Last month marks two years since the Supreme Court held, in Carpenter v. United States, that the Fourth Amendment applies to cell phone company records that detail a cell phone users location and movements. Under Carpenter, police are generally required to use a warrant to obtain seven days or more of a users cell-site location information from phone companies.
As we previously reported, Carpenter redefined how the Fourth Amendment applies to information held by technology companies in the digital age. Prior to Carpenter, the Court applied the third-party doctrine, under which a person who voluntarily revealed information to third partiessuch as telephone companies, banks, or technology companieslacks a reasonable expectation of privacy in that information and therefore forfeits Fourth Amendment protections. In Carpenter, the Court declined to apply the third-party doctrine to cell-site location information, even though the cell phone user revealed their location information to their phone company. Despite the significance of this ruling, the Court said that its decision in Carpenter was a narrow one that did not address other business records that might incidentally reveal location information or consider other collection techniques involving foreign affairs or national security.
Following Carpenter, many legal scholars and journalists predicted that the decision would result in significant litigation about whether the Fourth Amendment applied to new forms of non-content data held by third parties. In a dissent, Justice Alito wrote that the majority opinion in Carpenter guarantees a blizzard of litigation, and since then many defendants have relied on Carpenter to argue that police must use a warrant to obtain a variety of types of non-content data from third-parties.
In the two years following the Courts decision, however, Carpenter has had minimal impact on law enforcements ability to obtain non-content information from third parties without a warrant. For the most part, lower courts have largely heeded the Courts admonition that its decision was a narrow one, and declined to extend Fourth Amendment protection to a variety of non-content data types, including subscriber records, utility records, financial records, billing records, IP addresses, prescription drug information, cryptocurrency transactions, lists of devices accessing a wireless network, and cell-tower dumps in which cell phone service providers list every phone number connected to a particular cell tower during a specified time period. Earlier this month, moreover, the First Circuit held that Carpenter does not extend to eight months of video surveillance conducted from a pole camera. The court reasoned in part that unlike the collection of cell-site location information, pole camera surveillance is a conventional surveillance technique.
As the First Circuits recent decision highlights, lower courts have generally extended Carpenter only to data types that are closely analogous to the historical cell-site location information at issue in Carpenter, including data obtained with cell-site simulators, real-time (as opposed to historical) cell-site location information, historical cell-site location information spanning fewer than seven days, and GPS location data tied to a vehicle and acquired from a third party. In only a few key circumstances have lower courts relied on Carpenter to expand Fourth Amendment protections:
Continuous pole camera surveillance: In November 2019, for example, an appellate court in Colorado held that Carpenter merited extending Fourth Amendment protection to continuous pole camera surveillance of the curtilage of a defendants home.
Extensive computer monitoring: In August 2019, the Fourth Circuit held that extensive computer monitoring is sufficiently analogous to the privacy intrusion in Carpenter to merit Fourth Amendment protection. Relying on Carpenter, the Fourth Circuit held that the continuous monitoring of a defendants computer activity as a condition of supervised release involves a significant liberty intrusion by captur[ing] all computer activity regardless of any recidivism risk.
Lifetime or extensive monitoring of prior offenders: Also in August 2019, the North Carolina Supreme Court relied on Carpenter to invalidate mandatory lifetime GPS monitoring of sex offenders without an individualized assessment of the reasonableness of the search. Like cell-site location information, the court held, GPS monitoring permits a detailed chronicle of a persons physical presence compiled every day, every moment . . . [and] reveals more than we expect anyone to know. This February, a North Carolina appellate court relied on the North Carolina Supreme Courts decision to strike down a court order imposing thirty years of ankle monitoring on a sex offender as an unreasonable search.
Medical records containing information about alcohol or drug use: Last month, an Ohio appellate court held that the Fourth Amendment protects medical records containing information about alcohol or drug use following an accident suspected to be caused by driving under the influence. Relying on Carpenter, the court acknowledged conflicting decisions within the state on this issue.
In recent months, some lower courts have also suggested that they may be willing to extend Fourth Amendment protection to other sensitive data types in the future as data collection through technology becomes even more pervasive. Last month, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana declined to extend Carpenter to Facebook subscriber information, such as registration information and records of session times and duration. But the court noted: [t]he evolution of technology may one day change the analysis on this issue . . . . We may one day wake up and find that Facebook or some other social network has become as indispensable as the cell phone and determine, as a society, that the information collected is deserving of constitutional protection. This April, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that Carpenter does not extend to data obtained from Advanced License Plate Readers (ALPR) placed at four fixed locations on public roads. In reaching its decision, however, the Massachusetts high court indicated that extensive use of ALPRs could constitute a search. If deployed widely enough, the court reasoned, ALPRs could tell police someones precise, real-time location virtually any time the person decided to drive, thus making ALPRs the vehicular equivalent of a cellular telephone ping.
In sum, Carpenters reach thus far has been largely limited. But lower courts have shown some willingness to extend Fourth Amendment protection to sensitive non-content data stored by third parties that reveals extensive, detailed, and intimate private information. We will continue to monitor how lower courts apply Carpenter to new data types and in new contexts as the case law further develops.
Read the rest here:
Two Years of Carpenter - Lexology
- Quinn: Supreme Court should clarify Fourth Amendment rights in the digital age - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Fourth amendment | Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia ... - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment is destroyed by the Roberts led Supreme Court. - Video - April 26th, 2014 [April 26th, 2014]
- Protections for e-data clear Senate committee - April 27th, 2014 [April 27th, 2014]
- Weighing The Risks Of Warrantless Phone Searches During Arrests - April 29th, 2014 [April 29th, 2014]
- Court may let cops search smartphones - April 29th, 2014 [April 29th, 2014]
- Supreme Court to hear case on police searches of cellphones - April 29th, 2014 [April 29th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment in the digital age: Supreme Court to decide if police can search cellphones without a warrant - April 30th, 2014 [April 30th, 2014]
- What Scalia knows about illegal searches - April 30th, 2014 [April 30th, 2014]
- Should police be allowed to search your smartphone - Video - April 30th, 2014 [April 30th, 2014]
- The Shaky Legal Foundation of NSA Surveillance on Americans - May 1st, 2014 [May 1st, 2014]
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules police don't need warrants to search cars - May 3rd, 2014 [May 3rd, 2014]
- Local police: Updated vehicle-search law still requires probable cause - May 3rd, 2014 [May 3rd, 2014]
- Liberal Supreme Court Justice Comes To The Defense Of Scalia - May 3rd, 2014 [May 3rd, 2014]
- Smartphones and the Fourth Amendment - Video - May 4th, 2014 [May 4th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment Defined & Explained - Law - May 6th, 2014 [May 6th, 2014]
- I-Team: Do police seek search warrant friendly judges? - May 8th, 2014 [May 8th, 2014]
- Is Big Brother Listening? Applying the Fourth Amendment in an Electronic Age - Video - May 9th, 2014 [May 9th, 2014]
- Magistrate waxes poetic while rejecting Gmail search request - May 10th, 2014 [May 10th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment - Video - May 10th, 2014 [May 10th, 2014]
- License reader lawsuit can be heard, appeals court rules - May 15th, 2014 [May 15th, 2014]
- Seize the Rojo - Video - May 16th, 2014 [May 16th, 2014]
- NSA Spying Has a Disproportionate Effect on Immigrants - May 16th, 2014 [May 16th, 2014]
- Motorists sue Aurora, police in 2012 traffic stop after bank robbery - May 18th, 2014 [May 18th, 2014]
- Judge Says NSA Phone Surveillance Likely Unconstitutional - Video - May 21st, 2014 [May 21st, 2014]
- New York Attorney Heath D. Harte Releases a Statement on Fourth Amendment Rights - May 22nd, 2014 [May 22nd, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment Rights - Video - May 23rd, 2014 [May 23rd, 2014]
- Bangor Area School District teachers vote no to random drug - May 24th, 2014 [May 24th, 2014]
- I Don't Care About The Contitution, Take Your Fourth Amendment And Shove It The Hills Hotel - Video - May 27th, 2014 [May 27th, 2014]
- Lonestar1776 at Illegal Checkpoint 80 Miles Inside Border - Standing UP & Pushing Back! pt 2/2 - Video - August 31st, 2014 [August 31st, 2014]
- Suit charges Daytona Beach's rental inspection program violates civil rights - September 3rd, 2014 [September 3rd, 2014]
- 4th Amendment - Laws.com - September 4th, 2014 [September 4th, 2014]
- YOU CAN ARREST ME NOW (cops refuse, steal phone) - Video - September 7th, 2014 [September 7th, 2014]
- The Feds Explain How They Seized The Silk Road Servers - September 8th, 2014 [September 8th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Does obtaining leaked data from a misconfigured website violate the CFAA? - September 9th, 2014 [September 9th, 2014]
- Defence asks judge in NYC to toss out bulk of evidence in Silk Road case as illegally obtained - September 10th, 2014 [September 10th, 2014]
- Family of a mentally ill woman files lawsuit against San Mateo Co. after deadly shooting - September 10th, 2014 [September 10th, 2014]
- Minnesota Supreme Court upholds airport drug case decision - September 12th, 2014 [September 12th, 2014]
- Law Talk - Obamacare Rollout; Fourth Amendment, NSA Spying Stop & Frisk DUI Check Points lta041 - Video - September 12th, 2014 [September 12th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: The posse comitatus case and changing views of the exclusionary rule - September 15th, 2014 [September 15th, 2014]
- Guest: Why the privacy of a public employees cellphone matters - September 16th, 2014 [September 16th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Apples dangerous game - September 19th, 2014 [September 19th, 2014]
- Judge expounds on privacy rights - September 20th, 2014 [September 20th, 2014]
- Great privacy essay: Fourth Amendment Doctrine in the Era of Total Surveillance - September 20th, 2014 [September 20th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment By Maison Erdman - Video - September 20th, 2014 [September 20th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: When administrative inspections of businesses turn into massive armed police raids - September 22nd, 2014 [September 22nd, 2014]
- The chilling loophole that lets police stop, question and search you for no good reason - September 23rd, 2014 [September 23rd, 2014]
- Pet Owners Look to Muzzle Police Who Shoot Dogs - September 27th, 2014 [September 27th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: A few thoughts on Heien v. North Carolina - September 29th, 2014 [September 29th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Third Circuit on the mosaic theory and Smith v. Maryland - October 1st, 2014 [October 1st, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Third Circuit gives narrow reading to exclusionary rule - October 2nd, 2014 [October 2nd, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Supreme Court takes case on duration of traffic stops - October 3rd, 2014 [October 3rd, 2014]
- Search & Seizure, Racial Bias: The American Law Journal on the Philadelphia CNN-News Affiliate WFMZ Monday, October 6 ... - October 3rd, 2014 [October 3rd, 2014]
- Argument preview: How many brake lights need to be working on your car? - October 3rd, 2014 [October 3rd, 2014]
- The 'Barney Fife Loophole' to the Fourth Amendment - October 3rd, 2014 [October 3rd, 2014]
- Search & Seizure: A New Fourth Amendment for a New Generation? - Promo - Video - October 4th, 2014 [October 4th, 2014]
- Ap Government Fourth Amendment Project - Video - October 4th, 2014 [October 4th, 2014]
- Lubbock Liberty Workshop With Arnold Loewy On The Fourth Amendment - Video - October 5th, 2014 [October 5th, 2014]
- Feds Hacked Silk Road Without A Warrant? Perfectly Legal, Prosecutors Argue - October 7th, 2014 [October 7th, 2014]
- Supreme Court Starts Term with Fourth Amendment Case - October 7th, 2014 [October 7th, 2014]
- Argument analysis: A simple answer to a deceptively simple Fourth Amendment question? - October 9th, 2014 [October 9th, 2014]
- Feds Say That Even If FBI Hacked The Silk Road, Ulbricht's Rights Weren't Violated - October 9th, 2014 [October 9th, 2014]
- Mass Collection of U.S. Phone Records Violates the Fourth Amendment - Video - October 9th, 2014 [October 9th, 2014]
- Leggett sides with civil liberties supporters - October 10th, 2014 [October 10th, 2014]
- Search & Seizure / Car Stops: A 'New' Fourth Amendment for a New Generation? - Video - October 10th, 2014 [October 10th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment- The Maininator Period 4 - Video - October 10th, 2014 [October 10th, 2014]
- Judge nukes Ulbricht's complaint about WARRANTLESS FBI Silk Road server raid - October 11th, 2014 [October 11th, 2014]
- Montgomery County will not hold immigrants without probable cause -- Gazette.Net - October 13th, 2014 [October 13th, 2014]
- Debate: Does Mass Phone Data Collection Violate The 4th Amendment? - October 14th, 2014 [October 14th, 2014]
- Does the mass collection of phone records violate the Fourth Amendment? - October 19th, 2014 [October 19th, 2014]
- When Can the Police Search Your Phone and Computer? - October 21st, 2014 [October 21st, 2014]
- Supreme Court to decide if cops can access hotel registries without warrants - October 22nd, 2014 [October 22nd, 2014]
- Third Circuit Allows Evidence from Warrantless GPS Device - October 22nd, 2014 [October 22nd, 2014]
- US court rules in favor of providing officials access to entire email account - October 24th, 2014 [October 24th, 2014]
- EL MONTE POLICE OFFICER VIOLATES ARMY VETERAN'S FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT - Video - October 25th, 2014 [October 25th, 2014]
- FBI demands new powers to hack into computers and carry out surveillance - October 30th, 2014 [October 30th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment (United States Constitution ... - November 4th, 2014 [November 4th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment - Video - November 4th, 2014 [November 4th, 2014]
- Call Yourself a Hacker and Lose Fourth Amendment Rights - Video - November 5th, 2014 [November 5th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Magistrate issues arrest warrants for 17 years but is new to probable cause - November 7th, 2014 [November 7th, 2014]