Fighting voter ID laws in the courts isn’t enough. We need boots on the ground – Los Angeles Times

I first met Cinderria, an 18-year-old woman of color, in a library in downtown Madison, Wis. She approached the table marked Voter ID Assistance and explained that with the 2016 presidential primary only a few months away, and despite several trips to the DMV, she still didnt have a valid ID as mandated by Wisconsins strict new laws.It turned out she needed a Social Security card but wasnt sure how to obtain one.

Proponents of voter ID laws dont want to acknowledge that Cinderrias case is far from unusual. Experts project that in Wisconsin alone, 300,000 eligible voters lack the ID necessary to cast a ballot. Across the country, 32 states have some form of voter ID law, creating a crisis of disenfranchisement not seen since the civil rights era. These ID laws dont touch all groups equally: Voters of color, like Cinderria, are hit hardest. The elderly, students and low-income votersalso are disproportionately affected. (A new study published in the Journal of Politics, for instance, found that strict ID laws lower African American, Latino, Asian American and multiracial American turnout.)

States that have implemented voter ID laws have shown little to no interest in helping their citizens comply. And the advocacy organizations that oppose these laws have few resources for direct voter assistance. Instead, groups like the American Civil Liberties Unionhave focused on challenging voter ID mandates in court. Thats essential, but its not enough. As court battles proceed, we must acknowledge our collective obligation to voters like Cinderria by investing in on-the-ground, in-person support.

Before the 2016 election, a group of us in Madison recognized the problem and got to work, partnering with local organizations like the League of Women Voters and NAACP. As one coalition, we collaborated with social service agencies, churches, food pantries, employers, schools and election administrators. Outreach continued through the November electionand is ongoing for spring elections. But theres tons of work left to do in Madison, to say nothing of the state or nation as a whole.

The right to vote is not denied only in large volume. Our democracy deteriorates every single time an older voter cant find transportation to a distant DMV, and every single time a working mother cant afford the fees associated with redundant paperwork to prove her citizenship.

Having worked one-on-one with would-be voters, a nefarious truth about these laws has become clear to me. Not only do the requirements hamper individuals in the short term, they also can send a long-term signal to historically disenfranchised communities that theyre not invited into their countrys democratic process a feeling all too familiar to those who were born before the abolition of Jim Crow.

We cannot return to the era of literacy tests and poll taxes. Its crucial that all voters are offered helpbecause they must not lose the belief that their vote is precious and their participation essential to our democracy. These voters are our neighbors, our co-workers and, at the most basic level, our fellow citizens. Their rights are as valuable as those of any big-spending campaign donor.

Despite repeated assurances from voter ID proponents that these laws arent discriminatory and are easy to comply with, lived experience proves the opposite.

Cinderria was finally able to obtain an ID, but only weeks after we first met; I traveled with her to the DMV to make sure nothing went wrong. Claudelle, a voter in his 60s whose mother mistakenly spelled his name Clardelle on his birth certificate, was refused an ID with his correct name twice.On a trip to the DMV with a 34-year-old named Zack, we were given inaccurate information on how to receive a free ID to vote. A recording of that interactionprompted a federal judge to order retraining of DMV workers across Wisconsin.

The voters affected by these laws who, again, are more likely to be low-income, transient and elderly often are unreachable through social media campaigns or other online communication. That makes in-person outreach indispensable. A young Madison woman named Treasure, for instance, was unable to obtain an ID until neighborhood canvassers knocked on her door and gave her accurate information and assistance.

Such work is not an admission that voter ID laws arent worth fighting; they are. It represents, rather, a commitment to fight suppression at every level. We have no choice but to organize, lace up our shoes and meet would-be voters where they live and work.

Molly J. McGrath is an attorney, voting rights advocate and organizer.She can be found @votermolly or votermolly.com

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter@latimesopinionorFacebook

More:

Fighting voter ID laws in the courts isn't enough. We need boots on the ground - Los Angeles Times

Westminster warned against benefits ‘claw back’ once ‘bedroom tax’ abolished in Scotland – Scottish Housing News

Scottish ministers are to seek assurances from the UK government that it will not reduce the benefits of claimants in Scotland when the Scottish Government abolishes the bedroom tax.

Communities, social security and equalities secretary, Angela Constance, made the call for clarity ahead of a meeting with the Department of Work and Pensions in London today.

Ms Constance will stress the abolition of the bedroom tax cannot be counted as benefit income when it comes to the UK governments benefit cap as it will penalise people by having other UK benefit payments clawed back.

The principle of no claw back for Scottish Government benefits was agreed in the Smith Commission and the financial agreement covering the Scotland Act 2016, and ministers are concerned that when the bedroom tax is abolished in Scotland, the UK government will treat this as additional income for a household and impose the cap.

The Scottish Government will provide 47 million next year to mitigate the bedroom tax imposed by the UK government, ensuring no one needs to lose out because of it, and will seek to abolish it as soon as practically possible.

Ms Constance said: The bedroom tax is an abhorrent charge which makes the lives of those already struggling to make ends meet even harder theres no place for that in a modern Scotland. I make no secret of the fact we want to abolish it but what we also dont want to see is anyones benefits being reduced again because by abolishing bedroom tax they end up over threshold for the UK benefit cap.

It is not acceptable for the Scottish Government to give with one hand only for the UK Government to take away with the other when these powers were transferred to Scotland there was a commitment there would be no claw back of benefits as a result of payment or eligibility decisions made by the Scottish Government. We need cast iron commitments from the UK Government that they will abide by those principles and that people wont be penalised further.

This issue has been raised with UK ministers on a number of occasions and I look forward to discussing this further at Mondays meeting.

More than 70,000 households in Scotland benefit because the Scottish Government mitigates the bedroom tax. It is estimated that the new lower UK benefit cap affects 5000 households in Scotland, and more are likely to reach the cap when the bedroom tax is abolished.

Social security minister Jeane Freeman and employability minister Jamie Hepburn will also attend the meeting in London.

Continue reading here:

Westminster warned against benefits 'claw back' once 'bedroom tax' abolished in Scotland - Scottish Housing News

Govt mulls abolition of parallel degree programs in public varsities … – Capital FM Kenya (press release) (blog)

State House Spokesman Manoah Esipisu noted that this might be one of the issues contributing to the current lecturers strike/FILE

By SIMON NDONGA, NAIROBI, Kenya, Feb 19 The government is mulling the abolition of parallel degree programs in public universities across the country as a result of what it terms as a lack of accountability of the monies generated.

State House Spokesman Manoah Esipisu noted that this might be one of the issues contributing to the current lecturers strike.

Speaking during his weekly briefing on Sunday, Esipisu indicated that such a move would be in line with the exam reform process currently being undertaken by the Education Ministry.

You know with this reform of the exam system, one of the results of that is the potential complete removal of the Parallel structure, he stated. You know very well that there have been issues about accountability in terms of the resources coming out of that parallel structure.

The Spokesman further indicated that funds raised through these programs have not been accounted for.

The absence of funding from that parallel structure obviously is something that needs to be looked at in terms of the underlying reasons for the current problems, he said.

Money that is paid from those programs to lecturers and to universities is not exactly in the public view and has not probably been accounted for in the way you would expect other government resources to be, he stated.

He however expressed confidence that Education Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiangi will be able to deal with the situation.

People do feel that all these things need to be put on the table as part of the discussions. What is it that is driving unrest in terms of the lecturers position? But this is a matter that I think the Cabinet Secretary is seized with and he has shown that he does get his work done so we do not think it is out of his hands, he stated.

University lecturers rejected a Sh10 billion pay deal that would see the lowest paid teaching staff earn Sh91,593.

Under the package, professors pay bracket will open up to an upper limit of Sh240,491 per month.

University Academic Staff Union (UASU) last week deal as a drop in the ocean and announced massive nationwide strike starting Monday.

UASU is insisting on a 30 percent pay rise as opposed to the 3 percent they would get under the proposed deal.

Read more from the original source:

Govt mulls abolition of parallel degree programs in public varsities ... - Capital FM Kenya (press release) (blog)

The redeeming chaos of a bull in the government china shop – Charleston Post Courier

BY KIRKPATRICK SALE

It all depends on what you think of the china shop. If you believe it is a neat, ordered operation, providing beautiful and necessary things for discerning and deserving people, then you will like it and be fearful of any bull that might be sniffing at the door.

If on the other hand you regard it as a worn out, dated collection of obsolete knick-knacks that have long since lost their value and are merely gathering dust, then you wont mind what the bull will do or how clumsily he does it.

Washington the political establishment is that china shop. And you know who the bull is. The liberal-global, welfare-warfare arrangement that has been government for the last 70 years, since Americas triumph in World War II, has been based on three unquestioned premises:

1. The right of citizens to welfare entitlements from the federal government, in the form of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and roughly 75 other means-tested welfare programs;

2. The creation and maintenance of a global empire based on military penetration (750 bases worldwide) providing cover and protection for economic (NAFTA, GATT) and political (NATO) penetration as well;

3. The unrestricted operation of the federal bureaucracy allowing the establishment consensus to prevail and run business as usual no matter which political party is in office.

And those premises have been enhanced and buttressed through the decades by the powerful liberal cultural forces of the American academy, which is the indoctrinatory home of the left and Marxist professoriate, the Hollywood film industry and its cavalcade of leftist stars-with-a-cause, and especially the modern media, slap-happy handmaidens of the establishment with no longer a pretense of objectivity in their fawning zeal for the Democratic party. With the Trump election, all that is challenged. Trump himself may not fully understand what he represents, but he is surrounded by people who do. In particular, his right-hand man and perhaps the power behind the throne, Stephen Bannon, who has been quoted as saying, with unusual clarity, I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of todays establishment. An astonishing statement, but it is clear he will do his best to see that Trump carries this out.

It is likely not to be neat and orderly, since thats not the kind of man Trump is, and indeed the first few weeks have seen some scattershot decrees. But when you name a cabinet that is designed to thwart much of what the liberal consensus has been doing for 70 yearsa woman for Education who is against public education, a man for the Environmental Protection Agency who has tried to eviscerate it in the past, a doctor for Housing and Urban Development who has no comprehension of what the department does, a fossil-fuel executive to be the top diplomat, and a labor secretary who pays minimum wage to his restaurant employeesthen it is obvious that there is some design and purpose at work.

I for one welcome this fundamental restraint of the liberal orthodoxy and hope the Trump regime will operate swiftly and intelligently to reorder government as we know it. But I fear that at the moment it is far more reactive that purposeful, Trump operating more by instinct, particularly his instinct to respond to challenge, than by any sense of where exactly he would want to end up in four years. In aid of providing a more methodical approach to taking down the establishment, I propose the following program as the basis for action for the Trump administration for the next four years.

Abolition of the income tax, a foolish tax that punishes people just for making money, which is what the whole society is about anyway, when a proper government would tax behavior that is unwanted. And with it, of course, abolishing the IRS.

Dismantling the empire and withdrawal of troops from all overseas wars and bases, to be redeployed for border protection and the management of the Army Corps of Engineers in the task of infrastructure repair at home.

Sharply cutting welfare, particularly for the able-bodied, and insisting on strictly enforced work requirements (in Maine, this cut welfare caseloads by 80 percent), plus the abolition of all marriage penalties and policies that work against stable families.

Abolishing foreign aid, in entirety, including the Export-Import Bank, programs that chiefly benefit and Wall Street banksters that make the loans and American global corporations that get the contracts, and with it the elimination of payments to foreign treaty organizations.

Elimination of federal interference in private, family and religious affairs, allowing states to decide issues such as abortion, pornography, prostitution, prayer in schools, political speech in churches, religious symbols in public and similar matters.

Elimination or serious reduction of all cabinet departments created since 1947, including Education, Energy, Health, Housing, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs, whose necessary functions, if any, could be decentralized to the states.

There: six simple, straightforward, effectual, and thoroughgoing ways to reform and restrain Washingtonian power and bring a few things crashing down. And easy enough for a bull to follow.

Kirkpatrick Sale, who lives in Mount Pleasant, is the author of 12 books.

Read the original here:

The redeeming chaos of a bull in the government china shop - Charleston Post Courier

My Turn: Make no mistake President Trump is the enemy – Concord Monitor

In 49 B.C., Julius Caesar, governor of Gaul, and his legion forded the Rubicon, the dividing line between Gaul and Italy, and marched on Rome, thus declaring civil war.

Rome was the last of the free cities that had existed throughout the Mediterranean. They had vanished and finally only Rome, a republic, remained. Her people were free citizens of the republic, not subjects of a single ruler. The Roman Republic of a thousand years ended with Caesars invasion and the Roman Empire and rule of emperors actually dictators began.

The founders of our republic drew in part from the republican pillars of Rome as well as those of Athens and also from the Magna Carta in forming our country. They recognized the critical necessity of these and other imperatives to the construction and continuance of a democratic republic.

Donald Trump has crossed the Rubicon and has declared war on the republic of the United States. His goal is singular: disassemble our republic and remake it to his desire.

The foundations of our republic and the creation and protraction of our system of orderly government and citizen rights and protections are of no consequence to him or his minions.

Government agencies, judicial actions and beacons of freedom such as a free press are to be remade, ridiculed, silenced or eliminated.

He has removed the director of national intelligence and the military Joint Chiefs of Staff from the Principals Committee of the National Security Council because he knows more about intelligence than they. Hes replaced them with Steve Bannon and White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, neither of whom has any experience in that bodys charge or work.

They will, however, do his bidding.

He pledges repeal of the Dodd-Frank Act, legislation that in essence limits how banks may invest, regulates certain credit card rules and, most significantly, makes homebuyers understanding of mortgage instruments easier and prevents unscrupulous lending practices.

This act is intended to prevent repeat of the disastrous implosion of the mortgage industry and bank failures in 2008-09 that resulted in massive home mortgage foreclosures, job losses and recession.

Repeal will benefit banks but not borrowers. Banks already are showing pleasure with repeal possibility.

Words and actions on other issues testify to his and his sycophants belligerence, dismissiveness of people and institutions they dislike and efforts to wrest power, such as: elimination of Planned Parenthood funding; the recent ban on immigration from selected countries; abolition of sanctuary cities; insult and castigation of a judge with whose decision he disagrees; Bannons rant that the media is the opposition party and needs to keep its mouth shut; silencing of Sen. Warren. The list is already endless.

His lack of understanding of domestic and international economic and political matters is mind-boggling. He denigrates the United Nations. He has sown divides between us and other governments.

We are at war with Trump and company. We should not believe otherwise. He is a clear and present danger. He is indeed the enemy within. The emperor must be deposed.

(Arnold Coda lives in Hopkinton.)

Original post:

My Turn: Make no mistake President Trump is the enemy - Concord Monitor

Equalities Secretary to seek UK assurances over benefits after … – AOL Money UK

Equalities Secretary Angela Constance is to seek assurances from the UK Government that it will not reduce the benefits of claimants in Scotlandwhen the bedroom tax is abolished.

Ms Constance will meet with the Department of Work and Pensions in London on Monday and stress that the abolition of the bedroom tax cannot be counted as a benefit income when it comes to the UK Government's benefit cap.

Scottish Government ministers are concerned that when the bedroom tax is removed in Scotland, the UK Government will treat this as additional income for a household and impose the cap.

The Scottish Government is to provide 47 million next year in an attempt to mitigate the bedroom tax and will seek to abolish it "as soon as practically possible".

Ms Constance said:"The bedroom tax is an abhorrent charge which makes the lives of those already struggling to make ends meet even harder - there's no place for that in a modern Scotland.

"I make no secret of the fact we want to abolish it but what we also don't want to see is anyone's benefits being reduced again because by abolishing bedroom tax they end up over threshold for the UK benefit cap.

"It is not acceptable for the Scottish Government to give with one hand only for the UK Government to take away with the other.

"When these powers were transferred to Scotland there was a commitment there would be no claw back of benefits as a result of payment or eligibility decisions made by the Scottish Government.

"We need cast iron commitments from the UK Government that they will abide by those principles and that people won't be penalised further.

"This issue has been raised with UK ministers on a number of occasions and I look forward to discussing this further at Monday's meeting."

See the original post here:

Equalities Secretary to seek UK assurances over benefits after ... - AOL Money UK

The myth of the alpha leader is destroying our relationshipsat work and at home – Quartz

The myth of the alpha leader is destroying our relationshipsat work and at home
Quartz
Schoolchildren are taught that Thomas Edison single-handedly invented the lightbulb, and that Abraham Lincoln unswervingly shepherded the country toward the abolition of slavery. But in fact, the achievements of Edison and Lincoln would not exist ...

Read more here:

The myth of the alpha leader is destroying our relationshipsat work and at home - Quartz

County To Apply for Grant for I.V. Community Center | The Daily Nexus – Daily Nexus

If received, the grant of up to $1.1 million will be used to fund critical renovations of the Isla Vista Community Center

The grant could allow the Isla Vista Community Center to host a variety of private and public events, including quinceaeras, sorority and fraternity events, recreational classes and live music shows. Jose Arturo Ochoa / Daily Nexus

The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors passed a motion Tuesday morning authorizing county officials to apply for a grant of up to $1.1 million to renovate the Isla Vista Community Center.

Isla Vistans voiced their support for the action and encouraged the board to apply for the grant at the boards meeting in downtown Santa Barbara Tuesday.

Ethan Bertrand, director-elect for the I.V. Community Services District (CSD), spoke at the meeting, saying the center has great potential to help I.V.

There are so many potential uses for the facility, and it can truly benefit the culture of Isla Vista, providing an outlet and a venue for positive activity, he said.

Matias Eusterbrock, an I.V. resident since 2011 and board director for the I.V. Community Development Corporation (IVCDC), spoke during public comment to thank board members who have previously supported I.V.s attempts to establish the community center.

From the abolition of the development agency to the granting of $485,000 in support of critical renovations to the building, the board has proven a steady ally to the sizable community of Isla Vista, he said. For that you have our appreciation.

Eusterbrock went on to list the possible uses for the building if the grant was acquired and funds were allocated to the center.

I believe all the residents will benefit from the sense of knowledge and community that comes from classes such as dancing or cooking or by sweating out the stresses of work and studying during live music shows, he said.

Eusterbrock also suggested the space could be used to host private events for a variety of members in the community, including quinceaeras and sorority and fraternity events.

Skip Grey, assistant director of the Santa Barbara County General Services Department, is working on the application for the grant. Grey said that the grant will specifically be used for the I.V. Community Center.

Grey said his department began working on this grant in December, and the application has already been completed. The Board of Supervisors motion Tuesday now authorizes Grey to submit the paperwork. He said the application is complete and due to the state on Feb. 23.

According to Grey, the grant is competitive and is not awarded automatically. The winners of the grant are expected to be announced by June 30.

General Services partnered with the County Community Services Department to complete the application because of its authority over affordable housing programs. General Services will perform the renovations on the community center if the funding is approved, though the two departments worked together to complete the request for funding.

I.V. qualified for the grant due the number of affordable housing units built in recent years. Specifically, the grant rewards cities and counties that approve affordable housing programs and the County of Santa Barbara has done a good job of that, Grey said.

Spencer Brandt, IVCDC and CSD board member, was not in attendance at Tuesdays meeting but spoke to the Nexus on Monday to describe possible uses for the grant.

If the grant was used to renovate the community center, Brandt said possible renovations could include replacing the roof of the building, creating a shade structure and possibly installing a garage-door-like opening on the side of the community center so that events could be held outdoors and indoors simultaneously.

A version of this story appeared on p. 4 of the Thursday, February 16, 2017 print edition of the Daily Nexus.

Read more from the original source:

County To Apply for Grant for I.V. Community Center | The Daily Nexus - Daily Nexus

Another Body Blow to the Trump White House as Labor Pick Withdraws – Yahoo News

President Trumps streak of success in getting controversial cabinet nominees through a closely divided Senate broke on Wednesday, with the news that Andrew Puzder will remove his name from consideration for the position of Secretary of Labor. The news arrives in the midst of a tumultuous week for the new administration, which is facing calls for Congressional investigations into connections between the presidents campaign staff and Russian intelligence officials.

Puzders nomination has long had a question mark hanging over it. The wealthy CEO of the CKE fast food restaurant chain, Puzder was very slow to submit his financial disclosure forms and other documents necessary for an ethics screening. He also faced severe criticism from both sides of the aisle in Congress for various positions he has taken over the years.

Related: 4-Star General Warns of Unbelievable Turmoil in Trumps White House

Democrats wanted to block Puzder because they saw his nomination to head the Labor Department as an insult to workers. Puzder is anti-union and has called for the abolition of minimum wage laws, positions Democrats saw as antithetical to the Labor Departments mission To foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners, job seekers, and retirees of the United States; improve working conditions; advance opportunities for profitable employment; and assure work-related benefits and rights.

Many Republicans were baffled by the choice because of Puzders history of advocating immigration reforms that would make it easier for low-skilled people from other countries to enter the US legally and find work. Trump had campaigned on a stridently anti-immigrant platform, promising to build a wall on the Mexican border and to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.

In recent days, allegations of spousal abuse that arose in a divorce proceeding decades ago were raised after former television host Oprah Winfrey provided members of Congress with a recording of an interview with Puzders ex-wife in which she made claims of physical abuse.

Related: Can Trump Deliver 4% Growth? Why Most Economists Say Not This Year

The decision to pull out of the nomination process came as Puzder was approaching his long-delayed Senate confirmation hearing. A source told CBS News that the nominee was very tired of the abuse.

His departure deprives Trump of a Labor Department chief who shares his unique views about the way employment is measured in the US, but who was rapidly losing support from Congressional Republicans. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reportedly told the administration on Wednesday that he did not believe Puzder had the votes to be confirmed by the whole Senatebecause as many as seven Republicans were planning to vote against him.

Under normal circumstances, the defeat of a cabinet nominee would be a major blow to a new presidential administration. But the way things have been going for the Trump White House in the last 48 hours, theres a non-trivial chance that the failure of the Puzder nomination feels less like a defeat than a welcome distraction.

Top Reads from The Fiscal Times:

See original here:

Another Body Blow to the Trump White House as Labor Pick Withdraws - Yahoo News

A People’s Globalism: Notes Toward a New Left Internationalism – The Nation.

An anti-Trump protest in Berlin, Germany, in front of the Brandenburg Gate. (Wikimedia Commons)

Whatever shape American foreign policy takes in the next four years, it will very probably be unlike anything we have ever seen. A contradictory melange of dime-store isolationism and saber-rattling fit to make a neocon blushpromises to reinvest at home laced with pledges to bomb the shit out of enemies abroadthe Trump Doctrine seems to boil down to a single phrase: America First. Little of use can be said about its real-world meaning without reference to its origins among a crowd of Americans in the early 1940s who thought the evils of fascism had been overblown. By all accounts, nationalism has returned. Ask not whether it ever really left.

While it would seem that progressives in the United States and, increasingly, around the world have little power to determine the shape of things to come, that may not actually be the case. Whether the left ratifies this new turn toward nationalism may determine whether the various upheavals since the Brexit referendum last June prove to be the inauguration of a brave new world or the dying gasps of a very old one. In this foruman installment of our ongoing series, Thats Debatablethree writers consider the major foreign-policy questions facing the left today: whether to renew or reconsider its historic commitment to a politics of internationalism, and what a new and improved version of that commitment might look like.

Let me begin by distinguishing internationalism from cosmopolitanism. Internationalism assumes the existence of nations and works to create alliances and solidarities across national borders. Cosmopolitanism aims to abolish those borders. The free movement of capital, commodities, and labor around the world is an example of cosmopolitanism, but not of internationalismand certainly not left internationalism. Free movement makes for a capitalist paradise: global laissez-faire. But for a very large part of the worlds population, global laissez-faire is a capitalist hell. Left internationalism is a politics aimed, so to speak, at the abolition of hell.

The fight for social democracy takes place in one state after another, and it is there we must find our comrades.

Solidarity with comrades abroad is the oldest definition of left internationalism. We look for people who are fighting for equality, democracy, and freedom anywhere in the world, and we join their fight. Think of this as the foreign policy of the left. This is what all our organizationsparties, unions, NGOs, magazinesshould be doing. Mostly, these fights go on within states, because right now the state is the most effective agent of human rights and economic justice. The regulation of laissez-faire capitalism was a social-democratic achievement, and it was achieved only in the state. That is where it must now be defended, by internationalists, against globalization. The European Union promised an expansion of the social-democratic achievementa promise unfulfilled but one still worth fighting for. The fight takes place in one state after another, and it is in those states that we must find our comrades. Two simple examples: Our comrades in Greece are the people fighting against austerity, and our comrades in Germany are the people fighting against the bankers.

Of course, we oppose our own bankers and the neoliberal policies and the unjust wars of our own governmentalways working with comrades abroad who are resisting those policies and wars in the name of equality, democracy, and freedom. This resistance will probably be a central part of our politics in the age of Trump, though if Trumpism means isolationism we may have to support comrades abroad who need American help.

The choice of comrades is the test of left internationalists. Ours is not a self-regarding politics; it requires listening to and cooperating with other people. Which other people? Our comrades abroad are never the rulers of authoritarian states or their collaborators or their apologists. Where there are tyrants, we support dissidents. We support workers struggling to organize independent unions; we support writers whose books cant be published in their own countries; we support feminists defending gender equality against patriarchal regimes; we support heretics and free-thinkers threatened by a ruling zealotry. Left internationalism is a solidarity of leftists.

Against Global Nationalism

The past few years have given rise to a strange political chimera: the right-wing ethno-nationalist party that denounces free trade, international cooperation, and the global elite all while cheering forand even financially supportingits fellow far-right white supremacists around the world. Rhetorically, these parties put their countries first, in the form of Brexit or Donald Trump, yet they nevertheless remain invested in a worldwide nationalistic project, and go out of their way to help like-minded parties achieve their own far-right ethno-nationalist goals.

The stakes are higher now than ever. Get The Nation in your inbox.

Call it global nationalism, or the ethno-national internationale. The nationalists have come up with a version of internationalism. Whatever the hell it is, its gaining traction, and the left isnt coming up with much of an alternative. Where to begin?

The lesson is that progressives ought to start thinking of their causes as global ones, too, even if they begin as territorially constrained national initiatives. If the success of Bernie Sanderss presidential campaign is any sign of whats to come, redistribution, in the form of tax policy and social-welfare programs, will be crucial to winning constituents at homeand key in winning allies and support abroad.

Its understandable to want to deal with domestic problems first and foremost. But an America first policy wont make sense if America means American power and American companies and first means military domination and corporate profits. The only way Americans will win, in Trumpian parlance, is if they have a strong social safety net to ensure that basic rights like education, health care, food, and shelter are covered. Thats what will make Americans, America, and everyone else living in it great.

This is harder to pull off than promoting nationalism around the world on Twitter, as the right-wing parties do. The nationalist calculus is that, once these countries are sealed off from the world with walls and tariffs, theyre on their own. The global nationalist rhetoric is a ladder to power that gets thrown away once the parties in question win.

A global leftist movement cant stop there, because it needs to put forth a vision thats good for people in the long run and that ensures that countries work together both to maintain peace between nations and prosperity within them.

Borders do matter. You cant redistribute anything without boundaries, and you cant provide for all people in the world equally given our current political infrastructure.

The problem is that weve never seen a version of globalization that didnt put companies first and workers last. We forget that what we refer to as globalization was actually a series of agreements reached by national governments that simultaneously gave enormous power to the private sector and gutted the public one. You cant fix that by walling yourself off from the world. You do that by setting an example. A left internationalism will also take care to protect and encourage diversity and multiculturalism within and across national borders.

The Bars on the Cage

The reasons to revive a left internationalism are morally clear and compelling. Systems of profit and violence, inequality and vulnerability, have gone global, and fights against them must as well. Capital mobility, technology, supply chains, and other factors exacerbating the divide between rich and poor treat borders as mere afterthoughts. The same goes for regional violence and collapse, as in the Middle East, where American intervention has been a toxic catalyst to instability. Climate change reminds us that nations are unnatural, that borders are graffiti on the surface of a changing planet growing more dangerous by the year.

Climate change reminds us that nations are unnatural, borders graffiti on the surface of a changing planet.

Borders, it can seem, mostly trap people in zones of deeply unequal resources and savagely unequal vulnerability. Which country you are born in accounts for about two-thirds of your lifetime income. Borders form the bars on the cages of humanity all across the world.

Internationalism is basically an effort to take the mobilization of democratic politics to the scale that globalism has given to 21st-century capitalism. It can seem to be the only decent politics at a time when nationalismexplicit and nakedis the politics of the indecent. The electoral insurrections behind the rise of Donald Trump and other so-called populists of the right, from Brexit impresario Nigel Farage to the quasi-fascist parties of Eastern Europe, thrust forward ethnic and religious ideas of the nation, the homeland, or real Americans.

But does being against these grotesque nationalisms mean being for their opposite, and what could that opposite, internationalism, be? There is nothing inherently progressive about defying or dissolving borders. Hawks have their humanitarian interventions, which look more opportunistic and more reckless with every decade. Neoliberals have their globalism, which has built this world of supply chains and mobile capital. Internationalism can sometimes provide cover for invasion, plunder, and less vivid forms of exploitation. Getting beyond the nation-state does not necessarily mean progress.

More importantly, getting beyond the nation-state is an illusion, at least for now. Democratic politics requires collective action, and the state is the uniquely effective vehicle of that action. A left globalism would need to work the levers of nation-states. Every form of organizing that leftists care about interacts intensely with national laws. No strategy of horizontal, leaderless, or otherwise extra-state organizing can overcome the fact that nation-states do a tremendous amount to shape the ground where it must work. The conditions of internationalism are inevitably set by nation-states.

In this situation, internationalism means building movements and constituencies that are at once national and international. History confirms that this is possible, though hardly easy. International Workingmens Associations in the 19th century were alliances of unions fighting for factory safety and shortened work-days in national parliaments and coordination of labor strength toward the possibility of international actions, such as solidarity strikes. In an even less democratic world, abolitionist networks turned their elite and middle-class influence on their national governments toward international reform. Today, ironically enough, religious or national identity is more likely than class interest or economic reform to cross borders: Christian solidarity groups have been pressing for years for Donald Trumps proposed priority for Christian refugees from the Middle East, and immigrants pressing their new governments to intervene in the affairs of their old ones is a very old story.

What we lack today is a sense of class position in the global economic order as an aspect of identity and self-interestperhaps even as the most important oneand as a locus of political action. The nationalist turn in recent economic populism is a mark of how elusive this understanding is today. Perhaps an under-appreciated power of the old, Marx-inflected version of left-wing internationalism was that it leapt over some of the structural challenges to internationalism with an enabling myth about how revolution would happen: the conviction that the international working class was an agent in history that would bend its shared effort to create a different world. That way of viewing the situation turned a shared problemthe bars on the cageinto a source of solidarity. We still have the problem. We need to keep working on versions of both solidarity and strategy that the left can take seriously in todays world.

See the article here:

A People's Globalism: Notes Toward a New Left Internationalism - The Nation.

Might mandatory retirement come back with 70 as the new 65? – The Globe and Mail

It used to be workers expected to retire from their jobs at 65, whether they wanted to or not.

Prior to the late 1990s, mandatory retirement was the norm in Canada, says Kenneth Thornicroft, a lawyer, author and professor of law and employment relations at the University of Victorias Gustavson School of Business.

These days thats no longer the case. Over the past two decades due to a series of landmark court cases challenging what many saw as age discrimination under human rights legislation, and a large, active and politically powerful population of baby boomers bent on determining their own career fate mandatory retirement has been abolished in all 13 Canadian provinces and territories.

Or has it?

Tools: How Long Will I Live? and other helpful online retirement calculators

Read more: Five signs youre counting too much on CPP for retirement

Rob Carrick: The new way to tell if youve saved enough for retirement

Dr. Thornicroft says that perception is not quite accurate.

His newest paper, The Uncertain State of Mandatory Retirement in Canada, published in Labor Law Journal, finds that there are still many legal exceptions providing for mandatory retirement across a wide variety of professions, from commercial pilots to police officers and firefighters.

Dr. Thornicroft goes a step farther in his latest academic submission. He suggests that mandatory retirement may be making a comeback.

Notably, he says young workers are at the heart of the resurgence of the discussion.

Currently, one-third of Canadas nearly 36 million people is between age 50 and 74 with those born between 1945 and 1960 making up the largest part of this group.

Given the greying of the work force, he notes, it is hardly surprising that the general abolition of mandatory retirement was spearheaded by the baby boom generation, particularly as the early boomers edged ever closer to the age of 65.

But the force of millennials is also hard to ignore, especially as they continue to make their way into the work force. Dr. Thornicroft foresees the possibility of intergenerational resentment building up among younger workers as their own ascension in the professional ranks is stymied by a lack of movement by senior colleagues, often in better paid and higher-level positions.

Younger workers may support mandatory retirement so that they are not foreclosed from future occupational opportunities, he concludes.

So-called double dipping by older workers who continue to work while also collecting a pension will serve only to ratchet up tensions between the generations (though Dr. Thornicroft believes thats unlikely to play a significant role in the debate. More likely, he says, as long as generous pensions are there, most people are prepared to leave the work force and take their pension, even if they like their job, and then maybe look for part-time employment.)

In safety-sensitive positions, both employers and employees concerned about working with older people who may not be up to the demands of the job may also press for mandatory retirement provisions.

Already several professions are required to adhere to mandatory retirement ages and, says Dr. Thornicroft, I dont see any move afoot to take those away.

Supporters of mandatory retirement hold that the practice is not discriminatory because everyone is subject to the same law. Employers, meanwhile, tend to like it because it allows for more effective workplace planning and eliminates the need to continually test older workers to ensure their competence.

Opponents, however, argue that such a provision unfairly robs society of valuable human capital.

Moreover, many say laws mandating retirement are unnecessary since most employees retire at a conventional age anyway.

Dr. Thornicroft himself believes there is merit to the latter argument, referencing 2015 Statistics Canada data that puts the average age of retirement in Canada at 63.5 years. In the same year, public sector workers (and those most likely to have a retirement plan) retired, on average, at 61.4, while those employed in private business left the workplace, on average, at 64.1. Self-employed workers remained in the work force the longest, retiring, on average at 66.7.

Currently, there is no real need to push for mandatory retirement, he says. But that could change, depending on what happens.

It will depend on how the second and third wave of baby boomers react to the labour market, and whether they are going to hang in and clog up middle- and higher-level positions so that younger employees are denied access, he says.

Dr. Thornicroft adds, regardless of whether provinces decide to return to mandatory retirement, millennials can likely bank on remaining in the workplace longer than their parents and grandparents.

If the move goes ahead, Dr. Thornicroft says its possible that 70 will become the new 65.

The courts, to date, have held that there is no Charter violation if mandatory retirement is in place and while legislatures have removed the age 65 limit in their human rights laws, there is nothing in law preventing legislatures from re-enacting, in effect, a mandatory retirement age at, say, age 70, he says.

On the other hand, with several polls showing young adults are failing to adequately save for retirement, and with fewer opportunities than previous generations to rely on a good pension plan from work, he says, a lot of younger employees now are not going to be able to afford to retire.

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeInvestor

See the rest here:

Might mandatory retirement come back with 70 as the new 65? - The Globe and Mail

‘What Is My Future After This?’ – Human Rights Watch

Two in five adolescents are out of school in Tanzania, although the country has declared education a national priority and abolished school fees and financial contributions. Lack of money is, however, only one of the reasons why education ends after primary school for so many young people. Barriers include exams that limit access to secondary schools, long distances to schools, and outmoded policies, Human Rights Watch found in researching a new report, I Had a Dream to Finish School. Girls have a particularly hard time. Subject to widespread sexual harassment and outright expulsion if they become pregnant, their dropout rate is higher than that of boys. Human Rights Watchs Birgit Schwarz talked to researcher Elin Martinez about violence in schools, broken dreams, and what Tanzanias government can do to improve access to education.

Tanzania has long made education a priority and recently removed school fees for lower-secondary education. So why did you decide to investigate this issue?

Since 2005, Tanzania has taken important steps to increase access to secondary education. Yet, 1.5 million adolescents are still out of lower-secondary school. We decided to look at barriers other than financial ones that stop adolescents from going to school. While additional resources are clearly needed for example, to build more schools and infrastructure there are a variety of improvements that do not necessarily require lots of additional resources but instead a change of mindset and policy reforms.

More than 120 Form II students prepare to sit their mock exams in a secondary school in Mwanza, northwestern Tanzania.

2016 Elin Martnez/Human Rights Watch

You interviewed more than 200 young people for this report. What did they tell you about their dreams and why they dropped out?

Fees had been a major reason for children to drop out. Teachers would send the kids home and tell them to only come back once they had paid up. In some cases, children told us their teachers would beat them up if they didnt pay the fees.

One girl we interviewed had almost finished lower-secondary school, but had to drop out just before the final exam because her parents could not afford the final exam fee. A nongovernmental organization (NGO) referred her to a vocational center, and now, at 17, she was training to become a mechanic. But what she really wanted was to go back to secondary school and become an engineer.

Many children said they had not passed the Primary School Leaving Exam, which is currently necessary to continue on to secondary school. If they dont pass, theyre not allowed to re-take the final year of primary school or the exam. Many drop out without learning basic skills or being able to read or write properly.

We interviewed many girls who had become domestic workers after they dropped out. They work extremely long hours, sometimes for an abusive employer. Some wanted to have their own small businesses, others wanted to go to secondary school to become doctors or engineers. But the second they start working, their dreams of further education come to an end.

Fewer than a third of girls entering lower-secondary school graduate. What causes girls to drop out more frequently than boys?

Teenage pregnancy, a huge public health issue in Tanzania, is a big barrier to girls completing school. More than 8,000 girls drop out of school annually and permanently because of pregnancy, although this is a gross underestimate according to many NGOs, and we found that schools often dont report the reasons why students drop out. School officials regularly run mandatory pregnancy tests and expel girls who are pregnant. The government punishes any offense against morality with expulsion, because it thinks this will keep teenage pregnancies at bay. Married girls are automatically expelled in most and perhaps all schools. With almost two in five girls marrying before the age of 18, these policies affect a huge number of girls. The government is working on policies that would mandate schools to accept young mothers back at school. But even some government officials we talked to think that these reforms would encourage other girls to get pregnant.

Once they leave school, girls have limited options to return to formal schooling. There is no way for many of them to realistically raise their children while studying. Until the government sets up a good system to support them when they go back to school, their only option would be to attend alternative or informal educational programs. But this would not give them the skills or accreditation to get back on track.

An unfinished science laboratory next to a classroom at a secondary school in Shinyanga region, northern Tanzania. Construction work was put on hold when school officials were no longer allowed to ask parents for financial contributions following the governments abolition of school fees and contributions in December 2015.

2016 Elin Martnez/Human Rights Watch

Also, in some cases, families do not have resources to send all their children to secondary school, and they will opt to send the boys, while the girls are made to work.

And finally, there are many safety issues. Many girls told us of teachers who had harassed them or their friends. Several girls told us that their friends had become pregnant because a teacher had coerced them into a sexual relationship. While the girls had to drop out of school, the responsible teachers are still in the school. All of this combines to push girls out.

Does sexual harassment not get reported?

In most schools, there is simply no confidential reporting mechanism, and school officials seldom report incidents to the police. Girls told us that even when they turn to female teachers for help, they will be accused of having instigated the incident. NGOs and government officials are advocating for a system of trained counselors who can provide guidance and counseling and report abuse. But the reporting mechanism needs to be fully confidential and linked to law enforcement to ensure that sexual abuse is investigated and that the perpetrators are prosecuted rather than sent to a different school.

What fate awaits those who are expelled or drop out?

Once they are out of the formal education system, children must often pay private institutions to study for the equivalent grades. This means that secondary education remains an inaccessible dream for many of them.

In Mwanza, we met a large group of young mothers and pregnant girls who had been enrolled in a vocational course by a nongovernmental organization. They were learning computer literacy and other subjects. Many of these girls told us that their families were not supportive. One girl, whose parents were church leaders, had been kicked out of her home while pregnant. She went from one house to another, until she found a room. She worked extremely long hours in a factory, until she was eight months pregnant and in so much pain that she had to stop. Once she had given birth, she had to leave her baby behind when at work, with the door to her room open so that neighbors could keep an eye. But she simply had no choice. It was either that or going hungry.

Even now that she is doing this course, she is asking herself, What is my future after this? What am I going to do next?

Was there a story that moved you more than others?

It was painful and frustrating to hear children talk about the brutal nature of corporal punishment that is inflicted on them in schools. It was shocking to see the marks and scars on the girls legs, or hear how teachers were venting their anger and frustrations with a cane on children, hitting them on breasts or buttocks, teaching them fear. No one really learns in those conditions. It also goes against scientific evidence that shows that childrens cognitive development is particularly affected by repeated exposure to violence during adolescence.

Speak English signs found in secondary schools in Ukerewe, an island on Lake Victoria, and Mwanza, in northwestern Tanzania. Many secondary schools strictly enforce the use of English a new language for most secondary school students, as Kiswahili is the medium of instruction in primary schools. Many students are not given adequate support to transition from Kiswahili to English, and some reported being punished for not speaking English in class. In 2014, the government adopted a policy to allow the dual use of Swahili and English as languages of instruction in secondary schools.

2016 Elin Martnez/Human Rights Watch

There was a girl named Lucia who I met in Mwanza. She had first told us she had dropped out because of the distance to school. She had to negotiate a very rocky path each day. But when we carefully probed a bit further, she started talking about her teachers attempts to seduce her and coerce her into meeting him after sports practice. She first stopped going to field practice, then she stopped going to school for days. Her performance dropped and she felt she could not concentrate in class. In the end, she said she decided to stop wasting her parents money and to drop out altogether.

Many stories I heard were like this stories of adolescents who had so much potential but who were pushed out or felt forced to leave because there was simply not enough money, because a teacher was trying to take advantage of them, or because they were pregnant.

What barriers to education do children with disabilities face?

A very small minority of students with disabilities make it to secondary education at all. An average school does not have the capacity to accommodate students with disabilities. Even in schools that are supposed to cater to students with disabilities, we found that buildings were not accessible, or the terrain was very difficult to navigate on a wheelchair or for blind students. Some students with disabilities told us they feel ignored and excluded in schools. There were many issues with students who are blind or have low vision, for example. The lack of equipment to translate materials into braille, for example, meant that these students dropped way behind the rest of the class, and many did not have adapted textbooks. Some students had to wait for over a month to get the material they need to follow whats taught in class. Some students told us they want to become engineers or study science, but theyve been told they can only study social sciences because math or science subjects are only available for sighted students.

How would you describe the quality of education in general?

Secondary education remains of poor quality in Tanzania, and the government recognizes this challenge. We found that many schools are not able to teach core compulsory subjects like science or mathematics because there is a substantial shortage of fully trained and qualified teachers, especially in rural areas. Most students only speak Swahili in primary school, but once theyre in secondary school, the language of instruction switches to English. Many told us they find it hard to follow their subjects because they dont have enough support to learn and communicate in a new language. And while the average class size should be 40 to 45, we found classes that had up to 70 pupils.

Frances (pseudonym), 21, struggled to pay for secondary school. She worked as a domestic worker to help pay her school fees: From 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. I studied, then from 5 p.m. 11 p.m. I worked [at her employees home] and I also worked over the weekends ... I got 30,000 shillings [US$14] per month not enough to pay for school. She failed the secondary school exam and dropped out of Form IV.

2016 Elin Martnez/Human Rights Watch

Has the loss of income from school fees exacerbated the financial problems faced by schools?

The governments decision to abolish all official school fees and additional financial contributions, including private tuition, as of January 2016, opened the doors to many adolescents whose parents or guardians could not afford to pay school fees for secondary school. Removing fees tackled one of the main barriers keeping children out of secondary school. However, school principals told us they were very worried because previously most schools would use parental contributions or funds raised by the community to pay for the school needs. But in January 2016, they had to stop new construction projects, such as building science labs that used to be mandatory, or separate latrines with running water for girls. Schools can no longer afford to hire temporary teachers to solve the teaching gap. On a positive note, the policy is nevertheless widely respected. It will be up to the government now to find ways of supplementing school budgets and ensure that schools can provide basic infrastructure and a conducive learning environment.

Tanzania is a low-income country. Can the government afford free secondary education?

Tanzania aspires to become a middle-income country by 2020, and education is a central component of that transformation. The government has shown a lot of political will to ensure access. In 2017, more than a fifth of the national budget is earmarked for education. The money partly came from cuts to all ministerial travel budgets, or expenses for national festivities, and an expanded tax base. But to continue making progress, the government will progressively need to allocate additional resources to cover the deficit in school budgets and to accommodate the increasing number of students who will enroll for secondary education now that it is free.

What needs to be done to improve the conditions for students who are currently in school?

The government should focus on the quality of education at all levels. This means all students should learn the basics early on in primary school so that they can confidently access and benefit from secondary school education. The government should phase out the primary school exam as a selective tool, and focus on ensuring all children are supported to complete lower-secondary education.

Discriminatory practices of expelling girls who become pregnant or marry should be abolished immediately, and policies to allow girls who dropped out to re-enter school should be put in place.

All forms of violence or abuse in schools, including corporal punishment, should be banned, and should definitely not be encouraged as a way of managing classrooms and enforcing discipline. The government needs to provide teachers with in-service training, particularly in classroom management, and cut down on class size. But to tackle the endemic nature of corporal punishment, the government needs to send out a clear message that it has no place in schools. Sexual abuse is certainly affecting a significant percentage of female students and also needs to be taken seriously. The government needs to set up monitoring mechanisms in schools and take action against teachers found to be abusing students. And in the long term, the government needs to build better infrastructure in every ward across the country and ensure that schools are adequately resourced with qualified teachers, equipment, and books.

Was there any story that gave you hope?

One of the people we worked with, Angel Benedict, was a former child domestic worker. She dropped out of school but was able to study the condensed secondary education curriculum with support from an NGO. She now runs an organization that helps child domestic workers and enables them to go back to school so that they can continue their education, graduate, and get proper jobs. She has become an important role model for many girls. Some call her their angel.

More here:

'What Is My Future After This?' - Human Rights Watch

Protests as Iowa considers its own ‘Scott Walker bill’ – Washington Examiner

In 2011, when Wisconsin passed Act 10, 100,000 left-wing activists descended upon Madison. When the bill passed and the reforms saved local governments billions of dollars, all the rancor looked pretty silly in hindsight.

The opposition to Iowa's version of Act 10 is not proving to be nearly as bitter or numerically overwhelming, but the teachers' unions sense the danger.

Hundreds of Iowa teachers, school children and other activists rallied outside the statehouse Sunday, voicing opposition to legislation filed last week that would overhaul the state's collective bargaining law ... The legislation would gut Chapter 20 which sets the parameters for contract negotiations with public employee unions Iowa Democrats have said, while Republicans have argued the changes would provide more local control and modernize the 1974 law.

Under the proposed legislation, public employees except for police and firefighters would only be able to bargain for base wages.

Another difference: Although the Iowa law is trying to do what Walker did in Wisconsin treating public safety workers differently from other state and government workers public safety unions are visibly protesting as well, arguing that this distinction between the two classes is artificial and could be undone in the future.

In Wisconsin, Act 10 limited collective bargaining to wages only (though wage bargaining was also sharply limited). The abolition of collective bargaining over work rules and benefits returned decision-making to elected officials at all levels. This created all kinds of new budgetary flexibility for school districts that they had never enjoyed before.

Previously, they had been bound to spend much of their budgets according to negotiation or arbitration procedures with the public-sector unions rather than decision-making by elected officials. But under Act 10, instead of massively overpaying on (for example) negotiated sweetheart deals to buy insurance plans from the union itself, they could bid competitively, save a fortune and spend the money on actually hiring teachers and educating students. What's more, they could create their own work rules merit pay, rewarding excellence instead of seniority and innovate without being hauled into court.

This is why Act 10 was so revolutionary. Because of the windfall it brought to local governments and school districts, the state contribution to these local government units could be scaled back without their having to raise property taxes. This, in the end, was the only realistic solution to the state's massive recession-era budget crisis, and it's the reason Act 10 has become so popular in the state today.

Like Wisconsin's bill, Iowa's would require public-sector unions to be recertified in regular elections. As noted in this explainer, union representation in many of the collective bargaining units in state and municipal government was voted on 40 years ago and hasn't been revisited since. In those cases, no one working today had any part in the decision. Workers who want a different union or no union are bound by decisions made in some cases before they were born.

Like Wisconsin's, this bill would also end the state's practice of automatically deducting union dues from paychecks. In cases where wage disputes go to arbitration, arbitrators would actually be bound (it's amazing this wasn't the case already) by the government employer's budget limitations.

Also from the Washington Examiner

The suspect was taken down by an employee of the network and wounded by the attacker.

02/13/17 6:12 PM

Republicans in the state legislature in Des Moines may find there is less resistance there, in part because Iowa is already a right-to-work state Wisconsin was not when Act 10 passed in 2011 and in part because Madison isn't its capital. But at a moment when the Left is especially restive and seems to be protesting everything, this reform isn't gaining the same kind of national attention Wisconsin's did.

Top Story

President Trump is "evaluating the situation" regarding national security adviser Michael Flynn role in the administration, the White House said Monday.

"The president is evaluating the situation," White House press secretary Sean Spicer. "He is speaking to vice president relative to the conversation the VP had with General Flynn and also speaking to various other people about what he considers he single most important subject there is - our national security."

Spicer's statement came approximately one hour after Kellyanne Conway said on TV that Flynn has "the full confidence of the president.

02/13/17 5:17 PM

See the article here:

Protests as Iowa considers its own 'Scott Walker bill' - Washington Examiner

Justice Ginsburg Expresses Concern About Anti-Immigrant Sentiment – Daily Caller

5478625

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed concern about rising anti-immigrant sentiment during remarks she gave in Hawaii this weekend.

The 83-year old justice, at ease with several leis around her neck, spoke to students from Mililani High School in Central Oahu. She was asked if immigrants have benefited the country, according to the Honolulu Civil Beat.

I think of the U.S. as a place that welcomes people from abroad who want to work and who are yearning to be free, she said. Its disheartening to see that there are some people who dont agree with that view who think our borders should be closed. But its not the first time in U.S. history that has happened.

She added that she hopes the country will quickly restore its reputation as a land of freedom and democracy that embraces people who come to us as strangers and then become part of us.

Prior to arriving in Hawaii, where she is participating in the jurist-in-residence program at the University of Hawaiis William S. Richardson School of Law, Ginsburg gave the Rathbun Lecture on a Meaningful Lifeat Stanford University where she called for the abolition of the electoral college. She echoed those comments during her remarks in Oahu this weekend.

During her Stanford appearance, she was asked which constitutional provisions should evolve with the society.

Well, some things I would like to change, one is the electoral college, she said, to rapturous applause. But that would require a constitutional amendment. Amending our Constitution is powerfully hard to do, as I know from the struggle for the Equal Rights Amendment, which fell three state shy [of passage].

Still physically active despite her advanced age, Ginsburg was scheduled to go horseback riding Saturday morning, but was precluded from doing so by rain.

Follow Kevin on Twitter

Send tips to [emailprotected].

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [emailprotected].

Read the original:

Justice Ginsburg Expresses Concern About Anti-Immigrant Sentiment - Daily Caller

The Abolition of Man – Wikipedia

The Abolition of Man is a 1943 book by C. S. Lewis. It is subtitled "Reflections on education with special reference to the teaching of English in the upper forms of schools," and uses that as a starting point for a defense of objective value and natural law, and a warning of the consequences of doing away with or "debunking" those things. It defends science as something worth pursuing but criticizes using it to debunk valuesthe value of science itself being among themor defining it to exclude such values. The book was first delivered as a series of three evening lectures at King's College, Newcastle, part of the University of Durham, as the Riddell Memorial Lectures on February 2426, 1943.

Lewis begins with a critical response to The Green Book, by Gaius and Titius, i.e. The Control of Language: A Critical Approach to Reading and Writing, published in 1939 by Alex King and Martin Ketley.[1] The Green book was used as a text for upper form students in British schools.[2]

Lewis criticises the authors for subverting student values. He claims that they teach that all statements of value (such as "this waterfall is sublime") are merely statements about the speaker's feelings and say nothing about the object. Lewis says that such a subjective view of values is faulty, and, on the contrary, certain objects and actions merit positive or negative reactions: that a waterfall can actually be objectively praiseworthy, and that one's actions can be objectively good or evil. In any case, Lewis notes, this is a philosophical position rather than a grammatical one, and so parents and teachers who give such books to their children and students are having them read the "work of amateur philosophers where they expected the work of professional grammarians."

Lewis cites ancient thinkers such as Plato, Aristotle and Augustine, who believed that the purpose of education was to train children in "ordinate affections," that is, to train them to like and dislike what they ought; to love the good and hate the bad. He says that although these values are universal, they do not develop automatically or inevitably in children (and so are not "natural" in that sense of the word), but must be taught through education. Those who lack them lack the specifically human element, the trunk that unites intellectual man with visceral (animal) man, and may be called "men without chests".

Lewis criticizes modern attempts to debunk "natural" values (such as those that would deny objective value to the waterfall) on rational grounds. He says that there is a set of objective values that have been shared, with minor differences, by every culture "...the traditional moralities of East and West, the Christian, the Pagan, and the Jew...". Lewis calls this the Tao (which closely resembles Taoist usage).[a] Without the Tao, no value judgments can be made at all, and modern attempts to do away with some parts of traditional morality for some "rational" reason always proceed by arbitrarily selecting one part of the Tao and using it as grounds to debunk the others.

The final chapter describes the ultimate consequences of this debunking: a distant future in which the values and morals of the majority are controlled by a small group who rule by a "perfect" understanding of psychology, and who in turn, being able to "see through" any system of morality that might induce them to act in a certain way, are ruled only by their own unreflected whims. In surrendering rational reflection on their own motivations, the controllers will no longer be recognizably human, the controlled will be robot-like, and the Abolition of Man will have been completed.

An appendix to The Abolition of Man lists a number of basic values seen by Lewis as parts of the Tao, supported by quotations from different cultures.

A fictional treatment of the dystopian project to carry out the Abolition of Man is a theme of Lewis's novel That Hideous Strength.

Passages from The Abolition of Man are included in William Bennett's 1993 book The Book of Virtues.

Read the original here:

The Abolition of Man - Wikipedia

Pope Francis on death penalty – Philippine Star

The use of capital punishment, is one of the most controversial issue in the criminal justice system all over the world. On December 1, 2016, the United Nations released a report on use of capital punishment among the 195 members of the UN.

The UN report states the following:

54 countries retain the death penalty in law and practice;

32 countries have abolished the death penalty de facto, namely according to Amnesty International, they have not executed anyone during the last 10 years and are believed to have a policy or established practice of not carrying out executions;

6 countries have abolished the death penalty but retain it for exceptional or special circumstances such as crimes committed during wartime;

103 countries have abolished it for all crimes.

Opinion ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1

Among the developed countries of the world, four countries continue to have capital punishment United States, Japan, Singapore and Taiwan. China is the worlds most active death penalty country. The UN report states that there were more than 1,000 executions in China in 2014. Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran have also very high numbers of executions.

Europe has the strongest position against the death penalty. The abolition of the death penalty is a pre condition to joining the European Union. The number of countries abolishing the death penalty have increased in the last decade. The latest countries to abolish the death penalty were Latvia (2012), Madagascar (2012), Fiji (2015), Suriname ( 2015), Republic of the Congo (2015), Nauru (2016) Guinea (2016) and Mongolia (2016). South Korea has declared a moratorium on the death penalty.

The Philippines abolished the death penalty in 2006. However, the government has now introduced a bill in Congress that will restore the death penalty.

Pope Francis has been calling for a worldwide abolition of the death penalty. He said: I appeal to the consciences of those who govern to reach an international consensus to abolish the death penalty.. The commandment Thou shalt not kill has absolute value and applies to both the innocent and the guilty.

In an address a year ago, Pope Francis said that there was now a growing opposition to the death penalty even for the legitimate defense of society because there now exists other ways to efficiently repress crimes without definitively denying the person who committed it the possibility of rehabilitating themselves.

In a visit to a prison in Mexico, Pope Francis also called for better prison conditions saying: All Christians and men of good will are called on to work not only for the abolition of the death penalty, but also to improve prison conditions so that they respect the human dignity of people who have been deprived of their freedom.

In another address to the world conference against the death penalty in Oslo, Norway, Pope Francis again said: Indeed, nowadays the death penalty is unacceptable however, grave the crime of the convicted person. It is an offense to the inviolability of life and to the dignity of the human person; it likewise contradicts Gods plan for individuals and society, and is merciful justice...It does not render justice to victims, but instead fosters vengeance.

It is clear that Pope Francis believes there is no moral justification in Catholic teaching that would justify capital punishment. This active opposition to the death penalty is actually a recent development in Church teaching that seems to have begun only half a century ago from the time of Pope John XXIII.

The growing movement in the Catholic world to abolish the death penalty took a major step in January 1999, when St. John Paul II publicly appealed for a global consensus to end the death penalty because he believed it was both cruel and unnecessary. His successor, Pope Benedict XVI made a similar appeal in November 2011. However, Pope Francis has made the strongest argument for abolishing capital punishment based on convictions of faith.

In his address to the US Congress on September 14, 2014 he quoted the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you..this rule points us in a clear direction...[it] reminds us of our responsibility to protect and defend human life at every stage of its development.

He also told the members of the US Congress that ...this conviction has led me from the beginning of my ministry to advocate at different levels for the global abolition of the death penalty. I am convinced that this way is the best, since every life is sacred, every human person is endowed with an inalienable dignity, and society can only benefit from the rehabilitation of those convicted of crimes.

The International Commission Against Death Penalty believe that the risk of executing innocent people will always exist no matter how developed a justice system is. It then states that unlike prison sentences, the death penalty is irreversible and irreparable. The Commission also argues that the arbitrary application of the death penalty cannot be ruled and will be used in a disproportionate manner against the poor and favour the rich who can afford to hire the best and most expensive lawyers. There is the argument that the death penalty does not deter crime effectively. According to a recent United Nations report ...there is no conclusive evidence of the deterrent value of the death penalty.

Pope Francis clearly believes that that punishment should never rule out any hope for rehabilitation. He said: ...I also offer encouragement to all those who are convinced that a just and necessary punishment must never exclude the dimension of hope and the goal of rehabilitation.

Creative writing classes for kids and teens: February 18 and March 4 (1:30pm-3pm). Creative Nonfiction Writing for Adults: March 11 (1:30pm-4:30pm). Classes at Fully Booked Bonifacio High Street. For registration and fee details text 0917-6240196 or email writethingsph@gmail.com.

Email: elfrencruz@gmail.com

Follow this link:

Pope Francis on death penalty - Philippine Star

Italy sets up fast-track asylum courts for migrants – The Local Italy

A rescue operation by the crew of the Topaz Responder, a rescue ship run by Maltese NGO "Moas" and the Italian Red Cross, in November 2016 off the Libyan coast. File photo: Andreas Solaro/AFP

The Italian government on Friday created 14 fast-track asylum appeal courts in a bid to speed up decisions on deporting migrants with no right to stay in the country.

This latest sign of Italy moving to a tougher approach to deter further migrant arrivals, was approved by decree at a cabinet meeting on Friday.

It comes into force immediately but has to be approved by parliament inside two months.

Around half a million migrants have arrived in Italy in the last three years, most of them Africans who were rescued from overcrowded boats in the Mediterranean after setting off from Libya on vessels operated by people smugglers.

Registered asylum requests rose from 23,620 in 2013 to 123,482 last year and the average time taken to study them has risen from 167 to 268 days.

"The complexity of the migratory phenomenon is also increasing with people arriving from very different countries," Justice Minister Andrea Orlando said after the cabinet meeting.

"We are talking about life-defining decisions, we don't want to leave people in limbo," he added.

The government is also recruiting 250 additional specialists to speed up the work of the commissions which carry out the first assessment of asylum requests.

Around 60 percent of those end with a decision to deny the applicant the right to remain in Italy.

The new courts will be designed to ensure people in this case have their appeals heard much quicker and that a binding decision is made at that stage.

As things stand, rejected asylum seekers can generally mount two appeals in a lengthy process that overturns the original denial in an estimated 70 percent of cases.

"These will be specialised judges with detailed knowledge of migration issues," Orlando said, denying the abolition of a second appeal involved lowering standards of legal protection.

The UN refugee agency welcomed the strengthening of the asylum commissions but voiced reservations about the new courts.

"There will have to be a very thorough examination of individual cases. If it is impossible to appeal, the first hearing has to be as good as possible with the emphasis on quality rather than speed," a spokeswoman said.

Orlando vowed the commissions would become more reliable and consistent in their decisions thanks to the new recruits and the recording of all discussions becoming compulsory.

Friday's initiative follows recent moves by the government to make it easier for migrants awaiting decisions on their fate to do voluntary work that will help them integrate into Italian society.

Italy has also recently agreed to help train Libya's coastguard to better police its coastal waters to reduce the number of boats leaving the country, and to help its former colony with the running of centres to house migrants pending their repatriation to their home countries.

On Friday, the government announced the creation of around 20 permanent repatriation centres capable of housing a total of 1,600 people pending deportation.

Read more:

Italy sets up fast-track asylum courts for migrants - The Local Italy

Did Darwin’s theories on evolution encourage abolition of slavery? – Washington Post

By Jerry A. Coyne By Jerry A. Coyne February 9 at 2:26 PM

Jerry A. Coyneis professor emeritus in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago. He is the author of Why Evolution Is True and Faith vs. Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible.

On New Years Day, 1860, four men sat around a dinner table in Concord, Mass., contemplating a hefty green book that had just arrived in America. Published in England barely a month before, Charles Darwins On the Origin of Species was sent by the author himself to Asa Gray, a Harvard botanist who would become one of Darwins staunchest defenders. Gray gave his heavily annotated copy to his wifes cousin, child-welfare activist Charles Loring Brace, who, lecturing in Concord, brought it to the home of politician Franklin Sanborn. Besides Sanborn and Brace, the distinguished company included the philosopher Bronson Alcott and the author/naturalist Henry David Thoreau.

According to Randall Fuller, this meeting changed America by catalyzing the movement to rid the nation of slavery. Although Gray and the Concord Four were ardent abolitionists, only Gray was interested in the recondite biological details of Darwins theory. The rest of them focused on the books implicit message about human races.

[The Metaphysical Club, the Boston philosophers who changed the way American thought]

This is curious because On the Origin of Species carefully sidesteps the topic of human evolution and says nothing at all on the subject of race. Darwin was so concerned about the heretical nature of his message that he decided to avoid mentioning the most incendiary of all his conclusions: that humans, supposedly created in the image of God, were in fact nothing more than modified great apes. He therefore devoted just 12 timid words to human evolution in the entire 500-page work: Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history.

But that was enough. Reading between the lines, everyone, including the Concord Four, saw what Darwin had kept to himself: that humans had, like all other species, evolved via natural selection from ancient ancestors.

[Darwin the liberator: how evolutionary thought undermined the rationale for slavery]

What is the relevance of all this to abolitionism? At the time, it was debated whether humans had a single origin or several, with each race being separately created. The multiple-creation school, polygenism, was popular with apologists for slavery. If, as they supposed, the Adam-and-Eve creation produced whites, but other races derived from earlier and inferior acts of creation, then whites were justified in applying a different moral standard to people of nonwhite race, who were not created in Gods image. Polygenists sometimes saw blacks as subhuman intermediates or even as members of a different species, justifying their subjugation and enslavement.

But if humans had a single origin (monogenism), as Darwin proposed for other species, then all human races were genealogically connected: Blacks were every bit as human as whites equivalent to distant cousins and slavery became morally untenable. This is perhaps one of the very few times in the history of evolutionary biology that Darwins ideas aligned with a literal interpretation of the Bible. Like Darwin, the Genesis account suggests a single origin for all humans courtesy of Adam and Eve with no mention of multiple creations. This detail was overlooked by advocates of slavery, who proved to be creative and slippery theologians. According to Fuller, the excitement Darwin brought to Gray and the Concord Four came from providing a scientific justification for overturning the multiple-origins argument.

The Book That Changed America gives a vivid picture of the intellectual life of Concord, infused not just with abolitionism but with the Transcendentalist philosophy that saw a divine spark within each human, prizing subjective experience over hard facts. Fullers story ranges widely and sometimes discursively, including colorful characters such as Louisa May Alcott (daughter of Bronson), who, before gaining fame with Little Women, wrote unpublishable books about interracial love; Louis Agassiz, another Harvard professor, a racist and polygenist implacably opposed to Darwins theories; John Brown, whose disastrous attempt to start a slave rebellion at Harpers Ferry was secretly financed by Sanborn; Frederick Douglass, a former slave turned orator and writer; and even P.T. Barnum, whose interest in science was driven by his desire to turn everything into a pay-per-view spectacle.

Unfortunately, Fullers engrossing account of the literary and intellectual hub of New England does little to support his thesis that Darwins book gave powerful ammunition to abolitionists, ultimately contributing to the Civil War. That is dubious for two reasons.

First, although the Concord abolitionists found a modicum of support in Darwins ideas, they already had strong moral arguments against slavery, and at any rate had almost no influence on the conflagration that began in 1861 but had been smoldering for decades. Second, Darwins ideas gave ammunition to the pro-slavery movement as well, for social Darwinists simply co-opted Darwins idea of competition among groups in nature to argue that whites had outstripped blacks in the struggle for existence. Like the Bible itself, Origin has been cited in support of diverse and often conflicting ideologies.

Its worth noting that the real revolution wrought by Origin the replacement of a divine creationism with a purely naturalistic explanation of lifes history had nothing to do with slavery. Within a decade of the books publication, virtually all American scientists and intellectuals were on board with Darwins ideas, which changed not only the whole of biology but also our self-image. Gone was the idea of humans as Gods special creation, replaced by the view that we are a product of a shuffling by natural selection of randomly arising variation a process involving huge amounts of suffering and death. In a letter to Gray, Darwin admitted that the facts of evolution didnt comport with the Abrahamic God: But I own that I cannot see, as plainly as others do, & as I should wish to do, evidence of design & beneficence on all sides of us. There seems to me too much misery in the world. I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent & omnipotent God would have designedly created the Ichneumonid [parasitic wasps] with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of caterpillars, or that a cat should play with mice.

It was this issue of God and spirituality that led four of the five main characters in Fullers book to ultimately reject Darwins scientific message. The exception was Thoreau, who spent his last years obsessively cataloguing data on the Concord woodlands in a nebulous project cut short by his death from tuberculosis. But even Thoreau couldnt fully embrace Darwins message of naturalism, seeing science as powerless to explain things like emotions and behavior. Transcendentalists such as Alcott and Ralph Waldo Emerson, with their emphasis on the spiritual over the material, read into Darwin a misguided teleology of increasing perfection of the human soul. Brace became a theistic evolutionist, seeing God as masterminding the whole process. In the end, even the stalwart Gray was driven by his faith to see evolution as partly divine, proposing that God himself created the variation now known to be mutations in the DNA that fueled evolution.

Things havent changed much since 1860. A 2014 Gallup poll showed that 42 percent of Americans are young-Earth creationists, while another 31 percent are theistic evolutionists like Gray, accepting some form of human evolution but insisting it was directed by God. And only 19 percent of us 1 in 5 adhere to Darwins view that humans evolved in a purely naturalistic way with no supernatural help. Slavery, thankfully, is no longer with us, but, like the Transcendentalists, most of us still insist that a divine hand guided the origin of our species.

The Book That Changed America

How Darwins Theory of Evolution Ignited a Nation

By Randall Fuller.

Viking. 304 pp. $27.

Continue reading here:

Did Darwin's theories on evolution encourage abolition of slavery? - Washington Post

Judicial review is government at work – The Independent Florida Alligator

In todays lesson plan, we are going to be covering the U.S. Government. Its become clear in the past few weeks that a lot of Americans are not entirely aware of how the government functions. It has, after all, been a long time since seventh-grade civics or senior-year Advanced Placement U.S. Government. And unless you have some aspirations in politics or listen to the Hamilton soundtrack regularly, there might be some holes in your memory.

Disclaimer: This is a brief synopsis, and if you want a very thorough analysis of the early days of the U.S. Government, you will have to hit up your local history major or take UF professor Samuel P. Staffords American Civil Liberties class.

Our government is set up with separation of powers, a system of checks and balances which ensures no one branch of government overpowers another. You see, our newly formed country still had bad memories of England and an overruling tyrant, so the Continental Congress wanted to make sure that didnt happen. The first run of a set of laws for our country were the Articles of Confederation, which essentially allocated no executive power, leaving everything up to the states. Theres a reason we dont use them anymore and a reason the Continental Congress had to reassemble and figure out another way to whip our country into shape.

So they drafted up the Constitution and worked on getting it approved by the states.

One of the biggest roadblocks in ratifying our current Constitution was that people feared it would give the government namely the executive branch too much power. But eventually it was obvious we couldnt just leave everything up to the states. So compromises were made, powers were checked and balanced, and thus our Constitution was born and has been amended 27 times to keep up with changing times.

Now, a lot of people will point out that the original Constitution did not give the judicial branch much power. Indeed, it was only with the Supreme Court case of Marbury v. Madison that judicial review the power of the Supreme Court to determine whether a law is constitutional was established. But since then, all checks and balances and branches have been pretty even.

Currently, a very textbook example of the judicial branch stepping in to balance out the executive branch is playing out. Namely, the contentious travel ban by President Donald Trump has been halted and put up for review.

This is nothing new. Yet hundreds of thousands of people are acting personally victimized that (gasp!) the government dare do its job. The sad (and scary) part is that some of these people work for the government. Its not un-American or unpatriotic that the judicial branch is doing this it is, in essence, the most American thing of all. We feared a strong, overbearing single branch of government, so within our laws, we did our best to prevent that. Our government has been doing that for the past two hundred and some years.

From judicial review came: Miranda rights, the abolition of poll taxes in state elections, the separate but equal ruling, the subsequent overturning of that ruling, the rejection of former President Richard Nixons notion of executive privilege and thats just scratching the surface. The fact is this has been a very vital and important part of our country since 1803.

Challenging a presidents or Congresss decision is not going against the government. It is the government doing what it was made to do: work for the people. Not for a political party, or for groups of senators or representatives, but all the people of our country.

See the rest here:

Judicial review is government at work - The Independent Florida Alligator

Commissioner hits back at Mayoral candidate’s call for abolition of … – The Northern Echo (registration)

A POLICE and Crime Commissioner has hit back at a mayoral candidate who is calling for the abolition of his scandal-hit force.

Ben Houchen, who is fighting to be the Tees Valley Mayor as a Conservative candidate, says Cleveland Police has lost all credibility and he will set up an independent commission to bring about the end of the force.

However, Police and Crime Commissioner for Cleveland, Barry Coppinger, maintains that the retention of Cleveland Police is in the best interests of the residents it serves and reminded the candidate that the force is outside the control of the mayoral role.

Last month, the Labour Party-backed Mr Coppinger announced a review of the forces professional standards department after it was heavily criticised following a series of failed employment tribunals and court hearings.

He said: We have invested heavily in a series of ongoing measures to tackle issues that have raised concern. This includes the commissioning of independent analysis of past mistakes and, where necessary, looking outside of police circles for future answers.

I recognise the seriousness of the mistakes that were made in the past but to scrap an entire police force because of the actions of a tiny number of officers makes no sense.

I am in regular contact with Her Majestys Inspectorate of Constabulary who is supportive of the steps we have taken and whose recent reports recognise Cleveland as an improving force. To scrap the work already underway and start again would be foolish, a shameful waste of public money and betrayal of the rank and file officers who serve the badge of Cleveland Police with integrity and pride.

UKIPs Tees Valley mayoral candidate, John Tennant, said: While the sentiment of abolishing Cleveland Police is one I can support, particularly in light of a series of professional failings of the Force and the public lack of confidence, it does not fall under the powers of the Mayor of Tees Valley.

While John Tait, who is standing as the North Easy Party candidate, added: There needs to be a regional police force but I think it is damaging when a candidate for one office criticises another office when they clearly would have no control over the force if elected.

Read more here:

Commissioner hits back at Mayoral candidate's call for abolition of ... - The Northern Echo (registration)