SiLC Technologies Recognized by Frost & Sullivan for Technology Innovation in 3D/4D Imaging Industry – PRNewswire

MONROVIA, Calif., July 23, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --SiLC Technologies, Inc., (SiLC), the leading developer of integrated single-chip FMCW LiDAR solutions, today announced that Frost & Sullivan, the prestigious market research firm, has selected the company for its 2020 North American 3D/4D LiDAR Imaging Industry Technology Innovation Award. This recognition comes on the heels of SiLC being selected by EETimes as one of the emerging silicon startups to watch worldwide. According to the Frost & Sullivan report, SiLC's proprietary 4D LIDAR chip is ideally positioned to disrupt the global LIDAR market due to its unique capabilities with broad applications, including autonomous vehicles, machine vision, and augmented reality.

"We're delighted by this recognition and greatly appreciate the depth and quality of Frost & Sullivan's analysis of SiLC's breakthrough Smart 4D Vision Sensor technology," said Mehdi Asghari, CEO of SiLC Technologies. "We also appreciate that Frost & Sullivan highlighted the breadth of our technology, which has the potential to replace ToF-based LiDAR sensors used in applications from automotive advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and self-driving autonomous vehicles to augmented reality, security, and industrial machine vision."

Each year, Frost & Sullivan embarks on a rigorous selection and benchmarking process for its technology innovation leadership awards and recognizes companies that lead the development and successful introduction of high-tech solutions to customers' most pressing needs.

"With the growing demand for LiDAR solutions across emerging applications and industry trends, such as autonomous vehicles and Industry 4.0, SiLC Technologies is poised to emerge as a forerunner in FMCW-based LiDAR solutions," said Frost & Sullivan's Varun Babu, Industry Analyst, TechVision. Furthermore, the firm's Best Practices research group reports that SiLC Technologies' Smart Vision is expected to disrupt the global LiDAR market in the next three to five years by providing in-depth, detailed information about objects in many user environments.

The report states, "SiLC Technologies' proprietary silicon photonic 4D chip-scale imaging platform manufactured utilizing CMOS fabrication infrastructure is likely to be a game-changer. SiLC's plan to adopt a semiconductor business model to make its solutions widely available to many end users and developers across a broad range of applications and markets should enable aggregate volume scaling beyond what any single player could enable and hence offer cost points that would otherwise not be possible. Furthermore, SiLC's solution has already demonstrated long-range (>300m) and high resolution. This added to its integrated approach enabling compact footprint, low power dissipation, and solid-state reliability is likely to offer a platform that could be capable of ubiquitous deployment."

Frost & Sullivan's market research forecasts, "The global market for CMOS image sensors will approach about $30 billion over the next few years, positioning SiLC Technologies, with its recent release of high-performance 4D+ Vision Chip, to achieve optimum growth in the near future."

Frost & Sullivan concludes, "SiLC Technologies' patent-protected technology and broad customer engagements should provide it with vast growth opportunities to build a global footprint over the long term. As a pioneering market participant, the company's positioning and marketing strategy for its production-scalable technology will allow it to capture significant market share in the coming years."

SiLC's silicon photonics integration platform offers a cost effective solution by integrating all the high-performance components needed into a single silicon chip through mature semiconductor fabrication processes offering a low cost, compact, and low power solution.

To download the full Frost & Sullivan report visit http://www.silc.com/news.

Additional Resources: EETimes Selects SiLC as Emerging Silicon Startup to Watch

About Frost & SullivanFrost & Sullivan, the Growth Partnership Company, works in collaboration with clients to leverage visionary innovation that addresses the global challenges and related growth opportunities that will make or break today's market participants. For more than 50 years, we have been developing growth strategies for the global 1000, emerging businesses, the public sector and the investment community.

About SiLC TechnologiesSiLC Technologies, Inc. is a leading provider of highly integrated FMCW LiDAR solutions, located in Monrovia, Southern California. The company's initial focus is on its integrated 4D+ Vision Chip, which has demonstrated a range of beyond 300 meters and isapplicable to a wide range of applications. Founded by a group of highly experienced industry veterans, with more than 20 years of commercial product development and manufacturing heritage, SiLC utilizes a proprietary silicon-based semiconductor fabrication process to manufacture its chips and standard, automated IC style assembly processes, enabling robust, cost-effective and compact solutions. Please visit us at: http://www.SiLC.com.

Media Contacts:[emailprotected]

SOURCE SiLC Technologies Inc.

Home New

Read this article:

SiLC Technologies Recognized by Frost & Sullivan for Technology Innovation in 3D/4D Imaging Industry - PRNewswire

Webinar: The innovative use of data and technology in reducing variation and improving margin – ModernHealthcare.com

For more information on Modern Healthcare webcasts, visit ModernHealthcare.com/webinars or email [emailprotected].

The complete Webinar FAQ is at http://www.modernhealthcare.com/webinarFAQ.

I lost/never received my GoToWebinar email. How do I get to the webinar?

When the webinar begins, click here and enter the e-mail you used to register for the event.

Re-Broadcast

The presentation slides will be available 48 hours AFTER the broadcast, and links to a video recording will be available on the same page.

Technical Questions

If you have difficulty logging into the webinar, can't hear the webinar or other technical questions, please call GoToWebinar's technical support line at 1-800-263-6317. If you are unable to view the webinar, you can still listen via the GoToWebinar phone number in your registration email.

You may be contacted by the sponsor of this event.

Originally posted here:

Webinar: The innovative use of data and technology in reducing variation and improving margin - ModernHealthcare.com

Dayton business offering new technology that scans for fevers and masks – WDTN.com

DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN)- Energy Optimizers, USA is making a facial recognition infrared thermal scanner available for schools, businesses and hospitals in the Miami Valley.

The no-contact machine can detect a persons temperature while also determining if that person is wearing a mask or is a stranger to the building. If the person being scanned has a high temperature, is not wearing a mask or is not recognized by the systems database then the door will remain locked and entry will be denied.

While this technology can be useful for businesses or hospitals, school administrators are looking closely to use the technology for school.

This product, along with other PPE tools, we have decided to provide to our school customers, because this is what they need right now, explained Belinda Kenley, Vice President of Energy Optimizers, USA.Theres such a sense of urgency to make sure that buildings are safe for students and staff.

So far, Valley View Local School District has expressed interest in the technology, as well as the Montgomery County Educational Center.

Thursday, superintendent of the Montgomery County Educational Center, Shannon Cox, visited Energy Optimizers to learn more about the technology that could help more than 60,000 students in the school system.

This is the type of technology that would help us enter into the 21st century, said Cox. This would allow us to make certain that were not just taking into consideration in the midst of COVID, but we also need to make sure that were keeping our kids safe forever. So the fact that this has safety and security features, that would be an added benefit to all of us.

The technology could also be used to take attendance of students and staff. Cox says the educational center is looking for solutions to not only reopen schools but keep schools open safely and long-term.

Parents have got a hard job right now. Its a tough decision and I dont think any of us want to say that a piece of machinery is going to make parents feel better. But something like this [machine] can at least assure that were providing the safest environment that we possible can, said Cox.

For more information on the Smart Pass machine and other technology available through Energy Optimizers, USA, click here.

Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram for all the latest news, weather and sports.

Go here to see the original:

Dayton business offering new technology that scans for fevers and masks - WDTN.com

Henrico nursing home cited for COVID-19 violations turns to new technology to fight the virus – 8News

HENRICO COUNTY, Va. (WRIC) A Henrico nursing home cited for keeping COVID-19 positive residents in the same room with COVID-19 negative residents may now be a leader in the fight against the coronavirus.

8News exposed that Westport Rehabilitation & Nursing Center was cited for housing those residents together during an unannounced inspection in late May. Yet, patients like Courtney Nelson feel they have been well cared for. She contracted COVID-19 in May.

I was tested three times, says Nelson.

Nelson told 8News she was never worried but the isolation from the outside during the pandemic has been tough.

No, not scared. The only thing is that we cant leave our room, thats hard. No one is allowed in the building ever, so you cant bring something from outside to us, she said.

The Westport resident never had any symptoms but by late May the facility had an outbreak, nine people died and an inspection warned of an immediate jeopardy. 8News asked the lead clinician, Jenni Johnson, why the facility was still putting residents who were COVID-19 positive in the same room with residents who were negative for the virus.

Once a patient is in the room with someone that tested positive, we are going to presume that they are also positive because they have been exposed to the virus, she told 8News. So, until we have all of the test results back it is not beneficial to move those patients around and risk spreading the virus until we have all of the facts together.

Johnson said Westport was always working closely with local and state health officials.

It has been so challenging. These residents and these staff, theyre my family, said Johnson.

Yet, the staff worked fast to get the virus under control. And now in late July, the Henrico nursing home maybe a leader in the fight against the virus. Currently we are COVID-free, Johnson told 8News.

Westport, part of the Vita Healthcare Group, turned to Shalom Reinman, the founder and CEO of Megadata to help identify potential COVID cases. Oxygen was really good indicator, says Reinman.

When the pandemic hit, Megadata, which analyzes data for mainly nursing homes, started tracking their residents vitals. They monitored temperatures, symptoms, nurses notes and oxygen levels.

We found that oxygen numbers could be an early indicator even earlier than temperatures and other symptoms, Reinman said. He says the slightest change in patients baseline oxygen level proved to be a potential sign of the coronavirus.

It gave the ability to really understand even before a COVID test whos looking like they might have COVID, Reinman explained.

It was a game changer for Westport. Huge difference, Johnson said. She told 8News now residents immediately go into isolation as soon as they are suspected of having the virus. Nelson feels shes in good hands at Westport.

They do the best they can. If it wasnt good, I certainly wouldnt sit here and put up with it, she said.

Westport told 8News they have asked for a review of that inspection. They also said all residents and staff are tested for COVID-19 weekly. Megadata, which works with about 350 nursing across the country, is working on a study to share their findings.

See original here:

Henrico nursing home cited for COVID-19 violations turns to new technology to fight the virus - 8News

Amid Covid19 Pandemic, Louisiana’s 360 AUTO Introduces Innovative Touchless Retail Technology for Auto Dealers – PRNewswire

LAFAYETTE, La., July 23, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Retailers that do the best job adapting to the need for safe, contactless shopping are leading the rebuild of the post-Covid19 economy, says Frankie Russo, Founder & CEO of 360 AUTO, which specializes in Customer Experience Technology for the automotive industry.

Fueled by demand for contactless sales as a result of the Covid19 pandemic, 360 AUTO, a Louisiana-based Inc. 500 company, is among the top MarTech companies that are flourishing during this ever-changing time.

This month, 360 AUTO entered the Digital Retailing Business with its best-in-class digital retailing technology for automotive consumers.

"Our CXM now seamlessly allows consumers to complete a car-buying transaction without ever entering a dealership," says Russo. "360 AUTO has turned over all the controls to the customer!"

360 AUTO's new Digital Retailing technology, says Russo, empowers the everyday dealership to deliver an experience that, to date, only Carvana and Tesla have offered.

"A good experience creates loyal customers, and being there for every step of the customer car-buying process has never been more important," says Russo.

360 AUTO's centerpiece, the 360CXM, is a customer experience technology for Automotive Dealers with a focus on Identifying, scoring and targeting In-Market car buyers for marketing, equity mining, digital retailing, and attribution purposes.

Russo says the latest trends show that 50% of consumers, across income levels, are using digital retailing tools when they enable a faster and easier car-buying process. And when customers engage those tools dealers experience a closing rate 15% higher than typical internet sales, higher F&I profits, and in-store deals are completed within 30 minutes.

Making that experience memorable in a digital retailing world is crucial for dealers. And what makes 360 AUTO's technology unique is that it creates a personalized website for each customer.

Studies show that car buyers are spending less time shopping for cars, making decisions more quickly and that fact, coupled with the Covid19 shopping experience, is forcing companies to switch their mindset from being product-focused to being customer-focused and making every single customer interaction that much more important.

"Every employee, from the top to the bottom, has a role in CXM," says Russo.

"Each employee has a chance to meet or exceed expectations as they all play a part in designing and reacting to customer interactions. The hope, obviously, is that each interaction leads to greater customer satisfaction and brand loyalty."

"Because many customers come armed with more information and are ready to buy when they arrive at the dealership website, it has changed that key interaction between salesman and customer," Russo says.

"Today's consumers are smarter and more informed than ever and you need to treat them that way. So, today's salesman should serve as more of a consultant as customers want honesty and transparency throughout the customer experience journey," Russo says.

Founded in 2015, 360 AUTO, a subsidiary of 360ia, is a Lafayette, LA based MarTech software company focused on cutting edge customer experience technology. For more information visit 360 AUTO.

This press release was issued through 24-7PressRelease.com. For further information, visit http://www.24-7pressrelease.com.

SOURCE 360 AUTO

Read this article:

Amid Covid19 Pandemic, Louisiana's 360 AUTO Introduces Innovative Touchless Retail Technology for Auto Dealers - PRNewswire

Microsoft: Leading the future of education with technology – Microsoft Malaysia News Center – Microsoft

Image above: Online classroom on Teams organised by Sekolah Kebangsaan Taman Bukit Indah during the movement control order (MCO) period

KUALA LUMPUR, 23 July 2020 As schools in Malaysia reopen and welcome back students after a 4-month closure, Microsoft Malaysia is committed to further enable and accelerate the digital transformation of the nations education sector in collaboration with the government and education communities.It is timely for us to move towards digital learning especially during this time of Covid-19 pandemic, said Dr. Habibah Abdul Rahim, Director-General of Education, Ministry of Education. The Movement Control Order (MCO) has acted as a catalyst to accelerate digital transformation as teachers are now engaged in the delivery of digital learning and leveraging on different technologies which they have opted to use with their pupils. For the future, digital learning will have to continue to be part of school culture, embedded in our daily teaching and learning.

The move towards digital in Malaysia is in line with the global shifts for education. In a study by Microsoft which surveyed 500 teachers and institutional leaders from around the world within the Microsoft Education community, 61% expect to begin the next school year in a hybrid learning environment involving a mix of remote and in-person learning. The survey also found that 87% of educators expect to use technology more than before, when in-classroom teaching resumes.

During the MCO, the use of digital tools was accelerated to enhance remote learning experiences. Moving forward, this usage is expected to rise, complementing in-classroom teaching methods as schools move into a blended learning or rotational mode due to social distancing measures. This is in addition to the growing importance and emphasis on preparing students with the right digital tools and skills to take on the challenges of tomorrow.

In a move to digitalize education, the Ministry of Education in partnership with Microsoft Malaysia and other industry players launched DELIMa, or Digital Educational Learning Initiative Malaysia. Through this platform, more than 5.2 million students and educators nationwide can access Microsofts productivity applications and services, namely Office 365 (O365) using a single sign-on, in addition to learning resources from Google and Apple.

Further to this, Microsoft Malaysia had partnered with the Ministry of Higher Education to conduct open webinars and online tutorials to share knowledge on setting up virtual classrooms as well as the available digital resources to support teaching and learning process. The open webinars were attended by hundreds of educators from public schools, MRSM schools and private institutions of higher learning. These efforts are continuous, as teachers can easily access the webinars via education portals like Digital Classroom, to learn how to properly utilize the tools available to them from the experts themselves. From conducting training webinars for educators to forging valuable and long-lasting partnerships with educational institutions, Microsoft is constantly looking for different avenues in which technology can be leveraged to complement education.

Pn. Hjh Saripah binti Ahmad, a School Improvement Specialist Coach (SISC+) from Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Melaka Tengah and a proud Digital Classroom Admin said, In the first phase of the MCO, we conducted 14 webinars for teachers in an initiative titled From Teacher to Teacher (FT2T) and 11 webinars in another motivational program designed to encourage teachers to improve their professional development named sembang santai. FT2T trains teachers to master tools such as Teams, Sway, Flipgrid, PowerPoint, simple coding and digital storytelling. The response from teachers in the Digital Classroom telegram group has been overwhelmingly positive and the groups membership grew to 52,000, with members adding in their friends and colleagues who are also teachers.

In April 2020 alone, Digital Classroom admins have conducted more than 50 e-classes for UPSR, PT3, SPM and STPM students, with Teams chosen as their one-stop center for teaching and learning.

Microsofts work with MARA reflects a similar story, with Microsoft conducting a series of webinars and trainings over Teams to empower MARAs 11,000 employees and 53,000 students to continue education during the MCO. The webinars, conducted by MARAs Microsoft Innovative Educator Expert (MIEE), MIEE fellows and volunteers from TVET Colleges, facilitated rapid onboarding to Teams. Recorded sessions from these webinars were uploaded on MARAs Teams channel, providing a space for staffs to learn, connect and share the latest content, news and updates within the education sphere.For over two decades, Microsoft has invested greatly in the enhancement of Malaysias education system in line with its vision to democratize technology in education. If our future is digital, the need for our teachers and students to have access to the right tools and solutions is critical for the continuous growth of our nation, said K. Raman, Managing Director for Microsoft Malaysia.

Over the last few months, weve worked with the government and educational institutions to help ease the transition of schools for remote learning. As the education sector reopens, we are now focused on enabling and sustaining the digital transformation that is already happening. In this regard, the launch of DELIMa is an important milestone as it demonstrates the importance of technology to the future of education. Given the potential impact it has, we hope to see greater integration of digital tools within classroom settings, traditional or virtual moving forward. This certainly bodes well with the nations goal in empowering every student with crucial digital skills; and most importantly, transforming the learning environment allowing for a more enjoyable and holistic education experience, he added.

Tags: DeLIMA, Digital Transformation, Education

Follow this link:

Microsoft: Leading the future of education with technology - Microsoft Malaysia News Center - Microsoft

How AI will revolutionize the retail industry and how technology will address the needs of future shoppers – The Times of India Blog

The retail environment is changing rapidly, and that is reflective of more aware customers who are looking for higher convenience, specific products, faster access, and in the current context, a safer environment as well. Thus retailers need to continue to evolve, keeping Customer Centricity as the core of the transformation to develop unique and innovative solutions, creating seamless and frictionless experiences for the customers across varied channels.

I believe that the infusion of innovative technology is no longer a thing of the future but instead an essential tool in retail to power their strategy towards creating the best experience for customers, associates (team members), and other stakeholders with clear financial impact. Today, technologies are being applied across the value chain of retail in varying proportions. However, only when it is used holistically across the value chain like sourcing, supply chain and distribution, in stores, digital, omnichannel, last-mile deliveries, among others, will the solutions become faster, better and scalable, thereby providing personalized solutions to customers and driving more substantial business impact across the phygital (physical and digital) world.

The technologies and their applications are continuously evolving. AI and ML, which I believe are no longer futuristic technologies, are, in fact, gradually becoming an integral part of processing data, assessing needs, and deploying the right measures through both predictive and prescriptive models, again across the value chain of the organization. If you look at the whole value chain in Supply Chain and logistics, AI and ML can be applied across right from developing efficient sourcing strategies, effective planning strategies, warehouse management better demand forecasting, inventory holding, packaging & route optimization, geo-localizing the storage, faster and cost-effective transportation, and so on and so forth. Similarly, these AI models could help in predicting demands of unseen products to artificially synthesizing winning product designs, personalize interactions with customers and associates to optimizing route and packaging for faster fulfillment to assessing planograms, inventory replenishment, shelf purity and other consumer experiences in stores to even building a smarter functional and hyper-real applications and providing a stronger tactile experience to customers across the digital channels.

Today we are a convergence of various technologies to build solutions that will shape the future.

Data Analytics, along with technologies such as AI/ ML, allow us to assimilate a lot of data, apply intelligence, generate insights that allow our internal associates to create more value for our consumers.

Technologies such as Blockchain, IoT (Internet of Things), along with AI (Artificial Intelligence) can help us bring more transparency to our customers, increase sustainability, reduce carbon footprint, and create a more robust circular economy.

Technologies such as Robotics, Haptics, AR/ VR along with AI can create a stronger visualization environment for the consumers and build an immersive sensory enabled e-commerce environment, consumer adaptable stores, faster fulfilments, among others blurring the lines between stores and digital.

As technology is evolving rapidly, we are at the junction of collaboration over competition. Various stakeholders need to collaborate to create a sustainable future of an integral part of our lives our home! And thus, Home Improvement retail is a significant category of retail and, in fact, one of the fastest-growing categories as well.

Multiple reasons are leading to the fast growth of the Home Improvement category. Apart from the psychological confidence of owning a home, the remodeling of homes, basis change in the fashion aesthetics across demographics is an important factor. It is also the infusion of millennials who are highly keen on buying and remodeling homes, and that too is acting as an additional factor. Another reason that I feel is important is the way technology is being used to create unique and innovative solutions that are driving the growth of the sector, thereby meeting the demand through solutions that are more personalized and frictionless.

Over the last few years, I have been privileged to work on a multitude of AI projects with both large internal teams as well with startups and academic institutions who are working to redefine processes and, in some cases, their overall industries as well. At this point as well I am working with seven exceptional startups from across India, representing a diverse range of interests including merchandising, AI-driven trend forecasting, automated content generation, talent acquisition, hyper-real AI and sustainable, next-gen home construction technology, among others, which have deep learning AI models built to reimagine how we look at retail today and in the future.

On that note, I am incredibly excited to see the way Artificial Narrow Intelligence, which we generally refer to as AI, is transforming the world of retail and how thats shaping our lives better!

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

See original here:

How AI will revolutionize the retail industry and how technology will address the needs of future shoppers - The Times of India Blog

How smart investments in technology can beef up Africas economy – The Conversation CA

There is no shortage of technological innovations designed to boost animal agriculture in Africa. These range from GPS tracking systems which identify and trace pastoralists herds to livestock vaccine SMS services that alert farmers to disease outbreaks.

But to unlock the economic potential of the sector as demand for meat and milk swells threefold towards 2050, countries must invest in the critical areas that will improve quality across the whole value chain. That is increasing productivity and quality from the breeding of the animal throughout the production process to the end product. This includes safe storage, handling and sale.

My native Uganda offers some useful lessons from its use of smart investments in technology and farmer organisation. These have made it the only East African country that is self-sufficient in milk.

In recent years, some private sector players in Uganda have invested in testing systems to detect aflatoxin in animal feeds. The goal is to prevent milk and meat contamination. Others have developed refrigeration units that are powered with biogas from manure. Both are among the innovations that improve the quality of the final product.

As highlighted by a new report from the Malabo Montpellier Panel on which I sit, the same can be achieved elsewhere. It can also benefit other livestock commodities, to give Africa food sovereignty across animal-sourced foods and greater access to international markets.

The report makes 11 recommendations for Africas livestock sector. These range from technological innovations and supportive policies to addressing trade barriers and challenges specific to each commodity.

African nations must be strategic in prioritising the infrastructure that will make the most difference to quality and productivity. The first priority is to increase consumer awareness around food safety, nutrition and sustainability to kickstart demand for better quality products.

Partly as a response to European consumer expectations around quality and safety, for example, Morocco developed a new system for animal identification and traceability in 2015.

Livestock can be identified using electronic tags that communicate with the national database via mobile phone networks. This increases transparency and traceability. It also promotes Moroccan animal products on international markets such as the European Union.

The second priority is then to direct technology towards opportunities to open up market access.

To unlock trade means investing in improved animal health, processing operations, storage and distribution. Meeting regional and international standards for food safety and quality is a vital goal. Africa currently contributes 2.8% of the global meat market, which translates to 14 million tons. The continent produces just over 10% of the worlds milk.

There are a number of barriers to increasing this production and gaining greater market share. They include limited availability of quality animal feed, access to affordable energy needed in producing and processing livestock, and limited infrastructure, particularly in the last mile.

With meat and milk being perishable goods, innovation in the cold chain and sustainable energy supplies will help strengthen the sector.

For example, an East African initiative which centralised milk quality testing and storage in chillers prior to sale increased yields sixfold within five years.

The volume of milk supplied to the 30km catchment area rose to three million litres a month. This increased income per smallholder household by more than 160% in Uganda, 120% in Kenya, and almost 65% in Rwanda.

The success of such projects in turn drives demand for continued innovation, such as solar-powered cold chains or interventions that protect other resources like water and grasslands.

Finally, countries also need to prioritise policies that support new technologies across the livestock sector.

To transform its milk production sector, Uganda privatised the state-owned processing company Dairy Corporation as well as creating a Dairy Development Authority.

The Dairy Industry Act of 1998 empowered the authority to enforce milk hygiene standards and quality controls. As a result, traders were licensed to meet public health and milk quality standards. This encouraged the modernisation of the sector through the expansion of pasteurisation plants and processing infrastructure as well as processing of high value products.

Certainly, the gains have trickled down to the farmers in better farm gate prices.

As the Malabo Montpellier Panel points out, many of the tools needed to tap into the potential of Africas livestock sector exist already. But with limited resources, they must be deployed smartly to improve the entire value chain.

Scaling up innovation at critical points will unlock new opportunities and help ensure animal agriculture keeps pace with a rising demand from a growing population.

See the original post:

How smart investments in technology can beef up Africas economy - The Conversation CA

Mhealth Market: Integration of Wireless Technologies to Fuel Market’s Growth – BioSpace

Global mHealth Market: Snapshot

Mobile technology has expanded significantly across the globe in recent years. As per the Cisco Visual Networking Index, mobile traffic has increased four-fold in recent years and it is expected to grow exponentially in the near future. This increase in mobile traffic is seen due to advances in 3G and 4G network that has enabled utilization of smartphones and tablets in the field of commerce, entertainment, healthcare and others. Integration of mobile technology into healthcare services has allowed consumers to manage their daily activities effectively. mHealth helps to reduce healthcare expenditure by limiting the number of hospital visits and also reduces readmissions. Mobile connectivity with healthcare professionals helps in decreasing the bridge between healthcare professionals and patients.

Request Brochure of Report https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=36707

The global mHealth market is divided into three segments: by product, by end user and by geography. Based on product, the global mHealth market has been segmented into connected medical devices, mHealth applications and mHealth services. Connected medical devices segment accounted for leading market share in 2016. Further connected medical devices is segmented into heart rate monitors, activity monitors, electrocardiograph, fetal monitoring, neuromonitoring and others and mHealth applications is further segmented into fitness & wellness, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, central nervous system disease, respiratory diseases, musculoskeletal diseases, smoking cessation, medication adherence and others. Increasing penetration of internet across the region and technological advancements such as introduction of 3G/4G/5G internet services, increasing focus of general population towards fitness, wellness and nutrition diets are expected to propel the growth of mHealth application segment in the forecast period

Request for Analysis of COVID19 Impact on Mhealth Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=36707

Based on end user, the mHealth market is segmented into B2C and B2B. B2C end user is further segmented into patients and caregivers and B2B is further classified into providers, payers, employers, and others. B2B segment accounted for leading market share in 2016. Increasing adoption of mHealth solutions by hospitals, health insurance companies and government organizations are expected to drive the growth of the B2B segment in the forecast period.

Request for Custom Research - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=CR&rep_id=36707

Geographically, the mHealth market has been categorized into five regions: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. North America was the largest market in 2016, followed by Europe. High health care expenditure, government initiatives, high rate of adoption of new technologies and increasing funding by private and public organizations are some of the factors driving the growth of the mHealth market in North America and Europe. On the other hand, the mHealth market in Asia Pacific is anticipated to grow at the higher CAGR compared to other regions during the forecast period from 2017 to 2025. Increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, aging population and increasing disposable income are some of the major factor likely to drive the growth of the mHealth market in the Asia Pacific. The mHealth market in Latin America is a promising market, offering significant growth opportunities due to increasing government initiatives and increasing funding by public and private investors and establishment of new companies and new product launches.

Pre Book Mhealth Market Report at https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/checkout.php?rep_id=36707&ltype=S

Major players operating in the global mHealth market are Dexcom, Inc., Apple Inc., FitBit, Inc., Withings, Jawbone, Proteus Digital Health, Omada Health, Inc., WellDoc, Inc., Livongo Health, Noom, Inc., Ginger.io, Inc., Propeller Health, 2Morrow, Inc., Canary Health, Mango Health, BiogeniQ Inc., Twine Health, Inc., Glooko, Inc., Firstbeat Technologies Ltd., Claritas MindSciences, Big Health, Dthera Sciences, Virta Health Corp, Zest Health, LLC, Meru Health, Inc., HealthMine, Inc., Pear Therapeutics, Inc., BioTelemetry, Inc., Blue Mesa Health, and Digital Therapeutics

About Us

Transparency Market Research is a next-generation market intelligence provider, offering fact-based solutions to business leaders, consultants, and strategy professionals.

Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information we offer customized solutions through ad hoc reports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of right sense of fact-oriented problem solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.

TMR believes that unison of solutions for clients-specific problems with right methodology of research is the key to help enterprises reach right decision.

ContactMr. Rohit BhiseyTransparency Market ResearchState Tower,90 State Street,Suite 700,Albany NY - 12207United StatesUSA - Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453Email: sales@transparencymarketresearch.comWebsite: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/

Continue reading here:

Mhealth Market: Integration of Wireless Technologies to Fuel Market's Growth - BioSpace

Making the Most of Near Field Light – Technology Networks

There are many types of light some visible and some invisible to the human eye. For example, our eyes and brain dont have the tools to process ultraviolet light when it hits our eyes, making it invisible. But there is another type of light that is invisible simply because it never reaches our eyes. When light hits certain surfaces, part of it sticks and remains behind rather than being transmitted or scattered away. This type of light is called near-field light.

Today, near-field light is mostly used for ultra-high-resolution microscopy, known as the near-field scanning optical microscopes (NSOM). However, near-field light also has untapped potential for particle manipulation, sensing, and optical communications. But since near-field light doesnt reach our eyes like far-field light does, researchers havent developed a comprehensive toolkit to harness and manipulate the near field.

Today, we have a lot of tools and techniques to design what far-field light looks like, said Vincent Ginis, a visiting professor at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS). We have lenses, telescopes, prisms and holograms. All these things enable us to sculpt freely propagating light in space.

Ginis is also a professor at the Vrije University of Brussel.

Now, SEAS researchers have developed a system to mold near-field light opening the door to unprecedented control over this powerful, largely unexplored type of light. The research is published in Science.

Over the years, our group has developed new powerful techniques to structure propagating light using subwavelength-patterned metasurfaces, said Federico Capasso, the Robert Wallace Professor of Applied Physics and Vinton Hayes Senior Research Fellow in Electrical Engineering, and senior author of the paper. With this work, we show how to structure the near field at a distance, opening exciting opportunities in science and technology.

In order to manipulate near-field light, the researchers developed a device in which light confined to a waveguide bounces back and forth between two reflectors. After each bounce it changes mode, meaning it propagates with a different spatial pattern. With multiple bounces, these patterns add up to generate a complex light intensity profile along the waveguide. The near field light near the surface of the waveguide also changes. When all the different patterns of the near-field light are superimposed on each other, a specific shape is created. The researchers can pre-program that shape by tailoring the amplitude of the modes of the bouncing light.

The coexistence of all these modes can be designed to create near-field landscapes at will on the surface of the device, said Marco Piccardo, a research associate at SEAS and co-author of the paper. The shape of the landscape is determined by the combined properties of the cascading light.

Its a bit like music, said Ginis. The music that you are hearing is the superposition of many notes or modes assembled in patterns conceived by the composer. One note alone isnt much but taken together you can generate any type of music. While music operates in time, our near-field generator operates in three-dimensional space and the extra intriguing aspect of our device is that one note generates the other.

Importantly, this molding process happens remotely, meaning no part of the device directly interacts with the near-field light. This reduces interference, which is important for applications such as particle manipulation, and is a major departure from current local methods of sculpting near fields such as shining light on metallic tips and nanoparticles.

To demonstrate their design, the researchers molded near-field light into the shape of an elephant. Or, more specifically, an elephant inside a boa constrictor, an homage to the play on dimensions in Antoine de Saint-Exuprys classic The Little Prince.

The researchers also shaped the light into a curve, a plateau and a straight line.

"This research provides a new path towards unprecedented three-dimensional control of near-field light, said Capasso. It is a portent of the exciting discoveries and technology developments I expect to come out of this work in the future.

ReferenceGinis, V. et al. Remote structuring of near-field landscapes. Science 24 Jul 2020: Vol. 369, Issue 6502, pp. 436-440, DOI: 10.1126/science.abb6406

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Read more here:

Making the Most of Near Field Light - Technology Networks

Even the Vikings Had Smallpox – Technology Networks

The fatal disease smallpox is older and more widespread than scientists so far have proved. A new study by an international team of researchers from the University of Copenhagen and the University of Cambridge shows that the Vikings also suffered from smallpox.

Through the ages, the highly infectious disease smallpox has killed hundreds of millions of people. But it is unclear exactly when the disease emerged. There has been found evidence of smallpox from individuals from the 17th century while written records suggest the disease is much older.

Now a new study shows that the disease dates 1,000 years further back in time than previously shown. Researchers from the University of Copenhagen (UCPH) and the University of Cambridge have found proof that smallpox also existed in the Viking Age. The new results have been published in the scientific journal Science.

We have found the oldest evidence of smallpox. Moreover, it seems to have been surprisingly common as early as in the Viking Age, says Associate Professor Martin Sikora, Globe Institute, UCPH, and the University of Cambridge. He continues:

Smallpox is the infection in the world that has killed most people. For that reason alone, it is very important and interesting to know how the disease developed. It gives us a unique opportunity to understand the viruses evolution: How did it change and become the pathogen that we know of today.

The researchers have studied and analysed the DNA of 13 individuals from Northern Europe infected with smallpox. The samples are 1,000 years older than the previous oldest sample known to have been infected based on ancient DNA, and they thus push the timeline for smallpox further back in time.

The study also shows the disease has been more widespread than previously assumed. The general idea used to be that smallpox was not endemic to Northern Europe during that time period.

We show that not only was it endemic in Europe, but it was actually quite widespread in Northern Europe already at the year 600. That means that the disease was almost certainly far more established at a much earlier age than previously thought, says Professor Eske Willerslev, Globe Institute, UCPH.

The researchers have also discovered that the viruses circulating during the Viking Age were distinct from their modern counterparts, and not directly ancestral to the viruses that caused the last big outbreak of smallpox in the 20th century.

They share a common ancestor, but they also have unique features that differentiate them from the ones circulating later on in history. It turns out that the viruses we have found were some of these very, very early and different versions of the devastating pathogens known from the 20th century. It is the first time we can trace these early smallpox viruses and compare their genomes and mutations and see how the disease evolved over time, says Eske Willerslev.

Even though the disease has been eradicated today, it is still very useful to know how it developed and mutated through the ages.

Smallpox is a so-called poxvirus, a large family of viruses with many different types infecting a diverse set of host species. One such example is monkeypox, which typically infects monkeys but has also been known to cause a disease similar to smallpox in humans. It is therefore useful to known how other types of poxviruses mutate and survive.

When we know how the disease mutated through time, it gives us an opportunity to put together a catalogue of how these pathogens might mutate in the future: What mutations and combinations make such a pathogen viable and successful? If they had those mutations in the past, they can most likely get them again.

It is one of a few examples where ancient genetic research has direct implications for present-day and future health, says Martin Sikora.

ReferenceMhlemann, B. Diverse variola virus (smallpox) strains were widespread in northern Europe in the Viking Age. Science 24 Jul 2020: Vol. 369, Issue 6502, eaaw8977, DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw8977

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Read the original post:

Even the Vikings Had Smallpox - Technology Networks

ENGIE IT Teams with DXC Technology and ServiceNow to Launch Certified Global Center of Excellence – Business Wire

PARIS & TYSONS, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ENGIE IT is a business unit of Global Business Support, part of ENGIE (EPA: ENGI), a worldwide reference in low-carbon energy and services. A global partner for IT and digital technology for ENGIE, ENGIE IT announced today, in collaboration with DXC Technology (NYSE: DXC), the successful implementation and launch of a certified, global ServiceNow Center of Excellence (CoE). The CoE, comprising a team of nearly 50 practitioners from ENGIE IT, DXC and ServiceNow, will guide ENGIE business units as they modernize their processes, delivering practical innovation to accelerate their digital transformation.

The CoE leverages ServiceNows leading digital workflow capabilities and gives ENGIE more flexible, industrialized and cost-effective enterprise service management (ESM) solutions. ENGIE IT provides innovative and high-performance ServiceNow solutions that deliver an enhanced digital employee experience for over 170,000 employees across more than 50 countries.

"Digital technology is now an integral part of our working lives. In view of its undeniable benefits to drive productivity gains, process automation, collaboration, data insights and more, ENGIE IT has a strategic ambition to proactively support ENGIEs digital adoption and success. The ServiceNow Center of Excellence is an integral part of ENGIE ITs response to this opportunity," said Matthieu Pestel, general manager of ENGIE IT.

"Our applications services enable customers to simplify platforms and modernize processes while reducing costs," said Pierre Bruno, VP and general manager, Southern Europe, DXC. "Working with ENGIE IT, we will help them achieve business agility, resilience and operational efficiency all while providing improved customer and employee experiences."

ENGIE IT CoE Services Benefit ENGIE Business Units and Employees

The immediate deployment of the CoE to more than 50,000 ENGIE employees, via ENGIE ITs MyPortal solution, will accelerate business process digitization across multiple functional areas including IT, Human Resources, Finance, Procurement, Facility Management and Cyber Security. The joint ENGIE IT, DXC and ServiceNow team will provide competitive and innovative services including:

"The ENGIE IT ServiceNow Center of Excellence is a unique set of skilled people, IP and innovative offerings which will further enable ENGIE business units to leverage the Now Platform as a foundation for enterprise-wide digital transformation," said Olivier Mollet, ENGIE Agile Business Solutions director.

"DXC is proud to be a part of this ServiceNow CoE model globally," added Nicolas Leszek, managing director of the ServiceNow practice for DXCs Southern Europe region. "With ServiceNow as a global strategic partner, DXC will help ENGIE IT deliver operational excellence and business-leading solutions."

ENGIE IT Helps ENGIE IMPACT to Accelerate its Digital Transformation

ENGIE Impact, an ENGIE business unit that delivers sustainability solutions and services to corporations, cities and governments across the globe, is one of several business units that will benefit from the CoE.

"Digital solutions are the foundation for large-scale sustainability transformation, which is extremely complex and impacts all aspects of a business," said Mark House, vice president of Information Technology at ENGIE Impact. "The ENGIE IT ServiceNow Center of Excellence will set an extremely high standard for implementing the Now Platform, which is critical in driving operational excellence and measuring the quality of IT services delivered."

"Collaborating with ENGIE Impact is a great example of how ENGIE IT will provide a structured implementation methodology transforming IT workflows in weeks with a compelling return on investment," said Birama Traore, head of ServiceNow Center of Excellence by ENGIE IT. "DXC Technology, as our global strategic partner, enables us to deploy a skilled team of ServiceNow experts across the world in a matter of days to support ENGIE Business Units strategic IT projects."

About DXC Technology

DXC Technology (NYSE: DXC) helps global companies run their mission critical systems and operations while modernizing IT, optimizing data architectures, and ensuring security and scalability across public, private and hybrid clouds. With decades of driving innovation, the worlds largest companies trust DXC to deploy our enterprise technology stack to deliver new levels of performance, competitiveness and customer experiences. Learn more about the DXC story and our focus on people, customers and operational execution at http://www.dxc.technology.

About ENGIE IT

ENGIE IT is a business unit of Global Business Support, part of ENGIE (EPA: ENGI), a worldwide reference in low-carbon energy and services. A global partner for IT and digital technology for the ENGIE Group, ENGIE IT partners with the ENGIE business units and their teams to implement and run IT and digital transformation projects. By delivering services and solutions to drive the operational excellence of the Group, ENGIE IT is creating a highly connected and collaborative environment that enables ENGIEs transformation.

See the original post:

ENGIE IT Teams with DXC Technology and ServiceNow to Launch Certified Global Center of Excellence - Business Wire

10 Best IoT Development Tools and Technologies in 2020 – IoT For All

As per diverse research, IoT linked devices will cross 75 billion by 2025. The scope and development of IoT are going to evolve in the coming years ultimately influencing people and companies to seek the top IoT product solutions. IoT development tools are created for tailing IoT applications across various networks and managing diverse updates to test how app changes can affect hardware responses.

If youre looking for the top IoT development platforms or want to work with some of the top IoT development companies below is a list of some of the most popular IoT development tools and technologies.

Microsoft Azure created a team by coordinating with Adafruit for building six IoT kits that come Azure Certified for the need of IoT developers having single-board PCs, actuators, and sensors. Generally, developers can make use of the WiFi boards, SD cards, sensors, and colored LEDs inside the kits. Some of the IoT kits from Azure are intended for the need of top IoT product developmentby experts. Those who are beginners or have intermediate knowledge can try the Adafruit Raspberry Pi Kit, Adafruit Feather M0 Kit, and SparkFun Thing Dev Kit.

Adruino is a top IT company based in Italy famous for building microcontroller boards, and interactive kits and objects that are reputed as the most preferred IDEs among other IoT development tools. Arduino crafted a full-blown, optimized, and mature platform for interconnecting diverse hardware systems. Arduino provides a full IoT package that is enriched with many top examples and libraries that supports the industry-grade IoT app development projects.

Arduino offers IoT packages enriched with library support for top industry-grade IoT app development projects. Arduino is easy-to-use to implement strategies that any beginner can adopt and start with it.

Raspbian IoT IDE was built for the Raspberry Pi board offered by IoT tech specialists. With more than 35,000 packages and various examples of rapid installation that come with the use of pre-compiled software make it an important IoT development tool. Maybe Raspbians greatest quality is that its under constant development and has widened reach for computing so users receive maximum benefits.

DeviceHive is an open-source machine to machine communication framework that was launched in 2012. DeviceHive is considered as one of the most preferred IoT application development platforms because it has a cloud-based API that anybody can control remotely and independently of network configuration.

The same applies to its management portal, protocols, and libraries. DeviceHive works best with applications that address security, sensors, automation, and smart home technology. As a bonus, DeviceHives website includes support and references from its community and online blog resources.

OpenSCADA is a tool thats part of the SCADA project represented by Eclipse IoT industry groups. It is well-known for its security and flexibility having a modern design. OpenSCADA supports editing and debugging and comes with front-end apps, back-end applications, libraries, interface apps, and configuration tools. The set of diverse tools can be combined with the development of advanced IoT apps. Just like the other IDEs, OpenSCADA supports diverse programming languages and consists of sub-projects including Utgard, Atlantis, Orilla, and others.

Home Assistant is aimed at home automation and functions on the Python-based coding system. Its an open-source tool whose IoT system is controlled with desktop browsers and mobile. Home Assistant is known for its frictionless operations, privacy standards, and security. The software can support any systems that are running on Python 3. However, it lacks cloud computing and its ability to secure data is a significant disadvantage.

DeviceHub is an integrated solution that offers a combination of business intelligence and cloud integration for delivering hardware and web technologies. Usually, the kit is offered as a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that allows software developers to use its power for the cause of IoT app development. Its especially beneficial for enterprise bodies who want to rebrand and install software for the need of deploying enterprise apps using Virtual Private Cloud. DeviceHub has achieved success in the fast going building of fleet management systems, smart vending machines, and wearable software.

Tessel 2 is a hardware provider used for creating basic IoT solutions and prototypes. It always gives a helping hand using its several modules and sensors. Tessel has plug and play module ecosystems including 10-pin modules, USB modules, community-created modules, and high-level hardware APIs. This is a kind of board that can hold up a large number of modules that cover the camera, RFID, accelerator, and GPS.

Java developers who are well aware of the use of Node.JS can make the use of Tessel and can program it with the use of Node.JS. In this manner, Tessel can be used for churning out a host of servers and also the hardware firmware IoT solutions.

Undoubtedly, Flutter is the best choice to make if youre looking for IoT product development. Flutter understands your needs and decreases unnecessary and repetitive electronic tasks. It refers to a programmable processor center that is dependent on Arduino. It is a remote transmitter with the proper inclination for achieving over a half-mile. Shudder sheets have the right to provide permission for coordinating with the correspondence with one another and apply where there is no need for any switch.

Kinoma allows two types of IoT projects that are both serious and fun. To fulfill its purpose, it required only two products: Create and Element boards. Kinoma Create is a scriptable hardware kit that utilizes JavaScript for connecting with the sensors and building the structure of IoT-enabled devices. The kit has complete supporting essential like a BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy), Integrated WiFi, Speaker, touchscreen and a microphone.

We are living in a technology-based era where everything is available at our fingertips. IoT has the capability to connect diverse devices that will make human life much easier and full of comfort. Because of these benefits, IoT is seeing exponential growth in its demand and there is no doubt in saying that IoT is the future of the technology-based world.

If youre aiming to create the best IoT app, take into consideration the tools and technologies outlined in this article. This way, you will be able to create a feature-loaded and user-friendly IoT app that will fulfill all the requirements of your targeted user-base.

Continue reading here:

10 Best IoT Development Tools and Technologies in 2020 - IoT For All

Nanomedicine – an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

17.8 Commentary on Hurdles in Clinical Translation of Various Nanotechnology Products

Research regarding nanoconstructs development in the cancer treatment field has witnessed a noticeable increase after discovery of the EPR effect. However, the number of anticancer drugs that actually reached the market was considered extremely low, as out of 200,000 anticancer drugs only 15 made it by 2017 (Greish et al., 2018). The reasons why most of the nanomedicines cannot even reach the market are the hardship or inability to maintain detailed characterization of these products, unsuccessful manufacturing on large scales, and issues in their safety and efficacy. These hurdles require many developmental processes to overcome them including a precise understanding of every component and all the possible interactions between them, determination of key characteristics to understand in which possible ways they affect performance, and the extent of it. If key characteristics can be replicated under manufacturing conditions (scaling up), the efficacy of targeting at the site of action and their stability and sterility can be enhanced and/or assessed (Desai, 2012). The majority of these hurdles are summarized in Table 17.5 (Tinkle et al., 2014).

Table 17.5. Major Hurdles That Face the Commercialization of Nanomedicine

Lack of standard nano nomenclature: imprecise definition for nanomedicines

Currently used compounds/components for nanodrug synthesis often pose problems for large-scale good manufacturing (cGMP) production

Lack of precise control over nanoparticle manufacturing parameters and control assays

Lack of quality control: issues pertaining to separation of undesired nanostructures (byproducts, catalysts, starting materials) during manufacturing

Reproducibility issues: control of particle size distribution and mass

Scalability complexities: enhancing the production rate to increase yield

High fabrication costs

Lack of rational preclinical characterization strategies via multiple techniques

Biocompatibility, biodistribution and toxicity issues: lack of knowledge regarding the interaction between nanoparticles and biosurfaces/tissues

Consumer confidence: the publics general reluctance to embrace innovative medical technologies without clearer safety or regulatory guidelines

The relative scarcity of venture funds

Ethical issues and societal issues are hyped up by the media

Big Pharmas continued reluctance to seriously invest in nanomedicine

Patent review delays, patent thickets, and issuance of invalid patents by the US Patent and Trademark Office

Regulatory uncertainty and confusion due to baby steps undertaken by US Food and Drug Administration: a lack of clear regulatory/safety guidelines

One of the major concerns related to NPs is their potential incompatibility and toxicity. Studies showed that inhaling NPs can cause pulmonary inflammation as well as inducing endothelial dysfunction that might lead to further complications in the cardiovascular system. A study for evaluation of iron oxide toxicity showed that monocyte-mediated dissolution and phagocytosis of the NPs have caused severe endothelial toxicity by initiating oxidative stress. Nanomaterials used in oral DDS have been shown to accumulate in hepatic cells, which might induce the immune response and eventually cause permanent damage to the liver. The accumulation of NPs in cells has been found to cause cancer by transforming cells into the tumorous state (Jain et al., 2018; Riehemann et al., 2009). Thus, handling these nanosystems requires special equipment and caution, which increases the cost of the production process and requires further investigations of the safety of nanomaterials to have a better understanding and optimize safety during manufacturing (Hammed et al., 2016). Production of NPs in the laboratory often requires complex, multistep synthesis processes to yield the nanomaterials with the required properties. Aside from the complexity of the process, controlling conditions such as temperature and concentrations precisely is significant to achieve homogeneity of NPs in terms of desired characteristics. However, retaining temperature and concentration in large systems is harder to achieve resulting in NPs with different characteristics (Gomez et al., 2014).

NPs tend to aggregate forming clusters with several microns in size. Aggregation of NPs alters their characteristics such as reactivity, transport, toxicity, and risk in the environment. Dissolution reduces when aggregation occurs due to the decrease in available surface area that will eventually reduce the activity of NPs. For example, dechlorination rate of CT (carbon tetrachloride) by magnetite NPs has shown to decrease when aggregation of the NPs increases resulting in an inverse relationship between dechlorination rate of carbon tetrachloride and aggregation of magnetite NPs (Hotze et al., 2010; Hou and Jafvert, 2009).

All these requirements are extremely important because the majority of the nanomedicines have failed to reach the commercialization step even though their efficacy in animal models was considerably high. Due consideration must be given regarding the several difficulties such as their low targeting, low safety, low efficacy, heterogeneity of disease between individuals, inability to scale-up successfully, and unavailability in determining a convenient characterization methods (Agrahari and Agrahari, 2018; Hare et al., 2017; Kaur et al., 2014). These hurdles that face the research process of accelerated translation are summarized in Fig. 17.8 (Satalkar et al., 2016).

Figure 17.8. Major issues that face accelerated translation process of nanoparticles.

Therefore, more understanding in all aspects of nanomedicine production, characterization, and clinical processes must be fulfilled to control and improve the development processes, and increase the efficacy of the translational methods. Other significant hurdles hindering clinical translation are the insignificant incentives regarding technology transfer, as well as socioeconomic uncertainties along with the safety problems faced. In the majority of cases, consideration of commercialization aspects in early stages of development is hardly even considered thus eliminating the market-oriented development (Rsslein et al., 2017).

Nanomedicines face tough, challenging concerns when it comes to determining the applicable analytical tests in terms of chemical, physical, or biological characterization. This is mainly achieved due to their complex nature in comparison with other pharmaceutical products. Hence, there is a need for more complex and advanced levels of testing to ensure a full accurate characterization of nanomedicine products. Quantification of each component of nanomedicine is considered essential alongside the identification and evaluation of interactions between them. For more possibility in achieving successful manufacturing processes with reproducibility, these products should be investigated and understood more during the early developmental stages to identify their key characteristics. The challenges for nanomedicine during scale-up and manufacturing are considered relatively unique because other pharmaceutical manufacturing processes systems are not three-dimensional multicomponent in nature on the nanometer scale. Therefore, a certain series of obstacles in the scale-up process is required. To reach the desired safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters to produce the therapeutic effect are needed. These are further determined by the proper selections of the essential components, determination of the critical manufacturing steps, and key characteristics identification. Several methods of orthogonal analysis are essential for in-process quality controls of nanoparticle products and any deviations from key parameters could result in a significant negative impact on both the safety and efficacy of nanomedicines (Desai, 2012).

Each step in the manufacturing process of NPs must be understood extensively with the need of experienced technicians. The development process also requires more enhancements in both complexity and cost. Inadequate data regarding scaling-up processes of nanomedicine products is a major concern in the commercialization step as there are only a few reports supporting scaling-up developments. Many formulation methods have been developed for manufacturing nanomedicine products. The most common methods are nanoprecipitation and emulsion-based approaches. Generally, formulations are prepared either by precipitating the dissolved molecules (bottom-up method) or by reducing the size of larger drug particles (top-down method). Removal of the solvent in the bottom-up method is not an easy process and it cannot be controlled well either, thus explaining why this method is less often applied in industrial manufacturing (Agrahari and Agrahari, 2018; Vauthier and Bouchemal, 2009). Investments in innovative projects face several issues with the major one being the knowledge that should be obtained from the innovation. Its confidentiality is easily breached when a company uses that knowledge as it cannot prevent other companies from using it. Thus, investors are not attracted to this type of project because the total return on the investment cannot be easily appropriated (Morigi et al., 2012).

The complexities in formulating nanoproducts on large scales are due to the inability of optimization of formulation processes and achieving reproducibility. Whereas formulation steps including size reduction, homogenization, centrifugation, sonication, solvent evaporation, lyophilization, extrusion, and sterilization can be easily optimized on small-scales, its still a challenging process on large-scales. Accordingly, variations between batches cannot be controlled sufficiently thereby limiting the possibility of nanomedicine to get through commercial translation (Anselmo et al., 2017; Desai, 2012).

Another problem is that even slight changes in either the formulation or the manufacturing process can have a significant effect on the nanomedicine physiochemical properties (crystallinity, size, surface charge, release profile), which will ultimately influence the therapeutic outcome. Most of the pharmaceutical industrial facilities cannot manufacture nanomedicines because of the lack of the right equipment for the process. As nanomedicine manufacturing usually involves the use of organic solvents, the ability to correctly process and handle nanoproducts is crucial to control their safety and sterility (Anselmo et al., 2017; Desai, 2012; Kaur et al., 2014). These steps require an expensive and complicated equipment, well-trained staff, and precise control to get the required product in the right quality (Desai, 2012; Kaur et al., 2014; Ragelle et al., 2017).

To date, only 58 nanoformulations are approved based on their clinical efficacy but only a quarter of them are meant for cancer treatment. Majority of the nanoformulations could not even be reproduced successfully due to several factors including the study design, overall analysis, protocols, data collection, and the quality and purity of materials used. Besides, the poor establishment of the correlation and prediction of safety and efficacy of the nanomedicine on patients hinders the successful DDS. Targeting and drug accumulation of anticancer drugs in the site of action is considered relatively poor in mouse models. Many nanoformulations were faced with failure in different clinical trial phases. Some of them got approved but then withdrawn from the market such as peginesatide. Unfortunately, the increased failures will most probably affect the development movement in the pharmaceutical industry (Greish et al., 2018).

At the present time, regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMEA are examining every new nanomedicine on a product-by-product basis. They are considered a unique category due to the fact that there are no true standards in their examination process (Desai, 2012). Two of the major regulatory issues that emerged at the start of nanomedicine is the lack of scientific experts in the FDA and the difficulty in classifying the product (Morigi et al., 2012). The unique characteristics of nanomedicines are directly related to their regulation hurdles, which is the same as other pharmaceutical systems such as liposomes and polymeric systems (Sainz et al., 2015).

Researchers keep investigating nanomedicines when attached to prodrugs, drugs, tracking entities, and targeting molecules. Development of robust methods and assays in quality control of nanomedicines are required for more effective monitoring and characterizations. Also, estimation of their overall performance in releasing drugs, binding to proteins, and the specificity in cellular uptake must be considered (Sainz et al., 2015; Tinkle et al., 2014).

Nanomedicine products are both complex and diverse requiring explanation of challenges to have a clear definition and an effective regulation. The lack of regulatory guidelines for these products hinders their clinical potential. Drug regulatory authorities must keep up with the rapid pace of the knowledge and technological development as they play a major role translating nanomedicines towards the market. The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and the FDA have different requirements in evaluating new nanomedicines as well as different definitions regarding nanomedicine. Agreeing on specific regulatory procedures internationally is very important to ease the translational researches of nanomedicines. Also, better long-term monitoring of toxicity should be achieved by prolonging postmarketing surveillance especially for a patient with chronic diseases (Sainz et al., 2015; Tinkle et al., 2014).

Nanomedicines just like any other pharmaceutical formulations must offer higher value to patients to become commercially successful, and have better efficacy and safety. New nanomedicine products follow the same steps in clinical trials as other drugs. It starts with preclinical tests, then be submitted to get the IND (investigational new drug) approval and following that it enters the three stages of clinical trials, one after another to evaluate safety and efficacy of the new drug (Agrahari and Agrahari, 2018).

In recent years, toxicities caused by nanomedicines have drawn attention and been recognized to be unique to nanoparticulate systems. Hence, a minimum set of measurements for the nanoparticle like surface charge, size, and solubility are monitored so as to predict the possible toxicity of NPs. Besides, NPs can stimulate the immune system by acting as an antigen. Immunogenicity is mainly affected by the size of the nanoparticle, its surface characteristics, hydrophobicity, charge, and solubility. Hematologic safety concerns have also been observed such as hemolysis and thrombogenicity (Desai, 2012).

In vivo and in vitro studies provide the proper characterization of the interactions between the product and the biological system. The problem is that the data attained from current toxicity tests are not from clinical trials and it cannot always be extrapolated to humans. Monolayers of cell cultures are currently used to characterize immunogenicity, drug release, cellular uptake, and toxicity. However, the cellular uptake process of nanoformulations is majorly influenced by physicochemical characteristics. Thus, 3D cell systems will probably provide better outcomes (Gupta et al., 2016). More caution should be given when handling any nanosized powder due to the ability of such particles to penetrate the skin and because it can also show pulmonary toxicity (Agrahari and Hiremath, 2017; Nel et al., 2006).

See more here:
Nanomedicine - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Size, Revenue Expectation, Market Dynamics, Growth Status, Global Trends Evaluation, Covid 19 Analysis…

Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Report is an objective and comprehensive study of the current state expected at the major drivers, market strategies, and key vendors growth. The study also includes the important achievements of the market, Research & development and regional growth of the leading competitors operating in the market.

This report also explain the numerous factors that form a significant element of the market. It includes the definition and the scope of the market with a detailed explanation of the market drivers, opportunities, restraints, and threats.

Get Free Sample Report(including full TOC, Tables and Figures): @

https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/global-testosterone-replacement-therapy-market-2019-by-manufacturers,-regions,-type-and-application,-forecast-to-2024/129647#request_sample

Leading players of Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market:

AbbVie, Endo International, Eli lilly, Pfizer, Actavis (Allergan), Bayer, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Upsher-Smith, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kyowa Kirin, Acerus Pharmaceuticals

Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Geographical Segmentation Includes:

The research report includes an exploration of the competitive landscape present in the global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market. It includes an impost of the current and future trends that players can invest in. Likewise, it also includes an estimation of the business outlooks of the players and explains the nature of the competition.

Hurry up to get huge discount:

Note: Upto 30% Discount: Get this reports in Discounted Price

Ask For Discount: https://www.globalmarketers.biz/discount_inquiry/discount/129647

Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Segmentation

Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Segmentation: By Types

GelsInjectionsPatchesOther

Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Segmentation: By Applications

HospitalsClinicsOthers

The plus point of this research study is that it includes the impact ofCOVID-19to the Testosterone Replacement Therapy market. The data summarized within this research study includes forecast from 2019 to 2024. COVID-19 has significantly impacted each and every market on the global platform. If you have any specific requirement then Please get in touch with us. Our Expert team will provide as per report customized to your requirement.

Do You Have Any Query or Specific Requirement? Ask Our Industry [emailprotected]

https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/global-testosterone-replacement-therapy-market-2019-by-manufacturers,-regions,-type-and-application,-forecast-to-2024/129647#inquiry_before_buying

Important Features of the report:

Detailed analysis of the Testosterone Replacement Therapy market

Changing market dynamics of the trade

Comprehensive market segmentation

Historical, present and expected market size in terms of volume and value

Current business trends and developments

Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Modest landscape of the market

Plans of key players and product offerings

A neutral view towards market performance

Reasons for buying this report:

It compromises an analysis of moving competitive scenario.

For making up-to-date decisions in the businesses, it offers analytical data with strategic planning methodologies.

It offers a Six-year assessment of the Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy

It supports in sympathetic the major key product segments.

It offers the regional analysis of the Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market along with the business profiles of several stakeholders.

It offers huge data about trending factors that will impact the progress of the Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy

Some Major TOC Points:

Chapter 1. Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Report Overview

Chapter 2. Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy industry Growing Trends

Chapter 3. Market Share by Key vendors

Chapter 4. Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Breakdown Data by Type and Application

Chapter 5. Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market by End Users/Application

Chapter 6. COVID-19 Outbreak: Testosterone Replacement Therapy Industry Impact

Chapter 7. Opportunity Analysis in Covid-19 Crisis

Chapter 9. Market Driving Factors

And Many More

Table of Content & Table Of Figures

https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/global-testosterone-replacement-therapy-market-2019-by-manufacturers,-regions,-type-and-application,-forecast-to-2024/129647#table_of_contents

View post:
Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Size, Revenue Expectation, Market Dynamics, Growth Status, Global Trends Evaluation, Covid 19 Analysis...

Impact of COVID-19 on Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market with Covid-19 Effect Analysis | likewise Industry is Booming Globaly with Key…

Note: Due to the pandemic, we have included a special section on the Impact of COVID 19 on the Testosterone Replacement TherapyMarket which would mention How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Industry, Market Trends and Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape, Key Regions and Proposal for Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Players to battle Covid-19 Impact.

The Testosterone Replacement TherapyMarket report is compilation of intelligent, broad research studies that will help players and stakeholders to make informed business decisions in future. It offers detailed research and analysis of key aspects of the Testosterone Replacement Therapy market. Readers will be able to gain deeper understanding of the competitive landscape and its future scenarios, crucial dynamics, and leading segments of the global Testosterone Replacement Therapy market. Buyers of the report will have access to accurate PESTLE, SWOT and other types of analysis on the global Testosterone Replacement Therapy market. Moreover, it offers highly accurate estimations on the CAGR, market share, and market size of key regions and countries. Players can use this study to explore untapped Testosterone Replacement Therapy markets to extend their reach and create sales opportunities.

The study encompasses profiles of major Companies/Manufacturers operating in the global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market.Key players profiled in the report include:Endo International, AbbVie, Eli lilly, Pfizer, Actavis (Allergan), Bayer, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Upsher-Smith, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kyowa Kirin, Acerus Pharmaceuticals and More

Get PDF Sample Copy of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart):https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request-Sample/118364

Market Segment By Type:GelsInjectionsPatchesOthers

Market Segment By Application:HospitalsClinicsOthers

To get Incredible Discounts on this Premium Report, Click Here @ https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request_discount/118364

The authors of the report have analyzed both developing and developed regions considered for the research and analysis of the global Testosterone Replacement Therapy market. The regional analysis section of the report provides an extensive research study on different regional and country-wise Testosterone Replacement Therapy industry to help players plan effective expansion strategies.

Regions Covered in the Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market: The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt) North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada) South America (Brazil etc.) Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.) Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia)

Years Considered to Estimate the Market Size:History Year: 2015-2019Base Year: 2019Estimated Year: 2020Forecast Year: 2020-2026

For More Information:https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/118364/Testosterone-Replacement-Therapy-market

Customization of the Report:Market Info Reports provides customization of reports as per your need. This report can be personalized to meet your requirements. Get in touch with our sales team, who will guarantee you to get a report that suits your necessities.

Get Customization of the [emailprotected]:https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request-Customization/118364/Testosterone-Replacement-Therapy-market

Get in Touch with Us :Mr. Marcus KelCall: +1 915 229 3004 (U.S)+44 7452 242832 (U.K)Email: [emailprotected]Website: http://www.marketinforeports.com

The rest is here:
Impact of COVID-19 on Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market with Covid-19 Effect Analysis | likewise Industry is Booming Globaly with Key...

Why George Orwell’s Quote on ‘Self-Censorship’ Is More Relevant Than Ever | Brad Polumbo – Foundation for Economic Education

Rule One: Speak your mind at your own peril. Rule Two: Never risk commissioning a story that goes against the narrative. Rule Three: Never believe an editor or publisher who urges you to go against the grain. Eventually, the publisher will cave to the mob, the editor will get fired or reassigned, and youll be hung out to dry.

The above is a quotation from George Orwells preface to Animal Farm, titled "The Freedom of the Press," where he discussed the chilling effect the Soviet Unions influence had on global publishing and debate far beyond the reach of its official censorship laws.

Wait, no it isnt. The quote is actually an excerpt from the resignation letter of New York Times opinion editor and writer Bari Weiss, penned this week, where she blows the whistle on the hostility toward intellectual diversity that now reigns supreme at the countrys most prominent newspaper.

A contrarian moderate but hardly right-wing in her politics, the journalist describes the outright harassment and cruelty she faced at the hands of her colleagues, to the point where she could no longer continue her work:

My own forays into Wrongthink have made me the subject of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views. They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments about how Im writing about the Jews again. Several colleagues perceived to be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers. My work and my character are openly demeaned on company-wide Slack channels where masthead editors regularly weigh in. There, some coworkers insist I need to be rooted out if this company is to be a truly inclusive one, while others post ax emojis next to my name. Still other New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action. They never are.

Weisss letter reminds us of the crucial warning Orwell made in his time: To preserve a free and open society, legal protections from government censorship, while crucial, are not nearly enough.

To see why, simply consider the fate that has met Weiss and so many others in recent memory who dared cross the modern thought police. Here are just a few of the countless examples of cancel culture in action:

These are just a few examples of many. One important commonality to note is that none of these examples involve actual government censorship. Yet they still represent chilling crackdowns on free speech. As David French put it writing for The Dispatch, Cruelty bullies employers into firing employees. Cruelty bullies employees into leaving even when theyre not fired. Cruelty raises the cost of speaking the truth as best you see ituntil you find yourself choosing silence, mainly as a pain-avoidance mechanism.

These recent observations echo what Orwell warned of decades ago:

Obviously it is not desirable that a government department should have any power of censorship... but the chief danger to freedom of thought and speech at this moment is not the direct interference of the [government] or any official body. If publishers and editors exert themselves to keep certain topics out of print, it is not because they are frightened of prosecution but because they are frightened of public opinion. In this country intellectual cowardice is the worst enemy a writer or journalist has to face, and that fact does not seem to me to have had the discussion it deserves.

Similarly, the British philosopher Bertrand Russell noted in a 1922 speech It is clear that thought is not free if the professional of certain opinions makes it impossible to earn a living.

Some might wonder why its really so important to protect speech and thought beyond the law. After all, if no ones going to jail over it, how serious can the consequences really be?

While understandable as an impulse, this logic misses the point. Free and open speech is the only way a society can, through trial and error, get closer to the truth over time. It was abolitionist Frederick Douglas who described free speech as the great moral renovator of society and government. What he meant was that only the free flow of open speech can challenge existing orthodoxies and evolve society. From womens suffrage to the civil rights movement, we never would have made so much progress on sexism and racism without the right to speak freely.

Silence enshrines the status quo. As John Stuart Mill put it:

If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.

This great discovery process through free-flowing speech first and foremost requires a hands-off approach from the government, but it still cannot occur in a culture hostile to dissenting opinion and debate. When airing a differing view can get you mobbed or put your job in jeopardy, only societys most powerful or those whose views align with the current orthodoxy will be able to speak openly without fear.

Orwell and Russell were right then, even if were only fully realizing it now. Self-censorship driven by culture, not government, erodes our collective discovery of truth all the same.

Here is the original post:

Why George Orwell's Quote on 'Self-Censorship' Is More Relevant Than Ever | Brad Polumbo - Foundation for Economic Education

Who The Democratic And Republican Party Censors Are, For The ‘News’ You See & Hear – Scoop.co.nz

Thursday, 23 July 2020, 11:06 amArticle: Eric Zuesse

Eric Zuesse,originally posted at StrategicCulture

Back in July of 2016, I did a two-partarticle, American Samizdat Publication Forbidden in U.S., which went down therabbit-hole of news-suppression (censorship) in the UnitedStates but left, for the future, a more detailed descriptionof the money-track back to the individuals who control thatcensorship in serving the economic interests of the samebillionaires who control both the Democratic NationalCommittee and the Republican National Committee both ofAmericas two national political Parties (and they thusdetermined, forexample, in the Democratic Party, that Bernie Sanders wouldnever get that Partys Presidential nomination, though hehad the highest approval-rating of any politician in thecountry, and far higher than Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump,and Joe Biden ever had yet the billionaires fooledthe majority of Democratic Party primary voters to thinkthat he was too radical to be able to beat Trump, eventhough, in all polled hypothetical matchups against Trump,Sanders beat Trump by far higher margins thanClinton did, and basicallyequal to whatBiden did, so the electability issue wasfabricated by the billionaires press, in order to get acandidate who was acceptable to the billionaires tobe running against Trump).

A dictatorship functions bynews-suppression and other forms of censorship, even morethan it does by its own lying. It functions by deceit, butthe main way it deceives is by prohibiting the truth to bepublished on any of the billionaires (or other rulinggroups) media including all of the media that havelarge audiences.

News-suppression used to becontrolled by the CIAs OperationMockingbird, in which the owners andtop executives of the major news-media took theCIAs orders and trusted it to represent in the mostreliable way the collective interests of Americaswealthiest persons, so as to weaken those individualsforeign economic competitors. However, gradually, after the1976 Frank-Church-led U.S. Senate hearings into the CIAsdeceptions of the American public, Americas wealthiest the same people whom Wall Street firms also represent relied increasingly upon the nonprofits (foundationsetc.) that they controlled, in order to transfer some ofthis censorship-function over to those nonprofits privatize the censorship function. It was done so that thesame people who controlled the U.S. Government would be ableto continue controlling it and would allow into thebillionaire class new members (mainly technocrats) of thenations aristocracy. This would enhance the U.S.aristocracys collective control over the U.S. Government.There is less need, than before, for the CIA to do thecensoring. (So: the group collectively also constitutesits own gatekeepers. They dont rely onlyupon market-forces in order to determine who is us,and who is them, but any misbehaving member willincreasingly become treated as being one ofthem, and this will be reflected in the groupsnews-media. Its an oligarchy here, and not only anaristocracy. It is an exclusionary aristocracy.)

HughWilfords 2008 THEMIGHTY WURLITZER: How the CIA Played Americadescribed how, starting in the late 1960s, Americassuper-rich began transferring (privatizing) some of theircensorship-functions away from the Government, and intotheir own controlled news-media andnonprofits.

As the former Washington Postreporter Carl Bernstein headlined on 20 October 1977, THECIA AND THE MEDIA, in the wake of the ChurchCommittees report, and described that Senate reportscontext:

During the 1976 investigation of the CIAby the Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by SenatorFrank Church, the dimensions of the Agencys involvementwith the press became apparent to several members of thepanel, as well as to two or three investigators on thestaff. But top officials of the CIA, including formerdirectors William Colby and George Bush, persuaded thecommittee to restrict its inquiry into the matter and todeliberately misrepresent the actual scope of the activitiesin its final report. The multivolume report contains ninepages in which the use of journalists is discussed indeliberately vague and sometimes misleading terms. It makesno mention of the actual number of journalists who undertookcovert tasks for the CIA. Nor does it adequately describethe role played by newspaper and broadcast executives incooperating with the Agency.

Ever since that time,the CIAs direct control over U.S. media has eroded andbecome privatized largely into the billionairesnonprofits, even while the CIAscontrol over the media in U.S.-allied foreignaristocracies has continued unabated, so as to extendyet further the American empire.

At the top in Americaare the billionaires who donate the most to politicians, andwhose tax-exempt foundations collectively carry out whatused to be the CIAs Operation Mockingbird thecensorship-function.

Two organizations especiallyshould be cited here as leaders of todays Americanbillionaire-class and privatized censorship operations, andany reader here should keep in mind that the largest fundersof these two organizations are themselves only hints at thebillionaires who control each one of them, and, furthermore,since these are only two such organizations, there might beother similar organizations that, perhaps in other ways, areequally important as these two determiners of the news thatthe vast majority of the U.S. public are, and will be,blocked from seeing and hearing (such as this).

Firstis a crucial operation that serves the Democratic NationalCommittee, the DNC (for links to sources, click onto theURL):

https://www.prwatch.org/cmd/index.html

WhatWe Do

The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD)is a nationally recognized watchdog that leads in-depth,award-winning investigations into the corruption thatundermines our democracy, environment, and economicprosperity.

The Koch brothers and their networkof billionaires are operating with a reach and resourcesthat exceed those of political parties and they are usingthat power to erode the integrity of our elections and saptaxpayer dollars away from investments in publicinfrastructure, education, and healthcare to benefit narrowspecial interests and globalcorporations.

CMDs investigations, publicinformation requests, and lawsuits have ignited nationalconversations on money in politics and the distortion ofU.S. law and democracy at every level of government andin every region of the country. We believe in the publicsright to know how government operates and how corporationsinfluence our democracy and the true motivations fortheir actions. When necessary, CMD litigates to defend thatright and ensure those in power follow thelaw.

Since CMD first exposed ALEC in 2011, morethan 100 corporations have dropped ALEC, including Verizon,Ford, Coca-Cola, Wal-Mart, General Electric, and Google. Asa result of that ongoing investigation and other reporting,CMD is often contacted by whistleblowers wanting to make adifference. CMD has also researched the array of groups thatare part of ALEC, including numerous Koch-funded entitiesand national and state think tanks that are affiliatedwith the State Policy Network.

CMD files morethan 1,000 public information requests each year. Thisinvestigative watchdog work has broken through in thenational debate. For example, CMD exposed EPA AdministratorScott Pruitt's deep ties to the fossil fuel industry andrevealed lobbyist efforts to hide Chamber of Commercemembers overwhelming support for raising the minimum wageand providing paid sick leave, among other groundbreakinginvestigations.

CMDs work has been featuredin the New York Times, Washington Post, POLITICO, theGuardian, Bloomberg, WIRED, Vice, The Atlantic and Buzzfeedas well as on CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR, The DailyShow, and Last Week with John Oliver. We also partner withinvestigative writers at The Intercept and ProPublica topublish new reports and findings.

The fightto keep our democracy from becoming a plutocracy doesn'thave a scrappier warrior than the Center for Media andDemocracy. Bill Moyers

CMD's scrappycrew tracks the Koch Machine every day, shines a light oncorruption in our democracy, and takes politicians to courtwhen they try to hide their special-interest ties from thepublic. Robert Reich

...watchdoggroup that studie[s] the mechanics of politicalmanipulation." -- Jane Mayer, DarkMoney

[CMD's] requests are of federalimportance. -- Sens. Carper, Whitehouse, Merkley, Booker,Markey and Duckworth

How We ExposeCorruption

CMD puts a spotlight on hidden andunreported activities, forcing those trying to maneuveraround the edges of laws and ethics out of the shadows. Ouroriginal research digs deeper than the 24-hour news cycle toanswer and understand why and how special interests and darkmoney are reshaping American politics and elections. Ourteam focuses on documenting the facts and revealing theeffects on communities and people in areas ranging fromclimate change and education to workplace standards andfreedom of speech.

CMDs groundbreakingexposs are featured on ExposedbyCMD.org.The watchdog also publishes SourceWatch, an encyclopedia ofcorporations, corporate special interest groups and theirleaders; specialized investigative websites, includingALECExposed.org;and its founding website, PRWatch.org.

Awardsand Honors

CMDs investigations have beenrecognized for their excellence and impact. Our recentawards for investigative journalisminclude:

The Sidney Award from the SidneyHillman Foundation in 2018 for the expos Two Faces ofJanus.

The Izzy I.F. Stone Awardfor outstanding achievement in independent media (sharedwith Democracy Now! correspondent Sharif Abdel Kouddous)from the Park Center for Independent Media.

The Sidney Award (shared jointly with The Nation) from theSidney Hillman Foundation.

The annualProfessional Freedom and Responsibility Award from theAssociation for Education in Journalism and MassCommunication, Culture and Critical Studies Division, whosepast recipients include Izzy Stone, Bill Moyers, and MollyIvins.

The Benny from the BusinessEthics Network.

CMD has been honored by theMilwaukee Press Club for one of its investigations intoshadowy front groups influencing elections.

CMDs research was featured in Ava DuVernay's film The13th, which was nominated for a 2017 Academy Award forBest Documentary.

Ground-breaking books bywriters from the Center for Media and Democracyinclude:

Deadly Spin: An Insurance CompanyInsider Speaks Out on How Corporate PR Is Killing HealthCare and Deceiving Americans

Toxic SludgeIs Good For You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public RelationsIndustry

Trust Us, We're Experts: HowIndustry Manipulates Science and Gambles With YourFuture

Mad Cow USA

Weaponsof Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War onIraq

Banana Republicans: How the Right Wingis Turning America Into a One-party State

The Best War Ever: Lies, Damned Lies and the Mess inIraq

Governance

CMD was founded in1993 by John Stauber in Madison, Wisconsin. In March 2018,Arn Pearson became CMDs Executive Director, succeedingLisa Graves, who served as executive director from 2009-2018and currently serves as board President. CMDs teamincludes researchers, data experts, FOIA experts, lawyers,and fact-checkers. CMD is a 501(c)(3) tax-exemptnon-profit.

Board of Directors

Lisa Graves, Board President

DeborahBey

Ellen Braune

CosmoHarrigan

Jan Miyasaki

TedNace

Bo Yerxa

Arn Pearson,Ex-Officio BoardMember

Funding

The followingfoundations have provided at least one grant of $5,000 ormore to support the work of CMD since its inception in 1993.Those listed in bold are recent funders.

American Legacy Foundation

Bauman FamilyFoundation

CarethFoundation

CarolynFoundation

Changing Horizons CharitableTrust

CourtneysFoundation

CS Fund

DeerCreek Foundation

Educational Foundation ofAmerica

EttingerFoundation

Ford Foundation

Foundation for Deep Ecology

Foundation forPolitical Management

FundingExchange

Richard & Rhoda GoldmanFund

Grodzins Fund

HelenaRubinstein Foundation

HKHFoundation

LitowitzFoundation

MarislaFoundation

MostynFoundation

Open SocietyInstitute

Park Foundation

Public Welfare Foundation

ProteusFund

V. Kann RasmussenFoundation

RockefellerAssociates

Rockefeller FamilyFoundation

Rockwood Fund

Stern Family Fund

Schumann Center for Mediaand Democracy

SunlightFoundation

ThresholdFoundation

TidesFoundation

Town CreekFoundation

TurnerFoundation

Wallace GlobalFund

WinslowFoundation

Contributions from individuals andnon-profit organizations are accepted. We accept no grantsfrom government agencies or for-profit corporations, exceptfor CREDO, which makes donations to nonprofits based onvotes by its activists and customers.

CMD doesnot accept funding from for-profit corporations or grantsfrom government agencies. Learn how you can help support andexpand CMD's groundbreaking investigationshere.

Second is a crucial operationthat serves the Republican National Committee, the RNC (forlinks to sources, click onto the URL):

Read more:

Who The Democratic And Republican Party Censors Are, For The 'News' You See & Hear - Scoop.co.nz

Will Trump ban TikTok in the USA? – Vox.com

TikTok was never supposed to be political. When it launched in the US in 2018, the video app was marketed as a fun place to discover goofy content and experiment with its sophisticated editing software and vast music library. Yet nearly two years and 165 million nationwide downloads later, TikTok has been a platform for teachers strikes, QAnon conspiracy theories, Black Lives Matter protests, and a teen-led campaign to sabotage a Trump rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The TikTok algorithm is perfectly suited to spread political content faster and to a wider audience than any social media app in history, whether the company wants to admit it or not.

Now TikTok is proving itself to be political in a much broader way, one that challenges the very existence of the app. White House officials are talking seriously about attempting to ban it (how the government would choose to do so is less clear) in the wake of rising tensions with China, where TikToks parent company ByteDance is based.

There are two major factors at play when we talk about the risks TikToks ownership could potentially pose: data privacy and censorship. While the former is potentially easier to understand (the Equifax hack, where members of the Chinese military were charged with stealing the personal information of 145 million Americans, is perhaps the most famous example), the latter, which includes how TikTok instructs its moderators and changes its algorithm, could have more existential and more difficult-to-predict consequences for the US at large.

Will a ban actually happen? President Trumps chief of staff, Mark Meadows, said in July that a decision could come in weeks, not months. But the conversation is a lot more complicated than Is China stealing our data? although thats likely how the Trump White House would prefer to frame it. TikTok has become a straw man for fears over a serious competitor to Silicon Valley: If a generation of kids is synonymous with an app owned by China, what does that mean for Americas role in global technology?

Experts in cybersecurity and Chinese tech make it clear that the issue is not black and white, and that serious concerns about national security are likely rooted not in xenophobia but in the fact that the Communist Party of China (CCP) under President Xi Jinping has a track record of surveillance, censorship, and data theft. There are also those who warn that the US banning TikTok and other Chinese-owned apps could set a dangerous precedent for a less free and open internet ironically, the sort of internet modeled after that of China.

The governments interest in TikToks ties to China and its communist leadership stems from last fall, when Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Tom Cotton (R-AR) called for an investigation into the company. Their statements came after reports from the Guardian and the Washington Post revealed that TikTok had at one point instructed its moderators to censor videos considered sensitive by the Chinese government.

By November, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which investigates the potential national security implications of foreign acquisitions of US companies, announced that it would be reviewing ByteDances acquisition of Musical.ly, the app that would become TikTok. Meanwhile, TikTok has been steadfast in its claim that it does not send US user data to China and does not remove content sensitive to its government and would not if it were asked. Two Chinese intelligence laws from 2014 and 2017, however, require companies to assist with any government investigation and hand over all relevant data without refusal.

In a statement to Vox, a TikTok spokesperson wrote:

Protecting the privacy of our users data is of the utmost importance to TikTok. Theres a lot of misinformation about TikTok right now. The reality is that the TikTok app isnt even available in China. TikTok is led by an American CEO, with hundreds of employees and key leaders across safety, security, product, and public policy in the U.S. TikTok stores U.S. user data in Virginia, with backup in Singapore, and we work to minimize access across regions. We welcome conversations with lawmakers who want to understand our company. Were building a team here in Washington, D.C. so lawmakers and experts can come to us with questions or concerns. We know that actions speak louder than words, which is why were opening Transparency Centers in LA and DC so that lawmakers and invited experts can see for themselves how we moderate content and keep our users data secure.

In early July, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Fox News that the US was considering a TikTok ban after months of rising tensions with China and a ban of more than 50 Chinese apps including TikTok in India the week prior. Since then, TikTok users have been panicking over the potential loss of the internets greatest time waster; the Senate just advanced a bill to ban TikTok from all government devices. Facebook, too, is closing in: The company announced it will launch its copycat product, Instagram Reels, in the US in August.

Banning TikTok isnt as straightforward as it may sound in a country built upon the First Amendment, but there are several ways it could take place. The first is that CFIUS could force ByteDance to sell off TikTok to a US-owned company by determining it a national security risk (thats what happened to Grindr after it was sold to a Chinese company). Another is that it could put TikTok on whats called the entity list so that US companies like Apple and Google would be forced to remove it from their app stores. Adi Robertson at The Verge has a thorough examination of all these possibilities, but lets get to the real issue at play.

The case for banning TikTok, for many cybersecurity professionals, is relatively simple: The risk is simply too great, no matter how wonderful the content on the app may be. Kiersten Todt, managing director of the Cyber Readiness Institute, says that despite what TikTok claims, If the Chinese government wanted that data, they would be able to get that data.

While that may not scare the apps large user base of teenagers who are pretty sure the Chinese government doesnt care about their scrolling habits, Todt says its possible China could be building dossiers on high-profile individuals, including information like passwords, bank accounts, internet addresses, or geolocation, all of which could then be cross-referenced with even more personal data on other apps.

Ive been in the national security space for a couple of decades, and there is decades worth of evidence and data around Chinese interest, intent, and capability to hack the US, whether thats through intellectual property or through data theft, Todt says. The Chinese government hacked the broadest database of personnel in the US government. Theyre the only ones who have done that.

Todts other concern relates to Chinas role in the global tech wars at large. Artificial intelligence is only as good as the data that goes into it, and so if China continues to collect all of this data from populations around the world, its artificial intelligence has a lot more data input into it. How might it aggregate that data for the purposes of innovation, research and development and science? she asks. That can sound xenophobic, but it is a national security statement, just as we are cautious about Russia and Iran and North Korea for different reasons.

There are other arguments for banning TikTok, ones that relate to moderation and censorship. I find the data privacy issue to be a bit of a red herring, says Jordan Schneider, host of the ChinaTalk podcast and newsletter. The Chinese government has many likely more impactful ways of getting blackmail or corporate secrets or just general information about individual US nationals.

Instead, Schneider argues that the problem is the Chinese Communist Partys potential ability to influence conversation about politics on the app. People today are very concerned about the amount of power [Facebooks] Mark Zuckerberg has to value one type of speech over another or impacting elections by tweaking the algorithms and end up changing peoples opinions on certain things. So imagine if someone with the equivalent of Mark Zuckerbergs level of power over the US has no choice but to do what the CCP wants it to do? My sense is that is the case with ByteDance. He uses recent examples of Chinese disinformation campaigns on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube around topics like the Hong Kong protests and Taiwanese independence.

I think theyve probably learned the lesson of 2016, which is that Russia can interfere in elections and basically get away with it, he says. What might that look like? For the average TikTok user, it wont really look like anything. You can just push certain videos more than others, and theres no open API to double-check these things, Schneider says. At the end of the day, the Chinese government clearly has the leverage to push ByteDance to do this sort of thing, and would honestly be dumb not to, because the prize is enormous, which is the ability to influence who the next president of the United States is.

It would be easy to leave it there, but Samm Sacks, a senior cybersecurity policy fellow at Yale Law Schools Paul Tsai China Center and New America who has testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee, warns against conflating Chinese tech companies with the CCP. There is much more of a push and pull in that relationship there, particularly around the security services access to private data, she says.

Plus, she argues that the incentive to censor content and steal user data is worth less than owning one of the worlds most important global tech companies. TikTok was intended to thrive and fly on its own overseas, and so its not necessarily in the Chinese government or ByteDances interest to set up the company to be secretly beholden to Beijing. Theres a commercial incentive at play that I think we have to take into account.

TikTok has, for many people in American politics and tech, become an existential threat that no amount of distancing itself from China building headquarters in the US and London, hiring a former Disney executive as its CEO will undermine. TikToks terms of use and black box algorithm are virtually identical to Facebooks policies, but its success has foreshadowed a potential end to Silicon Valleys dominance. Unspoken in many tech executives dismissal of TikTok is protectionism and, arguably, xenophobia.

Should the US government ban TikTok, Sacks says, it would be an important step toward the US government controlling the way that Americans use the internet, which is ironically a step toward Beijings own cyber-sovereignty, the very thing weve been railing against for years.

It also would likely be against the USs commercial interests. It offers a blueprint for others around the world to think, Maybe we dont trust the way that Silicon Valley companies are handling our data, so lets just ban them, too, she says. Were already starting to see the rise of digital sovereignty in Europe and in India in these really important markets, and when we think about the so-called tech competition with China, particularly with artificial intelligence and machine learning, what is it thats going to give US companies an edge? Its access to large international data sets. If we are increasingly closed out of markets around the world and access to that data because weve helped create a blueprint for how to do it with China, I could see those same tools turned around on us.

Instead, Sacks has called for a comprehensive federal data privacy law that would be applied to all platforms, not just Chinese-owned ones, that would create standards for better data security, algorithmic transparency, and better management of online content. All of the things that I think were using is China as a foil and saying, That company is a threat, lets stamp them out, [could be dealt with by] developing our own vision for how we want to govern the internet in a more democratic, secure way, she says.

China aside, a TikTok ban would have serious effects on American youth culture, where hundreds of teenagers have now built massive followings and spread important political messaging on an app that allowed them to reach huge audiences. Its changed not only the experience of being online but the experience of being a young person.

TikTok has serious flaws conspiracy theories in particular, some related to QAnon, Pizzagate, and the coronavirus, have thrived unchecked on the app but theres still no evidence that the Chinese government has anything to do with any of those. Would setting a precedent against any one Chinese-owned tech company solve the immediate issues that affect American social media users, namely misinformation, content moderation, and transparency? Or would it allow Silicon Valley companies like Facebook to continue to mimic competitors software and grow ever larger and more powerful? Its now in the hands of the government to decide.

Get our newsletter in your inbox twice a week.

Support Voxs explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Voxs work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Follow this link:

Will Trump ban TikTok in the USA? - Vox.com

We need to take back control of the internet – Spiked

Theresa Mays online harms agenda made a comeback this week. A new select-committee report tries to capitalise on widespread fear of the coronavirus in order to advance this censorious programme, which was not expected to be implemented until 2023. A barely noticed Ofcom report released last week is even more concerning. It lays out how parts of this controversial online-harms project are to be snuck into UK law indefinitely via an EU directive in just a few weeks time.

How we got here is important. And it demonstrates exactly why we were right to vote to leave the anti-democratic EU and why our illiberal elite was so in favour of it the EU allows politicians to implement their often unpopular agendas without public scrutiny.

The Online Harms Bill was unveiled by Therea May’s Conservative government in April last year in a panicked flurry after 14-year-old Molly Russell tragically killed herself after viewing online images of self-harm. The rushed proposals included a duty of care on tech firms and a regulator with the power to issue heavy fines to platforms which do not censor sufficiently. Initially, these harms included trolling and disinformation. The definition of harm was kept deliberately vague and expansive so that it could include new threats as they emerge. The dangers of these proposals for internet freedom have been pointed out before on spiked. And there is still a very real danger of mass censorship and the end of an open internet.

Julian Knight MP, chair of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Select Committee, which is behind the recent demands, insisted on Tuesday that the government get on with the world-leading legislation on social media that weve long been promised. His latest report discusses much more than self-harm videos. It calls for censorious action on anti-5G and anti-vaccination conspiracy theories, bigoted attacks on Asians linked to the virus, and, of course, Russian bots.

The report was, conveniently, released on the same day the Intelligence and Security Committee published its long-awaited report into Russian interference in British democracy. The calls for mass censorship were placed in a context of alleged attacks by the Kremlin. According to Knight, the proliferation of dangerous claims about Covid-19 has been unstoppable and without due weight of the law, social-media companies have no incentive to silence people.

Mays government published the initial Online Harms White Paper the month before I broke the news that it was to delay the unenforceable Internet Age Verification System (or Porn Block Law, as we called it at the tabloids). The age-verification policy was officially abandoned a few months later. Perhaps mistakenly, some of us had hoped this would lead Boris Johnson to take a more liberal approach than his authoritarian predecessor and that he would drop the online-harms agenda outright. But then, in October, culture secretary Nicky Morgan told parliament that online-harms legislation would, in fact, be pursued because of the failure of the porn-block law.

Meanwhile, Damian Collins, one of the agendas loudest proponents, was ousted as chairman of the DCMS Committee in favour of Julian Knight, shortly after Boriss re-election.

Now that Collins will no longer play a role in overseeing any official arbiter of truth online as some have framed the online-harms agenda he has recently set up an unofficial arbiter of truth. He is the founder of an independent, expert fact-checking service for coronavirus called Infotagion. Lord Puttnam, the chair of the Lords Democracy and Digital Technologies Committee, who made similar calls to rush through the online-harms agenda in June, is another founder. Infotagion answers questions like, Is the Illuminati behind the coronavirus? and Is the Covid-19 lockdown intended to create a police state? with answers such as, FALSE: DO NOT SHARE Lockdown measures are to reduce social contact to slow the spread of Covid-19. Collins and Co clearly do not have much faith in the intelligence of the electorate.

So who do they want to put in charge of regulating social media? The DCMS committee has given some hint in a previous report on fake news. It called on the government to use Ofcoms broadcast-regulation powers, including rules relating to accuracy and impartiality as a basis for setting standards for online content. In other words, they want our tweets, posts and YouTube videos to be controlled and mediated in a similar way to Sky News and the BBC.

And it looks like they are going to get their way. Ofcom revealed last week that it is pushing ahead with plans to regulate all UK-based video-sharing platforms. It will introduce interim measures, based on the Online Harms White Paper, to ensure the UK complies with the little-known EU-wide Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Ofcom put out a Call For Evidence on 16 July to help it finalise guidance, in which it described how it will enforce appropriate measures to protect young people from potentially harmful content and all users from illegal content and incitement to hatred and violence.

In other words, a form of the online-harms agenda pertaining to video at least has been foisted on the UK via the EU. Despite Brexit. And it will be enforced in autumn by Ofcom, just as censorious hardliners like Collins and the DCMS committee have demanded. Ofcom was chosen to do this because, according to last weeks report, the government concluded that the Online Harms White Paper process would not be completed in time before the EUs transposition deadline of autumn 2020 and before the UK fully leaves the Brexit transition period.

Outrageously, the directive will be made law in the UK in just a few weeks, with no serious parliamentary or public debate. And it will remain law after the transition period ends a few months later because all EU regulations will automatically be brought into domestic law. Ofcom adds that it will continue to work with EU bodies, which the UK will have no influence over, to enforce it and protect children from hate and content which could impair their moral development whatever that means.

Ofcom is completely unsuitable for this job. Social media is more like a town-hall meeting than a television broadcast. Normal people speaking online and in videos should not be regulated like broadcasters (which are already overregulated). And they should certainly not have to apologise or face punishment when they are wrong or one-sided.

One journalist covering the report suggested that the recent Darren Grimes interview with David Starkey, which contained a racist remark, would be the type of content which could be reported and even censored by Ofcom. However, that particular exchange was shown on YouTube and because YouTube is owned by Google and headquartered in Ireland, the video would, in fact, be regulated by an Irish body. Bizarrely, content made in Britain for a British audience could be censored by another EU state according to this interpretation of EU law. The platforms likely to come under UK jurisdiction are Twitch, TikTok, LiveLeak, Imgur, Vimeo and Snapchat, according to Ofcom.

Its hard to know what to make of this complex web of control and restriction. But self-harm videos are already dealt with by existing laws. And contrary to claims made by Knight and the DCMS committee, there is already too much censorship of online commentary about the Covid virus of everyone from journalists to scientists. Rather than a regulated internet, a free and open internet is needed more than ever. Rebel voices are essential in science. They are even more valuable in this era of mass conformism and should not be silenced because they go against the grain of establishment orthodoxy.

Unfortunately, the censors are winning. Social media and video platforms abandoned the principles of free speech some time ago, when they started deleting speech they considered hateful. Now, during the pandemic, they appear to have fully abandoned the principles of open inquiry and scientific method, too. They now routinely delete things they label misleading, removing the right to be wrong and presupposing that moderators know more than scientists who happen to be in a minority. The European Commission has unsurprisingly been pushing this agenda, meeting with the tech firms behind closed doors and forcing them to sign a new code of conduct and a pledge to remove fake news.

After Brexit, it should be, finally, time for our parliament and our people to have a say about what legislation and rules should govern our internet. Boris Johnson should repeal the EU version of the online-harms agenda and abandon the plan to implement the May governments proposals. After an initial backlash to those last year, the government insisted it would not force the blocking or deletion of legal content. It also gave some vague assurances to protect free speech. We must keep the pressure on and make sure this latest coup doesnt go unopposed.

Liam Deacon is the Brexit Partys former head of press.

Picture by: Getty.

To enquire about republishing spikeds content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

See the article here:

We need to take back control of the internet - Spiked