Federal agents have begun to withdraw from Portland, Oregon, where they were stationed to protect federal property and personnel amid protests in the city, despite objection by local leaders. But, their authority to be there in the first place has deep roots.
Legislation passed just after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11 designed to protect the U.S. from national security threats; and judicial expansion just after the Civil War designed to ensure southern states adhered to Reconstruction-era laws provide the framework for what we see today, says Northeastern law professor Michael Meltsner.
Michael Meltsner is the George J. and Kathleen Waters Matthews distinguished university professor of law in the Northeastern University School of Law. Photo by Matthew Modoono/Northeastern University
Federal presence in Portland is both authorized and problematic, says Meltsner, who is the George J. and Kathleen Waters Matthews Distinguished University Professor of Law.
Authorities in the Trump administration say that the federal agents, who were deployed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security earlier this month, are in Portland to protect federal property and personnel. The federal force is composed of officers from Customs and Border Protection, the Transportation Security Administration, the Coast Guard, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement who back up the Federal Protective Service, which is already responsible for protecting federal property, according to The New York Times.
On July 29, Oregon Gov. Kate Brown announced that the forces would begin withdrawing from the state beginning July 30.
The federal agents arrived after weeks of protests in the city against racial injusticeprotests that had already been met with aggressive tactics from local police that were criticized by local officials including the governor, speaker of the Oregon House of Representatives, and some city councilors.
President Donald J. Trump has also threatened to send as many as 75,000 federal agents to other U.S. cities to quell protests there as well, even as local authorities in Portland, including Brown and Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler, have implored the agency to stand down, and the Oregon attorney general and the American Civil Liberties Union, a civil rights group, have sued.
But federal officials say they have clear authority. Representatives from Customs and Border Protection cited a section of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, legislation passed after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
The act gives the U.S. secretary of Homeland Security the authority to protect the buildings, grounds, and property that are owned, occupied, or secured by the federal government and the persons on the property. The law was designed to protect the U.S. national security threats such as those perpetrated on 9/11, Meltsner says.
The agents in Oregon were there ostensibly, then, to protect federal propertyincluding the federal courthouse in downtown Portlandfrom protesters, he says.
To the extent that this is all they were doing, it would seem non-controversial, Meltsner says.
But news media reports from the city show what appear to be plain-clothes federal agents forcing protesters into unmarked vans.
If that were the case, Meltsner says, the agents would be in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects U.S. citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures.
In that case, just because federal agents have nominal authority under a federal statute, it doesnt mean that they can violate peoples constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment, Meltsner says. From what Ive read in the papers, it would appear that these federal agents are interfering with the liberty of the people without any cause.
A state official could decide to take a federal agent to court over an alleged violation. Often, however, such cases are not tried in a state courthouse, theyre removed to the federal court system to be triedor, as is often the case, dismissedthere, Meltsner says.
This act of removal is a judicial power that was created during the Reconstruction period in the U.S., roughly 1863 to 1875. During the years after the Civil War, progressive congressmen passed legislation that would ensure the rights of formerly enslaved people in the countryincluding the passage of the Fourteenth Amendmentand sent federal agents to various Southern states to enforce that legislation.
White officials in those Southern states, reluctant to apply the new legislation to formerly enslaved people in their states, tried to find ways to prosecute the federal agents enforcing the laws, Meltsner says. In order to protect the agents and the rights of Black people, Congress allowed cases that had begun in state courts to be taken out of them and tried in federal courts, where they were often dismissed, he says.
Now, Meltsner says, the same tactics may be used to protect the federal agents allegedly acting unlawfully in Oregon.
Basically, whats happening in Portland now could ultimately involve the same tactics used by the Justice Department to protect these federal agents during Reconstruction and the Civil Rights movement, Meltsner says.
And, he adds, although the focus on federal intervention in the city is warranted, its just as important to examine the behavior of the city and state police before federal agents arrived.
Based on the news reports, it would appear that there was an incredible amount of First Amendment and Fourth Amendment violation from the Portland Police Department, Meltsner says. This is certainly an evolving situation, with a lot of questions to be answered about what, exactly, is going on.
For media inquiries, please contact Jessica Hair at j.hair@northeastern.edu or 617-373-5718.
Read more here:
- What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? | United States Courts - December 30th, 2022 [December 30th, 2022]
- Fourth Amendment EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center - December 30th, 2022 [December 30th, 2022]
- With The Onions support, satirist asks court to revive lawsuit against police who arrested him - SCOTUSblog - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Trump legal counsel vows 'Fourth Amendment based' challenge to Mar-a ... - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Utah Court of Appeals reverses sex offender's conviction, claiming state failed to prosecute case for 2 years - FOX 13 News Utah - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Accused killer sent home in Indianapolis triple murder trial; evidence thrown out - WTHR - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- What is Fog Reveal? A legal scholar explains the app some police forces are using to track people without a warrant - Cobb County Courier - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Some Texas Lawyers Think Greg Abbott's Border Initiative Is UnconstitutionalBut They're Afraid to Challenge It - Texas Monthly - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- West Virginia midterm elections: What to know about voting in Mon County - The Daily Athenaeum - thedaonline - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- HIGHPEAK ENERGY, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance... - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- WMU Law professor says if federal probe is opened, the 4th and 5th amendments will be key in Lyoya case - FOX 17 West Michigan News - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- NJ Appeals Court: Lower Court Mixed Up 4th And 5th Amendment And Either Way, Phone Passcodes Can Be Compelled - Techdirt - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- Department of Justice reaches agreement with Springfield about policing - Reminder Publications - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- Op-ed: The Constitution in a time of change - Courier & Press - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- Sinclair Closes Refinancing and Extension of STG Credit Facilities - Business Wire - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- SP PLUS CORP : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet... - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- 'You Have The Right To Remain Silent JUST KIDDING!' Says Biden Administration - Above the Law - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- In review: key recent IP developments and trends in China - Lexology - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- Syracuse police had other options for dealing with 8-year-old accused of stealing. They didn't use them. - City & State - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- Jon Bernthal embedded with Baltimore police to play city's dirtiest cop in HBO's "We Own This City" - Salon - April 28th, 2022 [April 28th, 2022]
- When the government hides spy cameras on your land, fight back in court | Opinion - Tennessean - December 14th, 2021 [December 14th, 2021]
- Comparing drug patent linkage in China and the US - Lexology - December 14th, 2021 [December 14th, 2021]
- Rockford Black Lives Matter case over bond hearings is now in hands of US Court of Appeals - Rockford Register Star - December 14th, 2021 [December 14th, 2021]
- Man convicted of raping two lifeguards appeals to Va. Supreme Court over DNA collected from drinking straws - WTOP - December 14th, 2021 [December 14th, 2021]
- We Hear You: Parents Must Fight to Save Public Schools - Daily Signal - December 14th, 2021 [December 14th, 2021]
- Judge Denies Motion to Suppress DNA Evidence on Cup Used by Accused in Police Interview; Defense Claimed Client Denied Water on 6-Hour Trip, then... - November 29th, 2021 [November 29th, 2021]
- European Union: COVID-19 State aid update - State aid Temporary Framework prolonged and additional aid for recovery possible (6th Amendment) -... - November 29th, 2021 [November 29th, 2021]
- Govt That Spies Has Insatiable Appetite - KMJ Now - February 4th, 2021 [February 4th, 2021]
- No-knock search warrants began in Wisconsin, Rep. Myers wants to end them here - Wisconsin Examiner - February 4th, 2021 [February 4th, 2021]
- Close the Gaps - East Bay Express - February 4th, 2021 [February 4th, 2021]
- Is Americas Approach to Cannabis Racist? Study Shows Its Worse Than You Think - GreenState - February 4th, 2021 [February 4th, 2021]
- Federal appeals court allows reporters to sue SWAT officer who tear-gassed them during Ferguson protests - JURIST - February 4th, 2021 [February 4th, 2021]
- Invoking Scalia, Sotomayor Presses for Broad Fourth Amendment Protections - Reason - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing That Law Enforcement Access to Wi-Fi Derived Location Data Violates the Fourth Amendment - EFF - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- Main Points Of The Fourth Amendment To Chinese Patent Law (Approved On October 17, 2020, Effective From June 1, 2021) - Intellectual Property - China... - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- Column: Michigan can bring privacy into the 21st century - The Oakland Press - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- IMPD dismissed from Dreasjon Reed lawsuit - WTHR - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- The Criminal Justice of Amy Coney Barrett - Washington Monthly - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- A guide to the statewide constitutional amendments on the ballot in November 2020 - Yellowhammer News - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- RUTHS HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an... - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- Assembly Committee Clears Verrelli & Benson Bill Protecting Employees from Employer Tracking Device Violations - InsiderNJ - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- The tyranny of the experts - Leader & Times - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- Mike R. Galli is recognized by Continental Who's Who - PRNewswire - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- Mail Voting Litigation in 2020, Part II: Submission of Mail-In Ballots - Lawfare - October 30th, 2020 [October 30th, 2020]
- In its 4th revision to the SEC, Palantir tries to explain what the hell is going on - TechCrunch - September 20th, 2020 [September 20th, 2020]
- City of Pierre among South Dakota towns ordered to pay a total of $440000 because of forced catheterizations - Drgnews - September 20th, 2020 [September 20th, 2020]
- Former Torrington officer seeks to have evidence suppressed before trial - Scottsbluff Star Herald - September 20th, 2020 [September 20th, 2020]
- Council To Have One-Day Session To Learn About Police - The Rhino TImes - September 20th, 2020 [September 20th, 2020]
- Things to Know Before Your Neighborhood Installs an Automated License Plate Reader - EFF - September 20th, 2020 [September 20th, 2020]
- Attorney argues Haynes and his brother bribed witness to recant his testimony in 1999 murder case - Kankakee Daily Journal - September 20th, 2020 [September 20th, 2020]
- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburgs Lasting Impact on U.S. Traffic Laws - The Art of Gears - September 20th, 2020 [September 20th, 2020]
- Editorial, August 10, 2020: Your cellphone might be "Big Brother" - Richmond.com - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- Legal Brief: Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment - SecurityInfoWatch - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- Common Ways to Fight Against a Drug Possession Charge - Student Assembly of the State University of New York - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- Trump Judge Casts Deciding Vote to Grant Qualified Immunity on First Amendment Retaliation Claim: Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears - People For the... - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- Did Judge Reeves Reach the Correct Result in Jamison v. McClendon? - Reason - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- The Police Lie. All the Time. Can Anything Stop Them? - Slate - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- The Court of Justice of the European Union in Schrems II: The impact of GDPR on data flows and national security - Brookings Institution - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- Calls for police reform and racial justice spur a flurry of resolutions before the ABA House - ABA Journal - August 10th, 2020 [August 10th, 2020]
- Reporters Committee amicus brief in Alasaad v. Wolf - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - August 8th, 2020 [August 8th, 2020]
- Meet the Judge Who Thinks a Black Man Walking Around Is a Crime - Rewire.News - August 8th, 2020 [August 8th, 2020]
- Who will police Springfields cops? - The Boston Globe - August 8th, 2020 [August 8th, 2020]
- 'Defund the police' is not a real reform strategy - The Maine Wire - August 8th, 2020 [August 8th, 2020]
- Assessing Indias obsession with data localisation - Deccan Herald - August 8th, 2020 [August 8th, 2020]
- Senators Graham And Blumenthal Can't Even 'Earn' The EARN IT Act: Looking To Sneak Vote Through Without Debate - Techdirt - August 6th, 2020 [August 6th, 2020]
- The Constitutional Case Against Trumps Use of the Department of Homeland Security - The New Yorker - August 6th, 2020 [August 6th, 2020]
- 'Trump's Troops Are Breaking the Law and Creating Chaos' - FAIR - August 6th, 2020 [August 6th, 2020]
- Portland demonstrates that government spying on citizens has become commonplace, and easy - Washington Times - August 6th, 2020 [August 6th, 2020]
- Plainclothes NYC police grab protester and throw her into unmarked car - WSWS - August 6th, 2020 [August 6th, 2020]
- Majority of Kingston aldermen view Kingstonian project tax pact favorably, with conditions - The Daily Freeman - August 4th, 2020 [August 4th, 2020]
- Officers on the street without ID or insignia is dangerous - News-Press Now - August 4th, 2020 [August 4th, 2020]
- "It's the decent thing to do" - News - Fowler Tribune - August 4th, 2020 [August 4th, 2020]
- What would the Founding Fathers do? - Smoky Mountain News - August 4th, 2020 [August 4th, 2020]
- How the president became the deporter in chief. - Slate - August 3rd, 2020 [August 3rd, 2020]
- Want To Reform The Police? Get Rid Of Qualified Immunity - WBUR - August 3rd, 2020 [August 3rd, 2020]
- Who is Zane James, why were his brother and father detained by police in Cottonwood Heights protest? - MEAWW - August 3rd, 2020 [August 3rd, 2020]
- Unpacking DHS's Troubling Explanation of the Portland Van Video - Lawfare - August 1st, 2020 [August 1st, 2020]
- Capitol Hill grilling of tech CEOs highlights expansion of 'geofence warrants' - WRAL.com - August 1st, 2020 [August 1st, 2020]
- R Sikoryaks latest project is a word-for-word adaptation of the U.S. Constitution - Boing Boing - August 1st, 2020 [August 1st, 2020]