Swedish Philosopher Nick Bostroms simulation argument says we might be living in a computer-generated reality. Maybe hes right. There currently exists no known method by which we could investigate the parameters of our programming, so its up to each of us to decide whether to believe in The Matrix or not.
Perhaps its a bit more nuanced than that though. Maybe hes only half-wrong or half-right, depending on your philosophical view.
What if we are living in a simulation, but theres no computer (in the traditional sense) running it?
Heres the wackiest, most improbable theory I could cobble together from the weirdest papers Ive ever covered. I call it: Simulation Argument: Live and Unplugged.
Philosophy!
Bostroms hypothesis is actually quite complicated:
But it can be explained rather easily. According to him, one or more of the following statements must be true:
Bostroms basically saying that humans in the future will probablyrun ancestry simulations on their fancy futuristic computers. Unless they cant, dont want to, or humanity gets snuffed out before they get the chance.
Physics!
As many people have pointed out, theres no way to do the science when it comes to simulation hypothesis. Just like theres no way for the ants in an antcolony to understand why youve put them there, or whats going on beyond the glass, you and I cant slip the void to have a chat with the programmers responsible for coding us. Were constrained by physical rules, whether we understand them or not.
Quantum Physics!
Except, of course, in quantum mechanics. There, all the classical physics rules we spent millennia coming up with make almost no sense. In the reality you and I see every day, for example, an object cant be in two places at the same time. But the heart of quantum mechanics involves this very principal.
The universe at large appears to obey a different set of rules than the ones that directly apply to you and I in our everyday existence.
Astrophysics!
Scientists like to describe the universe in terms of rules because, from where were sitting, were basically looking at infinity from the perspective of an amoeba. Theres no ground-truth for us to compare notes against when we, for example, try to figure out how gravity works in and around a black hole. We use rules such as mathematics and the scientific method to determine whats really real.
So why are the rules different for people and stars than they are for singularities and wormholes? Or, perhaps more correctly: if the rules are the same for everything, why are they applied in different measures across different systems?
Wormholes, for example, could, in theory, allow objects to take shortcuts through physical spaces. And who knows whats actually on the other side of a black hole?
But you and I are stuck here with boring old gravity, only able to be in a single place at a time. Or are we?
Organic neural networks!
Humans, as a system, are actually incredibly connected. Not only are we tuned in somewhat to the machinations of our environment, but we can spread information about it across vast distances at incredible speeds. For example, no matter where you live, its possible for you to know the weather in New York, Paris, and on Mars in real-time.
Whats important there isnt how technologically advanced the smart phone or todays modern computers have become, but that we continue to find ways to increase and evolve our ability to share knowledge and information. Were noton Mars, but we know whats going on almost as if we were.
And, whats even more impressive, we can transfer that information acrossiterations. A child born today doesnt have to discover how to make fire and then spend their entire life developing the combustion engine. Its already been done. They can look forward and develop something new. Elon Musks already made a pretty good electric engine, so maybe our kids will figure out a fusion engine or something even better.
In AI terms, were essentially training new models based on the output from old models. And that makes humanity itself a neural network. Each generation of human adds selected information from the previous generations output to their input cycle and then, stack by stack, develop new methods and novel inferences.
The Multiverse!
Where it all comes together is in the wackiest idea of all: our universe is a neural network. And, because Im writing this on a Friday, Ill even raise the stakes and say our universe is one of many universes that, together, make up a grand neural network.
Thats a lot to unpack, but the gist involves starting with quantum mechanics and maintaining our assumptions as we zoom out beyond what we can observe.
We know that subatomic particles, in what we call the quantum realm, react differently when observed. Thats a feature of the universe that seems incredibly significant for anything that might be considered an observer.
If you imagine all subatomic systems as neural networks, with observation being the sole catalyst for execution, you get an incredibly complex computation mechanism thats, theoretically, infinitely scalable.
Rather than assume, as we zoom out, that every system is an individual neural network, it makes more sense to imagine each system as a layer inside of a largernetwork.
And, once you reach the biggest self-contained system we can imagine, the whole universe, you arrive at a single necessary conclusion: if the universe is a neural network, its output must go somewhere.
Thats where the multiverse comes in. We like to think of ourselves as characters in a computer simulation when we contemplate Bostroms theory. But what if were more like cameras? And not physical cameras like the one on your phone, but more like the term camera as it applies to when a developer sets a POV for players in a video game.
If our job is to observe, its unlikely were the entities the universe-as-a-neural-network outputs to. It stands to reason that wed be more likely to be considered tools or necessary byproducts in the grand scheme.
However, if we imagine our universe as simply another layer in an exponentially bigger neural network, it answers all the questions that derive from trying to shoehorn simulation theory into being a plausible explanation for our existence.
Most importantly: a naturally occurring, self-feeding, neural network doesnt require a computer at all.
In fact,neural networks almost never involve what we usually think of ascomputers. Artificial neural networks have only been around for a matter of decades, but organic neural networks, AKA brains, have been around for at least millions of years.
Wrap up this nonsense!
In conclusion, I think we can all agree that the most obvious answer to the question of life, the universe, and everything is the wackiest one. And, if you like wacky, youll love my theory.
Here it is: our universe is part of a naturally-occurring neural network spread across infinite or near-infinite universes. Each universe in this multiverse is a single layer designed to sift through data and produce a specific output. Within each of theselayers are infinite or near-infinite systems that comprise networks within the network.
Information travels between the multiverses layers through natural mechanisms. Perhaps wormholes are where data is received from other universes and black holes are where its sent for output extraction into other layers. Seems about as likely as us all living in a computer right?
Behind the scenes, in the places where scientists are currently looking for all the missing dark matter in the universe, are the underlying physical mechanisms that invisibly stitch together our observations (classical reality) with whatever ultimately lies beyond the great final output layer.
My guess: theres nobody on the receiving end, just a rubber hose connecting output to input.
Published April 2, 2021 20:06 UTC
Read more from the original source:
What if youre living in a simulation, but theres no computer? - The Next Web
- The application of three-axis low energy spectroscopy in quantum physics research - Phys.Org - May 3rd, 2017 [May 3rd, 2017]
- Physicists breed Schrdinger's cats to find boundaries of the | Cosmos - Cosmos - May 3rd, 2017 [May 3rd, 2017]
- Scientists 'BREED' Schrodinger's Cat in massive quantum physics breakthrough - Express.co.uk - May 3rd, 2017 [May 3rd, 2017]
- Quantum Physics: Are Entangled Particles Connected Via An Undetected Dimension? - Forbes - May 3rd, 2017 [May 3rd, 2017]
- Quantum physics is oppressive - Patheos - Patheos (blog) - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- It's widely abused as a buzzword. But can quantum mechanics explain how we think? - National Post - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Quantum Physics and Love are Super Weird and Confusing, but This Play Makes Sense of Them Both - LA Magazine - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- One step closer to the quantum internet by distillation - Phys.Org - June 7th, 2017 [June 7th, 2017]
- UW Grad Student from Star Valley Earns Quantum Mechanics Fellowship - SweetwaterNOW.com - June 10th, 2017 [June 10th, 2017]
- Solving systems of linear equations with quantum mechanics - Phys.Org - June 10th, 2017 [June 10th, 2017]
- Quantum Computing Might Be Here Sooner Than You Think ... - Bloomberg - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- Quantum Physics News - Phys.org - News and Articles on ... - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- Chinese satellite breaks a quantum physics record, beams entangled photons from space to Earth - Los Angeles Times - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Popular Quantum Physics Books - Goodreads - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Cybersecurity Attacks Are a Global Threat. Chinese Scientists Have the Answer: Quantum Mechanics - Newsweek - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- A quantum step to a great wall for encryption - The Hindu - June 18th, 2017 [June 18th, 2017]
- What Is Quantum Mechanics? - livescience.com - June 18th, 2017 [June 18th, 2017]
- Physicists Demonstrate Record Breaking Long-Distance Quantum Entanglement in Space - Futurism - June 20th, 2017 [June 20th, 2017]
- Viewpoint: A Roadmap for a Scalable Topological Quantum Computer - Physics - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- How Schrdinger's Cat Helps Explain the New Findings About the Quantum Zeno Effect - Futurism - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- BMW and Volkswagen Try to Beat Apple and Google at Their Own Game - New York Times - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- How quantum physics could revolutionize casinos and betting if you can understand it - Casinopedia - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- Quantum thermometer or optical refrigerator? - Phys.Org - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- Physicists settle debate over how exotic quantum particles form - Phys.Org - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- In 1928, One Physicist Accidentally Predicted Antimatter - Popular Mechanics - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- Atomic imperfections move quantum communication network closer ... - Phys.Org - June 24th, 2017 [June 24th, 2017]
- DOE Launches Chicago Quantum Exchange - HPCwire (blog) - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]
- Google to Achieve "Supremacy" in Quantum Computing by the End of 2017 - Big Think - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]
- Physicists make quantum leap in understanding life's nanoscale ... - Phys.Org - June 27th, 2017 [June 27th, 2017]
- Berkeley Lab Intern Finds Her Way in Particle Physics - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - June 27th, 2017 [June 27th, 2017]
- Payments Innovation - A Quantum World Of Payments - Finextra (blog) - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Why can't quantum theory and relativity get along? - Brantford Expositor - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- How quantum trickery can scramble cause and effect - Nature.com - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Telecommunications, Meet Quantum Physics - Electronics360 - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Stephen Colbert Gets a Lesson on Quantum Physics from Brian ... - Patheos (blog) - July 2nd, 2017 [July 2nd, 2017]
- Quantum physics for babies a different bedtime story - CBC.ca - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- How quantum mechanics can change computing - San Francisco ... - San Francisco Chronicle - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- Physicists Use Lasers to Set Up First Underwater Quantum Communications Link - Gizmodo - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- Notable Quotes on Quantum Physics Quantum Enigma - February 15th, 2018 [February 15th, 2018]
- Nothing Is Solid & Everything Is Energy Scientists Explain The World ... - April 11th, 2018 [April 11th, 2018]
- The World Of Quantum Physics: EVERYTHING Is Energy - In5D ... - April 22nd, 2018 [April 22nd, 2018]
- Nothing Is Solid & Everything Is Energy Scientists ... - May 1st, 2018 [May 1st, 2018]
- Black Holes Bolster Case For Quantum Physics' Spooky Action ... - August 29th, 2018 [August 29th, 2018]
- Physics4Kids.com: Modern Physics: Quantum Mechanics - September 29th, 2018 [September 29th, 2018]
- Quantum Theory - Full Documentary HD - November 6th, 2018 [November 6th, 2018]
- Quantum mind - Wikipedia - February 6th, 2019 [February 6th, 2019]
- What is quantum theory? - Definition from WhatIs.com - May 5th, 2019 [May 5th, 2019]
- The Ultimate Mystery? Consciousness May Exist in the Absence of Matter (Weekend Feature) - The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Faculty Opening, Quantum Information and Condensed Matter Experiment - Physics - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Become the physicists the world needs with the help of a physics degree - Study International News - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Imec and NUS working on chip-based quantum cryptography - Optics.org - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Strong LightMatter Coupling in Molecular and Material Engineering - Advanced Science News - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- The key to bigger quantum computers could be to build them like Legos - MIT Technology Review - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Australian universities are accused of trading free speech for cash - The Economist - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- APS Physics Career Center - Physics - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Assistant Professor of Physics, Employment - Physics - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- A new approach to quantum gravity - Tech Explorist - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- A Huge Experiment Has 'Weighed' the Tiny Neutrino, a Particle That Passes Right Through Matter - Gizmodo - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Many Worlds, But Too Much Metaphor - Forbes - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Iran to open 1st quantum physics lab in a year: AEOI head - Mehr News Agency - English Version - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Quantum Computing Breakthrough: New Detection Tool Uncovers Noise That Can Kill Qubits - SciTechDaily - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- A quantum computing startup that spun out of a Harvard lab just came out of stealth mode with $2.7 million in seed funding from investors like Samsung... - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Important Quantum Algorithm May Be a Property of Nature - Technology Networks - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- A New Perspective On Grover's Search Algorithm -- Quantum Physics & DNA - Analytics India Magazine - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Iran to open first quantum physics lab in a year: AEOI head - Quantaneo, the Quantum Computing Source - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Sean Carroll: Universe a 'tiny sliver' of all there is - PBS NewsHour - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- IBM cuts ribbon on quantum computing centre wherein a 53-qubit monster lurks - The Register - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- In 'Something Deeply Hidden,' Sean Carroll Argues There Are Infinite Copies Of You - NPR - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Physicists race to develop room-temperature quantum chips - The Next Web - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- This One Experiment Reveals More About Reality Than Any Quantum Interpretation Ever Will - Forbes - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Our world is in need of the Mahatmas teachings: Dalai Lama - Livemint - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Quantum-inspired Beckman Institute celebration will be anything but small - Central Illinois Buzz - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Is It a Wave or a Particle? It's Both, Sort Of. - Space.com - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Princeton announces initiative to propel innovations in quantum science and technology - Quantaneo, the Quantum Computing Source - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Precision physics with 'tabletop' experiments - Stanford University News - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Andrea Young uncovers the strange physics of 2-D materials - Science News - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- A Scientific Explainer of What Terrence Howard Was Talking About at the Emmys - VICE - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- China's Silicon Valley aims to become the country's top research center - Abacus - October 16th, 2019 [October 16th, 2019]
- New Quantum-Mechanical Dissipation Mechanism Observed for the First Time - SciTechDaily - October 16th, 2019 [October 16th, 2019]
- Physicists have found quasiparticles that mimic hypothetical dark matter axions - Science News - October 16th, 2019 [October 16th, 2019]