Let Kids Eat Dirt: Over-Cleanliness Linked to Heart Disease | 80beats

baby-dirtThis week brings more vindication for a childhood full of bumps, bruises, and going outside, rather than sterile modern living. In a long-term study published in The Proceedings of the Royal Society B, U.S. researchers suggest that over-cleanliness could make babies more prone to inflammation later in life, and in turn raise the risk for stroke and heart disease.

Thomas McDade’s team studied more than 1,500 people in the Philippines who had health surveys at age two and then again at age 20. The team tested them for C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation. They found that the more pathogens the people had encountered before age 2, the less CRP they had at age 20. Every episode of diarrhoea back then cut the chance of higher CRP later by 11 per cent; every two months spent in a place with animal faeces cut it by 13 per cent. Being born in the dusty, dirty dry season cut the chance by a third [New Scientist].

McDade chose the Philippines to test the idea that a dirty childhood leads to a healthier adulthood because the particular area lacked Western-style sanitation. The Filipino children thus had more infectious diseases than American kids, but their adult CRP was 80 percent lower. The research suggests that inflammatory systems may need a higher level of exposure to common everyday bacteria and microbes to guide their development [UPI].

The finding are another boon for the “hygiene hypothesis“—the idea that our sanitized world fouls up people’s immune systems (which evolved to deal with a germy environment), and makes people more prone to allergies, asthma, and more ailments. It also backs up a Nature Medicine study from last month which showed that over-cleanliness hindered the skin’s ability to heal.

So, McDade says, parents should develop a healthy medium between letting kids get dangerously sick and raising them in a nearly sterile environment. “In the U.S we have this idea that we need to protect infants and children from microbes and pathogens at all possible costs. But we may be depriving developing immune networks of important environmental input needed to guide their function throughout childhood and into adulthood” [LiveScience].

As for CRP, the Wall Street Journal says you might be hearing its name more frequently as the pharmaceutical giants move toward drugs for people with high levels.

Related Content:
80beats: Doc Diagnoses Our Nut-Phobic Society with Mass Hysteria
Discoblog: Let Them Eat Dirt! It Contains Essential Worms
DISCOVER: Asthma and the Curse of Cleanliness

Image: flickr / deanj


Sensenbrenner Pulls an Inhofe, Asserts Global Warming is an “International Conspiracy” | The Intersection

This speaks for itself:

This is really an inconvenient truth. The President’s science advisor, who is a former Harvard professor named Holdren, is involved in the email scandals and covering up the fact that data has been lost, the fact that contrary opinions to the global warming crowd has been squeezed out of scientific journals – and as a matter of fact – the editor of one scientific journal who published contrary data has been fired. Now this is an international conspiracy. Before we end up transferring trillions of dollars from the pocketbook of American ratepayers to China and India – which is what Al Gore’s global warming treaty proposes to do – then we ought to get to the bottom of this and find out whether this is really science or whether this is a bunch of people with a political agenda that’s cooked the books.

[italics added]

I had thought nobody in the GOP was more extreme on climate change than James Inhofe, who dubbed the idea of human-caused global warming the “greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.”

But now, in conspiracy-theory-land, Inhofe has a true competitor.


La ciencia es importante. Una vez mas. | Bad Astronomy

Back in March, I wrote a piece called Science is Important and made a short video about it. I got a lot of positive feedback about it, which warmed my heart. People like science!

Shortly thereafter, BABloggee Lourdes Cahuich translated what I said into Spanish and posted a transcript. Now another fan, Julio Vannini, took the original video and created Spanish captions. He even posted it on YouTube:


My thanks to everyone who has helped, who has taken this message to heart, and who has run with it.


Is Google the Guardian Angel of Rainforests? | 80beats

deforestation-sat-webGoogle.org, the non-profit division of the search engine giant Google, wants to help scientists monitor deforestation by harnessing the power of its popular Google Earth and Maps applications. Its new “high-performance satellite imagery-processing engine” can process terabytes of information on thousands of Google servers while giving access to the results online. The platform, which was demonstrated on Thursday at the International Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, would allow anyone using the tool to monitor whether or not trees were being chopped down in a given forest. It analyzes satellite images to show forest changes over a given time period [CNET].

The announcement comes at a time when delegates from around the world are attempting to negotiate a treaty to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Google debuted their new program at Copenhagen because they are hoping that their software could help countries conform to the REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries) program proposed by the United Nations, in which industrialized nations would pay developing nations to keep their forests standing.

Google’s program is based on recommendations included in reports such as the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, which found that keeping forests intact is one of the cheapest ways to reduce carbon emissions. Forests soak up and store carbon dioxide, but when they are cleared during deforestation all that C02 is released into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. Politicians can propose all the limits they want, however there must be tools to monitor their countries’ emissions to ensure they are keeping their word–for example, by not allowing their farmers to clear cut forests to plant lucrative crops.

But actually tracking the changes in forestation can be a significant challenge, since it generally takes place across vast tracks of remote land and satellite imagery may be beyond the financial reach of developing-world governments or the research organizations that work with them. Furthermore, it’s essential that nations use a standardized, validated method of measuring changes, or it will leave any emissions tracking system open to misinterpretation, and any credit system open to abuse. [Ars Technica]. Google’s software is still undergoing testing, but they expect to have it ready by next year, and it will be freely available to all through Google.org.

Related Content:
80beats: Take a Virtual Tour of Pompeii on Google Street View
80beats: Could Google Book Search Be an All-Powerful, Privacy-Killing Monopoly?
80beats: Google Founder Tries to Crack Parkinson’s Genetic Code With Crowdsourcing
80beats: Googlefest Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop: 3 New Ways Google Will Take Over Your Life

Image: USGS


“ClimateGate” a PR Disaster That Will Be “Taught in University Communications Courses” | The Intersection

You simply must read science journalist Fred Pearce’s take on the PR blunders made in “ClimateGate,” especially by the University of East Anglia and other institutions. He writes:

The media blizzard that has descended on climate science since the hacking of hundreds of e-mails held on the webmail server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia in Norwich, England, is set to become a case study — in public relations disasters, in the folly of incontinent electronic communication, in the shortcomings of peer review, and, very probably, in “how not to save the world.”

And again:

The failure of the University of East Anglia to respond substantially to the avalanche of invective from climate skeptics has been a PR disaster that undermined the reputation of science as well as the institution itself. One angry media insider says: “Their response will be taught in university communications courses. Because I’m going to make sure it is.” The university’s failure for a full fortnight to put up a single scientist to defend Phil Jones amounted to cruelty.

Ah, but will scientists and heads of scientific institutions take those communications courses? As we explained in Unscientific America, this is still a rarity, at best.

“ClimateGate” is really the ultimate in demonstrating that the scientific world has got to work vastly harder on communications.


Bundle up Sunday Night to Watch the Geminid Meteor Shower | 80beats

Geminid425As we approach the winter solstice, you might find yourself cursing the increasingly short days. But if you’re an astronomy fan—or just a hot cocoa enthusiast who enjoys a good show—the long hours of dark will be a blessing this weekend as the Geminid meteor shower, one of the most visible and reliable showers, makes it appearance.

The Geminid shower peaks the night of December 13/14. Although often considered a poor cousin to August’s Perseid shower, the Geminids often put on a better show [Astronomy]. And this year the moon won’t hinder the Geminid display—it won’t rise until nearly 6 a.m., when dawn will already be upon us.

Like the Leonid meteors we see in the constellation Leo, which made an appearance last month, the Geminids are so named because of their apparent origin, the constellation Gemini. The shower’s radiant, the point in the sky from which they all seem to originate, is near Castor and Pollux. It’s well up in the east by 9 or 10 p.m. and crosses near the zenith (for mid-northern observers) around 2 a.m [Sky & Telescope]. The Geminids are strange, too. Their parent object isn’t a comet, which is the case for the Leonids and most other showers, but rather an asteroid with a trail of debris. Astronomers aren’t 100 percent sure what’s going on here; the asteroid could be the nucleus of a comet that lost all its other material.

If you brave the cold Sunday night, you could get quite a show. Depending on dark your location is, and how much of the sky you can see, meteors may streak into view that night at an average rate of one or two per minute [SPACE.com].

Related Content:
80beats: Leonid Meteor Shower Set To Light Up the Tuesday Morning Sky, from November
80beats: Study: 20 Million Year Meteor Shower Turned Earth Warm & Wet
Bad Astronomy: Catch a Shooting Star This Weekend, on last year’s Geminids

Image: NASA


Incredible VISTA of the cosmos | Bad Astronomy

Astronomers with the European Southern Observatory have just revealed the first images from their new telescope called VISTA: the Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy. If ever there was an appropriate name for a ’scope, that’s it.

Why?

Here’s why:

vista_flamenebula

Oh baby. Yeah, click it to embiggen.

This image is of the Flame Nebula, a star forming gas cloud in Orion. The image itself covers about half a square degree on the sky (twice the area of the full Moon) and shows details of the nebula, including the core made up of stars invisible to optical telescopes. The bright star in the image is the monster blue supergiant Alnitak, which is the easternmost (left, to northern observers) star in Orion’s belt. Get a good look at it, because in a million years or so that star is gonna blow.

Can you spot the famous Horsehead Nebula in this picture? It looks a little different than you usually see it, because VISTA operates in the visible and near-infrared. It uses a 4.1 meter mirror (that’s big, folks) to suck down light from the sky. It is extremely sensitive and produces very high-resolution images… as you’d expect from a ’scope that has a 67 million pixel detector.

That’s so many pixels you’d think they’d make an image you could zoom into. Oh wait: they did. You’ll have some fun playing with that; in fact, if you spend more than 14 minutes playing with it you’ll have spent longer than it took to take this image! That’s right, that gorgeous shot is only a 14 minute exposure.

vista_starfieldHere’s another phenomenal picture. It’s an amazing 2 x 1.5 degree field toward the center of the Milky Way, revealing about a million stars! It’s taken completely in the near infrared, just outside of what the human eye can see, and shows dust and stars mostly invisible in optical light. As you can see, the center of our Galaxy is a mess. Getting images in different wavelengths of light allows us to get a better handle on what’s happening in this incredibly crowded volume of space.

And yeah, this image is zoomable too. You absolutely want to take that little tour; I literally gasped when I saw it.

vista_fornaxThere’s also this very pretty shot of the Fornax galaxy cluster, a collection of galaxies 60 million light years away. This 25 minute exposure captures quite a few galaxies. Like before, it’s shots like this that help scientists get a handle on not just individual objects, but the environment in which they live, too. If you want to see that environment for yourself, why, tour the zoomable image.

vista_detectorFinally, let me leave you with this remarkable photo, showing the VISTA camera itself. Note the dude standing on the left. VISTA is huge! It weighs three tons, and I suspect most of that is the support equipment for it, including a dewar that holds the liquid nitrogen needed to cool the detector down to -200° C. See the glass in the front? That’s the largest IR-transparent window ever created.

It’s hard to believe that such a hulking camera can take such fine, detailed images, but that’s how these things work. A lot of times in astronomy, bigger is better… especially when it allows us to take such deep images of the cosmos.

Credits: Credit: ESO/J. Emerson/VISTA. Acknowledgment: Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit; ESO/Y. Beletsky.


Michael Gerson Attempts Thoughtfulness on “ClimateGate,” Then Gives it Up | The Intersection

The latest column by Michael Gerson in the Washington Post is a fascinating read. He starts out with a well reasoned account of why the stolen climate emails from East Anglia cannot be taken to undermine the global edifice of climate science:

But the hacked climate e-mails reveal a scandal, not a hoax. Even if every question raised in these e-mails were conceded, the cumulative case for global climate disruption would be strong. The evidence is found not only in East Anglian computers but also in changing crop zones, declining species, melting ice sheets and glaciers, thinning sea ice and rising sea levels. No other scientific theory explains these changes as well as global warming related to the rise in greenhouse gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution. Over millennia, the climate shifts in natural cycles. But we seem to be increasing the pace of change so rapidly that plants, animals and humans may not be able to adequately adjust.

Bravo! This is better than I could have put it. And yet unfortunately, Gerson then somehow goes on blame the scientists quoted in the emails for undermining the whole scientific enterprise:

This professional objectivity is precisely what the hacked e-mails call into question. Some of these scientists are merely activists, deeply invested in a predetermined outcome. They assume that political change is the goal; the scientific enterprise is the means — like a political ad or a campaign speech. But without trust in disinterested, scientific judgments on climate, most non-scientists will resist costly, speculative, legislative actions. When the experts become advocates, no one believes the experts or listens to the advocates.

It is an irony of the first order. Having accused others of a “war on science,” it is climate scientists who are assaulting the authority of science more effectively than anyone else.

I’m not saying that every scientist whose emails have been quoted in “ClimateGate” behaved in a perfectly appropriate manner. However, although he whirls around the phrase “war on science,” Gerson clearly doesn’t know what it means.

What it means, among other things, is that the very scientists now in question were at that moment, when they were writing those emails, subject to politically motivated data requests, harassment, and attempts to seed the scientific literature with questionable papers, all activities tied to fossil fuel interests and their supporting think tanks and politicians. All of this is documented amply in The Republican War on Science.

So for Gerson to describe the scientists as arrogant, “a community coddled by global elites, extensively funded by governments, celebrated by Hollywood and honored with international prizes”–this is ludicrous. These are people who are regularly slandered, pulled before Congress, and indeed, subject to email hacking. They have been under intense and politically motivated fire for years. And, yes, they developed a bit of a siege/herd mentality as a result. Who wouldn’t?

The East Anglia emails cannot be read in any other context but this one.


Starfleet Academy?

A post over on NASA Watch indirectly poses an interesting question: Should NASA have a Starfleet Academy?

I say yes – NASA would benefit from such a program, specifically a program that would train the agency’s next generation of leaders.  While the NASA Academy and the International Space University fit this type of need, they don’t specifically train young NASA civil servants.

For the most part, we tend to hire folks to fit a specific need, to replace someone who has retired, or for a specific role in a specific branch.  These folks are then effectively trained to be just like everyone else who has ever worked in that organization.

We need to find a new way to train our leaders, and it needs to start when they are hired.  I picture something like a NASA boot camp + a graduate school version of military academies.  It would attract college graduates from all across the country.  Each group would be trained together for several years, doing hands-on work on small, inexpensive, risky projects (perhaps at Wallops?).  More importantly, they would be trained as leaders, in team-building, critical thinking, communication, and all the other fields that are necessary to be effective in leadership positions.  In return, they’d promise to serve NASA for a particular number of years, and when they graduated from the program, they’d fill positions all across the agency.

How does that sound?

SpaceUp – A Space Unconference

I’m a big fan of the BarCamp format*, especially when applied to space.  So I have great news for you (which I’ll tell you more about in a bit).

If you are not familiar with BarCamps, they are an increasingly popular open-format collaborative working meeting format where those attending are encouraged to present to others on a topic of their choice. The barcamp format has been catching on in pockets around the space community. @edgufry and I had an opportunity to plan a BarCamp this fall which was hosted by the NASA Space Life Sciences Directorate (SLSD) at Johnson Space Center in August.  It was such a success that we are now in the process of planning a second event for January 29th (creatively entitled “Barcamp: A Sequel“). The goal of the the SLSDBarCamp events is to increase enthusiasm and communication within SLSD, create a platform for SLSD members to share their work, bridge gaps, facilitate knowledge management, brainstorm for new ideas and utilize existing ones. Our hope was to bring together members of our local community together and introduce the idea of hosting BarCamps at NASA JSC. Unfortunately, since this format is very new to the NASA community, we haven’t been able to convince management to open the SLSDBarCamps up to *everyone* yet (aka non NASA badged people) - but we are trying. In the near future, we hope to host BarCamp events that are open to the public at NASA Johnson Space Center, and for now we encourage those attending our events to join outside barcamps after their in-house experience.

But, we have great news for everyone! A new space barcamp event is being organized called “SpaceUp” – and this venue is open to YOU! As their website advertises, “you will be amazed at what comes out of SpaceUp. Based on similar unconferences in other industries, you might see businesses started, problems solved, projects kicked off, plans hatched, and amazing friendships born.” We encourage you to check them out! The first SpaceUp will be in San Diego this upcoming February or March.  Pre-register here.

SpaceUp

* Why I’m a big fan of the BarCamp format (and why it’s better than your normal meeting as originally posted here):

1. All the people in the room attend voluntarily
2. If anyone feels they cannot contribute further, they can apply the law of two feet** and get up and leave
3. People join meetings on the basis of their interest and ability to contribute
4. Whoever is talking is doing so to share, teach, and ask/learn, not to look smart
5. Even in a crowded room, the conversation is facilitated in such a way that all those who wish to participate actively can
6. No judgment
7. No rank pulling
8. Content is king
9. Questions are welcome
10. PowerPoint is accidental

** There is one general law that governs all barcamps, it’s called the “law of 2 feet” which essentially means if people don’t like what they are seeing, they can get up on their two feet and move to another session or engage in a discussion with someone else. Yes, that’s actually encouraged and is the beauty of barcamp!

Government in the Digital Age

blogpost

Over the past five years, I’ve watched as the public sector has become more comfortable with, and in some cases has even embraced and pushed forward, the use of “social media technology” and “enterprise 2.0 software” to transform the way government work is done.  The promise of technological conveniences is truly enticing, especially to an increasing impatient, technology equipped workforce, who have grand visions for the future of government. A large part of the change is lead by “Digital Natives” – people who have grown up in a connected world and have different attitudes, approaches and habits than those in preceding generations. And, while there is no doubt that the way we work in government is changing at a speed that is increasingly uncomfortable for many digital skeptics, a number of questions remain unanswered about what the future of government truly looks like in this new world. For example, what are the implications of growing up in a society that always remembers and never forgets?  What are the ramifications for organizations navigating a world with more and more digital interactions and communications? What does this mean for government leaders who are trying to cope with the information overload, which is only amplified by each new wave of technology?

These are a few of the questions we will be discussing at the Nobel Public Services Summit in Stockholm this December.  In a session called “A Public Sector Where Digital Natives Thrive” we will be exploring how the public sector will evolve in the Digital Age and we will compare and contrast the roles of the Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, and Digital Skeptics in this new digital landscape.

We hope to create an interactive, technology-enabled session so that YOU can participate alongside (digitally speaking) with the public sector delegates to collaborate, debate, and vote on a number of discussion related questions. During the event we will use #PSS09 and #PSS09DN.  But, in preparation for the session, we are asking for your participation in helping us answer three questions related to the future of government in the digital age which are included below.  We’ve setup three easy ways for you to share your input – a simple web interface, a twitter poll, or texting capability.  Additionally, we hope that you will share your thoughts with us by leaving a comment here.

So, what do YOU think?

1.  Should privacy be sacrificed for transparency?

Vote one of 3 Ways:
a.   Online poll
b.   Twitter – tweet @poll 46463 for Yes, @poll 46464 for No
c.   Text to +447624806527 – 46463 for Yes, 46464 for No

2.  Should the integration of devices, workplaces and “boundary-less” organizations be a top priority for the public sector?

Vote one of 3 Ways:
a.   Online poll
b.   Twitter – tweet @poll 46462 for Yes, @poll 46465 for No
c.   Text to +447624806527 – 46462 for Yes, 46465 for No

3.  Should public sector workers be allowed to post content in real-time using social media technologies without management approval?

Vote one of 3 Ways:
a.  Online poll
b.  Twitter – tweet @poll 46466 for Yes, @poll 46467 for No
c.  Text to +447624806527 – 46466 for Yes, 46467 for No

Space: What’s NOT to Hope for?

At the NASA tweet-up down at the Kennedy Space Center for the STS-129 launch a reporter asked me a question that really threw me. Here, a week later, I’m still thinking about it. He asked:

“Do you think bringing tweeters here gives NASA hope for the future.”

NASA Tweeps Photo Credit: NASA/Carla Cioffi
NASA Tweeps Photo Credit: NASA/Carla Cioffi

Hope for the future? Really?

Why wouldn’t we have hope for the future? With or without Twitter in the mix?

What’s not to hope for?

Now, I get all the doom and gloom reporting about job losses with the end of the Space Shuttle program, and threats of budget cuts. Yes, the job losses are real. Yes, they are heartbreaking AND very frightening for those whose jobs are at stake. Yes, we’ll probably take some budget hits from the White House and Congress. We are, after all, in a squeezed economy…though we see signs of recovery. But none of this is new. We’ve faced all this before.

But, hope for the future? I simply can’t conceive the reverse.

We have a universe of questions out there to find answers to. We, as humans, are curious creatures. We’ll find ways to get the answers. It may or may not look like someone’s pet project. It may or may not fit on today’s calendar. Or even tomorrow’s.

But we, as a human race, WILL GO FORWARD. We will seek answers beyond our planetary borders.

NASA will play a role. What that role will be is determined by the President and Congress. That’s the way this works. But we’ll be a player, none-the-less. We’ll shape the debate. We’ll craft the solutions.

Again, what’s not to hope for?

Maybe what we need more than hope is to work harder to ignite that spark of passion in young and old alike to:

  • ask big questions,
  • never accept the easy answer,
  • stretch beyond even our wildest dreams.

Oh we have much to hope for! Humanity has many problems yet to solve. But some of us can’t sleep until we bridge the gap between imagination and reality. And, you know what? It’s not about you and me…or what we may want out of this life — fame, fortune, power, or simply survival.

Hope is about a better tomorrow…for all of humanity.

So the real question may be: what role will NASA and the international space community play in the future? (A HUGE one, I hope!) And, how can you and I take steps to get us there?

If you ask me, I want to: Be the hope! Be the change!

“Be the change you wish to see in the world.” Gandhi

Crosspost on Beth Beck’s Blog.

Leading Amidst the Disruptive Innovation Storm

I read a report this morning on BusinessWeek about Singularity University that really got me thinking about our path forward amidst a technological revolution filled with disruptive innovations.  How do you prepare for something you can’t see coming?  Even if a few people can see it coming, how do we ensure that these voices get heard?  How do we use this technological storm to our advantage, instead of to our demise?

In order for NASA to prosper moving forward, it will have to be adaptable, efficient and possibly even prophetic.  Now making this statement is very simple.  Everybody knows philosophically that an organization needs to be efficient and adaptable, but implementation is a much more daunting task.  This time instead of first asking “How do we make NASA adaptable, efficient and prophetic?”, we should ask

“What is needed to make NASA adaptable, efficient and prophetic?”

Below are a few things that I think NASA needs to start building.

1)  Trust from Employees (civil servants and contractors)
2)  Empowerment of Employees
3)  Multi-disciplined Employees
4)  Partnership w/ External Organizations

Trust from Employees

Trust is by far the most important thing that NASA can build between its employees.  With trust invisible walls get eliminated, and everything works faster.  An employee has to know that leadership has their best interest at heart or they will not offer cost saving suggestions, and will not speak up when they see issues that need consideration.  If the decisions that NASA makes cause good employees to fear for their livelihoods, trust will be broken.  When trust is broken, employees best move is always to take care of themselves and bureaucracies form as a result.  Plans can’t get executed without people; therefore, people matter. Without trust between its employees NASA will not be able to succeed moving forward.

Empowerment of Employees

NASA has some of the brightest and most dedicated individuals.  With such talent, it begs the question why are all decisions still being made at the top?  In a time of disruptive innovation, employees have to be empowered to try things that could make themselves and NASA better?

How does NASA empower its employees?

What if every employee got given $500 yearly to invest in cost-cutting initiatives?   What if the top 10 people that came up with the greatest cost savings, each got an award of $10k tax free?  Now this would empower employees to take initiative, and it would also create an incentive for the employees to be accountable.

What if on top of that, each employee was given $500 more to use with others in a group effort (3-10 people)?  Assuming a similar award incentive as before, this would help larger groups become more efficient while building a collaborative environment.

The final award has to be large enough to be beneficial to the individuals, but not too large that it causes fighting.

Multi-Disciplined Employees

In times of such great disruptive change, not only does NASA have to be adaptable so do the employees.  It won’t always be possible for NASA to employ everybody.  What NASA can do is ensure that every person under its employment has a diverse set of skills and that each employee is given growth opportunities that make them marketable.  Focusing on growing employees might seem inefficient at the onset, but at the end not only does the employee win so does NASA.  As the customer, NASA has a responsibility to ensure that not only civil-servants have sufficient training, but that their contractors also have sufficient training.  Passing the buck, only increases the long-term cost of operation.

Partnership w/ External Organizations

NASA can’t afford to do everything.  NASA simply does not have the resources to do everything on its own; therefore, NASA will have to be a great partner.  In order for NASA to be an effective partner, NASA has to be willing to give.  NASA can’t take the “partnership” idea as a way of just getting more money.  Nobody likes to partner with a moocher.   NASA has to be flexible and willing to listen, or partnerships won’t work.
In the Internet age, NASA will have to be able to “connect” with its partners via the internet easily and without hassle, or communication will be halted.

Conclusion

By creating multi-disciplined, empowered and trusting employees NASA will be able to leverage its internal resources to be adaptable, efficient and even prophetic (wisdom of the crowds).  By developing great, brotherly partnerships with external organizations, NASA will be able fulfill its mission with less of its own resources and account for disruptive change which NASA can’t see coming.

NASA will float or sink based on the ability and effort of its employees (civil servants AND contractors), and its external partners.  If NASA is to succeed it has to edify both its employees and its partners.

I leave you with the following video on innovation management, which relates to adaptability.

It’s better in person

sts129

It’s been quite a long time since I had a chance to see a shuttle launch in person, despite numerous attempts otherwise.  The normal routine is to jump in the car last minute, drive 16 hours across 5 states, usually in the middle of the night, with 3 two-minute stops only for gas.  It’s hard to explain the logic behind this sleep and food deprived ritual and usually takes quite a bit of convincing in order to get others to join me.  But here’s why I do it: “a shuttle launch is just better in person.”

In today’s age of HD video, livecasting, and everything in between, it’s hard to imagine that you wouldn’t be able to capture all the glory of a launch in bits and bytes.  The fact of the matter is, you can’t.  Even as good as the Discovery Channel is, their footage just doesn’t compare.   Seeing a shuttle launch in person is truly an awe-inspiring experiences, one that will change your perspective.  It’s something you’ll never forget.  It’s something you just have to experience for yourself, in person.

What made today that much sweeter for me was to experience this launch with 100 of the most excited space fans I have ever met.  NASA hosted it’s first ever launch “tweetup,” bringing together people from around the world and giving them behind the scenes access to NASA.  Q/A sessions with astronauts and engineers, tours of Kennedy Space Center, and most importantly, an opportunity to watch the launch in person, from the same place that press watches from.  I had a unique advantage today to just sit back and observe the passion of those who were allowed an opportunity to participate in NASA’s mission, some for the first time ever.  It’s hard to capture their excitement for our space program, but I think a photo by Justin W. Moore (@bikegeek) sums it up better than anything I could write.  It’s a great reminder of why NASA does what it does.

The benefit of NASA’s use of social media tools and technologies is that launch events like today’s can be archived online.  Anyone can follow the  (and participate in) the #nasatweetup conversation.  You can watch webcasts of the events, browse thousands of pictures on flickr, and share in the excitement.  But, with only 5 more shuttle launches left, we’re quickly closing this chapter in America’s human space-flight ambitions.  If you haven’t had a chance to experience one in person, I’d do anything possible to see one – even if it means driving 16 hours across 5 states, or flying in from New Zealand, or using your last vacation day even if your boss doesn’t quite understand.  That fact is, it’s just better in person.

STS-129 Tweetup

(download this picture)

Random Hacks of Kindness

rhokWe are started, and Craig Fugate, the Administrator of FEMA, just gave his keynote. Sitting 3 miles away from NASA Ames Research Center at the Hacker Dojo, we are creating a community of developers for the emergency response community. This meeting is bringing technologists and developers together with subject matter experts to understand each other – learn what technology already exists, and which ones need to get created. After Administrator Fugate, we have a dozen 5-minute lightening talks, both from technologists and subject matter experts. On organizing the event, asked people to come up with problem statements – or featured hacks – and have seven of them defined on the wall (including one submitted by the Department of State). After lightening talks, we will open up into a hack-a-thon as well as have rooms available for barcamp-style discussions. We’re going all night, and teams submit their programs by 1pm tomorrow, present them to the community, and a panel of judges will give out awards to the best hacks created at the event.

In June 2009, the first ever Crisis Camp barcamp was held in Washington, DC. During one of the opening sessions an industry panel including representatives from Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! agreed that some matters supersede competitive concerns. As a result Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! agreed to cooperate in order to mobilize developer communities to create interoperable solutions/code that will have real impact in the field. It took the World Bank to make this partnership happen and it quickly grew to include us, NASA.

picture-1

Since its inception, NASA has demonstrated an unparalleled ability to tackle massively complex and ambitious goals to forward the human endeavor. As a result of its decades long development of technology in robotics, intelligent systems, satellites, human spaceflight and data analysis, visualization and modeling, NASA has a powerful and intelligent network of scientists and engineers.

NASA has 15 spacecraft currently orbiting the Earth monitoring the dynamic Earth environment. With approximately ~4TB of new Earth Science data available each day, NASA’s scientists and engineers are at the forefront of understanding our global system. This data, together with 40 years of archived data, is a global resource for the development and reconstruction community. NASA is supporting Random Hacks (RHoK) to create a developer community to enhance and enable development and reconstruction efforts to share information, have access to timely data, and to collaborate publicly to solve some of the toughest social and environmental challenges today.

Hacking for Humanity

This is the first of a series of Random Hacks of Kindness (RHoK) events. The aim is to build a global community of developers and subject matter experts to work on distater relief, and potentially grow to development and reconstruction issues.

2009 Space Elevator Games

While we may not be as much of a rock-star center as Kennedy or Johnson, Dryden Flight Research Center has its moments! Take last week’s 2009 Space Elevator Games, for example.

For those of you who are not familiar with the project, teams competing in the Space Elevator Games were tasked with creating a robot that would climb a 1 km tether (suspended from a helicopter) at a minimum speed of 2 m/s. The climber is limited to a 50 kg net weight and must carry as much payload as possible. Winners are determined by a formula based on the climber’s speed, payload, and net weight.

A total of $2 million was up for grabs (NASA provided). The team LaserMotive took home $900K. See the full results at http://www.spaceelevatorgames.org/.

shame on us

A friend pointed me to a blog called PostSecret this weekend.  Apparently people write a secret they’ve never told anyone else and send it to somebody in Germantown, MD.

This one had a NASA contribution…

nasa-secret

The Boulders of Copernicus

"This image represents a portion of the central uplift within the crater Copernicus. The image, LOV-152-H1, was taken by Lunar Orbiter V on 16 August 1967 at an altitude of 103 km. The spacecraft was looking straight down at the crater as it snapped this picture series. The resolution of this image is 2.2 meters/pixel. You can see the increase in contrast and resolution that LOIRP has attained when you compare the high resolution USGS image and the one obtained by LOIRP on 10 December 2009." High res images

Big Aerospace Warns of Job Cut Impact

AIAA President Warns Congress That Cuts to Human Spaceflight Programs Will Harm Aerospace Workforce, U.S. Economy, and National Security. AIAA

"AIAA President Dave Thompson today testified before the House Committee on Science and Technology on "Decisions on the Future Direction and Funding for NASA: What Will They Mean for the U.S. Aerospace Workforce and Industrial Base?" Thompson and his fellow panelists were asked to address the effects of NASA's future direction and funding on the country's aerospace industry and the nation as a whole."

Aerospace Workforce Imperiled by Funding Cuts, AIA

"U.S. preeminence in aerospace is threatened by aging demographics and uncertainty over the future of the U.S. space program and adequate funding to support it, AIA President and CEO Marion Blakey said Thursday in testimony before the House Committee on Science and Technology."

How to Contact Your Elected Officials, Boeing via Capitol Connect

"Contact your elected officials and let them know that NASA and its space exploration programs are on the right trajectory. As the President and Congress weigh the options for our nation's future space exploration policy, it's important our elected officials know that you support the Constellation and Ares rocket programs."