Treat Yo Self to the (Fake) Leaked Parks and Recreation Reunion Special – Phoenix New Times

Last Thursday, NBC announced it'll be doing a reunion episode of Parks and Recreation this Thursday, April 30,to benefit Feeding America'sCOVID-19 Response Fund.

Thanks to an inside source (who is 100 percent not Chris Pratt's dog baptizer), wewereable to get our hands on a leaked script of the special. It is WILD. (Editor's note: This is a parody, so read on.)

If you want to know all the nitty-gritty deets about the special, read on as we break down the scripts with this detailed recap. It is nothing but spoilers (not really), so don't put us on your list because we ruined things for you.

We begin with a cold open. Tom struts into the office, wearing a floor-length chenille parka. Except for Donna, nobody pays it any mind. Enraged that his sweet fit isnt getting the respect it deserves, Tom vows to turn the streets of Pawnee into his own personal runway.

People will be lining up around the block to give me high-fives when they see this, he shouts as he storms out. He comes back an hour later: It was a hit! I touched so many people both literally and poetically, like Babyface!

Two Days Later...

Perd Hapley announces that there are over 400 cases of COVID-19 in Pawnee. Nobody knows how the disease spread so quickly, but the town is in a panic.

Leslie fully activates her centrist Democrat powers and vows to beat this virus with 100 plans, 1,000 action items, across-the-aisle cooperation, and a little American can-do spirit. She convinces the city council to pass a stay-at-home order and close all nonessential businesses.

Unfortunately, everybody in town is written to be raving morons (like always) and wont cooperate. Ron Swanson is infuriated at this government overreach and vows to stay out of his house at all times. He walks within two feet of everybody else, shakes every hand within his reach, and makes a point to cough on any vegetables he sees.

Tom, feeling a little unwell but seeing a business opportunity, takes a meeting with Dennis Feinstein and pitches him on partnering up to produce a line of designer hazmat suits. Dennis instead convinces Tom to invest in Feinsteins Hand Xani: hand sanitizer that is 10 percent aloe vera and the remainder as liquid Xanax. Everybody coughs on Jerrys desk and touch it constantly because they're monsters.

Ann Perkins, the only useful person on this show, does what she can to fight the pandemic by pulling in extra shifts at the hospital.

Worried about his immune system being compromised, Chris orders a stillsuit that converts his waste into sanitizer. Ben tries to help Leslie sell her plan to the town by appearing on Joans talk show, but instead flies into a rage and ends up punching out Joan when she says that R.E.M. sucks. Andy, watching the show with a giggling April, mutters, Its not like it can get any worse, babe.

One Week Later...

Chaos reigns in Pawnee. Over 3,000 Pawneans are dead from COVID-19. Ron buries stashes of toilet paper around town. Tom dies after overdosing on Dennis Feinsteins Hand Xani and posthumously treats himself to being buried in a Gucci body bag. Due to Leslies stay-at-home orders, nobody attends his funeral except for Jean-Ralphio and DJ Roomba. Tears in his eyes, Jean-Ralphio empties a bottle of Snake Juice on Toms grave while Roomba plays Flo Rida.

April and Andy both get the virus. April seems to become even more dark and evil while Andy gets his brain super-sized and starts getting smarter.Chris has a plastic bubble built around him and his Peloton to protect his microchip from being compromised.

Ben scrambles to stop Sweetums from releasing a line of edible face masks while Leslie, in full-on crisis mode, produces a 2,000 page color-coded manual on stopping the pandemic. Nobody reads it.

Everyone in the office continues coughing, spitting, licking, and rubbing themselves all over Jerrys desk. He bears this constant, life-threatening germ warfare with good humor. Ann is too busy fighting the disease and helping people to waste her time with a B plot.Leslie, who is desperate for guidance, prays to Nancy Pelosi late at night. The silence of Nancy, like the silence of a merciful God, is deafening.

One month later.

A quarter of Pawnee is on fire. Eagletonians, realizing that their plan to literally throw money at sick people is failing, take refuge in Pawnee.

Diane and the girls are dead. Ron, broken and in the depths of despair, dyes his mustache black. After her beloved Mercedes gets infected, Donna empties a full clip into the engine and falls on top of the hood. She stains the pristine paint job with her tears. Ben receives a used Letters From Cleo CD in the mail and forgets to disinfect it. Leslie visits him every day in the hospital as he succumbs.

A guilt-ridden Ron, upset that his individualist beliefs doomed the town and destroyed all the people he loved, attempts to hang himself. However, the chair he stands, with its shabby craftsmanship, cant hold his weight. He weeps and begs God to take him.

Ben is dead. A numb and devastated Leslie leaves the hospital, leaving Ann behind, and walks down the burning streets. She finds Ron asleep outside a furniture store and lies down next to him. She dreams about a shirtless John McCain riding across the sky on a pale horse.

In the midst of all this, Andy has become a super genius. He has built a beer helmet that lets him talk to Bandit. He tries to get Mouserat back together, but the rest of the band are dead

Mark Brendanawicz returns to Pawnee as part of an emergency team sent by the federal government. Orrin, doing an archery recital for April and Andy, fires an arrow out the window and accidentally kills Mark. Nobody notices or cares.

Leslie returns home and is shocked to find Ben waiting for her. He reveals that hes Ben-Prime, a Ben from an alternate timeline who created a board game so complex, it opened a rift in the space-time continuum. Other Bens appear in the house from other timelines. The sight of them destroys Leslies fragile psyche.

The episode ends with a cut back to Chriss office. Traeger, injecting apple cider vinegar into his toes, notices theres a small rip inside his bubble. He screams in horror as the bubble collapses around him.

"The microchip," he shouts.

TO BE CONTINUED

We jump 10 years into the future.The U.S. government, desperate to prevent the Pawnee death-clap from spreading across the rest of the world, has dropped a giant dome on top of Pawnee and Eagleton. Chris Traeger, driven insane after catching a common cold, has transformed himself into a Randall Flagg-style satanic despot and rules "Plaguee" with an iron fist.

April, thanks to years of overbearing mentorship from Leslie, has become Chriss trusted aide-de-camp. She spends her days cheerfully typing up death lists for Chris to approve. April is jubilant every day now. Thats how bad things have gotten under the dome.

Opposing the dark lord Traeger is an underground resistance led by Jerry and Ann Perkins. Jerry is now a fearsome robo-warrior who crushes enemy skulls. Ann, still the only useful person in the hellscape, is hard at work developing a vaccine.

Leslie has retreated into alcoholism. A still-mournful Ron, refusing to be a joiner, hides inside the bunker and bides his time. Hopelessly addicted to snorting luxury shoe polish, Jean-Ralphio secretly leaks information about the resistance to Kyle, Chriss reluctant lackey.

Thanks to Ben-Primes time-shattering board game, more and more Bens continue to enter this reality and have become the new dumb and angry population of Plaguee. A Benleads a brutal attack on the resistance base. Leslie is taken prisoner while Donna goes down guns blazing. In her dying moments, she sees her 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML350 flashing its high beams down at her from Heaven.

In their darkest hour, the resistance is saved by Andy Dwyer, who has gotten so smart that hes figured out a plan to stop Chris and has come up with a way of sending all the Bens back to their original timelines. Ann sends Leslie to recruit Ron for a suicide mission: assassinating Chris Traeger by force-feeding him a double-patty bacon Angus slider.

Everything converges back at City Hall for the climax. Jerry rips out Kyles spine (after apologizing profusely), andApril kills Jerry by putting a spider in his inhaler. Ron succeeds in feeding Chris the burger, but dies from getting grazed by a tofu-laced bullet. His redeemed soul is borne aloft to Paradise by a heavenly host of angelic Tammies. At last, he can be with Diane and the girls!

Leslie, the newly elected president of Plaguee, sees that nobodys done any paperwork in the last 10 years and sobs uncontrollably on her John McCain body pillow.

Ann and Andy are both moments away from succeeding in making a vaccine when disaster strikes. Someone wheels an idol of Zorp the Surveyor into the town square in a shopping cart, claiming they found it in the woods. The idol is actually a nuclear bomb that Ron bought from a suspicious Russian at a woodcarving convention. The bomb goes off, instantly killing everyone in Pawnee and Eagleton.

Adult superstar Brandi Maxxx, who got the hell out of Pawnee long before the dome went down, watches all this happen on TV. The disintegration of Pawnee and Eagleton is the nations most popular reality show. She is now the only Pawnee citizen left.

Fade to black.

Ben-Prime returns to his timeline. He and Leslie are getting ready to move out of Pawnee. He tenderly embraces his wife. The camera pulls away from the couple and zeroes in on the TV in the living room. Hapley is on the air, positive and professional as always, reporting that Pawnee just got its first confirmed COVID-19 case. Cut to Andy making an OH MY GAWD face.

The end.

Follow this link:

Treat Yo Self to the (Fake) Leaked Parks and Recreation Reunion Special - Phoenix New Times

I Called Out A Sun Columnist For Spreading A COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory, And She Did Not Take It Well – CANADALAND

Saturday began as a day like any other for me: I woke up, poured myself a pot of coffee, and opened up Twitter to discover that I was a propagandist for the Chinese Communist government.

It turned out that Toronto Sun scribe Candice Malcolms weekly column was, in part, about me.

Dont let anyone stop you from asking tough questions about China, the headline read, and I was one of those supposedly standing in the way of her quest for Sino-justice.

Malcolm wrote that, in January, she had taken to her podcast and raised questions about the link between the new coronavirus and Chinas lone biosafety level-4 laboratory, but as has become a sad sign of our times, agenda-driven journalists quickly attempted to discredit these questions.

Canadian freelance writer Justin Ling wrote a post for Foreign Policy regurgitating Chinese propaganda that implied I and others were spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories by bringing up these questions.

The column, which ran across the country, is part of Malcolms attempt to rewrite her own corner of history, to make herself look like the Nostradamus of the Sun. Judging by some of the emails in my inbox, people are buying it.

Malcolm wrote that the theory that COVID-19 leaked from a Chinese laboratory is looking more credible with each passing day.

Which is, to begin with, not really accurate. But, for Malcolm, an occasional Rebel Media guest and former contributor, the theory has to be true. She, after all, predicted it! Or so she implies in the column.

On the January 27 edition of her YouTube show, Malcolm asked her 4,901 viewers: Why isnt the mainstream media talking about the origin of this deadly virus? Could it be linked to Chinas biological warfare program?

She later introduces the story by saying she noticed this story in The Washington Times over the weekend.

First off: Why is Candice Malcolm reading The Washington Times? Many have a habit for confusing the Times with the conservative-but-still-reputable Washington Examiner. They are very different. The Times has a long history of running junk race science and publishing literal white-supremacist writers, is virulently Islamophobic, has run stories contributing to the Seth Rich conspiracy theory, and was a major proponent of the Barack Obama birther movement.

The story Malcolm referred to reported that COVID-19 may have originated from a covert biological weapons program, citing an Israeli biological warfare analyst.

Reading the whole story, it is immediately clear that the only evidence for this theory was a very vague quote from that analyst, Dany Shoham. (The full quote: Certain laboratories in the institute have probably been engaged, in terms of research and development, in Chinese [biological weapons], at least collaterally, yet not as a principal facility of the Chinese BW alignment.)

Malcolm read out an excerpt from the story, adding we dont know anything, and Im not going to speculate, but Im just saying that, you know, an expert who knows what hes talking about is linking this.

That sort of speculation is not helpful, its dangerous. It is not asking hard-hitting questions in the name of the truth, its being duped by a conspiracy rag and repeating it verbatim. Even the Times later appended an editors note to its story, conceding that COVID-19 does not show signs of having been manufactured or purposefully manipulated in a lab.

Around then, I wrote a piece for Foreign Policy, speaking to actual epidemiologists, and debunking the claim that COVID-19 was a lab-made bioweapon. I cited Malcolms bonkers YouTube show, and fellow Sun columnist Tarek Fatahs sharing of an even more absurd conspiracy theory, as evidence that quasi-mainstream figures were spreading misinformation. I even did a followup when the theory was amplified by noted conspiracy- and Russian-propaganda-peddling website ZeroHedge.

The nugget of truth in the theory is that there is, in fact, a highly-secure government lab in Wuhan which handles highly infectious viruses, like Ebola and some strains of coronavirus.

It is not, however, a military lab, nor does it research germ warfare. The lab works to prevent and cure infectious diseases we can say this pretty confidently because it works with an equivalent lab in Canada, and American health officials have toured the lab on multiple occasions. China, undoubtedly, researches biological weapons, but it would not allow American teams into such a site.

In recent weeks, it has become clear that the lab was cited for lax security standards as recently as two years ago. Those revelations appear to have sparked interest from the White House.

Last week, Fox News wrote that there is increasing confidence that the COVID-19 outbreak likely originated in a Wuhan laboratory, though not as a bioweapon but as part of Chinas attempt to demonstrate that its efforts to identify and combat viruses are equal to or greater than the capabilities of the United States.

Despite that apparent confidence level, Fox didnt actually cite any evidence for the theory, simply attributing it to multiple sources who have been briefed on the details of early actions by Chinas government and seen relevant materials. The story does quote U.S. General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who when asked about the possibility of the virus beginning in a Chinese lab and maybe having been released accidentally, said, The weight of evidence seems to indicate natural [origin]. A full-scale investigation has since been ordered.

Peer-reviewed research, published in the journal Nature, has pretty definitively concluded that COVID-19 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.

This news does not in fact back up Malcolms musings from January. Nor have I, or most other journalists working on this story, ruled out the possibility that this was in fact some horrible lab accident.

Nevertheless, Malcolm used her YouTube channel to take a victory lap, declaring that its important that fake-news journalists like Justin Ling at Foreign Policy be called out for their dishonesty.Justin Lings column for Foreign Policy is fake news, and it should be taken down immediately.

She then echoed the message from her perch in the Toronto, Ottawa, Winnipeg, Calgary, and EdmontonSuns.

Anyone who raised questions about the link between the new coronavirus and Chinas lone biosafety level-4 laboratory located in the same city were attacked and maligned, including myself, she wrote.

While Malcolm might want to believe its all true, there is still no hard evidence for this theory, let alone the explanation she offered in January.

And, look, this isnt my first rodeo. Infowars readers giving me the gears for not ascribing to their string-corkboard theories is pretty much a daily occurrence. Most of them, however, do not have a dedicated Saturday column in a national newspaper chain. (While our data is about five years old, the Sun chain used to boast a print circulation of around 250,000 copies on Saturdays.)

I contacted the Sun to write a rebuttal to Malcolms claims, but was immediately turned down by editor Anthony Furey.

The Sun has been a vector for this sort of irresponsible misinformation for some time. Underneath it is a pretty serious set of ethical problems.

Malcolm is both a weekend columnist for the Sun and the founder of True North Canada, a think tank and media outlet. It is also a registered charity, under the name True North Centre for Public Policy.

She actually inherited the charitable registration from a group whose stated mission was to provide support and assistance to UK immigrants coming to British Columbia, which had brought in just a few hundred dollars in donations a year.

True North now reports an income of $500,000 more than half coming from donations, and about a third coming as gifts from other registered charities. The source of True Norths income isnt clear, but PressProgress has reported that $18,000 came from a charity linked to a long-time Conservative donor.

Also on the True North team as a fellow is Furey, Malcolms editor at the Sun.

That potential conflict aside, the Sun has let its already-lax standards slide for some time.

Trying to undercut trust in the mainstream press in favour of Malcolms brand of nonsense, especially at a time of national crisis, is playing with fire. If we dont keep some level of trust in our institutions right now, the effectiveness of our response to this pandemic is going to be severely weakened.

Whats more, buying into whatever conspiracy theory we find on the internet that matches our worldview is giving a free pass to Chinas actual crimes.

Beijing runs a brutal, repressive regime. It has built a rickety empire through exploiting its own workers and keeping them in check through a surveillance regime which they perfected via treatment of religious minorities. It seems fairly obvious now that Beijing has also tried to cover up the early days of the COVID-19 outbreak, potentially robbing the world of crucial time to prepare.

Given all the ways in which we know Xi Jinpings China is dangerous to its own citizens and others, why would we play fantasy?

After the 2003 SARS outbreak, shoddy Russian research helped spark a conspiracy theory in China that the virus was a biological weapon developed by the Americans. China has tried to do the same thing this time.

There is plenty of blame to be directed at China, both in their response to COVID-19 and on their human rights record. We dont need to cling to unproven theories to hold them to account and we certainly dont need to start inventing them.

Justin Ling is a freelance journalist who writes for everybody.

I think you should be getting our newsletter

Get a weekly note from David about our top stories.

This is a good thing that we do. You'll like this.

Go here to read the rest:

I Called Out A Sun Columnist For Spreading A COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory, And She Did Not Take It Well - CANADALAND

I’m Native and Disabled. The US Government Is Sacrificing My People. – Truthout

Sequestered away in my apartment in Washington, D.C., I listen to the sounds of construction outside my window. Despite stay-at-home orders and closures of non-essential businesses, the construction bringing gentrification and overpriced apartment buildings most D.C. residents cant afford continues on. Its a beautiful sunny day and Id like to be anywhere but at my computer right now.

Im multiply disabled and chronically ill with several of the underlying health conditions that make me vulnerable to COVID-19. For the sake of my life and all others I come in contact with Im staying home. However, the vulnerabilities that put my life in jeopardy under this pandemic arent simply the fear of contracting the virus. Im vulnerable during this time partially due to the lack of disability resources and access to my regular medical care. Even if I manage to avoid contracting COVID-19 I could still very well die due to this pandemic.

All of my regular medical care, including pain management, is canceled for the foreseeable future. My pain levels are rising with every day. Soon I may not be able to work or pay my bills. Not only is this a financial hardship, but it could mean one less media professional to cover the stories of my hyper-erased and misrepresented communities. Not only am I disabled and chronically ill, but Im also bisexual, Two Spirit and a citizen of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. I spend a great deal of my time just trying to get people to understand that all of my communities are real and exist. While I dont want to be one of the very few journalists in my communities, it is the reality. It infuriates me that our stories could further go unheard.

Get Truthouts daily edition delivered to your inbox.

Coupled with the lack of resources pre-pandemic, the crisis has put me at a real risk of losing my home health aide. In 2019 the D.C. government significantly reduced and kicked many people off of the local home health aide program. Many of us, myself included, were already in the midst of filing appeals and suing the government to keep our aides. Now with COVID-19, more of us are losing our aides because they either cant or wont come to work, and the D.C. and federal governments are doing nothing to rectify this situation. The average home health aide in D.C. earns between $11-16 hourly. Benefits are few and far between. Most of the aides are womxn of color and immigrants. The work they do isnt valued because disabled and ill peoples lives, along with elders lives, arent valued.

As public transit has been significantly reduced, many aides are unable to get to their patients homes, and alternate, affordable means of transportation have not been provided to them. My aide and I are paying out of our pockets so she can take rideshares and cabs to my home. Neither of us has this kind of money, but its whats now necessary. With the closures of public schools, many are without their free or low-cost childcare, creating yet another barrier to work. Personal protective equipment (PPE) and information on COVID-19 arent available to many aides either. The agency my aide works for hasnt given out any information to the aides on the pandemic and how to keep themselves and their patients safer. Nor has it given out hand sanitizer or wipes. It only began giving extra gloves and giving the aides one mask each about two weeks ago. When Ive spoken with my case manager and the agency, Ive been told, We cant make people work. This is true, but what they and the government more broadly should be doing is providing health care workers with the supports they need to do their jobs with lower risks to their well-being and that of their patients.

Discrimination and a lack of resources are going unchecked. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and the city council have done little to ensure people such as myself are cared for during this time. The aides arent receiving any additional paid sick leave, hazard pay, nor are their increased expenses being covered.

Access to food for disabled and ill people is an issue. Just this week while attempting to shop at a Trader Joes, I was denied use of an elevator and told that despite being disabled I still had to stand in line to enter the store. Most of the grocery stores in D.C. arent offering special shopping hours for those of us who are vulnerable but arent elders, putting us in the position to either go hungry or risk our lives to grocery shop. Delivery services are often more expensive than shopping in the stores, and they dont all accept SNAP, creating another barrier for many disabled people. Buses, when theyre even running, are only opening the front doors for those who are visibly disabled or elders, but as roughly half the disabled people in the U.S. have invisible disabilities, this has created larger access barriers. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority paratransit program, which is the only way some disabled people are able to get around, has suspended all evaluation processes, leaving some disabled people without paratransit.

Disabled people are more likely to live in poverty and suffer from higher rates of houselessness than the abled. This is partially because employment is difficult for many of us to obtain and keep. Ive had several employment situations where I was denied my federally protected right to reasonable accommodations, such as working from home. I was repeatedly told its not doable, so Ive stayed in poverty even when I was physically able to work full time. Its rather ironic that the universities and other workplaces that have refused to make accommodations for me are now offering these same accommodations widespread to the abled and healthy. I sincerely hope that those of us that come out the other side of COVID-19 have the opportunity to sue employers, institutions of learning and the governmental bodies that are have denied us our federally protected rights.

Compounding my fears are the projections that the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area could become one of the next hotspots, with our peak cases anticipated to possibly hit in late June or early July. I worry that the photos of mass graves being dug for the excess bodies in New York City could become a reality here.

By the time this is all said and done, most of us in the U.S. will know at least one person that contracted COVID-19; many of us will know people whove died from it. As I confront this reality, I think of my communities with deep concern. The Native population only recently grew to 2 percent of the total U.S. population. While this number is small, its significant and represents how were rebounding from over 500 years of genocide, but now we have to worry again about entire tribes ceasing to exist. Indigenous people were already suffering multiple crises pre-coronavirus. Despite the federal governments trust and treaty responsibility, our Native health care system is the worst in the country. The Indian Health Service (IHS) is grossly underfunded, understaffed and without many of the resources even the most bare-bones of medical facilities have. Its also important to note that Native people have the highest rates of disabilities and illnesses in the U.S.

Funding streams and access to supplies have been grossly less than what our tribal leaders have requested or theyve been flat out denied. Many health care facilities that serve Native communities are without COVID-19 tests and the labs to process them. The numbers of confirmed cases and deaths in IHS system continue to grow rapidly. The Navajo Nation has had as many confirmed COVID-19 deaths as thirteen states combined. A lack of accurate data collection, however, doesnt reflect the true rates of contraction and death. Seventy-one percent of Natives are urban based, but our ethnicity often isnt accurately counted in non-Native health care. Despite repeatedly checking American Indian on health forms, throughout my life, Ive often found that Im listed as white in my medical records. The numbers from IHS also dont include the number of cases in tribal-run and urban Indian health centers. Im terrified at what this all means for my communities especially as we now face state economies being reopened. Frankly, Im pissed off that I, and my loved ones, could die due to preventable causes.

Its becoming more difficult for me to maintain my composure every time I leave my home and see people without their faces covered or taking any precautions such as social distancing.

The lack of access to medical care is also further setting us up for eugenics and even genocide. Determinations of whos socially useful and therefore worthy of medical care exclude the vast majority of my community members and many other marginalized people. Our lives are deemed worthless in the best of times, so its not surprising that were deemed unworthy of care during a pandemic. The only real chance I have in being deemed socially useful is that I have the privilege of a graduate education, am a journalist and not an elder. Many of my people arent that fortunate.

The weight of historical and intergenerational trauma from the government restricting Native peoples movement and germ warfare are a heavy burden Im carrying. It wasnt so very long ago that Native people werent allowed to leave reservations without the white mans permission. Pandemics and germ warfare have been used to kill us, and there are signs that this could happen again. Some white supremacists have been reported encouraging each other to go into Indigenous, people of color, and Jewish spaces to cough on us and spread COVID-19 in the hopes that well die. This is a modern-day version of smallpox blankets that were used to solve the Indian problem.

Every day is a struggle to remain hopeful and to continue fighting to live. Since the stay-at-home orders and rising numbers of cases and deaths, Ive had days when my depression has been so bad, I felt a complete void of interest and motivation in anything, including my work, which I love dearly and feel a responsibility to. I worry how many in my communities that struggle with trauma and addiction will fare during this time.

Im especially worried for my home state of Oklahoma, which is one of the very few states that hasnt issued a stay-at-home order. Instead, Gov. Kevin Stitt has told Oklahomans to practice personal responsibility. The first person to die of COVID-19 in the state was a fellow Cherokee Nation citizen. Stitt and the other right-wing, oppressive monsters that run Oklahoma have blood on their hands, proving just how little they value life despite their claims to the contrary.

Regardless of whether or not I make it through this pandemic, I know my communities will endure, as we always have but well pay a very heavy toll along the way.

See original here:

I'm Native and Disabled. The US Government Is Sacrificing My People. - Truthout

PRESENT AND AFTER-EFFECTS OF CORONAVIRUS THE WORLD OVER – Kashmir Times

By JC Chaudhry. Dated: 4/26/2020 11:14:24 PM

The tightly connected systems of a globalized world have transformed the novel corona virus from a handful of cases in China to a global pandemic in a few months. More than one-quarter of the world's 7.8 billion people are now largely confined to their homes, as governments step up curbs on movement and social contact in a bid to contain the virus.As the global health crisis surrounding the corona virus pandemic worsens and as lockdown quickly becomes the new norm for many, there is a growing realization that even once corona virus is over in the immediate sense, it will have changed the shape of the world forever. The consensus is that the entire world will probably be dealing with the immediate threat from COVID-19 for the next 18-24 months, in some way or another, and even then, the rebuild and the lasting impact will no doubt be felt for years to come. In many parts of the world, borders are closed, airports, hotels and businesses shut, and educational institutions are closed. These unprecedented measures are tearing at the social fabric of some societies and disrupting many economies, resulting in mass job losses and raising the spectre of widespread hunger.At present, there are many unknowns about how this crisis will unfold. The highest priority is survival (Jaan Hai Toh Jahaan Hai). And the purpose of survival is future success. But in order to succeed in the future, countries across the world must plan for it. While references to World War II are understandable, corona virus cannot be fought and beaten as if this were a war. While wartime enemies often are unpredictable, they are rarely invisible. Still, as in a shooting war, sound planning is vital and irreplaceable if victory is to be achieved.Two similar layers are emerging as this pandemic closes the world down. (a) The first is a public health emergency that is likely to last for two years. The virus will remain a threat until a vaccine is developed as countries struggle to flatten the curve of new infections and keep their health systems afloat. Collective action is also needed to clear barriers to the development, manufacture, and equitable distribution of a vaccine. International supply chains must be put on a wartime footing to produce the supplies needed, from masks to ventilators, to treat rapidly growing numbers of patients who need intensive care.(b) The pandemics second-order effects of this infectious disease can devastate global financial markets rapidly, with China facing the disappearance of export markets and fraying of supply chains. Covid-19 has not only crashed asset prices and stock markets, but real lives and real activity.There is little doubt that the world is staring into a recession, likely to manifest fully next year. The projections for world GDP 2021 have fallen below 2.5%. When production comes to a halt, this is the expected outcome. Businesses have been forced to stop operations, there is loss of production across the board.COVID-19 will fast-forward the fourth industrial revolution and digitalization of all services, including public services. The relationship between the community and the state will become ever more remote, whereby states are now expanding their remote control over civil society and private life.Technology-led impact of Corona Virus on World Economies1. Strengthened Digital InfrastructureCOVID-19 caused people to adapt to working from home and in isolation. By forcing our collective hand to find digital solutions to keep meetings, lessons, workouts, and more going when sheltering in our homes, it allowed us to see the possibilities for continuing some of these practices in a post-COVID-19 world.2. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Enabled Drug DevelopmentThe faster we can create and deploy an effective and safe drug to treat and a vaccine to prevent COVID-19 and future viruses, the faster it will be contained. Artificial intelligence is an ideal partner in drug development to accelerate and complement human endeavors. Our current reality will inform future efforts to deploy AI in drug development.3. TelemedicineTo curb traffic at hospitals and other healthcare practitioners offices, many are implementing or reminding their patients that consultations can be done through video. Rather than rush to the doctor or healthcare center, remote care enables clinical services without an in-person visit. Some healthcare providers had dabbled in this before COVID-19, but the interest has increased now that social distancing is mandated in many areas.4. Increased Reliance on RobotsRobots are not susceptible to viruses. Whether they are used to deliver groceries or to take vitals in a healthcare system or to keep a factory running, companies realize how robots could support us today and play an important role in a post-COVID-19 world or during a future pandemic.We will also witness more government use of surveillance. It is a useful weapon to fight the virus - for instance, countries like India and Israel are using smartphones to figure out who's been where in order to track clusters of the virus - but at the same time, such moves threaten to undermine individual freedom and privacy.Separately, China will benefit greatly from this crisis as it was the first country to experience the epidemic and to get out of it though speculations are rife that it might be entering a second wave of outbreak of the virus.More retail will be carried out online and customer service interactions will be virtual. "Social distancing" means face-to-face interactions between employees and customers and partners will be on a decline, and electronic interactions will be on the rise. As with the work-from-home trend, even when the crisis is over new habits will have been formed and the post-pandemic world will look very different from the pre-pandemic world. The higher cost of face-to-face interactions will go way down, but the relatively lower cost of electronic interactions will go up.Social media companies and news organizations will have an especially important role in framing how we think about the outbreak, particularly when it comes to countering the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories on their platforms.Global Impact of Corona Virus On Education/Learning-Based Sector1. The corona virus pandemic has changed how millions around the globe are educated.Over 421 million children are affected due to school closures announced or implemented in 39 countries. In addition, another 22 countries have announced partial "localized" closures.(a) With the corona virus spreading rapidly across Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the United States, countries have taken swift and decisive actions to mitigate the development of a full-blown pandemic. In the past two weeks, there have been multiple announcements suspending attendance at schools and universities. (b) These risk-control decisions have led millions of students into temporary home-schooling situations, especially in some of the most heavily impacted countries, like China, South Korea, Italy, and Iran. These changes have certainly caused a degree of inconvenience, but they have also prompted new examples of educational innovation. (c) To help slow the virus' spread, students in different parts of the world including India started to learn at home via interactive apps. Majority got access to learning material through live television broadcasts. (d) With 5G technology becoming more prevalent in countries such as China, US and Japan, the learners and solution providers will shift towards truly embracing the learning anywhere, anytime concept of digital education in a range of formats. Traditional in-person classroom learning will be complemented with new learning modalities - from live broadcasts to educational influencers to virtual reality experiences. Learning could become a habit that is integrated into daily routines - a true lifestyle.2. Learning consortiums and coalitions could take shape, with diverse stakeholders - including governments, publishers, education professionals, technology providers, and telecom network operators - coming together to utilize digital platforms as a temporary solution to the crisis. In emerging countries where education has predominantly been provided by the government, this could become a prevalent and consequential trend to future education.3. The pandemic is also an opportunity to remind ourselves of the skills students need in this unpredictable world such as informed decision making, creative problem solving, and perhaps above all, adaptability. To ensure those skills remain a priority for all students, resilience must be built into our educational systems as well.Indias education system is impaired, and students are unable to follow their regular academic routines. In wake of this emergency and keeping the student safety in mind and their academic concern, most of the institutions have taken the initiative to provide the facility of telecommunication, skype call, zoom call and access to other virtual options to fill the gap of learning. It is giving training to students and teachers to use technology to facilitate virtual classes and exchange of information. Undoubtedly, this is a very crucial time for students. So, the move is aimed at easing the pressure on students and helping them use their time profitably without compromising on the quality. Economic Impact of Corona Virus on World Economy And Viable Measures 1. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) states global growth, which was already low at 2.9 per cent last year, could fall below 2 per cent this year. A global recession is now all but certain.Apart from the tragic human consequences of the COVID-19 corona virus epidemic, the economic uncertainty it has sparked will likely cost the global economy $1 trillion in 2020. The UNCTAD assumes India will have a trade loss of 348 million dollars due to the corona outbreak.Nearly 25 million jobs could be lost worldwide due to the corona virus pandemic, but an internationally coordinated policy response can help lower the impact on global unemployment. 2. The United States of America is incredibly dependent on China. Not many people understand what is happening to our world and economy right now. Often in companies, up to 90 per cent of all goods are made in China from oil-derived substances such as plastic and polyester. We will soon see shelves empty of shoes, phones, clothes and even toothpaste. We will have a shortage of medical supplies and will see a stop in the endless production of ugly souvenirs and useless goody bags.The world order stands to change due to Covid-19. Even assuming erratic pandemics do not recur, what is clear is that the Chinese governments totalitarianism and lack of transparency will continue to hurt the world. Today it is Covid-19, tomorrow it may be their financial system. What is clear is that putting all eggs in one basket and shifting 80% of supply chains to China just on considerations of profit is myopically unsustainable. The endless Chinese exports of synthetic saris to India and plastic household objects to Africa, which have severely disrupted local economies there and created a lot of joblessness (and pollution) over the years might also come to a halt, possibly bringing new opportunities for making locally.The United States and Europe should take this moment as a wake-up call to pay far more attention to addressing non-military national security threats, including their excessive dependence on China for crucial supply chains that reach from pharmaceuticals to rare earth materials used in almost all our high-tech gear. Today, about 80% of pharmaceuticals sold in the US are produced in China. China is also the largest and sometimes only global supplier for the active ingredient of some vital medications.3. China's attempts to limit the spread of a deadly viral outbreak have crippled factories that produce everything from cars and electronics to clothes and greetings cards. That, in turn, has reminded the rest of the world just how dependent it is on China as a source of components and finished products.Countries need to seriously start considering setting up indigenous production of goods and medicines as a strategic asset necessary for running the day-to-day life of a country.In this context, India is very well positioned to help build a more dynamic and sustainable world. India has a competitive advantage in the services including the Information Technology Services, Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology, and Medical tourism sectors.India has massive potential to grow. Just 35 years ago, the Indian and Chinese economy had similar exports. The Chinese economy experienced massive growth, in part, due to substantial market friendly reforms. Iran, one of the four countries hit hardest by corona virus, with more than 4,700 cases and 124 deaths, is lurching between measures to stop its spread among an increasingly distrustful population and steps it has taken to accelerate its uranium enrichment toward a nuclear weapon. Iran could choose to rapidly reduce its costly, malign regional behavior, which neither its citizens nor its neighbors can afford. It could pull back from recent steps to increase its uranium enrichment in the direction of weapons grade materials.Of the worlds 10 largest ports, seven of them are in China. It was built to be the worlds manufacturer. It was not built to be the worlds importer. China has 1.3 billion people to feed and house. If the pandemic has taught us anything, it is that the overwhelming dependence on China needs to reduce and drastically, a thought uppermost in many parts of the world.4. The outbreak of the virus has placed tremendous power and responsibility in the hands of governments. This is not a problem that can be dealt with bottom up, but need specific guidance, orders, and regulation from the government. Recovery will be centrally driven. Governments have a long road ahead.(a) Firstly, concerted effort across the globe is required to keep interest rates down till economic activity revives which is expected to trigger demand for goods and services and subsequently revive economies. (b) Secondly, when the government asks people to stay indoors and not turn up for work, the responsibility of providing for those who lose their income is high and real. There are millions of daily wage earners who have been put out of work due to shutdowns. There would be widespread layoffs, cutbacks, leading to eventual unemployment. Governments must find the resources for handouts and borrow heavily, since tax collections will have dropped.The other drivers of the economy private consumption, investment demand, export growthwill all slow down and take time to revive. Without government spending, the recessionary impact will be deeper.(c) The co-operation between economies will have to be reworked to facilitate global recovery. Economies that depend on world trade for growth, will take longer to bounce back. The uneven stages of economic activity will mean that as China and South Korea are ready to return to production, UK and US are falling into a low consumption and shut down mode. India might be fortunate in comparison, given the high level of domestic consumption and relatively lower dependence on external sector.At the national level, this pandemic will force many countries to reconsider their social policies, especially social protection and healthcare. In addition, there will be efforts to help workers in the informal sector. 5. Health is now a strategic issue, accompanied by defence and security. The world has been spending huge amount of money over new and innovative technologies with regards to hard power which emphasizes over military might and destructive weapons since long. Those states which are spending more money on acquiring new technology in weapons and arms remain much influential and powerful nations of the world. Over the past fourteen years, the government of United States has spent $1.5 trillion for military operations, $92 billion for indigenous security forces, $92 billion for state and foreign aid, and $5 billion for other services.The changing dynamics of world also effect the moods of war, transitioning from traditional to other forms such as Bio-War, Hybrid war, and Cyber war etc. Some contend that the corona virus is an experimental germ that accidently escaped from a Chinese lab. Others argue it is the handiwork of the worlds most powerful military i.e. United States of America, which used the planets most populated country as proving grounds for a new bioweapon. An alternate theory is that China deliberately launched a biological attack in order to position itself as the single greatest superpower, while flattening its rivals industrial and economic capacity.Bio-warfare labs everywhere have been a source of serious threats, with the big powers seeing them as potentially usable as weapons of mass destruction, proved by the large number of such facilities worldwide. The world will be judged not only on how many people are lost to the Wuhan virus, but how it acts with respect to issues of governance, crisis management and preparation for the days after.Having let the germ war genie out of the bottle, none of the big powers can now disown responsibility. To fight the corona virus, a global fund to support public health and address the humanitarian and sanitary needs of partner countries by providing financial assistance will be a step in the right direction.Setting up of an integrated commission and thinktank teams at national level consisting of non-political members and scientists to coordinate sustained multilateral efforts against the corona virus outbreak is the need of the hour. This will reinforce the public health sectors and mitigate the socio-economic impact. Economic Impact of Corona Virus on World Economy and Viable Measures 1. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) states global growth, which was already low at 2.9 per cent last year, could fall below 2 per cent this year. A global recession is now all but certain.Apart from the tragic human consequences of the COVID-19 corona virus epidemic, the economic uncertainty it has sparked will likely cost the global economy $1 trillion in 2020. The UNCTAD assumes India will have a trade loss of 348 million dollars due to the corona outbreak.Nearly 25 million jobs could be lost worldwide due to the corona virus pandemic, but an internationally coordinated policy response can help lower the impact on global unemployment. 2. The United States of America is incredibly dependent on China. Not many people understand what is happening to our world and economy right now. Often in companies, up to 90 per cent of all goods are made in China from oil-derived substances such as plastic and polyester. We will soon see shelves empty of shoes, phones, clothes and even toothpaste. We will have a shortage of medical supplies and will see a stop in the endless production of ugly souvenirs and useless goody bags.The world order stands to change due to Covid-19. Even assuming erratic pandemics do not recur, what is clear is that the Chinese governments totalitarianism and lack of transparency will continue to hurt the world. Today it is Covid-19, tomorrow it may be their financial system. What is clear is that putting all eggs in one basket and shifting 80% of supply chains to China just on considerations of profit is myopically unsustainable. The endless Chinese exports of synthetic saris to India and plastic household objects to Africa, which have severely disrupted local economies there and created a lot of joblessness (and pollution) over the years might also come to a halt, possibly bringing new opportunities for making locally.The United States and Europe should take this moment as a wake-up call to pay far more attention to addressing non-military national security threats, including their excessive dependence on China for crucial supply chains that reach from pharmaceuticals to rare earth materials used in almost all our high-tech gear. Today, about 80% of pharmaceuticals sold in the US are produced in China. China is also the largest and sometimes only global supplier for the active ingredient of some vital medications.3. China's attempts to limit the spread of a deadly viral outbreak have crippled factories that produce everything from cars and electronics to clothes and greetings cards. That, in turn, has reminded the rest of the world just how dependent it is on China as a source of components and finished products.Countries need to seriously start considering setting up indigenous production of goods and medicines as a strategic asset necessary for running the day-to-day life of a country.In this context, India is very well positioned to help build a more dynamic and sustainable world. India has a competitive advantage in the services including the Information Technology Services, Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology, and Medical tourism sectors.India has massive potential to grow. Just 35 years ago, the Indian and Chinese economy had similar exports. The Chinese economy experienced massive growth, in part, due to substantial market friendly reforms. Iran, one of the four countries hit hardest by corona virus, with more than 4,700 cases and 124 deaths, is lurching between measures to stop its spread among an increasingly distrustful population and steps it has taken to accelerate its uranium enrichment toward a nuclear weapon. Iran could choose to rapidly reduce its costly, malign regional behavior, which neither its citizens nor its neighbors can afford. It could pull back from recent steps to increase its uranium enrichment in the direction of weapons grade materials.Of the worlds 10 largest ports, seven of them are in China. It was built to be the worlds manufacturer. It was not built to be the worlds importer. China has 1.3 billion people to feed and house. If the pandemic has taught us anything, it is that the overwhelming dependence on China needs to reduce and drastically, a thought uppermost in many parts of the world.4. The outbreak of the virus has placed tremendous power and responsibility in the hands of governments. This is not a problem that can be dealt with bottom up, but need specific guidance, orders, and regulation from the government. Recovery will be centrally driven. Governments have a long road ahead.(a) Firstly, concerted effort across the globe is required to keep interest rates down till economic activity revives which is expected to trigger demand for goods and services and subsequently revive economies. (b) Secondly, when the government asks people to stay indoors and not turn up for work, the responsibility of providing for those who lose their income is high and real. There are millions of daily wage earners who have been put out of work due to shutdowns. There would be widespread layoffs, cutbacks, leading to eventual unemployment. Governments must find the resources for handouts and borrow heavily, since tax collections will have dropped.The other drivers of the economy private consumption, investment demand, export growthwill all slow down and take time to revive. Without government spending, the recessionary impact will be deeper.(c) The co-operation between economies will have to be reworked to facilitate global recovery. Economies that depend on world trade for growth, will take longer to bounce back. The uneven stages of economic activity will mean that as China and South Korea are ready to return to production, UK and US are falling into a low consumption and shut down mode. India might be fortunate in comparison, given the high level of domestic consumption and relatively lower dependence on external sector.At the national level, this pandemic will force many countries to reconsider their social policies, especially social protection and healthcare. In addition, there will be efforts to help workers in the informal sector. 5. Health is now a strategic issue, accompanied by defence and security. The world has been spending huge amount of money over new and innovative technologies with regards to hard power which emphasizes over military might and destructive weapons since long. Those states which are spending more money on acquiring new technology in weapons and arms remain much influential and powerful nations of the world. Over the past fourteen years, the government of United States has spent $1.5 trillion for military operations, $92 billion for indigenous security forces, $92 billion for state and foreign aid, and $5 billion for other services.The changing dynamics of world also effect the moods of war, transitioning from traditional to other forms such as Bio-War, Hybrid war, and Cyber war etc. Some contend that the corona virus is an experimental germ that accidently escaped from a Chinese lab. Others argue it is the handiwork of the worlds most powerful military i.e. United States of America, which used the planets most populated country as proving grounds for a new bioweapon. An alternate theory is that China deliberately launched a biological attack in order to position itself as the single greatest superpower, while flattening its rivals industrial and economic capacity.Bio-warfare labs everywhere have been a source of serious threats, with the big powers seeing them as potentially usable as weapons of mass destruction, proved by the large number of such facilities worldwide. The world will be judged not only on how many people are lost to the Wuhan virus, but how it acts with respect to issues of governance, crisis management and preparation for the days after.Having let the germ war genie out of the bottle, none of the big powers can now disown responsibility. To fight the corona virus, a global fund to support public health and address the humanitarian and sanitary needs of partner countries by providing financial assistance will be a step in the right direction.Setting up of an integrated commission and thinktank teams at national level consisting of non-political members and scientists to coordinate sustained multilateral efforts against the corona virus outbreak is the need of the hour. This will reinforce the public health sectors and mitigate the socio-economic impact. Social and Cultural After- Effects of Corona Virus1. More Contactless Interfaces and InteractionsThe physical analog world is being decimated, with traditional analog businesses including hotels, restaurants and airplanes in crisis. The digital world, however, is thriving through this pandemic because of technology. Everyone is sitting at home, and their window to the world is through their smartphone. In the post-pandemic world, technology will be found everywhere as it is now, if not more, and tech companies will become even more powerful and dominant. That includes smaller firms like Zoom, and the big players such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Paypal. There was a time not too long ago when we were impressed by touch screens and all they enabled us to do. COVID-19 has made most of us hyper-aware of every touchable surface that could transmit the disease, so in a post-COVID-19 world, it is expected that we will have fewer touch screens and more voice interfaces and machine vision interfaces. 2. Personal Becomes Dangerous. A crisis on this scale can reorder society in dramatic ways, for better or worse. And it will. The corona virus pandemic will reshape society in lasting ways, from how people will travel and buy homes, to the level of security and surveillance they are accustomed to, and even to the language they use. This virus that keeps us contained in our homesmaybe for monthsis already reorienting our relationship to government, to the outside world, even to each other. Changes expected to occur in the coming months or years might feel unfamiliar, even unsettling. Will nations stay closed? Will touch become taboo? What will become of restaurants and travel? What behaviour will be exhibited in health clubs? Sit-down restaurants also could close permanently as people frequent them less, it is likely there will be many fewer sit-down restaurants across the world.We know now that touching things, being with other people and breathing the air in an enclosed space can be risky. It could become second nature to recoil from shaking hands or touching our facesand we might find we cannot stop washing our hands. The comfort of being in the presence of others might be replaced by a greater comfort with absence, especially with those we do not know. People will distrust crowds. Limits on social gatherings, how we interact in the workplace, in school and in public, even how children play together, all will be very different in the new normal. The social fabric that breaks might not be repaired. There will be questions ranging from whether we will still shake hands, whether we will be able to travel safely or even vacation to whether we will dismantle our home office set-ups when the pandemic is over. 3. Many people will look back and see this as a time when things changed in their lives.A lot of our lives are habitual, and habits are highly effective in helping us work, look after our families and pursue our goals. What a shock to the system does is change those habits. People work and travel in a different way, their daily routines and the very rhythm of their lives change, including when they eat and how they communicate with their families. And when people are forced to do things differently, new habits begin to form.4. Another aspect of life that has been badly affected by the outbreak is culture, to be specific - religion. The pandemic has impacted religion in various ways, including the cancellation of the worship services of various faiths as well as the cancellation of pilgrimages surrounding observances and festivals. In some countries such as South Korea, Iran and Malaysia, the surge of COVID-19 cases was attributed to pilgrimage sites and closer home at India, to religious gatherings.This pandemic is far from a war, but it requires pulling together. And when people realise what collective action can achieve, it could change how they relate to others, resulting in a greater sense of community. Envisioning that post-pandemic world is key in ensuring we change for the better, not the worse. The Covid-19 pandemic has significantly changed the world. The how is growing clearer with each day of its global spread.When we emerge, we will be different people in a different world. *(The writer is a renowned entrepreneur, motivational speaker and numerologist)

Go here to read the rest:

PRESENT AND AFTER-EFFECTS OF CORONAVIRUS THE WORLD OVER - Kashmir Times

How Space Travel Tries to Kill You and Make You Ugly – WIRED

Of these 34 risks, three are potential showstoppers: radiation, gravity (or lack thereof), and the need for surgery or a complicated medical procedure.

The Gravity of the Situation

Lets explore the gravity issue.

Some science fiction writers in the mid-20th century speculated that zero gravity would be life-giving: blood would flow more easily; arthritis would be a thing of the past; back pain would be cured for good; and aging itself would slow down. So, bring grandma along for the ride. We had hints from early in the space program that such a rosy scenario wasnt true. Astronauts returned from just a few days of weightlessness feeling weak. But they recovered; and many thought, well, maybe it isnt so bad. Then we spent more time in space. Russians on the Mir space station for months appeared to have some serious, prolonged health issues on their return. The Russians were tight-lipped about the health of their cosmonauts, though, so we never knew for sure. Many of these cosmonauts, championed as heroes, were rarely seen in public after their return. It was the ISS missions that drove home the message: long-term exposure to zero gravity is detrimental to human health on many levels. Kudos to NASA for that.

Before I continue, I should first define some terms. Zero gravity, however visually convenient, can be a misnomer in the context of near-earth activity. The astronauts on the ISS are not living in the absence of gravity. Rather, they are in free-fall, forever falling over the horizon and missing the Earth. The ISS and other satellites are not floating in space because they have escaped the pull of Earths gravity; they stay up there because of their terrific horizontal speed. The ISS is moving at 17,500 miles per hour. If, somehow, it came to a complete stop, it would fall straight down to Earth, and down would come astronaut, cradle and all. The Earths gravitational force, in fact, keeps the moving satellites in orbit as a perfectly balanced counterforce, in a downward motion, to the lateral motion set in place during the launch. Without the Earths gravitational force (if the Earth suddenly, magically, disappeared), the satellites would shoot off in a straight line. Therefore, more accurate terms for describing the lack of sensation of gravity aboard the ISS are microgravity and weightlessness. Yet, even these terms are neither perfect nor synonymous. Astronauts on the ISS have weight, about 90 percent of their weight on Earth, which is only about 200 miles below their feet. Theyd be much lighter on the Moon, actually, at just about 16 percent of their weight. Absolute zero gravity is not attainable, because gravity is the force of attraction between any two objects. But in deep space, far from the gravitational tug of any moon, planet, or star, gravity is attenuated to almost zero. I tend to use the terms zero gravity, micro-gravity, and weightlessness interchangeably in the context of space travel.

Our understanding of gravitys effect on the body has only two data points: one and zero. On Earth, we live with a gravitational force of 1G. On the ISS, astronauts live in 0G. We really dont know about anything in between. Air force pilots might accelerate their jets so quickly that they experience forces of 5G or higher, which sometimes causes them to black out. Thats five times the force of normal Earth gravity, which pushes blood out of their brains. But such forces typically last only a few seconds; the pilots arent living in a hyper-gravity environment. And anyway, we dont care too much about forces greater than 1G because every place we want to go in our Solar SystemL2 orbit, the Moon, Mars, and so onhas a gravitational force less than 1G.

Read this article:

How Space Travel Tries to Kill You and Make You Ugly - WIRED

ISRO invites proposals for tech relating to human space travel – EdexLive

Representative Image

The Indian space agency which plans to send Indians has called for proposals from national research and academic institutions for developing affordable indigenous technologies for human survival in low earth orbit.

The space agency has sought technological proposals in the areas of: radiation hazard characterisation and mitigation, space food, inflatable habitats, human robotic interfaces, thermal protection systems, environmental control and life support systems, green propulsion, debris management and mitigation, energy harness and storage, in-situ 3D manufacturing; fluid technology and management, space bioengineering, bio-astronautics, simulated gravity; human psychology for long term missions, space medicine and diagnostics and others. The last date for submission of the proposals is July 15, 2020.

According to Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) its Human Space Programme will endeavour to send humans to destinations from low earth orbits and beyond. Human Space Mission requires innovations and creative technologies for space explorations which will lead to widening of scientific knowledge, economic growth, value addition to the quality of life of a common man and thus national development, said ISRO.

The Indian space agency said there is need to build capabilities to derive scientific benefits from ISRO's Human Spaceflight Programme. "There is also a need to establish long term research as well as plan for necessary facilities, human resource developments for optimal utilisations of experimental applications and technological development for societal usage," ISRO said.

This opportunity will enable national research/academic institutions to harness their expertise and capabilities towards development of technologies for space exploration. According to ISRO, the Principal Investigator (PI) of the proposal should (a) Provide necessary details and usage of technology/solution for human space programme which can Abridge the gap in terms of affordability and indigenisation and (b) Be capable of developing a space qualified payload/solution.

See more here:

ISRO invites proposals for tech relating to human space travel - EdexLive

Astronaut review a heartwarming trip to inner space – The Guardian

Amid the pressures of the current crisis, we could all use some uplifting, unchallenging, bittersweet sentimentality. Thats exactly whats on offer from Astronaut, a film with a small budget, a big heart and an A-list Hollywood star blessed with enough twinkly charisma to pull off a potentially preposterous role. More at home on a TV screen than it perhaps would have seemed in cinemas, this wistful drama from Shelagh McLeod (her directorial feature debut) may not be earth-shattering, yet it retains the power to charm, thanks in large part to a central performance by Richard Dreyfuss that ranks among his best work.

Dreyfuss is Angus Stewart, a retired and recently widowed civil engineer who always dreamed of becoming an astronaut. Ailing with age, Angus has moved in with his daughter Molly (Krista Bridges), a development that hardly delights Mollys husband, Jim (Lyriq Bent). Secretive Jim is dealing with down-to-earth problems of his own and has no time for talk of stars or wishes. But young son Barney (Richie Lawrence) is delighted to have Grandpa around, sharing his sense of wonder at the magical comet that lights up the sky, adding a fairytale element to the drama. People have been looking up at the stars for ever, Angus tells Barney, and I think its always for the same reason: to see where we belong.

Angus clearly doesnt belong in Mollys house (He said he didnt want to be a burden, snaps an overheard Jim); nor indeed in the Sundown Valley retirement home, which plays the kind of relaxing music that drove Jack Nicholson to distraction in One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest. Indeed, the only place Angus feels at home is in his dreams of space travel dreams that could become a reality thanks to a TV lottery organised by billionaire Marcus Brown (Colm Feore) to win a once-in-a-lifetime seat on a commercial spacecraft. Angus may be too old and too infirm to qualify but, in the whimsical, wish-fulfilment world of McLeods film, he still has a shot.

We know from the outset that this very modest drama has neither the resources nor the desire to turn into a space-travel extravaganza. Indeed, Angus (who once specialised in fixing roads and runways) soon becomes more concerned with the earthbound safety issues Marcus seems to have ignored than in his own rather foolish attempts to win a seat on the ship. Could it be that Anguss place is down on the ground after all?

There are plot holes wider than lunar craters. Could Angus really have made it on to the spaceflight shortlist with just a hastily acquired fake ID, even if Barney does insist that he could look 65? Would Marcus really be this cavalier about a mission into which he has sunk so much time and money? And how likely is it that Anguss particular area of expertise would align quite so neatly with a critical plot development?

But to focus on credibility gaps is to miss the point of the story, which (despite the title) has very little to do with space travel. Dreyfuss has compared Angus to Roy Neary, the character he played in Close Encounters of the Third Kind, suggesting that this is what might have become of Roy had he not climbed aboard that alien spacecraft all those years ago. Its an astute observation, not least because it reaffirms that the main journey here is internal rather than external. Spielbergs movie may have been a jaw-dropping cinematic spectacle but it was the sight of Dreyfuss obsessively building a mountain from mashed potato that became its defining image.

Similarly in Astronaut, its not the hokey space-lottery plot that matters but Dreyfusss face as he listens to a doctor telling him to keep up the good fight, Angus, because whats the alternative? Later, in a scene filled with verbose small talk, we observe Dreyfuss listening to a chirpy retirement-home manager babbling about fire doors and dinner times while his family attempt to kid themselves that he can be happy here. Dreyfuss doesnt say a word in the entire scene but his silence is so eloquent that it drowns out everything else. Significant, too, that Anguss best friend in Sundown Valley is Len (Graham Greene), who doesnt speak because no one listens.

There are moments of sharp humour (a brassy singer telling her OAP audience: Ill see some of you next week) and Virginia Kilbertuss tinkling score manages to combine childish innocence with world-weary melancholia. But its Dreyfuss who carries the movie, pulling us over the cracks in the narrative, drawing us into his world, providing a much-needed element of magic.

Astronaut is available to stream on all major platforms from 27 April

See original here:

Astronaut review a heartwarming trip to inner space - The Guardian

Get out of the way: The 1st restartable solid rocket fuel could help reduce space junk (op-ed) – Space.com

Nicholas Dallmann is a research engineer at Los Alamos National Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy facility. He contributed this article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. The project he describes is funded by Los Alamos Laboratory Directed Research and Development.

In the 2013 movie "Gravity," space junk nearly killed Sandra Bullock. While that story was most definitely fiction (and sensational fiction at that), the threat of space junk is real so real that NASA has a whole office devoted to tracking and mitigating it. And last year marked the first international conference focused entirely on orbital debris.

There's good reason to be concerned. Currently, about 2,000 operational satellites orbit the Earth not to mention another 3,000 non-operational ones and that number is expected to skyrocket. This year, more than 1,500 satellites are scheduled for launch. (Compare this to 2018, when only 365 were launched.)

Related: Space junk explained: The orbital debris threat (infographic)

Space might be big, but it's getting increasingly crowded, and that's a real problem. Low Earth orbit, or LEO, where most satellites travel, is a natural resource. And just like other natural resources, we need to carefully manage it. All it takes is for a few satellites to collide to spur the Kessler effect: a runaway chain reaction where more debris results in more collisions, which could not only damage or destroy virtually every spacecraft in LEO, but render that part of space useless for decades.

But what if you could maneuver satellites on a collision course out of harm's way? Believe it or not, that's not easy to do. Most satellites sent into LEO particularly small satellites and cubesats don't have propulsion systems because they tend to be heavy and expensive. They also pose an additional risk to the rocket that's ferrying the satellite into space, as well as any other payloads hitching a ride. That's because the most common rocket propulsion system uses liquid rocket fuel, which is extremely volatile. If you're a small cubesat riding shotgun on a multimillion-dollar rocket and your fickle propulsion system blows up during launch or on the ride into outer space, you've ended the entire mission. Talk about a bad day.

The easiest solution is to use solid rocket fuel instead. It's high-thrust, much safer and low-cost, plus it can be stored for extremely long periods of time. But solid rocket fuel has one huge drawback: It can't be stopped and restarted. Once you ignite it, you have one burn. That's it. And that's a problem for avoiding debris. To avoid collision by changing orbit, you need at least two independent burns: one to rapidly move it out of the way, and one to put it back on its correct orbit. To de-orbit the satellite, you likely need multiple burns as well.

At Los Alamos National Laboratory, we're working to change this. We've recently developed and demonstrated the ability to stop and restart solid rocket motors many times something that has never been done before.

Related: Space junk clean up: 7 wild ways to destroy orbital debris

A solid rocket is simple, with only a few major components. It includes a combustion chamber containing an ignition system and propellant, and an exhaust nozzle. We recently developed a safer propellant system with separated solid fuel and solid oxidizer. However, in order to make our solid rocket system capable of stopping and restarting, we needed to develop a reusable ignition system and a resettable way to extinguish a burn.

For ignition, we replaced traditional pyrotechnics with water. With our system, a satellite would launch with a small tank of benign water. Once on orbit and just prior to a burn, an electrolyzer would separate the water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. At the moment of ignition, the hydrogen and oxygen would be rapidly injected into the combustion chamber and lit by a spark. The resulting flame would ignite the solid propellant.

The next challenge was to figure out how to extinguish the burn. It has long been understood that a rapid decompression of the chamber can reliably cause a solid rocket to extinguish but how best to do that? Last year, we developed an aerospike nozzle with a changeable choke area. Once the burn has achieved a desired velocity change, the choke area would be opened, decompressing the chamber and extinguishing the burn. When another burn of the rocket is needed, the choke area is reset to its original position. Repeat as needed.

We have recently demonstrated multiple independent burns from a single solid rocket in static test stands at Los Alamos. The next hurdle will be an on-orbit demonstration. We are working now to refine our system and looking for an opportunity for the demonstration.

We're also looking at developing a payload that is isolated from the main satellite and that contains its own power, has low-bandwidth communications with the ground, has attitude control to establish pointing for a burn and is equipped with our solid rocket system. With this payload, avoiding debris and de-orbiting could possibly be performed many years after the satellite has reached end-of-life.

Solid rockets are not the answer to all potential challenges for addressing the problem of space junk but their simplicity, ease of scaling to the size of the spacecraft, high thrust and now multiple independent thrusts makes them a great candidate for avoiding orbital debris and deorbiting. Our hope is that someday, these rockets will ride aboard every satellite launched into space keeping LEO safe and usable for millennia to come.

Follow all of the Expert Voices issues and debates and become part of the discussion on Facebook and Twitter. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.

Read the original here:

Get out of the way: The 1st restartable solid rocket fuel could help reduce space junk (op-ed) - Space.com

How Deliver Us The Moon Uses Astronaut Tech to Make the Game Feel Real – PlayStation.Blog

This is a moment we have been waiting all our lives for I am extremely excited to announce that Deliver Us The Moon launches today on PlayStation 4!

Deliver Us The Moon is a space sci-fi adventure game that draws endless inspiration from sci-fi movie titans such as Interstellar and Gravity. These films have heart. They feature breathtaking scenery, gorgeous cinematography and stupendously immersive atmospheres. But as we took our first steps in developing Deliver Us The Moon, we realized there was one more thing these films had in common: they made you believe it could be real. So we knew that we needed to ground our story in a realistic, plausible setting if we wanted players to feel like an astronaut, it had to feel real.

But how do you make a science-fiction game feel real?

Its tempting to overlook the procedures and complications involved with launching a rocket into space but as we all well know, it takes more than simply pressing a Launch! button. Thankfully, NASA has an enormous library of publicly available information, including the order of events that are involved with blasting a vessel into space. So when you get to launch your own rocket in Deliver Us The Moon, we need you to take care of these gaseous oxygen vent arms, sound suppression systems and hydrogen burn-off igniters!

It may sound impossible, but an enormous elevator tethering a space station to the moon has been the subject of more than a few serious studies. Efficiency is a crucial factor in space travel, so if were going to make regular trips to the moon and back again, we need to make sure we save fuel wherever we can. One way of doing so is by eliminating some fuel-heavy moments on our trips such as landing. A space elevator would allow us to dock our vessels onto a space station and reach the moon without having to burn precious fuel to land on (and depart from) its surface. Perhaps well never create such a colossal elevator, but its a fascinating idea, and one that makes for a pretty picture.

The story of Deliver Us The Moon centers around a colony on the moon that had one goal: to provide energy to Earth. A key element to the colonys success was to be able to get the energy from the moon to Earth as efficiently as possible (theres a recurring theme here). When we looked into how this would work, we came upon Japanese research about getting power wirelessly from one point to another using microwaves. While this technology Microwave Power Transmission isnt viable yet for long distances, it inspires hope for our future. If this technology improves, steel lattice towers and overhead power lines may well be a thing of the past.

So how would this lunar colony generate enough energy to keep the lights on back on Earth? The moon is a pretty desolate place, but due to its lack of a magnetic field, its been bombarded with Helium-3 by solar wind. If we could extract and process these isotopes, it could well serve as a potent source of energy instead of the fossil fuels were currently burning at an alarming rate. As with Microwave Power Transmission, its not a viable alternative right now but it could be in the future. A future in which we, hopefully, have learned to take responsibility and have established a sustainable relationship with our planet. A future that isnt as ominous as it is in Deliver Us The Moon.

We cannot wait for you to experience all of this, and more, in Deliver Us The Moon. Perhaps you will find even more examples of other realistic technologies in the game?

See more here:

How Deliver Us The Moon Uses Astronaut Tech to Make the Game Feel Real - PlayStation.Blog

A Giant Leap of Faith in Virgin Galactic Stock Will Pay Off – Investorplace.com

Space flight is a dream that many of us Earth-bound citizens have. Virgin Galactic (NYSE:SPCE) is working hard to make this dream a reality. Investors can take a long position in SPCE stock as the anticipation builds towards the companys maiden voyage.

Source: Tun Pichitanon / Shutterstock.com

Price watchers might notice that the stock already launched and rocketed past the $37 mark in February. The share price peaked at around the same time that many other stocks topped out. The novel coronvirus impact on the economy has made it more difficult for businesses to expand, including Virgin Galactic.

However, the share-price pullback could be viewed as a chance to reload in anticipation of the economys eventual return to a modified normalcy. Its also an opportunity to get aboard a company with tremendous potential as the space-flight market is still in its infancy.

Virgin Galactic was founded by famous and somewhat eccentric billionaire Richard Branson. Hes known for being a visionary, and Virgin Galactic represents much more than a just pet project for Branson.

Its also potentially a highly profitable venture. By Feb. 23, Virgin Galactic had already received 7,957 registrations. If that doesnt sound like a lot of clients, keep in mind that the ticket price for a flight into outer space is a cool quarter of a million dollars.

And theres plenty of room for growth in this burgeoning market. Virgin Galactic CEO George Whitesides explains how an eventual reduction in the price of admission should lead to exponential growth in the consumer base for space flight:

Globally we think around 2 million people can experience this over the coming years at this price point. Over time well be able to reduce that price point and at that point the market just explodes, its 10 times as many at 40 million people.

UBS expressed a similar sentiment, claiming that a decade from now, the space-tourism market could potentially reach $3 billion. Therefore, one strategy for long-term investors would be to add shares of SPCE stock on each dip.

The objective would be to hold the shares in anticipation of a rebound in the broader economy. Even an event as worrisome as the spread of the coronavirus cant permanently eradicate the publics desire for space travel.

Whitesides thesis is that in time, the price of admission will come down. As a result, more people will be able to afford space flight. That, in turn, would augment the consumer base for Virgin Galactic.

Thats a long-term thesis, but Virgin Galactic is already taking steps towards the goal of enhanced accessibility and affordability. Two cleverly named programs, Small Step and Giant Leap, provide hope that even middle-class citizens can experience space flight:

Take your first Small Step to space today, by paying a fully refundable registration fee of US$1,000. This can be applied to your future spaceflight deposit and will put you front of line for new seats when they become available. At that time, you will be personally contacted with a firm Giant Leap offer, an incredible opportunity to confirm your journey to space.

A thousand dollars down is a highly accessible starting point for something as lofty as space travel. Making participation more affordable is a worthy objective for Virgin Galactic. Plus, it should enhance the companys bottom line in the long run.

The expansion of the space-flight market is inevitable. Its only a matter of time until outer-space dreams come to fruition, not only for the ultra-wealthy, but for the middle class too. A long position in SPCE stock is an investment in a company thats on the forefront of this movement, and in the dream itself as Bransons brainchild is ready for takeoff.

Louis Navellier had an unconventional start, as a grad student who accidentally built a market-beating stock system withreturns rivaling even Warren Buffett. In his latest feat, Louis discovered the Master Key to profiting fromthe biggest tech revolution of this (or any) generation. Louis Navellier may hold some of the aforementioned securities in one or more of his newsletters.

Continued here:

A Giant Leap of Faith in Virgin Galactic Stock Will Pay Off - Investorplace.com

Best sky-centric movies and TV shows of all time. Yes, Star Trek makes the cut – Los Angeles Times

Andr Bormanis, co-executive producer and writer for the Fox/Hulu series The Orville and consulting producer on National Geographics Cosmos, picks the following five films:

1. 2001: A Space Odyssey. This 1968 Stanley Kubrick film is one of the most realistic depictions of space travel in our solar system, Bormanis said.

Astronaut Poole, left (Gary Lockwood) and Mission Commander Bowman (Keir Dullea) seek the privacy of a one-man space pod in an effort to confer without being overheard by computer Hal 9000 in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey.

(Handout/Handout/Handout)

2. Apollo 13. This 1995 film, directed by Ron Howard, is a re-enactment of the flight of the third mission to send men to the surface of the moon, which nearly ended in tragedy.

3. The Martian. This 2015 film by Ridley Scott is a very good, scientifically credible story about one mans attempt to survive being stranded on Mars.

Matt Damon portrays an astronaut who draws upon his ingenuity to subsist on a hostile planet in the movie The Martian.

(Aidan Monaghan/Aidan Monaghan/Aidan Monaghan/Twentieth Century)

4. The Planets. This 2019 BBC documentary series, hosted by Brian Cox, offers a very good overview of our solar system and our current understanding of it.

CG illustration of Saturn in The Planets, a 2019 BBC documentary series. Credit: Lola Post Production/ BBC Studios

(Lola Post Production/ BBC Studios)

5. Star Trek, the original 1966-69 series, created by Gene Roddenberry. Fifty-plus years later, they really still hold up. And the special effects were redone for high-definition television standards a few years ago. If your cable company carries the MeTV network, which specializes in Boomer reruns, you can find original Star Trek episodes at 10 on Saturday nights.

Star Trek

(Paramount Pictures/Paramount Pictures/Paramount Pictures)

Read the original post:

Best sky-centric movies and TV shows of all time. Yes, Star Trek makes the cut - Los Angeles Times

Spanish professor adjusts to quarantine in Barcelona – The Auburn Plainsman

Two Auburn University professors have found themselves a long way from their home after travel bans put in place by President Donald Trump prevented international travel to and from the United States because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Professor Carmen Rossell and her husband, Jordi Olivar, traveled to their home city of Barcelona, Spain, for a funeral, not expecting that they would be stuck there potentially until the fall semester. Rossell teaches elementary Spanish courses at Auburn as well as other communicative skill courses.

My husband and I traveled to Barcelona, Spain, on March 4 to attend my father-in-laws funeral, who had passed away only two days prior," Rossell said. I had plans to return to Auburn after spring break.

When the Spanish government declared a state of alarm on March 14 because of the coronavirus, the U.S. banned flights to and from Europe in order to prevent the spread of the virus. By then, it was clear for Rossell and her husband that they would not be able to return to the U.S. to finish the semester in person.

Rossell said she and her husband are both Spanish citizens and permanent residents of the United States. They visit their family in Barcelona for a few months every year, so they already had an apartment there waiting for their arrival.

However, their apartment is very small and confined not ideal for a place to live during a lockdown, they said. Even with such little space, she said she is doing her duty as a citizen to stay inside as much as she can.

Almost everybody in [Spanish] cities live in apartments, said Rossell. Our [apartment] doesnt have a balcony or any type of small area where you could, I dont know, have breakfast in the sun its confined.

The couple had not prepared for a five-month stay in a place across the world from their home in Auburn. Rossell said when stores open back up, she will definitely have to do some unplanned wardrobe shopping to prepare for the upcoming months.

I traveled with only a carry-on bag, because I was going to be away for just a few days, she said. I didnt even bring my teaching materials.

So Rossell made the transition to remote instruction from a foreign country, with no school supplies but her laptop.

It was stressful for a while thinking OK, we are doing online, but if the campus is reopened, we could not travel, and we would have to be quarantined if we could travel [back to Auburn], said Rossell. So that was very stressful for me personally.

Rossell said there are challenges that come with such a wide time difference between her and her students.

We are seven hours ahead from Central Daylight Time here in Spain, so that means that when Auburn is waking up, we are having lunch, Rossell said. When we go to bed, everyone is still working, so usually we wake up to a ton of emails every day from the day before.

Even with these challenges, the two professors have been working out their obstacles one day at a time. Rossell said she feels the transition will not get in the way of still having a successful end to the semester.

I think weve been doing brilliantly, honestly," Rossell said. "Our students have been great, and I am confident we can finish out the semester successfully."

With such an unanticipated change in scenery, especially confined to such a small space, Rossell talked about some of the things she misses most about life on the Plains.

Open spaces, she said without hesitation. That is always what I miss the most; the roominess is very different from what you get in Spain. Its a good life in Auburn so I miss that the good life in Auburn.

The rest is here:

Spanish professor adjusts to quarantine in Barcelona - The Auburn Plainsman

The most stylish space suits in movies, from 2001: A Space Odyssey to Sunshine – SYFY WIRE

Before Yuri Gagarin became the first man in history to journey into outer space in 1961, Hollywood had beaten the Soviet effort to this historical milestone by at least a decade. The desire to travel outside of the Earth's orbit has long since fascinated humankind, so it is no surprise that movies also fixed its eye on the sky. Georges Mlis' seminal 1902 silent film Le Voyages dans la Lune (A Trip to the Moon) is an early example of filmmaking and astrological desire. Over the last 100-plus years, movies have ensured the galaxy is not an unobtainable concept; nearly 20 years before Neil Armstrong walked on the moon, the cast of Destination Moon had already been there, done that.

Dressing for space requires a protective garment to put a barrier between the astronaut and the harmful side effects of exiting our hospitable-for-human-life atmosphere. Gagarin wore an SK-1 number, which had the honor of being the first-ever space suit to fulfill its purpose the SK-2 suit was developed for women in 1963. The bold orange color has been replicated in 2001: A Space Odyssey and Armageddon, as well as worn by NASA.

For the first moonwalk, the white bulky visage is iconic, a symbol of potential and great prosperity with the star-spangled banner on the sleeve. Style doesn't rank highly when other factors such as keeping a person alive and flexibility are more pressing issues. The bespoke garment was crafted and conceived by International Latex Corporation in Dover, Delaware, the same company also made Playtex girdles and bras. This clothing crossover doesn't seem all that strange when you factor in the durable and flexible technology of our undergarments.

Moonboot style shoes have had their brief moment in the trend sun and NASA-emblazoned attire has been having a resurgence over the last few years; affordable brands including H&M have produced tees and hoodies featuring this logo. High-end designers have also got in on the space nostalgia, including Coach's NASA knits that also resemble Danny Torrance's sweater from The Shining.

However, a spacesuit and helmet aren't everyday garments the helmet would prove quite a bit useful right now. This is not to say that on-screen attempts haven't been made to jazz up the recognizable protective gear and this is far from a one-size-fits-all utilitarian look.

An early standout is the 1950 sci-fi Destination Moon, which showcases a variety of colored space suits something that Stanley Kubrick would pull off nearly 20 years later in his sci-fi masterpiece to help the audience differentiate between character. Technicolor was still an exciting development, which the filmmakers used to their advantage with this tale of great exploration. It also offers a somewhat kitsch vibe, even if some of the colors match those that will later be worn in actual space, as well as provide a glimpse at how close Hollywood can get it with features depicting air supply, helmets, and ribbed joints (for flexibility).

Cut to the year before the moon landing, when 2001: A Space Odyssey depicted four different styles of extravehicular activity (EVA) suit in different bold shades. The red (which also reads as orange) is the most iconic, as it features in the instantly recognizable shot of Dr. Frank Poole (Gary Lockwood) onboard the spacecraft.

Practical, functional, and stylish to boot, both the costume and production design hit the retro-futuristic notes that led to its appearance in the pages of Vogue (including the above shot of the actors on the set of the Hilton #5 set). Sir Hardy Amies' innovative costumes have no doubt influenced the last 50 years of astronaut attire.

If 1969 was a monumental year for space travel, 1968 dominated the sartorial on-screen depictions. Released later that same year, Barbarella was less interested in accuracy than sartorial flare the latter was delivered by fashion designer Paco Rabanne via the now-legendary costumes. The film opens with Barbarella (Jane Fonda) taking off her silver spacesuit, and the detachable sleeves and arms are a unique feature. A clear plastic back and see-through top lean into the sexuality that is absent in Kubrick's masterpiece aside from the short shorts for jogging around the craft. It wouldn't pass any safety checks, but the transforming helmet would've crushed it at the Camp-themed Met Gala last year.

Keeping with the space-but-make-it-kitsch theme, the 1968 Star Trek episode "The Tholian Web" also featured a design that is less concerned with realism. This is perhaps less functional than Barbarella's striptease space get-up, which features colorful attachments and a soft material helmet, resembling a flimsy Tuppawear container. Maybe that far in the future, materials are more durable and destined for glitter domination.

It isn't just humans who require space attire both IRL and in movies. Both the Soviet and US space programs famously sent animals (including monkeys and dogs) into the great beyond, all in the name of exploration.

In the 1971 Escape from the Planet of the Apes, the apes' spaceship is sent through a time warp that causes them to crash land on Earth in 1973. Their no-frills suits further emphasize how out of the ordinary this scenario is. They don't need to up the bizarre factor with detachable sleeves or a shiny design.

Taking on the shiny vibe is Roger Moore as James Bond in 1979's Moonraker, but as is sometimes the case, the promo costume is not the same as the one in the movie. This silver look, complete with 007 name badge, was the first time a non-tuxedo Bond had featured on the poster.

This is an incredibly jazzed up version of what he actually wears in the movie. The yellow alternative looks more like a nuclear protection suit and is definitely not as thrilling.

Also released in 1979, the first Alien had an unmeasurable impact on depictions of space. Costume designer John Mollo's contribution to science fiction clothing is enormous (he also designed A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back), which saw a somewhat battered-looking EVA suit for the initial exploration. The pads at the front resemble sports protection and there is an armor-like quality that cannot protect the Nostromo crew from what is to come except for Ripley (Sigourney Weaver), who climbs into the paneled and quilted garment at the end of the movie as a way to escape death.

Mollo used samurai warriors as an inspiration point and rather than the shiny, clean lines of other spacesuits, he favored a worn appearance. There is nothing glamorous about what the crew of this craft wear throughout the film and their spacesuits are an extension of this rugged aesthetic. It is still worth a pretty penny, though; Ripley's suit went for just over $200,000 at auction two years ago.

Since Alien, there have been many space-set movies including Moon, Gravity, Mission to Mars, Armageddon, and Interstellar. In The Martian, there is a biker uniform quality to the orange and white garb worn by Matt Damon, but a lot of these costume choices revert to a similar style to what you might expect from NASA. In the recent Ad Astra, the gold-coated reflective helmet aspect sadly obscures Brad Pitt's face, but it does add to the tension of the moon chase.

Gold is a huge part of Sunshine's unique design, which is vital to the work the crew of Icarus II is doing as they near the sun. The view from inside the specialist equipment is a snapshot of this excruciating experience. Suttirat Larlarb's costume design factors in actual materials NASA has used, like reflective Mylar, but she also drew on diving suits in her conception.

The restrictive nature of wearing something like this, coupled with the intense gold vision, only adds to the beauty of Danny Boyle's portrayal of this dangerous mission to save humanity.

It isn't easy to come up with a spacesuit style that hasn't been depicted in real life or countless movies charting the exploration of the galaxy. There are ways to avoid this conundrum, which is something Gattaca did by eschewing this specialist costume altogether instead of flying into space in a regular tailored suit.

Nevertheless, there are still ways to add some glitz to this genre without going full Barbarella, as proven by the blinged-out golden Sunshine suit. Much like reaching for the stars, dressing out of this world is a concept that science-fiction makes possible.

Follow this link:

The most stylish space suits in movies, from 2001: A Space Odyssey to Sunshine - SYFY WIRE

Billionaires showered with wealth as experts say global economy set for long and deep recession – The Register

The word unprecedented is getting banded about so much these days that it is losing its meaning. It is worth remembering, then, that even seasoned commentators have been left slack-jawed by the continuing economic poo-narmi.

As one financial journalist said on Twitter earlier this week: "That scene in Event Horizon where Sam Neill grabs Laurence Fishburne's head and shows him a vision of hell...that how I'd sum up the economic data out of Europe today."

But it's not all bad. At least, not if you are a billionaire. According to a study by the Institute for Policy Studies, the US scholar-activists thinktank, between January 1, 2020 and April 10, 2020, 34 of the nation's wealthiest 170 billionaires have seen their individual wealth increase by tens of millions of dollars.

The leader of the pack was that figure we all know and love, Amazon founder and CEO, Jeff Bezos. His wealth surge is "unprecedented in the history of modern markets," the study said. It has climbed $12bn since February 21st, 2020, the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Now, you might say that Amazon is particularly well-placed to do well during the crisis because of its ability to send laptops and loo roll to millions of locked down individuals worldwide. But Bezos is not the only billionaire to benefit from the COVID-19 forced quarantine and social distancing.

Meanwhile, former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, who is now retired, woke up one April morning with a satisfying feeling in his bowels telling him his wealth had increased by $2.2bn. Probably. The $2.2bn part is true anyway.

We come inevitably to Elon Musk. It's not as if space travel and electric cars have become vital resources since the nasty viral entity reared its ugly head, yet, that famous expert on subaquatic cave rescues, rolled out of bed, logged onto Twitter and found his wealth had climbed by $5bn.

The study found combined billionaire wealth increased by 9.5 per cent in just 23 days during the COVID-19 crisis. By April 10, their wealth had surged to $3.2 trillion, surpassing the 2019 level.

It is a long-term trend. Billionaire wealth tends to return more rapidly after a financial crisis than the overall economy. Within 30 months of the September 2008 crash, most billionaire fortunes had recovered. And between 2010 and 2020, the combined wealth of the US billionaire class surged by a staggering 80.6 per cent, said the Institute for Policy Studies.

Makes it a bit less tolerable to listen to the politicians, many of whom are backed by a few of the mega-rich, with the brass neck to stand at a lectern and say: "We're all in this together."

"We are likely to see a deeper contraction in 2020 than during the global financial crisis. But so much depends on what comes next: how long the suppression measures last, what medical science can deliver, what further policy support is available," Janet Henry, global chief economist at HSBC told Reuters.

Here's hoping those measures work.

Sponsored: Practical tips for Office 365 tenant-to-tenant migration

Read the rest here:

Billionaires showered with wealth as experts say global economy set for long and deep recession - The Register

Deliver Us The Moon Review Ad Astra – GamingBolt

When I was a kid, I got to watch a space shuttle launch from three miles away. Its the closest you can be. I got to do it a few times, but the one I remember most was a night launch. It was a cold night and the wait was a long one, but you forgot all about that when it happened. It was like watching the sun come up. For as far as you could see, there was light. And then, a couple minutes later, the sound hit you. The roar of the shuttles engines, so impossibly loud, and still delayed by the differences between the speed of light and sound. Watching it, hearing it, youd believe we could accomplish anything.

I also remember watching the space shuttle Columbia disintegrate on re-entry from my backyard because a piece of insulating foam came off during flight and damaged its left wing. It was a sobering reminder of how dangerous space travel is. Whatever weve achieved, whatever weve managed to build, came at a cost. Challenger. Columbia. Apollo 1. Space is incredible. It is also terrifying. A single mistake can be fatal.

"Your first task is to launch your rocket. Despite the importance of your mission, youre alone, save for the voices of the scientists telling you what to do via radio."

Deliver Us The Moon understands that, and captures both the awe and terror of traveling in an empty, airless blackness. The year is 2030, and human society on Earth teeters on the brink of collapse. The planets natural resources are depleted, and climate changed has ravaged what remains. Nearly the entire planet is covered in either desert or ocean. Humanity forms the World Space Agency to search for answers. They find them on the moon in the form of Helium-3, a potent new form of energy. The WSA colonizes the moon in 2032 and begins harvesting it. The resulting energy is transported to Earth by the Microwave Power Transmission (MPT), a big laser beam that somehow transmits energy via satellite. The whole thing seems a little ridiculous, but it works.

Then, in 2054, transmissions from the MPT stop, and contact with the lunar colonies is lost. Unable to mount a rescue mission for lack of resources, the WSA is shut down in 2055. However, a small group of scientists refuses to give up hope and manages to build a rocket ship in an abandoned facility. By 2059, they are ready to launch an astronaut (you) to the moon. Your mission is clear: get the MPT back online and figure out what happened to the colonies.

Your first task is to launch your rocket. Despite the importance of your mission, youre alone, save for the voices of the scientists telling you what to do via radio. Youll turn off the fuel pumps, find access codes to open doors, fix things that break (or figure out how to get around them), and collect bits of history scattered throughout the world that tell you whats going on, and finally, launch the rocket itself. This sets the tone for most of the game. Deliver Us The Moon is largely a game about exploration, and fixing the problems that crop up as you try to progress. Theres no one else on the mission, so everything is up to you.

"ASE can go into small spaces, like air ducts, that you cant; work switches that open doors or turn things off and on; replay holograms recorded by the moons previous inhabitants; and even scout out areas for you, alerting you to potential threats before they put your astronaut at risk."

Once you get to the moon, you gain access to a small robot named ASE. ASE is exceptionally useful: it can go into small spaces, like air ducts, that you cant; work switches that open doors or turn things off and on; replay holograms recorded by the moons previous inhabitants; and even scout out areas for you, alerting you to potential threats before they put your astronaut at risk. When youre not controlling ASE, itll follow you around, providing an extra light source unless you maneuver it somewhere far away from you, in which case he will stay there. ASE is a helpful little robot, and it has enough of a personality to be endearing, but its presence doesnt change the fact that youre utterly alone, a fact Deliver Us The Moon drives home early and often.

Exploring environments often feels like walking through a tomb. Youll see remnants of the people that lived in these lunar colonies: discarded magazines, notes, datapads, food, and little personal touches like art or communal spaces. One of my favorites was a small voting booth to determine what film was going to be shown for movie night. These places feel lived in, even if they are crumbling from disuse. The game does most of its storytelling through its environment, and all of the usual suspects are here: audio logs, emails, notes, schematics for parts of the station, discarded items you can scan for info, etc and most of it is pretty effective.

The best part of Deliver Us The Moons story isnt its science, which is often handwaved to allow the developers to tell the story they want (see: the MPT, launching a rocket by yourself). Hell, there are even bits of the larger plot that dont make logistical sense. But the human stuff here works, and you care about the characters whose stories you discover, even though you never meet them, whether theyre scientists struggling with family relationships, or the original group that got sent to fix the MPT and failed. Developer Keoken never loses sight of the people at the center of this story, and when the emotional points hit, and several of them do, it is because of that.

"There are several excellent moments: launching your rocket, docking with a space station, driving a moon rover, exploring areas while managing a limited oxygen supply. But theres also a lot of repetition."

Where the game struggles most is its gameplay. There are several excellent moments: launching your rocket, docking with a space station, driving a moon rover, exploring areas while managing a limited oxygen supply. But theres also a lot of repetition. Aside from the hologram recordings, which is a novel way to deliver cinematics, youve seen all of the games storytelling techniques, and the gameplay elements they allow for, before. Locked out of a room? Guess youd better find a code, which is naturally written down on a sticky note somewhere. Cant reach somewhere? Youd better move something to jump on, or send ASE through a duct. These are common tropes, but they can get a bit old when theyre repeated ad nauseum, which Deliver Us The Moon tends to do.

By far the worst part of the game is the need to power everything. It makes sense: things need power, and the colonies are running on fumes. But having to transport so many portable batteries is tiresome, especially when you have to use one to power another area so you can get yet another battery. The other major problem is how often things break. Again, this makes sense: these places have been abandoned for several years and stuff breaks, even when its well-maintained. You wouldnt stick a car in a garage for five years and expect it to run. But I cant count how many times I fixed something only to have the game tell me I now had to fix something else before I could go where fixing the original thing was supposed to get me. This is compounded by the fact that youll often have to do the same things you just did.

An example: before your ASE will work, you have to fix it, which involves finding repair parts scattered around the environment youre in, and placing them in the ASE properly. The first time, that was fine, and even fun. But when I finished, the game informed me that I also needed to fix something else which involved, you guessed it, finding more repair parts scattered around the exact same environment and placing them in the ASE. I didnt even get to go to a new area! The game pulls this trick often enough that its no longer novel, and whatever surprise there is the first few times wears off quickly. And dont get me started on how many times fixing one thing broke something else. Often, there are plot reasons for this, and many of them end up being very clever, but still.

"While you mostly play in third-person, one segment, which you spend in zero-g, is in first-person, and is quite different from the rest of the game. Its a nice change of pace and contains a few of the most memorable moments."

That said, the game does vary things up. While you mostly play in third-person, one segment, which you spend in zero-g, is in first-person, and is quite different from the rest of the game. Its a nice change of pace and contains a few of the most memorable moments. The only issue is that you often feel like youre controlling a camera, not a full body, which is a bit distracting. But overall it works well, and since its only used once, it doesnt wear our its welcome.

If I sound harsh about my time with Deliver Us The Moon, I dont mean to. I genuinely enjoyed the games story, despite some of the leaps of logistical logic, and many of the levels are very good, especially the later ones. At its best, the game is a lonely, melancholy adventure where every little success feels like a hard-earned victory. This is buoyed by the excellent visual design and stellar soundtrack, which alternates between foreboding, lonely, beautiful, and triumphant. The story-telling was good enough that I went out of my way to collect everything, and the ending is both surprising and touching.

The bits that dont work only stand out because so much of it works so well. The game has a few technical errors (sometimes textures dont load properly, and the game freaked so badly during a pivotal emotional moment that I could barely tell what was going on). Sure, theres some annoying gameplay segments, none of this is particularly new, and one big reveal about a characters identity works on an awful lot of coincidences, but when Deliver Us The Moon works, it soars. Its the most basic moments: figuring out a puzzle, finding an oxygen canister just as your air is about to run out, driving your lunar rover across the moons surface, or launching your rocket. Theyre whatll keep you going, and believe me, theyre more than worth it.

"Like our history of space travel, the game has its moments of triumph and failure, though the stakes here are thankfully much lower."

Deliver Us The Moon isnt a long game. It has six levels that you can return to at chapter select once you finish them, and youll finish it in six to eight hours if you want to find everything. The game sets itself up for a possible sequel (which I hope well get) while functioning as a standalone game that ends very well. For all its promise, which is substantial, Deliver Us The Moon isnt perfect. Like our history of space travel, the game has its moments of triumph and failure, though the stakes here are thankfully much lower.

But at its best, it reminds us why we dare to look at the stars and dream about whats out there. Keoken is fascinated with space, and that love shows. But it never overshadows the studios love for its characters. The universe is vast, and all we know is on this this little blue marble. In the end, were all weve got. Deliver Us The Moon has its eyes on the stars, but it never forgets that its heart is the people traveling them. And in the end, thats its greatest triumph.

This game was reviewed on Xbox One.

Driving the moon rover. The zero-g segments. The story and characters. ASE is charming and helpful. Cool environments. Doesn't overstay its welcome. Incredible soundtrack. Looks good.

Puzzles can be repetitive. Leaps of logic that don't make sense. Absolutely everything breaks all the time. Visual issues.

Deliver Us The Moon mirrors humanity's history of space travel: the successes are incredible, but it's failures can't be overlooked.

Continue reading here:

Deliver Us The Moon Review Ad Astra - GamingBolt

Red Rover Review But Why Tho? A Geek Community – But Why Tho? A Geek Community

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Imagine if you were given the opportunity to get a brand new start in life, but all you would have to do is join the worlds first attempt to live on Mars. Red Rover, a film directed by Shane Belcourt, puts its main character in this very situation. Damon (Kristian Bruun) spends his waking hours searching for something new in his life. Whether its discovering a deeper meaning, love, or just treasure on the beach with his metal detector. Unfortunately, hes had a difficult time since his girlfriend Beatrice (Meghan Heffern) broke up with him. When all seems lost, Damon meets an offbeat musician named Phoebe (Cara Gee) handing out flyers for a one way trip to Mars. The two quickly form a bond, which leads to her helping Damon find that thing he is looking for by sending him 33.9 million miles away, even though what he needs might be right in front of him.

I was really surprised by the premise of the film. A trip to Mars to get a brand new start on life is obviously too good to be true, but one can help to wonder what it really would be like. The film isnt really backed by any scientific sources, or at least none that I noticed, which calls for viewers to suspend their disbelief. But regardless of this, I was excited to see how the premise would be carried out. It brought on a sense of nostalgia since I was always fascinated with space travel when I was younger. Though the premise itself isnt something relatively new since its been seen in films like Garden State and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. However, adding the opportunity for space travel is enough to make a played-out premise seem important again.

However, its also because of the films premise that I wasnt surprised that the Manic Pixie Dream Girl (MPDG) trope would be used as well. For those who arent familiar with the trope, it describes a girl who solely exists to teach men to embrace life and all it has to offer. In the case of Red Rover, Phoebe would act as the MPDG whos responsible for saving Damon. Ive come to dislike films that rely too heavily on this trope, much like Red Rover. Damon does become his own person and stands up for himself by the end of the film, but its only because of Phoebes help. The film wouldve had a bigger impact had Phoebe be given a different role.

Above all else,Red Rover was at times difficult to watch because of how Damons character was written and the situation he was living in. I understand that the film needed to portray him as someone who had hit rock bottom and had nothing left to lose, but it may have taken things too far. Its almost as ifRed Rover gave me no choice but to root for his character. I understand that the point was to root for him, but the way the film presented his dilemmas was over-exaggerated. One bad thing after another happening to one character becomes comical rather than bringing out a feeling of empathy towards him.

Overall, Red Rovers plot was simple and enjoyable, but simply saying that a film is enjoyable doesnt mean the film isnt flawed. While the premise took a more unique approach, several other elements werent enough to define this as a good film. The use of the MPDG trope in this film immediately took away any appreciation for Damon and Phoebes bond throughout the film. It was adorable, dont get me wrong, but it felt completely fabricated for the plots purpose. Ultimately, Damons portrayal took me out of the film at times because of how forced it was made to root for him. I expected much more from this film but it ended up being disappointing.

Red Rover is set to be released on May 12th wherever films are sold.

Red Rover

5/10

TL;DR

Red Rovers plot was simple and enjoyable, but simply saying that a film is enjoyable doesnt mean the film isnt flawed. While the premise took a more unique approach, several other elements werent enough to define this as a good film. The use of the MPDG trope in this film immediately took away any appreciation for Damon and Phoebes bond throughout the film.

Like Loading...

More:

Red Rover Review But Why Tho? A Geek Community - But Why Tho? A Geek Community

New Theory of Everything Unites Quantum Mechanics with Relativity … and Much More – Discover Magazine

One of the goals of modern physics is to determine the underlying rules that govern our reality. Indeed, one of the wonders of the universe is that just a few rules seem to describe many aspects of our world. Whats more, scientists have found ways to combine these rules into simpler, more powerful ones.

That has tempted many thinkers to suggest there might be a single rule, or set of rules, from which all else emerges. This pursuit of a theory of everything has driven much of the thinking behind modern physics. We have built multibillion-dollar machines and observatories to test these ideas, generally with huge success.

Despite this success, one outstanding challenge is to unite two entirely different but fundamental pillars of modern science: the theory of relativity, which describes the universe on a large scale; and the theory of quantum mechanics, which describes it on the smallest scale.

Both theories almost perfectly explain the results of almost every experiment ever performed. And yet they are entirely at odds with each other. Numerous theorists have attempted a unification, but progress has been slow.

That sets the scene for the work of Stephen Wolfram, a physicist and computer scientist who has spent much of his career categorizing simple algorithms, called cellular automatons, and studying their properties. His main finding is that the simplest algorithms can produce huge complexity; some even generate randomness. And his main hypothesis is that the universe is governed by some subset of these algorithms.

In 2002, he published his results in a weighty tome called A New Kind of Science, which garnered mixed reviews and generally failed to make the impact Wolfram seemingly hoped for. Now hes back with another, similar idea and an even more ambitious claim.

Once again, Wolfram has studied the properties of simple algorithms; this time ones that are a little different to cellular automatons, but which he says are as minimal and structureless as possible. And, once again, he says that applying these simple algorithms repeatedly leads to models toy universes, if you like of huge complexity. But his new sensational claim is that the laws of physics emerge from this complexity, that they are an emergent property of these toy universes.

Wolfram, who works with a couple of collaborators, describes how relativity and space-time curvature are an emergent property in these universes. He then describes how quantum mechanics is an emergent property of these same universes, when they are studied in a different way. By this way of thinking, relativity and quantum mechanics are different sides of the same coin. He goes on to show how they are intimately connected with another, increasingly influential and important idea in modern physics: computational complexity.

So his new theory of everything is that three pillars of modern physics relativity, quantum mechanics and computational complexity are essentially the same thing viewed in different ways. At this point I am certain that the basic framework we have is telling us fundamentally how physics works, says Wolfram. Its a jaw-dropping claim.

The first thing to acknowledge is that it is hard to develop any coherent theory that unites relativity with quantum mechanics. If it passes muster under peer review, it will be a tremendous achievement.

But there are also reasons to be cautious. First, it is not clear that Wolfram is submitting the work for formal peer review. If not, why not?

Second, the measure of any new theory is the testable predictions it makes that distinguish it from other theories. Numerous interesting ideas have fallen by the wayside because their predictions are the same as conventional or better-known theories.

Wolfram certainly says his approach leads to new predictions. Weve already got some good hints of bizarre new things that might be out there to look for, he says.

But whether they are testable is another matter, since he leaves out the details of how this could be done. For example, his theory suggests there is an elementary length in the universe of about 10^-93 meters, which is much smaller than the Planck length 10^-35 m, currently thought of as the smallest possible length.

Wolfram says this implies that the radius of an electron is about 10^-81 m. The current experimental evidence is that the radius is less than 10^-22 m.

His theory also predicts that mass is quantized into units about 10^36 times smaller than the mass of an electron.

Another prediction is that particles like electrons are not elementary at all, but conglomerations of much simpler elements. By his calculations, an electron should be composed of about 10^35 of these elements.

But much simpler particles made of fewer elements should exist, too. He calls these oligons and because they ought to exert a gravitational force, Wolfram suggests they make up the dark matter that astronomers think fills our universe but cant see.

Just how physicists can test these predictions isnt clear. But perhaps its unfair to expect that level of detail at such an early stage. (Wolfram said he started working in earnest on this idea only in October of last year.)

One final point worth noting is Wolframs place in the physics community. He is an outsider. That shouldnt matter, but it does.

A persistent criticism of A New Kind of Science was that it failed to adequately acknowledge the contributions of others working in the same field. This impression undoubtedly had a detrimental effect on the way Wolframs ideas were received and how they have spread.

Will things be different this time? Much will depend on his interactions with the community. Formal peer review would be a good start. Wolfram has made some effort to acknowledge useful discussions he has had with other physicists, and he includes a long list of references (although roughly a quarter are to his own work or to his company, Wolfram Research). In particular, Wolfram acknowledges the work of Roger Penrose on combinatorial space-time in the early 1970s, which anticipated Wolframs approach.

Like it or not, science is a social endeavor. Ideas spread through a network whose nodes are people. And if youre not part of the community and actively flout its norms, then it should not be a surprise if your work is ignored or that collaborations do not flourish or that funding is hard to come by. And while theoretical work like Wolframs can flourish with minimal funding, experimental work cannot.

Wolframs work would certainly benefit from broad collaboration and development. Whether he will get it is in large part up to him.

Ref: A Class of Models with the Potential to Represent Fundamental Physics arxiv.org/abs/2004.08210For an informal introduction: Finally We May Have a Path to the Fundamental Theory of Physics and Its Beautiful

Visit link:

New Theory of Everything Unites Quantum Mechanics with Relativity ... and Much More - Discover Magazine

New hypothesis argues the universe simulates itself into existence – Big Think

How real are you? What if everything you are, everything you know, all the people in your life as well as all the events were not physically there but just a very elaborate simulation? Philosopher Nick Bostrom famously considered this in his seminal paper Are you living in a computer simulation?, where he proposed that all of our existence may be just a product of very sophisticated computer simulations ran by advanced beings, whose real nature we may never be able to know. Now a new theory comes along that takes it a step further what if there are no advanced beings like that either and everything in "reality" is a self-simulation that generates itself from pure thought?

The physical universe is a "strange loop" says the new paper titled "The Self-Simulation Hypothesis Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" from the team at the Quantum Gravity Research, a Los Angeles-based theoretical physics institute, founded by the scientist and entrepreneur Klee Irwin. They take Bostrom's simulation hypothesis, which maintains that all of reality is an extremely detailed computer program, and ask - rather than relying on advanced lifeforms to create the amazing technology necessary to compose everything within our world, isn't it more efficient to propose that the universe itself is a "mental self-simulation"? They tie this idea to quantum mechanics, seeing the universe as one of many possible quantum gravity models.

One important aspect that differentiates this view relates to the fact that Bostrom's original hypothesis is materialistic, seeing the universe as inherently physical. To Bostrom, we could simply be part of an ancestor simulation, engineered by posthumans. Even the process of evolution itself could just be a mechanism by which the future beings are testing countless processes, purposefully moving humans through levels of biological and technological growth. In this way they also generate the supposed information or history of our world. Ultimately, we wouldn't know the difference.

But where does the physical reality that would generate the simulations comes from, wonder the researchers? Their hypothesis takes a non-materialistic approach, saying that everything is information expressed as thought. As such, the universe "self-actualizes" itself into existence, relying on underlying algorithms and a rule they call "the principle of efficient language."

What is reality?

Under this proposal, the entire simulation of everything in existence is just one "grand thought". How would the simulation itself be originated? It was always there, say the researchers, explaining the concept of "timeless emergentism". According to this idea, time isn't there at all. Instead, the all-encompassing thought that is our reality offers a nested semblance of a hierarchical order, full of "sub-thoughts" that reach all the way down the rabbit hole towards the base mathematics and fundamental particles. This is also where the rule of efficient language comes in, suggesting that humans themselves are such "emergent sub-thoughts" and they experience and find meaning in the world through other sub-thoughts (called "code-steps or actions") in the most economical fashion.

In correspondence with Big Think, physicist David Chester elaborated: "While many scientists presume materialism to be true, we believe that quantum mechanics may provide hints that our reality is a mental construct. Recent advances in quantum gravity, such as seeing spacetime emergent via a hologram, also is a hint that spacetime is not fundamental. This is also compatible with ancient Hermetic and Indian philosophy. In a sense, the mental construct of reality creates spacetime to efficiently understand itself by creating a network of subconscious entities that can interact and explore the totality of possibilities."

The scientists link their hypothesis to panpsychism, which sees everything as thought or consciousness. The authors think that their "panpsychic self-simulation model" can even explain the origin of an overarching panconsciousness at the foundational level of the simulations, which "self-actualizes itself in a strange loop via self-simulation." This panconsciousness also has free will and its various nested levels essentially have the ability to select what code to actualize, while making syntax choices. The goal of this consciousness? To generate meaning or information.

If all of this is hard to grasp, the authors offer another interesting idea that may link your everyday experience to these philosophical considerations. Think of your dreams as your own personal self-simulations, postulates the team. While they are rather primitive (by super-intelligent future AI standards), dreams tend to provide better resolution than current computer modeling and are a great example of the evolution of the human mind. As the scientists write, "What is most remarkable is the ultra-high-fidelity resolution of these mind-based simulations and the accuracy of the physics therein." They point especially to lucid dreams, where the dreamer is aware of being in a dream, as instances of very accurate simulations created by your mind that may be impossible to distinguish from any other reality. To that end, now that you're sitting here reading this article, how do you really know you're not in a dream? The experience seems very high in resolution but so do some dreams. It's not too much of a reach to imagine that an extremely powerful computer that we may be able to make in not-too-distant future could duplicate this level of detail.

The team also proposes that in the coming years we will be able to create designer consciousnesses for ourselves as advancements in gene editing could allow us to make our own mind-simulations much more powerful. We may also see minds emerging that do not require matter at all.

While some of these ideas are certainly controversial in the mainstream science circles, Klee and his team respond that "We must critically think about consciousness and certain aspects of philosophy that are uncomfortable subjects to some scientists."

Want to know more? You can read the full paper online in the journal Entropy.

More on the hypothesis and the backstory of the Quantum Gravity Research institute

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Go here to read the rest:

New hypothesis argues the universe simulates itself into existence - Big Think

Creator of Wolfram Alpha Has a Bold Plan to Find a New Fundamental Theory of Physics – ScienceAlert

Stephen Wolfram is a cult figure in programming and mathematics. He is the brains behind Wolfram Alpha, a website that tries to answer questions by using algorithms to sift through a massive database of information. He is also responsible for Mathematica, a computer system used by scientists the world over.

Last week, Wolfram launched a new venture: the Wolfram Physics Project, an ambitious attempt to develop a new physics of our Universe.

The new physics, he declares, is computational. The guiding idea is that everything can be boiled down to the application of simple rules to fundamental building blocks.

Why do we need such a theory? After all, we already have two extraordinarily successful physical theories.

These are general relativity a theory of gravity and the large-scale structure of the Universe and quantum mechanics a theory of the basic constituents of matter, sub-atomic particles, and their interactions. Haven't we got physics licked?

Not quite. While we have an excellent theory of how gravity works for large objects, such as stars and planets and even people, we don't understand gravity at extremely high energies or for extremely small things.

General relativity "breaks down" when we try to extend it into the miniature realm where quantum mechanics rules. This has led to a quest for the holy grail of physics: a theory of quantum gravity, which would combine what we know from general relativity with what we know from quantum mechanics to produce an entirely new physical theory.

The current best approach we have to quantum gravity is string theory. This theory has been a work in progress for 50 years or so, and while it has achieved some success there is a growing dissatisfaction with it as an approach.

Wolfram is attempting to provide an alternative to string theory. He does so via a branch of mathematics called graph theory, which studies groups of points or nodes connected by lines or edges.

Think of a social networking platform. Start with one person: Betty. Next, add a simple rule: every person adds three friends. Apply the rule to Betty: now she has three friends. Apply the rule again to every person (including the one you started with, namely: Betty). Keep applying the rule and, pretty soon, the network of friends forms a complex graph.

A simple rule multiple times creates a complex network of points and connections. (Author provided)

Wolfram's proposal is that the universe can be modelled in much the same way. The goal of physics, he suggests, is to work out the rules that the universal graph obeys.

Key to his suggestion is that a suitably complicated graph looks like a geometry. For instance, imagine a cube and a graph that resembles it.

(Author provided)

Above:In the same way that a collection of points and lines can approximate a solid cube, Wolfram argues that space itself may be a mesh that knits together a series of nodes.

Wolfram argues that extremely complex graphs resemble surfaces and volumes: add enough nodes and connect them with enough lines and you form a kind of mesh. He maintains that space itself can be thought of as a mesh that knits together a series of nodes in this fashion.

How can complicated meshes of nodes help with the project of reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics? Well, quantum theory deals with discrete objects with discrete properties. General relativity, on the other hand, treats the universe as a continuum and gravity as a continuous force.

If we can build a theory that can do what general relativity does but that starts from discrete structures like graphs, then the prospects for reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics start to look more promising.

If we can build a geometry that resembles the one given to us by general relativity using a discrete structure, then the prospects look even better.

Space may be a complex mesh of points connected by a simple rule that is iterated many times. (Wolfram Physics Project)

While Wolfram's project is promising, it does contain more than a hint of hubris. Wolfram is going up against the Einsteins and Hawkings of the world, and he's doing it without a life spent publishing in physics journals.

(He did publish several physics papers as a teenage prodigy, but that was 40 years ago, as well as a book A New Kind of Science, which is the spiritual predecessor of the Wolfram Physics Project.)

Moreover, his approach is not wholly original. It is similar to two existing approaches to quantum gravity: causal set theory and loop quantum gravity, neither of which get much of a mention in Wolfram's grand designs.

Nonetheless, the project is notable for three reasons.

First, Wolfram has a broad audience and he will do a lot to popularise the approach that he advocates. Proponents of loop quantum gravity in particular lament the predominance of string theory within the physics community. Wolfram may help to underwrite a paradigm shift in physics.

Second, Wolfram provides a very careful overview of the project from the basic principles of graph theory up to general relativity. This will make it easier for individuals to get up to speed with the general approach and potentially make contributions of their own.

Third, the project is "open source", inviting contributions from citizen scientists.

If nothing else, this gives us all something to do at the moment in between baking sourdough and playing Animal Crossing, that is.

Sam Baron, Associate professor, Australian Catholic University.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Read the original:

Creator of Wolfram Alpha Has a Bold Plan to Find a New Fundamental Theory of Physics - ScienceAlert

A new kind of physics? Stephen Wolfram has a radical plan to build the universe from dots and lines – The Conversation AU

Stephen Wolfram is a cult figure in programming and mathematics. He is the brains behind Wolfram Alpha, a website that tries to answer questions by using algorithms to sift through a massive database of information. He is also responsible for Mathematica, a computersystem used by scientists the world over.

Last week, Wolfram launched a new venture: the Wolfram Physics Project, an ambitious attempt to develop a new physics of our universe. The new physics, he declares, is computational. The guiding idea is that everything can be boiled down to the application of simple rules to fundamental building blocks.

Why do we need such a theory? After all, we already have two extraordinarily successful physical theories. These are general relativity a theory of gravity and the large-scale structure of the universe and quantum mechanics a theory of the basic constituents of matter, sub-atomic particles, and their interactions. Havent we got physics licked?

Not quite. While we have an excellent theory of how gravity works for large objects, such as stars and planets and even people, we dont understand gravity at extremely high energies or for extremely small things.

General relativity breaks down when we try to extend it into the miniature realm where quantum mechanics rules. This has led to a quest for the holy grail of physics: a theory of quantum gravity, which would combine what we know from general relativity with what we know from quantum mechanics to produce an entirely new physical theory.

The current best approach we have to quantum gravity is string theory. This theory has been a work in progress for 50 years or so, and while it has achieved some success there is a growing dissatisfaction with it as an approach.

Read more: Explainer: String theory

Wolfram is attempting to provide an alternative to string theory. He does so via a branch of mathematics called graph theory, which studies groups of points or nodes connected by lines or edges.

Think of a social networking platform. Start with one person: Betty. Next, add a simple rule: every person adds three friends. Apply the rule to Betty: now she has three friends. Apply the rule again to every person (including the one you started with, namely: Betty). Keep applying the rule and, pretty soon, the network of friends forms a complex graph.

Wolframs proposal is that the universe can be modelled in much the same way. The goal of physics, he suggests, is to work out the rules that the universal graph obeys.

Key to his suggestion is that a suitably complicated graph looks like a geometry. For instance, imagine a cube and a graph that resembles it.

Wolfram argues that extremely complex graphs resemble surfaces and volumes: add enough nodes and connect them with enough lines and you form a kind of mesh. He maintains that space itself can be thought of as a mesh that knits together a series of nodes in this fashion.

How can complicated meshes of nodes help with the project of reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics? Well, quantum theory deals with discrete objects with discrete properties. General relativity, on the other hand, treats the universe as a continuum and gravity as a continuous force.

If we can build a theory that can do what general relativity does but that starts from discrete structures like graphs, then the prospects for reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics start to look more promising. If we can build a geometry that resembles the one given to us by general relativity using a discrete structure, then the prospects look even better.

While Wolframs project is promising, it does contain more than a hint of hubris. Wolfram is going up against the Einsteins and Hawkings of the world, and hes doing it without a life spent publishing in physics journals. (He did publish several physics papers as a teenage prodigy, but that was 40 years ago, as well as a book A New Kind of Science, which is the spiritual predecessor of the Wolfram Physics Project.)

Moreover, his approach is not wholly original. It is similar to two existing approaches to quantum gravity: causal set theory and loop quantum gravity, neither of which get much of a mention in Wolframs grand designs.

Read more: Einstein to Weinstein: the lone genius is an exception to the rule

Nonetheless, the project is notable for three reasons. First, Wolfram has a broad audience and he will do a lot to popularise the approach that he advocates. Proponents of loop quantum gravity in particular lament the predominance of string theory within the physics community. Wolfram may help to underwrite a paradigm shift in physics.

Second, Wolfram provides a very careful overview of the project from the basic principles of graph theory up to general relativity. This will make it easier for individuals to get up to speed with the general approach and potentially make contributions of their own.

Third, the project is open source, inviting contributions from citizen scientists. If nothing else, this gives us all something to do at the moment in between baking sourdough and playing Animal Crossing, that is.

Excerpt from:

A new kind of physics? Stephen Wolfram has a radical plan to build the universe from dots and lines - The Conversation AU