In New Jersey, yet another bill amending the animal cruelty statute (S1640) was recently passed into law. The amendments [e]stablish . . . requirements concerning necessary care of dogs, domestic companion animals, and service animals, and for tethering of dogs.
Many of the other provisions requiring necessary care to a companion animal are reasonable if the laws are appropriately enforced by professional law officers, who have sought guidance from individuals with expertise in animal health, care, and handling. Unfortunately this is not the case in New Jersey, where the animal cruelty statute is improperly enforced.
This makes the following provision extremely problematic and of concern to companion animal owners and their attorneys in the State:
any humane law enforcement officer or agent of the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals or county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, certified animal control officer, or other State or local law enforcement officer may immediately enter onto private property where a dog, domestic companion animal, or service animal is located and take physical custody of the animal, if the officer or agent has reasonable suspicion to believe that the animal is at risk of imminent harm due to a violation of this act.
While an earlier provision requires a showing of probable cause before a court of competent jurisdiction could issue a subpoena permitting law enforcement to enter private property and seize an animal, this latter provision impermissibly violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution.
A district court case provides clarity of rights under the Fourth Amendment:
In Badillo v. Amato, Case No. 13-1553, slip op. (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2014) the Court denied then Monmouth County SPCA Chief Amatos motion to dismiss, in relevant part, Badillos allegation that Amato violated his right to be free from illegal search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. In this case, Badillo, a priest of the Santeria religion was issued nine municipal court summons for animal animal abuse and neglect after Amato went around to the back of . . . [Badillos house, opened the gate and let himself in the fenced backyard without permission or a warrant and began taking pictures . . . Case No. 13-1553, slip op., at p. 3 (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2014).
As the Court explained, finding that the Complaint sufficiently pleaded Fourth Amendment violations by Amato to survive a motion to dismiss, the Fourth Amendment provides:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and persons or things to be seized. Id., at p. 8 (quoting U.S. Const. amend. IV.)
The Court reaffirmed that not only is the home sacrosanct but that protections afforded by the Fourth Amendment extend not only to a persons home, but also to the curtilage surrounding the property. Id., at p. 8-9 (citing Estate of Smith v. Maraso, 318 F.3d 497, 518-519 (3d Cir. 2003).
It appears that the foregoing provision of the newly amended animal cruelty statute, permitting entry to private property based on merely reasonable suspicion and in the absence of a court order would violate the Fourth Amendment.
Additional concerns about these amendments, previously discussed, remain included in the final adopted law.
For example, a person may not keep a dog (or other domestic companion animal) in an animal crate or carrier for transport, exhibition, show, contest, training or similar event if the top of the head of the dog touches the ceiling of the animal carrier or crate when the dog is in a normal standing position. There are many acceptable, safe dog carriers that permit dogs to stand, turn around and lie down comfortably, but the top of their head would touch the ceiling of the crate.
The public must be adequately informed about this new requirementthat does nothing to provide for the welfare of dogs transported in dog carriersso they are not victims of animal cruelty citations issued by over zealous agents and officers of the NJ or County SPCAs. As noted in the State of New Jersey Commission of Investigation 2000 report on Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, at least one County society (Warren) routinely stopped vehicles with horse trailers for proof that a Coggins test certificate was available as required by the NJ Department of Agriculture. As the report concluded:
Not only is the absence of a certificate not cruelty, but SPCA personnel lack the expertise to know whether the horse described in the certificate, such as a Bay or Chestnut [which are specific horse colors and patterns], is in fact the horse being transported.
It would not be unprecedented if humane officers decided to target people traveling with dogs throughout the state, and started pulling over and issuing summons related to the size the their dog carriers.
Dog owners beware!
See the original post:
- Court Analogizes Coinbase To 'Traditional Bank' For Purposes of Fourth Amendment Privacy Protection - Lexology - July 5th, 2020
- Do We Have Privacy Rights Anymore? - Lawyer Monthly Magazine - July 4th, 2020
- Philly Lawyers Prepping Massive Lawsuit Against City Over Tear Gas and Other Incidents - Philadelphia magazine - July 4th, 2020
- Tucker Carlson's Fanciful Defense of What He Imagines Qualified Immunity To Be - Cato Institute - July 4th, 2020
- Home Invasion: Warrantless Searches in Brazil and the United States - Justia Verdict - June 22nd, 2020
- German Regulator Softens the Tone with Online Casino and Poker - GamblingNews.com - June 22nd, 2020
- Evaluating the GOPs JUSTICE Act - National Review - June 22nd, 2020
- Barr sides with Idaho on preventing transgender women from playing women's sports | TheHill - The Hill - June 22nd, 2020
- What Is Qualified Immunity and Why Do Some Want To End It? - Snopes.com - June 22nd, 2020
- GBI Says Fulton DA Blindsided Agency Amid Investigation in Brooks Case - All On Georgia - June 22nd, 2020
- Google stokes GOP allegations of tech bias - Politico - June 22nd, 2020
- Homeland Security used aircraft to surveil BLM protests in 15 cities - CNET - June 22nd, 2020
- HART: Wow! The reopening of our country has been a riot - Odessa American - June 22nd, 2020
- Armed Agents of the State Shouldn't Be Enforcing Traffic Laws - Reason - June 22nd, 2020
- Buffalos Police Brutality Didnt Start With Martin Gugino - The Nation - June 22nd, 2020
- Contact Tracing Shouldn't Upend 4th Amendment Protections - Law360 - June 10th, 2020
- CBS 2 Chicago Wins Peabody Award For [un]warranted: A Series That Exposed Chicago Police Pattern Of Raiding Homes Of Innocent Families - CBS Chicago - June 10th, 2020
- Bipartisan resistance to reining in the surveillance state - OCRegister - June 10th, 2020
- Felony DUI charge dismissed due to illegal breath test - Idaho Mountain Express and Guide - June 10th, 2020
- Privacy Org Presses 5th Circ. To Veto Border Phone Searches - Law360 - June 10th, 2020
- Can they do that? - USA TODAY - June 10th, 2020
- Federal judge restricts use of tear gas, non-lethal projectiles by Denver police - JURIST - June 10th, 2020
- Cops Who Allegedly Assaulted and Arrested a Man for Standing Outside His Own House Are Protected by Qualified Immunity - Reason - June 10th, 2020
- The Glaring Hole in the Democrats' Police Reform Bill - The New Republic - June 10th, 2020
- From bail money to filming the police, here's how to protect yourself as a citizen journalist at protests - The Retriever - June 10th, 2020
- The US Constitution and Limits on Detention and Use of Force in Handling Civil Unrest - Just Security - June 9th, 2020
- Abolish qualified immunity and quit protecting abusive police - Chicago Sun-Times - June 9th, 2020
- Suit against sheriff transferred to federal court - The Herald - June 9th, 2020
- Judge tosses suit on officer's actions before car strike - Arkansas Online - June 9th, 2020
- What if police were ordered to search homes in violation of the Fourth Amendment? - LawOfficer.com - May 15th, 2020
- These Are the Legal Issues Surrounding Unmasking, and Heres Whos Doing It the Most - Law & Crime - May 15th, 2020
- Arlington gym owner reopens, trying to be as responsible as possible - MyNorthwest.com - May 15th, 2020
- Disease Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment Reason.com - Reason - April 9th, 2020
- Disease Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment - Lawfare - April 9th, 2020
- Law Review: Police fail to inform drunk driver of loss of license for refusing blood test - Sierra Sun - April 9th, 2020
- Petitions of the week - SCOTUSblog - April 9th, 2020
- Today's Headlines and Commentary - Lawfare - April 9th, 2020
- An end to immigration checks on Greyhound buses reaffirms Fourth Amendment argument from civil rights groups - The San Diego Union-Tribune - March 4th, 2020
- Justices make the tough but right call in cross-border shooting case | TheHill - The Hill - March 4th, 2020
- One thing these two New Mexico sheriffs agree on: 'Red flag' law will end up in court - Las Cruces Sun-News - March 4th, 2020
- Bivens Liability and Its Alternatives - Reason - March 4th, 2020
- Cops are using body cameras to live-stream from crime scenes - Fast Company - March 4th, 2020
- Diversion agreement hearing set for teen accused of stabbing his dad - Journal & Courier - March 4th, 2020
- A Democratic president could have a big impact on the tech industry here's where the candidates stand on important tech issues - CNBC - March 4th, 2020
- NY Safe Act's Mental Health Reporting Is Bad But Proposed Mental Eval Bill Is Worse - AmmoLand Shooting Sports News - March 4th, 2020
- What the 2020 election means for encryption - The Verge - March 4th, 2020
- Bernie Asked If Democrats Are 'Staging Coup Against' Him. He Refuses To Answer. - The Daily Wire - March 4th, 2020
- Evelyn Shaw: Installing utilities is in the best interest of the city - The Fayetteville Observer - February 29th, 2020
- Bill Barr can't be trusted to reform unconstitutional FISA surveillance - Washington Examiner - February 29th, 2020
- NSA Blew $100 Million On Phone Records Over Five Years, Generated Exactly One Usable Lead - Techdirt - February 29th, 2020
- Bernie Sanders Is the Only Leading Presidential Candidate Publicly Opposing the Patriot Act - In These Times - February 29th, 2020
- Greyhound to stop allowing regular immigration checks on buses - Peninsula Daily News - February 24th, 2020
- Interview With James Goodale: Stunning How Few In US Care About Threat Posed By Assange's Case - Shadowproof - February 24th, 2020
- Column: What happened in Vegas should stay in Vegas - Seacoastonline.com - February 24th, 2020
- 112 Media Mistakes in the Trump Era: The Definitive List - Sharyl Attkisson - February 24th, 2020
- The case for repealing FISA and reforming the FBI and CIA - Washington Examiner - February 24th, 2020
- The Role of Originalism in Torres v. Madrid - Reason - February 12th, 2020
- 6th Circuit: This Man Can Sue the Cop Who Arrested Him for Defending His Daughter Against a Feral Cat - Reason - February 12th, 2020
- Mountain View to pay $350K in settlement over forced sexual assault exam of 5-year-old - Mountain View Voice - February 12th, 2020
- Editorial: Surveillance by government must have oversight - Jacksonville Journal-Courier - February 12th, 2020
- Shooting suspects lawyer demands tour of private house. Thats legal, but... - syracuse.com - February 12th, 2020
- Property, Privacy and New Technology - Roanoker - February 12th, 2020
- Snapchat is testing a big new redesign - The Verge - February 12th, 2020
- Time to Reverse 'Citizens United' and Corporate Constitutional Rights - The Nation - February 8th, 2020
- Court To Cop: We Don't Need On-Point Precedent To Deny You Immunity For Killing A Dog That Couldn't Hurt You - Techdirt - February 8th, 2020
- Facial Recognition Has Its Eye on the U.K. - Lawfare - February 8th, 2020
- Facebook adds itself to the list of companies demanding Clearview cease scraping its websites - TechSpot - February 8th, 2020
- Mans death after encounter with Etowah Sheriffs Department is call to action on mental health - AL.com - February 8th, 2020
- Free-Speech Case Over Patron's Arrest At The Kansas City Public Library Finally Comes To An End - KCUR - February 2nd, 2020
- U.K. Police Will Soon be able to Search Through U.S. Data Without Asking a Judge - EFF - February 2nd, 2020
- Blood draws and fatal crashes: What the new ruling means - WMTW Portland - January 30th, 2020
- Town of Normal, police officers being sued in connection to officer allegedly stealing $12K - WEEK - week.com - January 30th, 2020
- Supreme Court Asked To Tell Cops That Consenting To A Search Is Not Consenting To Having Your Home Destroyed - Techdirt - January 30th, 2020
- Letters: Newark Advocate readers speak out on subsidies, guns and polling places - The Newark Advocate - January 30th, 2020
- Court ruling on required blood tests unlikely to affect investigations of fatal crashes, police say - Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel - January 30th, 2020
- Daines intends to introduce bill to reform PATRIOT Act - Ripon Advance - January 30th, 2020
- Howie Carr: Weve all had just about enough of this Schiff - Boston Herald - January 30th, 2020
- SJC: Police can't pat frisk a driver solely out of concern for safety of officers and public - The Boston Globe - January 30th, 2020
- With 5G arriving, the Supreme Court needs to rule on what digital privacy means - Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) - January 5th, 2020
- Worthington law enforcement continued to face litigation in 2019 | The Globe - The Globe - January 5th, 2020