medical Fun with Christmas Carols - December 22nd, 2009 [December 22nd, 2009]
- Lithium for ALS – Angioplasty for MS - December 23rd, 2009 [December 23rd, 2009]
- “Toxins”: the new evil humours - December 24th, 2009 [December 24th, 2009]
- 2009’s Top 5 Threats To Science In Medicine - December 24th, 2009 [December 24th, 2009]
- Buteyko Breathing Technique – Nothing to Hyperventilate About - December 26th, 2009 [December 26th, 2009]
- The Graston Technique – Inducing Microtrauma with Instruments - December 29th, 2009 [December 29th, 2009]
- The “pharma shill” gambit - December 29th, 2009 [December 29th, 2009]
- Ginkgo biloba – No Effect - December 30th, 2009 [December 30th, 2009]
- Oppose “Big Floss”; practice alternative dentistry - January 1st, 2010 [January 1st, 2010]
- Causation and Hill’s Criteria - January 3rd, 2010 [January 3rd, 2010]
- The life cycle of translational research - January 10th, 2010 [January 10th, 2010]
- The anti-vaccine movement strikes back against Dr. Paul Offit - January 10th, 2010 [January 10th, 2010]
- Osteoporosis Drugs: Good Medicine or Big Pharma Scam? - January 10th, 2010 [January 10th, 2010]
- Acupuncture for Hot Flashes - January 10th, 2010 [January 10th, 2010]
- The case for neonatal circumcision - January 10th, 2010 [January 10th, 2010]
- A victory for science-based medicine - January 10th, 2010 [January 10th, 2010]
- James Ray and testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) - January 10th, 2010 [January 10th, 2010]
- The Water Cure: Another Example of Self Deception and the “Lone Genius” - January 12th, 2010 [January 12th, 2010]
- Be careful what you wish for, Dr. Dossey, you just might get it - January 13th, 2010 [January 13th, 2010]
- You. You. Who are you calling a You You? - January 15th, 2010 [January 15th, 2010]
- The War on Salt - January 16th, 2010 [January 16th, 2010]
- Is breech vaginal delivery safe? - January 16th, 2010 [January 16th, 2010]