Freedom Foods sees another CFO depart troubled Australian dairy business – just-food.com

Freedom Foods' share remain suspended at its own request

Graham's departure marks another executive to leave the New South Wales business, which has been bogged down for almost a year investigating possible fraudulent activity in its accounts dating back to June, and more recently agreed a AUD200m (US$156.7m today) capital injection from its majority shareholder Arrovest, led by the Perich family, as part of a recapitalisation exercise.

Its share remain suspended on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) at Freedom Foods' request, and have not traded since last June. The company has repeatedly extended the suspension as it seeks to resolve the crisis at hand.

Freedom Foods producesconsumer-dairy products, dairy ingredientsand plant-based beverages. In December, the company announced the sale of its cereal and snacks division to local peerThe Arnott's Group, owned by US private-equity firm KKR, for AUD20m.

The financial saga at Freedom Foods resulted in the resignation of CEO Rory Macleod in June, the same month CFOCampbell Nicholas also quit the business, followed by vompany secretary Trevor Allen. Michael Perich is currently serving as interim chief executive.

Jose Lemoine, who stepped in as CFO when Nicholas departed, will now occupy the same executive position again with immediate effect.

"Ms. Lemoine has been working within the company's finance team since November 2020," Freedom Foods said in thefiling with the ASX. "The board of Freedom Foods Group thanks Ms. Graham for her service and commitment to the company and wishes her well in her future endeavours."

In January, Freedom Foods' chairman Perry Gunner noted in another ASX filing that the company was reviewing the potential disposal of its "Speciality Seafood" division, which would leave the business engaged in dairy and nutritionals and plant-based beverages.

Perich noted in the same document: "Wehave been reviewing every product line, every site, every sales channel and every market segment to ensure we are focused on those with the greatest potential. We are removing or repositioning products that are not delivering value and investing in the ones that are."

Those comments were issued on the back of Freedom Foods' financial results for the fiscal year to 30 June 2020, the most recent numbers. All of the company's 2019 accounts have been restated.

Revenue climbed 26% to AUD461.8m, but losses permeated the rest of the results. EBITDA was in the red to the tune of AUD96.7m, widening from the previous year's loss of AUD118.6m.

Net profit after tax was a loss of AUD174.5m, down from a corresponding loss of AUD145.8m. Net debt stood at AUD275.2m, up from AUD122m in the prior 12 months.

Read more:

Freedom Foods sees another CFO depart troubled Australian dairy business - just-food.com

Opinion | Give Fred Gray the Medal of Freedom, because no one deserves it more – alreporter.com

Last updated on February 18, 2021, at 05:49 pm

Alabama Congresswoman Terri Sewell has to be wrong. The letter she sent Wednesday to President Joe Biden asking that Tuskegee attorney Fred Gray Sr. receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom must have been sent in error.

Because surely theres no way that Fred Gray hasnt received the Medal of Freedom yet.

I know Sewell doesnt make many mistakes, but that simply cant be true. It cant be true that Gray is behind the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, Richard Petty and Bear Bryant. I mean, make whatever arguments youd like for those guys, but they aint no Fred Gray.

Doubt me?

Did any of those guys manage to get Martin Luther King Jr. acquitted of tax evasion by an all-white jury in Alabama in 1960 at the height of the Civil Rights Movement?

Because Fred Gray did that.

Did any of them represent Rosa Parks after her infamous arrest on a Montgomery bus, and also help plan and orchestrate the Montgomery Bus Boycott?

Because Fred Gray did that, too.

Did any of them file and argue the lawsuit that led to the desegregation of Alabamas colleges and universities?

Because, yep, Fred Gray did that, as well.

What about did any of them represent Vivian Malone and James Hood, ensuring they could get past George Wallace as he stood in the schoolhouse door?

Yeah, he did that, too.

What about winning the first-ever voting rights case for a group of Tuskegee teachers any of them do that?

Because Gray did.

Look, I could go on and on and on like this for quite some time because very few people have changed America more than Fred Gray. You could almost pick any civil rights case from 1955 to 1975, and youd very likely find Gray as the attorney of record.

He was Kings personal attorney for years, helping him successfully navigate a never-ending maze of legal issues. He was Parkss attorney. He repd Black teachers and Black students. He defended the NAACP.

It was Gray who filed and won the lawsuit that gave marchers the right to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma and march all the way to Montgomery a march that ended with the Voting Rights Act.

Heck, without Gray, there wouldnt have been a Bus Boycott. Not only did he help plan the whole thing and defend Parks, but he also defended Claudette Colvin in a prior case that led to law changes regarding racial segregation on the buses.

He successfully fought off the state of Alabama when it attempted to outright ban the NAACP from operating in the state.

And it was Gray who, in the 1970s, defended the participants of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, winning a $10 million verdict and getting a formal apology for those participants and their families from then-President Bill Clinton. (That verdict also dramatically altered the way government studies were performed and documented.)

Gray told me once during an interview that it was his goal coming out of law school to fight segregation everywhere I could.

I didnt want to just desegregate the buses in Montgomery, he said. I wanted to desegregate everything.

And, dammit, he pretty much has.

Which is why its patently absurd that Gray hasnt received every honor and medal that can be handed out for helping to make America a better, fairer country.

In her letter to Biden, Sewell says of Gray:

As a Black lawyer and as Alabamas first Black Congresswoman, I am a direct beneficiary of Grays lifelong work in the fight for justice, inclusion and equity for all. His litigation in groundbreaking cases like Browder v. Gayle can be seen as not only directly responsible for integrating institutions in Alabama, but all across America. An iconic figure and pioneer of the Civil Rights Movement, I can think of few people more deserving of the Presidential Medal of Freedom than Fred Gray.

Gray changed the world for Sewell and millions of other Black Americans, and he made America a much, much better place for all of us.

And like Sewell, I cant think of anyone more deserving of the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

View original post here:

Opinion | Give Fred Gray the Medal of Freedom, because no one deserves it more - alreporter.com

Biden Has No Time to Lose on Freedom of Navigation Operations Against China – Foreign Policy

Few foreign-policy challenges confronting the Biden administration are more daunting than China. With recent headlines drawn toward trade wars, repression in Hong Kong, COVID-19 conspiracy theories, the intimidation of Taiwan, concentration camps in Xinjiang, and the China-India border crisis, its easy to forget that the South China Sea, despite being quieter than it was in the mid-2010s, remains one of the most controversial and volatile disputes in U.S.-China relations. The two countries differences over freedom of navigation in the vital waterway constitute the only bilateral dispute that has repeatedly produced hostile or dangerous encounters between Chinese and U.S. military platforms in close proximity with escalation risks.

Over the past decade, a series of provocative Chinese claims and actions in the South China Sea have opened a gaping geopolitical fault line with the United States, including its unlawful nine-dash line claim, its occupation of the disputed Scarborough Shoal, its creation and militarization of seven artificial islands in the Spratlys, and its use of a vast maritime militia to bully and coerce its neighbors. But it is Beijings attempts to restrict freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, particularly for U.S. warships, that has generated the most concern in Washington and provoked the most robust policy response.

The U.S. Freedom of Navigation operations (FONOP) program, which sees U.S. naval vessels challenge unlawful and sweeping maritime claims that are inconsistent with customary international law, was bought from obscurity into international headlines in the mid-2010s when China began construction of its artificial islands in the South China Sea.

After a hiatus of several years, the Obama administration began conducting FONOPs near Chinese outposts in 2015. The number of annual FONOPs in the South China Sea swelled under the Trump administration, prompting mounting anger from Chinese officials who deemed U.S. operations as blatant navigation hegemony and a military provocation.

The Biden administration is expected to continue regular FONOPs in the South China Sea, but the pace of operations and the Chinese claims challenged are up for debate. As U.S. President Joe Biden deliberates his South China Sea strategy, the administration should recall and avoid some of the stumbles that characterized the Obama administrations early FONOP policies. Operations should be regular and routine, ideally at a pace of at least two per quarter, in addition to being depoliticized and not sensationalized. Finally, FONOPs cannot be viewed as a bartering tool to solicit Chinese cooperation in other areas: Freedom of navigation must remain nonnegotiable.

Since 1979, the U.S. Defense and State Departments have jointly run the FONOPs program, which challenges maritime claims the United States finds inconsistent with international law. China is far from the only country targeted by the program. In 2019, the U.S. government used FONOPs to challenge unlawful claims of 22 countries. However, since the construction of Chinas artificial islands in the mid-2010s, U.S. FONOPs in the South China Sea have attracted greater international attention and greater Chinese ire.

Based on publicly available information, the United States conducted one FONOP directed at excessive Chinese maritime claims in 2015, three in 2016, four in 2017, six in 2018, eight in 2019, and nine in 2020, although the number of actual FONOPs may be higher than those publicly reported. In 2019, U.S. FONOPs challenged a variety of unlawful Chinese claims in the East and South China Seas, including Chinas demand that foreign warships obtain prior permission from Beijing for innocent passage through Chinas territorial sea.

Chinas Ministry of Foreign Affairs claimed U.S. FONOPs have gone beyond the scope of freedom of navigation. It is a political provocation, and the purpose is to test Chinas response. U.S. freedom of navigation is actually deprivation of others freedom, according to China Military, a publication run by the Chinese military, and an excuse for its gunboats to run wild in other countrys territorial waters.

In public, Chinese officials often claim Beijing would never seek to restrict freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.

In public, Chinese officials often claim Beijing would never seek to restrict freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. When has freedom of navigation in the South China Sea ever been affected? asked Adm. Sun Jianguo at a 2016 closed forum. It has not, whether in the past or now, and in the future, there wont be a problem as long as nobody plays tricks.

However, Chinese scholars and officials, including Sun, have repeatedly revealed that when they speak of freedom of navigation, they refer only to commercial vessels, not military vessels. China doesnt believe the United States military surveillance and reconnaissance in Chinas exclusive economic zone is freedom of navigation, said an opinion reporter for China Daily. No freedom of navigation for warships and airplanes, added Chinese Ambassador to the Philippines Zhao Jianhua.

This is not merely a rhetorical dispute. Since the turn of the century, Chinese ships and aircraft have repeatedly harassed or intimidated U.S. military vessels operating lawfully in Chinas 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and 12-nautical-mile territorial sea. International law grants China exclusive economic rights in its EEZ but not the right to regulate most foreign military activities. And although China can demand prior authorization for foreign military operations in its 12-nautical-mile territorial sea, it must respect the right of innocent passage for foreign warships there.

Disputes over freedom of navigation are not new to U.S.-China relations. Beijing has long objected to U.S. close in surveillance activities near Chinese territory despite U.S. operations adhering to international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). (China, which helped draft UNCLOS, ratified the convention in 1994. The U.S. Senate has not ratified UNCLOS, but U.S. policy recognizes and aligns with UNCLOS provisions on maritime entitlements and freedom of navigation.)This rift was exacerbated by Chinas construction of artificial islands in the South China Sea.

In late 2013, China began dredging what would eventually be thousands of acres of sand on seven disputed rocks and low-tide elevations in the Spratly Islands, transforming the features into seven large, militarized artificial islands. However, it wasnt until early 2015 that they were drawn into the international spotlight when the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative published high resolution satellite images of the growing Chinese outposts.

National security experts quickly began calling for the Obama administration to conduct FONOPs within 12 nautical miles of the artificial islands, correctly predicting China would seek jurisdiction around the outposts inconsistent with international law, including attempting to restrict U.S. freedom of navigation.

Yet, Washington deliberated for months. In June 2015,Daniel Russel, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs, sent a peculiar and confusing signal by saying, As important as [the] South China Sea is its not fundamentally an issue between the U.S. and China.

The long deliberation prompted an escalating game of diplomatic chicken with Beijing. China will never tolerate any military provocation or infringement on sovereignty from the United States or any other country, just as the United States refused to 53 years ago [during the Cuban Missile Crisis], according to the China Daily in 2015. This is our backyard; we can decide what vegetables or flowers we want to grow, said Senior Col. Li Jie of the Peoples Liberation Army Navys Military Academy.

In September 2015, for the first time, Chinese naval vessels entered U.S. territorial waters following a naval exercise with Russia, passing through Alaskas Aleutian Islands precisely as the state was hosting a rare visit by President Barack Obama. The following month, a senior Chinese military officialtold Newsweek,There are 209 land features still unoccupied in the South China Sea, and we could seize them all.

Eventually, the Obama administration called Chinas bluff. In late October 2015, the USS Lassen conducted a FONOP near Subi Reef, one of Chinas artificial islands in the Spratlys. However, even that delayed operation drew criticism. With several Chinese artificial islands and several forms of FONOPs to choose from, the administration opted for exercising innocent passage within 12 nautical miles of Subi Reef, the weakest type of FONOP the U.S. could have chosen, according to international law expert Julian Ku. And to make matters worse, limiting the FONOP to innocent passage could actually strengthen Chinas sketchy territorial claims in the region. Even sympathetic experts found the FONOP to be poorly managed with a lack of clarity and potentially a huge blunder.

In the years to follow, FONOPs in the South China Sea became more robust and routine, but the hesitation and seeming politicization of the first operation risked feeding the impression that freedom of navigation was negotiable. Ely Ratner, former deputy national security advisor to then-Vice President Joe Biden, has argued the United States was insufficiently resolute in its response to early Chinese provocations in the South China Sea, resulting in incremental gains for China as a result.

The Biden administration needs to avoid these early missteps and instead, conduct a rigorous and clear program. Beginning in 2021, the Biden administration should pursue a regular schedule of FONOPs in the South China Sea at least twice per quarter, the pace established in 2019 and exceeded in 2020. On Feb. 5, the USS John McCain reportedly conducted the first South China Sea FONOP of the Biden administration, accompanied by an unusually detailed readout of the operation.

Should Chinese attempts to restrict U.S. freedom of navigation escalate, the administration should be prepared to increase the tempo and consider new flavors of FONOPs. Naval War College professor James Kraska recommends bolstering FONOPs by using not just single ships and airplanes but squadrons, such as surface action groups and aircraft carrier and expeditionary strike groups.

FONOPs should continue to include military maneuvers within 12 nautical miles of low-tide elevations (LTEs) subsequently transformed into artificial islands by Chinese land reclamation. International law is clear: LTEs cannot be reclassified as natural islands entitled to a territorial sea and EEZ. Any Chinese attempts to claim an undefined military alert zone around the outposts or restrict navigation is unlawful.

FONOPs should also be depoliticized and not sensationalized. The Obama administration was criticized for seeming to delay or downgrade FONOPs to avoid offending Beijing at a time the administration was seeking Chinas cooperation on issues like climate change and North Koreas nuclear program. Beijing will undoubtedly try to tempt the Biden administration into similarly unbalanced compromises as recent, testy exchanges over climate change showed.

At the same time, FONOPs should not be high-publicity affairs. In some ways, international fanfare can undermine the intended objective. Regular, routine operations and transits of the South China Sea are arguably just as effective at signaling U.S. nonrecognition of Chinas unlawful claims. Experts Isaac Kardon and Peter Dutton believed consistent practice of free navigation, not the reactive FONOP, is the policy best suited to respond to Chinese assertiveness in the [South China Sea]. This is especially true in areas such as the Spratly Islands where China has made no actual legal claims to challenge.

Although U.S. allies have thus far shown little interest in conducting joint FONOPs in the South China Sea, Gregory Poling, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, argues the U.S. government should seek to persuade like-minded partners to conduct their own FONOPs independently. The vast majority of the worlds capitals find Chinas claims in the South China Sea ludicrous. It would be harder for China to sell the false narrative that the South China Sea is a bilateral dispute with the United States if other countries were more robust in their exercise of freedom of navigation in the South China Sea like Australia is.

FONOPs are no panacea for the South China Sea, but they are a uniquely effective tool for advancing the United States most vital interest there. In October 2019, Kurt Campbell, the Biden administrations new Indo-Pacific tzar, affirmed in no uncertain terms, I think the most important dimension of the South China Sea [dispute] is freedom of navigation. Defending the United States varied interests and addressing Chinas multilayered challenges in the South China Sea will require a much broader U.S. strategy. But FONOPs are a key pillar ofnot a distraction fromthat strategy.

Read the rest here:

Biden Has No Time to Lose on Freedom of Navigation Operations Against China - Foreign Policy

The scars of solitary: Albert Woodfox on freedom after 44 years in a concrete cell – The Guardian

Every morning for almost 44 years, Albert Woodfox would awake in his 6ft by 9ft concrete cell and brace himself for the day ahead. He was Americas longest-serving solitary confinement prisoner, and each day stretched before him identical to the one before.

Did he have the strength, he would ask himself, to endure the torture of his prolonged isolation? Or might this be the day when he would finally lose his mind and, like so many others on the tier, suddenly start screaming and never stop?

On Friday, Woodfox will wake up in a much better place. He will find himself in his three-bedroom home in New Orleans, the city of his birth. There will be colourful pictures on the wall, books to read, not an inch of brutal concrete in sight. It will be soothingly quiet no cries and howls bouncing off the walls, no metal doors clanging. Once up, he can step outside and look up at the open sky, a pleasure withheld from him for almost half a century.

It will be a good day. Today he will celebrate his 74th birthday. Today he will mark the fifth anniversary of his freedom.

On 19 February 2016, on his 69th birthday, Woodfox walked free from prison after more than 43 years inside. Almost all that time he spent in solitary confinement, on a life sentence for a murder which he did not commit.

His experiences as a former Black Panther in Angola, Louisianas notorious state penitentiary and the largest maximum-security prison in the US, tested his mental fortitude to the limit and beyond. It made him dig deep into reserves of compassion and resilience he never knew he had, and forced him to learn how to live in the absence of human touch.

Five years on from his release, he might chuckle a little to himself at the irony of today. This may be his birthday and the anniversary of his freedom, but he will spend the day in physical isolation along with most Americans who, courtesy of Covid, have spent the past year getting a tiny taste of what life in solitary really means.

Who would have thought that all those years in solitary would have prepared me for living through this pandemic? Woodfox said when we meet on Zoom. People always want to know what its like. I used to tell them, Why dont you spend 24 hours in your bathroom and find out for yourself. Well, thats no longer necessary this pandemic has forced everyone to isolate and they are freaking out!

One of Woodfoxs techniques for surviving years alone in a 6ft by 9ft cell was to compose a list of what he would do were he to be set free. Most of the lists items were strikingly mundane: he would have dinner with his family, drive a car, go to the store, have a holiday, eat some good old home-cooking.

Other desires were more substantive. He would get to know his daughter Brenda, whom hed had when he was 16 but hardly knew. He would go to the grave of his mama, Ruby Edwards Mable, who died while he was behind bars. And he would visit Yosemite national park in California, which he had fallen in love with watching National Geographic on his cell TV.

Over the past five years, he has ticked every single item on his list. A day after he walked free in 2016, he went to Rubys grave and told her: Im free now. I love you. He has forged a strong bond with his daughter and her children. His brother Michael, a master chef by trade, comes regularly to his house to cook him stuffed crab, hot sausage or his favourite, smothered potatoes. Hes even adopted a stray dog he came across out by Lake Pontchartrain. He named him Hobo.

Not all of it has been easy. In the early days of his release, Woodfox had to retrain his body to do things it hadnt done for decades, like walking up and down stairs or sitting without shackles and leg irons. There have been a lot of first-time experiences that were both exciting and scary: first flight on a plane, first visit to a university to speak about solitary confinement, and the one we all share first time on Zoom.

He was anxious for quite a while about how he would fare in the outside world. He had been separated so long from his family, and he was apprehensive too about his childhood neighborhood of Trem, which as a teenager he had plagued with acts of petty crime and fighting. I went into prison as a kid and emerged almost 70, this patriarchal figure. So how do you fit in? When I left society, my daughter was a baby; now shes a grown woman with three kids and four grandkids and great-grandkids beneath. And the community. When I left Trem I was a predator on my own people. How could I make amends?

To his relief, both sides have worked out fine. He is a present and much-loved grandfather and great-grandfather, pandemic notwithstanding. Through childhood friends, he attended meetings with community groups and apologized for what he had done back in the 1960s, asking for forgiveness. They gave me a second chance, and since that time Ive been working hard to earn the trust they put in me, he said.

Some of the hardest things have been the least expected. He has felt a disturbing disconnect between the world as he knew it from his prison cell all mediated for him through TV, books and magazines that he fought hard for years to be allowed access to and the actual physical world that now accosts him in all its raw, unfiltered splendour.

He did make that longed-for trip to Yosemite, and almost wished he hadnt.

It was far rougher than I thought it would be. We went to this waterfall way up the side of the mountain. It was quite a task getting there, going up, up and up. The waterfall was so high theres a massive spray where the water hits the rocks, and as I turned into it, it was like someone had thrown a bucket of ice-cold water on me. It was a wonderful experience, in hindsight, but in the moment, I was, What the hell am I doing here? In the cell it looked so magnificent, but when I got there I realized, you know, this is real.

Numerous scientific studies have found that when human beings are cooped up in isolation, the experience can cause psychological damage that can be irreversible or even fatal. It can induce panic, depression, hallucinations, self-harming and suicide and should not extend under international rules set by the UN beyond 15 days.

Woodfox endured not 15, but 15,000 days in solitary.

He was held on the tier known as closed cell restricted, or CCR, where prisoners were locked up alone for at least 23 hours a day. He went into CCR in April 1972, aged 25, and remained in it almost without pause until his release aged 69 in 2016.

Ostensibly, the punishment was meted out to Woodfox and his fellow member of a group of solitary prisoners who became known as the Angola 3, Herman Wallace, after they were accused and convicted of murdering a prison guard, Brent Miller. A mass of documentation gathered over years by his tireless defense lawyers points to them having been framed.

There was ample forensic evidence at the scene of the murder, including a bloody fingerprint, yet none of it implicated Woodfox and Wallace. Both men, who were serving separate sentences for robbery at the time, had alibis. It emerged after the trial that the main state witness against them, a fellow prisoner, had been paid for his testimony in cigarettes and promises of a reduced sentence.

Despite all that, and many other discrepancies, all-white juries took less than an hour to convict both men in separate trials.

There is also an abundance of evidence that supports the real reason why the pair later joined by the third member of the Angola 3, Robert King were held for so long in the harshest form of captivity. Three years before they were framed for Millers death, Woodfox and Wallace set up an Angola prison branch of the Black Panther party.

They saw it as a way to fight for racial justice in an environment in which none existed. Angola was built on the site of an old cotton plantation where slaves were bred and put to work in the fields. The location was named after the African country that supplied most of the slaves.

In 1971, when Woodfox formed the Panther chapter, the prison continued to operate a system of slave labour in all but name. Black prisoners, segregated from white inmates, were sent out into the baking sun to pick cotton for two cents an hour.

When Miller was stabbed to death and culprits needed to be rounded up swiftly, the Black Panther troublemakers were a convenient target. They were thrown into solitary where they remained, year after year, decade after decade, long after the Black Panther party itself had ceased to exist. Many years into their time in CCR, the warden of Angola admitted under oath in legal depositions that they were being held in CCR because of their Pantherism.

If the Angola authorities thought that they could break Woodfox on the rack of solitary confinement, they hadnt counted on his powers of resistance. And they hadnt factored in the principles and values instilled within him by the Black Panther movement, which he says literally saved his life.

The Panthers gave me a sense of self-worth, that I did have something to offer to humanity, he said. More than anything, it made me realise that the person I had become was not determined by me, but by the institutional racism of this country. My life had been set in survival mode.

Woodfox came to believe that he could change his own destiny by simple force of willpower. Everything solitary does to you, we managed to survive it. Not just to survive, but prosper as human beings. I wasnt sure whether I would ever be physically free, but I knew that I could become mentally and emotionally free.

In his 2019 book Solitary, a finalist for the Pulitzer prize, Woodfox describes how he managed to stay sane. He immersed himself in prison library books by Frantz Fanon, Malcolm X, Marcus Garvey. He studied law for his appeals. He organised maths tests and spelling bees, played chess and checkers, shouting quiz questions and board moves through the bars of his cell to fellow solitary prisoners down the tier.

His proudest achievement was teaching another inmate to read.

Our cells were meant to be death chambers but we turned them into schools, into debate halls, Woodfox told me. We used the time to develop the tools that we needed to survive, to be part of society and humanity rather than becoming bitter and angry and consumed by a thirst for revenge.

The evident pride in his voice about how he had refused to be broken prompted me to ask a perverse question. Did he miss anything about Angola?

He replied without hesitation. Yeah. I miss the time that I had. One day it dawned on me: I just dont have the time that I used to in prison. In solitary, I had 24/7 to do what I wanted. I had structure, a program. In society there are so many more distractions, so many more demands made on you. In Angola, in the cell, I didnt have a choice.

Albert Woodfox may have survived 43 years in solitary, but it came at a price. Over the past five years, he has observed in himself the long-term damage inflicted by conditions that the UN has denounced as psychological torture.

Sometimes I wake up and Im not aware where Im at. Im confused for seconds or minutes. Im used to waking up seeing concrete and bars, not pictures on the wall, and for a moment its like, Where the hell am I?

Claustrophobia was something he wrestled with throughout his four decades in solitary. At times, he would sleep sitting up to try to fend off the sensation of the cell walls bearing down on him.

He still has claustrophobic attacks every few months or so. Once he was in the bleachers at a sports stadium watching his great-niece and nephew compete when he started having telltale signs. We were sitting there and all of a sudden I felt I was being smothered, like the atmosphere closing in, pushing down on me. I went outside and just walked and walked. That was a surprise I didnt know you could be in a stadium with a couple of thousand people and it happen to you.

His awareness of the scars he still keeps him eager to fight for change, as he has throughout the past five years. He helped found a non-profit, Louisiana Stop Solitary, to press for reform in Angola and other state prisons. Its a long struggle. Last year Louisiana banned the use of solitary confinement for pregnant women, the first reform in the states use of the practice in more than a century. But the state continues to rank No 1 in the solitary league table, with rates that are four times the national average.

Woodfox has taken his message around the globe, traveling extensively across North America and Europe with King by his side (Herman Wallace died of cancer in 2013, two days after the authorities begrudgingly let him out). Woodfox uses the power of his story to press for an end to solitary confinement, which nationally still holds 80,000 US prisoners in its brutal grip.

Last October, he became a central character in 12 Questions, the album by Fraser T Smith in which the super-producer enlists artists and activists to help him explore critical issues of our time.

Smith asked Woodfox a simple question: Whats the cost of freedom? The resulting conversation, according to Smith, was life-changing.

Smith told the Guardian he came away from the encounter with the overwhelming sense that Albert did become free in that 6ft by 9ft cell. To hear someone who has actually lived it tell you that no matter horrendous your external situation, you can be free in your mind that was mind-blowing for me.

In his book, Woodfox writes that he had the wisdom to know that bitterness and anger are destructive. I was dedicated to building things, not tearing them down.

And now that hes out, what does he make of the political turmoil engulfing the US?

Im more optimistic than Ive ever been. Im 74, so Ive seen a lot of upheaval in this country, and the Capitol insurrection was a defining moment in American society. Its made people realise that democracy is fragile, it can be destroyed, that its only as strong as those who believe in it.

When Woodfox first emerged from captivity five years ago, he was amazed by the number of Confederate flags he saw stuck on windows or on car license plates. It took him about three weeks, he said, to appreciate that the apparent improvements in Americas approach to race since he had been in prison were purely cosmetic.

I came to see that America was still a very racist country. It had become coded I guess you could say racism had put on a suit and tie. But it was still there. Donald Trump was making it safe to be a racist.

So where does all that optimism come from? It comes in part, he explained, from the Black Panthers manifesto. The party may not exist any more, but Woodfox still holds tight to its values: We want an immediate end to police brutality, We want decent housing, fit for shelter of human beings, We want education that teaches our role in present-day society.

There is an unmistakable echo with Black Lives Matter, the second source of Woodfoxs optimism. The sacrifice of so many black men and women and young kids in this country has made Black Lives Matter a rallying cry throughout the world, he said.

In the end, Woodfoxs meditations on isolation, resilience and the cost of freedom always bring him back to something more personal. Or someone: his mother Ruby. She may not have been able to read or write, but over the years he has come to know her as his true hero.

The closest he ever came to cracking in solitary, to starting to scream and never stopping, was when the Angola prison authorities refused to let him attend her funeral in 1994. As he looks back today on his five years as a free man, and the 43 years in a concrete cell that preceded them, he finds himself thinking more and more about her.

You start remembering things, things she said, how she said them. My mom was functionally illiterate, but I never saw them break her, I never saw a look of defeat in her face no matter how hard things got. I grew into my mothers wisdom. I carry it within me.

Continue reading here:

The scars of solitary: Albert Woodfox on freedom after 44 years in a concrete cell - The Guardian

Washington Spirit owners, Freddy Adu, and more: Freedom Kicks – Black And Red United

Good morning! It is another gross day down here in Richmond, and I hope that everyone stays warm, safe, and en-powered today as we march towards spring. There is a bunch of news today on a lot of weighty topics, so lets get right into it.

Washington Spirit add literally dozens of new owners

If youre reading this, there is a not insignificant chance that you too are an owner of the Washington Spirit, as they added a ton of new ones yesterday. Chelsea Clinton and Jenna Bush Hager leaked a day early, but other notable names include Tom Daschle, Dominique Dawes, Brianna Scurry, Jay Carney, and a bunch more.

As Chelsea Clinton, Jenna Bush Hager invest, meet 1st female owner of Washington Spirit

All of these new owners join Steven Baldwin and Michelle Kang, who was the teams first woman owner; her company, Cognosant, has almost 2,000 employees.

D.C. United is close to signing their other first round draft pick, which would give them some much needed help on the front line.

A new Crystal Dunn - USWNT star will not be staying silent any longer

Crystal Dunn talks to Seth Vertelney about how she is speaking out about her positional preferences with the USWNT and so much more.

This is a very big deal!

Black Chicago Fire players share their experiences with race in life and soccer.

Chicago Fire players speak out about the racist abuse that they have suffered, not only in the MLS ranks but in youth academy matches from parents. Any parent who uses a slur should be immediately banned.

Revealed: how the pay gap at US Soccer goes all the way up the ladder

US Soccer: still doing a bad job!

It would not surprise if the situation is similar in USL League One, and probably not too much different for the majority of players in USL Championship. These players are scrapping by for the love of the game, and these teams are scrapping by one small margins and small staffs. The only USL teams that I see that really break out the pocket books are the ones that are mortgaging their future in hopes that they get that jump to MLS. If they dont, the cuts come fast.

I always wish the best for Freddy Adu, but he has just been let go from a 3rd division side in Sweden. The quote is....not great.

Swansea City 1-0 Nottingham Forest: Late Connor Roberts header earns Swans dramatic Championship victory

Paul Arriola sighting!

Thats all Ive got today, whats up?

Here is the original post:

Washington Spirit owners, Freddy Adu, and more: Freedom Kicks - Black And Red United

Readers Write: Impeachment trial, freedom of speech, the cold weather – Minneapolis Star Tribune

Well, GOP senators had two chances to get former President Donald Trump off their backs for good through impeachment, and they threw them both away. This latest act of cowardice, acquitting Trump of inciting insurrection, will come back to haunt them.

The Senate trial was not a criminal one. There will be action by the Justice Department, the FBI, the District of Columbia and the trials of those arrested for violent activities at the Capitol building on Jan. 6, among others.

Tens of thousands of moderate Republicans, sickened by what has been done in their names, have called their state parties to resign from the GOP. There is now talk of a split between those moderates and those who have been co-opted by Trump and have defended his notorious behavior for four years.

The repercussions from the insurrection are far from over.

A Trump-supporting mob shouted, "We will destroy the GOP." And when Republican senators acquitted Trump for instigating the Jan. 6 insurrection, they helped make the mob's dream come true. The GOP, the Grand Old Party, no longer espouses high-minded policies or values. Nor can it be considered "grand." The Republican senators are spineless politicians under the thumb of a ruthless tyrant and his followers. Destroy the GOP? With Trump's acquittal, the answer is yes.

Many years ago I was employed by a public affairs (i.e., lobbying) organization. My boss was an old-school Missourian with a deep understanding of politicians. He used to say, "The first rule in politics is self-preservation."

The Republican senators from red states voted for self-preservation. The senate is a political body, not a court of law. If you vote to impeach, you antagonize your constituents, who have the power to end your career at the next election and you incur the everlasting hatred of Trump. What politician needs enemies?

The red-state Republicans made a calculated decision to please many constituencies and to keep their jobs. That's how politics works.

If someone ever writes "Profiles in Cowardice" as a companion to John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage," there are 43 U.S. senators who will merit a collective chapter.

It continues to amaze me that so many Republican politicians remain eager to identify with such a transparently self-serving narcissist as Trump, especially after his appalling behavior following his election loss to President Joe Biden. These lackeys apparently cling to Trump out of abject fear of offending him and his base, but that's treading a fine line. They may have gained some traction with that base by condoning Trump's hateful attacks on those they consider to be the "others," but to a narcissist everybody is an "other." No matter how vehemently they align with him, or how abjectly they kowtow to him, even Trump's most servile supporters will eventually work their way to the top of his hate list.

One perceived transgression can make him turn on someone in a flash. Just look at the attrition rate among the sycophants in his administration. For his inability to override Biden's sweeping electoral win, even former Vice President Mike Pence, Trump's longtime No. 1 groveler, suddenly went from prince to pariah.

For the GOP, lying about sexual relations with a woman other than one's wife: impeachable.

Lying about the results of a free election and inciting a seditious mob: unimpeachable.

Thus one of the numerous reasons I am no longer, in good conscience, able to vote Republican.

As expected, a majority of Senate Republicans voted Saturday to acquit Trump. The evidence that Trump incited the deadly insurgency of Jan. 6 is incontrovertible. What prompted those senators to ignore that evidence?

While some of them are perfectly comfortable as lap dogs to a caudillo Sen. Lindsey Graham comes to mind for most there are two related reasons: cynicism and cowardice.

The ratio varies with each lap dog, but for all of them, their only motivation is re-election. If they anger Trump, a child-man with skin so thin it's a wonder his insides stay there, he will attack them and do everything in his now-limited power to turn his base against them. Even worse, they will likely be primaried by someone even further to the right.

So principle, truth and their oaths of office be damned, and they let the insurgent off. If history remembers them at all, it will not be kindly.

One final note: By constantly predicting that Senate Republicans would make themselves complicit in attacking our country and its democracy, commentators implicitly granted them permission to do just that. If we had publicly expected them to consider the overwhelming evidence against Trump, maybe some of them would have.

Regarding "Must freedom of speech include the freedom to lie?" (Opinion Exchange, Feb. 16), Cass Sunstein advances the notion that our psyches are inclined to embed false information. I suppose I am an exception. I suspected his premise was false information from the get-go or, at least tenuous science at best. One doesn't need a Ph.D. in psychology to realize that making generalizations about beliefs is shaky business. The components of faith, educational level, individual gullibility (an unquantifiable behavior) and mob psychology are all ingredients in this matter. Sunstein doesn't really address this. Can he or any "expert" really demonstrate that people like me reluctant to believe everything I hear are vastly outnumbered by people who embrace lies? I doubt it.

So, while Sunstein is cautious about forwarding restrictions on dissemination of information ("No one ... should assume the role of a Ministry of Truth"), he is proposing limited censorship. I doubt the efficacy of this. Personally, I prefer to accept the risks of widespread misinformation to the risks of limited censorship. I believe that as our world becomes more complicated, with greater challenges, the dissemination of information will become increasingly essential. Yes, there will be falsehoods that require debunking. (The "stolen election" comes to mind.) But the risks of limiting vital information are greater.

Dear weathercasters,

We know that out of every 30-minute news broadcast, 42 minutes are devoted to weather. You kindly tell us that Joe's thermometer says it was -5 in his backyard in Grand Rapids, and Jane's thermometer showed -4 in Mankato. It's riveting. Riveting, I tell you.

But fer Pete's sake it's winter. In Minnesota. It's been cold for a few days. Could you stop with the gushing, breathless delivery? It's cold. We expect it to be cold. It's going to be cold again. Then it will get warmer. Maybe even cold again. It's not a surprise!

Just give me the high, the low, what to expect for wind, temperature and precipitation over the next few days. That's it. That's all I need. If I want more, I can go to your website.

If you keep gushing, it's likely to freeze that way.

We want to hear from you. Send us your thoughts here.

More here:

Readers Write: Impeachment trial, freedom of speech, the cold weather - Minneapolis Star Tribune

What the Trump administration meant for freedom of information requests – Columbia Journalism Review

The election of Donald Trump promised an epic test for the Freedom of Information Act. On one side, the powerful, yet deeply flawed, transparency law that turned 50 years old a few months before Trumps 2016 election. On the other, a brash, dishonest, norm-flouting billionaire who had spent his adult life working in a privately-owned business. What would happen when Trump, the reality-star-turned-demagogue, became subject to the presidencys transparency laws?

Alas, the FOIA world is notoriously slow-moving; historian and journalist Jon Wieners battle for John Lennons FBI file began with a request in 1981 and didnt fully end until late 2006, when the bureau handed over the last 10 pages. And one of the biggest FOIA-driven stories of the Trump years, the Washington Posts Afghanistan Papers, was a reminder that the law often works better as a window into the past than a mirror of the present.

But we can begin to glean at least the outlines of what happened when Donald Trump met the law that the late New York Times columnist William Safire said has done more to inhibit the abuse of Government power than any legislation in our lifetime. The results of that clash are as revealing about the 45th president as they are about FOIA.

Trump came into office with the FOIA bar already low. The Obama administration, despite lofty campaign rhetoric about transparency and a first-day-in-office memo urging agencies to adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, set records for FOIA non-compliance and was caught at one pointby a FOIA lawsuit, naturallycontradicting its public posture by lobbying against FOIA reform behind closed doors. Thus, as MuckRock co-founder Michael Morisy put it, comparing Obama and Trumps transparency records is a case study in setting high expectations and then failing to meet them in some really critical ways versus setting some really low expectations and delivering what folks expected.

Trump as president lied prodigiously, withheld White House visitor logs, went months between formal press briefings, made employees sign non-disclosure agreements, attempted to stop the publication of books about his administration, and committed a long list of other offenses against openness.

And when it comes to FOIA, its hard to find any statistical category where the Trump administration cleared even the low bar set by Obama. FOIA rejections and redactions increased under Trump, while delays grew at most federal agencies and the number of FOIA lawsuits skyrocketed. Just about by any measure, things have gone from bad to worse, says Adam Marshall, who works on FOIA lawsuits for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Jason Leopold, a senior investigative reporter at BuzzFeed who used the law to pry loose more than 40,000 pages of documents during the Trump years, says that in his everyday requesting and conversations with FOIA analysts, he noticed a culture during Trumps tenure of more of an active conversation taking place within the agencies to withhold records [and] to thwart the efforts of requesters to essentially ensure that information is not being released.

Though some of this took place behind the scenes, there were plenty of moments when that disdain for FOIA was publicly visible. At one point, the Department of Interior proposed new rules that would make it more difficult for members of the public to file requests, before retracting the changes due to public outcry. While serving as the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, John Kelly encouraged an official to avoid sending emails in order to evade FOIA. (Similar allegations about email shenanigans were later raised about Trumps Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.) Last March, a high-level Department of Justice official made the absurd charge that FOIA lawsuits had become a way for plaintiffs to generate attorneys fees (which would surely make them one of the least effective get-rich-quick schemes in American history). And later in the year, former Attorney General Bill Barr publicly griped, There is no FOIA for Congress or the CourtsYet Congress has happily created a regime that allows the public to seek whatever documents it wants from the Executive Branch.

COVID-19 slowed the gears of the federal FOIA-response machinery further. National Security Archive Director Tom Blanton says that the results of the pandemic were simple and dramatic: it shut down most agencies FOIA processes altogether.

BuzzFeeds Leopold says the laws administration is so flawed that to say its in disarray would not actually be a proper way of explaining it. Washington Post FOIA director Nate Jones adds, FOIA, today, [in December 2020], issignificantly worse off than it was four years ago.

Adam Marshall says that the national FOIA ecosystem is in such abysmal shape that when he conducts records-request training for journalists around the country, he shares a message at the beginning of each session: avoid it if you can. If you can get documents in some other way, either through a state or local public record request or through some other means, that is almost assuredly going to be faster than trying to get them through a federal FOIA request, he says.

And yet despite the laws age, its flaws, and an administration that was openly hostile to its ethos, FOIA still produced remarkable results during Trumps presidency. Indeed, one of the enduring lessons of the last four years is that, while FOIA may be badly broken, its far from useless or obsolete, particularly if youve got lawyers.

The Trump years saw FOIA put to powerful use as a fact-checking tool. When White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer exaggerated the crowd size at the previous days inauguration, requesters used FOIA to obtain surveillance video and aerial photos to disprove him. When Donald Trump tweeted accusations that the Obama administration had wiretapped Trump Tower, it was a FOIA lawsuit that compelled the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice Departments National Security Division to state, for the record, that it had no evidence to support such claims. More recently, the Washington Post used FOIA to access a State Department cable showing that the White House had no hard proof to back up its claims that COVID-19 had been deliberately or accidentally released by a Chinese laboratory.

FOIA also took us behind the scenes at executive agencies as employees reacted to an unpredictable, sometimes unhinged, president. FOIA-produced emails revealed anger and indignation from NOAA scientists over SharpieGate, when someone in the White House used a marker to hand-draw an extension of Hurricane Dorians expected path in order to match Trumps comments. The law also helped reveal chaos at the Pentagon following the presidents tweets about banning transgender soldiers, and shock and sadness at the FBI following Trumps dismissal of agency director, James Comey.

Meanwhile, FOIA helped us to more clearly see some most important moments and policies of the presidency. The best example of thisand surely one of the signature FOIA stories of the Trump Yearswas BuzzFeeds multi-part series on the Mueller Report, which unredacted key portions of the report, added hundreds pages of newly released background material, and, at one point, prompted a federal judge to lambast Bill Barr for the way his pre-release memo misleadingly spun the report in Trumps favor. BuzzFeed also used the law to produce information on deaths in Immigrations and Customs Enforcement custody during the Trump years.

Elsewhere, FOIA helped deepen our understanding of the pandemic. In July, a New York Times FOIA lawsuit prompted the CDC to release data showing that Latino and African-American residents of the United States have been three times as likely to become infected as their white neighbors. Thanks to another FOIA lawsuit, we learned that NFL star Tom Bradys company, TB12, received nearly a million dollars in aid under the Paycheck Protection Program, and that, overall, according to one expert quoted in the Washington Post, this program primarily benefited the well-banked and well-lawyered at the expense of the small businesses it was supposed to benefit. FOIA also helped produce one of the most remarkable documents of the Trump era: a draft press release from the United States Postal Service announcing plans to send five cotton masks to every household in the countrya total of 650 million masksduring the early days of the COVID-19 crisis. That policy never came to fruition and the release was never published, but thanks to FOIA, we have a glimpse of alternate history in which, perhaps, fewer Americans could have died.

Overall, the law was perhaps most effective in highlighting the various ways Trump worked the presidency to his financial advantage. Trump arrived in office with a dizzying tangle of conflicts of interest, and over the four years of his presidency, FOIA revealed the way he funnelled hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars through the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of State, Department of Commerce, and other agencies to properties he owned. According to one FOIA-based Washington Post report, Trumps golf club in Bedminster New Jersey charged the Secret Service more than $21,800 to rent a cottage and other rooms while the club was closed and otherwise off-limits to guests. In another case, FOIA helped ProPublica publish a taxpayer-funded $1,000 liquor bill for Trump staffers at Mar-A-Lago.

This exposure of questionable uses of taxpayer money extended to other high profile figures in Trumps orbit, as well. FOIA gave us emails showing that Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Director Ben Carson and his wife, Candy, spent $31,000 on furniture for a dining room at HUD headquarters. The Intercept used the law to shine a light on millions spent on security by Environmental Protection Agency Director Scott Pruitt, including $80,000 for radios and $1,500 for tactical pants. The organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) used the law to report on Secretary of State Mike Pompeos use of tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars to fund lavish dinners for GOP donors and other high-profile conservatives. CREW also used FOIA to highlight tens of thousands of dollars spent on Secret Service protection for a Donald Trump Jr. hunting trip to Mongolia.

Since its passage in 1966, the FOIA has led to embarrassing or alarming revelations about nearly every American president, including FBI surveillance of groups opposed to Ronald Reagans policies, the details of state-sanctioned torture under George W. Bush and the legal justification for drone killings under Barack Obama.

As of today, its too early to say how Joe Biden will approach and administer the FOIA. The law went unmentioned in the barrage of memos and executive orders he has issued in his first days on the job, an absence that was itself revealing about transparencys ranking on his list of priorities. And, a few weeks before inauguration, his transition team declined to answer questions from independent reporter Joshua Eaton, for an excellent New Republic piece exploring Bidens potential approach to transparency. For the moment, it remains to be seen if the new administration will adopt any of the open-government recommendations offered by the good-government advocacy group, Accountability 2021.

Adam Marshall describes the various challenges of the last four yearsincluding COVID-19, government shutdowns and political meddling in FOIA mattersas an unprecedented stress test for the law. The result?

FOIA is still standing and still turned to every single day by reporters trying to get information for the benefit of the public, he says.

This doesnt change the profound and numerous ways in which the law fails requesters, but its important to place the failures and successes side by side. You cant look at one aspect of FOIA over the last four years without the other, he says. Its both broken and more necessary than ever.

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly named the former secretary of the Department of Homeland Security as Michael Kelly. He is John Kelly.

TOP IMAGE: Archived papers, Wikimedia Commons

See original here:

What the Trump administration meant for freedom of information requests - Columbia Journalism Review

Freedom and security: On social media platforms operating in India – The Hindu

By calling on social media platforms operating in India to follow the law of the land, as it did last week in Parliament, the government has not just stated the seemingly obvious but also delivered a warning to Twitter that it ought not to defy its orders again, the way it did in early February, when the government wanted certain handles blocked for spreading incendiary content. We respect criticism you can criticise even the Prime Minister, said Minister of IT and Communications Ravi Shankar Prasad in Parliament on Thursday. But if social media is used to propagate hate, then action will be taken. Further, he asked, why when police act in Washingtons Capitol Hill ransacking, a micro blogging site stands in their support, but when a similar action is taken at Red Fort, our national pride, the platform opposes it? That the government wanted problematic hashtags blocked is understandable, given the tense situation on the ground on the day of the farmer protests, but what is difficult to appreciate is that it also wanted handles of some journalists, activists and politicians to be blocked. Twitter eventually complied, but not fully. We have not taken any action on accounts that consist of news media entities, journalists, activists, and politicians, it said in its blog. To do so, we believe, would violate their fundamental right to free expression under Indian law.

After all this, the issue is still in the realm of statements and counter-statements. While keeping up the pressure on Twitter by threatening to take action, the government, at least for the time being, seems to have stopped short of taking action. And while being defiant initially, Twitter also seems to have stopped short of escalating it and going to court. This is significant because if either one of the parties had decided to escalate the issue, the contentious law under which social media platforms are required to comply with blocking orders could come under legal scrutiny. The reference is to Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, under which the government can order a digital intermediary to block any content on grounds including security of the state and public order. Sure, the Supreme Court did uphold the constitutionality of Section 69A in the Shreya Singhal vs. the Union of India case in 2015, but criticism over the secrecy of the process and the arbitrariness with which it has been used over the years has never ceased. This Section, in a way, represents the wide censorship powers that the government has. It is, therefore, important that freedom of speech is not seen as the antithesis of security of the state, but as one of its key facilitators.

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day's newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper, crossword and print.

Read this article:

Freedom and security: On social media platforms operating in India - The Hindu

‘You have to stay strong’: 102-year-old freedom fighter’s message to Disha Ravi – Hindustan Times

Harohalli Srinivasaiah Doreswamy was 23-years-old and had joined a new job as a school teacher when he was first arrested and imprisoned for 14 months for organizing strikes against the British government. His second visit to the prison was at the age of 57 when he took on then prime minister Indira Gandhi during the emergency.

In an interview with Arun Dev, the 102-year-old draws parallels between the times he has lived through and the present state of affairs in the country. He says that a leader or a movement has always emerged whenever democracy was threatened in the country. He also has a message for 22-year-old activist Disha Ravi, who was recently arrested on charges of sedition in connection with the toolkit case you have to stay strong. Edited excerpts:

How do you look at the government using sedition against voices of dissent?

Isnt it clear? Those who do not support or speak up against the government are called traitors. What is even more concerning is that most of them have not been given a trial. Even the British had done the same (registered sedition cases) but when cases were filed against Gandhiji and (Bal Gangadhar) Tilak, they were produced before the court. By not producing them before the court, their (governments) intention is to harass and create an environment of fear for the others. They want to see people silenced.

How old were you when you were arrested during the freedom movement?

I was 23-years-old when I was arrested. I had just got a new job as a teacher in a high school then. I started working in June but by then, the Quit India Movement has begun. I helped organise a 14-day strike at the mills across Mysore state and also blew up government record rooms and postboxes with very small time-bombs. Our intention was to disrupt the British governments daily functioning.

By December, I was arrested, and I lost my job as well.

Was the jail term a difficult experience?

Not at all, it was a learning experience. I had a purpose in life, to fight the British rule. I was not worried at all; in fact, it was like a university for me. The other leaders in jail used to give lectures. I learnt new languages when I was there.

You lived through the Emergency also

Oh yes, there was an interesting incident from the time of Emergency. After the Emergency was announced, I wrote a letter to Indira Gandhi (then prime minister), saying she was a dictator. In the letter, I threatened to go village to village and mobilise the people against her dictatorship. Soon after that, I held the first meeting in Gandhi Bazar (in Bengaluru). I was arrested. But I was in jail only for four months.

During the trial, the prosecution said that I had criticised the prime minister and that I was an enemy of the state. But that judge who was hearing my case said that I had every right to criticise the government and there is no proof to say that I am an enemy of the state. The judge then told the prosecution to ask the government under what charge should I be booked and released me.

I hope our current judiciary will stand up for justice as that judge did then.

What are your views on the recent arrest of 21-year-old Disha Ravi by Delhi Police?

The police took a woman from Bengaluru to Delhi without informing the local magistrate it is very harsh on their part. But she has braved it. It is very brave of her.

If you could tell her anything, what would you say?

You have to be strong. We are facing a dictatorial regime that is merciless, you need to stay strong.

There are reports of parents telling their children not to take part in protests in the wake of the arrests of young activists. What are your views on it?

You dont worry about it. Todays youngsters are smart and wiser. The youngsters of the country have always fought for the right causes. They know what should be done and no one can stop them.

As someone who has seen the freedom struggle and emergency, what do you think of our countrys future?

Nothing is permanent. There will be ups and downs. During the freedom struggle there was Gandhi, during the emergency there was JP (Jayaprakash Narayan) and then Anna Hazare also came, even though he was misguided later. If not a leader, there will be a movement that takes on what is wrong in our country.

I see hope in the farmers protests, this has the power to unite people against this dictatorial government. The longer they stay on the streets, the stronger the resistance becomes.

Read the original:

'You have to stay strong': 102-year-old freedom fighter's message to Disha Ravi - Hindustan Times

Freedom | Definition of Freedom at Dictionary.com

the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint: He won his freedom after a retrial.

exemption from external control, interference, regulation, etc.

the power to determine action without restraint.

political or national independence.

personal liberty, as opposed to bondage or slavery: The formerly enslaved seamstress bought her freedom and later became Mary Todd Lincolns dressmaker and stylist.

exemption from the presence of anything specified (usually followed by from): freedom from fear.

the absence of or release from ties, obligations, etc.

ease or facility of movement or action: to enjoy the freedom of living in the country.

frankness of manner or speech.

general exemption or immunity: freedom from taxation.

the absence of ceremony or reserve.

a liberty taken.

a particular immunity or privilege enjoyed, as by a city or corporation: freedom to levy taxes.

civil liberty, as opposed to subjection to an arbitrary or despotic government.

the right to enjoy all the privileges or special rights of citizenship, membership, etc., in a community or the like.

the right to frequent, enjoy, or use at will: to have the freedom of a friend's library.

Read this article:

Freedom | Definition of Freedom at Dictionary.com

Freedom – Wikipedia

Freedom, generally, is having the ability to act or change without constraint. Something is "free" if it can change easily and is not constrained in its present state. In philosophy and religion, it is associated with having free will and being without undue or unjust constraints, or enslavement, and is an idea closely related to the concept of liberty. A person has the freedom to do things that will not, in theory or in practice, be prevented by other forces. Outside of the human realm, freedom generally does not have this political or psychological dimension. A rusty lock might be oiled so that the key has the freedom to turn, undergrowth may be hacked away to give a newly planted sapling freedom to grow, or a mathematician may study an equation having many degrees of freedom. In physics or engineering, the mathematical concept may also be applied to a body or system constrained by a set of equations, whose degrees of freedom describe the number of independent motions that are allowed to it.

In philosophical discourse, freedom is discussed in the context of free will and self-determination.

Advocates of free will regard freedom of thought as innate to the human mind, while opponents regard the mind as thinking only the thoughts that a purely deterministic brain happens to be engaged in at the time.

In political discourse, political freedom is often associated with liberty and autonomy in the sense of "giving oneself their own laws", and with having rights and the civil liberties with which to exercise them without undue interference by the state. Frequently discussed kinds of political freedom include freedom of assembly, freedom of association, freedom of choice, and freedom of speech.

In some circumstances, particularly when discussion is limited to political freedoms, the terms "freedom" and "liberty" tend to be used interchangeably.[1][2] Elsewhere, however, subtle distinctions between freedom and liberty have been noted.[3] JohnStuartMill, differentiated liberty from freedom in that freedom is primarily, if not exclusively, the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; whereas liberty concerns the absence of arbitrary restraints and takes into account the rights of all involved. As such, the exercise of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others.[4]

Wendy Hui Kyong Chun explains the differences in terms of their relation to institutions:

Liberty is linked to human subjectivity; freedom is not. The Declaration of Independence, for example, describes men as having liberty and the nation as being free. Free willthe quality of being free from the control of fate or necessitymay first have been attributed to human will, but Newtonian physics attributes freedomdegrees of freedom, free bodiesto objects.[5]

Freedom differs from liberty as control differs from discipline. Liberty, like discipline, is linked to institutions and political parties, whether liberal or libertarian; freedom is not. Although freedom can work for or against institutions, it is not bound to themit travels through unofficial networks. To have liberty is to be liberated from something; to be free is to be self-determining, autonomous. Freedom can or cannot exist within a state of liberty: one can be liberated yet unfree, or free yet enslaved (Orlando Patterson has argued in Freedom: Freedom in the Making of Western Culture that freedom arose from the yearnings of slaves).[5]

Another distinction that some political theorists have deemed important is that people may aspire to have freedom from limiting forces (such as freedom from fear, freedom from want, and freedom from discrimination), but descriptions of freedom and liberty generally do not invoke having liberty from anything.[2] To the contrary, the concept of negative liberty refers to the liberty one person may have to restrict the rights of others.[2]

Other important fields in which freedom is an issue include economic freedom, academic freedom, intellectual freedom, and scientific freedom.

In purely physical terms, freedom is used much more broadly to describe the limits to which physical movement or other physical processes are possible. This relates to the philosophical concept to the extent that people may be considered to have as much freedom as they are physically able to exercise. The number of independent variables or parameters for a system is described as its number of degrees of freedom. For example the movement of a vehicle along a road has two degrees of freedom; to go fast or slow, or to change direction by turning left or right. The movement of a ship sailing on the waves has four degrees of freedom since it can also pitch nose-to-tail and roll side-to-side. An aeroplane can also climb and sideslip, giving it six degrees of freedom.

Degrees of freedom in mechanics describes the number of independent motions that are allowed to a body, or, in case of a mechanism made of several bodies, the number of possible independent relative motions between the pieces of the mechanism. In the study of complex motor control, there may be so many degrees of freedom that a given action can be achieved in different ways by combining movements with different degrees of freedom. This issue is sometimes called the degrees of freedom problem.

"Freedom of Gait" in Dressage Theory (a concept in horse training) refers to the horse's ability to reach his natural range of motion (seen at liberty) under the rider. This can only be accomplished if the rider has an independent seat. It must be established and maintained in basic training and refers mostly to the biomechanical articulation of the rear and front legs.

In mathematics freedom is the ability of a variable to change in value.

Some equations have many such variables. This notion is formalized as the dimension of a manifold or an algebraic variety. When degrees of freedom is used instead of dimension, this usually means that the manifold or variety that models the system is only implicitly defined. Such degrees of freedom appear in many mathematical and related disciplines, including degrees of freedom as used in physics and chemistry to explain dependence on parameters, or the dimensions of a phase space; and degrees of freedom in statistics, the number of values in the final calculation of a statistic that are free to vary.

Read more from the original source:

Freedom - Wikipedia

After 400 Years, The Reason People Come To America Is Still …

Four centuries ago, the Pilgrims of the Mayflower landed at Plymouth Rock. They were fleeing religious persecution in the Old World. This is to say they were seeking freedom in the New World.

All these years after the Mayflowers voyage, the world has changed, but the reason to come to America remains the same: freedom. Thats it. Thats the whole deal. Freedom, and the opportunities that come with it.

Think about it. Why else would anyone choose to come here? We have a mediocre K-12 education system. We have a good healthcare system if youre rich and a middling one if youre poor. Sure, we have a social safety net, but how many people who immigrated to this country come to America for Medicare or social security?

Pilgrims, both old and new, came here for freedom. They came here because, in their former country, they couldnt say what they thought, worship their god, or pursue happiness in their own way. They came here because they dont want to be imprisoned or killed for being a member of the wrong party or the wrong religion. Take these freedoms away and America is reduced to a middle-of-the-road European country without the fancy historic architecture.

So, its fair that we take our freedom seriously in America. Its the thing that sets us apart. We havent always gotten it right, there are certainly dark chapters in our experiment in self-government, but for those who come here, freedom is still the ultimate prize. For those lucky enough to be born here American freedom is an inheritance worth more than all the riches in Silicon Valley.

For the past few months, we, a free people, have willingly accepted restrictions and lockdowns in order to slow the spread of a deadly virus. Some of these measures were necessary some were not. But now, we have governors and county health bureaucrats telling us we cant congregate with our families to celebrate Thanksgiving.

Those skeptical of such policies are scapegoated as anti-science. But, as in most situations, skepticism is healthy, and these particular arguments are worth having, especially when the same government leaders canceling Thanksgiving (Newsom, Murphy, Lightfoot to name just a few) are ignoring their own rules. The hypocrisy of the ruling class is hard to stomach. Indeed, the very idea of a ruling class is anti-American. These are the same people that often selectively based on their political preferences choose between which protests to allow.

So no, the ability to have Thanksgiving with ones friends and family is not about mashed potatoes and gravy its about the freedom to peaceably assemble with whom you choose in your own house. Truly, if you arent free to peaceably assemble in your own house, its only a matter of time before other freedoms erode. Todays turkey dinner is tomorrows political meeting.

Many will say that these rules from the governors will not actually be enforced. Maybe so. But if they can make the rule this time, theres no guarantee to say it wont be enforced next time.

Still, others will say this is a small price to pay to stay safe and save lives. Indeed, there will always be voices calling to trade freedom for safety. But this is a false choice. With prudence and responsible leadership, we can enjoy both freedom and safety.

Of course, freedom has a flip side: responsibility. Not coincidentally, this reality has caused freedom to go out of fashion lately. If you are free to choose, you are also responsible for your choice. In the end, acting responsibly is one of the foremost ways we preserve and protect freedom.

Yes, this does mean wearing masks when appropriate during a pandemic, not because the government said we had to, but because its the responsible thing to do. Yes, it means limiting our contact with the elderly and vulnerable. Yes, it means being thoughtful about handwashing, maintaining distance from others where possible, and thinking twice about high-risk activities.

In my family, were scaling back our Thanksgiving significantly. Were taking precautions. I think you should too. But, this Thanksgiving, how many and whom you choose to gather with in your own home is none of my business. Frankly, its none of the governments business either.

When addressing free people about matters essential to their liberty, government leaders must persuade not coerce. The refrain trust science is not enough its a political cudgel, meant to cut off debate. To be sure, theres a place for science to inform policy decisions, but science doesnt have a say about freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. Theres a reason they dont teach the first amendment in chemistry class.

In America, we get to have our debates and make our mistakes out in the open for everyone to see. Its all very messy, sometimes its even embarrassing, but its freedom. And the alternative is much worse: a ruling class exempt from the rules sitting in back rooms deciding what we can and cant do, deciding where we can and cant go, deciding what we can and cant say.

After 400 years, the original idea that drove people from all over the world to our shores remains: freedom. Its still what makes us unique. Its still the reason to come to America and the reason to stay. Its still something to be thankful for and something to fight for.

The rest is here:

After 400 Years, The Reason People Come To America Is Still ...

Medicare Advantage Plans for Florida at Freedom Health …

Marion County

Over 13,400 active Freedom Health network members, 70+ Primary Care Office locations, 260+ Specialist Offices and 10 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 1,800 members in Volusia County enjoy access to 40+ Primary Care Office locations, 240+ Specialist Offices and over 40 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 2500 members within Brevard County, more than 30 Primary Care Office locations, 240+ Specialist Offices and 30 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 4,600 members in Citrus County, 30+ Primary Care Office locations, 110+ Specialist Offices and 10 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 3,500 members in Sumter County, 40+ Primary Care Office locations, 70+ Specialist Offices and 4 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 7,400 members in Lake County enjoy access to over 70 nearby in-network Primary Care Office locations, 300+ Specialist Offices and 10 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 2,400 members in Seminole County, over 30 Primary Care Office locations, 250+ Specialist Offices and 29 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 9,000 members in Orange County, over 110 Primary Care Office locations, 710+ Specialist Offices and 48 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 6,300 members in Osceola County, 90+ Primary Care Office locations, 280+ Specialist Offices and 14 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 2,800 active Freedom Health Network members in Polk County, over 90 Primary Care Office locations, 280+ Specialist Offices and more than 30 Health Fitness Center locations.

540+ active members in Hernando County, 60+ Primary Care Office locations, 170+ Specialist Offices and more than 15 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 730 members in Pasco County, 90+ Primary Care Office locations, 470+ Specialist Offices and more than 30 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 730 members in Pinellas County, 110+ Primary Care Office locations, 690+ Specialist Offices and more than 80 Health Fitness Center locations in the Freedom Health Pinellas County network serving both local members and Treasure Coast visitors.

Over 1,100 active Freedom Health members in Hillsborough County, 150+ Primary Care Office locations, 900+ Specialist Offices and 70 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 4,600 active members, 30+ Primary Care Office locations, 270+ Specialist Offices and more than 20 Health Fitness Center locations to choose from in the Manatee County Freedom Health Network.

Over 3,900 active members, over 50 Primary Care Office locations, 310+ Specialist Offices and more than 20 Health Fitness Center locations in Sarasota County.

Over 960 active members in Charlotte County, 30+ Primary Care Office locations, 120+ Specialist Offices and more than 10 Health Fitness Center locations within Charlotte County.

Over 3,100 active members in Lee County, over 70 Primary Care Office locations, 610+ Specialist Offices and more than 30 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 320 active Freedom Health Network members in Collier County, 60+ in-network Primary Care Physician Providers, 300+ Specialist Offices and more than 10 Health Fitness Center locations.

Broward has 70 Primary Care Office locations, 560+ Specialist Offices and 80 Health Fitness Center locations in the Freedom Health Network.

Over 740 active Freedom Health Network members, 60+ in-network Primary Care Office locations, 780+ in-network Specialist Providers and over 50 Health Fitness Center locations within Palm Beach County.

Over 200 members in Martin County, 5+ Primary Care Office locations, 100+ Specialist Offices and more than 10 Health Fitness Center locations. Click the map to view plans for Martin County.

Over 2,200 members in Saint Lucie County, 10+ Primary Care Office locations, 200+ Specialist Offices and currently 9 Health Fitness Center locations.

Over 2,100 active Freedom Health Advantage Plan members in Indian River County, 6+ Primary Care Office locations, 130+ Specialist Offices and 5 Health Fitness Center locations. You can choose your care providers from anywhere in Florida.

See the original post here:

Medicare Advantage Plans for Florida at Freedom Health ...

Freedom of Religion or Belief club formed at BYU – The Daily Universe – Universe.byu.edu

The Freedom of Religion or Belief Club logo reflects the clubs motto to educate students on religious freedom. (Freedom of Religion or Belief club)

A club educating students on freedom of religion and belief was formed at BYU. The Freedom of Religion and Belief club, known as FoRB, was created by students seeking to find a way to communicate with other students who have similar interests.

The clubs website explains that the club is designed to empower members of the BYU community to become actively aware of the freedom of religion or belief in the broader context of human rights and actively engaged in defending it.

I pondered on the admonition of church and national leaders who have emphasized the importance of protecting religious freedom. I realized that BYU is uniquely positioned to create a powerful impact for freedom of religion or belief, club president Rachel Miner states on their website. Together with amazing faculty and friends, the beginning of the BYU FoRB Club sprung to life.

Miner said the idea for the club came from Article 18 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which reads, Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

She explained that the right to religion or belief is one students cannot overlook, especially at a religious university. We are protecting the right to believe in God as much as we protect the right to not believe in God, she said.

Anna Bryner, another founding member and president of the FoRB club, shared that after a mission in upstate New York, she became curious about restrictions on religious freedom. Since then, she has taken classes and attended conferences and seeks to inspire others to care about religious freedom.

We hear about the importance of religious freedom a lot, but its hard to know what we can do to get involved, Bryner said.

Bryner said she hopes that those interested in the club will understand that rather than a time commitment, the club hopes for a commitment of heart.

Brady Earley, another FoRB club president, explained that the club is designed in regard to BYUs mission statement, leading to lifelong learning.

We feel that there is so much that students at BYU have to contribute to this issue. There is a lot that everyone can do right now to be educated, he said.

The club plans on having two to four main events throughout the semester. The first is scheduled for Sept. 24 at 7 p.m. with speaker Elizabeth Clark, the Associate Director for the International Center for Law and Religion Studies.

See more here:

Freedom of Religion or Belief club formed at BYU - The Daily Universe - Universe.byu.edu

Freedom 76 At Grandview Will Be Live On FloRacing – FloRacing

Eddie Mumford won the first Freedom 76 Modified Classic back in 1971 and Mike Gular won the last one in 2019. It is anyones guess as to who will walk off with the trophy and the $35,550 pot of gold as winner of the 50th Annual Freedom 76 taking place at Grandview Speedway on Saturday, September 19th.

Watch the 50th Annual Freedom 76 Modified Classic LIVE on FloRacing!

Quite an impressive list of racing talents are expected including two of the winningest Modified talents in the sport, Stewart Friesen and Matt Sheppard. Friesen, a Freedom 76 winner in 2014, also spends his time racing on the NASCAR Truck Series circuit and will be coming from the Thursday night race at Bristol Motor Speedway. Rising star Billy Pauch, Jr. (his father a six time winner) is entered as is Bobby Varin, Mike Maresca, Ryan Godown and a host of other visitors.

For the first time in the prestigious race's history, the event will be live on FloRacing.com for both the Friday and Saturday portions.

Track champion Craig Von Dohren will be seeking his sixth win, his first one coming in 1985. Jeff Strunk is a seven time winner while Duane Howard has five wins. Ray Swinehart, another past winner, will be looking for another victory as will Meme DeSantis, a three time winner.

A long list of Grandview regulars and visitors will be filling the pits as they try for a qualifying spot in the Classic, 76 laps around the one-third-mile, banked clay track.

The weekend kicks off with the action packed Freedom 38 for Sportsman stock cars paying the winner of the 38-lapper $3,550. This race is also expected to attract many visitors to test their skills.

Also on Friday night, action starting at 7:30 p.m., the Modified racers planning to participate in the Freedom 76 will be given practice time during the evenings events.

Pits open at 3 p.m. and main grandstand gates open at 5:30 p.m.

Adult admission is $15 with youngsters 6 through 11 paying $5 and kids under 6 admitted free. Pit admission for Friday is $35 and there is no license required.

Tickets for the Freedom 76 will sell for $40. Youngsters, 6 through 11, on Saturday will pay $10 while kids under 6 are admitted free. Pit admission will be $45 with no license required. There are no advance tickets being offered.

Saturday will see pit gates open at 9 a.m. Ticket windows open at 3:00 p.m. Fans will be able to enter the speedway at the first turn and fourth turn spectator gates to reserve seats with blankets between 9am and 12noon.

On track action will get started at 7 p.m. as top Modified racing talents participate in qualifying events, the $1,000 to win Kirsten Snyder Web Design & Photography Cash Dash, the Schaffer Racing Minuteman 20 and top it all off with the 50th edition of the Freedom 76, The Granddaddy of Modified Stock Car Classics.

A large amount of lap money will be divided amongst lap leaders during the big race and the racer gaining the most positions during the 76 laps will receive $500 from Bobby Gunther Walsh and his sponsors as the Hard Charger.

Competition Carburetion Fast Lap of $50 will be awarded Friday, Sept. 18 for the Freedom 38 and for the Saturday September 19th Freedom 76.

All winners are entered into a random drawing at the end of the season for a Grand Prize of $500.00

Freedom Fest will take place from 10 AM to 12 NOON on Saturday in the first turn pavilion area and will feature music by Maddie Pearl. Race cars driven by Ryan Grim, Colt Harris and Dylan Swinehart will be on display.

Bob Hilbert Sportswear will present a jacket to the winner of the Freedom 76.

Check the website for information on camping regulations.

Information can be had at http://www.grandviewspeedway.com or telephone 610.754.7688.

More here:

Freedom 76 At Grandview Will Be Live On FloRacing - FloRacing

Trump Attacks The 1619 Project: U.S. Wasnt Founded On Slavery And Oppression, It Was Freedom – Moguldom

Written by Ann Brown

Sep 18, 2020

Trump decided it was a good idea to use Constitution Day Sept. 17 not to talk about the constitution but instead to bash the New York Times Pulitzer Prize-winning 1619 Project, which is credited with reframing the story weve been taught about the origin of the U.S. around the arrival 401 years ago of the first African slaves.

During a Constitution Day speech at the National Archives, POTUS launched the first White House Conference on American History in an effort to contradict reality.

A series of essays, the 1619 Project was published to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the first slaves arriving by ship at the Virginia colony. It places the consequences of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans at the very center of the story we tell ourselves about who we are, Hari Sreenivasan wrote for PBS.

Trump derided the 1619 Project, which highlights the legacy of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans, MarketWatch reported.

He used his attack on the project to claim that the U.S. was not built and did not become prosperous due to free slave labor. He called this fact lies and declared the U.S. was built on freedom.

For many years now, the radicals have mistaken Americans silence for weakness. But they are wrong, Trump said. There is no more powerful force than a parents love for their children and patriotic moms and dads are going to demand that their children are no longer fed hateful lies about this country.

This isnt the first time Trump has attacked The 1619 Project, which was spearheaded by New York Times reporter Nikole Hannah-Jones. The material has been added to several school curriculums across the country. He has called out the project a number of times, making it a campaign talking point.

Trump called the project toxic propaganda, and vowed to take measures to promote what he called patriotic education.

The 1619 Project has become a common foil for right-wing politicians, calling it ideological poison that will dissolve the civic bonds of America, Forbes reported.

Trump railed against what he called the left-wing indoctrination in school curriculums, which he said views every issue through the lens of race in an effort to impose tyranny and a new segregation.

Trump has proposed patriotic education and declared he will sign an executive order establishing a commission to promote patriotic education, which will be called the 1776 Commission, in contrast to the 1619 Project, The Washington Post reported.

He also applauded a grant awarded by the National Endowment for the Humanities to develop, in his words, a pro-American curriculum that celebrates the truth about our nations great history.

Our mission is to defend the legacy of Americas founding, the virtue of Americas heroes, and the nobility of the American character, Trump said, according to a transcript of his speech.We must clear away the twisted web of lies in our schools and classrooms, and teach our children the magnificent truth about our country. We want our sons and daughters to know that they are the citizens of the most exceptional nation in the history of the world.

The left has warped, distorted, and defiled the American story with deceptions, falsehoods, and lies, POTUS continued. There is no better example than the New York Times totally discredited 1619 Project. This project rewrites American history to teach our children that we were founded on the principle of oppression, not freedom.

He even tried pulling out a quote by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to support his belief. We embrace the vision of Martin Luther King, where children are not judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character, Trump said.

Many observers say this latest speech by Trump is further evidence that Trump has cast himself as the defender of White America.

Presenting himself as a warrior against identity politics, the president has increasingly made appeals to the grievances of white supporters a centerpiece of his re-election campaign, The New York Times reported.

In short, Trump, it appears, is ignoring the calls of protesters across the country who are pushing for changes in the judicial system, for an end of racial and economic injustice.

Just days after returning from Kenosha, Wis., where he staunchly backed law enforcement and did not mention the name of Jacob Blake, the Black man shot seven times in the back by the police, Trump issued an orderto purge the federal government of racial sensitivity training that his White House called divisive, anti-American propaganda, The Times reported.

Trump has declaredhimself the candidate of white America, The Times wrote.

Listen to GHOGH with Jamarlin Martin | Episode 73: Jamarlin Martin Jamarlin makes the case for why this is a multi-factor rebellion vs. just protests about George Floyd. He discusses the Democratic Partys sneaky relationship with the police in cities and states under Dem control, and why Joe Biden is a cop and the Steve Jobs of mass incarceration.

And it seems to be working. A recent poll by CBS News found that 66 percent of registered voters believed Trump favored white people, versus 4 percent who said he worked against their interests. By contrast, 20 percent thought he favored Black people and 50 percent said he worked against Black people. Eight-one percent of Black voters said he worked against their interests.

The poll also revealed that Trump led former Vice President Joe Biden, his Democratic challenger, among white voters by 51 percent to 43 percent, but trailed among Black voters with just 9 percent support, compared with 85 percent Black support for Biden.

View original post here:

Trump Attacks The 1619 Project: U.S. Wasnt Founded On Slavery And Oppression, It Was Freedom - Moguldom

Aviation Analysis: Revival of Fifth Freedom Flights? – Sam Chui

Airlines have begun to ramp up their network connectivity at any cost. For what has felt like an age, the roars of the engines are finally starting to be heard again. With airlines resuming their operations, and jostling for prime positions in their core markets, they are signalling to the world that they have navigated beyond the crisis.

However, a big question lingers on whether demand has genuinely recovered in the long-haul sector. It still remains uncertain. Throughout the COVID-19 crisis, we have been exposed to countless scenarios and forecast models, but the majority have been well off the mark. 2023 has been widely projected as the year when long-haul demand will recover, but in this case, we shall look to 2025 and beyond, of which can be based upon the Nike Swoosh-Shaped Recovery.

In turn, this conservative estimate challenges airlines to optimise their networks in a far more disciplined manner; a manner which must reflect the low-demand environment. On the other hand, there are overoptimistic airlines rapidly scaling up their wide-body long-haul operations again (e.g. Boeing 777-300ER) at a time when there is low passenger confidence and the economy is on the brink of another global recession.

In the build-up to the pandemic, the airline industry was facing crippling overcapacity issues. Huge levels of competition were shrinking the pool of profit; in many ways the industry was cannibalising itself. Fares were plummeting to unsustainable levels, both from a financial and environmental perspective, the service quality on long-haul flights was also declining too.

Airlines are employing a range of commercial strategies to rebuild their long-haul networks and, as lockdowns are lifted in many parts of the world, we could witness a fifth freedom rights boost in connectivity. It would allow hub carriers to consolidate their networks since fifth freedom flights may also prove to be more dynamic (e.g. codeshare agreements with other carriers). The launch of fifth freedom flights would also lead to additional revenue opportunities, e.g. belly-hold cargo carriage.

Between 2014 and 2019, the capacity of the South East Asia United States market more than doubled (CAPA, 2020). This was largely driven by a diversified demand among both business and VFR passengers. The Asia North America market has been dominated by hub carriers making use of fifth and sixth freedom traffic rights (e.g. Cathay Pacific and Singapore Airlines). Until 2017, United Airlines operated several fifth freedom flights from the United States to cities like Hong Kong and Singapore via their Tokyo-Narita hub.

However, a new generation of twin-engine, fuel efficient and long-range aircraft, like the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350, have made such intra-Asia flights obsolete. In 2017, United Airlines began a nonstop service between San Francisco and Singapore on their 787-9 aircraft. Doing so, ended their historic fifth freedom service between Hong Kong and Singapore.

Inan application to the US Department of Transportationsubmitted in May 2020, United requested to recommence fifth freedom operations between Hong Kong and Singapore. United have been operating cargo-only flights using Boeing 777-300ERs since 10th May 2020. However, United still want to maintain the option to open the route to flying passengers; once conditions improve and safe air travel corridors, between Singapore and the United States, can be established. Commencing passenger service on this route exemplifies the airlines need to optimise passenger loads, in a low-demand environment.

By adjusting to a long and slow recovery for long-haul air travel demand, it would make sense to reintroduce commercial routes like this. Even the thought of re-introducing routes like San Francisco Hong Kong Singapore is a more interesting prospect than prioritising non-stop flights, which have become more popular over the past few years. With passenger demand and the oil price at rock bottom, the incentive to fly non-stop partly diminishes. Serving Singapore via Hong Kong suddenly becomes a more feasible option to sustain service between both cities, while airlines avoid unnecessarily increasing capacity through independent non-stop services to each city from the United States (e.g. San Francisco Hong Kong and San Francisco Singapore).

As the industry charts its course to recovery, carriers like Singapore Airlines could be in a position to take advantage of fifth-freedom agreements and operate multi-stop flights. They would benefit from demand at their core hub, in order to supplement weaker point-to-point load factors. In addition to the increasing number of ultra long-haul flights (e.g. Newark, Seattle, San Francisco and Los Angeles) Singapore Airlinesis also experienced in fifth freedom flights. The carrier has diverse fifth-freedom routes that allow passengers to fly between different countries and continents, including Singapore Frankfurt New York JFK (daily, A380-800), Singapore Moscow Stockholm (5x weekly, A350-900), Singapore Hong Kong San Francisco (daily, B777-300ER) and Singapore Tokyo Narita Los Angeles (daily, B777-300ER).

In January 2020, Singapore Airlines was granted permission by the Japanese authorities to operate fifth freedom flights between Tokyo and New York. Any potential route to New York could be flown by Singapore Airlines in partnership withtheir Star Alliance partner ANA. The permission could serve as a solid foundation to kick start travel between Asia and North America in the near future.

Fifth freedom flights between Singapore and Houston via Manchester would further enhance Manchesters transatlantic connectivity; providing Singapore Airlines with routes to the United States that bypass more expensive hubs like London-Heathrow and London-Gatwick. This example could be followed by other airlines in other markets (e.g. fifth freedom flights via secondary markets).

With respect to the recent normalisation of the UAE-Israel relations, and the UAE carriers increasing shift towards local/point-to-point traffic in the post COVID-19 era, Etihad Airways or Emirates for instance could restore their previously challenging LATAM network, by operating fifth freedom flights via Tel Aviv in codesharing with El Al to cities like Buenos Aires, Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Mexico City, Lima, Bogota and Panama City. Today the Jewish population in Latin America stands somewhere around 400,000, with the majority split between in Argentina (250,000) and Brazil (130,000). The financially weak airline El Al could maintain their focus on the high yield markets, like the United States and Europe.

As people prioritise their health, direct flights have significant benefits over connecting flights that require a stopover midway through the journey (e.g. ultra long-haul flights). Recent developments have forced airlines, which rely on a hub-and-spoke model, to rethink their entire strategy and consider launching fifth and sixth freedom routes in the future.

By operating fifth freedom routes using the same aircraft, there is an opportunity to increase confidence in air travel. As there is no need to change aircraft at the stopover airport, passengers would not need to undergo any additional security and baggage checks; in addition the same booked seat could be used throughout the entire journey from A to B via C.

Foregoing typical connections at busy hub airports, with the above-mentioned benefits, could be one of the more safe options for passengers during and after the pandemic. Since the ultra-long-haul sector remains a niche and more expensive option, the alternative opportunities for air travel with competitive health benefits could lie in the fifth and sixth freedom sector (e.g. Emirates recent UK Australia service via Dubai on same aircraft).

Continue reading here:

Aviation Analysis: Revival of Fifth Freedom Flights? - Sam Chui

PAUL TIYAMBE ZELEZA – Beyond Political Freedom to Inclusive Wealth Creation and Self-Reliance – The Elephant

The Tonse Alliance that made history in June by winning the rerun of the presidential election, the first time this has happened in Africa. It represented a triumph of Malawian democracy, undergirded, on the one hand, by the independence of the judiciary, and on the other, by the unrelenting political resilience and struggles of the Malawian people for democratic governance. In short, we can all be proud of Malawis enviable record of political freedom. However, our democratic assets are yet to overcome huge developmental deficits. Our record of economic development and poverty eradication remains dismal, uneven, and erratic.

Malawis persistent underdevelopment does not, of course, emanate from lack of planning. In 1962, Dunduzu Chisiza convened what was perhaps the first international symposium on African Economic Development to be held on the continent. It brought renowned economists from around the world and Africa. In attendance was a young journalist, Thandika Mkandawire, who was inspired to study economics, and rose to become one of the worlds greatest development economists. I make reference to Chisiza and Mkandawire to underscore a simple point: Malawi has produced renowned and influential development thinkers and policy analysts, whose works need to be better known in this country. If we are to own our development, instead of importing ready-made and ill-suited models from the vast development industry that has not brought us much in terms of inclusive and sustainable development, we have to own the generation of development ideas and implementation.

I begin, first, by giving some background on the countys development trajectory; and second, by identifying the three key engines of development the quality of human capital, the quality of infrastructure, and the quality of institutions without which development is virtually impossible.

Malawis patterns of economic growth since independence have been low and volatile, which has translated into uneven development and persistent poverty. A 2018 World Bank report identifies five periods. First, 1964-1979, during which the country registered its fastest growth at 8.79%. Second, 1980-1994, the era of draconian structural adjustment programmes when growth fell to 0.90%. Third, 1995-2002 when growth rose slightly to 2.85%. Fourth, 2003-2010, when growth bounced to 6.25%. Finally, 2011-2015, when growth declined to 3.82%. Another World Bank report, published in July 2020, notes that the economy grew at 3.2% in 2017, 3.0% in 2018, an estimated 4.4% in 2019, and will likely grow at 2.0% in 2020 and 3.5% in 2021.

Clearly, Malawi has not managed to sustain consistently high growth rates above the rates of population growth. Consequently, growth in per capita income has remained sluggish and poverty reduction has been painfully slow. In fact, while up to 1979 per capita GDP grew at an impressive 3.7%, outperforming sub-Saharan Africa, it shrunk below the regional average after 1980. It rose by a measly 1.5% between 1995 and 2015, well below the 2.7% for non-resource-rich African economies. Currently, Malawi is the sixth poorest country in the world.

While the rates of extreme poverty declined from 24.5% in 2010/11 to 20.1% in 2016/17, moderate poverty rates increased from 50.7% to 51.5% during the same period. Predictably, poverty has a gender and spatial dimension. Women and female-headed households tend to be poorer than men and male-headed households. Most of the poor live in the rural areas because they tend to have lower levels of access to education and assets, and high dependency ratios compared to urban dwellers, who constitute only 15% of the population. Rural poverty is exacerbated by excessive reliance on rain-fed agriculture and vulnerability to climate change because of poor resilience and planning. In the urban areas, poverty is concentrated in the informal sector that employs the majority of urban dwellers and suffers from low productivity and incomes, and poor access to capital and skills.

While the rates of extreme poverty declined from 24.5% in 2010/11 to 20.1% in 2016/17, moderate poverty rates increased from 50.7% to 51.5% during the same period. Predictably, poverty has a gender and spatial dimension.

The causes and characteristics of Malawis underdevelopment are well-known. The performance of the key sectors agriculture, industry, and services is not optimal. While agriculture accounts for two-thirds of employment and three-quarters of exports, it provides only 30% of GDP, a clear sign of low levels of productivity in the sector. Apparently, only 1.7% of total expenditure on agriculture and food goes to extension, and one extension agent in Malawi covers between 1,800 and 2,500 farmers, compared to 950 in Kenya and 480 in Ethiopia. As for irrigation, the amount of irrigated land stands at less than 4%.

Therefore, raising agricultural productivity is imperative. This includes greater crop diversification away from the supremacy of maize, improving rural markets and transport infrastructure, provision of agricultural credit, use of inputs and better farming techniques, and expansion of irrigation and extension services. Commercialisation of agriculture, land reform to strengthen land tenure security, and strengthening the sectors climate resilience are also critical.

In terms of industry, the pace of job creation has been slow, from 4% of the labour force in 1998 to 7% in 2013.In the meantime, the share of manufacturings contribution to the countrys GDP has remained relatively small and stagnant, at 10%. The sector is locked in the logic of import substitution, which African countries embarked on after independence and is geared for the domestic market.

Export production needs to be vigorously fostered as well. It is reported that manufacturing firms operate on average at just 68 per cent capacity utilisation. This suggests that, with the right policy framework, Malawis private sector could produce as much as a third more than current levels without needing to undertake new investment.

After independence, Malawi, like many other countries, created policies and parastatals, and sought to nurture a domestic capitalist class and attract foreign capital in pursuit of industrialisation. The structural adjustment programmes during Africas lost decades of the 1980s and 1990s aborted the industrialisation drive of the 1960s and 1970s, and led to de-industrialisation in many countries, including Malawi. The revival and growth of industrialisation require raising the countrys competitiveness and improving access to finance, the state of the infrastructure, the quality of human capital, and levels of macroeconomic stability.

Over the last two decades, Malawi has improved its global competitiveness indicators, but it needs to and can do more. According to the World Banks Ease of Doing Business, which covers 12 areas of business regulation, Malawi improved its ranking from 132 out of 183 countries in 2010 to 109 out of 190 countries in 2020; in 2020 Malawi ranked 12th in Africa. In the World Economic Forums Global Competitiveness Index, a four-pronged framework that looks at the enabling environment markets, human capital, and the innovation ecosystem Malawi ranked 119 out of 132 countries in 2009 and 128 out of 141 countries in 2019.

Access to finance poses significant challenges to the private sector, especially among small and medium enterprises that are often the backbone of any economy. The banking sector is relatively small, and borrowing is constrained by high interest rates, stringent collateral requirements, and complex application procedures. In addition, levels of financial inclusion and literacy could be greatly improved. The introduction of the financial cash transfer programme and mobile money have done much to advance both.

Corruption is another financial bottleneck, a huge and horrendous tax against development. The accumulation of corruption scandals Cashgate in 2013, Maizegate in 2018, Cementgate and other egregious corruption scandals in 2020 is staggering in its mendacity and robbery of the countys development and future by corrupt officials that needs to be uncompromisingly uprooted.

Malawis infrastructure deficits are daunting. Access to clean water and energy remains low, at 10%, and frequent electricity outages are costly for manufacturing firms that report losing 5.1% in annual sales; 40.9% of the firms have been forced to have generators as backup. The countrys generating capacity needs massive expansion to close the growing gap between demand and supply. Equally critical is investment in transport and its resilience to contain the high costs of domestic and international trade that undermine private sector development and poverty reduction.

Digital technologies and services are indispensable for 21st century economies, an area in which Malawi lags awfully behind. According to the ICT Development Index by the International Telecommunications Union, in 2017 Malawi ranked 167 out of 176 countries. There are significant opportunities to overcome the infrastructure deficits in terms of strengthening the countrys transport systems through regional integration, developing renewable energy sources, and improving the regulatory environment. Developing a digitally-enabled economy requires enhancing digital infrastructure, connectivity, affordability, availability, literacy, and innovation.

Malawis infrastructure deficits are daunting. Access to clean water and energy remains low, at 10%, and frequent electricity outages are costly for manufacturing firms that report losing 5.1% in annual sales.

The services sector has grown rapidly, accounting for 29% of the labor force in 2013 up from 12% in 1998. It is dominated by the informal sector which is characterized by low productivity, labor underutilization, and dismal incomes. The challenge is how to improve these conditions and facilitate transition from informality to formality.

The challenges of promoting Malawis socio-economic growth and development are not new. In fact, they are so familiar that they induce fatalism among some people as if the country is doomed to eternal poverty. Therefore, it is necessary to go back to basics, to ask basic questions and become uncomfortable with the countys problems, with low expectations about our fate and future.

From the vast literature on development, to which Thandika made a seminal contribution, there are many dynamics and dimensions of development. Three are particularly critical, namely, the quality of human capital, the quality of infrastructure, and the quality of institutions. In turn, these enablers require the drivers embodied in the nature of leadership, the national social contract, and mobilisation and cohesiveness of various capitals.

The quality of human capital encompasses the levels of health and education. Since 2000, Malawi has made notable strides in improving healthcare and education, which has translated into rising life expectancy and literacy rates. For the health sector, it is essential to enhance the coverage, access and quality of health services, especially in terms of reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and early child development, and public health services, as well as food security and nutrition services.

The introduction of free primary education in 1994 was a game changer. Enrollment ratios for primary school rose dramatically, reaching 146% in 2013 and 142% in 2018, and for secondary school from 44% in 2013 to 40% in 2018. The literacy rate reached 62%. But serious challenges remain. Only 19% of students progress to Standard Eight without repeating and dropout rates are still high; only 76% of primary school teachers and 57% of secondary school teachers are professionally trained. Despite increased government expenditure, resources and access to education remain inadequate.

Consequently, in 2018 Malawis adult literacy was still lower than the averages for sub-Saharan countries (65%) and the least developed countries (63%). This means the skill base in the country is low and needs to be raised significantly through increased, smart and strategic investments in all levels of education. Certainly, special intervention is needed for universities if the country, with its tertiary education enrollment ratio of less than 1%, the lowest in the world, is to catch up with the enrollment ratios for sub-SaharanAfrica and the world as a whole that in 2018 averaged 9% and 38%, respectively.

Human capital development is essential for turning Malawis youth bulge into a demographic dividend rather than a demographic disaster. Policies and programmes to skill the youth and make them more productive are vital to harnessing the demographic dividend. Critical also is accelerating the countrys demographic transition by reducing the total fertility rate.

As for infrastructure, while the government is primarily responsible for building and maintaining it, the private sector has an important role to play, and public-private-partnerships are increasingly critical in many countries. It is necessary to prioritise and avoid wish lists that seek to cater to every ministry or constituency; to concentrate on a few areas that have multiplier effects on various sectors; and ensure the priorities are well-understood and measurable at the end of the governments five-year term. Often, the development budget doesnt cover real investment in physical infrastructure and is raided to cover over-expenditure in the recurrent budget.

The quality of institutions entails the state of institutional arrangements, which UNDP defines as the policies, systems, and processes that organizations use to legislate, plan and manage their activities efficiently and to effectively coordinate with others in order to fulfill their mandate. Thus, institutional arrangements refer to the organisation, cohesion and synergy of formal structures and networks encompassing the state, the private sector, and civil society, as well as informal norms for collective buy-in and implementation of national development strategies. But setting up institutions is not enough; they must function. They must be monitored and evaluated.

Human capital development is essential for turning Malawis youth bulge into a demographic dividend rather than a demographic disaster. Policies and programmes to skill the youth and make them more productive are vital to harnessing the demographic dividend.

The three enablers of development require the drivers of strong leadership and good governance. Malawi has not reaped much from its peace and stability because of a political culture characterised by patron-clientelism, corruption, ethnic and regional mobilisation, and crass populism that eschews policy consistency and coherence, and undermines fiscal discipline. Malawis once highly regarded civil service became increasingly politicised and demoralised. Public servants and leaders at every level and in every institutional context have to restore and model integrity, enforce rules and procedures, embody professionalism and a high work ethic, and be accountable. Impunity must be severely punished to de-institutionalise corruption, whose staggering scale shows that domestic resources for development are indeed available. To quote the popular saying by Arthur Drucker, organisational culture eats strategy.

Also critical is the need to forge social capital, which refers to the development of a shared sense of identity, understanding, norms, values, common purpose, reciprocity, and trust. There is abundant research that shows a positive correlation between the social capital of trust and various aspects of national and institutional development and capabilities to manage crises. Weak or negative social capital has many deleterious consequences. The COVID-19 pandemic has made this devastatingly clear countries in which the citizenry is polarised and lacks trust in the leadership have paid a heavy price in terms of the rates of infection and deaths.

Impunity must be severely punished to de-institutionalise corruption, whose staggering scale shows that domestic resources for development are indeed available. To quote the popular saying by Arthur Drucker, organisational culture eats strategy.

The question of social capital underscores the fact that there are many different types of capital in society and for development. Often in development discourse the focus is on economic capital, including financial and physical resources. Sustainable development requires the preservation of natural capital. Malawis development has partly depended on the unsustainable exploitation of environmental resources that has resulted in corrosive soil erosion and deforestation. Development planning must encompass the mobilisation of other forms of capital, principally social and cultural capital. The diaspora is a major source of economic, social and cultural capital. In fact, it is Africas largest donor, which remitted an estimated $84.3 billion in 2019.

In conclusion, Malawis development trajectory has been marked by progress, volatility, setbacks, and challenges. For a long time, Malawis problem has not been a lack of planning, but rather a lack of implementation, focus and abandoning the very basics of required integrity in all day-to-day work.Also, the plans are often dictated by donors and lack local ownership so they gather the proverbial bureaucratic dust.

Let us strive to cultivate the systems, cultures, and mindsets of inclusion and innovation so essential for the construction of developmental and democratic states, as defined by Thandika and many illustrious African thinkers and political leaders.

This article is the authors keynote address at the official opening of the 1st National Development Conference presided by the State President of Malawi, His Excellency Dr. Lazarus Chakwera, at the Bingu International Convention Centre, Lilongwe, on 27 August, 2020.

View original post here:

PAUL TIYAMBE ZELEZA - Beyond Political Freedom to Inclusive Wealth Creation and Self-Reliance - The Elephant

Backyard pool will bring joy and freedom to Niagara Falls boy – StCatharinesStandard.ca

Owen Hyatt has always loved the water.

His mom Dawn Hyatt said its been true of her son from the time he was a month old, relaxing in his first tub bath. And so, when she was applying for Owen to receive a wish from Make-a-Wish Foundation, a pool seemed the obvious choice.

He just squeals with excitement in the pool. This wish is going to be fantastic, said Hyatt. I knew going on a trip for him is nothing; he wouldnt get anything out of it. Having a pool for him, its family time, its strengthening for him and hes just the happiest in the pool.

Owen, who will turn five in a couple of weeks, was born prematurely with a rare genetic disorder. He is one of only about four children in the world who have this particular genetic disorder. Owen is also blind, nonverbal and uses a wheelchair.

Susan Lott, ambassador for Make-a-Wish Niagara, said for children like Owen, these wishes make a lasting impact.

Its almost like, depending on the wish, they have that time period where theyre just a normal kid. Theyre not having to go to the doctors all the time. Theyre not having people talking to them about it all the time, she said. In Owens case, having the pool, this is going to be his freedom in that pool.

Lott said thats most important for Make-a-Wish Foundation and its volunteers: that the wish is something meaningful for the child.

We like to know the why behind (the wish); its so important, she said. You want to make sure its what the child wants. You want it to be a very special thing for the child.

And for Owen, thats a swimming pool.

Hyatt said her family finds water wherever they go. They took their trailer out three times over the summer for camping and made sure there was a nearby lake for Owen. He takes private swimming lessons, and Hyatts sister has a backyard pool the family uses as often as possible.

She said Owen even loves the rain.

But having his own pool in the backyard? Hyatt said it will be life-changing for Owen.

I just think hes going to have so much more freedom in his life, she said.

Having it right in my backyard, we can go swimming any day. He would be in the water from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. if he could.

The pool is an 18-foot round, heated above-ground pool that Hyatt said will be perfect in the backyard of their Niagara Falls home.

Eventually my husband will make a deck and itll be like a beautiful oasis for Owen, she said. Were actually going to make a sign; its going to be Camp O-Bear because everyone calls him O-Bear.

The original plan was for the Hyatts pool to be installed over the May long weekend, but it was delayed by COVID-19 and then again when the Hyatts decided to move into a home that was better suited for their family long term.

Loading...Loading...Loading...Loading...Loading...

Lott said a number of wishes, specifically travel ones, are on hold because of the pandemic, and others were delayed in the spring when the lockdown began. She said shes excited to see them come to fruition, especially the pool, which is the first one being put in by Make-a-Wish in Niagara.

Hyatt said her son deserves the fun hell have in the pool.

He is such a joy to have. He is the happiest little boy, she said. Owen has suffered and struggled so much in his whole life and ... he deserves everything. He deserves his wish.

The Make-a-Wish reveal happened Sept. 10 at the Hyatts home. There were a few family members present to celebrate the moment as well as some special touches for Owens eight-year-old sister Hailey.

Lott said Boston Pizza donated pizza for Hailey, who decorated a special sign for the reveal.

Hailey, who finds it easy and fun being Owens big sister, said this is special for him because he loves to swim and thats really the thing he loves to do most.

Lott said this is her favourite part: meeting the families and getting to know the kids. She tries not to cry when the wish is revealed, but isnt often successful.

Its just so awesome, she said.

Hyatt said shes proud of her son and glad she can give him this pool.

(Owens) taught me so many things. I am a changed mother, Im a changed person. Hes changed me in so many ways.

See the original post here:

Backyard pool will bring joy and freedom to Niagara Falls boy - StCatharinesStandard.ca

Parson James Talks New Single, Lockdown, and Artistic Freedom – vmagazine.com

His poetic lyricism is, as always, paired with vocals powerful enough to fill the heights of a cathedral, emotion palpable enough to taste, and soul blended with pop in an ethereal experience transmuting tribulation into inspiration. The song is a story in his soulful style, a rhythmic ode to the contents of Parson's heartwhich, when not residing on his sleeve, permeates all aspects of his music.

We chatted with the LA-based, South-Carolina native singer/songwriter about lockdown, his new label, and artistry. Read the full interview below, and stream "High Tide, Low Tide" here.

V MAGAZINE With more freedom (in terms of the new label), how is your artistry changing?

PARSON JAMES I feel that Ive been lucky in that Ive always had a clear vision of what I want to say and how I want to say it. I think even with my last label I still was able to get my message across even when the politics of the industry got in the way here and there. I think then, though, I was just more likely to back down when faced with opposing opinions from within that unit. I wanted to please everyone so much that I found myself to be a bit more passive in my approach for things I wanted to fight for. Ive experienced a lot in those years since and have taken all of it into account to really learn from. The biggest change I have noticed within my artistry personally is something that is very similar to the way I felt before I had any success or a label and I was just back in New York writing from the heart. I am leading with what feels right for me rather than what I feel is right for someone else. Ive been so inspired to explore the many facets of my abilities and range and not put myself in this unnecessary box I so long thought I needed to be in.

V In terms of what this song's about - why do you think we so easily put aside our own best interests for others when, logically, this makes no sense?

P You know I honestly think its just much easier to deal with other peoples shit than your own sometimes, simply. Im sure you have had that realization of catching yourself giving someone the most brilliant fucking advice ever and as youre relaying it youre like why dont I listen to myself more often??. I know for me Ive always just had this empathetic nature and I never really knew what it truly was until the last few years when I sit back and think about how tired, exhausted and crazy I make myself over OTHER PEOPLES PROBLEMS! Empathy is this weird thing that I both hate and wouldnt trade for the world I genuinely want people to be at their best, especially when its those I care for. it pains me in a way I cant really describe if theyre not. I didnt know the toll it was taking on me though until these last few months and now Ive been making a valiant effort to treat myself with the same care and concern I give to those around me.

VHopefullylockdowns and lockdown relationships will be a once in a lifetime thing. Are you happy that this one was the one you had?

P Omg, even the word lockdown incites a twitch in my eye lol this has all been so insanely odd and unimaginable. I know its the same for absolutely everyone, but I do hope that lockdown love is a one time thing as well hahaha. Look this happened in the most amazing way I met this guy about 2 days before lockdown started in LA on a dating app we went on a date like the last night before quarantine started and then when it did we just were like lets keep hanging out? It was truly a universe thing and I have to say the months of quarantine became some of the absolute best of my life. When youre dating or getting to know someone in quarantine its like youre going backwards you cant hide behind a bar or restaurant buzz.. youre at one of your respective homes seeing all the shit good bad and ugly right away. Its such a wild way to get to know someone. Quickly I learned so much about him and I saw so many parallels in his upbringing and mine (crazy religious father, sexuality repression, body image, commitment, trust) allll of the things. I took those on because I genuinely felt such a connection that blew my mind and above all I felt that there was an opportunity for a true deep friendship and bond. Thats what ultimately happened the closer we got it became apparent that we needed to be there for each other in this crazy time as friends first and I can safely say his presence and friendship saved me this quarantine so yes I am super happy that it happened.

V What did you learn during lockdown that you plan to carry with you for the rest of your life?

P I learned how to say no and I learned how to just be with myself. Ive always had this incessant need to be around people constantly & this inability to say no to anyones plans. This has caused me to spend way too much money, drink way too much, gain weight, become exhausted and it goes back to doing for others before myself. I learned that I was out socializing because I was escaping from facing a lot of my own mental struggles I was seeking validation and needed to be everywhere with everyone all the time.I developed a fear of sleep unless I was with someone or with people just really unhealthy behaviors. This lockdown situation was tough for me at first I had plenty of anxiety attacks & breakdowns bc I was out of my comfort zone being with myself so much but ultimately I pushed through the discomfort and found solace in being enough for myself. I also found out how important it was to have moments of selfishness & to say no sometimes. This may seem trivial but it has been a life changing realization for me.

V Were you the type that got creative while in lockdown, or who just sort of took it day by day since, you know, Armageddon?

P Ill be honest the first few weeks I was in this whirlwind thing and had no clue how long it was gonna last so I saw it as a full blown escape and opportunity to drink wine as much as I wanted hahaha. I also am a SEVERE hypochondriac so this whole thing was the most for me lol.. so I didnt want to really go to any studio or do anything my mind was all over the place. I wasnt creative at all until my manager introduced me to Colin Brittain who produced the single. It was just a timing thing where I was a few months into this whole quarantine thing and it was at a point with the lockdown love that was getting difficult.. the push and pull was happening (which is what high tide low tide is all about) so I agreed to go in and work with him one day socially distanced and masked and this song came about in minutes. Since then, Ive not been able to stop working and its felt more liberating than anything Ive done in years.

V What can we expect from you in terms of new music (after this)?

P Ive been on a roll. Not to mention I had several projects prepped before I even got the new deal and all of the new material started coming about. The music really touches on whats happened since my first project. I call myself a gambler in life because I find I am always taking chances on people in work, love, friendships etc. I am constantly getting fucked over or finding myself wrong about a situation of course sometimes Im also lucky and I land right where I am supposed to. Thats life though, its The Gamble you take. Ive written a lot about this lockdown love as well so Ive made some space for that on the first part of the project but overall this next bit of work is about being even more honest than before with myself with my own demons the demons of those I love, my empathy, overcoming trauma, acceptance and finding true understanding of who the fuck I am as a human.

V "With great power comes great responsibility," and all that. Now that you really have power over your own sound, do you feel any more or less nervous about your work? I can imagine sometimes, that newfound autonomy can almost be intimidating.

P I feel nervous about everything I do. I am a nervous fucking wreck always. I just so desperately want to make sure that I am always creating honest work that someone somewhere can latch on to and find a piece of their story within. I am here to tell my story so that others can find it within themselves to tell theirs. My only responsibility is to not mince my words and to forever tell the truth in the only way that I know how, to sing it.

See original here:

Parson James Talks New Single, Lockdown, and Artistic Freedom - vmagazine.com