In this Novembers general election, voters will get to decide the fate of six statewide amendments to the Constitution of Alabama.
Yellowhammer News has prepared a guide to each statewide amendment and its impact on Alabama if enacted.
The six amendments mentioned will be on every ballot handed to an Alabamian on Election Day. Other local amendments may appear on the ballot in certain counties.
How the first amendment will appear on the ballot:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to amend Article VIII of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, now appearing as Section 177 of the Official Recompilation of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended, to provide that only a citizen of the United States has the right to vote.
More directly, the Alabama constitution would be changed to say only a citizen of the United States who meets certain qualifications has the right to vote
It currently says every citizen of the United States who meets certain qualifications has the right to vote.
The change that would occur if Amendment 1 passes is primarily technical; legal scholars agree current Alabama law permits only citizens to vote. Proponents of the amendment say the change is a needed clarification.
Alabama Senate Pro Tem. Del Marsh (R-Anniston) sponsored Amendment 1, and it passed the upper chamber unanimously. Marsh told Yellowhammer News at the time that his goal was to affirm that only citizens can vote in Alabamas elections.
How the second amendment will appear on the ballot:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to increase the membership of the Judicial Inquiry Commission and further provide for the appointment of the additional members; further provide for the membership of the Court of the Judiciary and further provide for the appointment of the additional members; further provide for the process of disqualifying an active judge; repeal provisions providing for the impeachment of Supreme Court Justices and appellate judges and the removal for cause of the judges of the district and circuit courts, judges of the probate courts, and judges of certain other courts by the Supreme Court; delete the authority of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to appoint an Administrative Director Courts; provide the Supreme Court of Alabama with authority to appoint an Administrative Director of Courts; require the Legislature to establish procedures for the appointment of the Administrative Director of Courts; delete the requirement that a district court hold court in each incorporated municipality with a population of 1,000 or more where there is no municipal court; provide that the procedure for the filling of vacancies in the office of a judge may be changed by local constitutional amendment; delete certain language relating to the position of constable holding more than one state office; delete a provision providing for the temporary maintenance of the prior judicial system; repeal the office of circuit solicitor; and make certain nonsubstantive stylistic changes.
The Fair Ballot Commission summarized in plain language the six primary changes that would be made by Amendment 2:
1. It provides that county district courts do not have to hold city court in a city with a population of less than 1,000.
2. It allows the Alabama Supreme Court, rather than the chief justice, to appoint the administrative director of courts.
3. It increases from nine to 11 the total membership of the Judicial Inquiry Commission and determines who appoints each member (the Judicial Inquiry Commission evaluates ethics complaints filed against judges).
4. It allows the governor, rather than the lieutenant governor, to appoint a member of the Court of the Judiciary (the Court of the Judiciary hears complaints filed by the Judicial Inquiry Commission).
5. It prevents a judge from being automatically disqualified from holding office simply because a complaint was filed with the Judiciary Inquiry Commission.
6. It provides that a judge can be removed from office only by the Court of the Judiciary.
Amendment 2 also changes the statutes governing Alabamas constables; these changes are opposed by the Alabama Constables Association.
The amendment was sponsored by State Senators Arthur Orr (R-Decatur) and Cam Ward (R-Alabaster).
Amendment 2 is the result of work done by a task force comprised of legislators and members of the judicial branch of government.
Advocates for the amendment say it simplifies several administrative procedures that govern Alabamas judicial system, which they argue is needed since many of the current procedures were written several decades ago and are no longer relevant.
Opponents of the measure argue that removing municipal courts from small towns with less than 1,000 residents will inconvenience the people who live there.
They also say that removing the legislatures ability to impeach judges the amendment makes the Judicial Inquiry Commission the only institution that can do so takes away the ability of the peoples representatives to get rid of bad judges.
More information on what the Judicial Inquiry Commission is and what it does can be found here.
How the third amendment will appear on the ballot:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to provide that a judge, other than a judge of probate, appointed to fill a vacancy would serve an initial term until the first Monday after the second Tuesday in January following the next general election after the judge has completed two years in office.
Most simply, the amendment would extend the time that judges who are appointed to fill an empty seat may serve.
If Amendment 3 is approved, appointed judges would run for reelection in the first general election after they have served two years in their appointed job.
Currently, appointed judges run in the first general election to occur after they have served for one year.
Tom Spencer of the Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama (PARCA)authored a report on the proposed amendments.
He noted with regards to Amendment 3, This change might make it more attractive for nominees to accept a judicial appointment. At the same time, this change gives the appointee longer to build up the advantage of incumbency before running for a full term.
Judgeships come open when a sitting judge dies, resigns, retires or is removed. The amendment would not apply to probate judges.
Amendment 3 was sponsored by State Representative David Faulkner (R-Mountain Brook) and co-sponsored by State Representative Matt Fridy (R-Montevallo).
How the fourth amendment will appear on the ballot:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to authorize the Legislature to recompile the Alabama Constitution and submit it during the 2022 Regular Session, and provide a process for its ratification by the voters of this state.
If Amendment 4 is passed, state legislators would have permission to rearrange the state constitution to do four things, per the Fair Ballot Commission:
1. Remove racist language.2. Remove language that is repeated or no longer applies.3. Combine language related to economic development.4. Combine language that relates to the same county.
Only changes in those four categories could be made.
The proposed changes would be submitted during the 2022 legislative session for approval by both chambers of the legislature.
If the updated constitution is approved by the legislature, it would then be voted on by the people of Alabama in the 2022 general election.
Only if the legislature and the people of Alabama give the updated constitution their approval in 2022 would the changes become permanent. Amendment 4 could be thought of as permission for lawmakers and legislative staff to get started on the process.
As such, Amendment 4 will not affect how the state is governed; it only permits cosmetic changes and even those have to be approved by the public in two years.
Proponents say removing racist and redundant language is a worthy change to the states primary governing document.
Amendment 4 comes from a bipartisan place; it was sponsored by State Representative Merika Coleman (D-Birmingham) and co-sponsored by State House Speaker Mac McCutcheon (R-Monrovia), among others.
How the fifth and sixth amendments will appear on the ballot:
Relating to Franklin County, proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to provide that a person is not liable for using deadly physical force in self-defense or in the defense of another person on the premises of a church under certain conditions.
Statewide Amendment 6 reads in full:
Relating to Lauderdale County, proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to provide that a person is not liable for using deadly physical force in self-defense or in the defense of another person on the premises of a church under certain conditions.
Both amendments would create special stand your ground laws for the churches in their respective counties.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall already interprets Alabamas statewide stand your ground law as applicable to churches.
Local legislators in both Franklin and Lauderdale counties believe an additional measure stating the stand your ground law applies to churches in their counties is needed as a form of clarification.
The passage of Amendment 5 and Amendment 6 requires a majority of Alabama voters and a majority of the voters in the relevant counties.
The Fair Ballot Commissions breakdown, in plain language, of all six amendments is available here, and the full analysis from PARCA is available here.
The Fair Ballot Commission is an independent state entity that receives technical assistance from several agencies, but primarily the secretary of states office.
Sample ballots for each of Alabamas 67 counties can be found here.
Yellowhammer received guidance from Jason Isbell, a lawyer in Montgomery and a member of the Fair Ballot Commission, in putting this guide together.
Henry Thornton is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can contact him by email: firstname.lastname@example.org on Twitter@HenryThornton95
Read the original:
- WMU Law professor says if federal probe is opened, the 4th and 5th amendments will be key in Lyoya case - FOX 17 West Michigan News - April 28th, 2022
- NJ Appeals Court: Lower Court Mixed Up 4th And 5th Amendment And Either Way, Phone Passcodes Can Be Compelled - Techdirt - April 28th, 2022
- Department of Justice reaches agreement with Springfield about policing - Reminder Publications - April 28th, 2022
- Op-ed: The Constitution in a time of change - Courier & Press - April 28th, 2022
- Sinclair Closes Refinancing and Extension of STG Credit Facilities - Business Wire - April 28th, 2022
- SP PLUS CORP : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet... - April 28th, 2022
- 'You Have The Right To Remain Silent JUST KIDDING!' Says Biden Administration - Above the Law - April 28th, 2022
- In review: key recent IP developments and trends in China - Lexology - April 28th, 2022
- Syracuse police had other options for dealing with 8-year-old accused of stealing. They didn't use them. - City & State - April 28th, 2022
- Jon Bernthal embedded with Baltimore police to play city's dirtiest cop in HBO's "We Own This City" - Salon - April 28th, 2022
- When the government hides spy cameras on your land, fight back in court | Opinion - Tennessean - December 14th, 2021
- Comparing drug patent linkage in China and the US - Lexology - December 14th, 2021
- Rockford Black Lives Matter case over bond hearings is now in hands of US Court of Appeals - Rockford Register Star - December 14th, 2021
- Man convicted of raping two lifeguards appeals to Va. Supreme Court over DNA collected from drinking straws - WTOP - December 14th, 2021
- We Hear You: Parents Must Fight to Save Public Schools - Daily Signal - December 14th, 2021
- Judge Denies Motion to Suppress DNA Evidence on Cup Used by Accused in Police Interview; Defense Claimed Client Denied Water on 6-Hour Trip, then... - November 29th, 2021
- European Union: COVID-19 State aid update - State aid Temporary Framework prolonged and additional aid for recovery possible (6th Amendment) -... - November 29th, 2021
- Govt That Spies Has Insatiable Appetite - KMJ Now - February 4th, 2021
- No-knock search warrants began in Wisconsin, Rep. Myers wants to end them here - Wisconsin Examiner - February 4th, 2021
- Close the Gaps - East Bay Express - February 4th, 2021
- Is Americas Approach to Cannabis Racist? Study Shows Its Worse Than You Think - GreenState - February 4th, 2021
- Federal appeals court allows reporters to sue SWAT officer who tear-gassed them during Ferguson protests - JURIST - February 4th, 2021
- Invoking Scalia, Sotomayor Presses for Broad Fourth Amendment Protections - Reason - October 30th, 2020
- EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing That Law Enforcement Access to Wi-Fi Derived Location Data Violates the Fourth Amendment - EFF - October 30th, 2020
- Main Points Of The Fourth Amendment To Chinese Patent Law (Approved On October 17, 2020, Effective From June 1, 2021) - Intellectual Property - China... - October 30th, 2020
- Column: Michigan can bring privacy into the 21st century - The Oakland Press - October 30th, 2020
- IMPD dismissed from Dreasjon Reed lawsuit - WTHR - October 30th, 2020
- The Criminal Justice of Amy Coney Barrett - Washington Monthly - October 30th, 2020
- RUTHS HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an... - October 30th, 2020
- Assembly Committee Clears Verrelli & Benson Bill Protecting Employees from Employer Tracking Device Violations - InsiderNJ - October 30th, 2020
- The tyranny of the experts - Leader & Times - October 30th, 2020
- Mike R. Galli is recognized by Continental Who's Who - PRNewswire - October 30th, 2020
- Mail Voting Litigation in 2020, Part II: Submission of Mail-In Ballots - Lawfare - October 30th, 2020
- In its 4th revision to the SEC, Palantir tries to explain what the hell is going on - TechCrunch - September 20th, 2020
- City of Pierre among South Dakota towns ordered to pay a total of $440000 because of forced catheterizations - Drgnews - September 20th, 2020
- Former Torrington officer seeks to have evidence suppressed before trial - Scottsbluff Star Herald - September 20th, 2020
- Council To Have One-Day Session To Learn About Police - The Rhino TImes - September 20th, 2020
- Things to Know Before Your Neighborhood Installs an Automated License Plate Reader - EFF - September 20th, 2020
- Attorney argues Haynes and his brother bribed witness to recant his testimony in 1999 murder case - Kankakee Daily Journal - September 20th, 2020
- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburgs Lasting Impact on U.S. Traffic Laws - The Art of Gears - September 20th, 2020
- Editorial, August 10, 2020: Your cellphone might be "Big Brother" - Richmond.com - August 10th, 2020
- Legal Brief: Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment - SecurityInfoWatch - August 10th, 2020
- Common Ways to Fight Against a Drug Possession Charge - Student Assembly of the State University of New York - August 10th, 2020
- Trump Judge Casts Deciding Vote to Grant Qualified Immunity on First Amendment Retaliation Claim: Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears - People For the... - August 10th, 2020
- Did Judge Reeves Reach the Correct Result in Jamison v. McClendon? - Reason - August 10th, 2020
- The Police Lie. All the Time. Can Anything Stop Them? - Slate - August 10th, 2020
- The Court of Justice of the European Union in Schrems II: The impact of GDPR on data flows and national security - Brookings Institution - August 10th, 2020
- Calls for police reform and racial justice spur a flurry of resolutions before the ABA House - ABA Journal - August 10th, 2020
- Reporters Committee amicus brief in Alasaad v. Wolf - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - August 8th, 2020
- Meet the Judge Who Thinks a Black Man Walking Around Is a Crime - Rewire.News - August 8th, 2020
- Who will police Springfields cops? - The Boston Globe - August 8th, 2020
- 'Defund the police' is not a real reform strategy - The Maine Wire - August 8th, 2020
- Assessing Indias obsession with data localisation - Deccan Herald - August 8th, 2020
- How 9/11 and the US Civil War provided the framework for federal agents in Portland - News@Northeastern - August 7th, 2020
- Senators Graham And Blumenthal Can't Even 'Earn' The EARN IT Act: Looking To Sneak Vote Through Without Debate - Techdirt - August 6th, 2020
- The Constitutional Case Against Trumps Use of the Department of Homeland Security - The New Yorker - August 6th, 2020
- 'Trump's Troops Are Breaking the Law and Creating Chaos' - FAIR - August 6th, 2020
- Portland demonstrates that government spying on citizens has become commonplace, and easy - Washington Times - August 6th, 2020
- Plainclothes NYC police grab protester and throw her into unmarked car - WSWS - August 6th, 2020
- Majority of Kingston aldermen view Kingstonian project tax pact favorably, with conditions - The Daily Freeman - August 4th, 2020
- Officers on the street without ID or insignia is dangerous - News-Press Now - August 4th, 2020
- "It's the decent thing to do" - News - Fowler Tribune - August 4th, 2020
- What would the Founding Fathers do? - Smoky Mountain News - August 4th, 2020
- How the president became the deporter in chief. - Slate - August 3rd, 2020
- Want To Reform The Police? Get Rid Of Qualified Immunity - WBUR - August 3rd, 2020
- Who is Zane James, why were his brother and father detained by police in Cottonwood Heights protest? - MEAWW - August 3rd, 2020
- Unpacking DHS's Troubling Explanation of the Portland Van Video - Lawfare - August 1st, 2020
- Capitol Hill grilling of tech CEOs highlights expansion of 'geofence warrants' - WRAL.com - August 1st, 2020
- R Sikoryaks latest project is a word-for-word adaptation of the U.S. Constitution - Boing Boing - August 1st, 2020
- FBI bulletin exposes another crack in ELD mandate - Land Line - Land Line Media - August 1st, 2020
- Analysis: Is Trump stretching the law to deploy federal police power in cities? - wenatcheeworld.com - July 31st, 2020
- NRA and Tea Party: Where are you now? - Greensboro News & Record - July 31st, 2020
- Fourth Amendment | United States Constitution | Britannica - July 30th, 2020
- Fourth Amendment - the Text, Origins, and Meaning - July 30th, 2020
- "It's the decent thing to do" - News - Pueblo Chieftain - July 30th, 2020
- Trump Judge Casts the Deciding Vote to Reverse District Court Ruling to Suppress Evidence Obtained in Violation of the Fourth Amendment: Confirmed... - July 29th, 2020
- Trump Judge Casts the Deciding Vote to Give Qualified Immunity to Officers Who Violated Fourth Amendment: Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears - People... - July 29th, 2020
- How does the Fourth Amendment apply to my child while at school? - Lawyers.com Blog - July 29th, 2020
- Ga. voters will decide thorny 'sovereign immunity' issue this fall - Georgia Recorder - July 29th, 2020
- Shot Twice in the Back: A Case Tests the Fleeing Felon Defense - The New York Times - July 29th, 2020